Twin Falls County | minutes | meeting 2025-12-01 | December source: https://twinfallscounty.org/wp-content/uploads/December-2025.pdf Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 1, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of November 26, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioners attended a Farm Managers meeting. Commissioners met with office staff for a department update. Commissioners met with Legal for a department update. Commissioners attended an Elected Officials meeting. Commissioners met with Kali Sherill, Weeds Director for a department update. Commissioner Reinke attended a Parks and Waterways Board meeting. In the Matter of CONSENT AGENDA Commissioners considered the Consent Agenda; items may include status sheets, employee requisitions, alcohol licenses, tax cancellations, Sheriff’s Office Security Agreements, and Commissioner minutes. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke reviewed the items in the Consent Agenda to include an employee requisition for TARC; status sheets for the Sheriff’s Office, the Prosecutor’s Office and the Treasurer’s Office; and Commissioners minutes for November 10 – November 14. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of FEES Commissioners considered a request to waive building permit fees for the Wright Ave. Project. Bob Beer, Facilities Director reviewed the request to waive the building permit fees for the Wright Ave. Project with the Board. Jon Laux, CDS Director reviewed the building permit fees and noted that the amount of the fees is related to the cost of the project and are set to cover the cost for inspections and plan review. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the request to waive building permit fees for the Wright Ave. Project phase 1B. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. Commissioners considered the Annual Solid Waste Fee Waivers. The Board reviewed the list of entities that had waivers for solid waste. Commissioner Hall noted that he would like to see the Board review the waivers and the amount of waste that each entity is disposing of; look at best practices from other entities and review the policy throughout the next year. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the annual solid waste fee waivers for FY2026 as presented. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke noted that he will work with Southern Idaho Solid Waste to tighten up the waivers throughout the next year. The costs are still there they are just passed on to the taxpayers. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of GRANTS Commissioners considered a Twin Falls County Health Initiatives Trust FY2026 Grant Award. Commissioner Reinke and Jennifer Homburg, Magistrate Probation Supervisor reviewed the Twin Falls County Health Initiatives Trust FY2026 Grant Award with the Board. Ms. Homburg noted that the grant will be used to pay for drug testing for pre-trial clients and supervised clients. Commissioner Hall noted that he recused himself from the HIT Board’s consideration of the application. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Twin Falls County Health Initiatives Trust FY2026 Grant Award for Magistrate Probation and authorize the Chairman to sign the documents on behalf of the Board. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of WATERWAYS Commissioners considered a request from Gary Perron to utilize Centennial Park's waterway access. Commissioner Hall noted that Mr. Perron is still working on gathering the documents and is looking at another potential launch site. No action taken. There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 2, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 2, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 1, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Katherine Ford. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioners met with Ivy Medical for a program update. Commissioner Hall attended a BLM Resource Advisory Council meeting. Commissioners met with Dave Overacre, Special Projects Coordinator for a department update. Commissioner Reinke attended an Airport Board meeting. Commissioners attended a Southern Idaho Republican Women's meeting. In the Matter of CONSENT AGENDA Commissioners considered the Consent Agenda; items may include status sheets, employee requisitions, alcohol licenses, tax cancellations, Sheriff’s Office Security Agreements, and Commissioner minutes. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews reviewed the items in the Consent Agenda to include status sheets for District Court, TARC, Assessor’s Office and the Sheriff’s Office; and an employee requisition for Juvenile Detention. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of BUDGET Becky Petersen, Treasurer presented the October Joint Report. There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 3, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 3, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 2, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioner Hall attended an ICRMP Board meeting. Commissioner Reinke attended an Associated Taxpayers of Idaho Annual Conference. There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 4, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 4, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 3, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews and Commissioner Brent Reinke. ABSENT: Commissioner Don Hall. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioners attended a Twin Falls School District Tour. Commissioners met with Bob Beer, Facilities Director, for a department update. Commissioners attended an Airport Advisory Board meeting. In the Matter of INDIGENT Commissioners considered County Assistance Applications. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to reconsider the decision for case number 104835 and approve paying $950.00 to Wilkes Funeral home for cremation with a payment of $255.00 from the survivor benefits when the spouse receives that amount. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews noted that the County is the last resource and the client was a Twin Falls County resident. The funeral home will not cremate until they receive full payment and the survivor benefits can take a while to be paid. Motion Passed Unanimously. (Hall absent) There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 5, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 5, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 4, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioner Reinke to attended a WEMA meeting. Select Health presented the Twin Falls County Year End Experience Report. Commissioners attended an Idaho Association of Counties Strategic Planning Group virtual meeting. Commissioners attended an Idaho Association of Counties Platform & Policy Coordination Committee virtual meeting. Commissioner Matthews attended a Crisis Center of South Central Idaho Advisory Board meeting. Commissioner Hall attended the December 2025 TFCHIT Award Ceremony. Commissioner Reinke attended a Farm Bureau meeting. There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 8, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 8, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 5, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioners met with office staff for a department update. Commissioners met with Legal for a department update. Twin Falls County Fair Board met with the Commissioners to present the annual report. Commissioners attended a Historic Preservation Commission meeting. Commissioners attended an Idaho Transportation Department meeting. In the Matter of CONSENT AGENDA Commissioners considered the Consent Agenda; items may include status sheets, employee requisitions, alcohol licenses, tax cancellations, Sheriff’s Office Security Agreements, and Commissioner minutes. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke reviewed the items in the Consent Agenda to include employee requisitions for TARC and the Sheriff’s Office; status sheets for the Sheriff’s Office and District Court; and an alcohol catering permit for Anita’s Buck- N-Bar LLC on December 14, 2025 at the Fairgrounds. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of RESOLUTIONS Commissioners considered Resolution #2026-009 dedicating the Henry C. Givens Law Enforcement Complex. Commissioner Hall read the Resolution for the record. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve Resolution #2026-009 dedicating the Henry C. Givens Law Enforcement Complex. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews expressed his appreciation for Deputy Givens sacrifice and noted that naming the facility after Deputy Givens honors his life. Commissioners Reinke and Hall concurred with Commissioner Matthews. Motion Passed Unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-009 Resolution to Dedicate the Henry C. Givens Law Enforcement Complex WHEREAS, in 1933, Henry Givens began his law enforcement career with the Twin Falls County Sheriff’s Office, serving as a deputy, under the direction of Sheriff E. F. Prater; and WHEREAS, on November, 25th, 1935, Deputy Givens and Idaho State Police Trooper Fontaine Cooper pulled over a 1931 Ford coupe, a half mile East of the City of Buhl Idaho; and WHEREAS, Deputy Henry Givens and Trooper Fontaine Cooper had reason to believe the operator of the vehicle, Douglas Van Vlack, was suspected of recently kidnapping his estranged wife, Mildred Hook, in the city of Tacoma Washington; and WHEREAS, upon the officers approaching the vehicle, Mr. Van Vlack was asked to step out of the vehicle which Mr. Van Vlack refused; and WHEREAS, Trooper Fontaine Cooper opened the driver’s door and was immediately met with gun fire from a .380 semi. automatic pistol; and WHEREAS, Trooper Fontaine Cooper was struck by one bullet in the head dying instantly and Deputy Henry Givens was struck by three bullets: one in the throat, one in the left arm, and one in the left hand; and WHEREAS, Deputy Henry Givens was transported to the Twin Falls County Hospital where he underwent emergency surgery; and WHEREAS, On December 8th, 1935, Deputy Givens succumbed to his injuries due to post-operative infection leaving behind a wife and six children; and. WHEREAS, December 8, 2025 marks the 90th anniversary of Deputy Given’s ultimate sacrifice for the citizens of Twin Falls County. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Twin Falls County Board of Commissioners that in recognition of Deputy Henry C. Given’s ultimate sacrifice, the Twin Falls County Sheriffs Complex located at 2469 Wright Ave. Twin Falls shall hereto be known as the “Henry C. Givens Law Enforcement Complex”, effective December 8,2025, In the County of Twin Falls, State of Idaho. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand at the Twin Falls County Courthouse in Twin Falls, Idaho on this 8th day of December, 2025. /s/ Don Hall _ Don Hall, Chairman /s/ Rocky Matthews _ Rocky Matthews, Commissioner /s/ Brent Reinke _ Brent Reinke, Commissioner ATTEST: /s/ Kristina Glascock____________ Kristina Glascock, Clerk There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 9, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 9, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 8, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioner Reinke attended a GTFACT Transportation meeting. Commissioner Reinke attended a Twin Falls Canal Company meeting. Commissioners attended a Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. In the Matter of HARDSHIPS Commissioners considered a tax cancellation request as per Idaho Code 63-711 Hardship for Jacque Cameron. Becky Petersen, Treasurer reviewed the tax history for Ms. Cameron. Ms. Petersen noted that taxes had not been paid on the property since 2023 which were applied to the 2022 taxes. Ms. Cameron spoke with the Board and reviewed her finances and assets. There was discussion with Ms. Cameron’s daughter and her helping her mom to make sure she files for the Circuit Breaker program. Shannon Carter, Deputy Clerk reviewed the application and documentation with the Board. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to cancel the 2022 taxes, late fees and interest in the amount of $555.43 and cancel the late fees and interest for tax years 2023 and 2024 with a payback of $75.00 per month. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke noted that the cancellation will help keep Ms. Cameron out of the tax deed process for 2022 and work toward catching up on the other past due taxes. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of CONSENT AGENDA Commissioners considered the Consent Agenda; items may include status sheets, employee requisitions, alcohol licenses, tax cancellations, Sheriff’s Office Security Agreements, and Commissioner minutes. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews reviewed the items in the Consent Agenda to include status sheets for the Clerk’s Office and the Assessor’s Office; alcohol catering permits for Woody’s 2.0 on December 13th and 19th at the Fairgrounds and The Depot Grill on December 20th at the Fairgrounds; and Commissioners minutes for November 17 – November 21. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of BOARDS Commissioners considered the appointment of Ross Hyatt to the Twin Falls County Planning and Zoning Commission. Jon Laux, CDS Director reviewed the request to appoint Ross Hyatt to the Twin Falls County Planning and Zoning Commission with the Board. Mr. Hyatt has taken the place of a current Board member that is no longer able to serve so Mr. Hyatt will fulfill the remainder of that term and be eligible for two full terms after completing the partial term. Ross Hyatt introduced himself to the Board. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to appoint Mr. Ross Hyatt to the Twin Falls County Planning and Zoning Commission effective January 1, 2026 to December 31, 2027. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Hall thanked Mr. Hyatt for his willingness to serve. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of CONTRACTS Commissioner considered an Agreement for Pathology Services with Ada County. Will Carson, Coroner reviewed the agreement with the Board. Mr. Carson noted that the contract has been in place for many years with minor changes. The cost for autopsies did not increase from 2025. Commissioner Matthews noted that Legal has reviewed the agreement and had no concerns. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Agreement for Pathology Services with Ada County. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews noted that the lack of an increase in cost is a positive aspect of the renewal. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of TAXES Commissioners considered tax cancellation request as per Idaho Code 63-602G Homeowners Exemption. Brad Wills, Assessor reviewed the cancellation request with the Board. Mr. Wills noted that he expects one more set of cancellations before the end of the year. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the tax cancellation request as per Idaho Code 63-602G Homeowners Exemption as listed. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke noted that the cancellation is required as per Idaho Code. Motion Passed Unanimously. Property Owner Parcel # HO Exmpt Value Tax Cancellation Daniel & Marilyn Polosky MHPB050000890AA $64,420 $789.65 Linda Stratton MHPT080000240AA $9,860 $105.86 Wendy Kolb MHPT080000330AA $4,244 $45.56 Caleb Ussery RP09S15E150100A $60,976 $334.67 Lawrence Juneau RP10S16E117280A $125,000 $783.80 Lorraine Rice RP10S16E117300A $125,000 $783.80 Tammy Colver RP10S17E300001A $125,000 $821.89 Mathew Jensen RPB72410540150A $74,715 $915.85 Sandra Burkhalter RPB72611090120A $63,970 $784.14 Torie Beck RPB76570050110A $125,000 $1,532.23 Pablo Markesis RPF8401023003AA $77,848 $951.50 Cassidy Ennis RPF8481000001BA $63,049 $770.62 Michael Bean MHH9321029012AA $56,155 $606.19 Michael Bean RPH9321029012AA $25,504 $275.32 Terrance Handyside RPK87150010190A $125,000 $1,345.32 Amanda Percy RPK89740060170A $125,000 $1,345.32 Daniel Giaclone RPK91350050010A $125,000 $1,345.32 Wade & Elizabeth Dunlap RPOF1750010010A $125,000 $704.09 Lyndsey & Rieley Browne RPT00010540110A $84,521 $907.43 Curtis Boguslawski RPT02610120020A $104,224 $1,118.96 Allen Cummins RPT05560010100A $125,000 $1,342.02 Sheri Tate (ST Real Estate Properties) RPT08380020290A $125,000 $1,342.02 Noemi Juarez RPT1661006001BA $99,515 $1,068.41 August Kober RPT17410020030A $125,000 $1,342.02 Stephanie Dawson RPT19120010120A $99,426 $1,067.45 Richard Bell RPT20210000130A $125,000 $1,342.02 Blane Miranda RPT2881003007BA $125,000 $1,342.02 Phillip & Patricia Greenlee RPT3401001011AA $125,000 $1,342.02 Brian & Alexandra Ball RPT34920060010A $125,000 $1,342.02 Michael Griffith & Cole Meek RPT38010020030A $125,000 $1,342.02 Trevor George RPT38790010150A $125,000 $1,342.02 Valerie Garrett RPT40810040060A $125,000 $1,342.02 Samuel Purser RPT46510010110A $125,000 $1,342.02 Gabriel Quinonez RPT53610000080A $84,642 $908.73 Elizabeth Blass RPT56310000360A $69,171 $742.63 $3,417,240 $34,816.94 There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 10, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 10, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 9, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioners attended the annual Soil and Water Conservation Districts Legislative Luncheon. Commissioner Reinke attended a South Central Behavioral Health Board meeting. Commissioner Reinke attended a Misdemeanor Probation Training Council meeting. Commissioner Matthews attended an EMS Advisory Board meeting. Commissioners conducted a quarterly jail inspection. Commissioner Reinke attended a Pest Abatement District Board meeting. Commissioners attended a Republican Central Committee meeting. There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 11, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 11, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 10, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioners met with Elaine Molignoni, HR Director for a department update. Commissioners attended a meeting with department heads. Commissioners met with Bob Beer, Facilities Director for a department update. In the Matter of CONSENT AGENDA Commissioners considered the Consent Agenda; items may include status sheets, employee requisitions, alcohol licenses, tax cancellations, Sheriff’s Office Security Agreements, and Commissioner minutes. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke reviewed the items in the Consent Agenda to include status sheets for the Sheriff’s Office and the Assessor’s Office; and an employee requisition for the Sheriff’s Office. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of PUBLIC HEARINGS Commissioners conducted a public hearing to consider proposed Resolution #2026-010 establishing fees for the Collection of Development Impact Fees for Fire District System Improvements and for the Creation of Taxing Districts. Commissioners and Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter reviewed the proposed fees and when those fees would apply. Commissioner Hall opened the public hearing at 10:10 a.m. No public comment received. Commissioner Hall closed the public hearing at 10:10 a.m. In the Matter of RESOLUTIONS Commissioners considered Resolution #2026-010 establishing fees for the Collection of Development Impact Fees for Fire District System Improvements and for the Creation of Taxing Districts. Commissioner Matthews reviewed the proposed Resolution with the Board. There was discussion on the Impact Fees and the process that the Fire Districts are following for the impact fees and the process for collecting those fees. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve Resolution #2026-010 establishing fees for the Collection of Development Impact Fees for Fire District System Improvements and for the Creation of Taxing Districts. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews noted that the fees help to pay for the growth that is happening within the county. Motion Passed Unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-010 A Resolution Setting Fees for Services Provided by Twin Falls County for the Collection of Development Impact Fees for Fire District System Improvements and for the Creation of Taxing Districts. WHEREAS, pursuant to Idaho Code § 31-870, a Board of County Commissioners may impose and collect fees for those services provided by the County which would otherwise be funded by ad valorem tax revenues, and the fees collected pursuant thereto shall be reasonably related to, but shall not exceed the actual cost of the service being rendered; and WHEREAS, the proposed fees are required to offset the costs associated with providing the services; and WHEREAS, the proposed fees are reasonably related to, and do not exceed, the actual cost of the services being provided; and WHEREAS, on October 2, 2025, Twin Falls County entered into agreements with Rock Creek Rural Fire Protection District, Buhl Rural Fire Protection District, Filer Rural Fire District and Twin Falls Rural Fire District for the Collection and Expenditure of Development Impact Fees for Fire District System Improvements; and WHEREAS, the Idaho Legislature has set statutory requirements for creating taxing districts, many of which require the county to process petitions, conduct public hearings, issue orders and conduct elections; and. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Twin Falls County Board of Commissioners, that the following fee schedule is hereby adopted, and that all portions of previous ordinances and resolutions that conflict with the current resolution are repealed. Department Present Fee Proposed Increase (+) Total New Fee Taxing Dist. Creation Fee: $0.00 $450.00 $450.00 Collection of Development Impact Fees: $0.00 $25.00 $25.00 Dated this 11th day of December, 2025. TWIN FALLS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS /s/ Don Hall___________________________ ATTEST: Don Hall, Chairman /s/ Rocky Matthews ____________________ /s/ Kristina Glascock___________ Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Kristina Glascock, Clerk /s/ Brent Reinke_______________________ Brent Reinke, Commissioner There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 12, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 12, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 11, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Katherine Ford. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioner Reinke attended a WEMA meeting. Commissioners attended the Mid-Snake RC&D annual meeting. There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 15, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 15, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 12, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioners met with office staff for a department update. Commissioners met with Legal for a department update. Commissioners attended a Castleford Men’s Club meeting. Commissioner Reinke attended a Magic Valley Land Trust meeting via Zoom. In the Matter of CONSENT AGENDA Commissioners considered the Consent Agenda; items may include status sheets, employee requisitions, alcohol licenses, tax cancellations, Sheriff’s Office Security Agreements, and Commissioner minutes. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews reviewed the items in the Consent Agenda to include status sheets for the Sheriff’s Office, the Treasurer’s Office and the Assessor’s Office; and employee requisitions for the Health Initiatives Trust Board and the Fairgrounds. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of CONTRACTS Commissioners considered an MOU with the Twin Falls County Highway Districts. Commissioner Reinke reviewed the MOU with the Twin Falls County Highway Districts with the Board. The MOU will be for Code Enforcement with the Highway Districts and is a continuation of a previous agreement. The MOU has been reviewed by Legal and has been approved by all of the Highway Districts. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the MOU with the Twin Falls County Highway Districts. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke noted that the agreement helps to keep communication clear about the expectations between the County and the Highway Districts. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of AWARDS Commissioners considered a request to award badge, ID card and service weapon to retiring Corporal Chris Bratt. Sheriff Jack Johnson reviewed the request to award badge, ID card and service weapon to retiring Corporal Chris Bratt with the Board. Sheriff Johnson thanked Cpl. Bratt for his years of service to the community. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the request to award badge, ID card and service weapon to retiring Corporal Chris Bratt. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 16, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 16, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 15, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Katherine Ford. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioners met with Dave Overacre, Special Projects Coordinator for a department update. Commissioner Reinke attended a Twin Falls Area Chamber of Commerce Board meeting. Commissioners met with Sheriff Jack Johnson to discuss credit cards. Commissioners met with Jackie Frey, Emergency Services Director, for a department update. Commissioner Hall attended a St. Luke's Magic Valley and Jerome Community Board meeting. Commissioner Matthews attended a Fair Foundation meeting. In the Matter of INDIGENT Commissioners considered County Assistance Applications. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to release the lien, zero the account balance and close case number 93044. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke noted that the client is deceased and it is appropriate to close the case. Commissioner Hall noted that the client has made consistent payments in the past and has lived out of state for many years so it makes sense to close the case. Motion Passed Unanimously. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve case number 104839. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews noted that the client does not have a plan for future rental payments and the landlord has already started the eviction process. Motion Failed Unanimously. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve case number 104840 for rental assistance in the amount of $1,070.00 with a payback of $50.00 per month to begin in February 2026 and 50% of future tax refunds. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke noted that the client has a plan for future rental payments. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of CONSENT AGENDA Commissioners considered the Consent Agenda; items may include status sheets, employee requisitions, alcohol licenses, tax cancellations, Sheriff’s Office Security Agreements, and Commissioner minutes. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke reviewed the items in the Consent Agenda to include a status sheet for the Commissioner’s Office, TARC and Juvenile Detention; alcohol license number 2026-198 Sodbuster Market and Bistro LLC; a tax cancellation request from the Assessor’s Office for Parcel #RPT06380210060A in the amount of $583.35; and Commissioner minutes for November 24 – November 28. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of BUDGET Commissioners considered the November 2025 Accounts Payables. Kristina Glascock, Clerk reviewed the November 2025 Accounts Payables in the amount of $5,168,129.29 with the Board. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the November 2025 Accounts Payables in the amount of $5,168,129.29. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of CONTRACTS Commissioners considered a proposal from Interior Environments for Phase 2. Commissioner Reinke and Kristina Glascock, Clerk reviewed the proposal with the Board. Commissioner Hall noted that this is an expensive purchase but they want to invest in good quality items that will last as long as possible. Commissioner Hall thanked Ms. Glascock and her team for looking for the best quality and best price available. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the proposal from Interior Environments for Phase 2 in the amount of $245,509.28 and authorize the Chairman to sign the documents on behalf of the Board. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Commissioner Reinke noted that he believes it is important to make this investment so that the new facility has long lasting furniture. Motion Passed Unanimously. Commissioners considered a Memorandum of Agreement with the State Historic Preservation Office. Ron James, Historic Preservation Commission member reviewed the Memorandum of Agreement with the Board. Commissioner Hall expressed his support for the Historic Preservation Commission and the work that they do. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Memorandum of Agreement with the State Historic Preservation Office. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of BOARDS Commissioners considered the re-appointment of Tamara Stricker to the Board of Community Guardians. Lisa Greer, Board of Community Guardians Coordinator noted that Tamara Stricker has been a reliable and knowledgeable member on the Board. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the re-appointment of Tamara Stricker to the Board of Community Guardians. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of TAXES Commissioners considered Homeowner's Exemption cancellation requests. Brad Wills, Assessor reviewed the Homeowner's Exemption cancellation requests with the Board. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Homeowner's Exemption cancellation requests as presented. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. Property Owner Parcel # HO Exmpt Value Tax Cancellation Jeffrey Atkinson OCK89670050170A $53,318.00 $573.84 Wendy Munsee OCO47010000200A $125,000.00 $783.80 Susan Spring-Wenzel OCT15790030020A $58,640.00 $629.52 Curtis Talbot & Gigi Fotis- Smith RP10S16E260135A $125,000.00 $783.80 Kevin Rideout RP10S17E203060A $38,735.00 $254.69 Michael Malouf RPO38010020190A $125,000.00 $821.89 Robert Dyson RPO87010000200A $125,000.00 $821.89 Elizabeth Ross & Eugene Peters RPOB8210000040A $96,286.00 $614.52 Nathan & Janel Hudson RPOK2450050030A $125,000.00 $833.62 Bahram Sobbi RPT0411005018CA $125,000.00 $1,342.02 Haider Majid RPT0811003001EA $125,000.00 $1,342.02 Beatrice Reyes RPT17410030080A $125,000.00 $1,342.02 Casey Pearson RPT20950010040A $98,260.00 $1,054.88 Javid Avesta RPT2601000004HA $78,971.00 $847.84 Teasha Fletcher RPT30010080140A $107,135.00 $249.28 Rosario Maldonado RPT35810070050A $125,000.00 $1,342.02 Andrew Frostenson RPT39610010010A $125,000.00 $1,342.02 Jessica Stevens RPT53870010100A $125,000.00 $1,342.02 Totals $1,906,345.00 $16,321.68 There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 17, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 17, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 16, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioner attended the Twin Falls County Court Facility Grand Opening. Commissioner Hall attended a South Central Public Health Board meeting. There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 18, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 18, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 17, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioner Reinke attended the Governor's Summit on Agricultural Viability in Idaho. Commissioner Hall attended a School District Superintendents meeting. Commissioners met with Bob Beer, Facilities Director for a department update. Commissioners met with Elaine Molignoni, HR Director for a department update. Commissioner Hall attended a MVMPO Policy Board meeting. Commissioners attended the Idaho Legal Aid open house. Commissioner Hall attended a SIRCOMM Joint Powers Board meeting. In the Matter of CONSENT AGENDA Commissioners considered the Consent Agenda; items may include status sheets, employee requisitions, alcohol licenses, tax cancellations, Sheriff’s Office Security Agreements, and Commissioner minutes. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews reviewed the items in the Consent Agenda to include status sheets for the Prosecutor’s Office and TARC; and alcohol license #2026-199 Twin Falls Golf Course. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of CONTRACTS Commissioners considered a FY2026 Noxious Weed Cost Share Request with the Dept. of Ag. Kali Sherrill, Weeds Director reviewed the FY2026 Noxious Weed Cost Share Request with the Dept. of Ag with the Board. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the FY2026 Noxious Weed Cost Share Request with the Dept. of Ag as presented. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of BOARDS Commissioners considered the appointment of John Tolk to the Noxious Weeds Advisory Board. Kali Sherrill, Weeds Director reviewed the requests for appointment and the reappointments with the Board. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the appointment of John Tolk to the Noxious Weeds Advisory Board. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. Commissioners considered the reappointment of Doug Kippes, Matt Vawser and Tom Skinner to the Noxious Weeds Advisory Board. Commissioner Matthews noted that he is familiar with all three of the Board members and they do a good job. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the reappointment of Doug Kippes, Matt Vawser and Tom Skinner to the Noxious Weeds Advisory Board. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. Commissioners considered the reappointment of Monica Dekruyf, Jim Woods and Rick Novacek to the Parks and Waterways Board. Kali Sherrill, Parks and Waterways Director reviewed the request for the reappointment of Monica Dekruyf, Jim Woods and Rick Novacek to the Parks and Waterways Board. Commissioner Matthews noted that he knows all three members and they are all doing a good job. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the reappointment of Monica Dekruyf, Jim Woods and Rick Novacek to the Parks and Waterways Board. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 19, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 19, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 18, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioner Reinke attended a WEMA meeting. In the Matter of PUBLIC HEARINGS Commissioners conducted a public hearing to modify the Buhl, Castleford, Filer, Hansen, Hollister, Kimberly, Murtaugh and Twin Falls areas of city impact and to consider an ordinance repealing and replacing previous editions of Twin Falls County Code Title 8, Chapter 9, Section 18, Negotiation Procedure and Title 8, Chapter 9, Section 19, Area of City Impact and replacing it with Title 8, Chapter 22: areas of Impact Sections 1-3, Purpose, Negotiation Procedure and Area of Impact. Commissioner Hall reviewed the record to modify and/or confirm the Buhl, Castleford, Filer, Hansen, Hollister, Kimberly, Murtaugh and Twin Falls areas of city impact. Commissioner Hall noted that the Board would also consider an ordinance repealing and replacing previous editions of Twin Falls County Code Title 8, Chapter 9, Section 18, Negotiation Procedure and Title 8, Section 19, Area of City Impact and replacing it with Title 8, Chapter 22: areas of Impact Sections 1-3, Purpose, Negotiation Procedure and Area of Impact. Commissioner Hall reviewed the laws considered: The Board considered the following statutes, ordinances, and standards: • Idaho Code Section 67-6526 Areas of city impact. Commissioner Hall swore in all parties giving testimony. Jon Laux, CDS Director, Laura Wilson, CDS Planner III, City of Buhl Bob Vande Water Jeff Gabardi Jasmine Mills City of Filer Debbie Carpenter Rick Boepple Vera Pedro Nunez City of Hollister Robin Grover City of Kimberly Craig Eckles Bird Golay, Citizen Public comment portion Bird Golay, Kimberly citizen spoke and presented the Board with a letter from Kelly Luff. Mr. Golay expressed concern with the water needed for the expansion of the cities. Mr. Golay was in opposition to the expansion of the Areas of Impact. Commissioner Hall thanked Mr. Golay for his participation. Commissioner Reinke expressed his appreciation for Mr. Golay’s comments and his concern for water. Commissioner Hall asked the following questions of Commissioner staff and received the following answers. Questions for Commissioner staff: Shannon Carter, Office Administrator answered. • Were all 8 cities notified of the hearing today to modify or confirm their areas of impact as per IC 67-6526 (3)? Yes • When were the city notifications sent out? Mailed on November 18, 2025 • Was notice provided to property owners? Yes • When and how was that notice provided? Posted in the Times News on December 4, 2025. Buhl Commissioner Hall asked the following questions of CDS staff and received the following answers from Laura Wilson, CDS Planner III. • Has the City provided the following documents as requested; Yes Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes Current Zoning Code? Yes Current Zoning Map? Yes • Has the City of Buhl provided a proposed area of city impact map for the Board’s review? Yes • Does the proposed Buhl area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No • Are there any land splits in the proposed map? No • How were the land splits addressed? • Do you think the City’s proposed map fits the requirements of Idaho Code? (the section number is 67-6526) Yes • Do you have any other concerns about their map? No Jasmine Mills spoke on behalf of the City of Buhl and answered the following questions. • Does the proposed Buhl area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No • Is the proposed Buhl area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the next five (5) years? Yes o What is the anticipated commercial and residential growth of the city? Ms. Mills reviewed the anticipated area of growth for the City of Buhl. There was discussion on the past growth vs the anticipated growth. o What geographic factors are in this proposed area of impact? Ms. Mills reviewed the geographic factors in the proposed area. o Tell us about transportation infrastructure and systems, including connectivity. Ms. Mills reviewed the pending infrastructure updates and changes to code that require traffic studies for the growth. o Are these areas where municipal or public sewer and water are expected to be provided within five (5) years? Ms. Mills noted that there is capacity currently and they are looking at improving the water capacity on the east side of the city. They are considering grant opportunities as part of the proposed growth. o How do these boundaries correspond with other public service district boundaries? Ms. Mills stated that Buhl is using existing service boundaries and do not conflict with future services. Is there anything else about your city’s area of impact that you want us to know? Ms. Mills noted that the citizens within the area of impact participate and are active and they expect more of that in the future. Commissioner Reinke noted that it appears that there has been some thoughtful consideration on the area of impact for Buhl. There are some changes happening with the city council in Buhl. Commissioner Matthews thanked Ms. Mills and the Buhl city council for their participation in the process. Buhl reviewed the area of impact and agreed to changes based upon the new code requirements. Commissioner Hall noted that the proposed area of impact vs the current city limits, shows the growth potential is significant. The County wants to be fair to the cities with the requirements set by the legislature. The next five years will show what the growth will be. Filer Questions for Community Development Services staff: Laura Wilson, CDS Planner responded. • Has the City provided the following documents as requested; Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes Current Zoning Code? Yes Current Zoning Map? Yes • Has the Filer provided a proposed area of city impact map for the Board’s review? Yes Has CDS reviewed the draft? Yes • Does the proposed Filer area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No • Are there any land splits in the proposed map? No • How were the land splits addressed? The boundary lines were changed to match road coordinates removing the land splits. • Do you think the City’s proposed map fits the requirements of Idaho Code? (the section number is 67-6526) Yes • Do you have any other concerns about their map? No Questions for City Representative: Vera Pedro Nunez, P&Z Director answered. • Does the proposed Filer area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No • Is the proposed Filer area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the next five (5) years? Yes o What is the anticipated commercial and residential growth of the city? Ms. Nunez reviewed the anticipated growth with the Board. o What geographic factors are in this proposed area of impact? Ms. Nunez reviewed the geographic factors with the Board. o Tell us about transportation infrastructure and systems, including connectivity. Ms. Nunez reviewed the transportation infrastructure and noted that Filer just finished their transportation plan. o Are these areas where municipal or public sewer and water are expected to be provided within five (5) years? Ms. Nunez noted the intent is there and it depends on the developers that want to come into the area so that the tax payers don’t have to pay for those costs. o How do these boundaries correspond with other public service district boundaries? Laura Wilson, CDS Planner 3, noted the boundaries are the same. Ms. Nunez concurred with Ms. Wilson. Is there anything else about your city’s area of impact that you want us to know? Ms. Nunez noted that the third crossing has the potential to impact the City of Filer significantly. Commissioner Hall swore in Bob Templeman, Filer Mayor. Mayor Templeman spoke and noted that the third crossing could potentially impact Filer significantly. Also, a potential events center at the Fairgrounds could bring significant development to the City of Filer. Commissioner Reinke noted that planning is necessary for future growth and thanked Mayor Templeman for attending the hearing. Commissioner Reinke left the public hearing at 9:55 a.m. Commissioner Matthews noted that the expansion in the SW corner of the area of impact could be challenging but with his experience he understands the growth in that area. There was discussion on future changes based upon growth. Commissioner Hall noted that the area of impact is extremely large but there is a potential for growth and it is difficult to predict that growth. There was discussion on the direction the future could take the development of the city. Commissioner Reinke returned to the hearing at 10:05 a.m. Hollister Questions for Community Development Services staff: Laura Wilson, CDS Planner 3 responded • Has the City provided the following documents as requested; Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes, Aug 1996 draft Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes, August of 1996 draft Current Zoning Code? Yes, from their website Current Zoning Map? Yes, July 2025 draft • Has the City of Hollister provided a proposed area of city impact map for the Board’s review? Yes Has CDS reviewed that draft? Yes • Does the proposed Hollister area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No • Are there any land splits in the proposed map? There were in the original proposal, however CDS staff made corrections and has provided that draft. • How were the land splits addressed? Yes • Do you think the City’s proposed map fits the requirements of Idaho Code? (the section number is 67-6526) As proposed, Yes • Do you have any other concerns about their map? No. Questions for City Representative: Mayor Robin Grover responded. • Does the proposed City of Hollister area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No • Is the proposed Hollister area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the next five (5) years? Yes o What is the anticipated commercial and residential growth of the city? Mayor Grover reviewed the anticipated growth with the Board. o What geographic factors are in this proposed area of impact? Mayor. Grover reviewed the geographic factors with the Board. o Tell us about transportation infrastructure and systems, including connectivity. Mayor Grover noted that they are working on a transportation report. o Are these areas where municipal or public sewer and water are expected to be provided within five (5) years? Mayor Grover stated that it was anticipated. o How do these boundaries correspond with other public service district boundaries? Laura Wilson, CDS Planner reviewed the boundaries of the other public service districts with the Board. Is there anything else about your city’s area of impact that you want us to know? No. Commissioner Reinke expressed concern that the comprehensive plan documents were from 1996 and needed updated. The update was needed to enable the city to grow. Commissioner Hall noted that he felt the map was appropriate and encouraged future planning and the updating of the comprehensive plan. Commissioner Hall also encouraged Mayor Grover to reach out to the Idaho Association of Cities for assistance. Twin Falls City Questions for Community Development Services staff: Laura Wilson, CDS Planner 3 responded • Has the City of Twin Falls provided the following documents as requested; Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes Current Zoning Code? Yes Current Zoning Map? Yes • Has the City of Twin Falls provided a proposed area of city impact map for the Board’s review? Yes Has CDS reviewed that draft? Yes, changes were made and the information was sent to the City of Twin Falls. Ms. Wilson reviewed the changes that were made to the proposed map. • Does the proposed City of Twin Falls area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No • Are there any land splits in the proposed map? No • How were the land splits addressed? The City of Twin Falls worked with the City of Kimberly to address the land splits. The proposed boundaries were moved to accommodate the state requirements. • Do you think the City’s proposed map fits the requirements of Idaho Code §67-6526? Yes, as proposed. • Do you have any other concerns about their map? No. Questions for City Representative: Twin Falls City did not provide a representative. Ms. Wilson CDS Planner 3 responded. • Is the proposed City of Twin Falls area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the next five (5) years? Yes o What is the anticipated commercial and residential growth of the city? Ms. Wilson reviewed the anticipated growth that she was aware of. o What geographic factors are in this proposed area of impact? Ms. Wilson reviewed the geographic factors with the Board. o Tell us about transportation infrastructure and systems, including connectivity. Ms. Wilson noted that the City and Highway District work together on the roadways. o Are these areas where municipal or public sewer and water are expected to be provided within five (5) years? Ms. Wilson noted that studies were submitted in the packet of information from the City that showed the anticipated municipal service expansion. o How do these boundaries correspond with other public service district boundaries? Ms. Wilson reviewed the boundaries of the other public service districts with the Board. Is there anything else about the City of Twin Falls’ area of impact that you want us to know? Ms. Wilson noted that the zoning map provided does not show the zones like other city maps do. This information could be provided in the future. Commissioner Reinke asked why the property that has Fleur de Lis is not being included in the area of impact. Jon Laux, CDS Director noted that the property was not able to be annexed without it appearing to be spot annexing. Mr. Laux reviewed the requirements and process for annexation. Commissioner Reinke noted that he was not aware of any plans to provide services on the west side of Rock Creek canyon within the next 5 years. Commissioner Reinke expressed appreciation for the City of Twin Falls cooperating with CDS staff on the process. Commissioner Matthews noted that he has concerns with a section of the proposed area of impact south of Twin Falls that is part of the crash zone for the airport and stressed the importance of keeping that area more rural. Kimberly Questions for Community Development Services staff: Laura Wilson, CDS Planner 3 • Has the City provided the following documents as requested; Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes Current Zoning Code? Yes Current Zoning Map? Yes • Has the City of Kimberly provided a proposed area of city impact map for the Board’s review? Yes. Has CDS reviewed that proposed map? Yes • Does the proposed Kimberly area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No • Are there any land splits in the proposed map? No • How were the land splits addressed? • Do you think the City’s proposed map fits the requirements of Idaho Code §67-6526? Yes • Do you have any other concerns about their map? No Questions for City Representative: Craig Eckles, P&Z Administrator for the City of Kimberly responded. • Does the proposed City of Kimberly area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No • Is the proposed City of Kimberly area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the next five (5) years? Yes o What is the anticipated commercial and residential growth of the city? Mr. Eckles reviewed the past growth and the anticipated future growth with the Board. o What geographic factors are in this proposed area of impact? Mr. Eckles reviewed the geographic factors with the Board. o Tell us about transportation infrastructure and systems, including connectivity. Mr. Eckles reviewed the transportation and systems infrastructure with the Board. o Are these areas where municipal or public sewer and water are expected to be provided within five (5) years? Yes. o How do these boundaries correspond with other public service district boundaries? Mr. Eckles reviewed the boundaries of the other public service districts with the Board. Is there anything else about your city’s area of impact that you want us to know? Mr. Eckles thanked the Board for the way the process was working and the Board’s willingness to work with the cities. Commissioner Reinke thanked Mr. Eckles for being so thorough and providing the necessary information. The participation and communication between the City of Kimberly and the City of Twin Falls has helped the process. Commissioner Matthews expressed concern with one of the roadways names, however Mr. Eckles noted the name has been formalized, resolving the issue. Commissioner Hall noted that the proposed area of impact map makes sense. Mr. Eckles noted that they have had inquiries for almost every parcel that is in the area of impact map. Castleford Questions for Community Development Services staff: Laura Wilson, CDS Planner 3 responded • Has the City provided the following documents as requested; Current Comprehensive Plan? No. Current Comprehensive Plan Map? No. Current Zoning Code? No. Current Zoning Map? No. Ms. Wilson noted the documents she was able to gather were all from August of 2003 but nothing was submitted by the City. • Has the City of Castleford provided a proposed area of city impact map for the Board’s review? No. Has CDS reviewed a draft? Yes, Ms. Wilson noted that the city limits are the same as the proposed area of city impact. • Does the proposed Castleford area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No. • Are there any land splits in the proposed map? No • How were the land splits addressed? • Do you think the City’s proposed map fits the requirements of Idaho Code? (the section number is 67-6526) Yes. • Do you have any other concerns about their map? No. Questions for City Representative: Castleford did not provide a representative. Ms. Wilson CDS Planner 3 responded. . • Is the proposed Castleford area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the next five (5) years? Ms. Wilson noted the city limits are the area of impact so there is nothing to be annexed. o What geographic factors are in this proposed area of impact? The area is farm ground. o Tell us about transportation infrastructure and systems, including connectivity. Ms. Wilson reviewed the infrastructure and systems with the Board. o Are these areas where municipal or public sewer and water are expected to be provided within five (5) years? Ms. Wilson reviewed the municipal services with the Board. o How do these boundaries correspond with other public service district boundaries? Ms. Wilson reviewed the boundaries of the other public service districts with the Board. Is there anything else about your city’s area of impact that you want us to know? No Hansen Questions for Community Development Services staff: Laura Wilson, CDS Planner 3 responded • Has the City provided the following documents as requested; Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes Current Zoning Code? No, Ms. Wilson accessed the code from online. Current Zoning Map? Yes • Has the City of Hansen provided a proposed area of city impact map for the Board’s review? No. Has CDS reviewed a draft? Ms. Wilson noted that she did review the existing area of impact and had no recommended changes. • Does the proposed Hansen area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No. • Are there any land splits in the proposed map? No. • How were the land splits addressed? • Do you think the City’s proposed map fits the requirements of Idaho Code? (the section number is 67-6526) Yes. • Do you have any other concerns about their map? No. Questions for City Representative: Hansen did not provide a representative. Ms. Wilson CDS Planner 3 responded. • Is the proposed City of Hansen area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the next five (5) years? Yes. o What is the anticipated commercial and residential growth of the city? Ms. Wilson noted that there has been minimal commercial change in the last few years o What geographic factors are in this proposed area of impact? None, it is mostly farm ground. o Tell us about transportation infrastructure and systems, including connectivity. Ms. Wilson reviewed the infrastructure and systems with the Board. o Are these areas where municipal or public sewer and water are expected to be provided within five (5) years? Ms. Wilson reviewed the municipal services with the Board. o How do these boundaries correspond with other public service district boundaries? Ms. Wilson reviewed the boundaries of the other public service districts with the Board. Is there anything else about the city’s area of impact that you want us to know? No Commissioner Reinke asked if the City of Hansen has worked with CDS staff through the process. Ms. Wilson reviewed the steps that she had to go through to get information from the City of Hansen. Ms. Wilson recommended leaving the current area of impact for review in the next five years. Commissioner Reinke noted that the Board wants to be consistent in their processes. Commissioner Matthews noted that he went to the City of Hansen several times to try to get information. Commissioner Hall noted that Twin Falls County has made a lot of effort to work with the cities through the process and expressed hope that when the next review happens the cities will participate more. There was discussion on the process and the future growth. Commissioner Hall noted that the area of impact for Hansen was extremely large. But it was important to work with the city and hopefully in the next 5 years, the Commission can readdress that. Murtaugh Questions for Community Development Services staff: Laura Wilson, CDS Planner 3 responded • Has the City provided the following documents as requested; Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes Current Zoning Code? Yes Current Zoning Map? Yes • Has the City of Murtaugh provided a proposed area of city impact map for the Board’s review? No Has CDS reviewed the draft? Yes. The proposed map was presented to the Murtaugh City Council and they were agreeable. • Does the proposed Murtaugh area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No • Are there any land splits in the proposed map? Yes, however those splits were addressed. • How were the land splits addressed? Ms. Wilson reviewed how the land splits were addressed. • Do you think the City’s proposed map fits the requirements of Idaho Code? (the section number is 67-6526) Yes • Do you have any other concerns about their map? The area is quite large, but it will be reviewed in five years. Questions for City Representative: Murtaugh did not provide a representative. Ms. Wilson CDS Planner 3 responded. • Does the proposed City of Murtaugh area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No. • Is the proposed Murtaugh area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the next five (5) years? Yes, Ms. Wilson reviewed the proposed annexation and the necessity of expanding sewer services. o What is the anticipated commercial and residential growth of the city? Ms. Wilson reviewed the anticipated growth that she is aware of. o What geographic factors are in this proposed area of impact? Ms. Wilson reviewed the geographic factors with the Board. o Tell us about transportation infrastructure and systems, including connectivity. Ms. Wilson reviewed the infrastructure and systems with the Board. o Are these areas where municipal or public sewer and water are expected to be provided within five (5) years? Ms. Wilson noted that the City of Murtaugh plans to work on expanding the municipal services in the next 5 years. o How do these boundaries correspond with other public service district boundaries? Ms. Wilson reviewed the boundaries of the other public service districts with the Board. Is there anything else about your city’s area of impact that you want us to know? No Commissioner Reinke noted that he has the same concerns with Murtaugh and hopes to work with the city in the next 5 years to reevaluate the boundaries. Commissioner Matthews concurred. Commissioner Hall noted that some of the cities have been more proactive with the process. There was discussion on the future of the process and the potential for addressing the issue again in five years or sooner. Commissioner Hall closed the public hearing at 11:25 a.m. In the Matter of AREAS OF IMPACT Commissioners considered modifications to the Buhl, Castleford, Filer, Hansen, Hollister, Kimberly, Murtaugh and Twin Falls areas of city impact. The Board reviewed the discussion topics and made the following findings; Buhl *** Discussion Topics / Findings *** • Has the City of Buhl provided a proposed area of city impact for the Board’s review? Yes, we find the City of Buhl has responded and provided the area of impact map. • Does the proposed Buhl area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No, we find the maps show the area does not extend more than 2 miles. • Is the proposed Buhl area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the next five (5) years? Yes, we find the expansion is likely because of the information provided by the City during the hearing. • Has the City of Buhl provided the following documents as requested; Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes Current Zoning Code? Yes Current Zoning Map? Yes We find the information has been provided by the City of Buhl. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the modification to the area of impact and adopt the current Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Code, Zoning Map and the Area of Impact Map as presented at the hearing today, December 19, 2025 for the City of Buhl. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. Castleford *** Discussion Topics / Findings *** • Has the City of Castleford provided a proposed area of city impact for the Board’s review? No. Has CDS? Yes, we find the area of impact map provided by CDS staff shows that the city limits are the same as the area of impact map. • Does the proposed Castleford area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No, the maps presented show that the area of impact is congruent with the City limits. • Is the proposed Castleford area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the next five (5) years? Yes, the maps presented show that the area of impact is congruent with the City limits. • Has the City of Castlford or CDS staff provided the following documents as requested; Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes Current Comprehensive Plan Map? No Current Zoning Code? No Current Zoning Map? No We find the necessary information has been provided by the CDS staff. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the modification to the area of impact and adopt the current Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Code, Zoning Map and the Area of Impact Map as presented at the hearing today, December 19, 2025 for the City of Castleford. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. Filer *** Discussion Topics / Findings *** • Has the City of Filer provided a proposed area of city impact for the Board’s review? Yes, we find the City of Filer has provided the necessary information including maps and codes. • Does the proposed Filer area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No, we find that it does not because the provided maps show the area. • Is the proposed City of Filer area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the next five (5) years? Yes, we find the area of impact is likely based upon the information presented at the hearing today. • Has the City of Filer provided the following documents as requested; Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes Current Zoning Code? Yes Current Zoning Map? Yes We find the information has been provided by City of Filer and the requests are complete. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the modification to the area of impact and adopt the current Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Code, Zoning Map and the Area of Impact Map as presented at the hearing today, December 19, 2025 for the City of Filer. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. Hansen *** Discussion Topics / Findings *** • Has the City of Hansen or CDS staff provided a proposed area of city impact for the Board’s review? Yes, we find the City of Hansen and CDS staff have provided the necessary information including maps and codes. • Does the proposed Hansen area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No, we find that it does not because they provided maps which show the area. • Is the proposed Hansen area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the next five (5) years? Yes, we find the area of impact is likely based upon the information presented today. • Has the City of Hansen provided the following documents as requested; Current Comprehensive Plan? No Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes Current Zoning Code? No, However, CDS Staff located the code online. Current Zoning Map? Yes We find the information has been provided by City of Hansen and CDS staff and the Board reviewed the information presented. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the modification to the area of impact and adopt the current Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Code, Zoning Map and the Area of Impact Map as presented at the hearing today, December 19, 2025 for the City of Hansen. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. Hollister *** Discussion Topics / Findings *** • Has the City of Hollister provided a proposed area of city impact for the Board’s review? Yes, we find the City of Hollister and CDS Staff have provided the necessary information including maps and codes. • Does the proposed Hollister area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No, we find that it does not because they provided maps which show the area. • Is the proposed Hollister area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the next five (5) years? Yes, we find the proposed area of impact is likely to be annexed based upon the information presented today. • Has the City of Hollister or CDS Staff provided the following documents as requested; Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes Current Zoning Code? Yes Current Zoning Map? Yes We find the information has been provided by City of Hollister and staff and the Board reviewed the information presented. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the modification to the area of impact and adopt the current Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Code, Zoning Map and the Area of Impact Map as presented at the hearing today, December 19, 2025 for the City of Hollister. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. Kimberly *** Discussion Topics / Findings *** • Has the City of Kimberly provided a proposed area of city impact for the Board’s review? Yes, we find the City of Kimberly has provided the necessary information including maps and codes and a representative attended the meeting. • Does the proposed Kimberly area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No, we find that it does not because they provided maps which show the area and provided testimony at the meeting. • Is the proposed Kimberly area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the next five (5) years? Yes, we find the area of impact is likely based upon the information presented at the hearing today. • Has the City of Kimberly provided the following documents as requested; Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes Current Zoning Code? Yes Current Zoning Map? Yes We find the information has been provided by City of Kimberly and testimony was provided during the hearing. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the modification to the area of impact and adopt the current Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Code, Zoning Map and the Area of Impact Map as presented at the hearing today, December 19, 2025 for the City of Kimberly. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. Murtaugh *** Discussion Topics / Findings *** • Has the City of Murtaugh or CDS staff provided a proposed area of city impact for the Board’s review? Yes, we find the City of Murtaugh or CDS Staff has provided the necessary information including maps and codes which were presented at the hearing by staff. • Does the proposed Murtaugh area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No, we find that it does not because they provided maps which show the area and CDS staff provided testimony at the meeting. • Is the proposed Murtaugh area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the next five (5) years? Yes, we find there is potential for annexation as there is some infrastructure in the area of impact because that information was presented by CDS staff today. • Has the City of Murtaugh or CDS Staff provided the following documents as requested; Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes Current Zoning Code? Yes Current Zoning Map? Yes We find the information has been provided by City of Murtaugh or CDS Staff and CDS Staff provided testimony during the hearing today. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the modification to the area of impact and adopt the current Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Code, Zoning Map and the Area of Impact Map as presented at the hearing today, December 19, 2025 for the City of Murtaugh. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. Twin Falls *** Discussion Topics / Findings *** • Has the City of Twin Falls or CDS staff provided a proposed area of city impact for the Board’s review? Yes, we find the City of Twin Falls or CDS Staff has provided the necessary information including maps. • Does the proposed Twin Falls area of city impact extend more than two (2) miles from existing city limits? No, we find that it does not because they provided maps which show the area. • Is the proposed Twin Falls area of city impact very likely to be annexed to the city within the next five (5) years? Yes, we find there is potential and some infrastructure in the area of impact because that information was presented by CDS staff today. • Has the City of Twin Falls or CDS Staff provided the following documents as requested; Current Comprehensive Plan? Yes Current Comprehensive Plan Map? Yes Current Zoning Code? Yes Current Zoning Map? Yes We find the information has been provided by City of Twin Falls and CDS Staff provided testimony during the hearing today. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the modification to the area of impact and adopt the current Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Code, Zoning Map and the Area of Impact Map as presented at the hearing today, December 19, 2025 for the City of Twin Falls. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of ORDINANCES Commissioners considered an ordinance repealing and replacing previous editions of Twin Falls County Code Title 8, Chapter 9, Section 18, Negotiation Procedure, and Title 8, Chapter 9, Section 19, Area of City Impact, and replacing it with Title 8, Chapter 22: Areas of Impact Sections 1-3, Purpose, Negotiation Procedure and Area of Impact. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve Ordinance #292 repealing and replacing previous editions of Twin Falls County Code Title 8, Chapter 9, Section 18, Negotiation Procedure, and Title 8, Chapter 9, Section 19, Area of City Impact, and replacing it with Title 8, Chapter 22: Areas of Impact Sections 1-3, Purpose, Negotiation Procedure and Area of Impact. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. ORDINANCE NO. 292 An ordinance repealing and replacing previous editions of Twin Falls County Code Title 8, Chapter 9, Section 18, Negotiation Procedure and Title 8, Section 19, Area of City Impact. Be it ordained by the Board of County Commissioners of Twin Falls County, Idaho, that Twin Falls County Code Title 8, Chapter 9, Section 18, Negotiation Procedure and Title 8, Section 19, Area of City Impact, is hereby repealed and Title 8, Chapter 22, Section 1-3 be adopted as follows: CHAPTER 22 AREAS OF IMPACT SECTION: 8-22-1 Purpose: 8-22-2 Negotiation Procedure 8-22-3 Areas of Impact 8-22-1: PURPOSE: This Chapter establishes the authority, regulations, and criteria to be used for areas of impact within Twin Falls County. The regulations contained herein are designed to protect and promote the public health, safety, and community welfare of Twin Falls County; to promote the proper location and development of projects based on the effective use of local resources; and to avoid adverse impacts on the use and peaceful enjoyment of nearby lands for lawful purposes. 8-22-2: NEGOTIATION PROCEDURE: A. The governing body of Twin Falls County and each city therein may adopt by ordinance, following the notice and hearing procedures provided in section 67-6509, Idaho Code, a map identifying an area of impact within the unincorporated area of the County. The ordinance identifying an area of impact shall provide for one of the following: 1. Application of Twin Falls County’s Comprehensive Plan and zoning and subdivision ordinances; or 2. Application of individual county comprehensive plan and zoning and subdivision ordinance provisions regarding a specific area of impact. (Idaho Code § 67- 6526(4)(e)). B. If the respective city and County cannot agree upon all details of the area of impact, a recommendation committee shall be established. The city and County shall each select a representative to participate on the committee within (30) days of the demand for compliance and the process set forth in this paragraph shall commence. After the city and County representatives have been selected, they shall in turn select another city representative living within the applicable city and another County representative living in the County and not within any city to serve on the recommendation committee. Meeting of the recommending committee may be hosted by the city or County and shall be conducted in accordance with Idaho Open Meetings Law. These four (4) persons shall, by majority vote, provide a written recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners for an area of impact. The recommendation shall include and address the following: anticipated commercial and residential growth; geographic factors; transportation infrastructure and systems including connectivity; areas where municipal or public sewer and water are expected to be provided within five (5) years; and other public service district boundaries. The written recommendation shall be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners within one hundred eighty (180) days after the selection of the recommending committee members. C. Areas of impact shall not overlap. D. Areas of impact shall remain fixed until modifications are made pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6526. E. This section shall not preclude growth and development in areas of the County which are not within the areas of city impact provided for herein. (Ord. 21, 12-1-1998) 8-22-3: AREAS OF IMPACT A. Buhl, Idaho 1. BUHL AREA OF IMPACT BOUNDARY: Area of Impact for the City of Buhl is established and set forth herein and described as the Area of Impact map adopted by the Twin Falls County Board of County Commissioners on December 19, 2025. 2. STANDARDS: The following standards shall apply whenever an official, agency, planning and/or zoning commission, hearing examiner, or governing body of Twin Falls County considers a zone change, comprehensive plan change, request regarding any real property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, or other such land use permit application within the Area of Impact which is subject to this ordinance as of December 19, 2025: a. The City of Buhl Comprehensive Plan b. The zoning and subdivision regulations set forth in Title 9 of the Buhl City Code; c. Except as set forth above, all other applicable standards set forth in this code; and d. Except as set forth above, all other standards for any subdistricts or overlay district applicable within the Area of Impact. 3. Governing Plan, Policies, and Ordinances: a. Governing Plan: The City of Buhl Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Districts Map, Area of Impact Map, and Title 9 of the Buhl City Code shall comprise the governing plan and ordinance for the Buhl Area of Impact. The version of any of the documents listed herein which controls is the most recent of: the December 19, 2025, version, or the version most recently adopted by ordinance by the Twin Falls County Board of Commissioners. b. Within the Area of Impact, any parcel of land used solely for agricultural uses and in excess of 20 acres may continue said use until a change of use occurs. 4. ADMINISTRATION OF THE BUHL AREA OF IMPACT a. Administration: 1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints and authorizes the Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director, its agents, and employees, to enforce and administer the provisions of Title 9 of the Buhl City Code which are assigned in the Buhl City Code to the Planning and Zoning Clerk and to charge and collect fees for such administrative duties as adopted by reference herein for the Area of Impact. 2. The Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director accepts the appointment and authorization. b. Commission: 1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints the Twin Falls County Planning and Zoning Commission to administer Title 9 of the Buhl City Code in the Area of Impact in lieu of the Buhl Planning and Zoning Commission. 2. All applications for preliminary plat of a subdivision, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, and other such permits shall be submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission. All applications for final plat of a subdivision, for vacation, and for rezone shall be submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendation and action, prior to submission to the Board of County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners may approve, deny, or remand the application. The County shall provide the City with notice and opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509. 5. ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE BUHL AREA OF IMPACT a. Twin Falls County shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement of the City of Buhl Title 9 within the Area of Impact and shall receive all permit fees for inspections performed to recapture direct costs of inspections, administration, legal publications, any development fees or other costs arising from fulfilling the terms of each ordinance or regulation. 6. ANNEXATION: a. Annexation by the City of Buhl shall be compliant with Idaho Code §§ 67- 6509, 67-6526 and 50-222. Upon annexation, the provisions of this article, which is the agreement between the city of Buhl and Twin Falls County, shall no longer apply to the annexed area. b. The City of Buhl shall send notice of all annexations, de-annexations, amendments, changes and updates to Title 9 of the Buhl City Code and the Buhl Comprehensive Plan along with maps to the Twin Falls County Community Development Services office. c. All applications and requests to Twin Falls County for subdivision of any real property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, and other such land use permit applications and public notices within the Buhl Area of Impact shall be provided to the City of Buhl with notice and an opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the notice standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509. 7. RENEGOTIATION: a. Renegotiation: The Area of Impact may be reviewed and renegotiated at any time upon written request of either party hereto. In any event, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6526(e), the City and the County shall review the agreement every five (5) years. b. While renegotiation is occurring, all provisions of this Chapter shall remain in effect until this Chapter is amended or a substitute ordinance is adopted by Twin Falls County, in accordance with the notice and hearing procedures provided in Title 67, Chapter 65 of Idaho Code, or until judgment from the District Court is final pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6526(2)(b). c. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions: All ordinances and code sections or parts thereof in conflict with this subsection are hereby repealed. B. Castleford, Idaho 1. CASTLEFORD AREA OF IMPACT BOUNDARY: The agreed upon Area of Impact for the City of Castleford is established and set forth herein and described as the Area of Impact map adopted by the Twin Falls County Board of County Commissioners on December 19, 2025. 2. STANDARDS: The following standards shall apply whenever an official, agency, planning and/or zoning commission, hearing examiner, or governing body of Twin Falls County considers a zone change, comprehensive plan change, request regarding any real property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, or other such land use permit applications within the Area of Impact which is subject to this ordinance as of December 19, 2025: a. The City of Castleford Comprehensive Plan; b. The zoning and subdivision regulations set forth in Title 8 of the Castleford City Code; c. Except as set forth above, all other applicable standards set forth in this code; and d. Except as set forth above, all other standards for any subdistricts or overlay district applicable within the Area of Impact. 3. Governing Plan, Policies, and Ordinances: a. Governing Plan: The City of Castleford Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Districts Map, Area of Impact Map, and Title 8 of the Castleford City Code shall comprise the governing plan and ordinance for Castleford Area of Impact. The version of any of the documents listed herein which controls is the most recent of: the December 19, 2025, version or the version most recently adopted by ordinance by the Twin Falls County Board of Commissioners. b. Within the Area of Impact, any parcel of land used solely for agricultural uses and in excess of 20 acres may continue said use until a change of use occurs. 4. ADMINISTRATION OF THE CASTLEFORD AREA OF IMPACT a. Administration: 1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints and authorizes the Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director, its agents, and employees, to enforce and administer the provisions of Title 8 of the Castleford City Code and to charge and collect fees for such administrative duties as adopted by reference herein for the Area of Impact. 2. The Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director accepts the appointment and authorization. b. Commission: 1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints the Twin Falls County Planning and Zoning Commission to administer Title 8 of the Castleford City Code in the Area of Impact. 2. All applications for preliminary plat of a subdivision, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, and other such permits shall be submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission. All applications for final plat of a subdivision, for vacation, and for rezone shall be submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendation and action, prior to submission to the Board of County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners may approve, deny, or remand the application. The County shall provide the City with notice and opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509. 5. ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE CASTLEFORD AREA OF IMPACT a. Twin Falls County shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement of the City of Castleford ordinances within the Area of Impact and shall receive all permit fees for inspections performed to recapture direct costs of inspections, administration, legal publications, any development fees or other costs arising from fulfilling the terms of each ordinance or regulation. 6. ANNEXATION: a. Annexation by the City of Castleford shall be compliant with Idaho Code §§ 67-6509, 67-6526 and 50-222. Upon annexation, the provisions of this article, which is the agreement between the City of Castleford and Twin Falls County, shall no longer apply to the annexed area. b. The City of Castleford shall send notice of all annexation, de-annexations, amendments, changes and updates to Title 8 of the Castleford City Code and the Comprehensive Plan along with maps to the Twin Falls County Community Development Services office. c. All applications and requests to Twin Falls County for subdivision of any real property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, and other such land use permit applications and public notices within the Castleford Area of Impact shall be provided to the City of Castleford with notice and an opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the notice standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509. 7. RENEGOTIATION: a. Renegotiation: The Area of Impact may be reviewed and renegotiated at any time upon written request of either party hereto. In any event, pursuant to Idaho Code §67-6526(e), the City and the County shall review the agreement every five (5) years. b. While renegotiation is occurring, all provisions of this Chapter shall remain in effect until this Chapter is amended or a substitute ordinance is adopted by Twin Falls County, in accordance with the notice and hearing procedures provided in title 67, Chapter 65 of Idaho Code, or until judgment from the District Court is final pursuant to Idaho Code §67-6526(2)(b). c. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions: All ordinances and code sections or parts thereof in conflict with this subsection are hereby repealed. C. Filer, Idaho 1. FILER AREA OF IMPACT BOUNDARY: The agreed upon Area of Impact for the City of Filer is established and set forth herein and described as: the Area of Impact map adopted by the Twin Falls County Board of County Commissioners on December 19, 2025. 2. STANDARDS: The following standards shall apply whenever an official, agency, planning and/or zoning commission, hearing examiner, or governing body of Twin Falls County considers a zone change, comprehensive plan change, request regarding any real property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, and other such land use permit applications within the Area of Impact which is subject to this ordinance as of December 19, 2025: a. The City of Filer Comprehensive Plan; b. The zoning and subdivision regulations set forth in Title 9 and Title 10 of the Filer City Code; c. Except as set forth above, all other applicable standards set forth in this code; and d. Except as set forth above, all other standards for any subdistricts or overlay district applicable within the Area of Impact. 3. Governing Plan, Policies, and Ordinances: a. Governing Plan: The City of Filer Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Districts Map, Area of Impact Map, and Title 9 and Title 10 of the Filer City Code shall comprise the governing plan and ordinance for Filer Area of Impact. The version of any of the documents listed herein which controls is the most recent of: the December 19, 2025, version or the version most recently adopted by ordinance by the Twin Falls County Board of Commissioners. b. Within the Area of Impact, any parcel of land used solely for agricultural uses and in excess of 20 acres may continue said use until a change of use occurs. 4. ADMINISTRATION OF THE FILER AREA OF IMPACT a. Administration: 1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints and authorizes the Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director, its agents, and employees, to enforce and administer the provisions of Title 9 and Title 10 of the Filer City Code and to charge and collect fees for such administrative duties as adopted by reference herein for the Area of Impact. 2. The Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director accepts the appointment and authorization. b. Commission: 1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints the Twin Falls County Planning and zoning Commission to administer Title 9 and Title 10 of the Filer City Code in the Area of Impact. 2. All applications for preliminary plat of a subdivision, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, and other such permits shall be submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission. All applications for final plat of a subdivision, for vacation, and for rezone shall be submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendation and action, prior to submission to the Board of County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners may approve, deny, or remand the application. The County shall provide the City with notice and opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509. 5. ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE FILER AREA OF IMPACT a. Twin Falls County shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement of the City of Filer ordinances listed in Title 9 and 10 of this ordinance within the Area of Impact and shall receive all permit fees for inspections performed to recapture direct costs of inspections, administration, legal publications, any development fees or other costs arising from fulfilling the terms of each ordinance or regulation. 6. ANNEXATION: a. Annexation by the City of Filer shall be compliant with Idaho Code §§ 67- 6509, 67-6526 and 50-222. Upon annexation, the provisions of this article, which is the agreement between the City of Filer and Twin Falls County, shall no longer apply to the annexed area. b. The City of Filer shall send notice of all annexation, de-annexations, amendments, changes and updates to Title 9 and Title 10 of the Filer City Code and the City of Filer Comprehensive Plan along with maps to the Twin Falls County Community Development Services office. c. All applications and requests to Twin Falls County for subdivision of any real property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, and other such land use permit applications and public notices within the Filer Area of Impact shall be provided to the City of Filer with notice and an opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the notice standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509. 7. RENEGOTIATION: a. Renegotiation: The Area of Impact may be reviewed and renegotiated at any time upon written request of either party hereto. In any event, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6526(e), the City and the County shall review the agreement every five (5) years. b. While renegotiation is occurring, all provisions of this Chapter shall remain in effect until this Chapter is amended or a substitute ordinance is adopted by Twin Falls County, in accordance with the notice and hearing procedures provided in Title 67, Chapter 65 of Idaho Code, or until judgment from the District Court is final pursuant to Idaho Code §67-6526(2)(b). c. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions: All ordinances and code sections or parts thereof in conflict with this subsection are hereby repealed. D. Hansen, Idaho 1. HANSEN AREA OF IMPACT BOUNDARY: The agreed upon Area of Impact for the City of Hansen is established and set forth herein and described as: the Area of City Impact map adopted by the Twin Falls County Board of County Commissioners on December 19, 2025. 2. STANDARDS: The following standards shall apply whenever an official, agency, planning and/or zoning commission, hearing examiner, or governing body of Twin Falls County considers a zone change, comprehensive plan change, request regarding any real property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, or other such land use permit applications within the Area of Impact which is subject to this ordinance as of December 19, 2025: a. The City of Hansen Comprehensive Plan; b. The zoning and subdivision regulations set forth in Title 10 of the Hansen City Code; c. Except as set forth above, all other applicable standards set forth in this code; and d. Except as set forth above, all other standards for any subdistricts or overlay district applicable within the Area of Impact. 3. Governing Plan, Policies, and Ordinances: a. Governing Plan: The City of Hansen Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Districts Map, Area of Impact Map, and Title 10 of the Hansen City Code shall comprise the governing plan and ordinance for Hansen Area of Impact. The version of any of the documents listed herein which controls is the most recent of: the December 19, 2025, version or the version most recently adopted by ordinance by the Twin Falls County Board of Commissioners. b. Within the Area of Impact, any parcel of land used solely for agricultural uses and in excess of 20 acres may continue said use until a change of use occurs. 4. ADMINISTRATION OF THE HANSEN AREA OF IMPACT a. Administration: 1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints and authorizes the Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director, its agents, and employees, to enforce and administer the provisions of Title 10 of the Hansen City Code which are assigned in the Hansen City Code to the Administrator and to charge and collect fees for such administrative duties as adopted by reference herein for the Area of Impact. 2. The Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director accepts the appointment and authorization. b. Commission: 1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints the Twin Falls County Planning and Zoning Commission to administer Title 10 of the Hansen City Code in the Area of Impact in lieu of the Hansen Commission. 2. All applications for preliminary plat of a subdivision, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, and other such permit shall be submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission. All applications for final plat of a subdivision, for vacation, and for rezone shall be submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendation and action, prior to submission to the Board of County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners may approve, deny, or remand the application. The County shall provide the City with notice and opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the standards provided within Idaho Code §67-6509. 5. ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE HANSEN AREA OF IMPACT a. Twin Falls County shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement of the City of Hansen ordinances within the Area of Impact and shall receive all permit fees for inspections performed to recapture direct costs of inspections, administration, legal publications, any development fees or other costs arising from fulfilling the terms of each ordinance or regulation. 6. ANNEXATION: a. Annexation by the City of Hansen shall be compliant with Idaho Code §§ 67- 6509, 67-6526 and 50-222. Upon annexation, the provisions of this article, which is the agreement between the City of Hansen and Twin Falls County, shall no longer apply to the annexed area. b. The City of Hansen shall send notice of all annexation, de-annexations, amendments, changes and updates to Title 10 of the Hansen City Code and the Comprehensive Plan along with maps to the Twin Falls County Community Development Services office. c. All applications and requests to Twin Falls County for subdivision of any real property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, and other such land use permit applications and public notices within the Hansen Area of Impact shall be provided to the City of Hansen with notice and an opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the notice standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509. 7. RENEGOTIATION: a. Renegotiation: The Area of City Impact may be reviewed and renegotiated at any time upon written request of either party hereto. In any event, pursuant to Idaho Code §67-6526(e), the City and the County shall review the agreement every five (5) years. b. While renegotiation is occurring, all provisions of this Chapter shall remain in effect until this Chapter is amended or a substitute ordinance is adopted by Twin Falls County, in accordance with the notice and hearing procedures provided in Title 67, Chapter 65 of Idaho Code, or until judgment from the District Court is final pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6526(2)(b). c. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions: All ordinances and code sections or parts thereof in conflict with this subsection are hereby repealed. E. Hollister, Idaho 1. HOLLISTER AREA OF IMPACT BOUNDARY: The agreed upon Area of Impact for the City of Hollister is established and set forth herein and described as the Area of Impact map adopted by the Twin Falls County Board of County Commissioners on December 19, 2025. 2. STANDARDS: The following standards shall apply whenever an official, agency, planning and/or zoning commission, hearing examiner, or governing body of Twin Falls County considers a zone change, comprehensive plan change, request regarding any real property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, or other such land use permit application within the Area of Impact which is subject to this ordinance as of December 19, 2025: a. The City of Hollister Comprehensive Plan; b. The zoning and subdivision regulations set forth in Title XV of the Hollister City Code; c. Except as set forth above, all other applicable standards set forth in this code; and d. Except as set forth above, all other standards for any subdistricts or overlay district applicable within the Area of Impact. 3. Governing Plan, Policies, and Ordinances: a. Governing Plan: The City of Hollister Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Districts Map, Area of Impact Map, and Title XV of the Hollister City Code shall comprise the governing plan and ordinance for Hollister Area of Impact. The version of any of the documents listed herein which controls is the most recent of: the December 19, 2025, version or the version most recently adopted by ordinance by the Twin Falls County Board of Commissioners. b. Within the Area of Impact, any parcel of land used solely for agricultural uses and in excess of 20 acres may continue said use until a change of use occurs. 4. ADMINISTRATION OF THE HOLLISTER AREA OF IMPACT a. Administration: 1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints and authorizes the Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director, its agents, and employees, to enforce and administer the provisions of Title XV Chapter 152 and 153 of the Hollister City Code which are assigned in the Hollister City Code to the Zoning Administrator, and to charge and collect fees for such administrative duties as adopted by reference herein for the Area of Impact. 2. The Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director accepts the appointment and authorization. b. Commission: 1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints the Twin Falls County Planning and Zoning Commission to administer Title XV Chapters 152 and 153 of the Hollister City Code in the Area of Impact in lieu of the Hollister Planning and Zoning Commission. 2. All applications for preliminary plat of a subdivision, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, and other such permits shall be submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission. All applications for final plat of a subdivision, for vacation, and for rezone shall be submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendation and action, prior to submission to the Board of County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners may approve, deny, or remand the application. The County shall provide the City with notice and opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509. 5. ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE HOLLISTER AREA OF IMPACT a. Twin Falls County shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement of the City of Hollister ordinances within the Area of Impact and shall receive all permit fees for inspections performed to recapture direct costs of inspections, administration, legal publications, any development fees or other costs arising from fulfilling the terms of each ordinance or regulation. 6. ANNEXATION: a. Annexation by the City of Hollister shall be compliant with Idaho Code §§ 67-6509, 67-6526 and 50-222. Upon annexation, the provisions of this article, which is the agreement between the City of Hollister and Twin Falls County, shall no longer apply to the annexed area. b. The City of Hollister shall send notice of all annexation, de-annexations, amendments, changes and updates to Title XV Chapter 152 and 153 of the Hollister City Code and the Comprehensive Plan along with maps to the Twin Falls County Community Development Services office. c. All applications and requests to Twin Falls County for subdivision of any real property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, and other such land use permit applications and public notices within the Hollister Area of Impact shall be provided to the City of Hollister with notice and an opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the notice standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509. 7. RENEGOTIATION: a. Renegotiation: The Area of Impact may be reviewed and renegotiated at any time upon written request of either party hereto. In any event, pursuant to Idaho Code §67-6526(e), the City and the County shall review the agreement every five (5) years. b. While renegotiation is occurring, all provisions of this Chapter shall remain in effect until this Chapter is amended or a substitute ordinance is adopted by Twin Falls County, in accordance with the notice and hearing procedures provided in Title 67, Chapter 65 of Idaho Code, or until judgment from the District Court is final pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6526(2)(b). c. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions: All ordinances and code sections or parts thereof in conflict with this subsection are hereby repealed. F. Kimberly, Idaho 1. KIMBERLY AREA OF IMPACT BOUNDARY: The agreed upon Area of Impact for the City of Kimberly is established and set forth herein and described as the Area of Impact map adopted by the Twin Falls County Board of County Commissioners on December 19, 2025. 2. STANDARDS: The following standards shall apply whenever an official, agency, planning and/or zoning commission, hearing examiner, or governing body of Twin Falls County considers a zone change, comprehensive plan change, request regarding any real property, planned unit development, vacation, rezones, special use permit, variance, or other such land use permit application within the Area of Impact which is subject to this ordinance as of December 19, 2025: a. The City of Kimberly Comprehensive Plan; b. The zoning and subdivision regulations set forth in Title 17 of the Kimberly City Code; c. Except as set forth above, all other applicable standards set forth in this code; and d. Except as set forth above, all other standards for any subdistricts or overlay district applicable within the Area of Impact. 3. Governing Plan, Policies, and Ordinances: a. Governing Plan: The City of Kimberly Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Districts Map, Area of Impact Map, and Title 17 of the Kimberly City Code shall comprise the governing plan and ordinance for Kimberly Area of Impact. The version of any of the documents listed herein which controls is the most recent of: the December 19, 2025, version or the version most recently adopted by ordinance by the Twin Falls County Board of Commissioners. b. Within the Area of Impact, any parcel of land used solely for agricultural uses and in excess of 20 acres may continue said use until a change of use occurs. 4. ADMINISTRATION OF THE KIMBERLY AREA OF IMPACT a. Administration: 1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints and authorizes the Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director, its agents, and employees, to enforce and administer the provisions of Title 17 of the Kimberly City Code which are assigned in the Kimberly City Code to the Administrator, and to charge and collect fees for such administrative duties as adopted by reference herein for the Area of Impact. 2. The Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director accepts the appointment and authorization. b. Commission: 1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints the Twin Falls County Planning and Zoning Commission to administer Title 17 of the Kimberly City Code in the Area of Impact in lieu of the Kimberly Planning and Zoning Commission. 2. All applications for preliminary plat of a subdivision, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, and other such permit shall be submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission. All applications for final plat of a subdivision, for vacation, and for rezone shall be submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendation and action, prior to submission to the Board of County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners may approve, deny, or remand the application. The County shall provide the City with notice and opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509. 5. ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE KIMBERLY AREA OF IMPACT a. Twin Falls County shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement of the City of Kimberly ordinances within the Area of Impact and shall receive all permit fees for inspections performed to recapture direct costs of inspections, administration, legal publications, any development fees or other costs arising from fulfilling the terms of each ordinance or regulation. 6. ANNEXATION: a. Annexation by the City of Kimberly shall be compliant with Idaho Code §§ 67-6509, 67-6526 and 50-222. Upon annexation, the provisions of this article, which is the agreement between the City of Kimberly and Twin Falls County, shall no longer apply to the annexed area. b. The City of Kimberly shall send notice of all annexation, de-annexations, amendments, changes and updates to Title 17 of the Kimberly City Code and the Comprehensive Plan along with maps to the Twin Falls County Community Development Services office. c. All applications and requests to Twin Falls County for subdivision of any real property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, and other such land use permit applications and public notices within the Kimberly Area of Impact shall be provided to the City of Kimberly with notice and an opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the notice standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509. 7. RENEGOTIATION: a. Renegotiation: The Area of Impact may be reviewed and renegotiated at any time upon written request of either party hereto. In any event, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6526(e), the City and the County shall review the agreement every five (5) years. b. While renegotiation is occurring, all provisions of this Chapter shall remain in effect until this Chapter is amended or a substitute ordinance is adopted by Twin Falls County, in accordance with the notice and hearing procedures provided in Title 67, Chapter 65 of Idaho Code, or until judgment from the District Court is final pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6526(2)(b). c. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions: All ordinances and code sections or parts thereof in conflict with this subsection are hereby repealed. G. Murtaugh, Idaho 1. MURTAUGH AREA OF CITY IMPACT BOUNDARY: The agreed upon Area of Impact for the City of Murtaugh is established and set forth herein and described as the Area of Impact map adopted by the Twin Falls County Board of County Commissioners on December 19, 2025. 2. STANDARDS: The following standards shall apply whenever an official, agency, planning and/or zoning commission, hearing examiner, or governing body of Twin Falls County considers a zone change, comprehensive plan change, request regarding any real property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, or other such land use permit applications within the Area of Impact which is subject to this ordinance as of December 19, 2025: a. The City of Murtaugh Comprehensive Plan; b. The zoning and subdivision regulations set forth in Ordinance 24-01 of the Murtaugh City Code; c. Except as set forth above, all other applicable standards set forth in this code; and d. Except as set forth above, all other standards for any subdistricts or overlay district applicable within the Area of Impact. 3. Governing Plan, Policies, and Ordinances: a. Governing Plan: The City of Murtaugh Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Districts Map, Area of Impact Map, and Ordinance 24-01 of the Murtaugh City Code shall comprise the governing plan and ordinance for Murtaugh Area of Impact. The version of any of the documents listed herein which controls is the most recent of: the December 19, 2025, version or the version most recently adopted by ordinance by the Twin Falls County Board of Commissioners b. Within the Area of Impact, any parcel of land used solely for agricultural uses and in excess of 20 acres may continue said use until a change of use occurs. 4. ADMINISTRATION OF THE MURTAUGH AREA OF IMPACT a. Administration: 1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints and authorizes the Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director, its agents, and employees, to enforce and administer the provisions of Ordinance 24-01 of the Murtaugh City Code and to charge and collect fees for such administrative duties as adopted by reference herein for the Area of Impact. 2. The Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director accepts the appointment and authorization. b. Commission: 1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints the Twin Falls County Planning and Zoning Commission to administer Ordinance 24-01 of the Murtaugh City Code in the Area of Impact. 2. All applications for preliminary plat of a subdivision, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, and other such permits shall be submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission. All applications for final plat of a subdivision, for vacation, and for rezone shall be submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendation and action, prior to submission to the Board of County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners may approve, deny, or remand the application. The County shall provide the City with notice and opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509. 5. ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE MURTAUGH AREA OF IMPACT a. Twin Falls County shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement of the City of Murtaugh ordinances within the Area of Impact and shall receive all permit fees for inspections performed to recapture direct costs of inspections, administration, legal publications, any development fees or other costs arising from fulfilling the terms of each ordinance or regulation. 6. ANNEXATION: a. Annexation by the City of Murtaugh shall be compliant with Idaho Code §§ 67-6509, 67-6526 and 50-222. Upon annexation, the provisions of this article, which is the agreement between the City of Murtaugh and Twin Falls County, shall no longer apply to the annexed area. b. The City of Murtaugh shall send notice of all annexation, de-annexations, amendments, changes and updates to Ordinance 24-01 of the Murtaugh City Code and the Comprehensive Plan along with maps to the Twin Falls County Community Development Services office. c. All applications and requests to Twin Falls County for subdivision of any real property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, and other such land use permit applications and public notices within the Murtaugh Area of Impact shall be provided to the City of Murtaugh with notice and an opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the notice standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509. 7. RENEGOTIATION: a. Renegotiation: The Area of Impact may be reviewed and renegotiated at any time upon written request of either party hereto. In any event, pursuant to Idaho Code §67-6526(e), the city and the county shall review the agreement every five (5) years. b. While renegotiation is occurring, all provisions of this Chapter shall remain in effect until this Chapter is amended or a substitute ordinance is adopted by Twin Falls County, in accordance with the notice and hearing procedures provided in title 67, Chapter 65 of Idaho Code, or until judgment from the District Court is final pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6526(2)(b). c. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions: All ordinances and code sections or parts thereof in conflict with this subsection are hereby repealed. H. Twin Falls, Idaho: 1. TWIN FALLS AREA OF IMPACT BOUNDARY: The agreed upon Area of Impact for the City of Twin Falls is established and set forth herein and described as the Area of Impact map adopted by the Twin Falls County Board of County Commissioners on December 19, 2025. 2. STANDARDS: The following standards shall apply whenever an official, agency, planning and/or zoning commission, hearing examiner, or governing body of Twin Falls County considers a zone change, comprehensive plan change, request regarding any real property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, or other such land use permit application within the Area of Impact which is subject to this ordinance as of December 19, 2025: a. The City of Twin Falls Comprehensive Plan; b. The zoning and subdivision regulations set forth in Title 10 of the Twin Falls City Code; c. Except as set forth above, all other applicable standards set forth in this code; and d. Except as set forth above, all other standards for any subdistricts or overlay district applicable within the Area of Impact. 3. Governing Plan, Policies, and Ordinances: a. Governing Plan: The City of Twin Falls Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Districts Map, Area of Impact Map, and Title 10 of the Twin Falls City Code shall comprise the governing plan and ordinance for Twin Falls. The version of any of the documents listed herein which controls is the most recent of: the December 19, 2025, version or the version most recently adopted by ordinance by the Twin Falls County Board of Commissioners. b. Within the Area of Impact, any parcel of land used solely for agricultural uses and in excess of 20 acres may continue said use until a change of use occurs. 4. ADMINISTRATION OF THE TWIN FALLS AREA OF IMPACT a. Administration: 1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints and authorizes the Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director, its agents, and employees, to enforce and administer the provisions of Title 10 of the Twin Falls City Code which are assigned in the Twin Falls City Code to the City Planning Administrator and to charge and collect fees for such administrative duties as adopted by reference herein for the Area of Impact. 2. The Twin Falls County Community Development Services Director accepts the appointment and authorization. b. Commission: 1. The Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County hereby appoints the Twin Falls County Planning and Zoning Commission to administer Title 10 of the Twin Falls City Code in the Area of Impact in lieu of the Twin Falls City Planning and Zoning Commission. 2. All applications for preliminary plat of a subdivision, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, and other such permits shall be submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission. All applications for final plat of a subdivision, for vacation, and for rezone shall be submitted to the County Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendation and action, prior to submission to the Board of County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners may approve, deny, or remand the application. The County shall provide the City with notice and opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509. 5. ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE TWIN FALLS AREA OF IMPACT a. Twin Falls County shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement of the City of Twin Falls ordinances within the Area of Impact and shall receive all permit fees for inspections performed to recapture direct costs of inspections, administration, legal publications, any development fees or other costs arising from fulfilling the terms of each ordinance or regulation. 6. ANNEXATION: a. Annexation by the City of Twin Falls shall be compliant with Idaho Code §§ 67-6509, 67-6526 and 50-222. Upon annexation, the provisions of this article, which is the agreement between the City of Twin Falls and Twin Falls County, shall no longer apply to the annexed area. b. The City of Twin Falls shall send notice of all annexation, de-annexations, amendments, changes and updates to Title 10 of the Twin Falls City Code and the Comprehensive Plan along with maps to the Twin Falls County Community Development Services office. c. All applications and requests to Twin Falls County for subdivision of any real property, planned unit development, vacation, rezone, special use permit, variance, and other such land use permit applications and public notices within the Twin Falls Area of Impact shall be provided to the City of Twin Falls with notice and an opportunity to provide comment on these applications pursuant to the notice standards provided within Idaho Code § 67-6509. 7. RENEGOTIATION: a. Renegotiation: The Area of Impact may be reviewed and renegotiated at any time upon written request of either party hereto. In any event, pursuant to Idaho Code §67-6526(e), the city and the county shall review the agreement every five (5) years. b. While renegotiation is occurring, all provisions of this Chapter shall remain in effect until this Chapter is amended or a substitute ordinance is adopted by Twin Falls County, in accordance with the notice and hearing procedures provided in Title 67, Chapter 65 of Idaho Code, or until judgment from the District Court is final pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6526(2)(b). c. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions: All ordinances and code sections or parts thereof in conflict with this subsection are hereby repealed. WHEREAS, all ordinances, amendments, and code sections or parts which conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed; and WHEREAS, this ordinance is hereby declared to be severable. Should a court of competent jurisdiction declare any portion of this ordinance invalid, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect and shall be read to carry out the purpose(s) of the ordinance before the declaration of partial invalidity; and WHEREAS, a draft of this ordinance was considered by the Twin Falls Board of County Commissioner at a duly notice public hearing on the 19th, day of December, 2025. WHEREAS, this ordinance shall be effective upon passage and publication as provided by law. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Twin Falls County, Idaho, on this 19th day of December, 2025. This ordinance shall be effective upon passage and publication as provided by law. TWIN FALLS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS /s/ Don Hall Don Hall, Chairman Attest: /s/ Rocky Matthews _______ /s/ Kristina Glascock___________ Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Kristina Glascock, Clerk /s/ Brent Reinke____________ Brent Reinke, Commissioner There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 22, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 22, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 19, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioners met with office staff for a department update. Commissioners met with Legal for a department update. Kyli Gough, Community Health & Engagement Director presented the St. Luke's Community Benefit Report. Commissioners met with Security and Maintenance staff to discuss building access. In the Matter of CONSENT AGENDA Commissioners considered the Consent Agenda; items may include status sheets, employee requisitions, alcohol licenses, tax cancellations, Sheriff’s Office Security Agreements, and Commissioner minutes. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews reviewed the items in the Consent Agenda to include an employee requisition for District Court and Commissioner minutes from December 1 – December 5, 2025. Motion Passed Unanimously. (Hall absent) In the Matter of BUDGET Commissioners considered a request for Retention of County Vessel Funds. Kristina Glascock, Clerk and Deana Johnston, Accounts Receivable Clerk reviewed the County Vessel Fund Reporting and Remittance Form and the request for retention form with the Board. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the request for retention of County Vessel Funds in the amount of $147,417.99 and authorize the Chairman to sign the documents on behalf of the Board. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. (Hall absent) In the Matter of CONTRACTS Commissioners considered a Fairgrounds modification request. Commissioner Matthews reviewed the Fairgrounds Modification Request with the Board. The request is to approve replacing the heating and cooling unit in the railroad building at the Fairgrounds. The expenses will be covered by a donor so there will be no cost to the County or the Fair. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Fairgrounds Modification Request to replace the heating and cooling unit in the Railroad building and authorize the Chairman to sign the documents on behalf of the Board. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews noted the building is hot in the summer and cold in the winter and the replacement will help avoid damage to the property inside the building. Motion Passed Unanimously. (Hall absent) Commissioners considered a Service Order Form with Qualifacts. Jaci Urie, TARC Director reviewed the form with the Board. Ms. Urie noted that Legal has reviewed the document and approved the current form. Qualifacts will send an updated draft with a corrected start date. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Service Order Form with Qualifacts once it is submitted with updated dates and authorize the Chairman to sign the documents on behalf of the Board. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. (Hall absent) Commissioner Hall joined the meeting at 10: 20 a.m. In the Matter of TAXING DISTRICTS Commissioners considered a petition for the creation of the Rock Creek Magic Valley Veterans Memorial Cemetery Maintenance District. Greg Bryant, President of Twin Falls Veterans Health Commission presented the Board with a petition for the creation of the Rock Creek Magic Valley Veterans Memorial Cemetery Maintenance District. Mr. Bryant reviewed the history of the cemetery with the Board and noted that the cemetery needs funds to be able to continue taking care of the existing graves and the only way is to form a maintenance district. There are three hundred and twenty graves with headstones and they believe there are significantly more graves that do not have headstones. Kristina Glascock, Clerk, reviewed the estimate for the cost of election in the amount $2,047.00 and the time that the funds have to be paid. Commissioner Hall noted that there will be a hearing scheduled to allow anyone within the proposed district to oppose the petition. After the hearing, the Board will issue an order denying or granting the petition and the boundaries shall be fixed for the proposed district. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to accept the petition for the creation of the Rock Creek Magic Valley Veterans Memorial Cemetery Maintenance District. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 23, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 23, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Vice-Chairman Reinke called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 22, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke. ABSENT: Commissioner Don Hall. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Katherine Ford. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioner Reinke attended an IAC Education Committee virtual meeting. In the Matter of INDIGENT Commissioners considered County Assistance Applications. Case number 104840. No action taken In the Matter of CONSENT AGENDA Commissioners considered the Consent Agenda; items may include status sheets, employee requisitions, alcohol licenses, tax cancellations, Sheriff’s Office Security Agreements, and Commissioner minutes. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews reviewed the items in the Consent Agenda to include Commissioners minutes from December 8 – December 12, 2025. Motion Passed Unanimously. (Hall absent) In the Matter of TAXES Commissioners considered Homeowner's Exemption cancellation requests. Erin Porter, Chief Deputy Assessor reviewed the Homeowner's Exemption cancellation requests with the Board. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Homeowner's Exemption cancellation requests as presented. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. (Hall absent) Property Owner Parcel # Net Mrkt Value Tax Cancellation Dimitriy & Olga Stepanov RPB76210030040A $282,475 $1,532.23 Madison Applewhite RPF8401028001AA $134,312 $1,527.82 Ryan Downs RPF84170020040A $233,607 $1,527.82 Kaleigh Horton RPH93410020180A $94,917 $1,024.57 Jeannie Shakstad RPOK2520010010A $776,207 $833.62 Timothy Hicks RPOM4020020360A $207,989 $856.32 Alice Helms RPT08320060040A $403,942 $206.25 Michaela Ewing RPT15410010030A $181,342 $1,342.02 Pamela Roehl RPT1941002009AA $62,424 $670.19 Robert Reed RPT26430040070A $172,582 $1,342.02 Sabrina Mitchell RPT3821001022AA $163,791 $1,342.02 Kelsey Henslee RP08S13E027380A $817,316 $712.09 Graciela Flores MHOB581000012AA $7,199 $45.95 Graciela Flores RPOB581000012AA $43,552 $101.98 Alison Gittins RPB7241069014AA $73,134 $896.48 Steven Harrison RPT00010220130A $83,359 $894.95 Lori Watson RP09S14E241860A $134,108 $183.49 Lori Watson MH09S14E241860A $14,230 $90.78 Total $3,886,486 $15,130.59 There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 26, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 26, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 23, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Katherine Ford. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Regular Business There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 29, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 29, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 26, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioners met with office staff for a department update. Commissioners met with Legal for a department update. Commissioners attended Commissioner Don Hall’s farewell gathering. In the Matter of CONSENT AGENDA Commissioners considered the Consent Agenda; items may include status sheets, employee requisitions, alcohol licenses, tax cancellations, Sheriff’s Office Security Agreements, and Commissioner minutes. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke reviewed the items in the Consent Agenda to include a status sheet for the Sheriff’s Office; and a tax cancellation for parcel #RP09S15E284807A in the amount of $296.52 as requested by the Treasurer. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of COUNTY PROPERTY Cory Tverdy, Maintenance Director presented an incentive check from Idaho Power for lighting upgrades. There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 30, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 30, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 29, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Katherine Ford. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioners met with Dave Overacre, Special Projects Coordinator for a department update. Commissioners attended a ribbon cutting for Interlink Volunteer Caregivers. Commissioners attended Bill Carberry’s farewell gathering. In the Matter of INDIGENT Commissioners considered County Assistance Applications. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to accept a settlement offer on case number 91336. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke noted that according to county records, the client had prior knowledge of the debt and the county generally only accepts settlement offers of 50% or more. Motion Failed Unanimously. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve case number 104841 for rental assistance in the amount of $1,000.00 with a payback of $25.00 per month to begin in February 2026 and 50% of future tax refunds. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews noted that the client has a plan for future rental payments and has provided proof of full- time income. Motion Passed Unanimously. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve case number 104842 in the amount of $950.00 to Idaho Legacy LLC for cremation. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Reinke noted that the client was a Twin Falls County resident and was indigent. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of CONSENT AGENDA Commissioners considered the Consent Agenda; items may include status sheets, employee requisitions, alcohol licenses, tax cancellations, Sheriff’s Office Security Agreements, and Commissioner minutes. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews reviewed the items in the Consent Agenda to include a status sheet for the Commissioner’s Office. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of RESOLUTIONS Commissioners considered proposed Resolution #2026-011 supporting the America 250 in Idaho Commemoration. Commissioner Hall read the resolution for the record. Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve Resolution #2026-011 supporting the America 250 in Idaho Commemoration. Commissioner Reinke SECONDED. Discussion Commissioner Matthews expressed his support of the resolution. Commissioner Reinke expressed his gratitude to America250 TFC. Tom Wangeman, and Wendy French, America250 TFC, thanked the Board for their consideration of this resolution and their support of the America250. Ms. French noted that there is also a song for Idaho in the works that she would like to present to the Board once it is finished. Motion Passed Unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-011 A RESOLUTION OF TWIN FALLS COUNTY A Resolution Supporting the America 250 In Idaho Commemoration and the United States Semiquincentennial. WHEREAS, the year 2026 marks the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence; and WHEREAS, Governor Brad Little proclaimed the establishment of the America250 in Idaho Commemoration in July 2024 to plan, encourage, develop, and coordinate the commemoration of this momentous occasion, and honor and recognize the contributions of Idaho’s residents to the nation’s past, present, and future; and WHEREAS, it is fitting and desirable that we commemorate the birth of the nation with the support of partners and stakeholders across the Gem State, America250 in Idaho will advance the ideals of the American Revolution - equality, liberty, and justice – through meaningful community engagement and recognize, appreciate, and commemorate America’s legacy; and WHEREAS, Twin Falls County, founded in 1907 has contributed proudly and significantly to the history of our nation and our state for more than one-hundred and eighteen years; and WHEREAS, the County Commissioner Chair Don Hall and County Commissioners Matthews and Reinke of Twin Falls County thus encourage its citizens to create and participate in programs that will commemorate the history of our city, our state, and our nation; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Twin Falls County hereby endorses the America250 in Idaho Commemoration and its vision to celebrate American history and the invaluable contributions of Idahoans to our region, nation, and world. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that: 1. Twin Falls County commemorates the 250th anniversary of the establishment of the United States as an independent nation. 2. Twin Falls County authorizes the appointment of an individual or committee to oversee local projects and efforts to support this commemoration that will promote the maximum involvement of our residents, neighborhoods, businesses, schools, civic organizations, and institutions in the commemorations. 3. Twin Falls County will officially recognize the 250th Anniversary of America throughout 2026 at local libraries and schools with historically relevant displays and presentations. 4. That a copy of this resolution be sent to the America250 in Idaho Advisory Council. In the County of Twin Falls, State of Idaho. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand at the Twin Falls County Courthouse in Twin Falls, Idaho on this 30th day of December, 2025. /s/ Don Hall_______________________ Don Hall, Chairman /s/ Brent Reinke____________________ Brent Reinke, Commissioner /s/Rocky Matthews_________________ Rocky Matthews, Commissioner ATTEST: /s/Valerie Varadi for______________ Kristina Glascock, Clerk In the Matter of CONTRACTS Commissioners considered an IDJC Passthrough Funds Agreement. Kevin Sandau, Juvenile Probation Director and Aryn Probasco, Juvenile Services Coordinator reviewed the agreement with the Board. Mr. Sandau expressed his gratitude for these funds as the cover services that they would otherwise not be able to provide. There was discussion on the taxing on tobacco and the potential taxing on vapes. Mr. Sandau noted that they don’t receive any direct funding from tobacco tax to use for their programs. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the IDJC Passthrough Funds Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the documents on behalf of the Board. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. In the Matter of GRANTS Commissioners considered an America 250 Grant Application. Gary Anderson, Research and Development Supervisor reviewed the grant application with the Board. Mr. Anderson noted that this grant will pay for frames for displays of war artifacts and documents in libraries, schools, etc. Commissioner Hall thanked Mr. Anderson for his work on this grant. Commissioner Reinke noted that they reached out to other counties to ask if they would like to contribute and support this program as well, a few responded with possible interest. Tom Wangeman, America 250 TFC, noted that they will be pursuing routes of making these available to the homeschool community and eventually the public. Wendy French, America 250 TFC, listed some of the organizations that they have reached out to asking for support of this program. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the America 250 Grant Application and letter of support from the Board and authorize the Chairman to sign the documents on behalf of the Board. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. Commissioners considered a SMILES Grant Application. Gary Anderson, Research and Development Supervisor reviewed the grant application with the Board. Mr. Anderson noted that Frontier Community Resources offers the SMILES Grant. Mr. Anderson noted that SMILES stands for, simple, measurable, innovative, loveable, engaging, and strategic. Mr. Anderson noted that this grant be will pay for one of the Desert Station picnic sites in full and partially cover a second site. Mr. Anderson noted they will continue to pursue other organizations and grants to pay for the remaining five and a half picnic sites. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the SMILES Grant Application and authorize the Chairman to sign the documents on behalf of the Board. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. Commissioners considered a SEAGRAVES Grant Application. Gary Anderson, Research and Development Supervisor, Kevin Sandau, Juvenile Probation Director and Aryn Probasco, Juvenile Services Coordinator reviewed the grant application with the Board. Mr. Anderson noted that the grant will replace funding that was previously provided by VOCA grants. Mr. Sandau and Ms. Probasco noted that the grant funding pays for services that they provide to youth participating in their programs. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the SEAGRAVES Grant Application and authorize the Chairman to sign the documents on behalf of the Board. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., December 31, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. Twin Falls, Idaho REGULAR DECEMBER MEETING December 31, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Chairman Hall called the Board of County Commissioners to order at 8:00 a.m. in regular session, pursuant to the recess of December 30, 2025. PRESENT: Commissioner Rocky Matthews, Commissioner Brent Reinke, and Commissioner Don Hall. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Deputy Clerk Shannon Carter. The following proceedings were held to wit: In the Matter of MEETINGS Commissioner Reinke attended a Mid-Snake Regional Water Resource Commission meeting. Commissioner Reinke attended a Southern Idaho Solid Waste Board meeting. In the Matter of CONTRACTS Commissioners considered a Courthouse Office Space MOU. Commissioner Reinke reviewed the Courthouse Office Space MOU with the Board. Commissioner Reinke noted that the Prosecutor is in dire need of office space and this change will provide that. Commissioner Hall noted that the MOU will memorialize the Commissioner’s intent for the space on the second floor of the Old Courthouse and the relocation of the Clerk’s staff that are scanning files on the second floor, to the first-floor space currently occupied by the State Supreme Court IT staff. Commissioner Hall noted that the Clerk has the option to not use the space in the Old Courthouse if she determines there is space available in the remodeled Court Services building. There was discussion of the intent of the previous Commissioners to utilize the space in the Old Courthouse and the space needs of the Prosecutor’s Office and the Sheriff’s Office. Commissioner Hall stated that he felt it was fair to address the issue on his last day so as not to pass the issue on to the new Commissioner. Commissioner Reinke made a MOTION to approve the Courthouse Office Space MOU as presented. Commissioner Matthews SECONDED. Motion Passed Unanimously. There being no further business, the Board recessed until 8:00 a.m., January 2, 2025, at the Commissioners Chambers, second floor of the Twin Falls County West Facility, 630 Addison Ave West, Twin Falls, Idaho, for the transaction of further business of the Board. In the Matter of ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Expenditures by fund for December 2025: Fund 100 Current Expense 1,980,544.92 Fund 102 Tort 25,175.19 Fund 104 Agricultural Fair District 0.00 Fund 106 Safehouse 36,986.02 Fund 108 Capital Projects Fund 823,953.23 Fund 113 Weeds 19,483.76 Fund 114 Parks and Recreation 52,362.82 Fund 115 Solid Waste 1,343,377.08 Fund 116 Ad Valorem 162,322.04 Fund 118 District Court 107,467.83 Fund 130 Indigent Fund 12,413.79 Fund 131 Public Health 84,042.67 Fund 132 Revenue Sharing 106.14 Fund 137 Election Consolidation 18,082.54 Fund 174 County Boat License Fund 3,692.03 Fund 175 Snowmobiles 1,030.79 Fund 196 Justice Fund 1,264,697.47 Fund 601 TARC Grants 0.00 Fund 602 IDJC Safe Teen FY25 0.00 Fund 604 Federal Drug Seizures 0.00 Fund 605 Byrne Jag-Car Cameras 0.00 Fund 607 IDJC Safe Teen Assessment Grant 3,870.29 Fund 608 Juvenile Correction Act Funds 13,219.18 Fund 609 Tobacco Tax Grant 17,116.41 Fund 610 Boat Grant Waterways Match 1,103.92 Fund 611 Adult Probation Grants 104.00 Fund 612 ASAT 0.00 Fund 613 R.S.A.T. Grant 24,606.01 Fund 614 ISDA – Invasive Centennial Park 0.00 Fund 615 S.U.D. Funds 1,678.00 Fund 616 SCAAP 0.00 Fund 617 OHV Law Enforcement 0.00 Fund 618 BCP Basic-Safehouse Grant 23,072.94 Fund 619 IDJC Equine Therapy Grant 0.00 Fund 621 DOE EECBG Aware 0.00 Fund 626 ARPA Recovery Fund 0.00 Fund 627 ARPA Revenue Sharing Fund 0.00 Fund 628 OPIOD Abatement Account 18,689.34 Fund 635 Parks-Grants 1,535.79 Fund 644 S.O.R. Sheriff 75.00 Fund 645 JAG Grant 0.00 Fund 651 Sheriff Donation Fund 0.00 Fund 652 Sheriff Drug Seizure Money 77.46 Fund 659 Prosecutor’s Drug Seizure Money 0.00 Fund 660 CRT Facility Fund 753,509.26 Fund 663 Sheriff’s Youth Plate 405.00 Fund 666 Sheriff-Vests 0.00 Fund 667 Prosecutor Drug Reimb 8,025.16 Fund 671 TF Co Sheriff Search & Rescue 152.74 Fund 673 Juvenile Probation Misc. 1,578.36 Fund 676 VOCA/ICDVVA Grant 4,467.15 Fund 681 Treatment Courts 43,104.17 Fund 683 District Court-CAO 196.13 Fund 684 District Court-FCS 2,403.96 Fund 687 Sheriff’s Grants 3,060.87 TOTAL $6,857,789.46