City of Idaho Falls | agenda | meeting 2026-10-22 | City Council Meeting source: https://www.idahofallsidaho.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_10222026-2196 Page 1 or 6 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA City of Idaho Falls City Council Meeting 680 Park Avenue Thursday October 22, 2026 6:30 P.M. Mayor City Council Jim Francis Council President, Seat 4 John Radford Council Seat 5 Kirk Larsen Council Seat 3 Brandon Lee Council Seat 2 Jim Freeman Council Seat 6 Michelle Ziel-Dingman Council Seat 1 Lisa Burtenshaw Livestream at www.idahofallsidaho.gov/429/Live-Stream Page 2 of 6 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Welcome to the Idaho Falls City Council Meeting. Regularly scheduled City Council meetings are open to the general public. City Council meetings are also live- streamed and archived on the City website. Please be aware that the meeting agenda will differ from the published version if amendments to the agenda are made by the Council during the meeting. The Council encourages public input. While a general public comment option is not required by Idaho law, the Idaho Falls City Council welcomes general public input as part of regular City Council meetings. General public comment will be allowed for up to 20 minutes. However, citizens are always welcome to contact their Council representatives via e-mail or telephone, as listed on the City website. The Council is committed to an atmosphere that promotes equal opportunity, civility, mutual respect, proper decorum and freedom from discrimination or harassment. Those who wish to address City Council during the council meetings are encouraged to adhere to the guidelines below. Public Comment Guidelines Speakers are encouraged to: • State their name and city of residence. • Focus comments on matters within the purview of the City Council. Limit comments to three (3) minutes or less. • Refrain from repeating information already presented to preserve time for others to speak. Large groups are encouraged to select one or two speakers to represent the voice of the entire group. • Practice civility and courtesy. City leaders have the right and the responsibility to maintain order and decorum during the meeting. Time may be curtailed for those speakers whose comments are profane or disruptive in nature. • Refrain from comments on issues involving matters currently pending before the City’s Planning and Zoning Commission or other matters that require legal due process, including public hearings, City enforcement actions, and pending City personnel disciplinary matters. • Comments that pertain to activities or performance of individual City employees should be shared directly with the City’s Human Resources Department (208-612-8248), the City’s Legal Department (208-612- 8178) or with the Office of the Mayor (208-612-8235). Public Hearing Guidelines • In-Person Testimony. Because public hearings must follow various procedures required by law, please wait to offer your testimony until invited/indicated. Please address Council directly and try to limit your time to three (3) minutes. • Written Testimony. The public may provide written testimony via postal mail sent to City Hall or via email sent to the City Clerk at IFClerk@idahofalls.gov. Testimony will be distributed to the members of the Council and become a part of the official public hearing record. Written testimony must be received no later than forty-eight (48) hours prior to the date of the hearing to ensure inclusion in the permanent City record. If you need communication aids or other physical accommodations to attend or access this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (208) 612-8414 or the ADA Coordinator at (208) 612-8323 prior to the meeting. They will help accommodate special needs wherever possible. 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 City Council Agenda City Council Chambers 6:30 PM Thursday, October 22, 2026 1. Call to Order & Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Staff responses to prior public comment and other updates 4. Public Comment Please see guidelines on page 2. 5. Consent Agenda Questions on Consent Agenda Items may be addressed and/or moved to the Regular Agenda for separate consideration if requested by a Council Member. Items typical of consent can include routine items for purchase, supply or inventory replenishment, vehicle or equipment replacement, etc.; items already budgeted. Other changes to this agenda may require the approval of a majority of Council. A) Municipal Services 1) 2026 Third Quarter Impact Fee Report 26-390 Fee Summary Report Fees Paid Report 12.18.2025 Minutes 1.8.2026 Minutes Attachments: 26-414 26-415 26-416 B) Public Works 1) Thermoplastics Citywide 2026 - Change Order #1 - $46,490 Attachments: CO # 01 2) Bid IF26016 - Water Inventory Replenishment total $1,247,771, Core & Main $846,665 & Ferguson $401,106 Attachments: Bid 3) Bid Award IF-26-012, Annual Purchase of Chlorine and Sodium Bisulfite total $535,622.80, Thatcher $244,862.80 & Adelle Way $290,760 Attachments: Bid C) Office of the Mayor 1) September 2026 Licensing through the Office of the City Clerk 26-418 Page 3 of 6 City Council Agenda October 22, 2026 New Renewals Contractor Attachments: 2) City Council Meeting Minutes 26-391 09.09.26 Utility Board 09.21.26 Work Session 09.24.26 City Council 10.05.26 Work Session Attachments: Action Item: Approve, accept, or receive all items on the Consent Agenda according to the recommendations presented (or take other action deemed appropriate). 6. Regular Agenda A) Office of the Mayor 1) IFDDC Parking Program MOU 26-419 IFDDC has managed parking in the downtown district, and this MOU will renew that agreement. This agreement novates the prior parking agreement and authorizes IFDDC to manage downtown parking as the downtown enforcement organization. The cost of the service is $92,200. The MOU is effective upon execution through September 30, 2027, with an automatic renewal and a provision of termination with a six-month written notice. Action Item(s): Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation (IFDDC) to manage downtown parking as the downtown enforcement organization, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Attachments: Agreement 2) IFDDC Management Services Agreement 26-420 The management agreement retains IFDDC to continue providing management services for the BID for the fiscal year 2026/27 (term is from October 1, 2026, through September 30, 2027). Compensation will be 98% of the total BID revenue, paid in two equal installments based on the tax revenues collected. It is IFDDC’s responsibility for recordkeeping, district administration, managing revenue projects, and holding public meetings. Approve the agreement with the Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation (IFDDC) to Action Item(s): Page 4 of 6 City Council Agenda October 22, 2026 provide management services for the Business Improvement District (BID) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Agreement Attachments: B) Community Development Services: 1) Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, Arbor Estates Division No. 1. 26-408 Attached is the application for the Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for Arbor Estates Division No. 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its June 2, 2026, meeting and unanimously voted to recommend approval of the final plat to the Mayor and City Council as presented. This Final Plat was reviewed by CDS Planning staff as well as staff from Fire, Idaho Falls Power, and the Public Works Water, Wastewater, and Engineering/Survey Divisions. 1. Approve the Development Agreement for the Final Plat for Arbor Estates Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement (or take other action deemed appropriate). 2. Approve the Final Plat for Arbor Estates Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor, City Engineer, and City Clerk to sign said Final Plat (or take other action deemed appropriate). 3. Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Final Plat for Arbor Estates Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Action Item(s): Zoning Map Aerial Map Final Plat Staff Report PC Minutes Reasoned Statement Development Agreement Attachments: 2) Amendment to Title 11, Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Sections 11-2-2: Allowing Drinking Establishments in LC, Limited Commercial Zones as a Permitted Use. 26-409 Amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Sections 11-2-2: Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones to permit Drinking Establishments as an allowed use in the LC, Limited Commercial Zone. On September 1, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously Page 5 of 6 City Council Agenda October 22, 2026 voted to recommend approval permitting Drinking Establishments in the LC Zone to the Mayor and City Council as presented. Approve the Ordinance amending Title 11, Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Sections 11-2-2: Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones to permit Drinking Establishments as an allowed use in the LC, Limited Commercial Zone under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings, request that it be read by title and published by summary (or consider the Ordinance on the first reading and that it be read by title, reject the Ordinance, or take other action deemed appropriate). Action Item(s): Staff Report Ord Amendment PC Minutes Attachments: 7. Announcements 8. Adjournment Page 6 of 6 Memorandum File #: 26-390 City Council DATE: Monday, October 5, 2026 AGENDA: Consent FROM: Pam Alexander, Impact Fee Administrator DEPARTMENT: Municipal Services Title 2026 Third Quarter Impact Fee Report ☐Ordinance ☐Resolution ☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☐Legislative Public Hearing ☒Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☐Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: Accept the 2026 third quarter impact fee report pursuant to City Code, Section 10-8-7(G) (or take other action deemed appropriate). Description, Background Information, Purpose: City Code requires quarterly and annual reports to be provided to the Impact Fee Advisory Committee and Council. For the third quarter, July 1, 2026-September 30, 2026, a total of $521,892.60 has been paid in impact fees. This is an increase of $59,395.48 over the second 2026 quarter report, April -June, for a total of $462,497.12. For the July-September period, a total of $213,183.00 was paid for multi-family and single-family permits issued and calculated under the previous 2022 impact fee study and fee structure. A total of $308,709.60 was paid under the new 2026 impact fee study and fee structure, with 39.8% or a total of $122,740.00 of the permits paid for development category of 3,000 square feet or more and 30% or a total of $91,173.60 in the retail development category. An estimated total of $449,602.97 has been paid in impact fees under the 2026 impact fee study and fee structure. Estimated impact fee cash balances as of September 30, 2026, of $13.5M includes Police at $1.4M; Fire at $122,018; Parks at $3.8M; and Transportation at $8.1M. These cash balances are estimates as the full cash balances for the months of July, August, and September have not been confirmed in the city’s new Workday financial system as of the date this report was submitted to City Council. As a follow up to City Council, there was a positive resolution to the Barnwood Estates Townhomes and Terrace Gate Condominiums impact fee assessment appeal hearing on Thursday, December 18, 2025, with the developer receiving a reimbursement in the amount of $240,474.11 for completed Arterial Street Section City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/20/2026 Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ RETURN TO AGENDA File #: 26-390 City Council Improvements along Skyline Drive in early September 2026. In addition to the reimbursement, the developer also received an impact fee credit in the amount of $5,273.50 for one single-family residential unit as requested through Community Development Services on Friday, December 19, 2025. A copy of the City Council meeting motions from Thursday, December 18, 2025 (Pages 12-14) and Thursday, January 8, 2026 (Page 2) are attached for reference. Approved impact fee funded project(s) for the third 2026 quarter report are the Installation of Irrigation System at Meppen Park, approved at October 8, 2026, City Council meeting for a total of $98,900.00. This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/20/2026 Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Multi-Family Single-Family Industrial Institutional Office Retail Percent Received Police 10,175.00 $ 3,846.00 $ - - - - 7% Fire 14,850.00 3,114.00 - - - - 8% Parks and Recreation 43,450.00 11,124.00 - - - - 26% Transportation 102,520.00 24,104.00 - - - - 59% 170,995.00 $ 42,188.00 $ - $ - - $ - $ 100% Percentage by Category 80% 20% 0.0% 0% 0.0% 0% Total Impact Fees Received - 2022 Impact Fee Study 213,183.00 $ Under 1,500 1,500 to 2,999 3,000 or More Industrial Institutional Office Retail Percent Received Police 1,850.00 $ 3,874.00 $ 7,543.00 - - - 13,386.60 9% Fire 2,700.00 5,694.00 11,077.00 - - - 11,055.00 10% Parks and Recreation 7,900.00 16,588.00 32,300.00 - - - - 18% Transportation 18,640.00 37,550.00 71,820.00 - - - 66,732.00 63% 31,090.00 $ 63,706.00 $ 122,740.00 $ - - $ - $ 91,173.60 $ 100% Percentage by Category 10% 21% 39.8% 0% 0.0% 0% 30% Total Impact Fees Received - 2026 Impact Fee Study 308,709.60 $ Total Impact Fees Received July 1 - September 30, 2026 521,892.60 $ Police Fire Parks Transportation Total 1,410,245 $ 122,018 $ 3,849,417 $ 8,161,577 $ 13,543,257 $ (*) Cash balances have not been confirmed in Workday for July, August, and September Source Documentation: Cityworks reporting system as of Thursday, October 1, 2026; report parameters- paid impact fees July 1 - September 30, 2026. Estimated Impact Fee Cash Balances as of September 30, 2026 (*) Impact Fee Activity (July 1, 2026 - September 30, 2026) Impact Fees Issued and Paid by 2022 Impact Fee Study Categories (Permits Issued July 1, 2026 -September 30, 2026) Impact Fees Paid by 2026 Impact Fee Study Categories (Permits Issued July 1, 2026 - September 30, 2026) City of Idaho Falls 308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405 Phone: (208) 612-8100 Impact Fee Payments From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026 Case Number Case Name Location Account Code Amount IFFDH: IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 9/24/2026 RES26-00475 SFR: M 2372, G 1181, CP 520, FB 2040, UFB 285 5755 Dune Village Way 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 Date of Payment: 9/10/2026 RES26-00476 SFR: M 2573, G 1399, CP 638, FB 2014, UFB 559 5342 Wild Dunes Ln 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 Date of Payment: 8/27/2026 RES26-00405 SFR, M 1855, UNFB 1865, GAR 834, COVP 204 516 Boxwood Dr 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 Date of Payment: 7/16/2026 RES26-00248 SFR M 2400, G 1512, CP 270, FB 2400 2201 W 17th S 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 Date of Payment: 7/17/2026 RES26-00312 SFR: M 1937, G 931, CP 422, UFB 1941 5505 Boardwalk Rd 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 RES26-00317 SFR: M 1620, G 795, CP 180, FB 1620 5471 Boardwalk Rd 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 RES26-00320 SFR: M 1589, G 1084, CP 136, FB 1261, UFB 328 5911 Maggie Dr 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 RES26-00283 Twin Home: M 1589, G 518, UFB 1489 820 Kiah Ln 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 RES26-00284 Twin home; M 1589, G 518, UFB 1489 832 Kiah Ln 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 RES26-00289 SFR: M 1652, G 895, CP 52, UFB 1412 6161 Broken Stone Way 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 RES26-00288 Twin Home: M 1599, G 888, UFB 1589 5885 Maggie Dr 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 RES26-00286 Twin Home: M 1589, G 888, UFB 1589 5861 Maggie Dr 033-2355-325.01-00 $0.00 RES26-00286 Twin Home: M 1589, G 888, UFB 1589 5861 Maggie Dr 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 Date of Payment: 7/2/2026 RES26-00249 SFR: M 2565, G 1520, CP 455, FB 2557 4865 River Bend Ln 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 Date of Payment: 7/22/2026 RES26-00278 SFR: M 1784, G 802, CP 141, UFB 1584 5556 Sand Springs Rd 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 Date of Payment: 8/6/2026 RES26-00340 SFR: M 1881, G910, CP 232, FB 1439, UFB 415 5377 Boardwalk Rd 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM Page 1 of 16 City of Idaho Falls 308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405 Phone: (208) 612-8100 Impact Fee Payments From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026 Case Number Case Name Location Account Code Amount IFFDH: IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/20/2026 RES26-00351 SFR: M 1773, G 1018, CP 456, UFB 1662 5441 Boardwalk Rd 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 Date of Payment: 8/17/2026 RES26-00339 Twinhome: M 1544, G 543, FB 1538 417 East River Ln 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 RES26-00349 TwinHome: M 1544, G 543, FB 1538 425 East River Ln 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 IFFDH: IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 7/17/2026 RES26-00290 SFR: M 1730, G 798, CP 52, UFB 1484 1584 Sandbar St 033-2355-325.01-00 $583.00 Total Payments for IFFDH: $11,077.00 IFFDL: IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS UNDER 1,500 SQ CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/31/2026 RES26-00367 Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #6 033-2355-325.01-00 $270.00 Date of Payment: 8/27/2026 RES26-00366 Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #5 033-2355-325.01-00 $270.00 RES26-00365 Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #4 033-2355-325.01-00 $270.00 RES26-00360 Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #2 033-2355-325.01-00 $270.00 RES26-00362 Townhome Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #3 033-2355-325.01-00 $270.00 RES26-00356 Townhome Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #1 033-2355-325.01-00 $270.00 Date of Payment: 7/14/2026 RES26-00257 Townhome (3 Plex-Unit C): M 453, 2nd 885, G 433 1120 Elmore Ave 033-2355-325.01-00 $270.00 RES26-00258 Townhome (3 Plex-Unit B) M 487, 2nd 911, G 425 1124 Elmore Ave 033-2355-325.01-00 $270.00 RES26-00259 Townhome (3 Plex-Unit A): M 453, 2nd 885, G 432 1128 Elmore Ave 033-2355-325.01-00 $270.00 Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM Page 2 of 16 City of Idaho Falls 308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405 Phone: (208) 612-8100 Impact Fee Payments From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026 Case Number Case Name Location Account Code Amount IFFDL: IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS UNDER 1,500 SQ CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/17/2026 RES26-00448 ADU: M 448 419 Tyra Dr 033-2355-325.01-00 $270.00 Total Payments for IFFDL: $2,700.00 IFFDM: IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 9/22/2026 RES26-00282 SFR: M 2563, G 899, CP 656 4785 Providence Point Dr 033-2355-325.01-00 $438.00 Date of Payment: 9/28/2026 RES26-00500 SFR: M 1391, G 489, CP 91, UFB 1391 6855 Millbrook Dr 033-2355-325.01-00 $438.00 RES26-00503 SFR: M 1445, G 586, CP 116, UFB 1423 6856 Bronson Dr 033-2355-325.01-00 $438.00 Date of Payment: 9/3/2026 RES26-00472 Twin Home: M 1411, G 420, CP 40, UFB 1413 6349 Ender Ln 033-2355-325.01-00 $438.00 RES26-00471 Twin Home: M 1411, G 420, CP 40, UFB 1413 6333 Ender Ln 033-2355-325.01-00 $438.00 Date of Payment: 7/1/2026 RES26-00270 SFR: M 1454, G 968, CP 120, UFB 1432 1685 Palm Springs Dr 033-2355-325.01-00 $438.00 RES26-00245 SFR: M 1149, G 424, UFB 209, FB 983 1520 S Emerson Ave 033-2355-325.01-00 $438.00 Date of Payment: 7/13/2026 RES26-00323 SFR: M 1427, G 829, CP 66, UFB 1427 351 Birdie Thompson Dr 033-2355-325.01-00 $438.00 Date of Payment: 8/13/2026 RES26-00397 SFR: M 1362, 2nd 1153, GAR 612, COVP 114 5476 Rip Tide Rd 033-2355-325.01-00 $438.00 Date of Payment: 8/18/2026 RES26-00272 SFR: M 1919, G 540, CP 85 1619 Sandbar St 033-2355-325.01-00 $438.00 IFFDM: IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/3/2026 RES26-00325 SFR: M 2009, G 559, P 482 1568 Sandbar St 033-2355-325.01-00 $438.00 Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM Page 3 of 16 City of Idaho Falls 308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405 Phone: (208) 612-8100 Impact Fee Payments From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026 Case Number Case Name Location Account Code Amount IFFDM: IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/4/2026 RES26-00306 Twin Home: M 600, 2nd 1083, G 572 424 East River Ln 033-2355-325.01-00 $438.00 RES26-00302 Twin Home: M 663, 2nd 1139, G 572 414 East River Ln 033-2355-325.01-00 $438.00 Total Payments for IFFDM: $5,694.00 IFNRRTLFD: RETAIL IMPACT FEE FIRE/EMS CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 7/13/2026 COM26-00019 Pizza Ranch Restaurant & Fun- Zone 231 N Woodruff Ave 033-2355-325.01-00 $8,195.00 Date of Payment: 7/31/2026 COM25-00149 New Circle K Store and Gas Station 1575 Pancheri Dr 033-2355-325.01-00 $2,860.00 Total Payments for IFNRRTLFD: $11,055.00 IFNRRTLPD: RETAIL IMPACT FEE POLICE CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 7/31/2026 COM25-00149 New Circle K Store and Gas Station 1575 Pancheri Dr 032-2055-325.01-00 $3,463.20 Date of Payment: 7/13/2026 COM26-00019 Pizza Ranch Restaurant & Fun- Zone 231 N Woodruff Ave 032-2055-325.01-00 $9,923.40 Total Payments for IFNRRTLPD: $13,386.60 IFNRRTLTR: RETAIL IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTATION CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 7/13/2026 COM26-00019 Pizza Ranch Restaurant & Fun- Zone 231 N Woodruff Ave 035-4655-325.01-00 $49,468.00 Date of Payment: 7/31/2026 COM25-00149 New Circle K Store and Gas Station 1575 Pancheri Dr 035-4655-325.01-00 $17,264.00 Total Payments for IFNRRTLTR: $66,732.00 IFPLH: IMPACT FEE POLICE 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/17/2026 RES26-00339 Twinhome: M 1544, G 543, FB 1538 417 East River Ln 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM Page 4 of 16 City of Idaho Falls 308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405 Phone: (208) 612-8100 Impact Fee Payments From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026 Case Number Case Name Location Account Code Amount IFPLH: IMPACT FEE POLICE 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/17/2026 RES26-00349 TwinHome: M 1544, G 543, FB 1538 425 East River Ln 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 Date of Payment: 7/22/2026 RES26-00278 SFR: M 1784, G 802, CP 141, UFB 1584 5556 Sand Springs Rd 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 Date of Payment: 8/6/2026 RES26-00340 SFR: M 1881, G910, CP 232, FB 1439, UFB 415 5377 Boardwalk Rd 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 Date of Payment: 7/17/2026 RES26-00286 Twin Home: M 1589, G 888, UFB 1589 5861 Maggie Dr 032-2055-325.01-00 $0.00 RES26-00286 Twin Home: M 1589, G 888, UFB 1589 5861 Maggie Dr 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 RES26-00320 SFR: M 1589, G 1084, CP 136, FB 1261, UFB 328 5911 Maggie Dr 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 RES26-00288 Twin Home: M 1599, G 888, UFB 1589 5885 Maggie Dr 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 RES26-00312 SFR: M 1937, G 931, CP 422, UFB 1941 5505 Boardwalk Rd 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 RES26-00317 SFR: M 1620, G 795, CP 180, FB 1620 5471 Boardwalk Rd 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 RES26-00289 SFR: M 1652, G 895, CP 52, UFB 1412 6161 Broken Stone Way 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 RES26-00283 Twin Home: M 1589, G 518, UFB 1489 820 Kiah Ln 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 RES26-00284 Twin home; M 1589, G 518, UFB 1489 832 Kiah Ln 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 Date of Payment: 7/2/2026 RES26-00249 SFR: M 2565, G 1520, CP 455, FB 2557 4865 River Bend Ln 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 Date of Payment: 7/16/2026 RES26-00248 SFR M 2400, G 1512, CP 270, FB 2400 2201 W 17th S 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 Date of Payment: 8/27/2026 RES26-00405 SFR, M 1855, UNFB 1865, GAR 834, COVP 204 516 Boxwood Dr 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 Date of Payment: 9/10/2026 RES26-00476 SFR: M 2573, G 1399, CP 638, FB 2014, UFB 559 5342 Wild Dunes Ln 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 Date of Payment: 8/20/2026 RES26-00351 SFR: M 1773, G 1018, CP 456, UFB 1662 5441 Boardwalk Rd 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM Page 5 of 16 City of Idaho Falls 308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405 Phone: (208) 612-8100 Impact Fee Payments From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026 Case Number Case Name Location Account Code Amount IFPLH: IMPACT FEE POLICE 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 9/24/2026 RES26-00475 SFR: M 2372, G 1181, CP 520, FB 2040, UFB 285 5755 Dune Village Way 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 IFPLH: IMPACT FEE POLICE 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 7/17/2026 RES26-00290 SFR: M 1730, G 798, CP 52, UFB 1484 1584 Sandbar St 032-2055-325.01-00 $397.00 Total Payments for IFPLH: $7,543.00 IFPLL: IMPACT FEE POLICE UNDER 1,500 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/17/2026 RES26-00448 ADU: M 448 419 Tyra Dr 032-2055-325.01-00 $185.00 IFPLL: IMPACT FEE POLICE UNDER 1,500 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 7/14/2026 RES26-00259 Townhome (3 Plex-Unit A): M 453, 2nd 885, G 432 1128 Elmore Ave 032-2055-325.01-00 $185.00 RES26-00258 Townhome (3 Plex-Unit B) M 487, 2nd 911, G 425 1124 Elmore Ave 032-2055-325.01-00 $185.00 RES26-00257 Townhome (3 Plex-Unit C): M 453, 2nd 885, G 433 1120 Elmore Ave 032-2055-325.01-00 $185.00 Date of Payment: 8/27/2026 RES26-00356 Townhome Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #1 032-2055-325.01-00 $185.00 RES26-00360 Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #2 032-2055-325.01-00 $185.00 RES26-00362 Townhome Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #3 032-2055-325.01-00 $185.00 RES26-00365 Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #4 032-2055-325.01-00 $185.00 RES26-00366 Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #5 032-2055-325.01-00 $185.00 Date of Payment: 8/31/2026 RES26-00367 Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #6 032-2055-325.01-00 $185.00 Total Payments for IFPLL: $1,850.00 Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM Page 6 of 16 City of Idaho Falls 308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405 Phone: (208) 612-8100 Impact Fee Payments From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026 Case Number Case Name Location Account Code Amount IFPLM: IMPACT FEE POLICE 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/18/2026 RES26-00272 SFR: M 1919, G 540, CP 85 1619 Sandbar St 032-2055-325.01-00 $298.00 Date of Payment: 8/13/2026 RES26-00397 SFR: M 1362, 2nd 1153, GAR 612, COVP 114 5476 Rip Tide Rd 032-2055-325.01-00 $298.00 Date of Payment: 7/1/2026 RES26-00270 SFR: M 1454, G 968, CP 120, UFB 1432 1685 Palm Springs Dr 032-2055-325.01-00 $298.00 RES26-00245 SFR: M 1149, G 424, UFB 209, FB 983 1520 S Emerson Ave 032-2055-325.01-00 $298.00 Date of Payment: 7/13/2026 RES26-00323 SFR: M 1427, G 829, CP 66, UFB 1427 351 Birdie Thompson Dr 032-2055-325.01-00 $298.00 Date of Payment: 9/3/2026 RES26-00471 Twin Home: M 1411, G 420, CP 40, UFB 1413 6333 Ender Ln 032-2055-325.01-00 $298.00 RES26-00472 Twin Home: M 1411, G 420, CP 40, UFB 1413 6349 Ender Ln 032-2055-325.01-00 $298.00 Date of Payment: 9/28/2026 RES26-00503 SFR: M 1445, G 586, CP 116, UFB 1423 6856 Bronson Dr 032-2055-325.01-00 $298.00 RES26-00500 SFR: M 1391, G 489, CP 91, UFB 1391 6855 Millbrook Dr 032-2055-325.01-00 $298.00 Date of Payment: 9/22/2026 RES26-00282 SFR: M 2563, G 899, CP 656 4785 Providence Point Dr 032-2055-325.01-00 $298.00 IFPLM: IMPACT FEE POLICE 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/3/2026 RES26-00325 SFR: M 2009, G 559, P 482 1568 Sandbar St 032-2055-325.01-00 $298.00 IFPLM: IMPACT FEE POLICE 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/4/2026 RES26-00306 Twin Home: M 600, 2nd 1083, G 572 424 East River Ln 032-2055-325.01-00 $298.00 RES26-00302 Twin Home: M 663, 2nd 1139, G 572 414 East River Ln 032-2055-325.01-00 $298.00 Total Payments for IFPLM: $3,874.00 Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM Page 7 of 16 City of Idaho Falls 308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405 Phone: (208) 612-8100 Impact Fee Payments From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026 Case Number Case Name Location Account Code Amount IFPRH: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/17/2026 RES26-00339 Twinhome: M 1544, G 543, FB 1538 417 East River Ln 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 RES26-00349 TwinHome: M 1544, G 543, FB 1538 425 East River Ln 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 Date of Payment: 7/22/2026 RES26-00278 SFR: M 1784, G 802, CP 141, UFB 1584 5556 Sand Springs Rd 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 Date of Payment: 8/6/2026 RES26-00340 SFR: M 1881, G910, CP 232, FB 1439, UFB 415 5377 Boardwalk Rd 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 Date of Payment: 7/17/2026 RES26-00286 Twin Home: M 1589, G 888, UFB 1589 5861 Maggie Dr 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 RES26-00320 SFR: M 1589, G 1084, CP 136, FB 1261, UFB 328 5911 Maggie Dr 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 RES26-00288 Twin Home: M 1599, G 888, UFB 1589 5885 Maggie Dr 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 RES26-00286 Twin Home: M 1589, G 888, UFB 1589 5861 Maggie Dr 034-2755-325.01-00 $0.00 RES26-00317 SFR: M 1620, G 795, CP 180, FB 1620 5471 Boardwalk Rd 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 RES26-00289 SFR: M 1652, G 895, CP 52, UFB 1412 6161 Broken Stone Way 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 RES26-00283 Twin Home: M 1589, G 518, UFB 1489 820 Kiah Ln 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 RES26-00284 Twin home; M 1589, G 518, UFB 1489 832 Kiah Ln 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 RES26-00312 SFR: M 1937, G 931, CP 422, UFB 1941 5505 Boardwalk Rd 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 Date of Payment: 7/2/2026 RES26-00249 SFR: M 2565, G 1520, CP 455, FB 2557 4865 River Bend Ln 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 Date of Payment: 7/16/2026 RES26-00248 SFR M 2400, G 1512, CP 270, FB 2400 2201 W 17th S 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 Date of Payment: 8/27/2026 RES26-00405 SFR, M 1855, UNFB 1865, GAR 834, COVP 204 516 Boxwood Dr 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 Date of Payment: 8/20/2026 RES26-00351 SFR: M 1773, G 1018, CP 456, UFB 1662 5441 Boardwalk Rd 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM Page 8 of 16 City of Idaho Falls 308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405 Phone: (208) 612-8100 Impact Fee Payments From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026 Case Number Case Name Location Account Code Amount IFPRH: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 9/10/2026 RES26-00476 SFR: M 2573, G 1399, CP 638, FB 2014, UFB 559 5342 Wild Dunes Ln 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 Date of Payment: 9/24/2026 RES26-00475 SFR: M 2372, G 1181, CP 520, FB 2040, UFB 285 5755 Dune Village Way 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 IFPRH: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 7/17/2026 RES26-00290 SFR: M 1730, G 798, CP 52, UFB 1484 1584 Sandbar St 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,700.00 Total Payments for IFPRH: $32,300.00 IFPRL: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC UNDER 1,500 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/17/2026 RES26-00448 ADU: M 448 419 Tyra Dr 034-2755-325.01-00 $790.00 IFPRL: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC UNDER 1,500 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 7/14/2026 RES26-00259 Townhome (3 Plex-Unit A): M 453, 2nd 885, G 432 1128 Elmore Ave 034-2755-325.01-00 $790.00 RES26-00258 Townhome (3 Plex-Unit B) M 487, 2nd 911, G 425 1124 Elmore Ave 034-2755-325.01-00 $790.00 RES26-00257 Townhome (3 Plex-Unit C): M 453, 2nd 885, G 433 1120 Elmore Ave 034-2755-325.01-00 $790.00 Date of Payment: 8/27/2026 RES26-00356 Townhome Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #1 034-2755-325.01-00 $790.00 RES26-00360 Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #2 034-2755-325.01-00 $790.00 RES26-00362 Townhome Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #3 034-2755-325.01-00 $790.00 RES26-00365 Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #4 034-2755-325.01-00 $790.00 RES26-00366 Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #5 034-2755-325.01-00 $790.00 Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM Page 9 of 16 City of Idaho Falls 308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405 Phone: (208) 612-8100 Impact Fee Payments From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026 Case Number Case Name Location Account Code Amount IFPRL: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC UNDER 1,500 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/31/2026 RES26-00367 Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #6 034-2755-325.01-00 $790.00 Total Payments for IFPRL: $7,900.00 IFPRM: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/18/2026 RES26-00272 SFR: M 1919, G 540, CP 85 1619 Sandbar St 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,276.00 Date of Payment: 8/13/2026 RES26-00397 SFR: M 1362, 2nd 1153, GAR 612, COVP 114 5476 Rip Tide Rd 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,276.00 Date of Payment: 7/13/2026 RES26-00323 SFR: M 1427, G 829, CP 66, UFB 1427 351 Birdie Thompson Dr 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,276.00 Date of Payment: 7/1/2026 RES26-00270 SFR: M 1454, G 968, CP 120, UFB 1432 1685 Palm Springs Dr 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,276.00 RES26-00245 SFR: M 1149, G 424, UFB 209, FB 983 1520 S Emerson Ave 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,276.00 Date of Payment: 9/3/2026 RES26-00471 Twin Home: M 1411, G 420, CP 40, UFB 1413 6333 Ender Ln 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,276.00 RES26-00472 Twin Home: M 1411, G 420, CP 40, UFB 1413 6349 Ender Ln 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,276.00 Date of Payment: 9/28/2026 RES26-00503 SFR: M 1445, G 586, CP 116, UFB 1423 6856 Bronson Dr 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,276.00 RES26-00500 SFR: M 1391, G 489, CP 91, UFB 1391 6855 Millbrook Dr 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,276.00 Date of Payment: 9/22/2026 RES26-00282 SFR: M 2563, G 899, CP 656 4785 Providence Point Dr 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,276.00 IFPRM: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/3/2026 RES26-00325 SFR: M 2009, G 559, P 482 1568 Sandbar St 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,276.00 Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM Page 10 of 16 City of Idaho Falls 308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405 Phone: (208) 612-8100 Impact Fee Payments From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026 Case Number Case Name Location Account Code Amount IFPRM: IMPACT FEE PARKS AND REC 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/4/2026 RES26-00306 Twin Home: M 600, 2nd 1083, G 572 424 East River Ln 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,276.00 RES26-00302 Twin Home: M 663, 2nd 1139, G 572 414 East River Ln 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,276.00 Total Payments for IFPRM: $16,588.00 IFRMFFD: IMPACT FEE MULTIFAMILY FIRE/EMS CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 9/28/2026 COM26-00035 Stillwater Senior Living - 55 Unit Apartment 450 W Anderson St 033-2355-325-.01-00 $14,850.00 Total Payments for IFRMFFD: $14,850.00 IFRMFPD: IMPACT FEE MULTIFAMILY POLICE CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 9/28/2026 COM26-00035 Stillwater Senior Living - 55 Unit Apartment 450 W Anderson St 032-2055-325.01-00 $10,175.00 Total Payments for IFRMFPD: $10,175.00 IFRMFPR: IMPACT FEE MULTIFAMILY PARKS AND REC CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 9/28/2026 COM26-00035 Stillwater Senior Living - 55 Unit Apartment 450 W Anderson St 034-2755-325.01-00 $43,450.00 Total Payments for IFRMFPR: $43,450.00 IFRMFTR: IMPACT FEE MULTIFAMILY TRANSPORTATION CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 9/28/2026 COM26-00035 Stillwater Senior Living - 55 Unit Apartment 450 W Anderson St 035-4655-325.01-00 $102,520.00 Total Payments for IFRMFTR: $102,520.00 Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM Page 11 of 16 City of Idaho Falls 308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405 Phone: (208) 612-8100 Impact Fee Payments From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026 Case Number Case Name Location Account Code Amount IFRSFFD: IMPACT FEE SINGLE FAMILY FIRE/EMS CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/24/2026 RES25-00565 TownHome, Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd 1190, G 489, UFB 773 1331 Latah Ave 033-2355-325.01-00 $389.25 RES25-00564 TownHome Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd 1190, G 489, UFB 773 1327 Latah Ave 033-2355-325.01-00 $389.25 RES25-00563 TownHome Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd 1190, G 489, UFB 773 1323 Latah Ave 033-2355-325.01-00 $389.25 RES25-00562 TownHome: Bldg 5, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1319 Latah Ave 033-2355-325.01-00 $389.25 RES25-00561 TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1315 Latah Ave 033-2355-325.01-00 $389.25 RES25-00560 TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1311 Latah Ave 033-2355-325.01-00 $389.25 RES25-00559 TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1307 Latah Ave 033-2355-325.01-00 $389.25 RES25-00558 TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1303 Latah Ave 033-2355-325.01-00 $389.25 Total Payments for IFRSFFD: $3,114.00 IFRSFPD: IMPACT FEE SINGLE FAMILY POLICE CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/24/2026 RES25-00558 TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1303 Latah Ave 032-2055-325.01-00 $480.75 RES25-00559 TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1307 Latah Ave 032-2055-325.01-00 $480.75 RES25-00560 TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1311 Latah Ave 032-2055-325.01-00 $480.75 RES25-00561 TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1315 Latah Ave 032-2055-325.01-00 $480.75 RES25-00562 TownHome: Bldg 5, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1319 Latah Ave 032-2055-325.01-00 $480.75 RES25-00563 TownHome Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd 1190, G 489, UFB 773 1323 Latah Ave 032-2055-325.01-00 $480.75 RES25-00564 TownHome Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd 1190, G 489, UFB 773 1327 Latah Ave 032-2055-325.01-00 $480.75 RES25-00565 TownHome, Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd 1190, G 489, UFB 773 1331 Latah Ave 032-2055-325.01-00 $480.75 Total Payments for IFRSFPD: $3,846.00 Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM Page 12 of 16 City of Idaho Falls 308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405 Phone: (208) 612-8100 Impact Fee Payments From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026 Case Number Case Name Location Account Code Amount IFRSFPR: IMPACT FEE SINGLE FAMILY PARKS AND REC CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/24/2026 RES25-00565 TownHome, Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd 1190, G 489, UFB 773 1331 Latah Ave 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,390.50 RES25-00564 TownHome Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd 1190, G 489, UFB 773 1327 Latah Ave 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,390.50 RES25-00563 TownHome Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd 1190, G 489, UFB 773 1323 Latah Ave 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,390.50 RES25-00562 TownHome: Bldg 5, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1319 Latah Ave 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,390.50 RES25-00561 TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1315 Latah Ave 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,390.50 RES25-00560 TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1311 Latah Ave 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,390.50 RES25-00559 TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1307 Latah Ave 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,390.50 RES25-00558 TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1303 Latah Ave 034-2755-325.01-00 $1,390.50 Total Payments for IFRSFPR: $11,124.00 IFRSFTR: IMPACT FEE SINGLE FAMILY TRANSPORTATION CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/24/2026 RES25-00558 TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1303 Latah Ave 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,013.00 RES25-00559 TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1307 Latah Ave 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,013.00 RES25-00560 TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1311 Latah Ave 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,013.00 RES25-00561 TownHome: Bldg 6, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1315 Latah Ave 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,013.00 RES25-00562 TownHome: Bldg 5, M 774, U 1190, UFB 773, G 489 1319 Latah Ave 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,013.00 RES25-00563 TownHome Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd 1190, G 489, UFB 773 1323 Latah Ave 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,013.00 RES25-00564 TownHome Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd 1190, G 489, UFB 773 1327 Latah Ave 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,013.00 RES25-00565 TownHome, Bldg 5: MF 774, 2nd 1190, G 489, UFB 773 1331 Latah Ave 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,013.00 Total Payments for IFRSFTR: $24,104.00 Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM Page 13 of 16 City of Idaho Falls 308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405 Phone: (208) 612-8100 Impact Fee Payments From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026 Case Number Case Name Location Account Code Amount IFTRH: IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTATION 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 9/24/2026 RES26-00475 SFR: M 2372, G 1181, CP 520, FB 2040, UFB 285 5755 Dune Village Way 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 Date of Payment: 9/10/2026 RES26-00476 SFR: M 2573, G 1399, CP 638, FB 2014, UFB 559 5342 Wild Dunes Ln 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 Date of Payment: 8/20/2026 RES26-00351 SFR: M 1773, G 1018, CP 456, UFB 1662 5441 Boardwalk Rd 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 Date of Payment: 8/27/2026 RES26-00405 SFR, M 1855, UNFB 1865, GAR 834, COVP 204 516 Boxwood Dr 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 Date of Payment: 7/17/2026 RES26-00312 SFR: M 1937, G 931, CP 422, UFB 1941 5505 Boardwalk Rd 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 RES26-00284 Twin home; M 1589, G 518, UFB 1489 832 Kiah Ln 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 RES26-00283 Twin Home: M 1589, G 518, UFB 1489 820 Kiah Ln 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 RES26-00289 SFR: M 1652, G 895, CP 52, UFB 1412 6161 Broken Stone Way 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 RES26-00317 SFR: M 1620, G 795, CP 180, FB 1620 5471 Boardwalk Rd 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 RES26-00286 Twin Home: M 1589, G 888, UFB 1589 5861 Maggie Dr 035-4655-325.01-00 $0.00 RES26-00288 Twin Home: M 1599, G 888, UFB 1589 5885 Maggie Dr 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 RES26-00320 SFR: M 1589, G 1084, CP 136, FB 1261, UFB 328 5911 Maggie Dr 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 RES26-00286 Twin Home: M 1589, G 888, UFB 1589 5861 Maggie Dr 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 Date of Payment: 7/16/2026 RES26-00248 SFR M 2400, G 1512, CP 270, FB 2400 2201 W 17th S 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 Date of Payment: 7/2/2026 RES26-00249 SFR: M 2565, G 1520, CP 455, FB 2557 4865 River Bend Ln 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 Date of Payment: 8/6/2026 RES26-00340 SFR: M 1881, G910, CP 232, FB 1439, UFB 415 5377 Boardwalk Rd 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 Date of Payment: 7/22/2026 RES26-00278 SFR: M 1784, G 802, CP 141, UFB 1584 5556 Sand Springs Rd 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM Page 14 of 16 City of Idaho Falls 308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405 Phone: (208) 612-8100 Impact Fee Payments From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026 Case Number Case Name Location Account Code Amount IFTRH: IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTATION 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/17/2026 RES26-00349 TwinHome: M 1544, G 543, FB 1538 425 East River Ln 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 RES26-00339 Twinhome: M 1544, G 543, FB 1538 417 East River Ln 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 IFTRH: IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTATION 3,000 OR MORE SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 7/17/2026 RES26-00290 SFR: M 1730, G 798, CP 52, UFB 1484 1584 Sandbar St 035-4655-325.01-00 $3,780.00 Total Payments for IFTRH: $71,820.00 IFTRL: IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTAION UNDER 1,500 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/31/2026 RES26-00367 Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #6 035-4655-325.01-00 $1,864.00 Date of Payment: 8/27/2026 RES26-00366 Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #5 035-4655-325.01-00 $1,864.00 RES26-00365 Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #4 035-4655-325.01-00 $1,864.00 RES26-00362 Townhome Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #3 035-4655-325.01-00 $1,864.00 RES26-00360 Townhomes Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #2 035-4655-325.01-00 $1,864.00 RES26-00356 Townhome Bldg 4: M 550, U 938, G 420, CP 44 1527 Cassiopeia St, #1 035-4655-325.01-00 $1,864.00 Date of Payment: 7/14/2026 RES26-00257 Townhome (3 Plex-Unit C): M 453, 2nd 885, G 433 1120 Elmore Ave 035-4655-325.01-00 $1,864.00 RES26-00258 Townhome (3 Plex-Unit B) M 487, 2nd 911, G 425 1124 Elmore Ave 035-4655-325.01-00 $1,864.00 RES26-00259 Townhome (3 Plex-Unit A): M 453, 2nd 885, G 432 1128 Elmore Ave 035-4655-325.01-00 $1,864.00 IFTRL: IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTAION UNDER 1,500 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/17/2026 RES26-00448 ADU: M 448 419 Tyra Dr 035-4655-325.01-00 $1,864.00 Total Payments for IFTRL: $18,640.00 Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM Page 15 of 16 City of Idaho Falls 308 Constitution Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83405 Phone: (208) 612-8100 Impact Fee Payments From: 7/1/2026 To: 9/30/2026 Case Number Case Name Location Account Code Amount IFTRM: IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTAION 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 9/28/2026 RES26-00500 SFR: M 1391, G 489, CP 91, UFB 1391 6855 Millbrook Dr 035-4655-325.01-00 $2,890.00 RES26-00503 SFR: M 1445, G 586, CP 116, UFB 1423 6856 Bronson Dr 035-4655-325.01-00 $2,890.00 Date of Payment: 9/22/2026 RES26-00282 SFR: M 2563, G 899, CP 656 4785 Providence Point Dr 035-4655-325.01-00 $2,890.00 Date of Payment: 9/3/2026 RES26-00472 Twin Home: M 1411, G 420, CP 40, UFB 1413 6349 Ender Ln 035-4655-325.01-00 $2,890.00 RES26-00471 Twin Home: M 1411, G 420, CP 40, UFB 1413 6333 Ender Ln 035-4655-325.01-00 $2,890.00 Date of Payment: 7/1/2026 RES26-00245 SFR: M 1149, G 424, UFB 209, FB 983 1520 S Emerson Ave 035-4655-325.01-00 $2,870.00 RES26-00270 SFR: M 1454, G 968, CP 120, UFB 1432 1685 Palm Springs Dr 035-4655-325.01-00 $2,890.00 Date of Payment: 7/13/2026 RES26-00323 SFR: M 1427, G 829, CP 66, UFB 1427 351 Birdie Thompson Dr 035-4655-325.01-00 $2,890.00 Date of Payment: 8/13/2026 RES26-00397 SFR: M 1362, 2nd 1153, GAR 612, COVP 114 5476 Rip Tide Rd 035-4655-325.01-00 $2,890.00 Date of Payment: 8/18/2026 RES26-00272 SFR: M 1919, G 540, CP 85 1619 Sandbar St 035-4655-325.01-00 $2,890.00 IFTRM: IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTAION 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/4/2026 RES26-00302 Twin Home: M 663, 2nd 1139, G 572 414 East River Ln 035-4655-325.01-00 $2,890.00 RES26-00306 Twin Home: M 600, 2nd 1083, G 572 424 East River Ln 035-4655-325.01-00 $2,890.00 IFTRM: IMPACT FEE TRANSPORTAION 1,500 TO 2,999 SQ FT CASE STATUS: ISSUED Date of Payment: 8/3/2026 RES26-00325 SFR: M 2009, G 559, P 482 1568 Sandbar St 035-4655-325.01-00 $2,890.00 Total Payments for IFTRM: $37,550.00 Total Payments from 7/1/2026 to 9/30/2026: $521,892.60 Printed: 10/1/2026 2:59:40 PM Page 16 of 16 City Council Meeting Minutes 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID ! DAHO FALLS Thursday, December 18,2025 7:32 PM City Council Chambers 1. CalltoOrder Present: Mayor Rebecca L. Noah Casper Council President Lisa Burtenshaw {via Teams) Councilor Jim Francis Councilor John Radford Councilor Jim Freeman {via Teams) Councilor Kirk Larsen Absent: Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman Also present: Stephen Boorman, Acting General Mgr IF Power Wade Sanner, CDS Director Brad Cramer, Prospective Planning Brian Cunnngham, Public Works Emily Geisler, City Clerk Chris Fredericksen, Public Works Director Pam Alexander, Municipal Services Director Meghan Conrad, Elam and Burke {via Teams) Zack Jones, City Attorney 2. Pledge of Allegiance Rick Dale led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Public Comment No one appeared. 4. Mayor’s Choice Awards Purpose of the Awards ● Established about sixyears ago ● Selected by the Mayor’s staff with input from City Council members and department directors. ● Intended to recognize outstanding residents, businesses, organizations, or local efforts that made unique contributions to Idaho Falls. ● Typically presented at the first Council meeting of the year but awarded early this year to accommodatea busy Januaryagendaand to align with the holiday season. ● Recipient:Idaho Falls Spud Kings (juniorhockeyteam) ● Founded in 2022 and quickly became a major source of community pride. ● Won the 2025 Dineen Cup (NCDC championship), defeating the South Shore Kings 2-1. 1 City Council Meeting Minutes 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID I DAHO FALLS Goalie Charlie Durkin earned Championship Series MVP honors. Idaho Falls became the first non-East Coast City selected to host the Cup championships, happening in April 2026. The team regularly sells out the Mountain America Center and has built strong community engagement, including service activities by players. A Citywide celebration followed the recent championship, and May 1®^ was declared Idaho Falls Spud Kings Day. Award accepted by Kevin Greene, team president and co-owner. Mayor’s Choice Award forOutstanding.Community.Education ● Recipient: Mayor’s Scholarship Fund ● Founded in 2006 to support Idaho Falls students pursuing education beyond high school. ● Focuses on “strivers” — students often overlooked by traditional scholarships due to GPA orfinancial criteria. ● Has awarded nearly $1 million in locally raised funds to approximately800 students in Districts 91 and 93. ● Includes Promise Scholarships for grades 8-11 and awards for graduating seniors. ● Scholarships support colleges, universities, community colleges, and workforce training programs. ● Emphasizes encouragement, belief in students’ potential, and life-changing support, not just financial aid. ● Designed to help students see new possibilities for their future and feel supported by their community. ● Recognized for fostering a community-wide belief in students who may not fit traditional scholarship molds. ● Entirely funded by local donations and focused on helping students bridge financial gaps while motivating them to pursue education. ● Award accepted by Leslie Pincock, Executive Director, who emphasized continued community support and fundraisingfor local students. Mayor’s Choice Award for Outstanding CommunityContribution ● Recipient: Idaho Environmental Coalition (lEC), contractorfor the Idaho Cleanup Project at Idaho National Laboratory. ● Honored for critical national-level environmental cleanup work conducted safely and responsibly in Idaho. « Achievements include: o Treating one-third of INL’s legacy liquid radioactive waste, o Leading the DOE complex in shipments of transuranic waste (over 1,100 shipments since 2022). o Completing major cleanup projects ahead of schedule, including subsurface disposal areas and historic facility demolitions. ● lEC employs and trains hundreds of Idahoans and contributes significant volunteer hours and community investment. ● Award accepted by Dana Kirkham, lEC principal and former Ammon Mayor. 2 City Council Meeting Minutes 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID I DAHO FALLS Mayor’s Choice Award for "Under the Radar” ● Recipient: Steve Taggart, Idaho Falls attorney and communityleader. ● Recognized for behind-the-scenesleadership and strategic contributions to major local initiatives. ● Key roles have included: o Messaging and strategy behind the creation of the College of Eastern Idaho, o Assistance in reorganizing local transit into Greater Idaho Falls Transit (GIFT), o Mentoring leaders, candidates, and community organizations. ● Known for humility, volunteerism, and prioritizingteamwork over personal recognition. ● Celebrated for long-term civic impact, community responsibility, and quiet service. ● Award accepted by Steve Taggart himself. Mayor’s Choice Award for OutstandingCommunity Enrichment ● Recipient: Idaho Falls Farmers Market ● The Idaho Falls Farmers Market is a key communitygathering place that strengthens local connections, culture, and the economy. ● The market has grown significantly in recent years, expanding to Memorial Drive and hosting up to 173 vendors in 2025. ● During the May-October season, it attracts 8,000-9,000 visitors on a typical Saturday, with peak attendancereaching12,000. ● Overthe past four years, the markethas generatedmore than $6 million in Local sales, supportingfarmers,artisans,and small businesses. ● To adapt to Idaho’swinters,the marketlaunched a monthly indoor winter market (November-April)featuring about 75 vendors. ● The winter market provides year-round income opportunitiesfor local producers and a warm, welcoming space for families. ● The Farmers Market plays a major role in community events, including the Water Tower Tribute Block Party and the City tree lighting, helping transform them into vibrant celebrations. ● The market is recognized for its innovation, leadership, creativity, and service. ● Award accepted by Clark Poston, Market Manager Mayor’s Choice Award for Outstanding Humanitarian Service ● Defined by consistently stepping in to help wherever there is need. ● For more than 30 years, Dr. Fritz Schmutz has demonstrated this commitment to the Idaho Falls community. ● He is known for his quiet, hands-on compassion, always putting people first and never seeking recognition. ● Dr. Schmutz has played a key role in launching and supporting programs for individuals with special needs and veterans, contributing in anyway necessary to help those programs succeed. ● His early efforts helped create lasting opportunities that continue to change lives today. ● Long before the term “food insecurity” was common, he worked to address hunger in the community. ● He organized food drives, personally rented storage space when none existed, and partnered with local organizations to ensure food reached families in need. 3 City Council Meeting Minutes 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID I DAHO FALLS His work influenced community traditions, including parade-based food donation efforts supported by City leaders. Professionally, he has served as a physician in Idaho Falls for over three decades, known for exceptional care, attentiveness, and going the extra mile for patients. Dr. Schmutz exemplifies humility, compassion, and service above self. Award accepted by Dr. Schmutz himself. Mayor’s Choice Award for Outstanding Global Citizenship: ● Recognizes extraordinary dedication to international friendship and cultural understanding in Idaho Falls. ● Clarke Kido is honored for his long-standing service with the Idaho Falls Sister Cities organization, strengthening ties with Tokai, Japan. ● His work has built lasting cross-culturalconnectionsthat enrich the entire community. ● Clarke conceived and helped design the Idaho Falls Friendship Garden, inspired by gardens he saw in Japan. ● He collaborated with community partners and the Idaho Falls Parks and Recreation Department to bring the garden to life. ● The Friendship Garden is a valued community space used for reflection, gatherings, and milestone photos such as proms and weddings. ● Clarke continues to devote significant time to maintaining the garden and preserving its authenticityand cultural integrity. ● He is a longtime member of the Japanese American Citizens League (JACL) and has served as treasurer of the Idaho Falls Sister Cities Association. ● He has helped preserve and celebrate Japanese culture locally and created opportunities for meaningful cultural exchange. ● Clarke organized and led visits to important historical sites, including the Minidoka internment site, to foster understanding and remembrance. ● Community leaders describe him as thoughtful, kind, humble, and focused on improving life for others ratherthan seeking recognition. ● Clarke Kido is recognized as a quiet leader whose vision and service exemplify global citizenship and community impact. ● As he prepares to move to Boise to be closer to family, the community expresses gratitude for his lasting legacy and contributions. Mayor’s Choice Award for Outstanding Philanthropic Commitment ● Recipient: Heroes Defense Fund ● Hosts annual 9/11 Tribute Banquet and public events that bring first responders and 9/11 heroes to Idaho Falls to share their stories. ● Uses events as fundraisers to support first responders, veterans, and their families while deepening community appreciation for their service. ● Recognized for sustained, hands-on philanthropy despite operating as a for-profit business. ● Emphasized strong partnerships with local first responders and the strength of the Idaho Falls community. ● Award accepted by Travis Snowder, board of directors co-chair 4 City Council Meeting Minutes 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID I DAHO FALLS Mayor_:s ChoiceAwardJQr_Qjjtstanding Community Partnership ● Recipient: Shoshone-BannockTribes ● Honored for generations of stewardship of the land and meaningful collaboration with Idaho Falls. ● Contributions include cultural preservation, education, and community engagement. ● Longstanding partnership with the War Bonnet Round-Up Rodeo, including opening ceremonies with tribal drummers and dancers and cultural messages. ● Key partners with the Museum of Idaho’s Way Out West exhibit, providing expertise, artifacts, ceremonies, and cultural guidance. ● Collaborate annually with INLon Earth Day celebrations, including cultural blessings. ● Recognized for enriching the communitythrough respectful, professional, and enduring partnerships. Mayor’s Choice Award for_^Out of_the_Ashes” ● Recipient: Alan Reed, Reed’s Dairy ● Family-owned Idaho Falls institution dating back to 1955, rooted in early home milk delivery and farm-to-table practices. ● Alan Reed pioneered Reed’s Dairy ice cream, now a regional staple. ● Business has grown to serve Eastern and Western Idaho, operating multiple retail stores and processing milk from their own dairy. ● Known for innovation, communitytraditions, and family leadership across generations. ● After a devastating fire in January 2024 destroyed the original production facility, the family persevered with community support. ● Opened a new 25,000-square-foot production facility in November 2025, symbolizing resilience, renewal, and enduring community ties. ● Award accepted by Alan Reed, who expressed gratitude and humility, emphasizing that while tragedy brought sadness, it did not bring defeat. ● Mr. Reed credited the successful rebuilding of a new dairy processing facility in just 22 months to: o Dedicated employees and leadership, o Strong community support, o Assistance and partnership from the City. ● Mr. Reed thanked the Idaho Falls community for standing behind the business and making recovery possible. ● The Mayorclosed by Lightheartedly acknowledging the length of the ceremony, notingthat many more people deserve recognition and emphasized that Idaho Falls is a great place because of its people. The meeting paused briefly to allow recipients to gather for a group photo before the meeting was called back to order. 5. Remarks - Mayor Casper {Presented during the Mayor’s Choice Awards) 6. Consent Agenda A. Office of the Mayor 5 City Council Meeting Minutes 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID I DAHO FALLS 1. 25-496 Appointment of Jim Freeman to the Golf Advisory Board, reappointment of Bill Combo & Robert Nitschke to the Parks & Recreation Commission, and Reappointment of Tanner Fonnesbeck, Robert Skinner and Brent Robertson to the War Bonnet Advisory B. Municipal Services 1. 25-498 Bulk purchase of ammunition from Salt Lake Wholesale Sports for $107,190. 2. 25-501 Purchase of a Compact Wheel Loader from Intermountain Bobcat of Idaho Falls for $89,595.71. 3. 25-502 Software & Professional services from VLCM with Arctic Wolf for $104,802.50. 4. 25-505 Treasurer's Reportfor October2025 C. Airport 1. 25-504 Non-Exclusive Rental Car Concession Agreement with Overland West for $219,596.58 in revenue plus a 10% privilege fee. 2. 25-506 Peer-to-PeerCar SharingAgreementwith Turo Inc for 10% of its gross revenue. D. Office of the City Clerk 1. 25-465 City Council Meeting Minutes (04.26.2024) 2. 25-463 November 2025 permits and licenses a. 21 New b. 18 Renewed c. 15 Contractors 3. 25-474 Results of the Regular and Runoff Elections held on November 4'^ and December 2"'^ 2025 Motion 1: Approve, accept, or receive all items on the Consent Agenda according to the recommendationspresented, o Moved by: Councilor Larsen o Second: Councilor Radford o Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none o Motion carries. 7. Regular Agenda A. Idaho Falls Power 1. 25-486 Resolution Establishing Standards for Greenbelt Maintenance Presentation/Discussion (Acting General Manager Boorman): Idaho Falls Power uses the Snake River, a public resource, for hydroelectric generation, which creates physical impacts on the river. Under its Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license, Idaho Falls Power is legally required to: o Provide recreational opportunities related to its hydro projects, o Mitigate environmental and public-use impacts on the river. The proposed resolution clarifies responsibility for Greenbelt maintenance, specifically: 6 City Council Meeting Minutes 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID I DAHO FALLS Which maintenance obligations belong to the utility versus the City. How funding and resources are allocated. o o Proposed Approach: ● Rather than Idaho Falls Power directly managing park-like spaces, resources will be transferred so Parks & Recreation—the department with appropriate expertise—handles Greenbelt maintenance. ● This arrangement was described as a practical and efficient partnership that leverages existing City expertise. Council members acknowledged significant staff effort in developing the resolution. The resolution clarifies long-standing confusion over definitions, including the difference between the “Greenbelt” and the “pathway.” The agreement aligns well with the ongoing relicensing of the City’s hydroelectric generation project, expected to conclude around 2028. Motion: Approve the Resolution authorizing Idaho Falls Power (IFP) to contributeten percent of its annual gross hydro generation value to Idaho Falls Parks and Recreation (P&R) forgreenbelt maintenance and improvements within the FERC project boundary and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all necessary documents. Moved by: Councilor Francis Second: Councilor Larsen Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen. Nay: Radford. Motion carries. o o o o Public Works 1. 25-499 B Local Professional Services Agreement with Horrocks Engineers in support of the Holmes Avenue, Sunnyside Road to TaylorviewImprovement Project Presentation/Discussion(Director Fredericksen): Project Overview: ● The project involves the expansion and urbanization of Holmes Avenue, from south of Sunnysideto TaylorviewMiddle School. ● Improvements include widening the arterial roadway and adding sidewalks, curb and gutter, and lighting where right-of-way allows. ● Some limitations exist due to remaining county-owned properties, but the goal is to completethe arterial corridorwithin those constraints. Funding and Timeline: ● Design contract cost: $443,874 ● City match: 7.34% ($32,580} ● Design timeline: Approximately 12 months ● Estimated construction cost: Just under $3.4 million ● Construction funding is currently scheduled across 2030-2031, with hopes to consolidate into a single year closer to construction. Federal Funding Context: 7 City Council Meeting Minutes 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID I DAHO FALLS The project is part of the Federal Aid Program through the Bonneville Metropolitan PlanningOrganization(BMPO). Idaho is a net recipientstate, receivingmore federaltransportation funding than it contributes in gas taxes—unlike states such as Texas or California. Because of federal matching, the City effectively pays about $0.07 on the dollar, making the project a strong value for taxpayers. While federal funding adds complexity and longer timelines, it enables projects that would otherwise be unaffordable locally. Council Discussion: Council members emphasized the importance of long-range planning to take advantage of federal funds. Staff explained that although the timeline is lengthy, the project was not feasible earlier due to funding constraints and federal requirements. The consensuswas that waiting for federal assistance provides substantial benefit and makes major infrastructure investments possible. Motion: Approve the ProfessionalServices Agreementwith Horrocks Engineers, Inc., and authorize the Mayorto execute the document, o Moved by: Councilor Radford o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none o Motion carries. Resolution for Grant Application to Rehabilitate the Lincoln Road Bridge 2. 25-500 over the Idaho Canal Presentation/Discussion (Director Fredericksen): Key Details: ● The resolution is required to formally acknowledge the City’s intent to seek federal funds and committo the required local match. ● Federal funding requested: $2.6 million ● Local match: $190,840 (7.34%) ● if approved,the earliestconstructionfundingwould be available in 2033, reflectinglong federal project timelines. Additional Context: ● Federal aid projects take significant time to develop, often placing construction in the outeryears of funding programs. ● The City may use advance construction, paying upfront with local funds and later seekingfederal reimbursement, if community priorities and funding allow. ● Having design work completed early positions the City to take advantage of advance construction opportunities. Council Discussion: ● A Council member asked about the impact of newly collected road impact fees, specifically how much they are reducing the City’s infrastructure backlog. ● Staff explained that the impact fee study: 8 City Council Meeting Minutes 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID I DAHO FALLS o Based projections on arterial road mileage as of 2022. o Aims to maintain the same level of service as growth continues. ● Public Works staff offered to provide more detailed information in a future discussion. Motion: Approve the Resolution required as part of the grant application submission for federal funds to rehabilitate the Lincoln Road bridge over the Idaho Canal and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the document, o Moved by: Councilor Radford o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none o Motion carries. C. Community Development Services Final Plat and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, Idaho Traffic Safety, Division No. 1. 1. 25-503 Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner): ● Councilors Larson and Radford noted the item was straightforward, had gone through the Planning Commission, and raised no concerns. ● The plat met all requirements and aligned with prior approvals. ● Discussion clarified that the property name comes from the company name - Idaho Traffic Safety, which supplies and stores traffic control equipment such as cones and related materials. ● The company is relocating from its current Sunnyside location after outgrowing the existing facility. Motion 1: Accept or Approve the Final Plat for Idaho Traffic Safety, Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor, City Engineer, and City Clerk to sign said Final Plat, o Moved by: Councilor Larsen o Second: Councilor Radford o Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none o Motion carries. Motion 2: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Final Platfor Idaho TrafficSafety, Division No. 1 and give authorizationforthe Mayortoexecute the necessarydocuments. Moved by: CouncilorLarsen Second: Councilor Radford Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none Motion carries. o o o o 9 City Council Meeting Minutes 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID I DAHO FALLS Legislative Hearing for Consideration of an Ordinance approving the Urban Renewal Plan for the Riverwalk Urban Renewal District 2. 25-495 Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner, Mr. Cramer, Ms. Conrad - via Teams): ● The public hearing was opened, with all materials and testimony ordered into the official record. ● The proposed ordinance establishes a 20-year urban renewal district, running through December 31,2045. ● Key milestones: Eligibility Report Adopted by City Council: July 2025. Agency approval: Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency, October 16,2025. Planning Commission review: November 5, 2025, for Comprehensive Plan compliance. Public notice: All affected taxing districts notified; notices published in November. District Overview: ● Covers approximately 10 acres west of the Snake River near Pancheri Drive, Broadway Avenue, and adjacent to the existing River Commons area. ● Portions previously included in the Snake River Urban Renewal District (1988-2018) but remained undeveloped. ● Includes portions of Bridgeport Drive and Utah Avenue rights-of-way. Statutory CQmp,liancg^gd Jaxi DgJnip^cts: ● Plan meets Idaho Code requirements, including revenue allocation, financing provisions, and economic feasibility. ● District is well under the 10% taxable value cap, with total combined urban renewal districts at ~$108 million versus an $810 million limit. ● Bonneville County Ambulance District excluded due to lack of consent; school district levies not contributing at plan preparation. ● Fiscal impact primarily involves temporary deferral of new tax revenue, not a reduction in existing budgets. Economic Feasibility Highlights: ● Private investment: ~$40 million, including: TownePlace Suites hotel (112 rooms, ~$27 million) Multi-story office building Mixed-use development near Culver’s ● Eligible urban renewal costs: ~$4.1 million, mainly for rock blasting, infill, and limited public infrastructure. ● Multiplegrowthscenariosmodeled(conservativeto moderate),all showingsufficient tax increment revenue to cover costs. ● Developers receive 75% of tax increment revenues via Owner Participation Agreements (OPAs); the agency retains 25% for administration and potential public projects (~$1.1- $1.8 million). ● Full repaymentunder a conservativemodel is projectedby 2046, after district closure in 2045. Infrastructure and Timing: o o o o o o o 10 City Council Meeting Minutes 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID I DAHO FALLS ● Key improvements, like the canal pathway, planned early with initial development (Site One). ● Sidewalk gaps on Utah Avenue scheduled for later Site Three development but could be built earlier if funds allow. ● Prompt project initiation (e.g., hotel in 2026) is crucial for financial feasibility. Public_Comment and Legal Clarifications: ● Public inquiry by John Cummingham on possible parcel interest. He believes he has put money down on a portion of the property. He was directed to staff for follow-up outside the hearing. ● Minor slide corrections noted: “Bannock County” should not be shown ● Land use and zoning maps support mixed-use commercial development. Financing Clarification: ● Upfront costs (infrastructure, basalt removal) are developer-paid and reimbursed via tax increment revenue. Tax increment financing (TIF) does not directly burden taxpayers; long-term development increases the City’s tax base. Example: property values projected to grow from under $1 million to ~$40 million, enhancingfuture tax revenue. Hearing concluded and closed; Council moved to deliberation and consideration of the ordinanceto formallyapprovethe RiverwalkUrban RenewalDistrict. o o Motion: Approve the Ordinance approving the Riverwalk Urban Renewal District under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings and request that it be read by title and publishedby summary, o Moved by: CouncilorLarsen o Second: Councilor Radford o Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none o Motion carries. Ordinance Title Read: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS. IDAHO, APPROVING THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE RIVERWALK URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT, WHICH PUN INCLUDES REVENUE ALLOCATION FINANCING PROVISIONS: AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT A COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE AND OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION TO COUNTY AND STATE OFFICIALS AND THE AFFECTEDTAXING ENTITIES; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY.CODIFICATION,AND PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY; PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. D. Municipal Services 1. 25-473 Police Department Vehicle Lease and Upfit Program for FY 2025/26 Presentation/Discussion(DirectorAlexander): ● 14 police vehicles and associated equipment. 11 City Council Meeting Minutes 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID I DAHO FALLS ● Lease Authorization: Based on Resolution 2024-04, which allowed a lease-purchase agreement up to $1.5 million for law enforcement equipment. ● CurrentProposal: o Total lease amount: $904,135 over 5 years o Annual lease payments: $180,827 ● Procurement: o Vehicles purchased from United Fleet Services via RFP 24-01 o Vehicle upfits sourced via a separate RFP with Day Wireless ● Budget & Compliance: o Total authorized with this approval: $1,368,660, still under the $1.5 million cap o Lease and budget forecasts confirm the department remains within allocated funds ● Police Chief Johnson was present to answer operational questions; no further concerns raised. Motion: Accept and approve the Police Department vehicle lease and upfit program for fiscal year 2025/26 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the necessary documents, o Moved by: Councilor Larsen o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen. Nay: Radford, o Motion carries. Appeal Hearing-Impact Fee Assessment for Barnwood Estates Townhomes and Terrace Gate Condominiums 2. 25-497 Presentation/Discussion (Director Alexander, Director Fredericksen, Mr. Cunningham Attorney Jones), Appellant(s): Erin Bingham, Eric Reed: ● The hearing was opened with all material & testimony ordered to be includedin the record. R e im b u rsement_Rga.u_e.st ● Developers (the Appellant) sought credits for impact fees already paid, arguing the City required them to widen Skyline Drive beyond what their projects needed. ● Widening included land dedication (0.17 and 0.423 acres) and construction costs totaling $328,212.50. ● Developers claimed the City previously indicated, through staff discussions, that such credits could be granted if costs were verified. ● They requested a credit toward future fees, not a reimbursement for fees already paid, to avoid “double-dipping.” 12 City Council Meeting Minutes 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID I DAHO FALLS Development Agreement & Legal Context ● The Development Agreement allowed reimbursement for roadway improvements subject to City approval and impact fee collection. ● No formal written agreement existed prior to construction specifying the credit amount. ● City code (§10-8-9) requires a written agreement and three independentbids submitted priorto constructionto qualify for reimbursement. ● Developers submitted bids after construction, making their request procedurally untimely. ● A single-unit exemption for a demolished home was granted ($5,273.50), but other requested creditswere denied. City Reviewand Determinations ● Impact Fee Administrator (Director Alexander): o Denied system improvementcredits due to timeliness and lack of pre construction agreement, o Offered informal resolution: submission of three bids for potential consideration of road widening costs. ● Public Works Engineer (Mr. Cunningham): o Confirmed three bids prior to construction are required to ensure legal and competitive compliance, o Reimbursementpost-construction is difficult under state law. ● Procedural Notes: o Reimbursement applies only to construction costs, not right-of-way dedication. Skyline Drive’s arterial designation required lOOftwidth; this was consistent with City code and annexation requirements, o Paying impact fees without protest typically bars appeals, but Council determined it didn’t impact reimbursement eligibility here. o Developer/Appellant Position ● Developers obtained four bids prior to construction (Pepco, Edstrom, Knife River, MD Nursery& Landscape). ● Construction began in spring/summer 2024; delays in planning and zoning caused repeated resubmissions. ● Developers argued they were effectively being charged twice: through impact fees and roadway construction costs. ● They sought recognition of actual costs incurred and a negotiated credit for roadway construction (~$328,212) plus land dedication (~$370,000), totaling -$700,000. ● Developers expressed willingness to work with staff under the informal resolution offered. ● Appellant provided five handouts to Council and City Clerk (attached) 13 City Council Meeting Minutes 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID I DAHO FALLS C_o.uncil DLs_cuss[o_n ● Credit vs. Reimbursement: Council clarified reimbursement is separate from routine impact fees. ● Policy Limitations: Council focused on the appeal only; broader policy changes (e.g., right-of-way reimbursement) were off-limits. ● Procedural Errors: Council noted developers’ failure to pay under protest or obtain pre construction agreement but determined this did not prevent reimbursement eligibility for construction costs. ● Motions & Outcomes: 1. Affirmed Impact Fee Administrator’s Novembers, 2025, letter denying system improvement credits. 2. Affirmed single-unit housing exemption for the demolished home. 3. Directed staff to negotiate informal reimbursement for Skyline Drive construction based on pre-constructionbids. 4. Directed Legal staff to draft a reasoned statementexplaining Council deliberation and rationale. Council Direction on Reason Statement ● Paying Under Protest: Council decided not to include this as a denial basis to prevent it from becoming standard practice. ● Drafting & Review: Legal staff to prepare a written reasoned statement reflecting Council discussion, to be reviewed at a work session on January 5 and finalized January 8, before the end of the current Council term. ● The process was deliberately slow and deliberate to ensure transparency and public understanding of complex issues. Motion 1: Uphold the terms of the letter from the Impact Fee Administratorissued on November 6,2025, in terms of its offer of an informal resolution to resolve the official denial of eligibility for reimbursement of impact fees for the construction of Skyline Drive, o Moved by: Councilor Francis o Second: Councilor Larsen o Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none o Motion carries. Motion 2; Request that a Reasoned Statement be drafted by the Legal Department based on tonight’s deliberation and be returned to City Council no later than January 8,2026. o Moved by: Councilor Francis o Second: Councilor Burtenshaw o Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none 14 City Council Meeting Minutes 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID I DAHO FALLS o Motion carries. 8. Announcements ● UTV Holiday Light Parade: o Tomorrow night, o The parade is already full—no additional vehicles can participate, o Donations are encouraged for the food bank during the holiday season; details on whether donations should be cash only will be clarified via a social media post. ● Fire Station Ribbon Cutting: o Monday at 10:00 a.m. at Fire Station #6, 2767 Spitfire Drive, o Open to the public, with tours available. ● Police Department Swearing-In: o Monday at 4:00 p.m., swearing in of new police officers. ● City Closures: o City offices closed December 25 for Christmas Day. o City offices closed January 1 for New Year’s Day. ● Upcoming Meetings: o Work session: Monday, January 5, at 3:00 p.m. o Council meeting: January 8, to conclude old business, swear in newly elected officials, and formally seat the new Council. There being no'further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:44 PM Rebecca L. Noah Casper, Mayor 15 CITY OF IDAHO FALLS November 4, 9095 Bonneville County Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025 November 04, 2025 Detailed Results by Contest Idaho Falls Mayor Vote For 1 9 5»> s «● 6 r .●c .<● Tl C T Si O' Sj i? 's f9 i? c #3 e> .■5r Si Si Si ‘S o 4- ●* o o .C' ●6 J? ■fP Si A. a 'S A? Si V/ C- o O C5 a: NON NON NON 267 01 XI 203 0 1 1.482 520 02 203 36 133 0 0 1193 374 03 104 7 88 0 0 7fi« 199 224 04 IS 23S 0 4 1.351 474 05 162 37 99 1 1 1.037 298 06 244 26 172 0 0 1.156 442 157 07 26 139 0 1 1.096 324 06 279 21 165 0 1 1.203 465 09 159 32 134 0 3 1.389 325 10 220 26 170 0 1 1.161 416 176 11 36 242 0 1 1.223 454 12 162 41 186 0 2 1.123 409 158 13 36 186 0 1 1.293 382 14 172 20 215 0 2 954 407 251 15 17 320 0 0 1.206 568 282 16 9 309 0 0 V180 600 17 256 30 212 0 1 1.316 498 16 196 79 167 0 1 1.340 442 19 172 20 292 0 0 1.045 484 20 130 21 135 0 0 1.153 266 21 275 28 260 0 0 1.870 563 Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025 4 Last Updated: 11 /07/2025 14:37:51 Bonneville County Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025 November 04. 2025 Detailed Results by Contest Idaho Falls Mayor Vote For 1 s ■'b b .cG T .<● .<● f3 .c T O '3 S' «● » «> #!> ■9 Si o Ji' e> ●s’ o Sr S Js .If ft ■f? »s e> ,e> O 'J 6 ,o A S) s S' O NON NON NON 21 28 8 0 22 0 1,017 57 161 19 217 0 2 1.616 23 397 23 363 364 0 24 0 1,826 750 25 261 0 2 254 25 1,179 540 28 226 199 0 26 U 1,120 453 140 20 201 0 27 0 1,659 361 0 0 0 0 37 0 787 0 1 0 0 6 0 38 966 7 0 0 0 0 39 0 1,563 0 53 4 47 0 0 1,825 46 104 117 57 105 8 0 0 1,686 230 Contest Total 5,599 733 5.537 1 24 40.783 11.869 5 Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025 Last Updated; 11 /07/2025 14:37:51 Bonneville County Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025 November 04, 2025 Detailed Results by Contest Idaho Falls City Council Seat 2 Vote For 1 a O <9 *■ o -V 5> a }« * S' e> ,C>- .c S' <● 3i Qj s K '6 O a a U c- i. ■4P Q o o 6» o Jtf fi- «9 f9 <9 o a .e< s o K A' A? o NON NON NON NON NON NON NON 7 01 s 101 137 48 114 71 4 34 1.482 4B3 02 8 8 91 71 34 99 53 0 10 1.193 364 03 2 4 44 38 40 29 29 1 12 766 186 10 04 13 61 156 S6 76 64 1 21 1.351 456 05 9 19 51 .5? 36 65 54 2 12 1.037 286 06 8 17 106 108 43 68 57 0 35 1.156 407 07 9 12 S3 52 67 66 47 2 15 1.098 308 08 12 9 139 112 31 83 57 1 22 1.203 443 09 19 14 70 63 33 69 38 2 20 1.389 306 10 6 28 SI 103 36 77 61 1 24 1.161 392 11 6 12 89 107 86 79 39 2 33 1.223 420 12 18 13 102 111 45 66 41 1 16 1,123 394 13 5 9 55 104 58 67 62 0 23 1.293 360 14 4 11 77 146 45 57 37 0 32 954 377 IS 9 7 94 235 60 94 56 1 32 1.206 555 16 11 8 115 193 36 III 64 0 62 1.180 538 17 9 IS 111 116 58 92 68 2 28 1.316 469 16 6 15 70 149 36 78 S3 3 33 1.340 407 19 12 to 63 217 19 54 62 0 47 1.045 437 20 3 17 61 79 24 51 34 1 16 1.153 269 21 6 12 118 175 55 111 72 1 33 1,870 549 Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025 6 Last Updated: 11 /07/2025 14:37:51 Bonneville County Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025 November 04, 2025 Detailed Results by Contest Idaho Fails City Council Seat 2 Vote For 1 A is' 9/ fj * O A .c. A vg- e> .c< .c (9 s- ●■S' 9j 0/ S <6 a s- O A 9 S- ●V o Q «9 o o fo jC- «● ,«9 ft .ft -ft o 9 A o 4" ft A o o A c- e< ft A' o .c S> 9 y> o As^ is' .o is' <6 'S s e> -S -C o O A.' NON NON NON NON NON NON NON 2 1 7 t2 17 22 11 6 0 1 1,017 S6 17 ee 135 4G S 62 32 23 1 32 1,616 366 3 11 171 293 40 124 24 48 3 57 1,826 690 6 10 84 262 46 60 25 46 0 26 1.179 516 6 13 71 188 29 69 26 41 1 95 1.120 417 5 12 51 25 27 126 63 53 0 24 1.659 337 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 787 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 38 2 0 0 966 7 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.563 0 0 2 21 20 2 46 25 28 0 6 1,825 98 57 3 30 107 3 39 4 19 0 25 1,666 205 Contest Totei 213 327 2.276 3.671 1,148 2.067 1.396 30 766 40.783 11,098 Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025 7 Last Updated: n/07/2025 14:37:52 Bonneville County Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025 November 04, 2025 Detailed Results by Contest Idaho Palls City Council Seat 4 Vote Por1 * *: ●S'

<● P) C o >6 e> Qi Qj V o b ft ft j. e> ●s ft ft A o O -ik' NON NON 01 207 285 0 29 1,482 492 02 184 177 0 13 1.193 3fi1 03 93 97 0 9 766 190 04 164 287 0 27 1,351 451 05 121 162 0 17 1.037 283 06 186 229 0 27 1.156 415 07 138 175 0 12 1,098 313 08 230 217 0 19 1.203 447 09 149 163 0 16 1,389 312 10 182 215 0 20 1,161 397 151 11 282 1 21 1,223 433 168 12 229 0 14 1.123 397 124 13 237 0 22 1,293 361 14 127 265 0 17 954 392 IS 175 397 0 16 1,206 572 198 16 365 0 37 1,180 563 17 201 280 0 18 1.316 481 18 144 265 0 34 1,340 409 19 119 330 0 35 1.045 449 20 123 149 0 14 1.153 272 21 206 345 0 32 1,870 551 Consolidated Election - November 4,2025 Last Updated: 11/07/2025 14:37:52 Bonneville County Consolidated Election - November 4. 2025 November 04, 2025 Detailed Results by Contest Idaho Falls City Council Seat 4 Vote For 1 j) * ●V e> ●c #0 ●9 & o S' o o A' ,«3 i. >s’ .V /o ij. Cl ■5 S A? ro e> A? o NON NON 33 0 3 22 21 1,017 54 229 0 129 41 1,616 23 358 420 0 54 24 276 1,826 696 188 329 0 25 25 1,179 517 151 262 0 20 26 1,120 433 223 27 108 0 30 1,659 331 0 0 0 37 0 787 0 6 1 0 0 36 966 7 0 39 0 0 0 1,563 0 48 51 0 5 1,825 46 99 74 132 0 24 57 1,686 206 6,848 651 Contest Total 4,394 1 40.783 11,242 9 Consolidated Election - November 4. 2025 Last Updated: 11/07/2025 14:37:52 Bonneville County Consolidated Election - November 4. 2025 November 04, 2025 Detailed Results by Contest Idaho Falls City Council Seat 6 Vote For 1 5. fi- e> .c fC «/ <6 /f o 45 49 A..- Si 9) Cl 9) S> 0/ Si 9> o 4 Si o o A' a y> ,o ^ i. /ft b* f. 'J b‘ St A .C A? o NON NON 01 306 170 0 45 1.4B2 476 02 219 134 0 21 1.193 353 03 117 67 0 IS 766 1S4 04 319 128 1 30 1.351 447 05 177 104 0 19 1.037 261 06 262 121 0 39 1.156 403 or 191 117 0 17 1.098 308 08 278 159 0 29 1,203 437 09 188 115 1 24 1.389 303 10 258 134 0 25 1,161 392 11 300 124 0 31 1,223 424 12 265 127 0 19 1.123 392 13 259 77 0 47 1,293 336 14 253 114 1 41 954 367 IS 433 127 0 28 1,206 560 16 398 153 0 49 1,180 551 17 311 154 0 24 1.316 475 18 302 94 0 47 1.340 396 19 330 102 0 52 1.045 432 20 180 90 0 16 1.153 270 21 391 150 0 42 1,870 541 Consolidated Election ●November 4,2025 10 Last Updated: 11/07/2025 14:37:52 Bonneville County Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025 November 04, 2025 Detailed Results by Contest Idaho Falls City Council Seat 6 Vote For 1 f. «i b ■S' o .c Si? 3) ,<3 ti ft> e> e> *> o o ^ A e> j. V, s .V e> c- A? O NON NON 28 26 0 22 3 1,017 54 258 99 0 42 23 1.616 357 24 460 208 0 82 1.826 668 133 0 25 358 61 1,179 491 125 26 299 0 29 1,120 424 71 27 249 0 41 1.659 320 37 0 0 0 0 787 0 3 0 38 4 0 966 7 0 0 0 0 39 1.563 0 23 46 74 0 7 1,825 97 57 155 40 0 35 1.686 195 Contest Tolsl 7,642 3,299 3 950 40,783 10.941 Consolidated Election ●November 4,2025 11 Last Updated: 11 /07/2025 14:37:52 STATE OF IDAHO COUNTY OF BONNEVILLE We, the commissioners of the county and state aforesaid, acting as a Board of Canvassers of Election, do hereby state that the attached is a true and complete abstract of all votes cast within this county at the Consolidated Election held November4, 2025, as shown by the records now on file in the County Clerk's office. s'- lP ■- \ 6 Q: <. ■■ -fc '...'“OL/NTV /■ ^ O ■ ; rn cC . ● I V/ .Y T \Y County Board of Canvassers Attest: Clerk c.'" S s N m 'iLi ICO^N-PPW^ . %GWHEVILLE /'k ^ /oaho ^ s'' I, Christopher Poulter, County Clerk of said county and state, do hereby certify that the attached is a full, true and complete copy of the abstract of votes for the candidate/issue therein named as appeared on the election ballot held November4, 2025, as shown by the record of the Board of Canvassers filed in my office this 12th day of November, 2025. s' County Clerk CITY OF IDAHO FALLS RUNOFF ELECTION December 2, 2025 CITY OF IDAHO FALLS RUNOFF ELECTION DECEMBER 2, 2025 CITY OF IDAHO FALLS VOTING STATISTICS MAYOR COUNCIL SEAT 2 !C in a> 2 ■o 0> O) a: 76 0) -.c: O _ o o > OJ "S E 5 § ,52 2 P 2 cc O o> 9 2 o ,2 ●o cn n: ■o c x: 0) E T3 2— 2 c a> o (U o> S' (ft Precinct Q o ■c (ft X3 ® 05 ^ (U ^ ct I « -5 Q 0> ■o E o 5 OT CO c CO 0> (ft O) 52 CO 05 CD CO 05 CO 05 (ft 05 ^ O O > CD (ft 05 O oi O) I— ●● % /OahO ■o County Board of Canvassers vW' ’'n/'NJilil"' Attest: Clerk STATE OF IDAHO COUNTY OF BONNEVILLE I, Christopher Poulter, County Clerk of said county and state, do hereby certify that the attached is a full, true and complete copy of the abstract of votes for the candidate/issue therein named as appeared on the ballot for the election held December 2, 2025, as shown by the record of the Board of Canvassers filed in my office this 8th day of December, 2025. - ^ND F}^ 'o O V O ✓> N Q O §/ BONNEVILLE \ COUNTY iT» 33 County Clerk 's* /OahO IDAHO FALES City Council December 18, 2025 IDAHO FALES Final Plat PLT25-019 Idaho Traffic Safety Division No. 1 PLT25-019 Idaho Traffic Safety Div. 1 A Aerial PLT25-019 Idaho Traffic Safety Div. 1 PLT25-019 Idaho Traffic Safety Div. a a wa fom 1 7] 1am R2 Goo rmeh} C__)] 22 BR ce CC paeeg < ities i ied | frseany pom emen ~~ -Hemmert’Ave — f 0 _ Pop Kroll\Way Et NR 1 cpa ec ye Wy | Se) Tilt tees TTLitlibe PLULELERE PLiTEVER IDAHO TRAFFICSAFETYDIVISIONNO.l A NOHrN(A&TCO0l(* UOMt; TWnM>2 PlOMTh lUMi UU5TSM C^NQ 13«*a9» t A SUBDIVISION IN THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY IDAHO A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN SHEFTIOF? I b I mirn ● ubfuncs KMOvai HpbMd (ASTiy«CQIIHt« UCHOM7 TOW««Hr2HCIIIN CTfNo ●U&SCA^ .y*'0\ UUt lAM ●»r«rt in M04« iM| kWi/ -o- Hi IT 410 20 lUJii I urs&oci 1 CrHTTII VACOtMl rOMNV*** 2 WMm «AM4I UIAST4M i I POuNO U2I HvVISt CCftN|AOT*« ’1.'4 1/4 * l/UTHUCTKM 7] S* MHTIH' u ,«i.s v«»c4nin i ii' 2 loritiodi f R I a Si Ml irw» JB inMisor' ia*iKocxi t 'i HkOUl ‘?ll 5 * 2 s 3i 2 i! «v / i&.oo* < a iii a 2 i 'i t s b las a SrS|g Z M r 6 uToT €=:: UTl C* E2M0 R vuno UWII MIMWI >>«mMhTllO 151M1 ttv® T voSTT .rrt« iMPiAnro bUflAITID BOUNDARY DESCRtPTlON iiaUhiUQ AT A POiNT THAT 1$ $ M‘J7 2$'W AJ?N<» ThL U&T.WbSl OMEASiCTON UfiL 2M.90 F6kl ^KUM iHbEA^T l/4CUMSLMOSbCIION 7, >{7WNSHIA KANCSfc ^AS7 (}^ MHOIAK, :WU1> POtNf etMCj iHfc NOKtHWl&( CCMNER Of LUf 1. tiUXK PIOKIH nCLMES OIVlWCM NUMBfR 1 AN AtJUrllON TO r»l( ntT Of l0A2<0 ^A4lS. BONNEVUU COUNTY. IDAHO. R JNNING 7HCNCE ACONO ThC BOUNOAAV l\Ut OF SAIO HORTh HOUSES BUSNCSE KOUTC, DIVISION NUMBER *. TNf FO.LOW1N6 FOUR |4| COURSES. U) THENCE $.00'a2*C5*W. 3QS.4T ^Ecr. (2) iHfcNCb lib.1/ 7UI: iMLNCb S SS^. ^tET 10 A PONT Qt CURVE WiTN A RADIUS Of 20.00 FET AND A CHORD N 45*29 26*E. 2B.3S FEH. |4| tHENCE TO THE LE^TAlONQ SAID CURVE 31.S0 FEET THROUOH A CENTRAL ANOlE OF 90*IS Or TO A PONT ON THE WEST Ri(dHr^-WAY UNE OF NONIH HOMES AVENUe SAID PONT SEIMS A PONT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE Wmi A RADIUS OF 114141,^6 FEH ANO A CMOAO BEARING S acr»'S6*^ 40.01 FEET- THENCE TO ThI AlGHT AlONO MuQ NON-TANGENT CURVE 4001 FEET ThAOIAjH A CENTRAL ANCia OF 02*29^* 1HEMLE N49*34 Ol'W 209 07 FEET; THENCE N49*37*44'W 1C74 74 FEET TO Tkl WEST UNE Of NORTHWEST 1/4 0^ THE SOCTHEAST J/4 OF SAiD SECTION 7, THENCE NOraSaS'E ALONG SAID WEST UNE 264.47 FEET, THENCE 5,49*3 7 SrE. 4IQ.00 FEET, THCNCE N 00*2505*1. 207 S FfFT To SAID FAST WEST CENTER SECT ON UNE OF SAID SECTION 7, TV4ENCE NM*37 29*E AlONu kAST WtSI UNIER SACTTOK UNE b44 U Fi£T 10 THE f^Nl OF SE^ S NINO, C ON TAIN > N 0 >.9S7 ^C5. If J KMIM) 1/r IRON KIWANII RIPLACtbWIlHVS' IRON ROD WITH PlASnCCAP MAKKMJP.I.&.RttR cui-l ,AU JtUM_ CttA MC ■APVt IURW6 pftTAiia I «0*ui Mrann ‘ntfw*y 4j*r 4441' [ iiisiriy 2AM* >401 I FOUUOimtlUM wirTHe^orcowift SCCTICN7 IOWHSfW 2 IClATM AMI CH LEGEND p.o.a. POINT OFftlGINNiNG SECTION LINE AQIACENI LOT LME PIAT AOLINDAIIV ERTSIINOUniirY EASEMENT AS NOTED lOUNO 1/2' X24* IRON ROD WfTH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARiaDP.tS. 9469 OR AS NOTED lOilNO S/B* X 24* IRON ROD WnTN YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED P.i.S. 9469 OR AS NOTCO VET S/8* X 30* MON ROD WITH YEl lOW PlASTIC CAP PIS 9469 OR AS MARKED Pl.S.S. CORNER AS NOTED SuRjECfTO EKP>'IN<>(ASFMfNTVCH-RICORO E AGLE ROCK / NGINEERING NARRATIVE EAOU ROCK Iftij.HLEX NU WAS LOMM HOHIO B* lUAHO SAfCTV INC. TO SURVCT LAKC FUNSUAMT TO DFED INSTRUMENT NUMBER *.747969 A RECORD Of SURVfV WAS COMmETTO ANC A tCOADf U H M AT UP <024 tN BONNE Vi(. i COUN T T RECORDS PU»UAN 110 INSmUMEN T NUMBER :747354. MONUMENTS WERE FOUND AS SHOWN ON 'HE FAST R£COAS€D SURVrr AS kAlF tNC» WON HODS WUHPJ^SMC CAPS L> MONUMtNIi Vtl WU 46 E.W UUHliS<*«CH MUM RUO> W TH PLASnC CAPS SIAMFCO LS 9369 SCC'lON CORNUl uSED FOR CONTROL Of SoRVET ARE iHf FAST 1/4 (ORNfR PURSUANT TO H5'Rl>MFN1 Nl>veE*( 1S9BUS7. SOUTHEAST CCftNEk PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NUMBER 1594DSB AND THE CINT^R 1/4 COANST PtRSUAN*^ TO INSTRUMENT NUMUR 1447319 ALl B&UBPA3 SK7WN h£R£0N RelATE QIRK^;T TO THE Ci*V OF IDAHO COORDINATE S«STEM OF 2004. WMCn Q DEAivEO FROM The IDAHO STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM {EAST 2CWC llOlJ J S SUNVtT HH AND LAIN3 A COM8NES SCALE FFCTOA Of 1.000277244 FOR A i»RlD TO GROUND CCWVERS>ON. {REHRCNCE FRAME NAD U I2D01J. EPOO 2010 QOOQ THF SYSTEM OZENTAT^ON rS BASED ON OAiD NORTH ALONG THE CAST aNTRA MER DIAN. hi) LONVERuENCE AM E HAS BEEN AFPllEU. I n GMIP PLWMNGD 5.\Fh'niNC o VlUkUi^.- A4 Ui**A >»I K4J6M MAM SURvrYEDST: Off ICES A1 0 4 1>KAWWB»: M/IR 1331 Rrmont Ave. Idaho F«lb. kUhoS3402 ytUAKl pm MKiS HAND APPRO/rneY: «0' MT A( PMUEO NO. 24075 343 E4lhN, Sun* 119 Rcaburg. Kliho 63440 SYAI-t: r-8ff DATE: ■202S CAD NAME. I.DW6 PLT25-019 Idaho Traffic Safety Div 1 Site Photo Site Photo Looking west from N Holmes Ave ■j Ws,:.?, m <● 5 Site Photo PLT25-019 Idaho Traffic Safety Div 1 Site Photo Looking west from N Holmes Ave (interior) V ■ -fs* 6 Urban Renewal Plan for the Riverwalk Urban Renewal Project daho Falls City Counci December 18, 2025 7^ ff* . Apt 13U .106 ‘AfX IM This Project Area includes an estimated 10 acres (including public rights-of- way). / t Project Area Plan Approval Process ● June 18, 2025-Agency Board adopted Resolution No. 2025-07 accepting the Riverwalk Eligibility Report, prepared by Brad Cramer, Perspective Planning & Consulting LLC, and, thereafter, submitted the Report to the City Council for its consideration ● July 10, 2025- City Council adopts Resolution No. 2025-11, adopting the River\walk Eligibility Report and directs Agency to commence preparation of a plan ● October 16, 2025-Agency Board adopts Resolution No. 2025-15 approving the Urban Renewal Plan for the Riverwalk Urban Renewal Project and directing transmittal of the Riverwalk Plan to the Mayor and City Clerk to take the necessary action to process the Riverwalk Plan ♦ November 5, 2025- City Planning Commission meeting to find the Riverwalk Plan conforms to the City's Comprehensive Plan ● November 14, 2025- Notice of public hearing published in the newspaper of record and the Riverwalk Plan received by the affected taxing districts. ● November 28, 2025- Second notice of public hearing published in the newspaper ● December 18, 2025- City Council public hearing, consider public comment, and City Council Ordinance approving the Riverwalk P an E ements M' Idaho Code § 50-2905 identifies what information the Plan must include with specificity as follows; (1) A statement describing the total assessed valuation of the base assessment roll of the revenue allocation area and the total assessed valuation of all taxable property within the municipality; ● Section 502.3 A statement listing the kind, number, and location of all proposed public works or improvements within the revenue allocation area; ● Section 301 and Attachment 5 An economic feasibility study; ● Attachment 5 A detailed list of estimated project costs; ● Attachment 5 A fiscal impact statement showing the impact of the revenue allocation area, both until and after the bonds are repaid, upon all taxing districts levying taxes upon property on the revenue allocation area; ● Section 502.8 and Attachment 5 A description of the methods of financing all estimated project costs and the time when related costs or monetary obligations are to be (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) incurred; ● Sections 303, 304, 309, 501, 502, 503, 504 and Attachment 5 A termination date for the plan and the revenue allocation area as provided for in section 50-2903(20), Idaho Code. In determining the termination date, the plan shall recognize that the agency shall receive allocation of revenues in the calendar year following the last year of the revenue allocation provision described in the urban renewal plan; and ● Section 800 A description of the disposition or retention of any assets of the agency upon the termination date. Provided, however, nothing herein shall prevent the agency from retaining assets or revenues generated from such assets as long as the agency shall have resources other than revenue allocation funds to operate and manage such assets. ● Section 800 (7) (8) Additional Plan Requirements The adjusted base assessed value of the existing revenue allocation areas, plus the new Project Area is estimated as follows (2025): Total Taxable Value of the City: $8,103,605,399 $ 810,360,540 10% Value Limitation: $107,473,839 993,015 $108,466,854 Existing Plans:* New Area: Total: $ The existing base value, plus the current value of the proposed Area is well within the 10% value limitation. *lncludes estimated values for Snake River West District, Yellowstone Square District, and proposed Riverside District River Commons Distiict^ Eaele Ridse District Jackson Hole Junction District Paiiclieri East Bank District Anderson Bush District Stanley Boge District Snake Ri\'er West District (Estunated) Yellowstone Square District (Estimated) Ri\'erside District Proposed (Estunated)^ Ri\"erwalk District Proposed (Estimated) $ 154,412 $ 7,549,640 ■ $ 864,666 $ 5,965,637 , $ 6,536,2691 $ 4230S;702 i $ "547III5 ' $ 9,533^697' $ 34,013,401 : $ ’ 9931015 : Total of Existing and Proposed Districts ,S54.00 i ® Adjusted to show removal of values from deannexed parcels. ® Includes current value of deannexed parcels. Taxing Districts ●Bonneville County ●Bonneville County Ambulance ●Bannock County Road & Bridge ●City of Idaho Falls ●College of Eastern Idaho ●Flood Control No. 1 ●Idaho Falls School District # 91 RIVERWALK Po (a) =) — ” = Sa = faa) 7, < Li im 2 > O Zz O U Lu STUDY APPROACH ●Reviewed potential private development projects, timelines, and valuations ●Reviewed known and potential public infrastructure projects, timelines and costs ●Considered two revenue scenarios based on trends in city valuations and levies ●Considered one potential Owner Participation Agreement STUDY AREA BOUNDARIES . .. -'●'■●V ●Vv . . * ,V , f- *J ) \Y.'A ●,U « » .● V :k;> 1 1 ANTICIPATED PRIVATE INVESTMENT AND PUBLIC PROJECT COSTS Estimated 2025 Value Project Name $27,000,000 Site I Hote $3,000,000 Site 2 Office $ 10,000,000 Site 3 Mixed Use $40,000,000 Total ANTICIPATED ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS Project Estimated Cost Site I Blasting and Fill Site 2 Blasting and Fill Site 3 Blasting and Fill Sidewalk on Utah Power Pole Relocation Canal Pathway Total $808,889 $622,222 $2,485,124 $ 10,000 $75,000 $ 150,000 $4,151,235 LEVY AND VALUATION TRENDS Levy Rate City Valuation $9,000,000,000 $8,000,000,000 $7,000,000,000 $6,000,000,000 $5,000,000,000 $4,000,000,000 $3,000,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $1,000,000,000 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 $- 0.002 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 City Valuation CONSERVATIVE REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS Conservative Revenue.Total valuation increases 2% per year Applicable tax levy decreases I % per year Moderate Revenue:Total valuation increases 5% per year Applicable tax levy decreases 2% per year Base value remains unchanged Revenues collected year after valuation year ●Project area will be approved by the end of 2025 Total Project Area Annual Revenue Comparisons $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $- o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ro ro to ro cn O 'O 00 nO O s> to to to lO to o o o o o o ^ 4^ 4^ 4x 4^ 4^ to OJ 4^ Cn OJ CO CO CO to co 4:>. cn o^ 'O OO sO O CO CO Conservative Revenue Moderate Revenue Total Project Area Cumulative Revenue Comparisons $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 Conservative Revenue Moderate Revenue TOTAL PROJECT AREA CASH FLOW ASSUMPTIONS ●Accounts for respective revenue assumptions ●Estimated revenues reflects actual year revenues received, based on prior year’s valuations ●Accounts for one Owner Participation Agreement 75% ofTIF revenues go towards ORA payments ●IFRA will collect 10% ofTIF revenues for district administration ●All funds will be expended on projects by the end of the district TOTAL PROJECT AREA CASH FLOW WITH CONSERVATIVE REVENUE TOTAL PROJECT AREA CASH FLOW WITH MODERATE REVENUE FINDINGS The Riverwalk project is economically feasible with a 75% ORA With a conservative revenue model, there may need to be a small payment in the final year of revenue receipts QUESTIONS? aD PERSPECTIVE PLANNING &€ CONSULTING FLUM and ZONING a Houston S p4« WPt ’I . Albany h' *: Ssison St* ‘ t /A/ ● ●P r ▼ ■ ●-< ● .c* ■.' '‘i.- Post-July 1, 2016, Plan anc ● Limitations on Amendments to the Plan-I.C. 50-2903A ● Base reset ●Exceptions RAA ●December 18, 2025 - City Couna public hearing, consider public comment, and City Council ordinance readings ● Thereafter: publication of the ordinance summary; recordation of ordinance and separately recorded map/legal; transmittal of documents to County officials, STC and affected taxing districts ● Deadline to complete tasks 12/31/2025 Next Steps n "X-. ‘●'■V r-? '●I ^● i .‘■'V V ● 7’..1 iitr. -^1^; ●l ^ jy? p*»v ●■^ , - .» < i-. f T ?? i w.’-- i 'rji^ 1 7 ●; V'. / Questions/Com merits? ri>.JLa&U/ Suggested Motion: Move to waive readings and approve Ordinance approving the Urban Renewal Plan for the RiverwalkUrban Renewal Project and give authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Action "Chris Canfield" 1/10/2023 8:38:03 PM "matt.smith@summitbuildinggroup.com" "Naysha Foster" , ’"Kurt Roland"' , "Brian Cunningham' , "Kent Fugal" , "Kerry Beutler" FW: Terrace Gate/Barnwood Estates Impact Fees From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Matt Your request to present your concerns regarding impact fees to Council was forwarded to us. I have the following notes from the discussions in our meettngs: ● Wastewater Connection: Concordia requested that the construcdon of the Sewer for a gravity line to the South to be installed to serve the developmentbe offset with the applicable Impact fees. It was clarified that as impact Fees are to offset costs associated with Transportation, police, fire, and parks, that the sewer improvements required by the development cannot be interchanged or offset the applicable impact fees. In our meeting on December 23, 2022 with yourself and the Engineering department. Wastewater Mainline Connection fees were questioned regarding the development. The question was if the Mainline connection fees could be waived in the event that the line in front of the development was not used. We reviewed this further and would recommend if the gravity line to the south is constructed by this development that the mainline connection fees would not be applicable and handled in the DevelopmentAgreement accordingly. The other item we can offer is the reimbursement clause for future connections made to the wastewater main that is constructed by the developer outside of His development. ● There was also discussion about the ability to reimburse the Developer from the Transportation Impact fees for capacity improvements completed along the frontage of Skyline. This could be reimbursed and handled in the development agreement as well, however please note that the reimbursement is subject to construcdon bids and costs that can be verified prior to reimbursement of public funds. We would be happy to work with you on this further as the development progresses. ● The subject of a potential Redevelopment district that could be set up through Community Development Services in an effort to mitigate some of the development costs to support mutual goals accordingly. IT was recommended to review this with the Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency and see what can be done. Regarding your question on the appeal of the Impact Fees pertaining to your project, a fee payer is entitled to an appeal for Impact fees when the fee payer applies for a Building Permit. Impact fees are calculated by the City, using the City’s fee schedule at the time of application for a building permit. Idaho Falls City Code § 10-8-5(A). Alternatively, you can submit a written appticatton for an individual assessment for the project. Idaho Falls City Code § 10-8-5(D). it is after the City has determined the specific impact fee applied to the proposed construcdon (either at the time of building permit application or review and acceptance/denial of a developer's written application for individual assessment) that you can present an appeal to the Impact fee administrator for consideration. Thanks. IDAHO FALLS WORKS [im Chris Canfield, P.E. t Assistant Public Works Director 380 Constitution Way Box 50220 Idaho Falls. Idaho 83405-0220 Work (208)612-8259 Cell (208)201-5695 From: matt.smith@summitbuildineeroupj:Qm Sent: Tuesday, January 3,2023 11:40 AM To: Naysha Foster Cc: 'Kurt Roland' Subject: Terrace Gate/Barnwood Estates Impact Fees CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Naysha, Good morning. Hope you had a good New Year and Christmas break. Would it be possible for us to schedule some time at a future City Council meeting to address the impact fees for Terrace Gate/Barnwood Estates? Kurt Roland and I discussed the possibility of with the Engineering Dept, to revisit the issue with the City Council a week or so ago and while Kent was pessimistic about the outcome, he thought we could still bring up the impact fees for their reconsideration. Kurt is away for a couple of weeks but as soon as he gets back, we can come in to discuss the specifics of what we would like to present. Thanks, Matt Smith Land Development Summit Building Group/Concordia Development Group (928) 241-2298M % CONCORDIA [f DEVELOPMENT INGROUP APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTIONS: Please fill all applicable blanks in completely and accurately. This application should accompany your Special Conditions exhibit that will be attached to the standard-form agreement which contains the standard terms and conditions for all annexation or development agreements. A form Annexation or Development Agreement and sample special conditions have been provided to you separately. No deviations will be allowed from the standard terms and conditions in the form Annexation/Development Agreement. Your special Conditions exhibit should be uniquely drafted to fit the particular circumstances of your subdivision, however you should follow the sample special conditions as closely as possible. You should also prepare an “Exhibit A” which sets forth the legal description of your subdivision. Name of Subdivision: Terrace Gate Apartments & Barnwood Estates Name of Developer: Summit Development Group, LLC Address: 901 Pier View Dr, Suite 204 Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Form of Business Entity: Limited Liability Company Corporation Trust Other Individual Partnership Government (Check One) State of Incorporation/Principal Place of Business: Idaho Name, Brandt Monette Office: Managing Member Authorized Signator: Location Where Agreement Will Be Signed: ' j Anticipated Date of Development: January 2024 Consulting Engineer: Firm Name:, Eagle Rock Engineering Contact Person: Kurt Roland Address: 1331 Fremont Ave City/Zip: Idaho Falls , ID 83402 Telephone: 208 757 7625 Names of Corporate Guarantors (if applicable): Brandt M, Monette State: Idaho County: Bonneville -EXHIBIT A- TERRACE GATE APARTMENTS AND BARNWOOD ESTATES LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEGINNING AT A POINT THAT IS S.00"1Z’14”E. ALONG THE SECTION LINE 300.01 FEET AND S 89'57’52”W. 40.00 FEET FROM THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH RANGE 37 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SKYLINE DRIVE; RUNNING THENCE S.00‘12’14”E. ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 460.12 FEET; THENCE N.89“47’46’’E. 40.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S.00“12’14”E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE 276.51 FEET; THENCE N 89°59’57”W. 270.02 FEET; THENCE S.00"12’14”E. 281.70 FEET TO THE SOUTHLINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1 /4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1 /4 OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N 89°59’25”W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 312.92 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 91; THENCE FOLLOWING ALONG SAID BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 91 THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES; (1) THENCE N.00°10’03”E. 350.90 FEET; (2) THENCE N.89‘50’43”E. 108.38 FEET; (3) THENCE N.01'16’54’’E. 6.90 FEET; (4) THENCE N.01 ”13’41”E. 208.76 FEET; (5) THENCE N.89"59’57”W. 112.37 FEET; (6) THENCE N.OO°10’O3”E. 451.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WESTGATE PROFESSIONAL PARK, A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT, PURSUANT TO IDAHO CODE, TITLE 55, CHAPTER 15, A PART OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO; THENCE N.89"57’52”E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID WESTGATE PROFESSIONAL PARK AND THE SOUTH LINE OF SAFARI 66, DIVISION NUMBER 1ST AMENDED, TO THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY IDAHO A DISTANCE OF 536.34 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 10.831 ACRES -EXHIBIT B- SPECiAL CONDITIONS FOR TERRACE GATE APARTMENTS AND BARNWOOD ESTATES s; r. i.nn.TrnffirSi|jns. Developer agrees to install all street signs designating the names of all streets within the Subdivision. Street signs designating the name of public streets shall be constructed with white letters over green background. Street signs designating the name of private streets shall be constructed with white lettering over blue background. Such signs shall be installed in the manner and locations as directed by the City Engineer. s r. 2.nn. to Skyline Drive. Shall be in accordance with the Bonneville Metropolitan Planning Organization Access Management Plan. St r ;;.on infrastrnchire. When it is necessary to move or remove existing infrastructure not belonging to the CITY and not within the CITY Right-of-Way, the DEVELOPER will coordinate such activities with the applicable owner, (e.g. poles owned by Pacificorp dba Rocky Mountain Power). Any existing electrical infrastructure owned by Pacificorp dba Rocky Mountain Power will require a buy-out from the DEVELOPER prior to receipt of electrical service from the CITY. Request for the buy-out is to be initiated by the DEVELOPER after annexation. s; r. 4.01). Artprial Street Section Improvements. DEVELOPER shall design and construct the Roadway improvements in Skyline Drive in accordance with the City Approved Improvement Drawings/Siie Plan. DEVELOPER shall be reimbursed for this work and be subject the requirements of this Agreement. The reimbursement schedule is subject to the City’s ability to collect impact fees and final acceptance of the Roadway. DEVELOPER shall also provide for the landscaping in the park strip between the curb and the sidewalk. Maintenance of the landscape buffer shall be the responsibility of the DEVELOPER or the DEVELOPER’S heirs, successors, or assigns. to s r. fS.nn water rinp rnnnection. The City agrees to allow the Developer to connect to the water main located in Skyline Drive, subject to the Developer's payment of the water main connection fees in the amount of One Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty-One Dollars and Eighty Cents ($ 1.751 -80; 38 feet currently al $46.10 per foot), upon execution of this agreement, pursuant to section 8-4-14 (C) of the City Code. Pursuant to section 8-4-14 (B) of the City Code, the Developer or his heirs or assigns shall also pay individual water system connection fees each time an individual water service line is connected to the City water systems. Such fees shall be paid in the amounts and manner set forth in such Code Sections. S.r. 6.nn spwer Main Connection Fee. The City agrees to allow the Developer to connect to the sewer previously constructed within the development, subject to the Developer's payment of the sewer main connection charge pursuant to section 8-l-23(C) of the City Code in the amount of l\vcm\ Thousand One Hundred Sixty-Nine Dollars and Ninety Cents ($20,169.00; 747 feet; currently at $27.00 per foot). Mainline connection fee costs will be adjusted accordingly if the connections are not made at a time when the City fee resolution reflects the rate referenced herein. Pursuant to section 8-1-23(3) of the City Code, the Developer or his heirs or assigns shall also pay individual sewer connection fees each time an individual sewer service line is connected to the City sewer system. Such fees shall be paid in the amounts and manner set forth in such Code Section. The sewer main in Sk\ line Drive, where this development will connect, is shallow with respect to other developments in this area. The Developer will address this issue with the building design and provide additional measures necessary to mitigate the potential freezing of sewer service lines. The Developer acknowledges that sewer service lines will be maintained by the Developer or the Developer's heirs, successors, or assigns. S.C. 7.00 Storm Drainage. Storm Drainage will be designed and constructed to accommodate drainage of the lots within the development by the Developer. The storm drainage system shall meet the volume rcqiiircmcnis of the City Storm Drainage Policy. The storm pond will be constructed as shown on the improvement drawings and Site Plan. Maintenance of the storm pond shall be the responsibility of the Developer or the Developer's heirs, successors, or assigns. Requested Amount Land Credit - 0.17 Acre Strip for Road 106,931 Road Construction 328.213 Land Credit - 0.423 Acres Right of Way 266,070 Exemption for Prior Home (Granted) 5,273 706,487 Total 3.02 Acres appraised for $1,900,000 = $14.44 per SQFT 7,405.2 SQFT X $14.44= $106,931 0.17 Acres =7,405.2 SQFT 18,425.88 SQFT x 14.44 = $266,070 0.423 Acres = 18,425.88 SQFT (43,560 SQFT per Acre) APPRAISAL REPORT OF PROPOSED Terrace Gate Condominiums Buildings 1 and 2 And Foundation of Building 3 To be located at Approximately 1020 South Skyline Drive Idaho Fails, Idaho 83401 Appraisal No. 25-118 FOR CITIZENS COMMUNITY BANK, A DIVISION OF GLACIER BANK BY CHAD RIGBY, MAI RIGBY & COMPANY APPRAISERS AND CONSULTANTS LARS RIGBY MAI CHAI L. RIGBY MAI JEFF H. RIGBY Ma> 9,2025 Laima Ditto Citi2 ens Community Bank a Division of Glacier Bank Re: Appraisal of two condominium buildings consisting of a total of 48 units, and one proposed building to be completed up to the foundation, located at approximately 1020 South Skyline Drive, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402 Dear Ms. Ditto: Pursiant your request, I have perfonned an appraisal on the above referenced property This appraisal considers the market value of the subject underlying land as well as the two proposed cond 3ramum buildmgs to contain a total of 48 units with each building having 24 units with a unit 3f one-bedroom, two-bedroom and three-bedroom condominium units. Building 3 is also dered up to the point of completion of the foundation. The value calculations m“ade in this apprusal are considered m an as is condition as well as at completion of the proposed unprovements. Please refer to the Description of Improvements section of the appraisal for intor nation regarding the proposed improvements. mix consi ollowing narrative appraisal report is in full conformance with USPAP regulations. This app^isal also conforms to the reporting requirements set forth by FIRREA. The appraisal also confc rms to the Code of Ethics of the Appraisal Institute. The The iharketing time estimated in this report is less than one year with exposure time also estimated to be ess than one year with no additional discounting necessary. The L itended user of this appraisal is Citizens Community Bank a Division of Glacier Bank. iTothetical conditions are considered as part of this appraisal. It is the extraordinary assun ption of this appraisal that the subject proposed improvements will be built according to the plans and cost mformation provided to the appraiser. The use of these extraordinary assumptions may i npact assigned results. ^ No h 14^6 North Highway 89, Suite 220, Farmington, Utah 84025, (801) 298-3205 Fax (801)451-0443 E-mail: t:hadr]ebvmai a:Bmail i-om Ms. Ditto Pag 12 Maj 9,2025 It IS my opinion that the market values per the respective dates of appraisal in fee simple estate are: Mai ket value—as is—April 23.202j> ONE MILLION NINE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,900,000) pective market value at completion of vertical improvements—^Buildings 1 and 2. with Bniiping 3 fonndatioii—bulk valae—April 1.2026 TWELVE MILLION NINE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($12,900,000) bined retail value at completion—^Buildings I and 2 only—^Aoril 1. 2026 Con Unit types No. units Value/unit Retail value 1-bed 12 @ $230,000 $255,000 $275,000 $300,000 $2,760,000 $3,060,000 $3,300,000 $3.600.000 $12,720,000 2-bed 2-bed 3-bed 12 @ 12 @ 12 @ Total Shou d you have any questions concerning this analysis, please do not hesitate to contact my office. Resp ictflilly submitted, Chad L. Rigby, MAI Idaho Certi^cate CGA-4690 &qDires 5-3-26 State-Certified General Appraiser CERTIFICATION The nyJersigned does hereby certify that* The statements of efet contained in this erport are true and correct The erported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the erported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. I have no bias wife erspect to the property efat is the subject of this report or to efe parties involved with this assignment My mgagement in this assignment was not contmgent upon developing or rqwrting predetermined results. My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon efe development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that efvors fee cause of efe client, the amount of the value opinion, fee ^tainment of a stipulated result, or the occunence of a subsequent event directly erlated to efe intended use of efis ^praisal. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in confotmily wife the requirements of efe Code of Professional Ethics & Standards of Professional AoDraisal Practice ofthe Appraisal histitute. " The reported^ analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and efis erport has been prepared, in conformity wife efe Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practi The use of this report is subject to efe requirements of efe Appraisal Institute relating to erview by its duly authorized representatives. ^ I have made a personal inspection ofthe subject property. I have primed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, on efe property that is efe subject of this appraisal in efe pnor three years. No person has provided professional assistance to the person signing efe certification. As ofthe date ofthis report, I have completed efe continuing education program of efe Appraisal Institute. ce. May 9.2025 Date Chad L. Rigby, MAI Idaho State-Ceitified General Appraiser Certificate CGA-4690 Expires 5-3-26 SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS Idei tificatioD of the properly: The subject of this appraisal is Buildings 1 and 2, with Building 3 foundation value also included as part of the proposed Terrace Gate Condominiums to be located approximately 1020 South Skyline Drive, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402. at Proj erty right appraised: Fee simple estate Effe :tive date of appraisal: April 23,2025 April 1,2026—prospective date of completion May 9.2025 ■as IS Dah of report: Land size: 8.055 acres 3.02 acres allocated to subject Buildings 1,2, and 3 Proposed development Proposed HigI est and best use: Yeai built: Unit 1-bed sizes: 691 SF 964 SF 1,045 SF 1,317 SF 2-bed 2-bed 3-bed Desc ription of improvements: The subject is proposed to be built out with two condominium buildings—Buildings 1 and 2. The buildings will have a combined area of 48,204 square feet with a gross area including the breeze ways and patios at 54,618 square feet The unit mix is six one-bedroom, six three-bedroom, and 12 two-bedroom units. The subject also considers Building 3 at completion of die foundiion before vertical improvements take place. Please erfer to the Description of Improvements section of the appraisal for detailed information regarding the proposed improvements. Value Indicators As is At completion As is Cost approach Sales comparison approach Income approach $1,900,000 $14,100,000 $12,900,000 $12,400,000 Values $1,900,000 $12,900,000 The ^alue calculations above for the subject in an as is condition considers the pad value associated with Buildings 1,2, and 3. Amounts paid by Terrace Gate Properly Fund for Knife River to widen Skyline Drive Item Scheduled Nutek Unit Cost Quemrtv Units Speiificelxin SesIwnNo Uescriplion $2 00 SS.J8UOJ 1740 1 SjuvCurtme 30 S7.h97 SO $9 75 HIO cr t fteim»4lul PevenienlSeciiwi Sliylloe 50 $3,395 00 53,>95 00 1 L5 1 ConnccHotsisimKWileilinc 90 571,775 00 $99 00 725 u 1 Insult 12' Ajieiline 100 $1,275.00 5:,550 00 2 £A 1 InsUU 12'WjlnlH1mi!S|regtPU)gl no 5io,nooQ $5.070.00 £A l-lnsuil 12'Vatu' 120 $9,665 00 515,330 00 Tneie weteShyOiafils in phase 1, 2yirateonst|l'n<- £A 160 1 Install iecHyaijni 525,000 00 AicasanO 7 weteioitttiineg AiBaSisonsHylen: ana wasa0oui25n $25,000 00 l lnsLill UndeigiounO Heltiilion S/slem [Area S&7; 15 290 $37.00 528,490 00 7/0 If 1 Insl.ill 30‘Cui6jihJ Cullei 330 550 31000 $?G 00 lftisvi4S<)iii;injllYcaiW'ti ixjl ll^■^llc^ i„iniL' scct«m,islli<;teslQHneaevi:lui>nw;nl. jllei Onl 1935 V lull IOihIiI itieiniiiiJicocity scctiiin SY l-PavenicmSi;Clionlui Ssylmi-(7~/4‘/9*l 360 $20 00 54,lbO.CO IbO SY 2 Patemt-nlSeaionlut SSvliiH'(2V4*/9*| 780 (SS4.47U.C0l l$2fa U0| 2095 PEtCUPanemenlScrlionSKYlINf (ITtM360&76Q| SY 4 $53 00 5111,035 00 2095 ADD Ntf* P4>«iiu:iil Scclioii SKYLINb SY 4.1 $15.00 510,920 00 729 CY ftOD AdUilH)iMl I X lot SKYIIWI 4 2 534,,●'00 00 lt)l.il LC DETAIL A: ‘SCALE 1=1' DETAIL B: ‘SCALE 1 ‘$ 00°03'05" W 1165.00" ELMORE AVENUE (IN FEET ) 1 inch = R20 LOT 36 BLOCK 45 HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION OLD PLAT BOOK, PAGE 5 6°55" E 74.87! LOT 49 0.050 ACRES $ 89°57'03" E 92.31" LOT So 0.049 ACRES S 89°57'03" E 106.46" LOT 51 0.108 ACRES N 89°57'05" W 125.00' S BO°S705" E 49.25 LOT 52 0.115 ACRES § 89°57'04" E 125.00! LOT 53 0.062 ACRES N 89°57°04" W 125.00" LOT 54 0.075 ACRES N 89°56'55" W 125,00" LOT 44 BLOCK 45 HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION OLD PLAT BOOK, PAGE 5 S 00°42'55" W 44.42" $.00°0000" 144.58" ‘S$. 00°0308" WW 175.00" $.00°03'05" W HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION, THIRD AMENDED A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO BEING A RE-PLAT OF PORTIONS OF LOTS 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, AND 43 OF BLOCK 45, OF HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 37 EAST, BM ° = 3s BLOCK 45 HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION OLD PLAT BOOK, PAGE 5 8 a e N89°66'55" W 125.00" 12 13 NE CORNER, LOT 6, BLOCK 45 HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION ‘OLD PLAT BOOK, PAGE 5 | 07 20 1997 M.ZEZ0.00 S ONINVaE 4O SISVE GSLNSNNNOW | PROJECT LOCA’ NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 13 FOUND BRASS CAP PURSUANT TO CP&F INSTRUMENT No. 1657308 ELMORE AVE: RIVERSIDE OR: VICINITY MAP SURVEYOR NARRATIVE THIS SURVEY WAS DONE AT THE REQUEST OF TETON PEAKS DEVELOPERS, LLC WITH THE INTENTIONS OF DIVIDING THE LAND SHOWN TO FURTHER UTILIZE THE LAND SHOWN WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION. THE NORTHWEST BOUNDARY OF THIS SUBDIVISION WAS RESOLVED BY FOUND RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENTS AND INFORMATION FOUND IN DEEDS INSTRUMENT No. 1780826, 366042 AND ITD RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAN SET F-6471(31) R/W. THE NORTH, EAST SOUTH AND WEST BOUNDARIES WERE DETERMINED BY RECORD INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION FILED IN PLAT BOOK PAGE 5, DEEDS INSTRUMENT No. 1780826, 1780778, 1681537 AND FOUND MONUMENTS AS SHOWN, USING THE RAILROAD SPIKE AT THE INTERSECTION OF ELMORE AVENUE AND. HIGHAM STREET ALONG WITH THE THE FOUND 1/2 INCH REBAR AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7, BLOCK 45 OF THE SAID HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION. RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE SAID HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION MATCHES EXISTING FENCE LINES ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEY, THE SOUTH SIDE OF THIS SUBDIVISION AS WELL AS THE BACK OF SIDEWALK ALONG W. SHELLEY STREET QUITE WELL. THIS EVIDENCE WAS USED TO. DETERMINE THESE BOUNDARIES, REFERNCE: 1) ITO PROJECT No. F-6471(31) RW 2) HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION INSTRUMENT No. 1597107 3) DEED INSTRUMENT No. 366042 4) DEED INSTRUMENT No. 594298 5) DEED INSTRUMENT No. 1163156 6) DEED INSTRUMENT No. 1780778 7) DEED INSTRUMENT No. 1780826 8) DEED INSTRUMENT No. 1681537 9) CP&F'S AS LISTED ON THE FACE OF THIS PLAT LINE TABLE DIRECTION | LENGTH L1 | N31°0204"E | 0.91" L2 | sess712"E | 4.27 L3 | Nog"O401"E | 3.68" La | N25°43'22"E | 3.12" CURVE TABLE DELTA CURVE # | LENGTH | RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION | CHORD LENGTH of 6°39'43" | N 96°42'56" E 74°24 N 52°50'39" 45°26'13" | N53°4015" E 13°3934" | N 63°13'09" E 89°16'19" | $44°35'33"E 89°16'34" | $44°41'24" W 0°32'12" | S69°46'50" W 42°14'29" | S 68°26'25" W BASIS OF BEARING ALL MEASURED BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON RELATE DIRECTLY TO THE "CITY OF IDAHO FALLS COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 2004", WHICH IS DERIVED FROM THE IDAHO STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (EAST ZONE 1101) US SURVEY FEET AND USING A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.000277265 FOR AGRID TO GROUND CONVERSION, [REFERENCE FRAME NAD_83(2011), EPOCH 2010.0000} THE SYSTEM ORIENTATION IS BASED ON GRID NORTH ALONG THE EAST ZONE CENTRAL MERIDIAN. NO CONVERGENCE ANGLE HAS BEEN APPLIED. EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTIONAS FOUND ALUMINUM CAP MONUME! 18 TO CP&F INSTRUMENT No, 66 IDAHO FALLS, ID DRAWN BY: NK REVIEWED BY: CTP [soe no: 20166 | DATE: way 20,2025 _| '— CONNECT gp — ENGINEE HIGHLAND PARK ADDITION THIRD AMENDED Site Photo Looking southeast from Hwy 20 Site Photo PLT25-008 Highland Park Addition, 3rd Amended seus E~vsiope IG: SOF \COBS 9272 «93C KBE TACNN DSCs cece (EGHT FOR 3 By ENGINEER, Ho LASURL PSPC GOEL ILSILY MALL (NU SUM PESEAL SH AL BUILDINGS JESS OTHERS Control Paint Table BASIS OF BEARING Poatd Elevsn | ering = Eaetag Deseipliun OM CITY OF BANG TLLS CoNSOL 1 evanga | a7t14s<3 ga6zat.15 ROW MON BENCHMARK 2 arears | a71s704 68812654 ROW MON MSL TAMER > RAMEE SE Neve LAs 4025) 3 e7aa12 | a7tzs.a7 486832.00 43R_PUSFTHROUGHCAF EWAF 9 HiTRANT 24 THE HE TI. PR APE «eve se | errs? sont SURVEY NOTE: FIRELAME NO FAR«INC" ZICh. Entrance SSSTRIST AL SEAN h SSDORDANCE ITH SHC SLR: SITE INFORMATION Nameen | Station Ras us | Length | neiCaars Dirsctinr Ste asa0 Op ANCL UN i | Eeocies 188 un ——— Toa. AREA SE PROPERTY! 78.78 89 #7 1967 AORTA: a waa hoch ng, £71243.16 | Northing. 677285.28 DEEICN DESEIT’ QUNTSPER A> Cas.ing. 886981 29 | Casting. 086287.22 mE NLA aS REN AST SUL hock mg: €71285.28 | Nerthing: 671336 05 War aaa sey=1 7 98 eee 7 146s 4 a Vataa (asec 124sbaa FT ae: Eaccing: suas 42 | Easting: 68643 1.00 LETSt 123520. (364 837. OX! a ac : * 5 vg | Nosh na: 87 1388.05 | Nortung: 677358.45 Lares .2s3scrr faz srr are: ¢ 2.3% got 02a" LSrss aescr /2y91 SRT cee “2 $852 NGO BO OZIEE — Egg:ing: 836481.05 | Eaating: 688167.11 WSLS TSE ISIN Le . | sient es ssrossars | NOUhNG.S71588.45 | Netting. 677258.97 recestgnt 20 us | stoves S88 S8B"STONST — Fasing nadsT "1 | Pastng- cQGG07 OD BCP. ecoene ¥ ES wand 265 3077. Yn -,59) SFT. SANIALION EACH UT SEFONCIBE FCR THE SOON, Turn Around INS IU SAI HSM HOLL SA : GAL Dhaka Nek Nunber| Suton Rasue length IineiChors Mirestion Start Pent Frid Poin PEOU aE: ee 5 z poe Start 440,00 5 Pag yy age Noch va: 8120.80 | Nerting: 6/1470.07 PRY OL + | ena: “0n.e1 WEIL NOOO AZE Easting: BEBSESAS yy GENERAL NOT! sara “fin wenn AIS 0 SE LANE HE RoHS SH, WATER RETENTION AREA BOUNDARY SPaNCARD ERNIE, 2 Ae,0) STE NERCVEMENTE S4H4L Ze D9NS-S C7 " [ohare errs Cae at oe Coen STORM WATER INFORMATION FOR AREA 1 ALLS LIN SPL ‘STGAM WATER AREA PRATER ST =aasNTES urasis. FT FRE LANE NS BARK 5 SSN 5 Pall CURE NO $C ie NEZOEE, suber mr ante . 1 are ara doe VOLUME fu RABE HEERIG. WIFLTRNTION SRR cas=o-Fove: [NFLTRAT SM RICE ETEMTICNTM : » row 3ar8 EANDYLGAM e144 ate The . IMFILTRE” OW RATE WHS CHC-LATEDUS V5.8 SOREY OSM TRANEMIESION RAE CF 23 HR 2 SHERT WUE: SULT INE CRS OF SENG: GH-153 SITE OVERVIEW GRAPHIC SCALE be 2 Taerber 15 2095 re THIRD AMENDED OF HIGHLAND PARK ADD. Know what's below. PERT SN Call before you dig. IDAHO FALLS, ID SULLI Siak: OF X98 GARE CY — eee C-05 ,. C-11 inn S “Cor, CORREO PS, ‘Boo Hu wee” BFUSIONE A Aerial PLT25-008 Highland Park Addition, 3rd Amended Ss Pid Vy , ») > i oO > z [ i= ii] (s) : y ax Fy SE aN ee i A sri, Maxar, Earth IDAHO FALES RZN25-016 Rezone from HC to CC Taylor Crossing on the River, Division No. 8 A Aerial RZN25-016 2.58 Acres HC to CC = Pione at al Hj Na ner RZN25-016 2.58 Acres HC to CC | R1 | | R2 I tht) = PB | lic [ | R&D | 1&M \ [ ] RMH | | R3A cc !}Heo [| iM [fo] Pp fils. l4) ish | leh iy! UBER. ERiRRy Comprehensive Plan RZN25-016 2.58 Acres HC to CC |__| General Urban [J Mixed Use Centers and Corridors {NN Special Use [| Urban Core [|_| Industrial [|] Natural and Open Space [| Suburban o > Ks ° fe) ys ~ fe) io) (S) %) aw aa | ee Pervew : C Site Photo Looking down into rezone area Site Photo RZN25-016 2.58 Acres HC to CC Site Photo Looking Northeast from Pancheri Site Photo RZN25-016 2.58 Acres HC to CC Site Photo Looking generally west from South Utah Ave near Eagle Fountain Site Photo RZN25-016 2.58 Acres HC to CC N A Aerial RZN25-016 2.58 Acres HC to CC TORT Carson,St ie. S_Colorado Ave = ‘ 4" | 2 4 ‘nd : - _* C , Ne 3 , 7. ° ,, F is ‘ = : | | = fee eS LE | 1h . | = ee i) r e yo i —- oll ag y i 7 = pepe \V Colorado Ave S| SEED oe 791 2. Be Ler een) c= eu y, Snake River|Pkw IDAHO FALES Planned Unit Development PUD25-003 Sage Lakes Sage Lakes Planned Unit Development Jared Huish & Ji m Hirrlinger // City Council //January 8, 2026 Presentation Agenda Project Details andBenefits Comprehensive overview of the Sage Lakes development, including site specifications, unit mix, and enhanced amenities that exceed standard requirements. Alignment with CityVision How the proposal supports Imagine IF goals including aging in place, housing diversity, and sustainable community development. Sage Lakes Planned Unit Development Both the site plan for the PUD and the single- family homes surrounding the townhomes. Also, elevation examples of the product types and how a PUD is a better development for the community, both density and site plan design. Addressing Neighbor Concerns Direct responses to feedback from the August 27 neighborhood meeting, supported by independent traffic studies and research. Recommendation and Q&A Summary of benefits and request for approval. This presentation responds to feedback from attendees at our August 27, 2025 neighborhood meeting and the Planning Commission meeting, addressing key themes including density, traffic, and community character. Project Overview Location &Zoning The Sage Lakes development encompasses approximately 20 acres in the Fairway Estates neighborhood, positioned west of Lewisville Highway.The property is zoned R2 and R3 (Mixed Residential), which permits a diverse range of housing types. Development Composition • 246 individually owned townhome units • 74 single-family detached homes (not part of PUD) • 320 total residential units • All units for sale Community Amenities 4.51 acres of dedicated open space (25.1% of total area) • Two children's playgrounds with modern equipment • Community pavilion for gatherings • Two dedicated dog parks • Landscaped grassy hills and natural areas • Walking trails connecting amenities • Enhanced buffer zones with mature landscaping Access &Infrastructure Primary access north of Sage Lakes Boulevard includes a new bridge and roadway. Internal circulation via private roads designed to prevent cut-through traffic. Alignment with Imagine IF Comprehensive Plan Adopted by the City Council on February 24, 2022, the Imagine IF Comprehensive Plan provides strategic guidance for Idaho Falls' growth and development. This forward- thinking document emphasizes diverse, thoughtful development that serves residents across all life stages while utilizing existing infrastructure efficiently. Mixed ResidentialDevelopment Supports combining townhomes and single-family homes within R2 zones to create vibrant, varied neighborhoods that accommodate different household needs and preferences. Middle-Market Housing Near Amenities Encourages development of attainable housing options in established areas with existing infrastructure, schools, and services rather than forcing continued suburban sprawl. Compact Development Over Sprawl Promotes efficient use of land and infrastructure through thoughtful density that maintains quality while reducing the fiscal and environmental costs of sprawling development patterns. Embracing AppropriateDensity Recognizes that well-designed density enhances housing affordability and choice while supporting the commercial viability of neighborhood services and reducing per-unit infrastructure costs. Variety in Housing Types and Prices Advocates for neighborhoods that offer multiple housing forms and price points, enabling residents to find suitable homes regardless of life stage, household composition, or economic circumstances. Strategic Infill Development Prioritizes development in areas where water, sewer, roads, and other infrastructure already exist, maximizing return on public investment and reducing long-term maintenance burdens. Supporting Aging in Place and Lifecycle Housing The Challenge As Fairway Estates residents age, many face difficult choices: maintain large homes that no longer suit their needs or leave the neighborhood entirely. This out-migration breaks community bonds and forces residents away from familiar surroundings, friends, and local connections built over decades. The Imagine IFVision "The City should support 'aging in place' by encouraging a variety of housing options that allow residents to remain in their neighborhoods as their needs change over time. This includes providing accessible single-level homes, townhomes, and senior housing that enable transitions from larger family dwellings to smaller, more manageable units without requiring relocation." —Imagine IF Comprehensive Plan, Page 59, Chapter 4: Housing, Goal H-2 "Aging in place is a key strategy for Idaho Falls, where residents can downsize within the same community, fostering intergenerational connections and reducing the economic and emotional costs of moving. The plan prioritizes zoning and development standards that accommodate accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and multi-generational homes to support this transition." —Imagine IF Comprehensive Plan, Page 61, Chapter 4: Housing, Policy H-2.1 Creating Housing Diversity for Long-Term Community Retention The Foundation: Balanced Housing Mix "To meet the needs of a growing and changing population, Idaho Falls must provide a balanced mix of housing product types, including single-family detached homes, attached townhomes, multifamily apartments, and senior living options. This diversity ensures that families, young professionals, and older adults can find suitable housing within established neighborhoods, promoting long-term residency and neighborhood stability." —Imagine IF Comprehensive Plan, Page 58, Chapter 4: Housing, Objective H-1 Right-Sizing Within Communities "Residents should be able to 'right-size' their housing—moving from larger homes to smaller ones or from independent living to assisted options—while staying in the same area. By integrating a range of product types (e.g., duplexes, triplexes, and cottage clusters) into suburban and urban neighborhoods, the City can create vibrant, inclusive communities that adapt to life stages." —Imagine IF Comprehensive Plan, Page 60, Chapter 4: Housing, Policy H-1.3 Preventing Out-Migration "The lack of diverse housing product types contributes to out-migration when families or seniors can no longer afford or maintain their current homes. Imagine IF envisions neighborhoods where residents can seamlessly transition between housing forms—such as from a four-bedroom single-family home to a low- maintenance townhome—keeping economic contributions local and strengthening community bonds." —Imagine IF Comprehensive Plan, Page 62, Chapter 4: Housing, Implementation Strategy H-4 Sage Lakes Alignment: By combining 74 single-family homes with 246 townhomes, our development creates opportunities for seamless transitions within the same neighborhood, supporting residents through different life stages while maintaining their connection to Fairway Estates. Building Resilient, Multi-Generational Neighborhoods Community Character ThroughDiversity "Diverse housing mixes are essential for creating resilient neighborhoods that support all life stages, from young families starting out to seniors aging in place. This approach minimizes the need for long-distance moves and aligns with the City's goal of compact growth, where product variety (e.g., bungalows, rowhouses, and apartments) coexists with green spaces and amenities." —Imagine IF Comprehensive Plan, Page 87, Chapter 6: Community Character, Neighborhood Design Principles The Sage Lakes Approach: Our integration of townhomes and single-family homes, supported by 25.1% open space and comprehensive amenities, creates the type of vibrant, inclusive community envisioned in Imagine IF—one that welcomes residents across all life stages while fighting sprawl through thoughtful density. Young Families Starting Out Established Households Downsizing and Aging in Place A More Thoughtful Approach to Density The Sage Lakes PUD proposes significantly lower density than entitled under current zoning, prioritizing quality and community harmony over maximum unit count. This reduction represents a deliberate choice to balance growth with neighborhood character. R2 Maximum Entitlement 17 units peracre 340-350 potential units on 20 acres Minimal open space requirements Standard R2 amenity provisions Sage LakesProposal <12 units per acre 320 total units (74 SF + 246 townhomes) 25.1% dedicated open space Enhanced amenitiespackage The Difference 20%below maximum density 94 fewer units than entitled Significantly more greenspace Superior community features By utilizing the Planned Unit Development framework, we can deliver amenities and design features that exceed standard R2 requirements while maintaining lower overall density than maximum entitlements would allow. Sage Lakes Planned Unit Development + Fairway Estates > Dry wel <- Uiny . Al — i! oer ame =~ -| meg: fo a0 ‘en = Se SE sail ~ tee scaiteel Fm) — fame = Idaho Falls, Bonneville County Sage Lakes PUD +Fairway Estates Single Family Homes — CONCEPT TABULATIONS TOTAL ACREAGE +£49.3 ACRES z 1 eLOMSION™ @ TOTAL UNIT COUNT 319 Y ¢ g ¢ & meat ie Fy wart ate A] H 58 sh ls 38 3 Bs wife ih Np iy SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, PRELIM. PLAT: coors fF SSF SBI SRP cn 8 es fh fhe 22 4 TOTAL LOTS - 16 4 2 EL) : ci oss. Et on fe +% baa} 8 2 awe [lhe 83 /f she fa tertans i Se DIVISION 26: 0.325 AC. §| iy = a TOTAL LOTS - 30 a red wey if, + Ee ee ad idee ‘TOTAL SINGLE-FAMILY: : q 73 Lots “8 § 4 tee o> ied al se 21.7-ACRE TOWNHOME PUD | y wetee te TOTAL UNITS - 246, ay ime DENSITY - 11.3 : : | vee 2, & 2 (OPEN SPACE - 54 AC (25%) i ee Peal - ‘MAX BUILDING HEIGHT as st wee 3 |, 5 wale Pa ey ; ; 4 saz 1 ' | aL Acai =| LEGEND Niall aT a [ 78" MIN. SINGLE-FAMILY, MODIFIED FROM PRELIM. PLAT - 27 LOTS he He | | 3 % :' 4 —< ae TE texto towntiomes (2111479 - 149 UNITS ‘ 4 ae) h tx m2 17 FRONT-LOAD TOWNHOMES (24'x49') - 97 UNITS Dk ae 26 |, 18 : i ae a fom [EG open space -453 ac : i 4 ; . i as Eyes THER paar vanos- 35 ac ‘= Ss [EZ] open space aurrer - NOT COUNTED IN TOTAL 273 AC wo) 20 int TOIL bee i % F y v , — a =m am le) 5 | |.) 2 i) Enel tors 3] Lor w812) cor ssefaltorsz ghey corsy |} 2 tort erietleodtactly E o3as B Be) “ce. EI) Sse (ELE ne FAIRWAY ESTATES concept C 43°32'41.16°N, 112° 1'51.54"W - IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY Note: This plan is for illustrative purposes. Boundaries may be based on information obtained through public data and we can't confirm it’s accuracy. Itis 8/27/2025 recommended that a boundary survey be performed to determine actual boundary size and dimensions as well as other potential boundary conflicts. 25-5018 ‘Vaan 2h8 drwy Site enka +40 anahcancant\25 8 Forney Ele: Concmeh Cg Sage Lakes Blvd. (NE corner - Pevero & Sage Lakes Blvd.) Sage Lakes Blvd.) Sage Lakes Blvd. (Northside Sage Lakes Blvd. (East facing- Pevero & Sage Lakes Blvd.) Sage Lakes Blvd. (East facing- Pevero & Sage Lakes Blvd.) zz: y+ 74 a |) LeeLee LE ; : ili ye oil Sage Lakes Blvd. (East facing, East of Pevero & Sage Lakes Blvd.) — eee, a LOT L Sage Lakes Planned Unit Development - Site Plan haa —————— | CONCEPT TABULATIONS = = ty TOTAL ACREAGE +49,3 ACRES TOTAL UNIT COUNT 319 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, PRELIM. PLAT: TOTAL LOTS - 16 DIVISION 26: TOTAL LOTS - 30 TOTAL SINGLE-FAMILY: 73 LOTS 21.7-ACRE TOWNHOME PUD TOTAL UNITS - 246 DENSITY - 11.3 OPEN SPACE - 5.4 AC (25%) MAX BUILDING HEIGHT 35° LEGEND 78' MIN. SINGLE-FAMILY, MODIFIED FROM PRELIM. PLAT - 27 LOTS REAR-LOAD TOWNHOMES (21'x47') - 149 UNITS FRONT-LOAD TOWNHOMES (24'x49') - 97 UNITS OPEN SPACE - 4.53 AC PRIVATE YARDS - .35 AC MEOH PS OPEN SPACE BUFFER - NOT COUNTED IN TOTAL 2.73 AC Sage Lakes R2 (Non-PUD) - Site Plan R2 Concept PUD Concept PAN Townhome Area 21.7. ac 21.7 ae pone wd Townhome Units 285 246 aie || Density 13.1 du/ac 11.3 du/ac Rae | Open Space 1.75/ac 5.4ac Amenities fe) é L \F 5h | | i : R | | 7 Sagas = : wagrew DIVISION 26 - EB'-WIDE serarssw i087) 3 ? ue, SINGLEFAMIEY LOTS ~ “ite SAGE LAKES BOULEVARD 1 ae sa To OT 3 ie bk -axoor 244 GRAPHIC SCALE wy i ee * . are \ FAIRWAY ESTATES r2 concept 43°32'41.16"N, 112° 1'51.54"W - IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY Note: This plan is for illustrative purposes. Boundaries may be based on information obtained through public data and we can't confirm it's accuracy. It is 10/7/2025 recommended that a boundary survey be performed to determine actual boundary size and dimensions a: well as other potential boundary confict. 25-5018 Enhanced Amenities Through PUD Design The PUD Advantage The Planned Unit Development approach enables us to exceed standard R2 zoning requirements, delivering exceptional community features that would not be required under conventional development. With over 25% of the site dedicated to open space— far surpassing minimum standards—residents gain access to thoughtfully designed gathering places and recreational opportunities. What Maximum Density Would Mean If developed at the full R2 entitlement of 17 units per acre, this site could accommodate 340+ units with minimal open space and no requirement for the enhanced amenities package we're proposing. The result would be significantly higher traffic generation, greater infrastructure demands, and reduced quality of life for both new and existingresidents. Included Community Features • Two Modern Playgrounds: Safe, age-appropriate equipment for families • Community Pavilion: Covered gathering space for events • Dual Dog Parks: Dedicated areas for pets and their owners • Grassy Hills: Natural play areas and visual interest • Walking Trail Network: Connecting all amenities • Landscaped Buffers: Enhanced privacy and aesthetics Townhomeand Single-Family Elevations Townhome Elevations - Front Loaded #rVisionar Ww HOMES y Oak & Pine Plan Front Loaded Townhome Product Townhome Elevations - Front Loaded Sr victonar Ww HOMES y Oak & Pine Plan Front Loaded Townhome Product Oak & Pine Floor Plan Livability FEATURES: 24’wide x 49’deep 1764-2445 square feet : 3 Bedrooms he a 2.5 Bathrooms — 2 Living Spaces ni Large Kitchen Area 2-Car Garage 2-Car Driveway Townhome Elevations - Alley Loaded SITKA Plan Rear Loaded Townhome Product Sitka Floor Plan Livability FEATURES: 21’wide x 47’deep 1530 square feet 3 Bedrooms 2.5 Bathrooms 2 Living Spaces Large Kitchen Area 2-Car Garage 2-Car Driveway Variety of Elevation Styles Sivisionar W HOMES y Townhome Elevations - Alley Loaded SITKA Plan Rear Loaded Townhome Product Single-Family Elevations CAMBRIDGE Plan Renderings Fairview Product Single-Family Elevations Si visionar WY HOMES y SUMMERLYNN Plan Renderings Fairview Product FARMHOUSE Single-Family Elevations Bislonary REMINGTON Plan Renderings Fairview Product - pe Agee ey pear! PSY eM, - ‘iy > - See ae a Sage Lakes PUD - Walking Paths $89°4059"\ “O14 Traffic and Infrastructure: ComprehensiveAnalysis The Concerns Raised Residents at our neighborhood meeting expressed concerns about overwhelming roads and bridges with increased traffic volumes, potential infrastructure strain on water and gas systems, and impacts on local schools. These concerns warranted thorough, independent analysis. Understanding Level of Service (LOS) Traffic engineers measure intersection efficiency using Level of Service, which grades performance from A (Excellent) to F (Failing) based on average delay time per vehicle: • LOS A (Excellent): Less than 10 second delay • LOS B (Good): 10-15 seconddelay • LOS C (Stable): 15-25 second delay • LOS D (Acceptable): 25-35 second delay • LOS E (Congested): 35-55 second delay • LOS F (Failing): More than 55 second delay Idaho Falls requires new developments to maintain minimum LOS D at affected intersections. Sage Lakes exceeds this standard significantly. Professional Traffic Impact Assessment Focus Engineering completed an independent Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) on October 2, 2025, examining impacts through 2033. The study analyzed two key intersections using actual traffic counts from September 2025: • 5th East & Sage Lakes Boulevard • 5th West & Pevero Drive Infrastructure Coordination The new Sage Lakes Boulevard bridge and roadway will be phased to match development, with all utility systems sized and reviewed by city engineers. Private internal roads prevent cut-through traffic while maintaining emergency access. Water, gas, and sewer capacity has been confirmed adequate for the proposed density. Addressing Property Value Concerns The Concern At our August 27 neighborhood meeting, residents expressed concerns that townhomes would decrease surrounding property values. This belief, while understandable, is not supported by market research or economic analysis. The Builder's Perspective Our development team—building both the townhomes and single-family homes—has a direct financial stake in maintaining high quality standards. Lower-quality townhomes would cannibalize sales of the adjacent single-family homes we're also marketing. This economic reality ensures quality remains paramount across all housing types. Quality Specifications • Townhomes average 1,800+ square feet • Two-car attached garages standard • Premium finishes and materials • Modern architectural design • Owner-occupied What ResearchShows 70% No Impact or Positive Studies findingneutral or beneficial effects on surrounding values 30% Varies by Context Outcomes depend on design quality and amenities Academic and Industry Research: • NYU Furman Center: "Positive effects... on surrounding property values" from well-designed multifamily • MassLandlords: "Gently increased density... slight boost to property values" • National Association of Realtors: "No impact or positive" from low- income/multifamily housing • Virginia Tech Study: Homeowners associations (like our HOA) boost values through maintained standards The market demands diverse housing options, as emphasized in Imagine IF. Similar PUDs throughout Idaho Falls have enhanced their surrounding areas through quality design and community amenities rather than diminishing property values. Safety, Crime Prevention, and Family-Friendly Design Addressing Crime Concerns Neighborhood meeting comments raised concerns about increased crime and disruption to Fairway Estates' family-friendly character. These concerns deserve serious consideration and evidence-basedresponse. Why OwnershipMatters Sage Lakes consists entirely of individually owned townhomes and single-family homes. Research consistently shows owner-occupied housing correlates with: • More stable, long-termresidents • Greater investment inproperty maintenance • Stronger neighborhood connections • Active participation in communitylife These ownership characteristics promote the same family-oriented environment that existing Fairway Estates residents value. Evidence from SimilarDevelopments Similar PUD projects in Idaho Falls, including the recently approved Creekside Townhomes, show no correlation with increased crime rates. Well-designed, owner- occupied communities contribute positively to neighborhood safety. Safety Through Design The Sage Lakes site plan incorporates multiple features specifically designed to enhance safety and foster community: • Comprehensive Lighting: LED pathway and street lighting throughout common areas • Open Sight Lines: Playgrounds and gathering spaces visible from multiple homes • Natural Surveillance: Windows and entries oriented toward common areas • Defined Spaces: Clear transitions between public and private areas • Active Amenities: Playgrounds and dog parks encourage regular use, creating natural oversight • Landscaped Buffers: Visual screening without creating hiding places • Maintained Trails: Connected walking paths promote healthy activity and "eyes on the street" Building Community Connections The pavilion, playgrounds, and dog parks serve as natural gathering points where neighbors meet and form relationships. These social bonds—supported by ownership stability—create the strongest foundation for safe, family-friendly neighborhoods that align with Imagine IF's vision for community character. Thoughtful Buffers and Visual Harmony Concerns raised by meeting attendees regarding proximity and aesthetic clash with Fairway Estates are directly addressed through substantial physical separation and cohesive design standards. Physical SeparationStrategy Sage Lakes provides buffering between existing Fairway Estates homes and the townhomes, substantially exceeding typical development standards: • Three complete rows of single-family homes buffer the development’s southern edge. • Two full internal roadways (32 ft wide) with enhanced landscaping zones. • Enhanced landscaping zones including trees, shrubs, and berms. Architectural Cohesion The townhome and single-family home designs share consistent architectural elements that respect Fairway Estates' character: • Modern traditional styling with clean lines. • Neutral color palettes (grays, tans, whites) and quality exterior materials (fiber cement, stone accents). • Thoughtful roof lines and window proportions. • Two-car garages (preventing street parking clutter). The PUD framework enables these enhanced buffer and design standards, which exceed what would be required under standard R2 development. This extra investment directly responds to neighbor feedback and ensures a cohesive, high-quality environment. Community Benefits: A Comprehensive View The Sage Lakes PUD delivers measurable benefits to existing residents, future homeowners, and the broader Idaho Falls community through thoughtful design that balances growth with quality of life. Enhanced Neighborhood Amenities 4.51 acres of open space including two playgrounds, pavilion, dual dog parks, walking trails, and landscaped gathering areas—facilities that existing Fairway Estates residents can enjoy through trail connections. Responsible Development At < 12 units per acre, density stays 20% below maximum entitlements, reducing traffic, infrastructure demands, and visual impact compared to what could be built by-right under current zoning. Housing Choice andStability Mixed housing types enable aging in place and lifecycle transitions, keeping residents in Fairway Estates as needs change rather than forcing moves to other communities. Quality Standards Owner-occupied homes with HOA-maintained standards, enhanced buffers, and premium design features protect property values while fostering stable, engaged community members. Alignment with CityGoals Imagine IF Comprehensive PlanImplementation: • Supports aging in place (Goal H-2) • Provides diverse housing mix (Objective H-1) • Prevents out-migration (Strategy H-4) • Promotes compact growth over sprawl • Strengthens community character through design • Maximizes existing infrastructure investment Direct Response to NeighborFeedback: • Larger townhome units (1,800+ SF) with two-car garages • Substantial buffers • 100% for sale products • Independent traffic analysis confirming minimal impact • Enhanced landscaping and visual screening • Phased development matching infrastructure capacity Recommendation for Approval We Request Planning Commission Approval The Sage Lakes Planned Unit Development represents thoughtful, community-oriented growth that balances property rights and entitlements with neighbor concerns and city planning goals. This proposal deserves advancement to City Council based on: • Compliance with Imagine IF: Directly implements adopted comprehensive plan policies on housing diversity, aging in place, and compact development • Neighbor Responsiveness: Incorporates feedback from August 27 meeting with not maximizing density or unit count, including larger units, and ownership focus • Technical Validation: Independent traffic analysis confirms minimal impact; all intersections exceed city standards through 2033 • Planning Precedent: Consistent with recent Commission approvals for Creekside Townhomes, Highland Park, and setback flexibility • Council Direction: Aligns with expressed support from multiple councilors for density, housing options, and anti-sprawldevelopment • Evidence-Based Design: Research supports property value stability and community benefits from well- designed, owner-occupied developments Sage Lakes offers Fairway Estates a rare opportunity: growth that enhances rather than diminishes community character, providing housing choices that keep residents local while delivering amenities that benefit the entire neighborhood. Thank You Appendix Fairway Estates Traffic ImpactStudy Overview of Traffic and Level of Service (LOS) Idaho Falls, Idaho | October 2025 Appendix: 5th East (Lewisville Hwy) & Sage LakesBlvd. 5th West & Pevero Dr. Traffic Study – 2 intersections Appendix: Understanding Levelof Service What is LOS? Traffic engineers use Level of Service (LOS) to measure road and intersection efficiency based on average vehicle delay (seconds per vehicle). Performance Scale LOS ranges from A (Excellent) to F (Failing), with D considered the acceptable standard for city operations. Excellent Good Stable Acceptable Congested Failing Appendix: Traffic Study Parameters 1 Existing Traffic(2025) Traffic numbers recorded in September 2025 2 Project Traffic (2028) Projected traffic with full buildout in 2028 3 Background Traffic Forecasted numbers based on growth rates and modeling (2028 & 2033) 4 Total Traffic Background Traffic + Project Trafficcombined Appendix: Appendix: Traffic Study Parameters Table 6 — 2025 Existing Level of Service | intersection | PM Peak 5TH West & Pevero Drive WB Delay (s/veh) Worst Lane Group MOEs | B/0.25 (WBL) | B/0.27 (WBL) WB LOS 2025 Table 8 — 2028 Total Traffic Level of Service | Mors | AM Peak | __PMPeak a Table 10 — 2033 Total Level of Service ee ee 51H West & Pevero Drive WB Delay (s/veh) ee eee Worst Lane Group MOEs B / 0.25 (WBL) C / 0.33 (WBL) 2028 5TH East & Sage Lakes Blvd EB Delay (s/veh) Worst Lane Group MOEs B / 0.34 (EBR) A/0.16 (NBL) 2033 ; YU ey —Y Yyfllu Vids Lili “> § JUPITER HILLS DRIVE wy Se ie eee : : : 40TH NORTH es E ~ y ‘a 5 r eT Se) |PEVERO DRIVE «5 U FAIRWAY ESTATES evanerting SNDMRVEYING FIGURE 8 - 2028 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES (6949S. HIGH TECH DRIVE SUITE 200 STS EAE ome en Dae XX(XX) = AM(PM) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES. Appendx: ty 5 Yy LL ‘S BLVD ty a fe YY) YMA. ZoN Uy - iq ee . (voz)so 2 (eLygiz > 49TH NORTH sss & 138) €142(134) (061) 182 F (rho FAIRWAY ESTATES ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, LLC FIGURE 9 - 2033 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES vate AH XX(XX) = AM(PM) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES MIDVALE, UTAH $4047 PH: (991)352.0075, ‘wor focunutah com Appendx: YY o Y 4 MU WW “7 GZ YB Ben " Uy, J bad © JUPITERHILLS DRIVE mg so . _ 49TH NORTH sss FAIRWAY ESTATES BEEN SND SURVEYING LLC FIGURE 6 - PROJECT DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES (6849 S, HIGH TECH DRIVE HIGH. SUITE 20 MADVALE, UTAH S447 Bt @O1)3524073 XX% = PROJECT DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES Key Takeawa ys Excellent Performance All intersections operate at LOS A–C through 2033, well above city standards. No Improvements Needed No new signals or roadway improvements arerequired for development. Smooth Integration Fairway Estates integrates seamlessly into the existing road network with minimal impact. Appendix: Appendix: Supporting PlanningDocuments Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - July 1, 2025 These minutes document the Planning Commission's approval of reduced rear setbacks for alley-loaded homes, demonstrating support for flexible development standards that enable diverse housing types. Setback Amendment Key Points • Reduced rear setbacks to 3 feet for homes with alley access • Increases housing type flexibility and efficiency • Enables better lot utilization in urban contexts • Approved unanimously by Commission Commissioner Comments "A step in the right direction [for flexibility]." —Commissioner Meehan "Lives in TN... 3' rule... maximizes property." —Commissioner Ihler Relevance to Sage Lakes This amendment reflects the Commission's recognition that thoughtful flexibility in development standards can enhance housing options without compromising quality or neighborhood character. The Sage Lakes PUD similarly seeks appropriate variances that enable superior outcomes through planned development rather than rigid adherence to conventional zoning. The Commission's support for this amendment demonstrates openness to creative solutions that address housing needs while maintaining design quality—the same philosophy underlying the Sage Lakes proposal. Appendix: Planning Commission Precedents Meeting Minutes - June 3, 2025 These minutes document three significant approvals demonstrating Planning Commission support for townhome developments, thoughtful density, and creative infill solutions. Creekside Townhomes PUD 145-unit townhome development approved at 10.4 units/acre with enhanced amenities including pickleball courts and playground. Commissioners praised the developer for preserving Willowcreek and addressing neighbor concerns—establishing positive precedent for similar projects. Highland Park Plat Infill development featuring attached homes received Commission approval for creative solutions that efficiently utilize available land while respecting neighborhood context. Commissioners specifically applauded the innovative approach to infill challenges. Sage Lakes Comparison At 13.65 units/acre, Sage Lakes proposes lower density than Creekside while providing similar amenity packages and thoughtful design. The project follows the same principles that earned Commission praise in recent approvals: responding to concerns, preserving natural features, and delivering quality development. Appendix: Neighborhood Meeting Documentation 1. Density Concerns: Residents questioned whether 273 units would overwhelm the area 2. Traffic Impact: Worries about increased congestion and bridge capacity 3. Property Values: Fear that townhomes would decrease neighboring home values 4. Crime and Safety: Concerns about security and family-friendly character 5. Aesthetic Fit: Questions about architecturalcompatibility 6. Proximity: Desire for maximum separation from existing homes 7. Infrastructure: Questions about water, sewer, and school capacity August 27, 2025 Meeting Summary On August 27, 2025, the development team hosted a neighborhood meeting attended by 31 Fairway Estates residents. This session provided opportunity for direct dialogue about the Sage Lakes proposal and generated valuable feedback that shaped design refinements. Key Themes from Meeting Design ResponsesImplemented • Committed to density 20% below maximum entitlement • Commissioned independent Traffic Impact Analysis • Increased townhome sizes to 1,800+ SF with 2-car garages • Enhanced buffer zones with 515' total separation • Emphasized 100% ownership model (no rentals) • Coordinated with city utilities on infrastructure capacity • Refined architectural elevations for visual harmony Ongoing Engagement The development team remains committed to continued dialogue with Fairway Estates residents throughout the approval and construction process, ensuring concerns are addressed proactively. Appendix: Neighbor CommentExamples Written Feedback from Fairway Estates Residents During the public input process, residents submitted written comments expressing concerns about the Sage Lakes proposal. These comments, including handwritten notes from attendees, helped identify key themes requiring response and analysis. Sample Comment Themes From Meeting Attendee: "Home values... will decrease. Crime... schools overloaded. Keep townhomes away... harmony with aesthetic." This comment captures several core concerns that the presentation addresses through multiple lines of evidence: • Property Values: Addressed through research showing no negative impact from well-designed, owner-occupied developments, plus economic logic of shared builder maintaining quality across all housing types • Crime: Addressed through ownership structure, safety-conscious design features, and precedent from similar communities showing no correlation • School Capacity: Addressed through phased development timeline and recognition that owner-occupied homes attract similar demographics to existing neighborhood • Aesthetic Harmony: Addressed through cohesive architectural design, and enhanced landscaping Response Philosophy Rather than dismissing neighbor concerns, the development team has: 1. Taken each concernseriously 2. Sought objective evidence and expert analysis 3. Made design refinements where appropriate 4. Provided transparent, data-driven responses 5. Maintained opencommunication channels This approach recognizes that existing residents have legitimate interests in how their neighborhood evolves, while also balancing property rights, market demand, and city planning goals. The Idaho Falls Planning Commission has recently approved multiple projects demonstrating consistent support for townhomes, thoughtful density, and flexible development standards. These precedents establish clear alignment between the Sage Lakes proposal and current planning priorities. 1 June 3,2025 Creekside Townhomes PUD • 145 townhome unitsapproved • 10.4 units per acre density • Enhanced amenities: pickleball courts, playground • Integrated creek as open space feature • Thoughtful bufferdesign 2 3 July 1,2025 Setback Amendment • Reduced rear setbacks to 3 feet for alley-loaded homes • Increased flexibility for diverse housing types • Enables more efficient land use Commissioner Meehan: "A step in the right direction [for flexibility]." Commissioner Ihler: ”Maximizes property." June 3,2025 Highland Park Plat • Infill development with attached homes • Creative design solutions for existing neighborhood • Efficient use of available land Commissioner Ihler: "Good exampleof infill." Commissioner Meehan: "Applauds... creative solution." These approvals demonstrate the Planning Commission's recognition that townhome developments, when thoughtfully designed with appropriate amenities and buffers, enhance neighborhoods while addressing critical housing needs. Sage Lakes follows this proven approach at a lower density than Creekside (13.65 vs. 10.4 units/acre). Appendix: Planning Commission Precedents re ey: cm [Beat EAT ; ul Hedi i UT.ePUIO Daae ba RUBE TELAT iil SETAE THT . Tie hside.Cir, a Northsi THIS ESEYe}— a a ie t PUD25-003 Sage Lakes PUD iA Jaring Cir 1 a lex PET Ani i 4. 4] | ea aw te a Pr HY) = = Saddle;Rock Ln = ELIT 5 =a ; ! peland Dr, Sage fe) e\Kakes| Blvd Rock:Hill Ln Ne sir P Pevero Dr, BAVY,O}Uld * Sere, . = Fi EA i 4 — = qi = A z = ua Aqay,uaID ee Ke debe l 5 es 8 I North Poin PLE Sid sajbeoua Gg ¥ ie) [eh rol ed mae i k ———— : East River,LEn -003 Sage Lakes PUD PUD25 [} Rap [_] Iam | RMH ee lS Saddle Rock'Lin HD sse1dA9 § 4 2 a Bacazs|| UT/MO}IOH 4908 | AL SPS SSSSE=55) pba Me z = ¥ Comprehensive Plan PUD25-003 Sage Lakes PUD General Urban Mixed Use Centers and Corridors [7 Special Use Urban Core | Industrial Natural and Open Space Suburban EDGE —s ie a = Zi = —=W:6 NOH Ponte De a | NZ] La \ eT Lad ey Ge Wy f Vi a: Tapitio Dr, : Lt) NU aS ~_ SECM Pt ae . Eaglewood Dr. sf Ss d.Dré: STAIRS | Fairway, Blvd h g 478 nt, Rocklan Airport Compatible Land Us Approach Surface e Controlled Development [| Limited Development I) No Development (= ~~ ) . 2 = Ei g - = )) i) a} 2 ats Cc Fy [Fair Hills Cir] om i O Rock:Hill. Ln [) Controlled Development Approach Surface { | Limited Development Approach Surface 4 ; = . ¢ poe Elesth\N| 7 . ke ? ' [ ai > vee - Pa i. ~ r v up BO! wil” Ramses Ts E ; b> ica Northside Cir, [eke «a 4 = F “ aes 1 Ba 8B, 2 oe ee ; irae a a Saring Cialis! a oO ° . N bl 2 5 ‘4 : » op, > s ly c | ¢ te Spen Meadow Dr - Sage Lakes Blvd. Saddle Rock Ln PUD25-003 Sage Lakes PUD A >; * at? ri 2 = i é a = a fi >: q : i = act jn. 4 se - = , ; &, ee * e lt Se : }E 49th Nj PUD25-003 Sage Lakes PUD Airport Current Noise Contour be SPen Meadow, Dr 23N ~_Pevero Dr, Hs uz Aqay,ual|d mptirg(s eeaipenet 8 Sp ep i le + fa} (} * BE ° ic aye Si : 7+ al 5p. ye z ca yore? |, = Day-night Level a® dBA 60) —— FER: ROCK | a = AME a mo) 7 ae EE ae! | ttt it _— NOTES: PAREING: He == St LCE - COT ESE SEAT IDAHO FALLS SITE PLAN SAGE LAKES PUD TOTAL AREA: Aa | Y a = fl : ASPHALT DETAIL a he in - a r u SS TT jane rt ace + H = -, 1. Lt. 1 Ag ° Brari Tr iei @ LITT oA ee ACCOCLICEN CEE Resin We rs “K "| Nice - a \i a fa) | at ttt tt jo id aut Ti os ait v 43 AAs ors Co Pll LF Tt TT — CYPRESS CHEEK {__] ——. TOTAL AREA: SAGE LAKES PUD DIVISION PLAN IDAHO FALLS cm 3 i= 1 2 “4 i: in| Li h = = es | = } 4 J jan a I TAL oil ——— ms i @-TT it 1 = Ill LL] TTT Ty Tr : aa i i tne s Ee TL Co — t-te its t I DIVISION Fi PLAN mi el | Pes eee eee eee CYPRESS CREEK PLANT SCHEDULE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME, TREES Acer compestre Hedge Maple Acer gymala ‘Amur Maple Acer grandidentstum Bigtooth Maple Acer platanoides ‘Crimson King’ (Crmson King Norway Mapic Acer trinestum x platenoides Warrenred — Pactic Sunset® Maple Cerais canadensis Forest Pansy’ Easter Redbud Gleditsis tnacanthos merms “Skycole Skyline Honey Locust Gleditsis tnacenthos mermis Shademaster Shademaster Honey Locust Lauidembsr styracfus Slender Sihouette' Slender Sihouette Sweet Gum Malus x ‘Spring Snow ‘Spring Snow Crabapple Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak. Tis cordsta Littlelest Linden Tia condata 'Greenspire! Greensprre Littielest Linden Zelhova serrata ‘Green Vase? Green Vase Japanese Zelkova SHRUBS Aronia melanocarpa Low Scope Hedger Berbens aquitolum Compacts’ Buddleya david ‘Buzz Hot Raspberry’ Coryoptens x clandonensis Dive Mist! Cotoneaster aproulstus Cotoneaster dammen ‘Lowfast™ Hibiscus synzcus 'Antong Two! Juniperus honzontalis ‘Blue Chig* Jonperus sabina Monns! Physocarpus opulifolus ‘ttle Dewi Physocarpus opulifolus ‘anus! Black Chokeberry Compact Oregon Grape Hot Raspbemy Butterfly Bush Blue Must Bluebeard Cranberry Cotoneaster Lowtast Bearberry Cotoneaster LI Kim® Dwarf Rose of Sharon Blue Crip Creeping Juniper Calgary Carpet ® Jumper Little Devi Dwoef Ninebar Dwart Ninebark 1 1 1 1 al REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE Ri eeeeeeeeercece 5 gal. SYMBOL CODE DESCRIPTION RIVER COBBLE 1 (2) (s PLAYGROUND STRUCTURE, TED. DOG PARK 4 PAVILLION, TYP. TBD. 5 () BENCH (7) wns ravers, 700 ©) }---------- + PLANTSO THAT ROOTFLAR SAT (8 I" ABOVE FRISHED GRADE + PROVIDET DIA. CLEARANCE AT BASE OF TREE, FREE OF ROCK ‘AND TURF. RUBBER CINCH SECURED Tostace | (2) HARDWOOD STAKES ‘ZXZ DRIVEN (MIN. 15) FFRMLY INTO SUBGRADE Prysocarpis optics Nugget Nugget Nebo oat Pus mugo Mughos Mughus Mugo Pine Bal Poxents ratases Goldinger Golding Suen Cemuctol 2 a Rus sromatios Grow! Gro-tow Fragrant Somae Bt oss she Kock Out rook Out Rose Bal Sorvana sorbioia Sent Som False Spraea 2a Sprace x buna ‘thony Water? rth Waar pres 2a Tho xmeas png loponcse Yen 3a oes Homentons Color Gus Color Gud Adsmis Needle 2 aa GRASSES ASSES clsmagrosts x aitfiors Kar Foerster’ Kart Foerster Resther Reed Gross 1 43 Cenctros sopecirodes Homet HomeinFourtan Gross = Festocs ona qouss Bevlder Bue’ ——=«éouder Buc Peseue = Hatctatnchon Somparvmene Due Ost Grose me Fencum vegston Sherandost Sherondosh Such Grose | ga Pomecton sopearodes ad esd ‘Red Head Fourtan Grove ‘3 PERENNIALS Cece oroclhs madendor Donty mo Ferovsua sinplofota Lite Spe Lite Spre Russian Soge oe fasbecks omploucasie Dact-oyed Suse = Sonea nomoroas Boat Friend foot Presid Meadow Soge | 3a SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE GROUND COVERS oa pratense ertucly Buesroae coa Qty 150,018 N ¢ > GRAPHIC SCALE (INFEET) ie oe 9 + svensomartor or noot BALLS EVEN WITH THE FRaSHED MULCH (REEP MULCH ¢ADE ‘BACK FROM TRUNK) MULCH (KEEP MULCH BACK FROM TRUNE) REMOVE STRING & BURLAP FROM TOP 2/3 SACKFLL PLANTING MIX ‘4PARTS TOP SO, 1 PART PEAT MOSS WATER AND TAME TO REMOVE Aig POCKET. BRING. LEVEL TO FRISH GRADE. }—exstniG so BACKFL PLANTING MX “4 PARTS TOP SOL. 1 PART PEAT MOSS WATER AND TAMP TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS. 82NG LEVELTO FISH GRADE asTiG sol Be 1/2 DEPTH OF ROGTBALL (€°MN SHRUB PLANTING NOTTOSCALE MULCH (KEEP MULCH {F BACK FROM PLANT) ia PERENNIAL PLANTING NOTTO SCALE STING SOL Know what's below. Call 811 before youdig, REVISION BLOCK SAGE LAKES Z. < a) nN Oy 3 cE 2g aa Z < 4 ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, LLC 6849 S, HIGH TECH DRIVE SUITE 200 MIDVALE, UTAH 84047 PH: (801) 352-0075 www focus-es.com VA DIES Die Farwy EsicienNceagn SS SDIONOHNMSOATT ONIX CMOSCAPEPENTONG Site Photo Upper Left Photo looking North Site Primarily north and East Lower Right Photo looking East down road that connects to Bridge Site Primarily Northeast. Site Photo PUD25-003 Site Photo PUD25-003 Site Photo Looking Southeast PUD25-003 Sage Lakes PUD pees tat) Flee ae & Potts es, f ia Whe oe + se Se. ae i 3 im & 34 _ U7 MO}|OH 4204 | sd ele) (ome ae) real sa fsb fz) (RES | fos OI Fe , : 41g pooma|beq . Wee Lees © ee SP te eee ae , eae eo { an) : wath eo, “= wis ; - hy Ue =< rg 3 at. # Kin” a ted ¢ : Pa s a - a pe wT, < ¥ f. ae vad & e a ® x Memorandum File #: 26-414 City Council DATE: Thursday, October 15, 2026 AGENDA: Consent FROM: Chris Canfield, Public Works Director DEPARTMENT: Public Works Title Thermoplastics Citywide 2026 - Change Order #1 ☐Ordinance ☐Resolution ☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☐Legislative Public Hearing ☒Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☐Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: Approve the Change Order for the Thermoplastics Citywide 2026 project for $46,409 and give authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Description, Background Information, Purpose: The Public Works Seal Coat Contractor experienced significant delays to complete the work contracted this summer. As a result it became necessary to install straight line thermoplastic markings at critical intersections throughout the City. This change order provides for the markings necessary by providing an additional 4,484 square feet of 8”, 12”, and 24” straight-line thermoplastics at $10.35 per square foot of straight-line thermoplastics at designated locations throughout the City. Contract time will be adjusted to accommodate the order of materials and installation as directed. The original bid was approved and awarded by City Council on May 7, 2026, in the amount of $144,949.48. Additional costs associated with this change order are offset by liquidated damages charged against the seal coat contract This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments. 26-414 City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/20/2026 Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ RETURN TO AGENDA CITY OF IDAHO FALLS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Contract Change Order Project: Thermoplastics Citywide 2026 Project No: TRF-2026-02 Date: October 14, 2026 To: Falls Striping Change Order No: 1 Page Number: 1 of 1 You are directed to perform the following changes or additional work, which were not included in the plans and specifications of your Contract. This change order provides for an additional 4,484 square feet of 8", 12", and 24" straight line thermoplastics at designated locations throughout the City of Idaho Falls. Contract Time will be adjusted to accommodate order of materials and installation as directed. C0lA Line Thermoplastic 4,484 SF @ $10.35 per SF Total Increase Net Change Total: New Contract Completion Date: November 20, 2026 Original Contract Amount: $144,949.48 Contract Amount Before Change Order: $144,949.48 Total Estimated Increase in Contract Al mount: $46,409.00 New Contract Amount: $191,358.48 = = = $46,409.00 $46,409.00 $46,409.00 We, the undersigned Contractor, agree that if this proposal is approved, we will perform the work detailed above and accept payment at the prices shown for the respective items, in accordance with the terms of the original contract or as herein provided. Contractor Acceptance By: l--c:..- !f\; Contractor Date By  Sign tu Title Approved for City of Idaho Falls Date Mayor Attest, City Clerk Memorandum File #: 26-415 City Council DATE: Thursday, October 15, 2026 AGENDA: Consent FROM: Chris Canfield, Public Works Director DEPARTMENT: Public Works Title Bid IF26016 - Water Inventory Replenishment ☐Ordinance ☐Resolution ☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☐Legislative Public Hearing ☒Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☒Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: Approve the bid awards for the annual Water Division inventory replenishment to (1) Core & Main in the amount of $846,665.00 for Group 1 and (2) Ferguson Waterworks in the amount of $401,106.00 for Group 2 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other appropriate action). Description, Background Information, Purpose: This purchase will provide the annual water material inventory for the 2027 Water Division projects. Bids were received on Thursday, October 8, 2026, with a total of four bids received. The bid was broken into two groups; Group 1 (watermain pipe) will be awarded to Core & Main for $846,665 and Group 2 (services and accessories) will be awarded to Ferguson Waterworks for $401,106, for a project total of $1,247,771. The contract award recommendation is to award to the lowest bids, by group respectively. This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments. 26-415 City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/20/2026 Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ RETURN TO AGENDA Project Name Group ID/Name UOM Quantity Comment Price Quantity Total Cost Comment Price Quantity Total Cost Comment Price Quantity Total Cost Comment Price Quantity Total Cost WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 1 - MAIN PIPE Foot 13500 35.61 13,500.00 480,735.00 9 day lead time 35.97 13,500.00 485,595.00 35.61 13,500.00 480,735.00 35.78 13,500.00 483,030.00 WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 1 - MAIN PIPE Foot 5500 5508' required. $323,209.44 58.68 5,500.00 322,740.00 9 day lead time 61.29 5,500.00 337,095.00 58.7 5,500.00 322,850.00 58.98 5,500.00 324,390.00 WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 1 - MAIN PIPE Foot 500 504' required. $43,535.52 86.38 500 43,190.00 9 day lead time 89.27 500 44,635.00 86.41 500 43,205.00 88.13 500 44,065.00 WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 2 - SERVICE & ACC Each 400 651.2 400 260,480.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED 657.78 400 263,112.00 589 400 235,600.00 576 400 230,400.00 WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 2 - SERVICE & ACC Each 400 120.06 400 48,024.00 125 400 50,000.00 115.26 400 46,104.00 115.62 400 46,248.00 WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 2 - SERVICE & ACC Each 100 184.64 100 18,464.00 155 100 15,500.00 265.87 100 26,587.00 166.2 100 16,620.00 WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 2 - SERVICE & ACC Each 400 26.53 400 10,612.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED 59.57 400 23,828.00 32 400 12,800.00 31.95 400 12,780.00 WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 2 - SERVICE & ACC Each 10000 0.46 10,000.00 4,600.00 0.52 10,000.00 5,200.00 0.44 10,000.00 4,400.00 0.41 10,000.00 4,100.00 WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 2 - SERVICE & ACC Each 600 24.66 600 14,796.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED 24.53 600 14,718.00 21.79 600 13,074.00 21.35 600 12,810.00 WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 2 - SERVICE & ACC Each 600 24.07 600 14,442.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED 23.94 600 14,364.00 21.27 600 12,762.00 20.84 600 12,504.00 WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 2 - SERVICE & ACC Each 600 39.96 600 23,976.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED 50.71 600 30,426.00 35.14 600 21,084.00 34.6 600 20,760.00 WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 2 - SERVICE & ACC Each 600 34.91 600 20,946.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED 34.73 600 20,838.00 30.74 600 18,444.00 30.27 600 18,162.00 WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 2 - SERVICE & ACC Each 150 102.89 150 15,433.50 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED 102.37 150 15,355.50 90.49 150 13,573.50 89.1 150 13,365.00 WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 2 - SERVICE & ACC Each 100 24.45 100 2,445.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED 24.33 100 2,433.00 21.49 100 2,149.00 21.16 100 2,116.00 WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 2 - SERVICE & ACC Each 100 26.22 100 2,622.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED 26.06 100 2,606.00 21.49 100 2,149.00 22.68 100 2,268.00 WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 2 - SERVICE & ACC Each 100 37.98 100 3,798.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED 31.09 100 3,109.00 23.03 100 2,303.00 27.05 100 2,705.00 WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 2 - SERVICE & ACC Each 100 57.55 100 5,755.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED 80.12 100 8,012.00 50.6 100 5,060.00 49.82 100 4,982.00 WTR Materials for 2027 Projects A 2 - SERVICE & ACC Each 100 11.29 100 1,129.00 BABA CERTS CAN BE PROVIDIDED 12.9 100 1,290.00 12.75 100 1,275.00 12.86 100 1,286.00 VENDOR CORE & MAIN MOUNTAINLAND SUPPLY HD FOWLER FERGUSON WATERWORKS SUM BID FOR GROUP 1 846,665.00 867,325.00 846,790.00 851,485.00 SUM BID FOR GROUP 2 447,522.50 470,791.50 417,364.50 401,106.00 PROPOSED WINNING BID BASED ON GROUP COST ANALYSIS: GROUP 1 - CORE & MAIN GROUP 2 - FERGUSON WATERWORKS MOUNTAINLAND SUPPLY HD FOWLER FERGUSON WATERWORKS CORE & MAIN Memorandum File #: 26-416 City Council DATE: Thursday, October 15, 2026 AGENDA: Consent FROM: Chris Canfield, Public Works Director DEPARTMENT: Public Works Title Bid Award IF-26-012, Annual Purchase of Chlorine and Sodium Bisulfite ☐Ordinance ☐Resolution ☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☐Legislative Public Hearing ☒Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☒Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: Approve the bids from the lowest responsive and responsible bidders, Thatcher Company and Adelle Way, in an amount of $244,862.80 to Thatcher Company and in an amount of $290,760.00 to Adelle Way and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other appropriate action). Description, Background Information, Purpose: The City purchases Chlorine and Sodium Bisulfite annually for Water and Wastewater treatment operations. Bids for the annual purchase of these items were received on Thursday, September 17, 2026. The lowest responsive, responsible bidder for Items 1, 2, and 4 is Thatcher Company for $244,862.80. Item 3 is awarded to Adelle Way for $290,760.00 for a total project cost of $535,622.80. This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments. 26-416 City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/20/2026 Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ RETURN TO AGENDA 2026 furnishing Cylinders/Containers of Chlorine and Sodium Bisulfite Bid No. IF-26-012 Item No Description UOM 1 Chlorine, 150 Pound Cylinders Each Thatcher Company 2 150 Pound Cylinder demurrage Day Thatcher Company 3 Chlorine, 1-Ton Container, (2,000 lb/Cylinder) Each Adelleway.com 4 Sodium Bisulfite (NaHSO3): 40% Basis Solution Gallon Thatcher Company Item No Quote type Manufacturer Part # Quantity Price Total Cost Bid Rank 1 Bid lindedirect. 001 115 $3,607.00 $414,805.00 3 2 Bid Adelle Way 002 1 $6.54 $6.54 3 3 Bid Indian Springs 003 120 $2,423.00 $290,760.00 1 4 Bid like Alliance Chemical 004 80000 $12.25 $980,000.00 4 Item No Quote type Manufacturer Part # Quantity Price Total Cost Bid Rank 4 Bid Land View, Inc. 80000 3.68 $294,400.00 3 Item No Quote type Manufacturer Part # Quantity Price Total Cost Bid Rank 1 Bid 115 672 $77,280.00 2 2 Bid 1 0 $0.00 1 3 Bid 120 3800 $456,000.00 3 4 Bid 80000 0.33 $26,400.00 1 Item No Quote type Manufacturer Part # Quantity Price Total Cost Bid Rank 1 Bid Thatcher Company, Inc 1336305 115 487.5 $56,062.50 1 2 Bid Thatcher Company, Inc 1336305 1 0.3 $0.30 2 3 Bid Thatcher Company, Inc 1336309 120 2700 $324,000.00 2 4 Bid Thatcher Company, Inc 2237000 80000 2.36 $188,800.00 2 Land View, Inc. Morgan Ingland LLC Thatcher Company, Inc. Chemical Adelleway.com Chemical (Chemical) Project Total : $ 1,685,571.54 Group Total : $ 1,685,571.54 Group Total : $ 568,862.80 Project Total : $ 568,862.80 Group Total : $ 294,400.00 Group Total : $ 559,680.00 Project Total : $ 294,400.00 Project Total : $ 559,680.00 Memorandum File #: 26-418 City Council DATE: Wednesday, September 16, 2026 AGENDA: Consent FROM: Linda Lundquist, City Clerk DEPARTMENT: Mayor's Office Title September 2026 Licensing through the Office of the City Clerk ☐Ordinance ☐Resolution ☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☐Legislative Public Hearing ☒Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☐Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: Review and accept all permits and licenses issued by the City Clerk’s Office in September 2026 (or take other action deemed appropriate). Description, Background Information, Purpose: 2026 SEPTEMBER LICENSING 54 New Business Permits & 109 Renewed Business Lice 7 New & Renewed Contra This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/20/2026 Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ RETURN TO AGENDA NAME NUMBER TYPE STATUS DATE 1 Peru d paso 379893 Mobile Food Vendor APPROVED 9/11/2026 2 Berry Drizzl Co. 7369731 Mobile Food Vendor APPROVED 9/24/2026 3 Lupa Inc DBA Bowl-Ero Lanes 1610393 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/10/2026 4 Masquerade Ball 5326946 Alcohol Catering Permit Nonprofit APPROVED 9/3/2026 5 Naughte Latte 1575505 Mobile Food Vendor APPROVED 9/3/2026 6 New Fords Bar 627984 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/3/2026 7 Club Charleys 4442344 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/3/2026 8 Club Charleys 607485 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/3/2026 9 Club Charleys 3987661 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/3/2026 10 Club Charleys 660296 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/3/2026 11 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co. 260007 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/4/2026 12 Adakai, Karen 4921295 Public Transportation Operator APPROVED 9/17/2026 13 Wadsworth, Eathan 6625895 Public Transportation Operator APPROVED 9/17/2026 14 Club Charleys 8154341 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/14/2026 15 Club Charleys 6465071 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/14/2026 16 Soiled Dove LLC 5554048 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/14/2026 17 Soiled Dove LLC 5695255 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/14/2026 18 Roadhouse Saloon 2147482 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/14/2026 19 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co. 9884127 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/11/2026 20 Samoa Club 6975743 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/14/2026 21 The Snakebite 8037870 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/14/2026 22 Marshall 5195108 Door-to-Door Sales APPROVED 9/22/2026 23 City Bagels & Bakery 6658890 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/14/2026 24 City Bagels & Bakery 5343290 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/14/2026 25 Arriaga, Amber 5395688 Public Transportation Operator APPROVED 9/24/2026 26 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co. 1477971 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/17/2026 27 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co. 1992482 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/24/2026 28 Club Charleys 7258389 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/17/2026 29 Club Charleys 6278506 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/17/2026 30 Club Charleys 2048136 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/17/2026 31 BlackRock Fine Wine & Craft Beer 8905956 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/18/2026 32 Summit Idaho Retail LLC DBA Peak Stop #1003 6104708 Alcohol License DENIED- Out of City Limits 9/29/2026 33 TAP-N-FILL INC 1954211 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/23/2026 34 Makers Night - Book Binding 1913993 Alcohol Catering Permit Nonprofit APPROVED 9/23/2026 35 CIELITO LINDO 3037391 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/18/2026 36 TIMELESS TAPHOUSE 1247677 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/23/2026 37 The House Bar & Grill 9454309 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/23/2026 38 BlackRock Fine Wine & Craft Beer 7321807 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/23/2026 39 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co. 6786983 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/23/2026 40 New Fords Bar 7532673 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/23/2026 41 Sully's GastroPub 4363395 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/23/2026 42 Club Charleys 670922 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/28/2026 43 Club Charleys 8946413 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/29/2026 44 Club Charleys 9079123 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/29/2026 45 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co. 2635881 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/29/2026 46 City Bagels & Bakery 6758174 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/29/2026 47 City Bagels & Bakery 5261182 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/29/2026 48 The Snakebite 7527773 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/30/2026 49 Soiled Dove LLC 6651459 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/29/2026 50 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co. 7592705 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/29/2026 51 Pachangas Mexican Restaurant 6910293 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/29/2026 52 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co. 976835 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/29/2026 53 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co. 441822 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/29/2026 54 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering Co. 3521871 Alcohol Catering Permit APPROVED 9/29/2026 SEPTEMBER NEW BUSINESS LICENSES NAME NUMBER TYPE STATUS DATE 1 Albertson's LLC (17th Street #138) 31 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/28/2026 2 Albertson's LLC (W. Broadway #145) 23 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/21/2026 3 Jakes of Idaho Falls Inc dba Jaker's Bar & Grill 127 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/4/2026 4 Eagle's Lodge 119 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/28/2026 5 La Union Market 120 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 6 Fred Meyer #156 148 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/15/2026 7 Homestead Pizza & Bowling 331 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 8 Stinker Stores Inc. #28 308 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/21/2026 9 Sully's GastroPub 176 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/4/2026 10 Midget Market 230 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 11 Sam's Club No. 6345 2567 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/1/2026 12 Samoa Club 303 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/4/2026 13 Papa Tom's Pizza 275 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 14 Pockets Inc. 270 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 15 Garcias 1622 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 16 Stinker Stores Inc. #27 306 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/21/2026 17 Morenitas 2534 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/10/2026 18 Outback Steakhouse-Evergreen Restaurant #1311 3688 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 19 The Snake Bite Restaurant LLC 3123 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/28/2026 20 Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar 3575 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 21 Tobacco Connection #15 4202 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/4/2026 22 Jalisco's 4039 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 23 Puerto Escondido Inc OL 4246 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/28/2026 24 Muddy's Place 3591 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/28/2026 25 Casa Jaliscos Inc. 5159 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 26 Winco Foods #42 3880 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/21/2026 27 Idaho Falls Arts Council 4241 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 28 Walmart #5494 4854 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/1/2026 29 GMRI Inc dba The Olive Garden Italian Restaurant #1705 5108 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 30 Jacksons #73 3941 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/22/2026 31 Gator Tail Enterprises LCC dba The Frosty Gator 3705 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 32 Lucy's New York Style Pizzeria (Broadway) 5548 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 33 Los Albertos Inc. 6325 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 34 The Celt and Heads and Tails 5915 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/10/2026 35 Bee's Knees Pub & Catering 6114 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/21/2026 36 Oman Ventures LLC dba D'Railed 5825 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/28/2026 37 New Yummy House Restaurant 6567 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/4/2026 38 Hampton Inn 7355 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/4/2026 39 Stockmans Restaurant 5703 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 40 Mackenzie River Pizza Grill & Pub 6600 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/28/2026 41 Chili's Grill & Bar 4026 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 42 Snow Eagle Brewing & Grill 5742 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 43 Paula's Meat Market 5503 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/4/2026 44 Artitorium On Broadway - Idaho Falls Arts Council 7052 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/28/2026 45 Quick Stop of Idaho Falls 4593 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 46 Garcia's Meat Market #2 (Northgate) 5650 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 47 The Shop Bar LLC 5743 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/4/2026 48 Roadhouse Saloon, LLC 7723 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/28/2026 49 Smitty's Pancake & Steak House 5769 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 50 Tap-N-Fill Inc 7926 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/21/2026 SEPTEMBER BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWALS 51 Tandoori Oven 6875 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/21/2026 52 Tobacco Connection #30 5509 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/4/2026 53 Los Panchos 7485 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 54 Lucy's New York Style Pizzeria (Hitt) 7830 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 55 Cafe Mike's at Pinecrest 8305 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/21/2026 56 Walmart #5494 (Fuel Station) 8300 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/4/2026 57 Cafe Mike's at Sandcreek 8304 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 58 Cafe Mike's at Sage Lakes 8303 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/21/2026 59 The Alibi 8229 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/4/2026 60 El Rinconcito Authentic Mexican Food Inc 7567 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 61 Rogelio La Yesca 9431 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/28/2026 62 The House Bar and Grill 9241 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/30/2026 63 City Bagels & Bakery 8926 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 64 Sushi Time LLC 8912 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/28/2026 65 Smokin Fins 9377 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/21/2026 66 Costco Wholesale #1379 10137 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/4/2026 67 Longhorn Steakhouse #5627 10212 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/17/2026 68 Calakas Tacos & Miches 10399 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/4/2026 69 Mama Fla LLC 10575 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/21/2026 70 Holiday Inn 10050 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/4/2026 71 Fast Stop 1147 10438 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/21/2026 72 New Ford's Bar LLC 10649 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/30/2026 73 Park Avenue Grill 10778 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/28/2026 74 XVIII 10882 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/30/2026 75 HOKKAIDO RAMEN HOUSE 10752 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/2/2026 76 Idaho Rib and Chop House 10924 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/28/2026 77 Tacos Las Penitas 3 Inc 468815 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 78 Diamond Concessions IF Arena LLC 4699969 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 79 Fast Stop 2249 8622878 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/21/2026 80 Fast Stop 2247 8088824 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/21/2026 81 Fast Stop 2248 8412050 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/21/2026 82 Off The Rails Cafe 9452398 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 83 Actors' Repertory Theatre of Idaho 523170 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 84 Kin enterprises DBA Pop -N- Cork 8574266 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/10/2026 85 Diamond Concessions Inc (Chuckars) 7092087 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 86 Bob's Indoor Golf & Games 9644326 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 87 Park & A Italia LLC 3729308 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/30/2026 88 Romita Mexican Market 5818712 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/30/2026 89 Hops N Paws 5709306 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 90 Outpost Taphouse 6416910 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/30/2026 91 Kempner Restaurant Group LLC, DBA Elevate Bake Shop 9452323 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/30/2026 92 Leavitt Restaurants, LLC (Rodizio Grill) 3024566 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 93 Gill Investments LLC (Nextstop) 9915771 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 94 La Chinita Mexican Restaurant LLC (Plum Loco) 9449080 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/29/2026 95 Hotel Developers-Idaho Falls 4, LLC DBA Fairfield by Marriott Inn & Suites Riverfront 2830094 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/4/2026 96 Lupa Inc DBA Bowl-Ero Lanes 1610393 Alcohol License APPROVED 9/28/2026 97 Marshall, Benson 5195108 Door-to-Door Sales APPROVED 9/9/2026 98 Guns-N-Gear Sports LLC 7145 Secondhand Store APPROVED 9/21/2026 99 RJR Coins & Stuff 6039 Secondhand Precious Metals APPROVED 9/21/2026 100 The Gun Shop LLC 6177 Pawn Broker APPROVED 9/4/2026 101 World's Best Corndogs 7125546 Mobile Food Vender APPROVED 9/29/2026 102 Churrolicious LLC 7425425 Mobile Food Vender APPROVED 9/23/2026 103 B&A Collectibles Inc 6294562 Secondhand Precious Metals APPROVED 9/10/2026 104 U-Pick Red Barn 2298903 Mobile Food Vender APPROVED 9/17/2026 105 Eastern Idaho Edges 4047256 Itinerant Merchant APPROVED 9/29/2026 106 Lupita's Munchie's 4179018 Mobile Food Vender APPROVED 9/23/2026 107 Berry Drizzl Co. 7369731 Mobile Food Vendor APPROVED 9/23/2026 108 Tarver, Teresa 8631218 Public Transportation Operator APPROVED 9/4/2026 109 Wadsworth, Ethan 6625895 Public Transportation Operator APPROVED 9/4/2026 Number Name Type Issued 1 BLDC20-039 Uncommon Builders LLC Bldg Contractor - Class B 9/14/2026 2 BLDC21-009 Place Services Inc Bldg Contractor - Class B 9/2/2026 3 BLDC20-023 Hapco Construction LLC Bldg Contractor - Class B 9/2/2026 4 LRW24-018 Galicia's Concrete LLC Right-of-Way Contractor 9/2/2026 5 LBC26-048 Foothills Commercial Builders, Inc Bldg Contractor - Class B 9/14/2026 6 BLDC23-050 Bri Co Basements Bldg Contractor - Class C 9/16/2026 7 BLDC16-017 Teton West of Idaho Bldg Contractor - Class A 9/30/2026 SEPTEMBER CONTRACTOR LICENSES Memorandum File #: 26-391 City Council DATE: Monday, October 5, 2026 AGENDA: Consent FROM: Linda Lundquist, City Clerk DEPARTMENT: Mayor's Office Title City Council Meeting Minutes ☐Ordinance ☐Resolution ☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☐Legislative Public Hearing ☒Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☐Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: Approve the Utility Board meeting minutes from September 9 and the City Council meeting minutes from September 21 & 24, and October 5, 2026 (or take other action deemed appropriate) Description, Background Information, Purpose: Attached are the following minutes: · September 9, 2026 - Utility Board · September 21, 2026 - Work Session · September 24, 2026 - City Council · October 5, 2026 - Work Session This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/20/2026 Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ RETURN TO AGENDA Utility Board Meeting Minutes 1 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Wednesday, September 9, 2026 8:00 AM City Council Chambers Call to Order and Roll Call There were present: Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw Council President Jim Francis Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman Councilor Jim Freeman Councilor Kirk Larsen Councilor Brandon Lee Councilor John Radford Also present: Ian Turner, Airport Director Chris Fredericksen, IF Power GM Jason Bird, IF Power Sarah Wheeler, IF Power Bowen Campos, IF Power Jason Cooper, IF Power Colter Tucker, IF Power Chis Canfield, Public Works Director Dave Richards, Water Superintendent PJ Holm, Parks and Recreation Director Tyler Smith, Parks and Recreation Jordan Rechenmacher, Sanitation Supt/ Gregg Roderick, Wastewater Superintendent Pam Alexander, Municipal Services Director Mark Hagedorn, Finance Manager/Treasurer Zack Jones, City Attorney Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Mayor Burtenshaw called the meeting to order at 8:05 a.m. with the following items: Mayor, City Council - Mayor and Council Reports: Announcements, Liaison Reports, Events, Calendaring, Citywide Updates, Concerns, Questions, Proclamations, Notes and/or Minutes from Boards and Commissions: Council discussed upcoming police events, including the planned presentation regarding Flock/license plate reader options, which was moved from October to the first Council meeting in November to allow additional preparation time. Council also discussed the upcoming On Patrol: Live program in Idaho Falls, a police award and K-9 retirement event, and the annual stair climb memorial for first responders. Council discussed a potential feasibility study regarding a possible joint powers agreement/merger involving the City and the fire district. The study would be jointly funded by the City and fire district. Councilors reported on the Western Energy Summit, including transmission constraints, permitting and planning challenges, the need for additional generation, geothermal technology, data center growth, cybersecurity and national defense concerns, and the changing role of decarbonization in energy planning. Council also discussed concerns regarding Western energy markets, including Markets+ and CAISO, transmission costs, and uncertainty related to market participation. Council discussed a possible future financial training work session regarding the settlement run and accounting procedures, including appropriate separation between employees initiating and approving transactions. Utility Board Meeting Minutes 2 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Council also discussed bringing forward a work session regarding the extension of the Planned Development (PUD) ordinance before the matter proceeds to the Planning Commission. The discussion focused on better understanding the standards and negotiations associated with private streets, public parking, and development proposals. Additional reports included the potential expansion of Greater Idaho Falls Transit (GIFT) service into Ammon, Rexburg’s continued exploration of public transportation, and recognition of Transportation Coordinator Kade Marquez as Transportation Champion of the Year and his induction into ITD’s Public Transit Hall of Fame. Airport – FBO Request for Proposal Report (Director Turner): Presentation/Discussion (Director Turner): Director Turner presented an update on the Idaho Falls Regional Airport’s Request for Proposals for a Fixed Base Operator (FBO) and hangar development. He explained that an FBO provides required aviation services at the airport and may also provide optional services such as flight training, aircraft sales, chartering, and ground handling. The RFP was issued following multiple inquiries regarding a second FBO and significant demand for private hangars. Director Turner explained that federal grant assurances prohibit the airport from granting an exclusive right to an FBO unless the airport sponsor elects to provide the service itself. The City did not elect to exercise an exclusive right. The RFP was issued April 23, 2026. Two pre-proposal meetings were held, with 18 individuals attending the first and 12 attending the second. Four proposals were received: three FBO proposals from Beacon Air Group, Right Rudder LLC, and JJ Jet Center, and one hangar-development-only proposal from Integra CRE. JJ Jet Center and Beacon Air Group were the two highest-scoring proposals and were invited to make presentations. Following the presentations, JJ Jet Center ranked first. Its proposal included a Phillips 66 fueling partnership, access to the Contract Fuel Network and Aviation Partners Into-Plane Program, a sound financing and business plan, an FAR Part 145 aircraft maintenance operation, a Robinson helicopter dealership, and safety programs addressing fuel supply, quality, and training. Council discussed the effect of a second FBO on the existing Aramark operation, the demand for hangars, the possibility of negotiating additional hangar development, and the potential effect on airport revenues. Director Turner stated that JJ Jet Center had committed to developing some hangars, although the number and size would be determined during negotiations. Motion: Council direction to staff to proceed with negotiating a lease agreement. o Moved by: Councilor Dingman o Second: Councilor Freeman o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. Idaho Falls Power - Kleinschmidt Proposal for Consulting: Utility Board Meeting Minutes 3 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Presentation/Discussion (GM Fredericksen) : Staff presented an update regarding the proposal to continue consulting services with Kleinschmidt in connection with the City’s four hydroelectric projects and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) licensing process. Staff explained that the City is nearing the end of the licensing process, with a draft license application submitted at the beginning of September. The proposed consulting work would assist with managing the license application process, drafting required management plans, and finalizing reports submitted with the application. The projected cost for the upcoming fiscal year is approximately $250,000, compared with approximately $500,000 in the current fiscal year. Council discussed how information gathered through the FERC licensing process could support the City’s future River Corridor Master Plan. Staff noted that completed studies include recreation, fish entrainment, fish species, sediment, and other river-characterization studies. The fish study examined species, size, quantities, presence, and general population health over four seasons. The information will be made available to Council. Idaho Falls Power - City Runner Hub Progress Update: Presentation/Discussion (Mr. Cooper): Jason Cooper provided an update on the City Runner Hub and Controls Project, which began in earnest in March and is currently scheduled for completion in December. The project was reported to be slightly ahead of schedule. The runner hub has been rebuilt in Parma, Idaho, including replacement of bushings and seals and repairs to cavitation damage on the four blades. The hub passed pressure testing and was scheduled to return to Idaho Falls. Control panels were approximately 75% wired and tested, while the automatic voltage regulator had been installed and tested. Remaining work includes coordination of protection relays, slip-ring machining, and final commissioning, which is expected to take approximately one to one-and-a-half weeks. Staff explained that the project is primarily a 20-year maintenance refurbishment and is not expected to increase generation efficiency. Electromechanical switches are being replaced with digital relays, and a new communications rack is being installed. The digital protections are intended to protect the generator from overspeed, under speed, overvoltage, and similar conditions rather than specifically providing cybersecurity improvements. Council also discussed the City’s recent tour of Bonneville Dam and comparisons between the City’s hydroelectric facilities and Bonneville’s larger-scale operations, fish passage, maintenance requirements, and FERC inspections. Staff reported that the City’s high-hazard dams are inspected annually, with broader inspections occurring on a three-year cycle. The annual inspection was scheduled for September 15. The project outage was discussed, with staff estimating that the City was losing approximately 168 MWh of generation per day while the plant was offline, representing approximately $6,700 per day in lost revenue. Idaho Falls Power – Energy Conservation Update Presentation/Discussion (Mr. Bird): Jason Bird provided an update on Idaho Falls Power’s energy conservation programs, which have historically produced approximately 2–3 million kWh in annual Utility Board Meeting Minutes 4 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 savings, with approximately 3 million kWh saved during the previous year. Programs include rebates, zero-interest loans, residential and commercial efficiency measures, heat pumps, weatherization, lighting, energy audits, and custom energy-efficiency projects. Staff discussed the current $1,600 heat-pump incentive, consisting of an $800 EPA contribution matched by Idaho Falls Power. Heat-pump costs were reported to range from approximately $6,000 to $20,000 depending on the system and contractor. The loan program provides up to $10,000 for residential projects and $50,000 for commercial projects at 0% interest for up to 60 months, subject to payment-history requirements. Council discussed the Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Ninth Power Plan and concerns that proposed regional conservation targets could negatively affect Idaho and Montana residential programs. Staff explained that proposed separate targets for different portions of the Northwest could make Idaho and Montana’s residential programs less cost-effective under the methodology being considered. The potential loss of the Douglas heat-pump program was specifically discussed. Council also discussed the potential inclusion of tree planting as an energy-efficiency measure, noting that strategically placed trees can reduce air-conditioning demand. Staff stated that tree- planting programs are being used in other states and could potentially qualify depending on the state plan. Commercial and residential LED lighting conversion was discussed. Staff reported that substantial commercial opportunities remain, particularly in parking lots and other high-use applications, while residential LED conversion is largely complete. Staff reported approximately 3 million kWh of annual savings across residential, commercial, and industrial programs. Recent projects included City facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, fire stations, the ice arena, apartment complexes, and other commercial properties. The City wastewater treatment plant filter and pump project was highlighted as producing approximately 651,500 kWh in annual savings. Idaho Falls Power – Public Outage Map Update, Surge Protection Program, Net Distribution Metering, South Fork Archers Lease a. Public Outage Map Update Presentation/Discussion (Sarah Wheeler): Staff reported that its new public outage map is now live on the Idaho Falls Power website. The map allows customers to view outages affecting three or more homes and see information similar to what Idaho Falls Power staff see internally. Staff planned a public release and outreach through City media channels. b. Surge Protection Program Presentation/Discussion: Staff reported that approximately 126 customers participate in the City’s surge protection program, generating slightly more than $500 per month. Residential customers pay $4 per month and commercial customers $7 per month, while Idaho Falls Power purchases and installs the surge protection equipment. Staff recommended considering discontinuation of the program because of concerns about the level of protection provided, customer expectations, warranty limitations, installation costs, and the Utility Board Meeting Minutes 5 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 program’s overall value. Staff explained that the devices are generally more effective against large surges, while lower-level surges common in the Idaho Falls area may not be covered. Customers must generally pursue homeowners insurance before the equipment warranty applies. Council supported evaluating termination of the program while grandfathering existing customers. Staff also proposed providing customers with information about modern whole-home surge protection installed by electricians. c. Net Distribution Metering Presentation/Discussion: Staff discussed the City’s distributed generation/net-metering program, which currently includes solar generation and also allows for wind, geothermal, and small hydro systems. Customers must submit an application and receive appropriate permits so Idaho Falls Power can maintain system capacity and necessary grid protections. Staff reported an increase in misleading solar sales tactics in the community. Some companies were reportedly using Idaho Falls Power letterhead or logos and making inaccurate claims regarding future electricity rates and the ability of solar systems to eliminate utility bills. Staff stated that customers may still have significant costs for solar systems while continuing to receive charges for water, sewer, sanitation, and other services. Idaho Falls Power plans to develop a customer checklist, update its website with additional net- metering information and a potential calculator, and continue offering energy audits and energy-bill profiles. Council discussed whether the City could take legal action against companies improperly using City logos or information. Staff agreed to investigate the issue. Council also discussed reminding residents that door-to-door salespeople are required to obtain a City license and should be able to provide proof of that license. d. South Fork Archers Lease Presentation/Discussion: Staff discussed the South Fork Archers’ lease of City-owned property near Sandy Downs. A 2021 letter provided notice that Idaho Falls Power would eventually need the property for a potential substation and gave the organization five years to identify another location. The existing agreement expires at the end of September 2026. Staff reported that residential development has expanded closer to the property and residents have raised safety concerns after finding arrows in adjacent areas. Idaho Falls Power plans to meet with the South Fork Archers regarding relocation and will encourage them to identify another site. Council discussed whether another City-owned property might be suitable and noted concerns about a private organization using public property while restricting public access. Idaho Falls Power – Wasatch Agreement Amendment Presentation/Discussion: Staff presented an amendment to the agreement with the Wasatch Group, also known as Orchard Park, which previously requested a special rate arrangement because of its use of solar generation and battery storage. Utility Board Meeting Minutes 6 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 The arrangement allows the customer to charge its batteries from solar generation and discharge the batteries during peak demand periods, reducing its demand during Idaho Falls Power’s higher-cost peak period. Staff explained that additional historical data now allows the City to better establish the appropriate rates. The proposed amendment would change the non-peak energy rate from $0.037/kWh to $0.04/kWh and the demand charge from $5.50/kW to $6.00/kW. Staff reported that the historical data showed the battery system was functioning as intended, with the customer generally discharging during peak periods and charging during solar-production hours. The amendment is intended to ensure that the special rate structure accurately reflects the customer’s usage and does not result in other Idaho Falls Power customers subsidizing the arrangement. Council discussed the innovative nature of the agreement, the customer’s use of multiple smaller batteries, and the possibility of using similar concepts more broadly through virtual power plants, distributed batteries, smart thermostats, and microgrids. Staff indicated that further work would be undertaken to explore a potential virtual power plant model. The amendment was expected to return to Council for approval at a subsequent meeting. Break Public Works – Irrigation Utility Status Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield, Superintendent Richards): Staff provided an update on the City’s transition of parks and private developments to pressurized irrigation using surface water. Five City parks are either converted or in the process of being converted. Pinecrest and Erickson Park were identified as having transitioned, Community Park was operating with ongoing system issues, Freeman Park was under construction, and Tautphaus Park was being partially converted. Staff also discussed the potential future conversion of the soccer fields on the west end of town. For private development, staff reported 13 planned developments that are under construction or preparing for construction and are expected to eventually have pressurized irrigation pump stations. The first private-development systems are expected to come online in spring 2027. The proposed initial rate for pressurized irrigation would be $15 per month, with no volumetric charge until sufficient operating and maintenance data is available to establish an appropriate rate. Staff explained that irrigation funds would remain separate from culinary water funds. Council discussed problems experienced at Community Park, including repeated main-line breaks and the resulting costs and staff time. Parks staff reported approximately ten main-line breaks at Community Park during the year, with each repair costing approximately $2,500 in parts and labor. Council emphasized the need for closer coordination between Public Works and Parks, evaluation of existing systems before additional conversions, and consideration of enterprise or water- conservation funds rather than relying solely on General Fund resources. Staff stated that Community Park’s existing irrigation system contains infrastructure of varying ages and materials and that the City is evaluating whether repairs or replacement of portions of the Utility Board Meeting Minutes 7 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 system are appropriate. Staff also agreed to work toward a smoother transition process in which the installation team and Parks staff coordinate operation and maintenance responsibilities. Council discussed the possibility of using water-conservation funds for future irrigation-system replacements and the potential implications of federal recreation funding for improvements at Tautphaus Park. Public Works – Well Site/Cyber Security Presentation/Discussion (Tyler Smtih): Mr. Smith provided an update on cybersecurity threats affecting water and wastewater utilities. He explained that recent attacks have increasingly targeted SCADA systems and the electronic controls used to operate water and wastewater facilities. Staff reported that some attacks nationally have affected smaller systems with limited IT resources and have exploited preset or weak passwords on programmable logic controllers. The City has multiple cybersecurity protections in place and is working with counterparts at AIC to evaluate lessons learned and maintain proactive security measures. Council discussed whether Idaho Falls’ systems are adequately protected and how attackers have identified vulnerable systems. Staff explained that bad actors often search broadly for weak links rather than specifically targeting a particular utility. Public Works – Dewatering-Emulsion Status Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield, Superintendent Roderick): Wastewater Superintendent Roderick provided an update on the City’s sludge-dewatering process. The City’s goal is to achieve 15–18% dry solids. Under the previous dry-polymer process, the City generally averaged approximately 9% and only occasionally reached 11%. The City has begun using liquid emulsion polymer, which has improved sludge binding and dewatering. Staff reported achieving approximately 17.5% dry solids on several occasions using a pilot system. A new polymer skid has been ordered and is expected to provide greater control and allow further optimization. Improved dewatering will provide additional options for solids handling, including drying, composting, and potentially achieving Class A sludge. Staff explained that Class A sludge undergoes additional treatment and sterilization, creating more potential uses and disposal options. The City currently uses Class B sludge primarily on agricultural fields and has an agreement with the landfill for emergency disposal. Staff also discussed efforts to reduce the remaining wastewater lagoon, which is an important source of odor. The lagoon was reported to be approximately 39% full. Staff is evaluating composting as a possible future use of wastewater solids and has discussed a potential pilot project with the County. However, staff emphasized the need to evaluate PFAS concerns before establishing a permanent composting facility. Utility Board Meeting Minutes 8 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Public Works – 65th South Line Discussion Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield, Superintendent Roderick): Staff provided an update on discussions regarding a potential extension of the 65th South sewer line to properties near the golf course. The extension could eliminate three lift stations from the City’s wastewater system and provide additional benefits to the water system. Staff explained that the proposed line would be approximately 25 feet deep and would be expensive to construct. The City is discussing a potential collaborative project with developers because the line would provide regional service beyond an individual development. Council discussed the existing right-of-way, future development, roadway improvements, turn lanes, and potential use of impact-fee funds. Staff emphasized that the discussions are preliminary and that the City is evaluating the feasibility and benefits of the project. Public Works – County Tipping Fee Status Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield, Superintendent Rechenmacher): Staff provided an update regarding Bonneville County’s new tipping fees. Beginning December 1, 2026, the County will charge an $80-per-ton tipping fee, representing a significant increase and the first time the County has implemented a weight-based fee. Idaho Falls’ residential sanitation fee is expected to increase from $9.90 per month to $16.80 per month beginning December 1. The City will implement its new fees when the County’s fees take effect. Staff explained that the County fee will be separately identified on customers’ bills. Council discussed the potential effects on private garbage providers, commercial customers, recycling, illegal dumping, and the feasibility of weighing individual residential garbage cans. Council expressed concern about the accuracy and practicality of truck-mounted scales, particularly because of snow, ice, water, and other materials that can affect weight. Staff indicated that a wait- and-see approach would be appropriate regarding residential can weighing. Public Works – Streets and Sanitation Administration Building Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield): Staff provided an update on a proposed new Streets and Sanitation administrative building. The proposed building is approximately 11,000 square feet with a preliminary cost estimate of slightly more than $5 million. The building would include offices, training space, a break room, cleanup room, public reception area, and related administrative space. The existing building would ultimately be removed. Staff anticipated advertising the project for bids in fall 2026, with approximately 12–14 months of construction and potential occupancy during the following winter. Council discussed the estimated construction cost, which includes site work, utility connections, permitting, and demolition. Staff noted that some work could potentially be completed by City crews to reduce costs. Future phases may address additional indoor equipment storage. Utility Board Meeting Minutes 9 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Mayor – Department of Finance Discussion Presentation/Discussion (Mayor Burtenshaw): The Mayor presented a proposal to create a separate Department of Finance within the City organization. The proposed ordinance would remove several finance functions from the Municipal Services Department and establish a new Chapter 11 creating the Department of Finance. The Mayor explained that the City’s growth, including a budget approaching $400 million and an increasing number of departments, supports establishing Finance as its own department. She credited Director Pam Alexander with developing the finance division within Municipal Services and discussed the opportunity to transition Mark Hagedorn back into a finance leadership role following his work on the City’s ERP implementation. The Mayor recommended that Hagedorn serve as Finance Director and Treasurer. She noted that several other Idaho cities use a combined Finance Director/Treasurer structure. Council discussed whether creating the new department would increase staffing. Staff explained that no immediate increase in full-time employees (FTEs) is anticipated and that the City intends to evaluate efficiencies resulting from Workday/ERP before adding positions. A grant-management position discussed during the budget process would be overseen by the Finance team to improve grant administration and address audit concerns. Mayor Burtenshaw also discussed the potential for future expansion of the City’s Information Technology staff as the City develops a more comprehensive IT plan and addresses cybersecurity, SCADA, business-analysis, and enterprise-system needs. Councilors commended Municipal Services and the Finance team for their work on the ERP implementation and discussed the importance of distributing financial knowledge throughout the organization rather than relying on a single individual. Staff stated that the new structure would increase internal financial support for City departments. Utility Reports The Utility Reports included written reports from Energy Services/Customer Service, General Administration/Engineering, Operations Technology/Fiber Network, Transmission and Distribution/Generation, Water/Wastewater, Sewer/Sanitation, Federal and State Regulation/Litigation, and Organizational Membership Reports. The Mayor clarified that these were written reports rather than additional agenda items and that the Board would not reconvene after Executive Session. Motion: Receive the recommendations from the September 1, 2026 meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission pursuant to the Local Land Use Planning Act. o Moved by: Councilor Francis o Second: Councilor Lee o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. Utility Board Meeting Minutes 10 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Executive Session: The Council will not reconvene after the executive session. Motion: Move into Executive Session pursuant to Idaho Code § 74-206(1)(f) to communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated. o Moved by: Councilor Francis o Second: Councilor Freeman o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries. Litigation topic #1: Cutler v. City of Idaho Falls, CV10-23-4845 Present: Mayor Burtenshaw, Councilor Francis, Councilor Ziel-Dingman, Councilor Radford, Councilor Freeman, Councilor Lee, Councilor Larsen, and Zachary Jones. Start: 11:19 a.m. Stop: 11:27 a.m. Litigation topic #2: Eastern Idaho Homebuilders Association, Inc. v. City of Idaho Falls, CV10-24- 5380 Present: Mayor Burtenshaw, Councilor Francis, Councilor Ziel-Dingman, Councilor Radford (left meeting at 11:54 a.m.), Councilor Freeman, Councilor Lee, Councilor Larsen, and Zachary Jones. Start: 11:27 a.m. Stop: 11:58 a.m. Litigation topic #3: Notices of Tort Claim filed by Brian McKellar and Michael Rapp. Present: Mayor Burtenshaw, Councilor Francis, Councilor Ziel-Dingman (left meeting at 12:02 p.m.), Councilor Freeman, Councilor Lee, Councilor Larsen, and Zachary Jones. Start: 11:58 a.m. Stop: 12:05 p.m. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:13 AM. (Executive Session concluded at 12:05 PM) /s/ Linda Lundquist_________________ /s/ Lisa Burtenshaw _____________ Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor Idaho Falls Power Briefing Paper Date: September 3, 2026 Topic: Surge Protector Program — Program evaluation and potential discontinuation Contact: Chris Fredericksen, General Manager, Idaho Falls Power Issue: Idaho Falls Power is evaluating whether to continue its voluntary customer Surge Protector Program. Staff have identified concerns regarding the program's effectiveness, customer expectations, cost recovery, and compatibility with newer metering equipment. Background: IFP currently offers an opt-in Surge Protector Program in which the utility installs and maintains a meter-socket surge protector at the customer's electric meter. Customers pay a recurring monthly fee ($4/month residential, $7/month commercial). Early cancellation within the first two years triggers a $100 termination fee. The equipment costs approximately $170 per unit (varies somewhat annually) and takes 30 minutes to install. Labor costs, including staff time coordinating, scheduling and installing, are not currently isolated or tracked separately in program accounting. Devices are generally replaced every 10 years. The program has been in place since 2000 with 127 customers participating as of September 1, 2026. Discussion: Reasons for discontinuation 1. Limited protection, concerns regarding customer expectations and actual warranty. Meter- socket surge protectors are effective primarily against high-voltage momentary events such as lightning strikes. However, most customer-reported "surge" damage in Idaho Falls is caused by low-voltage conditions following outages or grid disturbances, a failure mode these devices do not protect against. This creates a gap between what customers believe they are purchasing and what the product actually delivers. 2. False sense of security. Because the product's name and marketing imply broad protection, customers may forgo more effective precautions (e.g., whole-home panel protection, point-of-use surge strips, or unplugging equipment during storms), potentially leaving them more exposed, not less. 3. Claims process concerns. Program documentation indicates that damage claims are typically payable after the customer has first filed a claim through their homeowner's insurance. This secondary-payer structure has generated dissatisfaction and does not align with customer expectations of a utility-backed protection product. 4. Incomplete cost accounting. Current program fees do not appear to fully capture all associated costs, including staff scheduling time, administrative overhead, and periodic hardware replacement. A full cost-of-service review would be needed to determine whether the current fee structure is sustainable even if the program continues. 5. Equipment compatibility issues. Some existing surge protector hardware is incompatible with IFP's newer meter infrastructure, creating a growing technical and logistical liability as the utility continues its meter modernization efforts. Recommendation: Staff recommends that Idaho Falls Power phase out the Surge Protector Program, beginning with discontinuing new enrollments and developing a reasonable transition plan for existing customers. Next Steps: Staff requests Board discussion and direction on whether to proceed with a formal discontinuation plan. If leadership is not comfortable eliminating the program, staff could conduct a formal cost-of- service and technical review to determine whether the monthly fee should be adjusted to fully recover the actual cost of providing the service. Municipal Services Director – Pam Alexander Director/Treasurer - Accountant – Assistant Finance Manager – Procurement & Payables Supervisor – Procurement Specialist – Accountant – Property & Records Coordinator – Accounts Payable Clerk – Admin ASST. – 1 Treasury Operation Manager – Accountant – Payroll Coordinator – Business Office Manager – Lead Treasury Clerk – Treasury Clerk – Utility Supervisor Asst. Utility Supervisor – Credit Specialist – Customer Service Rep – Utility Billing Specialist – Administrative Assistant – Chief Information Officer – Assistant Chief Information Officer – IT Systems Administrator IT Technician – Network IT Analyst/ Supervisor – IT Business Intel Analyst Fleet Maintenance Superintendent – Admin. Asst. – Parts & Inventory Coordinator – Shop Forman – Fleet Technician – Mechanic Apprentice – Building Maintenance Superintendent – Building Maintenance Foreman – Building Maint. Lead Technician – Building Maint. Technician – Building Maint. Specialist – Office Assi. – Custodian – Frontier Center for the Performing Arts Manager Finance City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 1 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Monday, September 21, 2026 3:00 PM City Council Chambers Call to Order and Roll Call There were present: Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw Council President Jim Francis Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman Councilor Jim Freeman Councilor Kirk Larsen Councilor Brandon Lee Councilor John Radford Also present: Wade Sanner, CDS Director Pam Alexander, Municipal Services Director Kerry Beutler, Assistant CDS Director Brian Cunningham, Asst Public Works Director Nick Terry, TOK Commercial Real Estate Chris Fredericksen, IF Power GM Zack Jones, City Attorney Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Mayor Burtenshaw called the meeting to order at 3:03 p.m. with the following items: Mayor, City Council – Discussion: Citywide updates, concerns, questions, reports: • Council discussed upcoming police neighborhood meetings being held in the City’s four police beats. Councilors were encouraged to attend and participate with residents. • Mayor Burtenshaw noted that the Police Department’s recent awards ceremony recognized numerous officers for heroic and exceptional service, with additional information expected in an upcoming departmental update. • Council discussed the continued usefulness of departmental highlights, with Councilors expressing support for receiving regular updates because they provide insight into activities occurring across City departments. • Councilor Radford provided an update on the City’s work toward an ordinance addressing electric bicycles, electric scooters, electric motorbikes, and other electric vehicles. The discussion focused on creating classifications that are practical for officers to enforce while addressing safety concerns. o Council discussed differences between lower-speed pedal-assisted e-bikes and higher-speed electric motorbikes with throttles. o Concerns were raised about children operating high-speed electric bikes and motorbikes on sidewalks and paths. o A local pediatrician had contacted the City regarding an increase in serious injuries to children, including traumatic brain injuries. o Council discussed potentially establishing speed limits on the Greenbelt and other pathways, improving signage, requiring users to warn pedestrians when passing, and addressing congestion in areas such as the Broadway Bridge. o Members emphasized that regulations should improve safety without discouraging bicycles and other electric vehicles as alternatives to automobiles. • Council discussed the possibility of meeting periodically with the Planning and Zoning Commission to review past cases and improve consistency in interpreting and applying City development regulations. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 2 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 • Mayor Burtenshaw raised concerns about vehicles blocking sidewalks, particularly affecting people with disabilities, wheelchair users, seniors and people with visual impairments. Police and Public Information staff were asked to consider enforcement and public education. • Council briefly discussed recent community events, including Symphony in the Park, the Downtown Street Party and the Day of the Arts. • State Representative Erin Bingham, also a member of the Gem State Housing Alliance, will be hosting local leaders to discuss expanding housing options in Idaho. Council is invited to the community conversation scheduled for October 19. Fire Department / Idaho Falls Power Updates • Councilor Larsen reported that the Fire Department had issued a Request for Qualifications for a feasibility study concerning potential consolidation of Idaho Falls Fire and Bonneville County Fire District No. 1. Responses were expected later in the week. • Council discussed an upcoming Fire Department block party at Station 1, including demonstrations, fire apparatus and food for the community. • Council noted that Idaho Falls Power performed well during the recent severe storm, with relatively few outages despite the conditions. Staff attributed part of the success to ongoing tree-trimming efforts, with the primary outage attributed to a lightning strike rather than a tree. • Council discussed a recent mobile-home fire on Ellsworth Drive in which firefighters rescued an unconscious resident. The resident remained hospitalized, while the resident’s dog died in the fire. • Members noted the unusually high number of structure fires recently and used the discussion to emphasize the importance of building, access and fire-safety codes, particularly when considering development standards and PUDs. CDS - Discussion: Serving Alcohol in Limited Commercial (LC) Zones Community Development Services — Serving Alcohol in the Limited Commercial (LC) Zone • Staff presented a proposed amendment to the LC zoning use table that would make standalone alcohol establishments a permitted use rather than requiring a conditional-use process. • Businesses would still be required to obtain the applicable state liquor/alcohol licenses, including compliance with separation requirements involving schools and churches. • The proposed change would also address situations such as businesses in the LC zone that want to offer limited alcohol service as part of their business, including spas, retail establishments or similar uses. • The proposal had already been considered and unanimously approved by the Planning Commission on September 1. Staff anticipated bringing the ordinance to Council in October after completion of the required notice period. • Council discussed concerns raised by the Police Department regarding the possibility of increasing the number of establishments serving alcohol, particularly if such establishments could be located closer to residential areas • Councilors supporting the change discussed: o The increasingly mixed residential/commercial character of LC areas. o The desire to encourage walkability rather than the concentration of alcohol-serving businesses in limited areas. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 3 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 o The similarity between limited commercial and the central commercial zones, where mixed- use development and alcohol-serving establishments already exist. o Situations in which existing businesses have been unable to offer limited wine or similar service despite it being incidental to their primary business. • Staff noted that the principal policy question was whether Council wanted standalone alcohol establishments to be permitted in LC zones, while acknowledging the Police Department's concerns. Municipal Services, Legal, Parks & Recreation, Public Works - City Property Update: Bel Aire Division 3 and 610 Water Ave Bel Air Division 3 / Vernon Lot • Director Alexander and Nick Terry of TOK Commercial provided an update on the approximately 8.6-acre City-owned property near Pinecrest Golf Course, also referred to as the Bel Air Division 3/Vernon Lot. • Council had previously authorized a letter of intent and purchase agreement with Clearstone, LLC, for approximately $2 million. • The agreement included several extensions, but the anticipated August 31 closing did not occur. The City subsequently issued a notice of termination and demanded the outstanding $10,000 extension payment or, in lieu of that payment, the developer's due diligence materials. • Clearstone had shown very little recent communication. The information received indicated that engineering work had revealed that fewer units could be developed than originally anticipated and that the developer had shifted priorities to other projects. • Staff had not received the developer's completed engineering, floor plans, plat information or other due- diligence materials. • Council discussed the potential value of obtaining the developer's due diligence, particularly geotechnical and site information, because it could assist a future purchaser in understanding the property's development constraints. • The property was being returned to the market at approximately $1.9 million, with staff and TOK continuing to contact other potentially interested parties. • Potential future uses discussed included multifamily/townhome development and affordable housing. Staff noted that available Low-Income Housing Tax Credit allocations could affect the timing of an affordable-housing proposal. • Mr. Terry reported continued interest in the property but noted that financing conditions and interest rates were affecting developers' ability to move projects forward. • Staff recommended continuing to market the property, gathering letters of intent and bringing potential offers back to Council for consideration. • Council also discussed whether the City could use a redevelopment/RFP approach to help shape the type of development desired on the property. 610 Water Avenue Property • Director Alexander provided an update on the City-owned property at 610 Water Avenue, including the history of its attempted sale. • The property had previously been appraised, with its value affected by the lack of a sewer connection. A public auction in April produced no bids, and a subsequent $30,000 offer was declined. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 4 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 • The property was then listed for approximately $65,000, with the buyer originally responsible for installing the sewer connection. Although there was substantial interest, the sewer requirement discouraged potential buyers. • Public Works identified an opportunity to install the sewer connection in conjunction with other nearby construction associated with the Boulevard/Birch Street roundabout. • The City obtained a change-order price of $15,898.75 for the sewer connection and proceeded with the work. A new meter pit and sewer stub were installed during the week of September 8. • Because the property is owned by the City (public works), proceeds from the eventual sale would return to that department. • The City received a $54,000 offer on September 12. Staff recommended declining the offer because it would provide little recovery beyond the City's sewer-installation expense. • The property remains listed at $65,000, now without the previous sewer-connection requirement for the purchaser. • Council discussed the length of time the property had been listed and the possibility of temporarily removing and relisting it to generate renewed interest. • Staff indicated that the property could potentially be worth approximately $65,000–$70,000 with the sewer connection now installed. Mayor’s Office, CDS, Legal - Discussion: Planned Unit Development (PUD) • Council discussed three main options for the ordinance: o Rescind the existing PUD ordinance and develop a new approach. o Place a temporary moratorium on new PUD applications. o Keep the existing ordinance and make targeted, incremental amendments. • A moratorium raised concerns about disrupting projects already in progress. o Staff noted that several developers were already working on PUDs in anticipation of potential ordinance changes. o Council discussed whether a moratorium could create unnecessary uncertainty or interrupt projects that had already been planned under the existing rules. • There was discussion of taking a more targeted approach. o Rather than rewriting the entire ordinance at once, Council could address specific problems individually. o Potential amendments included clearer definitions, setbacks, private-road standards, neighborhood compatibility, amenities and maintenance requirements. • The October 6 Planning Commission hearing became an immediate procedural issue. o A proposal to rescind the PUD ordinance had already been noticed for the Planning Commission's October 6 meeting. o Council could decide whether to proceed with that hearing, postpone it while staff develops amendments, or allow the Planning Commission to hear the matter and provide a recommendation. • The discussion ultimately identified several areas needing further work, particularly: o Private versus public roads o How PUD standards relate to the underlying zoning o Definitions and code clarity o Setbacks and building height o Amenities and open space City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 5 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 o Long-term HOA and infrastructure maintenance o Predictability for developers o The overall PUD application and hearing process. Council did not reach a final decision on whether to eliminate the PUD ordinance. The discussion centered on whether the City's concerns could be addressed through targeted amendments and process improvements rather than immediately replacing the entire PUD system, while also considering the already-scheduled Planning Commission hearing and the effect of any changes on developers currently working on projects. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:06 PM. /s/ Linda Lundquist_________________ /s/ Lisa Burtenshaw _____________ Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor 9/21/2026 City of Idaho Falls — City Property Update Bel Aire Division 3 610 Water Avenue Monday, September 21, 2026 IDAHO FALLS Commercial Broker — Nick Terry, TOK Thursday, September 11, 2025 — Letter of Intent to Purchase from Clearstone, LLC. Approved by City Council. Purchase and sale agreement signed October 24, 2025 Three addendums: Notice of exercise to extend options issued (4/9/26); (5/11/26); (7/6/26) Closing date — August 31, 2026 Termination Notice issued 9/1/26 9/21/2026 ic. Bs. Crna = Anderson Str eas La 4 eS Vernon Ave, = 7 ot '-/ aa - oi — Pinecrest Golf, Course : Sie ; Wheelenst ra MB a Le Offer Proposed Development Terms: Earnest Money Due Diligence Closing Clearstone, LLC $2,000,000 Townhomes 120-days $10,000 non-refundable 1 option of an additional 30-days with another $10,000 deposit; Expedited request for zoning, platting, lot adjustments, permitting process prior to closing Close 30-days after due diligence Hawkins $1,900,000 Multi-family 180-days $20,000 refundable 2-60-day extensions, with $10,000 non- refundable deposit within 30-days of the end of due diligence Expedited request for zoning, platting, lot line adjustments Close within 30-days of due diligence Mach, LLC $1,650,000 Affordable Housing; will require 180-days $20,000 refundable a low-income housing tax credit 2 options of 60-day extensions with $10,000 (approximately a 6-month deposit each extension process) No later than 60-days after due diligence 9/21/2026 610 Water Avenue / Questions Council Direction to Staff Underlying Zone Give-Ups What the city gives up in exchange for the higher standards required elsewhere in the PUD Underlying zone give-ups 4% Keep or amend? Current Code Position Council's Options Lot Size No minimum within a PUD Keep as-is (core PUD flexibility), or set a floor if internal lots are getting too small to function Density Fixed by Table 11-2-4; no council discretion to exceed Keep the table as the hard ceiling, or amend the per-zone numbers Setbacks Hard floor at the perimeter (can't go below adjacent non-PUD Keep case-by-case, or set a defined minimum internal setback, or set a minimum setback); internal setbacks case-by-case for PUDs adjacent to undeveloped ground Height Underlying zone max, +1 ft height per 2 ft added setback Keep the 2:1 ratio, change the ratio, or cap total additional height regardless of setback offered Higher Standards Required Higher standards 11 items the city gets (combined amenities and phases removed parkinglots Keep or revise? | Known Gap or Question | Higher Standard Common space (25% minimum) Scaled amenities (1 per 50 units) — phased delivery Enhanced landscaping Buffers (10' + fence/hedge) Superior streetscapes Height/massing sensitivity Architectural quality standards Pedestrian connectivity Unified maintenance responsibility Open question: what % of the 25% should be allowed from drainage facilities? Currently uncapped No construction-grade standard except playgrounds, Dog parks have requirements, amenity required for certificate of occupancy Underlying zone is 20% - increases to 25% Additional trees and bushes are required landscaping plans must be included 7 foot to a 10 foot buffer Has not been overly strict other than through landscaping Elevations are provided - Staff resolves this and is addressed at staff level (very technical) Subjective language (“high quality design”) — could be tightened with specific criteria Is only better when a trail system is part of an amenity and not just normal circulation HOA responsible for maintenance and replacement Concern Amenity construction standard Retention basin / common space credit Private road maintenance Private road emergency access / fire lanes Drive aisle safety Unaddressed Concerns — Proposed Fix Commercial-grade construction for all amenities (not just playgrounds); reserve study/escrow for replacement Cap % of the 25% that can be drainage-based; require drawdown analysis, max 5:1 slopes, pedestrian connectivity City’s right to cure with a cost recovery -A condition allowing the city to step in and perform necessary maintenance if the HOA fails to act after notic 26' min. unobstructed width, mandatory fire lane designation, signage/striping, enforcement independent of HOA, retrofit trigger Sight-triangle compliance, physical separation at crossings, routed trash/loading access, capped dead-end length, lighting plan A/B/C Judgment Call Only playgrounds currently require “commercial” grade. Reduce the number of amenities allowed Cap percentage is an open question Largely ready to become ordinance language (ties to Section 3(a) unified control) Draft language already exists — needs Fire Marshal sign-off on the 26' figure and IFC alignment Largely engineering-standard items — decide if these belong in this ordinance or the public works manual Underlying zone give-ups 4 items city gives up ¥ Keep or amend? Per-item council vote S Keep flexible as-is Or add firmer standards Higher standards 11 items city gets S Keep or revise? Per-item council vote S ° Keep current requirements ° ° Or strengthen / remove items . One council decision Unaddressed concerns 5 open risk areas S Amend or condition? Or take no action S Amend ordinance (uniform) Or leave as CUP condition Amend the ordinance sections that changed; leave the rest as-is City Council Meeting Minutes 1 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID Thursday, September 24, 2026 6:30 PM City Council Chambers 1. Mayor Burtenshaw called the meeting to Order at 6:30 PM Present: Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw Council President Jim Francis Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman Councilor Jim Freeman Councilor Kirk Larsen Councilor Brandon Lee Councilor John Radford Also present: Brad Cramer, Perspective Planning (via Teams) Megan Conrad, Elam & Burke Tyson Fitzgerald, Developer Darin Jones, Human Resources Director Chris Fredericksen, IF Power GM Chris Canfield, PW Director Wade Sanner, CDS Director Mark Hagedorn, Finance Director/Treasurer Bryce Johnson, Police Chief Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Jacob Beck, Assistant City Attorney 2. Pledge of Allegiance Councilor Radford led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Staff Responses to Prior Public Comment and Other Updates Director Jones - City Policy 300: Discrimination and Harassment: • Reiterated that the City maintains a zero-tolerance policy for unlawful discrimination, harassment, and disruptive behavior in the workplace and in interactions with the public. • Confirmed protections for all legally protected classes, including race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, age, disability, and veteran status. • Emphasized that employees who report concerns, serve as witnesses, or participate in complaints are protected from retaliation. • All employees must complete interactive, 60-minute respectful workplace training through the Idaho Counties Risk Management Program (ICRMP) upon hire and annually thereafter, covering employee rights, civility, harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. • Employees may report concerns to supervisors, department directors, Human Resources, or the City Attorney. All reports are documented and reviewed. • Supervisors first attempt to resolve concerns directly. When necessary, Human Resources or the City Attorney's Office conducts a thorough review. Substantiated violations may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination. Council clarification: Mayor Burtenshaw explained that the response was provided to clarify the City's existing policy and annual training requirements in light of comments received by Council. City Council Meeting Minutes 2 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 4. Public Comment A. Mosey Moran, Idaho Falls Resident • Shared personal experiences with racism dating back to elementary school and continuing throughout his life, including after moving to Idaho Falls. • Reported experiencing racist comments and harassment on a daily basis, both in person and online, including racial slurs and derogatory remarks. • Stated that racism affects both Black and Hispanic residents and that he frequently hears negative comments about Hispanic people. • Expressed frustration that his accomplishments and community involvement are often overshadowed by his race. He emphasized his love for Idaho Falls, where he raised his children and operates a business. • Reported having screenshots involving City employees and racist comments, and stated that he was not aware of any action taken regarding the concerns. • Request: Asked the City to make a public statement, including on Facebook, explicitly stating that racism is wrong and that Idaho Falls leadership does not support racist attitudes. He emphasized that he was seeking public acknowledgment and validation rather than policy changes or disciplinary action. B. Drew Satterthwaite, Idaho Falls Resident, Stronger Idaho Falls • Addressed the proposed rescission of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) ordinance. • Explained that PUDs are a valuable development tool throughout Idaho, allowing developers to pursue creative projects that may not fit existing zoning requirements. • Emphasized the importance of retaining development flexibility while ensuring projects meet the City's needs. • Request: Encouraged Council to establish an alternative before rescinding the ordinance or consider revising the existing PUD ordinance to better meet Idaho Falls' needs. C. Chris, Ammon Resident • Expressed concerns about Flock cameras and other automated license plate readers, stating that they create databases tracking the movements of innocent residents. • Questioned who operates and controls the cameras, what information is collected, and whether residents' movements are being tracked. • Reported contacting the City of Ammon, Bonneville County Sheriff's Office, and Bonneville County but said he had not received clear answers about responsibility. • Acknowledged that kidnapping investigations were cited as a benefit but questioned the broader value of the system. • Request: Asked Council to remove Flock cameras and, if the City does not control them, use its influence with Bonneville County to have them removed. D. Jim Harlinger, Rexburg Resident • Supported amending rather than rescinding the PUD ordinance. • Stated that the concerns raised during the Council's work session and August discussions could be addressed through specific code amendments. • Identified blighted or otherwise undevelopable properties as situations where PUDs can provide a useful development option. • Suggested that issues involving private streets, parking, and fire access could be addressed through targeted amendments, potentially requiring only minor changes to the code. • Request: Asked Council to consider amending the ordinance rather than eliminating the PUD process entirely. City Council Meeting Minutes 3 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID E. Terri Ireland, Idaho Falls Downtown Merchants Association • Addressed concerns regarding the relationship between Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation (IFDDC) and downtown merchants, stating that communication and cooperation problems have persisted throughout her 10–11 years as a downtown merchant. • Explained that merchants' previously limited engagement with IFDDC shifted to strong opposition following proposed parking changes approximately one year earlier. • Reported that downtown merchants increasingly do not want to work with or communicate with the IFDDC. • Stated that recent property tax increases have also contributed to merchants' reluctance to renew the Business Improvement District (BID). • Request: Asked Council to consider merchants' concerns when deciding whether to renew the IFDDC management plan and emphasized the need for immediate discussions among all stakeholders. F. Melissa, Idaho Falls Resident and Downtown Merchant • Presented concerns from an email previously sent to Council regarding IFDDC’s relationship with existing downtown businesses. • Downtown events and traffic: Stated that Saturday events, street closures, parking restrictions, and congestion interfere with customer access during a retail day. Asked how merchants' financial impacts are considered and how much input they receive before event plans are finalized. • Alley dumpsters and garbage fees: Requested clarification on why merchants pay for separate dumpster service while also paying for garbage through City utility bills, what each charge covers, who sets the additional fee, and whether participation is mandatory. • Downtown events and parking: Cited recent events, including a jazz festival and Oktoberfest, that affected parking in front of her business. Reported concerns about app-based metered parking, including elderly visitors struggling to use the app and worrying about whether their payments were recorded or whether they might be towed. • Communication and representation: Stated that merchants primarily receive notifications after decisions have already been made, with little opportunity to provide input. Expressed that she does not feel IFDDC advocates for existing merchants. • Referenced concerns from other downtown business owners, including one who reportedly experienced a 177% increase in the business improvement district tax for the following year. • Request: Asked for a written response addressing merchant consultation, dumpster charges, the economic impact of downtown events, the status of metered parking and merchant opposition, and the services and advocacy IFDDC provides to existing businesses. G. James Foster, Idaho Falls Resident • Expressed concerns about the City's Flock automated license plate reader program, arguing that it continuously collects information on vehicles belonging to people who have committed no wrongdoing. • Thanked Council for its July unanimous vote prohibiting Flock from training its artificial intelligence on local license plate data, but argued that additional safeguards are necessary. • Cited Idaho Code § 49-1432, arguing that license plate data should be limited to investigating crimes, traffic accidents, and missing persons rather than creating a permanent record of residents' movements. • Challenged comparisons between automated cameras and officers taking notes, arguing that cameras enable continuous collection and rapid searches across jurisdictions. City Council Meeting Minutes 4 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID • Raised concerns about documented misuse of license plate reader systems by law enforcement officers and the absence of published audits in Idaho Falls. • Acknowledged that Police Chief Johnson had identified locating people with warrants as a benefit and stated that his proposed safeguards would not prevent legitimate investigative searches. • Requests: o Require public quarterly audits identifying every search, the agency conducting it, and the stated reason. o Limit data retention to seven days and prohibit sharing with out-of-state or federal agencies without a signed warrant. o Require an annual City Council vote to renew the program. • Noted that the City operates 13 cameras, distinct from the nine operated by Bonneville County, and asked Council to establish accountability for the City's system. H. Matthew, Idaho Falls Resident • Opposed Flock cameras and other forms of mass surveillance, citing constitutional protections for privacy, liberty, and freedom of movement. • Argued that continuous surveillance of innocent people without warrants or probable cause raises Fourth Amendment concerns. • Expressed concern that government agencies could access collected information to build profiles of private citizens and that safeguards could be circumvented or abused. • Stated that he did not consent to Flock or other mass surveillance, nor to the use or sale of his personal data without his knowledge. • Request: Asked Council to discontinue the use of all Flock cameras and Flock-style mass surveillance within Idaho Falls. 5. Consent Agenda A. Fire Department 1. 26-337 Battery-Powered Extrication Equipment B. Finance 1. 26-357 Treasurer’s Report for May 2026 *Correction* C. Office of the City Clerk 1. 26-354 IFDDC Extension to Management Services Agreement -> moved to Regular Agenda 2. 26-355 August 2026 Licensing through the Office of the City Clerk a. 62 New Business Licenses b. 29 Renewed Business Licenses c. 26 Contractor Licenses Motion: Approve, accept, or receive all items on the Consent Agenda according to the recommendations presented. o Moved by: Councilor Dingman o Second: Councilor Radford o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. City Council Meeting Minutes 5 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 6. Regular Agenda 5.c.1 - 26-354 - IFDDC Extension to Management Services Agreement (Moved from consent agenda) Discussion: • Mayor Burtenshaw explained that the IFDDC requested additional time to meet and develop proposals regarding its parking management and enforcement agreement, BID agreement, FY 2026–27 budget, and goals. • IFDDC's next Executive Board meeting is scheduled for October 1, 2026, followed by a full Board of Directors meeting on October 13, 2026. • The City proposed extending the existing management services agreement through October 31, 2026, rather than allowing it to lapse. The extension would allow IFDDC to continue legally performing its duties, including parking enforcement and issuing citations, while preparing its proposals. • Mayor Burtenshaw anticipated that IFDDC would present draft parking management and BID agreements at a future Council work session for discussion and consideration of a vote. • Councilors expressed concerns about downtown management, billing, and outstanding bills, and encouraged further review of IFDDC's operations and finances. • Council clarified that the extension applied only to the previous year's agreement for one additional month, not a renewal for another full year. • Council agreed that additional time was needed for both the City and IFDDC to work through the concerns outside the Council meeting and develop proposals for future consideration. Motion: Move to extend the IFDDC management agreement and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute necessary documents, with the recommendation to work through issues that have arisen. o Moved by: Councilor Radford o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. A. Public Works 1. 26-201 Service Agreement for Wastewater Collection and Treatment with the Iona Bonneville Sewer District (IBSD) Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield): Staff presented a five-year agreement for wastewater collection and treatment services for the Iona Bonneville Sewer District. The agreement aligns with the City's current wastewater facility plan and includes incremental annual rate increases of approximately 5% to cover treatment facility costs. The agreement maintains the District's existing service area and addresses the possibility of IBSD transitioning to its own wastewater treatment facility in the future, with provisions intended to minimize impacts to the City. Council recognized Director Canfield's work to protect the City's interests and maintain a mutually beneficial agreement. City Council Meeting Minutes 6 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID Motion: Approve the Service Agreement for Wastewater Collection and Treatment with the Iona Bonneville Sewer District and give authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents o Moved by: Councilor Dingman o Second: Councilor Larsen o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. B. Finance 1. 26-369 Professional Audit Services for Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2026 Presentation/Discussion (Director Hagedorn): Staff requested approval of the final year of the City's three-year professional audit services agreement with Baker Tilly LLP, with an option to extend for an additional two years. The audit includes the City's annual financial report and internal controls, passenger facility charges, transit fund procedures, and a single audit of federal awards. The contract amount is $184,500 and covers two major federal programs. If an additional major program is identified, additional fees would require further approval. Motion: Approve the professional services contract with Baker Tilly, LLP, for professional audit services for an estimated amount of $ 184,500 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the necessary documents o Moved by: Councilor Dingman o Second: Councilor Larsen o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. C. Idaho Falls Power 1. 26-369 IFP 26-24 Substation 72.5KV SF6 Breakers Purchase Presentation/Discussion (GM Fredericksen): Idaho Falls Power requested approval to purchase three 72.5KV SF6 substation breakers from Western Electric Alliance, the lowest responsible bidder, for $342,588. Four bids were received. The breakers will be installed at the Rack Substation as part of its reconstruction. Delivery is estimated at 55 to 65 weeks. Council discussed supply-chain improvements and the anticipated delivery timeline. Motion: Approve the purchase of three (3) SF6 dead-tank breakers for substations and award the bid to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Western Electric Alliance, in the amount of $342,588.00. o Moved by: Councilor Freeman o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. City Council Meeting Minutes 7 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 2. 26-349 Amendment to the Power Sales Agreement with Orchard Park Apartments Presentation/Discussion (GM Fredericksen): Staff presented an amendment to the existing power sales agreement with Orchard Park Apartments, part of Idaho Falls Power's net metering pilot project. The amendment incorporates recently approved rate and fee increases of approximately 5% to 9%, effective October 1, 2026. It also allows future rate adjustments to be incorporated into the agreement as part of the City's rate-setting process, eliminating the need to bring the agreement back to Council for annual amendments. Motion: Approve the amendment to the Power Sales Agreement with Orchard Park Energy and give authorization to the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents. o Moved by: Councilor Freeman o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. D. Office of the Mayor 1. 26-359 Ordinance Amending Title 4, Chapter 12, Section 7, Itinerant Merchant License Presentation/Discussion (City Clerk Lundquist): Staff proposed removing the licensing and bonding requirements for non-food itinerant merchants participating in City Parks and Recreation special events. The change is intended to reduce the financial burden on small vendors, simplify the licensing process, and allow event organizers greater flexibility when managing vendor lists and making last-minute substitutions. Vendors must be approved by Parks and Recreation and pay the applicable booth rental fees. Motion: Adopt the Ordinance amending Title 4, Chapter 12, Section 7 under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete readings, and request that it be read by title and published by summary. o Moved by: Councilor Freeman o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. ORDINANCE 3678: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, AMENDING TITLE 4, CHAPTER 12, SECTION 7 TO PROVIDE AN EXCEPTION TO THE ITINERANT MERCHANT LICENSE REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL EVENTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; CODIFICATION; PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY; AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE. 2. 26-360 Ordinance Amending Title 4, Chapter 15, Sections 5, 6 and 11, Public Transportation Operator License City Council Meeting Minutes 8 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID Presentation/Discussion (City Clerk Lundquist): Staff proposed changing public transportation operator licenses for taxi, Uber, and similar services from annual renewals to two-year licenses. The amendment also changes fingerprinting from every three years to each two-year application, aligns badge expiration dates with the actual license term, and provides for phasing in current license holders. Council requested clarification regarding the need for repeat fingerprinting and identified the need to amend the license-fee language to reflect the two-year licensing period. Motion: Adopt the Ordinance amending Title 4, Chapter 15, Sections 5, 6, and 11 under suspension of the rules requiring three complete readings and request that it be read by title with the amendment of sentence one in 4.15.6. o Moved by: Councilor Francis o Second: Councilor Freeman o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. ORDINANCE 3679: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, AMENDING TITLE 4, CHAPTER 15, SECTIONS 5, 6, AND 11 TO CHANGE THE EXPIRATION DATE FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION OPERATOR’S LICENSES FROM ONE TO TWO YEARS; REQUIRE A FULL SET OF FINGERPRINTS FOR EACH APPLICATION; PROVIDE FOR THE PHASING IN OF CURRENT LICENSE HOLDERS; AND PROVIDING THAT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION SHALL SERVE AS PROOF OF LICENSE; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; CODIFICATION; PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY; AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE. E. Community Development Services 1. 26-376 Provide staff direction regarding Planned Unit Development (PUD) from the Comprehensive Zoning Code Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner, Mayor Burtenshaw, Council President Francis): • Council continued its discussion from the Monday work session regarding concerns with the existing PUD ordinance and whether to rescind, amend, or temporarily suspend it. • The October 5 Planning Commission meeting was scheduled to consider the proposed rescission and provide a recommendation to City Council. • Council generally expressed interest in retaining PUDs as a development tool while addressing concerns with the current ordinance, including private streets, setbacks, emergency access, streetscape design, and the interpretation of development standards. • Several Councilors expressed concern that rescinding the ordinance could leave the City without a PUD framework for an extended period while a replacement ordinance is City Council Meeting Minutes 9 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID developed. Others favored rescission as a way to move forward with a comprehensive rewrite. Key Discussion Points 1. Rescission, Moratorium, and Amendment Options • Council discussed three primary options: rescinding the ordinance, imposing a temporary moratorium, or leaving the ordinance in place while amendments are prepared. • A moratorium would require additional legal review. Legal counsel explained that emergency moratoriums are limited to 182 days and require evidence of imminent peril, while an interim moratorium involves a longer process and may last up to one year. • Council expressed concern about the legal ramifications of a moratorium, including potential impacts on applications already in process and vested development rights. • Some Councilors preferred exploring a moratorium or suspension before deciding whether to rescind the ordinance. Others noted that rescission and moratoriums could produce similar outcomes but with different legal requirements. • Council emphasized that PUDs should not be eliminated entirely and that the City should continue working toward a revised ordinance. 2. Proposed Ordinance Amendments • Staff indicated that certain amendments, including restrictions on varying setbacks and building heights, could be completed relatively quickly. • More extensive revisions involving private versus public streets would require coordination among Community Development Services, Public Works, and Fire Department staff. • Staff was reviewing PUD ordinances from other Idaho cities and offered to bring forward proposed issues and revisions based on Council's previous discussions. • Council emphasized the need for clearer communication between staff and Council regarding the purpose of PUD hearings and the City's expectations for development proposals. 3. Council's Role and the PUD Review Process • Council discussed its role as the land-use authority in quasi-judicial PUD hearings and the responsibility to independently evaluate whether proposals meet the intent of the ordinance. • Councilors expressed concern that staff presentations sometimes focus on whether applications meet the written code without adequately explaining potential conflicts, trade-offs, or conditions that could address community concerns. • Staff stated it was revising its reports and presentations to better explain negotiations with developers, the rationale behind design decisions, and potential conditions. City Council Meeting Minutes 10 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID • Legal counsel explained that Council may approve an application, deny it, approve it with legally supported conditions, or table it for additional fact-finding or reflection. • Tabling would allow staff to investigate specific concerns and return with additional information. Legal counsel recommended setting a definite date for reconsideration and cautioned against lengthy delays that could create legal concerns. • Council discussed the importance of resolving concerns earlier in the development process while recognizing the limitations on communications during quasi-judicial proceedings. 4. Development Standards and Community Concerns • Councilors raised concerns about private streets, street widths, emergency access, snow removal, public infrastructure, parking, garages, setbacks, and the overall appearance of developments. • Some Councilors questioned whether private streets and homeowners' association responsibilities adequately serve residents and the broader community. • Other Councilors emphasized that PUDs have produced successful developments and may provide housing opportunities at lower prices or rents. • Staff noted that Fire Department personnel had reviewed and approved existing projects' emergency-access provisions, including street-width and turning-radius requirements. Motion: Not rescinding the PUD Ordinance at this time and begin preparing amendments to the PUD Ordinance for consideration as soon as possible. o Moved by: Councilor Freeman o Second: Councilor Lee o Vote: Aye: Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee. Nay: Radford, Francis. o Motion carries 4-2. 2. 25-352 Legislative Hearing for Consideration of an Ordinance approving the Urban Renewal Plan for the Willow Creek Urban Renewal Project Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner, Mr. Cramer): Staff presented the proposed Willow Creek Urban Renewal Plan and Revenue Allocation Area, encompassing approximately 100 acres near the northwest corner of Holmes Avenue and Science Center Drive. The project anticipates more than $91 million in private investment across three phases and includes proposed public infrastructure improvements, including Aspen View Road, Alpine Ridge Road, and utility extensions. The plan identifies approximately $12 million in potential public projects and assumes 75% reimbursement to the developer through tax increment revenues, with remaining funds available for administrative costs and future projects. Staff reported that the plan is financially feasible under the assumptions presented, with projected developer City Council Meeting Minutes 11 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID reimbursement by 2042 under the conservative scenario and 2041 under the moderate scenario. Council discussed the revenue assumptions, statutory limitations, and potential benefits of improving access and infrastructure in the area. Motion: Approve the Ordinance approving the Urban Renewal Plan for the Willow Creek Urban Renewal Project and revenue allocation area under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings and request that it be read by title and published by summary. o Moved by: Councilor Lee o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. ORDINANCE 3680: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, APPROVING THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE WILLOW CREEK URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT, WHICH PLAN INCLUDES REVENUE ALLOCATION FINANCING PROVISIONS; AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT A COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE AND OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION TO COUNTY AND STATE OFFICIALS AND THE AFFECTED TAXING ENTITIES; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION, AND PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY; PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 7. Announcements • Oktoberfest: Oktoberfest events are taking place throughout the City this weekend. The event is designed to be family-friendly, with a different format and popular musical entertainment planned this year. • INL Tour: Mayor Burtenshaw reported that a majority of Tier One leaders and directors toured Idaho National Laboratory (INL). Several attendees had never visited the facility despite growing up locally or having family members who worked there. She praised staff for their thoughtful questions, enthusiasm, and engagement in learning about INL's work and its significance to Idaho Falls. • Greenbelt Maintenance: A community member expressed appreciation for Parks and Recreation's improvements to trees and brush along the Greenbelt pathways. Mayor Burtenshaw recognized the department's work and partnerships with local corporations and organizations that helped clear brush and improve the area. • Frontier Fields Recognition: Councilor Lee recognized Frontier Credit Union for its community partnership and contributions to Frontier Fields. The first varsity soccer match was held at the facility that day, following five to six years of community effort to bring the project to fruition. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:42 PM. /s/ Linda Lundquist_________________ /s/ Lisa Burtenshaw _____________ Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor IDAHO FALLS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY P.O. BOX 50220 IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO 83405-0220 MEMORANDUM To: Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission From: Brad Cramer, Executive Director Date: July 24, 2026 Re: Proposed Willow Creek Urban Renewal Area Introduction In 2024, the Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency (the Agency) began evaluating the creation of a new urban renewal area known as the Willow Creek Urban Renewal Area (Willow Creek Area). Following the procedures outlined in Idaho Code §50-200 and summarized in the attached process overview, the Agency approved a resolution on August 14, 2024, finding the area eligible for designation as an Urban Renewal Area (URA). The Idaho Falls City Council subsequently approved a resolution on September 27, 2024, confirming the area’s eligibility and authorizing preparation of an Urban Renewal Plan and Revenue Allocation Area. After completion of the draft plan and accompanying Economic Feasibility Study, the Agency approved the final plan on May 21, 2026. Before City Council consideration, Idaho Code §50-2008(b) requires that the plan be reviewed by the Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission “for review and recommendations as to (the plan’s) conformity with the general plan for the development of the municipality as a whole.” Project Overview The Willow Creek Area encompasses approximately 100 acres, located generally north of Anderson Street, west of Holmes Avenue, and west and south of Highway 20. The property includes Light Manufacturing (LM), Highway Commercial (HC), and Limited Commercial (LC) zoning and is identified as part of the Industrial and General Urban Transects on the City’s Future Land Use Map. The edges of the area have existing small-scale, light industrial development. The central portion has remined vacant, largely due to shallow basalt. This is the primary factor contributing to eligibility as a URA. The costs of blasting, removal, and importing suitable fill material have discouraged investment. Other contributing factors include an inadequate street network, faulty lot layout, diversity of ownership, and unsafe conditions. These conditions have left the area in a state of economic under development and qualify it for urban renewal designation under Idaho Code §50-2018. A summary table of all qualifying conditions is attached to this report. Only one of the statutory criteria must be met for an area to be deemed eligible. Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan The City’s comprehensive plan, Imagine IF, includes both city-wide policies and neighborhood- specific goals. This section evaluates the Willow Creek Plan for consistency with those policies. City-Wide Policies Imagine IF describes each transect these areas found on the Future Land Use Map: Industrial “The Industrial Transect denotes areas set aside for all varieties of industrial operations, from manufacturing facilities and related warehousing and distribution to machine shops or greenhouses. These areas are generally near major roadways, with frontage on arterial roadways, and they may have railroad access.” General Urban “The General Urban Transect denotes residential areas with a mix of commercial and service uses convenient to residents. These areas contain a wide variety of housing types, generally including small single-units, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, courtyard apartments, bungalow courts, townhouses, multiplexes and live-work units. Lot sizes are smaller and more compact than suburban areas. These areas could also include parks, schools, churches and commercial services. These areas have highly connective street patterns, similar to the traditional grid-pattern that encourages bicycle and pedestrian usage. These areas should be near an existing or part of a new walkable center.” While zoning primarily dictates the types of uses that may occur, an Urban Renewal Area enables those uses by providing tools to facilitate development. The mix of zones that exist across the proposed URA are appropriate for the type of development contemplated in the comprehensive plan. Encouraging the development of the vacant parcels and redevelopment of the peripheral areas supports the comprehensive plan’s vision for a mixed-use area near a major intersection. Connectivity and Walkability The primary intersection in the Willow Creek Area is Anderson and Holmes. The comprehensive plan discusses the importance of implementing the Bonneville Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (BMPO) High Capacity Roadway Needs study. The study identifies Anderon and Holmes an intersection which functions appropriately today, but will deteriorate to a Level of Service (LOS) D by 2050. Because TIF revenues can be used for public projects such as street and intersection improvements, the URA can provide assistance towards projects which keep the intersection at an acceptable LOS, maintaining traffic flow at a key arterial intersection. The proposed plan also proposes to assist with construction of an internal roadway network, which improves overall connectivity in the area, especially between the Willow Creek Area and the existing industrial development to the west. Economic Development The plan also promotes urban renewal and tax increment financing (TIF) as tools for reinvestment in older or underutilized areas, particularly where infrastructure already exists. The Willow Creek Area includes roadways and utilities on the perimeter. It is an infill site that has seen development in the surrounding area but remained underdeveloped due to the challenging characteristics of area. Relevant economic development actions from page 101 of Imagine IF include: e Continue to collaborate with the Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency to identify and promote redevelopment opportunities in older parts of the City. e Promote tax-increment financing as a primary tool for redevelopment. e Encourage development in areas already served by public utilities, or where extensions are least costly, through infill incentive programs. e Utilize local improvement districts (LIDs) and other financing tools to address identified infrastructure needs. Neighborhood-Specific Policies The Willow Creek Area lies within Area 4, which includes areas on the east side of the river including downtown and north to Fairway Estates. Urban renewal has recently been used in this area, including the Stanley Boge and Anderson Bush urban renewal districts. The Yellowstone Square urban renewal district is also located just to the east in Area 2. The Willow Creek Area also falls within an area that identified by a Community Health Assessment, which was a supporting study of the comprehensive plan, as a Tier 1, or least healthy, area of Idaho Falls. The assessment identified higher rents, lower incomes, and lower access to jobs. The comprehensive plan states, “This area also expressed repeated concerns about the need to continue efforts to redevelop and revitalize the City’s core and not just continue to expand outward. These revitalization efforts need to focus on diversifying the housing stock, improving walkability and increasing employment opportunities.” (pg. 171). The proposed housing in the Willow Creek Area, which is an infill site, and connections to employment centers and services support the goals of comprehensive plan for Area 4. One Imagine IF actions specific to Area 4 supports creation of the Willow Creek URA: e Explore TIF, LID and other grant and financing programs to focus on redevelopment of small neighborhood crossroads in more walkable areas, such as along Lindsey Blvd, or by Freeman Park. (p.173). The Willow Creek Plan advances the goals of the comprehensive plan by promoting infill development and enhancing bicycle and pedestrian connections to nearby commercial and residential areas. Conclusion and Recommended Action The proposed Willow Creek Urban Renewal Area aligns with the Imagine IF comprehensive plan by: e Promoting infill development over sprawl, e Utilizing urban renewal and TIF as strategic reinvestment tools, and e Advancing key connectivity infrastructure improvements. The Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency respectfully requests that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the resolution and forward the Willow Creek Urban Renewal Plan to the City Council for final adoption. Steps in Creating a New Urban Renewal Area and Revenue Allocation Area Steps in Creating a URA and Revenue Allocation Area If an urban renewal agency is in existence in in a community, the creation of an urban renewal area, including a revenue allocation area (required for use of tax increment financing), begins with an eligibility report for a designated area within the community. The central question for an eligibility report whether the study area has at least one of the statutory characteristics which | must be found to be considered eligible for urban renewal activities. These characteristics or criteria are: 1. The presence of a substantial number of deteriorated or deteriorating structures and deterioration of site [50-2018(9), 50-2903(8)(b) and (8)(c), and 50-2008(d)(4)(2)], Age or obsolescence [50-2018(8) and 50-2903(8)(a)], Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout [50-2018(9) and 50-2903(8)(b)], Outmoded street patterns [50-2008(d)(4)(2)], Need for correlation of area with other areas of municipality by streets and modern traffic requirements [50-2008(d)(4)(2)], Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness; obsolete platting [50-2018(9), 50-2903(8)(b) and (8)(c)], and 50-2008(d)(4)(2)} Unsuitable topography [50-2008(d)(4)(2)], Insanitary or unsafe conditions [50-2018(9), 50-2903(8)(b)], Diversity of ownership [50-2018(9), 50-2903(8)(b) and (8)(c), and 50-2008(d)(4)(2)], 10. Tax or special assessment delinquency [50-2018(9), 50-2903(8)(b)], and 50-2008 (d)(4)(2)] 11. Defective or unusual conditions of title [50-2018(9), 50-2903(8)(b) and (8)(c), and 50- 2008(d)(4)(2)], 12. Existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes [50- 2018(9), 50-2903(8)(b)], 13. Substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals or welfare [50-2018(9), 50-2903(8)(b) and 8(c)], 14. Conditions which retard development of the area [50-2008(d)(4)(2)], and 15. Results in economic underdevelopment of the area [50-2903(8)(b)] and economic disuse [50-2008(d)(4)(2)]. a wPwnds oe N If it is determined the Study Area has characteristics which meet one or more of the statutory criteria listed above, the Agency may accept the eligibility report and request its consideration by the governing body. No URA can be formed unless the City Council adopts a resolution finding the area under consideration is deteriorated or deteriorating due to such characteristics, the redevelopment of the area is necessary for the welfare of the residents, and the area is appropriate for an urban renewal project. The resolution approved by City Council authorizes the Agency to prepare a plan for the proposed urban renewal area. The urban renewal area plan is to include the following with specificity: 1. A statement describing the total assessed valuation of the base assessment roll of the revenue allocation area and the total assessed valuation of all taxable property within the municipality; 2. A statement listing the kind, number, and location of all proposed public works or improvements within the revenue allocation area; 3. An economic feasibility study; 4. Adetailed list of estimated project costs; 5. A fiscal impact statement showing the impact of the revenue allocation area, both until and after the bonds are repaid, upon all taxing districts levying taxes upon property on the revenue allocation area; 6. Adescription of the methods of financing all estimated project costs and the time when related costs or monetary obligations are to be incurred; 7. Atermination date for the plan and revenue allocation area as provided for in section 50- 2903(20), Idaho Code. In determining the termination date, the plan shall recognize that the agency shall receive allocation of revenues in the calendar year following the last year of the revenue allocation provision described in the urban renewal plan; 8. A description of the disposition or retention of any assets of the agency upon the termination date. Provided however, nothing herein shall prevent the agency from retaining assets or revenues generated from such assets as long as the agency shall have resources other than revenue allocation funds to operate and manage such assets; Once the plan is prepared and approved by the Agency, it is forwarded to the City Council. Prior to the public hearing before the City Council, the City Council forwards the plan to the City Planning and Zoning Commission for its determination that the plan conforms to the City’s comprehensive plan. At least thirty (30) days prior to the public hearing, a copy of the notice and plan is distributed to the taxing entities overlapping the boundaries of the proposed district. After receiving the recommendation of the commission, and after notice fully published, the public hearing is held. The City Council must approve an urban renewal plan, including revenue allocation financing provisions, by an ordinance. If the ordinance is adopted by the City Council, a copy of the ordinance with legal description of the Revenue Allocation Area (RAA) is distributed to all the overlapping taxing entities, county officials and the State Tax Commission. By state statute, following adoption of the ordinance, the RAA is effective January 1, of the year in which it is adopted. The RAA has a maximum life of twenty years under Idaho statutes. The urban renewal agency implements the plan adopted by the City Council. Eligibility Report Summary of Findings t CRITERION CRITERION CHARACTERISTICS SUPPORTING FINDING Substantial deterioration of No structures and site _ _ ; a oo There is not an internal public, developed street system . in the internal portion of the study area. Approximately Defective streety layout or Yes fifty acres is not served by a collector street or a local inadequate street layout . - : street system. There is no provision for vehicular or pedestrian traffic. ; 7 The central portion of the study area, approximately fifty acres, requires further subdivision to be developed at urban densities. Most of the developed portions of the study area adjacent to North Holmes and Anderson Faulty lot layout/obsolete Yes Street consist of metes and bounds parcels, many of _ platting which are combined into one ownership to have sufficient land to develop to modern commercial uses. A few of the existing unplatted properties are too narrow to be developed under today’s regulations or ; - today’s modern standards. Diversity of ownership Yes _ There are nineteen owners in roughly 80 acres. Unusual conditions of title No Tax delinquency _ No ; _ - _ 7 There is no public water or sewer system in the central portion of the study area. Nor is there a system to handle stormwater. The soil conditions for the western half of the study area present severe limitations for on- | site septic systems. The lack of public utility systems creates the potential for unsafe conditions. The : deterioration of the sidewalk in certain locations creates _ an unsafe condition. . There is no collector street to move traffic from the interior of the study to the adjacent arterial streets. There is no local street system in approximately 50 | acres to encourage and serve urban densities. = Basalt rock underlies the study area. Basalt, especially . Unsuitable topography Yes near the surface, substantially discourages urban _ development a . ' Although many of the buildings are over fifty years old, a site visit did not reveal a substantial number of Age or obsolescence Yes deteriorating buildings. The homes, of which a few are suffering from lack of maintenance, are nonconforming ' under the present zoning. — ; Access from fifty acres of the study area is not provided _ _ to the arterial streets and the community or region at | large by a collector street. No public local streets access | _ the majority of the study area. 7 a The widespread basalt rock has delayed the development of the study area. Over one half of the study area is underlain with basalt and substantially increases the costsofdevelopment. Unsafe conditions Yes Outmoded street patterns Yes Lack of correlation with Streets in municipality Yes Conditions which retard Y development of the area &s CRITERION Economic disuse or underdevelopment of the area Arrests or impairs the sound growth of the municipality CRITERION MET Yes CHARACTERISTICS SUPPORTING FINDING Development began in the study area prior to 1975. However, the presence of basalt, the lack of utilities, and the absence of an interior street system has meant __ the area has not developed at urban densities. The long-range plan of the City of Idaho Falls designates this area as general urban and industrial. Over half of the area is vacant, although the study area is adjacent to U.S. 20, a regional highway, and is served __ by two principal arterial streets. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 1 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Monday, October 5, 2026 3:00 PM City Council Chambers Call to Order and Roll Call There were present: Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw Council President Jim Francis Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman Councilor Jim Freeman Councilor Kirk Larsen Councilor Brandon Lee Absent: Councilor John Radford Also present: Ian Turner, Airport Director Jack Penning, Volaire Aviation Consulting Darin Jones, Human Resources Director Mark Hagedorn, Finance Director/Treasurer Jacob Beck, Assistant City Attorney Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Mayor Burtenshaw called the meeting to order at 3:03 p.m. with the following items: 1. Agenda A. Office of the Mayor 1. 26-385 Mayor and Council Reports: Announcements, liaison reports, events, calendaring, citywide updates, concerns, questions, proclamations, notes and/or minutes from boards and commissions Presentation/Discussion (Council and Mayor): Council discussed several ongoing matters and upcoming activities. • Alcohol Ordinance: Council President Francis reported that work on the comprehensive alcohol ordinance revision is continuing. Although no deadline has been established, meetings with the City Attorney continue to address the revisions. • Sidewalk Parking: Council President Francis reported that Police are using Citizen Watch to address vehicles parked across sidewalks and obstructing pedestrian access. Citizen Watch personnel may issue citations for parking on sidewalks. • Police/Fire/EMS “Halo” Ordinance: Council discussed a proposed ordinance establishing a minimum distance for members of the public who are recording police officers while officers are performing their duties. The Police Department is working with Legal to prepare an ordinance. Council discussed 15 feet versus 25 feet, with consensus favoring 25 feet as a safer distance. Council also discussed extending the concept to Fire and EMS because emergency personnel have experienced members of the public interfering with their work. Legal was asked to consider police, fire, and EMS in developing the proposed ordinance. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 2 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 • Street Striping: Council discussed the progress of striping newly constructed streets. Staff is working to complete striping as quickly as possible. • Bicycle, Scooter and Greenbelt Regulations: Council reported ongoing discussions with the Snake River Trail Alliance, Snake River Mountain Bike Club, and others regarding bicycle and mountain-bike activities, including development of the Gem Lake bike trails. The Parks and Recreation Commission is also considering bicycle and scooter rules for the Greenbelt and other areas. Council discussed asking the Commission to recommend appropriate scooter speeds, motor sizes, and related regulations, including a review of practices in the Treasure Valley. • Idaho Falls Power: Council reported that the Bulb project is being reassembled and, after testing, is expected to be operational in November. • Utility Board: Mayor Burtenshaw reported that the October Utility Board meeting was canceled because substantial utility business had already been addressed during the prior Council Work Session and there were insufficient additional items to warrant a meeting. • PUD Review: Mayor Burtenshaw reported that the Planning Commission would be discussing PUD regulations and concerns raised by Council and the Commission. Council will have an opportunity between October 19 and November 9 to visit selected PUDs and evaluate issues such as parking on private streets, congestion, desirable characteristics, and concerns. Council will receive survey questions and an opportunity for written comments. A November 9 discussion is planned to consider potential code revisions, including “low-hanging fruit,” to move revisions forward before the Christmas break if possible. • Upcoming PUD Hearing: Mayor Burtenshaw reminded Council that a PUD near Freeman Park is scheduled for the October 8 Council meeting. The hearing procedure will allow the developer, staff, and public to participate while Council asks questions and deliberates during the open hearing rather than closing and reopening the hearing for deliberation. If an impasse occurs, Council may table the decision and direct Community Development Services to work with the developer rather than outright rejecting the application and requiring the process to begin again. B. Airport 1. 26-372 Idaho Falls Regional Airport Leakage and Retention Study Presentation/Discussion (Director Turner and Mr. Penning): Director Turner introduced Mr. Penning, the airport’s consultant of record for 21 years, who presented the updated passenger retention and leakage study (year ended first quarter 2026), which uses the same catchment area and methodology as four prior studies. Retention: Retention of local passengers rose from 42% in 2016 to 59% in 2019, dipped during the pandemic as the overall market grew about 20% from national park demand, and now stands at roughly two-thirds, which is the 67% goal Mr. Penning projected in 2016 would take 20 years. It was reached in City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 3 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 ten. About 26% of the catchment now uses Salt Lake City, down from more than 50% a decade ago. The next goal is 75%. Passenger volume: In 2025, the airport served an average of 942 passengers per day in each direction, roughly double 2019. The catchment generates more than 1,470 passengers per day each way, with about 970 using IDA and about 500 still driving to other airports. Passengers using IDA are up 236 per day each way (32%) since 2023. Fares: For the first time in the study’s history, IDA fares are lower than Salt Lake City, about $12 less each way (airfare only, not counting driving and parking costs). The average fare paid was $253, and IDA is also lower than Boise. Competition among Delta, United, American, Alaska, and Allegiant was cited as a factor. Mr. Penning noted that sell-outs on peak days (Thursdays and Sundays) drive up last-minute fares and feed the perception that IDA is more expensive, and that capacity limits on those days are a main reason travelers still drive elsewhere. Pocatello retains only about four passengers per day each way. Load factor: IDA fills almost 85% of seats, the highest in the Pacific Northwest (average 81%). In response to Council’s question, Mr. Penning explained that low load factors make routes difficult to sustain, as in Pocatello, where revenue guarantees have been needed, and that Walla Walla and Yakima are challenged on profitability. Industry headwinds: Jet fuel has roughly doubled from about $2 to about $4.15 per gallon, and each 10- cent increase adds about $5 per seat. IDA’s short-haul routes are better positioned than long-haul flying, and airlines may redeploy aircraft to shorter routes, potentially increasing frequencies here. Overall costs are up 26% while real airfares are down about 4%. Consumer confidence is a concern, but at least 40% of IDA travelers are price-insensitive business travelers, and no demand softening has been seen in the region. Over the past 18 months, 389 routes nationally were canceled and 369 added, including Allegiant’s suspended Oakland service, which was withdrawn because Allegiant closed Oakland as a base, even though IDA was its top-performing Oakland market. Future service: The largest unserved markets are Los Angeles (about 105 passengers per day each way), San Francisco, and San Diego, which are the short-term priorities. The airport holds a $1 million Small Community Air Service Development Grant for a minimum revenue guarantee (written for Los Angeles, with a waiver allowing use for San Francisco), with a goal of service in 2027. Longer-term opportunities include Minneapolis–St. Paul, Houston, Atlanta, and potentially Honolulu in 5 to 10 years. Council discussion: Councilors praised the report. Mr. Penning identified the airport’s attractiveness as quick, easy travel, TSA efficiency, short walks, affordable parking, and good schedules and connectivity, and recommended continued in-person meetings with carriers because incentive requests may change with fuel costs. He expects one California market to be added next year. Director Turner added that the current tools should be used first, with attention to terminal facilities and operational capacity, before formulating the next step. C. Finance 1. 26-388 Overview and Discussion of the City’s Weekly Claims and Settlement Process City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 4 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Presentation/Discussion (Director Hagedorn): Director Hagedorn explained the weekly claims and settlement process following the transition to Workday. A “claim” is an amount owed by the City, and a “settlement run” is a batch of claims prepared for payment. Process • Supplier invoices go through a three-way match (purchase order, invoice, receiving document) in Procurement • A specialist reviews each invoice, then the settlement report is generated • The weekly email to Council is created from the settlement report • The Procurement Manager reviews each invoice • The Treasury Operations Manager or Director Hagedorn gives a final review before payment Payments outside the review • Some payments are generated through the bank and appear in the next settlement run, such as: o Utility refunds o Payroll liabilities o Debt payments • Emergency payments are handled carefully because urgent requests are a common fraud indicator • Recent emergency requests turned out to be spam attacks Internal controls • Only Procurement can change supplier data • Multiple approvals are required • Duties are segregated: Procurement creates the payment type, and Treasury initiates and executes it • An independent reconciler is used • Workday automates these controls • There is no internal audit function yet • Finance conducts annual self-reviews of selected areas and may create an audit function in the future Legal basis • State law requires Council approval of claims before payment and an adequate system of internal controls • The City uses a "negative confirmation" process: the weekly email is considered approved unless Council replies • Other Idaho cities use the same practice, including Boise, Meridian, Nampa, and Caldwell • Until 2017, Council also ratified payments after the fact; this was discontinued as redundant Report contents • Tabs: summary, supplier invoice, expense report, ad hoc, and miscellaneous • This week's run was about $3.2 million, compared with the typical $1.2–$1.5 million • The increase is because the end of the fiscal year and start of the new year bring the largest payment runs • Checks carry the highest fraud risk • The City encourages electronic payment but cannot require it • Director Hagedorn said staff will work on: City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 5 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 o Adding fund numbers or cost centers o Clarifying refund types in the ad hoc tab o Removing or explaining zero-dollar P-card lines in the expense tab What Council should look for • Council is not expected to know every payment's purpose, but should apply a "sniff test": o Do the vendor and amount make sense? o Is anything unusual or politically or operationally sensitive? • Questions can be sent to Director Hagedorn and the Accounts Payable email address • The report typically arrives Monday (occasionally Tuesday) • Payments are not released until Friday mid-morning, so Council has until then to respond • Asking a question does not automatically stop a payment • Council may also request a future Workday training session D. Human Resources 1. 26-383 City of Idaho Falls 457 Plan – Capital Group/American Funds Presentation/Discussion (Director Jones): Director Jones described an old, deferred compensation plan with Capital Group/American Funds, likely begun in the 1980s or 1990s, that was never terminated. Staff learned of it in June 2025 after receiving correspondence, and no plan documents could be located by the City or the provider. Three participants still held funds at that time (two retirees and one current employee). The retirees have since moved their money, and the remaining employee intends to withdraw no later than January 2027. Current plans available to employees (Nationwide, Empower, and Corebridge) have current plan documents. Director Jones plans to bring the item as an action item on Thursday’s regular Council agenda, asking Council to approve cancellation of the plan, and noted that a termination letter would not be sent until the last employee’s funds are removed. In response to a Councilor’s question about the form of the motion, Council discussed authorizing the Mayor (or designee) to cancel the plan when no participants remain, rather than using a fixed date, to avoid needing an amendment if the withdrawal slips past January. E. City Attorney 1. 26-381 Executive Session (Council will reconvene after the executive session.) Motion: Move Council into executive session pursuant to Idaho Code Section 74-206(1)(j) and 74- 206A(1)(a) to consider a labor contract matter. • Moved by: Councilor Francis • Second: Dingman • Vote: Aye: Dingman, Freeman, Francis, Lee, Larsen. Nay: none. • Result: Motion carried 5-0. Start: 4:20 PM City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 6 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Present: Mayor Burtenshaw, Councilor Francis, Councilor Freeman, Councilor Dingman, Councilor Lee, Councilor Larsen, Attorney Beck, Director Jones. End: 4:29 PM F. Human Resources 1. 26-382 Union Contract with Local 1565 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Presentation/Discussion: The MOU documents an agreement between the City and Local 1565 to increase the maximum sick-leave payout available to eligible Local 1565 employees from $2,500 to $3,000. Council returned to open session following the executive session and voted on the item without further discussion. Motion: Approve the MOU between the City of Idaho Falls and Local 1565 concerning the sick-leave payout available to eligible Local 1565 employees and give the Mayor authorization to execute the necessary documents. • Moved by: Councilor Freeman • Second: Councilor Lee • Vote: Aye: Lee, Dingman, Francis, Freeman, Larsen. Nay: none. • Result: Motion carries 5-0. 3. Announcements • This weekend is the last weekend the Zoo will be open, and Boo at the Zoo is the following weekend. • The ice rink has been converted for the season, and ice-skating lessons are being offered. • A speaker shared a visit to Temple View Elementary, where third graders answered what the City does to keep roads safe in winter, including plowing, salting, and putting down sand and oil. • Councilor Freeman plans to be at the Farmers Market this weekend to answer questions from the public. • The Mayor is participating in the Mayors’ Walking Challenge (10,000 steps per day), with the City earning $1,000 for a 10,000-step average or $500 for 5,000. She will invite departments and Council members to take part, and a walk and proclamation with the White Cane community is planned for next Saturday. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 4:34 PM. /s/ Linda Lundquist_________________ /s/ Lisa Burtenshaw _____________ Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor Memorandum File #: 26-419 City Council DATE: Monday, October 19, 2026 AGENDA: Regular FROM: Margaret Wimborne, Chief of Staff DEPARTMENT: Mayor's Office Title IFDDC Parking Program MOU ☐Ordinance ☐Resolution ☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☐Legislative Public Hearing ☐Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☒Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation (IFDDC) to manage downtown parking as the downtown enforcement organization, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Description, Background Information, Purpose: IFDDC has managed parking in the downtown district, and this MOU will renew that agreement. This agreement novates the prior parking agreement and authorizes IFDDC to manage downtown parking as the downtown enforcement organization. The cost of the service is $92,200. The MOU is effective upon execution through September 30, 2027, with an automatic renewal and a provision of termination with a six-month written notice. This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/20/2026 Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ RETURN TO AGENDA MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26 Page 1 of 9 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR IFDDC PARKING PROGRAM BETWEEN CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO AND IDAHO FALLS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR IFDDC PARKING PROGRAM BETWEEN CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO AND IDAHO FALLS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (hereinafter “MOU”) is entered into this day _____ of ___________, 2026, by and between City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, whose address is P.O. Box 50220, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83405 (hereinafter “CITY”), and the Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation, an Idaho non-profit corporation, 381 Shoup Ave, Ste. 207, Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83402 (hereinafter “IFDDC). WHEREAS, the downtown area in Idaho Falls is a vital, vibrant, and important part of our community; and WHEREAS, the commercial and business establishments in downtown thrive when there is efficient and effective and predictable parking usage; and WHEREAS, CITY wishes to promote the downtown area and to continue exploring a different way to manage the availability of on-street and off-street parking in the area depicted in Exhibit “A” incorporated in this MOU; and WHEREAS, the Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation (“IFDDC”) is dedicated to the improvement and sustaining of the downtown area for commercial, business, and residential purposes; and WHEREAS, CITY and IFDDC are of the opinion that IFDDC has the proper interest, organization, and staffing to regulate on-street and off-street parking in the downtown area; and WHEREAS, CITY and IFDDC desire to allow IFDDC to regulate downtown parking for the term of this MOU in order to have an effective downtown parking program; and WHEREAS, on February 12, 2026, CITY and IFDDC entered into a Memorandum of Understanding for IFDDC Parking Program Between City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, and Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation to provide for parking management services in CITY’s downtown area (the “Prior MOU”); and WHEREAS, CITY and IFDDC desires to novate the Prior MOU by entering into this MOU and making this MOU effective October 1, 2026, nunc pro tunc. THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises below, CITY and IFDDC agree as follows: 1.0 IFDDC’s OBLIGATIONS 1.1 Scope of IFDDC’S Authority IFDDC shall administer permits and enforcement of IFDDC parking program on CITY streets and public rights-of-way within the area in and around downtown Idaho Falls and as identified on the map incorporated into this MOU as Exhibit “A,” including both sides MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26 Page 2 of 9 of the streets that form the borders of the area illustrated in Exhibit “A.” Upon mutual written agreement, CITY and IFDDC may amend Exhibit “A.” 1.2 IFDDC’s Parking Regulations IFDDC shall apply all relevant state and local on-street and off-street parking regulations on City streets and public rights-of-way within the downtown area, as identified on the map appropriated as Exhibit “A” through the term of this MOU. Such parking regulations include those contained in Idaho Code Title 49 and Idaho Falls City Code, especially those regulations within Idaho Falls City Code Title 9. 1.3 CITY’s Jurisdiction IFDDC acknowledges that this MOU is not intended to be construed in any way to void, limit, or restrict CITY’s jurisdiction, control, or authority over dedicated CITY streets or public rights-of-way. Neither shall this MOU be construed as granted IFDDC an exclusive right to apply or enforce on-street and off-street parking regulations in the downtown area. 1.4 Collections and Use of Revenue CITY agrees to pay IFDDC a total of ninety-two thousand two hundred dollars ($92,200) per year during each year of the term of this MOU, for management and enforcement of on-street and off-street parking in the area illustrated in Exhibit “A.” This amount shall be split into in four equal quarterly payments. IFDDC shall submit a quarterly invoice by the following dates each year that this MOU is in effect: October 1, January 1, April 1, and July 1. CITY shall have thirty (30) days from the date the invoice is due or from the receipt of the invoice, whichever is later, to pay each invoice. IFDDC shall collect revenues associated with regulation and enforcement of the IFDDC Parking Program, including collection of administrative fines and penalties related to enforcement as described in this MOU, on dedicated CITY streets, parking lots, and public rights-of-way in the area shown in Exhibit “A.” IFDDC agrees that revenues generated from parking enforcement, encompassed by this MOU, shall be specifically accounted for and used exclusively on public transportation or maintenance and improvement of CITY streets, public rights-of- way, public parking facilities, and public property, as directed by CITY. In the event that IFDDC’s costs exceed ninety-two thousand two hundred dollars ($92,200), IFDDC may deduct reasonable costs directly attributable to enforcement or collection of parking revenue from the amount of revenue collected for and on behalf of CITY. Nothing in this MOU precludes IFDDC from retaining monies collected in excess of IFDDC program expenses as reserve funds for future downtown parking enhancements. 1.5 Parking and Traffic Control Signs CITY shall install and maintain traffic and parking control devices on designated CITY streets and public rights-of-way described in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and applicable State and local laws. CITY Director of Public Works shall approve regulatory traffic and parking devices on CITY streets and public MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26 Page 3 of 9 rights-of-way before being posted by IFDDC. IFDDC shall correct any inadequate or improper signage or markings at the direction of CITY’s Director of Public Works. Any additional signage requested by IFDDC related to this MOU shall be approved by CITY Director of Public Works. 1.6 Liability Coverage Provisions CITY is a governmental entity subject to statutory and constitutional restrictions concerning the acceptance of liability, CITY’s liabilities are further governed by the Idaho Tort Claims Act. It is the intention of the Parties that each will be responsible for its own acts and omissions and those of its officers and employees acting within the course and scope of their employment and will not be responsible for the other Party’s risks or liabilities. 1.6.1 Each Party to this MOU shall be responsible for the negligent acts or omissions of its own employees, officers, or agents in the performance of this MOU. Neither Party shall be considered the agent of the other and neither Party assumes any responsibility to the other Party for the consequences of any act or omission of any person, firm, or corporation not a party to this MOU. 1.6.2 Subject to the limits of CITY liability specified in Idaho Code Sections 6-901 through 6-929, known as the Idaho Tort Claims Act, IFDDC shall defend, indemnify and hold CITY and its agents and assigns harmless from and/or against any and all claims, damages, and liabilities (including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs) that may be suffered or incurred and that arise from any action, negligence, or failure to act by IFDDC (including any of IFDDC’s officers, agents, subcontractors, and employees) related to IFDDC’s obligations under the terms of this MOU. IFDDC, upon notice from CITY, shall defend CITY at IFDDC’s expense by counsel reasonably satisfactory to CITY. 1.6.3 City shall promptly notify the IFDDC of any such claim of which it has knowledge and shall cooperate fully with IFDDC or its representatives in the defense of the same, to the extent allowed by Idaho Code and Idaho County Risk Management Program (ICRMP). 1.6.4 IFDDC shall maintain Automobile Insurance, Workmen’s Compensation Insurance coverage, Employer’s Liability, and Comprehensive General Liability Insurance coverage. The Comprehensive General Liability Insurance shall have a minimum limit of liability of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) Combined Single Limits. IFDDC shall provide to CITY, upon request, proof of insurance for any required coverage under this paragraph. 1.7 Reporting Obligations 1.7.1 Claim Reporting. IFDDC shall provide a report to CITY of any liability or negligence claim of which it had knowledge, and shall cooperate fully with CITY or its representatives in the defense of the same. MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26 Page 4 of 9 1.7.2 Activity Reporting. On or before April 1 of each year this MOU is in effect, IFDDC shall provide an annual report to CITY summarizing the following for the period beginning March 1 of the year prior through the end of February of the current year: a. number of parking permits sold for CITY streets and public-rights-of-way; b. revenue from permits sold for CITY streets and public rights-of-way; and c. revenue generated from collection of administrative fines and penalty tickets. 2.0 Grant of Authority IFDDC employees are hereby granted the authority to issue permits and tickets or citations and to enforce CITY parking regulations on all CITY streets and public rights-of-way shown on Exhibit “A” in the manner as outlined in the Idaho Falls City Code. 3.0 General Terms 3.1 Additional Acts Except as otherwise provided herein, the Parties to this MOU shall perform, execute and/or deliver, or cause to be performed, executed and/or delivered, any and all such further acts and assurances as any Party to the MOU may reasonably require to execute the promises in this MOU. 3.2 Notices Any notice under this MOU shall be in writing and be delivered in person or by public or private courier services (including U.S. Postal Service Express Mail), or certified mail with return receipt requested, or by facsimile. All notices shall be addressed to the Parties at the following addresses or at such other addresses as the Parties may from time to time direct in writing: IFDDC: Executive Director 381 Shoup Avenue, Ste. 207 Idaho Falls, ID 83402 CITY: Director of Community Development Services Department P.O. Box 50220 Idaho Falls, ID 83405 (208) 612-8256 3.3 Term The term of this MOU shall commence on October 1, 2026, (the “Effective Date”) nunc pro tunc, and shall end September 30, 2027. This MOU shall automatically renew upon expiration for an additional one (1) year renewal term, unless notification of termination is provided subject to paragraph 3.4, Termination. MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26 Page 5 of 9 3.4 Termination Either Party may terminate this MOU by providing written notice six (6) months in advance of the proposed termination. Monies and resources paid to or collected by IFDDC shall be apportioned pro rata, at the termination of this MOU. IFDDC shall remit CITY a detailed accounting of amounts paid to IFDDC from CITY, IFDDC’s costs directly incurred by IFDDC’s parking management, amounts collected by IFDDC, and any money withheld by IFDDC for its costs or retained as reserve funds for future downtown parking enhancements. 3.5 Open Records and Retention IFDDC agrees that all records created as part of IFDDC’s day-to-day business performance of the MOU shall be treated as public records, as that term is defined in Idaho Code Title 74 Chapter 1. All public records shall be subject to and disclosed pursuant to Title 74, Chapter 1, of the Idaho Code (the Idaho Public Records Act). In addition, IFDDC agrees to retain public records in accordance with Idaho Code § 50-907 and City’s Retention Policy, Resolution No. 2023-12. The records of IFDDC that do not pertain to its day-to- day business performance of this MOU shall not be considered public records under this Paragraph unless otherwise required by law. 3.6 Modification This MOU may be modified or amended by mutual agreement of the Parties. Such amendments shall not be binding unless they are in writing and signed by personnel authorized to bind each of the Parties. 3.7 Headings The headings contained in this MOU are for reference purposes only and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation hereof. 3.8 Entity Authority Each individual executing this MOU on behalf of a Party hereto represents and warrants that he or she is duly authorized to execute and deliver this MOU on behalf of said Party in accordance with duly adopted organizational documents or agreement and, if appropriate, a Resolution of the Party, and that this MOU is binding upon said Party in accordance with its terms. MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26 Page 6 of 9 3.9 Nondiscrimination IFDDC shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideals, sex, age, marital status, physical, or mental handicap, gender identity/expression, sexual orientation, or national origin. In addition, IFDDC shall ensure that it administers the parking regulations and work under this MOU without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideals, sex, age, marital status, physical, or mental handicap, gender identity/expression, sexual orientation, or national origin. 3.10 Anti-Boycott Against Israel Act Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2346, if payments under this Agreement exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and IFDDC employs ten (10) or more persons, IFDDC certifies that it is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of this Agreement engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under its control. The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code section 67-2346 shall have the meaning defined therein. 3.11 Anti-Boycott of Certain Sectors Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2347A, if payments under this Agreement exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and IFDDC employs ten (10) or more persons, IFDDC certifies that it is not currently engaged in and will not for the duration of the Agreement engage in a boycott of any individual or company because the individual or company engages in or supports either (1) the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacture of fossil fuel-based energy, timber, minerals, hydroelectric power, nuclear energy, or agriculture; or (2) the manufacture, distribution, sale, or use of firearms, as defined in Idaho Code § 18-3302(2)(d). The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code § 67-2347A shall have the meaning defined therein. 3.12 Certification of No Chinese Ownership Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2359, IFDDC certifies that IFDDC is not currently owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic of China and will not, for the duration of this Agreement, be owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic China. 3.13 Novation The Parties agree that this MOU is a novation of the Prior MOU. As of the Effective Date of this MOU, the Parties’ remaining obligations under the Prior MOU shall be subsumed by the obligations in this MOU. Any past obligation under the Prior MOU existing before the execution of this MOU shall remain in effect and shall be enforceable under the terms of the Prior MOU. MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26 Page 7 of 9 ATTEST: CITY OF IDAHO FALLS _____________________________ By: ________________________________ Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Lisa M. Burtenshaw, Mayor IFDDC By: ___________________________ MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26 Page 8 of 9 STATE OF IDAHO ) ) SS. County of Bonneville ) On the _______ day of _______________, 2026, before me, the undersigned, a notary public for Idaho, personally appeared Lisa M. Burtenshaw, known to me to be the Mayor of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, the municipal corporation that executed the foregoing document, and acknowledged to me that he is authorized to execute the same for and on behalf of said City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. __________________________________ Notary Public for State of Idaho Residing at Idaho Falls, Idaho (Seal) My Commission Expires: ___________ STATE OF IDAHO ) ) SS. County of Bonneville ) On the ______ day of ____________, 2026, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said State, personally appeared _________________, known or identified to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same on behalf of the Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set me hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. _______________________________ Notary Public for State of Idaho Residing at Idaho Falls, Idaho (Seal) My Commission Expires:_________ Exhibit A a MOU BETWEEN CITY AND IFDDC (DOWNTOWN PARKING) 10.15.26 Page 9 of 9 Memorandum File #: 26-420 City Council DATE: Monday, October 19, 2026 AGENDA: Regular FROM: Margaret Wimborne, Chief of Staff DEPARTMENT: Mayor's Office Title IFDDC Management Services Agreement ☐Ordinance ☐Resolution ☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☐Legislative Public Hearing ☐Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☒Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: Approve the agreement with the Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation (IFDDC) to provide management services for the Business Improvement District (BID) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Description, Background Information, Purpose: The management agreement retains IFDDC to continue providing management services for the BID for the fiscal year 2026/27 (term is from October 1, 2026, through September 30, 2027). Compensation shall not exceed the BID revenue, which is estimated to be $119,063.94. The amount will be paid in two equal installments based on the actual tax revenues collected. It is IFDDC’s responsibility for recordkeeping, district administration, managing revenue projects, and holding public meetings. This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/20/2026 Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ RETURN TO AGENDA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26 1 MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT THIS MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (“AGREEMENT”), entered into on this ______ day of _________, 2026, by and between the CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, State of Idaho, a municipal corporation, (“CITY”) P. O. Box 50220, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83405, and the IDAHO FALLS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, an Idaho non-profit corporation, 381 Shoup Avenue Ste. 207, Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83402, (“IFDDC” and, collectively with CITY, the “PARTIES”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the CITY, pursuant to Ordinance No. 3125 (the “Ordinance”), as authorized by Idaho Code Section 50-2601, et seq., did establish a Business Improvement District, hereinafter referred to as the “DISTRICT,” and WHEREAS, IFDDC was organized and established for the purpose of revitalizing the Idaho Falls Downtown area and operates primarily within the boundaries of the DISTRICT as established by the Ordinance, and WHEREAS, IFDDC is willing to and is capable of providing certain administration and management services to the CITY regarding operation of the DISTRICT; and WHEREAS, on February 12, 2026, CITY and IFDDC entered into a Management Agreement (the “Prior Agreement”); and WHEREAS, on September 24, 2026, CITY and IFDDC agreed to extend the Prior Agreement by entering into the Extension to Management Agreement; and WHEREAS, CITY and IFDDC desires to novate the Prior Agreement and Extension to Management Agreement by entering into this Agreement and making this Agreement effective MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26 2 October 1, 2026, nunc pro tunc. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration set forth herein, the PARTIES agree as follows: 1. Pursuant to Idaho Code Section 50-2611, the CITY hereby retains IFDDC to provide certain management services as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, regarding the management and operation of the DISTRICT. IFDDC warrants it has adopted By-Laws necessary to fulfill the terms of this AGREEMENT and further covenants such administration complies with all applicable provisions of state and local law including, but not limited to, Chapter 26, Title 50, of the Idaho Code. 2. The principal office of IFDDC and registered agent thereof is presently located at 381 Shoup Avenue, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402, and all notices required by this AGREEMENT to be sent to IFDDC shall be mailed to such office or such other address designated in writing by IFDDC to the CITY. 3. On or before May 1, 2027, IFDDC shall provide to the CITY a projection of anticipated revenues and recommended expenditures of the DISTRICT for the 2027/2028 fiscal year of the CITY. IFDDC shall also establish and identify goals, objectives, projects and marketing and advertising campaigns for which Business Improvement District (“BID”) revenues are to be utilized and shall simultaneously submit such information to the CITY. The Idaho Falls City Council shall thereafter review such reports and recommendations and provide any comments or exceptions to IFDDC. 4. On or before June 1, 2027, IFDDC shall hold a public meeting for the purpose of allowing public comments and input regarding proposed projects, goals, objectives and MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26 3 expenditures of the DISTRICT for the 2027/2028 fiscal year. Such meeting shall be open to all persons against whom assessments are levied under the Ordinance and all persons who own or operate businesses within the DISTRICT. IFDDC shall mail a written notice of the meeting stating the date, time, place and purpose of the meeting to all such businesses not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the date of the meeting. 5. Upon receipt by the CITY of any appeal of any BID member of his or her assessment, the CITY may forward the same to IFDDC. Upon receipt of such appeal, IFDDC shall forthwith review the appeal and make recommendations to the Idaho Falls City Council regarding an appropriate disposition of the appeal. 6. IFDDC shall keep correct and complete books and records of accounts, shall keep minutes of the regular and special meetings of the Board of Directors of IFDDC and shall keep at the principal office a record of the names and addresses of all BID members. All books and records of IFDDC may be inspected by the CITY or its agents for any proper purpose at any time during normal business hours. 7. In consideration of the management services provided to the CITY by IFDDC, the CITY agrees to pay IFDDC an amount that shall not exceed a total of One Hundred Nineteen Thousand Sixty-Three Dollars and Ninety-Four Cents ($119,063.94) for the initial term of this Agreement and, if renewed, an amount that shall not exceed the total revenue from the assessed values of the BID for the then-current year according to the following: a. CITY will make two payments to IFDDC, with the first payment comprising assessment amounts collected by CITY through the end of January and the second MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26 4 payment comprising assessment amounts collected by CITY through the end of July. CITY will notify IFDDC by February 15, 2027, and August 15, 2027, of the assessment amounts collected through January and July, respectively, and to be billed by IFDDC for management services provided. IFDDC will invoice CITY for these amounts on or before February 28, 2027, for the first payment and on or before August 30, 2027, for the second payment. CITY shall pay each invoice within thirty (30) days of the date of the invoice or from the receipt of the invoice, whichever is later. b. By November 30, 2027, the CITY will reconcile the BID assessments collected, and if any collected assessment revenue remains in the BID fund, IFDDC may invoice the CITY a third time for the remaining balance of the funds, up to the total assessed value for the year for which the BID funds were collected. CITY shall pay this invoice within thirty (30) days of the date of the invoice or from the receipt of the invoice, whichever is later. c. IFDDC shall submit all invoices via email to the CITY’s Accounts Payable Office. In the event a court of competent jurisdiction holds the Ordinance to be invalid or unenforceable in any respect, then the CITY and IFDDC shall be released from any and all monetary obligations under this AGREEMENT that accrue after the date of any such ruling that the Ordinance is invalid or unenforceable and this AGREEMENT shall be deemed null and void. 8. IFDDC shall hire staff as determined by its Board of Directors to coordinate and assist in the administration of the operation of the DISTRICT. 9. The CITY shall be responsible for submitting the annual assessment to Bonneville MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26 5 County which will bill and collect all BID assessments and remit assessment collections to the CITY. 10. The term of this AGREEMENT shall commence on October 1, 2026, (the “Effective Date”) nunc pro tunc, and shall terminate on September 30, 2027. The PARTIES may renew this AGREEMENT by mutual consent provided notification of the desire to renew this contract shall be given not less than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the expiration of the proceeding contract term. For each renewal under this Section, the dates contained in Sections 3, 4, 7.a, 7.b, and 10 shall advance by one year. 11. IFDDC agrees that all records created as part of IFDDC’s day-to-day business performance of the AGREEMENT shall be treated as public records, as that term is defined in Idaho Code Title 74 Chapter 1. All public records shall be subject to and disclosed pursuant to Title 74, Chapter 1, of the Idaho Code (the Idaho Public Records Act). In addition, IFDDC agrees to retain public records in accordance with Idaho Code § 50-907 and City’s Retention Policy, Resolution No. 2023-12. The records of IFDDC that do not pertain to its day-to-day business performance of this AGREEMENT shall not be considered public records under this Paragraph unless otherwise required by law. 12. This AGREEMENT may be modified or amended by mutual agreement of the PARTIES. Such amendments shall not be binding unless they are in writing and signed by personnel authorized to bind each of the PARTIES. 13. Each individual executing this AGREEMENT on behalf of a PARTY hereto represents and warrants that he or she is duly authorized to execute and deliver this AGREEMENT on behalf of said PARTY in accordance with duly adopted organizational documents or agreement and, if MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26 6 appropriate, a Resolution of the PARTY, and that this AGREEMENT is binding upon said PARTY in accordance with its terms. 14. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2346, if payments under this AGREEMENT exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and IFDDC employs ten (10) or more persons, IFDDC certifies that it is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of this AGREEMENT engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under its control. The terms in this paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code section 67-2346 shall have the meaning defined therein. 15. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2347A, if payments under this AGREEMENT exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and IFDDC employs ten (10) or more persons, IFDDC certifies that it is not currently engaged in and will not for the duration of the AGREEMENT engage in a boycott of any individual or company because the individual or company engages in or supports either (1) the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacture of fossil fuel-based energy, timber, minerals, hydroelectric power, nuclear energy, or agriculture; or (2) the manufacture, distribution, sale, or use of firearms, as defined in Idaho Code § 18- 3302(2)(d). The terms in this paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code § 67-2347A shall have the meaning defined therein. 16. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2359, IFDDC certifies that IFDDC is not currently owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic of China and will not, for the duration of this AGREEMENT, be owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic China. 17. Whenever used in this AGREEMENT and when required by the context, the singular number shall include the plural, gender shall include the masculine, feminine and/or neuter MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26 7 genders, as may be applicable, and persons shall include corporations, trusts, partnerships or other lawful associations of any kind. 18. This AGREEMENT shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho. 19. IFDDC agrees that it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideals, sex, age, marital status, physical, or mental handicap, gender identity/expression, sexual orientation, or national origin. 20. The Parties agree that this Agreement is a novation of the Prior Agreement and Extension to Management Agreement. As of the Effective Date of this Agreement, the Parties’ remaining obligations under the Prior Agreement and Extension to Management Agreement shall be subsumed by the obligations in this Agreement. Any past obligation under the Prior Agreement or Extension to Management Agreement existing before the execution of this Agreement shall remain in effect and shall be enforceable under the terms of the Prior Agreement or Extension to Management Agreement. ATTEST: CITY OF IDAHO FALLS _____________________________ By: ________________________________ Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Lisa M. Burtenshaw, Mayor IFDDC By: _________________________ Kerry Hammon, Executive Director MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26 8 STATE OF IDAHO ) ) SS. County of Bonneville ) On the _______ day of _______________, 2026, before me, the undersigned, a notary public for Idaho, personally appeared Lisa M. Burtenshaw, known to me to be the Mayor of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, the municipal corporation that executed the foregoing document, and acknowledged to me that he is authorized to execute the same for and on behalf of said City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. __________________________________ Notary Public for State of Idaho Residing at Idaho Falls, Idaho (Seal) My Commission Expires: ___________ STATE OF IDAHO ) ) SS. County of Bonneville ) On the ______ day of ____________, 2026, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said State, personally appeared _________________, known or identified to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same on behalf of the Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set me hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. _______________________________ Notary Public for State of Idaho Residing at Idaho Falls, Idaho (Seal) My Commission Expires:_________ MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26 9 EXHIBIT A Business Improvement District Management Agreement City of Idaho Falls & Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation Updated: October 19, 2026 The goals, projects and programs described are IFDDC’s plans for the term and are subject to available funding, board approval and third party cooperation, and are not performance guarantees. Section 1: Mission Statement The Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation (IFDDC) advances historical downtown Idaho Falls as the premier regional center for commerce, culture, and leisure activities for both residents and visitors. Section 2: Organizational Overview IFDDC is a registered non-profit 501(c)(6) organization governed by a volunteer Board of Directors dedicated to achieving the organization's mission and strategic goals.  Public Meetings: General board meetings are open to the public and held on the second Tuesday of every month at 9:00 a.m. at the Colonial Theater (A Street).  Executive Committee: Composed of the Board President, Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer, the Executive Committee directly oversees IFDDC budgeting, staffing, grant administration, and daily operations. Section 3: Core Objectives 1. Promotion: Enhance the commercial Downtown District’s image by organizing, executing, and marketing district events and initiatives across local and regional media platforms. 2. Economic Development: Build and maintain an economic ecosystem that attracts new businesses, supports existing local merchants, secures investment, and generates foot traffic to ensure a vibrant urban core. 3. Organization & Governance: Maintain strong administrative infrastructure through strategic fundraising, volunteer recruitment, staff support, financial accounting, and program oversight. 4. Design & Preservation: Partner with the City of Idaho Falls to guide downtown architectural elements, develop incentives for building rehabilitation, and plan public infrastructure improvements. MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26 10 Section 4: 2027 Goals & Key Priorities  BID Renewal: Educate and inform stakeholders regarding the renewal of the 2027 Business Improvement District (BID), including timeline, legal processes, options, and historical data.  Strategic Alignment: Align IFDDC goals with those of the City of Idaho Falls, the Board of Directors, and downtown property and business owners.  Stakeholder Engagement: Survey district stakeholders to identify key areas for improvement, establish community priorities, and evaluate event outcomes based on direct merchant feedback.  Operational Efficiency: Streamline administrative processes, review and update all annual vendor/city agreements, and increase staff productivity.  Records Management: Modernize organizational archives by digitizing historical paper records and securing them with off-site cloud storage.  Downtown Beautification: Right-size seasonal beautification efforts to maintain fiscal responsibility amidst rising labor and material costs, actively pursuing corporate sponsorships to offset expenses.  Infrastructure & Parking Management: o Increase efficiency in parking citation and permit collections. o Upgrade parking software and hardware as budget allocations allow. o Research capital funding options for streetscape enhancements, including upgraded decorative lighting and intersection pavers.  Branding & Marketing: Explore a full downtown rebranding campaign in celebration of IFDDC’s 30th anniversary, contingent on funding. Section 5: Major Capital & Community Projects  Expand public art installations through dedicated grant applications.  Upgrade district lighting infrastructure in coordination with Idaho Falls Power.  Install additional directional signage for downtown public parking lots.  Explore revitalization options for Civitan Plaza via crowdsourced funding and capital campaign initiatives. Section 6: Marketing & Advertising Campaigns IFDDC promotes both organizational programs and individual member businesses within the Downtown Business Improvement District to boost community engagement and drive local foot traffic. MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26 11  Online Gift Certificate Program: Transitioned the Downtown Gift Certificate program to a fully digital platform accessible directly via the IFDDC website.  Marketing Advisory Group: Formed a volunteer advisory team to enhance staff marketing reach, expand video marketing, and execute targeted social media campaigns aimed at younger demographics. o Active Campaign: Holiday Gift Guide Campaign (Nov–Dec 2026). o Ongoing Campaign: "Everyday Downtown" video series featuring local residents experiencing downtown district amenities.  Holiday Showcase Program: An interactive holiday merchant initiative encouraging decorated storefronts and building history displays, featuring a public voting component (Nov–Dec 2026).  Event Consolidation & Optimization: Re-engineered traditional community events based on 2026 merchant feedback to maximize family-friendly engagement, increase inclusivity, and streamline staff operational demands.  Strategic Partnerships & Grants: o Secured a $5,000 marketing grant from the Yellowstone Teton Territory. o Maintained primary media partnership with Sandhill Media for regional radio promotion. o Renewed movie trailer advertising trade agreement with Centre Twin Theatre, including monthly date-night promotional packages. Section 7: Proposed 2027 Event & Program Schedule Note: All proposed events and programs are subject to final Board approval following the analysis of incoming merchant survey data. IFDDC will submit its finalized 2027 schedule to the City of Idaho Falls by January 2027. Additional pop-up initiatives may be added as funding permits. Community Events Event Proposed Date & Time Location Paddy’s Day on Park March 13 | 3:00 PM – 7:00 PM Park Avenue Gold in the District (Easter Egg Hunt) March 27 | 12:00 PM – 3:00 PM Civitan Plaza Back to School Downtown Disco August 21 | 7:00 PM – 10:00 PM Broadway Plaza Downtown District September 25 | 5:00 PM – 9:00 PM Park Avenue MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 10.19.26 12 Event Proposed Date & Time Location Oktoberfest Crawl-O-Ween October 24 | 7:00 PM TBD Tree Lighting & Holiday Market November 20 | 4:00 PM – 8:00 PM (Lighting at 6:00 PM) Broadway Plaza & Memorial Drive District Programs & Recurring Initiatives  Public Art Initiatives: Pet Murals, Traffic Cabinet Art, Downtown Unplugged, and general mural projects.  Seasonal Beautification: Year-round landscaping and streetscape maintenance (Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter).  Benefit Your Body on Broadway: Saturdays, June 6 – Sept 5 | 8:30 AM – 9:30 AM (Broadway Plaza).  Footloose Falls (Dance Instruction & Social): 1st Saturday of the month, April – October | 7:00 PM – Midnight (Broadway Plaza).  Decorate Downtown: November 12 – November 20.  The Downtown District Holiday Showcase: November 21 – December 20 (District- wide).  Horse-Drawn Trolley Rides: o Saturday, Nov 20 | 3:00 PM – 5:00 PM o Saturdays, Nov 27, Dec 4, Dec 11, & Dec 25 | 1:00 PM – 3:00 PM (Civitan Plaza)  Shop Small Saturday: Saturday, November 27. Memorandum File #: 26-408 City Council DATE: Tuesday, October 13, 2026 AGENDA: Regular FROM: Wade Sanner, Director DEPARTMENT: Community Development Services Title Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, Arbor Estates Division No. 1. ☐Ordinance ☐Resolution ☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☐Legislative Public Hearing ☐Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☒Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: 1. Approve the Development Agreement for the Final Plat for Arbor Estates Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement (or take other action deemed appropriate). 2. Approve the Final Plat for Arbor Estates Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor, City Engineer, and City Clerk to sign said Final Plat (or take other action deemed appropriate). 3. Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Final Plat for Arbor Estates Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Description, Background Information, Purpose: Attached is the application for the Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for Arbor Estates Division No. 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its June 2, 2026, meeting and unanimously voted to recommend approval of the final plat to the Mayor and City Council as presented. This Final Plat was reviewed by CDS Planning staff as well as staff from Fire, Idaho Falls Power, and the Public Works Water, Wastewater, and Engineering/Survey Divisions. This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal and Municipal Services Departments. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/20/2026 Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ RETURN TO AGENDA CURVE TABLE CURVE C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 LENGTH 52.86' 52.86' 55.65' 92.74' 58.14' 15.55' 32.02' 25.63' 5.06' 98.46' 31.48' 25.63' 25.63' 22.75' 72.17' 41.08' 25.63' 25.10' 74.14' 49.15' RADIUS 300.00' 300.00' 300.00' 500.00' 330.00' 270.00' 270.00' 45.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 45.00' 45.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 45.00' 535.00' 535.00' 265.00' DELTA 10°05'41" 10°05'41" 10°37'40" 10°37'40" 10°05'41" 3°18'01" 6°47'40" 32°38'14" 5°48'02" 112°49'34" 36°04'35" 32°38'13" 32°38'13" 26°03'59" 82°42'23" 47°04'19" 32°38'13" 2°41'17" 7°56'23" 10°37'40" CHORD BEARING N05°19'38"E N05°19'38"E S05°35'38"W S05°35'38"W S05°19'38"W S08°43'28"W S03°40'38"W S16°02'19"E S29°27'25"E S29°51'23"W N75°41'32"W N73°58'21"W S73°23'27"W S70°06'20"W N55°30'29"W N09°22'52"E N16°35'54"E N01°37'26"E N06°56'16"E N05°35'38"E CHORD LENGTH 52.79' 52.79' 55.57' 92.61' 58.07' 15.55' 32.00' 25.29' 5.06' 83.30' 30.97' 25.29' 25.29' 22.55' 66.07' 39.93' 25.29' 25.10' 74.08' 49.08' LINE TABLE SEGMENT L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 L19 L20 BEARING S45°17'07"W S44°42'52"E N45°17'07"E S44°42'52"E N45°17'27"E S89°42'33"E N44°42'33"W S45°17'27"W N44°42'33"W S45°17'08"W S44°42'52"E S00°16'48"W S44°59'41"W N45°00'19"W N45°17'08"E S06°17'03"W S06°17'03"W N44°42'52"W N44°59'40"W S45°00'20"W LENGTH 28.28' 28.28' 28.28' 28.28' 28.28' 20.00' 28.28' 28.28' 28.28' 28.29' 28.28' 23.75' 28.14' 28.42' 28.29' 75.41' 31.88' 28.28' 28.43' 28.14' CURVE TABLE CURVE C21 C22 C23 C24 C25 C26 C27 LENGTH 49.30' 12.84' 62.82' 23.43' 54.15' 3.99' 47.57' RADIUS 335.00' 335.00' 465.00' 465.00' 330.00' 330.00' 270.00' DELTA 8°25'54" 2°11'46" 7°44'26" 2°53'13" 9°24'09" 0°41'32" 10°05'41" CHORD BEARING N04°29'45"E N09°48'35"E N07°02'14"E N01°43'25"E S04°58'52"W S10°01'43"W S05°19'38"W CHORD LENGTH 49.25' 12.84' 62.77' 23.43' 54.09' 3.99' 47.51' HALLMARK ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 S89°42'33"E 177.11' N00°16'48"E 3.31' S89°42'33"E 439.65' N00°15'05"E 2055.72' N89°42'33"W 165.00' S00°17'27"W 525.04' N89°42'33"W 692.00' S01°12'41"E 242.54' N59°27'19"W 4.07' S00°16'59"E 139.51' S89°43'12"E 465.45' N00°16'48"E 455.10' 4 21329 SF 0.490 AC. 8 9005 SF 0.207 AC. 5 20527 SF 0.471 AC. 6 10538 SF 0.242 AC. 7 9002 SF 0.207 AC. 12 10070 SF 0.231 AC. 9 9008 SF 0.207 AC. 10 9015 SF 0.207 AC. 11 9230 SF 0.212 AC. 13 11856 SF 0.272 AC. 6 11722 SF 0.269 AC. 2 12195 SF 0.280 AC. 3 15740 SF 0.361 AC. 4 11692 SF 0.268 AC. 5 11648 SF 0.267 AC. 11 13479 SF 0.309 AC. 7 11126 SF 0.255 AC. 8 10932 SF 0.251 AC. 9 10934 SF 0.251 AC. 10 18673 SF 0.429 AC. 13 17168 SF 0.394 AC. 12 13479 SF 0.309 AC. 4 9541 SF 0.219 AC. 1 11988 SF 0.275 AC. 12 9560 SF 0.219 AC. 14 11852 SF 0.272 AC. 13 10279 SF 0.236 AC. 8 10615 SF 0.244 AC. 9 8855 SF 0.203 AC. 10 8855 SF 0.203 AC. 2 10200 SF 0.234 AC. 11 9151 SF 0.210 AC. 3 9053 SF 0.208 AC. 7 10565 SF 0.243 AC. 6 8872 SF 0.204 AC. 5 9504 SF 0.218 AC. 3 13016 SF 0.299 AC. 2 13016 SF 0.299 AC. 4 14318 SF 0.329 AC. 1 288069 SF 6.613 AC. 1 12551 SF 0.288 AC. N00°16'48"E 165.59' N00°16'48"E 375.33' N89°42'33"W 478.49' N89°42'33"W 368.50' N89°42'33"W 300.57' S00°16'48"W 152.52' N89°42'33"W 169.02' S00°16'48"W 126.69' N00°16'48"E 130.00' S00°17'27"W 186.02' S00°16'48"W 349.12' C3 C4 C1 C2 95.34' 75.00' 75.17' 59.91' N33°53'07"E 182.80' N83°09'11"E 107.37' S89°43'12"E 120.01' S89°43'10"E 120.05' S89°43'12"E 120.08' S89°43'12"E 120.12' S89°43'12"E 120.75' S89°05'25"E 129.38' S89°43'12"E 133.96' 114.00' L18 69.98' 27.55' C20 C18 49.91' 75.00' 75.00' 75.00' 22.98' C17 C16 C15 C14 C13 18.92' L19 147.59' 119.04' L1 71.69' 71.70' L2 100.28' S00°17'07"W 91.69' 100.29' L3 71.69' 120.28' 120.28' S00°16'48"W 91.61' 75.00' S89°43'12"E 118.07' S89°43'12"E 117.50' S89°43'12"E 118.07' S89°43'12"E 121.12' 75.00' S89°43'12"E 118.07' L16 S89°43'12"E 130.63' S89°43'12"E 123.33' S89°43'12"E 125.95' S89°43'12"E 124.43' S89°43'12"E 120.00' S89°43'12"E 120.00' S89°43'12"E 120.00' S00°16'48"W 101.00' 85.00' 43.29' L17 100.20' L13 80.00' 31.09' C25 C27 99.81' L14 81.99' 85.00' 75.00' 51.58' C24 C23 C22 C21 25.88' 71.63' L15 97.50' 98.07' L11 71.59' 75.00' 75.00' 75.00' L12 117.11' S00°16'48"W 95.00' 75.01' L4 97.12' 629.88' L5 N00°17'27"E 155.30' 180.37' L7 N00°17'27"E 131.02' N00°17'27"E 151.02' 86.19' L6 N00°17'27"E 151.02' N00°17'27"E 151.02' 86.19' 86.19' 76.13' L8 131.02' 96.13' 86.19' 131.02' L9 95.00' 115.00' N00°17'27"E 151.02' 89.25' N00°17'27"E 151.02' N00°17'27"E 151.02' 89.25' 104.98' L10 89.25' 89.25' N89°42'33"W 124.95' 131.02' N89°42'33"W 124.94' 87.51' 87.51' N89°42'33"W 124.92' 87.51' 87.51' 87.51' 14.28' C5 C6 C7 55.56' N89°42'33"W 134.18' N89°42'33"W 124.54' 58.85' C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 68.62' L20 93.72' S89°42'33"E 143.47' 85.00' 85.00' S89°42'33"E N89°42'33"W 132.30' 165.00' 87.51' 87.51' 87.51' 85.00' N02°10'47"W 15.06' 90.00' 75.00' 75.00' 75.00' 75.00' 75.00' 75.00' 100.00' 176.07' S89°42'33"E 185.60' BLOCK 5 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 6 BLOCK 5 BLOCK 7 BLOCK 8 HALLMARK ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 HALLMARK ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 UNPLATTED UNPLATTED UNPLATTED BLOCK 5 BLOCK 8 BLOCK 9 BLOCK 10 VIEW AVE COUNTRYSIDE LANE SEACOVE DRIVE EDMUND DRIVE VILLA MIRAGE COURT PRESSLEY DRIVE C19 436.26' S00°17'27"W 2619.02' BASIS OF BEARING 2004 CITY OF IDAHO FALLS CONTROL 1 2820 SF 0.065 AC. 2 10829 SF 0.249 AC. 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' HOLMES AVENUE 35.00' 35.00' 30.00' 30.00' 35' N00°18'06"E 363.16' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 15' 12' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) 12' 12' N88°41'49"E 230.39' 30.00' 30.00' 45.00' LOT 5 BLOCK 3 LOT 4 BLOCK 3 LOT 3 BLOCK 3 LOT 2 LOCK 3 LOT 1 BLOCK 3 LOT 4 BLOCK 2 1 10830 SF 0.249 AC. 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' 30' 30' 211.69' 186.02' N89°42'33"E 305.01' 125.72' 174.29' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION 30.00' 30.00' 2 10926 SF 0.251 AC. DETAIL 1 DETAIL 2 12' 15' 15' 20' 20' 50' 12' 91.69' 139.08' 12' W E S N 0 100' 100' 50' SCALE: 1" = 100' SURVEYED BY: DRAWN BY: PROJECT NO. APPROVED BY: AGLE ROCK NGINEERING CIVIL PLANNING SURVEYING IDAHO FALLS (208) 542-2665 E REXBURG (208) 359-2665 OFFICES AT: 1331 Fremont Ave. Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402 343 E 4th N, Suite 119 Rexburg, Idaho 83440 SHEET 1 OF 3 ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION No. 1 BEGINNING AT A POINT THAT IS S.00°17'27”W. ALONG THE SECTION LINE 436.26 FEET FROM THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN; RUNNING THENCE S.00°17'27”W. ALONG SAID SECTION LINE 397.71 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST BOUNDARY CORNER OF HALLMARK ESTATES, DIVISION NO. 1, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID HALLMARK ESTATES, DIVISION NO. 1 THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES: (1) THENCE N.89°42'33”W. 692.00 FEET; (2) THENCE S.00°17'27”W. 525.04 FEET; (3) THENCE N.89°42'33”W. 165.00 FEET; (4) THENCE S.00°17'27”W. 270.00 FEET; (5) THENCE N.89°42'33”W. 28.00 FEET; (6) THENCE S.00°17'27”W. 330.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST BOUNDARY CORNER OF SAID HALLMARK ESTATES, DIVISION NO. 1; THENCE S.00°15'11”W. 620.79 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 65TH SOUTH; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID 65TH SOUTH THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: (1) THENCE N.89°19'34”W. 425.78 FEET; (2) THENCE N.89°55'38”W. 4.89 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE N.00°15'05”E. ALONG SAID WEST LINE 2055.72 FEET; THENCE S.89°42'33”E. 439.65 FEET; THENCE N.00°16'48”E. 3.31 FEET; THENCE S.89°42'33”E. 177.11 FEET; THENCE N.00°16'48”E. 455.10 FEET; THENCE S.89°43'12”E. 465.45 FEET; THENCE S.00°16'59”E. 139.51 FEET; THENCE N.59°27'19”W. 4.07 FEET; THENCE S.01°12'41”E. 242.54 FEET; THENCE N.88°41'49”E. 230.39 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 34.568 ACRES BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION H. REESE M. PATZER K. ROLAND 26041 DATE: September 24, 2026 CAD NAME: X_26041 FINAL PLAT.DWG ROADWAY CENTERLINE SECTION LINE LOT LINE PLAT BOUNDARY EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT AS NOTED P.L.S.S. CORNER AS NOTED 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.) UNLESS OTHERWISE DIMENSIONED FOUND 1/2" X 24" IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED P.L.S. 10944 OR AS NOTED FOUND 5/8" x 30" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED P.L.S. 827 OR AS NOTED PLACED 1/2" X 24" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369 PLACED 5/8" x 30" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369 LEGEND PLACED 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH ALUMINUM CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369 POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.B. FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD AS NOTED, REPLACED WITH 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369 OR AS NOTED O H A D I F O E T A T R E G I S T E S R P R O F E S S I O N L A 9369 D E L A N D U S R O Y E V R K U R T J. R O L A N D I S PRELIMINARY EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN CPF NO. 1808113 FOUND IRON ROD SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN CPF No. 1808114 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 2 NOTES CALCULATED POINT 5.00' 3.31' NO CAP BENT NO CAP BROKEN PLASTIC CAP PLS 10944 BENT NO CAP NO CAP BROKEN PLASTIC CAP PLS 10944 1. A 15 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT IS HEREBY RESERVED WITHIN EACH LOT ALONG ALL ROAD FRONTAGES AS SHOWN. 2. AREA OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION = 8.286 ACRES. (34.568 ACRES [TOTAL PLAT ACREAGE] - 26.282 ACRES [SUM OF ALL LOT ACRES IN DIVISION] = 8.286 ACRES) 3. LOT 1 BLOCK 1, LOT 1 BLOCK 2, AND LOT 1 BLOCK 7 ARE GRANTED AS BLANKET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS IN THEIR ENTIRETY PURSUANT TO THE EXECUTION OF THIS INSTRUMENT. 4. LOT 2, BLOCK 2 IS A NON-BUILDABLE LOT WITH A GRANTED BLANKET PUBLIC UTILITY AND PUBLIC STORM WATER EASEMENT PURSUANT TO THE EXECUTION OF THIS INSTRUMENT. 5. LOT 1 BLOCK 8 IS DESIGNATED FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION USE. P.O.B. UTILITY EASEMENT PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 956426 20.16' 29.86' A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO A PARCEL OF LAND INCLUDING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF LOT 1 BLOCK 1 OF CORNERSTONE ASSEMBLY OF GOD DIVISION NO. 1 PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 1266974 BEING SITUATED IN THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN REMAINDER OF LOT 1 BLOCK1 CORNERSTONE ASSEMBLY OF GOD DIVISION NO. 1 5.00' SEACOVE DRIVE EDMUND DRIVE DETAIL 1 C26 DETAIL 2 50.00' 169.29' N59°27'19"W 4.07' RADIUS POINT 50' KNUCKLE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE 50.00' CORNER PERPETUATION AND FILING RECORD CPF SQUARE FEET SF ACRES AC I, KURTIS J. ROLAND, A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF IDAHO DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THIS SUBDIVISION DESIGNATED AS ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 WAS MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION, AND THAT SAID SUBDIVISION IS TRULY AND CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND STAKED AS PROVIDED BY LAW AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT AS DESCRIBED HEREON. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE HALLMARK ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 N89°19'34"W 425.78' S00°15'11"W 620.79' S00°17'27"W 330.00' N89°42'33"W 28.00' S00°17'27"W 270.00' 3 9276 SF 0.213 AC. 5 10799 SF 0.248 AC. 4 9271 SF 0.213 AC. 1 1554 SF 0.036 AC. 2 9848 SF 0.226 AC. 2 94085 SF 2.160 AC. 3 9711 SF 0.223 AC. 4 8400 SF 0.193 AC. 5 8400 SF 0.193 AC. 6 8400 SF 0.193 AC. 7 8400 SF 0.193 AC. 8 8400 SF 0.193 AC. 9 8400 SF 0.193 AC. 10 8520 SF 0.196 AC. 11 8520 SF 0.196 AC. 12 8520 SF 0.196 AC. 14 9009 SF 0.207 AC. 13 11245 SF 0.258 AC. 15 9011 SF 0.207 AC. 3 9591 SF 0.220 AC. 1 11678 SF 0.268 AC. 2 9595 SF 0.220 AC. 5 11661 SF 0.268 AC. 4 9590 SF 0.220 AC. 4 21329 SF 0.490 AC. 2 9750 SF 0.224 AC. 3 12193 SF 0.280 AC. 1 9766 SF 0.224 AC. 20527 SF 0.471 AC. 1 14149 SF 0.325 AC. 2 12195 SF 0.280 AC. 0.361 AC. S89°41'54"E 150.75' S89°42'33"E 150.51' S89°42'33"E 280.37' 95.34' S00°17'27"W 130.00' 110.00' 75.00' S00°17'27"W 130.00' 75.17' S89°42'33"E 59.91' N33°53'0 182.80' 147.59 L22 75.32' 75.00' 75.08' 93 S89°42'33"E 143.47' 85 85.00' S89°42'33"E 143.48' 80.00' 123.50' 85.00' 100.00' 75.07' 75.00' 75.27' L23 100.14' 95.25' 75.00' 74.99' S00°17'27"W 120.12' S00°17'27"W 120.13' S89°41'54"E 120.00' 71.00' 71.00' S89°41'54"E 120.00' S89°41'54"E 120.00' 71.00' 71.00' 71.00' 71.00' S89°41'54"E 120.00' S89°41'54"E 120.00' 70.00' 70.00' S89°41'54"E 120.00' 70.00' 70.00' 70.00' 70.00' S89°41'54"E 120.00' S89°41'54"E 120.00' 70.00' 70.00' 70.00' 70.00' S89°41'54"E 120.00' 70.00' 70.00' S89°41'54"E 120.00' 76.05' 81.00' L31 L32 L33 N89°40'03"W 114.99' N89°40'03"W 124.60' 733.93' L30 N89°40'03"W 111.07' 79.99' N89°40'03"W 115.99' 84.98' L29 L28 80.00' 80.00' S89°40'03"E 115.92' 80.00' 80.00' 95.00' 74.94' S89°40'03"E 115.85' 95.77' L27 95.72' 102.68' N89°41'54"W 115.63' 82.68' L25 81.68' 83.00' N89°41'54"W 115.57' 83.00' 83.00' N89°41'54"W 115.55' 83.00' N89°41'54"W 115.53' 83.00' 102.68' 82.66' 95.52' L24 L21 176 130.00' 120.10' N00°15'05"E 2055.72' S89°42'33"E 185.60' UNPLATTED 65th SOUTH BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 5 BLOCK 3 HALLMARK ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 UNPLATTED RIDDLE WAY PRESSLEY DRIVE HALLMARK DRIVE PRESS 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' L26 S00°15'05"W 41.08' 15.00' 18.92' 15.00' 21.44' 30.00' 30.00' 30.00' 30.00' 30.00' 30.00' 35' N00°18'06"E 514.34' N00°18'06"E 363.16' N00°18' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 15' S00°18'06"W 714.00' S89°41'54"E 245.24' LOT 2 BLOCK 3 LOT 1 BLOCK 3 LOT 5 BLOCK 1 LOT 4 BLOCK 1 L34 L35 N89°40'03"W 2630.44' R/W R/W R/W 1315.22' 1315.22' 1 3481 SF 0.080 AC. 35' 60' N00°18'06"E 405.44' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BLOCK 4 LINE TABLE SEGMENT L21 L22 L23 L24 L25 L26 L27 L28 L29 L30 L31 L32 L33 L34 L35 BEARING S44°42'14"E N45°17'46"E N44°42'14"W S45°17'46"W S44°41'54"E N00°18'06"E S45°18'06"W S44°40'58"E S44°40'58"E S89°40'03"E N45°19'02"E N45°19'02"E S89°40'03"E N89°19'34"W N89°19'34"W LENGTH 28.29' 28.28' 28.29' 28.28' 28.28' 20.00' 28.28' 7.06' 21.22' 96.08' 7.08' 21.21' 224.57' 274.69' 151.09' S00°17'27"W 2619.02' HOLMES AVENUE R/W R/W R/W S89°19'34"E 1285.45' S89°19'34"E 1285.30' R/W R/W R/W C30 C28 C29 R/W R/W R/W R/W W R/W R/W R/W R/W CURVE TABLE CURVE C28 C29 C30 C31 C32 C33 LENGTH 420.01' 420.40' 420.78' 340.47' 339.23' 337.98' RADIUS 34347.74' 34377.74' 34407.74' 34407.74' 34377.74' 34347.47' DELTA 0°42'02" 0°42'02" 0°42'02" 0°34'01" 0°33'55" 0°33'50" CHORD BEARING S89°23'07"E S89°23'07"E S89°23'07"E S88°26'48"E S88°23'40"E S88°20'30"E CHORD LENGTH 420.01' 420.39' 420.78' 340.47' 339.22' 337.98' W E S N 0 100' 100' 50' SCALE: 1" = 100' SURVEYED BY: DRAWN BY: PROJECT NO. APPROVED BY: AGLE ROCK NGINEERING CIVIL PLANNING SURVEYING IDAHO FALLS (208) 542-2665 E REXBURG (208) 359-2665 OFFICES AT: 1331 Fremont Ave. Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402 343 E 4th N, Suite 119 Rexburg, Idaho 83440 H. REESE M. PATZER K. ROLAND 26041 DATE: September 24, 2026 CAD NAME: X_26041 FINAL PLAT.DWG ROADWAY CENTERLINE SECTION LINE LOT LINE PLAT BOUNDARY EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT AS NOTED 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.) UNLESS OTHERWISE DIMENSIONED LEGEND POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.B. O H A D I F O E T A T R E G I S T E S R P R O F E S S I O N L A 9369 D E L A N D U S R O Y E V R K U R T J. R O L A N D I S PRELIMINARY FOUND IRON ROD SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN CPF NO. 1808114 EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN CPF NO. 1808113 SHEET 2 OF 3 ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION 1 A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO A PARCEL OF LAND INCLUDING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF LOT 1 BLOCK 1 OF CORNERSTONE ASSEMBLY OF GOD DIVISION NO. 1 PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 1266974 BEING SITUATED IN THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 1 15.25' 1.32' PLASTIC CAP ILLEGIBLE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN CPF NO. 1284104 UTILITY EASEMENT PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 956426 UTILITY EASEMENT PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 956426 N89°55'38"W 4.89' W E S N 0 100' 100' 50' SCALE: 1" = 100' P.L.S.S. CORNER AS NOTED FOUND 1/2" X 24" IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED P.L.S. 10944 OR AS NOTED FOUND 5/8" x 30" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED P.L.S. 827 OR AS NOTED PLACED 1/2" X 24" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369 PLACED 5/8" x 30" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369 PLACED 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH ALUMINUM CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369 FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD AS NOTED, REPLACED WITH 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369 OR AS NOTED CALCULATED POINT 25.07' 26.56' 30.00' 18.90' 30.00' 21.29' 30.00' 30.00' 23.35' RIGHT-OF-WAY R/W S89°55'38" 975.87' S89°55'38"E 980.59' FOUND ITD CONCRETE MONUMENT (CAP BROKEN OFF SOLID IN GROUND) FOUND IRON ROD SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN CPF NO. 566372 SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN CPF NO. 1284104 SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN CPF NO. 1591080 11.10' 11.08' 4.85' 4.85' 6.65' 8.71' 3.44' NORTH ARROW FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY DETAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY DETAIL S01°00'17"W 60.00' S00°15'52"W 60.00' S00°16'58"W 60.00' S00°00'00"W 60.00' SEE DETAIL A DETAIL A DETAIL B DETAIL C DETAIL D SEE DETAIL B SEE DETAIL C SEE DETAIL D S89°55'38" 980.59' S89°19'34"E 859.37' S89°55'38"E 980.56' S89°55'38" 980.57' CENTER LINE SECTION LINE CENTER LINE SECTION LINE CENTER LINE SECTION LINE CENTER LINE SECTION LINE S89°39'36"E 2613.62' SEE DETAIL E 17.55' DETAIL E CENTER LINE SECTION LINE 30.31' 12.75' S02°35'21"W 60.61' S88°56'57"E 734.87' S88°59'43"E 736.55' TIE LINE S88°58'20"E 735.71' CENTER LINESECTION LINE CORNER PERPETUATION AND FILING RECORD CPF SQUARE FEET SF ACRES AC 25.07' 26.56' 30.00' 18.90' 30.00' 30.00' 23.35' 21.29' 30.00' NO CAP 80.36' FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. S-6703 SOUTH BOUNDARY 4.70' WHERE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SOUTH BOUNDARY OF FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. S-6703 MEET SEE NOTE 6 ON THIS PAGE NOTES 6. THIS LINE IS ONLY A RETRACEMENT OF FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. S-6703 IS NOT AN ATTEMPT TO PORTRAY THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF 65TH SOUTH, IT IS ONLY SHOWN TO AS SUPPORTING EVIDENCE TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE ROAD SEE NOTE 6 ON THIS PAGE SEE NOTE 6 ON THIS PAGE SURVEYED BY: DRAWN BY: PROJECT NO. APPROVED BY: AGLE ROCK NGINEERING CIVIL PLANNING SURVEYING IDAHO FALLS (208) 542-2665 E REXBURG (208) 359-2665 OFFICES AT: 1331 Fremont Ave. Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402 343 E 4th N, Suite 119 Rexburg, Idaho 83440 H. REESE M. PATZER K. ROLAND 26041 DATE: September 24, 2026 CAD NAME: X_26041 FINAL PLAT.DWG O H A D I F O E T A T R E G I S T E S R P R O F E S S I O N L A 9369 D E L A N D U S R O Y E V R K U R T J. R O L A N D I S PRELIMINARY SHEET 3 OF 3 ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 PURSUANT TO I.C. §50-1334, THE OWNER DOES HEREBY, CERTIFY THAT ALL LOTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE WATER FROM THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM, AND SAID CITY HAS AGREED IN WRITING TO PROVIDE CULINARY WATER SERVICE TO SAID LOTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 8, CHAPTER 4 OF THE IDAHO FALLS CITY CODE, AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER HAS HEREUNTO SET ITS SIGNATURE THIS ________DAY OF ____________ , 202__. ROCKWELL HOMES, INC. _____________________________________ CURTIS JOHNSON, VICE PRESIDENT DRINKING WATER SYSTEM CERTIFICATE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT THE UNDERSIGNED ROCKWELL HOMES, INC. AN IDAHO CORPORATION IS THE LAWFUL OWNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON AND HAS CAUSED THE SAME TO BE PLATTED AND DIVIDED INTO BLOCKS, LOTS, AND STREETS, WHICH PLAT SHALL HEREAFTER BE KNOWN AS ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1, A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO. BE IT FURTHER KNOWN, THAT OWNER DOES HEREBY DEDICATE GRANT AND CONVEY TO THE PUBLIC, ALL STREETS AND RIGHT-OF-WAYS SHOWN HEREON, THAT OWNER ALSO DOES HEREBY GRANT AND CONVEY TO THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS ALL PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOREVER AS IRREVOCABLE PERMANENT NON-EXCLUSIVE PUBLIC EASEMENTS AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON. OWNER, OR ITS HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, AGREE THEY WILL CONSTRUCT NO PERMANENT STRUCTURE WITHIN OR UPON ANY EASEMENT SHOWN HEREON, AND THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS AND ITS SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS, PERMITEES OR LICENSEES SHALL ALSO HAVE THE RIGHT, TO REMOVE, CUT OR TRIM ANY TREES, BRUSH, ORNAMENTAL SHRUBBERY OR PLANT WHICH MAY INJURE OR INTERFERE WITH THE USE THEREOF FOR ITS INTENDED PURPOSES, SUCH RIGHT MAY BE EXERCISED WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE TO OWNER OR ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS. OWNER OR ITS HEIRS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS FURTHER AGREE THAT THEY SHALL NOT PLANT ANY TREES, BRUSH, ORNAMENTAL SHRUBBERY OR PLANTS WHICH MAY HINDER THE SAFE AND EFFICIENT UTILIZATION OF SAID EASEMENTS. OWNER OR ITS HEIRS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS HEREBY RELEASES THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS AND ITS SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS, PERMITEES OR LICENSEES FROM ANY CLAIM FOR DAMAGES, BASED UPON CONCEALED OR UNDISCLOSED PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED OR PERMITTED TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY OWNER OR ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS WITHIN ANY PUBLIC EASEMENTS, SUBSEQUENT TO RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION, THAT MAY BE INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS AND ITS SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS, PERMITEES OR LICENSEES ORDINARY USE OF THE PUBLIC EASEMENTS WITH DUE CARE. OWNER OR ITS HEIRS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS DO HEREBY WARRANT AND SHALL DEFEND SUCH DEDICATION AND CONVEYANCES IN THE QUIET AND PEACEFUL POSSESSION OF THE PUBLIC OR THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, AS THE CASE MAY BE, AGAINST SAID OWNER AND ITS HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, AND AGAINST EVERY PERSON WHOMSOEVER WHO LAWFULLY HOLDS OR WHO LATER CLAIMS TO HAVE LAWFULLY HELD ANY RIGHTS IN SAID ESTATE AS OF THE DATE HEREOF. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER HAS HEREUNTO SET ITS SIGNATURE THIS ________DAY OF ____________, 202__. ROCKWELL HOMES, INC. _____________________________________ CURTIS JOHNSON, VICE PRESIDENT RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE I CERTIFY THAT I AM A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF IDAHO AND THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS PLAT AND FIND THAT IT COMPLIES WITH I.C. §50-1305. DATE:_______________ _________________________________________________ BONNEVILLE COUNTY SURVEYOR, DAVID DOUGLAS ROMRELL P.L.S. NO. 12223 EXAMINING SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, THE UNDERSIGNED COUNTY TREASURER IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BONNEVILLE, STATE OF IDAHO, PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF I.C. §50-1308, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL COUNTY PROPERTY TAXES DUE FOR THE PROPERTY INCLUDED IN THE BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON ARE CURRENT. DATE:_________ _________________________________ BONNEVILLE COUNTY TREASURER TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE SANITARY RESTRICTIONS AS REQUIRED BY I.C. §50-1326 HAVE BEEN SATISFIED BASED ON THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (DEQ) APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE CONDITIONS IMPOSED ON THE DEVELOPER FOR CONTINUED SATISFACTION OF THE SANITARY RESTRICTIONS. BUYER IS CAUTIONED THAT AT THE TIME OF THIS APPROVAL, NO DRINKING WATER OR SEWER/SEPTIC FACILITIES WERE CONSTRUCTED. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CAN BE ALLOWED WITH APPROPRIATE BUILDING PERMITS IF DRINKING WATER OR SEWER FACILITIES HAVE SINCE BEEN CONSTRUCTED OR IF THE DEVELOPER IS SIMULTANEOUSLY CONSTRUCTING THOSE FACILITIES. IF THE DEVELOPER FAILS TO CONSTRUCT FACILITIES OR MEET THE OTHER CONDITIONS OF DEQ, THEN SANITARY RESTRICTIONS MAY BE REIMPOSED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH I.C. §50-1326, BY THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF DISAPPROVAL, AND NO CONSTRUCTION OF ANY BUILDING OR SHELTER REQUIRING DRINKING WATER OR SEWER/SEPTIC FACILITIES SHALL BE ALLOWED. EASTERN IDAHO PUBLIC HEALTH DISTRICT ___________________________________ ______________ ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST, REHS DATE: HEALTH DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL OWNER'S DEDICATION ALL MEASURED BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON RELATE DIRECTLY TO THE "CITY OF IDAHO FALLS COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 2004", WHICH IS DERIVED FROM THE IDAHO STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (EAST ZONE 1101) US SURVEY FEET AND USING A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.000277265 FOR A GRID TO GROUND CONVERSION, [REFERENCE FRAME NAD_83(2011), EPOCH 2010.0000]. THE SYSTEM ORIENTATION IS BASED ON GRID NORTH ALONG THE EAST ZONE CENTRAL MERIDIAN. NO CONVERGENCE ANGLE HAS BEEN APPLIED. BASIS OF BEARINGS CITY'S ACCEPTANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING PLAT, ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1, WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO. ___________________________________________DATE_________ BONNEVILLE COUNTY RECORDER IRRIGATION WATER RIGHTS DISCLOSURE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ALL PARCELS OR PROPERTY INCLUDED IN THIS PLAT ARE WITHIN THE IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT AND THAT A SUITABLE SYSTEM FOR SUCH PARCELS OR PROPERTY SHALL BE INSTALLED FOR DELIVERY OF SURFACE WATER FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES AND IS SUBJECT TO THAT CERTAIN CITY OF IDAHO FALLS SUBDIVISION IRRIGATION WATER AGREEMENT RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1787465 IN THE RECORDS OF BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO, (AS THE SAME MAY BE AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME). THE SYSTEM INSTALLED HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS AND THE IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT IN COMPLIANCE WITH IDAHO CODE § 31-3805. ALL PROPERTY WITHIN THE PLAT, INCLUDING STREETS, WILL REMAIN SUBJECT TO ASSESSMENTS LEVIED BY THE IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT WHICH SHALL BE PAID BY THE OWNERS AND THEIR SUCCESSORS-IN-INTEREST OF ANY PARCELS OR PROPERTY WITHIN THIS PLAT. THE UNPAID IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS ARE A LIEN ON THE LAND. IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT MAY WITHHOLD DELIVERY OF WATER UNTIL THE UNPAID ASSESSMENTS (ALONG WITH ANY ASSOCIATED PENALTIES AND INTEREST) ARE PAID IN FULL. FOR CONNECTIONS APPROVED FOR DELIVERY OF WATER TO MORE THAN ONE LEGAL PARCEL PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED BY DISTRICT, NON-PAYMENT OF A DISTRICT ASSESSMENT BY ONE ELECTOR WILL SUBJECT ALL PARCELS ON THE SHARED CONNECTION TO CURTAILMENT UNTIL SUCH DELINQUENT ASSESSMENT IS PAID IN FULL. ALL RIGHTS TO VOTE IN IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT MATTERS ARE HELD BY OWNERS AND THEIR SUCCESSORS-IN-INTEREST OF ANY PARCELS OR PROPERTY WITHIN THIS PLAT. PURSUANT TO TITLE 43, CHAPTER 11 OF THE IDAHO CODE, A PARCEL OWNER MAY AT A FUTURE DATE PETITION THE IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT FOR EXCLUSION FROM THE IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT, BUT SUCH EXCLUSION, IF GRANTED, WILL RESULT IN LOSS OF THE ABILITY TO IRRIGATE SUCH PARCEL. CONSISTENT WITH IDAHO CODE §§ 42-108 AND 42-222, ANY CHANGE IN THE NATURE OF USE OF SURFACE WATER PROVIDED BY AN IRRIGATION WATER DELIVERY ENTITY (SUCH AS THE IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT) MUST BE AUTHORIZED BY THE ENTITY HOLDING THE WATER RIGHTS FOR THE AVAILABLE SURFACE WATER. AS OF THE DATE OF RECORDING OF THIS PLAT, THE IDAHO IRRIGATION DISTRICT’S ADDRESS IS 496 E 14TH ST., IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO 83404. STATE OF _________________) :SS. COUNTY OF _______________ ) ON THIS_______ DAY OF____________, 20___, BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE, PERSONALLY APPEARED CURTIS JOHNSON , KNOWN OR IDENTIFIED TO ME TO BE THE VICE PRESIDENT, OF ROCKWELL HOMES INC., AND THE OFFICER WHO SUBSCRIBED SAID CORPORATION'S NAME TO THE FOREGOING OWNER'S DEDICATION, PREVIOUSLY PLATTED EASEMENTS VACATION CERTIFICATE, AND THE DRINKING WATER SYSTEM CERTIFICATE AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE SAME FOR AND ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AND AFFIXED MY OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND THE YEAR IN THIS CERTIFICATE FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. __________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF _______________ RESIDING AT: _____________________________ COMMISSION EXPIRATION DATE: ________________ ACKNOWLEDGMENT THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT WAS DULY ACCEPTED AND APPROVED AND THE GRANTS AND DEDICATIONS ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO FALLS ADOPTED THIS _____ DAY OF ________________ , 202____. ______________________ ______________________________ MAYOR CITY CLERK ______________________ ______________________________ CITY ENGINEER CITY SURVEYOR JONATHAN W. KNOWLES, PE 14787 KENNETH BALDWIN ROBERTS, PLS 9755 A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO A PARCEL OF LAND INCLUDING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF LOT 1 BLOCK 1 OF CORNERSTONE ASSEMBLY OF GOD DIVISION NO. 1 PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 1266974 BEING SITUATED IN THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN THE OWNER DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF I.C. §50-1306A(5) HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH IN ORDER TO VACATE PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING EASEMENT OF RECORD WITHIN THE PLAT BOUNDARY: 1.) THE 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.) ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, OF CORNERSTONE ASSEMBLY OF GOD DIVISION NO. 1, A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, FILED WITH THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER FOR BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER 1266974, DATED: 6-18-2007. THE VACATED EASEMENT LISTED HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS DRAWING. ALL OTHER EXISTING EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE STILL ACTIVE AND VALID. UPON APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, EXECUTION AND RECORDING OF THIS DOCUMENT, THE PORTIONS OF SAID EASEMENT SHALL BE VACATED WITHOUT FURTHER FUNCTION OF LAW. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER HAS HEREUNTO SUBSCRIBED ITS SEAL AND SIGNATURE THIS_________DAY OF_______202_ ROCKWELL HOMES, INC. ______________________________ CURTIS JOHNSON, VICE PRESIDENT PREVIOUSLY PLATTED EASEMENTS VACATION CERTIFICATE 1. EAGLE ROCK ENGINEERING WAS COMMISSIONED BY ROCKWELL HOMES INC. TO DESIGN A BOUNDARY FOR A NEW CITY OF IDAHO FALLS SUBDIVISION PLAT ON LAND OWNED BY ROCKWELL HOMES INC. PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 1806816 AND RIVERWOOD DEVELOPMENT LLC PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 1801725. 2. CORNERSTONE ASSEMBLY OF GOD, DIVISION NO. 1 PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 1266974 ADJOINS THE NEW PLAT. MONUMENTS FOUND WERE 1/2 INCH IRON RODS WITH PLASTIC CAPS STAMPED L.S. 8795 OR NO CAP. THE PLAT IS IN THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS BOUNDARY. 3. HALLMARK ESTATES, DIVISION NO. 1 PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 956426. AN AFFIDAVIT OF CORRECTION WAS FILED IN BONNEVILLE COUNTY RECORDS PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 959320. MONUMENTS FOUND WERE 5/8 INCH IRON RODS WITH PLASTIC CAPS STAMPED L.S. 827. THE PLAT IS A BONNEVILLE COUNTY PLAT. 4. RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG 65TH SOUTH WAS ESTABLISHED FROM FOUND MONUMENTS AND RECORD INFORMATION FROM IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. S-6703 (3). THE SAID FOUND MONUMENTS ARE RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENTS WITH THE TOP AND BRASS CAPS BROKEN OFF. THE DESCRIPTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IN IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. S6703 (3) DIFFERED FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY DESCRIBED IN QUIT CLAIM DEED PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 359917. FIELD DATA WAS GATHERED TO DETERMINE THE EXISTING CENTERLINE OF 65TH SOUTH. BY ANALYZING THE EXISTING CENTERLINE IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE ROAD WAS BUILT BY FOLLOWING THE IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. S-6703 (3). THE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. S-6703 (3) AND THE FOUND MONUMENTS WERE USED TO DETERMINE THE CENTER LINE OF ROAD AND THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE INFORMATION ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF 65TH SOUTH WAS SHOWN ONLY AS A RETRACEMENT OF THE FEDERAL AID PROJECT AND DOES NOT PORTRAY THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG 65TH SOUTH AS IT IS ONLY SHOWN AS A 30.00 FOOT REFERENCE MONUMENT TO THE CENTER LINE OF 65TH SOUTH. 5. IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. S-6703 SHOWED THE CENTERLINE BEING 10 FEET NORTH OF THE SECTION LINE, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE CENTERLINE IS 3.44 FEET NORTH OF THE SECTION LINE. IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE SECTION CORNER IS NO LONGER IN THE SAME POSITION AS SHOWN IN SAID FEDERAL AID PROJECT. NARRATIVE Page 1 of 5 Applicant: Eagle Rock Engineering Project Manager: David Peterson Property Owner: Rockwell Homes Inc Riverwood Development LLC Location: Generally located north of E 65th South, east of Columbia St, south of La Paloma Dr, and west of S Holmes Ave. Size: Approx. 34.568 acres Lots: 74 Buildable: 70 Existing Zoning: Site: R1 North: R1 South: County A-1 East: County A-1 West: County A-1 Existing Land Uses: Site: Vacant/Ag North: Residential South: Residential/Ag East: Residential West: Agricultural Future Land Use Map: Suburban and Mixed Use Centers and Corridors Attachments: 1. Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance Requirements 2. Comprehensive Plan Policies 3. Maps and aerial photos 4. Final Plat 5. Approved Preliminary Plat Requested Action: To approve the final plat for Arbor Estates Division No. 1 by the Mayor and City Council. History: The majority of the property was annexed into the City in 2026 with an initial zoning of R1 Single Dwelling Residential. A portion of Lot 2 Block 8 was annexed in 2007 with an initial zoning of R-1. A preliminary plat was approved by the Planning Commission in February 2026. Staff Comments: The proposed final plat consists of approximately 34.568 acres and includes 70 buildable lots and four non-buildable lots. The density of buildable residential lots is approximately 2.03 lots per acre. The maximum lot size for lots in the R1 Zone is 13,500 sq ft except for corner lots, wedge-shaped lots, and lots designated for religious institutions or schools. Lot 2 Block 8 is planned for a future religious institution. Four of the non-buildable lots are landscape lots intended to buffer the development from the adjacent arterial streets of E 65th South and S Holmes Ave. Lot 2 Block 2 is designated as a public utility and storm water easement in its entirety. Access to the subdivision will come from S Holmes Ave with the extension of Countryside Ln and from E 65th S via Pressley Dr. View Ave and Hallmark Dr will also be extended, connecting the existing Hallmark Subdivision to the new street network. Pressley Dr, Edmund Dr, Villa Mirage Ct, and the extension of Countryside Ln will be classified as residential collector streets. Riddle Way, Seacove Dr, and the extensions of View Ave and Hallmark Dr will be classified as local streets. The proposed street network and lot layout is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as primarily suburban, which denotes existing or planned residential areas in close proximity to or with easy vehicular access to regional commercial service areas that provide daily household needs. Staff Recommendation: Staff has reviewed the final plat and finds it consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The plat also meets the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Arbor Estates Division No. 1 as presented. STAFF REPORT FINAL PLAT Arbor Estates Division No. 1 October 22, 2026 Community Development Services Page 2 of 5 Transportation Plan: Pressley Dr, Edmund Dr, Villa Mirage Ct, Countryside Ln – Residential Collectors; Riddle Way, Seacove Dr, View Ave, Hallmark Dr – Local Streets Subdivision Ordinance: Boxes with an “X” indicated compliance with the ordinance REQUIREMENTS Staff Review Requirements listed in Section 10-1: Building envelopes sufficient to construct a building. X Lot dimensions conform to the minimum standards of Zoning Ordinance. X Lots have full frontage on, and access to, a dedicated street. X Residential lots do not have direct access to arterial streets. X Direct access to arterial streets from commercial or industrial lots shall be permitted only where it can be demonstrated that: 1) The direct access will not impede the flow of traffic on the arterial or otherwise create an unsafe condition; 2) There is no reasonable alternative for access to the arterial via a collector street; 3) There is sufficient sight distance along the arterial from the proposed point of access; 4) The proposed access is located so as not to interfere with the safe and efficient functioning of any intersection; and 5) The developer or owner agrees to provide all improvements, such as turning lanes or signals, necessitated for the safe and efficient uses of the proposes access. N/A Adequate provisions shall be made for soil preservation, drainage patterns, and debris and waste disposal and collection. X Sidelines of lots shall be at, or near, right angles or radial to the street lines. All corner lots shall have a minimum radius of twenty feet on the property line. X All property within the subdivision shall be included within a lot or area dedicated for public use. X All major streets in subdivision must conform to the major street plan of the City, as set forth in Comprehensive Plan. X The alignment and width of previously platted streets shall be preserved unless topographical conditions or existing buildings or structures require otherwise. X Residential lots adjoining arterial streets shall comply with: 1) Such lots shall have reverse frontage on the arterial streets, 2) such lots shall be buffered from the arterial street by any effective combination of the following: lot depth, earth berms, vegetation, walls or fences, and structural soundproofing, 3) Minimum lot depth shall be 150 ft except where the use of berms, vegetation, and structures can be demonstrated to constitute an effective buffer, 4) Whenever practical, existing roadside trees shall be saved and used in the arterial buffer, 5) Parking areas shall be used as part of the arterial buffer for high density residential uses, 6) Annexation and development agreement shall include provisions for installation and continued maintenance of arterial buffers. X – Landscape lots are proposed to buffer residential lots from the adjacent arterial streets. Page 3 of 5 Planning Director to classify street on basis of zoning, traffic volume, function, growth, vehicular & pedestrian safety, and population density. Pressley Dr, Edmund Dr, Villa Mirage Ct, Countryside Ln – Residential Collectors; Riddle Way, Seacove Dr, View Ave, Hallmark Dr – Local Streets Subdivision Ordinance: 10-1-5: GENERAL SUBDIVISION STANDARDS Meets all standards. 10-1-9: FINAL PLAT APPROVAL PROCESS (A)(9) If the final plat conforms to the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance and all other applicable State or Federal laws, or local ordinances, the Council shall approve the final plat. Zoning Ordinance: 11-3-3: PURPOSES OF RESIDENTIAL ZONES. (C) R1 Single Dwelling Residential Zone. This zone provides a residential zone which is representative of a less automobile-oriented, more walkable development pattern, characterized by somewhat smaller lot widths, and a somewhat denser residential environment than is characteristic of the RP Residential Park Zone. The principal uses in the R1 Residential Zone shall be single detached and attached dwelling units. This zone is also generally located near limited commercial services that provide daily household needs. 11-3-4: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONES. Table 11-3-1: Dimensional Standards for Residential Zones RE RP Rl R2 ITN R3 R34 RMH Lotarea | TT Lot Area Minimum in ft? 1 acre* 12,000 7,000 6,000* 3,000* 5,000* 5,000 3,000 ——| Area Maximum in ft? | 500* ‘SiteWidth | Width Site Width at Front Setback. - - - _ - - Sebacs, inimumine [PP pt ee a p 6 |S pose | 10 Lot Coverage, Building —_— and Density _ [Maximum LotCoveragein%| 30 | 40 | 40 | so | so | so | so | so in ft units/acre *See explanations, exceptions and qualifications m Section 11-3-4A.B.C of this Zoning Code. (Ord. 3218, 9-13-18) (Ord. 3310, 6-18-20) (Ord. 3452, 3-31-22) (Ord. 3496, 12-8-22) (A) Minimum and Maximum Lot Area. (1) Inthe Rl Zone, the maximum lot size shall be thirteen thousand five hundred square feet (13,500 ft*), except for corner lots, wedge-shaped lots in cul-de-sacs, or other unusual shaped lots. This shall also not apply to conditional uses such as schools and religious institutions. Page 4o0f 5 Page 5 of 5 Zoning Ordinance: 11-3-3: PURPOSES OF RESIDENTIAL ZONES. (C) R1 Single Dwelling Residential Zone. This zone provides a residential zone which is representative of a less automobile-oriented, more walkable development pattern, characterized by somewhat smaller lot widths, and a somewhat denser residential environment than is characteristic of the RP Residential Park Zone. The principal uses in the R1 Residential Zone shall be single detached and attached dwelling units. This zone is also generally located near limited commercial services that provide daily household needs. June 2, 2026 6:30 p.m. Planning Department City Annex Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Glen Ogden, Dale Storer, Forrest Ihler, Matthew Meehan, Tia Panter, Marry Scales, Deanna Harger, Bill Scott. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. ALSO PRESENT: Assistant Planning Director Kerry Beutler, Brian Stevens Planner, Mike Thrower Planner; Terry Rodino, Esq, City Attorney, and interested citizens. CALL TO ORDER: Ihler called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. MINUTES: Scott moved to accept the minutes of April 7, 2026, Meehan seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Business: 2. PLT 26-010: FINAL PLAT FOR ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1. Applicant: Eagle Rock Engineering. Not Present. Beutler presented the staff report, a part of the record. No discussion. Harger moved to recommend to the Mayor and City Council approval of the Final Plat for Arbor Estates Division No. 1., Ogden seconded the motion. Ihler called for roll call vote: Harger, yes; Storer, yes; Meehan, yes; Ihler, yes; Scales, yes; Scott, yes; Panter, yes; Ogden, yes. The motion passed unanimously Page 1 of 2 RSRCS PLT26-010 FINAL PLAT ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 REASONED STATEMENT OF RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT OF ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF E 65TH SOUTH, EAST OF COLUMBIA ST, SOUTH OF LA PALOMA DR, AND WEST OF S HOLMES AVE. WHEREAS, the applicant filed an application for a final plat on April 24, 2026; and WHEREAS, this matter came before the Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission during a duly noticed public meeting on June 2, 2026; and WHEREAS, this matter came before the Idaho Falls City Council during a duly noticed public meeting on October 22, 2026; and WHEREAS, having reviewed the application, including all exhibits entered and having considered the issues presented: I. RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the request pursuant to the City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan, the City of Idaho Falls Zoning Ordinance, the City of Idaho Falls Subdivision Ordinance, the Local Land Use Planning Act, and other applicable development regulations. 2. The property is approximately 34.568 acres generally located north of E 65th South, east of Columbia St, south of La Paloma Dr, and west of S Holmes Ave. 3. The plat includes 70 buildable lots and four non-buildable lots. 4. Lot 1, Block 1; Lots 1-2, Block 2; Lot 1, Block 7 are designated as public utility and stormwater easements in their entirety. 5. Lot 1, Block 8 is exempt from maximum lot size requirement of 13,500 sq ft because it is a corner lot. 6. Access to the property will come from E 65th South to the south and S Holmes Ave to the east with the extensions of Hallmark Dr and Countryside Ln. 7. A new street network will be dedicated with four residential collectors: Pressley Dr, Edmund Dr, Villa Mirage Ct, and Countryside Ln; Riddle Way, Seacove Dr, and the extensions of View Ave and Halmark Dr will be classified as local streets. 8. The plat complies with all requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance. 9. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area primarily as Suburban which denotes existing or planned residential areas in close proximity to or with easy vehicular access to regional commercial service areas that provide daily household needs. 10. The proposed development is consistent with the principles of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and complies with the requirements of the R1, Single Dwelling Residential Zone. Page 2 of 2 RSRCS PLT26-010 FINAL PLAT ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 II. DECISION Based on the above Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria, the City Council of the City of Idaho Falls approved the Final Plat. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS THIS _______ DAY OF ______________________, 2026 _____________________________________ Lisa Burtenshaw-Mayor NOTICE The Applicant or any affected person seeking judicial review of the compliance of this Reasoned Statement with the provisions of Idaho Code § 67-6535 must first seek reconsideration of this Reasoned Statement within fourteen (14) days by filing a request to reconsider pursuant in compliance with Idaho Code 67-6535. In addition, the above Applicant has the right to request a regulatory taking analysis pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 This DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 (“AGREEMENT”), made this day of , 2026, by and between CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, whose mailing address is P.O. Box 50220, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83405 (“CITY”), and ROCKWELL HOME, INC., an Idaho corporation, whose mailing address is 3539 Briar Creek Lane, Suite E, Ammon, Idaho 83406 (“DEVELOPER”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, DEVELOPER is the sole owner, in law or equity, of a certain tract of land in the County of Bonneville, State of Idaho, which land (hereafter referred to as “Subdivision”), is more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER desires to develop the Subdivision within CITY and has submitted a plat bearing the Subdivision name described in the caption of this AGREEMENT; and WHEREAS, City Engineer, and the Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission, have recommended such development be allowed, subject to certain requirements and obligations on the part of DEVELOPER; and WHEREAS, CITY is willing to allow the development of the Subdivision within City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, subject to the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT and the Special Conditions attached hereto; and WHEREAS, CITY has authority to approve Subdivision plats and the construction of streets, utility lines and other public improvements within CITY; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER specifically waives DEVELOPER’s right to protest development requirements described in this AGREEMENT, including DEVELOPER’s right of judicial review contained in Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code, and pursuant to-the standards set forth in § 67-5279, Idaho Code; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER understands that the public improvements required herein are standards required pursuant to Idaho Falls City Code, Title 10, Chapter 1, and are authorized by Idaho Code §§ 67-6513 and 67-6518; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER and CITY believe that without the public improvements required DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 — 9.16.26 PAGE 1 OF 15 herein, CITY would not be able to otherwise provide for mitigation of the effects of the Subdivision development on the ability of CITY to deliver services without compromising quality of such service delivery to current CITY residents, or without imposing substantial additional costs upon current CITY residents to accommodate the proposed Subdivision; and WHEREAS, CITY desires to ensure that public improvements consisting of those described in this AGREEMENT, including Special Conditions for the Subdivision, are constructed; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER understands that a waiver of public improvements is available pursuant to Idaho Falls City Code, but DEVELOPER specifically does not wish to request such a waiver and wishes to enter into this AGREEMENT; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER enters into this AGREEMENT of DEVELOPER's own free will and accord, without coercion and without inducement and at DEVELOPER's request; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER has read this AGREEMENT, has understood it, and has had the opportunity to avail itself of legal and other counsel prior to entering into this AGREEMENT and prior to signing it; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER has submitted a preliminary plat bearing the Subdivision name described in the caption of this AGREEMENT; and WHEREAS, City Engineer and City Planning and Zoning Commission have recommended such Subdivision be approved subject to certain requirements and obligations on the part of DEVELOPER; and WHEREAS, CITY is willing to approve the Subdivision to CITY, subject to the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT and the Special Conditions attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Approval of Subdivision. CITY hereby approves the Subdivision plat as described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part to this AGREEMENT by reference and agrees that upon DEVELOPER’s full and complete performance of the terms and conditions hereto, it will accept and maintain the property dedicated to CITY on the Subdivision plat and all public facilities and improvements shown in the Improvement Plans for the Subdivision. 2. Improvement, Preliminary, and Final Improvement Plans. “Improvement Plans,” used in this AGREEMENT, are engineer-designed plans showing all streets, sewer lines, water lines, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. | — 9.16.26 PAGE 2 OF 15 storm drains, street signs, traffic control devices, barricades, other public utilities (telephone, gas, electricity, fiber optic and irrigation facilities) and other public improvements contemplated within the Subdivision. “Preliminary Improvement Plans” as used in this AGREEMENT, are those Improvement Plans submitted and considered for the Subdivision development prior to the approval of City Engineer, and not yet approved for construction. “Final Improvement Plans” as used in this AGREEMENT, are those Improvement Plans submitted, considered and approved by City Engineer for the Subdivision development. DEVELOPER anticipates that development of the entire Subdivision will occur in phases or divisions. DEVELOPER has filed, and City Engineer has approved, Improvement Plans for the public improvements to be constructed within public rights-of-way exterior to the Subdivision, (hereafter referred to as the “Exterior Improvement Plans”) showing the width, location and alignment of all streets, sewer lines and water lines within the Subdivision and the size and materials specifications for such water and sewer lines. Prior to the commencement of any construction or development within any phase or division of the Subdivision, DEVELOPER shall also file with, and obtain the approval of, City Engineer Improvement Plans (hereafter the “Interior Improvement Plans”) for all streets, sewer lines, water lines, storm drainage facilities, street signs, traffic control devices, barricades and other public improvements contemplated within such phase or division of the Subdivision. The filed Improvement Plans shall also show the proposed location of other public utilities (telephone, gas and electricity), and irrigation facilities affected by the development of such phase or division of the Subdivision. Preliminary Improvement Plans are incorporated herein by reference as though set out in full, and the Final Improvement Plans shall also, upon approval by City Engineer, be deemed to be incorporated herein by reference. 3. Construction of Public Improvements. Unless otherwise agreed in the Special Conditions, DEVELOPER shall, at its expense, design and construct all public improvements shown in the Exterior Improvement Plans and Interior Improvement Plans. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by City Engineer, DEVELOPER shall construct all required public improvements within such Improvement Plans in strict accordance with the approved Preliminary and Final Improvement Plans and CITY Standard Engineering Drawings and Specifications (hereafter referred to as the “Standard Specifications”) in effect at the time the construction is accomplished. The Standard Specifications are incorporated herein by reference as though set out in full and compliance to the Standard Specifications is a condition of this AGREEMENT. 4. Permits. DEVELOPER shall obtain all right-of-way, excavation and/or other permits required by local ordinance and comply with all requirements therein with respect to the timely performance of the work governed by such permits. 5. Inspection. DEVELOPER shall retain a professional engineer (hereafter referred to as the “Project Engineer”) licensed within the State of Idaho to supervise, inspect and test the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. | — 9.16.26 PAGE 3 OF 15 construction of all public improvements within the Subdivision in order to ensure such improvements are constructed in accordance with this AGREEMENT, the Improvement Plans and the Standard Specifications. DEVELOPER shall not materially deviate from the Improvement Plans or Standard Specifications without the express written approval of the City Engineer. 6. Corrected Improvement Plans. Prior to acceptance of any phase or division of the Subdivision, DEVELOPER will file “As Constructed’’/ “As Built” Improvement Plans (hereafter referred to as the “Corrected Improvement Plans”) with City Engineer. Such Corrected Improvement Plans shall be prepared by the Project Engineer and shall show the actual constructed location of all public improvements within the Subdivision including the horizontal and vertical location of all water, sewer and storm drain lines, individual building service lines curb and gutter alignment and street grades. Such Corrected Improvement Plans shall also specifically show all changes between the Final Improvement Plans and the public improvements as actually constructed. The Project Engineer shall also certify upon the Corrected Improvement Plans that such Corrected Improvement Plans correctly show all public improvements as actually constructed and that such public improvements have been constructed in accordance with the Standard Specifications in effect at the time such construction was accomplished. The Project Engineer shall also deliver to City Engineer all compaction reports, daily construction logs, reports, written tests, analysis and other data as may be necessary to verify or support the certification of the Project Engineer. 7. Acceptance of Subdivision. Upon satisfactory completion of such public improvements and facilities, DEVELOPER's delivery of Corrected Improvement Plans and the filing and approval by CITY of a final plat, CITY will accept that portion of the Subdivision for which a final plat has been approved. Such acceptance shall not be valid unless expressly acknowledged in writing by City Engineer. Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Special Conditions, upon acceptance of any phase or division within the Subdivision, CITY shall assume ownership and control of all public facilities within any dedicated street or public utility right-of-way within the Subdivision and shall execute and record an instrument documenting such acceptance and that also references the recording information for this AGREEMENT and thereby releasing the Subdivision, or the accepted portion thereof, from the encumbrances of this AGREEMENT. Acceptance of the Subdivision Improvements and recording the acceptance instrument shall not be deemed as a waiver of DEVELOPER's agreement herein to fully and completely perform the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT, or as a waiver or release of the warranty set forth below in this AGREEMENT. 8. Warranty. DEVELOPER warrants that the materials and workmanship employed in the construction of all public improvements within the Subdivision shall be good and sound, and shall conform to generally accepted standards within the construction industry. Such warranty shall extend for a period of one (1) year after acceptance of any phase or division of the Subdivision DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 — 9.16.26 PAGE 4 OF 15 within which such improvements are located, by CITY, provided nothing herein shall limit the time within which CITY may bring an action against DEVELOPER on account of DEVELOPER's failure to construct such improvements in accordance with this AGREEMENT, the Improvement Plans or the Standard Specifications. DEVELOPER, and DEVELOPER’s heirs, successors and assigns, shall and do hereby respectively warrant and agree, to defend the quiet and peaceful possession of CITY in all easements, rights-of-way, street dedications or other estates conveyed pursuant to the terms of this AGREEMENT or pursuant to the subdivision plat which is the subject hereof, from and against all claims agains|s DEVELOPER and DEVELOPER's successors or assigns, respectively, and against every person whomsoever who lawfully holds, or who later lawfully claims to have held, rights in the premises by or through DEVELOPER and DEVELOPER’s successors or assigns, respectively, as of the date of this AGREEMENT. 9. Water and Sewer Main Connection Charges. DEVELOPER agrees to pay to CITY at the time any separate sanitary sewer service or culinary water service connection to CITY sanitary sewer system or culinary water system is requested, all connection fees, main connection charges, and main charges as set forth in the City Code in effect at the time such request for service is made. 10. Failure to Pay Fees. In the event DEVELOPER fails or refuses to pay any of the fees, charges or costs set forth herein, CITY may disannex any property owned by DEVELOPER within the Subdivision or declare the entire unpaid balance immediately due and payable and collect such sums in the manner provided by law, or may pursue any other remedy set forth herein or as may be available at law or in equity. All such remedies shall be cumulative and CITY may pursue the same separately or simultaneously as it deems necessary or appropriate. In the event of such acceleration, all sums due shall bear interest at the rate established by law for judgments entered in the State of Idaho, commencing on the date the unpaid amount is declared immediately due and written demand therefor is delivered to DEVELOPER. All fees owed by DEVELOPER are due and payable upon execution of this AGREEMENT unless otherwise specified. 11. Participation by CITY. The parties agree that those portions of the water main, the sanitary sewer line, storm drains and street section work (hereafter collectively referred to as the “Shared Work”), the cost (if any) of which CITY may have expressly agreed to pay pursuant to the Special Conditions (if any conditions for reimbursement are contained therein), which may include any water or sewer line or storm line extensions, increased line size or capacity and road construction, are required because of future service needs originating from properties not owned by DEVELOPER and located within the vicinity of the Subdivision, and that sound planning requires construction thereof at the present time in order to accommodate future expansion and development. In recognition of the cost savings which can be accomplished by construction of such increased capacity and improvements concurrently with the facilities to be constructed for DEVELOPER's purposes, and the impracticality of constructing such increased capacity and improvements separately or at a later time, DEVELOPER agrees to design and construct such DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. | — 9.16.26 PAGE 5 OF 15 facilities subject to CITY's agreement to retmburse DEVELOPER for a portion of such costs, to the extent such is set forth in the Special Conditions. If such reimbursement for the Shared Work is set forth in the Special Conditions, prior to the commencement of the Shared Work, DEVELOPER shall obtain and deliver to CITY three (3) independent bona fide bids for the performance of such work from qualified and responsible contractors. Such bids shall be solicited and itemized in a manner which allows clear and specific identification of that portion of the construction work for which CITY is responsible. CITY shall have no obligation to pay for any portion of the costs of such Shared work unless prior to the commencement of the work, the parties have expressly agreed in writing to a specific amount for which CITY will reimburse the DEVELOPER. Payment of such costs by CITY shall be due within thirty (30) days from when all of the following have been completed or received: (1) acceptance of the Subdivision by CITY; (2) delivery of a complete itemized statement to CITY, in a format acceptable to the CITY, setting forth in detail the total amount of the costs for which CITY is responsible; and, if any part of the Subdivision is within the boundaries of an urban renewal district, (3) a sworn statement signed by DEVELOPER, including its successors and assigns, and acknowledged by the Urban Renewal Agency for the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, also known as Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency (the “Agency”), that DEVELOPER paid for the costs of the Shared Work and that DEVELOPER and its successors and assigns has not contracted with and will not contract with the Agency for reimbursement of any portion of the costs of the Shared Work and has not received and will not receive reimbursement from the Agency for any portion of the costs of the Shared Work. To the extent DEVELOPER, or its successors and assigns, have contracted or contract in the future with the Agency for reimbursement for any portion of the costs of the Shared Work, the CITY’s obligation to reimburse DEVELOPER under this AGREEMENT shall be reduced on a dollar-for- dollar basis. Under no circumstances will the CITY and Agency each reimburse DEVELOPER or any third party for the same costs of the Shared Work. In the event DEVELOPER is reimbursed by CITY for any portion of the costs of the Shared Work that was also reimbursed by the Agency to DEVELOPER or another third-party, the CITY may, in addition to any other legal remedies available under the law, immediately pursue DEVELOPER and require DEVELOPER to repay to CITY any amount that CITY paid DEVELOPER for the costs of the Shared Work that were also reimbursed by Agency and, if CITY prevails, CITY shall be entitled to an award of attorneys fees and costs. DEVELOPER shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY and Agency from claims of any nature that any third party may assert against CITY or Agency for any costs of the Shared Work CITY pays DEVELOPER pursuant to this AGREEMENT and which same costs the third party claims are due from CITY or Agency to the third party. 12. Special Conditions. In recognition of the unique circumstances relative to this Subdivision the parties agree to the Special Conditions attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and by this reference made a part hereof. 13. Irrigation Facilities. DEVELOPER shall relocate or reconstruct, at DEVELOPER’s DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 — 9.16.26 PAGE 6 OF 15 expense, all ditches, headgate structures, culverts, siphons, drywells or other similar appurtenant structures that will be impaired or otherwise disturbed by the construction of this Subdivision. DEVELOPER shall also obtain the consent of all persons or entities who have any water right or control over such structures. DEVELOPER shall also indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any action, claim, demand or cost of any kind, including attorney's fees and court costs, arising from the relocation or reconstruction of such facilities or DEVELOPER's failure to properly relocate or reconstruct such facilities. 14. Relocation of Power Lines. DEVELOPER shall relocate at its expense, all existing electric utility poles or other utility lines or fixtures necessary to construct the public improvements within this Subdivision as shown on the Improvement Drawings. 15. Construction Schedule Change. Any modification to the public improvements shown in the Improvement Drawings or to the construction phase limits shall be approved by City Engineer. Prior to said approval, revised Improvement Drawings shall be resubmitted to City Engineering Department showing the proposed changes. 16. Taxes and Assessments. DEVELOPER shall pay all real property taxes and assessments levied or assessed against any interest in real property which DEVELOPER has agreed to convey to CITY pursuant to this AGREEMENT up to the date the final Subdivision plat for this Subdivision is recorded. Such taxes and assessments shall be paid prior to the acceptance by CITY of the public improvements within any phase or division of the Subdivision. 17. Occupancy. No building or structure within the Subdivision shall be used or occupied for any purpose other than for the construction of such building or structure, unless a final plat has been filed and approved and all public improvements within the plat have been completed and accepted by City Engineer. CITY may withhold Certificates of Occupancy until all such work has been completed. Nothing herein shall prevent the use of a model building for the purpose of DEVELOPER's sales promotional efforts provided the building is not occupied for any other commercial or industrial purposes. 18. Default. In the event DEVELOPER fails to comply with the terms and conditions hereof in any material respect, CITY may, without further notice to DEVELOPER, exercise any or all of the following remedies: A. Withhold the issuance of any building permit or certificate of occupancy for any structure located within any phase or division of the Subdivision affected by such default; B. Withhold the connection of water, sewer or electric service to any property located within any phase or division of the Subdivision affected by such default; DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 — 9.16.26 PAGE 7 OF 15 C. Refuse to accept public ownership and maintenance of public improvements within any phase or division of the Subdivision affected by such default and record a notice of such action with the Bonneville County Recorder's office; D. Issue a stop work order for any building under construction within any phase or division of the Subdivision affected by such default; E. Withhold reimbursement of Subdivision inspection fees collected pursuant to the Idaho Falls City Code; and F. Bring an action for damages, injunctive relief, specific performance or any other remedy available at law or in equity. 19. Notices. Any notice required by this AGREEMENT shall be mailed to the receiving party at the address set forth above or such other address as may be delivered to the sending party in writing. Such notice shall be mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid and addressed as set forth above and shall be deemed received upon its deposit in the United States mail in such manner. 20. Recording and Recording Fees. CITY may record this AGREEMENT with the Bonneville County Recorder’s office and prior to the execution and approval of this AGREEMENT, DEVELOPER shall pay to CITY all recording fees necessary to record this AGREEMENT with the Bonneville County Recorder's office. Prior to the approval of any final plat within the Subdivision, DEVELOPER shall pay to CITY all recording fees necessary to record such final plat with the Bonneville County Recorder's office. 21. Compliance With Applicable Law and Regulation. DEVELOPER agrees to comply with all applicable rules, regulations, Ordinances, Resolutions, statutes or administrative laws having applicability to development to this Subdivision and or phase of this Subdivision including, of those of CITY, Bonneville County, the State of Idaho, the United States of America, or any agency or political subdivisions thereof having jurisdiction over the Subdivision and to obtain any permits, licenses, permissions, authorizations, etc., that are required for such development. 22. Conflict With Standard Specifications. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this AGREEMENT or the Improvement Plans and the Standard Specifications, the terms of this AGREEMENT or the Improvement Plans shall prevail over any contrary provision of the Standard Specifications. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this AGREEMENT and the Improvement Plans, the terms of this AGREEMENT shall prevail. 23. Covenants Appurtenant to the Land. All covenants and conditions set forth herein shall be appurtenant to and run with the Subdivision and shall be binding upon DEVELOPER's heirs, successors Or assigns. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. | — 9.16.26 PAGE 8 OF 15 24. Governing Law. This AGREEMENT shall be governed by the laws of the State of Idaho. The venue for any action arising out of this Agreement shall be exclusively in the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District of the State of Idaho, Bonneville County or in the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. 25. Anti-Boycott Against Israel Act. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2346, if payments under this AGREEMENT exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and DEVELOPER employs ten (10) or more persons, DEVELOPER certifies that it is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of this AGREEMENT engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under its control. The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code section 67-2346 shall have the meaning defined therein. 26. Anti-Boycott of Certain Sectors. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2347A, if payments under this AGREEMENT exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and DEVELOPER employs ten (10) or more persons, DEVELOPER certifies that it is not currently engaged in and will not for the duration of the Agreement engage in a boycott of any individual or company because the individual or company engages in or supports either (1) the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacture of fossil fuel-based energy, timber, minerals, hydroelectric power, nuclear energy, or agriculture; or (2) the manufacture, distribution, sale, or use of firearms, as defined in Idaho Code section 18-3302(2)(d). The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code section 67-2347A shall have the meaning defined therein. 27. Certification of No Chinese Ownership. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2359, DEVELOPER certifies that DEVELOPER is not currently owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic of China and will not, for the duration of this AGREEMENT, be owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic China. 28. Non-Discrimination. DEVELOPER shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideals, sex, age, marital status, physical, or mental handicap, gender identity/expression, sexual orientation, or national origin. 29. Entire Agreement. This writing evidences the final and complete agreement between the parties and no other prior statement, representation or understanding shall be binding upon the parties unless expressly set forth herein. 30. Effective Date. This AGREEMENT shall become valid and binding only upon its approval by CITY Council of CITY and upon its execution by the Mayor. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. | — 9.16.26 PAGE 9 OF 15 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals this day and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO By Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor ROCKWELL HOMES, INC. By Cor Curtis Johnson, Vice President [Notary Page to Follow] DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 - 9.16.26 PAGE 10 OF 15 STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss. County of Bonneville ) On this day of , 2026, before me, the undersigned, a notary public for Idaho, personally appeared Lisa Burtenshaw, known to me to be the Mayor of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, the municipal corporation that executed the foregoing document, and acknowledged to me that they are authorized to execute the same for and on behalf of said City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public of Idaho (Seal) Residing at: My Commission Expires: STATEOF Telkwho ) ) ss: County of Bonmevi® ) On this (7 day of Seplerlore , 2026, before me, the undersigned, a notary public, in and for said State, personally appeared Curtis Jonson _, known or identified to me to be an authorized signator and whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they are authorized to execute the same for and on behalf of said developer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. qiiiittllllldeyyy,, Rx GER RE ela, SG NG 165725. $3 rege OG 0% Sf wOlprr . = Residing at: [ = 2 gat: Tonsn, FTO = <=> @ = 7 = Wo pn - 2 i¢ Pus e & My Commission Expires: _9 / G / 2030 B pf Ss 3 Le’) he > % By No, 20%" OS eae oe Ny, F MHinanww™ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 — 9.16.26 PAGE 11 OF 15 EXHIBIT “A” PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 BEGINNING AT A POINT THAT IS S.00°17'27’W. ALONG THE SECTION LINE 436.26 FEET FROM THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN; RUNNING THENCE S.00°17'27’W. ALONG SAID SECTION LINE 397.71 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST BOUNDARY CORNER OF HALLMARK ESTATES, DIVISION NO. 1, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID HALLMARK ESTATES, DIVISION NO. 1 THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES: (1) THENCE N.89°42'33”W. 692.00 FEET; (2) THENCE S.00°17'27"W. 525.04 FEET; (3) THENCE N.89°42'33”W. 165.00 FEET; (4) THENCE S.00°17'27°W. 270.00 FEET; (5) THENCE N.89°42'33”W. 28.00 FEET; (6) THENCE S.00°17'27"W. 330.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST BOUNDARY CORNER OF SAID HALLMARK ESTATES, DIVISION NO. 1; THENCE S.00°15'11”W. 620.79 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 65TH SOUTH; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID 65TH SOUTH THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: (1) THENCE N.89°19'34”W. 425.78 FEET; (2) THENCE N.89°55'38”W. 4.89 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE N.00°15'0S”E. ALONG SAID WEST LINE 2055.72 FEET; THENCE S.89°42'33”E. 439.65 FEET; THENCE N.00°16'48”E. 3.31 FEET; THENCE S.89°42'33”E. 177.11 FEET; THENCE N.00°16'48”E. 455.10 FEET; THENCE S.89°43'12”E. 465.45 FEET; THENCE S.00°16'59”E. 139.51 FEET; THENCE N.59°27'19"W. 4.07 FEET; THENCE S.01°12'41”E. 242.54 FEET; THENCE N.88°41'49”E. 230.39 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS: 34.568 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 — 9.16.26 PAGE 12 OF 15 EXHIBIT “B” SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 S.C. 1.00 Traffic Signs. DEVELOPER agrees to install all street signs designating the names of all streets within the Subdivision. Street signs designating the name of public streets shall be constructed with white letters over green background. Street signs designating the name of private streets shall be constructed with white lettering over blue background. Such signs shall be installed in the manner and locations as directed by CITY’s Engineer. S.C. _2.00 65 South and South Holmes Ave Turn Lane Improvements. DEVELOPER shall install turn lane improvements to the approaches to the Subdivision from 65" South and South Holms Avenue. Turn lane improvements shall be constructed as shown on the approved DEVELOPER shall design and construct, at DEVELOPER’s sole expense, all turn lanes along 65" South and S Holmes Ave. in accordance with the Improvement Drawings filed with and approved by CITY Engineer S.C. 3.00 Subdivision Seal Coat. In order to preserve the long-term effectiveness of required roadway seal coat in the Subdivision, DEVELOPER shall pay all seal coat costs associated with Subdivision improvements rather than applying the seal coat. In lieu of DEVELOPER seal coat application, DEVELOPER shall pay Sixty-Nine Thousand Five Hundred Forty-Nine Dollars and Fifteen Cents ($69,549.15) (22,803 square yards at $3.05 per square yard). CITY shall use such payment to apply the required seal coat at a later date, when Subdivision building permits are completed and at CITY’s sole discretion on timing. S.C. 4.00 Existing Infrastructure. When it is necessary to move or remove existing infrastructure not belonging to CITY and not within CITY right-of-way, DEVELOPER shall coordinate such activities with the applicable owner, (e.g., poles owned by Pacificorp, dba Rocky Mountain Power). Any existing electrical infrastructure owned by Pacificorp, dba Rocky Mountain Power, will require a buy-out from DEVELOPER prior to receipt of electrical service from CITY. Request for the buy-out, if any, is to be initiated by DEVELOPER after annexation. S.C. 5.00 Construction of Idaho Falls Power and Idaho Falls Fiber Infrastructure. DEVELOPER shall, at DEVELOPER’s sole expense, install all power infrastructure as described and illustrated on the Idaho Falls Power approved and signed contractor’s map provided and reviewed by Idaho Falls Power. All power infrastructure installation shall conform with Idaho Falls Power’s service policy. Typical power trench installation shall have a warranty of workmanship of one (1) year beginning at the time of City's final acceptance. However, if power infrastructure is installed during winter conditions (where frost is evident in the ground and backfill has the potential to be frozen earth) the warranty of workmanship shall be extended to two (2) full years beginning at the time of City’s final acceptance. DEVELOPER will incur all costs associated with Idaho Falls Power/Idaho Falls Fiber crews removing infrastructure in order to remedy settling. This includes, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. | — 9.16.26 PAGE 13 OF 15 but is not limited to, all settlement of trenching, transformer bases, fiber boxes, and/or conduit separation. S.C. 6.00 Storm Drainage. Storm Drainage shall be designed and constructed to accommodate drainage of the lots and right-of-way improvements within the Subdivision by DEVELOPER. The storm drainage system shall meet CITY’s Storm Drainage Policy. The storm system shall be constructed as shown on the CITY-approved Improvement Drawings. Maintenance of the storm system shall be the responsibility of DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER’s heirs, successors, or assigns. S.C. 7.00 Construction of Water Lines. DEVELOPER shall, at DEVELOPER’s sole expense, design and construct Nine Hundred Sixty-Five feet (965’) of Twelve inch (12”) water main line starting approximately 640 feet east from the intersection of Countryside Lane and South Holmes Ave. continuing to and across the entire frontage of this Subdivision along S. Holmes Ave. and Two Thousand Three Hundred Fifty Feet (2,350’) of Twelve inch (12”) water main line starting approximately 2,530 feet from the intersection of 65" South and Pressley Drive continuing to and across the entire frontage of this Subdivision and to the intersection of 65" South and S. Holmes Ave , as shown on the improvement plans approved by and on file with CITY Engineer. DEVELOPER shall design and construct, at DEVELOPER’s sole expense, all water mains and appurtenances within the Subdivision in accordance with CITY Standard Drawings and Engineering Specifications and as shown on the Improvement Drawings filed with and approved by CITY Engineer, and upon completion thereof, DEVELOPER shall furnish CITY with a certificate signed by a licensed professional engineer, certifying that the water mains and appurtenances have been constructed in accordance with such Specifications.. CITY agrees to reimburse DEVELOPER that portion of the costs of materials for the twelve inch (12”) main line which exceeds the costs of materials for a Eight inch (8”) water main line, subject to the limitations and bid procurement requirements of this AGREEMENT. S.C. 8.00 Reimbursement of Water Main Charges. Upon connection of water service to any property owned by any person other than DEVELOPER and fronting upon that portion of the S Holmes Ave and 65" South right-of-way in which DEVELOPER has constructed a water main line, CITY shall, to the extent permitted by law, and upon written request of DEVELOPER, pay to DEVELOPER all water main connection charges collected by CITY from the owners of such property, pursuant to Section 8-4-14(C), City Code, as the same currently exists or may be amended hereafter. Such right to reimbursement shall terminate with respect to any water main charge collected by CITY after the expiration of ten (10) years from the date of this AGREEMENT. S.C. 9.00 Construction of Sanitary Sewer Lines. DEVELOPER shall, at DEVELOPER’s sole expense, design and construct Two Thousand Three Hundred Forty Feet (2,340’) of Thirty-Six inch (36”) sanitary sewer main line starting approximately 2,530 feet from the intersection of 65" South and Pressley Drive continuing to and across the entire frontage of this Subdivision and to the intersection of 65" South and S. Holmes Ave., as shown on the improvement plans approved by and on file with CITY Engineer. DEVELOPER shall design and construct, at DEVELOPER’s sole expense, all sewer mains and appurtenances within the Subdivision in DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 — 9.16.26 PAGE 14 OF 15 accordance with CITY Standard Drawings and Engineering Specifications and as shown on the Improvement Drawings filed with and approved by CITY Engineer, and upon completion thereof, DEVELOPER shall furnish CITY with a certificate signed by a licensed professional engineer, certifying that the sewer mains and appurtenances have been constructed in accordance with such Specifications. CITY agrees to reimburse DEVELOPER that portion of the costs of materials for the Thirty-Six inch (36”) main line which exceeds the costs of materials for a Eight inch (8”) sewer main line, subject to the limitations and bid procurement requirements of this AGREEMENT. S.C. _ 10.00 Reimbursement of Sanitary Sewer Lines. Upon connection of sanitary sewer service to any property owned by any person other than DEVELOPER and fronting upon that portion of sanitary sewer which DEVELOPER has constructed outside of this Subdivision, CITY shall, to the extent permitted by law, and upon written request of DEVELOPER, pay to DEVELOPER all sewer main connection charges collected by CITY from the owners of such property, pursuant to Section 8-1- 23(C), City Code, as the same currently exists or may be amended hereafter. Such right to reimbursement shall terminate with respect to any sewer main charge collected by CITY after the expiration of ten (10) years from the date of this AGREEMENT S.C. __11.00_ Pressurized Irrigation. DEVOLPER shall install a surface water pressurized irrigation system as shown on the improvement plans approved by and on file with CITY Engineer. The system shall have a maximum diversion rate of 8.97 gallons per minute per developed acre, except as otherwise approved, or restricted in times of emergency or drought, by the governing board of the irrigation district. The System shall draw surface water at the 8.97 gallons per minute at a continuous rate (24 hours a day, 7 days a week) subject to adjustment for weather and Irrigation District direction. The canal diversion location and irrigation system design shall be approved in writing by the governing board of the irrigation district prior to Construction. DEVOLPER to provide required approval from the Irrigation District. The irrigation system shall be operational prior to the City issuing a Certificate of Occupancy. DEVELOPER shall arrange for a published water schedule allocated to the properties within the development to match up with the design and construction of the surface Water pressurized irrigation system. Prior to the sale of any lots within the subdivision, DEVELOPER shall notify property owners of the stipulated watering schedule, and that oversight of the watering schedule shall be the responsibility of the DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER’s heirs, successors, or assigns or property owners within the Development. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ARBOR ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 — 9.16.26 PAGE 15 OF 15 Memorandum File #: 26-409 City Council DATE: Tuesday, October 13, 2026 AGENDA: Regular FROM: Wade Sanner, Director DEPARTMENT: Community Development Services Title Amendment to Title 11, Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Sections 11-2-2: Allowing Drinking Establishments in LC, Limited Commercial Zones as a Permitted Use. ☒Ordinance ☐Resolution ☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☒Legislative Public Hearing ☐Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☐Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: Approve the Ordinance amending Title 11, Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Sections 11-2-2: Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones to permit Drinking Establishments as an allowed use in the LC, Limited Commercial Zone under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings, request that it be read by title and published by summary (or consider the Ordinance on the first reading and that it be read by title, reject the Ordinance, or take other action deemed appropriate). Description, Background Information, Purpose: Amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Sections 11-2-2: Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones to permit Drinking Establishments as an allowed use in the LC, Limited Commercial Zone. On September 1, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval permitting Drinking Establishments in the LC Zone to the Mayor and City Council as presented. This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Municipal Services Departments. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/20/2026 Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ RETURN TO AGENDA TITLE 11 COMPREHENSIVE ZONING 11 Applicant: City of Idaho Falls Project Manager: Caitlin Long Attachments: 1. Proposed amendment language. Requested Action: To approve the amendment to Section 11-2-4, Table 11-2-2 Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones to permit Drinking Establishment in the LC, Limited Commercial. Staff Comments: The City is currently working on updating ordinances city- wide as it relates to alcohol licensing and server training for alcohol. In the Zoning Ordinance, Drinking Establishments are currently permitted in two commercial zones, HC and CC, and Industrial Zones. Restaurants with bars are currently permitted in LC but not Drinking Establishments. By permitting them in LC, this use aligns more with the other commercial uses and can be a stand alone drinking establishment or an accessory use. Drinking Establishments will still have to follow state law and other city ordinances to permit the sale and serving of alcohol. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the amendments to permit Drinking Establishments in LC, Limited Commercial Zones. STAFF REPORT Amendment to Section 11-2-4, Table 11-2-2 Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones to permit Drinking Establishments in the LC, Limited Commercial Zone October 22, 2026 Community Development Services TITLE 11 COMPREHENSIVE ZONING 12 11-2-4: ALLOWED USES IN COMMERCIAL ZONES. Table 11-2-2: Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones P = permitted use. C1 = administrative conditional use. C2 = Board of Adjustment conditional use. C3 = City Council conditional use. A blank denotes a use that is not allowed in that zone. *Indicates uses that are subject to specific land use provisions set forth in the Standards for Allowed Land Uses Section of this Chapter. Commercial Proposed Land Use Classification PB CC LC HC PT Accessory Use P P P P P Accessory Use, Fuel Station* P P P Accessory Use, Storage Yard* P P P Amusement Center, Indoor P P P Amusement Center, Indoor Shooting Range* P P P Amusement Center, Outdoor* P Animal Care Clinic* P P P P Animal Care Facility* P Bed and Breakfast* P P P Boarding /Rooming House P P P Building Material, Garden and Farm Supplies P P Cemetery* C2 C2 C2 Club* P P P Communication Facility P P P Day Care, all Types* P P P P P Drinking Establishment P P P Drive-through Establishment * P* P P P P Dry Cleaning P Dwelling, Accessory Unit * P P P P Dwelling, Multi-Unit* P P P Dwelling, Multi-Unit Attached* P P P Dwelling, Single Unit Attached* P Dwelling, Single Unit Detached P Dwelling, Two Unit P P Eating Establishment P P P P Eating Establishment, Limited P P P P P Financial Institutions P P P P P Entertainment and Cultural Facilities P P P P P Equipment Sales, Rental and Services P P Food Processing, Small Scale P Food Store P P P P Health Care and Social Services P P P P P Higher Education Center P P P P Home Occupation* P P P P P Hospital* C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 Page 13 of 3 Proposed Land Use Classification PB CC LC HC PT Industry, Craftsman P P P P Industry, Light P P Information Technology P P P P P Live-Work* C2 P P P P Lodging Facility P P P P Mortuary P P Parking Facility P P P P Pawn Shop P Personal Service P P P P P Professional Service P P P P P Planned Unit Development* C3 C3 C3 Public Service Facility* C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 Public Service Facility, Limited P P P P P Public Service Use P P P P P Recreation Vehicle Park* P Religious Institution* P P P P Residential Care Facility P P P P P Retail P P P P School P P P P Short Term Rental* P P P Fuel Station P P P Fuel Station, Super C2 P P Storage Facility, Indoor P P P P Storage Facility, Outdoor P Storage Yard* P Transit Station P P P P Vehicle Body Shop P Vehicle Repair and Service P P P Vehicle Sales, Rental and Service P P Vehicle Washing Facility C2 C2 P (Ord. 3210, 8-23-18) (Ord. 3218, 9-13-18) (Ord. 3233, 12-20-18) (Ord 3277, 10-10-19) (Ord. 3358, 12-10-20) (Ord. 3451, 3-31-22) (Ord. 3574, 6-13-24) TITLE 11 COMPREHENSIVE ZONING 11 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; AMENDING TITLE 11 COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE, SECTION 11-2-4, TABLE 11-2-2 ALLOWED USES IN COMMERCIAL ZONES TO ALLOW DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS IN THE LIMITED COMMERCIAL ZONE; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City adopted the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance to promote the health, safety, peace; convenience and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City by implementing the goals and principals of the City’s Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City desires the standards of the City Zoning Code to be consistent and clear; and WHEREAS, the City is in the process of updating alcohol licensing and permitting Drinking Establishments in LC creates a more uniform approach for permitted uses in the Commercial Zones; and WHEREAS, the Ordinance includes changes to Section 11-2-4, Table 11-2-2 Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones standards of the Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing and unanimously recommend approval of the amendments of the Code on September 1, 2026; and WHEREAS, the Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing and passed a motion to approve the proposed amendments of the Code on October 22, 2026. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Section 11-2-4, Table 11-2-2 Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones of the City Code of Idaho Falls Idaho is hereby amended as follows: TITLE 11 COMPREHENSIVE ZONING 12 11-2-4: ALLOWED USES IN COMMERCIAL ZONES. Table 11-2-2: Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones P = permitted use. C1 = administrative conditional use. C2 = Board of Adjustment conditional use. C3 = City Council conditional use. A blank denotes a use that is not allowed in that zone. *Indicates uses that are subject to specific land use provisions set forth in the Standards for Allowed Land Uses Section of this Chapter. Commercial Proposed Land Use Classification PB CC LC HC PT Accessory Use P P P P P Accessory Use, Fuel Station* P P P Accessory Use, Storage Yard* P P P Amusement Center, Indoor P P P Amusement Center, Indoor Shooting Range* P P P Amusement Center, Outdoor* P Animal Care Clinic* P P P P Animal Care Facility* P Bed and Breakfast* P P P Boarding /Rooming House P P P Building Material, Garden and Farm Supplies P P Cemetery* C2 C2 C2 Club* P P P Communication Facility P P P Day Care, all Types* P P P P P Drinking Establishment P P P Drive-through Establishment * P* P P P P Dry Cleaning P Dwelling, Accessory Unit * P P P P Dwelling, Multi-Unit* P P P Dwelling, Multi-Unit Attached* P P P Dwelling, Single Unit Attached* P Dwelling, Single Unit Detached P Dwelling, Two Unit P P Eating Establishment P P P P Eating Establishment, Limited P P P P P Financial Institutions P P P P P Entertainment and Cultural Facilities P P P P P Equipment Sales, Rental and Services P P Food Processing, Small Scale P Food Store P P P P Health Care and Social Services P P P P P Higher Education Center P P P P Home Occupation* P P P P P Hospital* C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 ORDINANCE – Amendment to Zoning Ordinance Section 11-2-4, Table 11-2-2 Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones Page 13 of 4 Proposed Land Use Classification PB CC LC HC PT Industry, Craftsman P P P P Industry, Light P P Information Technology P P P P P Live-Work* C2 P P P P Lodging Facility P P P P Mortuary P P Parking Facility P P P P Pawn Shop P Personal Service P P P P P Professional Service P P P P P Planned Unit Development* C3 C3 C3 Public Service Facility* C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 Public Service Facility, Limited P P P P P Public Service Use P P P P P Recreation Vehicle Park* P Religious Institution* P P P P Residential Care Facility P P P P P Retail P P P P School P P P P Short Term Rental* P P P Fuel Station P P P Fuel Station, Super C2 P P Storage Facility, Indoor P P P P Storage Facility, Outdoor P Storage Yard* P Transit Station P P P P Vehicle Body Shop P Vehicle Repair and Service P P P Vehicle Sales, Rental and Service P P Vehicle Washing Facility C2 C2 P (Ord. 3210, 8-23-18) (Ord. 3218, 9-13-18) (Ord. 3233, 12-20-18) (Ord 3277, 10-10-19) (Ord. 3358, 12-10-20) (Ord. 3451, 3-31-22) (Ord. 3574, 6-13-24) SECTION 2. Savings and Severability Clause. The provisions and parts of this Ordinance are intended to be severable. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. Publication. This Ordinance, or a summary thereof in compliance with Idaho Code, shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect immediately upon its passage, approval, and publication. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication. ORDINANCE – Amendment to Zoning Ordinance Section 11-2-4, Table 11-2-2 Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones Page 14 of 4 PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, this day of , 2026. CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO ATTEST: Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor Linda Lundquist, City Clerk (SEAL) STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss: County of Bonneville ) I, LINDA LUNDQUIST, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY: That the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Ordinance entitled, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; AMENDING TITLE 11 COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE, SECTION 11-2-4, TABLE 11-2- 2 ALLOWED USES IN COMMERCIAL ZONES TO ALLOW DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS IN THE LIMITED COMMERCIAL ZONE; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.” A copy of the full text of the ordinance is available at City Hall. Linda Lundquist, City Clerk (SEAL) September 1, 2026 6:30 p.m. Planning Department City Annex Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Glen Ogden, Tia Panter, Forrest Ihler, Matthew Meehan, Marry Scales, Deanna Harger, Bill Scott. MEMBERS ABSENT: Dale Storer ALSO PRESENT: Assistant Planning Director Kerry Beutler, Caitlin Long Planner, Mike Thrower Planner; David Peterson Planner; Terry Rodino, Esq, City Attorney, and interested citizens. CALL TO ORDER: Ihler called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. MINUTES: Meehan moved to accept the minutes of August 4, 2026 with the correction to page 4, Scales seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Public Hearing: 4. RZN 26-004: ALLOWING DRINKING ESTABLISHMENT IN LC AS A PERMITTED USE. Applicant: CITY OF IDAHO FALLS. Long presented the staff report, a part of the record. Ihler asked if there are any restaurants that are in LC that have the accessory use as drinking. Long stated that Red Robin, Buffalo Wild Wings, or any chain restaurant that has a bar. Scales asked if the stipulation is there is food and they can serve alcohol because they serve food. Long agreed and stated that the drinking establishment, the definition in the zoning ordinance for a restaurant includes it can have a bar. Scales stated like Fords or the Tavern could exist in an LC with this ordinance change. Long agreed they need to have the restaurant to have that. Ihler asked if there are any restaurants that currently in LC that allow drinking. Long stated they do. Ihler asked if we are trying to fix this, so they are following the law? Long stated that a restaurant with a bar is currently permitted in LC. But a stand-alone drinking establishment is not, and an accessory is not. Long stated that there was a day spa that applied as an LC for a drinking license like a glass of wine with services, and currently that would not be permitted. If they allow drinking establishments and accessory uses in LC that would allow the day spa to serve wine. Scott asked if there is a limited number of liquor licenses available. Beutler stated that it is limited based on population. There is a limited number of liquor licenses, but the City does not regulate that. Meehan is passionate about this. Liquor licenses are regulated at State level. Every incorporated municipality gets 2 as a baseline and for every 1500 additional residents the City gets to issue another license. Liquor licenses are different from beer and wine licenses. They can have a drinking establishment that does not serve liquor. Local restaurants only serve beer and wine because it is easier to get a beer and wine license. Beutler stated that restaurants in the LC zone would be around the mall and Channing and Sams Club along 17th Street, and if any of those restaurants were to serve beer or wine. A liquor store is allowed in LC because it is retail, but you could not have a drinking establishment. Ogden asked if this is approved, they can apply for a liquor license or only serve beer and wine. Panter stated that a stand-alone bar is allowed in LC. Beutler stated that there was a spa that went through the process with the State and with Bonneville County to acquire a liquor license for beer and wine, and then the City said no because it is not allowed in that zone. A drinking establishment is not just necessarily just beer and wine, or other liquors. Scales stated that food is the trigger for accessory use. Long agreed and stated that this change will allow more accessory uses to the definition, regardless of the beverage. Meehan asked why this was left out in the first place, and why dry cleaning is not allowed. Long stated that it is a chemical thing associated with it. Drinking establishments in LC were not allowed originally because it is a mixed zone with residential and commercial. Meehan feels this is a no brainer. Ihler opened the public hearing. No one appeared in support or opposition. Ihler closed the public hearing. Meehan moved to recommend to the Mayor and City Council approval of the Amendment to Section 11- 2-4, Table 11-2-2- Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones to permit Drinking Establishments in the LC Zone. Scales seconded the motion. Ihler called for roll call vote: Scott, yes; Harger, yes; Meehan, yes; Ihler, yes; Scales, yes; Panter, yes; Ogden, yes. The motion passed unanimously