City of Pocatello | minutes | meeting 2026-05-07 | Regular City Council Meeting Agenda (6:00 PM)
source: https://pocatello.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Minutes/_05072026-1895

CITY OF | CITY OF POCATELLO, IDAHO

y CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MAY 7, 2026

AGENDAITEMNO. | 1: ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

The Regular City Council meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Mark
Dahlquist. Council members present were Dakota Bates, Brent Nichols, Hayden Paulsen,
Stacy Satterfield, and Ann Swanson. Council member Corey Mangum was excused.

Mayor Dahlquist led the audience in the pledge of allegiance.
AGENDAITEMNO. — 2:. INVOCATION

The invocation was offered by Pastor Dustin Andrew, representing Christ's Love
Vineyard.

AGENDAITEMNO. 3: CONSENT AGENDA
Council was asked to consider the following business iterns:

(a) MINUTES
Waive the oral reading of the minutes and approve the minutes from the
following meetings: Special City Council Goal Setting meetings of March 2
and March 13, 2026; Clarification and Regular City Council meetings of
March 5, 2026; City Council Work Session of April 9, 2026; and Special City
Council meetings of April 20 and April 23, 2026.

(b) MATERIAL CLAIMS
Approve the Material Claims for the period of April 16-30, 2026 in the
amount of $1,821,642.96.

(c) POCATELLO REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION APPOINTMENT
Confirm the Mayor’s appointment of Tianna Abel to serve as a member of
the Pocatello Regional Airport Commission, replacing Aaron Villano whose
term expired. Tianna’s term will begin May 8, 2026 and expire May 8, 2028.

(d) COUNCIL DECISION - FINAL PLAT APPROVAL BREEZY COMMONS A
DIVISION OF LOT 59 BLOCK 1 BREEZY TOWNHOUSES
Adopt the Council's decision approving the subdivision of approximately
2.12 acres of land into seven (7) lots, subject to conditions.

A motion was made by Ms. Swanson, seconded by Mr. Bates, to approve the items on the
Consent Agenda. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Swanson, Bates, Nichols,
Paulsen, and Satterfield.

Mayor Dahlquist recognized Scout Pack 1295, representing Connor Academy, in
attendance.

Mayor Dahlquist congratulated the ISU Softball Team on winning the Big Sky Conference
Championship tournament.

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 2
MAY 7, 2026

AGENDAITEMNO. 4: PROCLAMATIONS

Mr. Paulsen, on behalf of Mayor Dahlquist, proclaimed the month of May 2026 to be
Historic Preservation Month and called upon the people of Pocatello to join their fellow
citizens across the United States in recognizing and participating in this special
observance.

Marty Vizcarra, Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) Chair, accepted the
proclamation and thanked the Mayor, Council, and staff for the recognition.

Mr. Bates, on behalf of Mayor Dahlquist, proclaimed the month of May 2026 to be
National Tennis Month and urged all residents to become aware of and support National
Tennis Month.

Mikel Harmon, Portneuf Valley Tennis Association (PVTA) representative, accepted the
proclamation and thanked the Mayor and Council for the recognition. She announced
there would be a Free Play Day with instruction on May 30" at Capell Park from 10:00AM
to 1:00 PM. .

Mayor Dahlquist recognized participants in attendance who completed the City of
Pocatello’s first Brownfields Job Training. He noted the program provides free training
to community members and prepares individuals for careers in environmental
remediation and construction fields. The Mayor encouraged others in the community to
take advantage of future training opportunities. The following participants were
recognized: Quigley Baker, Eva Lopez, and Jim Young. Certificates of completion were
presented to participants afterward.

Mayor Dahlquist presented information regarding Idaho’s “250,000 Acts of Service”
initiative in recognition of the 250th anniversary of America and encouraged residents to
complete and register acts of service through IdahoKindness.com. Mayor Dahlquist
recognized Stacy and Meredith Dustin of Litterbugs Idaho for organizing a cleanup event
at Sacajawea Park, Bannock Civitan for a beautification project at Lookout Point, and JD
Hansen, owner of JD Hansen Salon and Medical Spa, along with volunteers Lexi and Roxy,
for a cleanup project in the downtown Art Alley area. The public was encouraged to
nominate individuals or organizations making a positive impact in the community by
contacting the Mayor’s Office.

AGENDAITEMNO. _ 5: CALENDAR REVIEW

Mayor Dahlquist reminded Council members _of the following meetings: May 14 City
Council Work Session at 9:00 a.m. followed by a Budget Development meeting; May 21
Council Clarification meeting at 5:30 p.m. and Regular City Council meeting at 6:00 p.m.
Mayor Dahlquist reminded Council members the June 11, 2026 Work Session has been -
canceled.

Mayor Dahlquist announced the City Auction will be held May 9 at Prime Time Auction;
May 10 is Mother’s Day at Zoo Idaho and mothers will receive half off the admission price
when accompanied by a paid child; Zoo Idaho is now open every day; dog licenses expire
June 1and the City is offering half-price dog licenses through the month of May. Licenses

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 3
MAY 7, 2026

may be purchased at the Animal Shelter. An animal licensing “Pop Up” tent will be
available in the City Hall parking lot on May 19 from noon to 6 p.m.

Mayor Dahlquist congratulated all Idaho State University graduates.
AGENDAITEMNO. 6: ITEMS FROM THE AUDIENCE

Nathan Bernosky, Pocatello resident, stated he represented the West Pocatello Creek
District. He spoke regarding utility fees for residents outside the City limits who are
charged a 50% premium for water service. He expressed concerns regarding the fairness
of the billing, stating that residents were required to connect to City water after their
wells were impacted and requested the matter be reviewed. He provided historical
documentation to the Mayor for consideration.

Idaho Law, Pocatello resident, voiced concerns regarding nuclear materials and
community safety, including potential impacts on farming practices, soil disturbance, and
food safety. He encouraged caution when gardening or handling produce in areas he
believes may be affected by historic materials.

AGENDAITEMNO. 7: PUBLIC HEARING - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
(PUD) APPLICATION - CREEKSIDE COVE

This time was set aside for the Council to hear comments from the public regarding a
request by Jonathan Hunt, represented by Gardner Francis, Westland Development
Services (mailing address: 2225 S. 50 E., Kaysville, UT 84037) for a Planned Unit
Development known as Creekside Cove to allow construction of 42 townhome units, with
open space and parking. The property is located at the southwest end of Freeman Lane.
Following a public hearing held on April 8, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval of the request with conditions. .

Mayor Dahlquist opened the public hearing.
Council members announced there had been no ex parte communication.

Gardner Francis, Westland Development, representing Jonathan Hunt, presented the
planned unit development (PUD) application for Creekside Cove, located at 1151 Freeman
Lane. He explained the proposal includes a clustered townhome development
constructed in four phases with 70 on-site parking stalls, on-site stormwater
management, and access from Freeman Lane. He stated the development complies with

City Code Title-17, including-density, setbacks, building height, parking, and_landscaping
requirements, with a proposed density of 11.5 units per acre, which is below the maximum
number permitted. He noted the project would preserve approximately 1.66 acres of
natural open space along Pocatello Creek, including a walking path and picnic area, while
frontage improvements and a hammerhead turnaround would be constructed to City
standards. He added that the project meets engineering requirements without creating
off-site impacts and that construction would be managed under City permits with
appropriate dust, noise, and traffic control measures.

Becky Babb, Planning Manager, presented the Planned Unit Development (PUD)
application for Creekside Cove at the end of Freeman Lane. She reported the Planning

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 4
MAY 7, 2026

and Zoning Commission recommended approval with conditions following a public
hearing on April 8, 2026. She explained the proposal would subdivide the property into 39
zero lot line townhome lots and one common area lot. A PUD would allow shared lot lines
and limited waivers for setbacks and building eaves. She stated the project preserves
approximately 1.34 acres of open space along Pocatello Creek, is compatible with
surrounding land uses, exceeds the minimum open space requirement, includes
architectural enhancements, and provides substantially fewer units than the maximum
density allowed by zoning. Ms. Babb also clarified that the required hammerhead
turnaround is located within publicly owned right of way, which was confirmed through
property records, and is intended for public roadway and emergency access purposes. In
response to questions from Council, Ms. Babb clarified that the required hammerhead
turnaround.is shown on Attachment A of the agenda packet and is located within the
public right of way between two adjacent parcels owned by the same property owner.

In response to questions from Council, Mr. Francis explained that the required open space
would be located along Pocatello Creek and the adjacent hillside. He stated the usable
recreation area would include a walking trail, swings, and picnic tables, while the hillside
would remain preserved as a wildlife corridor.

Mayor Dahlquist announced no written comments had been received.

Nikki Taysom, Pocatello resident, spoke in opposition to the proposal, expressing
concerns that the density of the development was excessive for the site. She also voiced
concerns regarding increased traffic near the adjacent school, potential impacts on
neighborhood property maintenance, and the loss of wildlife habitat along the creek
corridor.

Dakota Neifert, Pocatello resident, spoke in opposition to the proposal, expressing
concerns about increased traffic and stating that the development's design prioritizes
vehicle access over walkability and connectivity to the surrounding community.

In response to public testimony, Mr. Francis stated the proposal complies with City Code,
is below the maximum allowable density, and was designed to make efficient use of the
property. He added that City staff determined the anticipated traffic impacts were not
significant enough to require a traffic study.

In response to questions from Council, Ms. Babb explained that the planned unit
development is the first step in a three-step approval process, with detailed landscaping,
recreational amenities, and construction plans to be reviewed during the preliminary and

final plat stages before returning to Council for final approval. She noted that Council
may also Conditionally approve to require specific recreational features such as trails
and benches. She further clarified that the development includes two access points from
Freeman Lane, and that the layout, including the required turnaround, has been reviewed
by the Street and Fire Departments for compliance with City standards.

There being no further public comments, Mayor Dahlquist closed the public hearing.
A motion was made by Ms. Swanson, seconded by Mr. Bates, to approve a request for a

Planned Unit Development known as Creekside Cove to allow construction of 42
townhome units, with open space and parking with the following conditions: 1. All

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 5
MAY 7, 2026

applicable standards of Pocatello Municipal Code 16.20 and 16.24 shall be strictly
adhered to; 2. The parking area shall be dedicated as shared common area and at no
point may any fencing or other obstruction be placed within the parking and access area
so as to prevent fire access and turnaround. That the applicant shall maintain and
enforce a no parking requirement along the private drive aisles; 3. The applicant shall
provide a two foot (2') easement line around the footprint of each building cluster to
provide for awnings, eaves, overhangs, and landscaping to extend into the shared
common area, to be maintained by the homeowner's association. This easement shall be
shown on the preliminary and final plat for each phase of the development; 4. A final
landscape plan shall be submitted at the time of the initial building permit application and
shall be compliant with all landscaping requirements of Pocatello Municipal Code; 5.
Sidewalk and landscaping shall be installed adjacent to Freeman Lane; 6. All approved
architectural standards shall be enforced by the homeowner's association per Municipal
Code 17.02.140.G.5; and 7. All other standards or conditions of Municipal Code not herein
stated but applicable to the PUD, land subdivision and residential development shall apply
and that the property is located at the southwest end of Freeman Lane and that the
decision be set out in appropriate Council decision format. Upon roll call, those voting in
favor were Swanson, Bates, and Satterfield. Nichols and Paulsen voted in opposition. The
motion passed. ,

AGENDAITEMNO. 8: PUBLIC HEARING -_ CITY-INITIATED TEXT
AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 17: ZONING REGULATIONS

This time was set aside for the Council to hear comments from the public regarding
proposed amendments to Title 17: Zoning Regulations.

Mayor Dahlquist opened the public hearing.

Jim Anglesey, Long Range Planner, presented proposed amendments to Title 17 Zoning
Regulations, summarizing changes previously reviewed by Council during the March 12,
2026 Work Session. He explained the amendments include clarifications to use
classifications for group homes and residential care facilities to align with state code,
corrections and reorganization of zoning district use tables, removal of outdated
childcare references, and updates to residential use regulations in commercial and
downtown districts. He also noted revisions to dimensional standards allowing non-
enclosed carports to extend into setbacks, updates to off-street parking requirements
including administrative adjustments and downtown-specific flexibility, and clarification
of home occupation standards to allow limited on-site employees, simplified operating
requirements, and clearer permitting thresholds. He reported the Planning and Zoning
Commission_ recommended approval after apublic hearing, proper public noticing was

completed, and no written public comments were received.

In response to questions from Council, Mr. Anglesey explained that staff reviewed prior
Work Session feedback regarding home occupation hours of operation and compared it
with existing nuisance regulations. He stated that staff is recommending maintaining the
proposed hours of 9:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. rather than making additional changes.

Mayor Dahlquist announced no written comments had been received.

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 6
MAY 7, 2026

Nikki Taysom, Pocatello resident, spoke in opposition and raised general concerns about
short-term rentals and development standards, expressing a preference for stricter
regulations and consistent enforcement of zoning and land use rules.

There being no further public comments, Mayor Dahlquist closed the public hearing.

In response to questions from Council, Jared Johnson, City Attorney, confirmed that a
motion could be structured to exclude specific items from the proposed ordinance
amendments. Council discussion then focused on proposed home occupation hours, with
concerns raised that the timeframe was too broad.

Mr. Anglesey explained that the proposed hours are actually more restrictive than
existing nuisance ordinance standards, including established quiet hours and time
restrictions for construction and lawn care activities. Following clarification, the concern
regarding hours of operation was withdrawn.

A motion was made by Mr. Paulsen, seconded by Ms. Satterfield, to approve proposed
amendments to Title 17: Zoning Regulations Upon roll call, those voting in favor were
Paulsen, Satterfield, Bates, Nichols, and Swanson.

AGENDAITEMNO. 9: SHORT PLAT APPLICATION - BRADY SUBDIVISION

Council was asked to approve a short plat application by Brady Carter, represented by
Stewart Ward, (mailing address: 4880 Clover Dell Road, Chubbuck, ID 83202), to —
subdivide 1.68 acres (more or less) in a Commercial General zone into three (3) lots. The
property is located at 2042 Garrett Way and will be known as Brady Subdivision.

In response to questions from Council, Jennifer Flynn, Assistant Planner, clarified that
two of the parcels already contain existing structures, while the third is a smaller lot being
created through the platting process. She noted the properties are zoned Commercial
General and that specific uses are addressed through the standard zoning regulations
during the platting and development review process.

A motion was made by Mr. Paulsen, seconded by Mr. Bates, to approve a short plat
application by Brady Carter to subdivide 1.68 acres (more or less) in a Commercial
General zone into three (3) lots with the following conditions: 1. All conditions on the Short
Plat Subdivision Application Staff Report shall be met; 2.The plat shall be prepared in
accordance with all State and local laws and ordinances and is subject to review by the
City Surveyor; and 3. All other standards and conditions of Municipal Code not herein

stated-but-applicable to residential development-shall-apply-and thatthe decision be set
out in appropriate Council decision format and that the proposed property is located at
2042 Garrett Way and will be known as Brady Subdivision. Upon roll call, those voting in
favor were Paulsen, Bates, Nichols, Satterfield, and Swanson.

AGENDAITEMNO. 10: FINAL PLAT APPLICATION - RESTLAWN MEMORIAL
GARDENS 3®° AND 4™ ADDITIONS

Council was asked to approve a final plat application by City of Pocatello, represented by
Anne Butler, Parks and Recreation Director, to subdivide approximately 14 acres (more
or less) in the Restlawn Memorial Gardens 3'¢ Addition into 40 lots and the 4 Addition

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7
MAY 7, 2026

into 721 lots. The subject property is located at 2865 South 5 Avenue and is zoned Public
Lands Facilities (PLF).

A motion was made by Mr. Nichols, seconded by Ms. Swanson, to approve a final plat
application by City of Pocatello, represented by Anne Butler, Parks and Recreation
Director, to subdivide approximately 14 acres (more or less) in the Restlawn Memorial
Gardens 3 Addition into 40 lots and the 4 Addition into 721 lots with the following
condition: 1. All standards and conditions of Municipal Code not herein stated but
applicable to the subdivision shall apply and that the subject property is located at 2865
South 5"* Avenue and is zoned Public Lands Facilities (PLF) and that the decision be set out
in appropriate Council decision format. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Nichols,
Swanson, Bates, Paulsen, and Satterfield.

AGENDAITEMNO. | Tl: FISCAL YEAR 2026 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS -
POCATELLO REGIONAL TRANSIT

Council was asked to approve the 2026 Operating and Capital Program of Projects for
Transit’s Urban and Rural services and authorize the Mayor and City Attorney to PIN the
Grant Certifications (5307) and authorize the Public Transit Director to make necessary
amendments and modifications related to the grants as required, subject to Legal
Department review for the following:

(a) FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION URBAN GRANT (5307)
Federal Transit Administration Urban Grant (5307) in the amount of
$1,445,534.00 for Fiscal Year 2026 with a local share of $848,884.00;

(b) FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION SMALL URBAN GRANT (5310)
Federal Transit Administration Small Urban Grant (5310) in the amount of
$366,043.00 for Fiscal Year 2026 with a local share of $91,511.00;

(c) RURAL IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT GRANT (5311)
Federal Transit Administration Rural Idaho Transportation Department
Grant (5311) in the amount of $791,395.00 for Fiscal Year 2026 with a local
share of $347,152.00. No City funds are used for the Rural Program; and

(d) FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION GRANTS (5339) Federal Transit
Administration Grants (5339) in the amount of $817,200.00 for Fiscal Year
2026 with a local share of $204,300.00.

In-response to questions from-Council, Skyler Beebe, Pocatello Regional Transit Director,

explained that “local share” refers to the required local match used to support federal
transit grants, funded through a combination of City and County contributions, Medicaid
transportation contracts, and other program revenues. He further explained that the
Council action is a required administrative step to accept and align previously budgeted
federal grant funding in compliance with Federal Transit Administration requirements.

A motion was made by Mr. Bates, seconded by Mr. Paulsen, to approve the 2026
Operating and Capital Program of Projects for Transit’s Urban and Rural services as
outlined in Agenda Item No. 11(a) through 11(d) and authorize the Mayor and City Attorney
to PIN the Grant Certifications (5307) and authorize the Public Transit Director to make

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 8
MAY 7, 2026

necessary amendments and modifications related to the grants as required, subject to
Legal Department review. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Bates, Paulsen,
Nichols, Satterfield, and Swanson.

AGENDAITEMNO. 12: CITY HALL ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES AWARD AND
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - VCBO
ARCHITECTURE

Council was asked to award the highest qualified and approve a professional services
agreement between the City of Pocatello and VCBO Architecture for a Phase | feasibility
analysis in the amount of $203,000.00 with reimbursable expenses not to exceed
$25,000.00 and a Phase Il option for 6.89% of Construction Cost, and authorize the
Mayor’s signature on all pertinent documents, subject to Legal Department review. The
City conducted a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for architectural services and related
engineering services to complete the feasibility analysis, design and renovation
administration of a new City Hall facility at 150 South Arthur Avenue and received fifteen
(15) responsive and responsible proposals for the services and VCBO was deemed the
most highly qualified.

In response to questions from Council, Brent McLane, Planning and Development
Services Director, explained that the proposed agreement represents Phase One of a
feasibility study to evaluate whether the former federal building could serve as a
potential new City Hall location. This phase includes public outreach, building condition
and systems analysis, ADA and accessibility review, parking and site capacity
assessment, seismic considerations, departmental space programming, and preliminary
conceptual design work, along with cost estimating to support an informed decision to
proceed. He noted that this is an initial exploratory step only, and any advancement to
Phase Two—which would include construction drawings and project management—
would require separate Council approval. Discussion also included the timeline and
history of considering the federal! building as a downtown civic use, which has been
referenced in prior downtown planning efforts, with more active discussions with the
property owner beginning approximately a year and a half ago. Council asked whether
alternative options beyond the federal building had been studied; staff referenced a prior
internal and academic review effort that explored renovation, expansion, and new-build
scenarios, though it was not considered a definitive or formal comprehensive study. For
cost estimating, staff indicated a general placeholder of approximately $275 per square
foot is sometimes used, but emphasized that a professional building assessment would be
required to produce accurate estimates. The feasibility study is anticipated to take
approximately six months to complete.

Council discussion included concerns about the scope and focus of the proposed
feasibility study for a potential new City Hall location. The Mayor noted that public
feedback received included significant concern about parking, and reiterated that
approximately 89 City employees would be relocated if the project proceeds, with the
federal building offering an estimated 50-60 parking stalls, though additional nearby
parking options may be explored through leases or other arrangements.

Council discussion included differing perspectives on the adequacy of the study as
proposed. One Councilmember expressed concern that the justification for the project
has been heavily focused on economic considerations, while not fully addressing other key

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9
MAY 7, 2026

factors such as building functionality, ADA accessibility, long-term suitability, and public
access. Reference was made to prior studies estimating daily visitor volume and whether
the site would realistically accommodate public access needs.

Additional comments emphasized concerns about long-term facility planning, including
whether existing City Hall infrastructure remains viable and whether future needs for
police, fire, and administrative space are being adequately considered. Some
Councilmembers expressed support for a broader, more comprehensive analysis of all
potential City Hall options, including City-owned properties, rather than focusing
primarily on the federal building.

It was also noted that proceeding with a detailed, site-specific feasibility study at this
stage may make it more difficult to pivot to alternative options later, particularly given
the cost and scope of Phase One work. Staff clarified that if Council wished to pursue a
broader approach, the current study could be set aside and a separate RFP issued for a
more comprehensive analysis of City Hall options.

In response to questions from Council, Mr. McLane, stated that he has been involved in
ongoing discussions regarding the potential relocation of City Hall downtown and
believes downtown is the heart of the city, noting that successful cities typically locate
their city halls in their downtown core. He explained that a market analysis conducted
through his role with the Pocatello Development Authority identified gaps in downtown,
including a lack of government office presence, which he said provides stability and
serves as a backbone for downtown activity. He stated that relocating approximately 89
City employees downtown would create daily economic activity and support surrounding
businesses. He further stated that, based on available City-owned property, the federal
building is the only viable option for a new City Hall and described it as well-suited for civic
use given its original design as a courthouse, adaptable interior spaces, and capacity for
council chambers. He noted that future facility needs, particularly for the Police
Department and dispatch operations, will require additional planning and a phased
approach as the City continues to grow. He stated that architectural firms have
described the building located at 150 South Arthur as well-built and structurally sound and
emphasized its historic value and potential to serve as a civic anchor consistent with the
Downtown Master Plan and Comprehensive Plan. He added that relocating City Hall
downtown would support economic development by encouraging private investment,
increasing downtown activity, and strengthening property values, noting that downtown
properties generate significant property tax revenue per square foot and may help
offset residential tax burdens over time. He also stated that visitors and businesses
frequently comment on the condition of City Hall, and that investing in civic facilities
demonstrates_confidence_in_the community. He-acknowledged that_accessibility and

parking concerns exist but stated he believes they are manageable and consistent with
the use of historic buildings in other communities. He concluded by stating that, in his
professional opinion, the federal building is an appropriate location for City Hall and
represents an opportunity that may not be available in the future if not pursued at this
time.

In response to comments and discussion from Council, Council expressed general support
for further study of the proposal while noting differing levels of concern regarding cost,
timing, and overall feasibility. Council stated they were satisfied that the concept of
relocating City Hall has been long considered by staff and prior planning efforts and that

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 10
MAY 7, 2026 .

professional staff had evaluated costs, alternatives, and feasibility, noting that the
feasibility study represents an appropriate next step and that proceeding with Phase 1
does not obligate the City to proceed to Phase 2. Council stated support for moving the
project forward but expressed concern about affordability at this time and referenced
the importance of continued evaluation of alternatives. Council commented on working
conditions within the current City Hall facility, noting that portions of the building lack
natural light and adequate workspace conditions, and stated that experiencing the space
firsthand increased support for exploring alternatives while also acknowledging the need
for cost-effective solutions. Additional discussion reflected concerns regarding timing of
the decision, the importance of balancing economic considerations with accessibility and
functionality, and the need for comprehensive evaluation of all City Hall options rather
than a single-site focus. It was further noted that any solution would represent a
significant multi-million-dollar investment, regardless of whether the City chooses
renovation, new construction, or relocation, and that the issue does not require an
immediate decision but rather careful long-term planning. Council also raised concern
regarding the potential removal of taxable property from the tax rolls, while others
emphasized the importance of considering both fiscal impact and long-term community
growth in evaluating the proposal.

A motion was made by Mr. Paulsen, seconded by Ms. Swanson, to approve a professional
services agreement between the City of Pocatello and VCBO Architecture for a Phase |
feasibility analysis in the amount of $203,000.00 with reimbursable expenses not to
exceed $25,000.00 and a Phase II option for 6.89% of Construction Cost, and authorize
the Mayor’s signature on all pertinent documents, subject to Legal Department review.
Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Paulsen, Swanson, and Satterfield. Bates and
Nichols voted in opposition. The motion passed.

AGENDAITEMNO. 13: COMMUNITY GARDEN PROPERTY LEASE
AGREEMENT AMENDMENT - PORTNEUF VALLEY
PARTNERS

Council was asked to approve a lease amendment with Portneuf Valley Partners (PVP) to
use a portion of property known as parcel RPRPCPPO90403 as a community garden and
authorize the Mayor’s signature on all applicable documents, subject to Legal
Department review. The original lease agreement was approved by the Council at the
March 19, 2026 Regular City Council meeting and the amendment corrects scaling of the
original, which was incorrectly identified and caused an error in dimensions. The
amendment lists the correct size of the project which will be approximately 454’ x 95’.

Anne Butler, Parks-and Recreation Director, stated that-there is aone dollar-($1)lease

arrangement in place for the use of City property and that there would be no financial
cost to the City for the project, noting that the site would be developed as a community
garden.

A motion was made by Mr. Bates, seconded by Mr. Paulsen, to approve a lease
amendment with Portneuf Valley Partners (PVP) to use a portion of property known as
parcel RPRPCPP090403 as a community garden and authorize the Mayor’s signature on
all applicable documents, subject to Legal Department review. Upon roll call, those voting
in favor were Bates, Paulsen, Nichols, Satterfield, and Swanson.

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING Nl
MAY 7, 2026

AGENDAITEMNO. 14; CONCESSIONAIRE AGREEMENT AWARD - MODI’S,
LLC

Council was asked to approve a concessionaire agreement with Megan “Moe” Osterhout
of Modi’s, LLC (mailing address: 8549 North Parks Road, Pocatello, ID 83201) for food
and beverage services to be provided at NOP Park, 700 West Eldredge Road, and
authorize the Mayor’s signature on all pertinent documents, subject to Legal Department
review.

Anne Butler, Parks and Recreation Director, explained that following the resignation of
the long-standing concessionaire at the adult complex, the City issued a public bid
outlining the scope of services and requirements. The City received two bids, which were
evaluated in accordance with legal procurement guidelines, and a vendor was selected
through that process.

A motion was made by Mr. Paulsen, seconded by Ms. Swanson, to approve a
concessionaire agreement with Megan “Moe” Osterhout of Modi’s, LLC for food and
beverage services to be provided at NOP Park, 700 West Eldredge Road, and authorize
the Mayor’s signature on all pertinent documents, subject to Legal Department review.
Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Paulsen, Swanson, Bates, Nichols, and
Satterfield.

AGENDAITEMNO. 15: DECLARATION OF SURPLUS PROPERTY - VAC/JET
TRUCK WATER POLLUTION CONTROL

Council was asked to accept the recommendations of staff and declare one (1) 1983
Chevrolet Vac/Jet truck as surplus property and authorize the disposal for scrap material
and authorize the Mayor’s signature on all pertinent documents, subject to Legal
Department review. The asset was utilized at the WPC facility and is no longer safe or
road worthy.

A motion was made by Ms. Swanson, seconded by Mr. Paulsen, to accept the
recommendations of staff and declare one (1) 1983 Chevrolet Vac/Jet truck as surplus
property and authorize the disposal for scrap material and authorize the Mayor’s
signature on all pertinent documents, subject to Legal Department review. Upon roll call,
those voting in favor were Swanson, Paulsen, Bates, Nichols, and Satterfield.

AGENDAITEMNO. 16: PIGGYBACK BID ACCEPTANCE FOR CAT C9
. GENERATOR - WATER POLLUTION CONTROL (WPC)

Council was asked to accept the recommendations of staff and approve the piggyback
bid of Sourcewell contract #092222-CAT via Western States Equipment for one (1) C9
Generator in the amount of $83,423.00 and authorize the Mayor’s signature on all
applicable documents, subject to Legal Department review. Funding for the purchase
has been budgeted in the WPC FY2026 budget.

A motion was made by Mr. Nichols, seconded by Mr. Paulsen, to accept the
recommendations of staff and approve the piggyback bid of Sourcewell contract
#092222-CAT via Western States Equipment for one (1) C9 Generator in the amount of
$83,423.00 and authorize the Mayor’s signature on all applicable documents, subject to

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 12
MAY 7, 2026

Legal Department review. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were Nichols, Paulsen,
Bates, Satterfield, and Swanson.

AGENDAITEMNO. 17: PIGGYBACK PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR HAZMAT
TRUCK — FIRE DEPARTMENT

Council was asked to approve the piggybacking of Sourcewell Contract #032824-RTG
for the purchase of one (1) 2026 Alta Fire Ford F-550 4x4 Hazmat Rescue vehicle and
authorize the Mayor’s signature on all pertinent documents, subject to Legal Department
review. Funding for the purchase is through the Idaho Office of Emergency Management
to facilitate the purchase of essential equipment for the Region 6 Hazmat Team, which is
staffed and maintained by the Pocatello Fire Department.

A motion was made by Mr. Paulsen, seconded by Ms. Satterfield, to approve
piggybacking the Sourcewell Contract #032824-RTG for the purchase of one (1) 2026
Alta Fire Ford F-550 4x4 Hazmat Rescue vehicle and authorize the Mayor’s signature on
all pertinent documents, subject to Legal Department review. Upon roll call, those voting
in favor were Paulsen, Satterfield, Bates, Nichols, Swanson.

AGENDAITEMNO. 18: RESOLUTION - DECLARING INTENT TO CREATE
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID)

Council was asked to adopt a Resolution declaring intention to create Local Improvement
District (LID) #120 for water system improvements and setting a public hearing.

In response to questions from Council, Jared Johnson, City Attorney, explained that this
resolution is a procedural legal step in the consideration of a potential Local Improvement
District. The Council has received what has been determined to be a valid petition, and
the resolution simply sets the matter for a future public hearing. At that hearing, Council
will evaluate whether the proposed district meets the criteria under Idaho Code and
applicable City standards and then decide whether to proceed with creation of the
district. He clarified that this action does not commit Council to forming the district, but
only advances the process to the public hearing stage for further consideration.

A motion was made by Mr. Paulsen, seconded by Ms. Swanson, to adopt a Resolution
(2026-11) declaring intention to create Local Improvement District (LID) #120 for water
system improvements and setting a public hearing. Upon roll call, those voting in favor
were Paulsen, Swanson, Bates, Nichols, and Satterfield.

AGENDA ITEM NO.__19: __RECONSIDERATION REQUEST _-__ FAIRGROUNDS

PLACE SHORT PLAT SUBDIVISION

Council was asked to consider a reconsideration request from JMaxx Holdings, Inc.,
represented by Nathan Cuoio of Merrill & Merrill Chartered, (mailing address: 109 North
Arthur Street, Pocatello, ID 83201) to affirm, reverse or modify the City Council Decision
Short Plat Approval Fairgrounds Place Subdivision approved by the City Council on April
2, 2026.

Becky Babb, Planning Manager, provided the timeline and procedural context for the
Fairgrounds Place short plat reconsideration request, explaining that Council is reviewing

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 13
MAY 7, 2026

whether to affirm, reverse, or modify its prior decision and is not conducting anew review
of the underlying facts of the application. She noted that under Idaho’s Local Land Use
Planning Act (LLUPA), Idaho Code Title 67 Chapter 65, any affected party seeking judicial
review must first file a reconsideration request within 14 days and must identify specific
procedural deficiencies; she identified McCormack Ranch LLC as the applicant and JMAX
Holdings LLC as the affected party. She outlined the application history beginning with
the January 14, 2026 submission by Brady Smith, staff review and redlines, and
scheduling for Council consideration on March 19, 2026, where Council received a staff
report, discussed the application, and unanimously approved the short plat with
conditions under City Code 16.16.10, which allows short plats of four lots or fewer to be
reviewed administratively for compliance and finalized by Council without preliminary
plat requirements. She further explained that the Council Decision was later included on
the April 2, 2026 consent agenda and adopted unanimously without modification. She
then summarized the reconsideration request received April 16, 2026 alleging procedural
inconsistencies, including noticing concerns and administrative processing issues,
followed by a supplemental submission received after the 14-day statutory deadline, and
a separate late request for a public hearing, which she noted is not authorized under
LLUPA at this stage. She clarified that noticing requirements for short plats are satisfied
through open meeting laws and that administrative edits and recording procedures occur
after Council action under City Code. Finally, she stated that this is not a public hearing,
that Council is acting under a limited reconsideration framework, and that Council must
decide whether to affirm, reverse, or modify its prior decision and separately address the
request for a public hearing.

In response to questions from Council, Ms. Babb explained that a “specific deficiency”
under the Local Land Use Planning Act (LLUPA) refers to an error or failure in the
application or review process itself, such as a plat that does not properly close, exceeds
the allowed number of lots and would require a different review process, or a procedural
error in how staff or the City processed the application, as opposed to disagreement with
the outcome. She noted that in this case, staff identified and corrected technical issues
through standard redlining procedures, including inconsistencies in acreage and plat
data, which were provided to the applicant and accepted as part of the standard review
process. She clarified that staff often issues such corrections during review, that the
applicant accepted the revised information, and that the discrepancy referenced in the
reconsideration request amounted to approximately two (2) acres between initial
submissions. She further confirmed that under LLUPA, a request for a public hearing must
be made prior to the governing body’s final decision, and that in this case the request for
a public hearing was submitted after Council had already taken final action on the short
plat, making it untimely under statute.

A motion was made by Mr. Bates, seconded by Mr. Nichols, to deny the reconsideration
request for a public hearing due to timing requirements under LLUPA, noting that the
request was not submitted prior to Council’s final decision as required by statute, from
JMaxx Holdings, Inc., represented by Nathan Cuoio of Merrill & Merrill Chartered, and to
affirm the City Council Decision Short Plat Approval Fairgrounds Place Subdivision
approved by the City Council on April 2, 2026. Upon roll call, those voting in favor were
Bates, Nichols, Paulsen, Satterfield, and Swanson.

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 14
MAY 7, 2026

AGENDAITEMNO. 20: ADJOURN

There being no further business, Mayor Dahlquist adjourned the meeting at 8:08 p.m.

APPROVED BY:

Were Qh ——

MARK DAHLQUIST, MAYOR

ATTESTED BY:

PREPARED BY:

AUBRIANA T. RESENDES, DEPUTY CITY CLERK