Sentinel Media records · public agendas and minutes, text only, refreshed nightly from each body's own site · not a newspaper

December

minutes meeting date 2025-12-01 · fetched 2026-09-09 · 156234 characters · official file · plain text

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 1, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of November 26, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioners attended a Farm Managers meeting.
Commissioners met with office staff for a department update.
Commissioners met with Legal for a department update.
Commissioners attended an Elected Officials meeting.
Commissioners met with Kali Sherill, Weeds Director for a department update.
Commissioner Reinke attended a Parks and Waterways Board meeting.

In the Matter of CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioners considered the Consent Agenda; items may include status sheets, employee
requisitions, alcohol licenses, tax cancellations, Sheriff’s Office Security Agreements, and
Commissioner minutes.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke reviewed the items in
the Consent Agenda to include an employee requisition for TARC; status sheets for the Sheriff’s
Office, the Prosecutor’s Office and the Treasurer’s Office; and Commissioners minutes for
November 10 – November 14. Motion Passed Unanimously.

In the Matter of FEES
Commissioners considered a request to waive building permit fees for the Wright Ave. Project.

Bob Beer, Facilities Director reviewed the request to waive the building permit fees for the Wright
Ave. Project with the Board. Jon Laux, CDS Director reviewed the building permit fees and noted
that the amount of the fees is related to the cost of the project and are set to cover the cost for
inspections and plan review.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the request to waive building permit fees
for the Wright Ave. Project phase 1B. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed
Unanimously.

Commissioners considered the Annual Solid Waste Fee Waivers.

The Board reviewed the list of entities that had waivers for solid waste. Commissioner Hall noted
that he would like to see the Board review the waivers and the amount of waste that each entity is
disposing of; look at best practices from other entities and review the policy throughout the next
year.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the annual solid waste fee waivers for FY2026
as presented. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke noted
that he will work with Southern Idaho Solid Waste to tighten up the waivers throughout the next
year. The costs are still there they are just passed on to the taxpayers. Motion Passed
Unanimously.

In the Matter of GRANTS
Commissioners considered a Twin Falls County Health Initiatives Trust FY2026 Grant Award.

Commissioner Reinke and Jennifer Homburg, Magistrate Probation Supervisor reviewed the Twin
Falls County Health Initiatives Trust FY2026 Grant Award with the Board. Ms. Homburg noted
that the grant will be used to pay for drug testing for pre-trial clients and supervised clients.
Commissioner Hall noted that he recused himself from the HIT Board’s consideration of the
application.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Twin Falls County Health Initiatives
Trust FY2026 Grant Award for Magistrate Probation and authorize the Chairman to sign the
documents on behalf of the Board. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed
Unanimously.

In the Matter of WATERWAYS
Commissioners considered a request from Gary Perron to utilize Centennial Park's waterway
access.

Commissioner Hall noted that Mr. Perron is still working on gathering the documents and is
looking at another potential launch site.

No action taken.

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 2, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 2, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 1, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Katherine Ford.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioners met with Ivy Medical for a program update.
Commissioner Hall attended a BLM Resource Advisory Council meeting.
Commissioners met with Dave Overacre, Special Projects Coordinator for a department update.
Commissioner Reinke attended an Airport Board meeting.
Commissioners attended a Southern Idaho Republican Women's meeting.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews reviewed the items in
the Consent Agenda to include status sheets for District Court, TARC, Assessor’s Office and the
Sheriff’s Office; and an employee requisition for Juvenile Detention. Motion Passed Unanimously.

In the Matter of BUDGET
Becky Petersen, Treasurer presented the October Joint Report.

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 3, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 3, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 2, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioner Hall attended an ICRMP Board meeting.
Commissioner Reinke attended an Associated Taxpayers of Idaho Annual Conference.

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 4, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 4, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 3, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews and Commissioner Brent Reinke.

ABSENT:
Commissioner Don Hall.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioners attended a Twin Falls School District Tour.
Commissioners met with Bob Beer, Facilities Director, for a department update.
Commissioners attended an Airport Advisory Board meeting.

In the Matter of INDIGENT
Commissioners considered County Assistance Applications.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to reconsider the decision for case number 104835 and
approve paying $950.00 to Wilkes Funeral home for cremation with a payment of $255.00 from
the survivor benefits when the spouse receives that amount. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED.
Discussion Commissioner Matthews noted that the County is the last resource and the client was
a Twin Falls County resident. The funeral home will not cremate until they receive full payment
and the survivor benefits can take a while to be paid. Motion Passed Unanimously. (Hall absent)

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 5, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 5, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 4, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioner Reinke to attended a WEMA meeting.
Select Health presented the Twin Falls County Year End Experience Report.
Commissioners attended an Idaho Association of Counties Strategic Planning Group virtual
meeting.
Commissioners attended an Idaho Association of Counties Platform & Policy Coordination
Committee virtual meeting.
Commissioner Matthews attended a Crisis Center of South Central Idaho Advisory Board meeting.
Commissioner Hall attended the December 2025 TFCHIT Award Ceremony.
Commissioner Reinke attended a Farm Bureau meeting.

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 8, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 8, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 5, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioners met with office staff for a department update.
Commissioners met with Legal for a department update.
Twin Falls County Fair Board met with the Commissioners to present the annual report.
Commissioners attended a Historic Preservation Commission meeting.
Commissioners attended an Idaho Transportation Department meeting.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke reviewed the items in
the Consent Agenda to include employee requisitions for TARC and the Sheriff’s Office; status
sheets for the Sheriff’s Office and District Court; and an alcohol catering permit for Anita’s Buck-
N-Bar LLC on December 14, 2025 at the Fairgrounds. Motion Passed Unanimously.

In the Matter of RESOLUTIONS
Commissioners considered Resolution #2026-009 dedicating the Henry C. Givens Law
Enforcement Complex.

Commissioner Hall read the Resolution for the record.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve Resolution #2026-009 dedicating the Henry
C. Givens Law Enforcement Complex. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion
Commissioner Matthews expressed his appreciation for Deputy Givens sacrifice and noted that
naming the facility after Deputy Givens honors his life. Commissioners Reinke and Hall concurred
with Commissioner Matthews. Motion Passed Unanimously.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-009

Resolution to Dedicate the Henry C. Givens
Law Enforcement Complex

WHEREAS, in 1933, Henry Givens began his law enforcement career with the Twin
Falls County Sheriff’s Office, serving as a deputy, under the direction of Sheriff E. F. Prater; and

WHEREAS, on November, 25th, 1935, Deputy Givens and Idaho State Police Trooper
Fontaine Cooper pulled over a 1931 Ford coupe, a half mile East of the City of Buhl Idaho; and

WHEREAS, Deputy Henry Givens and Trooper Fontaine Cooper had reason to believe
the operator of the vehicle, Douglas Van Vlack, was suspected of recently kidnapping his
estranged wife, Mildred Hook, in the city of Tacoma Washington; and

WHEREAS, upon the officers approaching the vehicle, Mr. Van Vlack was asked to step
out of the vehicle which Mr. Van Vlack refused; and

WHEREAS, Trooper Fontaine Cooper opened the driver’s door and was immediately
met with gun fire from a .380 semi. automatic pistol; and

WHEREAS, Trooper Fontaine Cooper was struck by one bullet in the head dying
instantly and Deputy Henry Givens was struck by three bullets: one in the throat, one in the left
arm, and one in the left hand; and

WHEREAS, Deputy Henry Givens was transported to the Twin Falls County Hospital
where he underwent emergency surgery; and

WHEREAS, On December 8th, 1935, Deputy Givens succumbed to his injuries due to
post-operative infection leaving behind a wife and six children; and.

WHEREAS, December 8, 2025 marks the 90th anniversary of Deputy Given’s ultimate
sacrifice for the citizens of Twin Falls County.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Twin Falls County Board of
Commissioners that in recognition of Deputy Henry C. Given’s ultimate sacrifice, the Twin Falls
County Sheriffs Complex located at 2469 Wright Ave. Twin Falls shall hereto be known as the
“Henry C. Givens Law Enforcement Complex”, effective December 8,2025,

In the County of Twin Falls, State of Idaho.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my
hand at the Twin Falls County Courthouse in Twin
Falls, Idaho on this 8th day of December, 2025.

/s/ Don Hall

Don Hall, Chairman

/s/ Rocky Matthews _

Rocky Matthews, Commissioner

/s/ Brent Reinke _

Brent Reinke, Commissioner

ATTEST:

/s/ Kristina Glascock____________
Kristina Glascock, Clerk

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 9, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 9, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 8, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioner Reinke attended a GTFACT Transportation meeting.
Commissioner Reinke attended a Twin Falls Canal Company meeting.
Commissioners attended a Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.

In the Matter of HARDSHIPS
Commissioners considered a tax cancellation request as per Idaho Code 63-711 Hardship for
Jacque Cameron.

Becky Petersen, Treasurer reviewed the tax history for Ms. Cameron. Ms. Petersen noted that
taxes had not been paid on the property since 2023 which were applied to the 2022 taxes. Ms.
Cameron spoke with the Board and reviewed her finances and assets. There was discussion with
Ms. Cameron’s daughter and her helping her mom to make sure she files for the Circuit Breaker
program.

Shannon Carter, Deputy Clerk reviewed the application and documentation with the Board.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to cancel the 2022 taxes, late fees and interest in the
amount of $555.43 and cancel the late fees and interest for tax years 2023 and 2024 with a payback
of $75.00 per month. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke

noted that the cancellation will help keep Ms. Cameron out of the tax deed process for 2022 and
work toward catching up on the other past due taxes. Motion Passed Unanimously.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews reviewed the items in
the Consent Agenda to include status sheets for the Clerk’s Office and the Assessor’s Office;
alcohol catering permits for Woody’s 2.0 on December 13th and 19th at the Fairgrounds and The
Depot Grill on December 20th at the Fairgrounds; and Commissioners minutes for November 17 –
November 21. Motion Passed Unanimously.

In the Matter of BOARDS
Commissioners considered the appointment of Ross Hyatt to the Twin Falls County Planning and
Zoning Commission.

Jon Laux, CDS Director reviewed the request to appoint Ross Hyatt to the Twin Falls County
Planning and Zoning Commission with the Board. Mr. Hyatt has taken the place of a current
Board member that is no longer able to serve so Mr. Hyatt will fulfill the remainder of that term
and be eligible for two full terms after completing the partial term.

Ross Hyatt introduced himself to the Board.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to appoint Mr. Ross Hyatt to the Twin Falls County
Planning and Zoning Commission effective January 1, 2026 to December 31, 2027. Commissioner
Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Hall thanked Mr. Hyatt for his willingness to
serve. Motion Passed Unanimously.

In the Matter of CONTRACTS
Commissioner considered an Agreement for Pathology Services with Ada County.

Will Carson, Coroner reviewed the agreement with the Board. Mr. Carson noted that the contract
has been in place for many years with minor changes. The cost for autopsies did not increase from
2025. Commissioner Matthews noted that Legal has reviewed the agreement and had no concerns.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Agreement for Pathology Services with
Ada County. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews noted
that the lack of an increase in cost is a positive aspect of the renewal. Motion Passed Unanimously.

In the Matter of TAXES
Commissioners considered tax cancellation request as per Idaho Code 63-602G Homeowners
Exemption.

Brad Wills, Assessor reviewed the cancellation request with the Board. Mr. Wills noted that he
expects one more set of cancellations before the end of the year.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the tax cancellation request as per Idaho Code
63-602G Homeowners Exemption as listed. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion
Commissioner Reinke noted that the cancellation is required as per Idaho Code. Motion Passed
Unanimously.

Property Owner
Parcel #
HO Exmpt Value
Tax Cancellation
Daniel & Marilyn Polosky
MHPB050000890AA
$64,420
$789.65
Linda Stratton
MHPT080000240AA
$9,860
$105.86
Wendy Kolb
MHPT080000330AA
$4,244
$45.56
Caleb Ussery
RP09S15E150100A
$60,976
$334.67
Lawrence Juneau
RP10S16E117280A
$125,000
$783.80
Lorraine Rice
RP10S16E117300A
$125,000
$783.80
Tammy Colver
RP10S17E300001A
$125,000
$821.89
Mathew Jensen
RPB72410540150A
$74,715
$915.85
Sandra Burkhalter
RPB72611090120A
$63,970
$784.14
Torie Beck
RPB76570050110A
$125,000
$1,532.23
Pablo Markesis
RPF8401023003AA
$77,848
$951.50
Cassidy Ennis
RPF8481000001BA
$63,049
$770.62
Michael Bean
MHH9321029012AA
$56,155
$606.19
Michael Bean
RPH9321029012AA
$25,504
$275.32
Terrance Handyside
RPK87150010190A
$125,000
$1,345.32
Amanda Percy
RPK89740060170A
$125,000
$1,345.32
Daniel Giaclone
RPK91350050010A
$125,000
$1,345.32
Wade & Elizabeth Dunlap
RPOF1750010010A
$125,000
$704.09
Lyndsey & Rieley Browne
RPT00010540110A
$84,521
$907.43
Curtis Boguslawski
RPT02610120020A
$104,224
$1,118.96
Allen Cummins
RPT05560010100A
$125,000
$1,342.02
Sheri Tate (ST Real Estate Properties)
RPT08380020290A
$125,000
$1,342.02
Noemi Juarez
RPT1661006001BA
$99,515
$1,068.41
August Kober
RPT17410020030A
$125,000
$1,342.02
Stephanie Dawson
RPT19120010120A
$99,426
$1,067.45
Richard Bell
RPT20210000130A
$125,000
$1,342.02
Blane Miranda
RPT2881003007BA
$125,000
$1,342.02
Phillip & Patricia Greenlee
RPT3401001011AA
$125,000
$1,342.02
Brian & Alexandra Ball
RPT34920060010A
$125,000
$1,342.02
Michael Griffith & Cole Meek
RPT38010020030A
$125,000
$1,342.02
Trevor George
RPT38790010150A
$125,000
$1,342.02
Valerie Garrett
RPT40810040060A
$125,000
$1,342.02
Samuel Purser
RPT46510010110A
$125,000
$1,342.02

Gabriel Quinonez
RPT53610000080A
$84,642
$908.73
Elizabeth Blass
RPT56310000360A
$69,171
$742.63

$3,417,240
$34,816.94

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 10, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 10, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 9, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioners attended the annual Soil and Water Conservation Districts Legislative Luncheon.
Commissioner Reinke attended a South Central Behavioral Health Board meeting.
Commissioner Reinke attended a Misdemeanor Probation Training Council meeting.
Commissioner Matthews attended an EMS Advisory Board meeting.
Commissioners conducted a quarterly jail inspection.
Commissioner Reinke attended a Pest Abatement District Board meeting.
Commissioners attended a Republican Central Committee meeting.

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 11, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 11, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 10, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioners met with Elaine Molignoni, HR Director for a department update.
Commissioners attended a meeting with department heads.
Commissioners met with Bob Beer, Facilities Director for a department update.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke reviewed the items in
the Consent Agenda to include status sheets for the Sheriff’s Office and the Assessor’s Office; and
an employee requisition for the Sheriff’s Office. Motion Passed Unanimously.

In the Matter of PUBLIC HEARINGS
Commissioners conducted a public hearing to consider proposed Resolution #2026-010
establishing fees for the Collection of Development Impact Fees for Fire District System
Improvements and for the Creation of Taxing Districts.

Commissioners and Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter reviewed the proposed fees and when those fees
would apply.

Commissioner Hall opened the public hearing at 10:10 a.m.

No public comment received.

Commissioner Hall closed the public hearing at 10:10 a.m.

In the Matter of RESOLUTIONS
Commissioners considered Resolution #2026-010 establishing fees for the Collection of
Development Impact Fees for Fire District System Improvements and for the Creation of Taxing
Districts.

Commissioner Matthews reviewed the proposed Resolution with the Board. There was discussion
on the Impact Fees and the process that the Fire Districts are following for the impact fees and the
process for collecting those fees.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve Resolution #2026-010 establishing fees for
the Collection of Development Impact Fees for Fire District System Improvements and for the
Creation of Taxing Districts. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner
Matthews noted that the fees help to pay for the growth that is happening within the county.
Motion Passed Unanimously.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-010

A Resolution Setting Fees for Services Provided by Twin Falls County for the Collection of
Development Impact Fees for Fire District System Improvements and for the Creation of
Taxing Districts.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Idaho Code § 31-870, a Board of County Commissioners may
impose and collect fees for those services provided by the County which would otherwise be
funded by ad valorem tax revenues, and the fees collected pursuant thereto shall be reasonably
related to, but shall not exceed the actual cost of the service being rendered; and

WHEREAS, the proposed fees are required to offset the costs associated with providing
the services; and

WHEREAS, the proposed fees are reasonably related to, and do not exceed, the actual cost
of the services being provided; and

WHEREAS, on October 2, 2025, Twin Falls County entered into agreements with Rock
Creek Rural Fire Protection District, Buhl Rural Fire Protection District, Filer Rural Fire District
and Twin Falls Rural Fire District for the Collection and Expenditure of Development Impact Fees
for Fire District System Improvements; and

WHEREAS, the Idaho Legislature has set statutory requirements for creating taxing
districts, many of which require the county to process petitions, conduct public hearings, issue
orders and conduct elections; and.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Twin Falls County Board of
Commissioners, that the following fee schedule is hereby adopted, and that all portions of previous
ordinances and resolutions that conflict with the current resolution are repealed.

Department

Present Fee Proposed Increase (+)
Total New Fee

Taxing Dist. Creation Fee:
$0.00

$450.00

Collection of
Development Impact Fees:
$0.00

$25.00

Dated this 11th day of December, 2025.

TWIN FALLS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

/s/ Don Hall___________________________

ATTEST:
Don Hall, Chairman

/s/ Rocky Matthews ____________________

/s/ Kristina Glascock___________
Rocky Matthews, Commissioner

Kristina Glascock, Clerk

/s/ Brent Reinke_______________________
Brent Reinke, Commissioner

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 12, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 12, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 11, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Katherine Ford.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioner Reinke attended a WEMA meeting.
Commissioners attended the Mid-Snake RC&D annual meeting.

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 15, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 15, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 12, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,

and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioners met with office staff for a department update.
Commissioners met with Legal for a department update.
Commissioners attended a Castleford Men’s Club meeting.
Commissioner Reinke attended a Magic Valley Land Trust meeting via Zoom.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews reviewed the items in
the Consent Agenda to include status sheets for the Sheriff’s Office, the Treasurer’s Office and the
Assessor’s Office; and employee requisitions for the Health Initiatives Trust Board and the
Fairgrounds. Motion Passed Unanimously.

In the Matter of CONTRACTS
Commissioners considered an MOU with the Twin Falls County Highway Districts.

Commissioner Reinke reviewed the MOU with the Twin Falls County Highway Districts with the
Board. The MOU will be for Code Enforcement with the Highway Districts and is a continuation
of a previous agreement. The MOU has been reviewed by Legal and has been approved by all of
the Highway Districts.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the MOU with the Twin Falls County
Highway Districts. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke
noted that the agreement helps to keep communication clear about the expectations between the
County and the Highway Districts. Motion Passed Unanimously.

In the Matter of AWARDS
Commissioners considered a request to award badge, ID card and service weapon to retiring
Corporal Chris Bratt.

Sheriff Jack Johnson reviewed the request to award badge, ID card and service weapon to retiring
Corporal Chris Bratt with the Board. Sheriff Johnson thanked Cpl. Bratt for his years of service
to the community.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the request to award badge, ID card and
service weapon to retiring Corporal Chris Bratt. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion
Passed Unanimously.

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 16, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 16, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 15, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Katherine Ford.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioners met with Dave Overacre, Special Projects Coordinator for a
department update.
Commissioner Reinke attended a Twin Falls Area Chamber of Commerce Board meeting.
Commissioners met with Sheriff Jack Johnson to discuss credit cards.
Commissioners met with Jackie Frey, Emergency Services Director, for a department update.
Commissioner Hall attended a St. Luke's Magic Valley and Jerome Community Board meeting.
Commissioner Matthews attended a Fair Foundation meeting.

In the Matter of INDIGENT
Commissioners considered County Assistance Applications.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to release the lien, zero the account balance and close
case number 93044. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke
noted that the client is deceased and it is appropriate to close the case. Commissioner Hall noted
that the client has made consistent payments in the past and has lived out of state for many years
so it makes sense to close the case. Motion Passed Unanimously.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve case number 104839. Commissioner
Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews noted that the client does not have a
plan for future rental payments and the landlord has already started the eviction process. Motion
Failed Unanimously.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve case number 104840 for rental assistance in
the amount of $1,070.00 with a payback of $50.00 per month to begin in February 2026 and 50%
of future tax refunds. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke
noted that the client has a plan for future rental payments. Motion Passed Unanimously.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke reviewed the items in
the Consent Agenda to include a status sheet for the Commissioner’s Office, TARC and Juvenile
Detention; alcohol license number 2026-198 Sodbuster Market and Bistro LLC; a tax cancellation
request from the Assessor’s Office for Parcel #RPT06380210060A in the amount of $583.35; and
Commissioner minutes for November 24 – November 28. Motion Passed Unanimously.

In the Matter of BUDGET
Commissioners considered the November 2025 Accounts Payables.

Kristina Glascock, Clerk reviewed the November 2025 Accounts Payables in the amount of
$5,168,129.29 with the Board.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the November 2025 Accounts Payables in
the amount of $5,168,129.29. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

In the Matter of CONTRACTS
Commissioners considered a proposal from Interior Environments for Phase 2.

Commissioner Reinke and Kristina Glascock, Clerk reviewed the proposal with the Board.
Commissioner Hall noted that this is an expensive purchase but they want to invest in good quality
items that will last as long as possible. Commissioner Hall thanked Ms. Glascock and her team for
looking for the best quality and best price available.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the proposal from Interior Environments for
Phase 2 in the amount of $245,509.28 and authorize the Chairman to sign the documents on behalf
of the Board. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Commissioner Reinke noted that he
believes it is important to make this investment so that the new facility has long lasting furniture.
Motion Passed Unanimously.

Commissioners considered a Memorandum of Agreement with the State Historic Preservation
Office.

Ron James, Historic Preservation Commission member reviewed the Memorandum of Agreement
with the Board. Commissioner Hall expressed his support for the Historic Preservation
Commission and the work that they do.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Memorandum of Agreement with the
State Historic Preservation Office. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed
Unanimously.

In the Matter of BOARDS
Commissioners considered the re-appointment of Tamara Stricker to the Board of Community
Guardians.

Lisa Greer, Board of Community Guardians Coordinator noted that Tamara Stricker has been a
reliable and knowledgeable member on the Board.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the re-appointment of Tamara Stricker to the
Board of Community Guardians. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed
Unanimously.

In the Matter of TAXES
Commissioners considered Homeowner's Exemption cancellation requests.

Brad Wills, Assessor reviewed the Homeowner's Exemption cancellation requests with the Board.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Homeowner's Exemption cancellation
requests as presented. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

Property Owner
Parcel #
HO Exmpt
Value
Tax
Cancellation
Jeffrey Atkinson
OCK89670050170A
$53,318.00
$573.84
Wendy Munsee
OCO47010000200A
$125,000.00
$783.80
Susan Spring-Wenzel
OCT15790030020A
$58,640.00
$629.52
Curtis Talbot & Gigi Fotis-
Smith
RP10S16E260135A
$125,000.00
$783.80
Kevin Rideout
RP10S17E203060A
$38,735.00
$254.69
Michael Malouf
RPO38010020190A
$125,000.00
$821.89
Robert Dyson
RPO87010000200A
$125,000.00
$821.89
Elizabeth Ross & Eugene
Peters
RPOB8210000040A
$96,286.00
$614.52
Nathan & Janel Hudson
RPOK2450050030A
$125,000.00
$833.62
Bahram Sobbi
RPT0411005018CA
$125,000.00
$1,342.02
Haider Majid
RPT0811003001EA
$125,000.00
$1,342.02
Beatrice Reyes
RPT17410030080A
$125,000.00
$1,342.02

Casey Pearson
RPT20950010040A
$98,260.00
$1,054.88
Javid Avesta
RPT2601000004HA
$78,971.00
$847.84
Teasha Fletcher
RPT30010080140A
$107,135.00
$249.28
Rosario Maldonado
RPT35810070050A
$125,000.00
$1,342.02
Andrew Frostenson
RPT39610010010A
$125,000.00
$1,342.02
Jessica Stevens
RPT53870010100A
$125,000.00
$1,342.02

Totals
$1,906,345.00
$16,321.68

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 17, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 17, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 16, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioner attended the Twin Falls County Court Facility Grand Opening.
Commissioner Hall attended a South Central Public Health Board meeting.

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 18, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 18, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 17, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioner Reinke attended the Governor's Summit on Agricultural Viability in Idaho.
Commissioner Hall attended a School District Superintendents meeting.
Commissioners met with Bob Beer, Facilities Director for a department update.
Commissioners met with Elaine Molignoni, HR Director for a department update.
Commissioner Hall attended a MVMPO Policy Board meeting.
Commissioners attended the Idaho Legal Aid open house.
Commissioner Hall attended a SIRCOMM Joint Powers Board meeting.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews reviewed the items in
the Consent Agenda to include status sheets for the Prosecutor’s Office and TARC; and alcohol
license #2026-199 Twin Falls Golf Course. Motion Passed Unanimously.

In the Matter of CONTRACTS
Commissioners considered a FY2026 Noxious Weed Cost Share Request with the Dept. of Ag.

Kali Sherrill, Weeds Director reviewed the FY2026 Noxious Weed Cost Share Request with the
Dept. of Ag with the Board.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the FY2026 Noxious Weed Cost Share
Request with the Dept. of Ag as presented. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion
Passed Unanimously.

In the Matter of BOARDS
Commissioners considered the appointment of John Tolk to the Noxious Weeds Advisory Board.

Kali Sherrill, Weeds Director reviewed the requests for appointment and the reappointments with
the Board.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the appointment of John Tolk to the Noxious
Weeds Advisory Board. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

Commissioners considered the reappointment of Doug Kippes, Matt Vawser and Tom Skinner to
the Noxious Weeds Advisory Board. Commissioner Matthews noted that he is familiar with all
three of the Board members and they do a good job.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the reappointment of Doug Kippes, Matt
Vawser and Tom Skinner to the Noxious Weeds Advisory Board. Commissioner Matthews
SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

Commissioners considered the reappointment of Monica Dekruyf, Jim Woods and Rick Novacek
to the Parks and Waterways Board.

Kali Sherrill, Parks and Waterways Director reviewed the request for the reappointment of Monica
Dekruyf, Jim Woods and Rick Novacek to the Parks and Waterways Board. Commissioner
Matthews noted that he knows all three members and they are all doing a good job.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the reappointment of Monica Dekruyf, Jim
Woods and Rick Novacek to the Parks and Waterways Board. Commissioner Matthews
SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 19, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 19, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 18, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioner Reinke attended a WEMA meeting.

In the Matter of PUBLIC HEARINGS
Commissioners conducted a public hearing to modify the Buhl, Castleford, Filer, Hansen,
Hollister, Kimberly, Murtaugh and Twin Falls areas of city impact and to consider an ordinance

repealing and replacing previous editions of Twin Falls County Code Title 8, Chapter 9, Section
18, Negotiation Procedure and Title 8, Chapter 9, Section 19, Area of City Impact and replacing it
with Title 8, Chapter 22: areas of Impact Sections 1-3, Purpose, Negotiation Procedure and Area
of Impact.

Commissioner Hall reviewed the record to modify and/or confirm the Buhl, Castleford, Filer,
Hansen, Hollister, Kimberly, Murtaugh and Twin Falls areas of city impact. Commissioner Hall
noted that the Board would also consider an ordinance repealing and replacing previous editions
of Twin Falls County Code Title 8, Chapter 9, Section 18, Negotiation Procedure and Title 8,
Section 19, Area of City Impact and replacing it with Title 8, Chapter 22: areas of Impact Sections
1-3, Purpose, Negotiation Procedure and Area of Impact.

Commissioner Hall reviewed the laws considered:

The Board considered the following statutes, ordinances, and standards:
• Idaho Code Section 67-6526 Areas of city impact.
Commissioner Hall swore in all parties giving testimony.

Jon Laux, CDS Director, Laura Wilson, CDS Planner III,

City of Buhl
Bob Vande Water
Jeff Gabardi
Jasmine Mills

City of Filer
Debbie Carpenter
Rick Boepple
Vera Pedro Nunez

City of Hollister
Robin Grover

City of Kimberly
Craig Eckles

Bird Golay, Citizen

Public comment portion

Bird Golay, Kimberly citizen spoke and presented the Board with a letter from Kelly Luff. Mr.
Golay expressed concern with the water needed for the expansion of the cities. Mr. Golay was in
opposition to the expansion of the Areas of Impact. Commissioner Hall thanked Mr. Golay for his
participation. Commissioner Reinke expressed his appreciation for Mr. Golay’s comments and
his concern for water.

Commissioner Hall asked the following questions of Commissioner staff and received the
following answers.

Questions for Commissioner staff: Shannon Carter, Office Administrator answered.
• Were all 8 cities notified of the hearing today to modify or confirm their areas of impact
as per IC 67-6526 (3)? Yes
• When were the city notifications sent out? Mailed on November 18, 2025
• Was notice provided to property owners? Yes
• When and how was that notice provided? Posted in the Times News on December 4,
2025.

Buhl

Commissioner Hall asked the following questions of CDS staff and received the following answers
from Laura Wilson, CDS Planner III.

• Has the City provided the following documents as requested; Yes
Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes
Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes
Current Zoning Code? Yes
Current Zoning Map? Yes
• Has the City of Buhl provided a proposed area of city impact map for the Board’s
review? Yes
• Does the proposed Buhl area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing
city limits? No
• Are there any land splits in the proposed map? No
• How were the land splits addressed?
• Do you think the City’s proposed map fits the requirements of Idaho Code? (the section
number is 67-6526) Yes
• Do you have any other concerns about their map? No

Jasmine Mills spoke on behalf of the City of Buhl and answered the following questions.

• Does the proposed Buhl area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing
city limits? No
• Is the proposed Buhl area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the
next five (5) years? Yes
o What is the anticipated commercial and residential growth of the city? Ms. Mills
reviewed the anticipated area of growth for the City of Buhl. There was
discussion on the past growth vs the anticipated growth.
o What geographic factors are in this proposed area of impact? Ms. Mills reviewed
the geographic factors in the proposed area.
o Tell us about transportation infrastructure and systems, including connectivity.
Ms. Mills reviewed the pending infrastructure updates and changes to code that
require traffic studies for the growth.
o Are these areas where municipal or public sewer and water are expected to be
provided within five (5) years? Ms. Mills noted that there is capacity currently
and they are looking at improving the water capacity on the east side of the city.
They are considering grant opportunities as part of the proposed growth.
o How do these boundaries correspond with other public service district
boundaries? Ms. Mills stated that Buhl is using existing service boundaries and
do not conflict with future services.
Is there anything else about your city’s area of impact that you want us to know? Ms. Mills
noted that the citizens within the area of impact participate and are active and they expect more
of that in the future.
Commissioner Reinke noted that it appears that there has been some thoughtful consideration on
the area of impact for Buhl. There are some changes happening with the city council in Buhl.
Commissioner Matthews thanked Ms. Mills and the Buhl city council for their participation in the
process. Buhl reviewed the area of impact and agreed to changes based upon the new code
requirements. Commissioner Hall noted that the proposed area of impact vs the current city limits,
shows the growth potential is significant. The County wants to be fair to the cities with the
requirements set by the legislature. The next five years will show what the growth will be.

Filer

Questions for Community Development Services staff: Laura Wilson, CDS Planner responded.

• Has the City provided the following documents as requested;
Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes
Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes
Current Zoning Code? Yes
Current Zoning Map? Yes
• Has the Filer provided a proposed area of city impact map for the Board’s review? Yes
Has CDS reviewed the draft? Yes
• Does the proposed Filer area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing
city limits? No
• Are there any land splits in the proposed map? No
• How were the land splits addressed? The boundary lines were changed to match road
coordinates removing the land splits.
• Do you think the City’s proposed map fits the requirements of Idaho Code? (the section
number is 67-6526) Yes
• Do you have any other concerns about their map? No
Questions for City Representative: Vera Pedro Nunez, P&Z Director answered.

• Does the proposed Filer area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing
city limits? No
• Is the proposed Filer area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the
next five (5) years? Yes
o What is the anticipated commercial and residential growth of the city? Ms. Nunez
reviewed the anticipated growth with the Board.
o What geographic factors are in this proposed area of impact? Ms. Nunez
reviewed the geographic factors with the Board.
o Tell us about transportation infrastructure and systems, including connectivity.
Ms. Nunez reviewed the transportation infrastructure and noted that Filer just
finished their transportation plan.
o Are these areas where municipal or public sewer and water are expected to be
provided within five (5) years? Ms. Nunez noted the intent is there and it depends

on the developers that want to come into the area so that the tax payers don’t have
to pay for those costs.
o How do these boundaries correspond with other public service district
boundaries? Laura Wilson, CDS Planner 3, noted the boundaries are the same.
Ms. Nunez concurred with Ms. Wilson.
Is there anything else about your city’s area of impact that you want us to know? Ms. Nunez
noted that the third crossing has the potential to impact the City of Filer significantly.
Commissioner Hall swore in Bob Templeman, Filer Mayor.

Mayor Templeman spoke and noted that the third crossing could potentially impact Filer
significantly. Also, a potential events center at the Fairgrounds could bring significant
development to the City of Filer.

Commissioner Reinke noted that planning is necessary for future growth and thanked Mayor
Templeman for attending the hearing. Commissioner Reinke left the public hearing at 9:55 a.m.
Commissioner Matthews noted that the expansion in the SW corner of the area of impact could be
challenging but with his experience he understands the growth in that area. There was discussion
on future changes based upon growth. Commissioner Hall noted that the area of impact is
extremely large but there is a potential for growth and it is difficult to predict that growth. There
was discussion on the direction the future could take the development of the city. Commissioner
Reinke returned to the hearing at 10:05 a.m.

Hollister

Questions for Community Development Services staff: Laura Wilson, CDS Planner 3 responded
• Has the City provided the following documents as requested;
Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes, Aug 1996 draft
Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes, August of 1996 draft
Current Zoning Code? Yes, from their website
Current Zoning Map? Yes, July 2025 draft
• Has the City of Hollister provided a proposed area of city impact map for the Board’s
review? Yes Has CDS reviewed that draft? Yes
• Does the proposed Hollister area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from
existing city limits? No

• Are there any land splits in the proposed map? There were in the original proposal,
however CDS staff made corrections and has provided that draft.
• How were the land splits addressed? Yes
• Do you think the City’s proposed map fits the requirements of Idaho Code? (the section
number is 67-6526) As proposed, Yes
• Do you have any other concerns about their map? No.
Questions for City Representative: Mayor Robin Grover responded.
• Does the proposed City of Hollister area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles
from existing city limits? No
• Is the proposed Hollister area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within
the next five (5) years? Yes
o What is the anticipated commercial and residential growth of the city? Mayor
Grover reviewed the anticipated growth with the Board.
o What geographic factors are in this proposed area of impact? Mayor. Grover
reviewed the geographic factors with the Board.
o Tell us about transportation infrastructure and systems, including connectivity.
Mayor Grover noted that they are working on a transportation report.
o Are these areas where municipal or public sewer and water are expected to be
provided within five (5) years? Mayor Grover stated that it was anticipated.
o How do these boundaries correspond with other public service district
boundaries? Laura Wilson, CDS Planner reviewed the boundaries of the other
public service districts with the Board.
Is there anything else about your city’s area of impact that you want us to know? No.
Commissioner Reinke expressed concern that the comprehensive plan documents were from 1996
and needed updated. The update was needed to enable the city to grow. Commissioner Hall noted
that he felt the map was appropriate and encouraged future planning and the updating of the
comprehensive plan. Commissioner Hall also encouraged Mayor Grover to reach out to the Idaho
Association of Cities for assistance.

Twin Falls City

Questions for Community Development Services staff: Laura Wilson, CDS Planner 3 responded

• Has the City of Twin Falls provided the following documents as requested;
Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes
Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes
Current Zoning Code? Yes
Current Zoning Map? Yes
• Has the City of Twin Falls provided a proposed area of city impact map for the Board’s
review? Yes Has CDS reviewed that draft? Yes, changes were made and the information
was sent to the City of Twin Falls. Ms. Wilson reviewed the changes that were made to
the proposed map.
• Does the proposed City of Twin Falls area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles
from existing city limits? No
• Are there any land splits in the proposed map? No
• How were the land splits addressed? The City of Twin Falls worked with the City of
Kimberly to address the land splits. The proposed boundaries were moved to
accommodate the state requirements.
• Do you think the City’s proposed map fits the requirements of Idaho Code §67-6526?
Yes, as proposed.
• Do you have any other concerns about their map? No.
Questions for City Representative: Twin Falls City did not provide a representative. Ms. Wilson
CDS Planner 3 responded.
• Is the proposed City of Twin Falls area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city
within the next five (5) years? Yes
o What is the anticipated commercial and residential growth of the city? Ms.
Wilson reviewed the anticipated growth that she was aware of.
o What geographic factors are in this proposed area of impact? Ms. Wilson
reviewed the geographic factors with the Board.
o Tell us about transportation infrastructure and systems, including connectivity.
Ms. Wilson noted that the City and Highway District work together on the
roadways.
o Are these areas where municipal or public sewer and water are expected to be
provided within five (5) years? Ms. Wilson noted that studies were submitted in

the packet of information from the City that showed the anticipated municipal
service expansion.
o How do these boundaries correspond with other public service district
boundaries? Ms. Wilson reviewed the boundaries of the other public service
districts with the Board.
Is there anything else about the City of Twin Falls’ area of impact that you want us to know?
Ms. Wilson noted that the zoning map provided does not show the zones like other city maps do.
This information could be provided in the future.
Commissioner Reinke asked why the property that has Fleur de Lis is not being included in the
area of impact. Jon Laux, CDS Director noted that the property was not able to be annexed without
it appearing to be spot annexing. Mr. Laux reviewed the requirements and process for annexation.
Commissioner Reinke noted that he was not aware of any plans to provide services on the west
side of Rock Creek canyon within the next 5 years. Commissioner Reinke expressed appreciation
for the City of Twin Falls cooperating with CDS staff on the process. Commissioner Matthews
noted that he has concerns with a section of the proposed area of impact south of Twin Falls that
is part of the crash zone for the airport and stressed the importance of keeping that area more rural.

Kimberly

Questions for Community Development Services staff: Laura Wilson, CDS Planner 3
• Has the City provided the following documents as requested;
Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes
Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes
Current Zoning Code? Yes
Current Zoning Map? Yes
• Has the City of Kimberly provided a proposed area of city impact map for the Board’s
review? Yes. Has CDS reviewed that proposed map? Yes
• Does the proposed Kimberly area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from
existing city limits? No
• Are there any land splits in the proposed map? No
• How were the land splits addressed?
• Do you think the City’s proposed map fits the requirements of Idaho Code §67-6526? Yes
• Do you have any other concerns about their map? No

Questions for City Representative: Craig Eckles, P&Z Administrator for the City of Kimberly
responded.
• Does the proposed City of Kimberly area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles
from existing city limits? No
• Is the proposed City of Kimberly area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city
within the next five (5) years? Yes
o What is the anticipated commercial and residential growth of the city? Mr. Eckles
reviewed the past growth and the anticipated future growth with the Board.
o What geographic factors are in this proposed area of impact? Mr. Eckles
reviewed the geographic factors with the Board.
o Tell us about transportation infrastructure and systems, including connectivity.
Mr. Eckles reviewed the transportation and systems infrastructure with the Board.
o Are these areas where municipal or public sewer and water are expected to be
provided within five (5) years? Yes.
o How do these boundaries correspond with other public service district
boundaries? Mr. Eckles reviewed the boundaries of the other public service
districts with the Board.
Is there anything else about your city’s area of impact that you want us to know? Mr. Eckles
thanked the Board for the way the process was working and the Board’s willingness to work with
the cities.
Commissioner Reinke thanked Mr. Eckles for being so thorough and providing the necessary
information. The participation and communication between the City of Kimberly and the City of
Twin Falls has helped the process. Commissioner Matthews expressed concern with one of the
roadways names, however Mr. Eckles noted the name has been formalized, resolving the issue.
Commissioner Hall noted that the proposed area of impact map makes sense. Mr. Eckles noted
that they have had inquiries for almost every parcel that is in the area of impact map.

Castleford

Questions for Community Development Services staff: Laura Wilson, CDS Planner 3 responded

• Has the City provided the following documents as requested;
Current Comprehensive Plan? No.
Current Comprehensive Plan Map? No.
Current Zoning Code? No.
Current Zoning Map? No.
Ms. Wilson noted the documents she was able to gather were all from August of 2003 but
nothing was submitted by the City.
• Has the City of Castleford provided a proposed area of city impact map for the Board’s
review? No. Has CDS reviewed a draft? Yes, Ms. Wilson noted that the city limits are
the same as the proposed area of city impact.
• Does the proposed Castleford area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from
existing city limits? No.
• Are there any land splits in the proposed map? No
• How were the land splits addressed?
• Do you think the City’s proposed map fits the requirements of Idaho Code? (the section
number is 67-6526) Yes.
• Do you have any other concerns about their map? No.

Questions for City Representative: Castleford did not provide a representative. Ms. Wilson
CDS Planner 3 responded.
.
• Is the proposed Castleford area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within
the next five (5) years? Ms. Wilson noted the city limits are the area of impact so there is
nothing to be annexed.
o What geographic factors are in this proposed area of impact? The area is farm
ground.
o Tell us about transportation infrastructure and systems, including connectivity.
Ms. Wilson reviewed the infrastructure and systems with the Board.
o Are these areas where municipal or public sewer and water are expected to be
provided within five (5) years? Ms. Wilson reviewed the municipal services with
the Board.

o How do these boundaries correspond with other public service district
boundaries? Ms. Wilson reviewed the boundaries of the other public service
districts with the Board.
Is there anything else about your city’s area of impact that you want us to know? No

Hansen

Questions for Community Development Services staff: Laura Wilson, CDS Planner 3 responded
• Has the City provided the following documents as requested;
Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes
Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes
Current Zoning Code? No, Ms. Wilson accessed the code from online.
Current Zoning Map? Yes
• Has the City of Hansen provided a proposed area of city impact map for the Board’s
review? No. Has CDS reviewed a draft? Ms. Wilson noted that she did review the
existing area of impact and had no recommended changes.
• Does the proposed Hansen area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from
existing city limits? No.
• Are there any land splits in the proposed map? No.
• How were the land splits addressed?
• Do you think the City’s proposed map fits the requirements of Idaho Code? (the section
number is 67-6526) Yes.
• Do you have any other concerns about their map? No.

Questions for City Representative: Hansen did not provide a representative. Ms. Wilson CDS
Planner 3 responded.
• Is the proposed City of Hansen area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city
within the next five (5) years? Yes.
o What is the anticipated commercial and residential growth of the city? Ms.
Wilson noted that there has been minimal commercial change in the last few years

o What geographic factors are in this proposed area of impact? None, it is mostly
farm ground.
o Tell us about transportation infrastructure and systems, including connectivity.
Ms. Wilson reviewed the infrastructure and systems with the Board.
o Are these areas where municipal or public sewer and water are expected to be
provided within five (5) years? Ms. Wilson reviewed the municipal services with
the Board.
o How do these boundaries correspond with other public service district
boundaries? Ms. Wilson reviewed the boundaries of the other public service
districts with the Board.
Is there anything else about the city’s area of impact that you want us to know? No
Commissioner Reinke asked if the City of Hansen has worked with CDS staff through the process.
Ms. Wilson reviewed the steps that she had to go through to get information from the City of
Hansen. Ms. Wilson recommended leaving the current area of impact for review in the next five
years. Commissioner Reinke noted that the Board wants to be consistent in their processes.
Commissioner Matthews noted that he went to the City of Hansen several times to try to get
information. Commissioner Hall noted that Twin Falls County has made a lot of effort to work
with the cities through the process and expressed hope that when the next review happens the cities
will participate more. There was discussion on the process and the future growth. Commissioner
Hall noted that the area of impact for Hansen was extremely large. But it was important to work
with the city and hopefully in the next 5 years, the Commission can readdress that.

Murtaugh

Questions for Community Development Services staff: Laura Wilson, CDS Planner 3 responded
• Has the City provided the following documents as requested;
Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes
Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes
Current Zoning Code? Yes
Current Zoning Map? Yes
• Has the City of Murtaugh provided a proposed area of city impact map for the Board’s
review? No Has CDS reviewed the draft? Yes. The proposed map was presented to the
Murtaugh City Council and they were agreeable.

• Does the proposed Murtaugh area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from
existing city limits? No
• Are there any land splits in the proposed map? Yes, however those splits were addressed.
• How were the land splits addressed? Ms. Wilson reviewed how the land splits were
addressed.
• Do you think the City’s proposed map fits the requirements of Idaho Code? (the section
number is 67-6526) Yes
• Do you have any other concerns about their map? The area is quite large, but it will be
reviewed in five years.

Questions for City Representative: Murtaugh did not provide a representative. Ms. Wilson CDS
Planner 3 responded.
• Does the proposed City of Murtaugh area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles
from existing city limits? No.
• Is the proposed Murtaugh area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within
the next five (5) years? Yes, Ms. Wilson reviewed the proposed annexation and the
necessity of expanding sewer services.
o What is the anticipated commercial and residential growth of the city? Ms.
Wilson reviewed the anticipated growth that she is aware of.
o What geographic factors are in this proposed area of impact? Ms. Wilson
reviewed the geographic factors with the Board.
o Tell us about transportation infrastructure and systems, including connectivity.
Ms. Wilson reviewed the infrastructure and systems with the Board.
o Are these areas where municipal or public sewer and water are expected to be
provided within five (5) years? Ms. Wilson noted that the City of Murtaugh plans
to work on expanding the municipal services in the next 5 years.
o How do these boundaries correspond with other public service district
boundaries? Ms. Wilson reviewed the boundaries of the other public service
districts with the Board.
Is there anything else about your city’s area of impact that you want us to know? No

Commissioner Reinke noted that he has the same concerns with Murtaugh and hopes to work with
the city in the next 5 years to reevaluate the boundaries. Commissioner Matthews concurred.
Commissioner Hall noted that some of the cities have been more proactive with the process. There
was discussion on the future of the process and the potential for addressing the issue again in five
years or sooner.
Commissioner Hall closed the public hearing at 11:25 a.m.

In the Matter of AREAS OF IMPACT
Commissioners considered modifications to the Buhl, Castleford, Filer, Hansen, Hollister,
Kimberly, Murtaugh and Twin Falls areas of city impact.

The Board reviewed the discussion topics and made the following findings;

Buhl

*** Discussion Topics / Findings ***
• Has the City of Buhl provided a proposed area of city impact for the Board’s review?
Yes, we find the City of Buhl has responded and provided the area of impact map.
• Does the proposed Buhl area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing
city limits? No, we find the maps show the area does not extend more than 2 miles.
• Is the proposed Buhl area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the
next five (5) years? Yes, we find the expansion is likely because of the information
provided by the City during the hearing.
• Has the City of Buhl provided the following documents as requested;
Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes
Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes
Current Zoning Code? Yes
Current Zoning Map? Yes
We find the information has been provided by the City of Buhl.
Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the modification to the area of impact and adopt
the current Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Code, Zoning Map and the Area of
Impact Map as presented at the hearing today, December 19, 2025 for the City of Buhl. Commissioner
Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

Castleford

*** Discussion Topics / Findings ***
• Has the City of Castleford provided a proposed area of city impact for the Board’s
review? No. Has CDS? Yes, we find the area of impact map provided by CDS staff
shows that the city limits are the same as the area of impact map.
• Does the proposed Castleford area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from
existing city limits? No, the maps presented show that the area of impact is congruent
with the City limits.
• Is the proposed Castleford area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within
the next five (5) years? Yes, the maps presented show that the area of impact is
congruent with the City limits.
• Has the City of Castlford or CDS staff provided the following documents as requested;
Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes
Current Comprehensive Plan Map? No
Current Zoning Code? No
Current Zoning Map? No
We find the necessary information has been provided by the CDS staff.
Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the modification to the area of impact and adopt
the current Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Code, Zoning Map and the Area of
Impact Map as presented at the hearing today, December 19, 2025 for the City of Castleford. Commissioner
Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

Filer

*** Discussion Topics / Findings ***
• Has the City of Filer provided a proposed area of city impact for the Board’s review?
Yes, we find the City of Filer has provided the necessary information including maps and
codes.
• Does the proposed Filer area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing
city limits? No, we find that it does not because the provided maps show the area.

• Is the proposed City of Filer area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city
within the next five (5) years? Yes, we find the area of impact is likely based upon the
information presented at the hearing today.
• Has the City of Filer provided the following documents as requested;
Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes
Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes
Current Zoning Code? Yes
Current Zoning Map? Yes
We find the information has been provided by City of Filer and the requests are complete.
Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the modification to the area of impact and adopt
the current Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Code, Zoning Map and the Area of
Impact Map as presented at the hearing today, December 19, 2025 for the City of Filer. Commissioner
Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

Hansen

*** Discussion Topics / Findings ***
• Has the City of Hansen or CDS staff provided a proposed area of city impact for the
Board’s review? Yes, we find the City of Hansen and CDS staff have provided the
necessary information including maps and codes.
• Does the proposed Hansen area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from
existing city limits? No, we find that it does not because they provided maps which
show the area.
• Is the proposed Hansen area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the
next five (5) years? Yes, we find the area of impact is likely based upon the information
presented today.
• Has the City of Hansen provided the following documents as requested;
Current Comprehensive Plan? No
Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes
Current Zoning Code? No, However, CDS Staff located the code online.
Current Zoning Map? Yes

We find the information has been provided by City of Hansen and CDS staff and the Board
reviewed the information presented.
Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the modification to the area of impact and adopt
the current Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Code, Zoning Map and the Area of
Impact Map as presented at the hearing today, December 19, 2025 for the City of Hansen. Commissioner
Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

Hollister

*** Discussion Topics / Findings ***
• Has the City of Hollister provided a proposed area of city impact for the Board’s review?
Yes, we find the City of Hollister and CDS Staff have provided the necessary information
including maps and codes.
• Does the proposed Hollister area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from
existing city limits? No, we find that it does not because they provided maps which
show the area.
• Is the proposed Hollister area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within
the next five (5) years? Yes, we find the proposed area of impact is likely to be annexed
based upon the information presented today.
• Has the City of Hollister or CDS Staff provided the following documents as requested;
Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes
Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes
Current Zoning Code? Yes
Current Zoning Map? Yes
We find the information has been provided by City of Hollister and staff and the Board reviewed
the information presented.
Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the modification to the area of impact and adopt
the current Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Code, Zoning Map and the Area of
Impact Map as presented at the hearing today, December 19, 2025 for the City of Hollister. Commissioner
Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

Kimberly

*** Discussion Topics / Findings ***

• Has the City of Kimberly provided a proposed area of city impact for the Board’s review?
Yes, we find the City of Kimberly has provided the necessary information including maps
and codes and a representative attended the meeting.
• Does the proposed Kimberly area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from
existing city limits? No, we find that it does not because they provided maps which
show the area and provided testimony at the meeting.
• Is the proposed Kimberly area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within
the next five (5) years? Yes, we find the area of impact is likely based upon the
information presented at the hearing today.
• Has the City of Kimberly provided the following documents as requested;
Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes
Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes
Current Zoning Code? Yes
Current Zoning Map? Yes
We find the information has been provided by City of Kimberly and testimony was provided
during the hearing.
Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the modification to the area of impact and adopt
the current Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Code, Zoning Map and the Area of
Impact Map as presented at the hearing today, December 19, 2025 for the City of Kimberly. Commissioner
Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

Murtaugh

*** Discussion Topics / Findings ***
• Has the City of Murtaugh or CDS staff provided a proposed area of city impact for the
Board’s review? Yes, we find the City of Murtaugh or CDS Staff has provided the
necessary information including maps and codes which were presented at the hearing by
staff.
• Does the proposed Murtaugh area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from
existing city limits? No, we find that it does not because they provided maps which
show the area and CDS staff provided testimony at the meeting.

• Is the proposed Murtaugh area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within
the next five (5) years? Yes, we find there is potential for annexation as there is some
infrastructure in the area of impact because that information was presented by CDS staff
today.
• Has the City of Murtaugh or CDS Staff provided the following documents as requested;
Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes
Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes
Current Zoning Code? Yes
Current Zoning Map? Yes
We find the information has been provided by City of Murtaugh or CDS Staff and CDS Staff
provided testimony during the hearing today.
Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the modification to the area of impact and adopt
the current Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Code, Zoning Map and the Area of
Impact Map as presented at the hearing today, December 19, 2025 for the City of Murtaugh. Commissioner
Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

Twin Falls

*** Discussion Topics / Findings ***
• Has the City of Twin Falls or CDS staff provided a proposed area of city impact for the
Board’s review? Yes, we find the City of Twin Falls or CDS Staff has provided the
necessary information including maps.
• Does the proposed Twin Falls area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from
existing city limits? No, we find that it does not because they provided maps which
show the area.
• Is the proposed Twin Falls area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within
the next five (5) years? Yes, we find there is potential and some infrastructure in the area
of impact because that information was presented by CDS staff today.
• Has the City of Twin Falls or CDS Staff provided the following documents as requested;
Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes
Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes

Current Zoning Code? Yes
Current Zoning Map? Yes
We find the information has been provided by City of Twin Falls and CDS Staff provided
testimony during the hearing today.
Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the modification to the area of impact and adopt
the current Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Code, Zoning Map and the Area of
Impact Map as presented at the hearing today, December 19, 2025 for the City of Twin Falls. Commissioner
Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

In the Matter of ORDINANCES
Commissioners considered an ordinance repealing and replacing previous editions of Twin Falls
County Code Title 8, Chapter 9, Section 18, Negotiation Procedure, and Title 8, Chapter 9, Section
19, Area of City Impact, and replacing it with Title 8, Chapter 22: Areas of Impact Sections 1-3,
Purpose, Negotiation Procedure and Area of Impact.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve Ordinance #292 repealing and replacing
previous editions of Twin Falls County Code Title 8, Chapter 9, Section 18, Negotiation
Procedure, and Title 8, Chapter 9, Section 19, Area of City Impact, and replacing it with Title 8,
Chapter 22: Areas of Impact Sections 1-3, Purpose, Negotiation Procedure and Area of Impact.
Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

ORDINANCE NO. 292
An ordinance repealing and replacing previous editions of Twin Falls County Code Title 8,
Chapter 9, Section 18, Negotiation Procedure and Title 8, Section 19, Area of City Impact.

Be it ordained by the Board of County Commissioners of Twin Falls County, Idaho, that
Twin Falls County Code Title 8, Chapter 9, Section 18, Negotiation Procedure and Title 8,
Section 19, Area of City Impact, is hereby repealed and Title 8, Chapter 22, Section 1-3 be
adopted as follows:

CHAPTER 22

AREAS OF IMPACT

SECTION:

8-22-1 Purpose:
8-22-2 Negotiation Procedure
8-22-3 Areas of Impact

8-22-1: PURPOSE:

This Chapter establishes the authority, regulations, and criteria to be used for areas of impact
within Twin Falls County. The regulations contained herein are designed to protect and promote
the public health, safety, and community welfare of Twin Falls County; to promote the proper
location and development of projects based on the effective use of local resources; and to avoid
adverse impacts on the use and peaceful enjoyment of nearby lands for lawful purposes.

8-22-2: NEGOTIATION PROCEDURE:

A. The governing body of Twin Falls County and each city therein may adopt by ordinance,
following the notice and hearing procedures provided in section 67-6509, Idaho Code, a
map identifying an area of impact within the unincorporated area of the County. The
ordinance identifying an area of impact shall provide for one of the following:

1. Application of Twin Falls County’s Comprehensive Plan and zoning and
subdivision ordinances; or

2. Application of individual county comprehensive plan and zoning and subdivision
ordinance provisions regarding a specific area of impact. (Idaho Code § 67-
6526(4)(e)).

B. If the respective city and County cannot agree upon all details of the area of impact, a
recommendation committee shall be established. The city and County shall each select a
representative to participate on the committee within (30) days of the demand for
compliance and the process set forth in this paragraph shall commence. After the city and
County representatives have been selected, they shall in turn select another city
representative living within the applicable city and another County representative living in
the County and not within any city to serve on the recommendation committee. Meeting of
the recommending committee may be hosted by the city or County and shall be conducted
in accordance with Idaho Open Meetings Law. These four (4) persons shall, by majority
vote, provide a written recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners for an area
of impact. The recommendation shall include and address the following: anticipated
commercial and residential growth; geographic factors; transportation infrastructure and
systems including connectivity; areas where municipal or public sewer and water are
expected to be provided within five (5) years; and other public service district boundaries.
The written recommendation shall be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners
within one hundred eighty (180) days after the selection of the recommending committee
members.

C. Areas of impact shall not overlap.

D. Areas of impact shall remain fixed until modifications are made pursuant to Idaho Code §
67-6526.

E. This section shall not preclude growth and development in areas of the County which are
not within the areas of city impact provided for herein. (Ord. 21, 12-1-1998)

8-22-3: AREAS OF IMPACT

A. Buhl, Idaho

1. BUHL AREA OF IMPACT BOUNDARY:

Area of Impact for the City of Buhl is established and set forth herein and described
as the Area of Impact map adopted by the Twin Falls County Board of County
Commissioners on December 19, 2025.

2. STANDARDS:

The following standards shall apply whenever an official, agency, planning and/or
zoning commission, hearing examiner, or governing body of Twin Falls County
considers a zone change, comprehensive plan change, request regarding any real
property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, or
other such land use permit application within the Area of Impact which is subject to
this ordinance as of December 19, 2025:

a. The City of Buhl Comprehensive Plan
b. The zoning and subdivision regulations set forth in Title 9 of the Buhl City
Code;
c. Except as set forth above, all other applicable standards set forth in this code;
and
d. Except as set forth above, all other standards for any subdistricts or overlay
district applicable within the Area of Impact.

3. Governing Plan, Policies, and Ordinances:

a. Governing Plan: The City of Buhl Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Map, Zoning Districts Map, Area of Impact Map, and Title 9 of the
Buhl City Code shall comprise the governing plan and ordinance for the Buhl
Area of Impact. The version of any of the documents listed herein which
controls is the most recent of: the December 19, 2025, version, or the version
most recently adopted by ordinance by the Twin Falls County Board of
Commissioners.

b. Within the Area of Impact, any parcel of land used solely for agricultural uses
and in excess of 20 acres may continue said use until a change of use occurs.

4. ADMINISTRATION OF THE BUHL AREA OF IMPACT

a. Administration:

1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints
and authorizes the Twin Falls County Community Development

Services Director, its agents, and employees, to enforce and administer
the provisions of Title 9 of the Buhl City Code which are assigned in
the Buhl City Code to the Planning and Zoning Clerk and to charge
and collect fees for such administrative duties as adopted by reference
herein for the Area of Impact.

2. The Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director
accepts the appointment and authorization.

b. Commission:

1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints
the Twin Falls County Planning and Zoning Commission to administer
Title 9 of the Buhl City Code in the Area of Impact in lieu of the Buhl
Planning and Zoning Commission.

2. All applications for preliminary plat of a subdivision, vacation, rezone,
special use permit, variance, and other such permits shall be submitted
to the County Planning and Zoning Commission. All applications for
final plat of a subdivision, for vacation, and for rezone shall be
submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission for their
recommendation and action, prior to submission to the Board of
County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners may
approve, deny, or remand the application. The County shall provide
the City with notice and opportunity to provide comment on these
applications pursuant to the standards provided within Idaho Code §
67-6509.

5. ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE BUHL AREA OF IMPACT

a. Twin Falls County shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement
of the City of Buhl Title 9 within the Area of Impact and shall receive all
permit fees for inspections performed to recapture direct costs of inspections,
administration, legal publications, any development fees or other costs arising
from fulfilling the terms of each ordinance or regulation.

6. ANNEXATION:

a. Annexation by the City of Buhl shall be compliant with Idaho Code §§ 67-
6509, 67-6526 and 50-222. Upon annexation, the provisions of this article,
which is the agreement between the city of Buhl and Twin Falls County, shall
no longer apply to the annexed area.

b. The City of Buhl shall send notice of all annexations, de-annexations,
amendments, changes and updates to Title 9 of the Buhl City Code and the

Buhl Comprehensive Plan along with maps to the Twin Falls County
Community Development Services office.

c. All applications and requests to Twin Falls County for subdivision of any real
property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit,
variance, and other such land use permit applications and public notices
within the Buhl Area of Impact shall be provided to the City of Buhl with
notice and an opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant
to the notice standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509.

7. RENEGOTIATION:

a. Renegotiation: The Area of Impact may be reviewed and renegotiated at any
time upon written request of either party hereto. In any event, pursuant to
Idaho Code § 67-6526(e), the City and the County shall review the agreement
every five (5) years.

b. While renegotiation is occurring, all provisions of this Chapter shall remain in
effect until this Chapter is amended or a substitute ordinance is adopted by
Twin Falls County, in accordance with the notice and hearing procedures
provided in Title 67, Chapter 65 of Idaho Code, or until judgment from the
District Court is final pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6526(2)(b).

c. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions: All ordinances and code sections or parts
thereof in conflict with this subsection are hereby repealed.

B. Castleford, Idaho

1. CASTLEFORD AREA OF IMPACT BOUNDARY:

The agreed upon Area of Impact for the City of Castleford is established and set forth
herein and described as the Area of Impact map adopted by the Twin Falls County
Board of County Commissioners on December 19, 2025.

2. STANDARDS:

The following standards shall apply whenever an official, agency, planning and/or
zoning commission, hearing examiner, or governing body of Twin Falls County
considers a zone change, comprehensive plan change, request regarding any real
property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, or
other such land use permit applications within the Area of Impact which is subject to
this ordinance as of December 19, 2025:

a. The City of Castleford Comprehensive Plan;

b. The zoning and subdivision regulations set forth in Title 8 of the Castleford
City Code;
c. Except as set forth above, all other applicable standards set forth in this code;
and
d. Except as set forth above, all other standards for any subdistricts or overlay
district applicable within the Area of Impact.

3. Governing Plan, Policies, and Ordinances:

a. Governing Plan: The City of Castleford Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Districts Map, Area of Impact Map, and Title 8
of the Castleford City Code shall comprise the governing plan and ordinance
for Castleford Area of Impact. The version of any of the documents listed
herein which controls is the most recent of: the December 19, 2025, version or
the version most recently adopted by ordinance by the Twin Falls County
Board of Commissioners.

b. Within the Area of Impact, any parcel of land used solely for agricultural uses
and in excess of 20 acres may continue said use until a change of use occurs.

4. ADMINISTRATION OF THE CASTLEFORD AREA OF IMPACT

a. Administration:

1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints
and authorizes the Twin Falls County Community Development
Services Director, its agents, and employees, to enforce and administer
the provisions of Title 8 of the Castleford City Code and to charge and
collect fees for such administrative duties as adopted by reference
herein for the Area of Impact.

2. The Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director
accepts the appointment and authorization.

b. Commission:

1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints
the Twin Falls County Planning and Zoning Commission to administer
Title 8 of the Castleford City Code in the Area of Impact.

County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners may
approve, deny, or remand the application. The County shall provide
the City with notice and opportunity to provide comment on these
applications pursuant to the standards provided within Idaho Code §
67-6509.

5. ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE CASTLEFORD AREA OF IMPACT

a.
Twin Falls County shall be responsible for the administration and
enforcement of the City of Castleford ordinances within the Area of Impact
and shall receive all permit fees for inspections performed to recapture direct
costs of inspections, administration, legal publications, any development fees
or other costs arising from fulfilling the terms of each ordinance or
regulation.

6. ANNEXATION:

a. Annexation by the City of Castleford shall be compliant with Idaho Code §§
67-6509, 67-6526 and 50-222. Upon annexation, the provisions of this article,
which is the agreement between the City of Castleford and Twin Falls County,
shall no longer apply to the annexed area.

b. The City of Castleford shall send notice of all annexation, de-annexations,
amendments, changes and updates to Title 8 of the Castleford City Code and
the Comprehensive Plan along with maps to the Twin Falls County
Community Development Services office.

c. All applications and requests to Twin Falls County for subdivision of any real
property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit,
variance, and other such land use permit applications and public notices
within the Castleford Area of Impact shall be provided to the City of
Castleford with notice and an opportunity to provide comment on these
applications pursuant to the notice standards provided within Idaho Code §
67-6509.

7. RENEGOTIATION:

a. Renegotiation: The Area of Impact may be reviewed and renegotiated at any
time upon written request of either party hereto. In any event, pursuant to
Idaho Code §67-6526(e), the City and the County shall review the agreement
every five (5) years.

provided in title 67, Chapter 65 of Idaho Code, or until judgment from the
District Court is final pursuant to Idaho Code §67-6526(2)(b).

c. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions: All ordinances and code sections or parts
thereof in conflict with this subsection are hereby repealed.

C. Filer, Idaho

1. FILER AREA OF IMPACT BOUNDARY:

The agreed upon Area of Impact for the City of Filer is established and set forth
herein and described as: the Area of Impact map adopted by the Twin Falls County
Board of County Commissioners on December 19, 2025.

2. STANDARDS:

The following standards shall apply whenever an official, agency, planning and/or
zoning commission, hearing examiner, or governing body of Twin Falls County
considers a zone change, comprehensive plan change, request regarding any real
property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance,
and other such land use permit applications within the Area of Impact which is
subject to this ordinance as of December 19, 2025:

a. The City of Filer Comprehensive Plan;
b. The zoning and subdivision regulations set forth in Title 9 and Title 10 of the
Filer City Code;
c. Except as set forth above, all other applicable standards set forth in this code;
and
d. Except as set forth above, all other standards for any subdistricts or overlay
district applicable within the Area of Impact.

3. Governing Plan, Policies, and Ordinances:

a. Governing Plan: The City of Filer Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Map, Zoning Districts Map, Area of Impact Map, and Title 9 and
Title 10 of the Filer City Code shall comprise the governing plan and
ordinance for Filer Area of Impact. The version of any of the documents listed
herein which controls is the most recent of: the December 19, 2025, version or
the version most recently adopted by ordinance by the Twin Falls County
Board of Commissioners.

b. Within the Area of Impact, any parcel of land used solely for agricultural uses
and in excess of 20 acres may continue said use until a change of use occurs.

4. ADMINISTRATION OF THE FILER AREA OF IMPACT

a. Administration:

1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints
and authorizes the Twin Falls County Community Development
Services Director, its agents, and employees, to enforce and administer
the provisions of Title 9 and Title 10 of the Filer City Code and to
charge and collect fees for such administrative duties as adopted by
reference herein for the Area of Impact.

2. The Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director
accepts the appointment and authorization.

b. Commission:

1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints
the Twin Falls County Planning and zoning Commission to administer
Title 9 and Title 10 of the Filer City Code in the Area of Impact.

5. ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE FILER AREA OF IMPACT

a. Twin Falls County shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement
of the City of Filer ordinances listed in Title 9 and 10 of this ordinance within
the Area of Impact and shall receive all permit fees for inspections performed
to recapture direct costs of inspections, administration, legal publications, any
development fees or other costs arising from fulfilling the terms of each
ordinance or regulation.

6. ANNEXATION:

a. Annexation by the City of Filer shall be compliant with Idaho Code §§ 67-
6509, 67-6526 and 50-222. Upon annexation, the provisions of this article,

which is the agreement between the City of Filer and Twin Falls County, shall
no longer apply to the annexed area.

b. The City of Filer shall send notice of all annexation, de-annexations,
amendments, changes and updates to Title 9 and Title 10 of the Filer City
Code and the City of Filer Comprehensive Plan along with maps to the Twin
Falls County Community Development Services office.

c. All applications and requests to Twin Falls County for subdivision of any real
property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit,
variance, and other such land use permit applications and public notices
within the Filer Area of Impact shall be provided to the City of Filer with
notice and an opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant
to the notice standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509.

7. RENEGOTIATION:

c. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions: All ordinances and code sections or parts
thereof in conflict with this subsection are hereby repealed.

D. Hansen, Idaho

1. HANSEN AREA OF IMPACT BOUNDARY:

The agreed upon Area of Impact for the City of Hansen is established and set forth
herein and described as: the Area of City Impact map adopted by the Twin Falls
County Board of County Commissioners on December 19, 2025.

2. STANDARDS:

other such land use permit applications within the Area of Impact which is subject to
this ordinance as of December 19, 2025:

a. The City of Hansen Comprehensive Plan;
b. The zoning and subdivision regulations set forth in Title 10 of the Hansen
City Code;
c. Except as set forth above, all other applicable standards set forth in this code;
and
d. Except as set forth above, all other standards for any subdistricts or overlay
district applicable within the Area of Impact.

3. Governing Plan, Policies, and Ordinances:

a. Governing Plan: The City of Hansen Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Districts Map, Area of Impact Map, and Title 10
of the Hansen City Code shall comprise the governing plan and ordinance for
Hansen Area of Impact. The version of any of the documents listed herein
which controls is the most recent of: the December 19, 2025, version or the
version most recently adopted by ordinance by the Twin Falls County Board
of Commissioners.

b. Within the Area of Impact, any parcel of land used solely for agricultural
uses and in excess of 20 acres may continue said use until a change of use
occurs.

4. ADMINISTRATION OF THE HANSEN AREA OF IMPACT

a. Administration:

1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints and
authorizes the Twin Falls County Community Development Services
Director, its agents, and employees, to enforce and administer the
provisions of Title 10 of the Hansen City Code which are assigned in the
Hansen City Code to the Administrator and to charge and collect fees for
such administrative duties as adopted by reference herein for the Area of
Impact.

2. The Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director
accepts the appointment and authorization.

b. Commission:

1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints the
Twin Falls County Planning and Zoning Commission to administer Title

10 of the Hansen City Code in the Area of Impact in lieu of the Hansen
Commission.

2. All applications for preliminary plat of a subdivision, vacation, rezone,
special use permit, variance, and other such permit shall be submitted to
the County Planning and Zoning Commission. All applications for final
plat of a subdivision, for vacation, and for rezone shall be submitted to the
County Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendation and
action, prior to submission to the Board of County Commissioners. The
Board of County Commissioners may approve, deny, or remand the
application. The County shall provide the City with notice and opportunity
to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the standards
provided within Idaho Code §67-6509.

5. ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE HANSEN AREA OF IMPACT

a. Twin Falls County shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement
of the City of Hansen ordinances within the Area of Impact and shall receive
all permit fees for inspections performed to recapture direct costs of
inspections, administration, legal publications, any development fees or other
costs arising from fulfilling the terms of each ordinance or regulation.

6. ANNEXATION:

a. Annexation by the City of Hansen shall be compliant with Idaho Code §§ 67-
6509, 67-6526 and 50-222. Upon annexation, the provisions of this article,
which is the agreement between the City of Hansen and Twin Falls County,
shall no longer apply to the annexed area.

b. The City of Hansen shall send notice of all annexation, de-annexations,
amendments, changes and updates to Title 10 of the Hansen City Code and the
Comprehensive Plan along with maps to the Twin Falls County Community
Development Services office.

c. All applications and requests to Twin Falls County for subdivision of any real
property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit,
variance, and other such land use permit applications and public notices
within the Hansen Area of Impact shall be provided to the City of Hansen
with notice and an opportunity to provide comment on these applications
pursuant to the notice standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509.

7. RENEGOTIATION:

a. Renegotiation: The Area of City Impact may be reviewed and renegotiated at
any time upon written request of either party hereto. In any event, pursuant to

Idaho Code §67-6526(e), the City and the County shall review the agreement
every five (5) years.

c. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions: All ordinances and code sections or parts
thereof in conflict with this subsection are hereby repealed.

E. Hollister, Idaho

1. HOLLISTER AREA OF IMPACT BOUNDARY:

The agreed upon Area of Impact for the City of Hollister is established and set forth
herein and described as the Area of Impact map adopted by the Twin Falls County
Board of County Commissioners on December 19, 2025.

2. STANDARDS:

a. The City of Hollister Comprehensive Plan;

b. The zoning and subdivision regulations set forth in Title XV of the Hollister
City Code;

c. Except as set forth above, all other applicable standards set forth in this code;
and

d. Except as set forth above, all other standards for any subdistricts or overlay
district applicable within the Area of Impact.

3. Governing Plan, Policies, and Ordinances:

a. Governing Plan: The City of Hollister Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Districts Map, Area of Impact Map, and Title XV

of the Hollister City Code shall comprise the governing plan and ordinance for
Hollister Area of Impact. The version of any of the documents listed herein
which controls is the most recent of: the December 19, 2025, version or the
version most recently adopted by ordinance by the Twin Falls County Board
of Commissioners.

b. Within the Area of Impact, any parcel of land used solely for agricultural uses
and in excess of 20 acres may continue said use until a change of use occurs.

4. ADMINISTRATION OF THE HOLLISTER AREA OF IMPACT

a. Administration:

1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints and
authorizes the Twin Falls County Community Development Services
Director, its agents, and employees, to enforce and administer the
provisions of Title XV Chapter 152 and 153 of the Hollister City Code
which are assigned in the Hollister City Code to the Zoning Administrator,
and to charge and collect fees for such administrative duties as adopted by
reference herein for the Area of Impact.

2. The Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director
accepts the appointment and authorization.

b. Commission:

1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints the
Twin Falls County Planning and Zoning Commission to administer Title
XV Chapters 152 and 153 of the Hollister City Code in the Area of Impact
in lieu of the Hollister Planning and Zoning Commission.

2. All applications for preliminary plat of a subdivision, vacation, rezone,
special use permit, variance, and other such permits shall be submitted to
the County Planning and Zoning Commission. All applications for final
plat of a subdivision, for vacation, and for rezone shall be submitted to the
County Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendation and
action, prior to submission to the Board of County Commissioners. The
Board of County Commissioners may approve, deny, or remand the
application. The County shall provide the City with notice and opportunity
to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the standards
provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509.

5. ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE HOLLISTER AREA OF IMPACT

a. Twin Falls County shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement
of the City of Hollister ordinances within the Area of Impact and shall receive
all permit fees for inspections performed to recapture direct costs of
inspections, administration, legal publications, any development fees or other
costs arising from fulfilling the terms of each ordinance or regulation.

6. ANNEXATION:

a. Annexation by the City of Hollister shall be compliant with Idaho Code §§
67-6509, 67-6526 and 50-222. Upon annexation, the provisions of this article,
which is the agreement between the City of Hollister and Twin Falls County,
shall no longer apply to the annexed area.

b. The City of Hollister shall send notice of all annexation, de-annexations,
amendments, changes and updates to Title XV Chapter 152 and 153 of the
Hollister City Code and the Comprehensive Plan along with maps to the Twin
Falls County Community Development Services office.

c. All applications and requests to Twin Falls County for subdivision of any real
property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit,
variance, and other such land use permit applications and public notices
within the Hollister Area of Impact shall be provided to the City of Hollister
with notice and an opportunity to provide comment on these applications
pursuant to the notice standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509.

7. RENEGOTIATION:

a. Renegotiation: The Area of Impact may be reviewed and renegotiated at any
time upon written request of either party hereto. In any event, pursuant to
Idaho Code §67-6526(e), the City and the County shall review the agreement
every five (5) years.

c. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions: All ordinances and code sections or parts
thereof in conflict with this subsection are hereby repealed.

F. Kimberly, Idaho

1. KIMBERLY AREA OF IMPACT BOUNDARY:

The agreed upon Area of Impact for the City of Kimberly is established and set forth
herein and described as the Area of Impact map adopted by the Twin Falls County
Board of County Commissioners on December 19, 2025.

2. STANDARDS:

The following standards shall apply whenever an official, agency, planning and/or
zoning commission, hearing examiner, or governing body of Twin Falls County
considers a zone change, comprehensive plan change, request regarding any real
property, planned unit development, vacation, rezones, special use permit, variance,
or other such land use permit application within the Area of Impact which is subject
to this ordinance as of December 19, 2025:

a. The City of Kimberly Comprehensive Plan;

b. The zoning and subdivision regulations set forth in Title 17 of the Kimberly
City Code;

c. Except as set forth above, all other applicable standards set forth in this code;
and

d. Except as set forth above, all other standards for any subdistricts or overlay
district applicable within the Area of Impact.

3. Governing Plan, Policies, and Ordinances:

a. Governing Plan: The City of Kimberly Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Districts Map, Area of Impact Map, and Title 17
of the Kimberly City Code shall comprise the governing plan and ordinance
for Kimberly Area of Impact. The version of any of the documents listed
herein which controls is the most recent of: the December 19, 2025, version or
the version most recently adopted by ordinance by the Twin Falls County
Board of Commissioners.

b. Within the Area of Impact, any parcel of land used solely for agricultural
uses and in excess of 20 acres may continue said use until a change of use
occurs.

4. ADMINISTRATION OF THE KIMBERLY AREA OF IMPACT

a. Administration:

1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints and
authorizes the Twin Falls County Community Development Services

Director, its agents, and employees, to enforce and administer the
provisions of Title 17 of the Kimberly City Code which are assigned in
the Kimberly City Code to the Administrator, and to charge and collect
fees for such administrative duties as adopted by reference herein for the
Area of Impact.

2. The Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director
accepts the appointment and authorization.

b. Commission:

1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints
the Twin Falls County Planning and Zoning Commission to administer
Title 17 of the Kimberly City Code in the Area of Impact in lieu of the
Kimberly Planning and Zoning Commission.

2. All applications for preliminary plat of a subdivision, vacation, rezone,
special use permit, variance, and other such permit shall be submitted
to the County Planning and Zoning Commission. All applications for
final plat of a subdivision, for vacation, and for rezone shall be
submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission for their
recommendation and action, prior to submission to the Board of
County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners may
approve, deny, or remand the application. The County shall provide
the City with notice and opportunity to provide comment on these
applications pursuant to the standards provided within Idaho Code §
67-6509.

5. ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE KIMBERLY AREA OF IMPACT

a. Twin Falls County shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement
of the City of Kimberly ordinances within the Area of Impact and shall
receive all permit fees for inspections performed to recapture direct costs of
inspections, administration, legal publications, any development fees or other
costs arising from fulfilling the terms of each ordinance or regulation.

6. ANNEXATION:

a. Annexation by the City of Kimberly shall be compliant with Idaho Code §§
67-6509, 67-6526 and 50-222. Upon annexation, the provisions of this article,
which is the agreement between the City of Kimberly and Twin Falls County,
shall no longer apply to the annexed area.

b. The City of Kimberly shall send notice of all annexation, de-annexations,
amendments, changes and updates to Title 17 of the Kimberly City Code and

the Comprehensive Plan along with maps to the Twin Falls County
Community Development Services office.

c. All applications and requests to Twin Falls County for subdivision of any real
property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit,
variance, and other such land use permit applications and public notices
within the Kimberly Area of Impact shall be provided to the City of Kimberly
with notice and an opportunity to provide comment on these applications
pursuant to the notice standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509.

7. RENEGOTIATION:

c. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions: All ordinances and code sections or parts
thereof in conflict with this subsection are hereby repealed.

G. Murtaugh, Idaho

1. MURTAUGH AREA OF CITY IMPACT BOUNDARY:

The agreed upon Area of Impact for the City of Murtaugh is established and set forth
herein and described as the Area of Impact map adopted by the Twin Falls County
Board of County Commissioners on December 19, 2025.

2. STANDARDS:

The following standards shall apply whenever an official, agency, planning and/or
zoning commission, hearing examiner, or governing body of Twin Falls County
considers a zone change, comprehensive plan change, request regarding any real
property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, or
other such land use permit applications within the Area of Impact which is subject to
this ordinance as of December 19, 2025:

a. The City of Murtaugh Comprehensive Plan;

b. The zoning and subdivision regulations set forth in Ordinance 24-01 of the
Murtaugh City Code;

c. Except as set forth above, all other applicable standards set forth in this code;
and

d. Except as set forth above, all other standards for any subdistricts or overlay
district applicable within the Area of Impact.

3. Governing Plan, Policies, and Ordinances:

a. Governing Plan: The City of Murtaugh Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Districts Map, Area of Impact Map, and
Ordinance 24-01 of the Murtaugh City Code shall comprise the governing
plan and ordinance for Murtaugh Area of Impact. The version of any of the
documents listed herein which controls is the most recent of: the December
19, 2025, version or the version most recently adopted by ordinance by the
Twin Falls County Board of Commissioners

b. Within the Area of Impact, any parcel of land used solely for agricultural uses
and in excess of 20 acres may continue said use until a change of use occurs.

4. ADMINISTRATION OF THE MURTAUGH AREA OF IMPACT

a. Administration:

1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints
and authorizes the Twin Falls County Community Development
Services Director, its agents, and employees, to enforce and administer
the provisions of Ordinance 24-01 of the Murtaugh City Code and to
charge and collect fees for such administrative duties as adopted by
reference herein for the Area of Impact.

2. The Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director
accepts the appointment and authorization.

b. Commission:

1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints
the Twin Falls County Planning and Zoning Commission to administer
Ordinance 24-01 of the Murtaugh City Code in the Area of Impact.

5. ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE MURTAUGH AREA OF IMPACT

a. Twin Falls County shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement
of the City of Murtaugh ordinances within the Area of Impact and shall
receive all permit fees for inspections performed to recapture direct costs of
inspections, administration, legal publications, any development fees or other
costs arising from fulfilling the terms of each ordinance or regulation.

6. ANNEXATION:

a. Annexation by the City of Murtaugh shall be compliant with Idaho Code §§
67-6509, 67-6526 and 50-222. Upon annexation, the provisions of this article,
which is the agreement between the City of Murtaugh and Twin Falls County,
shall no longer apply to the annexed area.

b. The City of Murtaugh shall send notice of all annexation, de-annexations,
amendments, changes and updates to Ordinance 24-01 of the Murtaugh City
Code and the Comprehensive Plan along with maps to the Twin Falls County
Community Development Services office.

c. All applications and requests to Twin Falls County for subdivision of any real
property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit,
variance, and other such land use permit applications and public notices
within the Murtaugh Area of Impact shall be provided to the City of Murtaugh
with notice and an opportunity to provide comment on these applications
pursuant to the notice standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509.

7. RENEGOTIATION:

a. Renegotiation: The Area of Impact may be reviewed and renegotiated at any
time upon written request of either party hereto. In any event, pursuant to
Idaho Code §67-6526(e), the city and the county shall review the agreement
every five (5) years.

b. While renegotiation is occurring, all provisions of this Chapter shall remain in
effect until this Chapter is amended or a substitute ordinance is adopted by
Twin Falls County, in accordance with the notice and hearing procedures
provided in title 67, Chapter 65 of Idaho Code, or until judgment from the
District Court is final pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6526(2)(b).

c. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions: All ordinances and code sections or parts
thereof in conflict with this subsection are hereby repealed.

H. Twin Falls, Idaho:

1. TWIN FALLS AREA OF IMPACT BOUNDARY:

The agreed upon Area of Impact for the City of Twin Falls is established and set forth
herein and described as the Area of Impact map adopted by the Twin Falls County
Board of County Commissioners on December 19, 2025.

2. STANDARDS:

a. The City of Twin Falls Comprehensive Plan;

b. The zoning and subdivision regulations set forth in Title 10 of the Twin Falls
City Code;

c. Except as set forth above, all other applicable standards set forth in this code;
and

d. Except as set forth above, all other standards for any subdistricts or overlay
district applicable within the Area of Impact.

3. Governing Plan, Policies, and Ordinances:

a. Governing Plan: The City of Twin Falls Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Districts Map, Area of Impact Map, and Title 10 of
the Twin Falls City Code shall comprise the governing plan and ordinance for
Twin Falls. The version of any of the documents listed herein which controls is

the most recent of: the December 19, 2025, version or the version most recently
adopted by ordinance by the Twin Falls County Board of Commissioners.

b. Within the Area of Impact, any parcel of land used solely for agricultural uses and
in excess of 20 acres may continue said use until a change of use occurs.

4. ADMINISTRATION OF THE TWIN FALLS AREA OF IMPACT

a. Administration:

1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints and
authorizes the Twin Falls County Community Development Services
Director, its agents, and employees, to enforce and administer the
provisions of Title 10 of the Twin Falls City Code which are assigned in
the Twin Falls City Code to the City Planning Administrator and to charge
and collect fees for such administrative duties as adopted by reference
herein for the Area of Impact.

2. The Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director
accepts the appointment and authorization.

b. Commission:

1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints the
Twin Falls County Planning and Zoning Commission to administer Title
10 of the Twin Falls City Code in the Area of Impact in lieu of the Twin
Falls City Planning and Zoning Commission.

2. All applications for preliminary plat of a subdivision, vacation, rezone,
special use permit, variance, and other such permits shall be submitted to
the County Planning and Zoning Commission. All applications for final
plat of a subdivision, for vacation, and for rezone shall be submitted to the
County Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendation and
action, prior to submission to the Board of County Commissioners. The
Board of County Commissioners may approve, deny, or remand the
application. The County shall provide the City with notice and opportunity
to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the standards
provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509.

5. ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE TWIN FALLS AREA OF IMPACT

a. Twin Falls County shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement
of the City of Twin Falls ordinances within the Area of Impact and shall
receive all permit fees for inspections performed to recapture direct costs of

inspections, administration, legal publications, any development fees or other
costs arising from fulfilling the terms of each ordinance or regulation.

6. ANNEXATION:

a. Annexation by the City of Twin Falls shall be compliant with Idaho Code §§
67-6509, 67-6526 and 50-222. Upon annexation, the provisions of this article,
which is the agreement between the City of Twin Falls and Twin Falls
County, shall no longer apply to the annexed area.

b. The City of Twin Falls shall send notice of all annexation, de-annexations,
amendments, changes and updates to Title 10 of the Twin Falls City Code and
the Comprehensive Plan along with maps to the Twin Falls County
Community Development Services office.

c. All applications and requests to Twin Falls County for subdivision of any real
property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit,
variance, and other such land use permit applications and public notices
within the Twin Falls Area of Impact shall be provided to the City of Twin
Falls with notice and an opportunity to provide comment on these applications
pursuant to the notice standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509.

7. RENEGOTIATION:

a. Renegotiation: The Area of Impact may be reviewed and renegotiated at any
time upon written request of either party hereto. In any event, pursuant to
Idaho Code §67-6526(e), the city and the county shall review the agreement
every five (5) years.

c. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions: All ordinances and code sections or parts
thereof in conflict with this subsection are hereby repealed.

WHEREAS, all ordinances, amendments, and code sections or parts which conflict with
this Ordinance are hereby repealed; and

WHEREAS, this ordinance is hereby declared to be severable. Should a court of
competent jurisdiction declare any portion of this ordinance invalid, the remaining provisions
shall continue in full force and effect and shall be read to carry out the purpose(s) of the
ordinance before the declaration of partial invalidity; and

WHEREAS, a draft of this ordinance was considered by the Twin Falls Board of County
Commissioner at a duly notice public hearing on the 19th, day of December, 2025.

WHEREAS, this ordinance shall be effective upon passage and publication as provided
by law.

Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Twin Falls County, Idaho, on
this 19th day of December, 2025.

This ordinance shall be effective upon passage and publication as provided by law.

TWIN FALLS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

/s/ Don Hall
Don Hall, Chairman Attest:

/s/ Rocky Matthews _______
/s/ Kristina Glascock___________
Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Kristina Glascock, Clerk

/s/ Brent Reinke____________
Brent Reinke, Commissioner

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 22, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 22, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 19, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioners met with office staff for a department update.
Commissioners met with Legal for a department update.
Kyli Gough, Community Health & Engagement Director presented the St. Luke's Community
Benefit Report.
Commissioners met with Security and Maintenance staff to discuss building access.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews reviewed the items in
the Consent Agenda to include an employee requisition for District Court and Commissioner
minutes from December 1 – December 5, 2025. Motion Passed Unanimously. (Hall absent)

In the Matter of BUDGET
Commissioners considered a request for Retention of County Vessel Funds.

Kristina Glascock, Clerk and Deana Johnston, Accounts Receivable Clerk reviewed the County
Vessel Fund Reporting and Remittance Form and the request for retention form with the Board.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the request for retention of County Vessel
Funds in the amount of $147,417.99 and authorize the Chairman to sign the documents on behalf
of the Board. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. (Hall absent)

In the Matter of CONTRACTS
Commissioners considered a Fairgrounds modification request.

Commissioner Matthews reviewed the Fairgrounds Modification Request with the Board. The
request is to approve replacing the heating and cooling unit in the railroad building at the
Fairgrounds. The expenses will be covered by a donor so there will be no cost to the County or
the Fair.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Fairgrounds Modification Request to
replace the heating and cooling unit in the Railroad building and authorize the Chairman to sign
the documents on behalf of the Board. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion
Commissioner Matthews noted the building is hot in the summer and cold in the winter and the
replacement will help avoid damage to the property inside the building. Motion Passed
Unanimously. (Hall absent)

Commissioners considered a Service Order Form with Qualifacts.

Jaci Urie, TARC Director reviewed the form with the Board. Ms. Urie noted that Legal has
reviewed the document and approved the current form. Qualifacts will send an updated draft with
a corrected start date.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Service Order Form with Qualifacts
once it is submitted with updated dates and authorize the Chairman to sign the documents on behalf
of the Board. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. (Hall absent)

Commissioner Hall joined the meeting at 10: 20 a.m.

In the Matter of TAXING DISTRICTS
Commissioners considered a petition for the creation of the Rock Creek Magic Valley Veterans
Memorial Cemetery Maintenance District.

Greg Bryant, President of Twin Falls Veterans Health Commission presented the Board with a
petition for the creation of the Rock Creek Magic Valley Veterans Memorial Cemetery
Maintenance District. Mr. Bryant reviewed the history of the cemetery with the Board and noted
that the cemetery needs funds to be able to continue taking care of the existing graves and the only
way is to form a maintenance district. There are three hundred and twenty graves with headstones
and they believe there are significantly more graves that do not have headstones.

Kristina Glascock, Clerk, reviewed the estimate for the cost of election in the amount $2,047.00
and the time that the funds have to be paid. Commissioner Hall noted that there will be a hearing
scheduled to allow anyone within the proposed district to oppose the petition. After the hearing,
the Board will issue an order denying or granting the petition and the boundaries shall be fixed for
the proposed district.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to accept the petition for the creation of the Rock Creek
Magic Valley Veterans Memorial Cemetery Maintenance District. Commissioner Reinke
SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 23, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 23, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Vice-Chairman Reinke called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m.
in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 22, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke.

ABSENT:
Commissioner Don Hall.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Katherine Ford.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioner Reinke attended an IAC Education Committee virtual meeting.

In the Matter of INDIGENT
Commissioners considered County Assistance Applications.

Case number 104840. No action taken

In the Matter of TAXES
Commissioners considered Homeowner's Exemption cancellation requests.

Erin Porter, Chief Deputy Assessor reviewed the Homeowner's Exemption cancellation requests
with the Board.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Homeowner's Exemption cancellation
requests as presented. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. (Hall
absent)

Property Owner
Parcel #
Net Mrkt Value
Tax Cancellation
Dimitriy & Olga Stepanov
RPB76210030040A
$282,475
$1,532.23
Madison Applewhite
RPF8401028001AA
$134,312
$1,527.82
Ryan Downs
RPF84170020040A
$233,607
$1,527.82
Kaleigh Horton
RPH93410020180A
$94,917
$1,024.57
Jeannie Shakstad
RPOK2520010010A
$776,207
$833.62
Timothy Hicks
RPOM4020020360A
$207,989
$856.32
Alice Helms
RPT08320060040A
$403,942
$206.25
Michaela Ewing
RPT15410010030A
$181,342
$1,342.02
Pamela Roehl
RPT1941002009AA
$62,424
$670.19
Robert Reed
RPT26430040070A
$172,582
$1,342.02
Sabrina Mitchell
RPT3821001022AA
$163,791
$1,342.02

Kelsey Henslee
RP08S13E027380A
$817,316
$712.09
Graciela Flores
MHOB581000012AA
$7,199
$45.95
Graciela Flores
RPOB581000012AA
$43,552
$101.98
Alison Gittins
RPB7241069014AA
$73,134
$896.48
Steven Harrison
RPT00010220130A
$83,359
$894.95
Lori Watson
RP09S14E241860A
$134,108
$183.49
Lori Watson
MH09S14E241860A
$14,230
$90.78

Total
$3,886,486
$15,130.59

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 26, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 26, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 23, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Katherine Ford.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Regular Business

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 29, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 29, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 26, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioners met with office staff for a department update.
Commissioners met with Legal for a department update.
Commissioners attended Commissioner Don Hall’s farewell gathering.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke reviewed the items in the
Consent Agenda to include a status sheet for the Sheriff’s Office; and a tax cancellation for parcel
#RP09S15E284807A in the amount of $296.52 as requested by the Treasurer. Motion Passed
Unanimously.

In the Matter of COUNTY PROPERTY
Cory Tverdy, Maintenance Director presented an incentive check from Idaho Power for lighting
upgrades.

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 30, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 30, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 29, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Katherine Ford.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioners met with Dave Overacre, Special Projects Coordinator for a department update.
Commissioners attended a ribbon cutting for Interlink Volunteer Caregivers.
Commissioners attended Bill Carberry’s farewell gathering.

In the Matter of INDIGENT
Commissioners considered County Assistance Applications.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to accept a settlement offer on case number 91336.
Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke noted that according to
county records, the client had prior knowledge of the debt and the county generally only accepts
settlement offers of 50% or more. Motion Failed Unanimously.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve case number 104841 for rental assistance
in the amount of $1,000.00 with a payback of $25.00 per month to begin in February 2026 and
50% of future tax refunds. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner
Matthews noted that the client has a plan for future rental payments and has provided proof of full-
time income. Motion Passed Unanimously.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve case number 104842 in the amount of $950.00
to Idaho Legacy LLC for cremation. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion
Commissioner Reinke noted that the client was a Twin Falls County resident and was indigent.
Motion Passed Unanimously.

In the Matter of RESOLUTIONS
Commissioners considered proposed Resolution #2026-011 supporting the America 250 in Idaho
Commemoration.

Commissioner Hall read the resolution for the record.

Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve Resolution #2026-011 supporting the
America 250 in Idaho Commemoration. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion
Commissioner Matthews expressed his support of the resolution. Commissioner Reinke expressed
his gratitude to America250 TFC. Tom Wangeman, and Wendy French, America250 TFC,
thanked the Board for their consideration of this resolution and their support of the America250.

Ms. French noted that there is also a song for Idaho in the works that she would like to present to
the Board once it is finished. Motion Passed Unanimously.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-011
A RESOLUTION OF TWIN FALLS COUNTY

A Resolution Supporting the America 250 In Idaho Commemoration
and the United States Semiquincentennial.

WHEREAS, the year 2026 marks the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of
Independence; and
WHEREAS, Governor Brad Little proclaimed the establishment of the America250 in Idaho
Commemoration in July 2024 to plan, encourage, develop, and coordinate the
commemoration of this momentous occasion, and honor and recognize the contributions
of Idaho’s residents to the nation’s past, present, and future; and
WHEREAS, it is fitting and desirable that we commemorate the birth of the nation with the
support of partners and stakeholders across the Gem State, America250 in Idaho will
advance the ideals of the American Revolution - equality, liberty, and justice – through
meaningful community engagement and recognize, appreciate, and commemorate
America’s legacy; and
WHEREAS, Twin Falls County, founded in 1907 has contributed proudly and significantly to
the history of our nation and our state for more than one-hundred and eighteen years; and
WHEREAS, the County Commissioner Chair Don Hall and County Commissioners Matthews
and Reinke of Twin Falls County thus encourage its citizens to create and participate in
programs that will commemorate the history of our city, our state, and our nation; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Twin Falls County hereby endorses the
America250 in Idaho Commemoration and its vision to celebrate American history and the
invaluable contributions of Idahoans to our region, nation, and world.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that:
1. Twin Falls County commemorates the 250th anniversary of the establishment of the
United States as an independent nation.
2. Twin Falls County authorizes the appointment of an individual or committee to
oversee local projects and efforts to support this commemoration that will promote the
maximum involvement of our residents, neighborhoods, businesses, schools, civic
organizations, and institutions in the commemorations.

3. Twin Falls County will officially recognize the 250th Anniversary of America
throughout 2026 at local libraries and schools with historically relevant displays and
presentations.
4. That a copy of this resolution be sent to the America250 in Idaho Advisory Council.
In the County of Twin Falls, State of Idaho.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my
hand at the Twin Falls County Courthouse in Twin
Falls, Idaho on this 30th day of December, 2025.

/s/ Don Hall_______________________
Don Hall, Chairman

/s/ Brent Reinke____________________

Brent Reinke, Commissioner

/s/Rocky Matthews_________________

Rocky Matthews, Commissioner

ATTEST:

/s/Valerie Varadi for______________
Kristina Glascock, Clerk

In the Matter of CONTRACTS
Commissioners considered an IDJC Passthrough Funds Agreement.

Kevin Sandau, Juvenile Probation Director and Aryn Probasco, Juvenile Services Coordinator
reviewed the agreement with the Board. Mr. Sandau expressed his gratitude for these funds as the
cover services that they would otherwise not be able to provide. There was discussion on the taxing
on tobacco and the potential taxing on vapes. Mr. Sandau noted that they don’t receive any direct
funding from tobacco tax to use for their programs.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the IDJC Passthrough Funds Agreement and
authorize the Chairman to sign the documents on behalf of the Board. Commissioner Matthews
SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

In the Matter of GRANTS
Commissioners considered an America 250 Grant Application.

Gary Anderson, Research and Development Supervisor reviewed the grant application with the
Board. Mr. Anderson noted that this grant will pay for frames for displays of war artifacts and
documents in libraries, schools, etc. Commissioner Hall thanked Mr. Anderson for his work on
this grant. Commissioner Reinke noted that they reached out to other counties to ask if they would
like to contribute and support this program as well, a few responded with possible interest. Tom
Wangeman, America 250 TFC, noted that they will be pursuing routes of making these available
to the homeschool community and eventually the public. Wendy French, America 250 TFC, listed
some of the organizations that they have reached out to asking for support of this program.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the America 250 Grant Application and letter
of support from the Board and authorize the Chairman to sign the documents on behalf of the
Board. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

Commissioners considered a SMILES Grant Application.

Gary Anderson, Research and Development Supervisor reviewed the grant application with the
Board. Mr. Anderson noted that Frontier Community Resources offers the SMILES Grant. Mr.
Anderson noted that SMILES stands for, simple, measurable, innovative, loveable, engaging, and
strategic. Mr. Anderson noted that this grant be will pay for one of the Desert Station picnic sites
in full and partially cover a second site. Mr. Anderson noted they will continue to pursue other
organizations and grants to pay for the remaining five and a half picnic sites.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the SMILES Grant Application and authorize
the Chairman to sign the documents on behalf of the Board. Commissioner Matthews
SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

Commissioners considered a SEAGRAVES Grant Application.

Gary Anderson, Research and Development Supervisor, Kevin Sandau, Juvenile Probation
Director and Aryn Probasco, Juvenile Services Coordinator reviewed the grant application with
the Board. Mr. Anderson noted that the grant will replace funding that was previously provided by
VOCA grants. Mr. Sandau and Ms. Probasco noted that the grant funding pays for services that
they provide to youth participating in their programs.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the SEAGRAVES Grant Application and
authorize the Chairman to sign the documents on behalf of the Board. Commissioner Matthews
SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 31, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

Twin Falls, Idaho
REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING
December 31, 2025, 8:00 a.m.

Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular
session, pursuant to the recess of December 30, 2025.

PRESENT:
Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke,
and Commissioner Don Hall.

ABSENT:
None.

STAFF:
Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter.

The following proceedings were held to wit:

In the Matter of MEETINGS
Commissioner Reinke attended a Mid-Snake Regional Water Resource Commission meeting.
Commissioner Reinke attended a Southern Idaho Solid Waste Board meeting.

In the Matter of CONTRACTS
Commissioners considered a Courthouse Office Space MOU.

Commissioner Reinke reviewed the Courthouse Office Space MOU with the Board.
Commissioner Reinke noted that the Prosecutor is in dire need of office space and this change will
provide that. Commissioner Hall noted that the MOU will memorialize the Commissioner’s intent
for the space on the second floor of the Old Courthouse and the relocation of the Clerk’s staff that
are scanning files on the second floor, to the first-floor space currently occupied by the State
Supreme Court IT staff. Commissioner Hall noted that the Clerk has the option to not use the
space in the Old Courthouse if she determines there is space available in the remodeled Court
Services building. There was discussion of the intent of the previous Commissioners to utilize the
space in the Old Courthouse and the space needs of the Prosecutor’s Office and the Sheriff’s
Office. Commissioner Hall stated that he felt it was fair to address the issue on his last day so as
not to pass the issue on to the new Commissioner.

Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the Courthouse Office Space MOU as
presented. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously.

There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., January 2, 2025, at the
Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave
West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board.

In the Matter of ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
Expenditures by fund for December 2025:

Fund 100
Current Expense
1,980,544.92
Fund 102
Tort
25,175.19
Fund 104
Agricultural Fair District
0.00
Fund 106
Safehouse
36,986.02
Fund 108
Capital Projects Fund
823,953.23

Fund 113
Weeds
19,483.76
Fund 114
Parks and Recreation
52,362.82
Fund 115
Solid Waste
1,343,377.08
Fund 116
Ad Valorem
162,322.04
Fund 118
District Court
107,467.83
Fund 130
Indigent Fund
12,413.79
Fund 131
Public Health
84,042.67
Fund 132
Revenue Sharing
106.14
Fund 137
Election Consolidation
18,082.54
Fund 174
County Boat License Fund
3,692.03
Fund 175
Snowmobiles
1,030.79
Fund 196
Justice Fund
1,264,697.47
Fund 601
TARC Grants
0.00
Fund 602
IDJC Safe Teen FY25
0.00
Fund 604
Federal Drug Seizures
0.00
Fund 605
Byrne Jag-Car Cameras
0.00
Fund 607
IDJC Safe Teen Assessment Grant
3,870.29
Fund 608
Juvenile Correction Act Funds
13,219.18
Fund 609
Tobacco Tax Grant
17,116.41
Fund 610
Boat Grant Waterways Match
1,103.92
Fund 611
Adult Probation Grants
104.00
Fund 612
ASAT
0.00
Fund 613
R.S.A.T. Grant
24,606.01
Fund 614
ISDA – Invasive Centennial Park
0.00
Fund 615
S.U.D. Funds
1,678.00
Fund 616
SCAAP
0.00
Fund 617
OHV Law Enforcement
0.00
Fund 618
BCP Basic-Safehouse Grant
23,072.94
Fund 619
IDJC Equine Therapy Grant
0.00
Fund 621
DOE EECBG Aware
0.00
Fund 626
ARPA Recovery Fund
0.00
Fund 627
ARPA Revenue Sharing Fund
0.00
Fund 628
OPIOD Abatement Account
18,689.34
Fund 635
Parks-Grants
1,535.79
Fund 644
S.O.R. Sheriff
75.00
Fund 645
JAG Grant
0.00
Fund 651
Sheriff Donation Fund
0.00
Fund 652
Sheriff Drug Seizure Money
77.46
Fund 659
Prosecutor’s Drug Seizure Money
0.00
Fund 660
CRT Facility Fund
753,509.26
Fund 663
Sheriff’s Youth Plate
405.00
Fund 666
Sheriff-Vests
0.00
Fund 667
Prosecutor Drug Reimb
8,025.16
Fund 671
TF Co Sheriff Search & Rescue
152.74
Fund 673
Juvenile Probation Misc.
1,578.36
Fund 676
VOCA/ICDVVA Grant
4,467.15

Fund 681
Treatment Courts
43,104.17
Fund 683
District Court-CAO
196.13
Fund 684
District Court-FCS
2,403.96
Fund 687
Sheriff’s Grants
3,060.87
TOTAL

$6,857,789.46

Text is extracted by machine from the official file linked on each page; the official file is the record. Sentinel Media, LLC.