Sentinel Media records · public agendas and minutes, text only, refreshed nightly from each body's own site · not a newspaper
agenda meeting date 2026-10-22 · fetched 2026-10-25 · 511726 characters · read by OCR, check numbers against the source · official file · plain text
Page 1 or 6
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
City of Idaho Falls
City Council Meeting
680 Park Avenue
Thursday
October 22, 2026
6:30 P.M.
Mayor
City Council
Jim Francis
Council President, Seat 4
John Radford
Council Seat 5
Kirk Larsen
Council Seat 3
Brandon Lee
Council Seat 2
Jim Freeman
Council Seat 6
Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Council Seat 1
Lisa Burtenshaw
Livestream at www.idahofallsidaho.gov/429/Live-Stream
Page 2 of 6
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Welcome to the Idaho Falls City Council Meeting.
Regularly scheduled City Council meetings are open to the general public. City Council meetings are also live-
streamed and archived on the City website. Please be aware that the meeting agenda will differ from the published
version if amendments to the agenda are made by the Council during the meeting.
The Council encourages public input. While a general public comment option is not required by Idaho law, the
Idaho Falls City Council welcomes general public input as part of regular City Council meetings. General public
comment will be allowed for up to 20 minutes. However, citizens are always welcome to contact their Council
representatives via e-mail or telephone, as listed on the City website. The Council is committed to an atmosphere
that promotes equal opportunity, civility, mutual respect, proper decorum and freedom from discrimination or
harassment.
Those who wish to address City Council during the council meetings are encouraged to adhere to the guidelines
below.
Public Comment Guidelines
Speakers are encouraged to:
•
State their name and city of residence.
•
Focus comments on matters within the purview of the City Council. Limit comments to three (3) minutes
or less.
•
Refrain from repeating information already presented to preserve time for others to speak. Large groups
are encouraged to select one or two speakers to represent the voice of the entire group.
•
Practice civility and courtesy. City leaders have the right and the responsibility to maintain order and
decorum during the meeting. Time may be curtailed for those speakers whose comments are profane or
disruptive in nature.
•
Refrain from comments on issues involving matters currently pending before the City’s Planning and
Zoning Commission or other matters that require legal due process, including public hearings, City
enforcement actions, and pending City personnel disciplinary matters.
•
Comments that pertain to activities or performance of individual City employees should be shared directly
with the City’s Human Resources Department (208-612-8248), the City’s Legal Department (208-612-
8178) or with the Office of the Mayor (208-612-8235).
Public Hearing Guidelines
•
In-Person Testimony. Because public hearings must follow various procedures required by law, please
wait to offer your testimony until invited/indicated. Please address Council directly and try to limit your
time to three (3) minutes.
•
Written Testimony. The public may provide written testimony via postal mail sent to City Hall or via email
sent to the City Clerk at IFClerk@idahofalls.gov. Testimony will be distributed to the members of the
Council and become a part of the official public hearing record. Written testimony must be received no
later than forty-eight (48) hours prior to the date of the hearing to ensure inclusion in the permanent City
record.
If you need communication aids or other physical accommodations to attend or access this meeting, please
contact the City Clerk at (208) 612-8414 or the ADA Coordinator at (208) 612-8323 prior to the meeting. They will
help accommodate special needs wherever possible.
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
City Council
Agenda
City Council Chambers
6:30 PM
Thursday, October 22, 2026
1.
Call to Order & Roll Call
2.
Pledge of Allegiance
3.
Staff responses to prior public comment and other updates
4.
Public Comment
Please see guidelines on page 2.
5.
Consent Agenda
Questions on Consent Agenda Items may be addressed and/or moved to the Regular Agenda for separate
consideration if requested by a Council Member. Items typical of consent can include routine items for purchase,
supply or inventory replenishment, vehicle or equipment replacement, etc.; items already budgeted. Other changes to
this agenda may require the approval of a majority of Council.
A)
Municipal Services
1)
2026 Third Quarter Impact Fee Report
26-390
Fee Summary Report
Fees Paid Report
12.18.2025 Minutes
1.8.2026 Minutes
Attachments:
26-414
26-415
26-416
B)
Public Works
1)
Thermoplastics Citywide 2026 - Change Order #1 - $46,490
Attachments:
CO # 01
2)
Bid IF26016 - Water Inventory Replenishment total $1,247,771, Core &
Main $846,665 & Ferguson $401,106
Attachments:
Bid
3)
Bid Award IF-26-012, Annual Purchase of Chlorine and Sodium Bisulfite
total $535,622.80, Thatcher $244,862.80 & Adelle Way $290,760
Attachments:
Bid
C)
Office of the Mayor
1)
September 2026 Licensing through the Office of the City Clerk
26-418
Page 3 of 6
City Council
Agenda
October 22, 2026
New
Renewals
Contractor
Attachments:
2)
City Council Meeting Minutes
26-391
09.09.26 Utility Board
09.21.26 Work Session
09.24.26 City Council
10.05.26 Work Session
Attachments:
Action Item:
Approve, accept, or receive all items on the Consent Agenda according to the recommendations presented (or take
other action deemed appropriate).
6.
Regular Agenda
A)
Office of the Mayor
1)
IFDDC Parking Program MOU
26-419
IFDDC has managed parking in the downtown district, and this MOU will renew that
agreement. This agreement novates the prior parking agreement and authorizes IFDDC to
manage downtown parking as the downtown enforcement organization. The cost of the
service is $92,200. The MOU is effective upon execution through September 30, 2027, with an
automatic renewal and a provision of termination with a six-month written notice.
Action Item(s):
Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Idaho Falls Downtown
Development Corporation (IFDDC) to manage downtown parking as the downtown
enforcement organization, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary
documents (or take other action deemed appropriate).
Attachments:
Agreement
2)
IFDDC Management Services Agreement
26-420
The management agreement retains IFDDC to continue providing management services for
the BID for the fiscal year 2026/27 (term is from October 1, 2026, through September 30,
2027). Compensation will be 98% of the total BID revenue, paid in two equal installments
based on the tax revenues collected. It is IFDDC’s responsibility for recordkeeping, district
administration, managing revenue projects, and holding public meetings.
Approve the agreement with the Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation (IFDDC) to
Action Item(s):
Page 4 of 6
City Council
Agenda
October 22, 2026
provide management services for the Business Improvement District (BID) and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed
appropriate).
Agreement
Attachments:
B)
Community Development Services:
1)
Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Reasoned Statement of
Relevant Criteria and Standards, Arbor Estates Division No. 1.
26-408
Attached is the application for the Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Reasoned Statement of
Relevant Criteria and Standards for Arbor Estates Division No. 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission
considered this item at its June 2, 2026, meeting and unanimously voted to recommend approval of
the final plat to the Mayor and City Council as presented. This Final Plat was reviewed by CDS Planning
staff as well as staff from Fire, Idaho Falls Power, and the Public Works Water, Wastewater, and
Engineering/Survey Divisions.
1. Approve the Development Agreement for the Final Plat for Arbor Estates Division No. 1 and give
authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement (or take other action deemed
appropriate).
2. Approve the Final Plat for Arbor Estates Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor, City
Engineer, and City Clerk to sign said Final Plat (or take other action deemed appropriate).
3. Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Final Plat for Arbor
Estates Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents (or
take other action deemed appropriate).
Action Item(s):
Zoning Map
Aerial Map
Final Plat
Staff Report
PC Minutes
Reasoned Statement
Development Agreement
Attachments:
2)
Amendment to Title 11, Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,
Sections 11-2-2: Allowing Drinking Establishments in LC, Limited
Commercial Zones as a Permitted Use.
26-409
Amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Sections 11-2-2: Allowed Uses in
Commercial Zones to permit Drinking Establishments as an allowed use in the LC, Limited
Commercial Zone. On September 1, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously
Page 5 of 6
City Council
Agenda
October 22, 2026
voted to recommend approval permitting Drinking Establishments in the LC Zone to the
Mayor and City Council as presented.
Approve the Ordinance amending Title 11, Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Sections 11-2-2:
Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones to permit Drinking Establishments as an allowed use in the
LC, Limited Commercial Zone under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and
separate readings, request that it be read by title and published by summary (or consider the
Ordinance on the first reading and that it be read by title, reject the Ordinance, or take other
action deemed appropriate).
Action Item(s):
Staff Report
Ord Amendment
PC Minutes
Attachments:
7.
Announcements
8.
Adjournment
Page 6 of 6
Memorandum
File #: 26-390
City Council
DATE: Monday, October 5, 2026
AGENDA: Consent
FROM: Pam Alexander, Impact Fee Administrator
DEPARTMENT: Municipal Services
Title
2026 Third Quarter Impact Fee Report
☐Ordinance
☐Resolution
☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐Legislative Public Hearing
☒Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☐Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Accept the 2026 third quarter impact fee report pursuant to City Code, Section 10-8-7(G) (or take other action
deemed appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
City Code requires quarterly and annual reports to be provided to the Impact Fee Advisory Committee and
Council. For the third quarter, July 1, 2026-September 30, 2026, a total of $521,892.60 has been paid in impact
fees. This is an increase of $59,395.48 over the second 2026 quarter report, April -June, for a total of
$462,497.12. For the July-September period, a total of $213,183.00 was paid for multi-family and single-family
permits issued and calculated under the previous 2022 impact fee study and fee structure. A total of
$308,709.60 was paid under the new 2026 impact fee study and fee structure, with 39.8% or a total of
$122,740.00 of the permits paid for development category of 3,000 square feet or more and 30% or a total of
$91,173.60 in the retail development category. An estimated total of $449,602.97 has been paid in impact fees
under the 2026 impact fee study and fee structure. Estimated impact fee cash balances as of September 30,
2026, of $13.5M includes Police at $1.4M; Fire at $122,018; Parks at $3.8M; and Transportation at $8.1M.
These cash balances are estimates as the full cash balances for the months of July, August, and September
have not been confirmed in the city’s new Workday financial system as of the date this report was submitted
to City Council.
As a follow up to City Council, there was a positive resolution to the Barnwood Estates Townhomes and
Terrace Gate Condominiums impact fee assessment appeal hearing on Thursday, December 18, 2025, with the
developer receiving a reimbursement in the amount of $240,474.11 for completed Arterial Street Section
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 10/20/2026
Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
RETURN TO AGENDA
File #: 26-390
City Council
Improvements along Skyline Drive in early September 2026. In addition to the reimbursement, the developer
also received an impact fee credit in the amount of $5,273.50 for one single-family residential unit as
requested through Community Development Services on Friday, December 19, 2025. A copy of the City
Council meeting motions from Thursday, December 18, 2025 (Pages 12-14) and Thursday, January 8, 2026
(Page 2) are attached for reference.
Approved impact fee funded project(s) for the third 2026 quarter report are the Installation of Irrigation
System at Meppen Park, approved at October 8, 2026, City Council meeting for a total of $98,900.00.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 10/20/2026
Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
Multi-Family
Single-Family
Industrial
Institutional
Office
Retail
Percent Received
Police
10,175.00
$
3,846.00
$
-
-
-
-
7%
Fire
14,850.00
3,114.00
-
-
-
-
8%
Parks and Recreation
43,450.00
11,124.00
-
-
-
-
26%
Transportation
102,520.00
24,104.00
-
-
-
-
59%
170,995.00
$
42,188.00
$
-
$
-
-
$
-
$
100%
Percentage by Category
80%
20%
0.0%
0%
0.0%
0%
Total Impact Fees Received - 2022 Impact Fee Study
213,183.00
$
Under 1,500
1,500 to 2,999
3,000 or More
Industrial
Institutional
Office
Retail
Percent
Received
Police
1,850.00
$
3,874.00
$
7,543.00
-
-
-
13,386.60
9%
Fire
2,700.00
5,694.00
11,077.00
-
-
-
11,055.00
10%
Parks and Recreation
7,900.00
16,588.00
32,300.00
-
-
-
-
18%
Transportation
18,640.00
37,550.00
71,820.00
-
-
-
66,732.00
63%
31,090.00
$
63,706.00
$
122,740.00
$
-
-
$
-
$
91,173.60
$
100%
Percentage by Category
10%
21%
39.8%
0%
0.0%
0%
30%
Total Impact Fees Received - 2026 Impact Fee Study
308,709.60
$
Total Impact Fees Received July 1 - September 30, 2026
521,892.60
$
Police
Fire
Parks
Transportation
Total
1,410,245
$
122,018
$
3,849,417
$
8,161,577
$
13,543,257
$
(*) Cash balances have not been confirmed in Workday for July, August, and September
Source Documentation:
Cityworks reporting system as of Thursday, October 1, 2026; report parameters- paid impact fees July 1 - September 30, 2026.
Estimated Impact Fee Cash Balances as of September 30, 2026 (*)
Impact Fee Activity (July 1, 2026 - September 30, 2026)
Impact Fees Issued and Paid by 2022 Impact Fee Study Categories (Permits Issued July 1, 2026 -September 30, 2026)
Impact Fees Paid by 2026 Impact Fee Study Categories (Permits Issued July 1, 2026 - September 30, 2026)
City of Idaho Falls
308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
Phone: (208) 612-8100
Impact Fee Payments
From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026
Case Number
Case Name
Location
Account Code
Amount
IFFDH: IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 9/24/2026
RES26-00475
SFR: M 2372, G 1181, CP 520, FB
2040, UFB 285
5755 Dune Village Way
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
Date of Payment: 9/10/2026
RES26-00476
SFR: M 2573, G 1399, CP 638, FB
2014, UFB 559
5342 Wild Dunes Ln
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
Date of Payment: 8/27/2026
RES26-00405
SFR, M 1855, UNFB 1865, GAR
834, COVP 204
516 Boxwood Dr
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
Date of Payment: 7/16/2026
RES26-00248
SFR M 2400, G 1512, CP 270, FB
2400
2201 W 17th S
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
Date of Payment: 7/17/2026
RES26-00312
SFR: M 1937, G 931, CP 422, UFB
1941
5505 Boardwalk Rd
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
RES26-00317
SFR: M 1620, G 795, CP 180, FB
1620
5471 Boardwalk Rd
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
RES26-00320
SFR: M 1589, G 1084, CP 136, FB
1261, UFB 328
5911 Maggie Dr
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
RES26-00283
Twin Home: M 1589, G 518, UFB
1489
820 Kiah Ln
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
RES26-00284
Twin home; M 1589, G 518, UFB
1489
832 Kiah Ln
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
RES26-00289
SFR: M 1652, G 895, CP 52, UFB
1412
6161 Broken Stone Way
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
RES26-00288
Twin Home: M 1599, G 888, UFB
1589
5885 Maggie Dr
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
RES26-00286
Twin Home: M 1589, G 888, UFB
1589
5861 Maggie Dr
033-2355-325.01-00
$0.00
RES26-00286
Twin Home: M 1589, G 888, UFB
1589
5861 Maggie Dr
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
Date of Payment: 7/2/2026
RES26-00249
SFR: M 2565, G 1520, CP 455, FB
2557
4865 River Bend Ln
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
Date of Payment: 7/22/2026
RES26-00278
SFR: M 1784, G 802, CP 141, UFB
1584
5556 Sand Springs Rd
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
Date of Payment: 8/6/2026
RES26-00340
SFR: M 1881, G910, CP 232, FB
1439, UFB 415
5377 Boardwalk Rd
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM
Page 1 of 16
City of Idaho Falls
308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
Phone: (208) 612-8100
Impact Fee Payments
From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026
Case Number
Case Name
Location
Account Code
Amount
IFFDH: IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/20/2026
RES26-00351
SFR: M 1773, G 1018, CP 456,
UFB 1662
5441 Boardwalk Rd
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
Date of Payment: 8/17/2026
RES26-00339
Twinhome: M 1544, G 543, FB
1538
417 East River Ln
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
RES26-00349
TwinHome: M 1544, G 543, FB
1538
425 East River Ln
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
IFFDH: IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 7/17/2026
RES26-00290
SFR: M 1730, G 798, CP 52, UFB
1484
1584 Sandbar St
033-2355-325.01-00
$583.00
Total Payments for IFFDH:
$11,077.00
IFFDL: IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS UNDER 1,500 SQ
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/31/2026
RES26-00367
Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938,
G 420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #6
033-2355-325.01-00
$270.00
Date of Payment: 8/27/2026
RES26-00366
Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938,
G 420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #5
033-2355-325.01-00
$270.00
RES26-00365
Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938,
G 420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #4
033-2355-325.01-00
$270.00
RES26-00360
Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938,
G 420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #2
033-2355-325.01-00
$270.00
RES26-00362
Townhome Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G
420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #3
033-2355-325.01-00
$270.00
RES26-00356
Townhome Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G
420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #1
033-2355-325.01-00
$270.00
Date of Payment: 7/14/2026
RES26-00257
Townhome (3 Plex-Unit C): M 453,
2nd 885, G 433
1120 Elmore Ave
033-2355-325.01-00
$270.00
RES26-00258
Townhome (3 Plex-Unit B) M 487,
2nd 911, G 425
1124 Elmore Ave
033-2355-325.01-00
$270.00
RES26-00259
Townhome (3 Plex-Unit A): M 453,
2nd 885, G 432
1128 Elmore Ave
033-2355-325.01-00
$270.00
Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM
Page 2 of 16
City of Idaho Falls
308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
Phone: (208) 612-8100
Impact Fee Payments
From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026
Case Number
Case Name
Location
Account Code
Amount
IFFDL: IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS UNDER 1,500 SQ
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/17/2026
RES26-00448
ADU: M 448
419 Tyra Dr
033-2355-325.01-00
$270.00
Total Payments for IFFDL:
$2,700.00
IFFDM: IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 9/22/2026
RES26-00282
SFR: M 2563, G 899, CP 656
4785 Providence Point Dr
033-2355-325.01-00
$438.00
Date of Payment: 9/28/2026
RES26-00500
SFR: M 1391, G 489, CP 91, UFB
1391
6855 Millbrook Dr
033-2355-325.01-00
$438.00
RES26-00503
SFR: M 1445, G 586, CP 116, UFB
1423
6856 Bronson Dr
033-2355-325.01-00
$438.00
Date of Payment: 9/3/2026
RES26-00472
Twin Home: M 1411, G 420, CP 40,
UFB 1413
6349 Ender Ln
033-2355-325.01-00
$438.00
RES26-00471
Twin Home: M 1411, G 420, CP 40,
UFB 1413
6333 Ender Ln
033-2355-325.01-00
$438.00
Date of Payment: 7/1/2026
RES26-00270
SFR: M 1454, G 968, CP 120, UFB
1432
1685 Palm Springs Dr
033-2355-325.01-00
$438.00
RES26-00245
SFR: M 1149, G 424, UFB 209, FB
983
1520 S Emerson Ave
033-2355-325.01-00
$438.00
Date of Payment: 7/13/2026
RES26-00323
SFR: M 1427, G 829, CP 66, UFB
1427
351 Birdie Thompson Dr
033-2355-325.01-00
$438.00
Date of Payment: 8/13/2026
RES26-00397
SFR: M 1362, 2nd 1153, GAR 612,
COVP 114
5476 Rip Tide Rd
033-2355-325.01-00
$438.00
Date of Payment: 8/18/2026
RES26-00272
SFR: M 1919, G 540, CP 85
1619 Sandbar St
033-2355-325.01-00
$438.00
IFFDM: IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/3/2026
RES26-00325
SFR: M 2009, G 559, P 482
1568 Sandbar St
033-2355-325.01-00
$438.00
Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM
Page 3 of 16
City of Idaho Falls
308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
Phone: (208) 612-8100
Impact Fee Payments
From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026
Case Number
Case Name
Location
Account Code
Amount
IFFDM: IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/4/2026
RES26-00306
Twin Home: M 600, 2nd 1083, G
572
424 East River Ln
033-2355-325.01-00
$438.00
RES26-00302
Twin Home: M 663, 2nd 1139, G
572
414 East River Ln
033-2355-325.01-00
$438.00
Total Payments for IFFDM:
$5,694.00
IFNRRTLFD: RETAIL IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 7/13/2026
COM26-00019
Pizza Ranch Restaurant & Fun-
Zone
231 N Woodruff Ave
033-2355-325.01-00
$8,195.00
Date of Payment: 7/31/2026
COM25-00149
New Circle K Store and Gas Station 1575 Pancheri Dr
033-2355-325.01-00
$2,860.00
Total Payments for IFNRRTLFD:
$11,055.00
IFNRRTLPD: RETAIL IMPACT FEE POLICE
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 7/31/2026
COM25-00149
New Circle K Store and Gas Station 1575 Pancheri Dr
032-2055-325.01-00
$3,463.20
Date of Payment: 7/13/2026
COM26-00019
Pizza Ranch Restaurant & Fun-
Zone
231 N Woodruff Ave
032-2055-325.01-00
$9,923.40
Total Payments for IFNRRTLPD:
$13,386.60
IFNRRTLTR: RETAIL IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTATION
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 7/13/2026
COM26-00019
Pizza Ranch Restaurant & Fun-
Zone
231 N Woodruff Ave
035-4655-325.01-00
$49,468.00
Date of Payment: 7/31/2026
COM25-00149
New Circle K Store and Gas Station 1575 Pancheri Dr
035-4655-325.01-00
$17,264.00
Total Payments for IFNRRTLTR:
$66,732.00
IFPLH: IMPACT FEE POLICE 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/17/2026
RES26-00339
Twinhome: M 1544, G 543, FB
1538
417 East River Ln
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM
Page 4 of 16
City of Idaho Falls
308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
Phone: (208) 612-8100
Impact Fee Payments
From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026
Case Number
Case Name
Location
Account Code
Amount
IFPLH: IMPACT FEE POLICE 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/17/2026
RES26-00349
TwinHome: M 1544, G 543, FB
1538
425 East River Ln
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
Date of Payment: 7/22/2026
RES26-00278
SFR: M 1784, G 802, CP 141, UFB
1584
5556 Sand Springs Rd
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
Date of Payment: 8/6/2026
RES26-00340
SFR: M 1881, G910, CP 232, FB
1439, UFB 415
5377 Boardwalk Rd
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
Date of Payment: 7/17/2026
RES26-00286
Twin Home: M 1589, G 888, UFB
1589
5861 Maggie Dr
032-2055-325.01-00
$0.00
RES26-00286
Twin Home: M 1589, G 888, UFB
1589
5861 Maggie Dr
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
RES26-00320
SFR: M 1589, G 1084, CP 136, FB
1261, UFB 328
5911 Maggie Dr
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
RES26-00288
Twin Home: M 1599, G 888, UFB
1589
5885 Maggie Dr
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
RES26-00312
SFR: M 1937, G 931, CP 422, UFB
1941
5505 Boardwalk Rd
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
RES26-00317
SFR: M 1620, G 795, CP 180, FB
1620
5471 Boardwalk Rd
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
RES26-00289
SFR: M 1652, G 895, CP 52, UFB
1412
6161 Broken Stone Way
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
RES26-00283
Twin Home: M 1589, G 518, UFB
1489
820 Kiah Ln
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
RES26-00284
Twin home; M 1589, G 518, UFB
1489
832 Kiah Ln
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
Date of Payment: 7/2/2026
RES26-00249
SFR: M 2565, G 1520, CP 455, FB
2557
4865 River Bend Ln
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
Date of Payment: 7/16/2026
RES26-00248
SFR M 2400, G 1512, CP 270, FB
2400
2201 W 17th S
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
Date of Payment: 8/27/2026
RES26-00405
SFR, M 1855, UNFB 1865, GAR
834, COVP 204
516 Boxwood Dr
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
Date of Payment: 9/10/2026
RES26-00476
SFR: M 2573, G 1399, CP 638, FB
2014, UFB 559
5342 Wild Dunes Ln
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
Date of Payment: 8/20/2026
RES26-00351
SFR: M 1773, G 1018, CP 456,
UFB 1662
5441 Boardwalk Rd
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM
Page 5 of 16
City of Idaho Falls
308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
Phone: (208) 612-8100
Impact Fee Payments
From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026
Case Number
Case Name
Location
Account Code
Amount
IFPLH: IMPACT FEE POLICE 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 9/24/2026
RES26-00475
SFR: M 2372, G 1181, CP 520, FB
2040, UFB 285
5755 Dune Village Way
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
IFPLH: IMPACT FEE POLICE 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 7/17/2026
RES26-00290
SFR: M 1730, G 798, CP 52, UFB
1484
1584 Sandbar St
032-2055-325.01-00
$397.00
Total Payments for IFPLH:
$7,543.00
IFPLL: IMPACT FEE POLICE UNDER 1,500 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/17/2026
RES26-00448
ADU: M 448
419 Tyra Dr
032-2055-325.01-00
$185.00
IFPLL: IMPACT FEE POLICE UNDER 1,500 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 7/14/2026
RES26-00259
Townhome (3 Plex-Unit A): M 453,
2nd 885, G 432
1128 Elmore Ave
032-2055-325.01-00
$185.00
RES26-00258
Townhome (3 Plex-Unit B) M 487,
2nd 911, G 425
1124 Elmore Ave
032-2055-325.01-00
$185.00
RES26-00257
Townhome (3 Plex-Unit C): M 453,
2nd 885, G 433
1120 Elmore Ave
032-2055-325.01-00
$185.00
Date of Payment: 8/27/2026
RES26-00356
Townhome Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G
420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #1
032-2055-325.01-00
$185.00
RES26-00360
Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938,
G 420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #2
032-2055-325.01-00
$185.00
RES26-00362
Townhome Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G
420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #3
032-2055-325.01-00
$185.00
RES26-00365
Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938,
G 420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #4
032-2055-325.01-00
$185.00
RES26-00366
Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938,
G 420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #5
032-2055-325.01-00
$185.00
Date of Payment: 8/31/2026
RES26-00367
Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938,
G 420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #6
032-2055-325.01-00
$185.00
Total Payments for IFPLL:
$1,850.00
Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM
Page 6 of 16
City of Idaho Falls
308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
Phone: (208) 612-8100
Impact Fee Payments
From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026
Case Number
Case Name
Location
Account Code
Amount
IFPLM: IMPACT FEE POLICE 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/18/2026
RES26-00272
SFR: M 1919, G 540, CP 85
1619 Sandbar St
032-2055-325.01-00
$298.00
Date of Payment: 8/13/2026
RES26-00397
SFR: M 1362, 2nd 1153, GAR 612,
COVP 114
5476 Rip Tide Rd
032-2055-325.01-00
$298.00
Date of Payment: 7/1/2026
RES26-00270
SFR: M 1454, G 968, CP 120, UFB
1432
1685 Palm Springs Dr
032-2055-325.01-00
$298.00
RES26-00245
SFR: M 1149, G 424, UFB 209, FB
983
1520 S Emerson Ave
032-2055-325.01-00
$298.00
Date of Payment: 7/13/2026
RES26-00323
SFR: M 1427, G 829, CP 66, UFB
1427
351 Birdie Thompson Dr
032-2055-325.01-00
$298.00
Date of Payment: 9/3/2026
RES26-00471
Twin Home: M 1411, G 420, CP 40,
UFB 1413
6333 Ender Ln
032-2055-325.01-00
$298.00
RES26-00472
Twin Home: M 1411, G 420, CP 40,
UFB 1413
6349 Ender Ln
032-2055-325.01-00
$298.00
Date of Payment: 9/28/2026
RES26-00503
SFR: M 1445, G 586, CP 116, UFB
1423
6856 Bronson Dr
032-2055-325.01-00
$298.00
RES26-00500
SFR: M 1391, G 489, CP 91, UFB
1391
6855 Millbrook Dr
032-2055-325.01-00
$298.00
Date of Payment: 9/22/2026
RES26-00282
SFR: M 2563, G 899, CP 656
4785 Providence Point Dr
032-2055-325.01-00
$298.00
IFPLM: IMPACT FEE POLICE 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/3/2026
RES26-00325
SFR: M 2009, G 559, P 482
1568 Sandbar St
032-2055-325.01-00
$298.00
IFPLM: IMPACT FEE POLICE 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/4/2026
RES26-00306
Twin Home: M 600, 2nd 1083, G
572
424 East River Ln
032-2055-325.01-00
$298.00
RES26-00302
Twin Home: M 663, 2nd 1139, G
572
414 East River Ln
032-2055-325.01-00
$298.00
Total Payments for IFPLM:
$3,874.00
Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM
Page 7 of 16
City of Idaho Falls
308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
Phone: (208) 612-8100
Impact Fee Payments
From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026
Case Number
Case Name
Location
Account Code
Amount
IFPRH: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/17/2026
RES26-00339
Twinhome: M 1544, G 543, FB
1538
417 East River Ln
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
RES26-00349
TwinHome: M 1544, G 543, FB
1538
425 East River Ln
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
Date of Payment: 7/22/2026
RES26-00278
SFR: M 1784, G 802, CP 141, UFB
1584
5556 Sand Springs Rd
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
Date of Payment: 8/6/2026
RES26-00340
SFR: M 1881, G910, CP 232, FB
1439, UFB 415
5377 Boardwalk Rd
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
Date of Payment: 7/17/2026
RES26-00286
Twin Home: M 1589, G 888, UFB
1589
5861 Maggie Dr
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
RES26-00320
SFR: M 1589, G 1084, CP 136, FB
1261, UFB 328
5911 Maggie Dr
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
RES26-00288
Twin Home: M 1599, G 888, UFB
1589
5885 Maggie Dr
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
RES26-00286
Twin Home: M 1589, G 888, UFB
1589
5861 Maggie Dr
034-2755-325.01-00
$0.00
RES26-00317
SFR: M 1620, G 795, CP 180, FB
1620
5471 Boardwalk Rd
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
RES26-00289
SFR: M 1652, G 895, CP 52, UFB
1412
6161 Broken Stone Way
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
RES26-00283
Twin Home: M 1589, G 518, UFB
1489
820 Kiah Ln
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
RES26-00284
Twin home; M 1589, G 518, UFB
1489
832 Kiah Ln
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
RES26-00312
SFR: M 1937, G 931, CP 422, UFB
1941
5505 Boardwalk Rd
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
Date of Payment: 7/2/2026
RES26-00249
SFR: M 2565, G 1520, CP 455, FB
2557
4865 River Bend Ln
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
Date of Payment: 7/16/2026
RES26-00248
SFR M 2400, G 1512, CP 270, FB
2400
2201 W 17th S
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
Date of Payment: 8/27/2026
RES26-00405
SFR, M 1855, UNFB 1865, GAR
834, COVP 204
516 Boxwood Dr
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
Date of Payment: 8/20/2026
RES26-00351
SFR: M 1773, G 1018, CP 456,
UFB 1662
5441 Boardwalk Rd
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM
Page 8 of 16
City of Idaho Falls
308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
Phone: (208) 612-8100
Impact Fee Payments
From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026
Case Number
Case Name
Location
Account Code
Amount
IFPRH: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 9/10/2026
RES26-00476
SFR: M 2573, G 1399, CP 638, FB
2014, UFB 559
5342 Wild Dunes Ln
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
Date of Payment: 9/24/2026
RES26-00475
SFR: M 2372, G 1181, CP 520, FB
2040, UFB 285
5755 Dune Village Way
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
IFPRH: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 7/17/2026
RES26-00290
SFR: M 1730, G 798, CP 52, UFB
1484
1584 Sandbar St
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,700.00
Total Payments for IFPRH:
$32,300.00
IFPRL: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC UNDER 1,500 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/17/2026
RES26-00448
ADU: M 448
419 Tyra Dr
034-2755-325.01-00
$790.00
IFPRL: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC UNDER 1,500 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 7/14/2026
RES26-00259
Townhome (3 Plex-Unit A): M 453,
2nd 885, G 432
1128 Elmore Ave
034-2755-325.01-00
$790.00
RES26-00258
Townhome (3 Plex-Unit B) M 487,
2nd 911, G 425
1124 Elmore Ave
034-2755-325.01-00
$790.00
RES26-00257
Townhome (3 Plex-Unit C): M 453,
2nd 885, G 433
1120 Elmore Ave
034-2755-325.01-00
$790.00
Date of Payment: 8/27/2026
RES26-00356
Townhome Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G
420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #1
034-2755-325.01-00
$790.00
RES26-00360
Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938,
G 420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #2
034-2755-325.01-00
$790.00
RES26-00362
Townhome Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G
420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #3
034-2755-325.01-00
$790.00
RES26-00365
Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938,
G 420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #4
034-2755-325.01-00
$790.00
RES26-00366
Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938,
G 420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #5
034-2755-325.01-00
$790.00
Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM
Page 9 of 16
City of Idaho Falls
308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
Phone: (208) 612-8100
Impact Fee Payments
From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026
Case Number
Case Name
Location
Account Code
Amount
IFPRL: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC UNDER 1,500 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/31/2026
RES26-00367
Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938,
G 420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #6
034-2755-325.01-00
$790.00
Total Payments for IFPRL:
$7,900.00
IFPRM: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/18/2026
RES26-00272
SFR: M 1919, G 540, CP 85
1619 Sandbar St
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,276.00
Date of Payment: 8/13/2026
RES26-00397
SFR: M 1362, 2nd 1153, GAR 612,
COVP 114
5476 Rip Tide Rd
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,276.00
Date of Payment: 7/13/2026
RES26-00323
SFR: M 1427, G 829, CP 66, UFB
1427
351 Birdie Thompson Dr
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,276.00
Date of Payment: 7/1/2026
RES26-00270
SFR: M 1454, G 968, CP 120, UFB
1432
1685 Palm Springs Dr
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,276.00
RES26-00245
SFR: M 1149, G 424, UFB 209, FB
983
1520 S Emerson Ave
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,276.00
Date of Payment: 9/3/2026
RES26-00471
Twin Home: M 1411, G 420, CP 40,
UFB 1413
6333 Ender Ln
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,276.00
RES26-00472
Twin Home: M 1411, G 420, CP 40,
UFB 1413
6349 Ender Ln
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,276.00
Date of Payment: 9/28/2026
RES26-00503
SFR: M 1445, G 586, CP 116, UFB
1423
6856 Bronson Dr
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,276.00
RES26-00500
SFR: M 1391, G 489, CP 91, UFB
1391
6855 Millbrook Dr
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,276.00
Date of Payment: 9/22/2026
RES26-00282
SFR: M 2563, G 899, CP 656
4785 Providence Point Dr
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,276.00
IFPRM: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/3/2026
RES26-00325
SFR: M 2009, G 559, P 482
1568 Sandbar St
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,276.00
Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM
Page 10 of 16
City of Idaho Falls
308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
Phone: (208) 612-8100
Impact Fee Payments
From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026
Case Number
Case Name
Location
Account Code
Amount
IFPRM: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/4/2026
RES26-00306
Twin Home: M 600, 2nd 1083, G
572
424 East River Ln
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,276.00
RES26-00302
Twin Home: M 663, 2nd 1139, G
572
414 East River Ln
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,276.00
Total Payments for IFPRM:
$16,588.00
IFRMFFD: IMPACT FEE MULTIFAMILY FIRE/EMS
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 9/28/2026
COM26-00035
Stillwater Senior Living - 55 Unit
Apartment
450 W Anderson St
033-2355-325-.01-00
$14,850.00
Total Payments for IFRMFFD:
$14,850.00
IFRMFPD: IMPACT FEE MULTIFAMILY POLICE
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 9/28/2026
COM26-00035
Stillwater Senior Living - 55 Unit
Apartment
450 W Anderson St
032-2055-325.01-00
$10,175.00
Total Payments for IFRMFPD:
$10,175.00
IFRMFPR: IMPACT FEE MULTIFAMILY PARKS AND REC
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 9/28/2026
COM26-00035
Stillwater Senior Living - 55 Unit
Apartment
450 W Anderson St
034-2755-325.01-00
$43,450.00
Total Payments for IFRMFPR:
$43,450.00
IFRMFTR: IMPACT FEE MULTIFAMILY TRANSPORTATION
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 9/28/2026
COM26-00035
Stillwater Senior Living - 55 Unit
Apartment
450 W Anderson St
035-4655-325.01-00
$102,520.00
Total Payments for IFRMFTR:
$102,520.00
Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM
Page 11 of 16
City of Idaho Falls
308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
Phone: (208) 612-8100
Impact Fee Payments
From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026
Case Number
Case Name
Location
Account Code
Amount
IFRSFFD: IMPACT FEE SINGLE FAMILY FIRE/EMS
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/24/2026
RES25-00565
TownHome, Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd
1190, G 489, UFB 773
1331 Latah Ave
033-2355-325.01-00
$389.25
RES25-00564
TownHome Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd
1190, G 489, UFB 773
1327 Latah Ave
033-2355-325.01-00
$389.25
RES25-00563
TownHome Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd
1190, G 489, UFB 773
1323 Latah Ave
033-2355-325.01-00
$389.25
RES25-00562
TownHome: Bldg 5, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1319 Latah Ave
033-2355-325.01-00
$389.25
RES25-00561
TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1315 Latah Ave
033-2355-325.01-00
$389.25
RES25-00560
TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1311 Latah Ave
033-2355-325.01-00
$389.25
RES25-00559
TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1307 Latah Ave
033-2355-325.01-00
$389.25
RES25-00558
TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1303 Latah Ave
033-2355-325.01-00
$389.25
Total Payments for IFRSFFD:
$3,114.00
IFRSFPD: IMPACT FEE SINGLE FAMILY POLICE
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/24/2026
RES25-00558
TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1303 Latah Ave
032-2055-325.01-00
$480.75
RES25-00559
TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1307 Latah Ave
032-2055-325.01-00
$480.75
RES25-00560
TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1311 Latah Ave
032-2055-325.01-00
$480.75
RES25-00561
TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1315 Latah Ave
032-2055-325.01-00
$480.75
RES25-00562
TownHome: Bldg 5, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1319 Latah Ave
032-2055-325.01-00
$480.75
RES25-00563
TownHome Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd
1190, G 489, UFB 773
1323 Latah Ave
032-2055-325.01-00
$480.75
RES25-00564
TownHome Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd
1190, G 489, UFB 773
1327 Latah Ave
032-2055-325.01-00
$480.75
RES25-00565
TownHome, Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd
1190, G 489, UFB 773
1331 Latah Ave
032-2055-325.01-00
$480.75
Total Payments for IFRSFPD:
$3,846.00
Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM
Page 12 of 16
City of Idaho Falls
308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
Phone: (208) 612-8100
Impact Fee Payments
From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026
Case Number
Case Name
Location
Account Code
Amount
IFRSFPR: IMPACT FEE SINGLE FAMILY PARKS AND REC
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/24/2026
RES25-00565
TownHome, Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd
1190, G 489, UFB 773
1331 Latah Ave
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,390.50
RES25-00564
TownHome Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd
1190, G 489, UFB 773
1327 Latah Ave
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,390.50
RES25-00563
TownHome Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd
1190, G 489, UFB 773
1323 Latah Ave
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,390.50
RES25-00562
TownHome: Bldg 5, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1319 Latah Ave
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,390.50
RES25-00561
TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1315 Latah Ave
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,390.50
RES25-00560
TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1311 Latah Ave
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,390.50
RES25-00559
TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1307 Latah Ave
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,390.50
RES25-00558
TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1303 Latah Ave
034-2755-325.01-00
$1,390.50
Total Payments for IFRSFPR:
$11,124.00
IFRSFTR: IMPACT FEE SINGLE FAMILY TRANSPORTATION
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/24/2026
RES25-00558
TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1303 Latah Ave
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,013.00
RES25-00559
TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1307 Latah Ave
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,013.00
RES25-00560
TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1311 Latah Ave
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,013.00
RES25-00561
TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1315 Latah Ave
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,013.00
RES25-00562
TownHome: Bldg 5, M 774, U 1190,
UFB 773, G 489
1319 Latah Ave
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,013.00
RES25-00563
TownHome Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd
1190, G 489, UFB 773
1323 Latah Ave
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,013.00
RES25-00564
TownHome Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd
1190, G 489, UFB 773
1327 Latah Ave
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,013.00
RES25-00565
TownHome, Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd
1190, G 489, UFB 773
1331 Latah Ave
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,013.00
Total Payments for IFRSFTR:
$24,104.00
Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM
Page 13 of 16
City of Idaho Falls
308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
Phone: (208) 612-8100
Impact Fee Payments
From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026
Case Number
Case Name
Location
Account Code
Amount
IFTRH: IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTATION 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 9/24/2026
RES26-00475
SFR: M 2372, G 1181, CP 520, FB
2040, UFB 285
5755 Dune Village Way
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
Date of Payment: 9/10/2026
RES26-00476
SFR: M 2573, G 1399, CP 638, FB
2014, UFB 559
5342 Wild Dunes Ln
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
Date of Payment: 8/20/2026
RES26-00351
SFR: M 1773, G 1018, CP 456,
UFB 1662
5441 Boardwalk Rd
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
Date of Payment: 8/27/2026
RES26-00405
SFR, M 1855, UNFB 1865, GAR
834, COVP 204
516 Boxwood Dr
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
Date of Payment: 7/17/2026
RES26-00312
SFR: M 1937, G 931, CP 422, UFB
1941
5505 Boardwalk Rd
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
RES26-00284
Twin home; M 1589, G 518, UFB
1489
832 Kiah Ln
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
RES26-00283
Twin Home: M 1589, G 518, UFB
1489
820 Kiah Ln
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
RES26-00289
SFR: M 1652, G 895, CP 52, UFB
1412
6161 Broken Stone Way
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
RES26-00317
SFR: M 1620, G 795, CP 180, FB
1620
5471 Boardwalk Rd
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
RES26-00286
Twin Home: M 1589, G 888, UFB
1589
5861 Maggie Dr
035-4655-325.01-00
$0.00
RES26-00288
Twin Home: M 1599, G 888, UFB
1589
5885 Maggie Dr
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
RES26-00320
SFR: M 1589, G 1084, CP 136, FB
1261, UFB 328
5911 Maggie Dr
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
RES26-00286
Twin Home: M 1589, G 888, UFB
1589
5861 Maggie Dr
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
Date of Payment: 7/16/2026
RES26-00248
SFR M 2400, G 1512, CP 270, FB
2400
2201 W 17th S
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
Date of Payment: 7/2/2026
RES26-00249
SFR: M 2565, G 1520, CP 455, FB
2557
4865 River Bend Ln
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
Date of Payment: 8/6/2026
RES26-00340
SFR: M 1881, G910, CP 232, FB
1439, UFB 415
5377 Boardwalk Rd
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
Date of Payment: 7/22/2026
RES26-00278
SFR: M 1784, G 802, CP 141, UFB
1584
5556 Sand Springs Rd
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM
Page 14 of 16
City of Idaho Falls
308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
Phone: (208) 612-8100
Impact Fee Payments
From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026
Case Number
Case Name
Location
Account Code
Amount
IFTRH: IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTATION 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/17/2026
RES26-00349
TwinHome: M 1544, G 543, FB
1538
425 East River Ln
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
RES26-00339
Twinhome: M 1544, G 543, FB
1538
417 East River Ln
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
IFTRH: IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTATION 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 7/17/2026
RES26-00290
SFR: M 1730, G 798, CP 52, UFB
1484
1584 Sandbar St
035-4655-325.01-00
$3,780.00
Total Payments for IFTRH:
$71,820.00
IFTRL: IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTAION UNDER 1,500 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/31/2026
RES26-00367
Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938,
G 420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #6
035-4655-325.01-00
$1,864.00
Date of Payment: 8/27/2026
RES26-00366
Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938,
G 420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #5
035-4655-325.01-00
$1,864.00
RES26-00365
Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938,
G 420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #4
035-4655-325.01-00
$1,864.00
RES26-00362
Townhome Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G
420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #3
035-4655-325.01-00
$1,864.00
RES26-00360
Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938,
G 420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #2
035-4655-325.01-00
$1,864.00
RES26-00356
Townhome Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G
420, CP 44
1527 Cassiopeia St, #1
035-4655-325.01-00
$1,864.00
Date of Payment: 7/14/2026
RES26-00257
Townhome (3 Plex-Unit C): M 453,
2nd 885, G 433
1120 Elmore Ave
035-4655-325.01-00
$1,864.00
RES26-00258
Townhome (3 Plex-Unit B) M 487,
2nd 911, G 425
1124 Elmore Ave
035-4655-325.01-00
$1,864.00
RES26-00259
Townhome (3 Plex-Unit A): M 453,
2nd 885, G 432
1128 Elmore Ave
035-4655-325.01-00
$1,864.00
IFTRL: IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTAION UNDER 1,500 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/17/2026
RES26-00448
ADU: M 448
419 Tyra Dr
035-4655-325.01-00
$1,864.00
Total Payments for IFTRL:
$18,640.00
Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM
Page 15 of 16
City of Idaho Falls
308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
Phone: (208) 612-8100
Impact Fee Payments
From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026
Case Number
Case Name
Location
Account Code
Amount
IFTRM: IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTAION 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 9/28/2026
RES26-00500
SFR: M 1391, G 489, CP 91, UFB
1391
6855 Millbrook Dr
035-4655-325.01-00
$2,890.00
RES26-00503
SFR: M 1445, G 586, CP 116, UFB
1423
6856 Bronson Dr
035-4655-325.01-00
$2,890.00
Date of Payment: 9/22/2026
RES26-00282
SFR: M 2563, G 899, CP 656
4785 Providence Point Dr
035-4655-325.01-00
$2,890.00
Date of Payment: 9/3/2026
RES26-00472
Twin Home: M 1411, G 420, CP 40,
UFB 1413
6349 Ender Ln
035-4655-325.01-00
$2,890.00
RES26-00471
Twin Home: M 1411, G 420, CP 40,
UFB 1413
6333 Ender Ln
035-4655-325.01-00
$2,890.00
Date of Payment: 7/1/2026
RES26-00245
SFR: M 1149, G 424, UFB 209, FB
983
1520 S Emerson Ave
035-4655-325.01-00
$2,870.00
RES26-00270
SFR: M 1454, G 968, CP 120, UFB
1432
1685 Palm Springs Dr
035-4655-325.01-00
$2,890.00
Date of Payment: 7/13/2026
RES26-00323
SFR: M 1427, G 829, CP 66, UFB
1427
351 Birdie Thompson Dr
035-4655-325.01-00
$2,890.00
Date of Payment: 8/13/2026
RES26-00397
SFR: M 1362, 2nd 1153, GAR 612,
COVP 114
5476 Rip Tide Rd
035-4655-325.01-00
$2,890.00
Date of Payment: 8/18/2026
RES26-00272
SFR: M 1919, G 540, CP 85
1619 Sandbar St
035-4655-325.01-00
$2,890.00
IFTRM: IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTAION 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/4/2026
RES26-00302
Twin Home: M 663, 2nd 1139, G
572
414 East River Ln
035-4655-325.01-00
$2,890.00
RES26-00306
Twin Home: M 600, 2nd 1083, G
572
424 East River Ln
035-4655-325.01-00
$2,890.00
IFTRM: IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTAION 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT
CASE STATUS: ISSUED
Date of Payment: 8/3/2026
RES26-00325
SFR: M 2009, G 559, P 482
1568 Sandbar St
035-4655-325.01-00
$2,890.00
Total Payments for IFTRM:
$37,550.00
Total Payments from 7/1/2026 to 9/30/2026:
$521,892.60
Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM
Page 16 of 16
City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
! DAHO
FALLS
Thursday, December 18,2025
7:32 PM
City Council Chambers
1.
CalltoOrder
Present:
Mayor Rebecca L. Noah Casper
Council President Lisa Burtenshaw {via Teams)
Councilor Jim Francis
Councilor John Radford
Councilor Jim Freeman {via Teams)
Councilor Kirk Larsen
Absent:
Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Also present:
Stephen Boorman, Acting General Mgr IF Power
Wade Sanner, CDS Director
Brad Cramer, Prospective Planning
Brian Cunnngham, Public Works
Emily Geisler, City Clerk
Chris Fredericksen, Public Works Director
Pam Alexander, Municipal Services Director
Meghan Conrad, Elam and Burke {via Teams)
Zack Jones, City Attorney
2.
Pledge of Allegiance
Rick Dale led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.
3.
Public Comment
No one appeared.
4.
Mayor’s Choice Awards
Purpose of the Awards
●
Established about sixyears ago
●
Selected by the Mayor’s staff with input from City Council members and department
directors.
●
Intended to recognize outstanding residents, businesses, organizations, or local efforts
that made unique contributions to Idaho Falls.
●
Typically presented at the first Council meeting of the year but awarded early this year to
accommodatea busy Januaryagendaand to align with the holiday season.
●
Recipient:Idaho Falls Spud Kings (juniorhockeyteam)
●
Founded in 2022 and quickly became a major source of community pride.
●
Won the 2025 Dineen Cup (NCDC championship), defeating the South Shore Kings 2-1.
1
City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
Goalie Charlie Durkin earned Championship Series MVP honors.
Idaho Falls became the first non-East Coast City selected to host the Cup championships,
happening in April 2026.
The team regularly sells out the Mountain America Center and has built strong community
engagement, including service activities by players.
A Citywide celebration followed the recent championship, and May 1®^ was declared Idaho
Falls Spud Kings Day.
Award accepted by Kevin Greene, team president and co-owner.
Mayor’s Choice Award forOutstanding.Community.Education
●
Recipient: Mayor’s Scholarship Fund
●
Founded in 2006 to support Idaho Falls students pursuing education beyond high school.
●
Focuses on “strivers” — students often overlooked by traditional scholarships due to GPA
orfinancial criteria.
●
Has awarded nearly $1 million in locally raised funds to approximately800 students in
Districts 91 and 93.
●
Includes Promise Scholarships for grades 8-11 and awards for graduating seniors.
●
Scholarships support colleges, universities, community colleges, and workforce training
programs.
●
Emphasizes encouragement, belief in students’ potential, and life-changing support, not
just financial aid.
●
Designed to help students see new possibilities for their future and feel supported by their
community.
●
Recognized for fostering a community-wide belief in students who may not fit traditional
scholarship molds.
●
Entirely funded by local donations and focused on helping students bridge financial gaps
while motivating them to pursue education.
●
Award accepted by Leslie Pincock, Executive Director, who emphasized continued
community support and fundraisingfor local students.
Mayor’s Choice Award for Outstanding CommunityContribution
●
Recipient: Idaho Environmental Coalition (lEC), contractorfor the Idaho Cleanup Project at
Idaho National Laboratory.
●
Honored for critical national-level environmental cleanup work conducted safely and
responsibly in Idaho.
«
Achievements include:
o
Treating one-third of INL’s legacy liquid radioactive waste,
o
Leading the DOE complex in shipments of transuranic waste (over 1,100 shipments
since 2022).
o
Completing major cleanup projects ahead of schedule, including subsurface
disposal areas and historic facility demolitions.
●
lEC employs and trains hundreds of Idahoans and contributes significant volunteer hours
and community investment.
●
Award accepted by Dana Kirkham, lEC principal and former Ammon Mayor.
2
City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
Mayor’s Choice Award for "Under the Radar”
●
Recipient: Steve Taggart, Idaho Falls attorney and communityleader.
●
Recognized for behind-the-scenesleadership and strategic contributions to major local
initiatives.
●
Key roles have included:
o
Messaging and strategy behind the creation of the College of Eastern Idaho,
o
Assistance in reorganizing local transit into Greater Idaho Falls Transit (GIFT),
o
Mentoring leaders, candidates, and community organizations.
●
Known for humility, volunteerism, and prioritizingteamwork over personal recognition.
●
Celebrated for long-term civic impact, community responsibility, and quiet service.
●
Award accepted by Steve Taggart himself.
Mayor’s Choice Award for OutstandingCommunity Enrichment
●
Recipient: Idaho Falls Farmers Market
●
The Idaho Falls Farmers Market is a key communitygathering place that strengthens local
connections, culture, and the economy.
●
The market has grown significantly in recent years, expanding to Memorial Drive and
hosting up to 173 vendors in 2025.
●
During the May-October season, it attracts 8,000-9,000 visitors on a typical Saturday, with
peak attendancereaching12,000.
●
Overthe past four years, the markethas generatedmore than $6 million in Local sales,
supportingfarmers,artisans,and small businesses.
●
To adapt to Idaho’swinters,the marketlaunched a monthly indoor winter market
(November-April)featuring about 75 vendors.
●
The winter market provides year-round income opportunitiesfor local producers and a
warm, welcoming space for families.
●
The Farmers Market plays a major role in community events, including the Water Tower
Tribute Block Party and the City tree lighting, helping transform them into vibrant
celebrations.
●
The market is recognized for its innovation, leadership, creativity, and service.
●
Award accepted by Clark Poston, Market Manager
Mayor’s Choice Award for Outstanding Humanitarian Service
●
Defined by consistently stepping in to help wherever there is need.
●
For more than 30 years, Dr. Fritz Schmutz has demonstrated this commitment to the Idaho
Falls community.
●
He is known for his quiet, hands-on compassion, always putting people first and never
seeking recognition.
●
Dr. Schmutz has played a key role in launching and supporting programs for individuals with
special needs and veterans, contributing in anyway necessary to help those programs
succeed.
●
His early efforts helped create lasting opportunities that continue to change lives today.
●
Long before the term “food insecurity” was common, he worked to address hunger in the
community.
●
He organized food drives, personally rented storage space when none existed, and
partnered with local organizations to ensure food reached families in need.
3
City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
His work influenced community traditions, including parade-based food donation efforts
supported by City leaders.
Professionally, he has served as a physician in Idaho Falls for over three decades, known
for exceptional care, attentiveness, and going the extra mile for patients.
Dr. Schmutz exemplifies humility, compassion, and service above self.
Award accepted by Dr. Schmutz himself.
Mayor’s Choice Award for Outstanding Global Citizenship:
●
Recognizes extraordinary dedication to international friendship and cultural understanding
in Idaho Falls.
●
Clarke Kido is honored for his long-standing service with the Idaho Falls Sister Cities
organization, strengthening ties with Tokai, Japan.
●
His work has built lasting cross-culturalconnectionsthat enrich the entire community.
●
Clarke conceived and helped design the Idaho Falls Friendship Garden, inspired by gardens
he saw in Japan.
●
He collaborated with community partners and the Idaho Falls Parks and Recreation
Department to bring the garden to life.
●
The Friendship Garden is a valued community space used for reflection, gatherings, and
milestone photos such as proms and weddings.
●
Clarke continues to devote significant time to maintaining the garden and preserving its
authenticityand cultural integrity.
●
He is a longtime member of the Japanese American Citizens League (JACL) and has served
as treasurer of the Idaho Falls Sister Cities Association.
●
He has helped preserve and celebrate Japanese culture locally and created opportunities
for meaningful cultural exchange.
●
Clarke organized and led visits to important historical sites, including the Minidoka
internment site, to foster understanding and remembrance.
●
Community leaders describe him as thoughtful, kind, humble, and focused on improving
life for others ratherthan seeking recognition.
●
Clarke Kido is recognized as a quiet leader whose vision and service exemplify global
citizenship and community impact.
●
As he prepares to move to Boise to be closer to family, the community expresses gratitude
for his lasting legacy and contributions.
Mayor’s Choice Award for Outstanding Philanthropic Commitment
●
Recipient: Heroes Defense Fund
●
Hosts annual 9/11 Tribute Banquet and public events that bring first responders and 9/11
heroes to Idaho Falls to share their stories.
●
Uses events as fundraisers to support first responders, veterans, and their families while
deepening community appreciation for their service.
●
Recognized for sustained, hands-on philanthropy despite operating as a for-profit business.
●
Emphasized strong partnerships with local first responders and the strength of the Idaho
Falls community.
●
Award accepted by Travis Snowder, board of directors co-chair
4
City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
Mayor_:s ChoiceAwardJQr_Qjjtstanding Community Partnership
●
Recipient: Shoshone-BannockTribes
●
Honored for generations of stewardship of the land and meaningful collaboration with
Idaho Falls.
●
Contributions include cultural preservation, education, and community engagement.
●
Longstanding partnership with the War Bonnet Round-Up Rodeo, including opening
ceremonies with tribal drummers and dancers and cultural messages.
●
Key partners with the Museum of Idaho’s Way Out West exhibit, providing expertise,
artifacts, ceremonies, and cultural guidance.
●
Collaborate annually with INLon Earth Day celebrations, including cultural blessings.
●
Recognized for enriching the communitythrough respectful, professional, and enduring
partnerships.
Mayor’s Choice Award for_^Out of_the_Ashes”
●
Recipient: Alan Reed, Reed’s Dairy
●
Family-owned Idaho Falls institution dating back to 1955, rooted in early home milk delivery
and farm-to-table practices.
●
Alan Reed pioneered Reed’s Dairy ice cream, now a regional staple.
●
Business has grown to serve Eastern and Western Idaho, operating multiple retail stores
and processing milk from their own dairy.
●
Known for innovation, communitytraditions, and family leadership across generations.
●
After a devastating fire in January 2024 destroyed the original production facility, the family
persevered with community support.
●
Opened a new 25,000-square-foot production facility in November 2025, symbolizing
resilience, renewal, and enduring community ties.
●
Award accepted by Alan Reed, who expressed gratitude and humility, emphasizing that
while tragedy brought sadness, it did not bring defeat.
●
Mr. Reed credited the successful rebuilding of a new dairy processing facility in just 22
months to:
o
Dedicated employees and leadership,
o
Strong community support,
o
Assistance and partnership from the City.
●
Mr. Reed thanked the Idaho Falls community for standing behind the business and making
recovery possible.
●
The Mayorclosed by Lightheartedly acknowledging the length of the ceremony, notingthat
many more people deserve recognition and emphasized that Idaho Falls is a great place
because of its people.
The meeting paused briefly to allow recipients to gather for a group photo before the meeting was
called back to order.
5.
Remarks - Mayor Casper {Presented during the Mayor’s Choice Awards)
6.
Consent Agenda
A.
Office of the Mayor
5
City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
1.
25-496 Appointment of Jim Freeman to the Golf Advisory Board, reappointment of
Bill Combo & Robert Nitschke to the Parks & Recreation Commission, and
Reappointment of Tanner Fonnesbeck, Robert Skinner and Brent Robertson to the
War Bonnet Advisory
B.
Municipal Services
1.
25-498 Bulk purchase of ammunition from Salt Lake Wholesale Sports for
$107,190.
2.
25-501 Purchase of a Compact Wheel Loader from Intermountain Bobcat of Idaho
Falls for $89,595.71.
3.
25-502 Software & Professional services from VLCM with Arctic Wolf for
$104,802.50.
4.
25-505 Treasurer's Reportfor October2025
C.
Airport
1.
25-504 Non-Exclusive Rental Car Concession Agreement with Overland West for
$219,596.58 in revenue plus a 10% privilege fee.
2.
25-506 Peer-to-PeerCar SharingAgreementwith Turo Inc for 10% of its gross
revenue.
D.
Office of the City Clerk
1.
25-465 City Council Meeting Minutes (04.26.2024)
2.
25-463 November 2025 permits and licenses
a.
21 New
b.
18 Renewed
c.
15 Contractors
3.
25-474 Results of the Regular and Runoff Elections held on November 4'^ and
December 2"'^ 2025
Motion 1: Approve, accept, or receive all items on the Consent Agenda according to the
recommendationspresented,
o
Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o
Second: Councilor Radford
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
7.
Regular Agenda
A.
Idaho Falls Power
1.
25-486
Resolution Establishing Standards for Greenbelt Maintenance
Presentation/Discussion (Acting General Manager Boorman): Idaho Falls Power uses
the Snake River, a public resource, for hydroelectric generation, which creates physical
impacts on the river. Under its Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license,
Idaho Falls Power is legally required to:
o
Provide recreational opportunities related to its hydro projects,
o
Mitigate environmental and public-use impacts on the river.
The proposed resolution clarifies responsibility for Greenbelt maintenance, specifically:
6
City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
Which maintenance obligations belong to the utility versus the City.
How funding and resources are allocated.
o
o
Proposed Approach:
●
Rather than Idaho Falls Power directly managing park-like spaces, resources will be
transferred so Parks & Recreation—the department with appropriate expertise—handles
Greenbelt maintenance.
●
This arrangement was described as a practical and efficient partnership that leverages
existing City expertise.
Council members acknowledged significant staff effort in developing the resolution.
The resolution clarifies long-standing confusion over definitions, including the difference
between the “Greenbelt” and the “pathway.”
The agreement aligns well with the ongoing relicensing of the City’s hydroelectric
generation project, expected to conclude around 2028.
Motion: Approve the Resolution authorizing Idaho Falls Power (IFP) to contributeten
percent of its annual gross hydro generation value to Idaho Falls Parks and Recreation
(P&R) forgreenbelt maintenance and improvements within the FERC project boundary and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all necessary documents.
Moved by: Councilor Francis
Second: Councilor Larsen
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen. Nay: Radford.
Motion carries.
o
o
o
o
Public Works
1.
25-499
B
Local Professional Services Agreement with Horrocks Engineers in support
of the Holmes Avenue, Sunnyside Road to TaylorviewImprovement Project
Presentation/Discussion(Director Fredericksen):
Project Overview:
●
The project involves the expansion and urbanization of Holmes Avenue, from south of
Sunnysideto TaylorviewMiddle School.
●
Improvements include widening the arterial roadway and adding sidewalks, curb and
gutter, and lighting where right-of-way allows.
●
Some limitations exist due to remaining county-owned properties, but the goal is to
completethe arterial corridorwithin those constraints.
Funding and Timeline:
●
Design contract cost: $443,874
●
City match: 7.34% ($32,580}
●
Design timeline: Approximately 12 months
●
Estimated construction cost: Just under $3.4 million
●
Construction funding is currently scheduled across 2030-2031, with hopes to
consolidate into a single year closer to construction.
Federal Funding Context:
7
City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
The project is part of the Federal Aid Program through the Bonneville Metropolitan
PlanningOrganization(BMPO).
Idaho is a net recipientstate, receivingmore federaltransportation funding than it
contributes in gas taxes—unlike states such as Texas or California.
Because of federal matching, the City effectively pays about $0.07 on the dollar, making
the project a strong value for taxpayers.
While federal funding adds complexity and longer timelines, it enables projects that
would otherwise be unaffordable locally.
Council Discussion:
Council members emphasized the importance of long-range planning to take
advantage of federal funds.
Staff explained that although the timeline is lengthy, the project was not feasible earlier
due to funding constraints and federal requirements.
The consensuswas that waiting for federal assistance provides substantial benefit and
makes major infrastructure investments possible.
Motion: Approve the ProfessionalServices Agreementwith Horrocks Engineers, Inc., and
authorize the Mayorto execute the document,
o
Moved by: Councilor Radford
o
Second: Councilor Francis
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
Resolution for Grant Application to Rehabilitate the Lincoln Road Bridge
2.
25-500
over the Idaho Canal
Presentation/Discussion (Director Fredericksen):
Key Details:
●
The resolution is required to formally acknowledge the City’s intent to seek federal
funds and committo the required local match.
●
Federal funding requested: $2.6 million
●
Local match: $190,840 (7.34%)
●
if approved,the earliestconstructionfundingwould be available in 2033, reflectinglong
federal project timelines.
Additional Context:
●
Federal aid projects take significant time to develop, often placing construction in the
outeryears of funding programs.
●
The City may use advance construction, paying upfront with local funds and later
seekingfederal reimbursement, if community priorities and funding allow.
●
Having design work completed early positions the City to take advantage of advance
construction opportunities.
Council Discussion:
●
A Council member asked about the impact of newly collected road impact fees,
specifically how much they are reducing the City’s infrastructure backlog.
●
Staff explained that the impact fee study:
8
City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
o
Based projections on arterial road mileage as of 2022.
o
Aims to maintain the same level of service as growth continues.
●
Public Works staff offered to provide more detailed information in a future discussion.
Motion: Approve the Resolution required as part of the grant application submission for
federal funds to rehabilitate the Lincoln Road bridge over the Idaho Canal and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign the document,
o
Moved by: Councilor Radford
o
Second: Councilor Francis
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
C.
Community Development Services
Final Plat and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards,
Idaho Traffic Safety, Division No. 1.
1.
25-503
Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner):
●
Councilors Larson and Radford noted the item was straightforward, had gone through
the Planning Commission, and raised no concerns.
●
The plat met all requirements and aligned with prior approvals.
●
Discussion clarified that the property name comes from the company name - Idaho
Traffic Safety, which supplies and stores traffic control equipment such as cones and
related materials.
●
The company is relocating from its current Sunnyside location after outgrowing the
existing facility.
Motion 1: Accept or Approve the Final Plat for Idaho Traffic Safety, Division No. 1 and give
authorization for the Mayor, City Engineer, and City Clerk to sign said Final Plat,
o
Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o
Second: Councilor Radford
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
Motion 2: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Final
Platfor Idaho TrafficSafety, Division No. 1 and give authorizationforthe Mayortoexecute
the necessarydocuments.
Moved by: CouncilorLarsen
Second: Councilor Radford
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
Motion carries.
o
o
o
o
9
City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
Legislative Hearing for Consideration of an Ordinance approving the Urban
Renewal Plan for the Riverwalk Urban Renewal District
2.
25-495
Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner, Mr. Cramer, Ms. Conrad - via Teams):
●
The public hearing was opened, with all materials and testimony ordered into the
official record.
●
The proposed ordinance establishes a 20-year urban renewal district, running through
December 31,2045.
●
Key milestones:
Eligibility Report Adopted by City Council: July 2025.
Agency approval: Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency, October 16,2025.
Planning Commission review: November 5, 2025, for Comprehensive Plan
compliance.
Public notice: All affected taxing districts notified; notices published in
November.
District Overview:
●
Covers approximately 10 acres west of the Snake River near Pancheri Drive, Broadway
Avenue, and adjacent to the existing River Commons area.
●
Portions previously included in the Snake River Urban Renewal District (1988-2018) but
remained undeveloped.
●
Includes portions of Bridgeport Drive and Utah Avenue rights-of-way.
Statutory CQmp,liancg^gd Jaxi DgJnip^cts:
●
Plan meets Idaho Code requirements, including revenue allocation, financing
provisions, and economic feasibility.
●
District is well under the 10% taxable value cap, with total combined urban renewal
districts at ~$108 million versus an $810 million limit.
●
Bonneville County Ambulance District excluded due to lack of consent; school district
levies not contributing at plan preparation.
●
Fiscal impact primarily involves temporary deferral of new tax revenue, not a reduction
in existing budgets.
Economic Feasibility Highlights:
●
Private investment: ~$40 million, including:
TownePlace Suites hotel (112 rooms, ~$27 million)
Multi-story office building
Mixed-use development near Culver’s
●
Eligible urban renewal costs: ~$4.1 million, mainly for rock blasting, infill, and limited
public infrastructure.
●
Multiplegrowthscenariosmodeled(conservativeto moderate),all showingsufficient
tax increment revenue to cover costs.
●
Developers receive 75% of tax increment revenues via Owner Participation Agreements
(OPAs); the agency retains 25% for administration and potential public projects (~$1.1-
$1.8 million).
●
Full repaymentunder a conservativemodel is projectedby 2046, after district closure in
2045.
Infrastructure and Timing:
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
10
City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
●
Key improvements, like the canal pathway, planned early with initial development (Site
One).
●
Sidewalk gaps on Utah Avenue scheduled for later Site Three development but could be
built earlier if funds allow.
●
Prompt project initiation (e.g., hotel in 2026) is crucial for financial feasibility.
Public_Comment and Legal Clarifications:
●
Public inquiry by John Cummingham on possible parcel interest. He believes he has put
money down on a portion of the property. He was directed to staff for follow-up outside
the hearing.
●
Minor slide corrections noted: “Bannock County” should not be shown
●
Land use and zoning maps support mixed-use commercial development.
Financing Clarification:
●
Upfront costs (infrastructure, basalt removal) are developer-paid and reimbursed via
tax increment revenue.
Tax increment financing (TIF) does not directly burden taxpayers; long-term
development increases the City’s tax base.
Example: property values projected to grow from under $1 million to ~$40 million,
enhancingfuture tax revenue.
Hearing concluded and closed; Council moved to deliberation and consideration of the
ordinanceto formallyapprovethe RiverwalkUrban RenewalDistrict.
o
o
Motion: Approve the Ordinance approving the Riverwalk Urban Renewal District under a
suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings and request that it
be read by title and publishedby summary,
o
Moved by: CouncilorLarsen
o
Second: Councilor Radford
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
Ordinance Title Read: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO
FALLS. IDAHO, APPROVING THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE RIVERWALK URBAN
RENEWAL PROJECT, WHICH PUN INCLUDES REVENUE ALLOCATION FINANCING
PROVISIONS: AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT A COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE
AND OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION TO COUNTY AND STATE OFFICIALS AND THE
AFFECTEDTAXING ENTITIES; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY.CODIFICATION,AND
PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY; PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
D.
Municipal Services
1.
25-473
Police Department Vehicle Lease and Upfit Program for FY 2025/26
Presentation/Discussion(DirectorAlexander):
●
14 police vehicles and associated equipment.
11
City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
●
Lease Authorization: Based on Resolution 2024-04, which allowed a lease-purchase
agreement up to $1.5 million for law enforcement equipment.
●
CurrentProposal:
o
Total lease amount: $904,135 over 5 years
o
Annual lease payments: $180,827
●
Procurement:
o
Vehicles purchased from United Fleet Services via RFP 24-01
o
Vehicle upfits sourced via a separate RFP with Day Wireless
●
Budget & Compliance:
o
Total authorized with this approval: $1,368,660, still under the $1.5 million cap
o
Lease and budget forecasts confirm the department remains within allocated
funds
●
Police Chief Johnson was present to answer operational questions; no further concerns
raised.
Motion: Accept and approve the Police Department vehicle lease and upfit program for
fiscal year 2025/26 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the necessary
documents,
o
Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o
Second: Councilor Francis
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen. Nay: Radford,
o
Motion carries.
Appeal Hearing-Impact Fee Assessment for Barnwood Estates Townhomes
and Terrace Gate Condominiums
2.
25-497
Presentation/Discussion (Director Alexander, Director Fredericksen, Mr. Cunningham
Attorney Jones), Appellant(s): Erin Bingham, Eric Reed:
●
The hearing was opened with all material & testimony ordered to be includedin the
record.
R e im b u rsement_Rga.u_e.st
●
Developers (the Appellant) sought credits for impact fees already paid, arguing the City
required them to widen Skyline Drive beyond what their projects needed.
●
Widening included land dedication (0.17 and 0.423 acres) and construction costs
totaling $328,212.50.
●
Developers claimed the City previously indicated, through staff discussions, that such
credits could be granted if costs were verified.
●
They requested a credit toward future fees, not a reimbursement for fees already paid,
to avoid “double-dipping.”
12
City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
Development Agreement & Legal Context
●
The Development Agreement allowed reimbursement for roadway improvements
subject to City approval and impact fee collection.
●
No formal written agreement existed prior to construction specifying the credit amount.
●
City code (§10-8-9) requires a written agreement and three independentbids submitted
priorto constructionto qualify for reimbursement.
●
Developers submitted bids after construction, making their request procedurally
untimely.
●
A single-unit exemption for a demolished home was granted ($5,273.50), but other
requested creditswere denied.
City Reviewand Determinations
●
Impact Fee Administrator (Director Alexander):
o
Denied system improvementcredits due to timeliness and lack of pre
construction agreement,
o
Offered informal resolution: submission of three bids for potential
consideration of road widening costs.
●
Public Works Engineer (Mr. Cunningham):
o
Confirmed three bids prior to construction are required to ensure legal and
competitive compliance,
o
Reimbursementpost-construction is difficult under state law.
●
Procedural Notes:
o
Reimbursement applies only to construction costs, not right-of-way dedication.
Skyline Drive’s arterial designation required lOOftwidth; this was consistent
with City code and annexation requirements,
o
Paying impact fees without protest typically bars appeals, but Council
determined it didn’t impact reimbursement eligibility here.
o
Developer/Appellant Position
●
Developers obtained four bids prior to construction (Pepco, Edstrom, Knife River, MD
Nursery& Landscape).
●
Construction began in spring/summer 2024; delays in planning and zoning caused
repeated resubmissions.
●
Developers argued they were effectively being charged twice: through impact fees and
roadway construction costs.
●
They sought recognition of actual costs incurred and a negotiated credit for roadway
construction (~$328,212) plus land dedication (~$370,000), totaling -$700,000.
●
Developers expressed willingness to work with staff under the informal resolution
offered.
●
Appellant provided five handouts to Council and City Clerk (attached)
13
City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
C_o.uncil DLs_cuss[o_n
●
Credit vs. Reimbursement: Council clarified reimbursement is separate from routine
impact fees.
●
Policy Limitations: Council focused on the appeal only; broader policy changes (e.g.,
right-of-way reimbursement) were off-limits.
●
Procedural Errors: Council noted developers’ failure to pay under protest or obtain pre
construction agreement but determined this did not prevent reimbursement eligibility
for construction costs.
●
Motions & Outcomes:
1.
Affirmed Impact Fee Administrator’s Novembers, 2025, letter denying system
improvement credits.
2.
Affirmed single-unit housing exemption for the demolished home.
3.
Directed staff to negotiate informal reimbursement for Skyline Drive
construction based on pre-constructionbids.
4.
Directed Legal staff to draft a reasoned statementexplaining Council
deliberation and rationale.
Council Direction on Reason Statement
●
Paying Under Protest: Council decided not to include this as a denial basis to prevent it
from becoming standard practice.
●
Drafting & Review: Legal staff to prepare a written reasoned statement reflecting
Council discussion, to be reviewed at a work session on January 5 and finalized January
8, before the end of the current Council term.
●
The process was deliberately slow and deliberate to ensure transparency and public
understanding of complex issues.
Motion 1: Uphold the terms of the letter from the Impact Fee Administratorissued on
November 6,2025, in terms of its offer of an informal resolution to resolve the official denial
of eligibility for reimbursement of impact fees for the construction of Skyline Drive,
o
Moved by: Councilor Francis
o
Second: Councilor Larsen
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
Motion 2; Request that a Reasoned Statement be drafted by the Legal Department based
on tonight’s deliberation and be returned to City Council no later than January 8,2026.
o
Moved by: Councilor Francis
o
Second: Councilor Burtenshaw
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
14
City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
o
Motion carries.
8.
Announcements
●
UTV Holiday Light Parade:
o
Tomorrow night,
o
The parade is already full—no additional vehicles can participate,
o
Donations are encouraged for the food bank during the holiday season; details on
whether donations should be cash only will be clarified via a social media post.
●
Fire Station Ribbon Cutting:
o
Monday at 10:00 a.m. at Fire Station #6, 2767 Spitfire Drive,
o
Open to the public, with tours available.
●
Police Department Swearing-In:
o
Monday at 4:00 p.m., swearing in of new police officers.
●
City Closures:
o
City offices closed December 25 for Christmas Day.
o
City offices closed January 1 for New Year’s Day.
●
Upcoming Meetings:
o
Work session: Monday, January 5, at 3:00 p.m.
o
Council meeting: January 8, to conclude old business, swear in newly elected
officials, and formally seat the new Council.
There being no'further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:44 PM
Rebecca L. Noah Casper, Mayor
15
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS
November 4, 9095
Bonneville County
Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025
November 04, 2025
Detailed Results by Contest
Idaho Falls Mayor
Vote For
1
9
5»>
s
«●
6
r
.●c
.<●
Tl
C
T
Si
O'
Sj
i?
's
f9
i?
c
#3
e>
.■5r
Si
Si
Si
‘S
o
4-
●*
o
o
.C'
●6
J?
■fP
Si
A.
a
'S
A?
Si
V/
C-
o
O
C5
a:
NON
NON
NON
267
01
XI
203
0
1
1.482
520
02
203
36
133
0
0
1193
374
03
104
7
88
0
0
7fi«
199
224
04
IS
23S
0
4
1.351
474
05
162
37
99
1
1
1.037
298
06
244
26
172
0
0
1.156
442
157
07
26
139
0
1
1.096
324
06
279
21
165
0
1
1.203
465
09
159
32
134
0
3
1.389
325
10
220
26
170
0
1
1.161
416
176
11
36
242
0
1
1.223
454
12
162
41
186
0
2
1.123
409
158
13
36
186
0
1
1.293
382
14
172
20
215
0
2
954
407
251
15
17
320
0
0
1.206
568
282
16
9
309
0
0
V180
600
17
256
30
212
0
1
1.316
498
16
196
79
167
0
1
1.340
442
19
172
20
292
0
0
1.045
484
20
130
21
135
0
0
1.153
266
21
275
28
260
0
0
1.870
563
Consolidated Election
- November 4, 2025
4
Last Updated: 11 /07/2025 14:37:51
Bonneville County
Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025
November 04. 2025
Detailed Results by Contest
Idaho Falls Mayor
Vote For
1
s
■'b
b
.cG
T
.<●
.<●
f3
.c
T
O
'3
S'
«●
»
«>
#!>
■9
Si
o
Ji'
e>
●s’
o
Sr
S
Js
.If
ft
■f?
»s
e>
,e>
O
'J
6
,o
A
S)
s
S'
O
NON
NON
NON
21
28
8
0
22
0
1,017
57
161
19
217
0
2
1.616
23
397
23
363
364
0
24
0
1,826
750
25
261
0
2
254
25
1,179
540
28
226
199
0
26
U
1,120
453
140
20
201
0
27
0
1,659
361
0
0
0
0
37
0
787
0
1
0
0
6
0
38
966
7
0
0
0
0
39
0
1,563
0
53
4
47
0
0
1,825
46
104
117
57
105
8
0
0
1,686
230
Contest Total
5,599
733
5.537
1
24
40.783
11.869
5
Consolidated Election
- November 4, 2025
Last Updated; 11 /07/2025 14:37:51
Bonneville County
Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025
November 04, 2025
Detailed Results by Contest
Idaho Falls City Council Seat 2
Vote For
1
a
O
<9
*■
o
-V
5>
a
}«
*
S'
e>
,C>-
.c
S'
<●
3i
Qj
s
K
'6
O
a
a
U
c-
i.
■4P
Q
o
o
6»
o
Jtf
fi-
«9
f9
<9
o
a
.e<
s
o
K
<Jr
,b^
«5
-●C
a
b
z-
S'
s.
a
o
K
o
'tf
‘9
0;
O
<●
c
a:
s.
●5
<1?
a:
A?
e>
A'
A?
o
NON
NON
NON
NON
NON
NON
NON
7
01
s
101
137
48
114
71
4
34
1.482
4B3
02
8
8
91
71
34
99
53
0
10
1.193
364
03
2
4
44
38
40
29
29
1
12
766
186
10
04
13
61
156
S6
76
64
1
21
1.351
456
05
9
19
51
.5?
36
65
54
2
12
1.037
286
06
8
17
106
108
43
68
57
0
35
1.156
407
07
9
12
S3
52
67
66
47
2
15
1.098
308
08
12
9
139
112
31
83
57
1
22
1.203
443
09
19
14
70
63
33
69
38
2
20
1.389
306
10
6
28
SI
103
36
77
61
1
24
1.161
392
11
6
12
89
107
86
79
39
2
33
1.223
420
12
18
13
102
111
45
66
41
1
16
1,123
394
13
5
9
55
104
58
67
62
0
23
1.293
360
14
4
11
77
146
45
57
37
0
32
954
377
IS
9
7
94
235
60
94
56
1
32
1.206
555
16
11
8
115
193
36
III
64
0
62
1.180
538
17
9
IS
111
116
58
92
68
2
28
1.316
469
16
6
15
70
149
36
78
S3
3
33
1.340
407
19
12
to
63
217
19
54
62
0
47
1.045
437
20
3
17
61
79
24
51
34
1
16
1.153
269
21
6
12
118
175
55
111
72
1
33
1,870
549
Consolidated Election
- November 4, 2025
6
Last Updated: 11 /07/2025 14:37:51
Bonneville County
Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025
November 04, 2025
Detailed Results by Contest
Idaho Fails City Council Seat 2
Vote For
1
A
is'
9/
fj
*
O
A
.c.
A
vg-
e>
<z>
.c<
.c
(9
s-
●■S'
9j
0/
S
<6
a
s-
O
A
9
S-
●V
o
Q
«9
o
o
fo
jC-
«●
,«9
ft
.ft
-ft
o
9
A
o
4"
ft
A
o
o
A
c-
e<
ft
A'
o
.c
S>
9
y>
o
As^
is'
.o
is'
<6
'S
s
e>
-S
-C
o
O
A.'
NON
NON
NON
NON
NON
NON
NON
2
1
7
t2
17
22
11
6
0
1
1,017
S6
17
ee
135
4G
S
62
32
23
1
32
1,616
366
3
11
171
293
40
124
24
48
3
57
1,826
690
6
10
84
262
46
60
25
46
0
26
1.179
516
6
13
71
188
29
69
26
41
1
95
1.120
417
5
12
51
25
27
126
63
53
0
24
1.659
337
0
0
0
0
0
37
0
0
0
0
787
0
0
3
0
2
0
0
38
2
0
0
966
7
0
0
0
39
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.563
0
0
2
21
20
2
46
25
28
0
6
1,825
98
57
3
30
107
3
39
4
19
0
25
1,666
205
Contest Totei
213
327
2.276
3.671
1,148
2.067
1.396
30
766
40.783
11,098
Consolidated Election
- November 4, 2025
7
Last Updated: n/07/2025 14:37:52
Bonneville County
Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025
November 04, 2025
Detailed Results by Contest
Idaho Palls City Council Seat 4
Vote Por1
*
*:
●S'
<p
O'
a
o
s>
<●
P)
C
o
>6
e>
Qi
Qj
V
o
b
<?r
o
e>
ft
ft
j.
e>
●s
ft
ft
A
o
O
-ik'
NON
NON
01
207
285
0
29
1,482
492
02
184
177
0
13
1.193
3fi1
03
93
97
0
9
766
190
04
164
287
0
27
1,351
451
05
121
162
0
17
1.037
283
06
186
229
0
27
1.156
415
07
138
175
0
12
1,098
313
08
230
217
0
19
1.203
447
09
149
163
0
16
1,389
312
10
182
215
0
20
1,161
397
151
11
282
1
21
1,223
433
168
12
229
0
14
1.123
397
124
13
237
0
22
1,293
361
14
127
265
0
17
954
392
IS
175
397
0
16
1,206
572
198
16
365
0
37
1,180
563
17
201
280
0
18
1.316
481
18
144
265
0
34
1,340
409
19
119
330
0
35
1.045
449
20
123
149
0
14
1.153
272
21
206
345
0
32
1,870
551
Consolidated Election
- November 4,2025
Last Updated: 11/07/2025 14:37:52
Bonneville County
Consolidated Election - November 4. 2025
November 04, 2025
Detailed Results by Contest
Idaho Falls City Council Seat 4
Vote For
1
j)
*
●V
e>
●c
#0
●9
<j
o
c-
ft
<9
<3
Cl
e>
&
o
S'
o
o
A'
,«3
i.
>s’
.V
/o
ij.
Cl
■5
S
A?
ro
e>
A?
o
NON
NON
33
0
3
22
21
1,017
54
229
0
129
41
1,616
23
358
420
0
54
24
276
1,826
696
188
329
0
25
25
1,179
517
151
262
0
20
26
1,120
433
223
27
108
0
30
1,659
331
0
0
0
37
0
787
0
6
1
0
0
36
966
7
0
39
0
0
0
1,563
0
48
51
0
5
1,825
46
99
74
132
0
24
57
1,686
206
6,848
651
Contest Total
4,394
1
40.783
11,242
9
Consolidated Election - November 4. 2025
Last Updated: 11/07/2025 14:37:52
Bonneville County
Consolidated Election - November 4. 2025
November 04, 2025
Detailed Results by Contest
Idaho Falls City Council Seat 6
Vote For 1
5.
fi-
e>
.c
fC
«/
<6
/f
o
45
49
A..-
Si
9)
Cl
9)
S>
0/
Si
9>
o
4
Si
o
o
A'
a
y>
,o ^
i.
/ft
b*
f.
'J
b‘
St
A
.C
A?
o
NON
NON
01
306
170
0
45
1.4B2
476
02
219
134
0
21
1.193
353
03
117
67
0
IS
766
1S4
04
319
128
1
30
1.351
447
05
177
104
0
19
1.037
261
06
262
121
0
39
1.156
403
or
191
117
0
17
1.098
308
08
278
159
0
29
1,203
437
09
188
115
1
24
1.389
303
10
258
134
0
25
1,161
392
11
300
124
0
31
1,223
424
12
265
127
0
19
1.123
392
13
259
77
0
47
1,293
336
14
253
114
1
41
954
367
IS
433
127
0
28
1,206
560
16
398
153
0
49
1,180
551
17
311
154
0
24
1.316
475
18
302
94
0
47
1.340
396
19
330
102
0
52
1.045
432
20
180
90
0
16
1.153
270
21
391
150
0
42
1,870
541
Consolidated Election
●November 4,2025
10
Last Updated: 11/07/2025 14:37:52
Bonneville County
Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025
November 04, 2025
Detailed Results by Contest
Idaho Falls City Council Seat 6
Vote For
1
f.
«i
b
■S'
o
.c
Si?
3)
<?
o
-●&
«9
■<-
<z>
,<3
ti
ft>
e>
e>
*>
<c
iZ>
o
o
^
A
e>
j.
V,
s
.V
e>
c-
A?
O
NON
NON
28
26
0
22
3
1,017
54
258
99
0
42
23
1.616
357
24
460
208
0
82
1.826
668
133
0
25
358
61
1,179
491
125
26
299
0
29
1,120
424
71
27
249
0
41
1.659
320
37
0
0
0
0
787
0
3
0
38
4
0
966
7
0
0
0
0
39
1.563
0
23
46
74
0
7
1,825
97
57
155
40
0
35
1.686
195
Contest Tolsl
7,642
3,299
3
950
40,783
10.941
Consolidated Election
●November 4,2025
11
Last Updated: 11 /07/2025 14:37:52
STATE OF IDAHO
COUNTY OF
BONNEVILLE
We, the commissioners of the county and state aforesaid, acting as a Board of Canvassers of Election, do hereby
state that the attached is a true and complete abstract of all votes cast within this county at the Consolidated
Election held November4, 2025, as shown by the records now on file in the County Clerk's office.
s'-
lP
■-
\ 6
Q:
<.
■■
-fc '...'“OL/NTV
/■
^ O
■
;
rn
cC
.
●
I
V/
.Y
T
\Y
County Board of Canvassers
Attest:
Clerk
c.'"
S
s
N
m
'iLi
ICO^N-PPW^
.
%GWHEVILLE /'k ^
/oaho
^
s''
I, Christopher Poulter, County Clerk of said county and state, do hereby certify that the attached is a full, true and
complete copy of the abstract of votes for the candidate/issue therein named as appeared on the election ballot
held November4, 2025, as shown by the record of the Board of Canvassers filed in my office this 12th day of
November, 2025.
s'
County Clerk
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS
RUNOFF ELECTION
December 2, 2025
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS RUNOFF ELECTION
DECEMBER 2, 2025
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS
VOTING STATISTICS
MAYOR
COUNCIL SEAT 2
!C
in
a> 2
■o
<u
o>
0>
O)
a:
76
0)
-.c:
O
_
o
o >
OJ
"S
E 5
§
,52
2
P
2
cc
O
o>
9
2
o
,2
●o
cn
n:
■o
c
x:
0)
</:
<u
O
OT
S; O
in
TO
E
0)
<
° £
0)
"o
E >
E
T3
2— 2
c
a>
o
(U
o>
S'
(ft
Precinct
Q
o
■c
(ft
X3
®
05
^
(U
^
ct
I «
-5 Q
0>
■o
E
o
5
OT
CO
c
CO
0>
(ft
O)
52
CO
05
CD
CO
05
CO
05
(ft
05
^
O
O >
CD
(ft
05
O
oi
O)
I—
<u
LU
a:
292
233
220
273
01
1,387
10
1,397
526
37.7%
30.5%
24.1%
37.1%
27.2%
39.2%
28.3%
41.3%
22.3%
35.1%
37.0%
34.2%
27.4%
42.1%
47.1%
51.9%
37.4%
31.3%
47.6%
24.6%
42.7%
25.1%
37.1%
48.2%
50.7%
44.7%
31.6%
215
149
192
166
02
1,188
5
1,193
364
96
85
70
100
03
749
2
751
181
223
266
190
275
04
1,314
5
1,319
489
158
126
123
150
05
1.039
7
1.046
284
218
223
200
06
222
1,121
7
1,128
442
157
160
136
07
165
1,104
16
1,120
317
283
204
243
08
232
1,173
7
1,180
487
165
144
142
09
159
1,373
15
1,388
310
200
208
179
202
10
1,158
4
1,162
408
173
281
148
276
11
1,214
13
1,227
454
180
199
150
12
221
1.112
1
1,113
381
153
199
132
212
13
1,282
1
1,283
352
156
253
144
250
14
959
13
972
409
225
347
181
378
15
1,208
6
1,214
572
274
340
228
351
16
1,173
9
1,182
614
244
249
205
270
17
1,312
6
1,318
493
209
213
152
262
18
1,344
5
1,349
422
174
326
19
145
327
1,039
12
1,051
500
135
20
147
110
165
1,146
5
1,151
283
311
332
250
360
21
1,499
1,507
643
24
27
25
24
22
198
5
203
51
181
252
23
155
255
1,157
10
1,167
433
403
24
425
345
451
1,712
1,720
829
25
270
317
198
378
1,150
9
1,159
588
217
254
165
26
288
1,044
9
1,053
471
138
244
124
240
27
1,192
16
1,208
382
0
0
0
0
37
0
0
0
0
0.0%
12
38
1
6
5
16
0
16
13
81.3%
0
39
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0%
51
56
46
41
61
294
295
1
108
36.6%
53.2%
57
126
562
175
96
181
4
566
301
CO. TOTAL
5,663
6,435
4,695
6,899
32,219
219
32,438
12,107
37.3%
Total number of absentee ballots cast
Total number of early voting ballots cast
1,086
3,063
STATE OF IDAHO
COUNTY OF
BONNEVILLE
We, the commissioners of the county and state aforesaid, acting as a Board of Canvassers of Election, do hereby
state that the attached is a true and complete abstract of all votes cast within this county at the City of Idaho
Falls Runoff Election held December 2, 2025, as shown by the records now on file in the County Clerk's office.
N
cr
●
●
r <
;
' O
'
●
rn
■a?
cJJ
z
Co
6l
^
.. CounT>
●●
%
/OahO
■o
County Board of Canvassers
vW'
’'n/'NJilil"'
Attest:
Clerk
STATE OF IDAHO
COUNTY OF
BONNEVILLE
I, Christopher Poulter, County Clerk of said county and state, do hereby certify that the attached is a full, true and
complete copy of the abstract of votes for the candidate/issue therein named as appeared on the ballot for the
election held December 2, 2025, as shown by the record of the Board of Canvassers filed in my office this 8th
day of December, 2025.
- ^ND F}^
'o
O
V O
✓>
N
Q
O
§/ BONNEVILLE
\
COUNTY
iT»
33
County Clerk
's*
/OahO
IDAHO FALES
City Council
December 18, 2025
IDAHO FALES
Final Plat
PLT25-019
Idaho Traffic Safety Division No. 1
PLT25-019 Idaho Traffic Safety Div. 1
A Aerial PLT25-019 Idaho Traffic Safety Div. 1
PLT25-019 Idaho Traffic Safety Div.
a a wa fom 1 7] 1am
R2 Goo rmeh} C__)] 22 BR ce CC paeeg
< ities i ied
| frseany pom emen
~~ -Hemmert’Ave — f
0
_ Pop Kroll\Way
Et
NR 1 cpa ec
ye Wy
| Se)
Tilt tees
TTLitlibe
PLULELERE
PLiTEVER
IDAHO TRAFFICSAFETYDIVISIONNO.l
A
NOHrN(A&TCO0l(*
UOMt;
TWnM>2 PlOMTh lUMi UU5TSM
C^NQ 13«*a9»
t
A SUBDIVISION IN THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY IDAHO
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER AND THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7,
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN
SHEFTIOF?
I
b
I
mirn ●
ubfuncs
KMOvai
HpbMd
(ASTiy«CQIIHt«
UCHOM7
TOW««Hr2HCIIIN
CTfNo
●U&SCA^
.y*'0\
UUt
lAM
●»r«rt
in
M04«
iM|
kWi/
-o-
Hi IT
410 20
lUJii
I
urs&oci
1
CrHTTII VACOtMl
rOMNV***
2 WMm «AM4I UIAST4M
i
I
POuNO U2I
HvVISt CCftN|AOT*«
’1.'4
1/4
* l/UTHUCTKM
7]
S*
MHTIH'
u
,«i.s
v«»c4nin
i
ii'
2
loritiodi
f
R
I
a
Si
Ml
irw»
JB
inMisor'
ia*iKocxi
t
'i
HkOUl
‘?ll
5 * 2 s
3i 2
i!
«v
/
i&.oo*
<
a
iii
a
2
i
'i
t
s
b
las
a
SrS|g
Z
M
r
6
uToT
€=::
UTl C* E2M0
R
vuno UWII MIMWI
>>«mMhTllO
151M1
ttv®
T
voSTT
.rrt«
iMPiAnro
bUflAITID
BOUNDARY DESCRtPTlON
iiaUhiUQ AT A POiNT THAT 1$ $ M‘J7 2$'W AJ?N<» ThL U&T.WbSl OMEASiCTON UfiL 2M.90
F6kl ^KUM iHbEA^T l/4CUMSLMOSbCIION
7, >{7WNSHIA
KANCSfc
^AS7 (}^
MHOIAK,
:WU1>
POtNf
etMCj
iHfc NOKtHWl&(
CCMNER
Of
LUf
1. tiUXK
PIOKIH nCLMES
OIVlWCM NUMBfR
1
AN AtJUrllON
TO
r»l(
ntT Of
l0A2<0 ^A4lS. BONNEVUU
COUNTY. IDAHO. R JNNING 7HCNCE ACONO ThC BOUNOAAV l\Ut OF SAIO HORTh HOUSES BUSNCSE
KOUTC, DIVISION NUMBER
*. TNf FO.LOW1N6 FOUR
|4| COURSES. U) THENCE $.00'a2*C5*W. 3QS.4T
^Ecr.
(2)
iHfcNCb
lib.1/ 7UI:
iMLNCb S
SS^.
^tET 10 A PONT Qt
CURVE WiTN
A RADIUS Of
20.00 FET AND A CHORD N 45*29 26*E. 2B.3S FEH. |4| tHENCE TO THE
LE^TAlONQ SAID CURVE 31.S0 FEET THROUOH A CENTRAL ANOlE OF 90*IS Or TO A PONT ON THE
WEST
Ri(dHr^-WAY
UNE
OF
NONIH
HOMES
AVENUe
SAID
PONT
SEIMS
A PONT
ON
A
NON-TANGENT CURVE Wmi A RADIUS OF
114141,^6 FEH ANO A CMOAO BEARING S acr»'S6*^
40.01
FEET- THENCE
TO
ThI
AlGHT AlONO MuQ NON-TANGENT CURVE
4001
FEET ThAOIAjH
A
CENTRAL ANCia OF 02*29^* 1HEMLE N49*34 Ol'W
209 07 FEET; THENCE N49*37*44'W
1C74 74
FEET TO Tkl WEST UNE Of NORTHWEST
1/4 0^ THE SOCTHEAST J/4 OF SAiD SECTION 7, THENCE
NOraSaS'E
ALONG
SAID WEST
UNE
264.47 FEET, THENCE
5,49*3 7 SrE.
4IQ.00
FEET, THCNCE
N 00*2505*1. 207 S FfFT To SAID FAST WEST CENTER
SECT ON UNE
OF SAID SECTION
7,
TV4ENCE
NM*37 29*E
AlONu
kAST WtSI
UNIER SACTTOK
UNE
b44 U
Fi£T
10
THE
f^Nl
OF
SE^ S NINO, C ON TAIN
>
N 0 >.9S7 ^C5.
If
J
KMIM) 1/r IRON KIWANII
RIPLACtbWIlHVS' IRON
ROD WITH PlASnCCAP
MAKKMJP.I.&.RttR
cui-l ,AU
JtUM_
CttA
MC
■APVt
IURW6
pftTAiia
I
«0*ui
Mrann
‘ntfw*y
4j*r
4441'
[ iiisiriy
2AM*
>401
I
FOUUOimtlUM
wirTHe^orcowift
SCCTICN7
IOWHSfW
2 IClATM AMI
CH
LEGEND
p.o.a.
POINT OFftlGINNiNG
SECTION LINE
AQIACENI LOT LME
PIAT AOLINDAIIV
ERTSIINOUniirY EASEMENT AS NOTED
lOUNO 1/2' X24* IRON ROD WfTH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP
MARiaDP.tS. 9469 OR AS NOTED
lOilNO S/B* X 24* IRON ROD WnTN YELLOW PLASTIC CAP
MARKED P.i.S. 9469 OR AS NOTCO
VET S/8* X 30* MON ROD WITH YEl lOW PlASTIC CAP
PIS
9469 OR AS MARKED
Pl.S.S. CORNER AS NOTED
SuRjECfTO
EKP>'IN<>(ASFMfNTVCH-RICORO
E
AGLE ROCK
/ NGINEERING
NARRATIVE
EAOU ROCK
Iftij.HLEX NU
WAS LOMM HOHIO
B* lUAHO
SAfCTV INC.
TO SURVCT LAKC
FUNSUAMT TO DFED INSTRUMENT NUMBER *.747969
A RECORD Of SURVfV WAS COMmETTO ANC
A tCOADf U
H M AT UP <024 tN BONNE Vi(. i COUN T T RECORDS PU»UAN 110 INSmUMEN T NUMBER
:747354. MONUMENTS WERE FOUND AS SHOWN ON 'HE FAST R£COAS€D SURVrr AS kAlF tNC»
WON HODS WUHPJ^SMC CAPS L>
MONUMtNIi Vtl WU 46 E.W UUHliS<*«CH MUM RUO>
W TH PLASnC CAPS SIAMFCO LS
9369 SCC'lON CORNUl uSED FOR CONTROL Of
SoRVET ARE
iHf
FAST
1/4
(ORNfR PURSUANT
TO
H5'Rl>MFN1
Nl>veE*(
1S9BUS7. SOUTHEAST
CCftNEk
PURSUANT
TO
INSTRUMENT NUMBER
1594DSB
AND
THE CINT^R
1/4
COANST
PtRSUAN*^
TO
INSTRUMENT NUMUR 1447319
ALl B&UBPA3 SK7WN
h£R£0N RelATE QIRK^;T TO THE Ci*V OF
IDAHO
COORDINATE S«STEM OF
2004. WMCn
Q DEAivEO FROM The IDAHO STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM {EAST 2CWC
llOlJ J S
SUNVtT HH AND LAIN3 A COM8NES SCALE FFCTOA
Of 1.000277244 FOR A i»RlD TO GROUND CCWVERS>ON. {REHRCNCE FRAME NAD U I2D01J. EPOO
2010 QOOQ
THF SYSTEM OZENTAT^ON
rS
BASED
ON
OAiD NORTH ALONG
THE
CAST aNTRA
MER DIAN. hi) LONVERuENCE AM E HAS BEEN AFPllEU.
I
n
GMIP PLWMNGD
5.\Fh'niNC
o
VlUkUi^.-
A4 Ui**A
>»I K4J6M
MAM
SURvrYEDST:
Off ICES A1
0
4
1>KAWWB»:
M/IR
1331 Rrmont Ave.
Idaho F«lb. kUhoS3402
ytUAKl pm
MKiS
HAND
APPRO/rneY:
«0'
MT
A(
PMUEO NO.
24075
343 E4lhN, Sun* 119
Rcaburg. Kliho 63440
SYAI-t: r-8ff
DATE:
■202S
CAD NAME.
I.DW6
PLT25-019 Idaho Traffic Safety Div 1
Site Photo
Site Photo
Looking west from N Holmes Ave
■j
Ws,:.?,
m
<●
5
Site Photo
PLT25-019 Idaho Traffic Safety Div 1
Site Photo
Looking west from N Holmes Ave (interior)
V
■
-fs*
6
Urban Renewal Plan for the
Riverwalk Urban Renewal Project
daho Falls City Counci
December 18, 2025
7^
ff*
.
Apt 13U
.106
‘AfX IM
This Project Area includes
an estimated 10 acres
(including public rights-of-
way).
/
t
Project Area
Plan Approval Process
●
June 18, 2025-Agency Board adopted Resolution No. 2025-07 accepting the Riverwalk Eligibility Report,
prepared by Brad Cramer, Perspective Planning & Consulting LLC, and, thereafter, submitted the Report to the
City Council for its consideration
●
July 10, 2025- City Council adopts Resolution No. 2025-11, adopting the River\walk Eligibility Report and directs
Agency to commence preparation of a plan
●
October 16, 2025-Agency Board adopts Resolution No. 2025-15 approving the Urban Renewal Plan for the
Riverwalk Urban Renewal Project and directing transmittal of the Riverwalk Plan to the Mayor and City Clerk to
take the necessary action to process the Riverwalk Plan
♦
November 5, 2025-
City Planning Commission meeting to find the Riverwalk Plan conforms to the City's
Comprehensive Plan
●
November 14, 2025- Notice of public hearing published in the newspaper of record and the Riverwalk Plan
received by the affected taxing districts.
●
November 28, 2025- Second notice of public hearing published in the newspaper
●
December 18, 2025- City Council public hearing, consider public comment, and City Council Ordinance
approving the Riverwalk
P an E ements
M'
Idaho Code § 50-2905 identifies what information the Plan must include with specificity as follows;
(1)
A statement describing the total assessed valuation of the base assessment roll of the revenue allocation area and the total assessed
valuation of all taxable property within the municipality;
●
Section 502.3
A statement listing the kind, number, and location of all proposed public works or improvements within the revenue allocation area;
●
Section 301 and Attachment 5
An economic feasibility study;
●
Attachment 5
A detailed list of estimated project costs;
●
Attachment 5
A fiscal impact statement showing the impact of the revenue allocation area, both until and after the bonds are repaid, upon all taxing
districts levying taxes upon property on the revenue allocation area;
●
Section 502.8 and Attachment 5
A description of the methods of financing all estimated project costs and the time when related costs or monetary obligations are to be
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
incurred;
●
Sections 303, 304, 309, 501, 502, 503, 504 and Attachment 5
A termination date for the plan and the revenue allocation area as provided for in section 50-2903(20), Idaho Code. In determining the
termination date, the plan shall recognize that the agency shall receive allocation of revenues in the calendar year following the last year of the
revenue allocation provision described in the urban renewal plan; and
●
Section 800
A description of the disposition or retention of any assets of the agency upon the termination date. Provided, however, nothing herein shall
prevent the agency from retaining assets or revenues generated from such assets as long as the agency shall have resources other than revenue
allocation funds to operate and manage such assets.
●
Section 800
(7)
(8)
Additional Plan Requirements
The adjusted base assessed value of the existing
revenue allocation areas, plus the new Project Area is
estimated as follows (2025):
Total Taxable Value of the City: $8,103,605,399
$
810,360,540
10% Value Limitation:
$107,473,839
993,015
$108,466,854
Existing Plans:*
New Area:
Total:
$
The existing base value, plus the current value of the
proposed Area is well within the 10% value limitation.
*lncludes estimated values for Snake River West
District, Yellowstone Square District, and proposed
Riverside District
River Commons Distiict^
Eaele Ridse District
Jackson Hole Junction District
Paiiclieri East Bank District
Anderson Bush District
Stanley Boge District
Snake Ri\'er West District (Estunated)
Yellowstone Square District (Estimated)
Ri\'erside District Proposed (Estunated)^
Ri\"erwalk District Proposed (Estimated)
$
154,412
$
7,549,640
■
$
864,666
$
5,965,637
,
$
6,536,2691
$ 4230S;702
i
$
"547III5
'
$
9,533^697'
$ 34,013,401
:
$
’ 9931015
:
Total of Existing and Proposed Districts
,S54.00
i
® Adjusted to show removal of values from deannexed parcels.
® Includes current value of deannexed parcels.
Taxing Districts
●Bonneville County
●Bonneville County Ambulance
●Bannock County Road & Bridge
●City of Idaho Falls
●College of Eastern Idaho
●Flood Control No. 1
●Idaho Falls School District # 91
RIVERWALK
Po
(a)
=)
—
”
=
Sa
=
faa)
7,
<
Li
im
2
>
O
Zz
O
U
Lu
STUDY APPROACH
●Reviewed potential private development
projects, timelines, and valuations
●Reviewed known and potential public
infrastructure projects, timelines and costs
●Considered two revenue scenarios based
on trends in city valuations and levies
●Considered one potential Owner
Participation Agreement
STUDY AREA
BOUNDARIES
.
..
-'●'■●V
●Vv
.
.
*
,V
, f-
*J
)
\Y.'A
●,U
«
»
.●
V
:k;>
1
1
ANTICIPATED PRIVATE INVESTMENT
AND PUBLIC PROJECT COSTS
Estimated 2025 Value
Project Name
$27,000,000
Site
I Hote
$3,000,000
Site 2 Office
$ 10,000,000
Site 3 Mixed Use
$40,000,000
Total
ANTICIPATED ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS
Project
Estimated Cost
Site
I Blasting and Fill
Site 2 Blasting and Fill
Site 3 Blasting and Fill
Sidewalk on Utah
Power Pole Relocation
Canal Pathway
Total
$808,889
$622,222
$2,485,124
$ 10,000
$75,000
$ 150,000
$4,151,235
LEVY AND VALUATION TRENDS
Levy
Rate
City Valuation
$9,000,000,000
$8,000,000,000
$7,000,000,000
$6,000,000,000
$5,000,000,000
$4,000,000,000
$3,000,000,000
$2,000,000,000
$1,000,000,000
0.016
0.014
0.012
0.01
0.008
0.006
0.004
$-
0.002
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
0
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
City Valuation
CONSERVATIVE REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS
Conservative Revenue.Total valuation increases 2% per year
Applicable tax levy decreases
I % per year
Moderate Revenue:Total valuation increases 5% per year
Applicable tax levy decreases 2% per year
Base value remains unchanged
Revenues collected year after valuation year
●Project area will be approved by the end of 2025
Total Project Area Annual Revenue Comparisons
$600,000
$500,000
$400,000
$300,000
$200,000
$100,000
$-
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
ro
ro
to
ro
cn
O
'O
00
nO
O
s>
to
to
to
lO
to
o
o
o
o
o
o
^
4^
4^
4x
4^
4^
to
OJ
4^
Cn
OJ
CO
CO
CO
to
co
4:>.
cn
o^
'O
OO
sO
O
CO
CO
Conservative Revenue
Moderate Revenue
Total Project Area Cumulative Revenue
Comparisons
$7,000,000
$6,000,000
$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
Conservative Revenue
Moderate Revenue
TOTAL PROJECT AREA CASH FLOW ASSUMPTIONS
●Accounts for respective revenue assumptions
●Estimated revenues reflects actual year revenues received, based on
prior year’s valuations
●Accounts for one Owner Participation Agreement
75% ofTIF revenues go towards ORA payments
●IFRA will collect 10% ofTIF revenues for district administration
●All funds will be expended on projects by the end of the district
TOTAL PROJECT AREA
CASH FLOW WITH
CONSERVATIVE REVENUE
TOTAL PROJECT
AREA CASH FLOW
WITH MODERATE
REVENUE
FINDINGS
The Riverwalk project is economically feasible with a 75% ORA
With a conservative revenue model, there may need to be a small
payment in the final year of revenue receipts
QUESTIONS?
aD
PERSPECTIVE
PLANNING &€ CONSULTING
FLUM and ZONING
a
Houston
S
p4«
WPt
’I
.
Albany
h'
*:
Ssison St*
‘
t
/A/
●
●P
r
▼
■
●-<
●
.c*
■.'
'‘i.-
Post-July 1,
2016, Plan anc
●
Limitations on Amendments to the
Plan-I.C. 50-2903A
●
Base reset
●Exceptions
RAA
●December 18, 2025 - City Couna
public hearing, consider public
comment, and City Council
ordinance readings
●
Thereafter: publication of the
ordinance summary; recordation of
ordinance and separately recorded
map/legal; transmittal of documents
to County officials, STC and affected
taxing districts
●
Deadline to complete tasks
12/31/2025
Next Steps
n
"X-.
‘●'■V
r-?
'●I ^●
i
.‘■'V V
●
7’..1
iitr.
-^1^;
●l
^
jy?
p*»v
●■^
,
-
.»
<
i-.
f
T
??
i
w.’--
i
'rji^
1
7
●;
V'.
/
Questions/Com merits?
ri>.JLa&U/
Suggested Motion: Move to waive readings and
approve Ordinance approving the Urban Renewal
Plan for the RiverwalkUrban Renewal Project and give
authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
the necessary documents (or take other action
deemed appropriate).
Action
"Chris Canfield" <CCanfield@idahofalls.gov>
1/10/2023 8:38:03 PM
"matt.smith@summitbuildinggroup.com" <matt.smith@summitbuildingg roup.com>
"Naysha Foster" <nfoster@idahofai!s.gov>, ’"Kurt Roland"' <kroland@erengr.com>, "Brian Cunningham'
<BCunningham@idahofalis.gov>, "Kent Fugal" <KFugal@idahofalls.gov>, "Kerry Beutler"
<kbeutler@idahofa[ls.gov>
FW: Terrace Gate/Barnwood Estates Impact Fees
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Matt
Your request to present your concerns regarding impact fees to Council was forwarded to us.
I
have the following notes from
the discussions in our meettngs:
●
Wastewater Connection: Concordia requested that the construcdon of the Sewer for a gravity line to the South to be
installed to serve the developmentbe offset with the applicable Impact fees.
It was clarified that as impact Fees are
to offset costs associated with Transportation, police, fire, and parks, that the sewer improvements required by the
development cannot be interchanged or offset the applicable impact fees.
In our meeting on December 23, 2022 with
yourself and the Engineering department. Wastewater Mainline Connection fees were questioned regarding the
development. The question was if the Mainline connection fees could be waived in the event that the line in front of
the development was not used. We reviewed this further and would recommend if the gravity line to the south is
constructed by this development that the mainline connection fees would not be applicable and handled in the
DevelopmentAgreement accordingly. The other item we can offer is the reimbursement clause for future
connections made to the wastewater main that is constructed by the developer outside of His development.
●
There was also discussion about the ability to reimburse the Developer from the Transportation Impact fees for
capacity improvements completed along the frontage of Skyline.
This could be reimbursed and handled in the
development agreement as well, however please note that the reimbursement is subject to construcdon bids and
costs that can be verified prior to reimbursement of public funds. We would be happy to work with you on this further
as the development progresses.
●
The subject of a potential Redevelopment district that could be set up through Community Development Services in
an effort to mitigate some of the development costs to support mutual goals accordingly.
IT was recommended to
review this with the Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency and see what can be done.
Regarding your question on the appeal of the Impact Fees pertaining to your project, a fee payer is entitled to an appeal for
Impact fees when the fee payer applies for a Building Permit. Impact fees are calculated by the City, using the City’s fee
schedule at the time of application for a building permit. Idaho Falls City Code § 10-8-5(A). Alternatively, you can submit a
written appticatton for an individual assessment for the project. Idaho Falls City Code § 10-8-5(D). it is after the City has
determined the specific impact fee applied to the proposed construcdon (either at the time of building permit application or
review and acceptance/denial of a developer's written application for individual assessment) that you can present an appeal
to the Impact fee administrator for consideration.
Thanks.
IDAHO FALLS
WORKS
[im
Chris Canfield, P.E.
t
Assistant Public Works Director
380 Constitution Way
Box 50220
Idaho Falls. Idaho 83405-0220
Work
(208)612-8259
Cell
(208)201-5695
From: matt.smith@summitbuildineeroupj:Qm <matt.smith@summitb,uild_lnggroyp.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 3,2023 11:40 AM
To: Naysha Foster <nfoster@idahofalls.gov>
Cc: 'Kurt Roland' <kmLaQ.d@_eie.Dgr._CQm>
Subject: Terrace Gate/Barnwood Estates Impact Fees
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Naysha,
Good morning. Hope you had a good New Year and Christmas break. Would it be possible for us to schedule some time at a
future City Council meeting to address the impact fees for Terrace Gate/Barnwood Estates? Kurt Roland and
I discussed the
possibility of with the Engineering Dept, to revisit the issue with the City Council a week or so ago and while Kent was
pessimistic about the outcome, he thought we could still bring up the impact fees for their reconsideration. Kurt is away for
a couple of weeks but as soon as he gets back, we can come in to discuss the specifics of what we would like to present.
Thanks,
Matt Smith
Land Development
Summit Building Group/Concordia Development Group
(928) 241-2298M
% CONCORDIA
[f
DEVELOPMENT
INGROUP
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT
INSTRUCTIONS:
Please
fill
all applicable blanks in completely and accurately.
This
application should accompany your Special Conditions exhibit that will be attached to the
standard-form agreement which contains the standard terms and conditions for
all
annexation or development agreements. A form Annexation or Development Agreement
and sample special conditions have been provided to you separately. No deviations will
be allowed from the standard terms and conditions in the form Annexation/Development
Agreement.
Your special Conditions exhibit should be uniquely drafted to
fit the
particular circumstances of your subdivision, however you should follow the sample
special conditions as closely as possible.
You should also prepare an “Exhibit A” which
sets forth the legal description of your subdivision.
Name of Subdivision: Terrace Gate Apartments & Barnwood Estates
Name of Developer: Summit Development Group, LLC
Address:
901 Pier View Dr, Suite 204
Idaho Falls, ID
83402
Form of Business Entity:
Limited Liability
Company
Corporation
Trust
Other
Individual
Partnership
Government
(Check One)
State of Incorporation/Principal Place of Business: Idaho
Name, Brandt Monette
Office:
Managing Member
Authorized Signator:
Location Where Agreement
Will Be Signed:
'
j
Anticipated Date of Development: January 2024
Consulting Engineer: Firm Name:, Eagle Rock Engineering
Contact Person:
Kurt Roland
Address:
1331 Fremont Ave
City/Zip:
Idaho Falls
, ID 83402
Telephone: 208 757 7625
Names of Corporate Guarantors (if applicable): Brandt M, Monette
State:
Idaho
County:
Bonneville
-EXHIBIT A-
TERRACE GATE APARTMENTS AND BARNWOOD ESTATES
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BEGINNING AT A POINT THAT IS S.00"1Z’14”E. ALONG THE SECTION LINE 300.01 FEET
AND S 89'57’52”W. 40.00 FEET FROM THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP
2 NORTH
RANGE 37 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WEST
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SKYLINE DRIVE; RUNNING THENCE S.00‘12’14”E. ALONG SAID
WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 460.12 FEET; THENCE N.89“47’46’’E. 40.00 FEET TO THE EAST
LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S.00“12’14”E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE 276.51 FEET;
THENCE N 89°59’57”W. 270.02 FEET; THENCE S.00"12’14”E. 281.70 FEET TO THE
SOUTHLINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1 /4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1 /4 OF SAID SECTION 23;
THENCE N 89°59’25”W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 312.92 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY
LINE OF SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 91; THENCE FOLLOWING ALONG SAID BOUNDARY
LINE OF SAID SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 91 THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES; (1)
THENCE N.00°10’03”E. 350.90 FEET; (2) THENCE N.89‘50’43”E. 108.38 FEET; (3)
THENCE N.01'16’54’’E. 6.90 FEET; (4) THENCE N.01 ”13’41”E. 208.76 FEET; (5) THENCE
N.89"59’57”W. 112.37 FEET; (6) THENCE N.OO°10’O3”E. 451.00 FEET TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WESTGATE PROFESSIONAL PARK, A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT,
PURSUANT TO IDAHO CODE, TITLE 55, CHAPTER 15, A PART OF THE CITY OF IDAHO
FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO; THENCE N.89"57’52”E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID WESTGATE PROFESSIONAL PARK AND THE SOUTH LINE OF SAFARI 66, DIVISION
NUMBER 1ST AMENDED, TO THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY IDAHO A
DISTANCE OF 536.34 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 10.831 ACRES
-EXHIBIT B-
SPECiAL CONDITIONS FOR
TERRACE GATE APARTMENTS AND BARNWOOD ESTATES
s; r.
i.nn.TrnffirSi|jns. Developer agrees to install all street signs designating the names
of all streets within the Subdivision. Street signs designating the name of public streets shall be
constructed with white letters over green background. Street signs designating the name of
private streets shall be constructed with white lettering over blue background. Such signs shall be
installed in the manner and locations as directed by the City Engineer.
s r. 2.nn.
to Skyline Drive. Shall be in accordance with the Bonneville
Metropolitan Planning Organization Access Management Plan.
St r ;;.on
infrastrnchire. When it is necessary to move or remove existing
infrastructure not belonging to the CITY and not within the CITY Right-of-Way, the
DEVELOPER will coordinate such activities with the applicable owner, (e.g. poles owned by
Pacificorp dba Rocky Mountain Power). Any existing electrical infrastructure owned by
Pacificorp dba Rocky Mountain Power will require a buy-out from the DEVELOPER prior to
receipt of electrical service from the CITY. Request for the buy-out is to be initiated by the
DEVELOPER after annexation.
s; r. 4.01). Artprial Street Section Improvements. DEVELOPER shall design and
construct the Roadway improvements in Skyline Drive in accordance with the City Approved
Improvement Drawings/Siie Plan. DEVELOPER shall be reimbursed for this work and be subject
the requirements of this Agreement. The reimbursement schedule is subject to the City’s ability to
collect impact fees and final acceptance of the Roadway. DEVELOPER shall also provide for the
landscaping in the park strip between the curb and the sidewalk. Maintenance of the landscape
buffer shall be the responsibility of the DEVELOPER or the DEVELOPER’S heirs, successors, or
assigns.
to
s r.
fS.nn water rinp rnnnection. The City agrees to allow the Developer to connect
to the water main located in Skyline Drive, subject to the Developer's payment of the water main
connection fees in the amount of One Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty-One Dollars and Eighty
Cents ($ 1.751 -80; 38 feet currently al $46.10 per foot), upon execution of this agreement,
pursuant to section 8-4-14 (C) of the City Code.
Pursuant to section 8-4-14 (B) of the City Code,
the Developer or his heirs or assigns shall also pay individual water system connection fees each
time an individual water service line is connected to the City water systems. Such fees shall be
paid in the amounts and manner set forth in such Code Sections.
S.r.
6.nn spwer Main Connection Fee. The City agrees to allow the Developer to
connect to the sewer previously constructed within the development, subject to the Developer's
payment of the sewer main connection charge pursuant to section 8-l-23(C) of the City Code in
the amount of l\vcm\ Thousand One Hundred Sixty-Nine Dollars and Ninety Cents ($20,169.00;
747 feet; currently at $27.00 per foot). Mainline connection fee costs will be adjusted
accordingly if the connections are not made at a time when the City fee resolution reflects the rate
referenced herein. Pursuant to section 8-1-23(3) of the City Code, the Developer or his heirs or
assigns shall also pay individual sewer connection fees each time an individual sewer service line
is connected to the City sewer system. Such fees shall be paid in the amounts and manner set
forth in such Code Section.
The sewer main in Sk\ line Drive, where this development will connect, is shallow with
respect to other developments in this area. The Developer will address this issue with the building
design and provide additional measures necessary to mitigate the potential freezing of sewer
service lines. The Developer acknowledges that sewer service lines will be maintained by the
Developer or the Developer's heirs, successors, or assigns.
S.C. 7.00 Storm Drainage. Storm Drainage will be designed and constructed to
accommodate drainage of the lots within the development by the Developer. The storm drainage
system shall meet the volume rcqiiircmcnis of the City Storm Drainage Policy. The storm pond
will be constructed as shown on the improvement drawings and Site Plan. Maintenance of the
storm pond shall be the responsibility of the Developer or the Developer's heirs, successors, or
assigns.
Requested Amount
Land Credit - 0.17 Acre Strip for Road
106,931
Road Construction
328.213
Land Credit - 0.423 Acres Right of Way
266,070
Exemption for Prior Home (Granted)
5,273
706,487
Total
3.02 Acres appraised for $1,900,000 = $14.44 per SQFT
7,405.2 SQFT X $14.44= $106,931
0.17 Acres =7,405.2 SQFT
18,425.88 SQFT x 14.44 = $266,070
0.423 Acres = 18,425.88 SQFT
(43,560 SQFT per Acre)
APPRAISAL REPORT
OF
PROPOSED
Terrace Gate Condominiums Buildings 1 and 2
And Foundation of Building 3
To be located at
Approximately 1020 South Skyline Drive
Idaho Fails, Idaho 83401
Appraisal No. 25-118
FOR
CITIZENS COMMUNITY BANK,
A DIVISION OF GLACIER BANK
BY
CHAD RIGBY, MAI
RIGBY & COMPANY
APPRAISERS AND CONSULTANTS
LARS
RIGBY MAI
CHAI
L. RIGBY MAI
JEFF H. RIGBY
Ma> 9,2025
Laima Ditto
Citi2 ens Community Bank a Division of Glacier Bank
Re:
Appraisal of two condominium buildings consisting of a total of 48 units, and one
proposed building to be completed up to the foundation, located at approximately
1020 South Skyline Drive, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402
Dear Ms. Ditto:
Pursiant your request, I have perfonned an appraisal on the above referenced property
This
appraisal considers the market value of the subject underlying land as well as the two proposed
cond 3ramum buildmgs to contain a total of 48 units with each building having 24 units with a unit
3f one-bedroom, two-bedroom and three-bedroom condominium units. Building 3 is also
dered up to the point of completion of the foundation. The value calculations m“ade in this
apprusal
are considered m an as
is
condition
as
well as
at
completion
of the proposed
unprovements.
Please refer to the Description of Improvements section of the appraisal for
intor nation regarding the proposed improvements.
mix
consi
ollowing narrative appraisal report is in full conformance with USPAP regulations.
This
app^isal also conforms to the reporting requirements set forth by FIRREA.
The appraisal also
confc rms to the Code of Ethics of the Appraisal Institute.
The
The iharketing time estimated in this report is less than one year with exposure time also estimated
to be ess than one year with no additional discounting necessary.
The L itended user of this appraisal is Citizens Community Bank a Division of Glacier Bank.
iTothetical conditions are considered as part of this appraisal.
It is the extraordinary
assun ption of this appraisal that the subject proposed improvements will be built according to the
plans and cost mformation provided to the appraiser. The use of these extraordinary assumptions
may i npact assigned results.
^
No h
14^6 North Highway 89, Suite 220, Farmington, Utah 84025, (801) 298-3205 Fax (801)451-0443
E-mail: t:hadr]ebvmai a:Bmail i-om
Ms. Ditto
Pag 12
Maj 9,2025
It IS my opinion that the market values per the respective dates of appraisal in fee simple estate are:
Mai ket value—as is—April 23.202j>
ONE MILLION NINE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS
($1,900,000)
pective market value at completion of vertical improvements—^Buildings 1 and 2. with
Bniiping 3 fonndatioii—bulk valae—April 1.2026
TWELVE MILLION NINE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS
($12,900,000)
bined retail value at completion—^Buildings I and 2 only—^Aoril 1. 2026
Con
Unit types
No. units
Value/unit
Retail value
1-bed
12
@
$230,000
$255,000
$275,000
$300,000
$2,760,000
$3,060,000
$3,300,000
$3.600.000
$12,720,000
2-bed
2-bed
3-bed
12
@
12
@
12
@
Total
Shou d you have any questions concerning this analysis, please do not hesitate to contact my office.
Resp ictflilly submitted,
Chad L. Rigby, MAI
Idaho
Certi^cate CGA-4690 &qDires 5-3-26
State-Certified General Appraiser
CERTIFICATION
The nyJersigned does hereby certify that*
The statements of efet contained in this erport are true and correct
The erported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the erported assumptions and limiting
conditions, and are my personal, impartial, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions.
I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal
interest with respect to the parties involved.
I have no bias wife erspect to the property efat is the subject of this report or to efe parties involved with this
assignment
My mgagement in this assignment was not contmgent upon developing or rqwrting predetermined results.
My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon efe development or reporting of a
predetermined value or direction in value that efvors fee cause of efe client, the amount of the value opinion,
fee ^tainment of a stipulated result, or the occunence of a subsequent event directly erlated to efe intended use
of efis ^praisal.
The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in
confotmily wife the requirements of efe Code of Professional Ethics & Standards of Professional AoDraisal
Practice ofthe Appraisal histitute.
"
The reported^ analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and efis erport has been prepared, in
conformity wife efe Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practi
The use of this report is subject to efe requirements of efe Appraisal Institute relating to erview by its duly
authorized representatives.
^
I have made a personal inspection ofthe subject property.
I have primed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, on efe property that is efe subject of this
appraisal in efe pnor three years.
No person has provided professional assistance to the person signing efe certification.
As ofthe date ofthis report, I have completed efe continuing education program of efe Appraisal Institute.
ce.
May 9.2025
Date
Chad L. Rigby, MAI
Idaho State-Ceitified General Appraiser
Certificate CGA-4690 Expires 5-3-26
SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Idei tificatioD of the properly:
The subject of this appraisal is Buildings
1 and 2, with
Building 3 foundation value also included as part of the
proposed Terrace
Gate Condominiums
to be
located
approximately 1020 South Skyline Drive, Idaho Falls, Idaho
83402.
at
Proj erty right appraised:
Fee simple estate
Effe :tive date of appraisal:
April 23,2025
April 1,2026—prospective date of completion
May 9.2025
■as IS
Dah of report:
Land size:
8.055 acres
3.02 acres allocated to subject Buildings 1,2, and 3
Proposed development
Proposed
HigI est and best use:
Yeai built:
Unit
1-bed
sizes:
691 SF
964 SF
1,045 SF
1,317 SF
2-bed
2-bed
3-bed
Desc ription of improvements:
The
subject
is
proposed
to
be
built
out
with
two
condominium buildings—Buildings 1 and 2. The buildings
will have a combined area of 48,204 square feet with a gross
area including the breeze ways and patios at 54,618 square
feet
The unit mix is six one-bedroom, six three-bedroom,
and
12 two-bedroom
units. The subject
also
considers
Building 3 at completion of die foundiion before vertical
improvements take place. Please erfer to the Description of
Improvements
section
of
the
appraisal
for
detailed
information regarding the proposed improvements.
Value Indicators
As is
At completion
As is
Cost approach
Sales comparison approach
Income approach
$1,900,000
$14,100,000
$12,900,000
$12,400,000
Values
$1,900,000
$12,900,000
The ^alue calculations above for the subject in an as is condition considers the pad value associated
with Buildings 1,2, and 3.
Amounts paid by Terrace Gate Properly Fund for Knife River to widen Skyline Drive
Item
Scheduled
Nutek
Unit Cost
Quemrtv
Units
Speiificelxin
SesIwnNo
Uescriplion
$2 00
SS.J8UOJ
1740
1 SjuvCurtme
30
S7.h97 SO
$9 75
HIO
cr
t fteim»4lul PevenienlSeciiwi
Sliylloe
50
$3,395 00
53,>95 00
1
L5
1 ConnccHotsisimKWileilinc
90
571,775 00
$99 00
725
u
1
Insult
12' Ajieiline
100
$1,275.00
5:,550 00
2
£A
1 InsUU 12'WjlnlH1mi!S|regtPU)gl
no
5io,nooQ
$5.070.00
£A
l-lnsuil 12'Vatu'
120
$9,665 00
515,330 00
Tneie weteShyOiafils
in phase
1, 2yirateonst|l'n<-
£A
160
1
Install iecHyaijni
525,000 00
AicasanO 7 weteioitttiineg AiBaSisonsHylen: ana wasa0oui25n
$25,000 00
l lnsLill UndeigiounO Heltiilion S/slem [Area S&7;
15
290
$37.00
528,490 00
7/0
If
1
Insl.ill 30‘Cui6jihJ Cullei
330
550 31000
$?G 00
lftisvi4S<)iii;injllYcaiW'ti ixjl ll^■^llc^ i„iniL' scct«m,islli<;teslQHneaevi:lui>nw;nl. jllei Onl
1935
V lull IOihIiI itieiniiiiJicocity scctiiin
SY
l-PavenicmSi;Clionlui Ssylmi-(7~/4‘/9*l
360
$20 00
54,lbO.CO
IbO
SY
2 Patemt-nlSeaionlut SSvliiH'(2V4*/9*|
780
(SS4.47U.C0l
l$2fa U0|
2095
PEtCUPanemenlScrlionSKYlINf (ITtM360&76Q|
SY
4
$53 00
5111,035 00
2095
ADD Ntf* P4>«iiu:iil Scclioii SKYLINb
SY
4.1
$15.00
510,920 00
729
CY
ftOD AdUilH)iMl
I X lot SKYIIWI
4 2
534,,●'00 00
lt)l.il<ni.iiilily
I'l
1 IGCOSf Ixil tins
is ttur (|ii.nitily iiloini styling
$'3 00
3300
Sf
;tio
i-aminvjHi
$328,313.50
Total Cost:
1/31/2024 6:2l:17PM
.f
V-.
●'r
Knife River Corporation - Mountain West
4055 Professional Way
Idaho Fails, ID 83402
Contact:
Phone:
Fax:
Concordia Development
Matt Smith
'idMi.'
/●
James Hammer
208.220.0659
(208) 562-5045
/:
'1
:
.
'i, 1 V
Quote To:
Terrace Gate/Bamwood Estates
12/5/2023
Job Name:
Date of Plans:
Addendums:
Phone:
Fax;
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
QUANTITY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
ITEM
1,675.00
LF
1.50
2,512.50
Removal of Fence
10
1.00
LS
22,770.00
22,770.00
Removal of Existing Foimdation/Garbage
20
1,740.00
LF
2.00
3,480.00
Saw Cutting
30
16,810.00
SY
0.80
13,448.00
Clear and Grub
40
810.00
CY
9.75
7,897.50
Removal of Pavement Section - Skyline
50
2,370.00
CY
24,885.00
10.50
Cut/Fill to Subgrade
60
18,270.00
630.00
CY
29.00
Import Pit Run for Subgrade
70
1.00
LS
8,565.00
8,565.00
Tosoil Respread
80
1.00
LS
3,395.00
3,395.00
Connect to Existing Waterline
Install 12" Waterline
90
725.00
LF
99.00
71,775.00
100
2,550.00
2.00
EA
1,275,00
Install 12" Water Fittings (Tee & Plug)
no
5,070.00
10,140.00
2.00
EA
Install 12" Valve
120
1,480.00
LF
103,600.00
70.00
Install 8" Waterline
130
9.00
EA
3,065,00
27,585.00
Install 8" Water Valve
140
6.00
EA
950.00
5,700.00
Install 8" Water Fitting (Tee, 90*)
150
9,665.00
48,325.00
5.00
EA
Install Fire Hydrant
160
1.00
EA
16,000.00
16,000.00
2" Water/Fire Service to Clubhouse
170
35,400.00
2.00
EA
17,700.00
4" W'ater & Fire Service to Condo
180
28.00
EA
2,600.00
72,800.00
1" Water Service to Townhouse Unit
190
78.00
93,600.00
1,200.00
LF
Install 12" Sewer Line
200
4,760.00
70.00
LF
68.00
Install 8" Sewer Line
210
9.00
EA
41,850.00
4,650,00
Install Sewer Manhole
220
28.00
EA
1,840.00
51,520.00
Install 4" Sewer Service to Townhouse Units
230
3,800.00
22,800.00
6.00
EA
Install Stonn Catch Basin
240
43,225.00
910.00
LF
47.50
Install 12" Storm
245
44,400.00
12.00
EA
3,700.00
install Strom Manhole
250
9,695.00
1.00
EA
9.695.00
260
Install Infiltration Manhole
15.00
LF
80.00
1,200.00
270
Install 24" Storm
1.00
LS
3,050.00
3,050.00
280
Install Infiit. Beds w/6' Drain Rock (Pond 4)
1.00
LS
65,750.00
65,750.00
Install Underground Retention System (Area 5&7)
290
Page 1 of 5
ITEM
DHSCRJPTION
QUANTITY
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
810
Mobilizarion'Genera} Conditions
1,00
L.S
69,250.00
69,250.00
820
Traffif
1.00
LS
750.00
750.00
830
Signs
1.00
LS
12,650.00
12,650.00
840 PavemtuM Markings
1.00
LS
5,185.00
5,185.00
Phase U
1,452,164.50
890
Fence Removal
1.135.00
LF
1.50
1,702.50
900
Clear and Grub
12,850.00
SY
0.80
10,280.00
910
CuPPill to Subgrade
830.00
CY
10.50
8.715.00
920 Import Fit Run for .Subgrade
160.00
CY
29.00
4.640.00
930
Topsoil Respread
1.00
LS
8,190.00
8,190.00
940
Insrall 8" Watcrlme
255.00
LF
70.00
17,850.00
950
Install 8“ Fitting
1.00
EA
950.00
950.00
Install 8" Valve
960
2.00
EA
3,065.00
6,130.00
970
Install 4" FireAVaicr Service to Condo
2.00
EA
17,100.00
34,200.00
980
Install Fire Hydrani
1.00
EA
9,665.00
9,665.00
990
Install 8" Sewer
210.00
LF
64.00
13,440.00
1000
Install 6” Sewer .Service
3.00
EA
2.765.00
8,295.00
1010
Install Sewer Manhole
2.00
EA
4,650.00
9,300.00
1020
Install 12" Sionn
215.00
LF
47.50
10,212.50
1030
Install Storm Maiiliolc
4.00
EA
3,700.00
14,800.00
Sidewalk
1040
7,890.00
SF
9.00
71,010.00
1050
Trash Pad
LOO
EA
19,000.00
19,000.00
1,130.00
1060
Install 18" Curb and Gutter
LF
46.00
51,980.00
Pavement Section (2"/4".'9")
3,035.00
SY
1070
26.00
78,910.00
1.00
LS
1080
SWTPF
4,000.00
4,000.00
Mobtlizaiion/Gcnct'al Conditions
1.00
LS
49,000.00
1090
49,000.00
LS
IlOO
Traffic Control
1.00
750-00
750.00
Signs
1.00
LS
1110
265.00
265.00
PavemctU Markings
l.OO
LS
1120
L470.00
1,470.00
Pliase m
434,755.00
(JRAND TOTAL
$3,464,993.00
NOTES:
Bid Notes:
1. Price includes (1) mobilization to job. Each additional mobilization will be invoiced at quoted price.
2. Work will be completed upon a inuiually agreed scheclaic.
3.All utilities are stubbed to within 5' of tJie building.
4. Concrete flat work is included for sidewalks and AD.A's, Building Breesewas-s and townhomc driveways are excluded.
5. Knife River shall provide matcnals in conformance with the mix design provided to it or required in the plans and
specifications applicable to this Proposal.
EXCLUSIONS
I. Permits, fees,
2. Perfomiance or payment bonds.
3. Fees for inspection.^ or testing.
4, Sun'cying or slaking.
5. Removal'backfill of soft or satuiaied soils below subgradc.
6. SWPPP or N(,)l filing.
7. EPA.' DEO permit, paperwork or inspection requireinem.s.
Page 3 of 5
City Council Meeting
Minutes
1
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Thursday, January 8, 2026
7:30 PM
City Council Chambers
1. Call to Order
Present:
Mayor Rebecca L. Noah Casper
Council President Lisa Burtenshaw
Councilor John Radford
Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Councilor Jim Freeman
Councilor Jim Francis
Councilor Kirk Larsen
Also present:
Pam Alexander, Municipal Services Director
Stephen Boorman, Interim GM IF Power
Wade Sanner, CDS Director
Jared Huish, Developer
Chris Fredericksen, Public Works Director
Jim Hirrlinger, Developer
Zack Jones, City Attorney
Emily Geisler, City Clerk
2. Pledge of Allegiance
Dr. Bryce Burtenshaw led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Consent Agenda (Old Business)
A. Office of the City Clerk
1. 26-01
City Council Meeting Minutes (11.13.2025, 11.24.2025, 11.25.2025,
12.08.2025, 12.11.2025, 12.15.2025, 12.18.2025, 1.05.2026)
Motion 1: Approve, accept, or receive all items on the Consent Agenda according to the
recommendations presented.
o
Moved by: Council President Burtenshaw
o
Second: Councilor Larsen
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Dingman, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
4. Regular Agenda (Old Business)
A. City Attorney
1. 26-20
Reasoned Statement, Findings of Fact, and Conclusions of Law - Barnwood
Estates Townhomes and Terrace Gate Condominiums
Presentation/Discussion (Attorney Jones):
•
Related to a previously heard appeal.
•
The appeal concerned a request for an impact fee credit or reimbursement, heard on
December 18, 2025.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
2
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
The Council had previously heard arguments and voted to affirm the Impact Fee
Administrator’s decision.
•
The City Attorney’s office prepared a written reasoned statement explaining the
Council’s decision.
•
This statement was reviewed at a recent work session, with no changes recommended.
•
The document was presented for formal adoption as the Council’s official findings and
reasoning.
•
Council members were invited to ask questions; none were raised.
•
A comment was made to ensure the motion clearly reflects that the decision is
supported by all Council members and the Mayor and all are authorized to sign.
Motion: Council approve and sign the reasoned statement, findings of fact, and
conclusions of law for the impact fee appeal hearing held on December 18, 2025, for
Barnwood Estates Townhomes and Terrace Gate Condominiums, affirming the Fee
Administrator’s decision made on November 6, 2025, and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute the necessary documents.
o
Moved by: Councilor Francis
o
Second: Councilor Freeman
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Dingman, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
5. Remarks from Mayor Casper
•
As the outgoing Mayor, Mayor Casper reflected on the optimism, pride, and patriotic spirit
surrounding the swearing-in ceremony and expressed deep personal gratitude for the
moment.
•
She emphasized Idaho Falls’ importance locally, regionally, statewide, nationally, and even
internationally, noting her pride in representing the City.
•
She highlighted major accomplishments over the past 12 years, including:
o
Making Memorial Bridge pedestrian-safe.
o
Paying off hydroelectric bonds tied to post–Teton Dam recovery.
o
Building multiple fire stations and the City’s first standalone fire headquarters.
o
Establishing a community college on the tech campus.
o
Hosting large-scale events such as an air show and solar eclipse gatherings.
o
Constructing a new power generation facility ahead of schedule and under budget.
o
Financing and completing a new police complex with a historically low interest rate
of 1.89%.
o
Building a new water tower designed to serve the City for generations.
•
She noted Idaho Falls’ recognition as one of the nation’s best-performing small cities in
multiple recent years.
•
Mayor Casper stressed that these achievements were made without unreasonable debt,
while lowering the property tax levy rate since 2014.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
3
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
She praised City employees for their dedication, professionalism, and service—especially
during the pandemic—and encouraged public appreciation of their work.
•
She expressed pride in the community’s respect for first responders and the strong civic
culture of Idaho Falls.
•
She affirmed her belief that local government is the most important level of government and
warned against allowing national politics to overshadow local governance.
•
Addressing the incoming City Council, she emphasized that public service is about doing
what is right for the City—not what is easy or popular—and reminded them to consider
voices not always heard.
•
She thanked Council members, department directors, and all City staff for their
intelligence, professionalism, and commitment.
•
Concluding emotionally, Mayor Casper expressed deep gratitude for her 12 years of
service, reaffirmed her love for Idaho Falls, encouraged continued civic engagement, and
transitioned to administering the oath of office for incoming Mayor Burtenshaw.
6. Administration of the Oath of Office
A. Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw
o
Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw was formally sworn in as Mayor of Idaho Falls, choosing to
affirm rather than swear the oath.
o
Oath: I, Lisa Burtenshaw, do solemnly affirm that I will support the Constitution of the
United States, and the Constitution of the State of Idaho, and that I will faithfully
discharge the duties of Mayor for the City of Idaho Falls according to the best of my
ability.
o
Mayor Burtenshaw made brief remarks, acknowledging the heat and large crowd and
noting a recess would follow. She thanked all candidates who ran for office and
everyone who volunteered during the election. She expressed appreciation for
community members interested in serving on boards and commissions, stating she
already feels supported by their willingness to serve.
B. Councilor Jim Freeman
o
Sworn in by Mayor Burtenshaw
o
Oath: I, Jim Freeman, do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the
United States, and the Constitution of the State of Idaho, and that I will faithfully
discharge the duties of Council Member for the City of Idaho Falls, according to the best
of my ability.
C. Councilor Jim Francis
o
Sworn in by Mayor Burtenshaw
o
Oath: I, Jim Francis, do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United
States, and the Constitution of the State of Idaho, and that I will faithfully discharge the
duties of Council Member for the City of Idaho Falls, according to the best of my ability.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
4
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
D. Councilor Brandon Lee
o
Sworn in by Mayor Burtenshaw
o
Oath: I, Brandon Lee, do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the
United States, and the Constitution of the State of Idaho, and that I will faithfully
discharge the duties of Council Member for the City of Idaho Falls, according to the best
of my ability.
-- Recess --
7. Reconvene & Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw
Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Councilor Jim Francis
Councilor Jim Freeman
Councilor Kirk Larsen
Councilor Brandon Lee
Councilor John Radford
Zachary Jones, City Attorney
Emily Geisler, City Clerk
8. Remarks from Mayor Burtenshaw
•
Mayor Burtenshaw expressed her love for Idaho Falls and said that love was her primary
motivation for running for Mayor.
•
She thanked those in attendance and expressed gratitude for the opportunity to participate
in the election, noting it helped her better understand how the City can improve service to
residents.
•
She emphasized priorities for the City, including improving communication with residents,
supporting public safety, maintaining budget accountability, and investing in projects that
reflect community values. She highlighted key community assets such as roads, parks,
downtown, trails, and special events as essential to making Idaho Falls a great place to live,
raise a family, and grow a business.
•
Mayor Burtenshaw affirmed her commitment, along with the Council and City staff, to
these goals and expressed optimism for the next four years.
•
She stressed the importance of building the City for the next generation, with a focus on
safety and quality of life.
•
She concluded by thanking the public for their support, acknowledging Mayor Casper’s
service.
9. Elect President of the Council
Councilor Larsen shared that he has had the opportunity to work closely with Councilor
Francis and learn from him. He praised Councilor Francis as a dedicated, serious, and
City Council Meeting
Minutes
5
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
hardworking Council member. Larsen described Councilor Francis as a strong mentor and
expressed confidence that he would serve effectively as Council President.
Motion: Nominate Jim Francis for Council President.
o
Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o
Second: Councilor Freeman
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
Comments from Council President Francis:
•
He outlined key priorities for his leadership, focusing on improving consistency, clarity, and
efficiency in City ordinances and code. He noted that some areas of the code are unclear
and said work has already begun with the City Attorney to address those issues.
•
Francis emphasized his commitment to supporting the Mayor by helping turn Council
priorities into Citywide action and continuing, expanding, and improving the priority-setting
program started two years ago.
•
He acknowledged the importance of constructive disagreement between the Council
(legislative branch) and the Mayor (executive branch).
•
He expressed strong support for Mayor Burtenshaw’s efforts to recruit volunteers for
boards and commissions and pledged to support those nominations when they come
before the Council.
10. Public Comment
1. Anthony Mongillo – 4870 Pevero Drive - Congratulated the newly elected officials and
expressed appreciation for the democratic process and the ability to have differing
opinions. He suggested that the City consider developing an aquatic center, noting it would
benefit children and the broader community. He concluded by thanking the Council.
2. Evan Bastow – 3017 Sonora Drive - Requested that the City Council consider a proposal to
rename Community Park to Ida Hardcastle Community Park. He suggested the renaming as
a way to honor Ida Hardcastle for her service. He thanked the Council for considering the
request.
11. Consent Agenda (New Business)
A. Municipal Services
1. 26-13
Purchase of a replacement vehicle for Public Works from Smith Chevrolet
for $94,897.90.
B. Public Works
1. 26-11
Bid Award to Knife River Corp of the International Way Parking in the amount
of $349,963.50.
2. 26-12
Bid Award to Knife River Corp for the Anderson Water Line Railroad Crossing
in the amount of $389,389.00.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
6
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
C. Airport
1. 26-17
Non-Exclusive Rental Car Concession Agreement with Enterprise Rent A Car
Company of UT, LLC, with a fixed revenue total of $223,195.26 plus a 10% privilege fee.
2. 26-18
Non-Exclusive Rental Car Concession Agreement with Enterprise, operating
as Alamo Rent A Car and National Car Rental for a fixed revenue total of $269,205.54.
Motion 1: Approve, accept, or receive all items on the Consent Agenda according to the
recommendations presented.
o
Moved by: Council President Francis
o
Second: Councilor Larsen
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
12. Regular Agenda (New Business)
A. Idaho Falls Power
1. 26-19
Appointment of Idaho Falls’ UAMPS Member Representative and Alternate
Presentation/Discussion (Interim GM Boorman):
Interim GM Boorman explained a proposed change in the City’s representative to
UAMPS (Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems). Due to a staffing change, the City
proposed appointing Josh Roos as the primary representative and Colter Tucker as the
alternate.
No Council questions were raised, and a comment was made expressing
confidence in the proposed representatives. At the Council’s request, Director Boorman
explained that UAMPS is a consortium of municipal power systems that manages shared
energy projects and facilitates buying and selling excess power among members.
Motion: Approve the Resolution appointing Idaho Falls’ UAMPS Member Representative
and Alternate and authorize the City Clerk and Mayor to execute the necessary documents.
o
Moved by: Councilor Freeman
o
Second: Councilor Dingman
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
B. Municipal Services
1. 26-14
Sale of Used Transformer from Idaho Falls Power
Presentation/Discussion (Director Alexander): The Municipal Services Department
coordinates the disbursement/disposal of City surplus property under Resolution 2015-01.
The used transformer, located at the Sugar Mill site, was offered for surplus but initially
received no takers. Idaho Falls Power then contacted vendors, resulting in two bids; the
City Council Meeting
Minutes
7
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
highest bid came from J&J Transformers. The Council was asked to approve the sale of the
transformer to J&J Transformer.
Motion: Approve the sale of a used 15 MVA transformer from Sugarmill Substation to J&J
Transformers for $17,500.00, the highest of two offers received, and authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to sign the necessary documents.
o
Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o
Second: Councilor Radford
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
C. Office of the City Clerk
1. 26-08
Ordinance Amendment - City Council Meeting Time
Presentation/Discussion (Clerk Geisler): The City Clerk presented an ordinance
amendment to change the City Council meeting time. Historically, Council meetings have
been held on various Thursdays; the amendment keeps meetings on the second and fourth
Thursdays but moves the start time from 7:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. The change aims to make
meetings more accessible for the public.
Motion: Approve the Ordinance amending Title 1, Chapter 6, Section 1, to change the time
for regular City Council meetings and delete an unnecessary reference to the month of
November, under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate
readings; and request it be read by title and published by summary.
o
Moved by: Councilor Radford
o
Second: Councilor Larsen
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
Ordinance #3637 Title Read: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, AMENDING TITLE 1, CHAPTER 6,
SECTION 1, PROVIDING FOR THE NOTICE OF THE TIMES OF REGULAR MEETINGS;
CODIFICATION; PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY; AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.
D. Community Development Services
1. 26-15
Final Plat and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards,
Highland Park Addition, Third Amended.
Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner):
•
Highland Park Addition, Third Amended, is a six-lot development.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
8
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
These properties were originally annexed in 1906, prior to the construction of US
Highway 20, which created irregularly shaped lots.
•
The properties are currently zoned TN, allowing for infill development that makes
efficient use of existing utilities and resources.
•
Site layout:
o
Three lots to the north and three to the south.
o
Access is provided via a cul-de-sac on Elmore and an alleyway; portions of the
alley require easement over private property to achieve a full 20-foot width.
o
A Homeowners Association (HOA) will maintain the access easement.
o
Two fire-access points are planned (cul-de-sac and alleyway).
•
The subdivision will consist of owner-occupied, attached single-family homes, some
“back-loaded” facing Highway 20.
•
The preliminary plat passed unanimously through the Planning Commission with no
public comment.
•
Councilors praised the development as an example of creative, thoughtful infill
development, using the Traditional Neighborhood Zone to make previously
underutilized historic property productive.
•
The project is highlighted as beneficial amid a housing shortage, providing affordable
and approachable housing.
•
Councilors expressed appreciation for developer innovation and City support in
facilitating the project.
Motion 1: Accept or Approve the Final Plat for Highland Park Addition, Third Amended and
give authorization for the Mayor, City Engineer, and City Clerk to sign said Final Plat.
o
Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o
Second: Councilor Radford
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
Motion 2: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Final
Plat for Highland Park Addition, Third Amended and give authorization for the Mayor to
execute the necessary documents.
o
Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o
Second: Councilor Radford
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
*Director Sanner noted that a corrected version of the Reasoned Statement, which was
provided to each Council member, was the one being voted on. The corrected version
included the date of City Council approval.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
9
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
2. 26-10
Quasi-judicial Public Hearing-Rezone from HC, Highway Commercial to CC,
Central Commercial, Zoning Ordinance and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria
and Standards for approximately 2.45 acres consisting of a portion of Lot 2, Block 1,
Taylor Crossing on the River Division No. 8.
Hearing Opened
Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner):
•
The item is a rezoning request for two properties totaling 2.45 acres, located near
the Eagle roundabout between Utah Avenue and Pancheri Drive.
•
The request is to change the zoning from Highway Commercial (HC) to Central
Commercial (CC).
•
Adjacent properties are already zoned CC, so the request aligns with surrounding
land uses.
•
The rezoning fits the City’s comprehensive plan (“Imagine IF”) goals for mixed-use
centers and corridors. Both HC and CC are compatible with the transect
designation.
•
The properties are within the Riverwalk Urban Renewal District, allowing the
developer to use tax increment financing (TIF) to offset infrastructure costs.
•
The developer intends to blast lava rock on the site to allow for a commercial
boutique, a use permitted only in the CC zone.
•
The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval on December 9,
2025, with no public comment.
•
Councilors noted the CC zoning allows flexibility for residential and commercial
development, resolves a previously challenging site, and is not a spot zone.
There was no public testimony and the hearing was closed.
Motion 1: Approve the Ordinance Rezoning approximately 2.45 acres consisting of a
portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Taylor Crossing on the River Division No. 8. from HC, Highway
Commercial to CC, Central Commercial, under a suspension of the rules requiring three
complete and separate readings and request that it be read by title and published by
summary.
o
Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o
Second: Councilor Radford
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
Ordinance #3638 Title Read: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE REZONING OF
APPROXIMATELY 2.45 ACRES AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 OF THIS ORDINANCE FROM
City Council Meeting
Minutes
10
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
HC, HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL TO CC, CENTRAL COMMERCIAL; AND PROVIDING
SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.
Motion 2: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the
Rezone from HC to CC and give authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the
necessary documents.
o
Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o
Second: Councilor Radford
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
3. 26-09
Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing - Planned Unit Development (PUD) and
Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, Sage Lakes.
Hearing Opened
Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner, Mr. Huish, Mr. Hirrlinger, Director
Fredericksen):
•
Project Overview
o
Presented by developer Jared Huish (with later input from partner Jim Hirrlinger).
o
Approximately 20 acres located west of 5th East, south of the golf course (Sage
Lakes), and north of Fairway Estates.
o
Project has gone through neighborhood meetings and Planning Commission
review; the proposal reflects community feedback and is intended as a “living
document.”
•
Zoning & Planning Context
o
Property has been zoned R-2 since annexation in 2019, with adjacent R-1 and R-
3A zoning.
o
Zoning pattern follows traditional density transitions from higher density near
Lewisville Highway to lower density neighborhoods.
o
Site is within the General Urban Transect under the Imagine IF comprehensive
plan, which supports mixed housing types, walkability, and connected streets.
o
Development complies with airport-compatible land use requirements and lies
outside the main noise corridor.
•
Development Program & Density
o
PUD focuses on townhomes, while 74 single-family homes surrounding the site
were previously approved through a preliminary plat.
o
Proposal includes 246 townhomes, a 20% density reduction from what zoning
would otherwise allow (R-2 permits up to 17 units/acre; proposal is ~11
units/acre).
City Council Meeting
Minutes
11
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
o
Density was intentionally reduced to maintain higher quality, neighborhood
compatibility, and property values.
o
All units are for-sale and can be owner-occupied (not just rentals).
•
Design & Housing Types
o
Mix of single-family homes and townhomes supports multiple price points,
aging in place, and multigenerational living.
o
Townhomes are two-story only, with front-load and rear-load designs; rear-load
units use alleys to minimize garage/vehicle visibility.
o
Townhome widths range, all with two-car garages.
o
Buildings range from 4–8 attached units.
o
Architecture is designed to be cohesive with nearby neighborhoods and golf
course homes.
•
Open Space & Amenities
o
Approximately 4.5 acres of open space with two playgrounds, two dog parks,
pavilion, walking trails, patios, landscaping, and buffers
o
Most open space is common area maintained by an HOA; homeowners own
only their unit footprint (“pad lot” style).
o
Potential for shared park access with neighboring HOAs, subject to
maintenance agreements.
•
Access, Streets & Connectivity
o
Primary access is directly from the highway (Lewisville) to reduce cut-through
traffic in existing neighborhoods.
o
Surrounding streets are public; interior streets are private (no drive aisles).
o
Two access points provided to meet fire code requirements.
o
A street stub is shown only to preserve future access for a separate triangular
parcel to the north; it is not required for this PUD and not related to this
development.
o
Internal trails connect to sidewalks along Sage Lakes Boulevard and to future
planned bike/pedestrian facilities along Lewisville Highway.
•
Traffic, Utilities & Infrastructure
o
Traffic study found no expected level-of-service issues, with a reduction being
shown for the Pevero Drive/5th West intersection.
o
Water pressure concerns raised by neighbors were investigated:
Issues traced to temporary valve shutdowns during bridge construction.
City verified 55 PSI at residences; system meets standards and has
capacity for added demand.
o
Bridge (from Lewisville Hwy) and Sage Lakes Boulevard:
Certificates of occupancy will not be issued until the bridge is
completed and approved.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
12
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Financial assurance is in place to ensure completion even if the
developer fails.
•
Public & Planning Commission Input
o
Neighborhood and Planning Commission comments were included in the
Council packet.
o
Concerns addressed included traffic, water pressure, property values,
crime/safety, building height, and lack of nearby commercial services.
o
Staff noted commercial zoning exists nearby, but commercial development
typically follows residential growth.
o
Planning Commission recommended approval by a 5–1 vote.
•
Council Discussion Highlights
o
Councilor Francis asked whether building height could be formally limited to
two stories in the PUD approval.
Legal staff cautioned that imposing a height restriction below what R-2
allows could raise legal “takings” concerns, though PUDs allow more
conditions and developers can self-impose limits.
o
Clarified that the project uses private streets only and no drive aisles.
o
Confirmed zoning has not changed since 2019 and that the future access to the
North shown does not apply to the current development.
•
Next Steps
o
Council opened the process for public testimony, with speakers asked to state
their name and address and were given approximately three minutes each
o
Developer allowed rebuttal following public comment.
Public Comment:
•
Allison Hicken, 375 Pevero Drive
•
Perspective
Supports smart growth that respects existing residents and neighborhoods.
Does not oppose growth, but asks the City to ensure it is done safely and
thoughtfully.
•
Primary Concern: Access & Emergency Response
Fairway Estates currently has limited access to the City, with residents
traveling over a mile via Pevero Drive to East River Road (5th West).
Only one functional access route.
Sage Lakes Boulevard and the bridge are not yet operational, despite being
discussed for years.
Cited past experience where planned future roads never materialized,
leaving neighborhoods without promised access.
•
Emergency Response Examples
City Council Meeting
Minutes
13
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Recounted a lightning storm that caused multiple road closures and a
backyard fire.
Emergency services took 17 minutes to respond; residents extinguished the
fire themselves.
Referenced a recent grass fire in the Hatch Pit where emergency access was
again limited, requiring wildland fire units.
Expressed serious concern about adding 200–250+ new homes without
improving access.
•
Bridge & Bonding
Explained that the bridge (access from Lewisville Hwy) was only bonded and
guaranteed after years of residents advocating and expressing concern that
it might never be built.
Asked the Council to provide similar protection now, rather than relying on
future promises.
•
Neighborhood Equity & Amenities
Noted that although the new development is adjacent, it is treated as a
separate HOA, limiting Fairway Estates residents’ access to green space
and amenities.
Golf course green space is not public and explicitly marked as off-limits.
Stated Fairway Estates lacks:
•
Walkable access to the City
•
Sidewalks on East River Road and Lewisville Highway
•
Usable public green space
Lives in an older (1998) home with a large lot and mature landscaping.
Expressed concern about protecting home values and neighborhood
character near the golf course.
•
Infrastructure Concerns
Questioned water pressure assurances, noting that measurements were
taken in winter.
Requested testing during peak summer irrigation months, when residents
already experience low pressure.
•
Overall Message
Urged the City to prioritize roads, sidewalks, access, and emergency safety
before approving large new developments.
Framed her request as a call for protection of existing residents, not
opposition to new neighbors.
•
Darick Sontag, 5188 Grassy Hill
•
Questioned how the property was zoned R-2 or R-3, stating that this level of
density does not fit the existing neighborhood.
•
Reported that many neighbors oppose the project and are not supportive of the
development.
•
Raised concerns about increased traffic, noise, and overall neighborhood
impacts associated with higher-density development.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
14
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
Emphasized the potential loss of property values, noting that denser
development changes buyer preferences and reduces the pool of potential
homebuyers.
•
Stated they are not opposed to growth but believe this project does not make
sense in this location.
•
Urged the City Council to prioritize existing Idaho Falls residents and
neighborhood compatibility over the interests of out-of-state developers.
•
Amber Reynolds, 5288 Cypress Creek
•
Lives five houses from the proposed PUD in a quiet, family-oriented
neighborhood with many young children who regularly play outside.
•
Expressed serious safety concerns about adding 250 or more additional
vehicles to neighborhood streets, noting that children, despite safety guidance,
can act unpredictably.
•
Clarified she is not opposed to housing or growth, but believes the density and
scale of the PUD do not fit the neighborhood’s aesthetics, lifestyle, or
expectations when residents purchased their homes.
•
Works at Ethel Boyes Elementary School and noted District 91 elementary
schools are already over 90% capacity.
•
Raised concerns that combined with other nearby developments, the area
could see 500–600+ new homes, further overwhelming school capacity.
•
Asked the Council to consider whether the proposed PUD would truly make the
area a safe and happy place for families.
•
Zack Bennett, 480 Pevero Drive
•
Lives near the 5th West outlet, a high-traffic intersection.
•
Urged the Council that if the project is approved, they should strictly require
completion of a functional, usable bridge.
•
Emphasized that language must be clear and unambiguous about what
“completed and finished” means.
•
Stated that a true bridge completion should provide direct traffic access to the
City, not routing traffic down Pevero to Fifth West, but instead allowing access
from Lewisville.
•
Requested the Council “hold the line” on bridge requirements to ensure
meaningful access and traffic relief.
•
Curtis St. Michel, 275 Pevero
•
Lives near the end of the affected area and stated most concerns had already
been raised but emphasized infrastructure and access issues.
•
Warned that East River Road is already overburdened, with multiple current and
planned developments funneling traffic onto it.
•
Noted physical constraints on East River Road (power lines on one side, canal
on the other) that make widening or major improvements difficult.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
15
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
Argued that adding a turn lane alone will not address traffic volumes created by
existing and future development.
•
Stated there is no safe access to town except by car, and even driving is
marginal; walking or biking is unsafe, especially for children.
•
Highlighted that children have limited access to schools and destinations due
to lack of infrastructure.
•
Expressed frustration that development has proceeded without adequate
supporting infrastructure along the corridor.
•
Acknowledged that East River Road and related roads are county roads,
questioning what authority the City has to make necessary improvements.
•
Concluded that residents feel left to simply “live with it” without solutions.
•
Terri McIsaac, 6724 N. Orlinda Lane
•
Lives in J & K Estates and expressed concern about increased traffic on 65th
North due to new development.
•
Noted that construction vehicles and large trucks have damaged roads multiple
times.
•
Highlighted that biking and walking are difficult in the area due to traffic and lack
of infrastructure.
•
Stated that J & K Estates lacks green space or pedestrian paths, and while this is
currently acceptable under county jurisdiction, it is concerning as part of future
City growth.
•
Requested that the City take a broader look at development impacts and
consider slowing the pace of growth to address these issues.
•
Alice Durfree, 5214 Cypress Creek
•
Lives on Cypress Creek and appreciates the developer’s efforts to work with the
community.
•
Praises her neighborhood for being safe, family-friendly, and community-
oriented, with children playing outside.
•
Expressed concern that adding townhouses or two-story units could increase
crime and disrupt the current neighborhood atmosphere.
•
Worried about school capacity and the impact of additional families moving into
the area.
•
Suggested considering more single-family homes instead of two-story units to
better fit the neighborhood and accommodate older residents.
•
McKenzie Burden, 5279 Eaglewood
•
Lives at 5279 Eaglewood and has deep personal/family ties to the neighborhood
(grandfather donated land for Sage Lakes Golf Course and helped start Fairway
Estates).
City Council Meeting
Minutes
16
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
Appreciates the developers’ efforts to accommodate the community but
remains opposed to the proposed development.
•
Emphasizes the importance of preserving the neighborhood’s character, safety,
and happiness for her family and the broader community.
•
Strongly supports the principle of keeping the neighborhood and town safe and
family-friendly, aligning with prior remark.
•
Allen Rainsdon, 5675 Eaglewood
•
Lives on Eaglewood near the end of the street.
•
Acknowledges that the developer is trying to work with the community, but his
main concern is City infrastructure.
•
Key infrastructure concerns include:
o
Road capacity
o
Water supply
o
Schools
o
Buffer zones / green space
•
Suggests expanding the green space between single-family homes and
townhomes to create a solid green belt, which could help with capacity and
neighborhood cohesion.
•
Questions whether private roads and access to amenities (dog park, green
areas) will truly be available to existing homes.
•
Notes that future developments and connector roads may also face capacity
challenges, and recommends planning infrastructure improvements with a
long-term perspective.
•
Jim Matheson, 5315 Rock Hollow Lane
•
Acknowledges that the developers have made efforts to address neighborhood
concerns.
•
Access concerns:
o
5th West is not a safe entrance or exit for the neighborhood.
o
Turn lanes and modifications are inadequate.
o
Road safety is a major issue for all vehicles.
•
Housing mismatch concerns:
o
Townhomes are being built next to high-value single-family homes,
creating a market value mismatch.
o
Examples include townhomes nearby next to Heritage Hills single-family
homes.
o
Worries that this mismatch could negatively affect property values long-
term.
•
Infrastructure concerns:
City Council Meeting
Minutes
17
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
o
Additional 246 townhomes in Fairway Estates will stress existing
infrastructure.
o
Urges City Council to consider long-term development, infrastructure,
and neighborhood compatibility when approving zoning and
construction plans.
•
Personal context: moved to Fairway Estates for its single-family home character
and values neighborhood safety and aesthetics.
•
Brad Whipple, 1205 Susanne Ave
•
Supportive of the project: Defends the development against concerns raised.
•
Infrastructure access: Notes that roads, schools, and water are public
responsibilities, and townhome residents have equal rights to these services.
•
Bridge and road access: Acknowledges that the bridge and roads are bonded,
providing guaranteed access.
•
Overall impression: sees no major flaws with the project and believes the design
appropriately addresses common neighborhood concerns.
•
Sarah Williams, 5355 Eaglewood
•
Neighborhood buffer: Suggests using parks instead of houses as a buffer
between existing and new development for a more appealing layout.
•
School concerns: Highlights the inability to pass bonds for new schools in
District 91, stressing that additional housing will exacerbate overcrowding and
strain on schools like Idaho Falls High School.
•
Support for growth: Supports development in principle but emphasizes the need
for smart, planned growth.
•
Traffic concerns: Notes that cumulative development in the area will create
significant traffic, potentially adding hundreds of cars and congestion.
•
Overall message: Advocates for thoughtful planning that balances growth,
community aesthetics, school capacity, and traffic management.
•
Christian Ashcraft, 1065 Orlin Drive
•
Perspective: Offers an outside perspective, acknowledging residents’ concerns
about neighborhood change and increased density.
•
Developer engagement: Praises the developer for being highly involved and
trying to integrate the development with the existing neighborhood.
•
Housing diversity: Supports the concept of mixed housing types and multi-
generational options, noting benefits of having apartments and single-family
homes in one area.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
18
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
Community focus: Emphasizes that the success of a neighborhood depends on
the community built, not just the types of houses.
•
Overall view: Sees this development as a positive example for future
neighborhoods, balancing growth, integration, and community cohesion.
•
Hayley Baird, 5279 Cypress Creek
•
Location & context: Lives on Cypress Creek, directly adjacent to where new
townhomes are planned.
•
Appreciation for developer efforts: Commends thoughtful design elements like
garages on the backside to reduce front-facing traffic and enhance safety.
•
Neighborhood character: Emphasizes the idyllic nature of the neighborhood,
with a balance of empty nesters and children, making it peaceful and family-
friendly.
•
Concerns & suggestions:
o
Recommends shifting green space to act as a buffer between new
townhomes and existing single-family homes.
o
Notes the impact on recently moved-in families and stresses safety and
traffic management with increased density.
•
Overall stance: Appreciates townhomes as a housing type but advocates for
design adjustments to preserve neighborhood safety, character, and
infrastructure.
•
Kyle Hicken, 375 Pevero Drive
•
Location & context: Lives at 375 Pevero Drive, on the road heavily used by the
neighborhood.
•
Traffic concerns:
o
High traffic volume, including construction vehicles and speeding (40–
50 mph) on a residential street.
o
Concerned that the new high-density townhomes will increase
congestion without providing meaningful relief for the neighborhood.
•
Access & City planning issues:
o
Criticizes the development’s reliance on residential roads instead of
major arterials for high-density access.
o
Warns that future high-density developments north and east will
exacerbate traffic problems and landlock the neighborhood.
•
Infrastructure & long-term planning: Emphasizes that this project doesn’t
account for broader neighborhood infrastructure needs and calls for smart City
planning with proper access and consideration of cumulative density.
•
Overall stance: Opposes the development’s current design due to traffic,
access, and long-term planning concerns.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
19
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Further Discussion by Council and Developer:
1. Project Overview and Construction Updates:
•
The development involves Sage Lakes Boulevard and adjacent residential areas.
Construction of the road is nearly complete; curb, gutter, sewer, and irrigation lines are
installed, with the final asphalt layer pending plant availability and suitable temperatures.
Road completion is expected early in the year (Feb–Apr).
•
Once Sage Lakes Boulevard opens, it will significantly improve traffic flow, allowing
residents south of the area to avoid long detours. Some shifts in traffic patterns are
expected but are considered manageable.
2. Housing and Market Considerations:
•
Homes are primarily single-family, ~1,800 sq. ft., two-story.
•
The PUD includes a mix of townhomes and detached homes, designed to fit neighborhood
character and include green space, trails, and rear-facing homes to minimize visual impact.
3. Zoning, Density, and Prescriptive Rights:
•
Current zoning (R2/R3A) allows up to 340 units by-right; the PUD proposes 246 units,
reducing density while adding amenities.
•
“Prescriptive rights” mean developers could build to the maximum allowed under R2/R3A
without Council approval. The PUD offers more controlled, neighborhood-friendly
development compared to by-right development.
•
Height restrictions and density cannot be arbitrarily changed by Council; conditions must
comply with existing ordinance.
4. Infrastructure and Public Services:
•
Water and sewer improvements have addressed prior low-pressure issues, including a
completed loop and redundant water lines.
•
Transportation infrastructure plans are in progress: 5th West and Lewisville Highway are
being upgraded, with a five-lane facility proposed to accommodate future traffic from the I-
15/US-20 connection.
•
A new fire station, funded by impact fees, is located near the development, ensuring rapid
response.
•
The PUD also provides pedestrian connections, green space, and pathways, enhancing
walkability and safety.
5. The hearing was closed and followed by Council deliberation and rationale:
•
Council’s role is to apply the PUD ordinance, not to address school capacity or population
growth directly.
•
Traffic concerns were addressed via studies, and road improvements are planned;
construction traffic routing cannot be legally conditioned.
•
Council members emphasized that the PUD is preferable to by-right development because
it reduces density, preserves green space, and creates a more aesthetically pleasing and
functional neighborhood.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
20
https://idahofallsid.new.swagit.com/videos/371601
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
Positive aspects highlighted include the developer’s responsiveness to neighborhood
input, thoughtful design (rear-facing homes, no driveways on certain streets), and inclusion
of mixed housing types.
•
While school capacity remains a concern, Council members support broader solutions,
including school bonds for new elementary facilities.
•
Overall, the PUD is seen as a well-planned, community-oriented compromise that
balances growth, infrastructure, neighborhood character, and livability, avoiding
unchecked sprawl.
Motion 1: Approve the Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Sage Lakes as presented.
o
Moved by: Councilor Radford
o
Second: Councilor Larsen
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
Motion 2: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the
Planned Unit Development for Sage Lakes and give authorization for the Mayor to execute
the necessary documents.
o
Moved by: Councilor Radford
o
Second: Councilor Larsen
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
13. Announcements
•
None
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:05 PM.
/s/ Emily Geisler__________________
/s/ Lisa Burtenshaw________________
Emily Geisler, City Clerk
Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor
IDAHO FALES
City Council
January 8, 2026
IDAHO FALES
Final Plat
PLT25-008
Highland Park Addition, Third Amended
N Aerial PLT25-008 Highland Park Addition, 3rd Amended
Eataly Ave)
any juOWsss
Shas
iP
E ‘ae |!
ee
“4 oa + :
Jefferson Ave
Cassia Ave
Canyon Ave
Riverside)Dr,
Elmore’Ave
Zoning PLT25-008 Highland Park Addition, 3rd Amended
Co} rE FL jt 2 mT OO sO ews tc: (Re Liam
Co] ree (_] 2 (_] emo [__] 232A BB cc (J ec C_)] im «(7 Pp
r f ff XJ
y NM ys
— OD * Le
(all ys
14
m\ =
\ '
Se \ ie
\
| \
1 | y
Mv.
LEGEND
PLSS SECTION CONTROL (AS NOTED)
FOUND BRASS CAP RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENT
FOUND 1/2" REBAR WITH ILLEGIBLE PLASTIC CAP
FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE
‘SET 5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED PLS 18405
SET 1/2" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED PLS 18405,
SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY
LOT LINE
CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT & PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT
ADJOINING BOUNDARY LINE
SECTION LINE
DIMENSIONAL TIE LINE
CORNER PERPETUATION AND FILING RECORD
PRIVATE WATER EASEMENT
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT
RAILROAD SPIKE
(A -FOUND AT THE INTERSECTION OF
ELMORE AVENUE AND HIGHAM STREET.
>
LC
DETAIL A:
‘SCALE 1=1'
DETAIL B:
‘SCALE 1
‘$ 00°03'05" W 1165.00"
ELMORE AVENUE
(IN FEET )
1 inch =
R20
LOT 36
BLOCK 45
HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION
OLD PLAT BOOK, PAGE 5
6°55" E 74.87!
LOT 49
0.050 ACRES
$ 89°57'03" E 92.31"
LOT So
0.049 ACRES
S 89°57'03" E 106.46"
LOT 51
0.108 ACRES
N 89°57'05" W 125.00'
S BO°S705" E 49.25
LOT 52
0.115 ACRES
§ 89°57'04" E 125.00!
LOT 53
0.062 ACRES
N 89°57°04" W 125.00"
LOT 54
0.075 ACRES
N 89°56'55" W 125,00"
LOT 44
BLOCK 45
HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION
OLD PLAT BOOK, PAGE 5
S 00°42'55" W 44.42"
$.00°0000" 144.58"
‘S$. 00°0308" WW 175.00"
$.00°03'05" W
HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION, THIRD AMENDED
A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO
BEING A RE-PLAT OF PORTIONS OF LOTS 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, AND 43 OF BLOCK 45, OF HIGHLAND PARK
ADDITION LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 37 EAST, BM
°
=
3s
BLOCK 45
HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION
OLD PLAT BOOK, PAGE 5
8
a
e
N89°66'55" W 125.00"
12
13
NE CORNER, LOT 6, BLOCK 45
HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION
‘OLD PLAT BOOK, PAGE 5 |
07
20 1997 M.ZEZ0.00 S
ONINVaE 4O SISVE GSLNSNNNOW
|
PROJECT LOCA’
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 13
FOUND BRASS CAP PURSUANT TO CP&F
INSTRUMENT No. 1657308
ELMORE AVE:
RIVERSIDE OR:
VICINITY MAP
SURVEYOR NARRATIVE
THIS SURVEY WAS DONE AT THE REQUEST OF TETON PEAKS DEVELOPERS, LLC WITH THE INTENTIONS OF DIVIDING
THE LAND SHOWN TO FURTHER UTILIZE THE LAND SHOWN WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION.
THE NORTHWEST BOUNDARY OF THIS SUBDIVISION WAS RESOLVED BY FOUND RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENTS AND
INFORMATION FOUND IN DEEDS INSTRUMENT No. 1780826, 366042 AND ITD RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAN SET F-6471(31) R/W.
THE NORTH, EAST SOUTH AND WEST BOUNDARIES WERE DETERMINED BY RECORD INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE
PLAT OF HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION FILED IN PLAT BOOK PAGE 5, DEEDS INSTRUMENT No. 1780826, 1780778, 1681537
AND FOUND MONUMENTS AS SHOWN, USING THE RAILROAD SPIKE AT THE INTERSECTION OF ELMORE AVENUE AND.
HIGHAM STREET ALONG WITH THE THE FOUND 1/2 INCH REBAR AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7, BLOCK 45
OF THE SAID HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION. RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE SAID HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION
MATCHES EXISTING FENCE LINES ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEY, THE SOUTH SIDE OF THIS SUBDIVISION AS
WELL AS THE BACK OF SIDEWALK ALONG W. SHELLEY STREET QUITE WELL. THIS EVIDENCE WAS USED TO.
DETERMINE THESE BOUNDARIES,
REFERNCE:
1) ITO PROJECT No. F-6471(31) RW
2) HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION INSTRUMENT No. 1597107
3) DEED INSTRUMENT No. 366042
4) DEED INSTRUMENT No. 594298
5) DEED INSTRUMENT No. 1163156
6) DEED INSTRUMENT No. 1780778
7) DEED INSTRUMENT No. 1780826
8) DEED INSTRUMENT No. 1681537
9) CP&F'S AS LISTED ON THE FACE OF THIS PLAT
LINE TABLE
DIRECTION | LENGTH
L1 | N31°0204"E | 0.91"
L2 | sess712"E | 4.27
L3 | Nog"O401"E | 3.68"
La | N25°43'22"E | 3.12"
CURVE TABLE
DELTA
CURVE # | LENGTH | RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION | CHORD LENGTH
of 6°39'43" | N 96°42'56" E
74°24 N 52°50'39"
45°26'13" | N53°4015" E
13°3934" | N 63°13'09" E
89°16'19" | $44°35'33"E
89°16'34" | $44°41'24" W
0°32'12" | S69°46'50" W
42°14'29" | S 68°26'25" W
BASIS OF BEARING
ALL MEASURED BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON RELATE DIRECTLY TO THE "CITY
OF IDAHO FALLS COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 2004", WHICH IS DERIVED FROM
THE IDAHO STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (EAST ZONE 1101) US SURVEY
FEET AND USING A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.000277265 FOR AGRID TO
GROUND CONVERSION, [REFERENCE FRAME NAD_83(2011), EPOCH 2010.0000}
THE SYSTEM ORIENTATION IS BASED ON GRID NORTH ALONG THE EAST ZONE
CENTRAL MERIDIAN. NO CONVERGENCE ANGLE HAS BEEN APPLIED.
EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTIONAS
FOUND ALUMINUM CAP MONUME!
18 TO CP&F INSTRUMENT No, 66
IDAHO FALLS, ID
DRAWN BY: NK REVIEWED BY: CTP
[soe no: 20166 | DATE: way 20,2025 _|
'— CONNECT
gp — ENGINEE
HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION
THIRD AMENDED
Site Photo
Looking southeast from Hwy 20
Site Photo
PLT25-008 Highland Park Addition, 3rd Amended
seus E~vsiope IG: SOF \COBS 9272 «93C KBE TACNN DSCs
cece
(EGHT FOR 3
By ENGINEER,
Ho LASURL PSPC GOEL ILSILY MALL
(NU SUM PESEAL SH AL BUILDINGS JESS OTHERS
Control Paint Table
BASIS OF BEARING Poatd Elevsn | ering = Eaetag Deseipliun
OM CITY OF BANG TLLS CoNSOL 1 evanga | a7t14s<3 ga6zat.15 ROW MON
BENCHMARK 2 arears | a71s704 68812654 ROW MON
MSL TAMER > RAMEE SE
Neve LAs 4025) 3 e7aa12 | a7tzs.a7 486832.00 43R_PUSFTHROUGHCAF
EWAF 9 HiTRANT 24 THE
HE TI. PR APE
«eve se | errs? sont
SURVEY NOTE:
FIRELAME NO FAR«INC" ZICh.
Entrance
SSSTRIST AL
SEAN h SSDORDANCE ITH SHC SLR:
SITE INFORMATION
Nameen | Station Ras us | Length | neiCaars Dirsctinr
Ste asa0 Op
ANCL UN i | Eeocies 188
un ———
Toa. AREA SE PROPERTY! 78.78 89 #7 1967 AORTA: a waa hoch ng, £71243.16 | Northing. 677285.28
DEEICN DESEIT’ QUNTSPER A> Cas.ing. 886981 29 | Casting. 086287.22
mE NLA aS REN AST SUL hock mg: €71285.28 | Nerthing: 671336 05
War aaa sey=1 7 98 eee 7 146s 4 a
Vataa (asec 124sbaa FT ae: Eaccing: suas 42 | Easting: 68643 1.00
LETSt 123520. (364 837. OX!
a ac : * 5 vg | Nosh na: 87 1388.05 | Nortung: 677358.45
Lares .2s3scrr faz srr are: ¢ 2.3% got 02a"
LSrss aescr /2y91 SRT cee “2 $852 NGO BO OZIEE — Egg:ing: 836481.05 | Eaating: 688167.11
WSLS TSE ISIN Le
. | sient es ssrossars | NOUhNG.S71588.45 | Netting. 677258.97
recestgnt 20 us | stoves S88 S8B"STONST — Fasing nadsT "1 | Pastng- cQGG07 OD
BCP.
ecoene ¥
ES wand 265 3077. Yn -,59) SFT.
SANIALION
EACH UT SEFONCIBE FCR THE SOON, Turn Around
INS IU SAI HSM HOLL SA :
GAL Dhaka Nek Nunber| Suton Rasue length IineiChors Mirestion Start Pent Frid Poin
PEOU aE: ee 5
z poe Start 440,00 5 Pag yy age Noch va: 8120.80 | Nerting: 6/1470.07
PRY OL + | ena: “0n.e1 WEIL NOOO AZE Easting: BEBSESAS
yy GENERAL NOT!
sara “fin wenn AIS 0
SE LANE HE RoHS SH, WATER RETENTION AREA BOUNDARY
SPaNCARD ERNIE,
2 Ae,0) STE NERCVEMENTE S4H4L Ze D9NS-S C7 "
[ohare errs Cae at oe Coen STORM WATER INFORMATION FOR AREA 1
ALLS LIN SPL ‘STGAM WATER AREA PRATER ST =aasNTES
urasis. FT
FRE LANE NS BARK 5 SSN 5
Pall CURE NO $C ie NEZOEE, suber mr ante
. 1 are ara doe
VOLUME fu RABE HEERIG. WIFLTRNTION SRR cas=o-Fove: [NFLTRAT SM RICE ETEMTICNTM
: » row 3ar8 EANDYLGAM e144 ate The
. IMFILTRE” OW RATE WHS CHC-LATEDUS V5.8 SOREY OSM TRANEMIESION RAE CF 23 HR
2
SHERT WUE: SULT INE CRS OF
SENG: GH-153
SITE OVERVIEW
GRAPHIC SCALE
be 2 Taerber 15 2095
re
THIRD AMENDED OF HIGHLAND PARK ADD.
Know what's below. PERT SN
Call before you dig. IDAHO FALLS, ID
SULLI Siak: OF X98 GARE CY
— eee C-05 ,. C-11
inn S “Cor,
CORREO PS,
‘Boo Hu wee”
BFUSIONE
A Aerial PLT25-008 Highland Park Addition, 3rd Amended
Ss Pid
Vy ,
»)
>
i
oO
>
z
[<j
)
>
i=
ii]
(s)
: y
ax
Fy
SE aN
ee i
A sri, Maxar, Earth
IDAHO FALES
RZN25-016
Rezone from HC to CC
Taylor Crossing on the River, Division No. 8
A Aerial RZN25-016 2.58 Acres HC to CC
=
Pione
at al
Hj Na ner
RZN25-016 2.58 Acres HC to CC
| R1
| | R2
I tht) = PB | lic [ | R&D | 1&M \
[ ] RMH | | R3A cc !}Heo [| iM [fo] Pp
fils. l4) ish | leh iy!
UBER. ERiRRy
Comprehensive Plan RZN25-016 2.58 Acres HC to CC
|__| General Urban [J Mixed Use Centers and Corridors {NN Special Use [| Urban Core
[|_| Industrial [|] Natural and Open Space [| Suburban
o
>
Ks
°
fe)
ys
~
fe)
io)
(S)
%)
aw
aa | ee
Pervew
: C
Site Photo
Looking down into rezone area
Site Photo
RZN25-016 2.58 Acres HC to CC
Site Photo
Looking Northeast from Pancheri
Site Photo
RZN25-016 2.58 Acres HC to CC
Site Photo
Looking generally west from South Utah Ave near Eagle Fountain
Site Photo
RZN25-016 2.58 Acres HC to CC
N
A Aerial RZN25-016 2.58 Acres HC to CC
TORT
Carson,St ie.
S_Colorado Ave =
‘ 4" |
2 4 ‘nd
:
- _* C , Ne
3 , 7. °
,, F is
‘ = : |
| = fee eS LE | 1h
. |
= ee i)
r e yo
i —- oll
ag y
i 7 =
pepe \V Colorado Ave
S| SEED oe
791 2. Be Ler een)
c=
eu
y,
Snake River|Pkw
IDAHO FALES
Planned Unit Development
PUD25-003
Sage Lakes
Sage Lakes Planned
Unit Development
Jared Huish & Ji m Hirrlinger // City Council //January 8, 2026
Presentation Agenda
Project Details andBenefits
Comprehensive overview of the Sage Lakes
development, including site specifications, unit
mix, and enhanced amenities that exceed
standard requirements.
Alignment with CityVision
How the proposal supports Imagine IF goals
including aging in place, housing diversity, and
sustainable community development.
Sage Lakes Planned Unit Development
Both the site plan for the PUD and the single-
family homes surrounding the townhomes.
Also, elevation examples of the product types
and how a PUD is a better development for the
community, both density and site plan design.
Addressing Neighbor Concerns
Direct responses to feedback from the August 27 neighborhood meeting,
supported by independent traffic studies and research.
Recommendation and Q&A
Summary of benefits and request for approval.
This presentation responds to feedback from attendees at our August 27, 2025 neighborhood meeting and the Planning
Commission
meeting, addressing key themes including density, traffic, and community character.
Project Overview
Location &Zoning
The Sage Lakes development encompasses approximately
20 acres in the Fairway Estates neighborhood, positioned
west of Lewisville Highway.The property is zoned R2 and
R3 (Mixed Residential), which permits a diverse range of
housing types.
Development Composition
•
246 individually owned townhome units
•
74 single-family detached homes (not part of PUD)
•
320 total residential units
•
All units for sale
Community Amenities
4.51 acres of dedicated open space (25.1% of total
area)
•
Two children's playgrounds with modern
equipment
•
Community pavilion for gatherings
•
Two dedicated dog parks
•
Landscaped grassy hills and natural areas
•
Walking trails connecting amenities
•
Enhanced buffer zones with mature landscaping
Access &Infrastructure
Primary access north of Sage Lakes Boulevard
includes a new bridge and roadway. Internal
circulation via private roads designed to prevent
cut-through traffic.
Alignment with Imagine IF Comprehensive Plan
Adopted by the City Council on February 24, 2022, the Imagine IF Comprehensive Plan provides strategic guidance for Idaho Falls' growth and development. This forward-
thinking document emphasizes diverse, thoughtful development that serves residents across all life stages while utilizing existing infrastructure efficiently.
Mixed ResidentialDevelopment
Supports combining townhomes and single-family homes within R2 zones to
create vibrant, varied neighborhoods that accommodate different household
needs and preferences.
Middle-Market Housing Near Amenities
Encourages development of attainable housing options in established areas
with existing infrastructure, schools, and services rather than forcing continued
suburban sprawl.
Compact Development Over Sprawl
Promotes efficient use of land and infrastructure through thoughtful density
that maintains quality while reducing the fiscal and environmental costs of
sprawling development patterns.
Embracing AppropriateDensity
Recognizes that well-designed density enhances housing affordability and
choice while supporting the commercial viability of neighborhood services and
reducing per-unit infrastructure costs.
Variety in Housing Types and Prices
Advocates for neighborhoods that offer multiple housing forms and price
points, enabling residents to find suitable homes regardless of life stage,
household composition, or economic circumstances.
Strategic Infill Development
Prioritizes development in areas where water, sewer, roads, and other
infrastructure already exist, maximizing return on public investment and
reducing long-term maintenance burdens.
Supporting Aging in Place and Lifecycle Housing
The Challenge
As Fairway Estates residents age, many face difficult choices: maintain large
homes that no longer suit their needs or leave the neighborhood entirely. This
out-migration breaks community bonds and forces residents away from familiar
surroundings, friends, and local connections built over decades.
The Imagine IFVision
"The City should support 'aging in place' by encouraging a variety of housing options that
allow residents to remain in their neighborhoods as their needs change over time. This
includes providing accessible single-level homes, townhomes, and senior housing that
enable transitions from larger family dwellings to smaller, more manageable units without
requiring relocation."
—Imagine IF Comprehensive Plan, Page 59, Chapter 4: Housing, Goal H-2
"Aging in place is a key strategy for Idaho Falls, where residents can downsize within the
same community, fostering intergenerational connections and reducing the economic and
emotional costs of moving. The plan prioritizes zoning and development standards that
accommodate accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and multi-generational homes to support
this transition."
—Imagine IF Comprehensive Plan, Page 61, Chapter 4: Housing, Policy H-2.1
Creating Housing Diversity for Long-Term Community Retention
The Foundation: Balanced Housing Mix
"To meet the needs of a growing and changing population, Idaho Falls must provide a balanced mix of housing product types, including single-family detached homes, attached
townhomes, multifamily apartments, and senior living options. This diversity ensures that families, young professionals, and older adults can find suitable housing within
established neighborhoods, promoting long-term residency and neighborhood stability."
—Imagine IF Comprehensive Plan, Page 58, Chapter 4: Housing, Objective H-1
Right-Sizing Within Communities
"Residents should be able to 'right-size' their housing—moving from larger homes to
smaller ones or from independent living to assisted options—while staying in the
same area. By integrating a range of product types (e.g., duplexes, triplexes, and
cottage clusters) into suburban and urban neighborhoods, the City can create
vibrant, inclusive communities that adapt to life stages."
—Imagine IF Comprehensive Plan, Page 60, Chapter 4: Housing, Policy H-1.3
Preventing Out-Migration
"The lack of diverse housing product types contributes to out-migration when
families or seniors can no longer afford or maintain their current homes. Imagine IF
envisions neighborhoods where residents can seamlessly transition between
housing forms—such as from a four-bedroom single-family home to a low-
maintenance townhome—keeping economic contributions local and strengthening
community bonds."
—Imagine IF Comprehensive Plan, Page 62, Chapter 4: Housing, Implementation
Strategy H-4
Sage Lakes Alignment: By combining 74 single-family homes with 246 townhomes, our development creates opportunities for seamless transitions within the same neighborhood,
supporting residents through different life stages while maintaining their connection to Fairway Estates.
Building Resilient, Multi-Generational Neighborhoods
Community Character ThroughDiversity
"Diverse housing mixes are essential for creating resilient neighborhoods that support all life stages, from young families starting out to seniors
aging in place. This approach minimizes the need for long-distance moves and aligns with the City's goal of compact growth, where
product variety (e.g., bungalows, rowhouses, and apartments) coexists with green spaces and amenities."
—Imagine IF Comprehensive Plan, Page 87, Chapter 6: Community Character, Neighborhood Design Principles
The Sage Lakes Approach: Our integration of townhomes and single-family homes, supported by 25.1% open space and comprehensive amenities,
creates the type of vibrant, inclusive community envisioned in Imagine IF—one that welcomes residents across all life stages while fighting sprawl
through thoughtful density.
Young Families Starting Out
Established Households
Downsizing and Aging in Place
A More Thoughtful Approach to Density
The Sage Lakes PUD proposes significantly lower density than entitled under current zoning, prioritizing quality and community harmony
over maximum unit count. This reduction represents a deliberate choice to balance growth with neighborhood character.
R2 Maximum Entitlement
17 units peracre
340-350 potential units on 20 acres
Minimal open space requirements
Standard R2 amenity provisions
Sage LakesProposal
<12 units per acre
320 total units (74 SF + 246 townhomes)
25.1% dedicated open space
Enhanced amenitiespackage
The Difference
20%below maximum density
94 fewer units than entitled
Significantly more greenspace
Superior community features
By utilizing the Planned Unit Development framework, we can deliver amenities and design features that exceed standard R2 requirements
while maintaining lower overall density than maximum entitlements would allow.
Sage Lakes Planned Unit Development + Fairway Estates
> Dry wel <- Uiny .
Al —
i!
oer
ame =~
-| meg:
fo a0 ‘en = Se
SE sail ~ tee scaiteel Fm) — fame =
Idaho Falls, Bonneville County
Sage Lakes PUD +Fairway Estates Single Family Homes
— CONCEPT TABULATIONS
TOTAL ACREAGE +£49.3 ACRES
z 1 eLOMSION™ @ TOTAL UNIT COUNT 319
Y ¢ g ¢
& meat ie Fy
wart ate A] H 58 sh ls 38 3 Bs wife ih Np iy SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, PRELIM. PLAT:
coors fF SSF SBI SRP cn 8 es fh fhe 22 4 TOTAL LOTS - 16
4 2 EL) : ci
oss. Et on fe +%
baa} 8 2
awe [lhe 83 /f she fa
tertans i Se DIVISION 26:
0.325 AC. §| iy = a TOTAL LOTS - 30
a red wey
if, + Ee ee ad idee ‘TOTAL SINGLE-FAMILY:
: q 73 Lots
“8 §
4 tee o> ied al se 21.7-ACRE TOWNHOME PUD
| y wetee te TOTAL UNITS - 246,
ay ime DENSITY - 11.3
: : | vee 2, & 2 (OPEN SPACE - 54 AC (25%)
i ee Peal
- ‘MAX BUILDING HEIGHT as
st wee 3 |,
5 wale Pa ey ;
; 4 saz 1
' | aL Acai =| LEGEND
Niall aT a [ 78" MIN. SINGLE-FAMILY, MODIFIED FROM PRELIM. PLAT - 27 LOTS
he He | | 3
% :' 4 —< ae TE texto towntiomes (2111479 - 149 UNITS
‘ 4
ae) h tx m2 17 FRONT-LOAD TOWNHOMES (24'x49') - 97 UNITS
Dk ae 26 |, 18 :
i ae a fom [EG open space -453 ac
: i 4 ; .
i as Eyes THER paar vanos- 35 ac
‘= Ss [EZ] open space aurrer - NOT COUNTED IN TOTAL 273 AC
wo) 20 int TOIL
bee
i %
F
y
v ,
— a =m am
le)
5 | |.) 2 i) Enel
tors 3] Lor w812) cor ssefaltorsz ghey corsy |} 2 tort
erietleodtactly E o3as
B Be) “ce. EI) Sse (ELE ne
FAIRWAY ESTATES concept C
43°32'41.16°N, 112° 1'51.54"W - IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY Note: This plan is for illustrative purposes. Boundaries may be based on information obtained through public data and we can't confirm it’s accuracy. Itis
8/27/2025 recommended that a boundary survey be performed to determine actual boundary size and dimensions as well as other potential boundary conflicts.
25-5018
‘Vaan 2h8 drwy Site enka +40 anahcancant\25 8 Forney Ele: Concmeh Cg
Sage Lakes Blvd. (NE corner - Pevero & Sage Lakes Blvd.)
Sage Lakes Blvd.)
Sage Lakes Blvd. (Northside
Sage Lakes Blvd. (East facing- Pevero & Sage Lakes Blvd.)
Sage Lakes Blvd. (East facing- Pevero & Sage Lakes Blvd.)
zz: y+ 74
a
|) LeeLee LE ; : ili ye oil
Sage Lakes Blvd. (East facing, East of Pevero & Sage Lakes Blvd.)
—
eee, a LOT L
Sage Lakes Planned Unit Development - Site Plan
haa —————— | CONCEPT TABULATIONS
= = ty TOTAL ACREAGE +49,3 ACRES
TOTAL UNIT COUNT 319
SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, PRELIM. PLAT:
TOTAL LOTS - 16
DIVISION 26:
TOTAL LOTS - 30
TOTAL SINGLE-FAMILY:
73 LOTS
21.7-ACRE TOWNHOME PUD
TOTAL UNITS - 246
DENSITY - 11.3
OPEN SPACE - 5.4 AC (25%)
MAX BUILDING HEIGHT 35°
LEGEND
78' MIN. SINGLE-FAMILY, MODIFIED FROM PRELIM. PLAT - 27 LOTS
REAR-LOAD TOWNHOMES (21'x47') - 149 UNITS
FRONT-LOAD TOWNHOMES (24'x49') - 97 UNITS
OPEN SPACE - 4.53 AC
PRIVATE YARDS - .35 AC
MEOH
PS OPEN SPACE BUFFER - NOT COUNTED IN TOTAL 2.73 AC
Sage Lakes R2 (Non-PUD) - Site Plan
R2 Concept PUD Concept
PAN Townhome Area 21.7. ac 21.7 ae
pone wd Townhome Units 285 246
aie || Density 13.1 du/ac 11.3 du/ac
Rae | Open Space 1.75/ac 5.4ac
Amenities fe) é
L \F 5h | |
i
:
R |
| 7 Sagas
= : wagrew DIVISION 26 - EB'-WIDE serarssw i087) 3
? ue, SINGLEFAMIEY LOTS ~ “ite SAGE LAKES BOULEVARD 1
ae sa To OT
3 ie bk -axoor 244
GRAPHIC SCALE
wy i ee * .
are \
FAIRWAY ESTATES r2 concept
43°32'41.16"N, 112° 1'51.54"W - IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY Note: This plan is for illustrative purposes. Boundaries may be based on information obtained through public data and we can't confirm it's accuracy. It is
10/7/2025 recommended that a boundary survey be performed to determine actual boundary size and dimensions a: well as other potential boundary confict.
25-5018
Enhanced Amenities Through PUD Design
The PUD Advantage
The Planned Unit Development approach enables us to exceed standard R2 zoning
requirements, delivering exceptional community features that would not be required
under conventional development. With over 25% of the site dedicated to open space—
far surpassing minimum standards—residents gain access to thoughtfully designed
gathering places and recreational opportunities.
What Maximum Density Would Mean
If developed at the full R2 entitlement of 17 units per acre, this site could
accommodate 340+ units with minimal open space and no requirement for the
enhanced amenities package we're proposing. The result would be significantly higher
traffic generation, greater infrastructure demands, and reduced quality of life for both
new and existingresidents.
Included Community Features
•
Two Modern Playgrounds: Safe, age-appropriate
equipment for families
•
Community Pavilion: Covered gathering space for
events
•
Dual Dog Parks: Dedicated areas for pets and their
owners
•
Grassy Hills: Natural play areas and visual interest
•
Walking Trail Network: Connecting all amenities
•
Landscaped Buffers: Enhanced privacy and
aesthetics
Townhomeand Single-Family Elevations
Townhome Elevations - Front Loaded
#rVisionar
Ww HOMES y
Oak & Pine Plan
Front Loaded Townhome Product
Townhome Elevations - Front Loaded
Sr victonar
Ww HOMES y
Oak & Pine Plan
Front Loaded Townhome Product
Oak & Pine
Floor Plan
Livability
FEATURES:
24’wide x 49’deep
1764-2445 square feet :
3 Bedrooms he a
2.5 Bathrooms —
2 Living Spaces ni
Large Kitchen Area
2-Car Garage
2-Car Driveway
Townhome Elevations - Alley Loaded
SITKA Plan
Rear Loaded Townhome Product
Sitka Floor Plan
Livability
FEATURES:
21’wide x 47’deep
1530 square feet
3 Bedrooms
2.5 Bathrooms
2 Living Spaces
Large Kitchen Area
2-Car Garage
2-Car Driveway
Variety of Elevation Styles
Sivisionar
W HOMES y
Townhome Elevations - Alley Loaded
SITKA Plan
Rear Loaded Townhome Product
Single-Family Elevations
CAMBRIDGE Plan Renderings
Fairview Product
Single-Family Elevations
Si visionar
WY HOMES y
SUMMERLYNN Plan Renderings
Fairview Product
FARMHOUSE
Single-Family Elevations
Bislonary
REMINGTON Plan Renderings
Fairview Product
- pe Agee ey
pear! PSY eM, - ‘iy >
- See ae a
Sage Lakes PUD - Walking Paths
$89°4059"\
“O14
Traffic and Infrastructure: ComprehensiveAnalysis
The Concerns Raised
Residents at our neighborhood meeting expressed concerns about overwhelming roads and bridges with increased traffic volumes, potential infrastructure strain on water and gas systems,
and impacts on local schools. These concerns warranted thorough, independent analysis.
Understanding Level of Service (LOS)
Traffic engineers measure intersection efficiency using Level of Service, which grades
performance from A (Excellent) to F (Failing) based on average delay time per vehicle:
•
LOS A (Excellent): Less than 10 second delay
•
LOS B (Good): 10-15 seconddelay
•
LOS C (Stable): 15-25 second delay
•
LOS D (Acceptable): 25-35 second delay
•
LOS E (Congested): 35-55 second delay
•
LOS F (Failing): More than 55 second delay
Idaho Falls requires new developments to maintain minimum LOS D at affected
intersections. Sage Lakes exceeds this standard significantly.
Professional Traffic Impact Assessment
Focus Engineering completed an independent Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) on October 2,
2025, examining impacts through 2033. The study analyzed two key intersections using
actual traffic counts from September 2025:
•
5th East & Sage Lakes Boulevard
•
5th West & Pevero Drive
Infrastructure Coordination
The new Sage Lakes Boulevard bridge and roadway will be phased to match development,
with all utility systems sized and reviewed by city engineers. Private internal roads prevent
cut-through traffic while maintaining emergency access. Water, gas, and sewer capacity has
been confirmed adequate for the proposed density.
Addressing Property Value Concerns
The Concern
At our August 27 neighborhood meeting, residents expressed concerns that townhomes would
decrease surrounding property values. This belief, while understandable, is not supported by
market research or economic analysis.
The Builder's Perspective
Our development team—building both the townhomes and single-family homes—has a direct
financial stake in maintaining high quality standards. Lower-quality townhomes would cannibalize
sales of the adjacent single-family homes we're also marketing. This economic reality ensures
quality remains paramount across all housing types.
Quality Specifications
•
Townhomes average 1,800+ square feet
•
Two-car attached garages standard
•
Premium finishes and materials
•
Modern architectural design
•
Owner-occupied
What ResearchShows
70%
No Impact or Positive
Studies findingneutral or beneficial
effects on surrounding values
30%
Varies by Context
Outcomes depend on design quality
and amenities
Academic and Industry Research:
•
NYU Furman Center: "Positive effects... on surrounding property values"
from well-designed multifamily
•
MassLandlords: "Gently increased density... slight boost to property
values"
•
National Association of Realtors: "No impact or positive" from low-
income/multifamily housing
•
Virginia Tech Study: Homeowners associations (like our HOA) boost
values through maintained standards
The market demands diverse housing options, as emphasized in Imagine IF. Similar PUDs throughout Idaho Falls have enhanced their surrounding areas through quality
design and community amenities rather than diminishing property values.
Safety, Crime Prevention, and Family-Friendly Design
Addressing Crime Concerns
Neighborhood meeting comments raised concerns about increased crime and
disruption to Fairway Estates' family-friendly character. These concerns deserve serious
consideration and evidence-basedresponse.
Why OwnershipMatters
Sage Lakes consists entirely of individually owned townhomes and single-family homes.
Research consistently shows owner-occupied housing correlates with:
•
More stable, long-termresidents
•
Greater investment inproperty maintenance
•
Stronger neighborhood connections
•
Active participation in communitylife
These ownership characteristics promote the same family-oriented environment that
existing Fairway Estates residents value.
Evidence from SimilarDevelopments
Similar PUD projects in Idaho Falls, including the recently approved Creekside
Townhomes, show no correlation with increased crime rates. Well-designed, owner-
occupied communities contribute positively to neighborhood safety.
Safety Through Design
The Sage Lakes site plan incorporates multiple features specifically designed to
enhance safety and foster community:
•
Comprehensive Lighting: LED pathway and street lighting throughout common
areas
•
Open Sight Lines: Playgrounds and gathering spaces visible from multiple homes
•
Natural Surveillance: Windows and entries oriented toward common areas
•
Defined Spaces: Clear transitions between public and private areas
•
Active Amenities: Playgrounds and dog parks encourage regular use, creating
natural oversight
•
Landscaped Buffers: Visual screening without creating hiding places
•
Maintained Trails: Connected walking paths promote healthy activity and "eyes on
the street"
Building Community Connections
The pavilion, playgrounds, and dog parks serve as natural gathering points where
neighbors meet and form relationships. These social bonds—supported by ownership
stability—create the strongest foundation for safe, family-friendly neighborhoods that
align with Imagine IF's vision for community character.
Thoughtful Buffers and Visual Harmony
Concerns raised by meeting attendees regarding proximity and aesthetic clash with Fairway Estates are directly addressed through substantial physical separation and cohesive
design standards.
Physical SeparationStrategy
Sage Lakes provides buffering between existing Fairway Estates homes and the townhomes, substantially exceeding typical development standards:
•
Three complete rows of single-family homes buffer the development’s southern edge.
•
Two full internal roadways (32 ft wide) with enhanced landscaping zones.
•
Enhanced landscaping zones including trees, shrubs, and berms.
Architectural Cohesion
The townhome and single-family home designs share consistent architectural elements that respect Fairway Estates' character:
•
Modern traditional styling with clean lines.
•
Neutral color palettes (grays, tans, whites) and quality exterior materials (fiber cement, stone accents).
•
Thoughtful roof lines and window proportions.
•
Two-car garages (preventing street parking clutter).
The PUD framework enables these enhanced buffer and design standards, which exceed what would be required under standard R2 development. This extra investment directly
responds to neighbor feedback and ensures a cohesive, high-quality environment.
Community Benefits: A Comprehensive View
The Sage Lakes PUD delivers measurable benefits to existing residents, future homeowners, and the broader Idaho Falls community through thoughtful design that balances growth with quality of life.
Enhanced Neighborhood Amenities
4.51 acres of open space including two playgrounds, pavilion, dual dog parks, walking trails, and landscaped
gathering areas—facilities that existing Fairway Estates residents can enjoy through trail connections.
Responsible Development
At < 12 units per acre, density stays 20% below maximum entitlements, reducing traffic, infrastructure
demands, and visual impact compared to what could be built by-right under current zoning.
Housing Choice andStability
Mixed housing types enable aging in place and lifecycle transitions, keeping residents in Fairway Estates as
needs change rather than forcing moves to other communities.
Quality Standards
Owner-occupied homes with HOA-maintained standards, enhanced buffers, and premium design features
protect property values while fostering stable, engaged community members.
Alignment with CityGoals
Imagine IF Comprehensive PlanImplementation:
•
Supports aging in place (Goal H-2)
•
Provides diverse housing mix (Objective H-1)
•
Prevents out-migration (Strategy H-4)
•
Promotes compact growth over sprawl
•
Strengthens community character through design
•
Maximizes existing infrastructure investment
Direct Response to NeighborFeedback:
•
Larger townhome units (1,800+ SF) with two-car garages
•
Substantial buffers
•
100% for sale products
•
Independent traffic analysis confirming minimal impact
•
Enhanced landscaping and visual screening
•
Phased development matching infrastructure capacity
Recommendation for Approval
We Request Planning Commission Approval
The Sage Lakes Planned Unit Development represents thoughtful, community-oriented growth that balances
property rights and entitlements with neighbor concerns and city planning goals. This proposal deserves
advancement to City Council based on:
•
Compliance with Imagine IF: Directly implements adopted comprehensive plan policies on housing
diversity, aging in place, and compact development
•
Neighbor Responsiveness: Incorporates feedback from August 27 meeting with not maximizing density or
unit count, including larger units, and ownership focus
•
Technical Validation: Independent traffic analysis confirms minimal impact; all intersections exceed city
standards through 2033
•
Planning Precedent: Consistent with recent Commission approvals for Creekside Townhomes, Highland
Park, and setback flexibility
•
Council Direction: Aligns with expressed support from multiple councilors for density, housing options,
and anti-sprawldevelopment
•
Evidence-Based Design: Research supports property value stability and community benefits from well-
designed, owner-occupied developments
Sage Lakes offers Fairway Estates a rare opportunity: growth that enhances rather than diminishes community
character, providing housing choices that keep residents local while delivering amenities that benefit the entire
neighborhood.
Thank You
Appendix
Fairway Estates Traffic ImpactStudy
Overview of Traffic and Level of Service (LOS)
Idaho Falls, Idaho | October 2025
Appendix:
5th East (Lewisville Hwy)
& Sage LakesBlvd.
5th West & Pevero
Dr.
Traffic Study –
2 intersections
Appendix:
Understanding Levelof Service
What is LOS?
Traffic engineers use Level of Service (LOS) to
measure road and intersection efficiency based
on average vehicle delay (seconds per vehicle).
Performance Scale
LOS ranges from A (Excellent) to F (Failing),
with D considered the acceptable standard
for city operations.
Excellent
Good
Stable
Acceptable
Congested
Failing
Appendix:
Traffic Study Parameters
1
Existing Traffic(2025)
Traffic numbers recorded in September 2025
2
Project Traffic (2028)
Projected traffic with full buildout in 2028
3
Background Traffic
Forecasted numbers based on growth rates
and modeling (2028 & 2033)
4
Total Traffic
Background Traffic + Project Trafficcombined
Appendix:
Appendix:
Traffic Study Parameters
Table 6 — 2025 Existing Level of Service
| intersection | PM Peak
5TH West & Pevero Drive WB Delay (s/veh)
Worst Lane Group MOEs | B/0.25 (WBL) | B/0.27 (WBL)
WB LOS
2025
Table 8 — 2028 Total Traffic Level of Service
| Mors | AM Peak | __PMPeak
a
Table 10 — 2033 Total Level of Service
ee ee
51H West & Pevero Drive WB Delay (s/veh) ee eee
Worst Lane Group MOEs B / 0.25 (WBL) C / 0.33 (WBL)
2028
5TH East & Sage Lakes Blvd EB Delay (s/veh)
Worst Lane Group MOEs B / 0.34 (EBR) A/0.16 (NBL)
2033
; YU ey
—Y Yyfllu Vids Lili
“>
§ JUPITER HILLS DRIVE wy Se ie eee : : : 40TH NORTH es
E ~
y
‘a 5 r eT
Se) |PEVERO DRIVE «5
U FAIRWAY ESTATES
evanerting SNDMRVEYING FIGURE 8 - 2028 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES
(6949S. HIGH TECH DRIVE SUITE 200
STS EAE ome en Dae XX(XX) = AM(PM) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES.
Appendx:
ty
5 Yy LL ‘S BLVD ty a
fe YY) YMA. ZoN
Uy - iq ee .
(voz)so 2
(eLygiz >
49TH NORTH sss
& 138)
€142(134)
(061) 182
F (rho
FAIRWAY ESTATES
ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, LLC FIGURE 9 - 2033 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES
vate AH XX(XX) = AM(PM) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
MIDVALE, UTAH $4047 PH: (991)352.0075,
‘wor focunutah com
Appendx:
YY o
Y 4 MU WW “7
GZ YB Ben "
Uy,
J
bad
© JUPITERHILLS DRIVE mg so . _ 49TH NORTH sss
FAIRWAY ESTATES
BEEN SND SURVEYING LLC FIGURE 6 - PROJECT DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
(6849 S, HIGH TECH DRIVE
HIGH. SUITE 20
MADVALE, UTAH S447 Bt @O1)3524073 XX% = PROJECT DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
Key
Takeawa
ys
Excellent Performance
All intersections operate at LOS
A–C through 2033, well above
city standards.
No Improvements
Needed
No new signals or roadway
improvements arerequired for
development.
Smooth Integration
Fairway Estates integrates seamlessly into the existing road network with
minimal impact.
Appendix:
Appendix: Supporting PlanningDocuments
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - July 1, 2025
These minutes document the Planning Commission's approval of reduced rear setbacks for alley-loaded homes, demonstrating support for flexible
development standards that enable diverse housing types.
Setback Amendment Key Points
•
Reduced rear setbacks to 3 feet for homes with alley access
•
Increases housing type flexibility and efficiency
•
Enables better lot utilization in urban contexts
•
Approved unanimously by Commission
Commissioner Comments
"A step in the right direction [for flexibility]."
—Commissioner Meehan
"Lives in TN... 3' rule... maximizes property."
—Commissioner Ihler
Relevance to Sage Lakes
This amendment reflects the Commission's recognition that thoughtful flexibility in
development standards can enhance housing options without compromising quality
or neighborhood character. The Sage Lakes PUD similarly seeks appropriate
variances that enable superior outcomes through planned development rather than
rigid adherence to conventional zoning.
The Commission's support for this amendment demonstrates openness to
creative solutions that address housing needs while maintaining design
quality—the same philosophy underlying the Sage Lakes proposal.
Appendix: Planning Commission Precedents
Meeting Minutes - June 3, 2025
These minutes document three significant approvals demonstrating Planning Commission support for townhome developments, thoughtful density, and
creative infill solutions.
Creekside Townhomes PUD
145-unit townhome development approved at 10.4 units/acre with enhanced amenities including pickleball courts and playground.
Commissioners praised the developer for preserving Willowcreek and addressing neighbor concerns—establishing positive precedent for
similar projects.
Highland Park Plat
Infill development featuring attached homes received Commission approval for creative solutions that efficiently utilize available land while
respecting neighborhood context. Commissioners specifically applauded the innovative approach to infill challenges.
Sage Lakes Comparison
At 13.65 units/acre, Sage Lakes proposes lower density than Creekside while providing similar amenity packages and thoughtful design. The
project follows the same principles that earned Commission praise in recent approvals: responding to concerns, preserving natural features,
and delivering quality development.
Appendix: Neighborhood Meeting Documentation
1.
Density Concerns: Residents questioned whether 273 units would
overwhelm the area
2.
Traffic Impact: Worries about increased congestion and bridge capacity
3.
Property Values: Fear that townhomes would decrease neighboring
home values
4.
Crime and Safety: Concerns about security and family-friendly character
5.
Aesthetic Fit: Questions about architecturalcompatibility
6.
Proximity: Desire for maximum separation from existing homes
7.
Infrastructure: Questions about water, sewer, and school capacity
August 27, 2025 Meeting Summary
On August 27, 2025, the development team hosted a neighborhood meeting attended by 31 Fairway Estates residents. This session provided opportunity for
direct dialogue about the Sage Lakes proposal and generated valuable feedback that shaped design refinements.
Key Themes from Meeting
Design ResponsesImplemented
•
Committed to density 20% below maximum entitlement
•
Commissioned independent Traffic Impact Analysis
•
Increased townhome sizes to 1,800+ SF with 2-car garages
•
Enhanced buffer zones with 515' total separation
•
Emphasized 100% ownership model (no rentals)
•
Coordinated with city utilities on infrastructure capacity
•
Refined architectural elevations for visual harmony
Ongoing Engagement
The development team remains committed to continued dialogue with
Fairway Estates residents throughout the approval and construction process,
ensuring concerns are addressed proactively.
Appendix: Neighbor CommentExamples
Written Feedback from Fairway Estates Residents
During the public input process, residents submitted written comments expressing concerns about the Sage Lakes proposal. These comments, including handwritten notes from attendees, helped
identify key themes requiring response and analysis.
Sample Comment Themes
From Meeting Attendee: "Home values... will decrease. Crime... schools overloaded. Keep townhomes away...
harmony with aesthetic."
This comment captures several core concerns that the presentation addresses through multiple lines of evidence:
•
Property Values: Addressed through research showing no negative impact from well-designed, owner-occupied
developments, plus economic logic of shared builder maintaining quality across all housing types
•
Crime: Addressed through ownership structure, safety-conscious design features, and precedent from similar
communities showing no correlation
•
School Capacity: Addressed through phased development timeline and recognition that owner-occupied homes
attract similar demographics to existing neighborhood
•
Aesthetic Harmony: Addressed through cohesive architectural design, and enhanced landscaping
Response Philosophy
Rather than dismissing neighbor concerns, the development team has:
1.
Taken each concernseriously
2.
Sought objective evidence and expert analysis
3.
Made design refinements where appropriate
4.
Provided transparent, data-driven responses
5.
Maintained opencommunication channels
This approach recognizes that existing residents have legitimate interests
in how their neighborhood evolves, while also balancing property rights,
market demand, and city planning goals.
The Idaho Falls Planning Commission has recently approved multiple projects demonstrating consistent support for townhomes, thoughtful density, and flexible development standards. These precedents establish clear alignment
between the Sage Lakes proposal and current planning priorities.
1
June 3,2025
Creekside Townhomes PUD
•
145 townhome unitsapproved
•
10.4 units per acre density
•
Enhanced amenities: pickleball courts, playground
•
Integrated creek as open space feature
•
Thoughtful bufferdesign
2
3
July 1,2025
Setback Amendment
•
Reduced rear setbacks to 3 feet for alley-loaded homes
•
Increased flexibility for diverse housing types
•
Enables more efficient land use
Commissioner Meehan: "A step in the right direction [for flexibility]."
Commissioner Ihler: ”Maximizes property."
June 3,2025
Highland Park Plat
•
Infill development with attached homes
•
Creative design solutions for existing neighborhood
•
Efficient use of available land
Commissioner Ihler: "Good exampleof infill."
Commissioner Meehan: "Applauds... creative solution."
These approvals demonstrate the Planning Commission's recognition that townhome developments, when thoughtfully designed with appropriate amenities and buffers, enhance neighborhoods while addressing critical housing
needs. Sage Lakes follows this proven approach at a lower density than Creekside (13.65 vs. 10.4 units/acre).
Appendix:
Planning Commission Precedents
re
ey:
cm
[Beat
EAT
; ul Hedi
i
UT.ePUIO
Daae
ba RUBE
TELAT
iil
SETAE
THT .
Tie
hside.Cir,
a Northsi
THIS ESEYe}—
a
a
ie
t
PUD25-003 Sage Lakes PUD
iA
Jaring Cir 1 a lex
PET
Ani i 4.
4]
|
ea
aw
te
a
Pr
HY)
=
=
Saddle;Rock Ln
=
ELIT 5
=a
;
!
peland Dr,
Sage
fe)
e\Kakes| Blvd
Rock:Hill Ln
Ne
sir
P
Pevero Dr,
BAVY,O}Uld * Sere, . =
Fi EA i
4 — =
qi = A
z
=
ua Aqay,uaID ee
Ke debe l 5 es 8
I
North Poin
PLE
Sid sajbeoua
Gg ¥ ie) [eh
rol ed
mae
i k
————
:
East River,LEn
-003 Sage Lakes PUD
PUD25
[} Rap [_] Iam
| RMH
ee lS
Saddle Rock'Lin
HD sse1dA9
§ 4 2 a
Bacazs||
UT/MO}IOH 4908 |
AL
SPS SSSSE=55)
pba
Me z
=
¥
Comprehensive Plan PUD25-003 Sage Lakes PUD
General Urban Mixed Use Centers and Corridors [7 Special Use Urban Core
| Industrial Natural and Open Space Suburban
EDGE
—s
ie
a
=
Zi
=
—=W:6
NOH Ponte De
a
| NZ]
La \
eT Lad
ey Ge
Wy
f
Vi
a:
Tapitio Dr,
: Lt)
NU
aS
~_
SECM Pt ae .
Eaglewood Dr.
sf
Ss
d.Dré:
STAIRS
| Fairway, Blvd h
g 478
nt,
Rocklan
Airport Compatible Land Us
Approach Surface
e
Controlled Development [| Limited Development
I) No Development
(=
~~ )
. 2
=
Ei g
- = <s
, @ ° ey
© =
West) =
bi : North Pointe Dr, 2
a 7
‘ia i
” 7
bs af es Tapitio! Dr,
: : eu
BB
3 i LaCosta
5 Zz] ©)
Bhacii
a5
we
Pleaee
Cc
—
omss
(Gullane Cir} a & i
5 &
Fairway,Blvd Mm i
Omo
ry (4 a we
=) Ww tm ¢
< :
o
5 3
7) fo% i é a
@ re
[>)) i) a}
2 ats
Cc
Fy [Fair Hills Cir] om
i O
Rock:Hill. Ln
[) Controlled Development Approach Surface { | Limited Development Approach Surface
4 ; = .
¢ poe Elesth\N| 7 . ke ? '
[ ai > vee - Pa i.
~ r v up BO! wil”
Ramses Ts E
; b> ica Northside Cir,
[eke «a 4
= F “
aes 1 Ba 8B,
2 oe ee ; irae
a a Saring Cialis! a
oO ° . N bl
2 5 ‘4 : »
op, > s ly
c
| ¢
te Spen Meadow Dr -
Sage Lakes Blvd.
Saddle Rock Ln
PUD25-003 Sage Lakes PUD
A >; *
at? ri 2 = i é
a = a
fi >: q
: i =
act jn.
4 se - =
, ;
&, ee
*
e
lt Se
:
}E 49th Nj
PUD25-003 Sage Lakes PUD
Airport Current Noise Contour
be SPen Meadow, Dr
23N
~_Pevero Dr,
Hs
uz Aqay,ual|d mptirg(s eeaipenet 8 Sp ep i le +
fa}
(} *
BE
° ic
aye
Si :
7+ al
5p. ye z ca
yore? |,
=
Day-night Level
a®
dBA
60)
——
FER: ROCK |
a
=
AME a
mo)
7 ae EE
ae!
|
ttt it
_—
NOTES:
PAREING:
He ==
St
LCE
-
COT
ESE SEAT
IDAHO FALLS
SITE PLAN
SAGE LAKES PUD
TOTAL AREA:
Aa
| Y
a
=
fl
:
ASPHALT DETAIL
a
he
in - a r u
SS TT jane
rt
ace +
H =
-, 1. Lt. 1
Ag °
Brari Tr iei
@ LITT oA ee
ACCOCLICEN CEE Resin We
rs “K
"| Nice
- a \i a
fa)
|
at ttt tt
jo
id
aut
Ti os
ait v 43
AAs ors Co
Pll LF Tt TT
— CYPRESS CHEEK
{__]
——.
TOTAL AREA:
SAGE LAKES PUD
DIVISION PLAN
IDAHO FALLS
cm
3
i=
1 2 “4 i:
in| Li
h =
= es |
=
} 4 J
jan
a
I
TAL
oil
———
ms i
@-TT it 1
=
Ill
LL]
TTT Ty
Tr : aa i i
tne s
Ee TL Co
— t-te its t
I
DIVISION Fi
PLAN
mi el
|
Pes eee eee eee
CYPRESS CREEK
PLANT SCHEDULE
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME,
TREES
Acer compestre Hedge Maple
Acer gymala ‘Amur Maple
Acer grandidentstum Bigtooth Maple
Acer platanoides ‘Crimson King’ (Crmson King Norway Mapic
Acer trinestum x platenoides Warrenred — Pactic Sunset® Maple
Cerais canadensis Forest Pansy’ Easter Redbud
Gleditsis tnacanthos merms “Skycole Skyline Honey Locust
Gleditsis tnacenthos mermis Shademaster Shademaster Honey Locust
Lauidembsr styracfus Slender Sihouette' Slender Sihouette Sweet Gum
Malus x ‘Spring Snow ‘Spring Snow Crabapple
Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak.
Tis cordsta Littlelest Linden
Tia condata 'Greenspire! Greensprre Littielest Linden
Zelhova serrata ‘Green Vase? Green Vase Japanese Zelkova
SHRUBS
Aronia melanocarpa Low Scope Hedger
Berbens aquitolum Compacts’
Buddleya david ‘Buzz Hot Raspberry’
Coryoptens x clandonensis Dive Mist!
Cotoneaster aproulstus
Cotoneaster dammen ‘Lowfast™
Hibiscus synzcus 'Antong Two!
Juniperus honzontalis ‘Blue Chig*
Jonperus sabina Monns!
Physocarpus opulifolus ‘ttle Dewi
Physocarpus opulifolus ‘anus!
Black Chokeberry
Compact Oregon Grape
Hot Raspbemy Butterfly Bush
Blue Must Bluebeard
Cranberry Cotoneaster
Lowtast Bearberry Cotoneaster
LI Kim® Dwarf Rose of Sharon
Blue Crip Creeping Juniper
Calgary Carpet ® Jumper
Little Devi Dwoef Ninebar
Dwart Ninebark
1
1
1
1
al
REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE
Ri
eeeeeeeeercece
5 gal.
SYMBOL CODE DESCRIPTION
RIVER COBBLE
1
(2)
(s PLAYGROUND STRUCTURE, TED.
DOG PARK
4
PAVILLION, TYP. TBD.
5
() BENCH
(7) wns
ravers, 700
©)
}----------
+ PLANTSO THAT ROOTFLAR SAT
(8 I" ABOVE FRISHED GRADE
+ PROVIDET DIA. CLEARANCE AT
BASE OF TREE, FREE OF ROCK
‘AND TURF.
RUBBER CINCH SECURED
Tostace |
(2) HARDWOOD STAKES
‘ZXZ DRIVEN (MIN. 15)
FFRMLY INTO SUBGRADE
Prysocarpis optics Nugget Nugget Nebo oat
Pus mugo Mughos Mughus Mugo Pine Bal
Poxents ratases Goldinger Golding Suen Cemuctol 2 a
Rus sromatios Grow! Gro-tow Fragrant Somae Bt
oss she Kock Out rook Out Rose Bal
Sorvana sorbioia Sent Som False Spraea 2a
Sprace x buna ‘thony Water? rth Waar pres 2a
Tho xmeas png loponcse Yen 3a
oes Homentons Color Gus Color Gud Adsmis Needle 2 aa
GRASSES
ASSES clsmagrosts x aitfiors Kar Foerster’ Kart Foerster Resther Reed Gross 1 43
Cenctros sopecirodes Homet HomeinFourtan Gross =
Festocs ona qouss Bevlder Bue’ ——=«éouder Buc Peseue =
Hatctatnchon Somparvmene Due Ost Grose me
Fencum vegston Sherandost Sherondosh Such Grose | ga
Pomecton sopearodes ad esd ‘Red Head Fourtan Grove ‘3
PERENNIALS
Cece oroclhs madendor Donty mo
Ferovsua sinplofota Lite Spe Lite Spre Russian Soge oe
fasbecks omploucasie Dact-oyed Suse =
Sonea nomoroas Boat Friend foot Presid Meadow Soge | 3a
SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE
GROUND COVERS
oa pratense ertucly Buesroae coa
Qty
150,018
N
¢
>
GRAPHIC SCALE
(INFEET)
ie oe
9 + svensomartor or noot
BALLS EVEN WITH THE FRaSHED
MULCH (REEP MULCH ¢ADE
‘BACK FROM TRUNK)
MULCH (KEEP MULCH
BACK FROM TRUNE)
REMOVE STRING &
BURLAP FROM TOP 2/3
SACKFLL PLANTING MIX
‘4PARTS TOP SO,
1 PART PEAT MOSS
WATER AND TAME TO
REMOVE Aig POCKET. BRING.
LEVEL TO FRISH GRADE.
}—exstniG so
BACKFL PLANTING MX
“4 PARTS TOP SOL.
1 PART PEAT MOSS
WATER AND TAMP TO
REMOVE AIR POCKETS. 82NG
LEVELTO FISH GRADE
asTiG sol Be 1/2 DEPTH OF
ROGTBALL (€°MN
SHRUB PLANTING
NOTTOSCALE
MULCH (KEEP MULCH
{F BACK FROM PLANT)
ia
PERENNIAL PLANTING
NOTTO SCALE
STING SOL
Know what's below.
Call 811 before youdig,
REVISION BLOCK
SAGE LAKES
Z.
<
a)
nN Oy
3
cE
2g
aa
Z
<
4
ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, LLC
6849 S, HIGH TECH DRIVE SUITE 200
MIDVALE, UTAH 84047 PH: (801) 352-0075
www focus-es.com
VA DIES Die Farwy EsicienNceagn SS SDIONOHNMSOATT ONIX CMOSCAPEPENTONG
Site Photo
Upper Left Photo looking North Site Primarily north and East
Lower Right Photo looking East down road that connects to Bridge Site Primarily Northeast.
Site Photo
PUD25-003
Site Photo PUD25-003
Site Photo
Looking Southeast
PUD25-003 Sage Lakes PUD
pees tat)
Flee ae
&
Potts
es,
f ia Whe
oe
+
se Se. ae i 3
im &
34
_ U7 MO}|OH 4204 |
sd ele) (ome ae)
real sa fsb fz) (RES | fos OI Fe
, : 41g pooma|beq
. Wee Lees ©
ee SP te eee ae
, eae
eo
{ an) : wath eo,
“= wis
; -
hy
Ue
=< rg
3 at. #
Kin” a ted
¢ : Pa
s a
- a
pe
wT, <
¥ f. ae
vad & e
a ®
x
Memorandum
File #: 26-414
City Council
DATE: Thursday, October 15, 2026
AGENDA: Consent
FROM: Chris Canfield, Public Works Director
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
Title
Thermoplastics Citywide 2026 - Change Order #1
☐Ordinance
☐Resolution
☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐Legislative Public Hearing
☒Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☐Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve the Change Order for the Thermoplastics Citywide 2026 project for $46,409 and give authorization
for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
The Public Works Seal Coat Contractor experienced significant delays to complete the work contracted this
summer. As a result it became necessary to install straight line thermoplastic markings at critical intersections
throughout the City. This change order provides for the markings necessary by providing an additional 4,484
square feet of 8”, 12”, and 24” straight-line thermoplastics at $10.35 per square foot of straight-line
thermoplastics at designated locations throughout the City. Contract time will be adjusted to accommodate
the order of materials and installation as directed. The original bid was approved and awarded by City Council
on May 7, 2026, in the amount of $144,949.48. Additional costs associated with this change order are offset
by liquidated damages charged against the seal coat contract
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments.
26-414
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 10/20/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
RETURN TO AGENDA
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Contract Change Order
Project: Thermoplastics Citywide 2026
Project No: TRF-2026-02
Date: October 14, 2026
To: Falls Striping
Change Order No: 1
Page Number: 1 of 1
You are directed to perform the following changes or additional work, which were
not included in the plans and specifications of your Contract.
This change order provides for an additional 4,484 square feet of 8", 12", and 24"
straight line thermoplastics at designated locations throughout the City of Idaho Falls.
Contract Time will be adjusted to accommodate order of materials and installation as
directed.
C0lA Line Thermoplastic 4,484 SF @ $10.35 per SF
Total Increase
Net Change Total:
New Contract Completion Date: November 20, 2026
Original Contract Amount: $144,949.48
Contract Amount Before Change Order: $144,949.48
Total Estimated Increase in Contract Al mount: $46,409.00
New Contract Amount: $191,358.48
=
=
=
$46,409.00
$46,409.00
$46,409.00
We, the undersigned Contractor, agree that if this proposal is approved, we will perform
the work detailed above and accept payment at the prices shown for the respective items,
in accordance with the terms of the original contract or as herein provided.
Contractor Acceptance
By: l--c:..- !f\;
Contractor
Date
By
Sign tu
Title
Approved for City of Idaho Falls
Date
Mayor
Attest, City Clerk
Memorandum
File #: 26-415
City Council
DATE: Thursday, October 15, 2026
AGENDA: Consent
FROM: Chris Canfield, Public Works Director
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
Title
Bid IF26016 - Water Inventory Replenishment
☐Ordinance
☐Resolution
☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐Legislative Public Hearing
☒Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☒Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve the bid awards for the annual Water Division inventory replenishment to (1) Core & Main in the
amount of $846,665.00 for Group 1 and (2) Ferguson Waterworks in the amount of $401,106.00 for Group 2
and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other appropriate
action).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
This purchase will provide the annual water material inventory for the 2027 Water Division projects. Bids were
received on Thursday, October 8, 2026, with a total of four bids received. The bid was broken into two groups;
Group 1 (watermain pipe) will be awarded to Core & Main for $846,665 and Group 2 (services and
accessories) will be awarded to Ferguson Waterworks for $401,106, for a project total of $1,247,771. The
contract award recommendation is to award to the lowest bids, by group respectively.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments.
26-415
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 10/20/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
RETURN TO AGENDA
Project Name
Group ID/Name
UOM
Quantity
Comment
Price
Quantity
Total Cost
Comment
Price
Quantity
Total Cost
Comment Price
Quantity
Total Cost
Comment Price
Quantity
Total Cost
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
1 - MAIN PIPE
Foot
13500
35.61 13,500.00
480,735.00 9 day lead time
35.97 13,500.00
485,595.00
35.61 13,500.00
480,735.00
35.78 13,500.00
483,030.00
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
1 - MAIN PIPE
Foot
5500 5508' required. $323,209.44
58.68
5,500.00
322,740.00 9 day lead time
61.29
5,500.00
337,095.00
58.7
5,500.00
322,850.00
58.98
5,500.00
324,390.00
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
1 - MAIN PIPE
Foot
500 504' required. $43,535.52
86.38
500
43,190.00 9 day lead time
89.27
500
44,635.00
86.41
500
43,205.00
88.13
500
44,065.00
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
2 - SERVICE & ACC
Each
400
651.2
400
260,480.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED
657.78
400
263,112.00
589
400
235,600.00
576
400
230,400.00
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
2 - SERVICE & ACC
Each
400
120.06
400
48,024.00
125
400
50,000.00
115.26
400
46,104.00
115.62
400
46,248.00
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
2 - SERVICE & ACC
Each
100
184.64
100
18,464.00
155
100
15,500.00
265.87
100
26,587.00
166.2
100
16,620.00
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
2 - SERVICE & ACC
Each
400
26.53
400
10,612.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED
59.57
400
23,828.00
32
400
12,800.00
31.95
400
12,780.00
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
2 - SERVICE & ACC
Each
10000
0.46 10,000.00
4,600.00
0.52 10,000.00
5,200.00
0.44 10,000.00
4,400.00
0.41 10,000.00
4,100.00
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
2 - SERVICE & ACC
Each
600
24.66
600
14,796.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED
24.53
600
14,718.00
21.79
600
13,074.00
21.35
600
12,810.00
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
2 - SERVICE & ACC
Each
600
24.07
600
14,442.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED
23.94
600
14,364.00
21.27
600
12,762.00
20.84
600
12,504.00
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
2 - SERVICE & ACC
Each
600
39.96
600
23,976.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED
50.71
600
30,426.00
35.14
600
21,084.00
34.6
600
20,760.00
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
2 - SERVICE & ACC
Each
600
34.91
600
20,946.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED
34.73
600
20,838.00
30.74
600
18,444.00
30.27
600
18,162.00
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
2 - SERVICE & ACC
Each
150
102.89
150
15,433.50 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED
102.37
150
15,355.50
90.49
150
13,573.50
89.1
150
13,365.00
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
2 - SERVICE & ACC
Each
100
24.45
100
2,445.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED
24.33
100
2,433.00
21.49
100
2,149.00
21.16
100
2,116.00
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
2 - SERVICE & ACC
Each
100
26.22
100
2,622.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED
26.06
100
2,606.00
21.49
100
2,149.00
22.68
100
2,268.00
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
2 - SERVICE & ACC
Each
100
37.98
100
3,798.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED
31.09
100
3,109.00
23.03
100
2,303.00
27.05
100
2,705.00
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
2 - SERVICE & ACC
Each
100
57.55
100
5,755.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED
80.12
100
8,012.00
50.6
100
5,060.00
49.82
100
4,982.00
WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A
2 - SERVICE & ACC
Each
100
11.29
100
1,129.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED
12.9
100
1,290.00
12.75
100
1,275.00
12.86
100
1,286.00
VENDOR
CORE & MAIN
MOUNTAINLAND SUPPLY
HD FOWLER
FERGUSON WATERWORKS
SUM BID FOR GROUP 1
846,665.00
867,325.00
846,790.00
851,485.00
SUM BID FOR GROUP 2
447,522.50
470,791.50
417,364.50
401,106.00
PROPOSED WINNING BID BASED ON GROUP COST ANALYSIS:
GROUP 1 - CORE & MAIN
GROUP 2 - FERGUSON WATERWORKS
MOUNTAINLAND SUPPLY
HD FOWLER
FERGUSON WATERWORKS
CORE & MAIN
Memorandum
File #: 26-416
City Council
DATE: Thursday, October 15, 2026
AGENDA: Consent
FROM: Chris Canfield, Public Works Director
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
Title
Bid Award IF-26-012, Annual Purchase of Chlorine and Sodium Bisulfite
☐Ordinance
☐Resolution
☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐Legislative Public Hearing
☒Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☒Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve the bids from the lowest responsive and responsible bidders, Thatcher Company and Adelle Way, in
an amount of $244,862.80 to Thatcher Company and in an amount of $290,760.00 to Adelle Way and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other appropriate action).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
The City purchases Chlorine and Sodium Bisulfite annually for Water and Wastewater treatment operations.
Bids for the annual purchase of these items were received on Thursday, September 17, 2026. The lowest
responsive, responsible bidder for Items 1, 2, and 4 is Thatcher Company for $244,862.80. Item 3 is awarded
to Adelle Way for $290,760.00 for a total project cost of $535,622.80.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments.
26-416
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 10/20/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
RETURN TO AGENDA
2026 furnishing Cylinders/Containers of Chlorine and Sodium Bisulfite
Bid No. IF-26-012
Item No
Description
UOM
1
Chlorine, 150 Pound Cylinders Each
Thatcher Company
2
150 Pound Cylinder
demurrage
Day
Thatcher Company
3
Chlorine, 1-Ton Container,
(2,000 lb/Cylinder)
Each
Adelleway.com
4
Sodium Bisulfite (NaHSO3):
40% Basis Solution
Gallon
Thatcher Company
Item No
Quote type
Manufacturer
Part #
Quantity
Price
Total Cost
Bid Rank
1
Bid
lindedirect.
001
115
$3,607.00
$414,805.00
3
2
Bid
Adelle Way
002
1
$6.54
$6.54
3
3
Bid
Indian Springs
003
120
$2,423.00
$290,760.00
1
4
Bid
like Alliance Chemical
004
80000
$12.25
$980,000.00
4
Item No
Quote type
Manufacturer
Part #
Quantity
Price
Total Cost
Bid Rank
4
Bid
Land View, Inc.
80000
3.68
$294,400.00
3
Item No
Quote type
Manufacturer
Part #
Quantity
Price
Total Cost
Bid Rank
1
Bid
115
672
$77,280.00
2
2
Bid
1
0
$0.00
1
3
Bid
120
3800
$456,000.00
3
4
Bid
80000
0.33
$26,400.00
1
Item No
Quote type
Manufacturer
Part #
Quantity
Price
Total Cost
Bid Rank
1
Bid
Thatcher Company, Inc
1336305
115
487.5
$56,062.50
1
2
Bid
Thatcher Company, Inc
1336305
1
0.3
$0.30
2
3
Bid
Thatcher Company, Inc
1336309
120
2700
$324,000.00
2
4
Bid
Thatcher Company, Inc
2237000
80000
2.36
$188,800.00
2
Land View, Inc.
Morgan Ingland LLC
Thatcher Company, Inc.
Chemical
Adelleway.com
Chemical (Chemical)
Project Total : $ 1,685,571.54
Group Total : $ 1,685,571.54
Group Total : $ 568,862.80
Project Total : $ 568,862.80
Group Total : $ 294,400.00
Group Total : $ 559,680.00
Project Total : $ 294,400.00
Project Total : $ 559,680.00
Memorandum
File #: 26-418
City Council
DATE: Wednesday, September 16, 2026
AGENDA: Consent
FROM: Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
DEPARTMENT: Mayor's Office
Title
September 2026 Licensing through the Office of the City Clerk
☐Ordinance
☐Resolution
☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐Legislative Public Hearing
☒Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☐Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Review and accept all permits and licenses issued by the City Clerk’s Office in September 2026 (or take other
action deemed appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
2026 SEPTEMBER LICENSING
54
New Business Permits &
109
Renewed Business Lice
7
New & Renewed Contra
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 10/20/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
RETURN TO AGENDA
NAME
NUMBER
TYPE
STATUS
DATE
1 Peru d paso
379893
Mobile Food Vendor
APPROVED
9/11/2026
2 Berry Drizzl Co.
7369731
Mobile Food Vendor
APPROVED
9/24/2026
3 Lupa Inc DBA Bowl-Ero Lanes
1610393
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/10/2026
4 Masquerade Ball
5326946
Alcohol Catering Permit Nonprofit
APPROVED
9/3/2026
5 Naughte Latte
1575505
Mobile Food Vendor
APPROVED
9/3/2026
6 New Fords Bar
627984
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/3/2026
7 Club Charleys
4442344
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/3/2026
8 Club Charleys
607485
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/3/2026
9 Club Charleys
3987661
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/3/2026
10 Club Charleys
660296
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/3/2026
11 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co.
260007
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/4/2026
12 Adakai, Karen
4921295
Public Transportation Operator
APPROVED
9/17/2026
13 Wadsworth, Eathan
6625895
Public Transportation Operator
APPROVED
9/17/2026
14 Club Charleys
8154341
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/14/2026
15 Club Charleys
6465071
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/14/2026
16 Soiled Dove LLC
5554048
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/14/2026
17 Soiled Dove LLC
5695255
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/14/2026
18 Roadhouse Saloon
2147482
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/14/2026
19 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co.
9884127
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/11/2026
20 Samoa Club
6975743
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/14/2026
21 The Snakebite
8037870
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/14/2026
22 Marshall
5195108
Door-to-Door Sales
APPROVED
9/22/2026
23 City Bagels & Bakery
6658890
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/14/2026
24 City Bagels & Bakery
5343290
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/14/2026
25 Arriaga, Amber
5395688
Public Transportation Operator
APPROVED
9/24/2026
26 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co.
1477971
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/17/2026
27 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co.
1992482
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/24/2026
28 Club Charleys
7258389
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/17/2026
29 Club Charleys
6278506
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/17/2026
30 Club Charleys
2048136
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/17/2026
31 BlackRock Fine Wine & Craft Beer
8905956
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/18/2026
32 Summit Idaho Retail LLC DBA Peak Stop #1003
6104708
Alcohol License
DENIED- Out of City Limits
9/29/2026
33 TAP-N-FILL INC
1954211
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/23/2026
34 Makers Night - Book Binding
1913993
Alcohol Catering Permit Nonprofit
APPROVED
9/23/2026
35 CIELITO LINDO
3037391
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/18/2026
36 TIMELESS TAPHOUSE
1247677
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/23/2026
37 The House Bar & Grill
9454309
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/23/2026
38 BlackRock Fine Wine & Craft Beer
7321807
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/23/2026
39 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co.
6786983
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/23/2026
40 New Fords Bar
7532673
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/23/2026
41 Sully's GastroPub
4363395
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/23/2026
42 Club Charleys
670922
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/28/2026
43 Club Charleys
8946413
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/29/2026
44 Club Charleys
9079123
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/29/2026
45 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co.
2635881
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/29/2026
46 City Bagels & Bakery
6758174
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/29/2026
47 City Bagels & Bakery
5261182
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/29/2026
48 The Snakebite
7527773
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/30/2026
49 Soiled Dove LLC
6651459
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/29/2026
50 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co.
7592705
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/29/2026
51 Pachangas Mexican Restaurant
6910293
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/29/2026
52 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co.
976835
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/29/2026
53 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co.
441822
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/29/2026
54 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co.
3521871
Alcohol Catering Permit
APPROVED
9/29/2026
SEPTEMBER NEW BUSINESS LICENSES
NAME
NUMBER
TYPE
STATUS
DATE
1 Albertson's LLC (17th Street #138)
31
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/28/2026
2 Albertson's LLC (W. Broadway #145)
23
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/21/2026
3 Jakes of Idaho Falls Inc dba Jaker's Bar & Grill
127
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/4/2026
4 Eagle's Lodge
119
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/28/2026
5 La Union Market
120
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
6 Fred Meyer #156
148
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/15/2026
7 Homestead Pizza & Bowling
331
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
8 Stinker Stores Inc. #28
308
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/21/2026
9 Sully's GastroPub
176
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/4/2026
10 Midget Market
230
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
11 Sam's Club No. 6345
2567
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/1/2026
12 Samoa Club
303
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/4/2026
13 Papa Tom's Pizza
275
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
14 Pockets Inc.
270
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
15 Garcias
1622
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
16 Stinker Stores Inc. #27
306
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/21/2026
17 Morenitas
2534
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/10/2026
18 Outback Steakhouse-Evergreen Restaurant #1311
3688
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
19 The Snake Bite Restaurant LLC
3123
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/28/2026
20 Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar
3575
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
21 Tobacco Connection #15
4202
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/4/2026
22 Jalisco's
4039
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
23 Puerto Escondido Inc OL
4246
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/28/2026
24 Muddy's Place
3591
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/28/2026
25 Casa Jaliscos Inc.
5159
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
26 Winco Foods #42
3880
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/21/2026
27 Idaho Falls Arts Council
4241
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
28 Walmart #5494
4854
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/1/2026
29 GMRI Inc dba The Olive Garden Italian Restaurant #1705
5108
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
30 Jacksons #73
3941
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/22/2026
31 Gator Tail Enterprises LCC dba The Frosty Gator
3705
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
32 Lucy's New York Style Pizzeria (Broadway)
5548
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
33 Los Albertos Inc.
6325
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
34 The Celt and Heads and Tails
5915
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/10/2026
35 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering
6114
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/21/2026
36 Oman Ventures LLC dba D'Railed
5825
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/28/2026
37 New Yummy House Restaurant
6567
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/4/2026
38 Hampton Inn
7355
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/4/2026
39 Stockmans Restaurant
5703
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
40 Mackenzie River Pizza Grill & Pub
6600
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/28/2026
41 Chili's Grill & Bar
4026
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
42 Snow Eagle Brewing & Grill
5742
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
43 Paula's Meat Market
5503
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/4/2026
44 Artitorium On Broadway - Idaho Falls Arts Council
7052
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/28/2026
45 Quick Stop of Idaho Falls
4593
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
46 Garcia's Meat Market #2 (Northgate)
5650
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
47 The Shop Bar LLC
5743
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/4/2026
48 Roadhouse Saloon, LLC
7723
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/28/2026
49 Smitty's Pancake & Steak House
5769
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
50 Tap-N-Fill Inc
7926
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/21/2026
SEPTEMBER BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWALS
51 Tandoori Oven
6875
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/21/2026
52 Tobacco Connection #30
5509
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/4/2026
53 Los Panchos
7485
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
54 Lucy's New York Style Pizzeria (Hitt)
7830
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
55 Cafe Mike's at Pinecrest
8305
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/21/2026
56 Walmart #5494 (Fuel Station)
8300
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/4/2026
57 Cafe Mike's at Sandcreek
8304
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
58 Cafe Mike's at Sage Lakes
8303
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/21/2026
59 The Alibi
8229
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/4/2026
60 El Rinconcito Authentic Mexican Food Inc
7567
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
61 Rogelio La Yesca
9431
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/28/2026
62 The House Bar and Grill
9241
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/30/2026
63 City Bagels & Bakery
8926
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
64 Sushi Time LLC
8912
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/28/2026
65 Smokin Fins
9377
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/21/2026
66 Costco Wholesale #1379
10137
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/4/2026
67 Longhorn Steakhouse #5627
10212
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/17/2026
68 Calakas Tacos & Miches
10399
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/4/2026
69 Mama Fla LLC
10575
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/21/2026
70 Holiday Inn
10050
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/4/2026
71 Fast Stop 1147
10438
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/21/2026
72 New Ford's Bar LLC
10649
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/30/2026
73 Park Avenue Grill
10778
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/28/2026
74 XVIII
10882
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/30/2026
75 HOKKAIDO RAMEN HOUSE
10752
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/2/2026
76 Idaho Rib and Chop House
10924
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/28/2026
77 Tacos Las Penitas 3 Inc
468815
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
78 Diamond Concessions IF Arena LLC
4699969
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
79 Fast Stop 2249
8622878
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/21/2026
80 Fast Stop 2247
8088824
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/21/2026
81 Fast Stop 2248
8412050
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/21/2026
82 Off The Rails Cafe
9452398
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
83 Actors' Repertory Theatre of Idaho
523170
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
84 Kin enterprises DBA Pop -N- Cork
8574266
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/10/2026
85 Diamond Concessions Inc (Chuckars)
7092087
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
86 Bob's Indoor Golf & Games
9644326
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
87 Park & A Italia LLC
3729308
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/30/2026
88 Romita Mexican Market
5818712
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/30/2026
89 Hops N Paws
5709306
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
90 Outpost Taphouse
6416910
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/30/2026
91 Kempner Restaurant Group LLC, DBA Elevate Bake Shop
9452323
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/30/2026
92 Leavitt Restaurants, LLC (Rodizio Grill)
3024566
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
93 Gill Investments LLC (Nextstop)
9915771
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
94 La Chinita Mexican Restaurant LLC (Plum Loco)
9449080
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/29/2026
95 Hotel Developers-Idaho Falls 4, LLC DBA Fairfield by Marriott
Inn & Suites Riverfront
2830094
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/4/2026
96 Lupa Inc DBA Bowl-Ero Lanes
1610393
Alcohol License
APPROVED
9/28/2026
97 Marshall, Benson
5195108
Door-to-Door Sales
APPROVED
9/9/2026
98 Guns-N-Gear Sports LLC
7145
Secondhand Store
APPROVED
9/21/2026
99 RJR Coins & Stuff
6039
Secondhand Precious Metals
APPROVED
9/21/2026
100 The Gun Shop LLC
6177
Pawn Broker
APPROVED
9/4/2026
101 World's Best Corndogs
7125546
Mobile Food Vender
APPROVED
9/29/2026
102 Churrolicious LLC
7425425
Mobile Food Vender
APPROVED
9/23/2026
103 B&A Collectibles Inc
6294562
Secondhand Precious Metals
APPROVED
9/10/2026
104 U-Pick Red Barn
2298903
Mobile Food Vender
APPROVED
9/17/2026
105 Eastern Idaho Edges
4047256
Itinerant Merchant
APPROVED
9/29/2026
106 Lupita's Munchie's
4179018
Mobile Food Vender
APPROVED
9/23/2026
107 Berry Drizzl Co.
7369731
Mobile Food Vendor
APPROVED
9/23/2026
108 Tarver, Teresa
8631218 Public Transportation Operator
APPROVED
9/4/2026
109 Wadsworth, Ethan
6625895 Public Transportation Operator
APPROVED
9/4/2026
Number
Name
Type
Issued
1
BLDC20-039
Uncommon Builders LLC
Bldg Contractor - Class B
9/14/2026
2
BLDC21-009
Place Services Inc
Bldg Contractor - Class B
9/2/2026
3
BLDC20-023
Hapco Construction LLC
Bldg Contractor - Class B
9/2/2026
4
LRW24-018
Galicia's Concrete LLC
Right-of-Way Contractor
9/2/2026
5
LBC26-048
Foothills Commercial Builders, Inc
Bldg Contractor - Class B
9/14/2026
6
BLDC23-050
Bri Co Basements
Bldg Contractor - Class C
9/16/2026
7
BLDC16-017
Teton West of Idaho
Bldg Contractor - Class A
9/30/2026
SEPTEMBER CONTRACTOR LICENSES
Memorandum
File #: 26-391
City Council
DATE: Monday, October 5, 2026
AGENDA: Consent
FROM: Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
DEPARTMENT: Mayor's Office
Title
City Council Meeting Minutes
☐Ordinance
☐Resolution
☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐Legislative Public Hearing
☒Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☐Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve the Utility Board meeting minutes from September 9 and the City Council meeting minutes from
September 21 & 24, and October 5, 2026 (or take other action deemed appropriate)
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
Attached are the following minutes:
·
September 9, 2026 - Utility Board
·
September 21, 2026 - Work Session
·
September 24, 2026 - City Council
·
October 5, 2026 - Work Session
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 10/20/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
RETURN TO AGENDA
Utility Board
Meeting Minutes
1
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Wednesday, September 9, 2026
8:00 AM
City Council Chambers
Call to Order and Roll Call
There were present:
Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw
Council President Jim Francis
Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Councilor Jim Freeman
Councilor Kirk Larsen
Councilor Brandon Lee
Councilor John Radford
Also present:
Ian Turner, Airport Director
Chris Fredericksen, IF Power GM
Jason Bird, IF Power
Sarah Wheeler, IF Power
Bowen Campos, IF Power
Jason Cooper, IF Power
Colter Tucker, IF Power
Chis Canfield, Public Works Director
Dave Richards, Water Superintendent
PJ Holm, Parks and Recreation Director
Tyler Smith, Parks and Recreation
Jordan Rechenmacher, Sanitation Supt/
Gregg Roderick, Wastewater Superintendent
Pam Alexander, Municipal Services Director
Mark Hagedorn, Finance Manager/Treasurer
Zack Jones, City Attorney
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Mayor Burtenshaw called the meeting to order at 8:05 a.m. with the following items:
Mayor, City Council - Mayor and Council Reports: Announcements, Liaison Reports, Events, Calendaring,
Citywide Updates, Concerns, Questions, Proclamations, Notes and/or Minutes from Boards and
Commissions:
Council discussed upcoming police events, including the planned presentation regarding
Flock/license plate reader options, which was moved from October to the first Council meeting in
November to allow additional preparation time. Council also discussed the upcoming On Patrol: Live
program in Idaho Falls, a police award and K-9 retirement event, and the annual stair climb memorial
for first responders.
Council discussed a potential feasibility study regarding a possible joint powers agreement/merger
involving the City and the fire district. The study would be jointly funded by the City and fire district.
Councilors reported on the Western Energy Summit, including transmission constraints, permitting
and planning challenges, the need for additional generation, geothermal technology, data center
growth, cybersecurity and national defense concerns, and the changing role of decarbonization in
energy planning. Council also discussed concerns regarding Western energy markets, including
Markets+ and CAISO, transmission costs, and uncertainty related to market participation.
Council discussed a possible future financial training work session regarding the settlement run and
accounting procedures, including appropriate separation between employees initiating and
approving transactions.
Utility Board
Meeting Minutes
2
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Council also discussed bringing forward a work session regarding the extension of the Planned
Development (PUD) ordinance before the matter proceeds to the Planning Commission. The
discussion focused on better understanding the standards and negotiations associated with private
streets, public parking, and development proposals.
Additional reports included the potential expansion of Greater Idaho Falls Transit (GIFT) service into
Ammon, Rexburg’s continued exploration of public transportation, and recognition of Transportation
Coordinator Kade Marquez as Transportation Champion of the Year and his induction into ITD’s
Public Transit Hall of Fame.
Airport – FBO Request for Proposal Report (Director Turner):
Presentation/Discussion (Director Turner): Director Turner presented an update on the Idaho Falls
Regional Airport’s Request for Proposals for a Fixed Base Operator (FBO) and hangar development.
He explained that an FBO provides required aviation services at the airport and may also provide
optional services such as flight training, aircraft sales, chartering, and ground handling.
The RFP was issued following multiple inquiries regarding a second FBO and significant demand for
private hangars. Director Turner explained that federal grant assurances prohibit the airport from
granting an exclusive right to an FBO unless the airport sponsor elects to provide the service itself.
The City did not elect to exercise an exclusive right.
The RFP was issued April 23, 2026. Two pre-proposal meetings were held, with 18 individuals
attending the first and 12 attending the second. Four proposals were received: three FBO proposals
from Beacon Air Group, Right Rudder LLC, and JJ Jet Center, and one hangar-development-only
proposal from Integra CRE.
JJ Jet Center and Beacon Air Group were the two highest-scoring proposals and were invited to make
presentations. Following the presentations, JJ Jet Center ranked first. Its proposal included a Phillips
66 fueling partnership, access to the Contract Fuel Network and Aviation Partners Into-Plane
Program, a sound financing and business plan, an FAR Part 145 aircraft maintenance operation, a
Robinson helicopter dealership, and safety programs addressing fuel supply, quality, and training.
Council discussed the effect of a second FBO on the existing Aramark operation, the demand for
hangars, the possibility of negotiating additional hangar development, and the potential effect on
airport revenues. Director Turner stated that JJ Jet Center had committed to developing some
hangars, although the number and size would be determined during negotiations.
Motion: Council direction to staff to proceed with negotiating a lease agreement.
o
Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o
Second: Councilor Freeman
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries 6-0.
Idaho Falls Power - Kleinschmidt Proposal for Consulting:
Utility Board
Meeting Minutes
3
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Presentation/Discussion (GM Fredericksen) : Staff presented an update regarding the proposal to
continue consulting services with Kleinschmidt in connection with the City’s four hydroelectric
projects and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) licensing process. Staff explained
that the City is nearing the end of the licensing process, with a draft license application submitted at
the beginning of September.
The proposed consulting work would assist with managing the license application process, drafting
required management plans, and finalizing reports submitted with the application. The projected
cost for the upcoming fiscal year is approximately $250,000, compared with approximately $500,000
in the current fiscal year.
Council discussed how information gathered through the FERC licensing process could support the
City’s future River Corridor Master Plan. Staff noted that completed studies include recreation, fish
entrainment, fish species, sediment, and other river-characterization studies. The fish study
examined species, size, quantities, presence, and general population health over four seasons. The
information will be made available to Council.
Idaho Falls Power - City Runner Hub Progress Update:
Presentation/Discussion (Mr. Cooper): Jason Cooper provided an update on the City Runner Hub
and Controls Project, which began in earnest in March and is currently scheduled for completion in
December. The project was reported to be slightly ahead of schedule.
The runner hub has been rebuilt in Parma, Idaho, including replacement of bushings and seals and
repairs to cavitation damage on the four blades. The hub passed pressure testing and was
scheduled to return to Idaho Falls. Control panels were approximately 75% wired and tested, while
the automatic voltage regulator had been installed and tested. Remaining work includes
coordination of protection relays, slip-ring machining, and final commissioning, which is expected to
take approximately one to one-and-a-half weeks.
Staff explained that the project is primarily a 20-year maintenance refurbishment and is not
expected to increase generation efficiency. Electromechanical switches are being replaced with
digital relays, and a new communications rack is being installed. The digital protections are intended
to protect the generator from overspeed, under speed, overvoltage, and similar conditions rather
than specifically providing cybersecurity improvements.
Council also discussed the City’s recent tour of Bonneville Dam and comparisons between the
City’s hydroelectric facilities and Bonneville’s larger-scale operations, fish passage, maintenance
requirements, and FERC inspections. Staff reported that the City’s high-hazard dams are inspected
annually, with broader inspections occurring on a three-year cycle. The annual inspection was
scheduled for September 15.
The project outage was discussed, with staff estimating that the City was losing approximately 168
MWh of generation per day while the plant was offline, representing approximately $6,700 per day in
lost revenue.
Idaho Falls Power – Energy Conservation Update
Presentation/Discussion (Mr. Bird): Jason Bird provided an update on Idaho Falls Power’s energy
conservation programs, which have historically produced approximately 2–3 million kWh in annual
Utility Board
Meeting Minutes
4
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
savings, with approximately 3 million kWh saved during the previous year. Programs include rebates,
zero-interest loans, residential and commercial efficiency measures, heat pumps, weatherization,
lighting, energy audits, and custom energy-efficiency projects.
Staff discussed the current $1,600 heat-pump incentive, consisting of an $800 EPA contribution
matched by Idaho Falls Power. Heat-pump costs were reported to range from approximately $6,000
to $20,000 depending on the system and contractor. The loan program provides up to $10,000 for
residential projects and $50,000 for commercial projects at 0% interest for up to 60 months, subject
to payment-history requirements.
Council discussed the Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Ninth Power Plan and concerns
that proposed regional conservation targets could negatively affect Idaho and Montana residential
programs. Staff explained that proposed separate targets for different portions of the Northwest
could make Idaho and Montana’s residential programs less cost-effective under the methodology
being considered. The potential loss of the Douglas heat-pump program was specifically discussed.
Council also discussed the potential inclusion of tree planting as an energy-efficiency measure,
noting that strategically placed trees can reduce air-conditioning demand. Staff stated that tree-
planting programs are being used in other states and could potentially qualify depending on the state
plan.
Commercial and residential LED lighting conversion was discussed. Staff reported that substantial
commercial opportunities remain, particularly in parking lots and other high-use applications, while
residential LED conversion is largely complete.
Staff reported approximately 3 million kWh of annual savings across residential, commercial, and
industrial programs. Recent projects included City facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, fire
stations, the ice arena, apartment complexes, and other commercial properties. The City
wastewater treatment plant filter and pump project was highlighted as producing approximately
651,500 kWh in annual savings.
Idaho Falls Power – Public Outage Map Update, Surge Protection Program, Net Distribution Metering, South
Fork Archers Lease
a. Public Outage Map Update
Presentation/Discussion (Sarah Wheeler): Staff reported that its new public outage map is now
live on the Idaho Falls Power website. The map allows customers to view outages affecting three or
more homes and see information similar to what Idaho Falls Power staff see internally. Staff planned
a public release and outreach through City media channels.
b. Surge Protection Program
Presentation/Discussion: Staff reported that approximately 126 customers participate in the City’s
surge protection program, generating slightly more than $500 per month. Residential customers pay
$4 per month and commercial customers $7 per month, while Idaho Falls Power purchases and
installs the surge protection equipment.
Staff recommended considering discontinuation of the program because of concerns about the level
of protection provided, customer expectations, warranty limitations, installation costs, and the
Utility Board
Meeting Minutes
5
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
program’s overall value. Staff explained that the devices are generally more effective against large
surges, while lower-level surges common in the Idaho Falls area may not be covered. Customers
must generally pursue homeowners insurance before the equipment warranty applies.
Council supported evaluating termination of the program while grandfathering existing customers.
Staff also proposed providing customers with information about modern whole-home surge
protection installed by electricians.
c. Net Distribution Metering
Presentation/Discussion: Staff discussed the City’s distributed generation/net-metering program,
which currently includes solar generation and also allows for wind, geothermal, and small hydro
systems. Customers must submit an application and receive appropriate permits so Idaho Falls
Power can maintain system capacity and necessary grid protections.
Staff reported an increase in misleading solar sales tactics in the community. Some companies were
reportedly using Idaho Falls Power letterhead or logos and making inaccurate claims regarding
future electricity rates and the ability of solar systems to eliminate utility bills. Staff stated that
customers may still have significant costs for solar systems while continuing to receive charges for
water, sewer, sanitation, and other services.
Idaho Falls Power plans to develop a customer checklist, update its website with additional net-
metering information and a potential calculator, and continue offering energy audits and energy-bill
profiles. Council discussed whether the City could take legal action against companies improperly
using City logos or information. Staff agreed to investigate the issue.
Council also discussed reminding residents that door-to-door salespeople are required to obtain a
City license and should be able to provide proof of that license.
d. South Fork Archers Lease
Presentation/Discussion: Staff discussed the South Fork Archers’ lease of City-owned property
near Sandy Downs. A 2021 letter provided notice that Idaho Falls Power would eventually need the
property for a potential substation and gave the organization five years to identify another location.
The existing agreement expires at the end of September 2026.
Staff reported that residential development has expanded closer to the property and residents have
raised safety concerns after finding arrows in adjacent areas. Idaho Falls Power plans to meet with
the South Fork Archers regarding relocation and will encourage them to identify another site. Council
discussed whether another City-owned property might be suitable and noted concerns about a
private organization using public property while restricting public access.
Idaho Falls Power – Wasatch Agreement Amendment
Presentation/Discussion: Staff presented an amendment to the agreement with the Wasatch
Group, also known as Orchard Park, which previously requested a special rate arrangement because
of its use of solar generation and battery storage.
Utility Board
Meeting Minutes
6
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
The arrangement allows the customer to charge its batteries from solar generation and discharge the
batteries during peak demand periods, reducing its demand during Idaho Falls Power’s higher-cost
peak period. Staff explained that additional historical data now allows the City to better establish the
appropriate rates. The proposed amendment would change the non-peak energy rate from
$0.037/kWh to $0.04/kWh and the demand charge from $5.50/kW to $6.00/kW.
Staff reported that the historical data showed the battery system was functioning as intended, with
the customer generally discharging during peak periods and charging during solar-production hours.
The amendment is intended to ensure that the special rate structure accurately reflects the
customer’s usage and does not result in other Idaho Falls Power customers subsidizing the
arrangement.
Council discussed the innovative nature of the agreement, the customer’s use of multiple smaller
batteries, and the possibility of using similar concepts more broadly through virtual power plants,
distributed batteries, smart thermostats, and microgrids. Staff indicated that further work would be
undertaken to explore a potential virtual power plant model.
The amendment was expected to return to Council for approval at a subsequent meeting.
Break
Public Works – Irrigation Utility Status
Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield, Superintendent Richards): Staff provided an update
on the City’s transition of parks and private developments to pressurized irrigation using surface
water.
Five City parks are either converted or in the process of being converted. Pinecrest and Erickson Park
were identified as having transitioned, Community Park was operating with ongoing system issues,
Freeman Park was under construction, and Tautphaus Park was being partially converted. Staff also
discussed the potential future conversion of the soccer fields on the west end of town.
For private development, staff reported 13 planned developments that are under construction or
preparing for construction and are expected to eventually have pressurized irrigation pump stations.
The first private-development systems are expected to come online in spring 2027.
The proposed initial rate for pressurized irrigation would be $15 per month, with no volumetric
charge until sufficient operating and maintenance data is available to establish an appropriate rate.
Staff explained that irrigation funds would remain separate from culinary water funds.
Council discussed problems experienced at Community Park, including repeated main-line breaks
and the resulting costs and staff time. Parks staff reported approximately ten main-line breaks at
Community Park during the year, with each repair costing approximately $2,500 in parts and labor.
Council emphasized the need for closer coordination between Public Works and Parks, evaluation of
existing systems before additional conversions, and consideration of enterprise or water-
conservation funds rather than relying solely on General Fund resources.
Staff stated that Community Park’s existing irrigation system contains infrastructure of varying ages
and materials and that the City is evaluating whether repairs or replacement of portions of the
Utility Board
Meeting Minutes
7
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
system are appropriate. Staff also agreed to work toward a smoother transition process in which the
installation team and Parks staff coordinate operation and maintenance responsibilities.
Council discussed the possibility of using water-conservation funds for future irrigation-system
replacements and the potential implications of federal recreation funding for improvements at
Tautphaus Park.
Public Works – Well Site/Cyber Security
Presentation/Discussion (Tyler Smtih): Mr. Smith provided an update on cybersecurity threats
affecting water and wastewater utilities. He explained that recent attacks have increasingly targeted
SCADA systems and the electronic controls used to operate water and wastewater facilities.
Staff reported that some attacks nationally have affected smaller systems with limited IT resources
and have exploited preset or weak passwords on programmable logic controllers. The City has
multiple cybersecurity protections in place and is working with counterparts at AIC to evaluate
lessons learned and maintain proactive security measures.
Council discussed whether Idaho Falls’ systems are adequately protected and how attackers have
identified vulnerable systems. Staff explained that bad actors often search broadly for weak links
rather than specifically targeting a particular utility.
Public Works – Dewatering-Emulsion Status
Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield, Superintendent Roderick): Wastewater
Superintendent Roderick provided an update on the City’s sludge-dewatering process. The City’s
goal is to achieve 15–18% dry solids. Under the previous dry-polymer process, the City generally
averaged approximately 9% and only occasionally reached 11%.
The City has begun using liquid emulsion polymer, which has improved sludge binding and
dewatering. Staff reported achieving approximately 17.5% dry solids on several occasions using a
pilot system. A new polymer skid has been ordered and is expected to provide greater control and
allow further optimization.
Improved dewatering will provide additional options for solids handling, including drying,
composting, and potentially achieving Class A sludge. Staff explained that Class A sludge undergoes
additional treatment and sterilization, creating more potential uses and disposal options.
The City currently uses Class B sludge primarily on agricultural fields and has an agreement with the
landfill for emergency disposal. Staff also discussed efforts to reduce the remaining wastewater
lagoon, which is an important source of odor. The lagoon was reported to be approximately 39% full.
Staff is evaluating composting as a possible future use of wastewater solids and has discussed a
potential pilot project with the County. However, staff emphasized the need to evaluate PFAS
concerns before establishing a permanent composting facility.
Utility Board
Meeting Minutes
8
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Public Works – 65th South Line Discussion
Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield, Superintendent Roderick): Staff provided an update
on discussions regarding a potential extension of the 65th South sewer line to properties near the
golf course. The extension could eliminate three lift stations from the City’s wastewater system and
provide additional benefits to the water system.
Staff explained that the proposed line would be approximately 25 feet deep and would be expensive
to construct. The City is discussing a potential collaborative project with developers because the
line would provide regional service beyond an individual development.
Council discussed the existing right-of-way, future development, roadway improvements, turn
lanes, and potential use of impact-fee funds. Staff emphasized that the discussions are preliminary
and that the City is evaluating the feasibility and benefits of the project.
Public Works – County Tipping Fee Status
Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield, Superintendent Rechenmacher): Staff provided an
update regarding Bonneville County’s new tipping fees. Beginning December 1, 2026, the County will
charge an $80-per-ton tipping fee, representing a significant increase and the first time the County
has implemented a weight-based fee.
Idaho Falls’ residential sanitation fee is expected to increase from $9.90 per month to $16.80 per
month beginning December 1. The City will implement its new fees when the County’s fees take
effect. Staff explained that the County fee will be separately identified on customers’ bills.
Council discussed the potential effects on private garbage providers, commercial customers,
recycling, illegal dumping, and the feasibility of weighing individual residential garbage cans. Council
expressed concern about the accuracy and practicality of truck-mounted scales, particularly
because of snow, ice, water, and other materials that can affect weight. Staff indicated that a wait-
and-see approach would be appropriate regarding residential can weighing.
Public Works – Streets and Sanitation Administration Building
Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield): Staff provided an update on a proposed new Streets
and Sanitation administrative building. The proposed building is approximately 11,000 square feet
with a preliminary cost estimate of slightly more than $5 million.
The building would include offices, training space, a break room, cleanup room, public reception
area, and related administrative space. The existing building would ultimately be removed. Staff
anticipated advertising the project for bids in fall 2026, with approximately 12–14 months of
construction and potential occupancy during the following winter.
Council discussed the estimated construction cost, which includes site work, utility connections,
permitting, and demolition. Staff noted that some work could potentially be completed by City crews
to reduce costs. Future phases may address additional indoor equipment storage.
Utility Board
Meeting Minutes
9
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Mayor – Department of Finance Discussion
Presentation/Discussion (Mayor Burtenshaw): The Mayor presented a proposal to create a
separate Department of Finance within the City organization. The proposed ordinance would remove
several finance functions from the Municipal Services Department and establish a new Chapter 11
creating the Department of Finance.
The Mayor explained that the City’s growth, including a budget approaching $400 million and an
increasing number of departments, supports establishing Finance as its own department. She
credited Director Pam Alexander with developing the finance division within Municipal Services and
discussed the opportunity to transition Mark Hagedorn back into a finance leadership role following
his work on the City’s ERP implementation.
The Mayor recommended that Hagedorn serve as Finance Director and Treasurer. She noted that
several other Idaho cities use a combined Finance Director/Treasurer structure.
Council discussed whether creating the new department would increase staffing. Staff explained
that no immediate increase in full-time employees (FTEs) is anticipated and that the City intends to
evaluate efficiencies resulting from Workday/ERP before adding positions. A grant-management
position discussed during the budget process would be overseen by the Finance team to improve
grant administration and address audit concerns.
Mayor Burtenshaw also discussed the potential for future expansion of the City’s Information
Technology staff as the City develops a more comprehensive IT plan and addresses cybersecurity,
SCADA, business-analysis, and enterprise-system needs.
Councilors commended Municipal Services and the Finance team for their work on the ERP
implementation and discussed the importance of distributing financial knowledge throughout the
organization rather than relying on a single individual. Staff stated that the new structure would
increase internal financial support for City departments.
Utility Reports
The Utility Reports included written reports from Energy Services/Customer Service, General
Administration/Engineering, Operations Technology/Fiber Network, Transmission and
Distribution/Generation, Water/Wastewater, Sewer/Sanitation, Federal and State
Regulation/Litigation, and Organizational Membership Reports. The Mayor clarified that these were
written reports rather than additional agenda items and that the Board would not reconvene after
Executive Session.
Motion: Receive the recommendations from the September 1, 2026 meeting of the Planning and
Zoning
Commission pursuant to the Local Land Use Planning Act.
o
Moved by: Councilor Francis
o
Second: Councilor Lee
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries 6-0.
Utility Board
Meeting Minutes
10
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Executive Session: The Council will not reconvene after the executive session.
Motion: Move into Executive Session pursuant to Idaho Code § 74-206(1)(f) to communicate with
legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending
litigation or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated.
o
Moved by: Councilor Francis
o
Second: Councilor Freeman
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
Litigation topic #1: Cutler v. City of Idaho Falls, CV10-23-4845
Present: Mayor Burtenshaw, Councilor Francis, Councilor Ziel-Dingman, Councilor Radford,
Councilor Freeman, Councilor Lee, Councilor Larsen, and Zachary Jones.
Start: 11:19 a.m.
Stop: 11:27 a.m.
Litigation topic #2: Eastern Idaho Homebuilders Association, Inc. v. City of Idaho Falls, CV10-24-
5380
Present: Mayor Burtenshaw, Councilor Francis, Councilor Ziel-Dingman, Councilor Radford (left
meeting at 11:54 a.m.), Councilor Freeman, Councilor Lee, Councilor Larsen, and Zachary Jones.
Start: 11:27 a.m.
Stop: 11:58 a.m.
Litigation topic #3: Notices of Tort Claim filed by Brian McKellar and Michael Rapp.
Present: Mayor Burtenshaw, Councilor Francis, Councilor Ziel-Dingman (left meeting at 12:02 p.m.),
Councilor Freeman, Councilor Lee, Councilor Larsen, and Zachary Jones.
Start: 11:58 a.m.
Stop: 12:05 p.m.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:13 AM. (Executive Session concluded at 12:05
PM)
/s/ Linda Lundquist_________________
/s/ Lisa Burtenshaw
_____________
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor
Idaho Falls Power Briefing Paper
Date: September 3, 2026
Topic: Surge Protector Program — Program evaluation and potential discontinuation
Contact: Chris Fredericksen, General Manager, Idaho Falls Power
Issue: Idaho Falls Power is evaluating whether to continue its voluntary customer Surge Protector
Program. Staff have identified concerns regarding the program's effectiveness, customer
expectations, cost recovery, and compatibility with newer metering equipment.
Background: IFP currently offers an opt-in Surge Protector Program in which the utility installs and
maintains a meter-socket surge protector at the customer's electric meter. Customers pay a
recurring monthly fee ($4/month residential, $7/month commercial). Early cancellation within the
first two years triggers a $100 termination fee. The equipment costs approximately $170 per unit
(varies somewhat annually) and takes 30 minutes to install. Labor costs, including staff time
coordinating, scheduling and installing, are not currently isolated or tracked separately in program
accounting. Devices are generally replaced every 10 years.
The program has been in place since 2000 with 127 customers participating as of September 1,
2026.
Discussion: Reasons for discontinuation
1. Limited protection, concerns regarding customer expectations and actual warranty. Meter-
socket surge protectors are effective primarily against high-voltage momentary events such as
lightning strikes. However, most customer-reported "surge" damage in Idaho Falls is caused by
low-voltage conditions following outages or grid disturbances, a failure mode these devices do not
protect against. This creates a gap between what customers believe they are purchasing and what
the product actually delivers.
2. False sense of security. Because the product's name and marketing imply broad protection,
customers may forgo more effective precautions (e.g., whole-home panel protection, point-of-use
surge strips, or unplugging equipment during storms), potentially leaving them more exposed, not
less.
3. Claims process concerns. Program documentation indicates that damage claims are typically
payable after the customer has first filed a claim through their homeowner's insurance. This
secondary-payer structure has generated dissatisfaction and does not align with customer
expectations of a utility-backed protection product.
4. Incomplete cost accounting. Current program fees do not appear to fully capture all
associated costs, including staff scheduling time, administrative overhead, and periodic hardware
replacement. A full cost-of-service review would be needed to determine whether the current fee
structure is sustainable even if the program continues.
5. Equipment compatibility issues. Some existing surge protector hardware is incompatible with
IFP's newer meter infrastructure, creating a growing technical and logistical liability as the utility
continues its meter modernization efforts.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that Idaho Falls Power phase out the Surge Protector
Program, beginning with discontinuing new enrollments and developing a reasonable transition
plan for existing customers.
Next Steps: Staff requests Board discussion and direction on whether to proceed with a formal
discontinuation plan.
If leadership is not comfortable eliminating the program, staff could conduct a formal cost-of-
service and technical review to determine whether the monthly fee should be adjusted to fully
recover the actual cost of providing the service.
Municipal Services
Director –
Pam Alexander
Director/Treasurer -
Accountant –
Assistant Finance Manager –
Procurement & Payables
Supervisor –
Procurement
Specialist –
Accountant –
Property & Records Coordinator
–
Accounts Payable Clerk –
Admin ASST. –
1
Treasury Operation Manager –
Accountant –
Payroll Coordinator –
Business Office Manager –
Lead Treasury Clerk –
Treasury Clerk –
Utility Supervisor
Asst. Utility Supervisor –
Credit Specialist –
Customer Service Rep –
Utility Billing Specialist –
Administrative Assistant –
Chief Information Officer –
Assistant Chief Information
Officer –
IT Systems Administrator
IT Technician –
Network
IT Analyst/ Supervisor –
IT Business Intel Analyst
Fleet Maintenance
Superintendent –
Admin. Asst. –
Parts & Inventory Coordinator –
Shop Forman –
Fleet Technician –
Mechanic Apprentice –
Building Maintenance
Superintendent –
Building Maintenance Foreman
–
Building Maint. Lead Technician
–
Building Maint. Technician –
Building Maint. Specialist –
Office Assi. –
Custodian –
Frontier Center for the
Performing Arts Manager
Finance
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
1
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Monday, September 21, 2026
3:00 PM
City Council Chambers
Call to Order and Roll Call
There were present:
Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw
Council President Jim Francis
Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Councilor Jim Freeman
Councilor Kirk Larsen
Councilor Brandon Lee
Councilor John Radford
Also present:
Wade Sanner, CDS Director
Pam Alexander, Municipal Services Director
Kerry Beutler, Assistant CDS Director
Brian Cunningham, Asst Public Works Director
Nick Terry, TOK Commercial Real Estate
Chris Fredericksen, IF Power GM
Zack Jones, City Attorney
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Mayor Burtenshaw called the meeting to order at 3:03 p.m. with the following items:
Mayor, City Council – Discussion: Citywide updates, concerns, questions, reports:
•
Council discussed upcoming police neighborhood meetings being held in the City’s four police beats.
Councilors were encouraged to attend and participate with residents.
•
Mayor Burtenshaw noted that the Police Department’s recent awards ceremony recognized
numerous officers for heroic and exceptional service, with additional information expected in an
upcoming departmental update.
•
Council discussed the continued usefulness of departmental highlights, with Councilors expressing
support for receiving regular updates because they provide insight into activities occurring across City
departments.
•
Councilor Radford provided an update on the City’s work toward an ordinance addressing electric
bicycles, electric scooters, electric motorbikes, and other electric vehicles. The discussion focused on
creating classifications that are practical for officers to enforce while addressing safety concerns.
o
Council discussed differences between lower-speed pedal-assisted e-bikes and higher-speed
electric motorbikes with throttles.
o
Concerns were raised about children operating high-speed electric bikes and motorbikes on
sidewalks and paths.
o
A local pediatrician had contacted the City regarding an increase in serious injuries to
children, including traumatic brain injuries.
o
Council discussed potentially establishing speed limits on the Greenbelt and other pathways,
improving signage, requiring users to warn pedestrians when passing, and addressing
congestion in areas such as the Broadway Bridge.
o
Members emphasized that regulations should improve safety without discouraging bicycles
and other electric vehicles as alternatives to automobiles.
•
Council discussed the possibility of meeting periodically with the Planning and Zoning Commission to
review past cases and improve consistency in interpreting and applying City development regulations.
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
2
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
•
Mayor Burtenshaw raised concerns about vehicles blocking sidewalks, particularly affecting people
with disabilities, wheelchair users, seniors and people with visual impairments. Police and Public
Information staff were asked to consider enforcement and public education.
•
Council briefly discussed recent community events, including Symphony in the Park, the Downtown
Street Party and the Day of the Arts.
•
State Representative Erin Bingham, also a member of the Gem State Housing Alliance, will be hosting
local leaders to discuss expanding housing options in Idaho. Council is invited to the community
conversation scheduled for October 19.
Fire Department / Idaho Falls Power Updates
•
Councilor Larsen reported that the Fire Department had issued a Request for Qualifications for a
feasibility study concerning potential consolidation of Idaho Falls Fire and Bonneville County Fire
District No. 1. Responses were expected later in the week.
•
Council discussed an upcoming Fire Department block party at Station 1, including demonstrations,
fire apparatus and food for the community.
•
Council noted that Idaho Falls Power performed well during the recent severe storm, with relatively
few outages despite the conditions. Staff attributed part of the success to ongoing tree-trimming
efforts, with the primary outage attributed to a lightning strike rather than a tree.
•
Council discussed a recent mobile-home fire on Ellsworth Drive in which firefighters rescued an
unconscious resident. The resident remained hospitalized, while the resident’s dog died in the fire.
•
Members noted the unusually high number of structure fires recently and used the discussion to
emphasize the importance of building, access and fire-safety codes, particularly when considering
development standards and PUDs.
CDS - Discussion: Serving Alcohol in Limited Commercial (LC) Zones
Community Development Services — Serving Alcohol in the Limited Commercial (LC) Zone
•
Staff presented a proposed amendment to the LC zoning use table that would make standalone
alcohol establishments a permitted use rather than requiring a conditional-use process.
•
Businesses would still be required to obtain the applicable state liquor/alcohol licenses, including
compliance with separation requirements involving schools and churches.
•
The proposed change would also address situations such as businesses in the LC zone that want to
offer limited alcohol service as part of their business, including spas, retail establishments or similar
uses.
•
The proposal had already been considered and unanimously approved by the Planning Commission on
September 1. Staff anticipated bringing the ordinance to Council in October after completion of the
required notice period.
•
Council discussed concerns raised by the Police Department regarding the possibility of increasing the
number of establishments serving alcohol, particularly if such establishments could be located closer
to residential areas
•
Councilors supporting the change discussed:
o
The increasingly mixed residential/commercial character of LC areas.
o
The desire to encourage walkability rather than the concentration of alcohol-serving
businesses in limited areas.
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
3
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
o
The similarity between limited commercial and the central commercial zones, where mixed-
use development and alcohol-serving establishments already exist.
o
Situations in which existing businesses have been unable to offer limited wine or similar
service despite it being incidental to their primary business.
•
Staff noted that the principal policy question was whether Council wanted standalone alcohol
establishments to be permitted in LC zones, while acknowledging the Police Department's concerns.
Municipal Services, Legal, Parks & Recreation, Public Works - City Property Update: Bel Aire Division 3 and 610
Water Ave
Bel Air Division 3 / Vernon Lot
•
Director Alexander and Nick Terry of TOK Commercial provided an update on the approximately 8.6-acre
City-owned property near Pinecrest Golf Course, also referred to as the Bel Air Division 3/Vernon Lot.
•
Council had previously authorized a letter of intent and purchase agreement with Clearstone, LLC, for
approximately $2 million.
•
The agreement included several extensions, but the anticipated August 31 closing did not occur. The City
subsequently issued a notice of termination and demanded the outstanding $10,000 extension payment
or, in lieu of that payment, the developer's due diligence materials.
•
Clearstone had shown very little recent communication. The information received indicated that
engineering work had revealed that fewer units could be developed than originally anticipated and that
the developer had shifted priorities to other projects.
•
Staff had not received the developer's completed engineering, floor plans, plat information or other due-
diligence materials.
•
Council discussed the potential value of obtaining the developer's due diligence, particularly geotechnical
and site information, because it could assist a future purchaser in understanding the property's
development constraints.
•
The property was being returned to the market at approximately $1.9 million, with staff and TOK
continuing to contact other potentially interested parties.
•
Potential future uses discussed included multifamily/townhome development and affordable housing.
Staff noted that available Low-Income Housing Tax Credit allocations could affect the timing of an
affordable-housing proposal.
•
Mr. Terry reported continued interest in the property but noted that financing conditions and interest
rates were affecting developers' ability to move projects forward.
•
Staff recommended continuing to market the property, gathering letters of intent and bringing potential
offers back to Council for consideration.
•
Council also discussed whether the City could use a redevelopment/RFP approach to help shape the type
of development desired on the property.
610 Water Avenue Property
•
Director Alexander provided an update on the City-owned property at 610 Water Avenue, including the
history of its attempted sale.
•
The property had previously been appraised, with its value affected by the lack of a sewer connection. A
public auction in April produced no bids, and a subsequent $30,000 offer was declined.
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
4
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
•
The property was then listed for approximately $65,000, with the buyer originally responsible for
installing the sewer connection. Although there was substantial interest, the sewer requirement
discouraged potential buyers.
•
Public Works identified an opportunity to install the sewer connection in conjunction with other nearby
construction associated with the Boulevard/Birch Street roundabout.
•
The City obtained a change-order price of $15,898.75 for the sewer connection and proceeded with the
work. A new meter pit and sewer stub were installed during the week of September 8.
•
Because the property is owned by the City (public works), proceeds from the eventual sale would return
to that department.
•
The City received a $54,000 offer on September 12. Staff recommended declining the offer because it
would provide little recovery beyond the City's sewer-installation expense.
•
The property remains listed at $65,000, now without the previous sewer-connection requirement for the
purchaser.
•
Council discussed the length of time the property had been listed and the possibility of temporarily
removing and relisting it to generate renewed interest.
•
Staff indicated that the property could potentially be worth approximately $65,000–$70,000 with the
sewer connection now installed.
Mayor’s Office, CDS, Legal - Discussion: Planned Unit Development (PUD)
•
Council discussed three main options for the ordinance:
o
Rescind the existing PUD ordinance and develop a new approach.
o
Place a temporary moratorium on new PUD applications.
o
Keep the existing ordinance and make targeted, incremental amendments.
•
A moratorium raised concerns about disrupting projects already in progress.
o
Staff noted that several developers were already working on PUDs in anticipation of potential
ordinance changes.
o
Council discussed whether a moratorium could create unnecessary uncertainty or interrupt
projects that had already been planned under the existing rules.
•
There was discussion of taking a more targeted approach.
o
Rather than rewriting the entire ordinance at once, Council could address specific problems
individually.
o
Potential amendments included clearer definitions, setbacks, private-road standards,
neighborhood compatibility, amenities and maintenance requirements.
•
The October 6 Planning Commission hearing became an immediate procedural issue.
o
A proposal to rescind the PUD ordinance had already been noticed for the Planning Commission's
October 6 meeting.
o
Council could decide whether to proceed with that hearing, postpone it while staff develops
amendments, or allow the Planning Commission to hear the matter and provide a recommendation.
•
The discussion ultimately identified several areas needing further work, particularly:
o
Private versus public roads
o
How PUD standards relate to the underlying zoning
o
Definitions and code clarity
o
Setbacks and building height
o
Amenities and open space
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
5
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
o
Long-term HOA and infrastructure maintenance
o
Predictability for developers
o
The overall PUD application and hearing process.
Council did not reach a final decision on whether to eliminate the PUD ordinance. The discussion centered on
whether the City's concerns could be addressed through targeted amendments and process improvements
rather than immediately replacing the entire PUD system, while also considering the already-scheduled
Planning Commission hearing and the effect of any changes on developers currently working on projects.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:06 PM.
/s/ Linda Lundquist_________________
/s/ Lisa Burtenshaw
_____________
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor
9/21/2026
City of Idaho Falls —
City Property Update
Bel Aire Division 3
610 Water Avenue
Monday, September 21, 2026
IDAHO FALLS
Commercial Broker — Nick Terry,
TOK
Thursday, September 11, 2025 —
Letter of Intent to Purchase from
Clearstone, LLC. Approved by City
Council.
Purchase and sale agreement
signed October 24, 2025
Three addendums: Notice of
exercise to extend options issued
(4/9/26); (5/11/26); (7/6/26)
Closing date — August 31, 2026
Termination Notice issued 9/1/26
9/21/2026
ic. Bs. Crna
= Anderson Str
eas La 4 eS
Vernon Ave,
= 7 ot '-/ aa - oi —
Pinecrest Golf, Course : Sie ; Wheelenst ra
MB a Le
Offer Proposed Development Terms:
Earnest Money Due Diligence
Closing
Clearstone, LLC $2,000,000 Townhomes 120-days
$10,000 non-refundable 1 option of an additional 30-days with another
$10,000 deposit;
Expedited request for zoning, platting, lot
adjustments, permitting process prior to
closing
Close 30-days after due diligence
Hawkins $1,900,000 Multi-family 180-days
$20,000 refundable 2-60-day extensions, with $10,000 non-
refundable deposit within 30-days of the end
of due diligence
Expedited request for zoning, platting, lot line
adjustments
Close within 30-days of due diligence
Mach, LLC $1,650,000 Affordable Housing; will require 180-days
$20,000 refundable a low-income housing tax credit 2 options of 60-day extensions with $10,000
(approximately a 6-month deposit each extension
process) No later than 60-days after due diligence
9/21/2026
610 Water Avenue
/
Questions
Council Direction to Staff
Underlying Zone Give-Ups
What the city gives up in exchange for the higher standards required elsewhere in the PUD
Underlying zone give-ups
4%
Keep or amend?
Current Code Position Council's Options
Lot Size No minimum within a PUD Keep as-is (core PUD flexibility), or set a floor if internal lots are getting too small
to function
Density Fixed by Table 11-2-4; no council discretion to exceed Keep the table as the hard ceiling, or amend the per-zone numbers
Setbacks Hard floor at the perimeter (can't go below adjacent non-PUD Keep case-by-case, or set a defined minimum internal setback, or set a minimum
setback); internal setbacks case-by-case for PUDs adjacent to undeveloped ground
Height Underlying zone max, +1 ft height per 2 ft added setback Keep the 2:1 ratio, change the ratio, or cap total additional height regardless of
setback offered
Higher Standards Required
Higher standards
11 items the city gets (combined amenities and phases removed parkinglots
Keep or revise?
| Known Gap or Question
| Higher Standard
Common space (25% minimum)
Scaled amenities (1 per 50 units) — phased delivery
Enhanced landscaping
Buffers (10' + fence/hedge)
Superior streetscapes
Height/massing sensitivity
Architectural quality standards
Pedestrian connectivity
Unified maintenance responsibility
Open question: what % of the 25% should be allowed from drainage facilities? Currently uncapped
No construction-grade standard except playgrounds, Dog parks have requirements, amenity required for
certificate of occupancy
Underlying zone is 20% - increases to 25% Additional trees and bushes are required landscaping plans must
be included
7 foot to a 10 foot buffer
Has not been overly strict other than through landscaping
Elevations are provided - Staff resolves this and is addressed at staff level (very technical)
Subjective language (“high quality design”) — could be tightened with specific criteria
Is only better when a trail system is part of an amenity and not just normal circulation
HOA responsible for maintenance and replacement
Concern
Amenity construction standard
Retention basin / common space
credit
Private road maintenance
Private road emergency access / fire
lanes
Drive aisle safety
Unaddressed Concerns —
Proposed Fix
Commercial-grade construction for all amenities (not just
playgrounds); reserve study/escrow for replacement
Cap % of the 25% that can be drainage-based; require drawdown
analysis, max 5:1 slopes, pedestrian connectivity
City’s right to cure with a cost recovery -A condition allowing the city
to step in and perform necessary maintenance if the HOA fails to act
after notic
26' min. unobstructed width, mandatory fire lane designation,
signage/striping, enforcement independent of HOA, retrofit trigger
Sight-triangle compliance, physical separation at crossings, routed
trash/loading access, capped dead-end length, lighting plan
A/B/C Judgment Call
Only playgrounds currently require “commercial” grade.
Reduce the number of amenities allowed
Cap percentage is an open question
Largely ready to become ordinance language (ties to Section
3(a) unified control)
Draft language already exists — needs Fire Marshal sign-off on
the 26' figure and IFC alignment
Largely engineering-standard items — decide if these belong in
this ordinance or the public works manual
Underlying zone give-ups
4 items city gives up
¥
Keep or amend?
Per-item council vote
S
Keep flexible as-is
Or add firmer standards
Higher standards
11 items city gets
S
Keep or revise?
Per-item council vote
S
° Keep current requirements °
° Or strengthen / remove items .
One council decision
Unaddressed concerns
5 open risk areas
S
Amend or condition?
Or take no action
S
Amend ordinance (uniform)
Or leave as CUP condition
Amend the ordinance sections that changed; leave the rest as-is
City Council Meeting
Minutes
1
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Thursday, September 24, 2026
6:30 PM
City Council Chambers
1. Mayor Burtenshaw called the meeting to Order at 6:30 PM
Present:
Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw
Council President Jim Francis
Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Councilor Jim Freeman
Councilor Kirk Larsen
Councilor Brandon Lee
Councilor John Radford
Also present:
Brad Cramer, Perspective Planning (via Teams)
Megan Conrad, Elam & Burke
Tyson Fitzgerald, Developer
Darin Jones, Human Resources Director
Chris Fredericksen, IF Power GM
Chris Canfield, PW Director
Wade Sanner, CDS Director
Mark Hagedorn, Finance Director/Treasurer
Bryce Johnson, Police Chief
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Jacob Beck, Assistant City Attorney
2. Pledge of Allegiance
Councilor Radford led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Staff Responses to Prior Public Comment and Other Updates
Director Jones - City Policy 300: Discrimination and Harassment:
•
Reiterated that the City maintains a zero-tolerance policy for unlawful discrimination,
harassment, and disruptive behavior in the workplace and in interactions with the public.
•
Confirmed protections for all legally protected classes, including race, religion, gender, sexual
orientation, gender identity, national origin, age, disability, and veteran status.
•
Emphasized that employees who report concerns, serve as witnesses, or participate in
complaints are protected from retaliation.
•
All employees must complete interactive, 60-minute respectful workplace training through the
Idaho Counties Risk Management Program (ICRMP) upon hire and annually thereafter, covering
employee rights, civility, harassment, discrimination, and retaliation.
•
Employees may report concerns to supervisors, department directors, Human Resources, or
the City Attorney. All reports are documented and reviewed.
•
Supervisors first attempt to resolve concerns directly. When necessary, Human Resources or
the City Attorney's Office conducts a thorough review. Substantiated violations may result in
disciplinary action, up to and including termination.
Council clarification: Mayor Burtenshaw explained that the response was provided to clarify the City's
existing policy and annual training requirements in light of comments received by Council.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
2
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
4. Public Comment
A. Mosey Moran, Idaho Falls Resident
•
Shared personal experiences with racism dating back to elementary school and continuing
throughout his life, including after moving to Idaho Falls.
•
Reported experiencing racist comments and harassment on a daily basis, both in person and
online, including racial slurs and derogatory remarks.
•
Stated that racism affects both Black and Hispanic residents and that he frequently hears
negative comments about Hispanic people.
•
Expressed frustration that his accomplishments and community involvement are often
overshadowed by his race. He emphasized his love for Idaho Falls, where he raised his children
and operates a business.
•
Reported having screenshots involving City employees and racist comments, and stated that
he was not aware of any action taken regarding the concerns.
•
Request: Asked the City to make a public statement, including on Facebook, explicitly stating
that racism is wrong and that Idaho Falls leadership does not support racist attitudes. He
emphasized that he was seeking public acknowledgment and validation rather than policy
changes or disciplinary action.
B. Drew Satterthwaite, Idaho Falls Resident, Stronger Idaho Falls
•
Addressed the proposed rescission of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) ordinance.
•
Explained that PUDs are a valuable development tool throughout Idaho, allowing developers to
pursue creative projects that may not fit existing zoning requirements.
•
Emphasized the importance of retaining development flexibility while ensuring projects meet
the City's needs.
•
Request: Encouraged Council to establish an alternative before rescinding the ordinance or
consider revising the existing PUD ordinance to better meet Idaho Falls' needs.
C. Chris, Ammon Resident
•
Expressed concerns about Flock cameras and other automated license plate readers, stating
that they create databases tracking the movements of innocent residents.
•
Questioned who operates and controls the cameras, what information is collected, and
whether residents' movements are being tracked.
•
Reported contacting the City of Ammon, Bonneville County Sheriff's Office, and Bonneville
County but said he had not received clear answers about responsibility.
•
Acknowledged that kidnapping investigations were cited as a benefit but questioned the
broader value of the system.
•
Request: Asked Council to remove Flock cameras and, if the City does not control them, use its
influence with Bonneville County to have them removed.
D. Jim Harlinger, Rexburg Resident
•
Supported amending rather than rescinding the PUD ordinance.
•
Stated that the concerns raised during the Council's work session and August discussions
could be addressed through specific code amendments.
•
Identified blighted or otherwise undevelopable properties as situations where PUDs can
provide a useful development option.
•
Suggested that issues involving private streets, parking, and fire access could be addressed
through targeted amendments, potentially requiring only minor changes to the code.
•
Request: Asked Council to consider amending the ordinance rather than eliminating the PUD
process entirely.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
3
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
E. Terri Ireland, Idaho Falls Downtown Merchants Association
•
Addressed concerns regarding the relationship between Idaho Falls Downtown Development
Corporation (IFDDC) and downtown merchants, stating that communication and cooperation
problems have persisted throughout her 10–11 years as a downtown merchant.
•
Explained that merchants' previously limited engagement with IFDDC shifted to strong
opposition following proposed parking changes approximately one year earlier.
•
Reported that downtown merchants increasingly do not want to work with or communicate
with the IFDDC.
•
Stated that recent property tax increases have also contributed to merchants' reluctance to
renew the Business Improvement District (BID).
•
Request: Asked Council to consider merchants' concerns when deciding whether to renew the
IFDDC management plan and emphasized the need for immediate discussions among all
stakeholders.
F. Melissa, Idaho Falls Resident and Downtown Merchant
•
Presented concerns from an email previously sent to Council regarding IFDDC’s relationship
with existing downtown businesses.
•
Downtown events and traffic: Stated that Saturday events, street closures, parking restrictions,
and congestion interfere with customer access during a retail day. Asked how merchants'
financial impacts are considered and how much input they receive before event plans are
finalized.
•
Alley dumpsters and garbage fees: Requested clarification on why merchants pay for separate
dumpster service while also paying for garbage through City utility bills, what each charge
covers, who sets the additional fee, and whether participation is mandatory.
•
Downtown events and parking: Cited recent events, including a jazz festival and Oktoberfest,
that affected parking in front of her business. Reported concerns about app-based metered
parking, including elderly visitors struggling to use the app and worrying about whether their
payments were recorded or whether they might be towed.
•
Communication and representation: Stated that merchants primarily receive notifications after
decisions have already been made, with little opportunity to provide input. Expressed that she
does not feel IFDDC advocates for existing merchants.
•
Referenced concerns from other downtown business owners, including one who reportedly
experienced a 177% increase in the business improvement district tax for the following year.
•
Request: Asked for a written response addressing merchant consultation, dumpster charges,
the economic impact of downtown events, the status of metered parking and merchant
opposition, and the services and advocacy IFDDC provides to existing businesses.
G. James Foster, Idaho Falls Resident
•
Expressed concerns about the City's Flock automated license plate reader program, arguing
that it continuously collects information on vehicles belonging to people who have committed
no wrongdoing.
•
Thanked Council for its July unanimous vote prohibiting Flock from training its artificial
intelligence on local license plate data, but argued that additional safeguards are necessary.
•
Cited Idaho Code § 49-1432, arguing that license plate data should be limited to investigating
crimes, traffic accidents, and missing persons rather than creating a permanent record of
residents' movements.
•
Challenged comparisons between automated cameras and officers taking notes, arguing that
cameras enable continuous collection and rapid searches across jurisdictions.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
4
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
Raised concerns about documented misuse of license plate reader systems by law
enforcement officers and the absence of published audits in Idaho Falls.
•
Acknowledged that Police Chief Johnson had identified locating people with warrants as a
benefit and stated that his proposed safeguards would not prevent legitimate investigative
searches.
•
Requests:
o
Require public quarterly audits identifying every search, the agency conducting it, and
the stated reason.
o
Limit data retention to seven days and prohibit sharing with out-of-state or federal
agencies without a signed warrant.
o
Require an annual City Council vote to renew the program.
•
Noted that the City operates 13 cameras, distinct from the nine operated by Bonneville County,
and asked Council to establish accountability for the City's system.
H. Matthew, Idaho Falls Resident
•
Opposed Flock cameras and other forms of mass surveillance, citing constitutional protections
for privacy, liberty, and freedom of movement.
•
Argued that continuous surveillance of innocent people without warrants or probable cause
raises Fourth Amendment concerns.
•
Expressed concern that government agencies could access collected information to build
profiles of private citizens and that safeguards could be circumvented or abused.
•
Stated that he did not consent to Flock or other mass surveillance, nor to the use or sale of his
personal data without his knowledge.
•
Request: Asked Council to discontinue the use of all Flock cameras and Flock-style mass
surveillance within Idaho Falls.
5. Consent Agenda
A. Fire Department
1. 26-337 Battery-Powered Extrication Equipment
B. Finance
1. 26-357 Treasurer’s Report for May 2026 *Correction*
C. Office of the City Clerk
1. 26-354 IFDDC Extension to Management Services Agreement -> moved to Regular Agenda
2. 26-355 August 2026 Licensing through the Office of the City Clerk
a. 62 New Business Licenses
b. 29 Renewed Business Licenses
c. 26 Contractor Licenses
Motion: Approve, accept, or receive all items on the Consent Agenda according to the
recommendations presented.
o
Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o
Second: Councilor Radford
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries 6-0.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
5
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
6. Regular Agenda
5.c.1 - 26-354 - IFDDC Extension to Management Services Agreement (Moved from consent agenda)
Discussion:
•
Mayor Burtenshaw explained that the IFDDC requested additional time to meet and develop
proposals regarding its parking management and enforcement agreement, BID agreement, FY
2026–27 budget, and goals.
•
IFDDC's next Executive Board meeting is scheduled for October 1, 2026, followed by a full
Board of Directors meeting on October 13, 2026.
•
The City proposed extending the existing management services agreement through October 31,
2026, rather than allowing it to lapse. The extension would allow IFDDC to continue legally
performing its duties, including parking enforcement and issuing citations, while preparing its
proposals.
•
Mayor Burtenshaw anticipated that IFDDC would present draft parking management and BID
agreements at a future Council work session for discussion and consideration of a vote.
•
Councilors expressed concerns about downtown management, billing, and outstanding bills,
and encouraged further review of IFDDC's operations and finances.
•
Council clarified that the extension applied only to the previous year's agreement for one
additional month, not a renewal for another full year.
•
Council agreed that additional time was needed for both the City and IFDDC to work through
the concerns outside the Council meeting and develop proposals for future consideration.
Motion: Move to extend the IFDDC management agreement and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk
to execute necessary documents, with the recommendation to work through issues that have
arisen.
o
Moved by: Councilor Radford
o
Second: Councilor Francis
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries 6-0.
A. Public Works
1. 26-201
Service Agreement for Wastewater Collection and Treatment with the Iona
Bonneville Sewer District (IBSD)
Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield): Staff presented a five-year agreement for
wastewater collection and treatment services for the Iona Bonneville Sewer District. The
agreement aligns with the City's current wastewater facility plan and includes incremental
annual rate increases of approximately 5% to cover treatment facility costs. The agreement
maintains the District's existing service area and addresses the possibility of IBSD transitioning
to its own wastewater treatment facility in the future, with provisions intended to minimize
impacts to the City. Council recognized Director Canfield's work to protect the City's interests
and maintain a mutually beneficial agreement.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
6
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Motion: Approve the Service Agreement for Wastewater Collection and Treatment with the Iona
Bonneville Sewer District and give authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the
necessary documents
o
Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o
Second: Councilor Larsen
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries 6-0.
B. Finance
1. 26-369
Professional Audit Services for Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2026
Presentation/Discussion (Director Hagedorn): Staff requested approval of the final year of
the City's three-year professional audit services agreement with Baker Tilly LLP, with an option
to extend for an additional two years. The audit includes the City's annual financial report and
internal controls, passenger facility charges, transit fund procedures, and a single audit of
federal awards. The contract amount is $184,500 and covers two major federal programs. If an
additional major program is identified, additional fees would require further approval.
Motion: Approve the professional services contract with Baker Tilly, LLP, for professional audit
services for an estimated amount of $ 184,500 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign
the necessary documents
o Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
C. Idaho Falls Power
1. 26-369
IFP 26-24 Substation 72.5KV SF6 Breakers Purchase
Presentation/Discussion (GM Fredericksen): Idaho Falls Power requested approval to
purchase three 72.5KV SF6 substation breakers from Western Electric Alliance, the lowest
responsible bidder, for $342,588. Four bids were received. The breakers will be installed at the
Rack Substation as part of its reconstruction. Delivery is estimated at 55 to 65 weeks. Council
discussed supply-chain improvements and the anticipated delivery timeline.
Motion: Approve the purchase of three (3) SF6 dead-tank breakers for substations and award
the bid to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Western Electric Alliance, in the amount
of $342,588.00.
o Moved by: Councilor Freeman
o Second: Councilor Francis
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
7
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
2. 26-349
Amendment to the Power Sales Agreement with Orchard Park Apartments
Presentation/Discussion (GM Fredericksen): Staff presented an amendment to the existing
power sales agreement with Orchard Park Apartments, part of Idaho Falls Power's net metering
pilot project. The amendment incorporates recently approved rate and fee increases of
approximately 5% to 9%, effective October 1, 2026. It also allows future rate adjustments to be
incorporated into the agreement as part of the City's rate-setting process, eliminating the need
to bring the agreement back to Council for annual amendments.
Motion: Approve the amendment to the Power Sales Agreement with Orchard Park Energy and
give authorization to the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Freeman
o Second: Councilor Francis
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
D. Office of the Mayor
1. 26-359
Ordinance Amending Title 4, Chapter 12, Section 7, Itinerant Merchant License
Presentation/Discussion (City Clerk Lundquist): Staff proposed removing the licensing and
bonding requirements for non-food itinerant merchants participating in City Parks and
Recreation special events. The change is intended to reduce the financial burden on small
vendors, simplify the licensing process, and allow event organizers greater flexibility when
managing vendor lists and making last-minute substitutions. Vendors must be approved by
Parks and Recreation and pay the applicable booth rental fees.
Motion: Adopt the Ordinance amending Title 4, Chapter 12, Section 7 under a suspension of
the rules requiring three complete readings, and request that it be read by title and published
by summary.
o Moved by: Councilor Freeman
o Second: Councilor Francis
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
ORDINANCE 3678: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, AMENDING TITLE 4, CHAPTER 12, SECTION 7 TO
PROVIDE AN EXCEPTION TO THE ITINERANT MERCHANT LICENSE REQUIREMENT FOR
SPECIAL EVENTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; CODIFICATION; PUBLICATION BY
SUMMARY; AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.
2. 26-360
Ordinance Amending Title 4, Chapter 15, Sections 5, 6 and 11, Public
Transportation Operator License
City Council Meeting
Minutes
8
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Presentation/Discussion (City Clerk Lundquist): Staff proposed changing public
transportation operator licenses for taxi, Uber, and similar services from annual renewals to
two-year licenses. The amendment also changes fingerprinting from every three years to each
two-year application, aligns badge expiration dates with the actual license term, and provides
for phasing in current license holders. Council requested clarification regarding the need for
repeat fingerprinting and identified the need to amend the license-fee language to reflect the
two-year licensing period.
Motion: Adopt the Ordinance amending Title 4, Chapter 15, Sections 5, 6, and 11 under
suspension of the rules requiring three complete readings and request that it be read by title
with the amendment of sentence one in 4.15.6.
o Moved by: Councilor Francis
o Second: Councilor Freeman
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
ORDINANCE 3679: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, AMENDING TITLE 4, CHAPTER 15, SECTIONS 5, 6,
AND 11 TO CHANGE THE EXPIRATION DATE FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION OPERATOR’S
LICENSES FROM ONE TO TWO YEARS; REQUIRE A FULL SET OF FINGERPRINTS FOR EACH
APPLICATION; PROVIDE FOR THE PHASING IN OF CURRENT LICENSE HOLDERS; AND
PROVIDING THAT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION SHALL SERVE AS PROOF OF LICENSE; AND
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; CODIFICATION; PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY; AND
ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.
E. Community Development Services
1. 26-376
Provide staff direction regarding Planned Unit Development (PUD) from the
Comprehensive Zoning Code
Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner, Mayor Burtenshaw, Council President Francis):
•
Council continued its discussion from the Monday work session regarding concerns
with the existing PUD ordinance and whether to rescind, amend, or temporarily
suspend it.
•
The October 5 Planning Commission meeting was scheduled to consider the proposed
rescission and provide a recommendation to City Council.
•
Council generally expressed interest in retaining PUDs as a development tool while
addressing concerns with the current ordinance, including private streets, setbacks,
emergency access, streetscape design, and the interpretation of development
standards.
•
Several Councilors expressed concern that rescinding the ordinance could leave the
City without a PUD framework for an extended period while a replacement ordinance is
City Council Meeting
Minutes
9
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
developed. Others favored rescission as a way to move forward with a comprehensive
rewrite.
Key Discussion Points
1. Rescission, Moratorium, and Amendment Options
•
Council discussed three primary options: rescinding the ordinance, imposing a
temporary moratorium, or leaving the ordinance in place while amendments are
prepared.
•
A moratorium would require additional legal review. Legal counsel explained that
emergency moratoriums are limited to 182 days and require evidence of imminent
peril, while an interim moratorium involves a longer process and may last up to one
year.
•
Council expressed concern about the legal ramifications of a moratorium, including
potential impacts on applications already in process and vested development
rights.
•
Some Councilors preferred exploring a moratorium or suspension before deciding
whether to rescind the ordinance. Others noted that rescission and moratoriums
could produce similar outcomes but with different legal requirements.
•
Council emphasized that PUDs should not be eliminated entirely and that the City
should continue working toward a revised ordinance.
2. Proposed Ordinance Amendments
•
Staff indicated that certain amendments, including restrictions on varying setbacks
and building heights, could be completed relatively quickly.
•
More extensive revisions involving private versus public streets would require
coordination among Community Development Services, Public Works, and Fire
Department staff.
•
Staff was reviewing PUD ordinances from other Idaho cities and offered to bring
forward proposed issues and revisions based on Council's previous discussions.
•
Council emphasized the need for clearer communication between staff and
Council regarding the purpose of PUD hearings and the City's expectations for
development proposals.
3. Council's Role and the PUD Review Process
•
Council discussed its role as the land-use authority in quasi-judicial PUD hearings
and the responsibility to independently evaluate whether proposals meet the intent
of the ordinance.
•
Councilors expressed concern that staff presentations sometimes focus on
whether applications meet the written code without adequately explaining potential
conflicts, trade-offs, or conditions that could address community concerns.
•
Staff stated it was revising its reports and presentations to better explain
negotiations with developers, the rationale behind design decisions, and potential
conditions.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
10
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
Legal counsel explained that Council may approve an application, deny it, approve
it with legally supported conditions, or table it for additional fact-finding or
reflection.
•
Tabling would allow staff to investigate specific concerns and return with additional
information. Legal counsel recommended setting a definite date for reconsideration
and cautioned against lengthy delays that could create legal concerns.
•
Council discussed the importance of resolving concerns earlier in the development
process while recognizing the limitations on communications during quasi-judicial
proceedings.
4. Development Standards and Community Concerns
•
Councilors raised concerns about private streets, street widths, emergency access,
snow removal, public infrastructure, parking, garages, setbacks, and the overall
appearance of developments.
•
Some Councilors questioned whether private streets and homeowners' association
responsibilities adequately serve residents and the broader community.
•
Other Councilors emphasized that PUDs have produced successful developments
and may provide housing opportunities at lower prices or rents.
•
Staff noted that Fire Department personnel had reviewed and approved existing
projects' emergency-access provisions, including street-width and turning-radius
requirements.
Motion: Not rescinding the PUD Ordinance at this time and begin preparing amendments to the
PUD Ordinance for consideration as soon as possible.
o Moved by: Councilor Freeman
o Second: Councilor Lee
o Vote: Aye: Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee. Nay: Radford, Francis.
o Motion carries 4-2.
2. 25-352
Legislative Hearing for Consideration of an Ordinance approving the Urban Renewal
Plan for the Willow Creek Urban Renewal Project
Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner, Mr. Cramer): Staff presented the proposed
Willow Creek Urban Renewal Plan and Revenue Allocation Area, encompassing approximately
100 acres near the northwest corner of Holmes Avenue and Science Center Drive. The project
anticipates more than $91 million in private investment across three phases and includes
proposed public infrastructure improvements, including Aspen View Road, Alpine Ridge Road,
and utility extensions. The plan identifies approximately $12 million in potential public projects
and assumes 75% reimbursement to the developer through tax increment revenues, with
remaining funds available for administrative costs and future projects. Staff reported that the
plan is financially feasible under the assumptions presented, with projected developer
City Council Meeting
Minutes
11
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
reimbursement by 2042 under the conservative scenario and 2041 under the moderate
scenario. Council discussed the revenue assumptions, statutory limitations, and potential
benefits of improving access and infrastructure in the area.
Motion: Approve the Ordinance approving the Urban Renewal Plan for the Willow Creek Urban
Renewal Project and revenue allocation area under a suspension of the rules requiring three
complete and separate readings and request that it be read by title and published by summary.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Francis
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
ORDINANCE 3680: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS,
IDAHO, APPROVING THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE WILLOW CREEK URBAN RENEWAL
PROJECT, WHICH PLAN INCLUDES REVENUE ALLOCATION FINANCING PROVISIONS;
AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT A COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE AND OTHER
REQUIRED INFORMATION TO COUNTY AND STATE OFFICIALS AND THE AFFECTED TAXING
ENTITIES; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION, AND PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY;
PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
7. Announcements
•
Oktoberfest: Oktoberfest events are taking place throughout the City this weekend. The event is
designed to be family-friendly, with a different format and popular musical entertainment planned
this year.
•
INL Tour: Mayor Burtenshaw reported that a majority of Tier One leaders and directors toured Idaho
National Laboratory (INL). Several attendees had never visited the facility despite growing up
locally or having family members who worked there. She praised staff for their thoughtful
questions, enthusiasm, and engagement in learning about INL's work and its significance to Idaho
Falls.
•
Greenbelt Maintenance: A community member expressed appreciation for Parks and Recreation's
improvements to trees and brush along the Greenbelt pathways. Mayor Burtenshaw recognized the
department's work and partnerships with local corporations and organizations that helped clear
brush and improve the area.
•
Frontier Fields Recognition: Councilor Lee recognized Frontier Credit Union for its community
partnership and contributions to Frontier Fields. The first varsity soccer match was held at the
facility that day, following five to six years of community effort to bring the project to fruition.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:42 PM.
/s/ Linda Lundquist_________________
/s/ Lisa Burtenshaw
_____________
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor
IDAHO FALLS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
P.O. BOX 50220
IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO 83405-0220
MEMORANDUM
To: Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission
From: Brad Cramer, Executive Director
Date: July 24, 2026
Re: Proposed Willow Creek Urban Renewal Area
Introduction
In 2024, the Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency (the Agency) began evaluating the creation of a
new urban renewal area known as the Willow Creek Urban Renewal Area (Willow Creek Area).
Following the procedures outlined in Idaho Code §50-200 and summarized in the attached
process overview, the Agency approved a resolution on August 14, 2024, finding the area
eligible for designation as an Urban Renewal Area (URA).
The Idaho Falls City Council subsequently approved a resolution on September 27, 2024,
confirming the area’s eligibility and authorizing preparation of an Urban Renewal Plan and
Revenue Allocation Area. After completion of the draft plan and accompanying Economic
Feasibility Study, the Agency approved the final plan on May 21, 2026.
Before City Council consideration, Idaho Code §50-2008(b) requires that the plan be reviewed
by the Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission “for review and recommendations as to (the
plan’s) conformity with the general plan for the development of the municipality as a whole.”
Project Overview
The Willow Creek Area encompasses approximately 100 acres, located generally north of
Anderson Street, west of Holmes Avenue, and west and south of Highway 20. The property
includes Light Manufacturing (LM), Highway Commercial (HC), and Limited Commercial (LC)
zoning and is identified as part of the Industrial and General Urban Transects on the City’s
Future Land Use Map.
The edges of the area have existing small-scale, light industrial development. The central portion
has remined vacant, largely due to shallow basalt. This is the primary factor contributing to
eligibility as a URA. The costs of blasting, removal, and importing suitable fill material have
discouraged investment. Other contributing factors include an inadequate street network, faulty
lot layout, diversity of ownership, and unsafe conditions. These conditions have left the area in a
state of economic under development and qualify it for urban renewal designation under Idaho
Code §50-2018. A summary table of all qualifying conditions is attached to this report. Only one
of the statutory criteria must be met for an area to be deemed eligible.
Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan
The City’s comprehensive plan, Imagine IF, includes both city-wide policies and neighborhood-
specific goals. This section evaluates the Willow Creek Plan for consistency with those policies.
City-Wide Policies
Imagine IF describes each transect these areas found on the Future Land Use Map:
Industrial
“The Industrial Transect denotes areas set aside for all varieties of industrial operations, from
manufacturing facilities and related warehousing and distribution to machine shops or
greenhouses. These areas are generally near major roadways, with frontage on arterial roadways,
and they may have railroad access.”
General Urban
“The General Urban Transect denotes residential areas with a mix of commercial and service
uses convenient to residents. These areas contain a wide variety of housing types, generally
including small single-units, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, courtyard apartments, bungalow
courts, townhouses, multiplexes and live-work units. Lot sizes are smaller and more compact
than suburban areas. These areas could also include parks, schools, churches and commercial
services. These areas have highly connective street patterns, similar to the traditional grid-pattern
that encourages bicycle and pedestrian usage. These areas should be near an existing or part of a
new walkable center.”
While zoning primarily dictates the types of uses that may occur, an Urban Renewal Area
enables those uses by providing tools to facilitate development. The mix of zones that exist
across the proposed URA are appropriate for the type of development contemplated in the
comprehensive plan. Encouraging the development of the vacant parcels and redevelopment of
the peripheral areas supports the comprehensive plan’s vision for a mixed-use area near a major
intersection.
Connectivity and Walkability
The primary intersection in the Willow Creek Area is Anderson and Holmes. The comprehensive
plan discusses the importance of implementing the Bonneville Metropolitan Planning
Organization’s (BMPO) High Capacity Roadway Needs study. The study identifies Anderon and
Holmes an intersection which functions appropriately today, but will deteriorate to a Level of
Service (LOS) D by 2050. Because TIF revenues can be used for public projects such as street
and intersection improvements, the URA can provide assistance towards projects which keep the
intersection at an acceptable LOS, maintaining traffic flow at a key arterial intersection. The
proposed plan also proposes to assist with construction of an internal roadway network, which
improves overall connectivity in the area, especially between the Willow Creek Area and the
existing industrial development to the west.
Economic Development
The plan also promotes urban renewal and tax increment financing (TIF) as tools for
reinvestment in older or underutilized areas, particularly where infrastructure already exists. The
Willow Creek Area includes roadways and utilities on the perimeter. It is an infill site that has
seen development in the surrounding area but remained underdeveloped due to the challenging
characteristics of area.
Relevant economic development actions from page 101 of Imagine IF include:
e Continue to collaborate with the Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency to identify and
promote redevelopment opportunities in older parts of the City.
e Promote tax-increment financing as a primary tool for redevelopment.
e Encourage development in areas already served by public utilities, or where extensions
are least costly, through infill incentive programs.
e Utilize local improvement districts (LIDs) and other financing tools to address identified
infrastructure needs.
Neighborhood-Specific Policies
The Willow Creek Area lies within Area 4, which includes areas on the east side of the river
including downtown and north to Fairway Estates. Urban renewal has recently been used in this
area, including the Stanley Boge and Anderson Bush urban renewal districts. The Yellowstone
Square urban renewal district is also located just to the east in Area 2.
The Willow Creek Area also falls within an area that identified by a Community Health
Assessment, which was a supporting study of the comprehensive plan, as a Tier 1, or least
healthy, area of Idaho Falls. The assessment identified higher rents, lower incomes, and lower
access to jobs. The comprehensive plan states, “This area also expressed repeated concerns about
the need to continue efforts to redevelop and revitalize the City’s core and not just continue to
expand outward. These revitalization efforts need to focus on diversifying the housing stock,
improving walkability and increasing employment opportunities.” (pg. 171). The proposed
housing in the Willow Creek Area, which is an infill site, and connections to employment centers
and services support the goals of comprehensive plan for Area 4.
One Imagine IF actions specific to Area 4 supports creation of the Willow Creek URA:
e Explore TIF, LID and other grant and financing programs to focus on redevelopment of
small neighborhood crossroads in more walkable areas, such as along Lindsey Blvd, or
by Freeman Park. (p.173).
The Willow Creek Plan advances the goals of the comprehensive plan by promoting infill
development and enhancing bicycle and pedestrian connections to nearby commercial and
residential areas.
Conclusion and Recommended Action
The proposed Willow Creek Urban Renewal Area aligns with the Imagine IF comprehensive
plan by:
e Promoting infill development over sprawl,
e Utilizing urban renewal and TIF as strategic reinvestment tools, and
e Advancing key connectivity infrastructure improvements.
The Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency respectfully requests that the Planning and Zoning
Commission approve the resolution and forward the Willow Creek Urban Renewal Plan to the
City Council for final adoption.
Steps in Creating a New Urban Renewal Area and Revenue Allocation Area
Steps in Creating a URA and Revenue Allocation Area
If an urban renewal agency is in existence in in a community, the creation of an urban renewal
area, including a revenue allocation area (required for use of tax increment financing), begins
with an eligibility report for a designated area within the community. The central question for an
eligibility report whether the study area has at least one of the statutory characteristics which |
must be found to be considered eligible for urban renewal activities. These characteristics or
criteria are:
1. The presence of a substantial number of deteriorated or deteriorating structures and
deterioration of site [50-2018(9), 50-2903(8)(b) and (8)(c), and 50-2008(d)(4)(2)],
Age or obsolescence [50-2018(8) and 50-2903(8)(a)],
Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout [50-2018(9) and 50-2903(8)(b)],
Outmoded street patterns [50-2008(d)(4)(2)],
Need for correlation of area with other areas of municipality by streets and modern traffic
requirements [50-2008(d)(4)(2)],
Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness; obsolete
platting [50-2018(9), 50-2903(8)(b) and (8)(c)], and 50-2008(d)(4)(2)}
Unsuitable topography [50-2008(d)(4)(2)],
Insanitary or unsafe conditions [50-2018(9), 50-2903(8)(b)],
Diversity of ownership [50-2018(9), 50-2903(8)(b) and (8)(c), and 50-2008(d)(4)(2)],
10. Tax or special assessment delinquency [50-2018(9), 50-2903(8)(b)], and 50-2008
(d)(4)(2)]
11. Defective or unusual conditions of title [50-2018(9), 50-2903(8)(b) and (8)(c), and 50-
2008(d)(4)(2)],
12. Existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes [50-
2018(9), 50-2903(8)(b)],
13. Substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a municipality and is a menace to the
public health, safety, morals or welfare [50-2018(9), 50-2903(8)(b) and 8(c)],
14. Conditions which retard development of the area [50-2008(d)(4)(2)], and
15. Results in economic underdevelopment of the area [50-2903(8)(b)] and economic disuse
[50-2008(d)(4)(2)].
a wPwnds
oe N
If it is determined the Study Area has characteristics which meet one or more of the statutory
criteria listed above, the Agency may accept the eligibility report and request its consideration by
the governing body. No URA can be formed unless the City Council adopts a resolution finding
the area under consideration is deteriorated or deteriorating due to such characteristics, the
redevelopment of the area is necessary for the welfare of the residents, and the area is
appropriate for an urban renewal project.
The resolution approved by City Council authorizes the Agency to prepare a plan for the
proposed urban renewal area. The urban renewal area plan is to include the following with
specificity:
1. A statement describing the total assessed valuation of the base assessment roll of the
revenue allocation area and the total assessed valuation of all taxable property within the
municipality;
2. A statement listing the kind, number, and location of all proposed public works or
improvements within the revenue allocation area;
3. An economic feasibility study;
4. Adetailed list of estimated project costs;
5. A fiscal impact statement showing the impact of the revenue allocation area, both until
and after the bonds are repaid, upon all taxing districts levying taxes upon property on the
revenue allocation area;
6. Adescription of the methods of financing all estimated project costs and the time when
related costs or monetary obligations are to be incurred;
7. Atermination date for the plan and revenue allocation area as provided for in section 50-
2903(20), Idaho Code. In determining the termination date, the plan shall recognize that
the agency shall receive allocation of revenues in the calendar year following the last year
of the revenue allocation provision described in the urban renewal plan;
8. A description of the disposition or retention of any assets of the agency upon the
termination date. Provided however, nothing herein shall prevent the agency from
retaining assets or revenues generated from such assets as long as the agency shall have
resources other than revenue allocation funds to operate and manage such assets;
Once the plan is prepared and approved by the Agency, it is forwarded to the City Council. Prior
to the public hearing before the City Council, the City Council forwards the plan to the City
Planning and Zoning Commission for its determination that the plan conforms to the City’s
comprehensive plan. At least thirty (30) days prior to the public hearing, a copy of the notice and
plan is distributed to the taxing entities overlapping the boundaries of the proposed district. After
receiving the recommendation of the commission, and after notice fully published, the public
hearing is held. The City Council must approve an urban renewal plan, including revenue
allocation financing provisions, by an ordinance. If the ordinance is adopted by the City
Council, a copy of the ordinance with legal description of the Revenue Allocation Area (RAA) is
distributed to all the overlapping taxing entities, county officials and the State Tax Commission.
By state statute, following adoption of the ordinance, the RAA is effective January 1, of the year
in which it is adopted. The RAA has a maximum life of twenty years under Idaho statutes. The
urban renewal agency implements the plan adopted by the City Council.
Eligibility Report Summary of Findings
t
CRITERION CRITERION CHARACTERISTICS SUPPORTING FINDING
Substantial deterioration of No
structures and site _ _ ; a oo
There is not an internal public, developed street system
. in the internal portion of the study area. Approximately
Defective streety layout or Yes fifty acres is not served by a collector street or a local
inadequate street layout . - :
street system. There is no provision for vehicular or
pedestrian traffic. ; 7
The central portion of the study area, approximately
fifty acres, requires further subdivision to be developed
at urban densities. Most of the developed portions of
the study area adjacent to North Holmes and Anderson
Faulty lot layout/obsolete Yes Street consist of metes and bounds parcels, many of
_ platting which are combined into one ownership to have
sufficient land to develop to modern commercial uses.
A few of the existing unplatted properties are too
narrow to be developed under today’s regulations or
; - today’s modern standards.
Diversity of ownership Yes _ There are nineteen owners in roughly 80 acres.
Unusual conditions of title No
Tax delinquency _ No ; _ - _ 7
There is no public water or sewer system in the central
portion of the study area. Nor is there a system to
handle stormwater. The soil conditions for the western
half of the study area present severe limitations for on- |
site septic systems. The lack of public utility systems
creates the potential for unsafe conditions. The :
deterioration of the sidewalk in certain locations creates
_ an unsafe condition. .
There is no collector street to move traffic from the
interior of the study to the adjacent arterial streets.
There is no local street system in approximately 50 |
acres to encourage and serve urban densities. =
Basalt rock underlies the study area. Basalt, especially
. Unsuitable topography Yes near the surface, substantially discourages urban
_ development a .
' Although many of the buildings are over fifty years old,
a site visit did not reveal a substantial number of
Age or obsolescence Yes deteriorating buildings. The homes, of which a few are
suffering from lack of maintenance, are nonconforming
' under the present zoning. — ;
Access from fifty acres of the study area is not provided _
_ to the arterial streets and the community or region at |
large by a collector street. No public local streets access |
_ the majority of the study area. 7 a
The widespread basalt rock has delayed the
development of the study area. Over one half of the
study area is underlain with basalt and substantially
increases the costsofdevelopment.
Unsafe conditions Yes
Outmoded street patterns Yes
Lack of correlation with
Streets in municipality Yes
Conditions which retard
Y
development of the area &s
CRITERION
Economic disuse or
underdevelopment of the
area
Arrests or impairs the
sound growth of the
municipality
CRITERION
MET
Yes
CHARACTERISTICS SUPPORTING FINDING
Development began in the study area prior to 1975.
However, the presence of basalt, the lack of utilities,
and the absence of an interior street system has meant
__ the area has not developed at urban densities.
The long-range plan of the City of Idaho Falls
designates this area as general urban and industrial.
Over half of the area is vacant, although the study area
is adjacent to U.S. 20, a regional highway, and is served
__ by two principal arterial streets.
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
1
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Monday, October 5, 2026
3:00 PM
City Council Chambers
Call to Order and Roll Call
There were present:
Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw
Council President Jim Francis
Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Councilor Jim Freeman
Councilor Kirk Larsen
Councilor Brandon Lee
Absent:
Councilor John Radford
Also present:
Ian Turner, Airport Director
Jack Penning, Volaire Aviation Consulting
Darin Jones, Human Resources Director
Mark Hagedorn, Finance Director/Treasurer
Jacob Beck, Assistant City Attorney
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Mayor Burtenshaw called the meeting to order at 3:03 p.m. with the following items:
1. Agenda
A. Office of the Mayor
1. 26-385
Mayor and Council Reports: Announcements, liaison reports, events, calendaring,
citywide updates, concerns, questions, proclamations, notes and/or minutes from boards
and commissions
Presentation/Discussion (Council and Mayor): Council discussed several ongoing matters and upcoming
activities.
•
Alcohol Ordinance: Council President Francis reported that work on the comprehensive alcohol
ordinance revision is continuing. Although no deadline has been established, meetings with the City
Attorney continue to address the revisions.
•
Sidewalk Parking: Council President Francis reported that Police are using Citizen Watch to address
vehicles parked across sidewalks and obstructing pedestrian access. Citizen Watch personnel may
issue citations for parking on sidewalks.
•
Police/Fire/EMS “Halo” Ordinance: Council discussed a proposed ordinance establishing a minimum
distance for members of the public who are recording police officers while officers are performing
their duties. The Police Department is working with Legal to prepare an ordinance. Council discussed
15 feet versus 25 feet, with consensus favoring 25 feet as a safer distance. Council also discussed
extending the concept to Fire and EMS because emergency personnel have experienced members of
the public interfering with their work. Legal was asked to consider police, fire, and EMS in developing
the proposed ordinance.
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
2
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
•
Street Striping: Council discussed the progress of striping newly constructed streets. Staff is working
to complete striping as quickly as possible.
•
Bicycle, Scooter and Greenbelt Regulations: Council reported ongoing discussions with the Snake
River Trail Alliance, Snake River Mountain Bike Club, and others regarding bicycle and mountain-bike
activities, including development of the Gem Lake bike trails. The Parks and Recreation Commission is
also considering bicycle and scooter rules for the Greenbelt and other areas. Council discussed asking
the Commission to recommend appropriate scooter speeds, motor sizes, and related regulations,
including a review of practices in the Treasure Valley.
•
Idaho Falls Power: Council reported that the Bulb project is being reassembled and, after testing, is
expected to be operational in November.
•
Utility Board: Mayor Burtenshaw reported that the October Utility Board meeting was canceled
because substantial utility business had already been addressed during the prior Council Work Session
and there were insufficient additional items to warrant a meeting.
•
PUD Review: Mayor Burtenshaw reported that the Planning Commission would be discussing PUD
regulations and concerns raised by Council and the Commission. Council will have an opportunity
between October 19 and November 9 to visit selected PUDs and evaluate issues such as parking on
private streets, congestion, desirable characteristics, and concerns. Council will receive survey
questions and an opportunity for written comments. A November 9 discussion is planned to consider
potential code revisions, including “low-hanging fruit,” to move revisions forward before the
Christmas break if possible.
•
Upcoming PUD Hearing: Mayor Burtenshaw reminded Council that a PUD near Freeman Park is
scheduled for the October 8 Council meeting. The hearing procedure will allow the developer, staff,
and public to participate while Council asks questions and deliberates during the open hearing rather
than closing and reopening the hearing for deliberation. If an impasse occurs, Council may table the
decision and direct Community Development Services to work with the developer rather than
outright rejecting the application and requiring the process to begin again.
B. Airport
1. 26-372
Idaho Falls Regional Airport Leakage and Retention Study
Presentation/Discussion (Director Turner and Mr. Penning): Director Turner introduced Mr. Penning, the
airport’s consultant of record for 21 years, who presented the updated passenger retention and leakage
study (year ended first quarter 2026), which uses the same catchment area and methodology as four prior
studies.
Retention: Retention of local passengers rose from 42% in 2016 to 59% in 2019, dipped during the
pandemic as the overall market grew about 20% from national park demand, and now stands at roughly
two-thirds, which is the 67% goal Mr. Penning projected in 2016 would take 20 years. It was reached in
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
3
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
ten. About 26% of the catchment now uses Salt Lake City, down from more than 50% a decade ago. The
next goal is 75%.
Passenger volume: In 2025, the airport served an average of 942 passengers per day in each direction,
roughly double 2019. The catchment generates more than 1,470 passengers per day each way, with about
970 using IDA and about 500 still driving to other airports. Passengers using IDA are up 236 per day each
way (32%) since 2023.
Fares: For the first time in the study’s history, IDA fares are lower than Salt Lake City, about $12 less each
way (airfare only, not counting driving and parking costs). The average fare paid was $253, and IDA is also
lower than Boise. Competition among Delta, United, American, Alaska, and Allegiant was cited as a factor.
Mr. Penning noted that sell-outs on peak days (Thursdays and Sundays) drive up last-minute fares and
feed the perception that IDA is more expensive, and that capacity limits on those days are a main reason
travelers still drive elsewhere. Pocatello retains only about four passengers per day each way.
Load factor: IDA fills almost 85% of seats, the highest in the Pacific Northwest (average 81%). In response
to Council’s question, Mr. Penning explained that low load factors make routes difficult to sustain, as in
Pocatello, where revenue guarantees have been needed, and that Walla Walla and Yakima are challenged
on profitability.
Industry headwinds: Jet fuel has roughly doubled from about $2 to about $4.15 per gallon, and each 10-
cent increase adds about $5 per seat. IDA’s short-haul routes are better positioned than long-haul flying,
and airlines may redeploy aircraft to shorter routes, potentially increasing frequencies here. Overall costs
are up 26% while real airfares are down about 4%. Consumer confidence is a concern, but at least 40% of
IDA travelers are price-insensitive business travelers, and no demand softening has been seen in the
region. Over the past 18 months, 389 routes nationally were canceled and 369 added, including
Allegiant’s suspended Oakland service, which was withdrawn because Allegiant closed Oakland as a base,
even though IDA was its top-performing Oakland market.
Future service: The largest unserved markets are Los Angeles (about 105 passengers per day each way),
San Francisco, and San Diego, which are the short-term priorities. The airport holds a $1 million Small
Community Air Service Development Grant for a minimum revenue guarantee (written for Los Angeles,
with a waiver allowing use for San Francisco), with a goal of service in 2027. Longer-term opportunities
include Minneapolis–St. Paul, Houston, Atlanta, and potentially Honolulu in 5 to 10 years.
Council discussion: Councilors praised the report. Mr. Penning identified the airport’s attractiveness as
quick, easy travel, TSA efficiency, short walks, affordable parking, and good schedules and connectivity,
and recommended continued in-person meetings with carriers because incentive requests may change
with fuel costs. He expects one California market to be added next year. Director Turner added that the
current tools should be used first, with attention to terminal facilities and operational capacity, before
formulating the next step.
C. Finance
1. 26-388
Overview and Discussion of the City’s Weekly Claims and Settlement Process
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
4
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Presentation/Discussion (Director Hagedorn): Director Hagedorn explained the weekly claims and
settlement process following the transition to Workday. A “claim” is an amount owed by the City, and a
“settlement run” is a batch of claims prepared for payment.
Process
•
Supplier invoices go through a three-way match (purchase order, invoice, receiving document) in
Procurement
•
A specialist reviews each invoice, then the settlement report is generated
•
The weekly email to Council is created from the settlement report
•
The Procurement Manager reviews each invoice
•
The Treasury Operations Manager or Director Hagedorn gives a final review before payment
Payments outside the review
•
Some payments are generated through the bank and appear in the next settlement run, such as:
o
Utility refunds
o
Payroll liabilities
o
Debt payments
•
Emergency payments are handled carefully because urgent requests are a common fraud
indicator
•
Recent emergency requests turned out to be spam attacks
Internal controls
•
Only Procurement can change supplier data
•
Multiple approvals are required
•
Duties are segregated: Procurement creates the payment type, and Treasury initiates and
executes it
•
An independent reconciler is used
•
Workday automates these controls
•
There is no internal audit function yet
•
Finance conducts annual self-reviews of selected areas and may create an audit function in the
future
Legal basis
•
State law requires Council approval of claims before payment and an adequate system of internal
controls
•
The City uses a "negative confirmation" process: the weekly email is considered approved unless
Council replies
•
Other Idaho cities use the same practice, including Boise, Meridian, Nampa, and Caldwell
•
Until 2017, Council also ratified payments after the fact; this was discontinued as redundant
Report contents
•
Tabs: summary, supplier invoice, expense report, ad hoc, and miscellaneous
•
This week's run was about $3.2 million, compared with the typical $1.2–$1.5 million
•
The increase is because the end of the fiscal year and start of the new year bring the largest
payment runs
•
Checks carry the highest fraud risk
•
The City encourages electronic payment but cannot require it
•
Director Hagedorn said staff will work on:
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
5
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
o
Adding fund numbers or cost centers
o
Clarifying refund types in the ad hoc tab
o
Removing or explaining zero-dollar P-card lines in the expense tab
What Council should look for
•
Council is not expected to know every payment's purpose, but should apply a "sniff test":
o
Do the vendor and amount make sense?
o
Is anything unusual or politically or operationally sensitive?
•
Questions can be sent to Director Hagedorn and the Accounts Payable email address
•
The report typically arrives Monday (occasionally Tuesday)
•
Payments are not released until Friday mid-morning, so Council has until then to respond
•
Asking a question does not automatically stop a payment
•
Council may also request a future Workday training session
D. Human Resources
1. 26-383
City of Idaho Falls 457 Plan – Capital Group/American Funds
Presentation/Discussion (Director Jones): Director Jones described an old, deferred compensation plan
with Capital Group/American Funds, likely begun in the 1980s or 1990s, that was never terminated. Staff
learned of it in June 2025 after receiving correspondence, and no plan documents could be located by the
City or the provider. Three participants still held funds at that time (two retirees and one current
employee). The retirees have since moved their money, and the remaining employee intends to withdraw
no later than January 2027. Current plans available to employees (Nationwide, Empower, and Corebridge)
have current plan documents.
Director Jones plans to bring the item as an action item on Thursday’s regular Council agenda, asking
Council to approve cancellation of the plan, and noted that a termination letter would not be sent until
the last employee’s funds are removed. In response to a Councilor’s question about the form of the
motion, Council discussed authorizing the Mayor (or designee) to cancel the plan when no participants
remain, rather than using a fixed date, to avoid needing an amendment if the withdrawal slips past
January.
E. City Attorney
1. 26-381
Executive Session (Council will reconvene after the executive session.)
Motion: Move Council into executive session pursuant to Idaho Code Section 74-206(1)(j) and 74-
206A(1)(a) to consider a labor contract matter.
•
Moved by: Councilor Francis
•
Second: Dingman
•
Vote: Aye: Dingman, Freeman, Francis, Lee, Larsen. Nay: none.
•
Result: Motion carried 5-0.
Start: 4:20 PM
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
6
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Present: Mayor Burtenshaw, Councilor Francis, Councilor Freeman, Councilor Dingman, Councilor Lee,
Councilor Larsen, Attorney Beck, Director Jones.
End: 4:29 PM
F. Human Resources
1. 26-382
Union Contract with Local 1565 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
Presentation/Discussion: The MOU documents an agreement between the City and Local 1565 to
increase the maximum sick-leave payout available to eligible Local 1565 employees from $2,500 to
$3,000. Council returned to open session following the executive session and voted on the item without
further discussion.
Motion: Approve the MOU between the City of Idaho Falls and Local 1565 concerning the sick-leave
payout available to eligible Local 1565 employees and give the Mayor authorization to execute the
necessary documents.
•
Moved by: Councilor Freeman
•
Second: Councilor Lee
•
Vote: Aye: Lee, Dingman, Francis, Freeman, Larsen. Nay: none.
•
Result: Motion carries 5-0.
3. Announcements
•
This weekend is the last weekend the Zoo will be open, and Boo at the Zoo is the following weekend.
•
The ice rink has been converted for the season, and ice-skating lessons are being offered.
•
A speaker shared a visit to Temple View Elementary, where third graders answered what the City does to
keep roads safe in winter, including plowing, salting, and putting down sand and oil.
•
Councilor Freeman plans to be at the Farmers Market this weekend to answer questions from the public.
•
The Mayor is participating in the Mayors’ Walking Challenge (10,000 steps per day), with the City earning
$1,000 for a 10,000-step average or $500 for 5,000. She will invite departments and Council members to
take part, and a walk and proclamation with the White Cane community is planned for next Saturday.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 4:34 PM.
/s/ Linda Lundquist_________________
/s/ Lisa Burtenshaw
_____________
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor
Memorandum
File #: 26-419
City Council
DATE: Monday, October 19, 2026
AGENDA: Regular
FROM: Margaret Wimborne, Chief of Staff
DEPARTMENT: Mayor's Office
Title
IFDDC Parking Program MOU
☐Ordinance
☐Resolution
☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐Legislative Public Hearing
☐Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☒Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Idaho Falls Downtown Development
Corporation (IFDDC) to manage downtown parking as the downtown enforcement organization, and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
IFDDC has managed parking in the downtown district, and this MOU will renew that agreement. This
agreement novates the prior parking agreement and authorizes IFDDC to manage downtown parking as the
downtown enforcement organization. The cost of the service is $92,200. The MOU is effective upon execution
through September 30, 2027, with an automatic renewal and a provision of termination with a six-month
written notice.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 10/20/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
RETURN TO AGENDA
MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26
Page 1 of 9
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR IFDDC PARKING
PROGRAM BETWEEN CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO AND IDAHO
FALLS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR IFDDC PARKING PROGRAM
BETWEEN CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO AND IDAHO FALLS DOWNTOWN
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (hereinafter “MOU”) is entered into this day _____ of
___________, 2026, by and between City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, a municipal corporation of the
State of Idaho, whose address is P.O. Box 50220, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83405 (hereinafter “CITY”),
and the Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation, an Idaho non-profit corporation, 381
Shoup Ave, Ste. 207, Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83402 (hereinafter “IFDDC).
WHEREAS, the downtown area in Idaho Falls is a vital, vibrant, and important part of our
community; and
WHEREAS, the commercial and business establishments in downtown thrive when there is
efficient and effective and predictable parking usage; and
WHEREAS, CITY wishes to promote the downtown area and to continue exploring a different
way to manage the availability of on-street and off-street parking in the area depicted in Exhibit
“A” incorporated in this MOU; and
WHEREAS, the Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation (“IFDDC”) is dedicated to the
improvement and sustaining of the downtown area for commercial, business, and residential
purposes; and
WHEREAS, CITY and IFDDC are of the opinion that IFDDC has the proper interest, organization,
and staffing to regulate on-street and off-street parking in the downtown area; and
WHEREAS, CITY and IFDDC desire to allow IFDDC to regulate downtown parking for the term
of this MOU in order to have an effective downtown parking program; and
WHEREAS, on February 12, 2026, CITY and IFDDC entered into a Memorandum of
Understanding for IFDDC Parking Program Between City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, and Idaho Falls
Downtown Development Corporation to provide for parking management services in CITY’s
downtown area (the “Prior MOU”); and
WHEREAS, CITY and IFDDC desires to novate the Prior MOU by entering into this MOU and
making this MOU effective October 1, 2026, nunc pro tunc.
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises below, CITY and IFDDC agree as follows:
1.0 IFDDC’s OBLIGATIONS
1.1 Scope of IFDDC’S Authority
IFDDC shall administer permits and enforcement of IFDDC parking program on CITY
streets and public rights-of-way within the area in and around downtown Idaho Falls and
as identified on the map incorporated into this MOU as Exhibit “A,” including both sides
MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26
Page 2 of 9
of the streets that form the borders of the area illustrated in Exhibit “A.” Upon mutual
written agreement, CITY and IFDDC may amend Exhibit “A.”
1.2 IFDDC’s Parking Regulations
IFDDC shall apply all relevant state and local on-street and off-street parking regulations
on City streets and public rights-of-way within the downtown area, as identified on the map
appropriated as Exhibit “A” through the term of this MOU. Such parking regulations
include those contained in Idaho Code Title 49 and Idaho Falls City Code, especially those
regulations within Idaho Falls City Code Title 9.
1.3 CITY’s Jurisdiction
IFDDC acknowledges that this MOU is not intended to be construed in any way to void,
limit, or restrict CITY’s jurisdiction, control, or authority over dedicated CITY streets or
public rights-of-way. Neither shall this MOU be construed as granted IFDDC an exclusive
right to apply or enforce on-street and off-street parking regulations in the downtown area.
1.4 Collections and Use of Revenue
CITY agrees to pay IFDDC a total of ninety-two thousand two hundred dollars ($92,200)
per year during each year of the term of this MOU, for management and enforcement of
on-street and off-street parking in the area illustrated in Exhibit “A.” This amount shall be
split into in four equal quarterly payments. IFDDC shall submit a quarterly invoice by the
following dates each year that this MOU is in effect: October 1, January 1, April 1, and
July 1. CITY shall have thirty (30) days from the date the invoice is due or from the receipt
of the invoice, whichever is later, to pay each invoice. IFDDC shall collect revenues
associated with regulation and enforcement of the IFDDC Parking Program, including
collection of administrative fines and penalties related to enforcement as described in this
MOU, on dedicated CITY streets, parking lots, and public rights-of-way in the area shown
in Exhibit “A.” IFDDC agrees that revenues generated from parking enforcement,
encompassed by this MOU, shall be specifically accounted for and used exclusively on
public transportation or maintenance and improvement of CITY streets, public rights-of-
way, public parking facilities, and public property, as directed by CITY. In the event that
IFDDC’s costs exceed ninety-two thousand two hundred dollars ($92,200), IFDDC may
deduct reasonable costs directly attributable to enforcement or collection of parking
revenue from the amount of revenue collected for and on behalf of CITY.
Nothing in this MOU precludes IFDDC from retaining monies collected in excess of
IFDDC program expenses as reserve funds for future downtown parking enhancements.
1.5 Parking and Traffic Control Signs
CITY shall install and maintain traffic and parking control devices on designated CITY
streets and public rights-of-way described in accordance with the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices and applicable State and local laws. CITY Director of Public
Works shall approve regulatory traffic and parking devices on CITY streets and public
MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26
Page 3 of 9
rights-of-way before being posted by IFDDC. IFDDC shall correct any inadequate or
improper signage or markings at the direction of CITY’s Director of Public Works. Any
additional signage requested by IFDDC related to this MOU shall be approved by CITY
Director of Public Works.
1.6 Liability Coverage Provisions
CITY is a governmental entity subject to statutory and constitutional restrictions
concerning the acceptance of liability, CITY’s liabilities are further governed by the Idaho
Tort Claims Act. It is the intention of the Parties that each will be responsible for its own
acts and omissions and those of its officers and employees acting within the course and
scope of their employment and will not be responsible for the other Party’s risks or
liabilities.
1.6.1 Each Party to this MOU shall be responsible for the negligent acts or
omissions of its own employees, officers, or agents in the performance of this
MOU. Neither Party shall be considered the agent of the other and neither Party
assumes any responsibility to the other Party for the consequences of any act or
omission of any person, firm, or corporation not a party to this MOU.
1.6.2 Subject to the limits of CITY liability specified in Idaho Code Sections 6-901
through 6-929, known as the Idaho Tort Claims Act, IFDDC shall defend,
indemnify and hold CITY and its agents and assigns harmless from and/or against
any and all claims, damages, and liabilities (including reasonable attorney’s fees
and costs) that may be suffered or incurred and that arise from any action,
negligence, or failure to act by IFDDC (including any of IFDDC’s officers, agents,
subcontractors, and employees) related to IFDDC’s obligations under the terms of
this MOU. IFDDC, upon notice from CITY, shall defend CITY at IFDDC’s
expense by counsel reasonably satisfactory to CITY.
1.6.3 City shall promptly notify the IFDDC of any such claim of which it has
knowledge and shall cooperate fully with IFDDC or its representatives in the
defense of the same, to the extent allowed by Idaho Code and Idaho County Risk
Management Program (ICRMP).
1.6.4 IFDDC shall maintain Automobile Insurance, Workmen’s Compensation
Insurance coverage, Employer’s Liability, and Comprehensive General Liability
Insurance coverage. The Comprehensive General Liability Insurance shall have a
minimum limit of liability of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) Combined Single
Limits. IFDDC shall provide to CITY, upon request, proof of insurance for any
required coverage under this paragraph.
1.7 Reporting Obligations
1.7.1 Claim Reporting. IFDDC shall provide a report to CITY of any liability or negligence
claim of which it had knowledge, and shall cooperate fully with CITY or its representatives
in the defense of the same.
MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26
Page 4 of 9
1.7.2 Activity Reporting. On or before April 1 of each year this MOU is in effect, IFDDC
shall provide an annual report to CITY summarizing the following for the period beginning
March 1 of the year prior through the end of February of the current year:
a. number of parking permits sold for CITY streets and public-rights-of-way;
b. revenue from permits sold for CITY streets and public rights-of-way; and
c. revenue generated from collection of administrative fines and penalty tickets.
2.0 Grant of Authority
IFDDC employees are hereby granted the authority to issue permits and tickets or citations
and to enforce CITY parking regulations on all CITY streets and public rights-of-way
shown on Exhibit “A” in the manner as outlined in the Idaho Falls City Code.
3.0 General Terms
3.1 Additional Acts
Except as otherwise provided herein, the Parties to this MOU shall perform, execute and/or
deliver, or cause to be performed, executed and/or delivered, any and all such further acts
and assurances as any Party to the MOU may reasonably require to execute the promises
in this MOU.
3.2 Notices
Any notice under this MOU shall be in writing and be delivered in person or by public or
private courier services (including U.S. Postal Service Express Mail), or certified mail with
return receipt requested, or by facsimile. All notices shall be addressed to the Parties at the
following addresses or at such other addresses as the Parties may from time to time direct
in writing:
IFDDC:
Executive Director
381 Shoup Avenue, Ste. 207
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
CITY:
Director of Community Development Services Department
P.O. Box 50220
Idaho Falls, ID 83405
(208) 612-8256
3.3 Term
The term of this MOU shall commence on October 1, 2026, (the “Effective Date”) nunc
pro tunc, and shall end September 30, 2027. This MOU shall automatically renew upon
expiration for an additional one (1) year renewal term, unless notification of termination is
provided subject to paragraph 3.4, Termination.
MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26
Page 5 of 9
3.4 Termination
Either Party may terminate this MOU by providing written notice six (6) months in advance
of the proposed termination. Monies and resources paid to or collected by IFDDC shall be
apportioned pro rata, at the termination of this MOU. IFDDC shall remit CITY a detailed
accounting of amounts paid to IFDDC from CITY, IFDDC’s costs directly incurred by
IFDDC’s parking management, amounts collected by IFDDC, and any money withheld by
IFDDC for its costs or retained as reserve funds for future downtown parking
enhancements.
3.5 Open Records and Retention
IFDDC agrees that all records created as part of IFDDC’s day-to-day business performance
of the MOU shall be treated as public records, as that term is defined in Idaho Code Title
74 Chapter 1. All public records shall be subject to and disclosed pursuant to Title 74,
Chapter 1, of the Idaho Code (the Idaho Public Records Act). In addition, IFDDC agrees
to retain public records in accordance with Idaho Code § 50-907 and City’s Retention
Policy, Resolution No. 2023-12. The records of IFDDC that do not pertain to its day-to-
day business performance of this MOU shall not be considered public records under this
Paragraph unless otherwise required by law.
3.6 Modification
This MOU may be modified or amended by mutual agreement of the Parties. Such
amendments shall not be binding unless they are in writing and signed by personnel
authorized to bind each of the Parties.
3.7 Headings
The headings contained in this MOU are for reference purposes only and shall not in any
way affect the meaning or interpretation hereof.
3.8 Entity Authority
Each individual executing this MOU on behalf of a Party hereto represents and warrants
that he or she is duly authorized to execute and deliver this MOU on behalf of said Party
in accordance with duly adopted organizational documents or agreement and, if
appropriate, a Resolution of the Party, and that this MOU is binding upon said Party in
accordance with its terms.
MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26
Page 6 of 9
3.9 Nondiscrimination
IFDDC shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the
basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideals, sex, age, marital status, physical, or
mental handicap, gender identity/expression, sexual orientation, or national origin. In
addition, IFDDC shall ensure that it administers the parking regulations and work under
this MOU without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideals,
sex, age, marital status, physical, or mental handicap, gender identity/expression, sexual
orientation, or national origin.
3.10 Anti-Boycott Against Israel Act
Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2346, if payments under this Agreement exceed one
hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and IFDDC employs ten (10) or more persons,
IFDDC certifies that it is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of this
Agreement engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under its
control. The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code section 67-2346 shall
have the meaning defined therein.
3.11 Anti-Boycott of Certain Sectors
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2347A, if payments under this Agreement exceed one
hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and IFDDC employs ten (10) or more persons,
IFDDC certifies that it is not currently engaged in and will not for the duration of the
Agreement engage in a boycott of any individual or company because the individual or
company engages in or supports either (1) the exploration, production, utilization,
transportation, sale, or manufacture of fossil fuel-based energy, timber, minerals,
hydroelectric power, nuclear energy, or agriculture; or (2) the manufacture, distribution,
sale, or use of firearms, as defined in Idaho Code § 18-3302(2)(d). The terms in this
Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code § 67-2347A shall have the meaning defined
therein.
3.12 Certification of No Chinese Ownership
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2359, IFDDC certifies that IFDDC is not currently owned or
operated by the government of the People’s Republic of China and will not, for the duration
of this Agreement, be owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic
China.
3.13 Novation
The Parties agree that this MOU is a novation of the Prior MOU. As of the Effective Date
of this MOU, the Parties’ remaining obligations under the Prior MOU shall be subsumed
by the obligations in this MOU. Any past obligation under the Prior MOU existing before
the execution of this MOU shall remain in effect and shall be enforceable under the terms
of the Prior MOU.
MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26
Page 7 of 9
ATTEST:
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS
_____________________________
By: ________________________________
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Lisa M. Burtenshaw, Mayor
IFDDC
By: ___________________________
MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26
Page 8 of 9
STATE OF IDAHO
)
) SS.
County of Bonneville
)
On the _______ day of _______________, 2026, before me, the undersigned, a notary
public for Idaho, personally appeared Lisa M. Burtenshaw, known to me to be the Mayor of the
City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, the municipal corporation that executed the foregoing document, and
acknowledged to me that he is authorized to execute the same for and on behalf of said City.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the
day and year first above written.
__________________________________
Notary Public for State of Idaho
Residing at Idaho Falls, Idaho
(Seal)
My Commission Expires: ___________
STATE OF IDAHO
)
) SS.
County of Bonneville
)
On the ______ day of ____________, 2026, before me, the undersigned, a notary public
in and for said State, personally appeared _________________, known or identified to me to be
the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she
executed the same on behalf of the Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set me hand and affixed my official seal, the
day and year in this certificate first above written.
_______________________________
Notary Public for State of Idaho
Residing at Idaho Falls, Idaho
(Seal)
My Commission Expires:_________
Exhibit A a
MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26 Page 9 of 9
Memorandum
File #: 26-420
City Council
DATE: Monday, October 19, 2026
AGENDA: Regular
FROM: Margaret Wimborne, Chief of Staff
DEPARTMENT: Mayor's Office
Title
IFDDC Management Services Agreement
☐Ordinance
☐Resolution
☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐Legislative Public Hearing
☐Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☒Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve the agreement with the Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation (IFDDC) to provide
management services for the Business Improvement District (BID) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
The management agreement retains IFDDC to continue providing management services for the BID for the
fiscal year 2026/27 (term is from October 1, 2026, through September 30, 2027). Compensation shall not
exceed the BID revenue, which is estimated to be $119,063.94. The amount will be paid in two equal
installments based on the actual tax revenues collected. It is IFDDC’s responsibility for recordkeeping, district
administration, managing revenue projects, and holding public meetings.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 10/20/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
RETURN TO AGENDA
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26
1
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (“AGREEMENT”), entered into on this ______
day of _________, 2026, by and between the CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, State of Idaho, a
municipal corporation, (“CITY”) P. O. Box 50220, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83405, and the IDAHO
FALLS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, an Idaho non-profit corporation, 381
Shoup Avenue Ste. 207, Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83402, (“IFDDC” and, collectively with CITY, the
“PARTIES”).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the CITY, pursuant to Ordinance No. 3125 (the “Ordinance”), as authorized
by Idaho Code Section 50-2601, et seq., did establish a Business Improvement District, hereinafter
referred to as the “DISTRICT,” and
WHEREAS, IFDDC was organized and established for the purpose of revitalizing the
Idaho Falls Downtown area and operates primarily within the boundaries of the DISTRICT as
established by the Ordinance, and
WHEREAS, IFDDC is willing to and is capable of providing certain administration and
management services to the CITY regarding operation of the DISTRICT; and
WHEREAS, on February 12, 2026, CITY and IFDDC entered into a Management
Agreement (the “Prior Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, on September 24, 2026, CITY and IFDDC agreed to extend the Prior
Agreement by entering into the Extension to Management Agreement; and
WHEREAS, CITY and IFDDC desires to novate the Prior Agreement and Extension to
Management Agreement by entering into this Agreement and making this Agreement effective
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26
2
October 1, 2026, nunc pro tunc.
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration set forth herein, the PARTIES
agree as follows:
1. Pursuant to Idaho Code Section 50-2611, the CITY hereby retains IFDDC to provide
certain management services as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, regarding the management
and operation of the DISTRICT. IFDDC warrants it has adopted By-Laws necessary to fulfill the
terms of this AGREEMENT and further covenants such administration complies with all
applicable provisions of state and local law including, but not limited to, Chapter 26, Title 50, of
the Idaho Code.
2. The principal office of IFDDC and registered agent thereof is presently located at 381
Shoup Avenue, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402, and all notices required by this AGREEMENT to be sent
to IFDDC shall be mailed to such office or such other address designated in writing by IFDDC to
the CITY.
3. On or before May 1, 2027, IFDDC shall provide to the CITY a projection of anticipated
revenues and recommended expenditures of the DISTRICT for the 2027/2028 fiscal year of the
CITY. IFDDC shall also establish and identify goals, objectives, projects and marketing and
advertising campaigns for which Business Improvement District (“BID”) revenues are to be
utilized and shall simultaneously submit such information to the CITY. The Idaho Falls City
Council shall thereafter review such reports and recommendations and provide any comments or
exceptions to IFDDC.
4. On or before June 1, 2027, IFDDC shall hold a public meeting for the purpose of
allowing public comments and input regarding proposed projects, goals, objectives and
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26
3
expenditures of the DISTRICT for the 2027/2028 fiscal year. Such meeting shall be open to all
persons against whom assessments are levied under the Ordinance and all persons who own or
operate businesses within the DISTRICT. IFDDC shall mail a written notice of the meeting
stating the date, time, place and purpose of the meeting to all such businesses not less than fifteen
(15) days prior to the date of the meeting.
5. Upon receipt by the CITY of any appeal of any BID member of his or her assessment,
the CITY may forward the same to IFDDC. Upon receipt of such appeal, IFDDC shall forthwith
review the appeal and make recommendations to the Idaho Falls City Council regarding an
appropriate disposition of the appeal.
6. IFDDC shall keep correct and complete books and records of accounts, shall keep
minutes of the regular and special meetings of the Board of Directors of IFDDC and shall keep at
the principal office a record of the names and addresses of all BID members. All books and
records of IFDDC may be inspected by the CITY or its agents for any proper purpose at any time
during normal business hours.
7. In consideration of the management services provided to the CITY by IFDDC, the
CITY agrees to pay IFDDC an amount that shall not exceed a total of One Hundred Nineteen
Thousand Sixty-Three Dollars and Ninety-Four Cents ($119,063.94) for the initial term of this
Agreement and, if renewed, an amount that shall not exceed the total revenue from the assessed
values of the BID for the then-current year according to the following:
a.
CITY will make two payments to IFDDC, with the first payment comprising
assessment amounts collected by CITY through the end of January and the second
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26
4
payment comprising assessment amounts collected by CITY through the end of
July. CITY will notify IFDDC by February 15, 2027, and August 15, 2027, of the
assessment amounts collected through January and July, respectively, and to be
billed by IFDDC for management services provided. IFDDC will invoice CITY for
these amounts on or before February 28, 2027, for the first payment and on or
before August 30, 2027, for the second payment. CITY shall pay each invoice
within thirty (30) days of the date of the invoice or from the receipt of the invoice,
whichever is later.
b.
By November 30, 2027, the CITY will reconcile the BID assessments collected, and
if any collected assessment revenue remains in the BID fund, IFDDC may invoice
the CITY a third time for the remaining balance of the funds, up to the total
assessed value for the year for which the BID funds were collected. CITY shall pay
this invoice within thirty (30) days of the date of the invoice or from the receipt of
the invoice, whichever is later.
c.
IFDDC shall submit all invoices via email to the CITY’s Accounts Payable Office.
In the event a court of competent jurisdiction holds the Ordinance to be invalid or unenforceable in
any respect, then the CITY and IFDDC shall be released from any and all monetary obligations
under this AGREEMENT that accrue after the date of any such ruling that the Ordinance is invalid
or unenforceable and this AGREEMENT shall be deemed null and void.
8. IFDDC shall hire staff as determined by its Board of Directors to coordinate and assist
in the administration of the operation of the DISTRICT.
9. The CITY shall be responsible for submitting the annual assessment to Bonneville
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26
5
County which will bill and collect all BID assessments and remit assessment collections to the
CITY.
10. The term of this AGREEMENT shall commence on October 1, 2026, (the “Effective
Date”) nunc pro tunc, and shall terminate on September 30, 2027. The PARTIES may renew this
AGREEMENT by mutual consent provided notification of the desire to renew this contract shall
be given not less than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the expiration of the proceeding
contract term. For each renewal under this Section, the dates contained in Sections 3, 4, 7.a, 7.b,
and 10 shall advance by one year.
11. IFDDC agrees that all records created as part of IFDDC’s day-to-day business
performance of the AGREEMENT shall be treated as public records, as that term is defined in
Idaho Code Title 74 Chapter 1. All public records shall be subject to and disclosed pursuant to
Title 74, Chapter 1, of the Idaho Code (the Idaho Public Records Act). In addition, IFDDC agrees
to retain public records in accordance with Idaho Code § 50-907 and City’s Retention Policy,
Resolution No. 2023-12. The records of IFDDC that do not pertain to its day-to-day business
performance of this AGREEMENT shall not be considered public records under this Paragraph
unless otherwise required by law.
12. This AGREEMENT may be modified or amended by mutual agreement of the
PARTIES. Such amendments shall not be binding unless they are in writing and signed by
personnel authorized to bind each of the PARTIES.
13. Each individual executing this AGREEMENT on behalf of a PARTY hereto represents
and warrants that he or she is duly authorized to execute and deliver this AGREEMENT on behalf
of said PARTY in accordance with duly adopted organizational documents or agreement and, if
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26
6
appropriate, a Resolution of the PARTY, and that this AGREEMENT is binding upon said
PARTY in accordance with its terms.
14. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2346, if payments under this AGREEMENT exceed
one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and IFDDC employs ten (10) or more persons, IFDDC
certifies that it is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of this AGREEMENT
engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under its control. The terms in
this paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code section 67-2346 shall have the meaning defined
therein.
15. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2347A, if payments under this AGREEMENT exceed
one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and IFDDC employs ten (10) or more persons, IFDDC
certifies that it is not currently engaged in and will not for the duration of the AGREEMENT
engage in a boycott of any individual or company because the individual or company engages in or
supports either (1) the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacture of
fossil fuel-based energy, timber, minerals, hydroelectric power, nuclear energy, or agriculture; or
(2) the manufacture, distribution, sale, or use of firearms, as defined in Idaho Code § 18-
3302(2)(d). The terms in this paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code § 67-2347A shall have the
meaning defined therein.
16. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2359, IFDDC certifies that IFDDC is not currently owned
or operated by the government of the People’s Republic of China and will not, for the duration of
this AGREEMENT, be owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic China.
17. Whenever used in this AGREEMENT and when required by the context, the singular
number shall include the plural, gender shall include the masculine, feminine and/or neuter
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26
7
genders, as may be applicable, and persons shall include corporations, trusts, partnerships or other
lawful associations of any kind.
18. This AGREEMENT shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of
the State of Idaho.
19. IFDDC agrees that it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for
employment on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideals, sex, age, marital status,
physical, or mental handicap, gender identity/expression, sexual orientation, or national origin.
20. The Parties agree that this Agreement is a novation of the Prior Agreement and
Extension to Management Agreement. As of the Effective Date of this Agreement, the Parties’
remaining obligations under the Prior Agreement and Extension to Management Agreement shall
be subsumed by the obligations in this Agreement. Any past obligation under the Prior Agreement
or Extension to Management Agreement existing before the execution of this Agreement shall
remain in effect and shall be enforceable under the terms of the Prior Agreement or Extension to
Management Agreement.
ATTEST:
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS
_____________________________
By: ________________________________
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Lisa M. Burtenshaw, Mayor
IFDDC
By: _________________________
Kerry Hammon, Executive Director
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26
8
STATE OF IDAHO
)
) SS.
County of Bonneville
)
On the _______ day of _______________, 2026, before me, the undersigned, a notary
public for Idaho, personally appeared Lisa M. Burtenshaw, known to me to be the Mayor of the
City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, the municipal corporation that executed the foregoing document, and
acknowledged to me that he is authorized to execute the same for and on behalf of said City.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the
day and year first above written.
__________________________________
Notary Public for State of Idaho
Residing at Idaho Falls, Idaho
(Seal)
My Commission Expires: ___________
STATE OF IDAHO
)
) SS.
County of Bonneville
)
On the ______ day of ____________, 2026, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in
and for said State, personally appeared _________________, known or identified to me to be the
person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she
executed the same on behalf of the Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set me hand and affixed my official seal, the
day and year in this certificate first above written.
_______________________________
Notary Public for State of Idaho
Residing at Idaho Falls, Idaho
(Seal)
My Commission Expires:_________
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26
9
EXHIBIT A
Business Improvement District Management Agreement
City of Idaho Falls & Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation
Updated: October 19, 2026
The goals, projects and programs described are IFDDC’s plans for the term and are subject
to available funding, board approval and third party cooperation, and are not performance
guarantees.
Section 1: Mission Statement
The Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation (IFDDC) advances historical
downtown Idaho Falls as the premier regional center for commerce, culture, and leisure
activities for both residents and visitors.
Section 2: Organizational Overview
IFDDC is a registered non-profit 501(c)(6) organization governed by a volunteer Board of
Directors dedicated to achieving the organization's mission and strategic goals.
Public Meetings: General board meetings are open to the public and held on the
second Tuesday of every month at 9:00 a.m. at the Colonial Theater (A Street).
Executive Committee: Composed of the Board President, Vice President, Secretary,
and Treasurer, the Executive Committee directly oversees IFDDC budgeting, staffing,
grant administration, and daily operations.
Section 3: Core Objectives
1. Promotion: Enhance the commercial Downtown District’s image by organizing,
executing, and marketing district events and initiatives across local and regional
media platforms.
2. Economic Development: Build and maintain an economic ecosystem that attracts
new businesses, supports existing local merchants, secures investment, and
generates foot traffic to ensure a vibrant urban core.
3. Organization & Governance: Maintain strong administrative infrastructure through
strategic fundraising, volunteer recruitment, staff support, financial accounting, and
program oversight.
4. Design & Preservation: Partner with the City of Idaho Falls to guide downtown
architectural elements, develop incentives for building rehabilitation, and plan public
infrastructure improvements.
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26
10
Section 4: 2027 Goals & Key Priorities
BID Renewal: Educate and inform stakeholders regarding the renewal of the 2027
Business Improvement District (BID), including timeline, legal processes, options,
and historical data.
Strategic Alignment: Align IFDDC goals with those of the City of Idaho Falls, the
Board of Directors, and downtown property and business owners.
Stakeholder Engagement: Survey district stakeholders to identify key areas for
improvement, establish community priorities, and evaluate event outcomes based
on direct merchant feedback.
Operational Efficiency: Streamline administrative processes, review and update all
annual vendor/city agreements, and increase staff productivity.
Records Management: Modernize organizational archives by digitizing historical
paper records and securing them with off-site cloud storage.
Downtown Beautification: Right-size seasonal beautification efforts to maintain
fiscal responsibility amidst rising labor and material costs, actively pursuing
corporate sponsorships to offset expenses.
Infrastructure & Parking Management:
o Increase efficiency in parking citation and permit collections.
o Upgrade parking software and hardware as budget allocations allow.
o Research capital funding options for streetscape enhancements, including
upgraded decorative lighting and intersection pavers.
Branding & Marketing: Explore a full downtown rebranding campaign in celebration
of IFDDC’s 30th anniversary, contingent on funding.
Section 5: Major Capital & Community Projects
Expand public art installations through dedicated grant applications.
Upgrade district lighting infrastructure in coordination with Idaho Falls Power.
Install additional directional signage for downtown public parking lots.
Explore revitalization options for Civitan Plaza via crowdsourced funding and capital
campaign initiatives.
Section 6: Marketing & Advertising Campaigns
IFDDC promotes both organizational programs and individual member businesses within the
Downtown Business Improvement District to boost community engagement and drive local
foot traffic.
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26
11
Online Gift Certificate Program: Transitioned the Downtown Gift Certificate
program to a fully digital platform accessible directly via the IFDDC website.
Marketing Advisory Group: Formed a volunteer advisory team to enhance staff
marketing reach, expand video marketing, and execute targeted social media
campaigns aimed at younger demographics.
o Active Campaign: Holiday Gift Guide Campaign (Nov–Dec 2026).
o Ongoing Campaign: "Everyday Downtown" video series featuring local
residents experiencing downtown district amenities.
Holiday Showcase Program: An interactive holiday merchant initiative encouraging
decorated storefronts and building history displays, featuring a public voting
component (Nov–Dec 2026).
Event Consolidation & Optimization: Re-engineered traditional community events
based on 2026 merchant feedback to maximize family-friendly engagement, increase
inclusivity, and streamline staff operational demands.
Strategic Partnerships & Grants:
o Secured a $5,000 marketing grant from the Yellowstone Teton Territory.
o Maintained primary media partnership with Sandhill Media for regional radio
promotion.
o Renewed movie trailer advertising trade agreement with Centre Twin Theatre,
including monthly date-night promotional packages.
Section 7: Proposed 2027 Event & Program Schedule
Note: All proposed events and programs are subject to final Board approval following the
analysis of incoming merchant survey data. IFDDC will submit its finalized 2027 schedule to
the City of Idaho Falls by January 2027. Additional pop-up initiatives may be added as
funding permits.
Community Events
Event
Proposed Date & Time
Location
Paddy’s Day on Park
March 13 | 3:00 PM – 7:00 PM
Park Avenue
Gold in the District
(Easter Egg Hunt)
March 27 | 12:00 PM – 3:00 PM
Civitan Plaza
Back to School
Downtown Disco
August 21 | 7:00 PM – 10:00 PM
Broadway Plaza
Downtown District
September 25 | 5:00 PM – 9:00 PM
Park Avenue
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26
12
Event
Proposed Date & Time
Location
Oktoberfest
Crawl-O-Ween
October 24 | 7:00 PM
TBD
Tree Lighting & Holiday
Market
November 20 | 4:00 PM – 8:00 PM
(Lighting at 6:00 PM)
Broadway Plaza &
Memorial Drive
District Programs & Recurring Initiatives
Public Art Initiatives: Pet Murals, Traffic Cabinet Art, Downtown Unplugged, and
general mural projects.
Seasonal Beautification: Year-round landscaping and streetscape maintenance
(Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter).
Benefit Your Body on Broadway: Saturdays, June 6 – Sept 5 | 8:30 AM – 9:30 AM
(Broadway Plaza).
Footloose Falls (Dance Instruction & Social): 1st Saturday of the month, April –
October | 7:00 PM – Midnight (Broadway Plaza).
Decorate Downtown: November 12 – November 20.
The Downtown District Holiday Showcase: November 21 – December 20 (District-
wide).
Horse-Drawn Trolley Rides:
o Saturday, Nov 20 | 3:00 PM – 5:00 PM
o Saturdays, Nov 27, Dec 4, Dec 11, & Dec 25 | 1:00 PM – 3:00 PM (Civitan Plaza)
Shop Small Saturday: Saturday, November 27.
Memorandum
File #: 26-408
City Council
DATE: Tuesday, October 13, 2026
AGENDA: Regular
FROM: Wade Sanner, Director
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
Services
Title
Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, Arbor Estates Division
No. 1.
☐Ordinance
☐Resolution
☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐Legislative Public Hearing
☐Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☒Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
1. Approve the Development Agreement for the Final Plat for Arbor Estates Division No. 1 and give authorization for the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement (or take other action deemed appropriate).
2. Approve the Final Plat for Arbor Estates Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor, City Engineer, and City
Clerk to sign said Final Plat (or take other action deemed appropriate).
3. Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Final Plat for Arbor Estates Division No. 1
and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
Attached is the application for the Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and
Standards for Arbor Estates Division No. 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its June 2, 2026,
meeting and unanimously voted to recommend approval of the final plat to the Mayor and City Council as presented.
This Final Plat was reviewed by CDS Planning staff as well as staff from Fire, Idaho Falls Power, and the Public Works
Water, Wastewater, and Engineering/Survey Divisions.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal and Municipal Services Departments.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 10/20/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
RETURN TO AGENDA
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
C14
C15
C16
C17
C18
C19
C20
LENGTH
52.86'
52.86'
55.65'
92.74'
58.14'
15.55'
32.02'
25.63'
5.06'
98.46'
31.48'
25.63'
25.63'
22.75'
72.17'
41.08'
25.63'
25.10'
74.14'
49.15'
RADIUS
300.00'
300.00'
300.00'
500.00'
330.00'
270.00'
270.00'
45.00'
50.00'
50.00'
50.00'
45.00'
45.00'
50.00'
50.00'
50.00'
45.00'
535.00'
535.00'
265.00'
DELTA
10°05'41"
10°05'41"
10°37'40"
10°37'40"
10°05'41"
3°18'01"
6°47'40"
32°38'14"
5°48'02"
112°49'34"
36°04'35"
32°38'13"
32°38'13"
26°03'59"
82°42'23"
47°04'19"
32°38'13"
2°41'17"
7°56'23"
10°37'40"
CHORD BEARING
N05°19'38"E
N05°19'38"E
S05°35'38"W
S05°35'38"W
S05°19'38"W
S08°43'28"W
S03°40'38"W
S16°02'19"E
S29°27'25"E
S29°51'23"W
N75°41'32"W
N73°58'21"W
S73°23'27"W
S70°06'20"W
N55°30'29"W
N09°22'52"E
N16°35'54"E
N01°37'26"E
N06°56'16"E
N05°35'38"E
CHORD LENGTH
52.79'
52.79'
55.57'
92.61'
58.07'
15.55'
32.00'
25.29'
5.06'
83.30'
30.97'
25.29'
25.29'
22.55'
66.07'
39.93'
25.29'
25.10'
74.08'
49.08'
LINE TABLE
SEGMENT
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
L16
L17
L18
L19
L20
BEARING
S45°17'07"W
S44°42'52"E
N45°17'07"E
S44°42'52"E
N45°17'27"E
S89°42'33"E
N44°42'33"W
S45°17'27"W
N44°42'33"W
S45°17'08"W
S44°42'52"E
S00°16'48"W
S44°59'41"W
N45°00'19"W
N45°17'08"E
S06°17'03"W
S06°17'03"W
N44°42'52"W
N44°59'40"W
S45°00'20"W
LENGTH
28.28'
28.28'
28.28'
28.28'
28.28'
20.00'
28.28'
28.28'
28.28'
28.29'
28.28'
23.75'
28.14'
28.42'
28.29'
75.41'
31.88'
28.28'
28.43'
28.14'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
C21
C22
C23
C24
C25
C26
C27
LENGTH
49.30'
12.84'
62.82'
23.43'
54.15'
3.99'
47.57'
RADIUS
335.00'
335.00'
465.00'
465.00'
330.00'
330.00'
270.00'
DELTA
8°25'54"
2°11'46"
7°44'26"
2°53'13"
9°24'09"
0°41'32"
10°05'41"
CHORD BEARING
N04°29'45"E
N09°48'35"E
N07°02'14"E
N01°43'25"E
S04°58'52"W
S10°01'43"W
S05°19'38"W
CHORD LENGTH
49.25'
12.84'
62.77'
23.43'
54.09'
3.99'
47.51'
HALLMARK ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1
S89°42'33"E 177.11'
N00°16'48"E 3.31'
S89°42'33"E 439.65'
N00°15'05"E 2055.72'
N89°42'33"W 165.00'
S00°17'27"W 525.04'
N89°42'33"W 692.00'
S01°12'41"E 242.54'
N59°27'19"W 4.07'
S00°16'59"E 139.51'
S89°43'12"E 465.45'
N00°16'48"E 455.10'
4
21329 SF
0.490 AC.
8
9005 SF
0.207 AC.
5
20527 SF
0.471 AC.
6
10538 SF
0.242 AC.
7
9002 SF
0.207 AC.
12
10070 SF
0.231 AC.
9
9008 SF
0.207 AC.
10
9015 SF
0.207 AC.
11
9230 SF
0.212 AC.
13
11856 SF
0.272 AC.
6
11722 SF
0.269 AC.
2
12195 SF
0.280 AC.
3
15740 SF
0.361 AC.
4
11692 SF
0.268 AC.
5
11648 SF
0.267 AC.
11
13479 SF
0.309 AC.
7
11126 SF
0.255 AC.
8
10932 SF
0.251 AC.
9
10934 SF
0.251 AC.
10
18673 SF
0.429 AC.
13
17168 SF
0.394 AC.
12
13479 SF
0.309 AC.
4
9541 SF
0.219 AC.
1
11988 SF
0.275 AC.
12
9560 SF
0.219 AC.
14
11852 SF
0.272 AC.
13
10279 SF
0.236 AC.
8
10615 SF
0.244 AC.
9
8855 SF
0.203 AC.
10
8855 SF
0.203 AC.
2
10200 SF
0.234 AC.
11
9151 SF
0.210 AC.
3
9053 SF
0.208 AC.
7
10565 SF
0.243 AC.
6
8872 SF
0.204 AC.
5
9504 SF
0.218 AC.
3
13016 SF
0.299 AC.
2
13016 SF
0.299 AC.
4
14318 SF
0.329 AC.
1
288069 SF
6.613 AC.
1
12551 SF
0.288 AC.
N00°16'48"E 165.59'
N00°16'48"E 375.33'
N89°42'33"W 478.49'
N89°42'33"W 368.50'
N89°42'33"W 300.57'
S00°16'48"W
152.52'
N89°42'33"W 169.02'
S00°16'48"W
126.69'
N00°16'48"E
130.00'
S00°17'27"W 186.02'
S00°16'48"W 349.12'
C3
C4
C1
C2
95.34'
75.00'
75.17'
59.91'
N33°53'07"E
182.80'
N83°09'11"E
107.37'
S89°43'12"E
120.01'
S89°43'10"E
120.05'
S89°43'12"E
120.08'
S89°43'12"E
120.12'
S89°43'12"E
120.75'
S89°05'25"E
129.38'
S89°43'12"E
133.96'
114.00'
L18
69.98'
27.55'
C20
C18
49.91'
75.00'
75.00'
75.00'
22.98'
C17
C16
C15
C14 C13
18.92'
L19
147.59'
119.04'
L1
71.69'
71.70'
L2
100.28'
S00°17'07"W
91.69'
100.29'
L3
71.69'
120.28'
120.28'
S00°16'48"W
91.61'
75.00'
S89°43'12"E
118.07'
S89°43'12"E
117.50'
S89°43'12"E
118.07'
S89°43'12"E
121.12'
75.00'
S89°43'12"E
118.07'
L16
S89°43'12"E
130.63'
S89°43'12"E
123.33'
S89°43'12"E
125.95'
S89°43'12"E
124.43'
S89°43'12"E
120.00'
S89°43'12"E
120.00'
S89°43'12"E
120.00'
S00°16'48"W
101.00'
85.00'
43.29'
L17
100.20'
L13
80.00'
31.09'
C25
C27
99.81'
L14
81.99'
85.00'
75.00'
51.58'
C24
C23
C22
C21
25.88'
71.63'
L15
97.50'
98.07'
L11
71.59'
75.00'
75.00'
75.00'
L12
117.11'
S00°16'48"W
95.00'
75.01'
L4
97.12'
629.88'
L5
N00°17'27"E
155.30'
180.37'
L7
N00°17'27"E
131.02'
N00°17'27"E 151.02'
86.19'
L6
N00°17'27"E
151.02'
N00°17'27"E
151.02'
86.19'
86.19'
76.13'
L8
131.02'
96.13'
86.19'
131.02'
L9
95.00'
115.00'
N00°17'27"E
151.02'
89.25'
N00°17'27"E
151.02'
N00°17'27"E
151.02'
89.25'
104.98'
L10
89.25'
89.25'
N89°42'33"W
124.95'
131.02'
N89°42'33"W
124.94'
87.51'
87.51'
N89°42'33"W
124.92'
87.51'
87.51'
87.51'
14.28'
C5
C6
C7
55.56'
N89°42'33"W
134.18'
N89°42'33"W
124.54'
58.85'
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
68.62'
L20
93.72'
S89°42'33"E
143.47'
85.00'
85.00'
S89°42'33"E
N89°42'33"W
132.30'
165.00'
87.51'
87.51'
87.51'
85.00'
N02°10'47"W 15.06'
90.00'
75.00'
75.00'
75.00'
75.00'
75.00'
75.00'
100.00'
176.07'
S89°42'33"E 185.60'
BLOCK 5
BLOCK 4
BLOCK 4
BLOCK 6
BLOCK 5
BLOCK 7
BLOCK 8
HALLMARK ESTATES
DIVISION NO. 1
HALLMARK ESTATES
DIVISION NO. 1
UNPLATTED
UNPLATTED
UNPLATTED
BLOCK 5
BLOCK 8
BLOCK 9
BLOCK 10
VIEW AVE
COUNTRYSIDE LANE
SEACOVE DRIVE
EDMUND DRIVE
VILLA MIRAGE COURT
PRESSLEY DRIVE
C19
436.26'
S00°17'27"W 2619.02'
BASIS OF BEARING
2004 CITY OF IDAHO FALLS CONTROL
1
2820 SF
0.065 AC.
2
10829 SF
0.249 AC.
15'
15'
15'
15'
15'
15'
HOLMES AVENUE
35.00'
35.00'
30.00'
30.00'
35'
N00°18'06"E 363.16'
12'
12'
12'
12'
12'
12'
15'
12' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.)
12'
12'
N88°41'49"E 230.39'
30.00'
30.00'
45.00'
LOT 5
BLOCK 3
LOT 4
BLOCK 3
LOT 3
BLOCK 3
LOT 2
LOCK 3
LOT 1
BLOCK 3
LOT 4
BLOCK 2
1
10830 SF
0.249 AC.
35'
35'
35'
35'
35'
35'
35'
30'
30'
211.69'
186.02'
N89°42'33"E 305.01'
125.72'
174.29'
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION
30.00'
30.00'
2
10926 SF
0.251 AC.
DETAIL 1
DETAIL 2
12'
15'
15'
20'
20'
50'
12'
91.69'
139.08'
12'
W
E
S
N
0
100'
100'
50'
SCALE: 1" = 100'
SURVEYED BY:
DRAWN BY:
PROJECT NO.
APPROVED BY:
AGLE ROCK
NGINEERING
CIVIL PLANNING SURVEYING
IDAHO FALLS (208) 542-2665
E
REXBURG (208) 359-2665
OFFICES AT:
1331 Fremont Ave.
Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402
343 E 4th N, Suite 119
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
SHEET 1 OF 3
ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION No. 1
BEGINNING AT A POINT THAT IS S.00°17'27”W. ALONG THE SECTION LINE 436.26 FEET
FROM THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST OF
THE BOISE MERIDIAN; RUNNING THENCE S.00°17'27”W. ALONG SAID SECTION LINE
397.71 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST BOUNDARY CORNER OF HALLMARK ESTATES, DIVISION
NO. 1, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID
HALLMARK ESTATES, DIVISION NO. 1 THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES: (1) THENCE
N.89°42'33”W. 692.00 FEET; (2) THENCE S.00°17'27”W. 525.04 FEET; (3) THENCE
N.89°42'33”W. 165.00 FEET; (4) THENCE S.00°17'27”W. 270.00 FEET; (5) THENCE
N.89°42'33”W. 28.00 FEET; (6) THENCE S.00°17'27”W. 330.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
BOUNDARY CORNER OF SAID HALLMARK ESTATES, DIVISION NO. 1; THENCE
S.00°15'11”W. 620.79 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 65TH SOUTH; THENCE
WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID 65TH SOUTH THE
FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: (1) THENCE N.89°19'34”W. 425.78 FEET; (2) THENCE
N.89°55'38”W. 4.89 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF
SAID SECTION 6; THENCE N.00°15'05”E. ALONG SAID WEST LINE 2055.72 FEET; THENCE
S.89°42'33”E. 439.65 FEET; THENCE N.00°16'48”E. 3.31 FEET; THENCE S.89°42'33”E.
177.11 FEET; THENCE N.00°16'48”E. 455.10 FEET; THENCE S.89°43'12”E. 465.45 FEET;
THENCE S.00°16'59”E. 139.51 FEET; THENCE N.59°27'19”W. 4.07 FEET; THENCE
S.01°12'41”E. 242.54 FEET; THENCE N.88°41'49”E. 230.39 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING. CONTAINING 34.568 ACRES
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION
H. REESE
M. PATZER
K. ROLAND
26041
DATE:
September 24, 2026
CAD NAME:
X_26041 FINAL PLAT.DWG
ROADWAY CENTERLINE
SECTION LINE
LOT LINE
PLAT BOUNDARY
EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT AS NOTED
P.L.S.S. CORNER AS NOTED
15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.)
UNLESS OTHERWISE DIMENSIONED
FOUND 1/2" X 24" IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP
MARKED P.L.S. 10944 OR AS NOTED
FOUND 5/8" x 30" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW
PLASTIC CAP MARKED P.L.S. 827 OR AS NOTED
PLACED 1/2" X 24" IRON ROD WITH
YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369
PLACED 5/8" x 30" IRON ROD WITH
YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369
LEGEND
PLACED 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH ALUMINUM
CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369
POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.B.
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD AS NOTED, REPLACED
WITH 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP
MARKED P.L.S. 9369 OR AS NOTED
O
H
A
D
I
F
O
E
T
A
T
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
S
R
P
R
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
L
A
9369
D
E
L
A
N
D
U
S
R
O
Y
E
V
R
K
U
R
T
J.
R
O
L
A
N
D
I
S
PRELIMINARY
EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 6,
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN
CPF NO. 1808113
FOUND IRON ROD
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1
NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN
CPF No. 1808114
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 2
NOTES
CALCULATED POINT
5.00'
3.31'
NO CAP
BENT
NO CAP
BROKEN PLASTIC CAP
PLS 10944
BENT NO
CAP
NO CAP
BROKEN PLASTIC CAP
PLS 10944
1.
A 15 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT IS HEREBY RESERVED WITHIN EACH
LOT ALONG ALL ROAD FRONTAGES AS SHOWN.
2.
AREA OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION = 8.286 ACRES.
(34.568 ACRES [TOTAL PLAT ACREAGE] - 26.282 ACRES [SUM OF ALL LOT ACRES
IN DIVISION] = 8.286 ACRES)
3.
LOT 1 BLOCK 1, LOT 1 BLOCK 2, AND LOT 1 BLOCK 7 ARE GRANTED AS BLANKET
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS IN THEIR ENTIRETY PURSUANT TO THE EXECUTION
OF THIS INSTRUMENT.
4.
LOT 2, BLOCK 2 IS A NON-BUILDABLE LOT WITH A GRANTED BLANKET PUBLIC
UTILITY AND PUBLIC STORM WATER EASEMENT PURSUANT TO THE EXECUTION
OF THIS INSTRUMENT.
5.
LOT 1 BLOCK 8 IS DESIGNATED FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION USE.
P.O.B.
UTILITY EASEMENT PURSUANT TO
INSTRUMENT NO. 956426
20.16'
29.86'
A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO
A PARCEL OF LAND INCLUDING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF LOT 1 BLOCK 1 OF CORNERSTONE
ASSEMBLY OF GOD DIVISION NO. 1 PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 1266974 BEING SITUATED IN
THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38
EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN
REMAINDER OF LOT 1 BLOCK1
CORNERSTONE ASSEMBLY OF GOD
DIVISION NO. 1
5.00'
SEACOVE DRIVE
EDMUND DRIVE
DETAIL 1
C26
DETAIL 2
50.00'
169.29'
N59°27'19"W 4.07'
RADIUS POINT 50' KNUCKLE
POINT OF REVERSE
CURVATURE
50.00'
CORNER PERPETUATION AND FILING RECORD
CPF
SQUARE FEET
SF
ACRES
AC
I, KURTIS J. ROLAND, A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE
STATE OF IDAHO DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THIS
SUBDIVISION DESIGNATED AS ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 WAS
MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION, AND THAT SAID SUBDIVISION IS TRULY
AND CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND STAKED AS PROVIDED BY LAW AND IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT AS DESCRIBED HEREON.
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
HALLMARK ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1
N89°19'34"W 425.78'
S00°15'11"W 620.79'
S00°17'27"W 330.00'
N89°42'33"W 28.00'
S00°17'27"W 270.00'
3
9276 SF
0.213 AC.
5
10799 SF
0.248 AC.
4
9271 SF
0.213 AC.
1
1554 SF
0.036 AC.
2
9848 SF
0.226 AC.
2
94085 SF
2.160 AC.
3
9711 SF
0.223 AC.
4
8400 SF
0.193 AC.
5
8400 SF
0.193 AC.
6
8400 SF
0.193 AC.
7
8400 SF
0.193 AC.
8
8400 SF
0.193 AC.
9
8400 SF
0.193 AC.
10
8520 SF
0.196 AC.
11
8520 SF
0.196 AC.
12
8520 SF
0.196 AC.
14
9009 SF
0.207 AC.
13
11245 SF
0.258 AC.
15
9011 SF
0.207 AC.
3
9591 SF
0.220 AC.
1
11678 SF
0.268 AC.
2
9595 SF
0.220 AC.
5
11661 SF
0.268 AC.
4
9590 SF
0.220 AC.
4
21329 SF
0.490 AC.
2
9750 SF
0.224 AC.
3
12193 SF
0.280 AC.
1
9766 SF
0.224 AC.
20527 SF
0.471 AC.
1
14149 SF
0.325 AC.
2
12195 SF
0.280 AC.
0.361 AC.
S89°41'54"E 150.75'
S89°42'33"E
150.51'
S89°42'33"E 280.37'
95.34'
S00°17'27"W
130.00'
110.00'
75.00'
S00°17'27"W
130.00'
75.17'
S89°42'33"E 59.91'
N33°53'0
182.80'
147.59
L22
75.32'
75.00'
75.08'
93
S89°42'33"E
143.47'
85
85.00'
S89°42'33"E
143.48'
80.00'
123.50'
85.00'
100.00'
75.07'
75.00'
75.27'
L23
100.14'
95.25'
75.00'
74.99'
S00°17'27"W
120.12'
S00°17'27"W
120.13'
S89°41'54"E
120.00'
71.00'
71.00'
S89°41'54"E
120.00'
S89°41'54"E
120.00'
71.00'
71.00'
71.00'
71.00'
S89°41'54"E
120.00'
S89°41'54"E
120.00'
70.00'
70.00'
S89°41'54"E
120.00'
70.00'
70.00'
70.00'
70.00'
S89°41'54"E
120.00'
S89°41'54"E
120.00'
70.00'
70.00'
70.00'
70.00'
S89°41'54"E
120.00'
70.00'
70.00'
S89°41'54"E
120.00'
76.05'
81.00'
L31
L32
L33
N89°40'03"W
114.99'
N89°40'03"W
124.60'
733.93'
L30
N89°40'03"W 111.07'
79.99'
N89°40'03"W
115.99'
84.98'
L29
L28
80.00'
80.00'
S89°40'03"E
115.92'
80.00'
80.00'
95.00'
74.94'
S89°40'03"E
115.85'
95.77'
L27
95.72'
102.68'
N89°41'54"W
115.63'
82.68'
L25
81.68'
83.00'
N89°41'54"W
115.57'
83.00'
83.00'
N89°41'54"W
115.55'
83.00'
N89°41'54"W
115.53'
83.00'
102.68'
82.66'
95.52'
L24
L21
176
130.00'
120.10'
N00°15'05"E 2055.72'
S89°42'33"E 185.60'
UNPLATTED
65th SOUTH
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 2
BLOCK 5
BLOCK 3
HALLMARK ESTATES
DIVISION NO. 1
UNPLATTED
RIDDLE WAY
PRESSLEY DRIVE
HALLMARK DRIVE
PRESS
15'
15'
15'
15'
15'
L26
S00°15'05"W 41.08'
15.00'
18.92'
15.00'
21.44'
30.00'
30.00'
30.00'
30.00'
30.00'
30.00'
35'
N00°18'06"E 514.34'
N00°18'06"E 363.16'
N00°18'
12'
12'
12'
12'
12'
15'
S00°18'06"W 714.00'
S89°41'54"E 245.24'
LOT 2
BLOCK 3
LOT 1
BLOCK 3
LOT 5
BLOCK 1
LOT 4
BLOCK 1
L34
L35
N89°40'03"W 2630.44'
R/W
R/W
R/W
1315.22'
1315.22'
1
3481 SF
0.080 AC.
35'
60'
N00°18'06"E 405.44'
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION
BLOCK 4
LINE TABLE
SEGMENT
L21
L22
L23
L24
L25
L26
L27
L28
L29
L30
L31
L32
L33
L34
L35
BEARING
S44°42'14"E
N45°17'46"E
N44°42'14"W
S45°17'46"W
S44°41'54"E
N00°18'06"E
S45°18'06"W
S44°40'58"E
S44°40'58"E
S89°40'03"E
N45°19'02"E
N45°19'02"E
S89°40'03"E
N89°19'34"W
N89°19'34"W
LENGTH
28.29'
28.28'
28.29'
28.28'
28.28'
20.00'
28.28'
7.06'
21.22'
96.08'
7.08'
21.21'
224.57'
274.69'
151.09'
S00°17'27"W 2619.02'
HOLMES AVENUE
R/W
R/W
R/W
S89°19'34"E 1285.45'
S89°19'34"E 1285.30'
R/W
R/W
R/W
C30
C28
C29
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
C28
C29
C30
C31
C32
C33
LENGTH
420.01'
420.40'
420.78'
340.47'
339.23'
337.98'
RADIUS
34347.74'
34377.74'
34407.74'
34407.74'
34377.74'
34347.47'
DELTA
0°42'02"
0°42'02"
0°42'02"
0°34'01"
0°33'55"
0°33'50"
CHORD BEARING
S89°23'07"E
S89°23'07"E
S89°23'07"E
S88°26'48"E
S88°23'40"E
S88°20'30"E
CHORD LENGTH
420.01'
420.39'
420.78'
340.47'
339.22'
337.98'
W
E
S
N
0
100'
100'
50'
SCALE: 1" = 100'
SURVEYED BY:
DRAWN BY:
PROJECT NO.
APPROVED BY:
AGLE ROCK
NGINEERING
CIVIL PLANNING SURVEYING
IDAHO FALLS (208) 542-2665
E
REXBURG (208) 359-2665
OFFICES AT:
1331 Fremont Ave.
Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402
343 E 4th N, Suite 119
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
H. REESE
M. PATZER
K. ROLAND
26041
DATE:
September 24, 2026
CAD NAME:
X_26041 FINAL PLAT.DWG
ROADWAY CENTERLINE
SECTION LINE
LOT LINE
PLAT BOUNDARY
EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT AS NOTED
15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.)
UNLESS OTHERWISE DIMENSIONED
LEGEND
POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.B.
O
H
A
D
I
F
O
E
T
A
T
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
S
R
P
R
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
L
A
9369
D
E
L
A
N
D
U
S
R
O
Y
E
V
R
K
U
R
T
J.
R
O
L
A
N
D
I
S
PRELIMINARY
FOUND IRON ROD
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 6,
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN
CPF NO. 1808114
EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 6,
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN
CPF NO. 1808113
SHEET 2 OF 3
ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION 1
A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO
A PARCEL OF LAND INCLUDING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF LOT 1 BLOCK 1 OF CORNERSTONE
ASSEMBLY OF GOD DIVISION NO. 1 PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 1266974 BEING SITUATED IN
THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38
EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 1
15.25'
1.32'
PLASTIC CAP ILLEGIBLE
SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 6,
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN
CPF NO. 1284104
UTILITY EASEMENT PURSUANT TO
INSTRUMENT NO. 956426
UTILITY EASEMENT PURSUANT
TO INSTRUMENT NO. 956426
N89°55'38"W 4.89'
W
E
S
N
0
100'
100'
50'
SCALE: 1" = 100'
P.L.S.S. CORNER AS NOTED
FOUND 1/2" X 24" IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP
MARKED P.L.S. 10944 OR AS NOTED
FOUND 5/8" x 30" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW
PLASTIC CAP MARKED P.L.S. 827 OR AS NOTED
PLACED 1/2" X 24" IRON ROD WITH
YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369
PLACED 5/8" x 30" IRON ROD WITH
YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369
PLACED 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH ALUMINUM
CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD AS NOTED, REPLACED
WITH 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP
MARKED P.L.S. 9369 OR AS NOTED
CALCULATED POINT
25.07'
26.56'
30.00'
18.90'
30.00'
21.29'
30.00'
30.00'
23.35'
RIGHT-OF-WAY
R/W
S89°55'38" 975.87'
S89°55'38"E 980.59'
FOUND ITD CONCRETE MONUMENT
(CAP BROKEN OFF SOLID IN GROUND)
FOUND IRON ROD
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN
CPF NO. 566372
SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 6,
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN
CPF NO. 1284104
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 6,
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN
CPF NO. 1591080
11.10'
11.08'
4.85'
4.85'
6.65'
8.71'
3.44'
NORTH ARROW FOR
RIGHT-OF-WAY DETAIL
RIGHT-OF-WAY DETAIL
S01°00'17"W 60.00'
S00°15'52"W 60.00'
S00°16'58"W 60.00'
S00°00'00"W 60.00'
SEE DETAIL A
DETAIL A
DETAIL B
DETAIL C
DETAIL D
SEE DETAIL B
SEE DETAIL C
SEE DETAIL D
S89°55'38" 980.59'
S89°19'34"E 859.37'
S89°55'38"E 980.56'
S89°55'38" 980.57'
CENTER LINE
SECTION LINE
CENTER LINE
SECTION LINE
CENTER LINE
SECTION LINE
CENTER LINE
SECTION LINE
S89°39'36"E 2613.62'
SEE DETAIL E
17.55'
DETAIL E
CENTER LINE
SECTION LINE
30.31'
12.75'
S02°35'21"W 60.61'
S88°56'57"E 734.87'
S88°59'43"E 736.55'
TIE LINE
S88°58'20"E 735.71'
CENTER LINESECTION LINE
CORNER PERPETUATION AND FILING RECORD
CPF
SQUARE FEET
SF
ACRES
AC
25.07'
26.56'
30.00'
18.90'
30.00'
30.00'
23.35'
21.29'
30.00'
NO CAP
80.36'
FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. S-6703
SOUTH BOUNDARY
4.70'
WHERE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY
AND SOUTH BOUNDARY OF
FEDERAL AID PROJECT
NO. S-6703 MEET
SEE NOTE 6 ON THIS PAGE
NOTES
6.
THIS LINE IS ONLY A RETRACEMENT OF FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. S-6703 IS NOT
AN ATTEMPT TO PORTRAY THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF 65TH SOUTH, IT IS
ONLY SHOWN TO AS SUPPORTING EVIDENCE TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY
AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE ROAD
SEE NOTE 6 ON THIS PAGE
SEE NOTE 6 ON THIS PAGE
SURVEYED BY:
DRAWN BY:
PROJECT NO.
APPROVED BY:
AGLE ROCK
NGINEERING
CIVIL PLANNING SURVEYING
IDAHO FALLS (208) 542-2665
E
REXBURG (208) 359-2665
OFFICES AT:
1331 Fremont Ave.
Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402
343 E 4th N, Suite 119
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
H. REESE
M. PATZER
K. ROLAND
26041
DATE:
September 24, 2026
CAD NAME:
X_26041 FINAL PLAT.DWG
O
H
A
D
I
F
O
E
T
A
T
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
S
R
P
R
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
L
A
9369
D
E
L
A
N
D
U
S
R
O
Y
E
V
R
K
U
R
T
J.
R
O
L
A
N
D
I
S
PRELIMINARY
SHEET 3 OF 3
ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1
PURSUANT TO I.C. §50-1334, THE OWNER DOES HEREBY, CERTIFY THAT ALL LOTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE ELIGIBLE TO
RECEIVE WATER FROM THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM, AND SAID CITY HAS AGREED IN WRITING TO
PROVIDE CULINARY WATER SERVICE TO SAID LOTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 8, CHAPTER 4 OF THE IDAHO
FALLS CITY CODE, AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER HAS HEREUNTO SET ITS SIGNATURE THIS ________DAY OF ____________ , 202__.
ROCKWELL HOMES, INC.
_____________________________________
CURTIS JOHNSON, VICE PRESIDENT
DRINKING WATER SYSTEM CERTIFICATE
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT THE UNDERSIGNED ROCKWELL HOMES, INC. AN IDAHO CORPORATION IS THE
LAWFUL OWNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON AND HAS
CAUSED THE SAME TO BE PLATTED AND DIVIDED INTO BLOCKS, LOTS, AND STREETS, WHICH PLAT SHALL HEREAFTER BE
KNOWN AS ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1, A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, BONNEVILLE COUNTY,
IDAHO.
BE IT FURTHER KNOWN, THAT OWNER DOES HEREBY DEDICATE GRANT AND CONVEY TO THE PUBLIC, ALL STREETS AND
RIGHT-OF-WAYS SHOWN HEREON, THAT OWNER ALSO DOES HEREBY GRANT AND CONVEY TO THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS
ALL PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOREVER AS IRREVOCABLE PERMANENT NON-EXCLUSIVE PUBLIC EASEMENTS AS SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON.
OWNER, OR ITS HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, AGREE THEY WILL CONSTRUCT NO PERMANENT STRUCTURE WITHIN OR UPON ANY
EASEMENT SHOWN HEREON, AND THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS AND ITS SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS, PERMITEES OR LICENSEES
SHALL ALSO HAVE THE RIGHT, TO REMOVE, CUT OR TRIM ANY TREES, BRUSH, ORNAMENTAL SHRUBBERY OR PLANT
WHICH MAY INJURE OR INTERFERE WITH THE USE THEREOF FOR ITS INTENDED PURPOSES, SUCH RIGHT MAY BE
EXERCISED WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE TO OWNER OR ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS.
OWNER OR ITS HEIRS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS FURTHER AGREE THAT THEY SHALL NOT PLANT ANY TREES, BRUSH,
ORNAMENTAL SHRUBBERY OR PLANTS WHICH MAY HINDER THE SAFE AND EFFICIENT UTILIZATION OF SAID EASEMENTS.
OWNER OR ITS HEIRS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS HEREBY RELEASES THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS AND ITS SUCCESSORS,
ASSIGNS, PERMITEES OR LICENSEES FROM ANY CLAIM FOR DAMAGES, BASED UPON CONCEALED OR UNDISCLOSED
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED OR PERMITTED TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY OWNER OR ITS SUCCESSORS OR
ASSIGNS WITHIN ANY PUBLIC EASEMENTS, SUBSEQUENT TO RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION, THAT MAY BE INCURRED AS A
RESULT OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS AND ITS SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS, PERMITEES OR LICENSEES ORDINARY USE OF THE
PUBLIC EASEMENTS WITH DUE CARE.
OWNER OR ITS HEIRS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS DO HEREBY WARRANT AND SHALL DEFEND SUCH DEDICATION AND
CONVEYANCES IN THE QUIET AND PEACEFUL POSSESSION OF THE PUBLIC OR THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, AS THE CASE MAY
BE, AGAINST SAID OWNER AND ITS HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, AND AGAINST EVERY PERSON WHOMSOEVER WHO
LAWFULLY HOLDS OR WHO LATER CLAIMS TO HAVE LAWFULLY HELD ANY RIGHTS IN SAID ESTATE AS OF THE DATE
HEREOF.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER HAS HEREUNTO SET ITS SIGNATURE THIS ________DAY OF ____________, 202__.
ROCKWELL HOMES, INC.
_____________________________________
CURTIS JOHNSON, VICE PRESIDENT
RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE
I CERTIFY THAT I AM A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF IDAHO AND THAT I HAVE EXAMINED
THIS PLAT AND FIND THAT IT COMPLIES WITH I.C. §50-1305.
DATE:_______________
_________________________________________________
BONNEVILLE COUNTY SURVEYOR, DAVID DOUGLAS ROMRELL
P.L.S. NO. 12223
EXAMINING SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I, THE UNDERSIGNED COUNTY TREASURER IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BONNEVILLE,
STATE OF IDAHO, PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF I.C. §50-1308, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY THAT ALL COUNTY PROPERTY TAXES DUE FOR THE PROPERTY INCLUDED IN
THE BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON ARE CURRENT.
DATE:_________ _________________________________
BONNEVILLE COUNTY TREASURER
TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE
SANITARY RESTRICTIONS AS REQUIRED BY I.C. §50-1326 HAVE BEEN SATISFIED BASED ON THE DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (DEQ) APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE CONDITIONS
IMPOSED ON THE DEVELOPER FOR CONTINUED SATISFACTION OF THE SANITARY RESTRICTIONS. BUYER IS
CAUTIONED THAT AT THE TIME OF THIS APPROVAL, NO DRINKING WATER OR SEWER/SEPTIC FACILITIES WERE
CONSTRUCTED. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CAN BE ALLOWED WITH APPROPRIATE BUILDING PERMITS IF DRINKING
WATER OR SEWER FACILITIES HAVE SINCE BEEN CONSTRUCTED OR IF THE DEVELOPER IS SIMULTANEOUSLY
CONSTRUCTING THOSE FACILITIES. IF THE DEVELOPER FAILS TO CONSTRUCT FACILITIES OR MEET THE OTHER
CONDITIONS OF DEQ, THEN SANITARY RESTRICTIONS MAY BE REIMPOSED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH I.C. §50-1326, BY
THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF DISAPPROVAL, AND NO CONSTRUCTION OF ANY BUILDING OR SHELTER
REQUIRING DRINKING WATER OR SEWER/SEPTIC FACILITIES SHALL BE ALLOWED.
EASTERN IDAHO PUBLIC HEALTH DISTRICT
___________________________________ ______________
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST, REHS
DATE:
HEALTH DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL
OWNER'S DEDICATION
ALL MEASURED BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON RELATE DIRECTLY TO THE "CITY OF IDAHO FALLS COORDINATE SYSTEM
OF 2004", WHICH IS DERIVED FROM THE IDAHO STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (EAST ZONE 1101) US SURVEY
FEET AND USING A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.000277265 FOR A GRID TO GROUND CONVERSION, [REFERENCE
FRAME NAD_83(2011), EPOCH 2010.0000]. THE SYSTEM ORIENTATION IS BASED ON GRID NORTH ALONG THE EAST
ZONE CENTRAL MERIDIAN. NO CONVERGENCE ANGLE HAS BEEN APPLIED.
BASIS OF BEARINGS
CITY'S ACCEPTANCE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING PLAT, ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1, WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
RECORDER OF BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO.
___________________________________________DATE_________
BONNEVILLE COUNTY RECORDER
IRRIGATION WATER RIGHTS DISCLOSURE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ALL PARCELS OR PROPERTY INCLUDED IN THIS PLAT
ARE WITHIN THE IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT AND THAT A SUITABLE SYSTEM FOR
SUCH PARCELS OR PROPERTY SHALL BE INSTALLED FOR DELIVERY OF SURFACE
WATER FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES AND IS SUBJECT TO THAT CERTAIN CITY OF IDAHO
FALLS SUBDIVISION IRRIGATION WATER AGREEMENT RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT
NO. 1787465 IN THE RECORDS OF BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO, (AS THE SAME MAY
BE AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME). THE SYSTEM INSTALLED HAS BEEN APPROVED BY
THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS AND THE IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT IN COMPLIANCE
WITH IDAHO CODE § 31-3805. ALL PROPERTY WITHIN THE PLAT, INCLUDING STREETS,
WILL REMAIN SUBJECT TO ASSESSMENTS LEVIED BY THE IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
WHICH SHALL BE PAID BY THE OWNERS AND THEIR SUCCESSORS-IN-INTEREST OF ANY
PARCELS OR PROPERTY WITHIN THIS PLAT. THE UNPAID IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
ASSESSMENTS ARE A LIEN ON THE LAND. IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT MAY
WITHHOLD DELIVERY OF WATER UNTIL THE UNPAID ASSESSMENTS (ALONG WITH
ANY ASSOCIATED PENALTIES AND INTEREST) ARE PAID IN FULL. FOR CONNECTIONS
APPROVED FOR DELIVERY OF WATER TO MORE THAN ONE LEGAL PARCEL
PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED BY DISTRICT, NON-PAYMENT OF A DISTRICT ASSESSMENT
BY ONE ELECTOR WILL SUBJECT ALL PARCELS ON THE SHARED CONNECTION TO
CURTAILMENT UNTIL SUCH DELINQUENT ASSESSMENT IS PAID IN FULL. ALL RIGHTS
TO VOTE IN IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT MATTERS ARE HELD BY OWNERS AND THEIR
SUCCESSORS-IN-INTEREST OF ANY PARCELS OR PROPERTY WITHIN THIS PLAT.
PURSUANT TO TITLE 43, CHAPTER 11 OF THE IDAHO CODE, A PARCEL OWNER MAY AT
A FUTURE DATE PETITION THE IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT FOR EXCLUSION FROM
THE IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT, BUT SUCH EXCLUSION, IF GRANTED, WILL RESULT
IN LOSS OF THE ABILITY TO IRRIGATE SUCH PARCEL. CONSISTENT WITH IDAHO CODE
§§ 42-108 AND 42-222, ANY CHANGE IN THE NATURE OF USE OF SURFACE WATER
PROVIDED BY AN IRRIGATION WATER DELIVERY ENTITY (SUCH AS THE IDAHO
IRRIGATION DISTRICT) MUST BE AUTHORIZED BY THE ENTITY HOLDING THE WATER
RIGHTS FOR THE AVAILABLE SURFACE WATER. AS OF THE DATE OF RECORDING OF
THIS PLAT, THE IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT’S ADDRESS IS 496 E 14TH ST., IDAHO
FALLS, IDAHO 83404.
STATE OF _________________)
:SS.
COUNTY OF _______________ )
ON THIS_______ DAY OF____________, 20___, BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE, PERSONALLY
APPEARED CURTIS JOHNSON , KNOWN OR IDENTIFIED TO ME TO BE THE VICE PRESIDENT, OF ROCKWELL HOMES INC., AND
THE OFFICER WHO SUBSCRIBED SAID CORPORATION'S NAME TO THE FOREGOING OWNER'S DEDICATION, PREVIOUSLY
PLATTED EASEMENTS VACATION CERTIFICATE, AND THE DRINKING WATER SYSTEM CERTIFICATE AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO
ME THAT HE IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE SAME FOR AND ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AND AFFIXED MY OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND THE YEAR IN THIS
CERTIFICATE FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN.
__________________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF _______________
RESIDING AT: _____________________________
COMMISSION EXPIRATION DATE: ________________
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT WAS DULY ACCEPTED AND APPROVED AND THE GRANTS
AND DEDICATIONS ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO FALLS
ADOPTED THIS _____ DAY OF ________________ , 202____.
______________________
______________________________
MAYOR
CITY CLERK
______________________
______________________________
CITY ENGINEER
CITY SURVEYOR
JONATHAN W. KNOWLES, PE 14787
KENNETH BALDWIN ROBERTS, PLS 9755
A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO
A PARCEL OF LAND INCLUDING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF LOT 1 BLOCK 1 OF CORNERSTONE ASSEMBLY OF GOD
DIVISION NO. 1 PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 1266974 BEING SITUATED IN THE EAST HALF OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN
THE OWNER DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF I.C. §50-1306A(5)
HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH IN ORDER TO VACATE PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING
EASEMENT OF RECORD WITHIN THE PLAT BOUNDARY:
1.) THE 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.) ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1,
BLOCK 1, OF CORNERSTONE ASSEMBLY OF GOD DIVISION NO. 1, A SUBDIVISION
OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, FILED WITH THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER FOR
BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER 1266974, DATED:
6-18-2007.
THE VACATED EASEMENT LISTED HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS DRAWING. ALL
OTHER EXISTING EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE STILL ACTIVE AND VALID.
UPON APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, EXECUTION AND RECORDING OF THIS
DOCUMENT, THE PORTIONS OF SAID EASEMENT SHALL BE VACATED WITHOUT
FURTHER FUNCTION OF LAW.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER HAS HEREUNTO SUBSCRIBED ITS SEAL AND
SIGNATURE THIS_________DAY OF_______202_
ROCKWELL HOMES, INC.
______________________________
CURTIS JOHNSON, VICE PRESIDENT
PREVIOUSLY PLATTED EASEMENTS VACATION CERTIFICATE
1. EAGLE ROCK ENGINEERING WAS COMMISSIONED BY ROCKWELL HOMES INC. TO DESIGN A BOUNDARY FOR A NEW CITY OF
IDAHO FALLS SUBDIVISION PLAT ON LAND OWNED BY ROCKWELL HOMES INC. PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 1806816 AND
RIVERWOOD DEVELOPMENT LLC PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 1801725.
2. CORNERSTONE ASSEMBLY OF GOD, DIVISION NO. 1 PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 1266974 ADJOINS THE NEW PLAT.
MONUMENTS FOUND WERE 1/2 INCH IRON RODS WITH PLASTIC CAPS STAMPED L.S. 8795 OR NO CAP. THE PLAT IS IN THE
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS BOUNDARY.
3. HALLMARK ESTATES, DIVISION NO. 1 PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 956426. AN AFFIDAVIT OF CORRECTION WAS FILED IN
BONNEVILLE COUNTY RECORDS PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 959320. MONUMENTS FOUND WERE 5/8 INCH IRON RODS
WITH PLASTIC CAPS STAMPED L.S. 827. THE PLAT IS A BONNEVILLE COUNTY PLAT.
4. RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG 65TH SOUTH WAS ESTABLISHED FROM FOUND MONUMENTS AND RECORD INFORMATION FROM
IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. S-6703 (3). THE SAID FOUND
MONUMENTS ARE RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENTS WITH THE TOP AND BRASS CAPS BROKEN OFF. THE DESCRIPTION OF THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY IN IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. S6703 (3) DIFFERED
FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY DESCRIBED IN QUIT CLAIM DEED PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 359917. FIELD DATA WAS
GATHERED TO DETERMINE THE EXISTING CENTERLINE OF 65TH SOUTH. BY ANALYZING THE EXISTING CENTERLINE IT WAS
DETERMINED THAT THE ROAD WAS BUILT BY FOLLOWING THE IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO.
S-6703 (3). THE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. S-6703 (3)
AND THE FOUND MONUMENTS WERE USED TO DETERMINE THE CENTER LINE OF ROAD AND THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE
INFORMATION ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF 65TH SOUTH WAS SHOWN ONLY AS A RETRACEMENT OF THE FEDERAL AID
PROJECT AND DOES NOT PORTRAY THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG 65TH SOUTH AS IT IS ONLY SHOWN AS A 30.00 FOOT
REFERENCE MONUMENT TO THE CENTER LINE OF 65TH SOUTH.
5. IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. S-6703 SHOWED THE CENTERLINE BEING 10 FEET NORTH OF
THE SECTION LINE, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE CENTERLINE IS 3.44 FEET NORTH OF THE SECTION LINE. IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE
SECTION CORNER IS NO LONGER IN THE SAME POSITION AS SHOWN IN SAID FEDERAL AID PROJECT.
NARRATIVE
Page 1 of 5
Applicant: Eagle Rock
Engineering
Project Manager: David
Peterson
Property Owner:
Rockwell Homes Inc
Riverwood Development
LLC
Location: Generally
located north of E 65th
South, east of Columbia St,
south of La Paloma Dr, and
west of S Holmes Ave.
Size: Approx. 34.568 acres
Lots: 74
Buildable: 70
Existing Zoning:
Site: R1
North: R1
South: County A-1
East: County A-1
West: County A-1
Existing Land Uses:
Site: Vacant/Ag
North: Residential
South: Residential/Ag
East: Residential
West: Agricultural
Future Land Use Map:
Suburban and Mixed Use
Centers and Corridors
Attachments:
1.
Subdivision and Zoning
Ordinance
Requirements
2.
Comprehensive Plan
Policies
3.
Maps and aerial photos
4.
Final Plat
5.
Approved Preliminary
Plat
Requested Action: To approve the final plat for Arbor Estates Division
No. 1 by the Mayor and City Council.
History: The majority of the property was annexed into the City in 2026
with an initial zoning of R1 Single Dwelling Residential. A portion of Lot 2
Block 8 was annexed in 2007 with an initial zoning of R-1. A preliminary
plat was approved by the Planning Commission in February 2026.
Staff Comments: The proposed final plat consists of approximately 34.568
acres and includes 70 buildable lots and four non-buildable lots. The density
of buildable residential lots is approximately 2.03 lots per acre. The
maximum lot size for lots in the R1 Zone is 13,500 sq ft except for corner
lots, wedge-shaped lots, and lots designated for religious institutions or
schools. Lot 2 Block 8 is planned for a future religious institution. Four of
the non-buildable lots are landscape lots intended to buffer the development
from the adjacent arterial streets of E 65th South and S Holmes Ave. Lot 2
Block 2 is designated as a public utility and storm water easement in its
entirety.
Access to the subdivision will come from S Holmes Ave with the extension
of Countryside Ln and from E 65th S via Pressley Dr. View Ave and
Hallmark Dr will also be extended, connecting the existing Hallmark
Subdivision to the new street network. Pressley Dr, Edmund Dr, Villa
Mirage Ct, and the extension of Countryside Ln will be classified as
residential collector streets. Riddle Way, Seacove Dr, and the extensions of
View Ave and Hallmark Dr will be classified as local streets. The proposed
street network and lot layout is consistent with the approved preliminary
plat.
The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as primarily suburban, which
denotes existing or planned residential areas in close proximity to or with
easy vehicular access to regional commercial service areas that provide
daily household needs.
Staff Recommendation: Staff has reviewed the final plat and finds it
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The plat also meets the
requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance. Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Arbor Estates
Division No. 1 as presented.
STAFF REPORT
FINAL PLAT
Arbor Estates Division No. 1
October 22, 2026
Community
Development Services
Page 2 of 5
Transportation Plan: Pressley Dr, Edmund Dr, Villa Mirage Ct, Countryside Ln – Residential
Collectors; Riddle Way, Seacove Dr, View Ave, Hallmark Dr – Local Streets
Subdivision Ordinance: Boxes with an “X” indicated compliance with the ordinance
REQUIREMENTS
Staff Review
Requirements listed in Section 10-1:
Building envelopes sufficient to construct a building.
X
Lot dimensions conform to the minimum standards of Zoning
Ordinance.
X
Lots have full frontage on, and access to, a dedicated street.
X
Residential lots do not have direct access to arterial streets.
X
Direct access to arterial streets from commercial or industrial lots
shall be permitted only where it can be demonstrated that:
1) The direct access will not impede the flow of traffic on the
arterial or otherwise create an unsafe condition; 2) There is no
reasonable alternative for access to the arterial via a collector
street; 3) There is sufficient sight distance along the arterial from
the proposed point of access; 4) The proposed access is located so
as not to interfere with the safe and efficient functioning of any
intersection; and 5) The developer or owner agrees to provide all
improvements, such as turning lanes or signals, necessitated for
the safe and efficient uses of the proposes access.
N/A
Adequate provisions shall be made for soil preservation, drainage
patterns, and debris and waste disposal and collection.
X
Sidelines of lots shall be at, or near, right angles or radial to the
street lines. All corner lots shall have a minimum radius of twenty
feet on the property line.
X
All property within the subdivision shall be included within a lot
or area dedicated for public use.
X
All major streets in subdivision must conform to the major street
plan of the City, as set forth in Comprehensive Plan.
X
The alignment and width of previously platted streets shall be
preserved unless topographical conditions or existing buildings or
structures require otherwise.
X
Residential lots adjoining arterial streets shall comply with: 1)
Such lots shall have reverse frontage on the arterial streets, 2) such
lots shall be buffered from the arterial street by any effective
combination of the following: lot depth, earth berms, vegetation,
walls or fences, and structural soundproofing, 3) Minimum lot
depth shall be 150 ft except where the use of berms, vegetation,
and structures can be demonstrated to constitute an effective
buffer, 4) Whenever practical, existing roadside trees shall be
saved and used in the arterial buffer, 5) Parking areas shall be used
as part of the arterial buffer for high density residential uses, 6)
Annexation and development agreement shall include provisions
for installation and continued maintenance of arterial buffers.
X – Landscape lots are proposed to buffer
residential lots from the adjacent arterial
streets.
Page 3 of 5
Planning Director to classify street on basis of zoning, traffic
volume, function, growth, vehicular & pedestrian safety, and
population density.
Pressley Dr, Edmund Dr, Villa Mirage Ct,
Countryside Ln – Residential Collectors;
Riddle Way, Seacove Dr, View Ave,
Hallmark Dr – Local Streets
Subdivision Ordinance:
10-1-5: GENERAL SUBDIVISION STANDARDS
Meets all standards.
10-1-9: FINAL PLAT APPROVAL PROCESS
(A)(9) If the final plat conforms to the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance and all other applicable
State or Federal laws, or local ordinances, the Council shall approve the final plat.
Zoning Ordinance:
11-3-3: PURPOSES OF RESIDENTIAL ZONES.
(C) R1 Single Dwelling Residential Zone. This zone provides a residential zone which is representative of
a less automobile-oriented, more walkable development pattern, characterized by somewhat smaller lot
widths, and a somewhat denser residential environment than is characteristic of the RP Residential Park
Zone. The principal uses in the R1 Residential Zone shall be single detached and attached dwelling units.
This zone is also generally located near limited commercial services that provide daily household needs.
11-3-4: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONES.
Table 11-3-1: Dimensional Standards for Residential Zones
RE RP Rl R2 ITN R3 R34 RMH
Lotarea | TT
Lot Area Minimum in ft? 1 acre* 12,000 7,000 6,000* 3,000* 5,000* 5,000 3,000
——| Area Maximum in ft? | 500*
‘SiteWidth | Width
Site Width at Front Setback.
- - - _ - -
Sebacs, inimumine [PP
pt
ee
a
p 6 |S
pose | 10
Lot Coverage, Building
—_— and Density _
[Maximum LotCoveragein%| 30 | 40 | 40 | so | so | so | so | so
in ft
units/acre
*See explanations, exceptions and qualifications m Section 11-3-4A.B.C of this Zoning Code.
(Ord. 3218, 9-13-18) (Ord. 3310, 6-18-20) (Ord. 3452, 3-31-22) (Ord. 3496, 12-8-22)
(A) Minimum and Maximum Lot Area.
(1) Inthe Rl Zone, the maximum lot size shall be thirteen thousand five hundred square feet (13,500
ft*), except for corner lots, wedge-shaped lots in cul-de-sacs, or other unusual shaped lots. This
shall also not apply to conditional uses such as schools and religious institutions.
Page 4o0f 5
Page 5 of 5
Zoning Ordinance:
11-3-3: PURPOSES OF RESIDENTIAL ZONES.
(C) R1 Single Dwelling Residential Zone. This zone provides a residential zone which is representative of
a less automobile-oriented, more walkable development pattern, characterized by somewhat smaller lot
widths, and a somewhat denser residential environment than is characteristic of the RP Residential Park
Zone. The principal uses in the R1 Residential Zone shall be single detached and attached dwelling units.
This zone is also generally located near limited commercial services that provide daily household needs.
June 2, 2026
6:30 p.m.
Planning Department
City Annex Council Chambers
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Glen Ogden, Dale Storer, Forrest Ihler, Matthew Meehan, Tia
Panter, Marry Scales, Deanna Harger, Bill Scott.
MEMBERS ABSENT: None.
ALSO PRESENT: Assistant Planning Director Kerry Beutler, Brian Stevens Planner, Mike Thrower
Planner; Terry Rodino, Esq, City Attorney, and interested citizens.
CALL TO ORDER: Ihler called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
MINUTES: Scott moved to accept the minutes of April 7, 2026, Meehan seconded the motion. The
motion passed unanimously.
Business:
2. PLT 26-010: FINAL PLAT FOR ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1.
Applicant: Eagle Rock Engineering. Not Present.
Beutler presented the staff report, a part of the record.
No discussion.
Harger moved to recommend to the Mayor and City Council approval of the Final Plat for Arbor
Estates Division No. 1., Ogden seconded the motion. Ihler called for roll call vote: Harger, yes; Storer,
yes; Meehan, yes; Ihler, yes; Scales, yes; Scott, yes; Panter, yes; Ogden, yes. The motion passed
unanimously
Page 1 of 2
RSRCS PLT26-010 FINAL PLAT ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1
REASONED STATEMENT OF RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS
APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT OF ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1, GENERALLY LOCATED
NORTH OF E 65TH SOUTH, EAST OF COLUMBIA ST, SOUTH OF LA PALOMA DR, AND WEST OF S
HOLMES AVE.
WHEREAS, the applicant filed an application for a final plat on April 24, 2026; and
WHEREAS, this matter came before the Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission during a duly noticed public
meeting on June 2, 2026; and
WHEREAS, this matter came before the Idaho Falls City Council during a duly noticed public meeting on October
22, 2026; and
WHEREAS, having reviewed the application, including all exhibits entered and having considered the issues
presented:
I.
RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS
1. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the request pursuant to the City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive
Plan, the City of Idaho Falls Zoning Ordinance, the City of Idaho Falls Subdivision Ordinance, the Local Land
Use Planning Act, and other applicable development regulations.
2. The property is approximately 34.568 acres generally located north of E 65th South, east of Columbia St, south
of La Paloma Dr, and west of S Holmes Ave.
3. The plat includes 70 buildable lots and four non-buildable lots.
4. Lot 1, Block 1; Lots 1-2, Block 2; Lot 1, Block 7 are designated as public utility and stormwater easements in
their entirety.
5. Lot 1, Block 8 is exempt from maximum lot size requirement of 13,500 sq ft because it is a corner lot.
6. Access to the property will come from E 65th South to the south and S Holmes Ave to the east with the extensions
of Hallmark Dr and Countryside Ln.
7. A new street network will be dedicated with four residential collectors: Pressley Dr, Edmund Dr, Villa Mirage
Ct, and Countryside Ln; Riddle Way, Seacove Dr, and the extensions of View Ave and Halmark Dr will be
classified as local streets.
8. The plat complies with all requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance.
9. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area primarily as Suburban which denotes existing or planned residential
areas in close proximity to or with easy vehicular access to regional commercial service areas that provide daily
household needs.
10. The proposed development is consistent with the principles of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and complies with
the requirements of the R1, Single Dwelling Residential Zone.
Page 2 of 2
RSRCS PLT26-010 FINAL PLAT ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1
II.
DECISION
Based on the above Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria, the City Council of the City of Idaho Falls approved
the Final Plat.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS
THIS _______ DAY OF ______________________, 2026
_____________________________________
Lisa Burtenshaw-Mayor
NOTICE
The Applicant or any affected person seeking judicial review of the compliance of this Reasoned Statement
with the provisions of Idaho Code § 67-6535 must first seek reconsideration of this Reasoned Statement within
fourteen (14) days by filing a request to reconsider pursuant in compliance with Idaho Code 67-6535.
In addition, the above Applicant has the right to request a regulatory taking analysis pursuant to Idaho Code
§ 67-8003
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1
This DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1
(“AGREEMENT”), made this day of , 2026, by and between
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, whose mailing
address is P.O. Box 50220, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83405 (“CITY”), and ROCKWELL HOME, INC.,
an Idaho corporation, whose mailing address is 3539 Briar Creek Lane, Suite E, Ammon, Idaho
83406 (“DEVELOPER”).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER is the sole owner, in law or equity, of a certain tract of land in the
County of Bonneville, State of Idaho, which land (hereafter referred to as “Subdivision”), is more
particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER desires to develop the Subdivision within CITY and has submitted
a plat bearing the Subdivision name described in the caption of this AGREEMENT; and
WHEREAS, City Engineer, and the Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission, have
recommended such development be allowed, subject to certain requirements and obligations on
the part of DEVELOPER; and
WHEREAS, CITY is willing to allow the development of the Subdivision within City of Idaho
Falls, Idaho, subject to the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT and the Special Conditions
attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, CITY has authority to approve Subdivision plats and the construction of streets,
utility lines and other public improvements within CITY; and
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER specifically waives DEVELOPER’s right to protest development
requirements described in this AGREEMENT, including DEVELOPER’s right of judicial review
contained in Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code, and pursuant to-the standards set forth in § 67-5279,
Idaho Code; and
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER understands that the public improvements required herein are
standards required pursuant to Idaho Falls City Code, Title 10, Chapter 1, and are authorized by
Idaho Code §§ 67-6513 and 67-6518; and
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER and CITY believe that without the public improvements required
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 — 9.16.26 PAGE 1 OF 15
herein, CITY would not be able to otherwise provide for mitigation of the effects of the
Subdivision development on the ability of CITY to deliver services without compromising quality
of such service delivery to current CITY residents, or without imposing substantial additional costs
upon current CITY residents to accommodate the proposed Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, CITY desires to ensure that public improvements consisting of those described
in this AGREEMENT, including Special Conditions for the Subdivision, are constructed; and
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER understands that a waiver of public improvements is available
pursuant to Idaho Falls City Code, but DEVELOPER specifically does not wish to request such a
waiver and wishes to enter into this AGREEMENT; and
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER enters into this AGREEMENT of DEVELOPER's own free will
and accord, without coercion and without inducement and at DEVELOPER's request; and
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER has read this AGREEMENT, has understood it, and has had the
opportunity to avail itself of legal and other counsel prior to entering into this AGREEMENT and
prior to signing it; and
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER has submitted a preliminary plat bearing the Subdivision name
described in the caption of this AGREEMENT; and
WHEREAS, City Engineer and City Planning and Zoning Commission have recommended
such Subdivision be approved subject to certain requirements and obligations on the part of
DEVELOPER; and
WHEREAS, CITY is willing to approve the Subdivision to CITY, subject to the terms and
conditions of this AGREEMENT and the Special Conditions attached hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the
Parties agree as follows:
1. Approval of Subdivision. CITY hereby approves the Subdivision plat as described in
Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part to this AGREEMENT by reference and agrees that
upon DEVELOPER’s full and complete performance of the terms and conditions hereto, it will
accept and maintain the property dedicated to CITY on the Subdivision plat and all public facilities
and improvements shown in the Improvement Plans for the Subdivision.
2. Improvement, Preliminary, and Final Improvement Plans. “Improvement Plans,” used
in this AGREEMENT, are engineer-designed plans showing all streets, sewer lines, water lines,
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. | — 9.16.26 PAGE 2 OF 15
storm drains, street signs, traffic control devices, barricades, other public utilities (telephone, gas,
electricity, fiber optic and irrigation facilities) and other public improvements contemplated within
the Subdivision. “Preliminary Improvement Plans” as used in this AGREEMENT, are those
Improvement Plans submitted and considered for the Subdivision development prior to the
approval of City Engineer, and not yet approved for construction. “Final Improvement Plans” as
used in this AGREEMENT, are those Improvement Plans submitted, considered and approved by
City Engineer for the Subdivision development.
DEVELOPER anticipates that development of the entire Subdivision will occur in phases
or divisions. DEVELOPER has filed, and City Engineer has approved, Improvement Plans for the
public improvements to be constructed within public rights-of-way exterior to the Subdivision,
(hereafter referred to as the “Exterior Improvement Plans”) showing the width, location and
alignment of all streets, sewer lines and water lines within the Subdivision and the size and
materials specifications for such water and sewer lines. Prior to the commencement of any
construction or development within any phase or division of the Subdivision, DEVELOPER shall
also file with, and obtain the approval of, City Engineer Improvement Plans (hereafter the “Interior
Improvement Plans”) for all streets, sewer lines, water lines, storm drainage facilities, street signs,
traffic control devices, barricades and other public improvements contemplated within such phase
or division of the Subdivision. The filed Improvement Plans shall also show the proposed location
of other public utilities (telephone, gas and electricity), and irrigation facilities affected by the
development of such phase or division of the Subdivision. Preliminary Improvement Plans are
incorporated herein by reference as though set out in full, and the Final Improvement Plans shall
also, upon approval by City Engineer, be deemed to be incorporated herein by reference.
3. Construction of Public Improvements. Unless otherwise agreed in the Special
Conditions, DEVELOPER shall, at its expense, design and construct all public improvements
shown in the Exterior Improvement Plans and Interior Improvement Plans. Unless otherwise
agreed in writing by City Engineer, DEVELOPER shall construct all required public
improvements within such Improvement Plans in strict accordance with the approved Preliminary
and Final Improvement Plans and CITY Standard Engineering Drawings and Specifications
(hereafter referred to as the “Standard Specifications”) in effect at the time the construction is
accomplished. The Standard Specifications are incorporated herein by reference as though set out
in full and compliance to the Standard Specifications is a condition of this AGREEMENT.
4. Permits. DEVELOPER shall obtain all right-of-way, excavation and/or other permits
required by local ordinance and comply with all requirements therein with respect to the timely
performance of the work governed by such permits.
5. Inspection. DEVELOPER shall retain a professional engineer (hereafter referred to as
the “Project Engineer”) licensed within the State of Idaho to supervise, inspect and test the
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. | — 9.16.26 PAGE 3 OF 15
construction of all public improvements within the Subdivision in order to ensure such
improvements are constructed in accordance with this AGREEMENT, the Improvement Plans and
the Standard Specifications. DEVELOPER shall not materially deviate from the Improvement
Plans or Standard Specifications without the express written approval of the City Engineer.
6. Corrected Improvement Plans. Prior to acceptance of any phase or division of the
Subdivision, DEVELOPER will file “As Constructed’’/ “As Built” Improvement Plans (hereafter
referred to as the “Corrected Improvement Plans”) with City Engineer. Such Corrected
Improvement Plans shall be prepared by the Project Engineer and shall show the actual constructed
location of all public improvements within the Subdivision including the horizontal and vertical
location of all water, sewer and storm drain lines, individual building service lines curb and gutter
alignment and street grades. Such Corrected Improvement Plans shall also specifically show all
changes between the Final Improvement Plans and the public improvements as actually
constructed. The Project Engineer shall also certify upon the Corrected Improvement Plans that
such Corrected Improvement Plans correctly show all public improvements as actually constructed
and that such public improvements have been constructed in accordance with the Standard
Specifications in effect at the time such construction was accomplished. The Project Engineer shall
also deliver to City Engineer all compaction reports, daily construction logs, reports, written tests,
analysis and other data as may be necessary to verify or support the certification of the Project
Engineer.
7. Acceptance of Subdivision. Upon satisfactory completion of such public improvements
and facilities, DEVELOPER's delivery of Corrected Improvement Plans and the filing and
approval by CITY of a final plat, CITY will accept that portion of the Subdivision for which a
final plat has been approved. Such acceptance shall not be valid unless expressly acknowledged
in writing by City Engineer. Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Special Conditions,
upon acceptance of any phase or division within the Subdivision, CITY shall assume ownership
and control of all public facilities within any dedicated street or public utility right-of-way within
the Subdivision and shall execute and record an instrument documenting such acceptance and that
also references the recording information for this AGREEMENT and thereby releasing the
Subdivision, or the accepted portion thereof, from the encumbrances of this AGREEMENT.
Acceptance of the Subdivision Improvements and recording the acceptance instrument shall not
be deemed as a waiver of DEVELOPER's agreement herein to fully and completely perform the
terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT, or as a waiver or release of the warranty set forth
below in this AGREEMENT.
8. Warranty. DEVELOPER warrants that the materials and workmanship employed in the
construction of all public improvements within the Subdivision shall be good and sound, and shall
conform to generally accepted standards within the construction industry. Such warranty shall
extend for a period of one (1) year after acceptance of any phase or division of the Subdivision
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 — 9.16.26 PAGE 4 OF 15
within which such improvements are located, by CITY, provided nothing herein shall limit the
time within which CITY may bring an action against DEVELOPER on account of DEVELOPER's
failure to construct such improvements in accordance with this AGREEMENT, the Improvement
Plans or the Standard Specifications. DEVELOPER, and DEVELOPER’s heirs, successors and
assigns, shall and do hereby respectively warrant and agree, to defend the quiet and peaceful
possession of CITY in all easements, rights-of-way, street dedications or other estates conveyed
pursuant to the terms of this AGREEMENT or pursuant to the subdivision plat which is the subject
hereof, from and against all claims agains|s DEVELOPER and DEVELOPER's successors or
assigns, respectively, and against every person whomsoever who lawfully holds, or who later
lawfully claims to have held, rights in the premises by or through DEVELOPER and
DEVELOPER’s successors or assigns, respectively, as of the date of this AGREEMENT.
9. Water and Sewer Main Connection Charges. DEVELOPER agrees to pay to CITY at
the time any separate sanitary sewer service or culinary water service connection to CITY sanitary
sewer system or culinary water system is requested, all connection fees, main connection charges,
and main charges as set forth in the City Code in effect at the time such request for service is made.
10. Failure to Pay Fees. In the event DEVELOPER fails or refuses to pay any of the fees,
charges or costs set forth herein, CITY may disannex any property owned by DEVELOPER within
the Subdivision or declare the entire unpaid balance immediately due and payable and collect such
sums in the manner provided by law, or may pursue any other remedy set forth herein or as may
be available at law or in equity. All such remedies shall be cumulative and CITY may pursue the
same separately or simultaneously as it deems necessary or appropriate. In the event of such
acceleration, all sums due shall bear interest at the rate established by law for judgments entered
in the State of Idaho, commencing on the date the unpaid amount is declared immediately due and
written demand therefor is delivered to DEVELOPER. All fees owed by DEVELOPER are due
and payable upon execution of this AGREEMENT unless otherwise specified.
11. Participation by CITY. The parties agree that those portions of the water main, the
sanitary sewer line, storm drains and street section work (hereafter collectively referred to as the
“Shared Work”), the cost (if any) of which CITY may have expressly agreed to pay pursuant to
the Special Conditions (if any conditions for reimbursement are contained therein), which may
include any water or sewer line or storm line extensions, increased line size or capacity and road
construction, are required because of future service needs originating from properties not owned
by DEVELOPER and located within the vicinity of the Subdivision, and that sound planning
requires construction thereof at the present time in order to accommodate future expansion and
development. In recognition of the cost savings which can be accomplished by construction of
such increased capacity and improvements concurrently with the facilities to be constructed for
DEVELOPER's purposes, and the impracticality of constructing such increased capacity and
improvements separately or at a later time, DEVELOPER agrees to design and construct such
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. | — 9.16.26 PAGE 5 OF 15
facilities subject to CITY's agreement to retmburse DEVELOPER for a portion of such costs, to
the extent such is set forth in the Special Conditions. If such reimbursement for the Shared Work
is set forth in the Special Conditions, prior to the commencement of the Shared Work,
DEVELOPER shall obtain and deliver to CITY three (3) independent bona fide bids for the
performance of such work from qualified and responsible contractors. Such bids shall be solicited
and itemized in a manner which allows clear and specific identification of that portion of the
construction work for which CITY is responsible. CITY shall have no obligation to pay for any
portion of the costs of such Shared work unless prior to the commencement of the work, the parties
have expressly agreed in writing to a specific amount for which CITY will reimburse the
DEVELOPER. Payment of such costs by CITY shall be due within thirty (30) days from when
all of the following have been completed or received: (1) acceptance of the Subdivision by CITY;
(2) delivery of a complete itemized statement to CITY, in a format acceptable to the CITY, setting
forth in detail the total amount of the costs for which CITY is responsible; and, if any part of the
Subdivision is within the boundaries of an urban renewal district, (3) a sworn statement signed by
DEVELOPER, including its successors and assigns, and acknowledged by the Urban Renewal
Agency for the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, also known as Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency (the
“Agency”), that DEVELOPER paid for the costs of the Shared Work and that DEVELOPER and
its successors and assigns has not contracted with and will not contract with the Agency for
reimbursement of any portion of the costs of the Shared Work and has not received and will not
receive reimbursement from the Agency for any portion of the costs of the Shared Work. To the
extent DEVELOPER, or its successors and assigns, have contracted or contract in the future with
the Agency for reimbursement for any portion of the costs of the Shared Work, the CITY’s
obligation to reimburse DEVELOPER under this AGREEMENT shall be reduced on a dollar-for-
dollar basis. Under no circumstances will the CITY and Agency each reimburse DEVELOPER
or any third party for the same costs of the Shared Work. In the event DEVELOPER is reimbursed
by CITY for any portion of the costs of the Shared Work that was also reimbursed by the Agency
to DEVELOPER or another third-party, the CITY may, in addition to any other legal remedies
available under the law, immediately pursue DEVELOPER and require DEVELOPER to repay to
CITY any amount that CITY paid DEVELOPER for the costs of the Shared Work that were also
reimbursed by Agency and, if CITY prevails, CITY shall be entitled to an award of attorneys fees
and costs. DEVELOPER shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY and Agency from
claims of any nature that any third party may assert against CITY or Agency for any costs of the
Shared Work CITY pays DEVELOPER pursuant to this AGREEMENT and which same costs the
third party claims are due from CITY or Agency to the third party.
12. Special Conditions. In recognition of the unique circumstances relative to this
Subdivision the parties agree to the Special Conditions attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and by this
reference made a part hereof.
13. Irrigation Facilities. DEVELOPER shall relocate or reconstruct, at DEVELOPER’s
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 — 9.16.26 PAGE 6 OF 15
expense, all ditches, headgate structures, culverts, siphons, drywells or other similar appurtenant
structures that will be impaired or otherwise disturbed by the construction of this Subdivision.
DEVELOPER shall also obtain the consent of all persons or entities who have any water right or
control over such structures. DEVELOPER shall also indemnify and hold CITY harmless from
any action, claim, demand or cost of any kind, including attorney's fees and court costs, arising
from the relocation or reconstruction of such facilities or DEVELOPER's failure to properly
relocate or reconstruct such facilities.
14. Relocation of Power Lines. DEVELOPER shall relocate at its expense, all existing
electric utility poles or other utility lines or fixtures necessary to construct the public improvements
within this Subdivision as shown on the Improvement Drawings.
15. Construction Schedule Change. Any modification to the public improvements shown in
the Improvement Drawings or to the construction phase limits shall be approved by City Engineer.
Prior to said approval, revised Improvement Drawings shall be resubmitted to City Engineering
Department showing the proposed changes.
16. Taxes and Assessments. DEVELOPER shall pay all real property taxes and assessments
levied or assessed against any interest in real property which DEVELOPER has agreed to convey
to CITY pursuant to this AGREEMENT up to the date the final Subdivision plat for this
Subdivision is recorded. Such taxes and assessments shall be paid prior to the acceptance by CITY
of the public improvements within any phase or division of the Subdivision.
17. Occupancy. No building or structure within the Subdivision shall be used or occupied
for any purpose other than for the construction of such building or structure, unless a final plat has
been filed and approved and all public improvements within the plat have been completed and
accepted by City Engineer. CITY may withhold Certificates of Occupancy until all such work has
been completed. Nothing herein shall prevent the use of a model building for the purpose of
DEVELOPER's sales promotional efforts provided the building is not occupied for any other
commercial or industrial purposes.
18. Default. In the event DEVELOPER fails to comply with the terms and conditions hereof
in any material respect, CITY may, without further notice to DEVELOPER, exercise any or all of
the following remedies:
A. Withhold the issuance of any building permit or certificate of occupancy for any
structure located within any phase or division of the Subdivision affected by such
default;
B. Withhold the connection of water, sewer or electric service to any property located
within any phase or division of the Subdivision affected by such default;
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 — 9.16.26 PAGE 7 OF 15
C. Refuse to accept public ownership and maintenance of public improvements within
any phase or division of the Subdivision affected by such default and record a notice
of such action with the Bonneville County Recorder's office;
D. Issue a stop work order for any building under construction within any phase or
division of the Subdivision affected by such default;
E. Withhold reimbursement of Subdivision inspection fees collected pursuant to the
Idaho Falls City Code; and
F. Bring an action for damages, injunctive relief, specific performance or any other
remedy available at law or in equity.
19. Notices. Any notice required by this AGREEMENT shall be mailed to the receiving
party at the address set forth above or such other address as may be delivered to the sending party
in writing. Such notice shall be mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid
and addressed as set forth above and shall be deemed received upon its deposit in the United States
mail in such manner.
20. Recording and Recording Fees. CITY may record this AGREEMENT with the
Bonneville County Recorder’s office and prior to the execution and approval of this
AGREEMENT, DEVELOPER shall pay to CITY all recording fees necessary to record this
AGREEMENT with the Bonneville County Recorder's office. Prior to the approval of any final
plat within the Subdivision, DEVELOPER shall pay to CITY all recording fees necessary to record
such final plat with the Bonneville County Recorder's office.
21. Compliance With Applicable Law and Regulation. DEVELOPER agrees to comply with
all applicable rules, regulations, Ordinances, Resolutions, statutes or administrative laws having
applicability to development to this Subdivision and or phase of this Subdivision including, of
those of CITY, Bonneville County, the State of Idaho, the United States of America, or any agency
or political subdivisions thereof having jurisdiction over the Subdivision and to obtain any permits,
licenses, permissions, authorizations, etc., that are required for such development.
22. Conflict With Standard Specifications. In the event of any conflict between the terms of
this AGREEMENT or the Improvement Plans and the Standard Specifications, the terms of this
AGREEMENT or the Improvement Plans shall prevail over any contrary provision of the Standard
Specifications. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this AGREEMENT and the
Improvement Plans, the terms of this AGREEMENT shall prevail.
23. Covenants Appurtenant to the Land. All covenants and conditions set forth herein shall
be appurtenant to and run with the Subdivision and shall be binding upon DEVELOPER's heirs,
successors Or assigns.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. | — 9.16.26 PAGE 8 OF 15
24. Governing Law. This AGREEMENT shall be governed by the laws of the State of Idaho.
The venue for any action arising out of this Agreement shall be exclusively in the District Court
of the Seventh Judicial District of the State of Idaho, Bonneville County or in the United States
District Court for the District of Idaho.
25. Anti-Boycott Against Israel Act. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2346, if payments
under this AGREEMENT exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and DEVELOPER
employs ten (10) or more persons, DEVELOPER certifies that it is not currently engaged in, and
will not for the duration of this AGREEMENT engage in, a boycott of goods or services from
Israel or territories under its control. The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code
section 67-2346 shall have the meaning defined therein.
26. Anti-Boycott of Certain Sectors. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2347A, if payments
under this AGREEMENT exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and DEVELOPER
employs ten (10) or more persons, DEVELOPER certifies that it is not currently engaged in and
will not for the duration of the Agreement engage in a boycott of any individual or company
because the individual or company engages in or supports either (1) the exploration, production,
utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacture of fossil fuel-based energy, timber, minerals,
hydroelectric power, nuclear energy, or agriculture; or (2) the manufacture, distribution, sale, or
use of firearms, as defined in Idaho Code section 18-3302(2)(d). The terms in this Paragraph that
are defined in Idaho Code section 67-2347A shall have the meaning defined therein.
27. Certification of No Chinese Ownership. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2359,
DEVELOPER certifies that DEVELOPER is not currently owned or operated by the government
of the People’s Republic of China and will not, for the duration of this AGREEMENT, be owned
or operated by the government of the People’s Republic China.
28. Non-Discrimination. DEVELOPER shall not discriminate against any employee or
applicant for employment on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideals, sex, age,
marital status, physical, or mental handicap, gender identity/expression, sexual orientation, or
national origin.
29. Entire Agreement. This writing evidences the final and complete agreement between the
parties and no other prior statement, representation or understanding shall be binding upon the
parties unless expressly set forth herein.
30. Effective Date. This AGREEMENT shall become valid and binding only upon its
approval by CITY Council of CITY and upon its execution by the Mayor.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. | — 9.16.26 PAGE 9 OF 15
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals this day and
year first above written.
ATTEST: CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO
By
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor
ROCKWELL HOMES, INC.
By Cor
Curtis Johnson, Vice President
[Notary Page to Follow]
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 - 9.16.26 PAGE 10 OF 15
STATE OF IDAHO )
) ss.
County of Bonneville )
On this day of , 2026, before me, the undersigned, a
notary public for Idaho, personally appeared Lisa Burtenshaw, known to me to be the Mayor of
the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, the municipal corporation that executed the foregoing document,
and acknowledged to me that they are authorized to execute the same for and on behalf of said
City.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the
day and year first above written.
Notary Public of Idaho
(Seal) Residing at:
My Commission Expires:
STATEOF Telkwho )
) ss:
County of Bonmevi® )
On this (7 day of Seplerlore , 2026, before me, the undersigned, a
notary public, in and for said State, personally appeared Curtis Jonson _, known
or identified to me to be an authorized signator and whose name is subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledged to me that they are authorized to execute the same for and on
behalf of said developer.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the
day and year in this certificate first above written.
qiiiittllllldeyyy,,
Rx GER RE ela,
SG NG 165725.
$3 rege OG 0%
Sf wOlprr . = Residing at: [
= 2 gat: Tonsn, FTO
= <=> @ =
7 = Wo pn -
2 i¢ Pus e & My Commission Expires: _9 / G / 2030
B pf Ss
3 Le’) he >
% By No, 20%" OS
eae oe
Ny, F
MHinanww™
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 — 9.16.26 PAGE 11 OF 15
EXHIBIT “A”
PROPERTY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1
BEGINNING AT A POINT THAT IS S.00°17'27’W. ALONG THE SECTION LINE 436.26 FEET
FROM THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST OF
THE BOISE MERIDIAN; RUNNING THENCE S.00°17'27’W. ALONG SAID SECTION LINE
397.71 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST BOUNDARY CORNER OF HALLMARK ESTATES,
DIVISION NO. 1, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY
LINE OF SAID HALLMARK ESTATES, DIVISION NO. 1 THE FOLLOWING SIX (6)
COURSES: (1) THENCE N.89°42'33”W. 692.00 FEET; (2) THENCE S.00°17'27"W. 525.04
FEET; (3) THENCE N.89°42'33”W. 165.00 FEET; (4) THENCE S.00°17'27°W. 270.00 FEET; (5)
THENCE N.89°42'33”W. 28.00 FEET; (6) THENCE S.00°17'27"W. 330.00 FEET TO THE
SOUTHWEST BOUNDARY CORNER OF SAID HALLMARK ESTATES, DIVISION NO. 1;
THENCE S.00°15'11”W. 620.79 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 65TH SOUTH;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID 65TH SOUTH
THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: (1) THENCE N.89°19'34”W. 425.78 FEET; (2)
THENCE N.89°55'38”W. 4.89 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE
SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE N.00°15'0S”E. ALONG SAID WEST LINE
2055.72 FEET; THENCE S.89°42'33”E. 439.65 FEET; THENCE N.00°16'48”E. 3.31 FEET;
THENCE S.89°42'33”E. 177.11 FEET; THENCE N.00°16'48”E. 455.10 FEET; THENCE
S.89°43'12”E. 465.45 FEET; THENCE S.00°16'59”E. 139.51 FEET; THENCE N.59°27'19"W. 4.07
FEET; THENCE S.01°12'41”E. 242.54 FEET; THENCE N.88°41'49”E. 230.39 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL CONTAINS: 34.568 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 — 9.16.26 PAGE 12 OF 15
EXHIBIT “B”
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1
S.C. 1.00 Traffic Signs. DEVELOPER agrees to install all street signs designating the
names of all streets within the Subdivision. Street signs designating the name of public streets shall be
constructed with white letters over green background. Street signs designating the name of private
streets shall be constructed with white lettering over blue background. Such signs shall be installed in
the manner and locations as directed by CITY’s Engineer.
S.C. _2.00 65 South and South Holmes Ave Turn Lane Improvements. DEVELOPER
shall install turn lane improvements to the approaches to the Subdivision from 65" South and South
Holms Avenue. Turn lane improvements shall be constructed as shown on the approved
DEVELOPER shall design and construct, at DEVELOPER’s sole expense, all turn lanes along 65"
South and S Holmes Ave. in accordance with the Improvement Drawings filed with and approved by
CITY Engineer
S.C. 3.00 Subdivision Seal Coat. In order to preserve the long-term effectiveness of
required roadway seal coat in the Subdivision, DEVELOPER shall pay all seal coat costs associated
with Subdivision improvements rather than applying the seal coat. In lieu of DEVELOPER seal coat
application, DEVELOPER shall pay Sixty-Nine Thousand Five Hundred Forty-Nine Dollars and
Fifteen Cents ($69,549.15) (22,803 square yards at $3.05 per square yard). CITY shall use such
payment to apply the required seal coat at a later date, when Subdivision building permits are
completed and at CITY’s sole discretion on timing.
S.C. 4.00 Existing Infrastructure. When it is necessary to move or remove existing
infrastructure not belonging to CITY and not within CITY right-of-way, DEVELOPER shall
coordinate such activities with the applicable owner, (e.g., poles owned by Pacificorp, dba Rocky
Mountain Power). Any existing electrical infrastructure owned by Pacificorp, dba Rocky Mountain
Power, will require a buy-out from DEVELOPER prior to receipt of electrical service from CITY.
Request for the buy-out, if any, is to be initiated by DEVELOPER after annexation.
S.C. 5.00 Construction of Idaho Falls Power and Idaho Falls Fiber Infrastructure.
DEVELOPER shall, at DEVELOPER’s sole expense, install all power infrastructure as described
and illustrated on the Idaho Falls Power approved and signed contractor’s map provided and
reviewed by Idaho Falls Power. All power infrastructure installation shall conform with Idaho Falls
Power’s service policy. Typical power trench installation shall have a warranty of workmanship of
one (1) year beginning at the time of City's final acceptance. However, if power infrastructure is
installed during winter conditions (where frost is evident in the ground and backfill has the potential
to be frozen earth) the warranty of workmanship shall be extended to two (2) full years beginning at
the time of City’s final acceptance. DEVELOPER will incur all costs associated with Idaho Falls
Power/Idaho Falls Fiber crews removing infrastructure in order to remedy settling. This includes,
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. | — 9.16.26 PAGE 13 OF 15
but is not limited to, all settlement of trenching, transformer bases, fiber boxes, and/or conduit
separation.
S.C. 6.00 Storm Drainage. Storm Drainage shall be designed and constructed to
accommodate drainage of the lots and right-of-way improvements within the Subdivision by
DEVELOPER. The storm drainage system shall meet CITY’s Storm Drainage Policy. The storm
system shall be constructed as shown on the CITY-approved Improvement Drawings. Maintenance
of the storm system shall be the responsibility of DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER’s heirs, successors,
or assigns.
S.C. 7.00 Construction of Water Lines. DEVELOPER shall, at DEVELOPER’s sole
expense, design and construct Nine Hundred Sixty-Five feet (965’) of Twelve inch (12”) water main
line starting approximately 640 feet east from the intersection of Countryside Lane and South Holmes
Ave. continuing to and across the entire frontage of this Subdivision along S. Holmes Ave. and Two
Thousand Three Hundred Fifty Feet (2,350’) of Twelve inch (12”) water main line starting
approximately 2,530 feet from the intersection of 65" South and Pressley Drive continuing to and
across the entire frontage of this Subdivision and to the intersection of 65" South and S. Holmes Ave
, as shown on the improvement plans approved by and on file with CITY Engineer. DEVELOPER
shall design and construct, at DEVELOPER’s sole expense, all water mains and appurtenances within
the Subdivision in accordance with CITY Standard Drawings and Engineering Specifications and as
shown on the Improvement Drawings filed with and approved by CITY Engineer, and upon
completion thereof, DEVELOPER shall furnish CITY with a certificate signed by a licensed
professional engineer, certifying that the water mains and appurtenances have been constructed in
accordance with such Specifications.. CITY agrees to reimburse DEVELOPER that portion of the
costs of materials for the twelve inch (12”) main line which exceeds the costs of materials for a Eight
inch (8”) water main line, subject to the limitations and bid procurement requirements of this
AGREEMENT.
S.C. 8.00 Reimbursement of Water Main Charges. Upon connection of water service
to any property owned by any person other than DEVELOPER and fronting upon that portion of the S
Holmes Ave and 65" South right-of-way in which DEVELOPER has constructed a water main line,
CITY shall, to the extent permitted by law, and upon written request of DEVELOPER, pay to
DEVELOPER all water main connection charges collected by CITY from the owners of such property,
pursuant to Section 8-4-14(C), City Code, as the same currently exists or may be amended hereafter.
Such right to reimbursement shall terminate with respect to any water main charge collected by CITY
after the expiration of ten (10) years from the date of this AGREEMENT.
S.C. 9.00 Construction of Sanitary Sewer Lines. DEVELOPER shall, at
DEVELOPER’s sole expense, design and construct Two Thousand Three Hundred Forty Feet
(2,340’) of Thirty-Six inch (36”) sanitary sewer main line starting approximately 2,530 feet from the
intersection of 65" South and Pressley Drive continuing to and across the entire frontage of this
Subdivision and to the intersection of 65" South and S. Holmes Ave., as shown on the improvement
plans approved by and on file with CITY Engineer. DEVELOPER shall design and construct, at
DEVELOPER’s sole expense, all sewer mains and appurtenances within the Subdivision in
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 — 9.16.26 PAGE 14 OF 15
accordance with CITY Standard Drawings and Engineering Specifications and as shown on the
Improvement Drawings filed with and approved by CITY Engineer, and upon completion thereof,
DEVELOPER shall furnish CITY with a certificate signed by a licensed professional engineer,
certifying that the sewer mains and appurtenances have been constructed in accordance with such
Specifications. CITY agrees to reimburse DEVELOPER that portion of the costs of materials for
the Thirty-Six inch (36”) main line which exceeds the costs of materials for a Eight inch (8”) sewer
main line, subject to the limitations and bid procurement requirements of this AGREEMENT.
S.C. _ 10.00 Reimbursement of Sanitary Sewer Lines. Upon connection of sanitary sewer
service to any property owned by any person other than DEVELOPER and fronting upon that portion
of sanitary sewer which DEVELOPER has constructed outside of this Subdivision, CITY shall, to the
extent permitted by law, and upon written request of DEVELOPER, pay to DEVELOPER all sewer
main connection charges collected by CITY from the owners of such property, pursuant to Section 8-1-
23(C), City Code, as the same currently exists or may be amended hereafter. Such right to
reimbursement shall terminate with respect to any sewer main charge collected by CITY after the
expiration of ten (10) years from the date of this AGREEMENT
S.C. __11.00_ Pressurized Irrigation. DEVOLPER shall install a surface water pressurized
irrigation system as shown on the improvement plans approved by and on file with CITY Engineer.
The system shall have a maximum diversion rate of 8.97 gallons per minute per developed acre, except
as otherwise approved, or restricted in times of emergency or drought, by the governing board of the
irrigation district. The System shall draw surface water at the 8.97 gallons per minute at a continuous
rate (24 hours a day, 7 days a week) subject to adjustment for weather and Irrigation District direction.
The canal diversion location and irrigation system design shall be approved in writing by the
governing board of the irrigation district prior to Construction. DEVOLPER to provide required
approval from the Irrigation District. The irrigation system shall be operational prior to the City issuing
a Certificate of Occupancy.
DEVELOPER shall arrange for a published water schedule allocated to the properties within
the development to match up with the design and construction of the surface Water pressurized
irrigation system. Prior to the sale of any lots within the subdivision, DEVELOPER shall notify
property owners of the stipulated watering schedule, and that oversight of the watering schedule shall
be the responsibility of the DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER’s heirs, successors, or assigns or property
owners within the Development.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 — 9.16.26 PAGE 15 OF 15
Memorandum
File #: 26-409
City Council
DATE: Tuesday, October 13, 2026
AGENDA: Regular
FROM: Wade Sanner, Director
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
Services
Title
Amendment to Title 11, Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Sections 11-2-2: Allowing Drinking Establishments
in LC, Limited Commercial Zones as a Permitted Use.
☒Ordinance
☐Resolution
☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☒Legislative Public Hearing
☐Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☐Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve the Ordinance amending Title 11, Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Sections 11-2-2: Allowed Uses in
Commercial Zones to permit Drinking Establishments as an allowed use in the LC, Limited Commercial Zone
under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings, request that it be read by
title and published by summary (or consider the Ordinance on the first reading and that it be read by title,
reject the Ordinance, or take other action deemed appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
Amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Sections 11-2-2: Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones to
permit Drinking Establishments as an allowed use in the LC, Limited Commercial Zone. On September 1, 2026,
the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval permitting Drinking
Establishments in the LC Zone to the Mayor and City Council as presented.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Municipal Services Departments.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 10/20/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
RETURN TO AGENDA
TITLE 11 COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
11
Applicant: City of
Idaho Falls
Project Manager:
Caitlin Long
Attachments:
1.
Proposed
amendment
language.
Requested Action: To approve the amendment to Section 11-2-4, Table 11-2-2
Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones to permit Drinking Establishment in the
LC, Limited Commercial.
Staff Comments: The City is currently working on updating ordinances city-
wide as it relates to alcohol licensing and server training for alcohol. In the
Zoning Ordinance, Drinking Establishments are currently permitted in two
commercial zones, HC and CC, and Industrial Zones. Restaurants with bars are
currently permitted in LC but not Drinking Establishments. By permitting them
in LC, this use aligns more with the other commercial uses and can be a stand
alone drinking establishment or an accessory use. Drinking Establishments will
still have to follow state law and other city ordinances to permit the sale and
serving of alcohol.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the amendments to
permit Drinking Establishments in LC, Limited Commercial Zones.
STAFF REPORT
Amendment to Section 11-2-4, Table 11-2-2 Allowed Uses in
Commercial Zones to permit Drinking Establishments in the LC,
Limited Commercial Zone
October 22, 2026
Community
Development Services
TITLE 11 COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
12
11-2-4: ALLOWED USES IN COMMERCIAL ZONES.
Table 11-2-2: Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones
P = permitted use. C1 = administrative conditional use. C2 = Board of Adjustment conditional use. C3 = City Council conditional
use. A blank denotes a use that is not allowed in that zone.
*Indicates uses that are subject to specific land use provisions set forth in the Standards for Allowed Land Uses Section of this
Chapter.
Commercial
Proposed Land Use Classification
PB
CC
LC
HC
PT
Accessory Use
P
P
P
P
P
Accessory Use, Fuel Station*
P
P
P
Accessory Use, Storage Yard*
P
P
P
Amusement Center, Indoor
P
P
P
Amusement Center, Indoor Shooting
Range*
P
P
P
Amusement Center, Outdoor*
P
Animal Care Clinic*
P
P
P
P
Animal Care Facility*
P
Bed and Breakfast*
P
P
P
Boarding /Rooming House
P
P
P
Building Material, Garden and Farm
Supplies
P
P
Cemetery*
C2
C2
C2
Club*
P
P
P
Communication Facility
P
P
P
Day Care, all Types*
P
P
P
P
P
Drinking Establishment
P
P
P
Drive-through Establishment *
P*
P
P
P
P
Dry Cleaning
P
Dwelling, Accessory Unit *
P
P
P
P
Dwelling, Multi-Unit*
P
P
P
Dwelling, Multi-Unit Attached*
P
P
P
Dwelling, Single Unit Attached*
P
Dwelling, Single Unit Detached
P
Dwelling, Two Unit
P
P
Eating Establishment
P
P
P
P
Eating Establishment, Limited
P
P
P
P
P
Financial Institutions
P
P
P
P
P
Entertainment and Cultural Facilities
P
P
P
P
P
Equipment Sales, Rental and Services
P
P
Food Processing, Small Scale
P
Food Store
P
P
P
P
Health Care and Social Services
P
P
P
P
P
Higher Education Center
P
P
P
P
Home Occupation*
P
P
P
P
P
Hospital*
C2
C2
C2
C2
C2
Page 13 of 3
Proposed Land Use Classification
PB
CC
LC
HC
PT
Industry, Craftsman
P
P
P
P
Industry, Light
P
P
Information Technology
P
P
P
P
P
Live-Work*
C2
P
P
P
P
Lodging Facility
P
P
P
P
Mortuary
P
P
Parking Facility
P
P
P
P
Pawn Shop
P
Personal Service
P
P
P
P
P
Professional Service
P
P
P
P
P
Planned Unit Development*
C3
C3
C3
Public Service Facility*
C2
C2
C2
C2
C2
Public Service Facility, Limited
P
P
P
P
P
Public Service Use
P
P
P
P
P
Recreation Vehicle Park*
P
Religious Institution*
P
P
P
P
Residential Care Facility
P
P
P
P
P
Retail
P
P
P
P
School
P
P
P
P
Short Term Rental*
P
P
P
Fuel Station
P
P
P
Fuel Station, Super
C2
P
P
Storage Facility, Indoor
P
P
P
P
Storage Facility, Outdoor
P
Storage Yard*
P
Transit Station
P
P
P
P
Vehicle Body Shop
P
Vehicle Repair and Service
P
P
P
Vehicle Sales, Rental and Service
P
P
Vehicle Washing Facility
C2
C2
P
(Ord. 3210, 8-23-18) (Ord. 3218, 9-13-18) (Ord. 3233, 12-20-18) (Ord 3277, 10-10-19)
(Ord. 3358, 12-10-20) (Ord. 3451, 3-31-22) (Ord. 3574, 6-13-24)
TITLE 11 COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
11
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; AMENDING TITLE 11
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE, SECTION 11-2-4, TABLE 11-2-2 ALLOWED
USES IN COMMERCIAL ZONES TO ALLOW DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS IN
THE LIMITED COMMERCIAL ZONE; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY,
PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City adopted the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance to promote the health, safety,
peace; convenience and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City by implementing the goals and
principals of the City’s Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City desires the standards of the City Zoning Code to be consistent and clear; and
WHEREAS, the City is in the process of updating alcohol licensing and permitting Drinking
Establishments in LC creates a more uniform approach for permitted uses in the Commercial Zones;
and
WHEREAS, the Ordinance includes changes to Section 11-2-4, Table 11-2-2 Allowed Uses in
Commercial Zones standards of the Zoning Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing and unanimously
recommend approval of the amendments of the Code on September 1, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing and passed a motion to approve the
proposed amendments of the Code on October 22, 2026.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Section 11-2-4, Table 11-2-2 Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones of the City Code of Idaho
Falls Idaho is hereby amended as follows:
TITLE 11 COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
12
11-2-4: ALLOWED USES IN COMMERCIAL ZONES.
Table 11-2-2: Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones
P = permitted use. C1 = administrative conditional use. C2 = Board of Adjustment conditional use. C3 = City Council conditional
use. A blank denotes a use that is not allowed in that zone.
*Indicates uses that are subject to specific land use provisions set forth in the Standards for Allowed Land Uses Section of this
Chapter.
Commercial
Proposed Land Use Classification
PB
CC
LC
HC
PT
Accessory Use
P
P
P
P
P
Accessory Use, Fuel Station*
P
P
P
Accessory Use, Storage Yard*
P
P
P
Amusement Center, Indoor
P
P
P
Amusement Center, Indoor Shooting
Range*
P
P
P
Amusement Center, Outdoor*
P
Animal Care Clinic*
P
P
P
P
Animal Care Facility*
P
Bed and Breakfast*
P
P
P
Boarding /Rooming House
P
P
P
Building Material, Garden and Farm
Supplies
P
P
Cemetery*
C2
C2
C2
Club*
P
P
P
Communication Facility
P
P
P
Day Care, all Types*
P
P
P
P
P
Drinking Establishment
P
P
P
Drive-through Establishment *
P*
P
P
P
P
Dry Cleaning
P
Dwelling, Accessory Unit *
P
P
P
P
Dwelling, Multi-Unit*
P
P
P
Dwelling, Multi-Unit Attached*
P
P
P
Dwelling, Single Unit Attached*
P
Dwelling, Single Unit Detached
P
Dwelling, Two Unit
P
P
Eating Establishment
P
P
P
P
Eating Establishment, Limited
P
P
P
P
P
Financial Institutions
P
P
P
P
P
Entertainment and Cultural Facilities
P
P
P
P
P
Equipment Sales, Rental and Services
P
P
Food Processing, Small Scale
P
Food Store
P
P
P
P
Health Care and Social Services
P
P
P
P
P
Higher Education Center
P
P
P
P
Home Occupation*
P
P
P
P
P
Hospital*
C2
C2
C2
C2
C2
ORDINANCE – Amendment to Zoning Ordinance Section 11-2-4, Table 11-2-2 Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones
Page 13 of 4
Proposed Land Use Classification
PB
CC
LC
HC
PT
Industry, Craftsman
P
P
P
P
Industry, Light
P
P
Information Technology
P
P
P
P
P
Live-Work*
C2
P
P
P
P
Lodging Facility
P
P
P
P
Mortuary
P
P
Parking Facility
P
P
P
P
Pawn Shop
P
Personal Service
P
P
P
P
P
Professional Service
P
P
P
P
P
Planned Unit Development*
C3
C3
C3
Public Service Facility*
C2
C2
C2
C2
C2
Public Service Facility, Limited
P
P
P
P
P
Public Service Use
P
P
P
P
P
Recreation Vehicle Park*
P
Religious Institution*
P
P
P
P
Residential Care Facility
P
P
P
P
P
Retail
P
P
P
P
School
P
P
P
P
Short Term Rental*
P
P
P
Fuel Station
P
P
P
Fuel Station, Super
C2
P
P
Storage Facility, Indoor
P
P
P
P
Storage Facility, Outdoor
P
Storage Yard*
P
Transit Station
P
P
P
P
Vehicle Body Shop
P
Vehicle Repair and Service
P
P
P
Vehicle Sales, Rental and Service
P
P
Vehicle Washing Facility
C2
C2
P
(Ord. 3210, 8-23-18) (Ord. 3218, 9-13-18) (Ord. 3233, 12-20-18) (Ord 3277, 10-10-19)
(Ord. 3358, 12-10-20) (Ord. 3451, 3-31-22) (Ord. 3574, 6-13-24)
SECTION 2. Savings and Severability Clause. The provisions and parts of this Ordinance are
intended to be severable. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
clause or phrase of this Ordinance.
SECTION 3. Publication. This Ordinance, or a summary thereof in compliance with Idaho
Code, shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect
immediately upon its passage, approval, and publication.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication.
ORDINANCE – Amendment to Zoning Ordinance Section 11-2-4, Table 11-2-2 Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones
Page 14 of 4
PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho,
this
day of
, 2026.
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO
ATTEST:
Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
(SEAL)
STATE OF IDAHO
)
) ss:
County of Bonneville
)
I, LINDA LUNDQUIST, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY:
That the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Ordinance
entitled, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; AMENDING
TITLE 11 COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE, SECTION 11-2-4, TABLE 11-2-
2 ALLOWED USES IN COMMERCIAL ZONES TO ALLOW DRINKING
ESTABLISHMENTS IN THE LIMITED COMMERCIAL ZONE; AND
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND
ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.”
A copy of the full text of the ordinance is available at City Hall.
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
(SEAL)
September 1, 2026
6:30 p.m.
Planning Department
City Annex Council Chambers
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Glen Ogden, Tia Panter, Forrest Ihler, Matthew Meehan, Marry
Scales, Deanna Harger, Bill Scott.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Dale Storer
ALSO PRESENT: Assistant Planning Director Kerry Beutler, Caitlin Long Planner, Mike Thrower Planner;
David Peterson Planner; Terry Rodino, Esq, City Attorney, and interested citizens.
CALL TO ORDER: Ihler called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
MINUTES: Meehan moved to accept the minutes of August 4, 2026 with the correction to page 4, Scales
seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
Public Hearing:
4. RZN 26-004: ALLOWING DRINKING ESTABLISHMENT IN LC AS A PERMITTED USE.
Applicant: CITY OF IDAHO FALLS.
Long presented the staff report, a part of the record.
Ihler asked if there are any restaurants that are in LC that have the accessory use as drinking. Long stated that
Red Robin, Buffalo Wild Wings, or any chain restaurant that has a bar.
Scales asked if the stipulation is there is food and they can serve alcohol because they serve food. Long agreed
and stated that the drinking establishment, the definition in the zoning ordinance for a restaurant includes it can
have a bar. Scales stated like Fords or the Tavern could exist in an LC with this ordinance change. Long agreed
they need to have the restaurant to have that.
Ihler asked if there are any restaurants that currently in LC that allow drinking. Long stated they do. Ihler
asked if we are trying to fix this, so they are following the law? Long stated that a restaurant with a bar is
currently permitted in LC. But a stand-alone drinking establishment is not, and an accessory is not. Long
stated that there was a day spa that applied as an LC for a drinking license like a glass of wine with services,
and currently that would not be permitted. If they allow drinking establishments and accessory uses in LC that
would allow the day spa to serve wine.
Scott asked if there is a limited number of liquor licenses available. Beutler stated that it is limited based on
population. There is a limited number of liquor licenses, but the City does not regulate that.
Meehan is passionate about this. Liquor licenses are regulated at State level. Every incorporated municipality
gets 2 as a baseline and for every 1500 additional residents the City gets to issue another license. Liquor
licenses are different from beer and wine licenses. They can have a drinking establishment that does not serve
liquor. Local restaurants only serve beer and wine because it is easier to get a beer and wine license.
Beutler stated that restaurants in the LC zone would be around the mall and Channing and Sams Club along
17th Street, and if any of those restaurants were to serve beer or wine. A liquor store is allowed in LC because
it is retail, but you could not have a drinking establishment.
Ogden asked if this is approved, they can apply for a liquor license or only serve beer and wine. Panter stated
that a stand-alone bar is allowed in LC. Beutler stated that there was a spa that went through the process with
the State and with Bonneville County to acquire a liquor license for beer and wine, and then the City said no
because it is not allowed in that zone. A drinking establishment is not just necessarily just beer and wine, or
other liquors. Scales stated that food is the trigger for accessory use. Long agreed and stated that this change
will allow more accessory uses to the definition, regardless of the beverage.
Meehan asked why this was left out in the first place, and why dry cleaning is not allowed. Long stated that it
is a chemical thing associated with it. Drinking establishments in LC were not allowed originally because it is
a mixed zone with residential and commercial.
Meehan feels this is a no brainer.
Ihler opened the public hearing.
No one appeared in support or opposition.
Ihler closed the public hearing.
Meehan moved to recommend to the Mayor and City Council approval of the Amendment to Section 11-
2-4, Table 11-2-2- Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones to permit Drinking Establishments in the LC
Zone. Scales seconded the motion. Ihler called for roll call vote: Scott, yes; Harger, yes; Meehan, yes;
Ihler, yes; Scales, yes; Panter, yes; Ogden, yes. The motion passed unanimously
Text is extracted by machine from the official file linked on each page; the official file is the record. Sentinel Media, LLC.