Sentinel Media records · public agendas and minutes, text only, refreshed nightly from each body's own site · not a newspaper
minutes meeting date 2026-05-07 · fetched 2026-09-17 · 42055 characters · read by OCR, check numbers against the source · official file · plain text
CITY OF | CITY OF POCATELLO, IDAHO y CITY COUNCIL REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 7, 2026 AGENDAITEMNO. | 1: ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Regular City Council meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Mark Dahlquist. Council members present were Dakota Bates, Brent Nichols, Hayden Paulsen, Stacy Satterfield, and Ann Swanson. Council member Corey Mangum was excused. Mayor Dahlquist led the audience in the pledge of allegiance. AGENDAITEMNO. — 2:. INVOCATION The invocation was offered by Pastor Dustin Andrew, representing Christ's Love Vineyard. AGENDAITEMNO. 3: CONSENT AGENDA Council was asked to consider the following business iterns: (a) MINUTES Waive the oral reading of the minutes and approve the minutes from the following meetings: Special City Council Goal Setting meetings of March 2 and March 13, 2026; Clarification and Regular City Council meetings of March 5, 2026; City Council Work Session of April 9, 2026; and Special City Council meetings of April 20 and April 23, 2026. (b) MATERIAL CLAIMS Approve the Material Claims for the period of April 16-30, 2026 in the amount of $1,821,642.96. (c) POCATELLO REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION APPOINTMENT Confirm the Mayor’s appointment of Tianna Abel to serve as a member of the Pocatello Regional Airport Commission, replacing Aaron Villano whose term expired. Tianna’s term will begin May 8, 2026 and expire May 8, 2028. (d) COUNCIL DECISION - FINAL PLAT APPROVAL BREEZY COMMONS A DIVISION OF LOT 59 BLOCK 1 BREEZY TOWNHOUSES Adopt the Council's decision approving the subdivision of approximately 2.12 acres of land into seven (7) lots, subject to conditions. A motion was made by Ms. Swanson, seconded by Mr. Bates, to approve the items on the Consent Agenda. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Swanson, Bates, Nichols, Paulsen, and Satterfield. Mayor Dahlquist recognized Scout Pack 1295, representing Connor Academy, in attendance. Mayor Dahlquist congratulated the ISU Softball Team on winning the Big Sky Conference Championship tournament. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 2 MAY 7, 2026 AGENDAITEMNO. 4: PROCLAMATIONS Mr. Paulsen, on behalf of Mayor Dahlquist, proclaimed the month of May 2026 to be Historic Preservation Month and called upon the people of Pocatello to join their fellow citizens across the United States in recognizing and participating in this special observance. Marty Vizcarra, Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) Chair, accepted the proclamation and thanked the Mayor, Council, and staff for the recognition. Mr. Bates, on behalf of Mayor Dahlquist, proclaimed the month of May 2026 to be National Tennis Month and urged all residents to become aware of and support National Tennis Month. Mikel Harmon, Portneuf Valley Tennis Association (PVTA) representative, accepted the proclamation and thanked the Mayor and Council for the recognition. She announced there would be a Free Play Day with instruction on May 30" at Capell Park from 10:00AM to 1:00 PM. . Mayor Dahlquist recognized participants in attendance who completed the City of Pocatello’s first Brownfields Job Training. He noted the program provides free training to community members and prepares individuals for careers in environmental remediation and construction fields. The Mayor encouraged others in the community to take advantage of future training opportunities. The following participants were recognized: Quigley Baker, Eva Lopez, and Jim Young. Certificates of completion were presented to participants afterward. Mayor Dahlquist presented information regarding Idaho’s “250,000 Acts of Service” initiative in recognition of the 250th anniversary of America and encouraged residents to complete and register acts of service through IdahoKindness.com. Mayor Dahlquist recognized Stacy and Meredith Dustin of Litterbugs Idaho for organizing a cleanup event at Sacajawea Park, Bannock Civitan for a beautification project at Lookout Point, and JD Hansen, owner of JD Hansen Salon and Medical Spa, along with volunteers Lexi and Roxy, for a cleanup project in the downtown Art Alley area. The public was encouraged to nominate individuals or organizations making a positive impact in the community by contacting the Mayor’s Office. AGENDAITEMNO. _ 5: CALENDAR REVIEW Mayor Dahlquist reminded Council members _of the following meetings: May 14 City Council Work Session at 9:00 a.m. followed by a Budget Development meeting; May 21 Council Clarification meeting at 5:30 p.m. and Regular City Council meeting at 6:00 p.m. Mayor Dahlquist reminded Council members the June 11, 2026 Work Session has been - canceled. Mayor Dahlquist announced the City Auction will be held May 9 at Prime Time Auction; May 10 is Mother’s Day at Zoo Idaho and mothers will receive half off the admission price when accompanied by a paid child; Zoo Idaho is now open every day; dog licenses expire June 1and the City is offering half-price dog licenses through the month of May. Licenses REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 3 MAY 7, 2026 may be purchased at the Animal Shelter. An animal licensing “Pop Up” tent will be available in the City Hall parking lot on May 19 from noon to 6 p.m. Mayor Dahlquist congratulated all Idaho State University graduates. AGENDAITEMNO. 6: ITEMS FROM THE AUDIENCE Nathan Bernosky, Pocatello resident, stated he represented the West Pocatello Creek District. He spoke regarding utility fees for residents outside the City limits who are charged a 50% premium for water service. He expressed concerns regarding the fairness of the billing, stating that residents were required to connect to City water after their wells were impacted and requested the matter be reviewed. He provided historical documentation to the Mayor for consideration. Idaho Law, Pocatello resident, voiced concerns regarding nuclear materials and community safety, including potential impacts on farming practices, soil disturbance, and food safety. He encouraged caution when gardening or handling produce in areas he believes may be affected by historic materials. AGENDAITEMNO. 7: PUBLIC HEARING - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) APPLICATION - CREEKSIDE COVE This time was set aside for the Council to hear comments from the public regarding a request by Jonathan Hunt, represented by Gardner Francis, Westland Development Services (mailing address: 2225 S. 50 E., Kaysville, UT 84037) for a Planned Unit Development known as Creekside Cove to allow construction of 42 townhome units, with open space and parking. The property is located at the southwest end of Freeman Lane. Following a public hearing held on April 8, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the request with conditions. . Mayor Dahlquist opened the public hearing. Council members announced there had been no ex parte communication. Gardner Francis, Westland Development, representing Jonathan Hunt, presented the planned unit development (PUD) application for Creekside Cove, located at 1151 Freeman Lane. He explained the proposal includes a clustered townhome development constructed in four phases with 70 on-site parking stalls, on-site stormwater management, and access from Freeman Lane. He stated the development complies with City Code Title-17, including-density, setbacks, building height, parking, and_landscaping requirements, with a proposed density of 11.5 units per acre, which is below the maximum number permitted. He noted the project would preserve approximately 1.66 acres of natural open space along Pocatello Creek, including a walking path and picnic area, while frontage improvements and a hammerhead turnaround would be constructed to City standards. He added that the project meets engineering requirements without creating off-site impacts and that construction would be managed under City permits with appropriate dust, noise, and traffic control measures. Becky Babb, Planning Manager, presented the Planned Unit Development (PUD) application for Creekside Cove at the end of Freeman Lane. She reported the Planning REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 4 MAY 7, 2026 and Zoning Commission recommended approval with conditions following a public hearing on April 8, 2026. She explained the proposal would subdivide the property into 39 zero lot line townhome lots and one common area lot. A PUD would allow shared lot lines and limited waivers for setbacks and building eaves. She stated the project preserves approximately 1.34 acres of open space along Pocatello Creek, is compatible with surrounding land uses, exceeds the minimum open space requirement, includes architectural enhancements, and provides substantially fewer units than the maximum density allowed by zoning. Ms. Babb also clarified that the required hammerhead turnaround is located within publicly owned right of way, which was confirmed through property records, and is intended for public roadway and emergency access purposes. In response to questions from Council, Ms. Babb clarified that the required hammerhead turnaround.is shown on Attachment A of the agenda packet and is located within the public right of way between two adjacent parcels owned by the same property owner. In response to questions from Council, Mr. Francis explained that the required open space would be located along Pocatello Creek and the adjacent hillside. He stated the usable recreation area would include a walking trail, swings, and picnic tables, while the hillside would remain preserved as a wildlife corridor. Mayor Dahlquist announced no written comments had been received. Nikki Taysom, Pocatello resident, spoke in opposition to the proposal, expressing concerns that the density of the development was excessive for the site. She also voiced concerns regarding increased traffic near the adjacent school, potential impacts on neighborhood property maintenance, and the loss of wildlife habitat along the creek corridor. Dakota Neifert, Pocatello resident, spoke in opposition to the proposal, expressing concerns about increased traffic and stating that the development's design prioritizes vehicle access over walkability and connectivity to the surrounding community. In response to public testimony, Mr. Francis stated the proposal complies with City Code, is below the maximum allowable density, and was designed to make efficient use of the property. He added that City staff determined the anticipated traffic impacts were not significant enough to require a traffic study. In response to questions from Council, Ms. Babb explained that the planned unit development is the first step in a three-step approval process, with detailed landscaping, recreational amenities, and construction plans to be reviewed during the preliminary and final plat stages before returning to Council for final approval. She noted that Council may also Conditionally approve to require specific recreational features such as trails and benches. She further clarified that the development includes two access points from Freeman Lane, and that the layout, including the required turnaround, has been reviewed by the Street and Fire Departments for compliance with City standards. There being no further public comments, Mayor Dahlquist closed the public hearing. A motion was made by Ms. Swanson, seconded by Mr. Bates, to approve a request for a Planned Unit Development known as Creekside Cove to allow construction of 42 townhome units, with open space and parking with the following conditions: 1. All REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 5 MAY 7, 2026 applicable standards of Pocatello Municipal Code 16.20 and 16.24 shall be strictly adhered to; 2. The parking area shall be dedicated as shared common area and at no point may any fencing or other obstruction be placed within the parking and access area so as to prevent fire access and turnaround. That the applicant shall maintain and enforce a no parking requirement along the private drive aisles; 3. The applicant shall provide a two foot (2') easement line around the footprint of each building cluster to provide for awnings, eaves, overhangs, and landscaping to extend into the shared common area, to be maintained by the homeowner's association. This easement shall be shown on the preliminary and final plat for each phase of the development; 4. A final landscape plan shall be submitted at the time of the initial building permit application and shall be compliant with all landscaping requirements of Pocatello Municipal Code; 5. Sidewalk and landscaping shall be installed adjacent to Freeman Lane; 6. All approved architectural standards shall be enforced by the homeowner's association per Municipal Code 17.02.140.G.5; and 7. All other standards or conditions of Municipal Code not herein stated but applicable to the PUD, land subdivision and residential development shall apply and that the property is located at the southwest end of Freeman Lane and that the decision be set out in appropriate Council decision format. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Swanson, Bates, and Satterfield. Nichols and Paulsen voted in opposition. The motion passed. , AGENDAITEMNO. 8: PUBLIC HEARING -_ CITY-INITIATED TEXT AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 17: ZONING REGULATIONS This time was set aside for the Council to hear comments from the public regarding proposed amendments to Title 17: Zoning Regulations. Mayor Dahlquist opened the public hearing. Jim Anglesey, Long Range Planner, presented proposed amendments to Title 17 Zoning Regulations, summarizing changes previously reviewed by Council during the March 12, 2026 Work Session. He explained the amendments include clarifications to use classifications for group homes and residential care facilities to align with state code, corrections and reorganization of zoning district use tables, removal of outdated childcare references, and updates to residential use regulations in commercial and downtown districts. He also noted revisions to dimensional standards allowing non- enclosed carports to extend into setbacks, updates to off-street parking requirements including administrative adjustments and downtown-specific flexibility, and clarification of home occupation standards to allow limited on-site employees, simplified operating requirements, and clearer permitting thresholds. He reported the Planning and Zoning Commission_ recommended approval after apublic hearing, proper public noticing was completed, and no written public comments were received. In response to questions from Council, Mr. Anglesey explained that staff reviewed prior Work Session feedback regarding home occupation hours of operation and compared it with existing nuisance regulations. He stated that staff is recommending maintaining the proposed hours of 9:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. rather than making additional changes. Mayor Dahlquist announced no written comments had been received. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 6 MAY 7, 2026 Nikki Taysom, Pocatello resident, spoke in opposition and raised general concerns about short-term rentals and development standards, expressing a preference for stricter regulations and consistent enforcement of zoning and land use rules. There being no further public comments, Mayor Dahlquist closed the public hearing. In response to questions from Council, Jared Johnson, City Attorney, confirmed that a motion could be structured to exclude specific items from the proposed ordinance amendments. Council discussion then focused on proposed home occupation hours, with concerns raised that the timeframe was too broad. Mr. Anglesey explained that the proposed hours are actually more restrictive than existing nuisance ordinance standards, including established quiet hours and time restrictions for construction and lawn care activities. Following clarification, the concern regarding hours of operation was withdrawn. A motion was made by Mr. Paulsen, seconded by Ms. Satterfield, to approve proposed amendments to Title 17: Zoning Regulations Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Paulsen, Satterfield, Bates, Nichols, and Swanson. AGENDAITEMNO. 9: SHORT PLAT APPLICATION - BRADY SUBDIVISION Council was asked to approve a short plat application by Brady Carter, represented by Stewart Ward, (mailing address: 4880 Clover Dell Road, Chubbuck, ID 83202), to — subdivide 1.68 acres (more or less) in a Commercial General zone into three (3) lots. The property is located at 2042 Garrett Way and will be known as Brady Subdivision. In response to questions from Council, Jennifer Flynn, Assistant Planner, clarified that two of the parcels already contain existing structures, while the third is a smaller lot being created through the platting process. She noted the properties are zoned Commercial General and that specific uses are addressed through the standard zoning regulations during the platting and development review process. A motion was made by Mr. Paulsen, seconded by Mr. Bates, to approve a short plat application by Brady Carter to subdivide 1.68 acres (more or less) in a Commercial General zone into three (3) lots with the following conditions: 1. All conditions on the Short Plat Subdivision Application Staff Report shall be met; 2.The plat shall be prepared in accordance with all State and local laws and ordinances and is subject to review by the City Surveyor; and 3. All other standards and conditions of Municipal Code not herein stated-but-applicable to residential development-shall-apply-and thatthe decision be set out in appropriate Council decision format and that the proposed property is located at 2042 Garrett Way and will be known as Brady Subdivision. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Paulsen, Bates, Nichols, Satterfield, and Swanson. AGENDAITEMNO. 10: FINAL PLAT APPLICATION - RESTLAWN MEMORIAL GARDENS 3®° AND 4™ ADDITIONS Council was asked to approve a final plat application by City of Pocatello, represented by Anne Butler, Parks and Recreation Director, to subdivide approximately 14 acres (more or less) in the Restlawn Memorial Gardens 3'¢ Addition into 40 lots and the 4 Addition REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7 MAY 7, 2026 into 721 lots. The subject property is located at 2865 South 5 Avenue and is zoned Public Lands Facilities (PLF). A motion was made by Mr. Nichols, seconded by Ms. Swanson, to approve a final plat application by City of Pocatello, represented by Anne Butler, Parks and Recreation Director, to subdivide approximately 14 acres (more or less) in the Restlawn Memorial Gardens 3 Addition into 40 lots and the 4 Addition into 721 lots with the following condition: 1. All standards and conditions of Municipal Code not herein stated but applicable to the subdivision shall apply and that the subject property is located at 2865 South 5"* Avenue and is zoned Public Lands Facilities (PLF) and that the decision be set out in appropriate Council decision format. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Nichols, Swanson, Bates, Paulsen, and Satterfield. AGENDAITEMNO. | Tl: FISCAL YEAR 2026 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS - POCATELLO REGIONAL TRANSIT Council was asked to approve the 2026 Operating and Capital Program of Projects for Transit’s Urban and Rural services and authorize the Mayor and City Attorney to PIN the Grant Certifications (5307) and authorize the Public Transit Director to make necessary amendments and modifications related to the grants as required, subject to Legal Department review for the following: (a) FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION URBAN GRANT (5307) Federal Transit Administration Urban Grant (5307) in the amount of $1,445,534.00 for Fiscal Year 2026 with a local share of $848,884.00; (b) FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION SMALL URBAN GRANT (5310) Federal Transit Administration Small Urban Grant (5310) in the amount of $366,043.00 for Fiscal Year 2026 with a local share of $91,511.00; (c) RURAL IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT GRANT (5311) Federal Transit Administration Rural Idaho Transportation Department Grant (5311) in the amount of $791,395.00 for Fiscal Year 2026 with a local share of $347,152.00. No City funds are used for the Rural Program; and (d) FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION GRANTS (5339) Federal Transit Administration Grants (5339) in the amount of $817,200.00 for Fiscal Year 2026 with a local share of $204,300.00. In-response to questions from-Council, Skyler Beebe, Pocatello Regional Transit Director, explained that “local share” refers to the required local match used to support federal transit grants, funded through a combination of City and County contributions, Medicaid transportation contracts, and other program revenues. He further explained that the Council action is a required administrative step to accept and align previously budgeted federal grant funding in compliance with Federal Transit Administration requirements. A motion was made by Mr. Bates, seconded by Mr. Paulsen, to approve the 2026 Operating and Capital Program of Projects for Transit’s Urban and Rural services as outlined in Agenda Item No. 11(a) through 11(d) and authorize the Mayor and City Attorney to PIN the Grant Certifications (5307) and authorize the Public Transit Director to make REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 8 MAY 7, 2026 necessary amendments and modifications related to the grants as required, subject to Legal Department review. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Bates, Paulsen, Nichols, Satterfield, and Swanson. AGENDAITEMNO. 12: CITY HALL ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES AWARD AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - VCBO ARCHITECTURE Council was asked to award the highest qualified and approve a professional services agreement between the City of Pocatello and VCBO Architecture for a Phase | feasibility analysis in the amount of $203,000.00 with reimbursable expenses not to exceed $25,000.00 and a Phase Il option for 6.89% of Construction Cost, and authorize the Mayor’s signature on all pertinent documents, subject to Legal Department review. The City conducted a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for architectural services and related engineering services to complete the feasibility analysis, design and renovation administration of a new City Hall facility at 150 South Arthur Avenue and received fifteen (15) responsive and responsible proposals for the services and VCBO was deemed the most highly qualified. In response to questions from Council, Brent McLane, Planning and Development Services Director, explained that the proposed agreement represents Phase One of a feasibility study to evaluate whether the former federal building could serve as a potential new City Hall location. This phase includes public outreach, building condition and systems analysis, ADA and accessibility review, parking and site capacity assessment, seismic considerations, departmental space programming, and preliminary conceptual design work, along with cost estimating to support an informed decision to proceed. He noted that this is an initial exploratory step only, and any advancement to Phase Two—which would include construction drawings and project management— would require separate Council approval. Discussion also included the timeline and history of considering the federal! building as a downtown civic use, which has been referenced in prior downtown planning efforts, with more active discussions with the property owner beginning approximately a year and a half ago. Council asked whether alternative options beyond the federal building had been studied; staff referenced a prior internal and academic review effort that explored renovation, expansion, and new-build scenarios, though it was not considered a definitive or formal comprehensive study. For cost estimating, staff indicated a general placeholder of approximately $275 per square foot is sometimes used, but emphasized that a professional building assessment would be required to produce accurate estimates. The feasibility study is anticipated to take approximately six months to complete. Council discussion included concerns about the scope and focus of the proposed feasibility study for a potential new City Hall location. The Mayor noted that public feedback received included significant concern about parking, and reiterated that approximately 89 City employees would be relocated if the project proceeds, with the federal building offering an estimated 50-60 parking stalls, though additional nearby parking options may be explored through leases or other arrangements. Council discussion included differing perspectives on the adequacy of the study as proposed. One Councilmember expressed concern that the justification for the project has been heavily focused on economic considerations, while not fully addressing other key REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9 MAY 7, 2026 factors such as building functionality, ADA accessibility, long-term suitability, and public access. Reference was made to prior studies estimating daily visitor volume and whether the site would realistically accommodate public access needs. Additional comments emphasized concerns about long-term facility planning, including whether existing City Hall infrastructure remains viable and whether future needs for police, fire, and administrative space are being adequately considered. Some Councilmembers expressed support for a broader, more comprehensive analysis of all potential City Hall options, including City-owned properties, rather than focusing primarily on the federal building. It was also noted that proceeding with a detailed, site-specific feasibility study at this stage may make it more difficult to pivot to alternative options later, particularly given the cost and scope of Phase One work. Staff clarified that if Council wished to pursue a broader approach, the current study could be set aside and a separate RFP issued for a more comprehensive analysis of City Hall options. In response to questions from Council, Mr. McLane, stated that he has been involved in ongoing discussions regarding the potential relocation of City Hall downtown and believes downtown is the heart of the city, noting that successful cities typically locate their city halls in their downtown core. He explained that a market analysis conducted through his role with the Pocatello Development Authority identified gaps in downtown, including a lack of government office presence, which he said provides stability and serves as a backbone for downtown activity. He stated that relocating approximately 89 City employees downtown would create daily economic activity and support surrounding businesses. He further stated that, based on available City-owned property, the federal building is the only viable option for a new City Hall and described it as well-suited for civic use given its original design as a courthouse, adaptable interior spaces, and capacity for council chambers. He noted that future facility needs, particularly for the Police Department and dispatch operations, will require additional planning and a phased approach as the City continues to grow. He stated that architectural firms have described the building located at 150 South Arthur as well-built and structurally sound and emphasized its historic value and potential to serve as a civic anchor consistent with the Downtown Master Plan and Comprehensive Plan. He added that relocating City Hall downtown would support economic development by encouraging private investment, increasing downtown activity, and strengthening property values, noting that downtown properties generate significant property tax revenue per square foot and may help offset residential tax burdens over time. He also stated that visitors and businesses frequently comment on the condition of City Hall, and that investing in civic facilities demonstrates_confidence_in_the community. He-acknowledged that_accessibility and parking concerns exist but stated he believes they are manageable and consistent with the use of historic buildings in other communities. He concluded by stating that, in his professional opinion, the federal building is an appropriate location for City Hall and represents an opportunity that may not be available in the future if not pursued at this time. In response to comments and discussion from Council, Council expressed general support for further study of the proposal while noting differing levels of concern regarding cost, timing, and overall feasibility. Council stated they were satisfied that the concept of relocating City Hall has been long considered by staff and prior planning efforts and that REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 10 MAY 7, 2026 . professional staff had evaluated costs, alternatives, and feasibility, noting that the feasibility study represents an appropriate next step and that proceeding with Phase 1 does not obligate the City to proceed to Phase 2. Council stated support for moving the project forward but expressed concern about affordability at this time and referenced the importance of continued evaluation of alternatives. Council commented on working conditions within the current City Hall facility, noting that portions of the building lack natural light and adequate workspace conditions, and stated that experiencing the space firsthand increased support for exploring alternatives while also acknowledging the need for cost-effective solutions. Additional discussion reflected concerns regarding timing of the decision, the importance of balancing economic considerations with accessibility and functionality, and the need for comprehensive evaluation of all City Hall options rather than a single-site focus. It was further noted that any solution would represent a significant multi-million-dollar investment, regardless of whether the City chooses renovation, new construction, or relocation, and that the issue does not require an immediate decision but rather careful long-term planning. Council also raised concern regarding the potential removal of taxable property from the tax rolls, while others emphasized the importance of considering both fiscal impact and long-term community growth in evaluating the proposal. A motion was made by Mr. Paulsen, seconded by Ms. Swanson, to approve a professional services agreement between the City of Pocatello and VCBO Architecture for a Phase | feasibility analysis in the amount of $203,000.00 with reimbursable expenses not to exceed $25,000.00 and a Phase II option for 6.89% of Construction Cost, and authorize the Mayor’s signature on all pertinent documents, subject to Legal Department review. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Paulsen, Swanson, and Satterfield. Bates and Nichols voted in opposition. The motion passed. AGENDAITEMNO. 13: COMMUNITY GARDEN PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT - PORTNEUF VALLEY PARTNERS Council was asked to approve a lease amendment with Portneuf Valley Partners (PVP) to use a portion of property known as parcel RPRPCPPO90403 as a community garden and authorize the Mayor’s signature on all applicable documents, subject to Legal Department review. The original lease agreement was approved by the Council at the March 19, 2026 Regular City Council meeting and the amendment corrects scaling of the original, which was incorrectly identified and caused an error in dimensions. The amendment lists the correct size of the project which will be approximately 454’ x 95’. Anne Butler, Parks-and Recreation Director, stated that-there is aone dollar-($1)lease arrangement in place for the use of City property and that there would be no financial cost to the City for the project, noting that the site would be developed as a community garden. A motion was made by Mr. Bates, seconded by Mr. Paulsen, to approve a lease amendment with Portneuf Valley Partners (PVP) to use a portion of property known as parcel RPRPCPP090403 as a community garden and authorize the Mayor’s signature on all applicable documents, subject to Legal Department review. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Bates, Paulsen, Nichols, Satterfield, and Swanson. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING Nl MAY 7, 2026 AGENDAITEMNO. 14; CONCESSIONAIRE AGREEMENT AWARD - MODI’S, LLC Council was asked to approve a concessionaire agreement with Megan “Moe” Osterhout of Modi’s, LLC (mailing address: 8549 North Parks Road, Pocatello, ID 83201) for food and beverage services to be provided at NOP Park, 700 West Eldredge Road, and authorize the Mayor’s signature on all pertinent documents, subject to Legal Department review. Anne Butler, Parks and Recreation Director, explained that following the resignation of the long-standing concessionaire at the adult complex, the City issued a public bid outlining the scope of services and requirements. The City received two bids, which were evaluated in accordance with legal procurement guidelines, and a vendor was selected through that process. A motion was made by Mr. Paulsen, seconded by Ms. Swanson, to approve a concessionaire agreement with Megan “Moe” Osterhout of Modi’s, LLC for food and beverage services to be provided at NOP Park, 700 West Eldredge Road, and authorize the Mayor’s signature on all pertinent documents, subject to Legal Department review. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Paulsen, Swanson, Bates, Nichols, and Satterfield. AGENDAITEMNO. 15: DECLARATION OF SURPLUS PROPERTY - VAC/JET TRUCK WATER POLLUTION CONTROL Council was asked to accept the recommendations of staff and declare one (1) 1983 Chevrolet Vac/Jet truck as surplus property and authorize the disposal for scrap material and authorize the Mayor’s signature on all pertinent documents, subject to Legal Department review. The asset was utilized at the WPC facility and is no longer safe or road worthy. A motion was made by Ms. Swanson, seconded by Mr. Paulsen, to accept the recommendations of staff and declare one (1) 1983 Chevrolet Vac/Jet truck as surplus property and authorize the disposal for scrap material and authorize the Mayor’s signature on all pertinent documents, subject to Legal Department review. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Swanson, Paulsen, Bates, Nichols, and Satterfield. AGENDAITEMNO. 16: PIGGYBACK BID ACCEPTANCE FOR CAT C9 . GENERATOR - WATER POLLUTION CONTROL (WPC) Council was asked to accept the recommendations of staff and approve the piggyback bid of Sourcewell contract #092222-CAT via Western States Equipment for one (1) C9 Generator in the amount of $83,423.00 and authorize the Mayor’s signature on all applicable documents, subject to Legal Department review. Funding for the purchase has been budgeted in the WPC FY2026 budget. A motion was made by Mr. Nichols, seconded by Mr. Paulsen, to accept the recommendations of staff and approve the piggyback bid of Sourcewell contract #092222-CAT via Western States Equipment for one (1) C9 Generator in the amount of $83,423.00 and authorize the Mayor’s signature on all applicable documents, subject to REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 12 MAY 7, 2026 Legal Department review. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Nichols, Paulsen, Bates, Satterfield, and Swanson. AGENDAITEMNO. 17: PIGGYBACK PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR HAZMAT TRUCK — FIRE DEPARTMENT Council was asked to approve the piggybacking of Sourcewell Contract #032824-RTG for the purchase of one (1) 2026 Alta Fire Ford F-550 4x4 Hazmat Rescue vehicle and authorize the Mayor’s signature on all pertinent documents, subject to Legal Department review. Funding for the purchase is through the Idaho Office of Emergency Management to facilitate the purchase of essential equipment for the Region 6 Hazmat Team, which is staffed and maintained by the Pocatello Fire Department. A motion was made by Mr. Paulsen, seconded by Ms. Satterfield, to approve piggybacking the Sourcewell Contract #032824-RTG for the purchase of one (1) 2026 Alta Fire Ford F-550 4x4 Hazmat Rescue vehicle and authorize the Mayor’s signature on all pertinent documents, subject to Legal Department review. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Paulsen, Satterfield, Bates, Nichols, Swanson. AGENDAITEMNO. 18: RESOLUTION - DECLARING INTENT TO CREATE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID) Council was asked to adopt a Resolution declaring intention to create Local Improvement District (LID) #120 for water system improvements and setting a public hearing. In response to questions from Council, Jared Johnson, City Attorney, explained that this resolution is a procedural legal step in the consideration of a potential Local Improvement District. The Council has received what has been determined to be a valid petition, and the resolution simply sets the matter for a future public hearing. At that hearing, Council will evaluate whether the proposed district meets the criteria under Idaho Code and applicable City standards and then decide whether to proceed with creation of the district. He clarified that this action does not commit Council to forming the district, but only advances the process to the public hearing stage for further consideration. A motion was made by Mr. Paulsen, seconded by Ms. Swanson, to adopt a Resolution (2026-11) declaring intention to create Local Improvement District (LID) #120 for water system improvements and setting a public hearing. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Paulsen, Swanson, Bates, Nichols, and Satterfield. AGENDA ITEM NO.__19: __RECONSIDERATION REQUEST _-__ FAIRGROUNDS PLACE SHORT PLAT SUBDIVISION Council was asked to consider a reconsideration request from JMaxx Holdings, Inc., represented by Nathan Cuoio of Merrill & Merrill Chartered, (mailing address: 109 North Arthur Street, Pocatello, ID 83201) to affirm, reverse or modify the City Council Decision Short Plat Approval Fairgrounds Place Subdivision approved by the City Council on April 2, 2026. Becky Babb, Planning Manager, provided the timeline and procedural context for the Fairgrounds Place short plat reconsideration request, explaining that Council is reviewing REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 13 MAY 7, 2026 whether to affirm, reverse, or modify its prior decision and is not conducting anew review of the underlying facts of the application. She noted that under Idaho’s Local Land Use Planning Act (LLUPA), Idaho Code Title 67 Chapter 65, any affected party seeking judicial review must first file a reconsideration request within 14 days and must identify specific procedural deficiencies; she identified McCormack Ranch LLC as the applicant and JMAX Holdings LLC as the affected party. She outlined the application history beginning with the January 14, 2026 submission by Brady Smith, staff review and redlines, and scheduling for Council consideration on March 19, 2026, where Council received a staff report, discussed the application, and unanimously approved the short plat with conditions under City Code 16.16.10, which allows short plats of four lots or fewer to be reviewed administratively for compliance and finalized by Council without preliminary plat requirements. She further explained that the Council Decision was later included on the April 2, 2026 consent agenda and adopted unanimously without modification. She then summarized the reconsideration request received April 16, 2026 alleging procedural inconsistencies, including noticing concerns and administrative processing issues, followed by a supplemental submission received after the 14-day statutory deadline, and a separate late request for a public hearing, which she noted is not authorized under LLUPA at this stage. She clarified that noticing requirements for short plats are satisfied through open meeting laws and that administrative edits and recording procedures occur after Council action under City Code. Finally, she stated that this is not a public hearing, that Council is acting under a limited reconsideration framework, and that Council must decide whether to affirm, reverse, or modify its prior decision and separately address the request for a public hearing. In response to questions from Council, Ms. Babb explained that a “specific deficiency” under the Local Land Use Planning Act (LLUPA) refers to an error or failure in the application or review process itself, such as a plat that does not properly close, exceeds the allowed number of lots and would require a different review process, or a procedural error in how staff or the City processed the application, as opposed to disagreement with the outcome. She noted that in this case, staff identified and corrected technical issues through standard redlining procedures, including inconsistencies in acreage and plat data, which were provided to the applicant and accepted as part of the standard review process. She clarified that staff often issues such corrections during review, that the applicant accepted the revised information, and that the discrepancy referenced in the reconsideration request amounted to approximately two (2) acres between initial submissions. She further confirmed that under LLUPA, a request for a public hearing must be made prior to the governing body’s final decision, and that in this case the request for a public hearing was submitted after Council had already taken final action on the short plat, making it untimely under statute. A motion was made by Mr. Bates, seconded by Mr. Nichols, to deny the reconsideration request for a public hearing due to timing requirements under LLUPA, noting that the request was not submitted prior to Council’s final decision as required by statute, from JMaxx Holdings, Inc., represented by Nathan Cuoio of Merrill & Merrill Chartered, and to affirm the City Council Decision Short Plat Approval Fairgrounds Place Subdivision approved by the City Council on April 2, 2026. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Bates, Nichols, Paulsen, Satterfield, and Swanson. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 14 MAY 7, 2026 AGENDAITEMNO. 20: ADJOURN There being no further business, Mayor Dahlquist adjourned the meeting at 8:08 p.m. APPROVED BY: Were Qh —— MARK DAHLQUIST, MAYOR ATTESTED BY: PREPARED BY: AUBRIANA T. RESENDES, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Text is extracted by machine from the official file linked on each page; the official file is the record. Sentinel Media, LLC.