Sentinel Media records · public agendas and minutes, text only, refreshed nightly from each body's own site · not a newspaper
agenda meeting date 2026-09-10 · fetched 2026-09-17 · 549024 characters · read by OCR, check numbers against the source · official file · plain text
Page 1 of 9
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
City of Idaho Falls
City Council Meeting
680 Park Avenue
Thursday
September 10, 2026
6:30 P.M.
Mayor
City Council
Jim Francis
Council President, Seat 4
John Radford
Council Seat 5
Kirk Larsen
Council Seat 3
Brandon Lee
Council Seat 2
Jim Freeman
Council Seat 6
Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Council Seat 1
Lisa Burtenshaw
Livestream at www.idahofallsidaho.gov/429/Live-Stream
Page 2 of 9
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Welcome to the Idaho Falls City Council Meeting.
Regularly scheduled City Council meetings are open to the general public. City Council meetings are also live-
streamed and archived on the City website. Please be aware that the meeting agenda will differ from the published
version if amendments to the agenda are made by the Council during the meeting.
The Council encourages public input. While a general public comment option is not required by Idaho law, the
Idaho Falls City Council welcomes general public input as part of regular City Council meetings. General public
comment will be allowed for up to 20 minutes. However, citizens are always welcome to contact their Council
representatives via e-mail or telephone, as listed on the City website. The Council is committed to an atmosphere
that promotes equal opportunity, civility, mutual respect, proper decorum and freedom from discrimination or
harassment.
Those who wish to address City Council during the council meetings are encouraged to adhere to the guidelines
below.
Public Comment Guidelines
Speakers are encouraged to:
•
State their name and city of residence.
•
Focus comments on matters within the purview of the City Council. Limit comments to three (3) minutes
or less.
•
Refrain from repeating information already presented to preserve time for others to speak. Large groups
are encouraged to select one or two speakers to represent the voice of the entire group.
•
Practice civility and courtesy. City leaders have the right and the responsibility to maintain order and
decorum during the meeting. Time may be curtailed for those speakers whose comments are profane or
disruptive in nature.
•
Refrain from comments on issues involving matters currently pending before the City’s Planning and
Zoning Commission or other matters that require legal due process, including public hearings, City
enforcement actions, and pending City personnel disciplinary matters.
•
Comments that pertain to activities or performance of individual City employees should be shared directly
with the City’s Human Resources Department (208-612-8248), the City’s Legal Department (208-612-
8178) or with the Office of the Mayor (208-612-8235).
Public Hearing Guidelines
•
In-Person Testimony. Because public hearings must follow various procedures required by law, please
wait to offer your testimony until invited/indicated. Please address Council directly and try to limit your
time to three (3) minutes.
•
Written Testimony. The public may provide written testimony via postal mail sent to City Hall or via email
sent to the City Clerk at IFClerk@idahofalls.gov. Testimony will be distributed to the members of the
Council and become a part of the official public hearing record. Written testimony must be received no
later than forty-eight (48) hours prior to the date of the hearing to ensure inclusion in the permanent City
record.
If you need communication aids or other physical accommodations to attend or access this meeting, please
contact the City Clerk at (208) 612-8414 or the ADA Coordinator at (208) 612-8323 prior to the meeting. They will
help accommodate special needs wherever possible.
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
City Council
Agenda
City Council Chambers
6:30 PM
Thursday, September 10, 2026
1.
Call to Order & Roll Call
2.
Pledge of Allegiance
3.
Staff responses to prior public comment and other updates
4.
Public Comment
Please see guidelines on page 2.
5.
Consent Agenda
Questions on Consent Agenda items may be addressed and/or moved to the Regular Agenda for separate
consideration if requested by a Council Member. Other changes to this agenda may require the approval of a majority
of Council.
A)
Fire Department
1)
Bonneville County Fire Protection District #1 Service Agreement.
26-326
Agreement
Attachments:
B)
Public Works
1)
Bid Award - Tautphaus Park Surface Water Conversion
26-341
Tautphaus Park Surface Water Conversion
Attachments:
2)
Bid Award - Yellowstone Avenue Sidewalk - Federal Aid 24705
26-340
Yellowstone Ave Sidewalk
Galicias Concrete LLC Sam.gov Verification- PA 9-4-26
Attachments:
C)
Office of the Mayor
1)
City Council and Utility Board Meeting Minutes
26-338
07.30.26 City Council Minutes-F2
08.06.26 City Council Special Meeting - F
08.10.26 Work Session-F
08.13.26 City Council Minutes-F
08.12.26 Utility Board Minutes
Attachments:
Action Item:
Page 3 of 9
City Council
Agenda
September 10, 2026
Approve, accept, or receive all items on the Consent Agenda according to the recommendations presented (or take
other action deemed appropriate).
6.
Regular Agenda
A)
Public Works
1)
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5307 Small Urban
Funding Agreement
26-336
This Funding Agreement, between the Idaho Transportation Department and the City of Idaho
Falls, will allow for the use of federal funds for operating and capital costs for GIFT
microtransit services.
The Agreement is for $1,755,326.00 in federal funds reimbursement and is subject to a 35%
local match of $614,364.10. The budgeted match exists and will be paid by Greater Idaho Falls
Transit (GIFT). Sufficient funding and budget authority exist to execute the Agreement.
Approve the FTA 5310 Small Urban Funding Agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign the
necessary document (or take other action deemed appropriate).
Action Item(s):
O2674IF GIFT 5307 Agreement
Attachments:
B)
Municipal Services
1)
Approve the Write-off of Unpaid Ambulance Service Accounts
26-321
The Ambulance Account Review and Management Committee is recommending a total
request for write-off for the 2025 calendar year-end accounts for Medicare and Medicaid
published rates reduced to the maximum allowable rates for a total of $2,957,488.32 or 87%
of the total write-off request of $3.4M, with Medicare at 59% and Medicaid at 29%. The
remaining 13% of the total or $437,542.93 includes 2020 and 2021 calendar year contractual,
collection agency, deceased, with no known estate, approved bankruptcy, and approved
hardship accounts. For the collection agency category total of $223,683.63, includes accounts
from 2020 and 2021 where collection efforts are past statute or uncollectible as determined
by the collection agency. For comparison purposes, last year’s approved write-off request was
$4M, with 48% of the write-off attributed to Medicare and 24% to Medicaid. The approval of
the write-off requests will provide accurate recording of the city’s ambulance accounts
receivable records for the fiscal year-end September 30, 2026, annual audit.
Approve the write-off of unpaid ambulance service accounts for the calendar dates of service
2020, 2021, and 2025 determined as past statute or uncollectible for a total of $3,395,031.25
(or take other action deemed appropriate).
Action Item(s):
Page 4 of 9
City Council
Agenda
September 10, 2026
Summary 2026
Graphic
Policy
Attachments:
C)
Office of the Mayor
1)
Ordinance amending Title 1, Chapters 7, 9 and 13, Creation of a
City Finance Department
26-346
The creation of the City Finance Department is aligned with the Mayor and City Council’s
commitment to financial accountability, transparency, and sustainability. The stand-alone
Finance Department will direct all the financial operations of the City, including budgeting,
accounting, treasury, debt management, and utility rate-setting and billing. In addition, the
department will focus on the City’s overall financial strategy and planning, establishing
accounting policy and internal controls, identifying and managing financial risk and providing
high-level financial analysis and modeling to support City decision-making.
Adopt the Ordinance amending Title 1, Chapters 7, 9 and 13 and other updated titles,
chapters and sections of city ordinance to create a Finance Department, move the financial
duties from the Department of Municipal Services to the Finance Department, and designate
the City Treasurer as the Director of the Finance Department, under a suspension of the rules
requiring three complete readings, and request that it be read by title and published by
summary (or take other action deemed appropriate.)
Action Item(s):
2)
Appointment of Finance Director/Treasurer
26-
347
I request City Council’s confirmation of the appointment of Mark Hagedorn as the City’s new
Finance Director/Treasurer. Attached please find my appointment memo, as well as a resume
for Mr. Hagedorn, who currently serves as City Treasurer. The specific roles and
responsibilities of this position are outlined in the amended Title 1, Chapters 7, 9 and 13, and
updated chapters, titles and sections of City Code.
Confirm the appointment of Mark Hagedorn as the City’s new Finance Director/Treasurer (or
take other action deemed appropriate.)
Action Item(s):
Appointment Letter
Resume
Attachments:
3)
Ordinance Repealing Title 2, Chapter 8, Dissolving the Sister Cities
Advisory Committee and Releasing its Members
26-343
The City of Idaho Falls and Tokai-Mura entered into a Sister-City Alliance and International
Friendship in July 1981. The City established a Sister City Committee (whose name was later
Page 5 of 9
Attachments: Ordinance
City Council
Agenda
September 10, 2026
changed to Sister Cities Advisory Committee) and was tasked with formalizing the financial
relationship between the City and the Sister Cities Adult and Youth programs in the
community and pursuing economic relations with Tokai-Mura. The committee has been in
existence for over nine years and has faithfully discharged its duties and is no longer needed
to facilitate the City’s ongoing relationship as a Sister City with Tokai-Mura.
Adopt the Ordinance repealing Title 2, Chapter 8, of the Idaho Falls City Code, under a
suspension of the rules requiring three complete readings, and request that it be read by title
and published by summary (or take other action deemed appropriate).
Action Item(s):
Ordinance - Title 2, Ch 8 Sister Cities Advisory Committee 9.8.26
Attachments:
D)
Airport
1)
Approve Additional Services Request with T.O. Engineers
(Ardurra) for Terminal Renovation and Expansion Phase 3
(Priority 1A-Phase 1)
26-328
T.O. Engineers, Inc., now Ardurra, was selected for a slate of projects in April 2019 that
included terminal work for the Idaho Falls Regional Airport. Work Order 24-01 sought to
produce construction documents for the totality of Terminal Renovation and Expansion Phase
3 (Priority 1A - Phase 1A) for a total of $1,712,922.50. To address increased project costs, lack
of grant funding, and a rephasing of the project, Additional Services Request #1 increased the
cost of Work Order 24-01 by $427,408.74 which included producing the standalone Utility and
Infrastructure Package, currently underway.
As the terminal project progresses through Priority 1A - Phase 1, additional services are
necessary to deliver two final packages for this phase of terminal renovation and expansion.
The first package is the footings and foundation package, and the second package is building
out the expansion and renovation of existing terminal space including most of the Phase 1
elements and elements that were anticipated to be in Phase 2 including the ticket lobby,
Airline Ticket Offices, bag screening room, and restrooms. The total fee for these additional
services is $1,630,820.20. $388,850.92 remains in previously approved funds under Work
Order 24-01 from when the project was paused in 2024. This amount represents the
remaining effort to complete the design of elements in the Phase 1 area while the remainder
of the request represents the effort to design the elements in the Phase 2 area. Therefore, the
total for this additional services request is $1,242,969.28. Funding is available in existing
Federal Aviation Administration grants, an independent fee estimate has been performed,
and the Federal Aviation Administration has concurred with this fee.
Action Item(s):
Page6 of 9
City Council
Agenda
September 10, 2026
Approve Additional Services Request 2 to Work Order 24-01 with T.O. Engineers, now Ardurra,
related to the Terminal Renovation and Expansion Phase 3 (Priority 1A - Phase 1) or take other
action deemed appropriate.
Request 2
FAA Letter
Attachments:
2)
Approve the Other Transaction Agreement for the Law
Enforcement Officer Reimbursement Program with the
Transportation Security Administration
26-330
Appropriations from the federal government restored funding for the Law Enforcement
Officer Reimbursement Program in federal fiscal year 2026. In June, the Transportation
Security Administration issued a Notice of Funding Opportunity for these funds. The Idaho
Falls Regional Airport applied for, and received, an award not to exceed $146,000. The funds
are available to reimburse the airport $25 an hour for each hour a law enforcement officer is
assigned to the passenger screening checkpoint.
The agreement is for a one-year term and is renewable in succeeding years at the
determination of the federal government.
Approve the Other Transaction Agreement for the Law Enforcement Officer Reimbursement
Program (or take other action deemed appropriate).
Action Item(s):
Agreement
Parent Agreement
Attachments:
E)
Idaho Falls Power
1)
Kleinschmidt Continuing Relicensing Professional Service Contract
- FY2027
26-333
City Council approved Kleinschmidt Associates’ original contract on Oct. 28, 2021, following a
search of qualifications (SOQ) in 2019 to provide professional services on a year-over-year
basis as is allowed by Idaho Code § 67-2320 for relicensing the City’s hydroelectric projects
with the Federal Electric Regulatory Commission (FERC). The fiscal 2027 spending authority is
for ongoing project management, completing final technical reports (FTRs), reviewing
comments on the Draft License Application (DLA), resolving comments in the Final License
Application (FLA) development, developing Management Plans in consultation with IFP
management and operations staff, and managing the post filing process as explained on the
scope of work.
Action Item(s):
Page7 0f 9
City Council
Agenda
September 10, 2026
Approve the contract for fiscal year 2027 Relicensing Services for the Gem State and Idaho
Falls Projects through the Post-Final License Application (FLA) Filing Process for a total of
$579,100 and give authorization to the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary
documents (or take other action deemed appropriate).
Kleinschmidt Agr
Attachments:
2)
Construction Agreement for South Tourist Park Path Lighting
Project
26-334
On May 14, 2026, Idaho Falls Power (IFP) issued an informal bid request for the project. Bids
were received and opened on June 14, 2026. On June 25, 2026, on the recommendation of IFP
and the City’s Legal Department, the Council rejected the initial bids and directed staff to
solicit on the open market.
Following that direction, staff's review found the project is subject to Davis-Bacon prevailing
wage requirements due to its grant funding, a requirement not included in the original bid.
During preparation of the revised bid, a rock removal line item was also added to establish a
clear unit cost if rock is encountered during installation. The construction agreement
therefore includes both the Davis-Bacon wage requirement and the rock removal item to
accurately reflect project costs.
In summary, the construction agreement is not simply a higher-priced rebid of the original
project. It reflects two requirements identified after Council's rejection: Davis-Bacon
prevailing wages tied to the project's grant funding, and a rock removal for transparent cost
accounting if rock is encountered during construction.
Approve the Construction Agreement with Armstrong Electric, Inc, in the amount of
$145,680.06; and give authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary
documents (or take other action deemed necessary).
Action Item(s):
Agreement
Bid Tab
Map
Armstong
Attachments:
3)
Bid Award - IFP 26-25 Fiber Drop Cable Installation
26-344
On September 1, 2026, bids were received and opened for the Fiber Drop Cable Installation
project(s). A tabulation of bid results is attached. The purpose of the project(s) is to enter into
contract to provide installation of provided fiber, optical network terminal device and
required splicing inside homes and at the access point. Each individual installation is
Page 8 of 9
City Council
Agenda
September 10, 2026
considered a separate project and will be paid per project.
Approve the bid award for the Fiber Drop Cable Installation project(s); award to the lowest
responsive, responsible bidder, B Jackson Construction, for $531,463.00 (or take other action
deemed appropriate).
Action Item(s):
Bid
Attachments:
4)
Bid Award - IFP 26-26 Micro Duct Drop Installation Services
26-345
On September 1, 2026, bids were received and opened for the Micro Duct Drop Installation
project(s). A tabulation of bid results is attached. The purpose of the proposed project(s) is to
provide installation of a micro duct for broadband fiber service to individual structures at a
depth greater than 18 inches. Each installation will be considered a separate project and will
be paid per project.
Approve the bid award for the Micro Duct Drop Installation project(s) and award to the lowest
responsive, responsible bidder, B Jackson Construction, for a price of $208,845.30 (or take
other action deemed appropriate).
Action Item(s):
09012026_Idaho Falls Power Bid Tabulation Project_ Micro Duct Dr
Attachments:
7.
Announcements
8.
Adjournment
Page 9 of 9
Memorandum
File #: 26-326
City Council
DATE: Tuesday, August 25, 2026
AGENDA: Consent
FROM: Chief Olson
DEPARTMENT: Fire Department
Title
Bonneville County Fire Protection District #1 Service Agreement.
☐Ordinance
☐Resolution
☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐Legislative Public Hearing
☒Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☐Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Confirm the one-year Fire Protection and Joint Services Agreement between the City and Bonneville County
Fire Protection District #1 (or take other action deemed appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
This one-year renewal of the Fire Protection Joint Services Agreement allows the City and the Bonneville
County Fire Protection District #1 to work together to provide proficient and cost-effective methods of
firefighting to both the City and County residents. This Agreement provides for each party to share costs to
have a feasibility study performed regarding a potential merge and a joint powers agreement. By way of
Resolution No. 2026-14 adopted on June 4, 2026, Council authorized Fire Chief Johan Olson to negotiate and
execute this Agreement, provided certain conditions were met. This Agreement has already been signed by
Fire Chief Johan Olson and is being brought forward for Council’s review and confirmation.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Municipal Services Departments.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 9/8/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
FIRE PROTECTION JOINT SERVICES AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO AND
BONNEVILLE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1
This FIRE PROTECTION JOINT SERVICES AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN CITY
OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, AND BONNEVILLE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
NO. | (hereinafter "AGREEMENT") is between City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, a municipal corporation,
whose address is P.O. Box 50220, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83405 (hereinafter "CITY"), and the Bonneville
County Fire Protection District No. 1, a fire protection district organized under the laws of the State
of Idaho serving portions of Bonneville County, (hereinafter "DISTRICT" and, collectively with City,
the “Partics”).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, DISTRICT is a fire protection district duly and regularly organized pursuant to
the provisions of Title 31, Chapter 14, Idaho Code, for the purpose of providing fire protection
services within the boundaries of DISTRICT as established by law; and
WHEREAS, CITY is a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho;
and
WHEREAS, CITY owns and operates the Idaho Falls Fire and Public Safety Division for the
purpose of providing fire protection and public safety services within City limits; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Idaho Code Title 50, Chapter 3 and Idaho Code Section 31-1430, the
Partics arc authorized to enter into agreements for the mutually beneficial exercise of their respective
powcrs; and
WHEREAS, the Parties believe the execution of this Fire Protection Joint Services Agreement
to provide joint fire protection services to the residents of DISTRICT and CITY will avoid duplication
of services, improve the quality of fire protection within the respective scrvicc areas of the Parties
and reduce labor, equipment and maintenance costs incurred by the Parties in providing such
services; and
WHEREAS, this AGREEMENT is made in order to allow CITY to provide the scrvices
described in this AGREEMENT cmbracced within the boundaries of the DISTRICT excluding the
arca embraced within the geographic limits of the City of Ammon, Idaho, a municipal corporation of
the State of Idaho; and
WHEREAS, each Party to this AGREEMENT desires to, and shall, rctain all such Party's
authority within its jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, nothing in this AGREEMENT is intended to or should be interpreted to be a Joint
Powers Agreement pursuant to the Idaho Code,
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premiscs, covenants and conditions set forth
hercin, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Fire Protection Services. CITY agrees to provide fire protection services, as described herein,
to DISTRICT in accordance with the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT.
2. Services _to Residents of DISTRICT. CITY will provide fire protection services for
buildings, structures and real and personal properties embraced within the DISTRICT excluding the
arca embraced within the geographic limits of the City of Ammon, Idaho, as presently constituted,
and as shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A," and incorporated hercin, and such other
additional area or areas reasonably and lawfully annexed hereafter to DISTRICT, following mutual
written agreement of the Parties to do so.
3. Term. The term of this AGREEMENT shall commence on October 1, 2026, and shall
terminate at 11:59 p.m. local time on September 30, 2027, unless extended in writing by the Partics.
4. Description of Fire Protection Services. CITY agrecs to provide fire protection services, as
described herein, to DISTRICT to at least the same, or similar, level and degree of fire protection
services provided by CITY to DISTRICT under prior agreements between the Parties for the same
subject matter. Such fire protection services shall consist of the following services:
a.
The use of CITY cquipment and labor to suppress fires occurring within the boundaries
of DISTRICT; and
The use of DISTRICT cquipment and property to suppress fires occurring within the
boundarics of the DISTRICT; and
Performance of “pre-plan" inspections of all commercial and industrial buildings and
structures located within DISTRICT, as necessary, in order to acquaint CITY fire
protection officers with the layout of and fire protection measures within such buildings
and structures, provided that CITY shall have no obligation to enforce violations of any
DISTRICT fire or safety code, statute, law or ordinance, or of any other authority having
jurisdiction thereof; and
Dispatch of fire suppression, personnel, and equipment to DISTRICT; and
Promotion and use of public information programs for the purpose of encouraging fire
prevention measures.
5. Request for Assistance. The commanding officer of the fire department or the officer in charge
of a fire unit or an emergency medical service unit at the scene of an emergency, of either Party, is
authorized to request assistance from the other Party if confronted with an emergency situation at which
the requesting Party has need for equipment or personnel in excess of that available at the requesting
Party's fire department.
6. Response to Request. Upon receipt of such a request, the commanding officer of the Party
receiving the request shall immediately take the following action:
a. Determine if the responding Party has equipment and personnel available to respond to the
requesting Party and determine the nature of the equipment and number of personnel
available.
b. Determine what available equipment and what available personnel should be dispatched in
accordance with the operating plans and procedures established by the Parties.
c. In the event the needed equipment and personnel are available, to dispatch such equipment
and personnel to the scene of the emergency with proper operating instructions.
d. In the event the needed equipment and personnel are not available, they are to immediately
advise the requesting Party of such fact.
7. Liability. Each Party agrees to assume responsibility for all liabilities that occur or arise in any
way out of the performance of this AGREEMENT by its personnel only and to save and hold the other
Party, its cmployecs, and officials, harmless from all costs, expenses, losses, and damages, including
cost of defense, incurred as a result of any acts or omissions of the Party's personne] relating to the
performance of this AGREEMENT.
8. Command Responsibility at Emergency Scene, The chicf officcr or senior officer of the
Party to which the response is made shall be in command of the operations under which the equipment
and personnel sent by the responding Party shall serve; provided, that the responding equipment and
personnel shall be under the immediate supervision of the officer in charge of the responding
apparatus.
9, Limitations of Service. CITY shall have complete and sole discretion with respect to the
delivery and allocation of such fire protection services in times of equipment or labor shortages or
unavailability, force majeure, war, strike, or other emergency.
10. Budget and Negotiation. In considcration for the delivery of such fire protection services
pursuant to this AGREEMENT, DISTRICT agrees to pay CITY the sum of Onc Million Eight
Hundred Seventy-Two Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety-Three Dollars ($1,872,793) for the 2026-
2027 terms of this AGREEMENT. The sum shall be paid in equal quarterly installments, cach
respcctively due on October 10, 2026; January 10, 2027; April 10, 2027; and July 10, 2027.
On or before the last day of February 2027, DISTRICT shall notify CITY of its appointment
of one (1) or more representatives to meet with CITY for the purpose of negotiating a possible
extension of this AGREEMENT for one (1) or more additional years following the expiration of this
AGREEMENT. The Parties shall provide to one another such information as may be reasonably
obtained relating to the following:
CITY’s fire protection budget;
e any change in the ratio between emergency calls originating from within the DISTRICT in
comparison to such calls originating within the CITY;
e the number of staff requircd to respond to emergencies originating from within the DISTRICT in
comparison to the number of staff for emergency calls originating from within the CITY;
e any incrcasc in the cost of providing such services as a result of a State or fedcral mandate or
change of law;
e increase in costs attributable to any increased level of service;
e or any other appropriate and reasonable factor which affects the cost of providing fire protection
services to the DISTRICT.
In the event the Partics arc unable to rcach agreement before May 1, 2027, then this
AGREEMENT shall automatically terminate at 11:59 p.m. local time on September 30, 2027, unless
the Parties mutually agree in writing to extend the AGREEMENT for an additional period of time.
Il. Lease of DISTRICT Equipment. DISTRICT agrees to lease to CITY, for the entire
term of this AGREEMENT, ccrtain Leased Equipment. The Leased Equipment includes tools and
implements for firefighting, including but not limited to, engines, hoses supplied-air respirators, and
other firefighting tools as presently provided by DISTRICT to CITY, together with replacements of
the samc as requested by CITY to adequately maintain cach DISTRICT engine in a serviceable
condition to respond to fires within the DISTRICT. It shall be the responsibility of DISTRICT to
maintain records of purchase or ownership of DISTRICT's Leased Equipment sufficient to identify
the same. DISTRICT shall maintain an inventory shect of DISTRICT'S Leased Equipment and may
conduct periodic inspections of DISTRICT's Leased Equipment sufficient to maintain an accuratc
inventory of the same. The rental for the Leased Equipment shall be the sum of One Dollar ($1.00)
per ycar. CITY agrees to keep and maintain the Leascd Equipment in a good state of repair
throughout the term hereof, and CITY further agrees to purchasc and maintain property damage
insurance for at least the actual cash value thereof and shall provide DISTRICT with a certificate of
such coverage from the Idaho Countics Risk Management Program (ICRMP). DISTRICT shall
periodically replace and update its Leased Equipment such that its age and serviccabitity is
approximately equivalent to the age and serviceability of CITY's equipment having a similar
function. In the event of any loss or damage to DISTRICT' s equipment having a similar function,
such that the Leased Equipment substantially loscs its ability to operate in a safe, efficient, or
economical fashion, DISTRICT shall promptly rcplace such Leased Equipment with equipment of
comparable or greater value and function.
DISTRICT also agrees to be responsible for major expenses to replace or repair DISTRICT's
cquipment or apparatus, not to include Class A pumpers. The Parties agree that
major expense is defined to be non-aggregate expense of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) or more.
CITY agrees to ensure DISTRICT's fire station property covered by this AGREEMENT under
its property and liability coverage of CITY's ICRMP policy. CITY agrees to surrender all Leased
Equipment to DISTRICT upon termination of this AGREEMENT.
12. Lease of DISTRICT's Fire Station, DISTRICT agrees to Icasc, and docs hereby lease, to
CITY for the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) per year, that certain property commonly known as _ the
Lincoln Fire Station, located at 3475 E. Leihm, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401. CITY shall purchase,
and/or maintain, fire and cxtended coverage insurance insuring the interest of CITY and DISTRICT
in the building and property described above, as thcir interests may appcar, for the fair market value
thereof, throughout the term of this AGREEMENT. The Partics shall perform repair and maintenance
on DISTRICT 's fire station at 3475 E. Leihm, in accordance with the following: DISTRICT shall be
responsible for major repairs to DISTRICT's fire station during the term of this AGREEMENT. For
purposes of this AGREEMENT, "major repairs" shall be defined as 1) structural repairs to the
building, repair, maintenance, or replacement of fixed building equipment, including but not limited
to the elevator, HVAC, roof and plumbing, and repair and replacement of windows, sidewalks, and
water, sewer, and irrigation lincs appurtenant to the building, and 2) repairs that are estimated to cost
more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000).
CITY shall be responsible for minor repairs to DISTRICT's fire station during the term of this
AGREEMENT. For purposes of this AGREEMENT, "minor repairs" shall be defined as the repair,
maintenance, or replaccment of, but not limited to, computers, telephone system, fire extinguishers,
and electrical bulb fixtures and 2) repairs that are estimatcd to cost less than Five Thousand Dollars
($5,000).
CITY shall be responsible for routine maintenance of the HVAC system for the DISTRICT’s
fire station. CITY shall be responsible for performing all general maintenance to the interior of
DISTRICT's fire station, including, but not limited to, cleaning of carpets and other general janitorial
services.
CITY shall be responsible for all general maintenance to the exterior and grounds of
DISTRICT's fire station, including, but not limited to, painting, mowing, weeding, irrigation, and
general grounds maintenance. CITY shall be responsible for snow removal from DISTRICT's fire
station grounds, including all sidewalks on or adjacent to DISTRICT’s fire station grounds.
13. Termination. In the event of any termination as set forth above, CITY shall forthwith
surrender possession of the leased real property described in Section 12 of this AGREEMENT and
any DISTRICT Leased Equipment.
14, Discussions for Future Evaluations and Collaboration. The Parties acknowledge a shared
interest in promoting high-quality, sustainable, predictable, and operationally consistent fire protection
services throughout their respective jurisdictions. In furtherance of that objective, the Parties agree to
participate in good-faith discussions to evaluate and make recommendations regarding potential plans to
improve regional fire protection service delivery.
To support these efforts, the Parties may establish a joint steering committee, engage professional
consultants, commission feasibility studies, exchange relevant operational information, and develop
implementation benchmarks, findings, recommendations, timelines, or planning documents for
consideration by their respective governing bodies. Areas of evaluation may include, but are not limited
to:
. Operational policies, procedures, and standards (SOG/SOP alignment).
° Training integration and professional development.
° Radio and communications interoperability.
° Equipment and apparatus compatibility and standardization.
° SCBA coordination and compatibility.
° Dispatch coordination and logistics.
° Strategic station placement and deployment planning.
° Coordinated response systems and mutual aid models.
° Operational benchmarks and implementation considerations.
° Regional fire service delivery alternatives and governance coordination.
° The potential feasibility of a Joint Powers Agreement or other unified operational
framework.
Should the Parties mutually agree that an independent feasibility study, professional consultation,
or comparable third-party evaluation is appropriate, the Parties agree to share the associated reasonable
costs as set forth below. Prior to engagement, the Parties shall mutually approve the scope of work,
consultant selection process, estimated budget, and cost allocation methodology. Unless otherwise agreed
in writing, each Party shall be responsible for fifty percent (50%) of the approved costs of the study or
consultation. The total combined cost of any studies, consultations, or evaluations pursuant to this Section
shall not exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000). The Parties agree to cooperate in good faith
by providing reasonable access to operational, financial, service delivery, and other relevant information
necessary to facilitate an accurate and objective study, consultation, or evaluation. The parties agree to
submit a formal RFP no later than Aug 31, 2026. The parties agree to make all attempts to contract and
begin the feasibility study by October 1, 2026, with an absolute start deadline of December 31, 2026.
Pending feasibility study — minimal coordination efforts include:
e Monthly multi-agency training: quarterly subjects
e Quarterly Admin Meetings: Fire Chiefs
e Bi-—Annual elected officials meeting
Nothing in this Section shall:
(a) obligate either Party to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement, conso!
restructuring. lab ntesration. fax integration, board structuring, opera
reement;
equire implementation of any recommendation, coordinat
initiative, service delivery model, or operational change absent mutual writte
Parties and reasonable operational readine
alter the independent le al status, authority governance structure,
of either Party;
(d) modi e liability allo ition, indemnifi tion oblig: tions, comp tion provis: S. payment
obligations, Ownership int s, or other contractual rights and responsibili ies established
elsewhere in this AGRE MENT; or
(e) require resolution of governance, labor, rank structure, tax structure, board composition, or
similar institutional mat as a condition precedent to continues rood: faith collaboration and
15, In the event of any AMbIEtity in the ferme and earaiaons hereof, the Parties
agree that no adverse construction shall be drawn against the drafter hereof, it being their intention
that this AGREEMENT be construed solely in accordance with the Parties' intentions as evidenced
by any extrinsic circumstances demonstrating such intent.
16. Dispute Resolution. CITY and DISTRICT mutually endorse the use of partnering,
negotiation, mediation and arbitration for the prevention and resolution of disagreements that may
occur during the term of this AGREEMENT. The Parties, through their respective staffs, commit to
attempt, in good faith, to negotiate any disagreement quickly, fairly, and amicably. If such attempts
fail to resolve the matter within fifteen (15) days of the first attempt to resolve the disagreement, the
Chief for each entity and no more than one (1) Council member from CITY, and no morc than one
(1) DISTRICT commissioner shall meet to discuss and resolve the disagreement within fiftecn (15)
days of such failure to resolve the disagrecment. If that fails to resolve the matter, the dispute shall
be submitted to mandatory, non-binding mcdiation. Any dispute that cannot be resolved by mediation
shall then be considered by the Partics for submission to binding arbitration.
17. Venue and Jurisdiction. This AGREEMENT shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Idaho. The venue for any action arising out of this AGREEMENT shall be exclusively in the District
Court of the Seventh Judicial of the State of Idaho, Bonneville County or in the United States District
Court for the District of Idaho. |
18. Waiver. Any waiver ofa Party's rights with respect to any breach of this AGREEMENT, or
with respect to any other matter arising in connection with this AGREEMENT, shall not constitute a
waiver with respect to any other breach or matter arising in connection with this AGREEMENT. All waivers
must be in writing and signed by an authorized representative of the Party granting the waiver.
19, Nature of Relationship. Nothing hercin shall be construcd to be a Joint Powers Agreement,
joint enterprisc, joint venture, partnership, or joint undertaking betwccn the Parties. It is the sole intent
of the Parties that CITY shall be considered an independent contractor with respect to its fire
protection services to DISTRICT, pursuant to this AGREEMENT. Neither Party shall have authority
or a right to bind the other to any obligation, debt, or undertaking of any kind whatsoever, other than
as contemplated in this AGREEMENT.
20. Complete Agreement. This writing evidences the complete and final agreement of the Partics
on the subject matter of this AGREEMENT, and no other statement, representation or understanding
shall be binding except as expressly set forth herein. In particular, this AGREEMENT supersedes all
prior agreements between the Parties regarding the delivery of fire protection and public safety
services to DISTRICT and the Parties expressly acknowledge and agree to a full satisfaction and
release of all claims, obligations or liabilities arising from said prior agreements. This AGREEMENT
shall not obligate cither Party to breach any agreement a Party makes with another person or entity.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have hereunto set their hands the day and year first above written.
ATTEST: i Ue
City of Idaho Falls, Idaho
P. Olson, Fire Chief
“DISTRICT”
By A, ba ) Wvleres
Derik Neilsen
Commissioner
Bonneville County Fire Protection District No. 1
STATE OF IDAHO )
) ss.
County of Bonneville )
Onthis Yi are of Pusu ol ae , 2026, before me, the undersigned, a notary
public for Idaho, personally appeared Derik Neil son,known to me to be a District Commissioner of the
Bonneville County Fire Protection District No. 1, a fire protection district organized under the laws of the
State of Idaho, the fire protection district that executed the foregoing document, and acknowledged to me
that he is authorized to execute the same for and on behalf of said fire district.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, | have héreunto sem hand and affixed my official seal the day and
year first above written.
aho
at Idaho Falls
My Commission Expires: NM nech / b ) HAG
Notary Pu
E
(SEAL) PEG! DROLLINGER
COMMISSION NO. 69186
NOTARY PUBLIC
OF iDAH
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Baiaass
STATE OF )
) ss.
County of )
On this DY- day of
Ciily _, 20 Bi Detore me, the undersigned, a notary
ic f aid State, personally appear ( 20 Usa [XN , Known to me to be the
dit a of Cot Qe ldato Fay , and whose name is
subséri to the within instrument and acktrowledged to me that he/she is authorized to execute the
same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, | have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day afd year
first above written.
\\ 14,
Reet
OT SiiaBI2G 3S. %
-: “.oTAR ee
Wb
all Wy,
UND
Notary Public of idaho
Residing at:
My Commission Expires:
\y
\)
“Hw
*
°
*eeveene?®
Exhibit A
Aitimon
“WHERE TOMORROW BEGINS.
ae aaa ——— 8/18/2026
Fis pees eat
THE CITY OF AMMON DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTY OF FITNESS OF USE FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THIS PRODUC
Morgan Stewart, City Engineer, mstewart@cityofammon.us (208) 612-4029 ~ Carol Ellison, GIS Specialist, cellison@cityofammon.us (208) 612-4056
Memorandum
File #: 26-340
City Council
DATE: Thursday, September 3, 2026
AGENDA: Consent
FROM: Chris Canfield, Public Works Director
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
Title
Bid Award - Yellowstone Avenue Sidewalk - Federal Aid 24705
☐ Ordinance
☐ Resolution
☐ Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐ Legislative Public Hearing
☐ Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☒ Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve the bid award for the Yellowstone Avenue Sidewalk project; award to the lowest responsive bidder,
Galicia’s Concrete, LLC, for $322,570.80 (or take other action deemed appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
On Thursday, September 3, 2026, bids were received and opened for the Yellowstone Ave Sidewalk project. A
tabulation of bid results is attached. The project will provide pedestrian connectivity on a major arterial road.
Project reviews have been conducted with all necessary city departments to ensure coordination of project
activities. Sufficient funding and budget authority exist to complete the proposed improvements.
The Legal Department reviewed the bid process and concurred that the proposed Council action complies
with Idaho State Statute.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal Department.
26-340
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 9/8/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
IDAHO
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
1 TITLE SHEET —m™=—=ED 0
PROJECT CLEARANCE SUMMARY
PLAN AND PROFILE OF PROPOSED
YELLOWSTONE AVENUE SIDEWALK, IDAHO FALLS
SIDEWALK
DRIVEWAYS
Sista core FEDERAL AID PROJECT NU. A024¢705)
—
-— Sst | _____SiRS AND GUTTER
a KEY NO. 24705
of
a BONNEVILLE COUNTY
_ :C ov
JULY 2026
MOU |S
at RS He, Ms A02e4¢705)
Wr 4 ‘ey YELLOWSTONE AVENUE SIDEWALK, IDAHO FALLS
MP 4.526 TO MP 5.057
PLLLLLLORLEIS —Ji
om
eter pel
i]
ft 4M.P.
[/—__/ a
. a a
—. Sey, C
—
aM cho
A EIA
- i ia Y er
Fe ty cal
A | PEL fe AI - sul ) Aras
[Ie Yee | ens pens as ey wt ata LLL
[SES | bea 4 abun Peale
in YELLOWSTONE AVEL MS Oy oe
{MP. 4.526 Ke Boley
a ~_ ddSoh AAS e
J Wa . 7/1 Se a ee
iB AEN ff Vig TL TA
— / KK) eo; Gelhesih ater tI) N
Va) | Y WEL LE Wants
ULATIONS: 2000 U.S. CENSUS
0 05 1.0
a vies
REVISIONS - Eo IDAHO PROJECT NO. ROADWAY SUMMARY English
TRANSPORTATION YELLOWSTONE AVENUE “approved for Advertising
DEPARTMENT A024(705) SIDEWALK
IDAHO FALLS
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS OF Date Approved
Project:
Yellowstone Avenue Sidewalk Key # 24705
Number:
Submitted:
Chris Candfield, P.E.
Date:
Unit Price
Total Amount
Unit Price
Total Amount
Unit Price
Total Amount
Unit Price
Total Amount
Unit Price
Total Amount
Unit Price
Total Amount
Unit Price
Total Amount
SP
TOTAL
203-002A
REMOVAL OF OBSTRUCTIONS
6
EACH
$1,650.00
$9,900.00
$400.00
$2,400.00
$350.00
$2,100.00
$1,500.00
$9,000.00
$316.00
$1,896.00
$100.00
$600.00
$200.00
$1,200.00
203-015A
REMOVAL OF BITUMINOUS SURFACE
1114
SY
$20.00
$22,280.00
$15.00
$16,710.00
$17.50
$19,495.00
$30.00
$33,420.00
$18.74
$20,876.36
$55.00
$61,270.00
$5.00
$5,570.00
203-060A
REMOVAL OF CONCRETE SIDEWALK
173
SY
$15.00
$2,595.00
$30.00
$5,190.00
$23.50
$4,065.50
$25.00
$4,325.00
$58.85
$10,181.05
$120.00
$20,760.00
$10.00
$1,730.00
203-070A
REMOVAL OF CURB AND GUTTER
425
FT
$8.00
$3,400.00
$13.00
$5,525.00
$8.50
$3,612.50
$10.00
$4,250.00
$19.60
$8,330.00
$38.00
$16,150.00
$10.00
$4,250.00
203-075A
REMOVAL OF FENCE
219
FT
$15.00
$3,285.00
$10.00
$2,190.00
$14.50
$3,175.50
$6.50
$1,423.50
$9.86
$2,159.34
$30.00
$6,570.00
$10.00
$2,190.00
203-135A
REMOVAL OF SIGN
3
EACH
$350.00
$1,050.00
$150.00
$450.00
$450.00
$1,350.00
$150.00
$450.00
$360.00
$1,080.00
$900.00
$2,700.00
$250.00
$750.00
205-005A
EXCAVATION
231
CY
$30.00
$6,930.00
$30.00
$6,930.00
$40.50
$9,355.50
$45.00
$10,395.00
$132.00
$30,492.00
$165.00
$38,115.00
$30.00
$6,930.00
212-095A
INLET PROTECTION
4
EACH
$300.00
$1,200.00
$200.00
$800.00
$165.00
$660.00
$230.00
$920.00
$722.00
$2,888.00
$1,185.00
$4,740.00
$200.00
$800.00
303-022A
3/4" AGGREGATE TYPE B FOR BASE
421.6
TON
$80.00
$33,728.00
$28.00
$11,804.80
$21.00
$8,853.60
$65.00
$27,404.00
$185.00
$77,996.00
$86.00
$36,257.60
$30.00
$12,648.00
405-435A
SUPERPAVE HMA PAVEMENT INCLUDING ASPHALT AND
ADDITIVES, CLASS SP-3
20
TON
$250.00
$5,000.00
$200.00
$4,000.00
$355.00
$7,100.00
$360.00
$7,200.00
$450.00
$9,000.00
$895.00
$17,900.00
$200.00
$4,000.00
605-640A
ADJUST VALVE COVERS
3
EACH
$1,500.00
$4,500.00
$500.00
$1,500.00
$1,100.00
$3,300.00
$640.00
$1,920.00
$675.00
$2,025.00
$1,680.00
$5,040.00
$200.00
$600.00
610-085A
FENCE, TYPE CHAIN LINK
744
FT
$90.00
$66,960.00
$25.00
$18,600.00
$55.50
$41,292.00
$80.00
$59,520.00
$55.00
$40,920.00
$56.00
$41,664.00
$70.00
$52,080.00
614-015A
SIDEWALK
1491
SY
$100.00
$149,100.00
$70.00
$104,370.00
$88.00
$131,208.00
$90.00
$134,190.00
$76.00
$113,316.00
$91.00
$135,681.00
$120.00
$178,920.00
614-020A
DRIVEWAY
794
SY
$130.00
$103,220.00
$95.00
$75,430.00
$98.50
$78,209.00
$120.00
$95,280.00
$99.00
$78,606.00
$118.00
$93,692.00
$125.00
$99,250.00
615-491A
CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE 1
425
FT
$50.00
$21,250.00
$65.00
$27,625.00
$62.00
$26,350.00
$65.00
$27,625.00
$58.00
$24,650.00
$50.00
$21,250.00
$50.00
$21,250.00
626-010A
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS
342
SF
$25.00
$8,550.00
$12.50
$4,275.00
$14.00
$4,788.00
$15.00
$5,130.00
$7.93
$2,712.06
$14.00
$4,788.00
$30.00
$10,260.00
626-040A
BARRICADE, TYPE 3
8
EACH
$185.00
$1,480.00
$225.00
$1,800.00
$255.00
$2,040.00
$275.00
$2,200.00
$30.00
$240.00
$252.00
$2,016.00
$500.00
$4,000.00
626-050A
DRUMS
9
EACH
$50.00
$450.00
$39.00
$351.00
$44.00
$396.00
$50.00
$450.00
$13.20
$118.80
$44.00
$396.00
$200.00
$1,800.00
626-100A
MISCELLANEOUS TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ITEMS
3000
CA
$1.00
$3,000.00
$1.00
$3,000.00
$1.00
$3,000.00
$1.00
$3,000.00
$1.00
$3,000.00
$1.00
$3,000.00
$1.00
$3,000.00
626-105A
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL MAINTENANCE
120
HR
$60.00
$7,200.00
$58.00
$6,960.00
$65.00
$7,800.00
$75.00
$9,000.00
$70.00
$8,400.00
$65.00
$7,800.00
$50.00
$6,000.00
626-135A
WEIGHTED BASE TUBULAR MARKERS
40
EACH
$10.00
$400.00
$14.00
$560.00
$16.00
$640.00
$18.00
$720.00
$9.50
$380.00
$16.00
$640.00
$50.00
$2,000.00
634-005A
MAILBOX
1
EACH
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$1,650.00
$1,650.00
$1,850.00
$1,850.00
$2,100.00
$2,100.00
$1,300.00
$1,300.00
$1,850.00
$1,850.00
$500.00
$500.00
S900-50A
CONTINGENCY AMOUNT - MISC WORK
5000
CA
$1.00
$5,000.00
$1.00
$5,000.00
$1.00
$5,000.00
$1.00
$5,000.00
$1.00
$5,000.00
$1.00
$5,000.00
$1.00
$5,000.00
Z629-05A
MOBILIZATION
1
LS
$69,221.70
$69,221.70 $15,450.00
$15,450.00
$98,000.00
$98,000.00
$88,700.00
$88,700.00
$132,000.00
$132,000.00
$62,720.40
$62,720.40
$160,272.00
$160,272.00
TOTAL
$530,699.70
B Squared Legacy GC
LLC
$590,600.00
JM Concrete Inc.
$585,000.00
H-K Contractors, Inc.
$463,640.60
Suncore Construction &
Material, Inc.
$533,622.50
Schreder & Brand Mfg. Inc.
$577,566.61
Item Number
Description
Estimated Quantity
Galicia's Concrete LLC
$322,570.80
Unit
Engineer's Estimate
City of Idaho Falls
Engineering Division
Engineer's Estimate
----STR-2025-11
September 3, 2026
SU SAM.cov:
Home Search DataBank —_Data Services
Search AllWords —-¥ e.g. 1606N020Q02
Filter By -
Keyword Search
For more information on how to use our keyword search, visit our
help guide @
‘Simple Search Search Editor
O aAnywords ©
All Words
O Exact Phrase
bg. 1606N020Q02
"Galicias Concrete" x
"Galicia's Concrete, LLC” x
Federal Organizations
Enter Code or Name
S)
Status a
Help
(oon
(Attdomains ) Contracting Federal Assistance
No matches found
Your search did not return any results for active records.
‘Would you like to include inactive records in your search results?
Search inactive Go Back
G Requests Notifications
| searchnesats_ | ‘Saved Searches
Entity information Federal Hierarchy
98 Workspace
(Wage Determinations
B Sign out
actions @
Memorandum
File #: 26-341
City Council
DATE: Thursday, September 3, 2026
AGENDA: Consent
FROM: Chris Canfield, Public Works Director
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
Title
Bid Award - Tautphaus Park Surface Water Conversion
☐ Ordinance
☐ Resolution
☐ Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐ Legislative Public Hearing
☐ Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☒ Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve the bid award for the Tautphaus Park Surface Water Conversion project; award to the lowest
responsive, responsible bidder, B Squared Legacy GC, LLC, for $692,600 (or take other action deemed
appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
On Thursday, September 3, 2026, bids were received and opened for the Tautphaus Park Surface Water
Conversion project. A tabulation of bid results is attached. The project will facilitate the conversion of the park
irrigation system to use surface water.
Project reviews have been conducted with all necessary city departments to ensure coordination of project
activities. Sufficient funding and budget authority exist to complete the proposed improvements.
The Legal Department reviewed the bid process and concurred that the proposed Council action complies
with Idaho State Statute.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal Department.
26-341
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 9/8/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS
TAUTPHAUS PARK SURFACE WATER CONVERSION
2800 S BOULEVARD, IDAHO FALLS, ID 83402
» CITY PROJECT NUMBER
s
4 Ss 17TH ST ae
Ps w €
>
wi
x
a
WTR-2025-20
DRAWING INDEX:
G-0 DRAWING INDEX, LOCATION MAP & VICINITY MAP
G-1 GENERAL NOTES, CONTACT LIST, LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS
G-2 OVERALL PROJECT PLAN & CONTROL POINT TABLE
C-1 PLAN AND PROFILE STA: 9+75 TO 14+50
C-2 PLAN AND PROFILE STA: 14+50 TO 19+00
C-3 PLAN AND PROFILE STA: 19+00 TO 24+00
C-4 PLAN AND PROFILE STA: 24+00 TO 27+50
C-5 PLAN AND PROFILE STA: 27+50 TO 29+29
C-6 PLAN AND PROFILE STA: 40+00 TO 45+00
C-7 PLAN AND PROFILE STA: 45+00 TO 49+89
C-8 PLAN AND PROFILE STA: 60+00 TO 62+24
C-9 PLAN AND PROFILE STA: 70+00 TO 72+86
C-10 SHELTER 1 WATER LINE CONNECTION
D-1 CANAL INTAKE AND PUMP STATION SITE PLAN
D-2 CANAL INTAKE AND PUMP STATION SECTION
D-3 DRAIN LINE TERMINATION & AIR RELEASE VALVE
D-4 FILTER DISCHARGE, QUICK CONNECT & PUMP STATION DISCHARGE
D-5 TAUTPHAUS PARK CONNECTIONS
D-6 ROLLANDET PARK & ELK SOFTBALL FIELD CONNECTIONS & INTAKE WINCH
D-7 DRAIN, BATHROOM CONNECTION & YARD HYDRANT
D-8 ELK DRIVE CONNECTIONS
E-1 IDAHO FALLS POWER CONTRACTOR MAP
25TH ST
SALMON PROJECT AREA
S BOULEVARD
SUNNYSIDE RD
Ww
>
<x
to
lu
ja)
S
a
Oo
or
BLACKFOOT
POCATELLO
TAUTPHAUS PARK
RUPERT
e
LOCATION MAP VICINITY MAP
AUGUST 2026
IDAHO FALLS
WORKS
470 B Street
é & Idaho Falls, ID 83402
208-522-1244|saengrs.com
This document or any part thereof in detail or design concept is the property of
S&A Engineers, PC and shall nat be copied in any form without the written
ONC , ope
authorization of S&A Engineers, PC. ENGINEERS ? PC
W:\2024\24008 - Idaho Falls Tautphaus Park Irrigation Conversion\5.0 Design\CAD\24008 Main Drawing signed (2026-8-10).dwg
Project:
Tautphaus Park Surface Water Conversion
Number:
Submitted:
Jon Knowles, P.E.
Date:
Unit Price
Total Amount
Unit Price
Total Amount
Unit Price
Total Amount
Unit Price
Total Amount
200
DIVISION 200 - EARTHWORK
201.4.1.D.1
Removal of Asphalt
51
SY
$45.00
$2,295.00
$25.00
$1,275.00
$42.00
$2,142.00
$62.86
$3,205.86
201.4.1.E.1.a
Removal of Concrete
8
LF
$60.00
$480.00
$70.00
$560.00
$81.00
$648.00
$108.96
$871.68
201.4.1.E.1.b
Removal of Fence
23
LF
$75.00
$1,725.00
$60.00
$1,380.00
$56.00
$1,288.00
$28.06
$645.38
300
DIVISION 300 - TRENCHING
303.4.1.A.1
Exploratory Excavation
20
HR
$230.00
$4,600.00
$400.00
$8,000.00
$620.00
$12,400.00
$322.64
$6,452.80
307.4.1.A.3
Miscellaneous Surface Restoration (Sod)
2445
LF
$1.85
$4,523.25
$12.00
$29,340.00
$38.00
$92,910.00
$19.73
$48,239.85
307.4.1.B.1
Type “B” Surface Restoration (Concrete Roadway)
8
LF
$180.00
$1,440.00
$280.00
$2,240.00
$170.00
$1,360.00
$209.43
$1,675.44
307.4.1.D.1
Type “C” Surface Restoration (Gravel Roadway)
238
LF
$90.00
$21,420.00
$38.00
$9,044.00
$17.00
$4,046.00
$16.57
$3,943.66
307.4.1.G.1
Type “P” Surface Restoration (Asphalt Roadway)
50
SY
$110.00
$5,500.00
$166.00
$8,300.00
$78.00
$3,900.00
$206.74
$10,337.00
309.4.1.A.1.a
1" Horizontal Directional Bore
154
LF
$40.00
$6,160.00
$65.00
$10,010.00
$41.50
$6,391.00
$37.75
$5,813.50
309.4.1.A.1.b
8" Horizontal Directional Bore
123
LF
$135.00
$16,605.00
$160.00
$19,680.00
$112.00
$13,776.00
$286.50
$35,239.50
309.4.1.A.1.c
10" Horizontal Directional Bore
100
LF
$165.00
$16,500.00
$200.00
$20,000.00
$142.00
$14,200.00
$350.00
$35,000.00
309.4.1.A.1.d
12" Horizontal Directional Bore
40
LF
$185.00
$7,400.00
$230.00
$9,200.00
$160.00
$6,400.00
$395.14
$15,805.60
309.4.1.A.1.e
14" Horizontal Directional Bore
37
LF
$225.00
$8,325.00
$365.00
$13,505.00
$184.00
$6,808.00
$448.90
$16,609.30
400
DIVISION 400 - WATER
404.4.1.A.1
Water Service Connection, Size 2", Rollandet Bathroom
1
EA
$22,000.00
$22,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,800.00
$10,800.00
$32,716.13
$32,716.13
600
DIVISION 600 - CULVERTS & STORM DRAINS
601.4.1.A.5.
Gravity Irrigation Pipe, Class SDR 35 PVC
18
LF
$140.00
$2,520.00
$335.00
$6,030.00
$126.00
$2,268.00
$144.41
$2,599.38
602.4.1.A.1
Gravity Irrigation Manhole – Type Infiltration Manhole per IF-630A
1
EA
$13,000.00
$13,000.00
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
$10,600.00
$10,600.00
$15,031.48
$15,031.48
800
DIVISION 800 - AGGREGATES & ASPHALT
801.4.1.C.1
Drain Rock 3" Minus Uncrushed Aggregate Base - Around Pump Station P
3
CY
$350.00
$1,050.00
$210.00
$630.00
$270.00
$810.00
$294.34
$883.02
900
DIVISION 900 - PRESSURE IRRIGATION
901.4.1.A.1.a
2" Diameter Pressure Irrigation Pipe, DR17 HDPE
350
LF
$35.00
$12,250.00
$36.00
$12,600.00
$43.00
$15,050.00
$24.66
$8,631.00
901.4.1.A.1.b
4" Diameter Pressure Irrigation Pipe, DR17 HDPE
512
LF
$35.00
$17,920.00
$44.00
$22,528.00
$45.00
$23,040.00
$58.40
$29,900.80
901.4.1.A.1.c
6" Diameter Pressure Irrigation Pipe, DR17 HDPE
942
LF
$37.00
$34,854.00
$42.00
$39,564.00
$50.00
$47,100.00
$56.97
$53,665.74
901.4.1.A.1.d
8" Diameter Pressure Irrigation Pipe, DR17 HDPE
573
LF
$42.00
$24,066.00
$45.00
$25,785.00
$53.00
$30,369.00
$69.53
$39,840.69
901.4.1.A.1.e
10" Diameter Pressure Irrigation Pipe, DR17 HDPE
894
LF
$50.00
$44,700.00
$55.00
$49,170.00
$57.00
$50,958.00
$90.06
$80,513.64
902.4.1.A.1.a
2" Diameter Pressure Irrigation Valve – Curb Stop
2
EA
$570.00
$1,140.00
$1,875.00
$3,750.00
$1,300.00
$2,600.00
$1,739.28
$3,478.56
902.4.1.A.1.b
4" Diameter Pressure Irrigation Valve – Gate
11
EA
$2,400.00
$26,400.00
$2,850.00
$31,350.00
$2,200.00
$24,200.00
$3,532.80
$38,860.80
902.4.1.A.1.c
6" Diameter Pressure Irrigation Valve – Gate
2
EA
$3,600.00
$7,200.00
$3,050.00
$6,100.00
$2,500.00
$5,000.00
$4,356.44
$8,712.88
902.4.1.A.1.d
8" Diameter Pressure Irrigation Valve – Gate
1
EA
$5,200.00
$5,200.00
$4,200.00
$4,200.00
$3,400.00
$3,400.00
$5,990.89
$5,990.89
902.4.1.A.1.e
10" Diameter Pressure Irrigation Valve – Gate
1
EA
$7,300.00
$7,300.00
$5,600.00
$5,600.00
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$8,796.68
$8,796.68
2000
DIVISION 2000 - MISCELLANEOUS
2010.4.1.A.1
Mobilization
1
LS
$32,000.00
$32,000.00
$90,000.00
$90,000.00 $145,000.00 $145,000.00 $144,313.21 $144,313.21
2040.4.1.A.1
Fence, Type 6' Chain Link
49
LF
$165.00
$8,085.00
$60.00
$2,940.00
$65.00
$3,185.00
$71.93
$3,524.57
2040.4.1.B.1
Gates, Type Chain Link
1
EA
$550.00
$550.00
$4,700.00
$4,700.00
$770.00
$770.00
$1,415.09
$1,415.09
2040.4.1.D.1
Remove & Reset Fence, Type Ornamental (by Funland Octopus)
24
LF
$40.00
$960.00
$115.00
$2,760.00
$120.00
$2,880.00
$79.01
$1,896.24
SP
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
S0299
Materials Testing
1
LS
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$12,000.00
$12,000.00
$15,700.00
$15,700.00
$6,603.77
$6,603.77
S0370
Main Line Type "P" Surface Restoration (Asphalt Millings)
232
LF
$15.00
$3,480.00
$58.00
$13,456.00
$29.50
$6,844.00
$23.04
$5,345.28
S0404
Frost Free Hydrant, Drinking Water Connection, and Meter for Pavillion
1
LS
$12,000.00
$12,000.00
$12,500.00
$12,500.00
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
$14,803.27
$14,803.27
S0405
Disconnect Water Line
9
EA
$1,800.00
$16,200.00
$1,400.00
$12,600.00
$2,000.00
$18,000.00
$2,532.08
$22,788.72
S0790
Pump Sump with Concrete Pad
1
LS
$17,500.00
$17,500.00
$48,000.00
$48,000.00
$5,400.00
$5,400.00
$41,849.06
$41,849.06
S0799
Canal Intake Assembly
1
EA
$18,000.00
$18,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$51,700.00
$51,700.00
$83,956.73
$83,956.73
S0915
Sprinkler Zone Line Repairs
75
EA
$180.00
$13,500.00
$80.00
$6,000.00
$1,200.00
$90,000.00
$260.38
$19,528.50
S0920
Air/Vac Valve Assembly
5
EA
$3,800.00
$19,000.00
$3,650.00
$18,250.00
$3,000.00
$15,000.00
$4,987.58
$24,937.90
S0930
Drain Assembly
3
EA
$3,300.00
$9,900.00
$5,600.00
$16,800.00
$4,700.00
$14,100.00
$7,426.85
$22,280.55
S0940
Quick Connect Assembly
5
EA
$1,200.00
$6,000.00
$2,600.00
$13,000.00
$1,400.00
$7,000.00
$1,685.86
$8,429.30
S2021
Construction Staking
1
LS
$20,000.00
$20,000.00
$17,500.00
$17,500.00
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$6,226.42
$6,226.42
S2098
Power Service
1
LS
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$26,000.00
$26,000.00
$33,200.00
$33,200.00
$63,267.92
$63,267.92
S110215
Packaged Pump Station Installation
1
LS
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
$17,553.00
$17,553.00
$15,500.00
$15,500.00
$41,484.96
$41,484.96
0
TOTAL
$559,748.25
B Squared Legacy GC LLC
$692,600.00
H-K Contractors, Inc
$856,743.00
Outback Landscape, Inc
$1,026,112.75
Item Number
Description
Estimated Quantity
Unit
Engineer's Estimate
City of Idaho Falls
Engineering Division
Engineer's Estimate
----WTR-2025-20
September 3, 2026
Memorandum
File #: 26-338
City Council
DATE: Wednesday, September 2, 2026
AGENDA: Consent
FROM: Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
DEPARTMENT: Mayor's Office
Title
City Council and Utility Board Meeting Minutes
☐ Ordinance
☐ Resolution
☐ Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐ Legislative Public Hearing
☒ Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☐ Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve the City Council Meeting minutes from July 30, August 6, August 10, August 13 and the August 12,
2026 Utility Board Meeting Minutes (or take other action deemed appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
Attached are the following minutes:
·
July 30 - Council Meeting
·
Aug 06 - Special Council Meeting
·
Aug 10 - Work Session
·
Aug 12 - Utility Board Meeting
·
Aug 13 - Council Meeting
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Municipal Services Departments.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 9/8/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
City Council Meeting
Minutes
1
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Thursday, July 30, 2026
6:30 PM
City Council Chambers
1. Mayor Burtenshaw Called the meeting to Order at 6:30 PM
Present:
Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw
Council President Jim Francis
Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Councilor Jim Freeman
Councilor Kirk Larsen
Councilor John Radford
Councilor Brandon Lee (arrived at 6:39 pm)
Also present:
Chase Mills, EMS Fire Chief
Bryce Johnson, Police Chief
Chris Canfield, PW Director
Kerry Beutler, Assistant CDS Director
Chris Fredericksen, GM - IF Power
Pam Alexander, Municipal Services Director
Zack Jones, City Attorney
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
2. Pledge of Allegiance
Chief Mills led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Staff Response to Prior Public Comment and Other Updates
Mayor Burtenshaw explained that a new agenda item was being used to give department directors an
opportunity to respond to issues raised during previous public comment. She noted that staff cannot
engage in back-and-forth discussion when an issue is not on the agenda because of open meeting law
requirements, but the new format allows staff to provide follow-up information or proactively address
concerns.
Police Chief Bryce Johnson addressed three topics:
•
Communication with the Hispanic community: Chief Johnson said he confirmed that Captain
John Marley had responded to questions previously submitted by members of the Hispanic
community. Because many follow-up questions concerned federal agencies rather than the
Idaho Falls Police Department (IFPD), IFPD contacted those agencies and relayed the
information back to community members. At the community's request, IFPD created a
Spanish-language online question form that sends questions directly to three department staff
members. The department plans to promote the resource through local Spanish-language
media and community organizations and expects to respond within 2–3 days. Johnson
emphasized that the form is not for emergencies.
•
Alcohol enforcement: Johnson explained that under state law, businesses licensed to serve
alcohol must allow police officers to enter the premises whenever someone is present, without
a warrant, reasonable suspicion, or probable cause. Regarding a specific case raised during
prior discussion, he said he could not discuss the ongoing criminal prosecution publicly.
However, after reviewing the relevant body-camera footage, he concluded that probable cause
City Council Meeting
Minutes
2
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
existed and Sergeant Norman acted appropriately and professionally. The footage cannot be
released publicly while the case is pending, but Council members may review it.
•
License plate readers (LPRs/Flock cameras): Johnson said IFPD reviewed its use of the system
and determined that the documented uses were appropriate, but acknowledged that the
department's public documentation was confusing. IFPD is therefore revising its procedures to
require clearer explanations of why each LPR use is authorized, including the applicable
offense or statutory authority and case number when available.
He also announced that IFPD will increase its LPR audits from the state-required twice
per year to every other week (at least twice monthly) to provide more timely oversight. The
department is also limiting data retention to 30 days, exceeding state requirements in that
respect. Johnson pointed residents to the City's/IFPD's website for detailed information about
LPRs, privacy protections, and constitutional issues, and said a one-page summary will also be
distributed through social media.
Director Canfield of Public Works responded to concerns about Jefferson Street sidewalks and
infrastructure, explaining that he and Street Superintendent Cardin met with Ms. Alvarez and a
neighbor at the site. Project updates:
•
Jefferson Street has been overlaid, and the waterline work is complete.
•
Some remaining concrete work at corners is still being completed.
•
Staff discussed the City's curb-and-gutter program with Ms. Alvarez, including available
benefits and opportunities to coordinate work with neighboring property owners to achieve
economies of scale.
•
Staff also discussed sidewalk and curb maintenance requirements, accessibility, and
concerns about how notices/letters have been communicated to property owners.
•
Public Works is working to improve communication by sending notices earlier and making the
process more mutually beneficial and understandable for property owners and the City.
4. Public Comment
Finn Garren, IF Resident
•
Spoke in opposition to Flock automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras.
•
Questioned the accuracy of information on the City's transparency portal and argued that only
about 0.6% of vehicles captured by the cameras were on a “hot list,” while the remaining vehicles
are still recorded and retained for 30 days.
•
Raised concerns that Flock's technology can do more than capture individual photographs, citing
company demonstrations showing vehicle route mapping, “digital trails,” and travel-pattern/heat-
map capabilities.
•
Referenced concerns about searches conducted by law enforcement agencies in other Idaho
communities and cited examples of jurisdictions that have declined to continue or pursue ALPR
technology.
•
Noted that Idaho Falls Police previously indicated that the department ultimately wanted more
cameras, and questioned when the expansion would be considered sufficient.
•
Argued that Montana's restrictions on ALPRs demonstrate that such technology is not universally
viewed as necessary for public safety.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
3
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
Expressed frustration that residents were not given meaningful input before the cameras were
installed and said approving the proposed contract/addendum would effectively legitimize a
system that the public did not have an opportunity to weigh in on.
•
Concluded by emphasizing that residents, rather than surveillance cameras, should have a voice in
determining city policy.
Colby Hatton – IF resident
•
Focused on walkability and pedestrian-oriented development.
•
Used downtown Idaho Falls versus areas such as 17th Street as an example of how street and
neighborhood design affects whether people choose to walk.
•
Said walkable neighborhoods provide benefits including more physical activity, increased
patronage of local businesses, reduced traffic, and accessibility for people of different ages and
abilities.
•
Argued that pedestrian-friendly development can also be more financially efficient for the City,
because narrower, denser streets with homes and businesses cost less to build and maintain than
large arterial roads.
•
Said denser, walkable areas can generate stronger tax revenue relative to the infrastructure
required to serve them.
•
Emphasized the quality-of-life benefits of neighborhoods where residents can walk to businesses
such as bakeries, salons, and corner stores.
•
Stated that Stronger Idaho Falls believes new development should prioritize pedestrians, creating a
more vibrant, neighborly, productive, and ultimately better city for both pedestrians and drivers.
5. Consent Agenda
A. Municipal Services
1. 26-245 2026 Second Quarter Impact Fee Report
B. Fire Department
1. 26-268 Contract Service Payment to Public Consulting Group, LLC - $194,572.96
C. Idaho Falls Power
1. 26-248 Transformer Surplus sales bid of $75,000 to Mountain West Transformer
D. Police Department
1. 26-271 SRO Memorandum of Understanding 2026/27 School Year - Alturas
2. 26-272 SRO Memorandum of Understanding 2026/27 School Year - District 91
E. Public Works
1. 26-251 Bid Award - Police Station Shooting Range to 3H Construction, LLC for $116,451
F. Office of the City Clerk
1. 26-253 June 2026 Licensing through the Office of the City Clerk
a. 78 New Business Licenses
b. 16 Renewed Business Licenses
c. 10 Contractor Licenses
2. 26-275 City Council Meeting Minutes (6.22.2026, 6.25.2026, 7.6.2026, & 7.9.2026)
Motion: Approve, accept, or receive all items on the Consent Agenda according to the
recommendations presented.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
4
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
o
Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o
Second: Councilor Larsen
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
6. Regular Agenda
A. City Attorney
1. 26-274
Amendment to Flock Safety Contracts with Flock Group
Presentation/Discussion (Attorney Jones): The City Attorney presented an amendment to the
City’s contracts with Flock Group, Inc. in response to public concerns about how data
collected by the City’s automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras could be used by Flock.
Key changes to the contract:
•
The amendment prohibits Flock from using footage/customer data collected by Idaho Falls
cameras to train or improve any machine-learning or artificial intelligence (AI) models.
•
Flock may continue to use non-footage data, such as device metrics and hardware
performance information, to monitor and improve its equipment and services.
•
The amendment specifies that Flock may use customer data only as authorized by the
amendment and that the amendment supersedes conflicting language in Flock’s standard
online terms and conditions.
•
The definition of “permitted purpose” is narrowed to law-enforcement purposes authorized
under Idaho Code § 49-1432, including investigating crimes and conducting traffic studies.
•
The restrictions also apply to other law-enforcement agencies authorized to access Idaho
Falls data.
Police Department clarification:
•
The City’s Flock cameras capture license-plate images but do not use facial recognition or
identify drivers or passengers.
•
The cameras do not record audio or video continuously and are not used to monitor vehicle
speeds.
•
Idaho Falls retains control over which outside agencies are authorized to access its data.
•
The Police Department is beginning a process requiring out-of-state agencies seeking
access to Idaho Falls data to sign an agreement acknowledging their obligation to comply
with Idaho law. In-state agencies are already subject to those requirements.
Council discussion:
•
Councilors emphasized that the amendment is intended to address concerns about data
sharing and AI use, but it does not resolve all questions surrounding the Flock system.
•
Council President Francis noted that the Police Department has been asked to develop and
present alternative approaches to Flock, with that broader evaluation expected in the fall.
•
Councilor Radford specifically questioned who can access the City's data, prompting
clarification that the amendment itself does not change the authorized-user provisions;
rather, the City maintains control over who receives access.
•
One councilor stated support for the amendment while emphasizing that the vote should
not be interpreted as approval of Flock as a long-term solution, since alternatives are still
being evaluated.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
5
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Motion: Approve the amendment to the Flock Safety contracts with Flock Group, Inc., and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the necessary documents
o
Moved by: Councilor Francis
o
Second: Councilor Lee
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
2. 26-261
Settlement and Release Agreement with the Oloff Revocable Trust
Presentation/Discussion (Attorney Jones): The Legal Department presented a proposed
Settlement and Release Agreement with a revocable trust involved in the City’s ongoing
easement litigation concerning properties along Custer Road, north of Peterson.
•
The trust’s attorney approached the City seeking to withdraw from the litigation to avoid
additional legal expenses.
•
The City negotiated an agreement allowing the trust to step out of the lawsuit while
remaining bound by the eventual outcome regarding the disputed easement.
•
If the litigation determines that the City has the easement, the trust will recognize that
determination. If the court rules against the City, the City will likewise accept that the
claimed easement does not exist.
•
If settlement discussions with the remaining parties arise, the City must notify the trust. The
trust can participate, decline to participate, or waive its participation rights by failing to
respond within the specified period.
•
The arrangement reduces legal costs and administrative burdens for both the City and the
trust by removing the trust as an active party while preserving the City’s position in the
easement dispute.
•
The City Attorney characterized the agreement as an amicable resolution that benefits the
City while maintaining its legal interests.
Motion: Approve the settlement and release agreement with the Oloff Revocable Trust and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents
o
Moved by: Councilor Francis
o
Second: Councilor Dingman
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
B. Community Development Services
1. 26-255
Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria
and Standards, Westbrook Estates Division No. 1.
Presentation/Discussion (Assistant Director Beutler): CDS presented the final plat,
development agreement, and related standards for Westbrook Estates Division No. 1, located
on the west side of Idaho Falls near 17th North.
•
The subdivision includes 51 lots, with 48 buildable lots; the remaining lots are primarily for
stormwater ponds and other common areas.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
6
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
The development is zoned R-1, which allows both detached and attached single-dwelling
units.
•
The developer proposes twin homes, where two dwelling units share a common wall but
are located on separate, individually owned lots.
•
Staff explained that R-1 zoning allows up to three attached units. Because attached units
can make it difficult for individual lots to meet standard minimum lot-size and lot-coverage
requirements, the zoning code provides some flexibility for attached dwellings.
•
Staff emphasized that this flexibility does not increase the permitted overall density. The
development must still comply with the R-1 density limits.
•
As a result, some individual lots may be smaller than the typical 7,000-square-foot
minimum because they will contain attached dwelling units.
•
The proposed final plat is consistent with the previously approved preliminary plat,
complies with the City's subdivision and zoning ordinances, and is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
Motion 1: Approve the Development Agreement for the Final Plat for Westbrook Estates
Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
o
Moved by: Councilor Lee
o
Second: Councilor Francis
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
Motion 2: Approve the Final Plat for Westbrook Estates Division No. 1 and give authorization for
the Mayor, City Engineer, and City Clerk to sign said Final Plat.
o
Moved by: Councilor Lee
o
Second: Councilor Francis
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
Motion 3: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Final
Plat for Westbrook Estates Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the
necessary documents.
o
Moved by: Councilor Lee
o
Second: Councilor Francis
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
2. 26-256
Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria
and Standards, Westbrook Estates Division No. 2.
Presentation/Discussion (Assistant Director Beutler): This follows the same format as
described in the previous presentation.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
7
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Motion 1: Approve the Development Agreement for the Final Plat for Westbrook Estates
Division No. 2 and give authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
o
Moved by: Councilor Lee
o
Second: Councilor Francis
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
Motion 2: Approve the Final Plat for Westbrook Estates Division No. 2 and give authorization for
the Mayor, City Engineer, and City Clerk to sign said Final Plat.
o
Moved by: Councilor Lee
o
Second: Councilor Francis
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
Motion 3: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Final
Plat for Westbrook Estates Division No. 2 and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the
necessary documents.
o
Moved by: Councilor Lee
o
Second: Councilor Francis
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
C. Idaho Falls Power
1. 26-249
Short-Term Equipment Rental Agreement with Mountain West Transformer
Presentation/Discussion (Director Fredericksen): GM Fredericksen presented a proposed
short-term rental agreement with Mountain West Transformer for IF Power's Delta Star mobile
substation.
•
The mobile substation is an emergency backup asset that Idaho Falls Power has owned for
several decades but has not needed operationally in recent years.
•
Improvements to the City's electrical system, including additional substations and the
ability to reroute power, have significantly improved system reliability and reduced the need
for the mobile unit.
•
Idaho Falls Power proposes to rent the equipment to Mountain West Transformer for 18
months at $35,000 per month, generating $630,000 in rental revenue.
•
The agreement includes an option for an additional six months at $40,000 per month.
•
Council members asked about the equipment's age, destination, and whether Idaho Falls
Power could reclaim it if needed. Staff explained that the equipment is expected to travel to
the East Coast and that the agreement includes provisions addressing performance and
the City's rights under the lease.
•
Staff emphasized that the arrangement allows Idaho Falls Power to generate value from an
asset it currently does not need while retaining it as a potential emergency resource,
helping maintain reliable and affordable electricity service.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
8
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Motion: Approve the Short-Term Equipment Rental Agreement with Mountain West
Transformer for the use of a Delta Star Mobile Substation and give authorization for the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents
o
Moved by: Councilor Freeman
o
Second: Councilor Radford
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
D. Public Works
1. 26-250
Amendment to Development Agreement for Trumblee Acres
Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield): Public Works presented an amendment to the
Trumblee Acres Development Agreement to bring the agreement, originally executed in 2015,
into alignment with the City's current policies.
•
The property owner originally split his property near W 17th South to create an additional
parcel and sought connections to City services.
•
Under the original agreement, the City agreed to reimburse the owner for the additional
cost of constructing 17th South to an arterial street standard, rather than a typical
residential street standard.
•
Staff now proposes to update the agreement to reflect the City's current impact-fee
policies.
•
Instead of handling the reimbursement under the original arrangement, the applicable
impact fees would be incorporated into the future construction of 17th South.
•
Staff said this approach will better coordinate with a planned development to the north,
where Grizzly Avenue is expected to connect to 17th South and improve the nearby
intersection.
•
The amendment would therefore bring the 2015 agreement current while allowing the City's
future 17th South improvements to be coordinated with surrounding development.
Motion: Approve the Amendment to the Development Agreement for Trumblee Acres dated
October 22, 2015, and authorize the Mayor to sign the necessary document.
o
Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o
Second: Councilor Dingman
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
2. 26-259
Easement Vacation of portions of Pop Kroll Way lying within the SW1/4 of
Section 8 T. 2 N., R. 38 E., Bonneville County
Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield): Public Works presented a request to vacate an
existing roadway right-of-way/easement that runs along the front of the City's Street Sanitation
compound.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
9
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
The existing roadway functions primarily as a driveway/access route to the Street Sanitation
offices and compound, rather than as a public street.
•
Vacating the right-of-way would give the City greater flexibility in designing and constructing
the new Street Sanitation building, particularly regarding setbacks and street-facing
requirements.
•
The City would retain the necessary access easements on its property while eliminating the
unnecessary public right-of-way.
•
Staff noted that a similar process has been used previously for other City-owned facilities,
including the Police compound.
Council briefly commented on the unusual nature of the City essentially granting itself
permission to modify its own property.
Motion: Approve the Ordinance vacating an easement under a suspension of the rules
requiring three complete and separate readings and request that it be read by title
o
Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o
Second: Councilor Larsen
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
ORDINANCE 3668: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, PROVIDING FOR THE VACATION OF TWO PORTIONS
OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS AND LEGALLY
DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING THAT TITLE TO SAID VACATED
PORTIONS OF RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL VEST AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 2 OF THIS ORDINANCE;
PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT FROM AND AFTER
PASSAGE, APPROVAL, AND PUBLICATION ACCORDING TO LAW.
E. Municipal Services
1. 26-242
Public Hearing - Intended Exchange of City-Owned Real Property
Presentation/Discussion (Director Alexander): Municipal Services conducted a public
hearing regarding the City's proposed exchange of property with a developer.
•
The proposal involves exchanging 0.229 acres of City-owned property for 0.050 acres of
developer-owned property.
•
The exchange is intended to support construction of a restroom at Sage Lakes Golf Course,
where the City has identified a need for a permanent restroom but faces limited utility
access.
•
The City identified unused property that could be exchanged for a parcel that would provide
a more suitable location for the restroom.
•
At its June 22 work session, the Council declared its intent to proceed with the property
exchange pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 50-1402 and 50-1403.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
10
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
The proposed valuation was set at $2.50 per square foot, subject to the final survey.
•
Because the parcels are different in size and value, the developer will make an equalizing
cash payment to the City for the difference in value.
•
The developer will also pay one-half of the $3,500 property appraisal cost.
•
Mountain States Appraisal completed the appraisal, which was included in the Council
packet and made available for public review.
•
The public hearing was opened, but no members of the public testified, and the hearing
was closed.
•
Council members characterized the exchange as a “win-win,” noting that both the City and
developer would receive property they could more effectively use. Council also noted that
the golf course has needed a restroom at this location for years and has previously relied on
portable facilities.
Motion: Approve the exchange of real property based on a valuation of $2.50 per square foot,
subject to final survey results, with an equalizing cash payment to be made by the
developer to the City based on the difference in value, with the developer paying
one-half of the $3,500.00 property appraisal cost and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to sign the necessary documents
o Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.
2. 25-246
Tentative Approval of the 2026/27 Fiscal Year Budget
Presentation/Discussion (Director Alexander): Municipal Services presented the tentative FY
2026–2027 budget, noting that the budget process began in March and was moved up due to
the implementation of the City's new software system. Staff emphasized the collaborative
nature of the process, with departments coordinating priorities and, in some cases, reducing
their own requests to help fund other departments and projects.
Key budget details:
•
The tentative “not to exceed” budget is $393,483,954. The City may adopt a lower amount
but cannot exceed this figure when the final budget is adopted.
•
The budget includes utility and enterprise revenues, state and federal grants, service fees,
and property tax revenues.
•
It incorporates the 3% statutory property tax levy, plus approximately 1% ongoing forgone
dedicated to public safety, including Legal, Police, and Fire.
•
Less than 1% of additional forgone property tax revenue is designated for one-time Fire and
Parks & Recreation capital projects.
•
Estimated FY 2026–2027 property tax revenue is approximately $54.1 million.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
11
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
Staff stressed that the $393.5 million figure represents spending authority, not cash on
hand. Much of the total comes from enterprise operations such as utilities, sanitation, and
the airport, and expenditures can only occur if the corresponding revenue is available.
Staff encouraged residents to review the 100-plus-page budget book, particularly the
expenditure highlights and individual department narratives, which explain departmental
increases or decreases, accomplishments, planned projects, and priorities. The budget book
was scheduled to be posted on the City's website the following day.
The public hearing on the budget was scheduled for August 13 at 6:30 p.m., with final budget
adoption scheduled for August 27, 2026.
Council Discussion
Council members generally expressed strong support for the proposed budget and praised
staff for the budget book and its transparency.
•
Councilor Freeman highlighted the City's increased investment in public safety, noting
approximately $30 million for Police and $33 million for Police, Fire, EMS and related public
safety operations, compared with approximately $13 million for Parks & Recreation.
•
Councilor Larsen praised the budget book as an important transparency tool and
encouraged residents to read the department narratives, even if they are not comfortable
reviewing financial figures. He also emphasized the professionalism, training and quality of
the City's Fire/EMS services, particularly the quality of in-house EMS response.
•
Councilor Dingman praised the department directors and the budget process, while
acknowledging the impact of property-tax increases on residents. She cited examples of
approximately $10 per month for a $375,000 home and $17 per month for a $600,000
home, but said she believed the services and projects funded by the budget justified the
cost.
•
Councilors also expressed enthusiasm about the City's new enterprise management/ERP
system, which they expect will provide greater transparency, reporting capability and
insight into the City's finances.
Before proceeding, Council clarified a $10 discrepancy in the budget figure shown on the
presentation slide versus the agenda. Staff confirmed that the agenda's figure of $393,483,954
was the correct amount.
Motion: Approve the tentative 2026/27 fiscal year budget for a not-to-exceed amount of
$393,483,954 and give the authorization to publish the Notice of Public Hearing.
o Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
12
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
7. Announcements
•
War Bonnet Round Up: Mayor Burtenshaw encouraged residents to attend the War Bonnet Rodeo,
highlighting increased participation this year and the quality of the events. Opening night was noted
as the following evening, with family activities such as mutton busting taking place the previous
night.
•
Pints & Purrs: Councilor Dingman promoted the Pints & Purrs fundraiser on Saturday, August 8,
from 3:30–7:00 p.m. at Idaho Brewing Company. Proceeds will support low-cost spay and neuter
vouchers for community members.
•
Special City Council Meeting: Council President Francis reminded residents that the Council would
hold a special meeting the following week at 7:00 p.m. rather than the usual 6:30 p.m. The meeting
will address one quasi-judicial agenda item.
•
National Night Out: Francis also announced National Night Out at Tautphaus Park on August 4,
featuring the Police Department and demonstrations of its work. A proclamation supporting
community policing would also be presented.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:38 PM.
/s/ Linda Lundquist_________________
/s/ Lisa Burtenshaw
_____________
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor
IDAHO FALLS AUTOMATIC LICENSE PLATE READERS
P O L | C E Helping Solve Crime While Respecting Privacy
The Idaho Falls Police Department utilizes automatic license plate reader
(ALPR) cameras as an investigative tool to enhance public safety,
maximize efforts and efficiency, solve crimes, and support our community.
WHAT ARE ALPRS? HOW IT WORKS
ALPRs capture still images of the back of © = Q S
vehicles traveling on public roadways, and
Vehicle passes Camera captures if the vehicle Officers
objective information such as...
e License plate numbers
e Vehicle make, model, and color " enteta vehicle machesawarned — iwestigateusing
e Distinguishing characteristics (roof racks, ———— a | (eee
bumper stickers, etc.) a
They DO NOT:
e Use facial recognition.
e Identify drivers or passengers.
information
Officers can also search data that has been
gathered from the past 30 days.
e Record audio, video, or live stream. ALPR Data is an investigative tool. It does not
e Monitor speed. establish probable cause on its own.
HOW IT HELPS IDAHO FALLS PRIVACY CONSIDERATIONS
= Locate stolen vehicles e Data is automatically deleted after 30 days.
e Access to the system is restricted to only
© Locate vehicles connected to violent authorized users (Officers, Dispatchers, etc.)
crimes ; ,
e Every search is logged and auditable.
a] Help identify suspect vehicles e Use is governed by IFPD policy, in
Assist in locating missing or accordance with State and Federal law.
ps endangered persons e Searches are limited to investigations for
© Provide investigative leads when there felony or misdemeanor crimes, missing or
are no witnesses endangered people, and traffic accidents.
[ Reduce investigative time and help
afl bring offenders to justice. WHAT ALPRS ARE NOT
ALPR Cameras are a proven and e NOT mass surveillance
constitutionally compliant investigative e NOT facial recognition
tool that helps IFPD solve crime, recover
stolen property, locate missing persons,
and enhance public safety - while ; ; ;
respecting privacy and maintaining ¢ NOT replacing police officers or
accountability. investigative responsibility.
e NOT tracking people’s daily movements
e NOT traffic enforcement
Special City Council Meeting
Minutes
1
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Thursday, August 6, 2026
7:00 PM
City Council Chambers
1. Mayor Burtenshaw called the meeting to Order at 7:00 PM
Present:
Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw
Council President Jim Francis
Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Councilor Jim Freeman
Councilor Kirk Larsen
Councilor John Radford
Absent:
Councilor Brandon Lee
Also present:
Wade Sanner, CDS Director
Mack Smith, Presenter
Zack Jones, City Attorney
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
2. Pledge of Allegiance
Mr. Rocknack led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Public Comment - No one appeared.
4. Regular Agenda
A. Community Development Services
1. 26-258
Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing-Request for Reconsideration of the decision to
approve the application for the Planned Unit Development, PUD25-002, for Willows Place
Townhomes for the property located at 1080 S Bellin Road.
Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner, Mr. Smith): The Willow Place Townhomes Planned
Unit Development (PUD) reconsideration hearing addressed the Idaho Falls City Council's June 25,
2026 approval of PUD 25-002, a proposed 12-unit townhome development at approximately 1080
South Bellin Road. The reconsideration represented the final local-level review before the matter
could proceed to district court. Because the matter was quasi-judicial, Council was required to
apply the City's existing PUD regulations to the evidence in the record rather than make a legislative
or policy decision based solely on neighborhood opposition or preferences regarding development.
Quasi-Judicial Procedure and Ex Parte Disclosures
At the beginning of the hearing, Mayor Burtenshaw explained the special procedures governing a
quasi-judicial matter. Council members disclosed contacts they had received regarding Willow
Place.
Council Member John Radford reported that Mack Smith spoke with him immediately after
the previous hearing, before Council had been advised that the matter was quasi-judicial. Council
Special City Council Meeting
Minutes
2
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Member Brandon Lee received a phone call from an opponent but did not engage in discussion.
Council President Jim Francis did not answer calls concerning the project and deleted a voicemail
after learning it concerned Willow Place.
Councilors Francis and Lee had also participated in mediation with the developer. The City
Attorney explained that quasi-judicial decision-makers must avoid one-sided communications
about a pending case. Due to his participation in the mediation, Francis recused himself from the
final vote.
The hearing process included the parties seeking reconsideration, the City's staff response,
public testimony, rebuttal, and Council deliberation.
Mediation and Changes to the Project
Before the June 25 approval, the developer requested mediation with the City. Curt Thompson
served as mediator, and approximately four hours of negotiations occurred through the mediator.
The City entered mediation to address concerns previously identified during an earlier hearing,
including privacy, public access to amenities, density, streetscape and driveway lengths.
The project had already been reduced from 14 units in triplexes to 12 units in six twin
homes, bringing the density to approximately 6.61 units per acre.
The mediation resulted in additional changes, including relocating the playground to a more
publicly accessible location, requiring it to meet Parks Department standards, adding signage
inviting public use and identifying the HOA as responsible for maintenance, and allowing the
developer to name the park.
One twin home was moved across Zoey Lane to break up the row of homes and reduce
parking impacts. Driveways were increased from 20 to 25 feet, while a separate east-side buffer
was reduced from 10 to 5 feet. A full fence was discussed but was not required, in part because of
concerns about access to a utility facility.
The City accepted somewhat less than 25% common space during mediation to
accommodate the relocated home and stormwater retention, although the parties later indicated
that this issue was resolved differently.
The City's mediation team included representatives from Legal, Community Development
Services, Public Works, Idaho Falls Power, and Councilors Francis and Lee.
Opponents' Arguments for Reconsideration
Mediation, Public Process and Due Process
Mack Smith presented many of the opponents' primary arguments. He questioned whether the
mediation process and subsequent approval provided residents with adequate due process.
Smith argued that Council effectively approved the mediated proposal before residents had
a meaningful opportunity to comment on the changes. He cited Idaho Code §67-6525 and argued
that a mediated land-use agreement should be followed by an appropriate public hearing before
the decision-making body.
He maintained that the process created the appearance that Council had already
committed to the mediated proposal and that neighboring property owners who could be directly
affected should have participated in mediation.
The City responded that the mediation agreement did not itself approve the PUD. The
revised project remained subject to a full public hearing, where Council retained the authority to
approve or deny the application. Because the developer requested mediation, the City maintained
Special City Council Meeting
Minutes
3
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
that it was appropriate for the mediation to occur between the applicant and City representatives
rather than as a separate negotiation involving neighborhood residents.
PUD Review and the Two-Acre Requirement
Opponents questioned whether a PUD could properly be approved on the approximately 1.8-acre
site, arguing that the City's general two-acre minimum should have prevented approval.
Staff explained that the PUD ordinance allows smaller sites to be considered when Council
determines that the project qualifies under an exception, including redevelopment or the provision
of a public benefit or amenity. Council determined that Willow Place qualified as redevelopment.
Staff cited previous PUDs involving parcels under two acres, including Skyline Manor and
Anderson Townhomes. Staff later corrected an earlier reference concerning Cleveland PUD,
acknowledging that it was under two acres but had never been approved.
Opponents also argued that substantial revisions to the project should have required
another neighborhood meeting and Planning and Zoning Commission review.
Staff and the City Attorney explained that the City's major and minor PUD amendment
provisions apply to already-approved PUDs. Because no Willow Place PUD had been approved
before June 25, the revised proposal was not technically an amendment to an existing PUD and
therefore did not require another Planning Commission review before Council's decision.
Density, Lot Size and Neighborhood Compatibility
Opponents argued that the development was inconsistent with the surrounding single-family
neighborhood.
Roy Matthews focused on density and lot size. He initially argued that the property should
have approximately six units per acre under R-1 zoning and therefore contain about 10 units. He
also questioned whether the proposed lots met the 7,000-square-foot R-1 minimum.
Staff clarified that Willow Place was being reviewed under PUD regulations, not
conventional R-1 development. The PUD provisions permit different density and design standards
and do not impose the same minimum individual lot-size requirement applicable to conventional
R-1 lots.
Opponents nevertheless argued that the project represented too much flexibility from the
surrounding neighborhood's established development pattern. They pointed to differences in
building type, scale, construction and appearance between the proposed two-story twin homes
and existing detached single-family houses.
Residents also questioned the western property buffer, setbacks, parking arrangement,
landscaping and the amount of common space.
Setbacks and Inconsistent Project Documents
Teri Smith raised concerns about inconsistencies between documents presented during the
process.
She said the original PUD requested reducing a 25-foot setback to 20 feet and understood
from mediation that the developer agreed to restore a 25-foot setback or driveway area in exchange
for reducing another buffer.
However, she said publicly posted maps and findings still appeared to show a 20-foot
setback. The discrepancy became a continuing point of discussion.
Staff later stated that the approved plan showed a 20-foot front setback and 25-foot rear
setback. Developer Colin Hunter subsequently described the roadway as having been shifted five
Special City Council Meeting
Minutes
4
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
feet and characterized the resulting arrangement as providing 25-foot setbacks on both the front
and rear. This created some continuing uncertainty in the discussion about exactly how the
approved setback configuration should be characterized.
Opponents argued that discrepancies among plans, maps, plats and measurements made
it difficult for residents to determine precisely what Council had approved.
Canal Safety and Fencing - Canal safety was another major concern.
Mack Smith described the nearby canal as a significant hazard for children because of its steep
banks, cold and fast-moving water, and difficulty escaping once someone enters it. He
characterized it as an "attractive nuisance" and questioned why the development's amenities
would be open to the public without additional canal protection.
Residents also requested a privacy fence between Willow Place and neighboring
properties.
Staff explained that the PUD ordinance does not generally require privacy fencing between
residential developments. Fencing is specifically required in certain circumstances, such as
residential property next to commercial development or a dog park.
For Willow Place, the applicable requirement was a landscape buffer. Staff said the
developer's proposed western landscape buffer satisfied the ordinance. The code provides an
option for a six-foot fence as part of the buffering solution, but the developer did not choose that
option.
Councilor Francis clarified that fencing had been discussed during mediation and that the
developer's January 2026 written commitment remained part of the record to work with individual
adjacent property owners on appropriate fencing solutions, with no commitment exceeding six
feet.
Residents questioned whether such commitments would remain enforceable after
approval and urged that important agreements be formally documented.
Drainage, Stormwater and Site Conditions - Drainage and stormwater became one of the most
extensive areas of disagreement.
Opponents described the site as having existing drainage characteristics and argued that it
had historically functioned as a drainage area for surrounding properties. Mack Smith raised
concerns about the site's elevation, existing berms, soils and basalt conditions and argued that
development could create additional runoff problems.
He questioned whether the site's underlying windblown loess and silt soils could create
problems if saturated and pointed to shallow basalt and large basalt boulders as additional
development challenges.
A major dispute involved whether Willow Place's stormwater system would operate
independently from the adjacent church property.
Smith pointed to a drainage easement shown on a plat that appeared to connect the
development to the church's drainage system. He questioned whether surrounding runoff that
currently flows onto the property had been incorporated into the engineering calculations and
whether all necessary agreements and approvals were in place.
The developer maintained that the Willow Place stormwater system would be self-
contained on the PUD property and designed to accommodate a 100-year, 24-hour storm event
under City requirements. Any remaining church drainage would be handled separately by the
church.
Special City Council Meeting
Minutes
5
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Staff said the City's stormwater requirements include a master plan, engineering
calculations and plans prepared and stamped by an Idaho-licensed engineer. The plans were
routed through CDS to Public Works, where City engineers reviewed and approved them.
Staff emphasized that the project would not have advanced to the public hearing if City
engineering staff had determined the stormwater system was inadequate.
The developer explained that certain stormwater and cross-access easements would be
formally recorded during the later plat and site-plan process. Staff and the developer emphasized
that the PUD stage establishes the basic development concept, while detailed engineering and
construction requirements are addressed during subsequent review.
Church Property, Parking and Easements
The relationship between Willow Place and the neighboring church property generated repeated
questions.
Staff clarified that the church property is not part of the Willow Place PUD and that Willow
Place does not rely on church parking to meet its own requirements.
For 12 units, the project requires 24 parking spaces, while the proposal provides 42 spaces,
including garages and guest parking.
Residents nevertheless questioned separate easements involving the church property,
including stormwater, utilities, access and prior property transfers.
Mack Smith identified a 2025 right-of-way deed conveying approximately 3,072 square feet
of church property to the City for public street/highway purposes for $1, as well as a public utility
easement granted to the City for $1. He questioned the timing and relationship of those
transactions to the development process.
Staff explained that PUD approval does not automatically eliminate existing easements. An
Idaho Falls Power easement remains along part of the western property, and Idaho Falls Power
reviewed the proposal and retained its rights.
The modified project also affected church access. Discussion clarified that the church's
western parking-lot entrance would need to close to accommodate Zoey Lane, with a hammerhead
turnaround intended to provide emergency-vehicle access.
Residents also raised concerns about an alleged longstanding adverse easement they said
they had used for decades to access backyards.
Public Notice and Project History
Staff maintained that all applicable state notice requirements had been satisfied.
The City began publishing notice on June 3, mailed notices to property owners within 300
feet on June 8, and physically posted the property. Staff said the notice specifically identified the
revised Willow Place PUD and stated that it would return to Council for a public hearing following
mediation.
Staff acknowledged that residents might not have immediately received or noticed mailed
notices but said the City cannot control mail delivery.
Staff also acknowledged that the project's history - multiple versions, a neighborhood
meeting, an initial denial, mediation and revisions - could understandably create confusion.
However, staff maintained that the version presented at the June 25 hearing was the revised plan
that Council ultimately approved.
Special City Council Meeting
Minutes
6
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Other PUD and Development Standards
Staff explained that Willow Place was required to provide one amenity for every 50 units. With 12
units, the project was required to provide one amenity and proposed two. Staff also explained that
PUD regulations intentionally provide flexibility from traditional zoning requirements in exchange
for features such as common space, amenities, landscaping, compatible development, efficient
infrastructure and interconnected design.
The City's position was that the PUD approach was appropriate for the site's irregular, L-
shaped configuration.
Staff also clarified that Willow Place did not rely on church parking for compliance and that
the church's conditional use permit remained valid because the church continued to operate as a
religious institution.
Public Testimony
Miranda Marquit questioned whether the project would meaningfully improve housing affordability
and argued that new townhomes could still be unaffordable to many households. She urged
Council to require meaningful amenities, green space and neighborhood benefits.
Colby Hadden, representing Stronger Idaho Falls, supported the project and argued that Idaho
Falls needs additional housing, particularly duplexes, triplexes and townhomes. He said increasing
housing supply could help moderate prices and that denser development could make more
efficient use of infrastructure.
Angela Klingler opposed the project and expressed broader concerns about protecting
established single-family neighborhoods from rezoning, variances and increased density.
Kiery Wilson questioned the City's handling of ex parte communications and whether residents'
communications could be preserved in the record without creating improper contact with Council.
She also questioned whether commitments concerning fencing, canal access and public
amenities were sufficiently documented and enforceable.
Stephanie Sandbeck, a nearby resident and mother, raised traffic and pedestrian safety concerns
around Bellin Street and Pancheri Drive. She described a serious accident and expressed concern
about additional traffic from the development. She urged Council to delay the project until
necessary transportation improvements were in place.
Lisa Kincaid raised concerns about communication, drainage, code compliance and the location
of amenities.
Bridget Houx argued that the project did not conform to the City's Comprehensive or Master
Development planning concepts for locating higher-density housing closer to commercial areas
and transitioning to lower densities farther away.
Raul Ruiz raised concerns about capacity at Westside Elementary School and questioned whether
the school could accommodate additional students generated by new housing.
Special City Council Meeting
Minutes
7
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Developer
Developer representative Colin Hunter defended the project and argued that the property had
remained undeveloped for more than 20 years and had not functioned as a meaningful
neighborhood amenity.
Hunter maintained that the development team had followed City regulations and worked
closely with staff throughout the process.
He argued that increasing the housing supply could help moderate housing costs and that
the developers reviewed zoning requirements before purchasing the property and determined the
site qualified for a PUD. He also argued that additional students could generate additional state
funding for schools.
The developer maintained that the project's engineering, zoning and development
requirements were being addressed through the City's established review process.
Rebuttal
Dave Rocknak, is still concerned about water drainage, the easement, parking and an agreement
between the developer and the church.
Gretchen Rocknak (testimony is considered public comment) also spoke regarding the condition
of the property and described the lot as an unmaintained "weed patch," stating that the church had
historically maintained the field by mowing it. She focused particularly on fencing and drainage
concerns and hopes it is being addressed in the PUD.
Steve Heath with Mountain West Engineering explained that the drainage was calculated and a
pond was designed to withstand a 100-year storm event. He said the PUD will handle its own water
drainage and the church will address its drainage. As well, he explained that the PUD has satisfied
its parking with adequate spaces, and the church will be responsible for its own parking.
Mack Smith asked for clarification regarding the PUD changes regarding drainage and
acknowledged that the developer is now showing a 25-ft setback, which took much back and forth
to establish (much like the drainage issues). He said that the neighborhood drains into the PUD. He
explained that the “weed patch” is the result of the developer not mowing the lot, but has since
been mowed due to several complaints. Mr. Smith said the maps/plots are inconsistent and the
codes are complicated and hard to understand.
Teri Smith is pleased that the neighbors have been provided some clarifying information. She
commented on the improvements to the aforementioned 2-acre plots. She realizes that the church
is not reliant on the PUD parking lot but pointed out that, in order for Zoey Lane to comply with
code, one side of the church lot will need to be closed. She commented that in the June 25
meeting, supporters of the PUD weren’t necessarily commenting on the effects of the PUD on this
neighborhood, but on what a great person Mr. Smith is and his experience building similar homes in
other neighborhoods. Ms. Smith asked if the request for reconsideration is denied, are the
neighbors allowed to request mediation. She also feels like all the neighbors’ concerns weren’t
addressed at the June 25 meeting. She feels that Council’s “discretion” is always in favor of the
developers. She claimed that losing the neighbors’ adverse easement will cost her $10,000
because that access is how she gets her trailer into her own backyard. Ms. Smith brought up that
the developer offered to pay for half of Mr. Rocknak’s fencing in a prior meeting.
Special City Council Meeting
Minutes
8
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Council and Legal Deliberation
As the hearing moved toward deliberation, Council asked the City Attorney to clarify the limits of
Council's authority. The City Attorney emphasized that Council was acting as a quasi-judicial body,
not as a legislative body. Its task was to apply existing PUD standards to the evidence in the record.
The distinction was important because Council could not simply deny the project because
residents opposed it, because Council members preferred lower density, or because another type
of development might be more desirable unless those considerations provided a lawful basis
under the applicable ordinance.
The City Attorney also distinguished the Comprehensive Plan from binding zoning
regulations. The Comprehensive Plan can guide future policy but does not replace the enforceable
PUD and zoning ordinances. Consequently, Council could not deny the project solely because
members believed another land use would better match the broader planning vision if the PUD
satisfied the applicable standards.
The attorney also discussed the potential for a regulatory takings claim if Council denied
the project without a legally sufficient basis. Council referenced the Idaho Supreme Court's TCR,
LLC v. Teton County decision as an example of the consequences that can arise when a local
government denies a development application without adequate support in applicable law and
facts.
Councilors acknowledged that the hearing raised legitimate concerns about growth,
density, traffic, neighborhood compatibility, PUD flexibility and the City's broader development
policies. However, they concluded that those policy concerns did not necessarily provide a legal
basis for overturning this particular PUD.
Councilor Freeman questioned whether 12 townhomes would materially increase traffic or
population compared with six single-family homes and noted that the revised project addressed
concerns he had previously identified.
Councilor Dingman discussed available traffic information concerning Pancheri Drive and
indicated that the roadway appeared to have capacity. She also referenced District 91 enrollment,
which she said had remained relatively flat over the last four years.
Councilors repeatedly emphasized the importance of relying on evidence in the record and
applicable law rather than speculation.
Broader Discussion of Future PUD Regulations
Although Council concluded that it was legally constrained in deciding Willow Place, Councilors
and the Mayor acknowledged that the hearing exposed areas where the City's PUD regulations
could be clearer.
Mayor Burtenshaw said staff was already examining the PUD ordinance and considering
changes that could establish clearer parameters for future applications.
Council recognized that any future ordinance changes could not be applied retroactively to
Willow Place.
Council also discussed changes in state law that have expanded residential development
opportunities and limited some aspects of local control over density, accessory dwelling units,
parking and other development issues.
The Willow Place hearing therefore prompted a broader conversation about how Idaho Falls
should regulate future PUDs while complying with state law and preserving appropriate
neighborhood protections.
Special City Council Meeting
Minutes
9
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Final Decision
After extensive testimony and deliberation, Council concluded that the reconsideration question
was ultimately whether the June 25 approval complied with the existing PUD standards and
applicable law.
Although individual Councilors acknowledged concerns about density, growth, traffic,
neighborhood character and development policy, they determined that those concerns did not
provide a sufficient legal basis to overturn the approval.
Motion: To affirm the decision of the City Council to approve the Willows Place Townhomes
Planned Unit Development and to direct staff to prepare a written decision.
o
Moved by: Councilor Radford
o
Second: Councilor Dingman
o
Vote: Aye: Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none. Rescued: Francis
o
Motion carries.
Council did not adopt the formal written decision that evening. Staff and the City Attorney planned
to prepare the written findings, with the City Attorney noting that the City had until September 7 to
issue the formal written decision.
Because the matter remained subject to potential judicial review, Council members were
reminded that the applicable ex parte restrictions remained in effect and that they should not
privately discuss the case with interested parties.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:35 PM.
/s/ Linda Lundquist_________________
/s/ Lisa Burtenshaw
_____________
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
IDAHO FALLS LISA BURTENSHAW
MAYOR, CITY OF IDAHO FALLS
208.612.8235 | mayor@idahofalls.gov
30 July 2026
City Council
City of Idaho Falls
308 Constitution Way
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Notice Pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-604:
This special meeting of the Idaho Falls City Council is being convened to consider two requests for
reconsideration submitted by members of the public regarding the Willows Place Townhomes
PUD. This written notice is being provided to all members of the City Council in accordance with the
requirements of Idaho Code § 50-604.
Lian Poududha
Lisa Burtenshaw
Mayor, City of Idaho Falls
Cc: Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Zachary Jones, City Attorney
P.O Box 50220 | 308 Constitution Way | Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83405-0220
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
1
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Monday, August 10, 2026
3:00 PM
City Council Chambers
Call to Order and Roll Call
There were present:
Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw (Left at 5:19 pm)
Council President Jim Francis
Councilor John Radford
Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Councilor Jim Freeman
Councilor Kirk Larsen
Councilor Brandon Lee
Also present:
Ian Turner, Airport Director
Melissa Cross, Alliance (via Teams)
Nathan Cuvala, Ardurra Project Manager
Mary Lund, Library Board
Darin Jones, HR Director
Kerry Beutler, CDS Assistant Director
Jeremy Galbreaith, Deputy Chief of Police
Zack Jones, City Attorney
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Mayor Burtenshaw called the meeting to order at 3:02 p.m. with the following items:
Airport - Discussion: Airport Terminal Update: Airport staff provided an update on the terminal expansion, current
infrastructure work, funding, and timeline.
•
Current infrastructure work: The Utility and Infrastructure Package is replacing and relocating major
electrical, mechanical, plumbing, water, drainage, fiber, and lighting systems to prepare for the terminal
expansion. A new powerhouse, generators, chiller, and boilers are also being installed. This work is
scheduled for completion on September 16, 2026.
•
Revised Phase One: The Airport has scaled back the original expansion to focus on immediate needs. The
project will add approximately 21,700 square feet of single-story space, including six additional ticket
counters, expanded queuing, a new baggage makeup area, additional restrooms, airline/support space,
and electrical/IT infrastructure. About 16,700 square feet of existing space will also be remodeled.
•
Future expansion: The previously planned second level/gate-hold area will not be built now, but the new
structure will be designed to allow it to be added later. The Great Hall will remain unchanged.
•
Baggage screening: The expansion is intended to provide space for a second TSA baggage screening
machine, addressing a major current bottleneck and providing redundancy.
•
Funding: The project will use FAA grants, IIJA funding, passenger facility charges, an ITD grant, and other
Airport funding. Approximately $36–$37 million is currently available, with an estimated $7–$10 million in
borrowing potentially needed. The City would guarantee the debt, but it would be repaid from Airport
revenues.
•
Timeline: Foundations are proceeding now to keep the contractor mobilized. The full design is targeted
for late November 2026, with a new Guaranteed Maximum Price expected to come before Council around
early 2027. Major construction is anticipated to begin in spring/summer 2027 and take roughly 24
months.
Mayor, City Council – Discussion: Citywide updates, concerns, questions, reports:
•
Council President Francis
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
2
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Willow Place decision statement: A councilor asked that the recent written statement regarding
the Willow Place Townhomes decision be brought forward Thursday for discussion and possible
amendment. Legal has made some revisions to the draft, so councilors were encouraged to review the
updated version before the meeting. The goal is to expedite finalizing and releasing the statement.
•
Councilor Radford
Duck Race/community weekend: Council members praised the recent community weekend,
which included the Duck Race, Farmer’s Market, and Youth Jam. Attendance and participation were
strong, with approximately 25,000 ducks sold, just below the record of about 28,000. The Idaho Falls Duck
Race was noted as reportedly the second-largest duck race in the country, behind Chicago.
Electric motorcycles: Councilors discussed growing concerns about electric motorcycles capable
of reaching speeds around 40 mph, particularly their use by young riders and on sidewalks, trails, and
grass areas. Legal staff, Deputy Chief Galbreaith, and Council members are already examining the issue.
Councilors were encouraged to share ideas with City Attorney Jones and his team as they consider
potential regulations. Boise, Idaho, was mentioned as having recently adopted an emergency ordinance
following a teenager's death.
•
Mayor Burtenshaw
Northgate Mile planning: One of the Council's priorities is bringing in subject-matter experts to
review portions of the City's subdivision code. The next effort may focus on updating the Northgate Mile
plan, building on a plan previously developed by Brad Cramer. Chris Lee has volunteered to participate on
the citizen side of the planning effort. Councilors asked anyone with potential citizen experts or interested
participants to provide names to Director Sanner so the committee can be formed. The work may address
parking, trees, and other broader citywide planning issues, rather than being limited strictly to Northgate
Mile.
INL/energy and utility discussion: The Mayor announced a Wednesday evening documentary
screening and panel discussion focused on major developments affecting eastern Idaho's utilities,
including advanced reactors at INL, data centers, and geothermal energy. The discussion is intended to
help the community stay informed as these issues increasingly converge with the City's role as a utility
provider and the region's rapid growth. John Wagner and Lori Barber were expected to participate in the
panel.
The screening event will be held at the Frontier Center. There appeared to be an issue with
online registration, so attendees are welcome to just show up. If the Council meeting runs long, Council
Member Francis will finish the meeting, allowing Mayor Burtenshaw to participate in the
filming/screening event.
Library – Discussion: Leave without pay: Library Board member Mary Lund, a past Board chair and current
member-at-large, requested City Council approval for a 12-week leave of absence for a valued Library employee
who is pursuing a master’s degree in education.
•
The employee works in the Library's Makerspaces and is considered a highly valued, long-term employee.
•
The employee needs approximately three months to complete a practicum/master’s requirements.
•
Rather than taking a full education leave (which under City policy would end pay and benefits), the Library
requested leave without pay while reducing the employee's schedule to 20-hours per week for the
duration and retaining benefits.
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
3
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
•
Pay and benefits tied to hours worked would be reduced proportionally, including wages and retirement
contributions, while the employee would continue paying her share of medical coverage.
•
HR Director Jones explained that the request does not fit neatly within the City's formal education-leave
policy because the employee is not leaving work entirely.
•
The arrangement would actually reduce the City's personnel costs, although there could be some
temporary reduction in productivity.
•
Library staff emphasized that retaining the employee and gaining her additional education and skills
would ultimately be valuable to the Library.
•
The request was expected to come before Council for formal action on Thursday, although staff indicated
Council could potentially approve/disprove the request at this meeting if Council desired.
Motion: Approve the leave without pay as presented by the library.
o
Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o
Second: Councilor Radford
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
CDS – Discussion: Starter home subdivision:
City Council discussed Idaho's new starter-home subdivision legislation, which requires cities to allow smaller,
more affordable detached homes on qualifying parcels. Council generally supported the goal of increasing housing
attainability and missing-middle options, but expressed concern that large developments of repetitive, very small
homes could negatively affect neighborhood character, parking, open space, infrastructure, and livability.
Staff explained that the State law does not override all City standards. Height, density, lot coverage,
parking, street width, access, driveway spacing, fire access, and other requirements can still apply. However, some
existing standards, particularly density, lot coverage, and parking, could make starter-home developments
difficult to build under the State's intended model.
Council also questioned how the legislation could affect previously annexed and zoned properties, noting
that residents may have expectations about development based on existing zoning. Staff cautioned that the State
law is broad and may limit the City's ability to grandfather properties or impose additional approval requirements.
Staff presented three options:
•
A: Adopt the State requirements essentially as written.
•
B: Modify City regulations so starter-home subdivisions function effectively in all applicable zones.
•
C: Pursue B while also developing alternative housing models, such as cottage courts, attached homes,
smaller developments, design standards, and strategically located attainable housing that better fit Idaho
Falls.
Council Direction
Council generally favored Option C, with Option A as a backup if time becomes an issue. Staff will form an advisory
group involving Planning Commission members, developers, engineers, Public Works, and other experts to
examine density, lot coverage, parking, design, location, and alternative housing models.
The goal is to have a draft ordinance before the Planning Commission in October, bring it to Council in
November, and ensure compliance with State law by January 31, 2027.
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
4
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Bottom line: Council supports the State's affordable-housing objective but wants to develop a more thoughtful
Idaho Falls approach that provides attainable housing without simply creating large concentrations of repetitive
tiny homes.
Legal, Police - Discussion: Server training:
Council discussed separating the alcohol server training requirements from the broader alcohol ordinance
revisions. The server-training provisions would become a new Chapter 2.1, making them easier to find in the City
Code and allowing them to remain in place whether or not the City later consolidates its beer, wine, and liquor
ordinances.
Key points:
•
Training requirement: The ordinance would apply to alcohol license holders and their employees who
serve alcohol. It does not apply to employees working solely at charitable events covered by charitable-
event permits.
•
Free training: Between the ordinance's effective date and November 15, 2026, the Idaho Falls Police
Department (IFPD) will provide three free training sessions to help businesses become compliant before
the requirement takes effect.
•
Ongoing training: Beginning January 1, 2027, the IFPD will provide four free trainings per year. Businesses
may also use other courses approved by IFPD, including available online courses.
•
Compliance deadline: The required training date was moved from October 1 to November 15, 2026, giving
businesses additional time and avoiding placing the transition in the middle of the holiday season.
•
Proof of training: Businesses will not be required to keep certificates in a particular location or format. If
an authorized official requests proof, the employee/business will have four days to produce the
certification.
•
Approved courses: Council discussed whether alcohol distributors already provide server training. Police
will investigate whether distributor-sponsored courses meet the City's requirements and could potentially
qualify as approved training.
•
Posting approved programs: The list of approved training programs will be maintained by both the City
Clerk and Idaho Falls Police Department, rather than either one alone.
•
Public-health rationale: Council supported adding a recital citing Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
statistics concerning deaths associated with excessive alcohol use to explain the ordinance's purpose.
•
Cost and accessibility: Council noted that approved online training can be relatively inexpensive. For
example, a Boise-approved course was cited as costing about $17 and taking roughly two hours.
•
Next steps: Staff will incorporate the additional feedback and bring the revised server-training ordinance
to the Council for consideration on August 27, 2026. The broader alcohol ordinance revisions will be
addressed separately at a later date.
Mayor - Announcements, Events, Calendaring, Proclamations, Notes and/or Minutes from Boards and
Commissions:
Motion: Receive the recommendations from the July 7, 2026 meeting of the Planning and Zoning
Commission pursuant to the Local Land Use Planning Act.
o
Moved by: Councilor Francis
o
Second: Councilor Dingman
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
5
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
•
Councilor Freeman: Congratulated City staff on the successful rodeo.
•
Councilor Lee: Discussed the departure of Ariel, the Community Food Basket director, who is moving to
Boise for another charitable-sector position. An interim director from the Utah Food Bank is currently
serving, and Council members praised Ariel for her long-standing service and dedication to the
community.
•
Councilor Radford: Council members were reminded to review Ms. Thinnes’ email regarding travel
reimbursements. The City's new enterprise management system will change how reimbursements are
processed, and Council members may need to register or follow new procedures when seeking
reimbursement for expenses they personally pay.
o
Per diem: There was also brief discussion that the City may be considering changes to its per diem
and travel reimbursement system.
•
Councilor Francis: Fireworks: Concerns were raised about the increasing illegal use of fireworks around
the Fourth of July, including complaints about increasingly large aerial fireworks. They want to begin
planning well in advance of next July for a more proactive enforcement/prevention strategy. The
discussion noted that some vendors require purchasers to sign agreements stating they will not use
certain fireworks within prohibited areas, but Council expressed concern that enforcement and education
may need to start much earlier.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:24 PM.
/s/ Linda Lundquist_________________
/s/ Lisa Burtenshaw
_____________
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor
City Council Meeting
Minutes
1
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Thursday, August 13, 2026
6:30 PM
City Council Chambers
1. Mayor Burtenshaw called the meeting to order at 6:30 PM
Present:
Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw
Council President Jim Francis
Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Councilor Jim Freeman
Councilor Kirk Larsen
Councilor Brandon Lee
Councilor John Radford (arrived at 6:32 pm)
Also present:
Bryce Johnson, Police Chief
Ian Turner, Airport Director
Chris Canfield, PW Director
Chris Fredericksen, GM - IF Power
Pam Alexander, Municipal Services Director
Chase Mills, EMS Chief
Joseph Nilsson, Chief Information Officer
Wade Sanner, CDS Director
Tyler Bregborn, Developer
Colby Hatton, Stronger Idaho Falls
Christian Ashcraft, Resident
Dave Reed, Developer
Zack Jones, City Attorney
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
2. Pledge of Allegiance
Gary Mills led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Staff Responses to Prior Public Comment and Other Updates
Police Chief Johnson responded to concerns raised by Finn Garren regarding license plate readers and
Flock Safety. Johnson said he and Garren have spoken several times and recently agreed that a police ride-
along would be useful so Garren could see firsthand how officers use the technology and how it fits into
police operations.
Garren has completed the ride-along application and is expected to be scheduled soon. Johnson
acknowledged that they may not ultimately agree on Flock Safety, but said he respects Garren for having
the courage to voice his convictions and believes the ride-along will provide greater transparency and
understanding of the Police Department's practices.
4. Public Comment
Colby Hatton (IF Resident), an Idaho Falls resident and supporter of Stronger Idaho Falls, spoke about his
positive experience living in the city after having lived abroad in places including Asia, the Pacific, and
India. He highlighted the convenience and community value of having small, locally owned businesses
within residential neighborhoods, citing a nearby bakery and corner store as examples. He said these
businesses create local jobs, keep economic activity local, and provide useful services without causing
significant traffic or noise.
Hatton encouraged the City to allow more small businesses in traditionally residential areas, including
businesses such as bakeries, florists, and barbershops. He suggested allowing neighborhood businesses
City Council Meeting
Minutes
2
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
that can operate with five or fewer parking spaces, while emphasizing that the goal is not to introduce large
retailers such as Walmart into residential neighborhoods.
Rusty Gerdes (IF Resident), opposed spending on Flock cameras, code enforcement, and parking
enforcement, arguing that funding should instead support more police patrols and traffic enforcement. He
cited speeding, unsafe electric-bike behavior, and property damage in his neighborhood as examples of
what he believes are insufficiently addressed. Gerdes also expressed distrust of the Police Department
and frustration with what he described as inadequate responses to reports of crimes and property
damage.
5. Consent Agenda
A. Municipal Services
1. 26-279 Annual Renewal of Customer Information System (CIS) Support and Maintenance
for $99,453.60.
Motion: Approve, accept, or receive all items on the Consent Agenda according to the
recommendations presented.
o
Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o
Second: Councilor Francis
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries 6-0.
6. Regular Agenda
A. Legal
1. 26-297
Written Decision on Requests for Reconsideration Regarding Planned Unit
Development for Willows Place Townhomes
Presentation/Discussion (Attorney Jones): Attorney Jones reviewed the draft written decision
concerning the requests for reconsideration of the Willow Place Townhomes PUD. He explained
that the decision largely relied on the previously approved Reasoned Statement, with the factual
findings reorganized chronologically and updated to reflect the procedural history. Additional
findings addressed the revised PUD's twin-home configuration and its similarity to existing
structures in the surrounding neighborhood.
Attorney Jones reviewed the legal conclusions addressing whether the revised PUD was required to
return to the Planning and Zoning Commission, due process concerns, the public accessibility of
the playground, compatibility of the revised units with the surrounding neighborhood, the
applicability of the City's berm requirement, issues deemed irrelevant to the Council's decision,
fencing, and a claimed prescriptive easement. He explained that a prescriptive easement is a
matter for the courts and is outside the Council's jurisdiction. Council discussed the nature of a
prescriptive easement and agreed that the issue was not one the Council could adjudicate.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
3
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Council President Francis and Council Member Lee recused themselves due to their participation
in the mediation process and left the dais.
Motion: Approve the Written Decision Regarding Requests for Reconsideration affirming the
revised Planned Unit Development for Willows Place Townhomes and give authorization for the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents
o
Moved by: Councilor Radford
o
Second: Councilor Dingman
o
Vote: Aye: Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none. Recused: Francis, Lee
o
Motion carries 4-0.
B. Airport
1. 26-292
Memorandum of Agreement with the Federal Aviation Administration and the Idaho
State Historic Preservation Office
Presentation/Discussion (Director Turner): Director Turner presented a proposed Memorandum
of Agreement related to a hangar at 2541 Foote Drive that had been demolished and was
subsequently determined to have been eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.
Because the demolition occurred without the required prior coordination with the FAA, the
agreement is intended to rectify the City's noncompliance with federal grant assurances.
The agreement provides for commemorating the historic hangar with a plaque, likely to be
placed in the terminal's baggage claim area, and notifying airport tenants whose hangars are
currently eligible for the National Register. Director Turner said the airport had entered into a work
order not to exceed $15,000 to assist with the effort. Council clarified that the City and Airport did
not demolish the hangar; the lessee did so.
Council also discussed how similar situations could be prevented in the future, including
property rights, airport ground leases, historic eligibility that develops during the term of a lease,
and communication with tenants. Director Turner said he had begun notifying tenants of eligible
structures about the additional requirements associated with those structures.
Motion: Approve the Memorandum of Agreement among the Federal Aviation Administration,
Idaho State Historic Preservation Office, and the Idaho Falls Regional Airport and give authorization
to the Mayor to execute the necessary documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Radford
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
C. Public Works
1. 26-266
Development Agreement - Circle K Pancheri Drive and Skyline Drive
Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield): Director Canfield presented an amended
Development Agreement for a proposed Circle K at the corner of Skyline Drive and Pancheri Drive.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
4
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
The agreement replaces a prior development agreement and incorporates requirements
associated with the City's impact fee program. As part of the development, the developer will
extend Skyline Drive approximately 200–250 feet south. The City will participate using available
impact fee funds, up to approximately $119,500, toward the arterial road construction. Council
briefly clarified the location of the project.
Motion: Approve the Development Agreement for Circle K Pancheri Drive and Skyline Drive and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
2. 26-285
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5310 Small Urban Funding Agreement
Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield): Director Canfield explained that the agreement
provides federal funding through the FTA Section 5310 program to enhance transportation services
for elderly and disabled residents through the GIFT program. The agreement provides 80% federal
funding and a 20% local match, with $230,400 in federal reimbursement and a total expenditure of
$288,000. Council clarified that the funding does not add a vehicle to the City's fleet but helps
support and allocate the costs of services provided to elderly and disabled residents.
Motion: Approve the FTA 5310 Small Urban Funding Agreement and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute the necessary documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
D. Idaho Falls Power
1. 26-278
Bid Rejection - IFP 26-21-2 Upper Development Dam No. 1 Rehabilitation
Presentation/Discussion (Director Fredericksen): Staff presented two related bid rejections for
work at the Upper Power Dam. The first project involved replacing hydraulic piping and seals. The
engineer's estimate was approximately $500,000, while the low bid was approximately $761,000.
The second project involved construction of an earthen coffer dam necessary to dewater the east
channel so the rehabilitation work could occur. The engineer's estimate was approximately
$250,000, while the low bid was approximately $766,000.
Together, the projects exceeded the City's $750,000 budget by approximately $1 million.
Staff also noted that required approvals from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the
Department of Dam Safety had not yet been received. Staff recommended rejecting the bids and
City Council Meeting
Minutes
5
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
rebidding the projects at a later date when permitting is complete and construction conditions may
produce more favorable bids.
Motion: Reject the single bid received for the Upper Development Dam project
o Moved by: Councilor Freeman
o Second: Councilor Francis
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
2. 26-287
Bid Rejection - IFP 26-21-1 Upper Coffer Dam Project
Presentation/Discussion (Director Fredericksen): The Upper Coffer Dam project was discussed
together with the Upper Development Dam rehabilitation. Staff explained that the coffer dam was
necessary to dewater the east channel and allow the rehabilitation work to proceed. Because the
bids substantially exceeded the budget and required regulatory approvals remained outstanding,
staff recommended rejecting the bids and rebidding the project at a later date.
Motion: Reject all bids for the Upper Coffer Dam project
o Moved by: Councilor Freeman
o Second: Councilor Francis
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
E. Municipal Services
1. 26-293
Purchase Replacement Cardiac Monitor/Defibrillators for Idaho Falls Fire
Department
Presentation/Discussion (Chief Mills, Director Alexander): This concerned the replacement of
approximately 15 Stryker cardiac monitors/defibrillators purchased with CARES Act funding in
2020 that are approaching the end of their useful life. Staff recommended purchasing new Zoll
Zenix monitors, with a $165,000 trade-in allowance for the existing units, for a total purchase price
of $759,308.67.
Council discussed the change from LifePak equipment to Zoll equipment and the training
that will accompany the purchase. Staff explained that Zoll will provide a team to work with each
fire crew on configuration and training. Council also discussed the Ground Emergency Medical
Transportation (GEMT) program and learned that $1.4 million in GEMT funding was received during
the current year and would fund this purchase. Staff explained that the new equipment is expected
to have a substantially longer useful life than the refurbished CARES-funded monitors being
replaced.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
6
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Motion: Approve and accept the purchase of 15 ZOLL Zenix cardiac monitor/defibrillators from Zoll
Medical Corporation through the Sourcewell cooperative purchasing government contract
#041823-ZLL for a total of $759,308.67 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the
necessary documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
2. 26-280
Backup Software and Support Platform Services for Information Technology
Presentation/Discussion (Director Alexander, CIO Nilsson): Staff presented a proposed five-
year backup, storage, and support platform agreement with CompuNet through the OMNIA
Partners cooperative purchasing contract for Veeam and Object First services. The City's existing
Cohesity platform is scheduled to reach end of support in early 2027. Staff compared a three-year
agreement costing $218,760.06 with a five-year agreement costing $272,013.16, with the five-year
option providing approximately 25% savings over the term.
Council asked about contract termination provisions and was advised that the final
agreement would be reviewed with Legal and would include the appropriate termination language.
Council also discussed cybersecurity and ransomware recovery. Staff explained that the system
would serve as part of the City's disaster recovery plan while also allowing routine recovery of
deleted files.
Motion: Approve the purchase of backup software and support services from OMNIA Partners
Cooperative Purchasing Agreement #R250302 with CompuNet, Inc. for Veeam and Object First
Data Platform Services for a total of $272,013.16, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign
the necessary documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
3. 26-281
Public Hearing for the Proposed Fees for Fiscal Year 2026/27
Presentation/Discussion (Director Alexander): Director Alexander presented the proposed FY
2026/27 fee schedule. Staff explained that State law requires fees to reflect the actual cost of
providing services. Proposed changes included Airport landing, terminal, and key replacement
fees; Community Development Services subdivision, annexation, application, building, code
enforcement, parklet, and parking fees; Idaho Falls Power electric and fiber charges; a new Frontier
City Council Meeting
Minutes
7
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Center lobby rental fee; Parks and Recreation program and facility fees; Police animal-related fees;
and Public Works landfill, wastewater, water, and service connection fees.
Council discussed the removal and consolidation of obsolete or duplicative Parks and
Recreation fees, the Idaho Falls Raceway fee structure, the new Frontier Center lobby rental
opportunity, and the relationship between annexation fees and the City's impact fee program. Staff
explained that some Parks and Recreation programs and fees had been discontinued or
consolidated and that the City intended to continue simplifying the fee schedule.
-
Public Hearing: No members of the public testified regarding the proposed fees.
-
Action: Public hearing closed. No action was taken on the fee schedule at this hearing; staff
clarified that the fees would be considered as part of the overall budget adoption process.
4. 26-282
Public Hearing to Levy 1% Forgone for Fiscal Year 2026/27
Presentation/Discussion (Director Alexander): Staff explained that the City had approximately
$5.7 million in available forgone property tax balances and proposed using 1% ongoing forgone for
prioritized public safety and legal positions. The proposed funding would support one Assistant
City Attorney focused on civil and prosecution work, two Fire/EMS training captains, and one police
dispatcher shared with Bonneville County. The proposed 1% forgone amount was $538,354.
-
Public Hearing: No public testimony was given specifically regarding the 1% forgone.
-
Action: Public hearing closed. No action was taken because this hearing was part of the budget
process and the forgone would be addressed during budget adoption.
5. 26-293
Public Hearing to Levy One-Time Capital Project Forgone for Fiscal Year 2026/27
Presentation/Discussion (Director Alexander): Staff presented proposed one-time capital
forgone priorities focused on Fire, Parks and Recreation, and facility improvements. Proposed
projects included improvements at Fire Station 4, two projects at the Wes Deist Aquatic Center,
improvements to the Joe Wayne/Ice Arena, and initial infrastructure for a future public safety/fire
training facility. Staff explained that the proposed capital forgone would be used only for
designated one-time capital projects.
-
Public Hearing: Former Council Member Gary Mills (IF Resident) asked for clarification of the
numbering of three fire stations based on their openings. Council discussed whether the Fire
Station 4 project referred to the Woodruff location. Staff confirmed that it did. No other public
testimony was given.
-
Action: Public hearing closed. No action was taken at this hearing.
6. 25-284
Public Hearing for the 2026/27 Fiscal Year Budget
City Council Meeting
Minutes
8
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Presentation/Discussion (Director Alexander): Director Alexander presented the proposed FY
2026/27 budget with a tentative not-to-exceed amount of $393,483,954. The budget includes
charges for services, state and grant funding, 3% statutory property tax growth, growth and
annexation revenue, 1% ongoing forgone, and one-time capital forgone. Staff discussed proposed
employee compensation and benefits, including a 2% COLA for non-union employees, market
adjustments for Idaho Falls Power and Fiber employees, and increases in medical, vision, and
dental benefits.
Staff also reviewed approximately $17 million in community infrastructure investment,
prioritized public safety positions and projects, the GIFT contribution, Library funding, police pay
scale changes, enterprise fund positions, anticipated revenues and expenditures, the General
Fund, property tax valuation and levy assumptions, and estimated impacts on residential and
commercial property owners. Staff explained that charges for services include utility charges,
EMS/ambulance services, county agreements, Parks and Recreation fees, and other service-
related revenues.
-
Public Comment: Former Council Member Gary Mills and Christian Ashcroft addressed the
budget. Mr. Mills discussed ambulance billing, public safety, cybersecurity, and municipal
revenue issues. Mr. Ashcroft encouraged the City to develop earlier and simpler opportunities
for public engagement in the budget process.
-
Action: Public hearing closed. No budget adoption action was taken. Staff indicated that final
budget adoption would occur at the August 27, 2026 Council meeting.
F. Community Development Services
1. 26-288
Legislative Public Hearing — Annexation and Initial Zoning of R3, Multiple Dwelling
Residential — 11.874 Acres
Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner): Director Sanner presented a property-owner-
initiated request to annex approximately 11.874 acres along 15th East between 49th South and
65th South and establish R-3, Multiple Dwelling Residential zoning. The property is located in the
General Urban transect, where R-3 zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property
is currently farmland, and surrounding properties include R-3, R-3A, R-1, and County A-1 zoning.
The request was considered by the Planning Commission on April 7, 2026, where no public
testimony was given and the request received unanimous approval. Council briefly discussed the
property's frontage along 15th East, which was identified as approximately 236.43 feet.
-
Public Hearing: No public testimony was given. The hearing was closed.
Motion 1: Approve the ordinance annexing approximately 11.874 acres in portions of the
Southwest Quarter of Section 4 and Southeast Quarter of Section 5, Township 1 North, Range 38
East; assign a Comprehensive Plan designation of General Urban; suspend the rules requiring
three complete and separate readings; and request that the ordinance be read by title and
published by summary.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
9
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Francis
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
ORDINANCE 3669: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF
APPROXIMATELY 11.874 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE, AMENDING
THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY WITH THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY AND STATE
AUTHORITIES; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND
ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.
Motion 2: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the annexation
of approximately 11.874 acres in part of the SW ¼ of Section 4 and the SE ¼ of Section 5, Township
1 North, Range 38 East and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Francis
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
Motion 3: Approve the ordinance establishing the initial zoning for R3, Multiple Dwelling Residential
as shown in the Ordinance exhibits under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and
separate readings, request reading by title and published by summary; that the City limits
documents be amended to include the area annexed herewith; and that the City Planner be
instructed to reflect said annexation, amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, and initial zoning on
the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps located in the planning office.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Francis
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
ORDINANCE 3670: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE INITIAL ZONING OF
APPROXIMATELY 11.874 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE AS R3,
MULTIPLE DWELLING RESIDENTIAL; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY
SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.
Motion 4: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the initial zoning
of R3, Multiple Dwelling Residential and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary
documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
City Council Meeting
Minutes
10
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
o Second: Councilor Francis
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
2. 26-289
Legislative Public Hearing — Annexation and Initial Zoning of R3, Multiple Dwelling
Residential — Approximately 1.17 Acres
Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner): Director Turner presented an owner-initiated request
to annex approximately 1.17 acres currently located in Bonneville County and establish R-3 zoning
with the Limited Development Airport Overlay Zone. The property is located near 33rd North and is
intended to become part of a future PUD. The property is currently zoned A-1, while surrounding
properties are primarily R-3. Staff stated that the request is consistent with the General Urban
transect.
The applicant, Dave Reed, explained that the annexation would facilitate right-of-way and
connectivity for the future development, including a 112-foot minimum-width road connecting to
33rd North and providing access into the future Willow Creek Cove development. The road would
provide emergency access and connectivity to a potential future park.
-
Public Hearing: Applicant Dave Reed, a Mapleton, Utah developer, testified in support. No
additional public testimony was given. The hearing was closed.
Motion 1: Approve the ordinance annexing approximately 1.17 acres in the Southwest Quarter of
Section 6, Township 2 North, Range 38 East; assign a Comprehensive Plan designation of General
Urban; suspend the rules requiring three complete and separate readings; and request reading by
title and publication by summary.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Francis
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
ORDINANCE 3671: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF
APPROXIMATELY 1.17 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY WITH THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY AND STATE
AUTHORITIES; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY AND
ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.
Motion 2: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the annexation
of approximately 1.17 acres and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary
documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
City Council Meeting
Minutes
11
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
o Second: Councilor Francis
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
Motion 3: Approve the ordinance establishing initial zoning of R3, Multiple Dwelling Residential,
with the Limited Development Airport Overlay Zone as shown in the Ordinance exhibits, under a
suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings; and request that it be read
by title and published by summary; that the City limits documents be amended to include the area
annexed herewith; and that the City Planner be instructed to reflect said annexation, amendment
to the Comprehensive Plan, and initial zoning on the Comprehensive Plan, and Zoning Maps
located in the Planning office; and direct the City Planner to reflect the annexation, Comprehensive
Plan amendment, and initial zoning on the appropriate maps.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Francis
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
ORDINANCE 3672: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE INITIAL ZONING OF
APPROXIMATELY 1.17 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE AS R3, MULTIPLE
DWELLING RESIDENTIAL, WITH LIMITED DEVELOPMENT AIRPORT OVERLAY ZONE; AND
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Motion 4: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the initial zoning
of R3, Multiple Dwelling Residential with the Limited Development Airport Overlay Zone and give
authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Francis
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
3. 26-290
Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Reasoned
Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, Harvest Village
Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner, Director Canfield, Developer Bregborn): Director
Sanner presented the proposed Harvest Village PUD on approximately 14.575 acres near 65th
North and Sage Lakes Golf Course. The property is currently zoned R-2 with an Airport Overlay and
is located in the General Urban transect. The proposal includes 175 residential units consisting of
fourplexes, fiveplexes, sixplexes, and sevenplexes, for a density of approximately 12 units per acre,
below the 17 units per acre permitted under the PUD ordinance.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
12
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
The development would include public and private streets, rear-facing garages, five proposed
amenities, landscaping meeting the 25% requirement, two parking spaces per unit, and four
development phases. Staff discussed proposed front-yard setback modifications, private streets,
and an alternative arrangement of street trees.
Planning Commission considered the request on June 2 and unanimously recommended
approval. Public comments before the Planning Commission included concerns about a prior
horse-grazing arrangement and increased traffic associated with growth in the area.
-
Developer Bregborn explained that the primary reason for using the PUD process was to allow
units to front private streets. He stated that the developer had been communicating with the
adjacent property owner regarding the horse-grazing arrangement and did not anticipate
issues.
Council Discussion: Council discussed street-tree placement, maintenance responsibilities for
public and private streets, playground quality, parking, guest parking, garage dimensions,
sidewalks and pathways, traffic impacts, private-street no-parking requirements, the proposed 15-
foot front setback, and the legal standards governing PUD setbacks and variances.
Staff explained that the private streets would be maintained by the HOA and the public streets
by the City. The proposal includes 18 visitor parking spaces in addition to two garage spaces per
unit. Council expressed concern about the limited guest parking and the potential for vehicles to
obstruct private streets. The applicant agreed to paint private-street curbs red to reinforce the no-
parking requirement.
Council also discussed ADA access to stormwater/common areas and the potential need to
provide accessible routes into those areas. Legal Counsel explained the standards governing
deviations from the underlying R-2 setbacks and clarified that Council is not automatically required
to approve a requested variance.
Considerable discussion occurred regarding the placement and number of trees. Council
discussed using additional trees to mitigate the reduced setback and provide additional screening,
while staff clarified the PUD's minimum tree requirements and the flexibility available for alternate
tree spacing.
-
Public Comment: Colby Hatton, representing Stronger Idaho Falls, spoke in support of the
development. He stated that the organization supports dense housing and sustainable urban
development, while encouraging improved non-driving transportation options. He also
suggested that the development could provide opportunities for small neighborhood
businesses.
Motion 1: Approve the Planned Unit Development for Harvest Village as amended:
1. Playground equipment shall meet current Parks and Recreation standards as of August 13, 2026.
2. Private streets shall have additional no-parking markings, including red-painted curbs and signs,
with Fire Department input.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
13
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
3. Storm/common areas shall provide ADA accessibility.
4. Trees shall be planted along the north side of the development at approximately the same
spacing and number as shown on the south side, with reasonable adjustments where necessary to
accommodate sidewalks.
o Moved by: Councilor Francis
o Second: Councilor Lee
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: Freeman.
o Motion carries 5-1.
Presentation/Discussion: Following approval of the PUD, Council discussed the need for the
Reasoned Statement to specifically incorporate the four conditions approved with the PUD. Legal
Counsel advised that the language should be drafted specifically enough for staff to implement
and enforce the conditions. Council considered whether to approve the statement immediately or
recess to allow staff to prepare revised language. Council ultimately recessed to allow the
document to be revised.
During the recess, Legal Counsel revised the Reasoned Statement to include the following
conditions: Parks and Recreation standards for the playground as of August 13, 2026; red-
painted/no-parking curbs and signs on private streets; ADA accessibility for the two storm ponds;
and trees on the north side approximately equal in spacing and number to those on the south side.
Motion 2: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Planned
Unit Development for Harvest Village and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary
documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Francis
o Second: Councilor Lee
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries 6-0.
7. Announcements
o Council Member Larsen - Reported on the recent Duck Race and noted that approximately
$25,000 was raised and that Rotary has contributed more than $7 million to the Greenbelt and
parks over approximately 30 years.
o Council President Francis announced that he and Councilor Radford would meet with the Idaho
AARP’s Executive Director to discuss potential grants and community needs, particularly issues
affecting residents over age 50 and housing.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:09 PM.
/s/ Linda Lundquist_________________
/s/ Lisa Burtenshaw
_____________
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor
8/13/2026
City of Idaho Falls
Fiscal Year 2026/27
Fees, Forgone, and Budget Hearings
Thursday, August 13, 2026
Strategic &
— 25 os
Planning —~ — —>-—
8/43/2026
New Fees or Fees Greater than 5%
Public Hearing
Staff Presentation
Fees reflect the cost of public services to those who benefit from the services. Fees must be reasonably related to, but
cannot exceed, the cost of providing the service.
Fee Changes — Airport
(Section 1, Page 1)
¢ Landing fees
o Revised fee structure to add landing fees to include turn fees.
¢ Terminal rent
o Revised fee structure to add turn fees.
° Badge fee
o NEW - Key replacement fee at $50.00 per key.
Fee Changes — Community Development Services
(Section 2, Page 1-2)
¢ Subdivision fees
o 2.3a-2.3n
¢ Annexation fees
© 2.4a-b removed
¢ Application fees
o 2.5a-h
Fee Changes — Community Development Services
(Section 2, Page 2-4)
* Residential Building Fee Valuation Table
o Valuation range
° 2.6a-2.6a xciv2
* Commercial Building Fee Valuation Table
o Valuation range
* 2.7a-2.7alv2
8/13/2026
8/13/2026
Fee Changes — Community Development Services
(Section 2, Page 4-5)
¢ New Residential Buildings and Additions Valuation Multiples
0 2.9a-2.13g
* Code Enforcement Violations
0 2.13h-2.13}
* Parklet lease, temporary on-street construction parking permit
02.14, 2.15ab
Fee Changes — Idaho Falls Power & Fiber
(Section 4, Page 5)
* Electrical Service
o Various base, demand & service charges
o New- Street Light utility fee, per account, per month
* Public Unlit Fiber Optic Network
o Backbone service fee per single pair fiber, per month
8/13/2026
Fee Changes — Municipal Services
(Section 7, Page 5)
¢ Frontier Center for the Performing Arts
o New - Main lobby rental
Fee Changes — Parks and Recreation
(Section 8, Page 6-13)
o Sandy Downs
o Parks
o Horticulture/Forestry
o Activity Center
o Cemetery
o Tautphaus Park Zoo and Funland
o War Bonnet Rodeo
o Recreation
o Wes Deist Aquatic Center
o Golf
Revised with services and programs provided.
8/13/2026
Fee Changes — Police
(Section 9, Page 13)
¢ Animal Control
o New —At-risk/dangerous — unaltered license
o New —At-risk/dangerous — altered license
o New — Euthanasia — Non-resident
o Animal surrender
o Cremation fee
Fee Changes — Public Works
(Section 10, Pages 13-16)
* Sanitation
o County landfill fees
o Extra dump
o New — Bulk item pickup
¢ Wastewater
o Service connection fees
o Monthly non-metered and metered fees (residential, commercial and
industrial)
o County and city rates
o Septic haulers
8/13/2026
Fee Changes — Public Works
(Section 10, Pages 13-16)
* Water
o Service connection fees
o Disconnect/reconnection fee
o Service inspection call after hours
o Monthly non-metered and metered fees (residential, commercial, school,
industrial and irrigation)
o Recharge administration and sampling fee
Conclusion of
New Fees or Fees Greater than 5%
Public Hearing Staff Presentation
8/13/2026
Forgone Hearings
Staff Presentation
1% Forgone - Prioritized Requests
____Legaland Public Safety Operations _ | (say
One Assistant City Attorney (Civil and Prosecution) $176,311 Ongoing
Two Fire/EMS Training Officers (Captain level) 325,096 Ongoing
One Police Dispatcher 36,947 Ongoing
Total $538,354
Page 49 and 50 of the draft budget book
Forgone Notice: Saturday, August 1 and Saturday, August 8 as required by State Statute.
8/13/2026
One Time Capital Forgone — Prioritized Requests
Fire and Parks and Recreation One-Time Facility Capital | Amount | Type
____Improvements __ Awe
Fire Upgrade/Remodel the 35-year-old Station 4 Bathrooms $75,000 One-time
Wes Deist Aquatic Center Starting Blocks for 8 Lanes 74,240 One-time
Wes Deist Aquatic Center Main Entrance Door 18,700 One-time
Joe Marmo/Wayne Lehto Ice Arena Ice Rink Bleachers 140,000 One-time
Fire Conex Containers for future Public Safety Training Facility 28,500 One-time
Fire Training Facility Phase 1 Basic Infrastructure for future 13,560 One-time
Public Safety Training Facility (Forgone & Excess COP Funded)
Total $350,000
Page 50 of the draft budget book
Forgone Notice: Saturday, August 1 and Saturday, August 8 as required by State Statute.
Conclusion of Forgone Hearings
Staff Presentation
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Budget
Hearing
Overview of the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Proposed Budget
Total Not-to-Exceed Budget - $393,483,954 ($393.5M)
o Charges for services
o State and grant funding
o 3% Statutory property tax levy
o Growth and annexation
o 1% ongoing forgone
o One-time capital forgone
Page 21 of the draft budget book.
8/13/2026
10
8/13/2026
Overview of the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Proposed Budget
Proposed Tentative, Not-to-Exceed Budget Includes:
o 2% cost of living for non-union city employees
o Market study adjustments for Idaho Falls Power/Fiber employees
o Increase of 5% for medical benefits, 5% for vision and 10% for dental plan
o Replacement of Utility Billing Software -Customer Information System (CIS)
Page 21 of the draft budget book.
Community Investment in Community Infrastructure
$16,928,885 (S$17M)
Total Capital Investment
IDAHO FALLS
IDAHO FALLS re
PARKS REC LO Cjolfir.com >
IDAHO FALLS IDAHO FALLS
WORKS POLICE
Funding sources: IFP Greenbelt, Levy, Grants, Carryover, Impact Fees, Donations, General Funds, Admission fees, Federal Aid projects
11
Prioritized Requests — Public Safety
_ Department Request | Amount | — Funding Source —
One Assistant City Attorney (Civil and Criminal) $176,311 1% Forgone
Two Fire/EMS Training Captains 325,096 1% Forgone
One Police Detective — Opioid Response 104,530 Opioid & Narcotics
One Police Dispatcher 93,514 County %, Growth, 1%
Forgone and operating
Total $699,451
Page 49 and 50 of the draft budget book.
Prioritized Requests — Public Safety
Certificate of Participation Funding
? Public Safety
Police Records Management System —Implementation $83,481 One-time
Police Records Management System — Annual 192,014 Ongoing
Police Records Management System — Annual 168,065 Ongoing
(Future Years)
Fire Training Facility Phase 1 Basic Infrastructure 236,440 One-time
Total $680,000
Page 50 and 54 of the draft budget book.
8/13/2026
12
8/13/2026
Prioritized Requests - Growth
____ Department Request | Amount | Type _|
GIFT contribution $20,000 Ongoing
Library operational tax levy increase 201,661 Ongoing
Police pay scale change for sworn officers 84,308 Ongoing
One Police Dispatcher 8,533 Ongoing
Total $314,502
Pages 49, 50, and 52 of the draft budget book
Prioritized Requests — Enterprises (Rate Funded)
___ Department Request | Amount | Type _
Two Water Service Technicians (Public Works/Water) $190,676 Ongoing
Two Power Wiremen (Idaho Falls Power) 221,892 Ongoing
One Apprentice Generation Mechanic (Idaho Falls Power) 82,108 Ongoing
One Fiber Communications and Splicing Technician (Idaho 77,442 Ongoing
Falls Power/Fiber)
$572,118
Pages 55, 56 and 57 of the draft budget book
13
Budget Summary by Revenue Type
FY2024-25
Description Actual
Taxes and Franchises
Intergovernmental
Charges for Services
Licenses and Permits
Rentals and Leases
Fines and Forfeitures
Contributions and Donations
Investment Income
Miscellaneous
Debt Proceeds
Non -Revenue Transfers
Total Revenues
$49,170,741
45,244,307
145,087,757
6,780,860
1,688,081
337,495
1,872,222
8,897,156
3,537,500
9,215,094
$271,831,214
FY2025-26
Adopted Budget
$51,635,446
82,601,932
143,205,981
7,936,675
1,864,160
240,550
2,935,419
4,198,779
2,475,678
18,368,229
4,854,526
$320,317,375
8/13/2026
FY2026-27 |
Proposed Budget
$55,353,846
79,841,761
162,660,746
5,481,575
1,746,944
280,000
1,751,423
4,175,502
2,719,888
5,000,000
6,183,931
$325,195,615 |
Page 31 of the draft budget book.
Budget Summary by Expenditure Type
FY2025-26
FY2024-25 FY2026-27 ,
Description Actual Proposed Budget —
Adopted Budget
Salaries and Wages
Benefits
Current Operating Expense
Grant Expenditures
Capital Outlay
MERF Expenditures
Debt Service
MERF Allocation
Interdepartmental Charges
Cost Allocation Transfers
Contingency
Total Expenditures
$65,692,050
31,206,138
105,176,482
7,231,608
70,717,691
5,130,105
11,254,414
5,010,154
(4,674,307)
(13,100,394
$283,643,942
$70,721,155
33,543,505
120,612,327
9,579,691
111,473,524
6,387,135
12,521,883
4,706,694
(6,122,996)
(14,476,022)
40,688,080
$389,634,976
$74,879,525
36,432,922
136,520,384
6,985,435
117,261,955
6,562,070
12,618,067
5,280,104
(5,847,738)
(15,831,814)
18,623,044
$393,483,954
Page 33 of the draft budget book
14
8/13/2026
General Fund Budget Summary
FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27 FY 2026/27 Department
Adopted Proposed ‘Proposed Budget Book
Department Budget | Budget Revenue | _ Page
Police $27,765,248 $29,964,622 $3,153,723
Fire 19,236,132 19,982,676 4,481,279
Parks 12,695,021 14,737,372 4,947,149
Non-Departmental 8,469,663 9,848,399 60,011,985
Municipal Services 6,818,136 5,610,535 694,000
Public Works 4,255,693 4,499,513 2,672,500
Community Development 4,542,939 4,023,155 3,424,901
Services
Legal 740,880 933,135 180,000
Human Resources 498,938 555,672 --
Mayor and Council 1,022,441 492,796 91,500
Total General Fund $86,045,091 $90,647,934 $79,657,037
Page 34 of the draft budget book
Property Tax Valuation and Levy Overview
15
Property Tax — Valuation
PROPERTY TAX TABLE
2023 2024
(Estimated)
2025 2026 2027
Valuation $ 7,052,741.278 $ 8,296,469.966 $8103,605,399 $ 8,660,283169 $ 8,943,805, 451
Certified Property tax $ 42697326 $44,838,106 $47,681429 $50,560,429 $54,098,846
Levy Rate 0.0060540040 0.00540
ae ATs
~~
44800 0.0058839760 0.0058381958 0.0060487503
<a
Page 28, of the draft budget book
Property Tax Levy — Proposed Allocation
Proposed | %of | Amount %: |
FY2026-27 | Levy | Increase | Increase
General Fund $42,586,820 $45,684,368
Streets 2,953,380 3,041,981
Recreation 1,187,466 1,223,090
Library 3,042,763 3,335,707
Public Works CIP 790,000 813,700
Total Tax Levy $50,560,429 $54,098,846
84.0% $3,097,548 7.3%
5.7% 88,601 3.0%
2.3% 35,624 3.0%
5.9% 292,944 9.6%
1.5% 23,700 3.0%
100% $3,538,417 7.0%
Page 28, of the draft budget book
8/13/2026
16
8/13/2026
Property Tax — Estimated Annual eee Residential
__ Assessed Property Value aa $45 $606
Glietent Cprepeny Tax Assessment Fareed $1,897 $2,773
3% Statutory & Growth $95/S8 $116/$10 $160/$13
Forgone 1% for Operations $16/$1 $20/$2 $30/$2
Forgone for Capital $10/$1 $13/$1 $19/S2
Total Estimated Property Tax Assessment —
Annual $1,580/year $2,048/year $2,982/year
Monthly $132/month $171/month $249/month
Total Change from Current —
Annual $121/year $150/year $209/year
Monthly $10/month $13/month $17/month
PROP EEy Tax — = eee atee Annual AEA = oe
current pepe We Assessment "Taeis ~ $44,676 ” $58,382
3% Statutory & Growth $145/S12 $579/S48 $2,897/$241
Forgone 1% for Operations $31/$3 $124/$10 $620/$52
Forgone for Capital $20/$2 $81/$7 $403/$34
Total Estimated Property Tax Assessment —
Annual $3,115/year $12,460/year $62,302/year
Monthly $260/month $1,038/month $5,192/month
Total Change from Current —
Annual $196/year $784/year $3,920/year
Monthly $16/month $65/month $327/month
az
8/73/2026
Conclusion
of the
Fiscal Year 2026/27
Budget Hearing Staff Presentation
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS - Fee Changes DRAFT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Idaho Falls proposes to impose the following new fees and fee increases greater than 5% of such fees collected. The additional fees
are necessary to cover new services provided by City of Idaho Falls or for increased costs to services currently provided. Public comment on these proposed changes will be
received at a public hearing on August 13. 2026, at City of Idaho Falls Council Chambers, in the City Annex Building, located at 680 Park Avenue, Idaho Falls, Idaho, at 6:30 pm
Exhibit A
Idaho Falls Fee Schedule-PROPOSED
Effective October 1, 2026
Effective June 1, 2026 Proposed October 1,
Item Number Department / Division / Item Description Fee 2026
Unit of measurement
SECTION 1_|AIRPORT DEPARTMENT a |e
11 Landing Fee $2.50 maximum per 1,000 pound gross weight.
depended upon total annual landing
weight
fia AircraftwithO-sOseats T5232 00]maximumperturm
tb ircraftwitht100seats TCE C«S5293.00|maximum peru Cd
ite Aircraftwith101-150seats 8 854.00]/maximum pertum
iid SSSSCSC~*d:CArcraftwith>150 seats «dT «S15 00] maximum perturn CS
aS TerminalRent EHO 840.00]persquarefoot Cd
isa ircraftwithO-5Oseats $7 38.00|maximumpertum
sb Alircraftwith51-100seats PE $801.00]maximumpertum
5c Arcraftwith O1-SOseats TT $869.00]maximum pertum Cs
isd Aircraftwith>1S0seats EC 8937.00]maximumpertum
UG es sg Ee eS
SECTION 2 |COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES |
DEPARTMENT
ubdivision Fees
Site plan review and processing (review of civil
site plans other than single-family residence)
42) | S| Sl et wt Sh 6B wl oh) lef i Sl: Sl 6B
eel | 3} 6S} 6] SC} tS) Siela] «sis g] sl si 8
Sisisis| jes 8 8 S| 8 ts si si sisis sis S| si 8 8
o
S
an
Eee |
= i
5 aes
$525
$1575[perlot
$157.5
S525]periot
NIN
w]o
o
N
3.b Site plan resubmittal (review of civil site plans not
completed after 3 reviews)
.3.c Preliminary Plat Review and Processing Fee
(review of preliminary plats)
Preliminary plat resubmittal (review of preliminary
plats not completed after 3 reviews)
2.3.e Final Plat Review and Processing (review of final
plats)
Base Fee
2.3.f Final plat resubmittal (review of final plats not
completed after 3 reviews)
Base Fee
Zoning compliance report (researching historical
2.3.h Advertising fee (fee to cover cost of legal
advertisement for public hearings)
Improvement drawings review and processing
(review of improvement drawings)
Improvement drawings resubmittal (review of
improvement drawings not completed after 3
reviews)
Utility reviews — non-franchise (review of non-
franchise utility improvement plans)
lona Bonneville Sewer District reviews (review of
sewer improvement drawings with Sewer District)
nN
N
wo
=
Nn
gy
So
Oo @
o
|
$367 50
nN
w
nd 6‘
=!
ee
nN
wo
*
Vacation (Review and processing of applications
to vacate right-of-way, easements, and other
public utilities)
Appeals (Appeal decisions by Board or
—— Adjustment or Planning Commission)
“ A “A
Oo ow
wn
oe eaaaie leit st apeeenalis GRE:
a aia
S27 Sojeach
Ss77sjeach_——SSSSCSCSCSCSCSC~—S
ss77s0leach__—
Application Fees
Variance Application
ezoning Application
lanned Transition Zone Application
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
$350:
$550,
$550.
$250.
$262
Page 1 of 16
Exhibit A
Idaho Falls Fee Schedule-PROPOSED
Effective October 1, 2026
Effective June 1, 2026 Proposed October 1,
Item Number Department / Division / Item Description Fee 2026 Unit of measurement
Conditional Use Permit (Either Planning $225.00 $236 25)
Commission or City Council)
Conditional Use Permit (Both Planning $325.00
Commission and City Council)
Site Plan Bonding Application Fee
Planned Unit Development
esidential Building Permit Fee Valuation Table
Valuation Range
$1 to $499
$500 to $999
$1,000 to $9,999
$10,000 to $19,999
$20,000 to $29,999
$30,000 to $39,999
$40,000 to 49,999
$50,000 to $ 59,999
$60,000 to $69,999
$70,000 to $79,999
$80,000 to $89,999
$90,000 to $99,999
$100,000 to $104,999
$105,000 to $109,999
$110,000 to $114,999
$115,000 to $119,999
$120,000 to $124,999
$125,000 to $129,999
$130,000 to $134,999
$135,000 to $139,999
$140,000 to $144,999
$145,000 to $149,999
$150,000 to $154,999
$155,000 to $159.999
$160,000 to $164,999
$165,000 to $169,999
$170,000 to $174,999
$175,000 to $179,999
$180,000 to $184,999
$185,000 to $189,999
$190,000 to $194,999
$195,000 to $199,999
$200,000 to $204,999
$205,000 to $209,999
$210,000 to $214,999
$215,000 to $219,999
$220,000 to $224,999
$225,000 to $229,999
$230,000 to $234,999
$235,000 to $239,999
$240,000 to $244,999
$245,000 to $249,999
$250,000 to $254,999
$255,000 to $259,999
$260,000 to $264,999
$265,000 to $269,999
$270,000 to $274,999
$275,000 to $279,999
$280,000 to $284,999
$285,000 to $289,999
$290,000 to $294,999
$295,000 to $299,999
$300,000 to $304,999
$305,000 to $309,999
$310,000 to $314,999
$315,000 to $319,999
$320,000 to $324,999
$325,000 to $329,999
$330,000 to $334,999
$335,000 to $339,999
$340,000 to $344,999
$345,000 to $349,999
$350,000 to $354,999
$355,000 to $359,999
$360,000 to $364,999
$365,000 to $369,999
$370,000 to $374,999
$is750eah ——“C—tsS—isY
$3150
$150.00
$300.00
$31.6
$70.68)
$139.04
$173.2
$207.4
$241.5
$275.7
$30.1
$67.3
$132.4)
$164.9
$197.5:
6.a.iv
$262.6:
$295.2
$327.7
$360.3.
$392.88
$425.44
$458.00
$490.56
$523.1
$555.6
$588.2
$620.7!
$653.
$685.9
$718.4
$751.0
$783
$816.1
$848.6
$881.2
$913.80
6.avii
$344.4
$378.3
$412.5:
$446.7
$480.9
$515.0
6.a.x
6.a.xi
6.axii
n"
3
wo
OO] —[ Mm] Si al si ai wl—|hy
6.axiv
6.axv
6.a.xvi
Ad
A
©
nN
~
$583.45
$617.64
$651.8
$686.0:
$720.2
$754.3
$788.56
$8227
$856.94
$891.1
$925.3)
$959.4!
$993.6:
6.a.xviii
6.2 xxi
6.a.xxiv
6.a.xxv
6.a.xxvi
6a. xxvii
6a xxvill
6.a. xxix $987.06
$1,012.06
$1,037.0
$1,062.04
$1,087.0:
$1,.112.0
$1,137.00
$1,062 66
$1,088.9
$1,115.1
$1.167.6
$1,193.68
$1,220.1
$1,246.3
$1,272.5
$1,298 8
$1.325.0
$1,351.35
$1,377.54
$1.403.7:
$1,430.0
$1,456.21
$1,462.5
$1,508.7.
$1,534 9)
$1,561.2
$1,587 4
$1,613.6
$1,639
$1,665.1
$1,692.4
$1,7186:
$1,744.86
$1,771.41
$1,797 3
$1,823.62
31,849 66
$1,876.1
$1,902.3
$1,928.5
$1,954.8:
$1,981.06
$2,007.3
J
6 .a.xxxiv
6. xxxv
6.a.xxxvi
6.8. xxxvii
6.a.xxxviii
$1,186.99
$1,261.9:
$1,286.95
$1,311.94
$1,361.9
$1,386.9
$1,411.9
$1,436.90
6.a.xxxxiil
6.8. XXxxiv
6a. Xxxxv
6.8. XXxXVvi
6 a xXxxxvii
6.8 XxXxxviii
6.a xlix
6.al
bali
6.a.lii
$1,486.8
$1,536.85
$1,586.84
$1,611.83
$1,636.81
$1,661.80
$1,686.80
$1,711.79
$1,736.78)
$1,761.77
$1,786.76
$1,811.74
$1 836.7.
$1,861.7
$1,886 .7:
$1,911.7
$1,936.7
6.aly
6.a.lvi
6.a.lvil
6.a Wii
6.a.lix
6.alxi
6.a lxii
6.a.lxiv
6.a.lxvi
6.a lxvii
ou a fo) DD) lo
» ® ® wo ]o slo
& § < -
ey
“ “ “nn a“ Alan “
= —_ =. =} mend Oop Pea “a
o > w NIN _
LL | & {2/818 5 il INO
O}]]|N} wl a a RiSi8 S888 isis tf =i a $ RISS|ASslSlBlalBiAaj= NIN] a] o WINN] —-|@
"a
nt) Me hed
° ws ©
Ww hb w
) = &
ry g w rs
oO NILOlLWIo SS LOlLaroli@ Olal—[~L ot | Opi @ OLN @SALO lat -[~]2,C —[@iwl Olin wn fed Geet bad A
Page 2 of 16
Exhibit A
Idaho Falls Fee Schedule-PROPOSED
Effective October 1, 2026
Effective June 1, 2026
Fee
Proposed October 1,
2026
Department / Division / Item Description Unit of measurement
2.6.a.xciv.2 Rate $2 80}for each additional $1,000 of valuation or
fraction thereof
$375,000 to $379,999 $1,961.70] 2005979]
26.akix | $380,000 to $384,999 $1986.68] $2.086.01f
26alkx $385,000 to $389,999 $2,015.67] BZA 2B
26.alxi | $390,000 to $394,999 $2,036.66] S218BAST
$395,000 to $399,999 $2,061.65] S21G47ZT
26.abxii | $400,000 to $404,999 $2,086.65] S219098f
$405,000 to $409,999 $2114.64] Ta
$410,000 to $414,999 a
$415,000 to $419,999 SaaS EE ESS eee
$420,000 to $424,999 $2,186.60] $2295.93
$425,000 to $429,999 eS oo) | er
$430,000 to $434,999 $2,236.59] S2S4B AQ
$435,000 to $439,999 $2,261.58)" Sea]
$440,000 to $444,999 $2,206.57| $2400)
26.abkxxii | $445,000 to $449,999 $2,311.56] S2A2T AAP
26.alexxii | $450,000 to $454,999 $2,336.54] S2453370
J26.alkxxiv | $455,000 to $459,999 po SRATVGA
26.alxxv $460,000 to $464,999 $2,386.53] $2505.86]
$465,000 to $469,999 7 | |
$470,000 to $474,999 $2436.51) SZ
$475,000 to $479,999 $2462.60] S258573[
$480,000 to $484,999 $2,486.50] S2610BST
$485,000 to $489,999 $2,511.48) S237 05[
$490,000 to $494,999 $2,536.47[ $2663.29]
$495,000 to $499,999 $2561.46] S2.68953P
26.axcii | ~—_—« $500,000 to $1,000,000 ee ee ee |
Base Fee $2,865 .2
$4 31|for each additional $1,000 of valuation or
Picco
$1,000,001 to Beyond eS SS eee)
2 $4,9727;
hey
| 836.63)
[8339.26
L847.
Total Valuation up to $1,300
N
2G.axciit
Commercial Building Permit Fees Valuation Table aaa
Valuation Table be
Total Valuation up to $800 $30.1 ssiesp
27.aii $32.4 i eee i
Total Valuation up to $1,000 $34.8 i
Total Valuation up to $1,100 $37.3 a
Total Valuation up to $1,200 $39.8 1 Ss
|
NI
ale
ols
ao
=i
oO} a} o|o]=
nN
Total Valuation up to $900
Total Valuation up to $1,500
Total Valuation up to $1,400
Total Valuation up to $3,000
Total Valuation up to $12,000
$435.7
$447 5:
$456 7
$467 1
$475.0
$4841
$495.9
$415.02
$426.24
$434.96
$444.9.
Total Valuation up to $32,000
Total Valuation up to $33,000
Total Valuation up to $34,000
Total Valuation up to $35,000
Total Valuation up to $36,000
Total Valuation up to $37,000
Total Valuation up to $38,000
NINN] MIM
Base Fee
a“
glelglg Ps
NIN| S14 nN
wo No] @|@ SO] O|wl|— SINS] SOM Ol ol w alo SIN] O}O]O]|—|@ sD on “i@ = @ ~ On S/DIiO
wv
a
°o
N
Total Valuation up to $4,000 seas} ZN}
Total Valuation up to $5,000 aa ET (a
Total Valuation up to $6,000 == SN
Total Valuation up to $7,000 $127.13] BBA
Total Valuation up to $8,000 $is9.5of SMG STP
Total Valuation up to $9,000 $isoso[ SISBBAP
Total Valuation up to $10,000 $164.52f SPREE
Total Valuation up to $11,000 SO) a CT)
27. siso44j BST
Total Valuation up to $13,000 $201.91] S2NZOIP
Total Valuation up to $14,000 $2i4a7[ SS S2250Hf
Total Valuation up to $15,000 $2647] S287
Total Valuation up to $16,000 $240.54] S2SZETT
Total Valuation up to $17,000 $253.00[ S2GSOST
Total Valuation up to $18,000 s2ee7i] S2BDOST
Total Valuation up to $19,000 $277.93] S208]
Total Valuation up to $20,000 $290.39] $304 TT
Total Valuation up to $21,000 $304.1
Total Valuation up to $22,000 $316
Total Valuation up to $23,000 $327.7
Total Valuation up to $24,000 $341.4
Total Valuation up to $30,000 7) a
Total Valuation up to $31,000 sao7saf AZT
i
$472.3:
on
7A. XXxiX
Page 3 of 16
Exhibit A
Idaho Falls Fee Schedule-PROPOSED
Effective October 1, 2026
nN
o
oO
o
S
o
Qa
2
Ss
a.
¢
2,
<
o
5
S
— ]
2
Effective June 1, 2026 | Proposed October 1,
Department / Division / Item Description Fee 2026 Unit of measurement
7) aaa ) ea aa |
g4aaass[ S5IZGBP
ES) 2)
ssop.aof SSB
| aS Se ee
ss27ig] SESS ES|
ss35gif SATA
$54463f SSTTBSE
55461] 858234P
a
SST206) i ISO: |
$582.0 EY |
oo 00000 ee ht | |
$100,000
$562.02)
27.a.liii For total valuation between $100,001 and
$500,000
$9471
2.7.a.liv For total valuation between $500,001 and
$1,000,000
$994.48] for the first $100,000 of valuation
nN
a
s
o
o
$
o
a
a
$
6
Es
g
<
o
c
g
S
]
2
3 i a 9|s a S| a a
20 20 2 g
38 $8 8 3
ge a8 a a
eo o2 ge °
* 8 *3 25 Q
@ a a
= = : c
Q
8 8
° 2
g g
< <
2 2
5 5
S$ So Y
3 2]
g g
$3,155.92] for the first $500,000 of valuation
ees a
For total valuation of $1,000,000 and beyond
$4.9727
Nn
for the first $1,000,000 of valuation
nN
29
$94.50)
$26.2
fF square foot
per square foot
per square foot
$90.00
$25.00
2gc Unfinished Basement/Wood Frame Garage |
$6.1
$5
New Residential Buildings and Additions Valuation
Multiples
per each electrical service
per installation
$5.
$5.36
$31.6
per installation
per installation
each
Unit Fee for each Plumbing
Unit Fee for each Gas Piping System
Mobile home $30.1
“a
o
8 “
gS . &
BIBlSlHl |Blz mR BIS 5/8 &
A
ao
“ “wf fo}
sl |s|_ale| _(sisisisisls|_|slale 3 g i alsislelale|aisia|aale
$3169feach
$100.
utline Lighting Systems or Marquees: eS |
$65,
72 sl $95
i — a = SR sat
$15
2.13 Other Inspections and Fees (covers residential and
commercial buildings, plumbing, mechanical, and
a es
$30.1
Residential Combination Mechanical Electrical $0.08]per square foot total
Pasig MEP a
Residential Combination Energy Code
ee |) re
2.43.hi | _FirstOffense P86 7Sfeach Cd
Second Offense, within 1 year of a prior $75.00 $78 75jeach
1
50j}each
“a
n
x
2.13.h.iii Third Offense, and any subsequent offense, $150.00
within 1 year of a prior violation
Appeal code violation to BOA $150.00)
[213i = =——————S—S—S—«dY|~« Work Commencing before permit fee paid
214 Parklet Lease - Fee for leasing on-street parking for
a parklet
215 Temporary On-Street Construction Parking Permits
215.a Temporary On-Street Construction Parking Permit $10.00
(Downtown-Daily)
$131
$5.2
$1,260 00]per year per stall
310 50|per day
N
[=]
So
=]
So
n
~
be ea ket
o}o
® |
Page 4 of 16
Exhibit A
Idaho Falls Fee Schedule-PROPOSED
Effective October 1, 2026
Effective June 1, 2026 Proposed October 1,
Item Number Department / Division / Item Description Fee 2026 Unit of measurement
Temporary On-Street Construction Parking Permit $62.00 $65 10]per month
(Downtown-Monthly)
ae SS =
$
SECTION 4 |IDAHO FALLS POWER & FIBER
|__| Electrical Service popes
3230000
413 [CommercialRate-BaseEnergyCharge TTC C“‘“CSCCOCOC#C#C#C(‘é«
aigza——~—S~S~*d;SCase@ Energy Charge SSSSCdCSCSSSCSC~*~*~‘ ROOMS] C~*~*«SOAGH[perKWH SSCS
demand charge of $26 per month
aia SSSSCSCSC*diN@t Motoring Commerciale] CCT TTTCCCUdC—C—CSC—CSCSCSCCSY
ai4a_——SCS~*dt;SCWBas@ Energy Charge Consumption ——=—Ssd| ~——SCSC~C*~C~‘“~*~SOASOYSCC*‘“‘CSC#NOM@S(iperKWHSSCSC~—CSC~C~CS
aiab ——SSSSSSCSC*d;~=CBas@ Energy Charge Production _—=«d|~—SCSC~C~*~SSOLASOY]~S~S~SC~C~*~*~*~S OAS KWH CS
eS ee eee |
demand charge of $26 a month
— ae ea ee
415a | EnergyCharge CT 80.0AAO]80.0455]per KWH
4i5c dT DemandCharge BTS] S9OO|perKWiorallKW Cd
416 ————————~‘ighDDensityLoadRate OC] TTC CCTTTCTTTCTC~dYSC(C:;:C~CSCSSCCTTCC*d
4i6a dT EnergyCharge 0K 800KTfperKWH i
416b dT DemandCharge OOS 25|perKWiorallKW
418 Residential Energy ee ee ee
418b Monthly ServiceCharge 824001824 SO[permonth Cid
419 ——~—=~=SCSCSC*=*diN@tMeteringResidential Rate] | TCC
4i9a dT MonthlyCharge S2HOO $24. 50]permonth
J4i9b | Base Energy Charge Consumption | «$0.07 $0078
J4i9c Base Energy Charge Production $0.078
421 Temporary or ConstructionElectricRate | Sa
$0.078'
J421b | MonthlyServiceCharge | 887.00 $37.5
422 —=SCSCSC=*ittarge Power Temporary Construction Rate [SS he
Base Energy Charge $0.04
Street Light Ulility Fee ae 15
$1,800.00]per single pair fiber, per month
ieee
is
$5.0
|__| Public Unlit Fiber Optic Network
Cr
ackbone Service Fee
SECTION 6 AYOR'S OFFICE
| —~——_s«[Clerk Licenses and Fees
se]
urglary and Robbery Alarms
618.4 Third False Alarm Public Nuisance Alarm System
6.18.b Fourth False Alarm Public Nuisance Alarm
Fifth False Alarm Public Nuisance Alarm System
618d Sixth False Alarm Public Nuisance Alarm System
618.e Seventh and Subsequent False Alarm Public
‘> es Nuisance Alarm System Permit
619 ———————__|Bus Stop Bench Permit Fee
us Stop Bench Permit Extension Fee
us Stop Bench Renewal Fee
mergency Medical Services Licensing
EMS Class | Annual License
622.b EMS Class || Annual License
EMS Class Ill Annual License
$1,700
$100.00
$200.00)
$300.00)
$400.00)
oO
o®
°
as
$500.00)
$10.0)
$5
£
3
i=} 8 o ol~m ola oy or
=e a=
$500.00
$500.00] $500.00]peryear
$250.00 $250.00
oe
| s|sis 8
EMS Class IV Annual License $250.00] ———SS—S$250.00[peryear ss —(s:s—“‘CC;C;*C*z
Attendant — Ambulance Driver License $25.0
SECTION 7 |MUNICIPAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT So os»
7.2 SSS Frontier Center for the Performing Arts ee, | ae ee |
we... | Manne me YL
wo. | td Uh i See Se
720i +'| EachAddiionlHow S| SCC™~—CSC—CCCCCC SCC‘ S2©;.OO(iperhour
te IF" ‘ateseenrnesniecs cel DE, EE
Rermit-
+35 Fourth-FalseAlarn-Public Nuisance Alans $200.00 each
ER | ee Oe i BEES; Sees
His FithfalseAlasn Public Nuisance Alara Systent $300.00
PS aa... aes,
Page 5 of 16
Exhibit A
Idaho Falls Fee Schedule-PROPOSED
Effective October 1, 2026
Effective June 1, 2026 Proposed October 1,
Item Number Department / Division / Item Description Fee 2026
Unit of measurement
a 1 Nae nied EL EE a
ce f=
te Seventh and Subsequent False Alara Rube $500.00
i born Si... as | See
75 -—=s—=s=*(BueStopBonchRomuitxiensonhes =| (tit SEOOTCi‘CONSNCSC#C#C#C*C*‘“‘éi@OAGSHC (ee sd
zs |BweStopBonchRenowaihoe | ss SOOf— es—“‘“‘;é™SO;*#é( jas ‘$NSN$NNNNNNNNW§“$§RN’NNNNC YJ
Feb S™*~*é<“‘*™dC*EMS Glas Amualicanee iTS“ (‘SCSC*C‘C#C“C#C#C‘ésSOOUS eC
7d ee =~
[to —Ssss—~—=~=“‘(WC*dL én} AmbulancoDeiveriiconso =—— | (iSO (:t~“‘C‘Cé*QOGH FC eC Cid
SECTION 8 |PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT fc
- [Sandy Downs 2 een eee
ate - — —- iSaneyDowns—arO2 ee ES
Sta _—*«| Admission ——“‘C;S;C*dCOC‘“‘(S.C(C#SSY«OOOOY $1.00jeach —i‘s*sSsCSCSCSCidzC
Oi) eee
[Bibi ||||__—~=—~——*«| ~_——WaterTruck(withoperato) | S———CSS$20000 Ss (sSC—C“‘CéCS VA Si(ipErGayhour Cd
| [Parks See, + |) eet
a2 = Ti | PaeRenabeeros. eg | ee eee
TT ee eS Sa ee (| Se ee,
[t—“‘(‘C‘C#*di@FFMGidGRI-porday =
B2ax Non-Resident Camping Fees for Spacal. perNon-Resident_perday
Fe a> | PRE A a
pee | cetera)
BB aa Aiblnt ded Bay lisedtettat fom es $444.00 porday
Tournament_League- or Practica)
Bau $465.00
ee ee fea i ia
permit
Bb | Rentals soe _ eee)
Picnic Table 1-6 tables delivered to event $98.00
|
o|o D o 4
a|s B 8
|
|
,
8
a
o
<
@
ae Ss
| $98.00)
$12.00
$48.00] $52.00]perunit
(eee (eee
aS |e
ia2ei | MemorialBench
fi eg |
829 Taylors’ Rock Garden (Four Hour Block) (Non- $300.00 $300.00) four hour block
Resident)
I OS eS a aS) (a eae
aS | Tractor with Operator (Hou) | sf0000|____$11400]per hour
a3 |_ Hand Work per Operator (Hou)
| |Racewa ee (oy |) Aes!
64 __|ldaho Falls Raceway ~2706 7 arene oe ee
ean Practice Season Pass | a8 —idac CCS
OES 2
ee cc
|_| Horticulture/Forest ee | ee
5 HoricuturefForesty - 2707 Ls Saye) oT
5b | Arborist (Hour
Page 6 of 16
Exhibit A
Idaho Falls Fee Schedule-PROPOSED
Effective October 1, 2026
Department / Division / Item Description
Effective June 1, 2026 Proposed October 1,
Fee 2026 Unit of measurement
ja5c iit Truck with Operator (Hour) 8100.00 SSCS S[perhour Cd
| (| Acctivity Center ia) eae. ee
ee [Activity Genter — 2708 SS —— T
Small Rental (East and West Rooms 2 Hour $24.00 $24 00|each-per hour
pale (Pe | et.
pe ——— tire ee ee ee ee ee ol
a Day)
| |Cemete (aa) Saat < - Seay
je7 Cemetery ~ 2901 eT bees ed | ES
Adult/Child Up-Right Section
Bab) | Biel nGiound jie — I ee ee
I i i RS ig I
8.7.bvi Propane fee for ground thaw (If used winter $50.00 $55 00
ee il! Sree el a aaa,
Less
OG = Niche Walia ae ge ee A eS ed
BIEN = 3 i Se
(srieNt _ 'Burials.(Niche Well) a
Big! sD painetneni ae = ae ee ee | ee
Bats = _ ssw Additional een ee Ae eS ee
ja7fi_ Cemetery Plot Ownership processingFee | $10.00] SN OOfeach
| —_—-" rautphalie Rant 260) |. | =
eS Tauiphaus Park Zoo ~ 2601 ee Nl
9.8, nf). ROAST ISSIR ARNG © ee
Jaga CdS Reguiar Admission—Child(3-12 Years) TT
jB9ai1. | Nom Resident 89] ODfeach
$7.00
Soa. TW 'RegularAdiission=Sentor(@2ejs
&ab Teachet Summer Contain € duces Glasses $7500 each
Pe | earememrsete ee a. a
ube tite ZOO BRE YG Othe dot aett wate
a ss aD
egg ProgpentReam
LE a (OSE SS a a] |
TT a Se | es
[eodi ~—~—~*«| ~+~=~-60MinuteClass—(PreRegstered) S| CT $25.00 ]perhourperclassroom
jeodn2 sid] CNOmombor | SURO
i a, I
Bodw —=s«di’_=Cs“‘HoweGlase—Sihinougheus EP
eedwo | Nonmember =| SRO
faoav «| ~ @tHowgoocwse
jeodvat td Combe SOO
Page 7 of 16
Exhibit A
Idaho Falls Fee Schedule-PROPOSED
Effective October 1, 2026
Je9hii ST ee ae
BORE Within Distnets No Ot and No 93 (Nica.
Riche
Boho
ee eee ee
al ee
Any-Second Rrogram-on-the Same Day as- $49
a
a
Within Districts No-0t-and- No-92-(Non- 40
pond eed
Quiside-Districts No-94-and No-93-30 Mile E
Effective June 1, 2026 Proposed October 1,
Item Number Department / Division / Item Description Fee 2026 Unit of measurement
BOdux« Toe Glass —Miset long 10 e tears+ $434.00 each
‘i --yicpiatain e n ce- Ay)
Boake One-Stop Bohiad the Scones Look Zee $44.00
ne i eS ee
— OS Samana pei ho
ae a... ae
| eres
Feed Pengence
isedsmams | GuestSpeaker(Setes, i et I
a (IY. ae) [epee een (eee am | ee!
J89.dxxiit.a | NorResident TZ 850.00Jeach
CE a a es eee, | Sess) | ee
8.9.dxxii.2 | Child / Student (College orbelow) |
a) (RR eT) <n ( —o |
Jeodxm2e | SchoolGroup(S2e2taxenemp) [SOO
[8.9.d.xxii3. | Twoyearsoldandunder
[8.9.d.xxii.4. | Familyot4e
est — [> Volunteer Led’ Programs <= RS a]
aon Offsite Outreach (40 people orless) TT
il Within Districts No. 91 and No. 93 (Non- $70.00
BaD "naar naan gia) Sie * PERE 0,5
Bona Ghiteis DEBS Bahan nA Mee 82-00
ee ee el
Any Second Program on the Same Day as $45,00 $50.00)
a in acura Pte
Hele Ouiroach440 3
Page 8 of 16
Exhibit A
Idaho Falls Fee Schedule-PROPOSED
Effective October 1, 2026
Effective June 1, 2026
Fee
Proposed October 1,
2026
Department / Division / Item Description Unit of measurement
Long Distance Outreach:
UB eam nce arena Soe |
i
|
Ml
ALALAA
Oo eS
OO] Si
3
|
FY
$
|
| G2] Go
es] Es) 1S)
8/8
n
@o
=
| FR2SMember
War Bonnet Rodeo
War Bonnet - 2709
7
$2.00}each
$20.0
$20.0
| Admission
10.41 $10.00
10.a.i $22.00
10.a.ti $27.00
ig 2
$100.00.Jeach
eres, —
$600.00
leach
1O.aiv $27.00
1Oav $75.00
10.bi $500.0
10.b.i $500,
40.4
10.di
10.d i
AO.d iti $35
Recreation
Recreation — 4801, 4802, 4805, 4806
tte
Public Skate Admission (Any Public Time:
Public, Freestyle, Stick & Shoot, Pick-up
Hockey, Etc Time)
teviit $7.2
Mevi2
Wei. $12
Vevii4. $16
$600.
wn
wo
o
s
11.€ vii
14.€.viii.2. $8.4
11.6.
$90.00jeach— SCY
ia
eT)
a oh
Sia 00|eanh CCS
$299 00[each iY
S171 00jeach————C—iY
a
$520000/each SSCS
11,.6.1%.4. ges 13+ Non-Resident $537
11e.K5 Senlon.*-
Tex
11ex2 Ages 4-12 Non-Resident
8.11.e.x.3 Ages 13 + Resident $198.
=, —_ wo o
$ $ = = Be EP EIPIEIE
ios o = S.
Bilex4
B1tex5
text.
Wexi2 $512
$408
1 fiv.2.
8.11fVv Ice Skating Lesson with Rentals (Resident)
Thtw2
A F
Age
11.¢.ix.1. Ages 4-12 Resident
Wes $513.
A
SSS
$101.00feach
11eiK2 Ages 4-12 Non-Resident
$118
fe.) es] a a aio
m1 os
= =
2 ko me
Special Event Admission es
: $10.0
$10
Adult — Year Pass Pass (10 punch,
[a Businessmen's, Yearly)
8.14 Avii.2. $214 25
Yoary Businasemen s Baskettall Rass Neon
Baty
“A g “
8 als 8 sj6|s 8 sjsis} is} lel [3isis} |s 8
o|o|o we H)ol=|o BS Fd heed BS)
8 S|8|_ |8 sj3|8 8 S|s|s/8 SS/s/s]8 8
,
7 Page 9 of 16
Exhibit A
Idaho Falls Fee Schedule-PROPOSED
Effective October 1, 2026
Effective June 1, 2026 Proposed October 1,
Item Number Department / Division / Item Description Fee 2026 Unit of measurement
CE a Se | | |,
EF a 2 a (ae em ee
jetty C“‘“*LSOOCYoutHSOnins SO fee
C2 eee eee, eee eee, ee
BANKS = PIBSGRDIDENID ee eG
a a QA 2 (A NR (ee
Btikit [High SchoolBasketbaliLeague |
(A A 7)
Biiki2 Tt High School Basketbalileague J
Bitki2a | NonResident CT S84OO] S94 OOfeach
etka: — 3 |T — Bebketball Lengua: ee ae | ee
erika. |) 2 sVoutiPlayecFise
BA1kiS. |r HighPlayerFee PT
(Bi1kiSa | NonResident BBL $104 Bleach
B41kiSb | Non-Resident Without Jersey |] 887.26] S97 Bleach
B11ki6. Ss [HighSchoolPlayerFee TC
BNR —_ TT 2 eRe NS MGs = SS ee
$64.00
BATKar._——__s |<* Baskoltiel Shean: es le et
ete lf) BasketmaGaniph ff id
ettkv | YouthBasketbaliCamp |
etikvt. | NonResident 85520] SE ADfeach
ecg. -__-==_I|| Sana Baseband eS SS
fats ill Aeaghe Reems = eee ee ee ee
eqalin. “Nout DayLeaguePlayerFee nF
$71.23)
an RN 9 TI gv ae a | Sy) |
Jetitiza TC NonResident 81,428.00] $1.428.00[perteam
[esis Adult Softball Competitive Co-EdFall TT
Jetttii Bobbie Sox Softball TT
JBAttiit NorResident CT 859.0[889.0Dfeach Cid
Seu ii Si Knothole Baseball oe | A ee
Attivt dT NonResident TOOT 8EVOOfeach ss C“‘CCNC*C*
Baseball/Softball Game Non-Chalked Field
ee nN eg cg ee se oe ee |
$70.00jeach Cd
ee Baseball/Softball Game Chalked Field Use
PR recreate al eee Taney i aE,
(ES ae (1 Va (i | (6S |
Non-Resident Without Jerse
as = | apr ee SE
Bttmi Youth 600000 feach —C“‘“CS™S™C™C™C™C™C™C*™S
atta | TBallaPachngMechne i) | Cd TTC
eitqi | _NonResident_ = SSSSSCSCSCSCSC~dC SSCS OOOO] —SCSCSC~*~« OMe SSCSCSCSCSCS
Soccer ee a.
A ae AC re, PSs s =a | Sa
leitsi | Non-Resident ——S—S—SCSCS ~SSCSCS~S~S AO $5z00|each
ea NOR a es es
Non-Resident Without Jersey each
Btu se400jeach SSCS
ettw | Dancoteccons CC CC*~“‘CSC SOOO! €6UfpROO~“SC*™*C*C*C*C~C~C~CCCCCSY
Page 10 of 16
Exhibit A
Idaho Falls Fee Schedule-PROPOSED
Effective October 1, 2026
Effective June 1, 2026 Proposed October 1,
Item Number Department / Division / Item Description Fee 2026 Unit of measurement
ree meee
B.11.vi each
Road Closure Equipment Rentals
LL
)
=
o
O
@
pi
:
uatic Center Fees
12.c Membership Fees
12.¢.i.1 1-Month Senior
ee al
leach
pa
ee CS
jeiiz el
pre a |
612 |Wes Deist Aquatic CenterFees-4003_ =| SSCS —————
g12¢ | MembershipFees SSCS SSCS Pe
Sista Fae ee a
aiacit. sid’ sMoninSenor CCS CS” ot
$7858Jeach
SARC, = = Monti genet a a | ae
eee ee
BA Rela eaten SS [5 ee
S260. A eT Ee
ON Zi Ties Sila — MOM AGO) iS ei ee eS _
EE 5m SR 2 | (ge MN (ge Sa | FD eo
zich SE Month gui 2 | | ere Se]
(EEC RD FC (QS | [epg
ee | ee ee ee ops = ——
Household)
SADC 1 ae ee ee
(S31 2iedi2) = [k= Monin Golpigs ee
B.i2cii2a | Non-Resident OT 8894.70f 40S 7Ofeach
BAe Te | ont Canta se ee ee
BAzCNaS ———__= "|| = 22: ¥eehCotpiess oe eS ef
ei2cii4a s| ~NomResident 8785.29] S7E02feach
peer | noe
SAgGWAL_— s|t__ Se eMontieriy, a ea
BA2CWe. MONI ERNNG See ee ee
Bizcw2a «| _——S—sNomResident =— CT 8450.20) $45 2Sfeach
BAzcwes | te Monintaniyye em a eS
Bizewsa ——Ss|_ ~—SsSCWNResident S78 ZOf S755 2feach
pAzewa! al Sear enis = se eee | ee eS
8.12.c.iv.5 1-Month Family Add-On (Add 1 Extra
Household)
leizewSa | _NonReset ——SSSSCSCSC~dC SSCS] ~SCSC~SS DTH
I2cwer =f eMOnIRaMMy AddOns i SS
Bt2cvea +| _—NonResdent =] S| SST Afeach
adeeNn ss _ —@-MonthramipAg@on ee af
$62.54
piace 10. "WYeavkamiyAd@Onw) ee le
Em Public Swims and Fitness Classes)
Riad "| = Bau Eveying Punt Cad. ee | a |
lei2di2 SS SC*«dEC‘(‘S#SSRResidert’ = 81.13 $72.00
Page 11 of 16
Exhibit A
Idaho Falls Fee Schedule-PROPOSED
Effective October 1, 2026
Effective June 1, 2026 Proposed October 1,
Item Number Department / Division / Item Description Fee 2026 Unit of measurement
Raa Sa ee Se ee
812.e.ii Pre-School (3 & Under) — Swim Diaper
Included
12.¢.ii.1, Non-Resident $4.81
f=} f=}
Golf
Golf Course(s) Fees (* All Season Pass Categories,
are subject to an additional $1 per round USER
FEE. Pass Holders will have the option to avoid this
per round USER FEE by paying an annual USER
FEE of $60 per Pass Holder.)
Non-Resident Green Fees
Weekday 9 Holes
Weekday 18 Holes
Weekend 9 Holes
$24, $29.40[each
each
$30.6
13.a
13.4.1
i
$
13.a.iii $25.5
13.i.vi Small Bucket 10 Punch Pass $467: $53.7!
o
o
ach
Medium Bucket 10 Punch Pass
$637
nm
Mini Bucket 20 Punch Pass
|
leiaa | Non-Resident GreenFees—S—S
lei3a1__ | Weekday9Holes_———SSSSSSC—S
le13a0 | Weekday 18Holes____________
le13.am | Weekend 9 Holes ___—SC—S 2
Bish | hetGnentee re ee
e13b1 | Weekday9Holes __————S«d SS SSSSSCSC~SS2 SO] ———SCSCSC~«S Bw SCCCSCSCSCSC~CS
fe.13b.in | Weekend 9 Holes | $22.80] 2363Jeach SSCS
B13¢ | Junior Green Fee 9 Holes | $1050] $11.03Jeach SSCS
fata | Junior Green Fee 18 Holes | $1650] si94Jeach SSCS
I13.e | Resident SeasonPass™_ J] CO TCC SY
aise; | Fretagt SSSSSCSCSCSCSC*dSCSSSSSCSC~S TOFS OOS TT SOeacH ——CC~*Y
t3en | Second Adu | _$93000]__$976.50leach_———SCSCSCSCSS
fe13ei | First Senior 5-Day"________| $892.00] sa7a60Jeach SCS
et3ev | _Fi—st Senior 7-Day”_____| $950.00] s97.S0leach SSCS
$936.60
Bist | Non-Resident SeasonPass’ SS] CO] Cd TTC SY
iciag- 7} weer esses ee
et3qi | Punch 10-9Hole SCS SSSCSCSCSCS~ SO] ——SCSCSC«S TTS SSCS
B13gi
B13. | _Punch20-18Hole | $621.28] ses23iJeach____
at3n | Non-RessientPunchPasses SO] Cd TTTTCCdT SCC
5 OT a aS | Fe | |
p37 | MniBucket Cd SS SCSC~S S| SSC Yor CCSY
leagin | SmallBucket____———SSSSid SSS $550} Seach
Basi | Large Bucket | 89.80] 81093]each__]
B13ivi__ | Small Bucket 10PunchPass_________| $4675
is 13.ivi__| _ Medium Bucket 10 Punch Pass_________| sea each
fe13ivii | Mini Bucket 20 Punch Pass] $56.00 a
2 aS oS i a (oe | | a]
e13ji | GreenFees————S—SSSSSCSd SS SCSCSCSC~—~ OT] $00]
le1aji | PunchPass————S—SSSCSCSCSC~Sd SSCS 34 00] $42.50]eacn
fe3ji | Yearly Pass (75) | $8400] $30.00]|per year]
2 as oo a ae, <a | aT aT) | <a ET
eigki___| _ Go Cart Per RiderSHoles Sid SSCS SSO] SCO ach
Bigkv | 11 CanPunchPass «| ~——~—SCS~S 9800 $100 00]each
31.285 33)per year
Page 12 of 16
Exhibit A
Idaho Falls Fee Schedule-PROPOSED
Effective October 1, 2026
Effective June 1, 2026
Fee
Proposed October 1,
2026
Unit of measurement
Item Number Department / Division / Item Description
Medical Cart Usage Fee Year $293.00
Golf Sponsorship Packages
Eagle Pass/Punch Partner Sponsorship $2,225.00 $2,336 25}each
package
$310.00|per year
813i
Birdie Pass/Punch Partner Sponsorship $1,650.00 $1,732 50]each
ae ar. a.) :: a
J813.qii Par Partner Sponsorship package Po 81,375.00] $1,443.75each
IBi3qv Junior Partner Sponsorship package |] CC*C“‘SBOOOYLC*C‘“‘C#CS4O.OO@ch
Jesse Cd Sand SalecSandCreekGotCeuss TT
Soa. =e = OI See ee = EN ee Se ee |
SECTION9 |POLICEDEPARTMENT| ||
Oy — = alanine Conte ees ~ 3 eee a e ee
Ct ee ML icensing ees. fo ee A es SS
Is6avi Cd CAtRisk/Dangerous-UnalteredLicense TT $200.00feach Cd
ip6avi____ | _AtRisk/Dangerous -Allered License |_| _ $50.00Jeach_ |
jo6b Cd EuthanasiaandSurenderFees TT
al (TBE Se agihicge aaa pe eee
Only)
rr)
6.b iii Euthanasia - Trapped Squirrels $5.00)
psbve Animal Surrender per animal $30.00) $50.00|per animal
96by Out of County Stra’ $30.00
j96c Cd SMiscelianeousFees CCSCSCid
Cremation fee
City Resident
No ashes returned
0-25 Ibs with ashes returned
26-60 Ibs with ashes returned
61-100 Ibs with ashes returned
100+ Ibs with ashes returned
PUBLIC WORKS
mpact Fees
esidential
anitation Division
thly Residential Sanitation Charge:
art or Hand-load Container.
County Landfill Fee
Additional Cart. Weekly Pickup
County Landfill Fee
$30.00
$70.00
$90,00
$50.0
$90.00
$110.00
$145.0
$185.00
.6.d.iii.1.a
.6.d.iii,1.b
.6.d.iii,1.c
6.diii 1d
6.d.iii,1.e
SECTION 10
each
$165.00
3 sieisigis 3
; g/8/8 19) g
4
per month, 3-month minimum billing
per month
O.1.a.ii
O1.alit
Cart or Hand-load Container:
County Landfill Fee
Additional Cart, Weekly Pickup
County Landfill Fee
1 %C. Y. Container:
County Landfill Fee
3. Y. Container:
County Landfill Fee
4C. Y. Container:
County Landfill Fee
6 C.Y.Container
County Landfill Fee
arge Uncompacted Container.
O3.fi Solid Waste Rate
OSS. iii Construction Waste Rate
103.4iv County Disposal Fee
$6.9)
$9.90
03.a.ii
O3aiiil
O3aiv
per month, 3-month minimum billing
lo a
$14.0:
wo
O3bii per weekly pickup
0.3.c
O3ciii $28.1
er weekly pickup
$37.40] per weekly pickup
O3.d.iii
$56.10) Per weekly pickup
= ay ey Py ry ey ry pans ay Pry = OOO] O/o
ro) fo)
A oe
= = a
ic 8 ols
EF
Oo
fe}
3
3
@
3.
o
o
a
=
a
c
I
a
Q
a
©
a
03.e.1i
$141.7
$164.85
Current County Fee
per pickup
per pickup
per load
$141.7:
$164.8:
Current County Fee
Current County Fee|per load
10.34¥ County Unsorted Fee
Large Compacted Container.
Solid Waste Fee
County Disposal Fee
$129.1
Current County Fee
per pickup
$129.
an
ie)
§
oy
2
[2]
°
c
4
< a “
n bd £ ©
a & alan & 8
i=]
w
2
Page 13 of 16
Exhibit A
Idaho Falls Fee Schedule-PROPOSED
Effective October 1, 2026
Effective June 1, 2026 Proposed October 1,
Department / Division / Item Description Fee 2026 Unit of measurement
CAs 1 |G RCEN Gg — e
os SSCSCSC*dCEXra Dump ffor' 1.5, Sand 4CY Containers | 815.00] $80 00|perextradump
mow Sss*~C*~*«éd@BUK Remick = $838000]perpickup
| WastewaterDivision | ||
ae Water Service Connection Size
Ota —SSSSCSC~*dC Service Conmection | 81,285.00] 81,671.00feach
oid —SSSCSCSC*dCSCS" Service Connection | 88,224.00] $10,694.00feach
Ore —Ss—SSCSCS~C=*dCSA" Service Connection CT 812.850.00] S16.710.00Jeach
orf SSC*~‘“‘*C*d:CS" ervicle Connection | $25,700.00] $33.42000feach
Sewer Main Connection Charge $29.77 $31 25|per front foot of property owned upon
street or public right-of-way within which
fe a =] a sewer main is located
Single Family Dwellings, including condominium $26.25 $27 55|per month
units and mobile homes (excluding separate
apartment units within such dwelling), per dwelling
or unit
[a eco) en) RA cs I -<, |
o4c Apartment Unit (tenant pays bill) perunt_ [819.64] S2060]permonth
re a eT aS a!
Rates.
ee | Shortt pay ta perepacmeniuet
Category 2 (Bar, Church, Gym, Office Space, $32.66 $34.30]per month
a 24 Retail, Salon, Shop, Warehouse), per business
Category 3 (Big Box Retail, Car Sales, Convenience $59,27 $62 25|per month
Store, Day Care, Fast Food, Medical Office), per ——r
business
Category 5 (Grocery Store, Hotel or Rest Home $161.65 $169.75] per month
P| aso oone artetperoutness | ae. .| 5 eee!
10.5 Category 6 (Hotel or Rest Home with more than $937.81 $984 70}per month
Pe oo epee a ee
a eee |
— zz, Tk... aa
Junior High Schools, High Schools, Colleges, and $14.81 $15 S5}per month
es
fo? [Monthly Metered Wastewater Rates ——=—s[ SCS SSC SCCCCCSCSCC~*?Y
10.7.b Plus per each 1,000 gallons of metered water $2.68) $2.80
HOS |Construction WastewaterRates | Cd CTCCCCCCd CCC]
10.9.a Monthly Non-metered Residential Construction $12.97 $13.60]per month
Water Rate, Single Family Dwellings and Duplex
(excluding separate apartments units in such
dwelling), per dwelling or unit
eee al Monthly Non-metered Apartment Construction $9.77 $10.25]per month
Water at or un |. a
io te Le ee ed
O10 S=*sndustrial Rates forCenan Users | TCC TCTCCCCTCdSCSCCCOCOC*?
a 2 a TE (es reer
WOsOat Row 80 7EET[T S0BOONIper TOGO gains
HowOam | TSS CCCCCCCCCCCC~*dSCSSCSCSCSC~CSC~S. AH] 80.5000] per pound SS
fotob «Busch AgricuttwralResouces. | CP CUT TTC
fO70bi Flow OO C“‘*d:SC“(‘(‘CCNC#C#SNSS7{——C~S~S~SC*~*«SBOOO|per 1,000 gallons SCSC*d
HOtObi | BODSCSCSCSCSCSCSCSCSY. SSCS SVS 7|[___$0.8000]per pound SCS
hac i ene iee a
owe; low C™~—“—™CSCsSC“‘C##SN#N’N’N§#N§#NN“NS SOWA SSSCSC«ST'T8OO|per 7,000 gals ——SSSCS~S~*«r
$0.9000
Page 14 of 16
Exhibit A
Idaho Falls Fee Schedule-PROPOSED
Effective October 1, 2026
Item Number
Effective June 1, 2026 Proposed October 1,
Department / Division / Item Description Fee 2026 Unit of measurement
foi onouNM ein ee ee
fotod; CTS FlowSCCSC™~—“—SCSCSCCSCSCSCSCSTSSC*C“‘(S#$;(C.CSOVTSSST|_____—_—=«S07935|per'1,000 gallons SCS
a SSS ja a ae Sea (eee ty (aie eee eT!
Orta CityofAmmon $4. 10] per 7,000 gallons
ee. City of Ammon — Monthly Idaho DEQ Wastewater per connection per month
Negeri ge pee
HO.14c ona Bonneville Sewer District TST SA TO|per 1.000 galions
WOtte ————S—Ss«d«SGityofUcon SC CCCSC*dSCC*“C‘“‘;SC*‘S 3 GG|___—~C*~*~*‘“‘*SS BS(per 1,000.gallonsSCSCSCSCSC~S
10.12 Ammon, Ucon, and ISBD Wasterwater Service
Connection Fee: Based on Water Service
WOi2a "Service Connection CT 85BZOOf SBB0OOfeach
WoO12f "Service Connection CT 817,640.00f816,.60000feach Cid
WO12g dT B*Service Connection CT 818.624.00] 826.560 00feach
ACHIGS — = -_-___ Sep Hatha <= ee —_ |
015a Septic Haulers Annuallicense | 8105.00 SI 2Sfeach
10,15.b Septic Hauler Dumping fees (based on truck tank
capac, na cary nade Es ee ae
0.15.bii 10072 1500Gallons TC 8SBOLS1EDADfeach
10.15.bix 4001 4500Gallons 84S 4OL OT S47EZeach
Wo1Sbx 45072 5000Gallons CT CC‘ SSG] 8ST BOfeach Cid
WO1Sbxi | 50072 5500Gallons CT CCCSSSGOLSBAASfeach Cd
10.15.bxii_ | 5501 26000Gallons GOZO] GGT Seach
10.18 CS ervicedinspectionGallCharges
Horie | After-hourService/InspectionCallCharge | $2650] S27 BOfperhalfhour
| __|Water Division ay | (i ee
10.7. Ss Watter'Service'ConnectionFees;
Wo1a Service Connection 8.17200] 83.267 00feach
MO1b Cd 1.5" Service Connection 85,710.00] 85.881 OOfeach
HO1c | 2 ServiceConnection CT 89,199.00] 89.475.0each
oid "Service Connection 832,354.00] $33.323.00feach
WOte dA" Service Connection CT 863.440.00[ $85.340.00feach
HO1f Service Connection CT 8195,.467.00f8118.91900feach
WO1g 8 Service Connection $201,739.00] $207,781 each
10.3 Water Main Connection Charge $50.80 $53 35|per front foot of property owned upon
street or public right-of-way within which
a water main is located
pee Sevaaepectoncanchage
errant ae ie eae
107.a Single Family Dwellings and Mobile Homes $34 B5|per month, per dwelling or unit
(excluding separate apartment units within such
dwelling)
over 0.75 acres
to7.d | Apartment Unit(enantpaysbi) «| ~——SSSSSS~«S28 SS] S27 SOlpermonth perunt
A a
a Be ar
ee = _ 8 Retail, Salon, Shop, Warehouse)
10.8.¢ Category 3 (Big Box Retail, Car Sales, $58.80 $51 75]per month, per business
Convenience Store, Day Care, Fast Food.
Medical Office)
$162 65]per month, per business
Page 15 of 16
Exhibit A
Idaho Falls Fee Schedule-PROPOSED
Effective October 1, 2026
Effective June 1, 2026 | Proposed October 1,
Item Number Department / Division / Item Description Fee 2026 Unit of measurement
with 20 rooms or less)
20 rooms)
$464 50)
Monthly Non-metered School Water Rates =e See? SS er
109,
Elementary Schools $19.70 $20 70|per month, per 50 students or fraction
(22 TY oo. 3-4
109.b Junior High Schools, High Schools, Colleges, and $24 80 $26.05]per month, per 50 students or fraction
ees — as ee [ee
ke |
Rate
10.10.a Single Family Dwellings and Mobile Homes $17.70 $18.60]per month, per dwelling or separately
lowned landscape parcel
Large, Landscaped Residential Lot Rate $23.65 $24 &5|per month. per acre of fraction thereof
over 0.75 acres
o
un
10.10.c Duplex Rate
10.10. Apartment Unit (tenant pays bill
Monthly Non-metered Commercial Irrigation Water $0.35] per month, per 100 square feet of
Rate (All Commercial Categories plus Private Parks, calculated landscape area
Privately Maintained Common Area or Parcel)
i=]
n
=
a
=
So
Monthly Non-metered School Irrigation Water Rate ie = ee $19.00|per month, per acre or fraction thereof
1013, [Water MeterFeesforNewDevelopment |
Woi3a | Water Meterand AMI Endpoint Purchase 1" | 8398.65] S42000feach
HWo13c Water Meter and AMIEndpoint Purchase 2" [$1,098.70] 81,120.00feach
o13d | Water Meterand AMIEndpoint Purchase 3" [$2,709.50] S2.77000feach
013e | Water Meter and AMI Endpoint Purchase 4" [$3,256.00] 83.425.00feach
O13 Water Meterand AMIEndpointPurchase6" | 84.48555[ 84. 710.00feach
110.15. Fire HydrantMeteredUseVolumetricRate [| S50O] $5.25] per 1,000 gallons (or fraction thereof) |
Monthly Base Metered Water Rates, per size of
ic RD access lie taal Ne
Wo1ea | SB Meter TY 889.4S|permonth
O16b Meter BT 839.4E[permonth
1096.6 Meteo S10 BS per month = —
Woreg Meter BAO 8875 [permonth
OAGH Meter 82H 8931.20[permonth
WO1Gi | Meter 8288.05f$249.95[permonth
sed sho oala Oe | I a mead
recharge
Page 16 of 16
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS | PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2027 CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS 49
CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
The next tables detail the planned capital outlay and new operational requests. The capital outlay for
FY2026/2027 includes MERF replacements, projects and acquisitions not expected to be completed or
received by the end of FY2025/2026 marked as prior year carryforward (PY Carryforward) and new projects
and acquisitions. The new operational requests include personnel and operational costs.
M3IAYZA0
ST1v4 OHVGI
The amounts in the table show items funded by existing revenues and, if a remaining total is presented,
these are items funded by Council’s prioritization through one-time funding available, additional property
tax allocation from growth and forgone property taxes.
CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
General Fund Capital and Operating Budget Requests
Amount
Revenue
Description Covers Employee Capital Other Total
M3IAY3ZA0
a
Zz
>
Zz
2
>
a
Non-Departmental
GIFT Contribution to Cover Increased Costs (Growth
Funded) $410,000 $- $- $430,000 $20,000
Total $410,000 eo $- $430,000 $20,000
Municipal Services lated g m
ERP-Workday/SpryPoint Post Go-Live Consulting (PY Up
Carryforward) $ 150,000 $ - $ 150,000 $- $- 2 4
Utility Billing System Replacement 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 - - & m
Treasury-Space Improvements (PY Carryforward) 140,000 - 140,000 - | 2
Utility Billing-Space Improvements (PY Carryforward) 75,000 - 75,000 - -
Equipment Maintenance-Fuel Tank Expansion (PY
Carryforward) 100,000 - 100,000 - -
Equipment Maintenance-Fuel ConVault Tanks (3 Annual
Installs) 60,000 - 60,000 - -
Equipment Maintenance-Replace Unit 1008 (MERF Funded) 39,118 - 39,118 - - ”
Building Maintenance-Replace Unit 1304-2014 Chevy (MERF 23
Funded) 52,696 - 52,696 - - om
yw == SS Total $ 2,616,814 $- $2,616,814 5 $- 2 Z
. — a
Human Resources 7 a
Annex B on D Street Renovation for HR Offices Phase 1 &
ERP Team Return to Teams (-$200K HR/$100K ERP Team) $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ -
Zi ; Total $300,000 $- $300,000 $- $-
Community Development Services
GIS Intern (ISU Funded) $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ - $- $-
Replace Unit 6604 (MERF Funded) 28,255 - 28,255 - - a
Total $43,255 $ 15,000 $ 28,255 $- $- a
Legal a
FTE - Assistant City Attorney (1% Forgone Funded) $ - $- $ 176,311 $- $ 176,311
Total $- $- $ 176,311 $- $ 176,311
Police
IDAHO FALLS
OVERVIEW
=
<
0
z
<
z
i
OVERVIEW
DEPARTMENT/
FUND BUDGETS
INTERNAL
SERVICE FUNDS
GLOSSARY
50 CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS | PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2027
CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
General Fund Capital and Operating Budget Requests
Description
Pay Scale Change for Sworn Officers (Growth Funded)
FTE - Dispatcher ($33,593 1% Forgone/$22,515 from
Growth)
FTE - Opioid Response Detective (Opioid/Seizure Funded)
PTE - Evidence Clerk (Included in Operational Budget)
Records Management System Upgrade (Bonneville County)
Implementation (COP Funded)
Records Management System Upgrade (Bonneville County)
Annual SaaS Year 1 (COP Funded)
Shooting Range (PY Carryforward)
Bearcat (PY Carryforward)
Lease Payments-Bancorp FY22 19 Units PO1I7617 (MERF
Funded)
Lease Payments-Financial Pacific Leasing FY23 17 Units
013-256851-001 (MERF Funded)
Lease Payments-Financial Pacific Leasing FY24 2 Units
013-256851-002 (MERF Funded)
Lease Payments-Financial Pacific Leasing FY24 1 Units
013-256851-003 (MERF Funded)
Lease Payments-KS Statebank FY25 8 Units PO 118213
(MERF Funded)
Lease Payments-KS Statebank FY25 6 Units PO 118091
(MERF Funded)
Lease Payments-KS Statebank FY26 4 Units PO 121246
(MERF Funded)
Lease Payments-KS Statebank FY26 9 Units PO 120570
(MERF Funded)
New Lease for 16 Replacement Vehicles (MERF Funded)
Upfit 16 Replacement Vehicles (MERF Funded)
Ore =
FSA
e ! —_. a
Fire 2 ¥
FTE - Training Officers (Captains Rank) (1% Forgone
Funded)
Upgrade/Remodel the 35 year old Station 4 Bathrooms
(Capital Forgone Funded)
Lease Payments-3 New Engines (MERF Funded)
Hazmat Equipment (Grant Funded) (PY Carryforward)
Parks
Winter Activity Guides
Spring Activity Guides
Convert Railroad Bridge to Pathway-Add Fencing and Rails
(Greenbelt Capital Funded)
Build Stairs Down into Japanese Garden (Greenbelt Capital
Funded)
Amount
Revenue
Covers
$ -
37,406
104,530
17,586
45,000
950,000
428,645
299,548
229,763
21,348
11,252
99,943
72161
53,671
110,940
214,754
480,000
Total $ 3,176,547
tT
'
601,969
2,168,286
Total $ 2,770,255
$ 21,000
23,000
150,000
40,000
Employee Capital Other
$ 84,308
$ 84,308
93,514 = 56,108
104,530 x =
17,586 ;
2 83,481 2 83,481
237,014 192,014
950,000 ; 5
- 428,645 - -
: 299,548 :
- * 229,763 = :
21,348 :
- 11,252
2 99,943 = =
= 72,161 = :
- 53,671 2 2
= 110,940 - -
. 214,754 - -
- 480,000 F
$299,938 $3,055,506 $237,014 $415,911
$ 325,096 $ - $- $325,096
: 75,000 -
g 601,969 2
2,168,286 :
$325,096 $ 2,845,255
75,000
$ 400,096
$- $ 21,000 $- $ -
7 23,000 : -
150,000 - 2
: 40,000 - -
IDAHO FALLS
OVERVIEW
=
<
0
z
<
=
L
OVERVIEW
DEPARTMENT/
FUND BUDGETS
INTERNAL
SERVICE FUNDS
GLOSSARY
50 CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS | PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2027
CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
General Fund Capital and Operating Budget Requests
Amount
Revenue
Description Covers
Pay Scale Change for Sworn Officers (Growth Funded) $ -
FTE - Dispatcher ($33,593 1% Forgone/$22,515 from
Growth) 37,406
FTE - Opioid Response Detective (Opioid/Seizure Funded) 104,530
PTE - Evidence Clerk (Included in Operational Budget) 17,586
Records Management System Upgrade (Bonneville County)
Implementation (COP Funded) -
Records Management System Upgrade (Bonneville County)
Annual SaaS Year 1 (COP Funded) 45,000
Shooting Range (PY Carryforward) 950,000
Bearcat (PY Carryforward) 428,645
Lease Payments-Bancorp FY22 19 Units PO117617 (MERF
Funded) 299,548
Lease Payments-Financial Pacific Leasing FY23 17 Units
013-256851-001 (MERF Funded) 229,763
Lease Payments-Financial Pacific Leasing FY24 2 Units
013-256851-002 (MERF Funded) 21,348
Lease Payments-Financial Pacific Leasing FY24 1 Units
013-256851-003 (MERF Funded) 1,252
Lease Payments-KS Statebank FY25 8 Units PO 118213
(MERF Funded) 99,943
Lease Payments-KS Statebank FY25 6 Units PO 118091
(MERF Funded) 72,161
Lease Payments-KS Statebank FY26 4 Units PO 121246
(MERF Funded) 53,671
Lease Payments-KS Statebank FY26 9 Units PO 120570
(MERF Funded) 10,940
New Lease for 16 Replacement Vehicles (MERF Funded) 214,754
Upfit 16 Replacement Vehicles (MERF Funded) 480,000
, —a— ‘= Total $ 3,176,547
Fire @ :
FTE - Training Officers (Captains Rank) (1% Forgone
Funded) $-
Upgrade/Remodel the 35 year old Station 4 Bathrooms
(Capital Forgone Funded) :
Lease Payments-3 New Engines (MERF Funded) 601,969
Hazmat Equipment (Grant Funded) (PY Carryforward) 2,168,286
Total $ 2,770,255
Parks
Winter Activity Guides $ 21,000
Spring Activity Guides 23,000
Convert Railroad Bridge to Pathway-Add Fencing and Rails
(Greenbelt Capital Funded) 150,000
Build Stairs Down into Japanese Garden (Greenbelt Capital
Funded) 40,000
Employee Capital Other
$ 84,308 $- $- $ 84,308
93,514 2 = 56,108
104,530 = & 3
17,586 : > -
> 83,481 - 83,481
237,014 192,014
: 950,000 =
: 428,645 =
= 299,548 : =
: 229,763 : -
2 21,348 : :
: 11,252 : 3
= 99,943 é -
: 72161 - -
- 53,671 - =
- 110,940 . -
214,754 - -
- 480,000 - -
$299,938 $ 3,055,506 $ 415,911
$ 325,096 $- $- $325,096
: 75,000 2
601,969 -
2 2,168,286 - :
$325,096 $2,845,255 $- $400,096
75,000
$ - $ 21,000 $ - $-
- 23,000 ; =
150,000 é
- 40,000 ‘ :
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS | PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2027 CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS 51
CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
General Fund Capital and Operating Budget Requests
Amount 2 >
Revenue 20
Description Covers Employee Capital Other Total = B
Heritage Park Pathway Lighting (Greenbelt Capital ($210K) = 5
& Rotary ($80K) Funded) 295,000 - 295,000
Meppen Park (Annual Budget ($125K), MERF ($150K) &
Grant ($275K) Funded) 550,000 - 550,000 -
Heritage Park Parking Lot #2 (Greenbelt Capital Funded) 200,000 - 200,000 -
Replace Unit 0243 (MERF Funded) 208,000 - 208,000 -
Replace Unit 2039 (MERF Funded) 21,000 - 21,000 - -
Replace Unit 2044 (MERF Funded) 57,000 - 57,000 - - S BY
Replace Unit 2047 (MERF Funded) 40,000 - 40,000 - 4 >
Replace Unit 2070 (MERF Funded) 16,952 - 16,952 = Q
Replace Unit 2059 (MERF Funded) 52,450 - 52,450 =P
Replace Unit 2031 (MERF Funded) 55,753 - 55,753
Replace Unit 2057 (MERF Funded) 19,202 - 19,202 -
Zoo-Replace Unit 2213 (MERF Funded) 10,000 - 10,000 - -
Cemetery-Replace Unit 6821 (MERF Funded) 21,000 : 21,000 - -
Cemetery-Replace Unit 6813 (MERF Funded) 45,000 : 45,000 - - Np
Cemetery-Replace Unit 6815 (MERF Funded) 17,952 - 17,952 - - S 5
Cemetery-Replace Unit 6816 (MERF Funded) 18,331 - 18,331 - - = -
Softball Drive (PY Carryforward) 200,000 - 200,000 : - § z
Total $2,061,639 $- $2,061,639 $- $- ay g
Public Works , wl x . 4
PTE - Transit-Casual/Part-time Personnel $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $- $ - $ -
Transit-GIFT Bus Stops (Grant & TRPTA Funded) 170,000 - 170,000 - -
total $255,000 = $ 85,000 = $ 170,000 ~~ $- $-
Total General Fund Requests $11,633,510 $725,034 $11,253,780 $667,014 $1,012,318
SGNN&d ASIANAS
TVNUALNI
AUYSSOTS
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS | PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2027 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW 21
ACCOUNTING BASIS
The City of Idaho Falls finances are accounted for in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP) by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The government-wide and
proprietary finances are reported using the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when
earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows.
Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar items
are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met.
MZIAUZA0
ST1v4 OHVGI
The City budget is prepared using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized
when they have been earned and they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be
available when they are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of
the current period. For this purpose, the City of Idaho Falls considers revenues to be available if they are
collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded when
a liability is incurred. However, debt service principal and interest expenditures on general long-term debt,
as well as expenditures related to compensated absences and claims and judgments, are recorded only
when payment is due. General capital asset acquisitions, including entering into contracts giving the City
the right to use leased assets, are reported as expenditures in governmental funds. Issuance of long-term
debt and financing under capital leases are reported as other financing sources.
M3IAN3SA0
mn
z
>
z
wo
b
‘=
FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027 CITY OF IDAHO FALLS BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS
The following assumptions were used in the creation of enclosed budget documents.
* Salaries and wages of regular employees (also known as benefited employees) were calculated with the
following adjustments
a. General employees - 2% wage increase in addition to step and grade changes
$139an¢g anna
/ANSWLUVd3a
b. Fire Union employees - 2% wage increase in addition to step and grade changes
c. Idaho Falls Power and Fiber Department - 6% estimated Milliman study adjustment
* Health benefits were calculated using a 5% increase for medical, 5% increase for vision, and 10% for dental
insurance. This assumes no plan changes or changes to the employer/employee split. The City has continued
health insurance savings to smooth future funding of health insurance changes.
* Interdepartmental charges were reviewed and changes were made from the previous year. The allocable
value of interdepartmental charges are based on their respective five-year average of actuals.
* The City estimates spending $2 million on the Customer Information System (CIS) Utility Billing Software
Replacement Project project which will be funded by the benefitting Idaho Falls Power and Public Works
departments.
* Uses of accumulated Municipal Equipment Replacement Funds (MERF) are budgeted within departments and
divisions as MERF Expenditures. Resources set aside in the current year towards future MERF equipment are
budgeted for as MERF Allocation and the previous year’s accumulated resources for the purchase of MERF
equipment are presented within the Revenues and Resources within the Estimated Beginning Fund Balance.
* Grant obligations are included in each department and division and are represented as offsetting
intergovernmental revenue and grant expenditures. Departments were instructed to include grants and
contributions that have been awarded. Planned applications or recently submitted applications for grants and
contributions should not be included in the budget. If new awards are received during an approved budget
year, the department receiving the award will be provided contingency budget authority for those awards.
* Property taxes are assumed to increase by the statutorily allowed 3% increase and the assumed increase
related to growth and annexation estimated at $1,114,502 is included. An estimated $538,354 of 1% forgone
property tax for operations is also included to fund public safety personnel costs. An additional $350,000
in capital construction forgone property tax is assumed and included in the proposed budget to fund fire
station bathroom and training facility capital improvements, and aquatic center and skating rink facility
improvements.
SOGNNd SDIANSS
IWNUSALNI
so 1
AUVs
COMMUNITY INVESTMENT IN COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE
$16,928,885
TOTAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT
IDAHO FALLS _ IDAHO FALL ° e
ranks'nee = Park Projects Wonks Public Works Projects
Convert Railroad Bridge to $150,000
Pathway — Add Fencing & Rails Woodruff Expansion Design $150,000
Stairs into Friendship Garden $40,000 Holmes Widening Design $200,000
: 740,000
Heritage Park Pathway Lighting $295,000 Wallowstigns, Sidewalks sible
Heritage Park Parking Lot #2 $200,000 PEO Reel oo Ane ae eon 92,000,000
Rollandet Improvements —
ibn a caikbiade $550,000 Sunnyside Rd to 21st St $2,300,000
Softball Drive $200,000 Right of Way Landscape- Citywide $250,000
Category total $1,435,000 Pioneer Bridges $500,000
Storm Tap Removal $350,000
IDAHO FALLS e
Zoo Projects Category total $6,490,000
Part 1 Fencing on Rollandet $57,000
Part 2 Fencing on Rollandet $61,885 IDAHO FALLS St ts I tE
New Penguin Roof $40,000 WORKS Sa a as
New Camel Bam & Enclosure $100,000 Skyline Drive Freeway $270,000
New Fence & Windows for Zebras $35,000 Commercial Center
New Kookaburra Kafe $55,000 15th E from 49th S along Faraday $1,600,000
Subdivision
Pavilion to Maintenance Shop $5,000 $650,000
$150,000 33rd N — Recycle Rd West & E of :
Islands — Unfinished South End ’ N 5th W Intersection
Category total $503,885 15th E & 49th S Intersection $900,000
5th W Expansion from City Limits $2,600,000
N through W 33rd N
Golf Projects
Category total $6,020,000
Bathroom on Hole #5 at Sage Lakes $150,000
$150,000
Category total
eotice Police Impact Fee
Debt Service $630,000
Police Vehicles $200,000
Category total $830,000
pticeate Parks Impact Fee
Earthwork & Grading of Sandy Downs ~— $ g90,000
Utilities at Sandy Downs $700,000
$1,500,000
Category total
Funding Sources: IFP Greenbelt, Levy, Grants, Carryover, Impact Fees, Donations, General Fund, Admission Fees, Federal Aid Projects
OVERVIEW
IDAHO FALLS
=
<
Oo
z
<
4
L
OVERVIEW
DEPARTMENT/
FUND BUDGETS
INTERNAL
SERVICE FUNDS
GLOSSARY
~~
50 CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS | PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2027
CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
General Fund Capital and Operating Budget Requests —
Amount
Revenue
Description Covers
Pay Scale Change for Sworn Officers (Growth Funded) $ -
FTE - Dispatcher ($33,593 1% Forgone/$22,515 from
Growth) 37,406
FTE - Opioid Response Detective (Opioid/Seizure Funded) 104,530
PTE - Evidence Clerk (Included in Operational Budget) 17,586
Records Management System Upgrade (Bonneville County)
Implementation (COP Funded) -
Records Management System Upgrade (Bonneville County)
Annual SaaS Year 1 (COP Funded) 45,000
Shooting Range (PY Carryforward) 950,000
Bearcat (PY Carryforward) 428,645
Lease Payments-Bancorp FY22 19 Units PO117617 (MERF
Funded) 299,548
Lease Payments-Financial Pacific Leasing FY23 17 Units
013-256851-001 (MERF Funded) 229,763
Lease Payments-Financial Pacific Leasing FY24 2 Units
013-256851-002 (MERF Funded) 21,348
Lease Payments-Financial Pacific Leasing FY24 1 Units
013-256851-003 (MERF Funded) 11,252
Lease Payments-KS Statebank FY25 8 Units PO 118213
(MERF Funded) 99,943
Lease Payments-KS Statebank FY25 6 Units PO 118091
(MERF Funded) 72,161
Lease Payments-KS Statebank FY26 4 Units PO 121246
(MERF Funded) 53,671
Lease Payments-KS Statebank FY26 9 Units PO 120570
(MERF Funded) 110,940
New Lease for 16 Replacement Vehicles (MERF Funded) 214,754
480,000
a —s
Upfit 16 Replacement Vehicles (MERF Funded)
Fire pe ¥
FTE - Training Officers (Captains Rank) (1% Forgone
Funded)
Upgrade/Remodel the 35 year old Station 4 Bathrooms
(Capital Forgone Funded)
Lease Payments-3 New Engines (MERF Funded)
Hazmat Equipment (Grant Funded) (PY Carryforward)
Parks
Winter Activity Guides
Spring Activity Guides
Convert Railroad Bridge to Pathway-Add Fencing and Rails
(Greenbelt Capital Funded)
Build Stairs Down into Japanese Garden (Greenbelt Capital
Funded)
Total $ 3,176,547
tA
'
601,969
2,168,286
Total $ 2,770,255
$ 21,000
23,000
150,000
40,000
Employee Capital Other
$ 84,308 $- $- $ 84,308
93,514 : : 56,108
104,530 = 3
17,586 - - -
. 83,481 = 83,481
237,014 192,014
950,000 : :
- 428,645 - :
3 299,548 - “
c 229,763 3 -
: 21,348 2 :
: 11,252 > :
- 99,943 - :
fs 72161 : :
¢ 53,671 = -
: 110,940 : :
: 214,754 . .
: 480,000 :
$299,938 $3,055,506 $237,014 $415,911
$ 325,096 $ - $- $325,096
: 75,000 -
- 601,969 -
2,168,286 - -
$ 2,845,255 $- $400,096
75,000
$ 325,096
$ - $ 21,000 $- $-
: 23,000 - :
- 150,000 : 7
° 40,000 ;
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS | PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2027
CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS 51
CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
General Fund Capital and Operating Budget Requests
Amount
Revenue
Description Covers
Heritage Park Pathway Lighting (Greenbelt Capital ($210K)
& Rotary ($80K) Funded) 295,000
Meppen Park (Annual Budget ($125K), MERF ($150k) &
Grant ($275K) Funded) 550,000
Heritage Park Parking Lot #2 (Greenbelt Capital Funded) 200,000
Replace Unit 0243 (MERF Funded) 208,000
Replace Unit 2039 (MERF Funded) 21,000
Replace Unit 2044 (MERF Funded) 57,000
Replace Unit 2047 (MERF Funded) 40,000
Replace Unit 2070 (MERF Funded) 16,952
Replace Unit 2059 (MERF Funded) 52,450
Replace Unit 2031 (MERF Funded) 55,753
Replace Unit 2057 (MERF Funded) 19,202
Zoo-Replace Unit 2213 (MERF Funded) 10,000
Cemetery-Replace Unit 6821 (MERF Funded) 21,000
Cemetery-Replace Unit 6813 (MERF Funded) 45,000
Cemetery-Replace Unit 6815 (MERF Funded) 17,952
Cemetery-Replace Unit 6816 (MERF Funded) 18,331
Softball Drive (PY Carryforward) 200,000
Total $ 2,061,639
Public Works _ Ty ,
PTE - Transit-Casual/Part-time Perscinal $ 85,000
Transit-GIFT Bus Stops (Grant & TRPTA Fundea 170,000
a. Total $ 255,000
2. Total General Fund Requests $ 11,633,510
Employee
Capital Other Total
295,000 ;
: 550,000 - :
- 200,000 ; 3
= 208,000 :
3 21,000 z
57,000 cs
é 40,000 -
16,952
52,450
- 55,753 : =
‘ 19,202 3 <
= 10,000 - =
21,000 -
: 45,000 : =
z 17,952 : :
= 18,331 ;
: 200,000 : :
$- $2,061,639 $- $-
$ 85,000 $- $- $-
170,000 -
$ 85,000 $ 170,000 $- $-
$725,034 $11,253,780 $667,014 $1,012,318
M3IAUSAO
ST1v4 OHVdI
M&3lAusA0
a
Zz
>
Zz
£
>
ea
sLa9an8 ann
/LNSWLUvd3a
SONNd 331ANRS
IVWNUALNI
A¥YSSOT1S
IDAHO FALLS
OVERVIEW
-
<
3)
z
<
=
ue
OVERVIEW
DEPARTMENT/
FUND BUDGETS
INTERNAL
SERVICE FUNDS
GLOSSARY
54 CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS | PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2027
CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
Amount
revenue
Description covers
Battery Backup (PY Fund Balance) 40,000
Detection Upgrade (PY Fund Balance) 50,000
Video (PY Fund Balance) 5,000
Consultant Assistance (PY Fund Balance) 20,000
3 Audio Upgrades (PY Fund Balance) 15,000
Cellular Coordination (PY Fund Balance) 20,000
ITD Signal Shared Improvements (PY Fund Balance) 30,000
Checkpoint Fiber Switches (PY Fund Balance) 40,000
Detection Replacement (PY Fund Balance) 30,000
5th E and 49th S Intersection (ITD 23389 Grant Funded) 50,000
15th E and 49th S Intersection Improvements (ITD 24285
Grant Funded) 246,800
Total $ 641,800
Fire Capital Improvement .
Conex Containers for Training Facility (COP Funded) $-
Training Facility Phase 1 Basic Infrastructure (Capital
Forgone Funded) -
Training Facility Phase 1 Basic Infrastructure (COP Funded) -
ae Total S$ -
Zoo Capital Improvement __ Lest wa
Part 1 Fencing on Rollandet (1400 ft) (PY Fund Balance) $ 57,000
Part 2 Fencing on Rollandet (1520 ft) (PY Fund Balance) 61,885
New Penguin Roof (PY Fund Balance) 40,000
New Camel Barn and Enclosure (PY Fund Balance) 100,000
New Fence and Windows for Zebras (PY Fund Balance) 35,000
New Kookaburra Kafe (PY Fund Balance) 55,000
Pavilion to Maint Shop (PY Fund Balance) 5,000
Islands Unfinished South End (PY Fund Balance) 150,000
= =a Total $503,885
Golf Capital Improvement
Bathroom on Hole #5 at Sage Lakes (PY Carryforward) $ 150,000
= Lae Total $150,000
Total Other Governmental Funds Requests $ 23,047,204
Special Revenue & Capital Project Governmental Fund Capital and Operating Budget Requests
Other
Operational
Capital
Employee
- 40,000 - -
: 50,000 . .
> 5,000 5 :
: 20,000
- 15,000 - 7
3 20,000 = a
: 30,000 > :
- 40,000 ;
. 30,000 >
“ 50,000 : 3
wait 2 246,800 . :
“$- $641,800 $- $-
$- $28,500 $- $28,500
: 13,560 s
. 236,440 p
$- $278,500 $-
13,560
236,440
$ 278,500
$ - $ 57,000
61,885 - 7
- 40,000 :
100,000 :
35,000 : F
- 55,000 7 :
5,000 : 2
> 150,000 s 2
$- $ 503,885 $- $-
$- $ 150,000 $ - $ -
$- $150,000 $- $-
$- $23,546,644 $ 213,661 $713,101
52 CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS CITY OF IDAHO FALLS | PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2027
CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
Special Revenue & Capital Project Governmental Fund Capital and Operating Budget Requests
Amount
revenue
dz
<=
=
a
40
Description covers Employee Capital Operational
Streets =
Single Axle Patch Truck w/ Brine Applicator and
Underbody Plow Unit 1537 (MERF Funded) $ 450,000 $ - $ 450,000 $ - $ -
Asphalt Paver Unit 1550 (MERF Funded) 300,000 - 300,000 - -
Dump Truck w/ Slide in Spreader and Plow Units 1534 and
1541 (MERF Funded) 700,000 - 700,000 : -
%; New Street and Sanitation Admin Building ($2.75M &
< = Furnishings $150K) (PY Carryforward) 2,900,000 - 2,900,000 - -
Ze Total $4,350,000 $- $4,350,000 ae
zu
pe Recreation 72", a
Starting Blocks for 8 Lap Lanes (Capital Forgone Funded) $ - $- $ 74,240 $- $74,240
New Custom Bleachers for Ice Rink (Capital Forgone
Funded) - - 140,000 - 140,000
Replace Aquatic Center Main Entrance Door (Capital
— Forgone Funded) - - 18,700 - 18,700
5 oi Recreation-Replace Equipment Unit 2061 (MERF Funded) 52,000 - 52,000 - -
e a Zamboni Ice Resurfacer (MERF Funded PY Carryforward) 150,000 - 150,000 - -
a 3 Total $ 202,000 $2 $434,940 $- $232,940
anz
of Library i
Roof Replacement (PY Carryforward) $ 400,000 $ - $ 400,000 $ - $s
Operational Tax Levy Increase (Growth Funded) - - - 201,661 201,661
Tz ; Total $ 400,000 $- $400,000 $201,661 $201,661
, ~“SEP” .
ae Reel Grinder Mower (Add to Fleet for All Courses) $ 50,000 $- $ 50,000 $- $-
= m4 CR-20 Large Area Topdresser (Add to Fleet) 53,000 : 53,000 - -
ti ri} Patio Cover for Sage Lakes Café 70,000 : 70,000 - -
Zz Irrigation Repairs (MERF Funded) 12,000 - 12,000 a
u Pine Crest Equipment Replacements (MERF Funded) 138,000 - 138,000 - -
Sand Creek Equipment Replacements (MERF Funded) 220,000 - 220,000 - -
Sage Lake Equipment Replacements (MERF Funded) 150,000 - 150,000 - -
: Total $693,000 $- $681,000 $ 12,000 $-
EMS
Lease Payments-Stryker 360 (MERF Funded) $ 303,719 $ - $ 303,719 $- $ -
> 2 Ambulances (MERF Funded) 622,800 - 622,800 - -
< Ambulance Remounts (MERF Funded & PY Carryforward) 370,000 - 370,000 - -
6 Heart Monitors (PY Carryforward & GEMT Funded) 680,000 - 680,000 - -
G Total $ 1,976,519 $- $1,976,519 $: e:
Wildland
Upfitting for New Fire Engines (Arriving Fall 2026) $ 675,000 $ - $ 675,000 $ - $ -
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS | PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2027
CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS 53
CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
Special Revenue & Capital Project Governmental Fund Capital and Operating Budget Requests
Amount
revenue
Description covers
Type Ill Equipment (Grant Funded if Awarded-Assistance to
Firefighters) 560,000
Total $1,235,000
Police Impact Fee
Debt Service $ 630,000
Police Vehicles (Add to Fleet) 200,000
Total $830,000 —
Parks Impact Fee =
Earthwork and Grading of Sandy Downs $ 800,000
Utilities at Sandy Downs 700,000
Total $ 1,500,000
Fire Impact Fee “=...
Feasibility Study (PY Carryforward) $ 50,000
Total $ 50,000
Streets Impact Fee UF
Skyline Drive Freeway Commercial Center $ 275,000
15th E from 49th S Along Faraday Subdivision 1,600,000
33rd N Recycle Road West and E of N Sth W Intersection 650,000
15th E and 49th S Intersection 900,000
Sth W Expansion from City Limits North Through W 33rd N 2,600,000
Total $ 6,025,000
Public Works Capital Improvement
Rollandet Improvements Sunnyside Road to 2ist Street $ 2,300,000
Landscape Improvements Citywide 250,000
Pioneer Bridges 500,000
Storm Tap Removal (PY Carryforward) 350,000
; Total $ 3,400,000
Streets Capital Improvement
Woodroof Expansion Lincoln to Yellowstone-FA-Keller
Design Work (23302 Grant Funded) $ 150,000
Holmes Widening Sunnyside to Taylorview-FA-Horrocks
Design Work (24241 Grant Funded) 200,000
Yellowstone Avenue Sidewalk (TAP Grant Funded) 740,000
Total $ 1,090,000
Traffic Capital Improvement
Fiber Connection (PY Fund Balance) $ 25,000
Controller Upgrade (PY Fund Balance) 10,000
2 RRFB (PY Fund Balance) 60,000
Employee Capital Operational Total
. 560,000 ‘ ‘
$- $1,235,000 $- $-
$- $630,000 ¢ - $ -
, £ 200,000 i :
$- $830,000 $- Cs
$- $800,000 $ - $ -
slag 700,000 : :
~ $= $1,500,000 $- $-
$- $50,000 $ - $ -
$- $50,000 $- $-
$ - $ 275,000 $ - $ -
. 1,600,000 : ‘
. 650,000 : ;
: 900,000 ; “
- 2,600,000 ‘ :
$ id $ 6,025,000 $ > $ =
$- $2,300,000 $- $ -
: 250,000 ‘ :
‘ 500,000 . ‘
- 350,000 : -
$- $3,400,000 $- $-
$- $ 150,000 $ - $-
. 200,000 : :
; 740,000 ; é
$- $1,090,000 $- $-
$ - $ 25,000 $ - $-
: 10,000 . :
z 60,000 ‘ .
M&IAU3ZA0
sT1v4 OHVGI
M3lIAusA0
ae
z
>
Zz
2
>
>
$L395qn¢a aNn3
/ANAWLUWd3a
SGNN4 3DIANSaS
TVNUALNI
AUYSSO19
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS | PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2027
CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS 55
CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
Enterprise Funds Capital and Operating Budget Requests
Description
Airport
Ops Truck (MERF Funded)
Economy Lot Expansion
ARFF Truck (Grant or MERF Funded)
Shuttle Bus (Grant or MERF Funded)
Parking (CFC Funded)
Terminal Deice and Cargo Apron (Grant & PFC Funded)
Peterson Property Acquisition (Grant & PFC Funded)
Terminal Concept Budget Report (Grant Funded)
Expand Terminal (Grant, PFC, & Debt Funded)
Air Traffic Control Tower Siting (Grant Funded)
Taxiway Pavement Maintenance (Grant & PFC Funded)
VOR and Tower Design (Grant & PFC Funded)
‘Water
FTE - Service Technician
SUV (Add to Fleet)
Well 17 Upgrades
Well 3 Electrical
65th South Pump Station
Well 7 Abandonment
Well 5 Upgrades - Prepurchase
Well 3 Upgrades - Prepurchase
7th St & Linden Park Water Main Replacement
Edgemont Gardens Addition Water Main Replacement
D St Memorial Dr to Yellowstone
2027 Contracted Meter Box Installs
Valve Exercising Truck (MERF Funded)
Pipe Trailer (Add to Fleet)
Backhoe (Add to Fleet)
Well 20 Property Purchase
New Water Division Office (PY Carryforward)
N 15th E Water Main Extension-N Yellowstone Hwy to E
lona Rd
N Woodruff Ave Water Main Extension - E Lincoln Rd to
N Yellowstone Hwy
Well 20 & 21 Drilling
Participation with Developers
Sanitation
Replace 3/4 Ton Pickup Truck Full Size Bed w/
Tommygate Unit 7030
Amount =
Revenue
Covers
Employee
Capital
$ 70,000 $ - $ 70,000
51,637 : 51,637
725,000 . 725,000
240,000 , 240,000
1,600,000 : 1,600,000
12,216,859 : 12,216,859
3,297,960 : 3,297,960
2,657 2 2,657
28,438,432 : 28,438,432
592,919 : 592,919
14,596 : 14,596
700,000 : 700,000
$47,950,060 $- $47,950,060
$ 190,676 $190,676 $ -
35,000 ; 35,000
500,000 ‘ 500,000
200,000 4 200,000
500,000 ; 500,000
250,000 : 250,000
1,500,000 ‘ 1,500,000
1,250,000 ; 1,250,000
2,450,000 é 2,450,000
850,000 : 850,000
750,000 . 750,000
1,960,000 , 1,960,000
285,000 ‘ 285,000
30,000 ‘ 30,000
190,000 . 190,000
200,000 : 200,000
6,000,000 é 6,000,000
1,000,000 : 1,000,000
1,000,000 ‘ 1,000,000
1,200,000 ‘ 1,200,000
200,000 . 200,000
$ 20,540,676 $190,676 $ 20,350,000
$ 70,000 $- $ 70,000
60,000 : 60,000
1/2 Ton Crew Cab Pickup Truck (Add to Fleet)
Operational
Total
M3IAYN3ZA0
ST1V4 OHVGI
M&3lAYSA0
a
z
>
z
2
>
2
sLa9.qn9a GNn4
/ANAWLYVdad
SAGNNd S31AN3S
TIWNUALNI
AUYSSOTD
IDAHO FALLS
OVERVIEW
a
s
0
z
<
z
it
OVERVIEW
DEPARTMENT/
FUND BUDGETS
INTERNAL
SERVICE FUNDS
GLOSSARY
56 CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS | PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2027
CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
Enterprise Funds Capital and Operating Budget Requests _
Amount
Revenue
Description Covers
Replace Sweeper Unit 1548 480,000
95 gallon Residential Carts (Yearly Container Purchase) 100,000
Small Metal Dumpsters (Yearly Container Purchase) 50,000
New Street and Sanitation Admin Building ($2.75M &
Furnishings $150K) (PY Carryforward) 2,900,000
$ 3,660,000
Idaho Falls Power
FTE - Wireman $ 221,892
FTE - Apprentice Generation Mechanic 82,108
Digger Derrick to replace #3010 (MERF Funded) 445,729
Land Acquisition 550,000
FERC Relicense 579,000
Bulb AVR Replacement 400,000
City Plant ReBuild - Mechanical, Controls, Communication
and Rotor Rewind 625,000
Gem State Rip Rap 100,000
Governor Pilot Valve Upgrades - Upper/Lower 20,000
HMI Upgrades at Upper Plant/Air Compressor 20,000
HVAC System Pump Replacement/Plumbing Upgrade
Bulbs 30,000
HVAC system coil replacement - City and Lower Plants 20,000
Thermal Camera 30,000
Upper Dam Coffer Dam, Hydraulics Coatings & Seals 1,500,000
Concrete Cracking and Spalling Repair - Old Plant 8,000
Gem State Rear Stop Logs Rehab (Seals & Coatings) 35,000
Gem State Concrete Cracking and Spalling Repair Work 8,000
South Tourist Park - Lighting (Grant Funded) 170,000
Sugarmill-Hatch Tie Upgrade-NW Bonneville
Tie-Transmission & Distribution 400,000
Automate LTCs for Conservation Voltage Reduction
(CVR) 60,000
Harrison Sub Upgrade (Design) 900,000
City Sub Upgrade 46kv Breaker (Construction) 650,000
Rack Sub Upgrade w/ New Control Building (Design &
Material Purchase) 250,000
Hatch, Harrison LTC Maintenance & Updates 100,000
East River Reconductor-33rd North) (Design and
Easement Acquisition) 500,000
Direct Connect Fiber between Harrison-York-Sugarmill 100,000
161 Gem State Breaker (Material Acquisition) 2 Year Lead
Time 200,000
161 Gem State Breaker (Design) 100,000
General to Replace #3017 (MERF Funded) 483,833
Pickup w/ Service Bed Replace #3032 (MERF Funded) 75,000
Customer Line Extensions 1,700,000
Other
Capital Operational Total
Employee
- 480,000 - -
- 100,000 - :
- 50,000 - -
- 2,900,000 - -
$- $3,660,000
$ 221,892 $- - $-
82,108 = = >
445,729 Z ?
: 550,000 :
5 579,000 =
_ 400,000 - -
2 625,000 = -
E 100,000 : i
: 20,000 * -
20,000 : :
: 30,000 : ?
20,000 5
3 30,000 = :
- 1,500,000 - -
8,000 -
35,000 :
8,000 ki
Z 170,000 - .
400,000 - -
. 60,000 - -
: 900,000 - -
, 650,000 - -
: 250,000 - -
< 100,000 =
7 500,000 - -
- 100,000 - -
= 200,000 - -
: 100,000 -
= 483,833 - -
7 75,000 - -
: 1,700,000 - -
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS | PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2027 CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS 57
ge a ee OE EE VE CALNE BENE: HEME Sil: 08,
CAPITAL & OPERATING BUDGET REQUESTS
Enterprise Funds Capital and Operating Budget Requests ° g
Amount mi =
Revenue Other 2 ns
Description Covers Employee Capital Operational Total = z
Backyard Rebuild 750,000 - 750,000 - - a
Distribution Automation (3 sites) 75,000 - 75,000 - -
Public Works Projects (Miscellaneous) 100,000 - 100,000 - -
City Sub Upgrade 46kv Breaker (Construction) 650,000 - 650,000 - -
Harrison Sub Upgrade (Design) 900,000 - 900,000 - -
Streetlight Retrofit Project 225,000 - 225,000 - -
Rack Sub Upgrade w/ New Control Building (Design & oz
Material Purchase) 250,000 - 250,000 - - = S
Sugarmill-Hatch Tie Upgrade-NW Bonneville 2 =
Tie-Transmission & Distribution 400,000 - 400,000 - - Y 5
East River Rd, MK Simpson and 33rd N 75,000 - 75,000 - :
Pioneer and I-15 OH to UG Crossing 550,000 - 550,000 - -
Snake River Landing 1100 u/g JHJ to Event Center 900,000 - 900,000 - -
New Milligan Feeder to City Sub Tie 75,000 - 75,000 - -
49th South and 15 East 795 Feeder 200,000 - 200,000 : -
49th South (Brookside to St Clair) 80,000 - 80,000 5 a eg
795 Relocation Rollandet 120,000 - 120,000 - - § x
FAA Property Release Funding 528,000 - 528,000 - - 4 a]
Fault Indicator Analysis 25,000 : 25,000 : 3 4 m
Downtown H Structure to Underground (Grant Funded) 500,000 - 500,000 - - HE
Auto Equipment Replacement (MERF Funded) 75,000 - 75,000 - -
New Generation Gate Keepers 50,300 - 50,300 - -
New Services (Meters and CTs) 487,700 - 487,700 - -
Field Circuit Tester 60,000 - 60,000 - :
Security Camera/Physical Security Upgrade 50,000 : 50,000 - -
Upgrade UPS System 75,000 - 75,000 - : 4
Generator or Battery Bank at City Plant for Dispatch/ < &
SCADA 500,000 - 500,000 - - Ha] m
Westside Cover Storage 500,000 : 500,000 - - a ¢
Truck Barn Lean-to 250,000 - 250,000 - : = F
Provisions for EV Vehicles (MERF Funded) 50,000 - 50,000 - - *
Auto Equipment Replacement (MERF Funded) 20,000 - 20,000 - :
CFI Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (Grant Funded) 450,000 - 450,000 - -
2 $ 19,334,562 sees $ 18,979,562 $ 51,000 $-
Fiber od
FTE - Communications and Splicing Technician $77,442 $77,442 $- $- $- e
Fiber Network Capital (New Customers, Capital mn
Upgrades) 1,700,000 - 1,700,000 - - >
Upgrade Fiber Ring Network 200,000 - 200,000 - - <
Bucket Truck Replace 3004 (MERF Funded) 150,000 - 150,000 - -
$ 2,127,442 $77,442 $ 2,050,000 $- $-
Wastewater
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS | PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2027 BUDGET SUMMARY BY YEAR 31
BUDGET SUMMARY BY YEAR
FY 2026 FY 2027 og
FY 2025 Adopted Adopted <=
Actual Budget Budget 2 MS
REVENUES Fd nF
Taxes And Franchises $ 49,170,741 $ 51,635,446 $ 55,353,846 oh
Intergovernmental Revenue 45,244,307 82,601,932 79,841,761
Charges For Services 145,087,757 143,205,981 162,660,746
Licenses And Permits 6,780,860 7,936,675 5,481,575
Rentals & Leases 1,688,081 1,864,160 1,746,944
Fines & Forfeitures 337,495 240,550 280,000
Contributions & Donations 1,872,222 2,935,419 1,751,423 om
Investment Income 8,897,156 4,198,779 475,502 rm <
Miscellaneous (3,537,500 2,475,678 2,719,888 = FA
Debt Proceeds : 18,368,229 5,000,000 =?
Non Revenue Transfer 9,215,094 4,854,526 6,183,931
TOTAL REVENUES $ 271,831,214 $ 320,317,375 $ 325,195,615
EXPENDITURES : = _
Salaries And Wages $ 65,692,050 $ 70,721,155 $ 74,879,525 a
Benefits 31,206,138 33,543,505 36,432,922 S mt
Current Operating Expense 105,176,482 120,612,327 136,520,384 = -
Grant Expenditures 7,231,608 9,579,691 6,985,435 S e)
Capital Outlay 70,717,691 111,473,524 117,261,955 aD
MERF Expenditures 5,130,105 6,387,135 6,562,070 aS
Debt Service 11,254,414 12,521,883 12,618,067
MERF Allocation 5,010,154 4,706,694 5,280,104
Interdepartmental Charges (4,674,307) (6,122,996) (5,847,738)
Cost Allocation Transfers (13,100,394) (14,476,022) (15,831,814)
Contingency ws < 40,688,080 18,623,044 a
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 283,643,942 $ 389,634,976 $ 393,483,954 z a
=-i
EXCESS/(DEFICIENCY) ; $ (11,812,729) $ (69,317,601) $ (68,288,339) 2
c>
2r
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES * 3
Fund Balance-Estimated - 166,520,002 197,401,914
Reserve for Future Capital . (57,394,780) (90,183,953)
Reserve for Rate Stabilization 3 (28,500,000) (25,600,000)
Reserve for Conservation - (2,700,000) (3,800,000)
Reserve for Debt Service - (1,079,623) (1,079,623)
Reserve for Self Insurance - (4,688,000) (4,900,000)
Reserve for Health Insurance : (2,840,000) (3,550,000) a
TOTAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES $ = i$ 69,317,599 $ 68,288,338 9
NET EXCESS/(DEFICIENCY) $ (11,812,729) $ re$ * ¥
AUuY
* FY 2026 is the first year the City is presenting the Additional Resources section which includes estimated beginning fund balance
and reserve balances.
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS | PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2027 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES BY FUND 33
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES BY FUND
FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 og
EXPENDITURES BY FUND Actual Adopted Budget Proposed Budget 5 =
General Fund $ 70,753,405 $ 86,045,091 $ 90,647,934 Z S
Street Fund 12,282,284 14,901,539 16,336,597 2 é
Recreation Fund 2,690,049 3,586,806 3,458,596 bh
Library Fund 3,399,684 4,649,913 4,168,928
Airport Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Fund 10 - -
Business Improvement District Fund 77,000 119,300 118,965
Golf Fund 4,772,220 5,036,922 5,334,685
Risk Management Fund 3,684,291 4,735,000 7,566,432
Health Insurance Fund 160,000 — - - 2 5
Emergency Medical Service Fund 10,740,790 11,813,081 13,949,190 pu 2
Wildland Fire Fund 1,924,448 1,934,329 2,702,844 S Q
Police Impact Fee Fund 651,359 630,000 830,000 =F
Fire Impact Fee Fund 21,359 50,000 50,000
Parks & Recreation Impact Fee Fund 21,359 880,000 1,600,000
Streets Impact Fee Fund 903,661 5,500,000 6,025,000
Public Works Capital Improvement Fund 950,048 2,200,000 3,400,000
Street Capital Improvement Fund 2,884,213 2,623,000 1,090,000 No
Bridge & Arterial Capital Improvement Fund 99,559 - - S m
Surface Drainage Capital Improvement Fund - - : 4 5
Traffic Light Capital Improvement Fund 552,979 - 641,800 Ss 2
Parks Capital Improvement Fund — = . : mi z
Fire Capital Improvement Fund — ‘ 2,569,790 3,712,000 278,500 “™
Zoo Capital Improvement Fund 493,386 1,050,000 503,885
Frontier Center Capital Improvement Fund 3,174,993 4,681,860 -
Golf Capital Improvement Fund - 235,000 150,000
Police Capital Improvement Fund 118,268 = =
Airport Fund 9,922,926 73,075,495 57,026,588 w
Water Fund 19,679,407 29,653,546 32,823,313 z s
Sanitation Fund 6,389,310 10,037,435 15,236,967 on
Idaho Falls Power Fund 101,317,378 94,588,498 98,872,927 4 2
Fiber Fund 4,962,402 5,800,190 6,931,623 SP
Wastewater Fund 18,447,364 22,095,971 23,330,180 a
Street Lighting - - 409,000
Budgetary Fund = = z
TOTAL $ 283,643,942 89,634,976 $ 393,483,954
AUYSSOT1S
34 BUDGET SUMMARIES CITY OF IDAHO FALLS | PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2027
BUDGET SUMMARIES
2026/2027 PROPOSED CITY-WIDE BUDGET - YEAR TO YEAR COMPARISON
FY 2026 Adopted FY 2027 Proposed
Budget Budget
dz
qi
L>
oc
zS
40
$ Change % Change
Division Expenditures Revenues Expenditures Revenues Expenditure Expenditure
General Fund , -»
Mayor And Council $ 1,022,441 $ 101,600 $ 492,796 $ 91,500 $ (529,645) “52%
Legal 740,880 180,000 933,195 180,000 192,315 26%
Municipal Services 6,818,136 826,500 5,610,535 694,000 (1,207,601) 18%
< = Non- Departmental 8,469,663 55,332,138 9,848,399 60,011,985 1,378,736 16%
- > Community Development 4,542,939 4,084,637 4,023,155 3,424,901 (519,784) 11%
= wi Human Resources 498,938 : 555,672 e- 56,734 11%
io Police 27,765,248 3,351,458 29,964,622 3,153,723 2,199,374 8%
Fire 19,236,132 4,666,946 19,982,676 4,481,279 746,544 4%
Parks 12,695,021 3,156,979 14,737,372 4947149 2,042,351 16%
Public Works 4,255,693 3,060,554 4,499,513 2,672,500 243,820 6%
- - - - - 0%
~y Total General Fund $ 86,045,091 $74,760,812 $90,647,934 $79,657,037 $ 4,602,843 5%
2 ww
= a Special Revenue Funds FEA LF eS
& Wildland Fire $ 1,934,329 $ 1,059,329 $ 2,702,844 $2,308,046 $ 768,515 40%
& z Streets 14,901,539 8,679,180 16,336,597 9,091,964 1,435,058 10%
on Recreation 3,586,806 3,441,788 3,458,596 3,388,662 (128,210) -4%
Library 4,649,913 3,244,263 4,168,928 3,572,559 (480,985) -10%
Business Improvement District 119,300 115,500 118,965 118,965 (335) 0%
Golf 5,036,922 4,418,353 5,334,685 5,014,587 297,763 6%
Emergency Medical Service 11,813,081 9,940,850 13,949,190 12,006,914 2,136,109 18%
e - - - - - 0%
2 Z Total Special Revenue Funds $ 42,041,890 $ 30,899,263 $46,069,805 $35,501,697 $4,027,915 10%
zu
ri Special Revenue Impact Fees —
ze Funds
an Police Impact Fees $ 630,000 $ 765,000 $ 830,000 $ 415,000 $ 200,000 32%
Fire Impact Fees 50,000 (1,416,803) 50,000 500,000 = 0%
Parks & Rec Impact Fees 880,000 1,740,000 1,600,000 950,000 720,000 82%
Streets Impact Fees 5,500,000 2,850,000 6,025,000 2,050,000 525,000 10%
Total Special Revenue Impact —
Fee Funds — $ 7,060,000 $ 3,938,197 $8,505,000 $3,915,000 $ 1,445,000 20%
GLOSSARY
28 REVENUE & RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS CITY OF IDAHO FALLS | PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2027
PROPERTY TAX ALLOCATION
4 FA Current Property Tax by
LS Allocation Request Difference
2 ui Fire Capital Improvement Fund $ - $ - $ -
8 9 General Fund 42,586,820 45,684,368 3,097,548
Library Fund 3,042,763 3,335,707 292,944
Public Works Capital Improvement Fund 790,000 813,700 23,700
Recreation Fund 1,187,466 1,223,090 35,624
Street Fund 2,953,380 3,041,981 88,601
$ 50,560,429 $54,098,846 $3,538,417
22
oS PROPERTY TAX TABLE
= ui (Estimated)
io 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Valuation $ 7,052,741,278 $ 8,296,469,966 $ 8103,605,399 $ 8,660,283,169 $ 8,943,805,451
Certified Property tax $ 42,697,326 $ 44,838,106 $ 47,681,429 $ 50,560,429 $ 54,098,846
Levy Rate 0.0060540040 0.0054044800 0.0058839760 0.0058381958 0.0060487503
SS .
Estimated 3.3% increase for property valuation
4
zw
w Oo
ZS
& im
se
a>
OL
INTERNAL
SERVICE FUNDS
GLOSSARY
Idaho Falls Utility Board
Meeting Minutes
1
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Wednesday, August 12, 2026
8:06 AM
City Council Chambers
General - Call to Order and Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw
Mayor Pro Tem Jim Francis
Board Member Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Board Member Jim Freeman
Board Member John Radford
Board Member Kirk Larsen (arrived at 8:55 a.m.)
Absent:
Board Member Brandon Lee
Also Present:
Chris Fredericksen, General Manager
Chris Canfield, Public Works Director
Heidi Despain, City Attorney
Margaret Wimborne, Chief of Staff
Josh Roos, Chief Financial Officer
Jace Yancy, IFP Operations Assistant GM
AJ Morin, Electric Engineering Manager
Sarah Wheeler, External Affairs Manager
David Richards, Water Superintendent
Jordan Rechenmacher, Sanitation Superintendent
Gregg Roderick, Wastewater Superintendent
Megan Nelson, Executive Assistant
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Calendar, Announcements, Events, Reports, Updates, Questions and Discussion
•
Mayor Burtenshaw mentioned a lot is going on in the nuclear space with the Idaho National Laboratory
(INL) and clarified the reason and process for settlement claims.
•
Board Member Radford – American Public Power Administration (APPA) Policy Makers Council has
created a nuclear task force for small modular reactors (SMR) and data centers. Growing political
concern; they are seeking policy and science task force members from either this group or the INL, etc.
General Manager (GM) Fredericksen and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Roos have been attending their
online meetings. Discussion on the Oak Ridge, Tennessee facility and its competition for nuclear
contracts.
IFP – Customer: CIS Update
•
CFO Roos summarized the timeline of the utility’s process of finding, paying for and launching a new
billing system, which is projected to launch in the 2028 fiscal year. There will be a request for proposal
going out next week for a project manager to manage this process. Board Member Radford asked for
clarification of which utilities (electric, fiber, water, sewer, sanitation) are included in the software and
the range of cost, ongoing costs, etc. CFO Roos explained that the AMI power and water meters' day
rates can be explored. A customer service portal is a high priority for this software. Initial software
costs range from $2 – 4 million with an annual maintenance cost around $300,000 (similar to current
costs) with Internal vendor reviews beginning in October.
IFP – Customer: Easement Request
•
GM Fredericksen reviewed a requested easement at the energy campus.
Idaho Falls Utility Board
Meeting Minutes
2
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
IFP – Generation Power Supply: Peaking Plant Update/Campus Discussion
•
GM Fredericksen reviewed the continued maintenance issues and pointed out that the warranty costs
are covered but not the loss of revenue. The generators are most effective running in the first and third
quarters and an update will be brought to the board in October. Board Member Francis asked for a
report on IFP’s ability to meet demands in the recent hot weather. Board Member Freeman said that
IFP hit a new summer peak recently of 141, and GM Fredericksen added that the summer and winter
peaks’ gap is closing. Board Member Radford asked if there is an insurance option for lost revenue, and
GM Fredericksen said it has been an option and may look at it for the future. Francis asked how long
the generator warranty was for and CFO Roos mentioned between three and five years. Freeman
wondered if Lehi had experienced similar issues in their first few years and how they handled them.
•
IFP Operations Center Study – considering future City and utility growth needs on the energy campus –
with roughly 90 acres available for development. Mayor Burtenshaw reminded the group that building
out a campus would likely be conducted in phases and would require a bond. GM Fredericksen added
that this is merely campus planning and invited the opportunity for other entities to build as partners
and gave Aalo as an example, as they currently have a power purchase agreement in place. If the
campus builds out a new administration building, Board Member Radford expressed a desire to
eliminate the current IFP administrative building and turn the space back into a park or green space.
IFP – Generation Power Supply: Transmission Conversion
•
Due to aging infrastructure, GM Fredericksen gave an overview of converting the transmission system
from a 46kV to a 69kV system (not a big impact on the system and gives a lot of capacity) to provide
better redundancy for the City. Mr. Morin estimated that in 30-35 years the City will have double the
load and pointed out that to meet current load/demand, there can only be one to two substations
down at a time. He explained that losing a substation with higher demands on the system will pose a
problem, especially in winter months. Substation transformers are approaching 50-years and need to
be replaced. Mr. Morin reiterated that converting to 69kV is the best and most economical way to add
capacity to the system, matching what consultants have recommended. A general head nod was given
to move forward with planning the conversion.
IFP – Fiber: 2.5Gbps Residential Service Update
•
Ms. Wheeler explained the 2.5 GIG fiber launch that occurred on July 27 for under $100 per month from
all providers. Billing inserts will go out in September, along with postcard mailers later in the month to
non-customers. Board Member Radford asked who needs 2.5 GIGs, and AGM Yancey explained that
the download and upload speeds are higher for video streaming, etc.
•
New online shopping cart experience with better billing summaries, automated customer email
communication.
•
Increased engagement included more frequent website updates.
IFP – Finance: Q3 Financial Report/Budget/Fiber Payback/Fitch Rating/EV Projects
•
CFO Roos reviewed Power’s third-quarter financial statements. Power assets are up $3.8 million from
last year. He explained the work-in-progress numbers. Total current assets are up $1.9 million due to
Idaho Falls Utility Board
Meeting Minutes
3
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
accounts payable (timing snapshot). Net position = net value and has increased by $12 million over last
year.
•
Transmission revenue bonds – should be paid off in 10 more years at a 1.5 percent interest rate.
•
Power supply bonds – last drawdown was in July and will be included in 4th quarter financials.
•
Power income – retail sales down $1.5 million from last year due to a very mild winter.
•
Budget expenses are at 64%; operating expenses are at 61% of budget, reflecting continued cost
control.
•
Fitch Credit Rating affirms an AA rating with a stable outlook and CFO Roos pointed out there are only
5 out of 121 utilities that have a higher rating (19 rated AA – IFP in top 20%).
•
Grants
o South Tourist Park - $127,230 EECBG (p35) grant monies – already had purchased lighting,
so IFP will install LED decorative lighting along the walking path, with construction
beginning in September 2026.
o Downtown alleyway project to convert overhead power lines to underground service in
three alleyways – OEMR Energy Resiliency Grant Program – total cost $2 million (IFP cost
share $700,000)
o Electric Vehicle DOT Charging and Fueling Infrastructure (CFI) Discretionary grant – total
estimated project cost $3,753,570 (IFP cost share $750,714 – four locations
•
Fiber balance sheet - $2 million in cash – increase and capital assets have increased
•
Next loan payment to Power for $1.7million is scheduled for September (8 more years to pay off)
•
Operating revenues increased about 9%
•
Fiber is at 73% of budget, expenses at 56% of budget
•
Take rate is around 38%, averaging about 250 new customers per month
•
Fiber has exceeded the break-even point (around 8,850 customers), serving 10,800 customers -
receiving $492 per year from each customer
•
Power Supply - warm winter reduced power supply costs by $400,000 from last year; hot summer is
hitting new highs – UAMPS billing for revenue to be off by a couple of months due to their joining EDAM
(missing about $700,000 in revenue)
•
Total load is down 33,864 MWh from last year (25,718 MWh below projection, customer growth 1,450
•
BPA provider of choice contract (16-year contract) preserves IFP's flexibility to purchase power from
the most economical source, avoids committing to unknown long-term BPA power costs, allows us to
continue using IFP’s existing resource portfolio, aligns with how IFP has managed their power supply
for many years, and provides flexibility to evaluate large load and data centers individually, allowing IFP
to securer the most cost-effective power supply when new projects are committed.
*Break: 10 minutes*
PWD – Water: Wastewater Illicit Discharges/CIP/IBSD Agreement
•
Director Canfield stated that the goal of the project is to remove the sludge, noted that the utility is
working through illicit discharge issues, reviewing ordinances for enforcement controls, researching
what other communities do, working with pretreatment for grease users, and added that there may
need to add a license requirement for grease trap users.
Idaho Falls Utility Board
Meeting Minutes
4
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
PWD – Water: Water Building Update/Surface Water conversions/Capital Improvement Projects
•
Capital Improvement Projects – Priority 1
o
1.1 Secondary System Evaluation
o
1.2 Clean B System
o
1.3 Liquid Chlorine disinfection and Gate Replacement
o
1.4 Screening / Washer Compactor Improvements
o
1.5 Headworks Improvements
o
1.6 Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR)
o
1.7 Makeup Air Unit and Corrosion Improvements
•
Iona Bonneville Sewer District (IBSD) Board is meeting this week to address the 5-year agreement
update; agreement to be completed in the Fall
•
Water Building Update - Director Canfield demonstrated the water administration building design -
off of Hemmert Ave and Pop Kroll (25% administration, 75% equipment storage) – with anticipated
construction to begin in Spring 2027
•
Surface Water conversion – Mr. Richards explained how the pumps and motors work and issues
encountered with the system. Board Member Freeman pointed out the difficulty of time-of-day
watering in large parks and issues with ballpark users, etc. GM Fredericksen noted new users coming
onto the system could be surface water users opposed to well water users. Board Member Larsen
asked if the fountain in Tautphaus Park will be well or surface water use. Mayor Burtenshaw noted that
kids play in the water, so canal water would not be ideal in the situation. Director Canfield said it is
worth exploring the splash pad water use and doing something similar for the fountain.
•
Water - Significant CIP projects include:
o
New building
o
Meter box installs (tracking water use)
o
Water main replacements
o
Well upgrades
o
Wells 20 & 21 - drilling
PWD – General: Strategic Utility Extension
•
Director Canfield explained the 1000 feet contiguous property requirement concerning city annexation
and pointed out that the city coordinates these projects with the county
•
He reviewed the proposed project on Iona and 15th E and noted the County Ordinance Amendment is in
progress and added that the developer is currently reviewing the draft development agreement.
•
Director Canfield said that power/fiber infrastructure is also considered as the extensions are built out,
and explained the latecomer clauses with the city and county.
PWD – Finance: Financial Report
•
Director Canfield reviewed fiscal year revenues, percentages of expenditures, and noted that
sanitation is at 55% of budget, wastewater is 61%, and water is at 66%. He shared that Public Works is
constructing a new street sanitation building this winter.
General: Council travel – Boise Energy Summit
Idaho Falls Utility Board
Meeting Minutes
5
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:50 a.m.
/s/ Linda Lundquist
/s/ Lisa Burtenshaw
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor
Memorandum
File #: 26-336
City Council
DATE: Wednesday, September 2, 2026
AGENDA: Regular
FROM: Chris Canfield, Public Works Director
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
Title
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5307 Small Urban Funding Agreement
☐ Ordinance
☐ Resolution
☐ Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐ Legislative Public Hearing
☐ Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☒ Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve the FTA 5310 Small Urban Funding Agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign the necessary
document (or take other action deemed appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
This Funding Agreement, between the Idaho Transportation Department and the City of Idaho Falls, will allow
for the use of federal funds for operating and capital costs for GIFT microtransit services.
The Agreement is for $1,755,326.00 in federal funds reimbursement and is subject to a 35% local match of
$614,364.10. The budgeted match exists and will be paid by Greater Idaho Falls Transit (GIFT). Sufficient
funding and budget authority exist to execute the Agreement.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal Department.
26-336
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 9/8/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
Public Transportation Office itd.idaho.gov/pt PTOps@itd.idaho.gov
P a g e | 1
Idaho Transportation Department
Public Transportation Office
FTA 5307 Formula Grant Program
Funding Agreement
Agreement #: O2674IF
ITD Public Transportation Office
11331 W Chinden Blvd
Boise, ID 83714
PO Box 7129, Boise, ID 83707-1129
http://itd.idaho.gov/pt
Public Transportation Office itd.idaho.gov/pt PTOps@itd.idaho.gov
P a g e | 2
Pass-Through Awarding Agency: ITD – Public Transportation Office
Awarding Official: (Grants Officers)
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Connie Edwards
208 259 4199
PTBilling@itd.idaho.gov
Term of Grant: October 1, 2025 – September 30, 2027
Agreement Total: $1,755,326
Funding Program: FTA 5307 Formula Grant for Rural Area Programs
Assistance Listing Number (ALN): 20.507
Agreement Number: O2674IF
FAIN: ID-2026-034
Subrecipient Organization Name: City of Idaho Falls
Subrecipient Director or Equivalent: Chris Fredericksen
Subrecipient Address: 380 Constitution Way / PO Box 50220, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
Subrecipient Phone: 208-612-8256
Subrecipient E-mail: PWD@idahofalls.gov
Scope of Work:
FY 2022 Section 5307 funds for operating costs and capital costs of contracting for continued operations of Greater Idaho Falls
Transit (GIFT) turnkey contract for microtransit services in the City of Idaho Falls. A third-party contractor, competitively selected
by the City of Idaho Falls, will operate, market, and maintain a demand response rideshare service project.
Responsible Individuals Signatures of Agreement
This Agreement, together with the Attachments, and documents incorporated herein by reference, set forth the entire Agreement
between the parties with respect to the subject matter. There are no understandings, agreements, amendments, or representations, oral
or written, not specified herein.
Authorized Signature for Subrecipient:
Name
Title
Phone
E-mail
Signature and Date:
Name
Title
Phone
E-mail
Ron Duran
Public Transportation Manager
208-334-4475
Ron.Duran@itd.idaho.gov
Signature and Date:
Public Transportation Office itd.idaho.gov/pt PTOps@itd.idaho.gov
P a g e | 3
AGREEMENT CONDITIONS
GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
AND
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS
This Agreement is between the Idaho Transportation Department (hereinafter called the STATE) and City of
Idaho Falls (hereinafter called the Subrecipient). The STATE and the Subrecipient are entering into this Agreement.
This Agreement is effective when signed by both parties.
WHEREAS the Governor of the State of Idaho has designated the Idaho Transportation Department to administer this
grant;
The parties mutually agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF WORK:
Assumption of Responsibility: The Subrecipient agrees to assume all responsibility for this Project. The
Subrecipient further agrees to abide by the appropriate mutual covenants, promises, and representations
included in the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Master Agreement, with special emphasis on the
sections pertaining to the particular funding source.
2. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS, FEDERAL CHANGES: The Subrecipient agrees to
comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and codes of the State of Idaho, the United States Government, and
local governments. The Subrecipient shall at all times comply with all applicable FTA regulations, policies,
procedures and directives, including without limitation those listed directly or by reference in the most current
FTA Master Agreement included with, and incorporated into, this overall Grant Agreement, as they may be
amended or promulgated from time to time during the term of this contract. Subrecipient’s failure to comply shall
constitute a material breach of this contract.
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grantee-resources/sample-fta-agreements/sample-fta-agreements
3. SUBRECIPIENT CAPACITY:
A. Subrecipient Legal, Financial, and Managerial Capacity: The Subrecipient assures that it has the
necessary legal, financial, and managerial capability to apply for, receive, and disburse FTA funds awarded in
this grant agreement. The Subrecipient also assures that it will implement and manage this project and project
funds in keeping with the intent and provisions of the Subrecipient's grant application and the grant
agreement.
B. Subrecipient Legal Authority to Accept This Sub-Grant: The Subrecipient certifies that it has the legal
authority to accept grant funds for this project.
C. Subrecipient Debarment/Suspension Certification: the Subrecipient entity certifies, to the best of its
knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
i. are not currently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency, per the U.S. General Services
Administration (GSA) monthly "Lists of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement or Non-procurement
Public Transportation Office itd.idaho.gov/pt PTOps@itd.idaho.gov
P a g e | 4
Programs," available on the GSA web site:
http://www.sam.gov
ii. have not, within the past three years, been convicted of or had a civil judgment against them for: a
criminal offense or fraud in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a Federal,
state, or local public transaction; a violation of Federal or state antitrust statutes; commission of
embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records; making false statements; or
receiving stolen property;
iii. are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by any governmental entity with
commission of any of the offenses listed in the paragraph above; and
iv. have not within the last three years had any Federal, state, or local public transaction terminated for cause
or default.
If the Subrecipient later becomes aware of any information contradicting these Suspension/Debarment
statements, it will promptly provide that to the State who will forward it to FTA.
If the Subrecipient cannot certify for all the Suspension/Debarment statements above, the Subrecipient
shall so indicate in a transmittal letter or message of explanation, to be returned with the signed grant
agreement (Per 49 CFR Part 29).
D. Administrative and Accounting Systems: The Subrecipient certifies it has or will establish a proper
accounting system, per generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and any Federal or State directives.
It further agrees to administer the project, retain all project records, and grant access to project records and
personnel as specified in the applicable Federal Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200).
4. FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
A. Buy America
For purchases over $150,000, the Subrecipient agrees to comply with 49 CFR Parts 661 and 663, which
provide that Federal funds may not be obligated unless steel, iron, and manufactured products used in FTA-
funded projects are produced in the United States, unless a waiver has been granted by FTA or the product is
subject to a general waiver. In regards to the purchase of vehicles, all materials and supplies purchased with
these funds, will be manufactured in the United States and have:
FY 16 & FY17: more than 60% domestic content
FY18 & FY19: more than 65% domestic content
FY20 & beyond: more than 70% domestic content
The Subrecipient will provide the appropriate certification to verify this.
https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/Buy_America_Fact_Sheet.pdf
B. Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Architecture: If this grant will be used to fully or partially fund
acquisition of individual or systems of technologies that support ITS user services as defined in the "National
ITS Architecture," the Subrecipient assures it will comply and require its contractors and its subrecipients to
comply with all applicable requirements imposed by Section V Regional ITS Architecture and Section VI
Project Implementation of the FTA National ITS Architecture Policy on Transit Projects to the extent
required by FTA and the State.
http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/its_arch_imp/policy.htm
Public Transportation Office itd.idaho.gov/pt PTOps@itd.idaho.gov
P a g e | 5
C. Charter Service Operations - The Subrecipient agrees to only provide charter service with written consent
from the STATE. If consent is given, the Subrecipient agrees to comply with 49 U.S.C. 5323(d) and 49 CFR
Part 604, which provides that recipients and subrecipients of FTA assistance are prohibited from providing
charter service using federally funded equipment or facilities if there is at least one private charter operator
willing and able to provide the service, except under one of the exceptions at 49 CFR 604.9. Any charter
service provided under one of the exceptions must be "incidental," i.e., it must not interfere with or detract
from the provision of public transportation.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/CFR-2012-title49-vol7/CFR-2012-title49-vol7-part604/content-detail.html
D. School Transportation:
i. The Subrecipient assures that it will not engage in school bus operations exclusively for the
transportation of students and school personnel, in competition with private school bus operators, per
provisions of 49 CFR Part 605.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/CFR-2011-title49-vol7/CFR-2011-title49-vol7-part605
ii. If the Subrecipient is a public transportation system, it may provide "School Tripper Service” that is
regularly scheduled public transportation service open to the public but designed or modified to
accommodate the needs of school students and personnel (must be open to the public, must serve regular
transit stops, and must be shown on transit route schedules and maps) and schools signs may NOT be
displayed on the vehicle.
E. Clean Water
i. The Subrecipient agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. The Subrecipient agrees to
report each violation to the State, and understands, and agrees that the State will, in turn, report each
violation as required to assure notification to FTA and the appropriate EPA Regional Office.
ii. The Subrecipient also agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $100,000
financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA.
https://one.nhtsa.gov/nhtsa/whatsup/tea21/grantman/html/03_dotcomrul_49cfr18.html
F. Clean Air
i. The Subrecipient agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to
the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq. The Subrecipient agrees to report each
violation to the State and understands and agrees that the State will, in turn, report each violation as
required to assure notification to FTA and the appropriate EPA Regional Office.
ii. The Subrecipient also agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $100,000
financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA.
https://one.nhtsa.gov/nhtsa/whatsup/tea21/grantman/html/03_dotcomrul_49cfr18.html
G. Lobbying Prohibition: None of the funds paid under this agreement shall be used for the purpose of
lobbying activities before the Idaho State Legislature or the U.S. Congress.
If this grant is $100,000 or more:
i. the Subrecipient certifies that it has not and will not use Federal appropriated funds to pay for influencing
or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal department or agency, a member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection
Public Transportation Office itd.idaho.gov/pt PTOps@itd.idaho.gov
P a g e | 6
with obtaining any Federal grant, cooperative agreement, or any other Federal award.
ii. the Subrecipient assures that it will require its contractors and subcontractors each to report use of non-
Federal funds for any of the lobbying activities for which use of Federal funds is prohibited, at the end of
each calendar quarter on Federal Standard Form LLL (49 CFR Part 20), and that the Subrecipient will
forward all these forms to the State.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2006-title49-vol1/content-detail.html
H. Nondiscrimination Requirements: The Subrecipient assures that no person in the United States will, on the
basis of race, color, national origin, creed, sex, or age be excluded from participating in, denied the benefits
of, or otherwise be subject to discrimination in any program or activity (particularly in the level and quality of
transportation services and transportation-related benefits) for which the Subrecipient receives Federal
assistance from FTA or USDOT. The Subrecipient agrees to comply with all requirements of US DOT Civil
Rights Act implementing regulations (49 CFR 21), and the Title VI Program Guidelines for Federal Transit
Administration Recipients (FTA Circular 4702.1) and other applicable nondiscrimination directives.
https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/FTA_Title_VI_FINAL.pdf
i. Per 49 USC 5332 (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age,
and in employment or business opportunity), Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended,
USDOT implementing regulations (49 CFR 21), 42 USC 2000d (prohibition against exclusion from
participation in, denial of benefits of, and discrimination under federally assisted programs on ground of
race, color, or national origin)
ii. The Subrecipient assures that project and project facility operations, as well as property acquisitions, will
be in accordance with the civil rights requirements and understands that this assurance extends to its
entire facility, to all facilities operated in connection with this project, and to property acquisitions. The
Subrecipient assures:
1. Its FTA-assisted benefits and related services are made available and are equitably distributed
without regard to race, color, creed, national origin, sex, age, or disability;
2. The level and quality of its FTA-assisted transit services are sufficient to provide equal access and
mobility for any person without regard to race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age;
3. Opportunities to participate in the transit planning and decision making processes are provided to
persons without regard to race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age;
4. Decisions on the location of transit services and facilities are made without regard to race, color,
creed, national origin, sex, or age;
5. Corrective and remedial action is taken to prevent discriminatory treatment of any user of services
based on race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age;
6. Any contracts or sub agreements fully or partly funded through this project will contain language to
extend civil rights assurances to contractors and subcontractors; and the Subrecipient will also
include such language in any deeds and documents which record the transfer of real property,
structures, and improvements.
I. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability: The Subrecipient assures that no person with a disability shall
be, by reason of that disability, excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected
to discrimination in any program or activity receiving or benefiting from Federal assistance. The Subrecipient
Public Transportation Office itd.idaho.gov/pt PTOps@itd.idaho.gov
P a g e | 7
assures it will comply with 49 CFR Parts 27, 37, 38, and 39, which implement the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) and amend Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The Subrecipient understands
that it also has responsibilities under ADA in the areas of employment, public accommodations, and
telecommunications.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2006-title49-vol1/content-detail.html#1000
The Subrecipient assures that any vehicle purchased or acquired through this project will be ADA accessible,
except as exempted in by the State. If the Subrecipient is awarded funds to purchase a non-ADA vehicle for
use in demand responsive service, the Subrecipient assures that this demand responsive service provides or
will provide equivalent service to disabled persons that meet ADA requirements in keeping with 49 CFR 37.
The Subrecipient assures that all new or renovated facilities to be used for the provision of public
transportation services will be ADA accessible, including facilities such as maintenance facilities, garages,
building access facilities (sidewalks need curb cuts), etc.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2007-title28-vol1/content-detail.html
The Subrecipient assures that any construction contract funded through this project will include ADA
requirements.
J. Equal Employment Opportunities (EEO): The Subrecipient assures it will:
Treat employees or job applicants fairly, without regard to race, color, creed, national origin, sex, age, or
disability;
Take affirmative action to ensure job applicants are employed and employees are treated without regard to
race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age (such action includes but is not limited to employment,
upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or
other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship);
Post notices setting forth agency EEO policy in conspicuous places and make these available to employees
and job applicants;
Assure that any contracts or sub-agreements fully or partly funded through this project will contain language
to extend EEO assurances to contractors and subcontractors.
If the Subrecipient received $1,000,000 or more of Federal assistance in the previous Federal fiscal year and
had 50 or more public-transit-related employees, it agrees to submit to the State an EEO program, which
meets FTA requirements.
K. Discrimination Complaints: The Subrecipient assures that it will notify the public that complaints of
discrimination in the provision of transportation or transportation-related services or benefits may be filed
with the State, FTA, or USDOT. The Subrecipient assures it will promptly report to the State any civil rights
complaints it receives.
L. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE): The Subrecipient assures Disadvantaged Business Enterprises
will have the maximum opportunity to compete for and perform contracts and subcontracts financed under
this project, as specified in 49 CFR 26 and per the following:
Public Transportation Office itd.idaho.gov/pt PTOps@itd.idaho.gov
P a g e | 8
i. If the Subrecipient will purchase one or more transit vehicles (excluding unmodified mass-produced vans
or unmodified pop-top vans), it assures that it will obtain from each transit vehicle manufacturer a TVM
certification, to show that the manufacturer complies with DBE requirements.
ii. The Subrecipient is subject to the State’s DBE program filed with the Federal Highway Administration
and the State’s annual DBE goal with FTA. Additionally, the Subrecipient will report its DBE activity
and results to the State semi-annually every year of the Subrecipient agreement.
https://itd.idaho.gov/civilrights/
iii. The Subrecipient assures it will not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, color, gender, age, marital
status, ability, or national origin in implementation of the project, in award or performance of any third-
party contract or sub-agreement supported with this grant, or in administration of its DBE program and 49
CFR 26. If the State receives a complaint regarding discrimination by the Subrecipient, the Subrecipient
will cooperate fully in the investigation of the complaint by the State.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2006-title49-vol1/content-detail.html
Technical assistance pertaining to DBE is available at the following link or at (208)-334-8567.
https://itd.idaho.gov/civilrights/
M. Audits: The Subrecipient certifies that it will be audited annually as required by the Federal Single Audit Act
Amendments of 1996 (per 2 CFR 200 ). The Subrecipient recognizes FTA's, USDOT's, and the State's
authority to monitor project activities, to conduct reviews and inspections, and to conduct additional audits in
keeping with 2 CFR 200, to verify compliance with grant requirements and assurances. The Subrecipient
agrees to make the necessary records available to any of the above parties upon request.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-
content/uploads/legacy_drupal_files/omb/circulars/A133/2017/Compliance_Supplement_2017.pdf
N. Commercial Driver's License (CDL)Requirement: The Subrecipient, if not a recipient of Section 5311
funds, assures that if it operates a vehicle that requires a CDL, including a vehicle capable of transporting 16
or more persons (including the driver), will have a USDOT Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration drug
and alcohol testing program.
http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/overview-drug-and-alcohol-rules
O. Drug and Alcohol Testing: If this grant is funded by either Section 5309, 5311, or 5339 the Subrecipient
agrees to establish and implement a drug and alcohol testing program that complies with 49 CFR Parts 40 and
655, produce any documentation necessary to establish its compliance with Parts 40 and 655, and permit any
authorized representative of the United States Department of Transportation or its operating administrations,
and ITD, to inspect the facilities and records associated with the implementation of the drug and alcohol
testing program as required under 49 CFR Parts 40 and 655 and review the testing process. The Subrecipient
agrees further to submit the Management Information System (MIS) reports to the State annually, as
requested by the State.
https://damis.dot.gov/Login/
P. Employee Protections, Public Transportation Employee Protective Arrangements: The Subrecipient
agrees to comply with the applicable transit employee protective requirements as follows:
i. Standard Public Transportation Employee Protective Arrangements - If this grant is funded by either
Section 5309 or Section 5316, to the extent that the Project involves public transportation operations and
to the extent required by Federal law, the Subrecipient agrees to implement the Project in accordance with
the terms and conditions that the U.S. Secretary of Labor has determined to be fair and equitable to
protect the interests of any employees affected by the Project and that comply with the requirements of 49
Public Transportation Office itd.idaho.gov/pt PTOps@itd.idaho.gov
P a g e | 9
U.S.C. § 5333(b), in accordance with U.S. DOL guidelines, “Section 5333(b), Federal Transit Law,” 29
C.F.R. Part 215, and any amendments thereto. The Subrecipient agrees to implement the Project in
accordance with the conditions stated in that U.S. DOL certification. That certification and any
documents cited therein are incorporated by reference and made part of the Grant Agreement for the
Project.
ii. Public Transportation Employee Protective Arrangements for Projects in Non-urbanized Areas
Authorized by 49 U.S.C. § 5311 - The Subrecipient agrees to comply with the terms and conditions of
the Special Warranty for the Non-urbanized Area Program that is most current as of the date of execution
of the Grant Agreement for the Project, and any alternative comparable arrangements specified by U.S.
DOL for application to the Recipient’s project, in accordance with U.S. DOL guidelines, “Section
5333(b), Federal Transit Law,” 29 C.F.R. Part 215, and any revisions thereto.
Q. Incorporation of Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Terms - The preceding provisions include, in
part, certain Standard Terms and Conditions required by DOT, whether or not expressly set forth in the
preceding contract provisions. All contractual provisions required by DOT, as set forth in FTA Circular
4220.1 are hereby incorporated by reference. Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, all FTA
mandated terms shall be deemed to control in the event of a conflict with other provisions contained in this
Agreement. The Subrecipient shall not perform any act, fail to perform any act, or refuse to comply with any
requests which would cause the State to be in violation of the FTA terms and conditions.
https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/fta-circulars/third-party-contracting-guidance
R. Conflicts of Interest Prohibited: The Subrecipient certifies that it will establish safeguards to prohibit
employees from using their positions for a purpose that is or gives the appearance of personal or
organizational conflict of interest or of being motivated by desires for personal gain for themselves or others,
particularly those with whom they have family, business, or other ties.
5. STATE REQUIREMENTS:
A. Indemnification and Insurance: In this section, "Subrecipient" includes the Subrecipient's employees,
agents, and contractors.
The Subrecipient agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the State of Idaho, its officers, agents, and
employees from and against any claim of or liability for error, omission, or negligent act of the Subrecipient
arising out of the Subrecipient’s assumption of the responsibilities for the Project set forth in this agreement.
The Subrecipient is not required to indemnify the State of Idaho for a claim of or liability for the independent
negligence of the State. If there is a claim or liability for joint negligent error or omission of the ¬Subrecipient
and the independent negligence of the State, the indemnification and hold harmless obligation shall be
apportioned on a comparative fault basis. The term "independent negligence" is negligence other than in the
State's selection, administration, monitoring, or controlling of the Subrecipient.
Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of the State’s sovereign immunity, which
immunity is hereby expressly reserved. Moreover, all of the rights, defenses, or protections provided in Idaho
Code and or in the Idaho Administrative Procedural Rules are expressly reserved.
B. Independent Contractor Status
Unless otherwise expressly stated, vendors and/or non-state entities acting pursuant to this grant shall be that
of an independent contractor and not that of an agent or employee of the state. Such parties shall be
Public Transportation Office itd.idaho.gov/pt PTOps@itd.idaho.gov
P a g e | 10
responsible for paying all employment-related taxes and benefits, such as federal and state income tax
withholding, social security contributions, worker’s compensation and unemployment insurance premiums,
health and life insurance premiums, pension contributions and similar items. Furthermore, such parties shall
indemnify the State and hold it harmless form any and all claims for taxes (including but not limited to social
security taxes), penalties, attorneys’ fees and costs that may be made or assessed against the State arising out
of the party’s failure to pay such taxes, fees or contributions.
The Subrecipient shall maintain the policies of insurance listed below, to cover losses that may be incurred as
a result of the operation and maintenance of project vehicles and/or equipment throughout their period of
required use or as a result of other activities under this agreement.
Where specific limits are shown, they shall be the minimum acceptable limits. If the Subrecipient's policy
contains higher limits, the State shall be entitled to coverage to the extent of such higher limits.
i. Automobile Liability: ITD-PT imposes minimum insurance coverage of $500,000 on all transit vehicles
procured with or rehabilitated with federal or state funds. Additionally, Sub-recipients must be in compliance with
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) insurance thresholds. The policy shall provide all damage
arising out of personal injury to or destruction of property in any one occurrence on any revenue vehicle not
covered by 49 CFR Part 387. Furthermore, ITD-PT subrecipients must be at all times in compliance with Idaho
Administrative Rule 11.13.01.
The policy shall name the Idaho Transportation Department as “loss payee” of the property damage
portion of the policy.
The Subrecipient shall provide certificate of insurance to the State, annually and at other times if
requested. Each certificate must provide for a 30-day prior notice of cancellation, non-renewal, or
material change of conditions.
The Subrecipient shall use any insurance proceeds relating to items purchased under this grant to repair
or replace the covered item(s) that has been damaged, destroyed or stolen or; where specific items are
not involved, to cover other liability related to this grant project. The title to any replacement vehicle
must show the State of Idaho as lien holder.
C. Performance Requirement: The failure of the State to insist upon strict performance by the Subrecipient of
any provision or covenant in this Agreement, in any one or more instances, may not be considered as a waiver
or relinquishment of the provision or covenant for the future. The waiver by the State of any provision or
covenant in this Agreement cannot be enforced or relied upon by the Subrecipient unless the waiver is in
writing and signed on behalf of the State.
6. TERMINATION PROVISIONS:
A. Failure to Perform: If, through any cause, the Subrecipient shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner
its obligations under this Agreement, or if the Subrecipient shall violate any of the covenants, agreements or
stipulations of this Agreement, and if after notification by the State of such failure or violation, the
Subrecipient fails to take proper corrective action within a reasonable amount of time, the State shall have the
right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to the Subrecipient of such termination and
specifying the effective date thereof. Such notice shall be given at least 15 days before the effective date of
such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps,
models, photographs, reports, construction materials, and any construction completed by the Subrecipient
under this Agreement shall, at the option of the State, become the State's property and the Subrecipient shall
Public Transportation Office itd.idaho.gov/pt PTOps@itd.idaho.gov
P a g e | 11
be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed. Failure to adhere
to Project Schedule and any reporting requirements may be deemed by the State to be a "failure to perform"
and may result in the loss of the award, at the option of the State.
B. Convenience Termination: If, due to changed circumstances, the State or the Subrecipient wishes to
terminate this Agreement prior to its completion, the initiating party shall notify the other party in writing of
its reasons for requesting the early termination. This request must be made at least 15 days prior to the
proposed termination date. If both parties agree that it is in their mutual best interests to terminate this
Agreement early, all finished or unfinished documents and other materials as described in the Failure to
Perform paragraph above shall, at the option of the State, become the State's property. If the Agreement is
terminated as provided herein, the Subrecipient shall be reimbursed for actual expenses not otherwise
reimbursed under this Agreement which were incurred by the Subrecipient during the contract period and
which are directly attributable to the Subrecipient's performance of this Agreement. The State shall also
reimburse the Subrecipient for any costs properly incurred by the Subrecipient in honoring convenience
termination clauses in its Agreements with its contractors as long as these clauses conform to the standard
convenience termination clause used by the State for similar types of contracts.
7. NONCOMPLIANCE; DISPUTES; REMEDIES
A. Recovery of Funds: In the event of a default or violation of the terms of this Agreement, the State is entitled
to recover all or part of the project funds paid to the Subrecipient. If Subrecipient does not promptly remit the
funds in response to a demand, the State may collect the debt by:
-
Making an administrative offset against payments that would be due under other grant awards or
appropriations,
-
Withholding advance payments that would otherwise be due,
-
Instituting civil action, or
-
Taking any other action permitted by law.
All remedies conferred on the State by this Agreement or any other instrument or agreement are cumulative,
not exclusive, and may be exercised concurrently or consecutively at the State’s option.
B. Enforcement: The State may take one or more actions in the event Subrecipient fails to comply with the
terms of the award. Upon written notification explaining the basis of the action, the State may suspend the
grant pending corrective action or terminate the grant. The State may impose conditions requiring correction
of noncompliance or deficiency. If conditions are imposed, the State will inform Subrecipient of the
conditions and corrective action sought, the reason for imposition, and the time allowed for completing
corrective actions.
C. Rights and Remedies: The duties and obligations imposed by the Agreement and accompanying documents
and the rights and remedies available thereunder shall be in addition to and not a limitation of any duties,
obligations, rights and remedies otherwise imposed or available by law. No action or failure to act by the
State or Subrecipient shall constitute a waiver of any right or duty afforded any of them under the Contract,
nor shall any such action or failure to act constitute an approval of or acquiescence in any breach there under,
except as may be specifically agreed in writing.
8. GRANT REQUIREMENTS:
A. Billing Procedure and Reimbursements: The Subrecipient agrees to formally request reimbursement by
submitting to the State an itemized invoice(s) for allowable project costs. Each invoice shall clearly identify each
cost being billed and shall be in a format acceptable to or specified by the State, with supporting documentation of
Public Transportation Office itd.idaho.gov/pt PTOps@itd.idaho.gov
P a g e | 12
cost and payment as required below, and other documentation as may be required by the State.
B. Requests for reimbursement must be submitted based on the following timeline:
Monthly Billing Schedule
Billing Due By
Period Beginning
Period Ending
December 31 October 1
October 31
January 31 November 1
November 30
February 28 December 1
December 31
March 31 January 1
January 31
April 30 February 1
February 28
May 31 March 1
March 31
June 30 April 1
April 30
July 31 May 1
May 31
August 31 June 1
June 30
September 30 July 1
July 31
October 31 August 1
August 31
November 30 September 1
September 30
Invoices for operating, vehicles, equipment, or facilities shall be accompanied by documentation of the formal
obligations or expenses incurred, as well as the source of the match. Supporting documentation shall be copies of
vendor invoices, unless alternate documentation accompanied by a viable written explanation is acceptable to the
State. Supporting documentation must clearly tie to the itemized costs on the invoice (annotations to facilitate
easy review are encouraged). For vehicles, other documents related to the vehicle purchase are also required prior
to payments. Please reference the ITD Capital Site for the Vehicle Reimbursement Packet.
http://itd.idaho.gov/pt
The State reserves the right to mandate alternate or specialized billing procedures in any of the following
instances:
- when a particular project is split-funded (includes grant funds from more than one source), or;
- when irregular documentation or special timing is needed by the State for some other reason.
Such alternate procedures may be issued separately, but will be provided to the Subrecipient in writing.
Payments may be withheld if the quarterly report(s) have not been received as required.
Final billing must be submitted within 60 days of the termination date listed on this grant agreement or as
amended.
The State shall reimburse funds to meet formal obligations or expenses only with satisfactory documentation.
If required documentation is determined to be incomplete, incorrect, and/or in conflict with the scope of the
project, the Subrecipient will be notified that payment of project funds is being withheld until the incomplete,
incorrect, and/or conflicting items are resolved to the State's satisfaction.
C. Local Match Available: If this grant is for a vehicle(s) and/or equipment, the Subrecipient has or will have
the required local cash match for the project by the time of delivery. If this grant is for other items, the local
match will be met as grant funds are spent.
D. Operating and Maintenance Funds Available: The Subrecipient, by the time of vehicle and/or equipment
delivery, will have or have guarantee of funds necessary to operate and maintain the project vehicle and/or
equipment in safe, clean, and mechanically sound condition through the required period of performance
Public Transportation Office itd.idaho.gov/pt PTOps@itd.idaho.gov
P a g e | 13
(useful life). The State reserves the right to require transfer of the vehicle and/or equipment to another entity if
the Subrecipient fails to meet this requirement.
E. Indirect Costs: If a federally approved indirect cost rate is negotiated between the subrecipient and the
Federal government, this rate must be used. If no such rate exists, the subrecipient may either negotiate a rate
with the pass-through entity and the subrecipient (in compliance with this part), or elect the de minimus
indirect cost rate as defined in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs, paragraph (f), if eligible.
F. Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance Requirements: The Subrecipient agrees to develop a written
maintenance program and assures that it assumes responsibility to maintain and operate the vehicles and/or
equipment obtained under this project at a high level of cleanliness, safety, and mechanical soundness,
following at a minimum, the original equipment manufacturers’ (OEM) recommended maintenance and
inspection procedures and schedules, for at least the useful life of each item, to retain warranties and meet life
expectancy of the items. The Subrecipient further assures that it will maintain ADA accessibility features in
good working order, removing vehicles with nonworking accessibility features from service and repairing
them within 5 days. The Subrecipient agrees to document all maintenance completed and all maintenance
expenditures. The State and FTA shall have the right to conduct periodic inspections for the purpose of
confirming proper maintenance.
G. Vehicle and Equipment Use and Disposition: Use and disposition of project vehicles and equipment shall
be subject to restrictions set forth by the State.
The Subrecipient assures that it will not lease or contract the operation of project vehicles without prior
written approval from the State.
If a vehicle or equipment purchased with these funds can no longer meet project needs, the Subrecipient
agrees to notify the State, indicate its condition, and follow the State's instructions.
H. Reports: The Subrecipient is required to submit quarterly reports in a format specified or provided by the
State, per instructions provided by the State. The Subrecipient will certify the accuracy of each report.
I. A grantee must submit quarterly reports under the following schedule:
Quarterly Schedule
Period Beginning
Period Ending
Report Due By
January 1
March 31
May 31
April 1
June 30
August 31
July 1
September 30
November 30
October 1
December 31
February 28
J. Capital Inventory and Agency Profile: The Subrecipient agrees to participate fully in the inventory of
publicly funded vehicles, transportation equipment, and transportation-related facilities and other
transportation related data.
K. Changes and Amendments: The Subrecipient shall not execute any amendment or change order to this
Agreement without the prior written concurrence of the State. This Agreement may only be modified or
amended by a written agreement signed by both parties.
Public Transportation Office itd.idaho.gov/pt PTOps@itd.idaho.gov
P a g e | 14
L. Reimbursement of Grant Funds: Within sixty (60) days of issuance of a final audit report to the State or, if
no audit is required, then within sixty days after acceptance by the State that the Subrecipient has met the
requirements of this grant agreement, the Subrecipient’s remaining grant balance will return to the State.
M. Travel Requirements: Subrecipient must follow State of Idaho travel guidelines for reimbursement or your
agency’s travel rules, whichever is more restrictive.
N. Program Fraud and False or Fraudulent Statements and Related Acts: The Subrecipient certifies that
any statement it has made, it makes, it may make, or causes to be made about this grant project is or will be
true and accurate. Provision of untrue or inaccurate information may constitute fraud.
9. ASSIGNMENT OF WORK TO THIRD PARTIES:
A. State Consent Required: No portion of work to be performed under this agreement shall be assigned by the
Subrecipient to any third party without written consent of the State.
B. No Federal or State of Idaho Government Obligation to Third Parties: The Subrecipient agrees that the
Federal and State governments have no liability under this agreement. The Subrecipient assures that it will
include language in any contract under this agreement that states the Federal and State governments have no
liability under the contract and require the contractor to include language to this effect in any subcontract,
except if the Subrecipient has specific written consent from the Federal and/or State governments that it/they
will accept liability.
C. Subcontracting Rules: In the event the Subrecipient subcontracts any work covered by this Agreement, the
Subrecipient shall require compliance by its subcontractors with applicable provisions, statutes or regulations
governing their legal responsibilities in public contracts.
In addition, the Subrecipient shall require compliance with all Federal, State, and local laws and regulations
and include required Federal clauses in contracts and purchase orders.
10. Procurement Requirements:
All procurements for contracted services (complementary paratransit, cabs, etc.) must go through a bidding process.
A. Procurement System:
i. The Subrecipient, assures it has or will establish a procurement system in compliance with FTA
procurement requirements in FTA Circular 4220.1 third party contracting requirements as well as any
other implementing requirements of Federal, State, or local government, including:
1. a five-year limitation on rolling stock;
2. requirement for full and open competition;
3. a prohibition against geographic preferences;
4. the use of Brooks Act procedures for procurement of architectural engineering services if the state
has not adopted a statute governing procurement of such services;
https://www.acec.org/advocacy/qbs/brooks2/
5. inclusion in its contracts all Federal clauses required by Federal laws, executive orders, or their
implementing regulations, as required by FTA Circular 4220.1;
6. inclusion in its subcontracts and sub agreements all Federal clauses required by Federal laws,
executive orders, or their implementing regulations, as required in FTA Circular 4220.1;
7. written protest procedures;
8. ethical standards of conduct;
9. use of appropriate procurement method.
https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/Third%20Party%20Contracting%20Guidan
Public Transportation Office itd.idaho.gov/pt PTOps@itd.idaho.gov
P a g e | 15
ce%20%28Circular%204220.1F%29.pdf
B. Required Provision in Procurement Notices: The following required provision shall be included in any
advertisement or invitation to bid for any procurement under this Agreement:
Statement of Financial Assistance: "Statement of Financial Assistance: This Procurement is subject to a
financial assistance grant agreement between the State of Idaho and the U.S. Department of Transportation."
C. Procurement Requirements: Subrecipient will follow the following procurement guidelines:
Subrecipients are subject to their own procurement policies, and IDAPA Title 38 when applicable. If not
applicable at a MINIMUM FEDERAL thresholds issued in OMB issued memorandum OM-18-18 must be
followed. Note: Circulars may not be updated to reflect the new procurement thresholds issued by OMB
through OM-18-18.
D. Bus and Van Testing: The Subrecipient will comply with FTA bus testing requirements applicable to heavy-
duty large and small buses; medium-duty buses; light-duty mid-size buses; and light-duty small buses,
cutaways, or modified vans (does not apply to unmodified mass-produced vans). If testing is not required, the
Subrecipient will instead obtain the manufacturer's certification that the vehicle is exempt from FTA bus
testing requirements and also obtain a list of recent purchasers of the vehicle (with contact information), to aid
evaluation prior to vendor selection.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2005-title49-vol1/content-detail.html
i. For Equipment Purchases - The Subrecipient will provide the same equipment specifications to each
prospective vendor and seek at least three bids or price quotes. The Subrecipient will submit price
quotes or bids received to the State with its preferred vendor selection noted, for State approval to
purchase. For more information see FTA Best Practices Procurement Manual,
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/procurement/third-party-procurement/best-practices-procurement-
manual
E. Pre-Award and Post-Delivery Review of New Vehicles: The Subrecipient assures it will conduct a pre-
award and/or post-delivery reviews for all new vehicles purchased under this project, as specified below. The
Subrecipient assures it will conduct these reviews per the formats and instructions provided by the State. Pre-
Award Reviews must be submitted to the State for approval
F. Vehicle Identification Numbers to State: The Subrecipient will provide each vehicle's identification number
(VIN) to the State with the first payment invoice for the particular vehicle.
G. Titles to Vehicles/Equipment & Liens:
i. Title to Project equipment other than vehicles shall rest with the Subrecipient.
ii. The Subrecipient hereby agrees that the State of Idaho is lien holder for each vehicle purchased under
this Project. The Subrecipient shall arrange with the Idaho Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to issue
the certificate of title in the name of the Subrecipient with the State of Idaho Transportation Department
Public Transportation Office itd.idaho.gov/pt PTOps@itd.idaho.gov
P a g e | 16
as lien holder. The Subrecipient shall arrange with DMV to send the original title to the State's Public
Transportation Office for this project.
iii. The State will hold a lien on the title of any vehicle purchased under this project. The Subrecipient may
request a clear title after the vehicle reaches its useful life.
The Subrecipient gives the State Power of Attorney limited to applying for a Vehicle Title from the Idaho Division of
Motor Vehicles and to requesting the Idaho Division of Motor Vehicles remove the State's lien from the vehicle title.
Public Transportation Office itd.idaho.gov/pt PTOps@itd.idaho.gov
P a g e | 17
CERTIFICATION REGARDING FEDERAL LOBBYING:
Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements:
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of
Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any
Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation,
renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting
to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of
a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall
complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub-award at
all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grant, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all
Subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered
into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title
31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000
and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
RESTRICTION ON STATE LOBBYING
None of the funds under this program will be used for any activity specifically designed to urge or influence a State or local
legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any State or local legislative body.
Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g., “grassroots”) lobbying activities, with one exception. This does not preclude
a State official whose salary is supported with FTA and/or State general funds as it pertains to this agreement from engaging in
direct communications with State or local legislative officials, in accordance with customary State practice, even if such
communications urge legislative officials to favor or oppose the adoption of a specific pending legislative proposal.
Authorized Signature for Subrecipient:
Name
Title
Phone
E-mail
Signature and Date:
Memorandum
File #: 26-321
City Council
DATE: Friday, August 28, 2026
AGENDA: Regular
FROM: Pam Alexander, Municipal Services Director
DEPARTMENT: Municipal Services
Title
Approve the Write-off of Unpaid Ambulance Service Accounts
N/A Ordinance
N/A Resolution
N/A Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
N/A Legislative Public Hearing
N/A Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
YES Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve the write-off of unpaid ambulance service accounts for the calendar dates of service 2020, 2021, and
2025 determined as past statute or uncollectible for a total of $3,395,031.25 (or take other action deemed
appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
The Ambulance Account Review and Management Committee is recommending a total request for write-off
for the 2025 calendar year-end accounts for Medicare and Medicaid published rates reduced to the maximum
allowable rates for a total of $2,957,488.32 or 87% of the total write-off request of $3.4M, with Medicare at
59% and Medicaid at 29%. The remaining 13% of the total or $437,542.93 includes 2020 and 2021 calendar
year contractual, collection agency, deceased, with no known estate, approved bankruptcy, and approved
hardship accounts. For the collection agency category total of $223,683.63, includes accounts from 2020 and
2021 where collection efforts are past statute or uncollectible as determined by the collection agency. For
comparison purposes, last year’s approved write-off request was $4M, with 48% of the write-off attributed to
Medicare and 24% to Medicaid. The approval of the write-off requests will provide accurate recording of the
city’s ambulance accounts receivable records for the fiscal year-end September 30, 2026, annual audit.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Municipal Services Departments.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 9/8/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
2022 Write-Off
Approved Request
2023 Write-Off
Approved
Request
2024 Write-Off
Approved
Request
2025 Write-Off
Request
2025 Write-off
by Percentage
4-Year Average
Write-off by
Category
Medicare
2,038,103.33
2,073,457.01
1,958,672.61
1,989,157.17
59%
2,014,847.53
Medicaid
1,018,645.50
1,123,760.60
963,174.89
968,331.15
29%
1,018,478.04
Contractual
192,635.81
365,859.00
552,470.20
165,471.46
5%
319,109.12
Collection Agency
281,937.40
253,780.79
579,345.30
223,683.63
7%
334,686.78
Hardships
15,604.00
947.51
7,336.85
48,387.84
1.0%
18,069.05
Total
3,546,926.04
3,817,804.91
4,060,999.85
3,395,031.25
100%
3,705,190.51
Source Documentation: Wittman Enterprises December 2025 month-end report and Professional Credit Active Inventory Report
dated July 28, 2026.
Calendar Year 2025 (January 1, 2025-December 31, 2025)
Ambulance Write-Off Summary
Ambulance Write-Off Summary
Calendar Year 2025 (January 1, 2025 – December 31, 2025)
8,667
9,579
11,624
10,521
10,996
13,176
14,441
15,126
14,602
13,505
10,397
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
Ambulance Call Volume by Year
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
8,667
9,579
11,624
10,521
10,996
13,176
14,441
15,126
14,602
13,505
10,397
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
-
500,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,500,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,500,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,500,000.00
4,000,000.00
4,500,000.00
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Ambulance Write-Offs by Year and Call Volume
1
Date Prepared: 5/10/2016
CITY SERVICE DELIVERY ACCOUNT WRITE-OFF POLICY
I.
SUBJECT:
City Service Delivery Account Write-Off Policy
II.
PURPOSE: To document the process for requesting City Council to review and
approve writing-off uncollectible accounts.
III.
DEFINITIONS:
a.
. An account based upon an agreement between the City and a
recipient of City services, including water, sewer, solid waste, sanitation, electricity, or
public fiber optic.
b.
. A contract, obligation, or liability not founded upon an instrument of
writing. Statute of limitation: four (4) years.
c.
Uncollectible account. An account where no payments have been made.
d.
Write-off. The process of reducing an amount owed on a service delivery city account.
e.
A contract, obligation, or liability founded upon an instrument of writing.
Statute of limitation: five (5) years.
IV.
PROCESS:
In coordination with the City Department holding the City service delivery account (pursuant to an oral
or written contract), the Municipal Services Department will submit a memorandum to the Mayor and
City Council for authorization to write off accounts as uncollectible where:
a.
no payment has been posted to the account within a four-year/five-year period. In the event a
payment is made, within the four-year/five-year period, the account may be considered collectable
for an additional four-year/five-year period;
b.
contracted collections agency determines that the account is uncollectible;
c.
the account is in the name of a deceased person with no known estate;
d. the Finance Division or Department Director recommends an account write-off (in whole or part)
because of hardship, uncollectability, payment schedule, difficulty of collection, or another business
reason;
e.
the Ambulance Account Review and Management Committee recommends write-off pursuant to
the City collections policy for that Committee.
Memorandum
File #: 26-346
City Council
DATE: Friday, September 4, 2026
AGENDA: Regular
FROM: Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw
DEPARTMENT: Mayor's Office
Title
Ordinance amending Title 1, Chapters 7, 9 and 13, Creation of a City Finance Department
☒Ordinance
☐Resolution
☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐Legislative Public Hearing
☐Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☒Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Adopt the Ordinance amending Title 1, Chapters 7, 9 and 13 and other updated titles, chapters and sections of
city ordinance to create a Finance Department, move the financial duties from the Department of Municipal
Services to the Finance Department, and designate the City Treasurer as the Director of the Finance
Department, under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete readings, and request that it be read by
title and published by summary (or take other action deemed appropriate.)
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
The creation of the City Finance Department is aligned with the Mayor and City Council’s commitment to
financial accountability, transparency, and sustainability. The stand-alone Finance Department will direct all
the financial operations of the City, including budgeting, accounting, treasury, debt management, and utility
rate-setting and billing. In addition, the department will focus on the City’s overall financial strategy and
planning, establishing accounting policy and internal controls, identifying and managing financial risk and
providing high-level financial analysis and modeling to support City decision-making.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal Department.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 9/8/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
ORDINANCE – TITLES 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, FINANCE DEPARTMENT 9.08.26
Page 1 of 10
ORDINANCE NO. _________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, AMENDING TITLE 1, CHAPTERS 7,
9, AND 13; TITLE 2, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 12; TITLE 3, CHAPTER 3, SECTION 3;
TITLE 4, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 2; TITLE 7, CHAPTERS 9 AND 10; TITLE 8,
CHAPTERS 5 ,12, AND 13; TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, SECTION 25; AND TITLE 10,
CHAPTER 1, SECTION 12; AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 11 TO TITLE 3 TO
CREATE A NEW FINANCE DEPARTMENT, DELINEATE THE RESPONSIBILITIES
OF THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT, DESIGNATE THE CITY FINANCE
DIRECTOR/TREASURER AS THE DIRECTOR OF THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT,
CREATE
CONSISTENT
TERMINOLOGY
FOR
THE
FINANCE
DIRECTOR/TREASURER AND FINANCE DEPARTMENT, AND REMOVE
RESPONSIBILITIES FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES;
CODIFICATION;
PUBLICATION
BY
SUMMARY;
AND
ESTABLISHING
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Treasurer, referred to as the Finance Manager/Treasurer, is an appointed
officer pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-204; and
WHEREAS, under City Code Title 3, Chapter 3, Section 3, the financial duties of the Finance
Manager/Treasurer currently are the responsibilities of the Department of Municipal Services; and
WHEREAS, the Finance Manager/Treasurer is currently managed by the Director of the
Department of Municipal Services; and
WHEREAS, City Council desires to create a new department known as the Finance
Department, move the financial duties from the Department of Municipal Services to the Finance
Department, and designate the City Treasurer as the Director of the Finance Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, THAT:
SECTION 1: Title 3, Chapter 3, Section 3 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is
hereby amended as follows:
3-3-3: RESPONSIBILITIES OF DEPARTMENT: The Municipal Services Department shall
have the following responsibilities and authority:
(A)
Organization of the Municipal Services Department as is deemed to be in the best
interests of the City, including organizing the Municipal Services Department into
divisions, groups, or subgroups;
ORDINANCE – TITLES 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, FINANCE DEPARTMENT 9.08.26
Page 2 of 10
(B)
Management and supervision of all City shops, garages, including all equipment
and vehicles;, and administering and maintaining all public buildings and other
real or personal property owned or leased by the City; and administering and
controlling the purchase of all equipment and supplies used by the various
departments and divisions throughout the City;
(C)
Preparation, supervision and control of the annual budget, supervision of the
general account of the City, maintaining and keeping records of all insurance
coverage, in cooperation with the Clerk; accounting for all City utility revenue;
accounting for all moneys belonging to the City, filing proper reports and financial
statements;
(D)
Custody of all moneys belonging to the City and rendering of a monthly report
under oath showing the state of the balance of all monies and funds belonging to
the City; managing and depositing all City funds; and having charge of all funds
and records of Local Improvement Districts; investing all public funds in a sound,
prudent and lawful manner and keeping a record of all unpaid checks of the City;
keeping a record of all outstanding bonds against the City, showing the amount of
each, to whom the bonds were issued and when any bonds are purchased, paid or
cancelled; collecting all utility revenue, and performing all other duties imposed
upon the office by law;
(E)
Maintenance of all financial records, in accordance with generally accepted
accounting practices, audit requirements, and as required by law, regulations, and
City policy;
(C)(F) Operation and maintenance of all computer and electronic media record-keeping
equipment for the Department; administration and supervision of all data entry,
computer programming and other record-keeping or electronic data retrieval
operations of the Department;
(D)(G) Coordination of operation and maintenance of City Information Technology
divisions, as appropriate;
(E)(H) Administration of the operating budget of the Department in accordance with the
annual appropriation Ordinance adopted by the Council; and
(F)(I) Administration, management, and assumption of such other duties, programs, and
policies as may be directed by the Mayor and Council.
SECTION 2: Title 3 the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is hereby amended to add a
new Chapter 11 as follows:
CHAPTER 11
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
SECTION:
ORDINANCE – TITLES 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, FINANCE DEPARTMENT 9.08.26
Page 3 of 10
3-11-1:
Establishment of Finance Department
3-11-2:
Appointment of Finance Director; Management
3-11-3:
Responsibilities of Finance Department
3-11-4:
No Private Duty Established
3-11-1: ESTABLISHMENT OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT: The Finance Department is hereby
established as an administrative department of the City.
3-11-2: APPOINTMENT OF FINANCE DIRECTOR; MANAGEMENT: The Finance
Department shall be managed by the Finance Director. The Finance Director shall also serve as
the City Treasurer and shall be referred to as the Finance Director/Treasurer. The Finance
Director/Treasurer shall be appointed by the Mayor, subject to confirmation by at least four (4)
members of the Council. The Finance Director/Treasurer may be removed by the Mayor, with or
without cause, subject to confirmation by a vote of at least four (4) members of the Council, or by
the Council upon its own initiative upon a unanimous vote thereof.
3-11-3: RESPONSIBILITIES OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT: The Finance Department shall
have the following responsibilities and authority:
(A)
Organization of the Finance Department as is deemed to be in the best interests of
the City, including organizing the Finance Department into divisions, groups, or
subgroups.
(B)
Preparation, supervision and control of the annual budget, supervision of the general
accounting of the City, maintaining and keeping records of all insurance coverage,
in cooperation with the Clerk and Director of Human Resources; accounting for all
moneys belonging to the City, filing proper reports and financial statements;
(C)
Custody of all moneys belonging to the City and rendering of a monthly report
under oath showing the state of the balance of all monies and funds belonging to
the City; managing and depositing all City funds; and having charge of all funds
and records of Local Improvement Districts; investing all public funds in a sound,
prudent and lawful manner and keeping a record of all unpaid checks of the City;
keeping a record of all outstanding bonds against the City, showing the amount of
each, to whom the bonds were issued and when any bonds are purchased, paid or
cancelled; collecting all utility revenue, and performing all other duties imposed
upon the office of treasurer by law;
(D)
Administration of the adopted budget of the Finance Department in accordance with
the annual appropriation Ordinance adopted by the Council;
(E)
Administration and control of the purchase of all equipment and supplies used by
the various departments and divisions throughout the City; and
(F)
Administration, management, and assumption of such other duties, programs, and
policies as may be directed by the Mayor and Council.
ORDINANCE – TITLES 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, FINANCE DEPARTMENT 9.08.26
Page 4 of 10
(G)
Oversee grant administration from pre-award through closeout, including budget
development, fiscal compliance monitoring, drawdowns/reimbursement requests,
and financial reporting to funders in accordance with federal, state, local, and
private grant requirements. Ensure compliance with applicable grant regulations
(e.g., 2 CFR Part 200/Uniform Guidance) and organizational policies, including
proper allocation of costs, tracking of matching funds, and maintenance of audit-
ready documentation.
3-11-4: NO PRIVATE DUTY ESTABLISHED: Nothing in this Chapter shall create a private
right, duty or obligation of the City in favor of any person, or give rise to any private right of
action, on account of any failure by the City or any employee of the Finance Department to
perform the duties prescribed herein.
SECTION 3: Title 1, Chapter 7, Section 1 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is
hereby amended as follows:
1-7-1: APPOINTMENT: The Mayor shall, subject to confirmation by the Council, appoint a city
clerk, finance manager/treasurerFinance Director/Treasurer, city attorney, physician and such
other appointive officers deemed necessary for the efficient operation of the City. The Mayor may
suspend or remove any person from an appointive office, subject to the confirming vote of a
majority of the Council, and the Council may, by unanimous vote without the Mayor's
concurrence, suspend or remove such officers.
SECTION 4: Title 1, Chapter 9, Section 2 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is
hereby amended as follows:
1-9-2: BONDS: Before performing any duties of their respective offices, the following officers
shall furnish an official bond in the following amounts:
Clerk
five thousand dollars ($5,000)
Finance Director/TreasurerFinance Manager/Treasurer five thousand dollars ($5,000)
The bond required for the Finance Director/Treasurer Finance Manager/Treasurer shall be
approved by the Council and shall be filed with the Clerk. The bond required for the Clerk shall
be approved by the Council and shall be filed with the Mayor.
[Remainder of section unchanged.]
SECTION 5: Title 1, Chapter 13, Section 1 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is
hereby amended as follows:
1-13-1: PRESENTATION AND ALLOWANCE OF CLAIMS:
(A)
All claims for payment for goods or services for which a written purchase order or
contract has been duly approved or authorized by the Council shall be filed with the
Finance Director/TreasurerFinance Manager/Treasurer.
ORDINANCE – TITLES 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, FINANCE DEPARTMENT 9.08.26
Page 5 of 10
(B)
All bills shall be accepted, certified for payment and paid within sixty (60) calendar
days after the billing is delivered to the Finance Director/Treasurer Finance
Manager/Treasurer, unless the claimant and the City have agreed by written contract
for a longer period of time in which payment is to be made
[Remainder of section unchanged.]
SECTION 6: Title 1, Chapter 13, Section 2 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is
hereby amended as follows:
1-13-2: DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITORIES: The Council shall direct the Finance
Director/TreasurerFinance Manager/Treasurer to designate official depositories utilized by the
City pursuant to established City policy by ordinance or resolution.
SECTION 7: Title 1, Chapter 13, Section 3 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is
hereby amended as follows:
1-13-3: INVESTMENT OF IDLE FUNDS: The Finance Director/Treasurer Finance
Manager/Treasurer is hereby authorized and empowered to invest surplus or idle funds of the City
in any investment permitted by Idaho Code Section 67-1210, and interest received on all such
investments, unless otherwise required by law or ordinance, shall be paid into the general fund of
the City.
SECTION 8: Title 2, Chapter 1, Section 12 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is
hereby amended as follows:
2-1-12: EXCLUSIVE CONTROL OF LIBRARY FUNDS AND PROPERTY.
The Board shall prepare and adopt an annual budget, stating anticipated revenues and
expenditures, indicating what support and maintenance of the Library will be required for review
and approval by the Council for the ensuing year.
All funds for the Library shall be in the custody of the City Finance Director/Treasurer Finance
Manager/Treasurer and shall be used only for Library purposes. The Board shall have control of
Library expenditures. Money shall be paid for Library purposes, only upon properly authenticated
vouchers of the Board. The Board shall not make expenditures or incur indebtedness in any year
in excess of the amount appropriated for Library purposes. The Board may hold a separate
checking account to be used to pay petty cash expenses of the Library. This account shall be
audited along with other Library funds.
SECTION 9: Title 4, Chapter 1, Section 2 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is
hereby amended as follows:
4-1-2: ISSUANCE OF LICENSES:
(A) The Clerk shall prepare license forms for licenses issued under this Title. The license
shall specify the holder's name, the type of business licensed, the principal place of
ORDINANCE – TITLES 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, FINANCE DEPARTMENT 9.08.26
Page 6 of 10
business of the licensee and the expiration date of the license. The Clerk shall account
for all licenses signed by the Mayor, shall countersign the licenses and deliver the
licenses to licensees. The Clerk shall collect all license fees and promptly deliver them
to the City Finance Director/TreasurerFinance Manager/Treasurer. The City Finance
Director/TreasurerFinance Manager/Treasurer shall issue a receipt for any license fees
received from the Clerk.
[Remainder of section unchanged.]
SECTION 10: Title 7, Chapter 9, Section 12 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is
hereby amended as follows:
7-9-12: DEFINITIONS: The words and terms used in this Sign Code shall have the meanings
indicated below.
. . . .
OFFICER: Includes officers and boards in charge of departments and the members of such
boards, and such references as to the Clerk or City Finance Director/TreasurerFinance
Manager/Treasurer, as the case may be applicable.
[Remainder of section unchanged.]
SECTION 11: Title 7, Chapter 10, Section 3 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is
hereby amended as follows:
7-10-3: AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE:
. . . .
(J)
Subsection 106.8 Payment of permits, licenses and fees shall be adopted as follows:
All costs, fees, and payments associated with any permit or license provided for in the
Fire Code shall be paid to the City of Idaho Falls City Finance Manager/Treasurer’s
Office Finance Department or as otherwise specified by the Fire Department.
[Remainder of section unchanged.]
SECTION 12: Title 8, Chapter 5, Section 1 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is
hereby amended as follows:
8-5-1: DEFINITIONS: Certain terms used in this Chapter shall have the meanings ascribed
below:
. . . .
ORDINANCE – TITLES 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, FINANCE DEPARTMENT 9.08.26
Page 7 of 10
CITY UTILITY BILLING OFFICE: The City office, under the direction of the City Finance
Director/TreasurerFinance Manager/Treasurer, that has the responsibility for billing services for
City utilities.
[Remainder of section unchanged.]
SECTION 13: Title 8, Chapter 12, Section 6 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is
hereby amended as follows:
8-12-6: ESTABLISHMENT OF AIRPORT PFC FUND: A fund known as the Airport PFC Fund
is hereby established into which all revenues derived from the collection of PFC’s shall be
deposited. The City Finance Director/Treasurer Finance Manager/Treasurer shall maintain a
separate account for each approved Project for which PFC revenue has been approved by the
Administrator. The accounting record shall identify the PFC revenue received from the collecting
carriers, interest earned on such revenue, the amounts used on each approved project and the
amount reserved for currently approved projects.
SECTION 14: Title 8, Chapter 12, Section 7 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is
hereby amended as follows:
8-12-7: AUDIT OF AIRPORT PFC FUND: At least annually during any period in which a PFC
is collected, held or used, the City Finance Director/Treasurer Finance Manager/Treasurer shall
obtain an audit of said fund by an accredited independent public accountant. The accountant shall
express an opinion of the fairness and reasonableness of the procedures for receiving, holding and
using PFC revenue. The accountant shall also express an opinion whether the quarterly report
required under Section 158.63 of the Regulations fairly represents the net transactions within said
fund. The audit may be performed specifically for the fund or conducted as part of an audit under
the Single Agency Audit Act of 1983 (31 U.S.C. Section 7501, et seq.), provided the Airport PFC
Fund is specifically addressed by the auditor. Upon request, a copy of the audit shall be provided
to each collecting carrier that remitted PFC revenue to the City in the period covered by the audit,
and to the Administrator.
SECTION 15: Title 8, Chapter 13, Section 14 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho,
is hereby amended as follows:
8-13-14: BILLINGS: Billings for fiber optic access shall be rendered based upon the terms and
conditions of the customer’s Network agreement(s) or, if there is no agreement that governs the
billing conditions the customer will be billed following the standard City utility billing polices,
practices, and rates as set from time to time by Resolution of the Council. Billings shall be deemed
paid upon receipt at the office of the City Finance Director/TreasurerFinance Manager/Treasurer.
Bills may be rounded to the nearest even dollar.
SECTION 16: Title 9, Chapter 4, Section 25 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is
hereby amended as follows:
9-4-25: NOTICE OF PARKING VIOLATIONS OUTSIDE OF THE DOWNTOWN AREA:
ORDINANCE – TITLES 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, FINANCE DEPARTMENT 9.08.26
Page 8 of 10
. . . .
(C)
Any person issued a parking notice may enter an admission in the following ways:
(1)
Depositing the notice of violation with the amount of penalty stated thereon in any
collection box designated by the Police Department;
(2)
Mailing the notice of violation with the amount of the penalty stated thereon to the
address indicated on the notice; or
(3)
Presenting the notice together with the amount of the penalty indicated thereon at
the office of the City Finance Director/TreasurerFinance Manager/Treasurer.
[Remainder of section unchanged.]
SECTION 17: Title 10, Chapter 1, Section 12 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho,
is hereby amended as follows:
10-1-12: GUARANTEE OF COMPLETION:
. . . .
(D)
Cash Deposit, Certified Check, Negotiable Bond or Irrevocable Bank Letter of Credit:
(1)
Treasurer, Escrow Agent, or Trust Company: A cash deposit, certified check,
negotiable bond, or an irrevocable bank letter of credit, such surety acceptable
to the City, shall be deposited with an escrow agent City Finance
Director/TreasurerTreasurer, or trust company;
[Remainder of section unchanged.]
SECTION 18. Savings and Severability Clause. The provisions and parts of this Ordinance are
intended to be severable. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance should be
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
clause, or phrase of this Ordinance.
SECTION 19. Codification Clause. The Clerk is instructed to immediately forward this
Ordinance to the codifier of the official municipal code for proper revision of the Code.
SECTION 20. Publication and Effective Date. This Ordinance, or a summary thereof in
compliance with Idaho Code, shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City, and
shall take effect upon its passage, approval, and publication in accordance with law.
PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho,
this ______ day of ________________, __________.
ORDINANCE – TITLES 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, FINANCE DEPARTMENT 9.08.26
Page 9 of 10
ATTEST:
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO
______________________________ ____________________________________
LINDA LUNDQUIST, CITY CLERK
LISA M. BURTENSHAW, MAYOR
(SEAL)
ORDINANCE – TITLES 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, FINANCE DEPARTMENT 9.08.26
Page 10 of 10
STATE OF IDAHO
)
) ss:
COUNTY OF BONNEVILLE
)
I, LINDA LUNDQUIST, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY:
That the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Ordinance entitled,
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, AMENDING TITLE 1, CHAPTERS 7,
9, AND 13; TITLE 2, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 12; TITLE 3, CHAPTER 3, SECTION 3;
TITLE 4, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 2; TITLE 7, CHAPTERS 9 AND 10; TITLE 8,
CHAPTERS 5 ,12, AND 13; TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, SECTION 25; AND TITLE 10,
CHAPTER 1, SECTION 12; AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 11 TO TITLE 3 TO
CREATE A NEW FINANCE DEPARTMENT, DELINEATE THE RESPONSIBILITIES
OF THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT, DESIGNATE THE CITY FINANCE
DIRECTOR/TREASURER AS THE DIRECTOR OF THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT,
CREATE
CONSISTENT
TERMINOLOGY
FOR
THE
FINANCE
DIRECTOR/TREASURER AND FINANCE DEPARTMENT, AND REMOVE
RESPONSIBILITIES FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES;
CODIFICATION;
PUBLICATION
BY
SUMMARY;
AND
ESTABLISHING
EFFECTIVE DATE.”
A copy of the full text of the ordinance is available at City Hall.
______________________________________
LINDA LUNDQUIST, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
Memorandum
File #: 26-347
City Council
DATE: Friday, September 4, 2026
AGENDA: Regular
FROM: Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw
DEPARTMENT: Mayor's Office
Title
Appointment of Finance Director/Treasurer
☐ Ordinance
☐ Resolution
☐ Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐ Legislative Public Hearing
☒ Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☐ Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Confirm the appointment of Mark Hagedorn as the City’s new Finance Director/Treasurer (or take other action
deemed appropriate.)
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
I request City Council’s confirmation of the appointment of Mark Hagedorn as the City’s new Finance
Director/Treasurer. Attached please find my appointment memo, as well as a resume for Mr. Hagedorn, who
currently serves as City Treasurer. The specific roles and responsibilities of this position are outlined in the
amended Title 1, Chapters 7, 9 and 13, and updated chapters, titles and sections of City Code.
The City’s Legal Department has prepared and reviewed the ordinance creating the new Finance
Department, as well as the roles and responsibilities of the Finance Director/Treasurer.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 9/8/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
As outlined in the amended Title 1, Chapters 7, 9 and 13, and other updated titles, chapters and
sections of city ordinance, the City’s new Finance Department will be managed by a Finance
Director who will also serve as City Treasurer and shall be referred to as the Finance
Director/Treasurer.
I hereby appoint Mark Hagedorn, our City Treasurer, to the position pending Council
confirmation.
Mr. Hagedorn has been with the City since 2012, serving as a lead accountant and City
Controller before becoming City Treasurer/Finance Manager in 2022. During his tenure, he has
directed all aspects of City financial management, including billing, receivables, accounting, the
financial reporting of city revenues and investment activities and preparation of the City budget.
In his various roles, he has demonstrated he has the experience and skills necessary to take on
the additional responsibilities of the City’s chief financial officer, with a focus on overseeing the
City’s overall financial strategy. Those duties would include establishing accounting policy and
internal controls; certifying the accuracy of the City’s financial reports, identifying and managing
financial risk, and providing high-level financial analysis and modeling to support City decision-
making.
Mr. Hagedorn will be an asset as we continue our focus on accountability, transparency and
financial sustainability within the City.
TO:
City Council
FROM: Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw
DATE: Sept. 4, 2026
RE:
Appointment of New Finance Director
Mark Hagedorn
Leader, Problem-Solver, Team Player
1018 Ross Ave
Ammon, Idaho 83406
(208)-270-9087
markthagedorn@gmail.com
EXPERIENCE
City Treasurer/Finance Manager
December 2022 - Present
City of Idaho Falls
● Performs supervisory and professional duties in directing and
controlling City financial management, including billing, receivables,
accounting and financial reporting of city revenues and investment
activities, preparation of the budget, internal and external audit
procedures.
● Manages the day-to-day operations of the division; set work priorities;
develops guidelines and deadlines, directs financial management
processes; serves as administrative advisor and liaison to City council,
committees, and boards as needed to inform and apprise on fiscal
condition of the city; provides technical insight and recommendations
related to determining fiscal policies, goals and objectives
● Directs the activities of the Finance Administration Division, including
preparation of the budget; directs staff in reconciliation of all financial
records; prepares all financial statements for audit; approves all
requests for expenditures from Department Directors.
City Controller
February 2016 - December 2022
City of Idaho Falls
● Performed professional duties in directing and controlling City
financial management, including preparation of the budget, internal
and external audit procedures and insurance programs.
● Maintains accounting for City Revenues and Expenditures to ensure
compliance with all Ordinances and Fiscal Procedures; approves all
requisitions.
● Directs activities of Accounts Payable and Payroll processes,
including internal controls, payment processing, and reconciliations.
Lead Accountant
December 2012 - February 2016
City of Idaho Falls
● Assisted City Controller in financial management of the entity.
● Oversaw the day to day duties for accounts payable.
● Responsible for internal auditing functions
● Responsible for audit preparation documents
● City Risk Manager responsible for workers compensation and liability
claim processes
Senior Auditor
April 2006 - December 2012
Colby & Powell, PLLC
● Public CPA assigned auditing local governments and nonprofit
organizations
● Assisted in preparation go individual and business tax returns
EDUCATION
BYU-Idaho
Graduated 2005
● Bachelors of Science of Accounting
CERTIFICATIONS
● Certified in Public Accounting
○ Idaho License July 2013 - Present
○ Arizona License May 2010 - April 2015 Expired
Memorandum
File #: 26-343
City Council
DATE: Wednesday, September 2, 2026
AGENDA: Regular
FROM: Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
DEPARTMENT: Mayor's Office
Title
Ordinance Repealing Title 2, Chapter 8, Dissolving the Sister Cities Advisory Committee and Releasing its
Members
☒Ordinance
☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐Legislative Public Hearing
☐Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☐Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Adopt the Ordinance repealing Title 2, Chapter 8, of the Idaho Falls City Code, under a suspension of
the rules requiring three complete readings, and request that it be read by title and published by
summary (or take other action deemed appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
The City of Idaho Falls and Tokai-Mura entered into a Sister-City Alliance and International Friendship in July
1981. The City established a Sister City Committee (whose name was later changed to Sister Cities Advisory
Committee) and was tasked with formalizing the financial relationship between the City and the Sister Cities
Adult and Youth programs in the community and pursuing economic relations with Tokai-Mura. The
committee has been in existence for over nine years and has faithfully discharged its duties and is no longer
needed to facilitate the City’s ongoing relationship as a Sister City with Tokai-Mura.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Municipal Services Departments.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 9/8/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
ORDINANCE – TITLE 2, Chapter 8 SISTER CITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE 9.08.26
Page 1 of 3
ORDINANCE NO. _________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, REPEALING TITLE 2, CHAPTER 8,
SISTER CITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND RELEASING SISTER CITIES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY;
CODIFICATION;
PUBLICATION
BY
SUMMARY;
AND
ESTABLISHING
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Japanese city of Tokai-Mura and the City of Idaho Falls entered into an
Agreement to Establish a Sister-City Alliance and International Friendship on July 3, 1981; and
WHEREAS, the City established a Sister City Committee by way of Ordinance No. 3128 on
July 27, 2017; and
WHEREAS, Council changed the committee’s name to the Sister Cities Advisory Committee
and made other amendments to clarify the duties of the committee via Ordinance No. 3386, which
was adopted on May 13, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the Sister Cities Advisory Committee was tasked with formalizing the financial
relationship between the City and the Sister Cities Adult and Youth programs, promoting and
expanding the Sister Cities presence and programs in the community, and pursuing economic
relations with Tokai-mura; and
WHEREAS, the Sister Cities Advisory Committee has been highly successful in achieving the
first two goals and in laying the groundwork for establishing economic relations;
WHEREAS, the Sister Cities Advisory Committee has been in existence for over nine years
and has discharged its duties faithfully; and
WHEREAS, the Sister Cities Advisory Committee is no longer needed to facilitate the City’s
ongoing relationship as a sister city with Tokai-Mura; and
WHEREAS, Council wishes to give its sincerest thanks to the committee members, both past
and current, who have served faithfully over the years on the Sister Cities Advisory Committee;
and
WHEREAS, Council desires to release the Sister Cities Advisory Committee members from
their responsibilities as of October 1, 2026.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, THAT:
ORDINANCE – TITLE 2, Chapter 8 SISTER CITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE 9.08.26
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 1: Title 2, Chapter 8 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is hereby
REPEALED.
SECTION 2: All current committee members of the Sister Cities Advisory Committee, both
voting members and ex-officio non-voting members, are hereby removed from their roles as
members of the Sister Cities Advisory Committee as of the effective date of this Ordinance.
SECTION 3. Savings and Severability Clause. The provisions and parts of this Ordinance are
intended to be severable. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance should be
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
clause, or phrase of this Ordinance.
SECTION 4. Codification Clause. The Clerk is instructed to immediately forward this
Ordinance to the codifier of the official municipal code for proper revision of the Code.
SECTION 5. Publication and Effective Date. This Ordinance, or a summary thereof in
compliance with Idaho Code, shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City, and
shall take effect on October 1, 2026, after its passage, approval, and publication in accordance
with law.
PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho,
this ______ day of ________________, __________.
ATTEST:
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO
______________________________
____________________________________
LINDA LUNDQUIST, CITY CLERK
LISA M. BURTENSHAW, MAYOR
(SEAL)
ORDINANCE – TITLE 2, Chapter 8 SISTER CITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE 9.08.26
Page 3 of 3
STATE OF IDAHO
)
) ss:
COUNTY OF BONNEVILLE
)
I, LINDA LUNDQUIST, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY:
That the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Ordinance entitled,
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, REPEALING TITLE 2, CHAPTER 8,
SISTER CITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND RELEASING SISTER CITIES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY;
CODIFICATION;
PUBLICATION
BY
SUMMARY;
AND
ESTABLISHING
EFFECTIVE DATE.”
A copy of the full text of the ordinance is available at City Hall.
______________________________________
LINDA LUNDQUIST, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
Memorandum
File #: 26-328
City Council
DATE: Thursday, September 10, 2026
AGENDA: Regular
FROM: Ian Turner, Airport Director
DEPARTMENT: Airport
Title
Approve Additional Services Request with T.O. Engineers (Ardurra) for Terminal Renovation and Expansion
Phase 3 (Priority 1A-Phase 1)
☐Ordinance
☐Resolution
☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐Legislative Public Hearing
☐Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☒Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve Additional Services Request 2 to Work Order 24-01 with T.O. Engineers, now Ardurra, related to the
Terminal Renovation and Expansion Phase 3 (Priority 1A - Phase 1) or take other action deemed appropriate.
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
T.O. Engineers, Inc., now Ardurra, was selected for a slate of projects in April 2019 that included terminal work
for the Idaho Falls Regional Airport. Work Order 24-01 sought to produce construction documents for the
totality of Terminal Renovation and Expansion Phase 3 (Priority 1A - Phase 1A) for a total of $1,712,922.50. To
address increased project costs, lack of grant funding, and a rephasing of the project, Additional Services
Request #1 increased the cost of Work Order 24-01 by $427,408.74 which included producing the standalone
Utility and Infrastructure Package, currently underway.
As the terminal project progresses through Priority 1A - Phase 1, additional services are necessary to deliver
two final packages for this phase of terminal renovation and expansion. The first package is the footings and
foundation package, and the second package is building out the expansion and renovation of existing terminal
space including most of the Phase 1 elements and elements that were anticipated to be in Phase 2 including
the ticket lobby, Airline Ticket Offices, bag screening room, and restrooms. The total fee for these additional
services is $1,630,820.20. $388,850.92 remains in previously approved funds under Work Order 24-01 from
when the project was paused in 2024. This amount represents the remaining effort to complete the design of
elements in the Phase 1 area while the remainder of the request represents the effort to design the elements
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 9/8/2026
Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
File #: 26-328
City Council
in the Phase 2 area. Therefore, the total for this additional services request is $1,242,969.28. Funding is
available in existing Federal Aviation Administration grants, an independent fee estimate has been performed,
and the Federal Aviation Administration has concurred with this fee.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Municipal Services Departments.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 9/8/2026
Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
Work Order 24-01
Amendment #2
August 18, 2026
PAGE A-1
ADDITIONAL SERVICES REQUEST #2
WORK ORDER 24-01
IDAHO FALLS REGIONAL AIRPORT (IDA)
IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO
TERMINAL RENOVATION AND EXPANSION PHASE 3 (PRIORITY 1A – PHASE 1) –
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
This Amendment (#2) is attached to and incorporated into Work Order 24-01 for services related
to the Terminal Renovation and Expansion Phase 3 (Priority 1A – Phase 1) Construction
Documents (CDs) project at the Idaho Falls Regional Airport (IDA).
ADDITIONS TO THE SCOPE OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES:
The Scope of Work is attached as Exhibit A.
MODIFICATIONS TO THE FEE ESTIMATE:
Fees have been calculated using current Fee Schedules. A detailed Fee Proposal dated August
6, 2026 is attached as Exhibit B. Total fees for this Amendment are summarized below:
Task
Labor
Expenses
Total Fee
VI. Project Definition and Management
$92,965.00
$540.00
$93,505.00
VII. Footing and Foundation Bid Package
$321,900.00
$5,200.20
$327,100.20
VII. Additional Services Request
$1,166,375.00
$43,840.00
$1,210,215.00
Subtotal
$1,581,240.00
$49,580.20
$1,630,820.20
Less Fee Remaining
($388,850.92)
Total Amendment #2
$1,241,969.28
Work Order 24-01
Amendment #2
August 18, 2026
PAGE A-2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Client and Consultant have made and executed this AMENDMENT
#2 to Work Order 24-01 the day and year first above written.
FOR:
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS,
By:
Title:
Date:
FOR:
T-O ENGINEERS, LLC.
By:
Nathan Cuvala, P.E.
Title:
AV03 Group Lead
Date:
Exhibit A — Scope of Work
Work Order 24-01 – Amendment #2
AIP TBD - Scope of Work
June 2026
PAGE A-1
ADDITIONAL SERVICES REQUEST #2
WORK ORDER 24-01
IDAHO FALLS REGIONAL AIRPORT (IDA)
IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO
TERMINAL RENOVATION AND EXPANSION PHASE 3 (PRIORITY 1A – PHASE 1) –
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
This additional services request is a continuation of the services described in Work Order 24-01.
BACKGROUND
The Idaho Falls Regional Airport (IDA) is undertaking a project to remodel and expand the existing terminal
building. Since 2019, passenger enplanement levels have continued to break records. The airport has
increased from three airlines in 2020 to five airlines today with the potential for additional carriers to start
service. In 2024, more than 600,000 passengers used the airport. However, several terminal facilities are
limiting the addition of new airlines including ticketing, baggage screening, and baggage makeup.
IDA, with the assistance of Ardurra and Alliance, completed a Concept Budget Report (CBR) in 2022 that
outlined a series of future terminal improvements. Following the CBR, Ardurra and Alliance began
Schematic Design (SD) of Priority 1A, as defined in the 2022 CBR. Ardurra serves as the Prime Consultant
with Alliiance Architects (Alliiance) serving as the lead architect. Ardurra leads the civil and landscape
architecture design and has subcontracts with Alliiance (Lead Architect), Strata (Geotechnical) and Dioptra
(Survey). Alliiance, as lead architect, has subcontracts with Swanson Rink (Baggage Screening and
Conveyance), Michaud Cooley Erickson (Mechanical, Plumbing, and Electrical Engineering), Faith Group
(Information Technology, Security, Common-Use Technologies, Public Address), Meyer Borgman Johnson
(Structural), and Entro (Wayfinding/Signage). Priority 1A of the project is being delivered using the
Construction Manager – General Contractor (CM-GC) model with Clayco serving as the CM-GC. Clayco
was selected as the CM-GC in July of 2023 and is contracted separately with the Owner. SD was completed
in the Spring of 2023 and at that time the project was split into three phases to meet the anticipated budget.
Priority 1A Phase 1 included expansion of outbound baggage area, airline ticket offices, and the ticket lobby
as well as adding 2nd floor shell space over the outbound baggage expansion area. Priority 1A Phase 2
included an additional expansion and remodel of the ticket lobby and baggage screening area including
new public restrooms. Priority 1A Phase 3 included expansion and remodel of the great hall with a new 2nd
floor exit area that led directly to baggage claim along with new public restrooms at baggage claim. Due to
the estimated construction costs, only the work under Priority 1A Phase 1 was carried forward.
The design team is currently under contract to provide Construction Document (CD) Services for Priority
1A – Phase 1 under Work Order 24-01. Priority 1A – Phase 1 includes an expansion of the outbound
baggage area, baggage screening area, the ticketing lobby, airline ticket offices, 1st and 2nd level gate hold
rooms as well as major terminal building systems to serve the future expanded building. The design team
was working to finalize the design and prepare CDs for Priority 1A – Phase 1 in March 2024 when the
project went on hiatus due to an incomplete funding picture. In 2025, the design team completed contract
documents for Phase 0A, a Utilities and Infrastructure (UIP) package that included the terminal building
Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing (MEP) system upgrades, utility relocations, and site work required to
allow the building expansion to proceed. Clayco used this package to establish a Guaranteed Maximum
Price (GMP) of approximately $12 Million for the UIP work and started construction in the summer of 2025.
This work is scheduled to be completed in September of 2026. The airport recently received
Congressionally Directed Spending through the Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 appropriation in the amount of $12
Million and is now ready to move forward with the larger project. The airport plans to move forward with
elements of Priority 1A Phase 1 and Phase 2 with an estimated construction value of $45 Million.
Work Order 24-01 – Amendment #2
AIP TBD - Scope of Work
June 2026
PAGE A-2
ADDITIONAL SERVICES OVERVIEW
The design team was working to complete CDs for Priority 1A Phase 1 when the project was paused in
March of 2024. At that time, Priority 1A Phase 1 included a single story expansion of the ticket lobby to the
south, a two level expansion of the area behind the ticket lobby, and a two level expansion of the bag
makeup area with the 2nd level comprised of mostly unfinished future gatehold space with a small expansion
of the existing gatehold and structural reconfiguration of the building to meet covered mall code. In order to
provide funding for Phase 2, elements of Phase 1 are being reduced. The reduced elements include a
single level expansion of the area behind the new ticket lobby, and a single level smaller expansion of the
bag makeup area. The expansion of the bag makeup area will place a single outbound baggage carousel
and conveyors in their ultimate locations, and the floor of the future second level will be poured with the
roof sitting on top of the floor.
In order to keep Clayco working onsite and prevent the need to remobilize, an initial bid package will be
prepared that includes footing and foundations for the ticket lobby expansion to the south. This package
will also include MEP and site utility information for locating under slab conduits and piping. A second larger
package will be prepared with the remaining elements of Phase 1 and Phase 2.
The project elements being carried forward include:
Basement:
•
Footings and foundations for expansion area (Outbound baggage makeup, south ticket lobby, and
vestibules/restroom block).
Ground Level:
•
New Expansion Area: ~21,000 SF (Outbound Baggage Makeup, Ticketing Hall Expansion, Airline
Ticket Offices (ATOs), Infrastructure support spaces (Airport Main Telecommunications Room
(TR), Airline TR, Electrical Room, Janitorial and Roof Access, Vestibules (2), Restroom Block and
Janitorial Spaces). Outbound Baggage Makeup will include the future floor of the 2nd level under
the roof. Expansion of the restroom block to the east will require reconfiguration of the exterior
canopy, sidewalk and roadway in front of the terminal building.
•
Renovation of existing ticket lobby building: ~16,000 SF (ticket lobby, outbound baggage, push
ticket counter wall back, relocation of baggage screening room, ATOs, single user restrooms,
circulation)
Roof:
•
Full replacement of existing ticket lobby roof and removals of end-of-life Air Handling Units (AHUs).
Patch and infill curbs and pads with AHU removals.
SCOPE OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
VI. Project Definition and Management
A. Project Definition. Work with the Airport and Clayco to determine the project elements that can be
carried forward considering the revised construction budget. This task includes analyzing options
for the outbound baggage area considering the ultimate building footprint and the project budget.
Meet with the Airport and Clayco to review options, cost estimates, and funding to finalize project
elements.
B. Prepare Scope of Work and fee estimate for the work to be included.
Work Order 24-01 – Amendment #2
AIP TBD - Scope of Work
June 2026
PAGE A-3
C. Additional Project Management. This work is estimated to add approximately eight (8) months to
the project duration.
D. Additional Grant Administration. Prepare grant applications and administer up to three (3) additional
AIP grants using both traditional AIP and IIJA funding sources.
E. Prepare an eligibility analysis of the revised project area for both AIP and PFC/IIJA eligibility. This
task includes a reconciliation of eligibility and the federal share for the six grants (AIP 059, 061,
062, 065, 066, and 067) that have already been issued and reimbursements received as well as
the upcoming IIJA grant that will be issued in Fiscal Year (FY) 2026.
VII. Footings and Foundation Bid Package
Coordinate and complete Design Development (DD) and CD-level/bid set drawings and specifications (in
conjunction with IDA, Clayco, and Subconsultants), for the footings and foundation package including under
slab conduits and piping. Coordinate with architectural, structural, technology, and MEP disciplines for
footings, foundations, and underground utilities package. As the layout of the building has changed, the
structural design will be revised to incorporate the new layout and place expansion joints and rooflines in
the optimal location. The plan set is anticipated to include approximately 50 sheets.
A. Prepare DD Package. Alliiance (Aii), Michaud Cooley Erickson (MCE), Meyers Borgman Johnson
(MBJ), Faith Group, and Ardurra will coordinate on scope in the ticket lobby expansion area to
prepare 60% design drawing and outline specification package for footings, foundations, and
underground utilities including under slab MEP and technology. This includes separating and
rephasing project elements.
B. Prepare CD Package (100%) / Issue for Bid, Permitting, and Construction (IFB/IFP/IFC)
a. Provide CD-level engineering system design and coordination (structural, mechanical,
electrical, Information Technology (IT), civil)
b. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination with all listed disciplines (sheet list, itemize
required drawings and coordination).
c. Provide CD-level specifications (in conjunctions with IDA, Clayco, and Consultants)
d. Issue drawings to City of Idaho Falls Building Department for permitting.
C. CM/GC Bidding Assistance
a. Assist the CM/GC with documentation questions for pricing the early release packages.
b. Respond to substitution requests and Requests for Information (RFIs) from the documents.
D. Meetings for the footings and foundation package to facilitate and complete the work are anticipated
as follows:
a. Consultant Coordination Meetings. Weekly 1.5-hour meetings with the consultant team for 8
weeks.
b. Bi-weekly OAC meetings with the Airport and Clayco for 8 weeks.
c. Code official meeting and coordination for footing and foundation package. This includes one
(1) meeting with IDA and the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) including meeting preparation
time.
d. Owner review meetings for footings and foundation package. This includes two (2) meetings
with IDA staff to review the proposed drawings and solicit feedback.
Work Order 24-01 – Amendment #2
AIP TBD - Scope of Work
June 2026
PAGE A-4
VIII. Revised Phase 1 and Phase 2 Bid Package
Coordinate and complete DD and CD-level/bid set drawings and specifications (in conjunction with IDA,
Clayco, and Subconsultants), for revised Phase 1 and Phase 2 package. Coordinate with architectural,
structural, technology, and MEP disciplines. The plan set is anticipated to include approximately 400 sheets.
A.
Prepare DD Package. Aii, MCE, MBJ, Faith Group, Swanson Rink, Entro, and Ardurra will
coordinate on scope for the south ticketing expansion and buildout, existing ticket lobby renovation,
ATO reconfigurations, building systems rooms, vestibules, ticket lobby restroom block, outbound
baggage room, and curbside canopy to prepare 60% design drawing and outline specification
package. Finalize the layout and finishes of multiple project areas including the outbound baggage
room, ticket lobby, restroom block, ATOs, and curbside. This includes separating and rephasing
project elements into one package.
a. Provide DD-level engineering system design and coordination (structural, mechanical,
electrical, baggage, IT, civil)
i. ATO Layout. Coordinate with the airport to determine the layout of the ATO space.
ii. Restroom Block Layout. Coordinate with airport to finalize the size and layout of the
restroom block including storage space.
iii. Finishes, and Fixtures. Finalize selection of finishes and fixtures in the restroom block,
ticket lobby, and ATO spaces.
iv. Common Use. Evaluate the implementation of common use at both ticketing and the
gate counters with the airport. Consider both full and partial implementation of common
use including common use kiosks.
v. Baggage Conveyor: Finalize layout of baggage conveyor system in the ticket lobby,
baggage screening area, and outbound baggage room.
vi. Curbside Canopy. Curbside canopies were not designed previously. An allowance
based on an estimated weight of structural steel was used for cost estimating. Evaluate
options for curbside canopies given the layout of the restroom block, storage room,
and the front of terminal sidewalks and roadway.
vii. Terminal Curbside. In coordination with the Curbside Canopy and Restroom Block,
layout the sidewalk, curbing and roadway in front of the terminal building.
viii. Construction Phasing. Reevaluate construction phasing with the combined project
elements including work to the curbside of the terminal.
Provide DD-level drawings, specification outline, and coordination with all listed disciplines
(sheet list, itemize required drawings and coordination).
B.
Prepare CD Package (100%) / Issue for Bid, Permitting, and Construction (IFB/IFP/IFC)
a. Provide CD-level engineering system design and coordination (structural, mechanical,
electrical, IT, civil)
b. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination with all listed disciplines (sheet list, itemize
required drawings and coordination).
c. Provide CD-level specifications (in conjunctions with IDA, Clayco, and Consultants)
d. Issue drawings to City of Idaho Falls Building Department for permitting.
C.
CM/GC Bidding Assistance
a. Assist the CM/GC with documentation questions for pricing the early release packages.
b. Respond to substitution requests and RFIs from the documents.
Work Order 24-01 – Amendment #2
AIP TBD - Scope of Work
June 2026
PAGE A-5
D.
Meetings for the full design package to facilitate and complete the work are anticipated as follows:
a. Consultant Coordination Meetings. Weekly 1.5-hour meetings with the consultant team for 20
weeks.
b. Bi-weekly OAC meetings with the Airport and Clayco for 20 weeks.
c. Airline coordination meetings. This includes four (4) airline coordination meetings to review the
design.
d. TSA coordination meetings. This includes two (2) meetings with TSA officials to review the
baggage screening room layout and conveyor system.
e. Code official meetings and coordination and drawing review for full design package. This
includes two (2) meetings with IDA and the AHJ including meeting preparation time.
f.
City planning meetings. This includes two (2) meetings with city planning and engineering to
discuss the project.
g. Owner review meetings for full design package. This includes four (4) meetings with IDA staff
to review the proposed drawings and solicit feedback.
Exhibit B —- Fee Proposal
8/6/2026
Full Team by Task
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(A)+(B)+(C)+(D)
(E)
(A)+(B)+(C)+(D)-(E)
Labor
Expenses
Travel/Per
Diem
Special
Services
Sub Total
Less Fee
Remaining
Amount Requested
VI. Project Definition and Management
$92,965.00
$540.00
$0.00
$93,505.00
VII. Footing and Foundation Bid Package
$321,900.00
$1,870.00
$3,330.20
$327,100.20
VIII. Revised Phase 1 and Phase 2 Bid Package
$1,166,375.00
$6,780.00
$37,060.00
$1,210,215.00
Totals
$1,581,240.00
$9,190.00
$40,390.20
$0.00
$1,630,820.20
$388,850.66
$1,241,969.54
By Firm
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(A)+(B)+(C)+(D)
(E)
(A)+(B)+(C)+(D)-(E)
Labor
Expenses
Travel/Per
Diem
Special
Services
Sub Total
Less Fee
Remaining
Amount Requested
Ardurra - Civil
$196,490.00
$1,140.00
$1,305.00
$198,935.00
$96,186.00
$102,749.00
Alliiance - Architecture
$700,780.00
$4,080.00
$17,371.20
$722,231.20
$138,723.17
$583,508.03
MCE - Mech and Elec Eng
$200,720.00
$1,170.00
$11,580.80
$213,470.80
$57,362.32
$156,108.48
Faith Group - IT and Security
$126,080.00
$730.00
$2,895.20
$129,705.20
$31,315.15
$98,390.05
MBJ - Structural
$194,280.00
$1,120.00
$4,342.80
$199,742.80
$42,143.75
$157,599.05
Swanson Rink - Baggage Handling Consultant
$100,720.00
$590.00
$0.00
$101,310.00
$13,169.92
$88,140.08
Entro - Wayfinding/Signage
$62,170.00
$360.00
$2,895.20
$65,425.20
$9,950.61
$55,474.59
Totals
$1,581,240.00
$9,190.00
$40,390.20
$0.00
$1,630,820.20
$388,850.92
$1,241,969.28
Summary by Task
Workplan and Fee Estimate
IDA (Idaho Falls Regional Airport) - TERMINAL EXPANSION Phase 1 - ASA #2
Summary by Task
8/6/2026
Ardurra - Civil
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(A)+(B)+(C)+(D)
Travel/Per
Special
Amount
Labor
Expenses
Diem
Services
Requested
VI. Project Definition and Management
$33,600.00
$190.00
$0.00
$33,790.00
VII. Footing and Foundation Bid Package
$44,380.00
$260.00
$435.00
$45,075.00
VIII. Revised Phase 1 and Phase 2 Bid Package
$118,510.00
$690.00
$870.00
$120,070.00
Totals
$196,490.00
$1,140.00
$1,305.00
$0.00
$198,935.00
Ardurra - Civil
Total
Senior Project
Manager
Project Manager Project Engineer
Staff Engineer
Construction
Manager
Project
Coordinator
Project
Accountant
Total Cost
Hours
$335.00
$240.00
$165.00
$140.00
$190.00
$120.00
$90.00
for Labor
Labor
426
44
102
72
96
0
112
0
$0.00
Ardurra - Civil
Total
Senior Project
Manager
Project Manager Project Engineer
Staff Engineer
Construction
Manager
Project
Coordinator
Project
Accountant
Total Cost
Hours
$335.00
$240.00
$165.00
$140.00
$190.00
$120.00
$90.00
per Item
A. Project Definition
10
6
4
$2,970.00
B. Prepare Scope of Work
24
8
8
8
$5,560.00
C. Additional Project Management
28
4
12
12
$5,660.00
D. Additional Grant Administration
90
2
8
80
$12,190.00
E. Prepare Eligibility Analysis
36
4
8
24
$7,220.00
Estimated Total Labor
188
24
40
24
0
0
100
0
0.00
$33,600.00
Production Copier
$140.00
$140.00
Postage and Freight
$50.00
$50.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$190.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental / Other
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Travel
$0.00
Total
$8,040.00
$9,600.00
$3,960.00
$0.00
$0.00
$12,000.00
$0.00
$190.00
$33,790.00
Workplan and Fee Estimate
IDA (Idaho Falls Regional Airport) - TERMINAL EXPANSION Phase 1 - ASA #2
Summary by Task
Whole Project Labor Summary
VI. Project Definition and Management
Ardurra - Civil
Total
Senior Project
Manager
Project Manager Project Engineer
Staff Engineer
Construction
Manager
Project
Coordinator
Project
Accountant
Total Cost
Hours
$335.00
$240.00
$165.00
$140.00
$190.00
$120.00
$90.00
per Item
A. Prepare DD Package
62
2
8
12
40
$10,170.00
B. Prepare CD Package (100%)
a. Provide CD-level design and coordination
28
4
8
16
$4,520.00
b. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination with listed diciplines
62
2
8
12
40
$10,170.00
c. Provide CD-level specifications
26
2
8
8
8
$4,870.00
d. Issue drawings for permitting
18
2
4
8
4
$3,430.00
C. CM/GC Bidding Assistance
a. Assist the CM/GC with documentation questions
6
2
4
$1,630.00
b. Respond to substitution requests and RFIs
4
4
$960.00
D. Meetings
a. Consultant Coordination Meetings (weekly at 1.5 hours for 8 weeks)
12
12
$2,880.00
b. Bi-Weekly OAC meetings with Airport and Clayco
8
4
4
$2,300.00
c. Code official meeting and coordination (1 meeting with IDA and the AHJ + prep time)
4
2
2
$1,150.00
d. Owner review meetings (2 meetings with IDA)
8
4
4
$2,300.00
Estimated Total Labor
238
20
62
48
96
0
12
0
0.00
$44,380.00
Production Copier
$190.00
$190.00
Postage and Freight
$70.00
$70.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$260.00
Mileage (1 person-trips)
$435.00
$435.00
Flight/s (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Travel
$435.00
Total
$6,700.00
$14,880.00
$7,920.00
$13,440.00
$0.00
$1,440.00
$0.00
$0.00
$45,075.00
VII. Footing and Foundation Bid Package
Ardurra - Civil
Total
Senior Project
Manager
Project Manager Project Engineer
Staff Engineer
Construction
Manager
Project
Coordinator
Project
Accountant
Total Cost
Hours
$335.00
$240.00
$165.00
$140.00
$190.00
$120.00
$90.00
per Item
A. Prepare DD Package
0
$0.00
a. Provide DD-level engineering system design and coordination
0
$0.00
i. ATO Layout
2
2
$670.00
ii. Restroom Block, Storage Rooms, Vestibules
26
2
4
8
12
$4,630.00
iii. Finishes and Fixtures
2
2
$670.00
iv. Common Use
4
4
$1,340.00
v. Baggage Conveyor
2
2
$670.00
vi. Curbside Canopy
14
2
4
8
$2,950.00
vii. Terminal Curbside
62
2
4
16
40
$9,870.00
viii. Construction Phasing
20
4
8
8
$4,580.00
b. Provide DD-level drawings, specification outline, and coordination with listed disciplines
62
2
4
16
40
$9,870.00
B. Prepare CD Package (100%)
a. Provide CD-level engineering system design and coordination
42
2
4
12
24
$6,970.00
b. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination with listed disciplines
134
2
12
40
80
$21,350.00
c. Provide CD-level specifications
38
2
8
16
12
$6,670.00
d. Issue drawings for permitting
23
1
6
12
4
$4,235.00
C. CM/GC Bidding Assistance
a. Assist the CM/GC with documentaion questions
14
2
8
4
$3,250.00
b. Respond to substitution requests and RFIs
4
4
$960.00
D. Meetings for the full design package
a. Consultant Coordination Meetings (weekly at 1.5 hours for 20 weeks)
45
15
30
$12,225.00
b. Bi-Weekly OAC meetings with Airport and Clayco (20 weeks)
40
20
20
$11,500.00
c. Airline coordination meetings (4 meetings)
16
8
8
$4,600.00
d. TSA coordination meetings (2 meetings)
8
4
4
$2,300.00
e. Code official meetings and coordination (2 meetings with IDA and AHJ + prep time)
8
4
4
$2,300.00
f. City planning meetings (2 meetings)
8
4
4
$2,300.00
g. Owner review meetings (4 meetings with IDA)
16
8
8
$4,600.00
Estimated Total Labor
590
94
144
140
196
0
16
0
0.00
$118,510.00
Production Copier
$500.00
$500.00
Postage and Freight
$190.00
$190.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$690.00
Mileage (2 person-trips)
$870.00
$870.00
Flight/s (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Travel
$870.00
Total
$31,490.00
$34,560.00
$23,100.00
$27,440.00
$0.00
$1,920.00
$0.00
$1,560.00
$120,070.00
VIII. Revised Phase 1 and Phase 2 Bid Package
8/6/2026
Alliiance - Architecture
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(A)+(B)+(C)+(D)
Travel/Per
Special
Amount
Labor
Expenses
Diem
Services
Requested
VI. Project Definition and Management
$16,140.00
$100.00
$0.00
$16,240.00
VII. Footing and Foundation Bid Package
$161,980.00
$940.00
$0.00
$162,920.00
VIII. Revised Phase 1 and Phase 2 Bid Package
$522,660.00
$3,040.00
$17,371.20
$543,071.20
Totals
$700,780.00
$4,080.00
$17,371.20
$0.00
$722,231.20
Alliiance - Architecture
Total
Principal In
Charge
PM / Sr.
Terminal
Designer (Arch
& Int) Architect
Terminal
Designer (Arch &
Int)
Project Architect
Arch & Int
Support /
Technical III
Arch & Int
Support /
Technical I
Interiors
Total Cost
Hours
$290.00
$240.00
$205.00
$190.00
$180.00
$130.00
$110.00
for Labor
Labor
942
16
224
0
276
238
188
0
$0.00
Alliiance - Architecture
Total
Principal In
Charge
PM / Sr.
Terminal
Designer (Arch
& Int) Architect
Terminal
Designer (Arch &
Int)
Project Architect
Arch & Int
Support /
Technical III
Arch & Int
Support /
Technical I
Interiors
Total Cost
Hours
$290.00
$240.00
$205.00
$190.00
$180.00
$130.00
$110.00
per Item
A. Project Definition
22
2
20
$5,380.00
B. Prepare Scope of Work
22
2
20
$5,380.00
C. Additional Project Management
22
2
20
$5,380.00
D. Additional Grant Administration
0
$0.00
E. Prepare Eligibility Analysis
0
$0.00
Estimated Total Labor
66
6
60
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
$16,140.00
Production Copier
$70.00
$70.00
Postage and Freight
$30.00
$30.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$100.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental / Other
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Travel
$0.00
Total
$1,740.00
$14,400.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$100.00
$16,240.00
Workplan and Fee Estimate
IDA (Idaho Falls Regional Airport) - TERMINAL EXPANSION Phase 1 - ASA #2
Summary by Task
Whole Project Labor Summary
VI. Project Definition and Management
Alliiance - Architecture
Total
Principal In
Charge
PM / Sr.
Terminal
Designer (Arch
& Int) Architect
Terminal
Designer (Arch &
Int)
Project Architect
Arch & Int
Support /
Technical III
Arch & Int
Support /
Technical I
Interiors
Total Cost
Hours
$290.00
$240.00
$205.00
$190.00
$180.00
$130.00
$110.00
per Item
A. Prepare DD Package
224
4
40
60
60
60
$40,760.00
B. Prepare CD Package (100%)
a. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination
122
2
20
30
30
40
$21,680.00
b. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination with listed diciplines
100
20
30
30
20
$18,500.00
c. Provide CD-level specifications
76
16
30
30
$14,940.00
d. Issue drawings for permitting
120
20
30
30
40
$21,100.00
C. CM/GC Bidding Assistance
a. Assist the CM/GC with documentation questions
12
4
4
4
$2,440.00
b. Respond to subtitution requests and RFIs
12
4
4
4
$2,440.00
D. Meetings
a. Consultant Coordination Meetings (weekly at 1.5 hours for 8 weeks)
60
16
24
12
8
$11,600.00
b. Bi-Weekly OAC meetings with Airport and Clayco
46
2
8
24
8
4
$9,020.00
c. Code official meeting and coordination (1 meeting with IDA and the AHJ + prep time)
60
8
20
20
12
$10,880.00
d. Owner review meetings (2 meetings with IDA)
44
2
8
20
10
4
$8,620.00
Estimated Total Labor
876
10
164
0
276
238
188
0
0.00
$161,980.00
Production Copier
$680.00
$680.00
Postage and Freight
$260.00
$260.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$940.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Travel
$0.00
Total
$2,900.00
$39,360.00
$0.00
$52,440.00
$42,840.00
$24,440.00
$0.00
$0.00
$162,920.00
VII. Footing and Foundation Bid Package
Alliiance - Architecture
Total
Principal In
Charge
PM / Sr.
Terminal
Designer (Arch
& Int) Architect
Terminal
Designer (Arch &
Int)
Project Architect
Arch & Int
Support /
Technical III
Arch & Int
Support /
Technical I
Interiors
Total Cost
Hours
$290.00
$240.00
$205.00
$190.00
$180.00
$130.00
$110.00
per Item
A. Prepare DD Package
a. Provide DD-level engineering system design and coordination
156
20
40
12
60
24
$25,000.00
i. ATO Layout
116
20
30
12
30
24
$19,200.00
ii. Restroom Block, Storage Rooms, Vestibules
163
1
20
60
12
30
40
$26,950.00
iii. Finishes and Fixtures
283
1
20
24
8
30
200
$36,990.00
iv. Common Use
70
8
20
12
30
$11,780.00
v. Baggage Conveyor
106
8
32
12
30
24
$16,700.00
vi. Curbside Canopy
127
1
20
40
12
30
24
$21,390.00
vii. Terminal Curbside
127
1
20
40
12
30
24
$21,390.00
viii. Construction Phasing
78
12
24
12
30
$13,500.00
b. Provide DD-level drawings, specification outline, and coordination with listed disciplines
292
16
80
24
12
80
80
$46,160.00
B. Prepare CD Package (100%)
a. Provide CD-level engineering system design and coordination
148
24
60
24
40
$26,680.00
b. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination with listed disciplines
260
36
80
24
80
40
$42,960.00
c. Provide CD-level specifications
290
18
120
80
24
24
24
$54,200.00
d. Issue drawings for permitting
214
30
40
80
24
24
16
$39,800.00
C. CM/GC Bidding Assistance
a. Assist the CM/GC with documentaion questions
47
1
8
10
20
8
$9,500.00
b. Respond to substitution requests and RFIs
47
1
8
10
20
8
$9,500.00
D. Meetings for the full design package
a. Consultant Coordination Meetings (weekly at 1.5 hours for 20 weeks)
196
48
20
48
30
30
20
$36,240.00
b. Bi-Weekly OAC meetings with Airport and Clayco (20 weeks)
64
24
20
10
10
$12,660.00
c. Airline coordination meetings (4 meetings)
44
12
12
6
6
8
$7,900.00
d. TSA coordination meetings (2 meetings)
30
6
12
6
6
$5,580.00
e. Code official meetings and coordination (2 meetings with IDA and AHJ + prep time)
88
12
40
20
16
$16,160.00
f. City planning meetings (2 meetings)
50
12
20
10
8
$9,520.00
g. Owner review meetings (4 meetings with IDA)
68
2
20
20
10
8
8
$12,900.00
Estimated Total Labor
3064
8
422
280
846
320
632
556
0.00
$522,660.00
Production Copier
$2,200.00
$2,200.00
Postage and Freight
$840.00
$840.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$3,040.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (12 person-trips)
$8,580.00
$8,580.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental
$8,791.20
$8,791.20
Estimated Total Travel
$17,371.20
Total
$2,320.00
$101,280.00
$57,400.00
$160,740.00
$57,600.00
$82,160.00
$61,160.00
$20,411.20
$543,071.20
VIII. Revised Phase 1 and Phase 2 Bid Package
8/6/2026
MCE - Mech and Elec Eng
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(A)+(B)+(C)+(D)
Travel/Per
Special
Amount
Labor
Expenses
Diem
Services
Requested
VI. Project Definition and Management
$8,520.00
$50.00
$0.00
$8,570.00
VII. Footing and Foundation Bid Package
$37,430.00
$220.00
$0.00
$37,650.00
VIII. Revised Phase 1 and Phase 2 Bid Package
$154,770.00
$900.00
$11,580.80
$167,250.80
Totals
$200,720.00
$1,170.00
$11,580.80
$0.00
$213,470.80
MCE - Mech and Elec Eng
Total
Principal
Project Manager
Lead Designer
Lead Specialist -
Commissioning
Project Designer
Staff Designer
Intern
Total Cost
Hours
$290.00
$240.00
$210.00
$185.00
$175.00
$150.00
$90.00
for Labor
Labor
249
15
54
34
0
9
129
8
$0.00
MCE - Mech and Elec Eng
Total
Principal
Project Manager
Lead Designer
Lead Specialist -
Commissioning
Project Designer
Staff Designer
Intern
Total Cost
Hours
$290.00
$240.00
$210.00
$185.00
$175.00
$150.00
$90.00
per Item
A. Project Definition
14
4
10
$2,460.00
B. Prepare Scope of Work
4
1
3
$1,010.00
C. Additional Project Management
20
5
15
$5,050.00
D. Additional Grant Administration
0
$0.00
E. Prepare Eligibility Analysis
0
$0.00
Estimated Total Labor
38
6
22
0
0
0
10
0
0.00
$8,520.00
Production Copier
$40.00
$40.00
Postage and Freight
$10.00
$10.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$50.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental / Other
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Travel
$0.00
Total
$1,740.00
$5,280.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,500.00
$0.00
$50.00
$8,570.00
Workplan and Fee Estimate
IDA (Idaho Falls Regional Airport) - TERMINAL EXPANSION Phase 1 - ASA #2
Summary by Task
Whole Project Labor Summary
VI. Project Definition and Management
MCE - Mech and Elec Eng
Total
Principal
Project Manager
Lead Designer
Lead Specialist -
Commissioning
Project Designer
Staff Designer
Intern
Total Cost
Hours
$290.00
$240.00
$210.00
$185.00
$175.00
$150.00
$90.00
per Item
A. Prepare DD Package
23
1
4
18
$3,830.00
B. Prepare CD Package (100%)
a. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination
46
1
4
7
2
24
8
$7,245.00
b. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination with listed diciplines
17
3
0
1
13
$2,845.00
c. Provide CD-level specifications
12
3
3
1
5
$2,275.00
d. Issue drawings for permitting
6
4
2
$1,640.00
C. CM/GC Bidding Assistance
a. Assist the CM/GC with documentation questions
8
2
2
4
$1,500.00
b. Respond to subtitution requests and RFIs
8
2
2
4
$1,500.00
D. Meetings
a. Consultant Coordination Meetings (weekly at 1.5 hours for 8 weeks)
61
12
10
3
36
$10,905.00
b. Bi-Weekly OAC meetings with Airport and Clayco
0
$0.00
c. Code official meeting and coordination (1 meeting with IDA and the AHJ + prep time)
13
1
2
2
2
6
$2,440.00
d. Owner review meetings (2 meetings with IDA)
17
2
2
4
9
$3,250.00
Estimated Total Labor
211
9
32
34
0
9
119
8
0.00
$37,430.00
Production Copier
$160.00
$160.00
Postage and Freight
$60.00
$60.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$220.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Travel
$0.00
Total
$2,465.00
$7,680.00
$7,140.00
$0.00
$1,575.00
$17,850.00
$720.00
$0.00
$37,650.00
VII. Footing and Foundation Bid Package
MCE - Mech and Elec Eng
Total
Principal
Project Manager
Lead Designer
Lead Specialist -
Commissioning
Project Designer
Staff Designer
Intern
Total Cost
Hours
$290.00
$240.00
$210.00
$185.00
$175.00
$150.00
$90.00
per Item
A. Prepare DD Package
a. Provide DD-level engineering system design and coordination
0
$0.00
i. ATO Layout
20
1
2
2
1
10
4
$3,225.00
ii. Restroom Block, Storage Rooms, Vestibules
58
1
4
10
1
38
4
$9,585.00
iii. Finishes and Fixtures
10
1
3
6
$1,770.00
iv. Common Use
35
1
3
6
1
22
2
$5,925.00
v. Baggage Conveyor
45
1
4
6
30
4
$7,370.00
vi. Curbside Canopy
9
1
2
6
$1,560.00
vii. Terminal Curbside
9
1
2
6
$1,560.00
viii. Construction Phasing
32
4
4
24
$5,400.00
b. Provide DD-level drawings, specification outline, and coordination with listed disciplines
200
24
22
2
152
$33,530.00
B. Prepare CD Package (100%)
a. Provide CD-level engineering system design and coordination
75
4
10
3
2
56
$12,365.00
b. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination with listed disciplines
126
2
0
124
$19,080.00
c. Provide CD-level specifications
49
4
10
2
1
32
$8,405.00
d. Issue drawings for permitting
12
8
4
$3,280.00
C. CM/GC Bidding Assistance
a. Assist the CM/GC with documentaion questions
0
$0.00
b. Respond to substitution requests and RFIs
0
$0.00
D. Meetings for the full design package
a. Consultant Coordination Meetings (weekly at 1.5 hours for 20 weeks)
171
3
33
36
9
90
$31,425.00
b. Bi-Weekly OAC meetings with Airport and Clayco (20 weeks)
0
$0.00
c. Airline coordination meetings (4 meetings)
4
4
$960.00
d. TSA coordination meetings (2 meetings)
2
2
$480.00
e. Code official meetings and coordination (2 meetings with IDA and AHJ + prep time)
19
6
4
9
$3,490.00
f. City planning meetings (2 meetings)
0
$0.00
g. Owner review meetings (4 meetings with IDA)
29
3
6
2
18
$5,360.00
Estimated Total Labor
905
18
109
113
5
23
623
14
0.00
$154,770.00
Production Copier
$650.00
$650.00
Postage and Freight
$250.00
$250.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$900.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (8 person-trips)
$5,720.00
$5,720.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental
$5,860.80
$5,860.80
Estimated Total Travel
$11,580.80
Total
$5,220.00
$26,160.00
$23,730.00
$925.00
$4,025.00
$93,450.00
$1,260.00
$12,480.80
$167,250.80
VIII. Revised Phase 1 and Phase 2 Bid Package
8/6/2026
Faith Group - IT and Security
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(A)+(B)+(C)+(D)
Travel/Per
Special
Amount
Labor
Expenses
Diem
Services
Requested
VI. Project Definition and Management
$4,880.00
$30.00
$0.00
$4,910.00
VII. Footing and Foundation Bid Package
$17,740.00
$100.00
$0.00
$17,840.00
VIII. Revised Phase 1 and Phase 2 Bid Package
$103,460.00
$600.00
$2,895.20
$106,955.20
Totals
$126,080.00
$730.00
$2,895.20
$0.00
$129,705.20
Faith Group - IT and Security
Total
PIC
Sr. PM
Sr. Designer
Designer
BIM
Project
Coordinator
Systems SME
Total Cost
Hours
$275.00
$215.00
$200.00
$125.00
$115.00
$105.00
$185.00
for Labor
Labor
127
5
50
25
24
8
15
0
$0.00
Faith Group - IT and Security
Total
PIC
Sr. PM
Sr. Designer
Designer
BIM
Project
Coordinator
Systems SME
Total Cost
Hours
$275.00
$215.00
$200.00
$125.00
$115.00
$105.00
$185.00
per Item
A. Project Definition
2
1
1
$490.00
B. Prepare Scope of Work
6
2
2
2
$1,190.00
C. Additional Project Management
20
10
10
$3,200.00
D. Additional Grant Administration
0
$0.00
E. Prepare Eligibility Analysis
0
$0.00
Estimated Total Labor
28
3
13
0
0
0
12
0
0.00
$4,880.00
Production Copier
$20.00
$20.00
Postage and Freight
$10.00
$10.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$30.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental / Other
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Travel
$0.00
Total
$825.00
$2,795.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,260.00
$0.00
$30.00
$4,910.00
Workplan and Fee Estimate
IDA (Idaho Falls Regional Airport) - TERMINAL EXPANSION Phase 1 - ASA #2
Summary by Task
Whole Project Labor Summary
VI. Project Definition and Management
Faith Group - IT and Security
Total
PIC
Sr. PM
Sr. Designer
Designer
BIM
Project
Coordinator
Systems SME
Total Cost
Hours
$275.00
$215.00
$200.00
$125.00
$115.00
$105.00
$185.00
per Item
A. Prepare DD Package
38
8
12
12
4
2
$6,290.00
B. Prepare CD Package (100%)
a. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination
30
2
4
8
12
4
$4,970.00
b. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination with listed diciplines
0
$0.00
c. Provide CD-level specifications
4
2
2
$830.00
d. Issue drawings for permitting
3
1
1
1
$520.00
C. CM/GC Bidding Assistance
a. Assist the CM/GC with documentation questions
4
4
$860.00
b. Respond to subtitution requests and RFIs
4
2
2
$830.00
D. Meetings
a. Consultant Coordination Meetings (weekly at 1.5 hours for 8 weeks)
12
12
$2,580.00
b. Bi-Weekly OAC meetings with Airport and Clayco
0
$0.00
c. Code official meeting and coordination (1 meeting with IDA and the AHJ + prep time)
1
1
$215.00
d. Owner review meetings (2 meetings with IDA)
3
3
$645.00
Estimated Total Labor
99
2
37
25
24
8
3
0
0.00
$17,740.00
Production Copier
$70.00
$70.00
Postage and Freight
$30.00
$30.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$100.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Travel
$0.00
Total
$550.00
$7,955.00
$5,000.00
$3,000.00
$920.00
$315.00
$0.00
$0.00
$17,840.00
VII. Footing and Foundation Bid Package
Faith Group - IT and Security
Total
PIC
Sr. PM
Sr. Designer
Designer
BIM
Project
Coordinator
Systems SME
Total Cost
Hours
$275.00
$215.00
$200.00
$125.00
$115.00
$105.00
$185.00
per Item
A. Prepare DD Package
a. Provide DD-level engineering system design and coordination
28
4
8
16
$4,660.00
i. ATO Layout
22
2
8
12
$3,530.00
ii. Restroom Block, Storage Rooms, Vestibules
8
4
4
$1,300.00
iii. Finishes and Fixtures
0
$0.00
iv. Common Use
18
2
4
12
$3,150.00
v. Baggage Conveyor
18
2
8
8
$3,030.00
vi. Curbside Canopy
22
2
8
12
$3,530.00
vii. Terminal Curbside
18
2
8
8
$3,030.00
viii. Construction Phasing
6
2
4
$1,230.00
b. Provide DD-level drawings, specification outline, and coordination with listed disciplines
36
4
8
12
4
8
$7,120.00
B. Prepare CD Package (100%)
a. Provide CD-level engineering system design and coordination
208
8
24
48
80
24
24
$34,160.00
b. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination with listed disciplines
0
$0.00
c. Provide CD-level specifications
28
8
8
4
8
$5,220.00
d. Issue drawings for permitting
16
4
4
4
4
$3,180.00
C. CM/GC Bidding Assistance
a. Assist the CM/GC with documentaion questions
20
8
8
4
$3,740.00
b. Respond to substitution requests and RFIs
20
8
8
4
$3,740.00
D. Meetings for the full design package
a. Consultant Coordination Meetings (weekly at 1.5 hours for 20 weeks)
60
30
30
$12,450.00
b. Bi-Weekly OAC meetings with Airport and Clayco (20 weeks)
10
10
$2,150.00
c. Airline coordination meetings (4 meetings)
8
4
4
$1,600.00
d. TSA coordination meetings (2 meetings)
4
2
2
$830.00
e. Code official meetings and coordination (2 meetings with IDA and AHJ + prep time)
8
4
4
$1,660.00
f. City planning meetings (2 meetings)
4
2
2
$830.00
g. Owner review meetings (4 meetings with IDA)
16
8
8
$3,320.00
Estimated Total Labor
578
20
140
174
128
40
20
56
0.00
$103,460.00
Production Copier
$430.00
$430.00
Postage and Freight
$170.00
$170.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$600.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (2 person-trips)
$1,430.00
$1,430.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental
$1,465.20
$1,465.20
Estimated Total Travel
$2,895.20
Total
$5,500.00
$30,100.00
$34,800.00
$16,000.00
$4,600.00
$2,100.00
$10,360.00
$3,495.20
$106,955.20
VIII. Revised Phase 1 and Phase 2 Bid Package
8/6/2026
MBJ - Structural
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(A)+(B)+(C)+(D)
Travel/Per
Special
Amount
Labor
Expenses
Diem
Services
Requested
VI. Project Definition and Management
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
VII. Footing and Foundation Bid Package
$60,370.00
$350.00
$2,895.20
$63,615.20
VIII. Revised Phase 1 and Phase 2 Bid Package
$133,910.00
$770.00
$1,447.60
$136,127.60
Totals
$194,280.00
$1,120.00
$4,342.80
$0.00
$199,742.80
MBJ - Structural
Total
Principal
PM
LE
EIT
BIM
Total Cost
Hours
$240.00
$210.00
$210.00
$135.00
$155.00
$0.00
$0.00
for Labor
Labor
314
77
97
20
64
56
0
0
$0.00
MBJ - Structural
Total
Principal
PM
LE
EIT
BIM
0
0
Total Cost
Hours
$240.00
$210.00
$210.00
$135.00
$155.00
$0.00
$0.00
per Item
A. Project Definition
0
$0.00
B. Prepare Scope of Work
0
$0.00
C. Additional Project Management
0
$0.00
D. Additional Grant Administration
0
$0.00
E. Prepare Eligibility Analysis
0
$0.00
Estimated Total Labor
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
$0.00
Production Copier
$0.00
$0.00
Postage and Freight
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$0.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental / Other
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Travel
$0.00
Total
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Workplan and Fee Estimate
IDA (Idaho Falls Regional Airport) - TERMINAL EXPANSION Phase 1 - ASA #2
Summary by Task
Whole Project Labor Summary
VI. Project Definition and Management
MBJ - Structural
Total
Principal
PM
LE
EIT
BIM
0
0
Total Cost
Hours
$240.00
$210.00
$210.00
$135.00
$155.00
$0.00
$0.00
per Item
A. Prepare DD Package
76
20
20
4
16
16
$14,480.00
B. Prepare CD Package (100%)
a. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination
144
24
32
16
32
40
$26,360.00
b. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination with listed diciplines
0
$0.00
c. Provide CD-level specifications
16
8
8
0
0
0
$3,600.00
d. Issue drawings for permitting
4
0
4
0
0
0
$840.00
C. CM/GC Bidding Assistance
a. Assist the CM/GC with documentation questions
20
4
8
0
8
0
$3,720.00
b. Respond to subtitution requests and RFIs
20
4
8
0
8
0
$3,720.00
D. Meetings
a. Consultant Coordination Meetings (weekly at 1.5 hours for 8 weeks)
24
12
12
0
0
0
$5,400.00
b. Bi-Weekly OAC meetings with Airport and Clayco
2
1
1
0
0
0
$450.00
c. Code official meeting and coordination (1 meeting with IDA and the AHJ + prep time)
4
2
2
0
0
0
$900.00
d. Owner review meetings (2 meetings with IDA)
4
2
2
0
0
0
$900.00
Estimated Total Labor
314
77
97
20
64
56
0
0
0.00
$60,370.00
Production Copier
$250.00
$250.00
Postage and Freight
$100.00
$100.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$350.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (2 person-trips)
$1,430.00
$1,430.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental
$1,465.20
$1,465.20
Estimated Total Travel
$2,895.20
Total
$18,480.00
$20,370.00
$4,200.00
$8,640.00
$8,680.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$63,615.20
VII. Footing and Foundation Bid Package
MBJ - Structural
Total
Principal
PM
LE
EIT
BIM
0
0
Total Cost
Hours
$240.00
$210.00
$210.00
$135.00
$155.00
$0.00
$0.00
per Item
A. Prepare DD Package
0
$0.00
a. Provide DD-level engineering system design and coordination
190
32
64
30
64
0
$36,060.00
i. ATO Layout
0
$0.00
ii. Restroom Block, Storage Rooms, Vestibules
0
$0.00
iii. Finishes and Fixtures
0
$0.00
iv. Common Use
0
$0.00
v. Baggage Conveyor
0
$0.00
vi. Curbside Canopy
0
$0.00
vii. Terminal Curbside
0
$0.00
viii. Construction Phasing
0
$0.00
b. Provide DD-level drawings, specification outline, and coordination with listed disciplines
40
0
0
0
0
40
$6,200.00
B. Prepare CD Package (100%)
a. Provide CD-level engineering system design and coordination
124
24
40
20
40
0
$23,760.00
b. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination with listed disciplines
164
24
40
20
40
40
$29,960.00
c. Provide CD-level specifications
26
8
16
2
0
0
$5,700.00
d. Issue drawings for permitting
8
2
4
0
0
2
$1,630.00
C. CM/GC Bidding Assistance
a. Assist the CM/GC with documentaion questions
22
4
8
2
8
0
$4,140.00
b. Respond to substitution requests and RFIs
42
8
16
2
16
0
$7,860.00
D. Meetings for the full design package
a. Consultant Coordination Meetings (weekly at 1.5 hours for 20 weeks)
60
30
30
0
0
0
$13,500.00
b. Bi-Weekly OAC meetings with Airport and Clayco (20 weeks)
15
5
10
0
0
0
$3,300.00
c. Airline coordination meetings (4 meetings)
0
$0.00
d. TSA coordination meetings (2 meetings)
0
$0.00
e. Code official meetings and coordination (2 meetings with IDA and AHJ + prep time)
4
2
2
0
0
0
$900.00
f. City planning meetings (2 meetings)
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0.00
g. Owner review meetings (4 meetings with IDA)
4
2
2
0
0
0
$900.00
Estimated Total Labor
699
141
232
76
168
82
0
0
0.00
$133,910.00
Production Copier
$560.00
$560.00
Postage and Freight
$210.00
$210.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$770.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (1 person-trips)
$715.00
$715.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental
$732.60
$732.60
Estimated Total Travel
$1,447.60
Total
$33,840.00
$48,720.00
$15,960.00
$22,680.00
$12,710.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,217.60
$136,127.60
VIII. Revised Phase 1 and Phase 2 Bid Package
8/6/2026
Swanson Rink - Baggage Handling Consultant
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(A)+(B)+(C)+(D)
Travel/Per
Special
Amount
Labor
Expenses
Diem
Services
Requested
VI. Project Definition and Management
$22,145.00
$130.00
$0.00
$22,275.00
VII. Footing and Foundation Bid Package
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
VIII. Revised Phase 1 and Phase 2 Bid Package
$78,575.00
$460.00
$0.00
$79,035.00
Totals
$100,720.00
$590.00
$0.00
$0.00
$101,310.00
Swanson Rink - Baggage Handling Consultant
Total
Baggage Senior
Engineer
Baggage
Engineer 3
Baggage
Engineer 2
Senior Project
Manager
Project
Coordinator
BIM Coordinator BIM Production
Total Cost
Hours
$195.00
$165.00
$155.00
$175.00
$120.00
$130.00
$30.00
for Labor
Labor
146
0
0
0
75
21
50
0
$0.00
Swanson Rink - Baggage Handling Consultant
Total
Baggage Senior
Engineer
Baggage
Engineer 3
Baggage
Engineer 2
Senior Project
Manager
Project
Coordinator
BIM Coordinator BIM Production
Total Cost
Hours
$195.00
$165.00
$155.00
$175.00
$120.00
$130.00
$30.00
per Item
A. Project Definition
0
$0.00
B. Prepare Scope of Work
146
75
21
50
$22,145.00
C. Additional Project Management
0
$0.00
D. Additional Grant Administration
0
$0.00
E. Prepare Eligibility Analysis
0
$0.00
Estimated Total Labor
146
0
0
0
75
21
50
0
0.00
$22,145.00
Production Copier
$90.00
$90.00
Postage and Freight
$40.00
$40.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$130.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental / Other
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Travel
$0.00
Total
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$13,125.00
$2,520.00
$6,500.00
$0.00
$130.00
$22,275.00
Workplan and Fee Estimate
IDA (Idaho Falls Regional Airport) - TERMINAL EXPANSION Phase 1 - ASA #2
Summary by Task
Whole Project Labor Summary
VI. Project Definition and Management
Swanson Rink - Baggage Handling Consultant
Total
Baggage Senior
Engineer
Baggage
Engineer 3
Baggage
Engineer 2
Senior Project
Manager
Project
Coordinator
BIM Coordinator BIM Production
Total Cost
Hours
$195.00
$165.00
$155.00
$175.00
$120.00
$130.00
$30.00
per Item
A. Prepare DD Package
0
$0.00
B. Prepare CD Package (100%)
a. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination
0
$0.00
b. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination with listed diciplines
0
$0.00
c. Provide CD-level specifications
0
$0.00
d. Issue drawings for permitting
0
$0.00
C. CM/GC Bidding Assistance
a. Assist the CM/GC with documentation questions
0
$0.00
b. Respond to subtitution requests and RFIs
0
$0.00
D. Meetings
a. Consultant Coordination Meetings (weekly at 1.5 hours for 8 weeks)
0
$0.00
b. Bi-Weekly OAC meetings with Airport and Clayco
0
$0.00
c. Code official meeting and coordination (1 meeting with IDA and the AHJ + prep time)
0
$0.00
d. Owner review meetings (2 meetings with IDA)
0
$0.00
Estimated Total Labor
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
$0.00
Production Copier
$0.00
$0.00
Postage and Freight
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$0.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Travel
$0.00
Total
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
VII. Footing and Foundation Bid Package
Swanson Rink - Baggage Handling Consultant
Total
Baggage Senior
Engineer
Baggage
Engineer 3
Baggage
Engineer 2
Senior Project
Manager
Project
Coordinator
BIM Coordinator BIM Production
Total Cost
Hours
$195.00
$165.00
$155.00
$175.00
$120.00
$130.00
$30.00
per Item
A. Prepare DD Package
a. Provide DD-level engineering system design and coordination
0
$0.00
i. ATO Layout
0
$0.00
ii. Restroom Block, Storage Rooms, Vestibules
0
$0.00
iii. Finishes and Fixtures
0
$0.00
iv. Common Use
0
$0.00
v. Baggage Conveyor
220
40
60
20
100
$22,700.00
vi. Curbside Canopy
0
$0.00
vii. Terminal Curbside
0
$0.00
viii. Construction Phasing
0
$0.00
b. Provide DD-level drawings, specification outline, and coordination with listed disciplines
95
15
30
50
$9,075.00
B. Prepare CD Package (100%)
a. Provide CD-level engineering system design and coordination
105
15
40
50
$10,625.00
b. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination with listed disciplines
77
15
40
22
$9,785.00
c. Provide CD-level specifications
25
20
5
$4,675.00
d. Issue drawings for permitting
14
5
4
5
$2,410.00
C. CM/GC Bidding Assistance
a. Assist the CM/GC with documentaion questions
18
18
$3,510.00
b. Respond to substitution requests and RFIs
0
$0.00
D. Meetings for the full design package
a. Consultant Coordination Meetings (weekly at 1.5 hours for 20 weeks)
0
$0.00
b. Bi-Weekly OAC meetings with Airport and Clayco (20 weeks)
0
$0.00
c. Airline coordination meetings (4 meetings)
0
$0.00
d. TSA coordination meetings (2 meetings)
0
$0.00
e. Code official meetings and coordination (2 meetings with IDA and AHJ + prep time)
0
$0.00
f. City planning meetings (2 meetings)
0
$0.00
g. Owner review meetings (4 meetings with IDA)
81
81
$15,795.00
Estimated Total Labor
635
209
4
180
0
0
20
222
0.00
$78,575.00
Production Copier
$330.00
$330.00
Postage and Freight
$130.00
$130.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$460.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Travel
$0.00
Total
$40,755.00
$660.00
$27,900.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,600.00
$6,660.00
$460.00
$79,035.00
VIII. Revised Phase 1 and Phase 2 Bid Package
8/6/2026
Entro - Wayfinding
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(A)+(B)+(C)+(D)
Travel/Per
Special
Amount
Labor
Expenses
Diem
Services
Requested
VI. Project Definition and Management
$7,680.00
$40.00
$0.00
$7,720.00
VII. Footing and Foundation Bid Package
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
VIII. Revised Phase 1 and Phase 2 Bid Package
$54,490.00
$320.00
$2,895.20
$57,705.20
Totals
$62,170.00
$360.00
$2,895.20
$0.00
$65,425.20
Entro - Wayfinding
Total
GM
PM
PC
Designer
Designer
Total Cost
Hours
$300.00
$170.00
$150.00
$150.00
$130.00
$0.00
$0.00
for Labor
Labor
40
8
24
8
0
0
0
0
$0.00
Entro - Wayfinding
Total
GM
PM
PC
Designer
Designer
0
0
Total Cost
Hours
$300.00
$170.00
$150.00
$150.00
$130.00
$0.00
$0.00
per Item
A. Project Definition
40
8
24
8
$7,680.00
B. Prepare Scope of Work
0
$0.00
C. Additional Project Management
0
$0.00
D. Additional Grant Administration
0
$0.00
E. Prepare Eligibility Analysis
0
$0.00
Estimated Total Labor
40
8
24
8
0
0
0
0
0.00
$7,680.00
Production Copier
$30.00
$30.00
Postage and Freight
$10.00
$10.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$40.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental / Other
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Travel
$0.00
Total
$2,400.00
$4,080.00
$1,200.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$40.00
$7,720.00
Workplan and Fee Estimate
IDA (Idaho Falls Regional Airport) - TERMINAL EXPANSION Phase 1 - ASA #2
Summary by Task
Whole Project Labor Summary
VI. Project Definition and Management
Entro - Wayfinding
Total
GM
PM
PC
Designer
Designer
0
0
Total Cost
Hours
$300.00
$170.00
$150.00
$150.00
$130.00
$0.00
$0.00
per Item
A. Prepare DD Package
0
$0.00
B. Prepare CD Package (100%)
a. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination
0
$0.00
b. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination with listed diciplines
0
$0.00
c. Provide CD-level specifications
0
$0.00
d. Issue drawings to city
0
$0.00
C. CM/GC Bidding Assistance
a. Assist the CM/GC with documentation questions
0
$0.00
b. Respond to subtitution requests and RFIs
0
$0.00
D. Meetings
a. Consultant Coordination Meetings (weekly at 1.5 hours for 8 weeks)
0
$0.00
b. Bi-Weekly OAC meetings with Airport and Clayco
0
$0.00
c. Code official meeting and coordination (1 meeting with IDA and the AHJ + prep time)
0
$0.00
d. Owner review meetings (2 meetings with IDA)
0
$0.00
Estimated Total Labor
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
$0.00
Production Copier
$0.00
$0.00
Postage and Freight
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$0.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental
$0.00
$0.00
Estimated Total Travel
$0.00
Total
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
VII. Footing and Foundation Bid Package
Entro - Wayfinding
Total
GM
PM
PC
Designer
Designer
0
0
Total Cost
Hours
$300.00
$170.00
$150.00
$150.00
$130.00
$0.00
$0.00
per Item
A. Prepare DD Package
a. Provide DD-level engineering system design and coordination
0
$0.00
i. ATO Layout
0
$0.00
ii. Restroom Block, Storage Rooms, Vestibules
0
$0.00
iii. Finishes and Fixtures
0
$0.00
iv. Common Use
0
$0.00
v. Baggage Conveyor
0
$0.00
vi. Curbside Canopy
0
$0.00
vii. Terminal Curbside
0
$0.00
viii. Construction Phasing
0
$0.00
b. Provide DD-level drawings, specification outline, and coordination with listed disciplines
0
$0.00
B. Prepare CD Package (100%)
a. Provide CD-level engineering system design and coordination
264
12
32
20
80
120
$39,640.00
b. Provide CD-level drawings and coordination with listed disciplines
0
$0.00
c. Provide CD-level specifications
10
10
$1,500.00
d. Issue drawings to City
0
$0.00
C. CM/GC Bidding Assistance
a. Assist the CM/GC with documentaion questions
0
$0.00
b. Respond to substitution requests and RFIs
10
5
5
$1,600.00
D. Meetings for the full design package
a. Consultant Coordination Meetings (weekly at 1.5 hours for 20 weeks)
20
10
10
$4,700.00
b. Bi-Weekly OAC meetings with Airport and Clayco (20 weeks)
10
5
5
$2,350.00
c. Airline coordination meetings (4 meetings)
4
2
2
$940.00
d. TSA coordination meetings (2 meetings)
4
2
2
$940.00
e. Code official meetings and coordination (2 meetings with IDA and AHJ + prep time)
4
2
2
$940.00
f. City planning meetings (2 meetings)
4
2
2
$940.00
g. Owner review meetings (4 meetings with IDA)
4
2
2
$940.00
Estimated Total Labor
334
37
62
35
80
120
0
0
0.00
$54,490.00
Production Copier
$230.00
$230.00
Postage and Freight
$90.00
$90.00
Estimated Total Expenses
$320.00
Mileage (0 person-trips)
$0.00
$0.00
Flight/s (2 person-trips)
$1,430.00
$1,430.00
Hotel / Food / Car Rental
$1,465.20
$1,465.20
Estimated Total Travel
$2,895.20
Total
$11,100.00
$10,540.00
$5,250.00
$12,000.00
$15,600.00
$0.00
$0.00
$3,215.20
$57,705.20
VIII. Revised Phase 1 and Phase 2 Bid Package
U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration
Northwest Mountain Region
Colorado ∙ Idaho ∙ Montana ∙ Oregon∙ Utah∙ Washington∙ Wyoming
8/25/2026
Ian Turner, Director
Idaho Falls Regional Airport
iturner@idahofalls.gov
Idaho Falls Regional Airport (IDA)
Idaho Falls, Idaho
Grant Number: Multiple Terminal Projects
Engineering Fee Approval – Work Order 24-01 Request #2
Dear Director Turner,
We have reviewed your record of negotiations and Independent Fee Estimate (IFE) for Phase 3 –
Additional Services Request #2 for Construction Documents efforts by Ardurra for the subject
project. We accept your review of costs for reasonableness based on your cost analysis. Please
maintain a copy of your cost analysis for future audit purposes. Please note, this is a maximum fee
and the sponsor can only be reimbursed for actual costs incurred. Any future amendments to this
engineering agreement will require Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approval. The
following items are approved and eligible for federal participation, assuming the associated work is
completed.
Task 6 – Project Definition and Management =
$92,965.00
Task 7 – Footing and Foundation Bid Package =
$321,900.00
Task 8 – Revised Phase 1 and 2 Bid Package =
$1,166,375.00
Expenses =
$9,190.00
Travel/Per Diem =
$40,390.20
Grand Total
$1,630,820.20
Based on the submitted record of negotiations, we concur with the fees established are fair and
reasonable and the result of good faith negotiations. Please provide our office with a copy of the
executed engineering agreement.
If you have questions, please call me at (406) 441-5404.
Sincerely,
Tracy M. Stoner
Assistant Manager (A)
Helena ADO
Memorandum
File #: 26-330
City Council
DATE: Thursday, September 10, 2026
AGENDA: Regular
FROM: Ian Turner, Airport Director
DEPARTMENT: Airport
Title
Approve the Other Transaction Agreement for the Law Enforcement Officer Reimbursement Program with the
Transportation Security Administration
☐Ordinance
☐Resolution
☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐Legislative Public Hearing
☐Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☒Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve the Other Transaction Agreement for the Law Enforcement Officer Reimbursement Program (or take
other action deemed appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
Appropriations from the federal government restored funding for the Law Enforcement Officer
Reimbursement Program in federal fiscal year 2026. In June, the Transportation Security Administration issued
a Notice of Funding Opportunity for these funds. The Idaho Falls Regional Airport applied for, and received, an
award not to exceed $146,000. The funds are available to reimburse the airport $25 an hour for each hour a
law enforcement officer is assigned to the passenger screening checkpoint.
The agreement is for a one-year term and is renewable in succeeding years at the determination of the federal
government.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Municipal Services Departments.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 9/8/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
OTHER TRANSACTION AGREEMENT
OTA NUMBER
REQUISITION NUMBER
70T01026T6114N104
PR266114E119
ISSUED TO
ISSUED BY
Name & Address:
City of Idaho Falls
P O BOX 50220
IDAHO FALLS, ID 83405-0220
EIN: 82-6000208
UEI: MYQ7CMFVVRN4
Name & Address:
Transportation Security Administration
6595 Springfield Center Drive
Springfield, VA 20598, US
Email:
PROGRAM TITLE
Program: Law Enforcement Officers Reimbursement Program (LEORP)
Period of Performance: 12 months from date of award
NAICS: 922120 – Police Protection
PSC: S206 Housekeeping – Guard
FISCAL DATA
Accounting Line:
2026|0550000A002626DD|F270F210F000|5913902400|T26D172700|410019|61000000|6115000000|12SLR66AR2|010103|
Obligated: $146,000.00
Total Agreement Value: $146,000.00
PURPOSE
Agreement provides partial reimbursement to airport to offset the costs of carrying out aviation law enforcement
responsibilities in support of passenger screening activities.
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Agreement by their duly authorized officers.
_______________________
____________
Participant’s Signature
Date
__________________________________________
TYPED NAME AND TITLE
________________________
Contracting Officer’s Signature
08/21/2026
Date
ERICKA LANDRY
_________________________________________
TYPED NAME AND TITLE
This Individual Agreement, established between the Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
and City of Idaho Falls (“Participant”), is subject to all terms and conditions of the Parent
Agreement 70T01026TLEORP001. The Parent Agreement controls in the event of any conflict
with this Individual Agreement. By commencing performance against this Individual Agreement,
the Participant agrees to accept and comply with all terms and conditions of the Parent Agreement
without exception.
The Participant agrees to provide qualified law enforcement services through the Idaho Falls
Police Department on-site at Idaho Falls Municipal (IDA) during TSA screening checkpoint
operating hours, and to provide law enforcement support to the passenger-screening checkpoints
consistent with TSA requirements and the Parent Agreement.
The FSD, in consultation with the Participant, has determined that on-site Flexible stationing is
appropriate. Participant agrees to provide and maintain, on a reimbursable basis, visible Law
Enforcement presence in the vicinity of the screening checkpoint(s) during the hours of checkpoint
operations each day.
The base period of performance for this agreement is 1-Sep-26 to 31-Aug-27. At any time during
the performance under this Other Transaction Authority (OTA), TSA may unilaterally extend the
agreement or provide additional funding as it becomes available. Agreements may be extended
up to one year after the expiration of the Parent OTA.
The total funding obligated under this agreement is $146,000.00, which may not be exceeded
except via modification to this agreement by TSA. The funding provided under this agreement is
based upon the specific requirements for Law Enforcement Officer (LEO) support at IDA.
Hourly rate: $25.00
Daily hours: 16
Total number of days per year: 365
Annual hours (daily hours * total number of days per year): 5,840
Annual funding (annual hours * hourly rate): $146,000.00
Performance Requirements
The specific requirements that must be met to qualify for full reimbursement are provided in the
attachment containing the LEO application.
Invoice Submission Method
Refer to ARTICLE IX – BILLING PROCEDURE AND PAYMENT, of the Parent Agreement.
TSA Point of Contact – Individual Agreement
Contracting Officer (CO):
Name: Ericka Landry
E-mail: Ericka.Landry@tsa.dhs.gov
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR):
Name: Yarley Jean
E-mail: Yarley.Jean@tsa.dhs.gov
1
OTHER TRANSACTION AGREEMENT
OTA NUMBER
REQUISITION NUMBER
70T01026TLEORP001
Provided in Individual Agreements
ISSUED TO
ISSUED BY
Provided in Individual Agreements
Name & Address: Workforce & Enterprise Operations
Address: 6595 Springfield Center Drive
Springfield, VA 20598, US
Email: Robert.Farrell@tsa.dhs.gov
PROGRAM TITLE
Program: Law Enforcement Officers Reimbursement Program (LEORP)
Period of Performance: Provided in Individual Agreements
NAICS: 922120 – Police Protection
PSC: S206 Housekeeping – Guard
FISCAL DATA
Provided in Individual Agreements
PURPOSE
This establishes the requirements for the Parent Agreement for LEORP and the associated Terms and Conditions. All Terms
established in this Agreement flow down to the Individual Agreements.
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
________________________ ____________
Contracting Officer’s Signature
Date
_________________________________________
TYPED NAME AND TITLE
Jason Richards
6/23/2026
2
ARTICLE I – PARTIES
This Other Transaction Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Agreement” or “OTA”) is entered into between the
United States of America (hereinafter referred to as the “Government”) Transportation Security Administration
(hereinafter referred to as “TSA”) and Participant. The TSA and the Participant agree to cooperate in good faith and
to perform their respective obligations using their cooperative good faith efforts in executing the purpose of this
Agreement.
ARTICLE II – AUTHORITY
TSA and the Participant enter into this Agreement under the authority of the Aviation and Transportation Security
Act, Pub. L. 107-71, 115 Stat. 597, specifically 49 U.S.C. 114(m), and 106(l) and (m), which authorizes
agreements and other transactions on such terms and conditions as the Administrator determines necessary.
ARTICLE III – INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND, PURPOSE AND SCOPE
A. Introduction
The Law Enforcement Officer Reimbursement Program (LEO RP) was established to provide partial
reimbursement to airport operators to provide on-site, highly visible LEO presence through flexible, fixed, or a
combination of the two (hybrid) support of the passenger screening checkpoint. State and local LE agencies play
a critical role in security at airports. They are the primary responders to any incident within the airport perimeter.
B. Background
On November 19, 2001, the President and Congress enacted ATSA, which established TSA as a new Federal
agency. ATSA provides authority to the Administrator of TSA to carry out chapter 449 of Title 49 United States
Code relating to civil aviation security, including responsibility for ordering the deployment of law enforcement
personnel at each airport security passenger-screening location to ensure passenger safety and national security.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 44903(c) and 49 C.F.R. Part 1542, each airport operator is required to establish an air
transportation security program that provides a law enforcement presence and capability at the airport that is
adequate to ensure the safety of passengers. This Agreement is part of the joint effort of TSA and the airport operator
to deploy sufficient LEOs in support of passenger screening activities at the checkpoint to meet their dual
responsibility to ensure the safety of passengers and to counter risks to transportation security.
C. Purpose of this Agreement
The Participant agrees to maintain a law enforcement presence and response that is adequate to support each
system for screening persons and accessible property; focused on passenger screening checkpoint support. This
law enforcement presence provides for the safety and security of persons and property against an act of criminal
violence or aircraft piracy, and assists in preventing the introduction of TSA prohibited items.
LEOs will provide consistent support of TSA’s screening operations, including responding in person to calls
involving attempts to bring prohibited items through the checkpoint, suspicious persons, suspicious
circumstances, duress alarms, disorderly persons, and similar incidents and tasks and follow an established LE
response standard which is mutually acceptable to the FSD, Participant and LE service provider.
There is a broad range of activities that LEOs engage in at the nation’s airports, many of which are outside the
scope of this Agreement. Funding under this Agreement is intended to support a dedicated highly visible LEO
presence through on-site flexible, fixed, or a combination of the two (hybrid) LEO stationing of the TSA
screening checkpoints. For the purposes of this Agreement the acceptable LEO stationing postures will be
defined in the Individual Agreements as follows:
3
a. Fixed Stationing - The on-site LEO is stationed in the TSA passenger screening
checkpoint during screening operations.
b. Flexible Stationing - The on-site LEO is stationed in the vicinity/close proximity of the TSA
passenger screening checkpoint, providing an enhanced visible presence/support at the
checkpoint.
c. Hybrid/Combination Stationing - A form of on-site LEO stationing involving both fixed and
flexible stationing, which provides a combination of highly visible LEO presence in the
checkpoint and in the vicinity/close proximity of the checkpoint.
Individual Agreements will be customized in order to address airport-specific security requirements, and may
be updated as necessary based on changing circumstances.
II.
At a minimum the Participant will ensure that the Law Enforcement (LE) service provider:
a. Supports TSA’s screening operations, including dealing with attempts to bring
prohibited items through the checkpoint, disorderly persons and similar tasks.
b. Follows an established LE response standard which is mutually acceptable to the FSD,
Participant and LE service provider.
c. Participates in TSA’s Layered Security Programs (appropriate level of participation to be
determined by the FSD and Participant).
d. Provides a minimum of 730 LE support hours per year.
e. Provides consistent LE support during the hours of TSA checkpoint operations.
III.
The Participant agrees to maintain a sufficient number of LEOs at or in the vicinity/close proximity of
the checkpoint(s) during the hours of TSA screening checkpoint operations each day. For LEO RP
purposes, LEO support of screening begins up to 1 hour prior to scheduled departure and remains up to
30 minutes after wheels up. The specific number of LEOs and the number of hours assigned to
provide dedicated support to the passenger screening checkpoints must be identified in the submission.
IV.
The Participant will assist in the verification of LEO credentials as requested by the FSD or other TSA
representatives.
V.
The Participant will promptly provide incident reports, police reports, and other information when
requested by TSA as part of a regulatory investigation.
VI.
The Participant will fully cooperate with regulatory investigations.
VII. The Participant shall coordinate all media releases related to the Agreement with the FSD; other contact
with or by media on the terms and conditions of the LEO Reimbursement Agreement shall be referred to
the Contracting Officer.
VIII. Specific LEO support requirements will be defined within Individual Agreements supplementary to these
terms and conditions. This support, based on the specific characteristics and security requirements of the
airport, could include but is not limited to:
a. LEO patrol of a particular area.
b. Unique assistance to local TSA.
4
Note that such additional activities should only include those which are being performed during periods
of TSA screening operations, and which do not interfere with the LEOs’ ability to provide immediate
response to incidents at the screening checkpoints. For the purposes of this Agreement, LEO response
times in excess of 5 minutes are unacceptable. If utilizing Flexible Stationing or Hybrid/Combination
Stationing, specific LE response times to non-emergency/ routine TSA calls will be defined in Individual
Agreements.
IX. Should the Participant fail to comply with the provisions outlined in this Agreement, it may face full or
partial forfeiture of payment and/or sanctions up to removal from the Program. The Participant may be
given up to 60 days to take corrective action(s) and rectify any identified compliance issue(s).
ARTICLE IV – RESPONSIBILITIES
The Participant agrees to provide on-site qualified law enforcement services, during TSA screening checkpoint
operating hours, and to provide law enforcement support to the passenger-screening checkpoints in keeping with
requirements provided by TSA in accordance with the current Security Directive 1542-01-07 (series), regulations,
and other authorities regarding law enforcement services.
At locations where the Agreement allows for such flexible or hybrid stationing and it is appropriate based on
security needs and the configuration of the airport, LEOs may patrol in front of screening checkpoints, throughout
baggage drop areas, near retail and food concessions, and in other public areas. However, in order to be eligible
for partial reimbursement by the LEO RP the primary focus of the officers’ activities must still be on providing
dedicated checkpoint support. Program Participants are required to provide a consistent, highly visible law
enforcement presence at the checkpoint(s) during operational hours.
Unless a waiver has been granted in writing from an authorized TSA official, regardless of their position or title
any individual who provides law enforcement support as outlined in this Agreement must possess all of the
qualifications of a LEO set forth at 49 C.F.R. § 1542.217, while on duty at the airport. The TSA will provide
partial reimbursement for on-site support of the TSA screening activities pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
At a minimum the Participant will ensure that the Law Enforcement (LE) service provider will:
•
Provide consistent support of TSA’s screening operations, including dealing with attempts to bring
prohibited items through the checkpoint, disorderly persons and similar tasks.
•
Follow an established LE response standard which is mutually acceptable to the FSD, Participant
and LE service provider.
In addition, the FSD and the Participant will determine, where appropriate, the level of participation in TSA’s
Layered Security Programs, such as Advanced Threat Local Allocation Strategy (ATLAS), Table Top Exercises,
Breach Drills, and Joint Vulnerability Assessments (JVAs).
The participant is responsible for the following:
1. The Participant will notify the FSD, promptly and in writing, of any changes to the points of contact for this
Agreement or in the law enforcement agency providing the LE services.
2. The Participant shall coordinate all media releases related to the Agreement with the FSD; other contact with
or by media on the terms and conditions of the LEO Reimbursement Agreement shall be referred to the
Contracting Officer.
3. The Participant will assist in the verification of LEO credentials as requested by the FSD or other TSA
representatives.
4. In accordance with Federal, State, and Local statutes, the Participant will promptly furnish on request to any
5
authorized TSA representative incident reports, police reports, and other information dealing with Aviation
Security and/or each law enforcement response to transportation security incidents at the airport and in
connection with TSA administrative inquiries.
5. The Participant will fully cooperate with regulatory and other TSA investigations.
6. The Participant will notify the Program of any operational changes that will impact eligible reimbursement
activities during TSA checkpoint hours of operation.
7. The Participant shall take appropriate measures to protect proprietary, privileged, or otherwise confidential
information that may come into their possession as a result of this Agreement, including Sensitive Security
Information (SSI).
ARTICLE V - EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM
This Agreement will have a ten (10) year ordering period. Beginning on the effective date of award. The TSA reserves
the right to unilaterally extend this Agreement if it is in the Government’s best interest. Individual Agreements will be
placed with specific Agreement terms at any time during the ordering period with a period of performance that may
extend up to one (1) year after the expiration of this Agreement.
ARTICLE VI – INDIVIDUAL AGREEMENTS
This Agreement serves as the Parent Agreement for LEORP. The Government will establish Individual Agreements
that include funding for partial reimbursement and supplemental requirements with each Participant. Individual
Agreements will be issued bilaterally in accordance with the current ordering procedures. This Parent Agreement does
not serve as a guarantee for reimbursement.
ARTICLE VII – AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS
Funds are not obligated under this Parent Agreement, but will be obligated within Individual Agreements and are
contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds. No legal liability on the part of the Government for any
payment may arise until funds are made available and obligated within the Individual Agreements.
ARTICLE VIII – OBLIGATION AND PAYMENTS
A. Obligation.
The Government's liability to make payments to the Participant is limited to only those funds obligated under the
Individual Agreements.
B. Limitation of Government Obligation.
In no event is the Government obligated to reimburse the Participant for expenditures in excess of the total funds
allotted by the Government.
No Contracting Officer or employee of the Government may create or authorize an obligation in excess of the
funds available, or in advance of appropriations (Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. § 1341), unless otherwise
authorized by law.
TSA will provide partial reimbursement of the actual/direct costs of “fully burdened” Patrol Officers or
equivalent salaries, up to the established not-to-exceed (NTE) amount.
Fully Burdened Rates may include:
•
Base salary
•
Social Security
6
•
401(k)/403(b)/457 plans
•
Disability Insurance
•
Health care benefits
•
Pension
•
Life Insurance
TSA will not cover overhead, overtime rates, or administrative costs.
The maximum fully burdened hourly rate for reimbursement will be set by TSA. Reimbursement may be at
this rate or at the actual cost, whichever is the lesser of the two. TSA reserves the right to unilaterally
modify the maximum rate during the period of performance as necessary to optimize the impact of the
program.
ARTICLE IX – BILLING PROCEDURE AND PAYMENT
A. The United States Coast Guard Finance Center (“FINCEN”) performs the payment function on behalf of the
TSA. Registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) is mandatory for invoice payment. For
information regarding SAM, please refer to https://www.sam.gov/SAM/.
B. TSA will reimburse the Participant monthly for amounts expended for the passenger screening checkpoint
activities described in this Agreement . Participants are required to provide mandated LE services regardless of
funding level or period funding is received.
C. Requests for Reimbursement must detail the number of hours of LE services provided, the actual hourly rate,
and the total amount requested for reimbursement. Monthly invoicing consists of services provided from the 1st
day of the month to the last day of the month. Detailed documentation must be submitted for each item for which
reimbursement is requested; for example, checkpoint logs, timesheets, and/or appropriate validation from payroll
for each individual LEO’s fully burdened salary rate. Invoices must include signature from the FSD or FSD
Designee validating the submission.
D. The final Request for Reimbursement is due within 45 days of the end of the Program Period and must be
annotated as final.
E. Include the Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), Tax Identification Number (TIN) and the Electronic Funds Transfer
(EFT) Banking Information with the Request for Reimbursement. Please note that this information must be
consistent with the information in the Participant’s SAM account. Inaccurate information may result in delayed or
rejected payment.
F. Invoicing
The invoice shall, at a minimum, include the following:
1. Agreement Number
2. Invoice Number and Invoice Date
3. Airport Code (ABC)
4. Name and Address of the Airport Requesting Fund Disbursement
5. Point of Contact, with Address, Telephone, Fax and E-mail Contact Information
6. Tax Identification Number and DUNS Number
7. Total Amount of Funds Requesting to be Disbursed by TSA (the Distribution Value, as stated in Article
V of this Agreement)
8. Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) Banking Information (If Applicable)
9. Remittance Address
10. Certification of Requestor, including the following language: This is to certify that the incurred costs
billed were actually expended in furtherance of this Agreement, and we understand that intentional
7
falsification of the information contained herein may be subject to civil and criminal penalties under
applicable federal laws and/or regulations.
11. Signature of Requestor’s Authorized Representative with Date
Notwithstanding any other payment clause in this Agreement, the Government shall make invoice
payments under the terms and conditions specified in this Article. Payment shall be considered made on
the day the check is dated and deposited in the US mail, or an electronic funds transfer is completed. All
days referred to in this provision are calendar days, unless otherwise specified.
ARTICLE X – AUDITS
TSA shall have the right to examine or audit relevant financial records for each Participant facility, while this
Agreement, or any part thereof, remains in force and effect, and for a period of three years after expiration or
termination of the terms of this Agreement. For each facility, Participant shall maintain: project records, technology
maintenance records, and data associated with this project while this Agreement, or any part thereof, remains in
force and effect, and for a period of three years after the expiration or termination of this Agreement. If this
Agreement is completely or partially terminated, the records relating to the work terminated shall be made available
for three years after any resulting final termination settlement. Records relating to appeals under the “Disputes”
provision in Article XII regarding this Agreement shall be made available until such appeals are finally resolved.
As used in this provision, “records” includes books, documents and other data, regardless of type and regardless of
whether such items are in written form, in the form of computer or other electronic data, or in any other form that
relate to this project for each facility.
The Comptroller General of the United States shall also have access to, and the right to examine, any records involving
transactions related to this Agreement.
This article shall not be construed to require Participant, or its contractors or subcontractors who are associated with
or engaged in activities relating to this OTA, to create or maintain any record that they do not maintain in the
ordinary course of business pursuant to a provision of law, provided that those entities maintain records which
conform to generally accepted accounting procedures.
ARTICLE XI – AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES
TSA Contacts
Contracting Officer (CO)
Jason Richards
6595 Springfield Center Dr
Springfield, VA 20598
Email: Jason.Richards@tsa.dhs.gov
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)
Yarley Jean
6595 Springfield Center Dr
Springfield, VA 20598
Email: yarley.jean@tsa.dhs.gov
The COR is responsible for the technical administration and liaison of this Agreement. The COR is not authorized
to change the scope of work, to make any commitment or otherwise obligate the TSA, or authorize any changes
which affect the liability of the TSA. The Participant will inform the Contracting Officer in the event that the COR
takes any action which is interpreted by the Participant as a change in scope or liability to either party.
8
ARTICLE XII - LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY
Subject to the provisions of Federal law, including the Federal Torts Claims Act, each party expressly agrees
without exception or reservation that it shall be solely and exclusively liable for the acts or omissions of its own
agents and/or employees and that neither party looks to the other to save or hold it harmless for the consequences
of any act or omission on the part of one or more of its own agents or employees, subject to the same conditions
provided above.
Participant has the affirmative duty to notify the TSA Contracting Officer in the event that Participant believes
that any act or omission of a TSA agent or employee would increase Participant costs and cause the Participant to
seek compensation from TSA beyond TSA’s liability as stated in Article IV (Responsibilities), or Article VII
(Funding And Limitations). Claims against either party for damages of any nature whatsoever pursued under this
Agreement shall be limited to direct damages not to exceed the aggregate outstanding amount of funding
obligated under this Agreement at the time the dispute arises. If the Participant receives any communication
which it interprets as instructions to change the work encompassed in this Agreement, or to incur costs not
covered by funding obligated at that time, the Participant must not act on that communication, and must contact
the Contracting Officer verbally and in writing immediately.
In no event shall either party be liable to the other for consequential, punitive, special and incidental damages,
claims for lost profits, or other indirect damages.
No third party shall assert any rights under this Agreement unless expressly provided herein.
ARTICLE XIII – DISPUTES
Where possible, disputes shall be resolved by informal discussion between the Contracting Officer for TSA and
an authorized representative of Participant. All disputes arising under or related to this Agreement shall be
resolved under this Article. Disputes, as used in this Agreement, mean a written demand or written assertion by
one of the parties seeking, as a matter of right, the adjustment or interpretation of Agreement terms, or other relief
arising under this Agreement. The dispute shall be made in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative
of the Participant or the TSA Contracting Officer. At a minimum, a dispute under this Agreement shall include a
statement of facts, adequate supporting data, and a request for relief. In the event the parties are unable to resolve
any disagreement through good faith negotiations, Participant may submit the dispute to the Deputy Assistant
Administrator for Contracting and Procurement. If the decision of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Contracting and Procurement is unsatisfactory, the decision may be appealed to the TSA Assistant Administrator
for Contracting and Procurement. The parties agree that the TSA Assistant Administrator/Head of the
Contracting Activity for Contracting and Procurement’s decision shall be final and not subject to further judicial
or administrative review and shall be enforceable and binding upon the parties.
ARTICLE XIV – TERMINATION
In addition to any other termination rights provided by this Agreement, either party may terminate the Individual
Agreement at any time prior to its expiration date, with or without cause, by giving the other party at least thirty
(30) days’ prior written notice of termination . The Government has the unilateral right to terminate this Parent
Agreement. Upon receipt of a notice of termination, the Participant shall take immediate steps to stop the accrual
of any additional obligations that might require payment.
ARTICLE XV - CHANGES AND/OR MODIFICATIONS
Changes or modifications to this Agreement shall be made unilaterally by the TSA Contracting Officer (CO).
Modifications to Individual Agreements will be made in writing by the TSA CO, and will reference the Individual
Agreement number. Modifications shall cite the subject article to this Agreement and shall state the exact nature of
the modification. No oral statement by any person shall be interpreted as modifying or otherwise affecting the terms
of this Agreement. With the exception of Individual Agreement modifications that affect the scope of work which
require bilateral Agreement between TSA and the Participant, modifications shall be issued unilaterally by the CO.
9
This may include administrative changes, additional funding, or changes to funding information.
ARTICLE XVI - CONSTRUCTION OF THE AGREEMENT
This Agreement and subsequent Individual Agreements are issued under 49 U.S.C. §106 (l)(6) and §114(m) and is
not a procurement contract, grant, cooperative agreement, or other financial assistance. It is not intended to be,
nor shall it be construed as, a partnership, corporation, or other business organization. Both parties agree to
provide their best efforts to achieve the objectives of this Agreement. The Agreement constitutes the entire
Agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter and supersedes all prior agreements,
understanding, negotiations and discussions whether oral or written of the parties. Each party acknowledges that
there are no exceptions taken or reserved under this Agreement.
ARTICLE XVII - PROTECTION OF INFORMATION
The parties agree that they shall take appropriate measures to protect proprietary, privileged, or otherwise
confidential information that may come into their possession as a result of this Agreement.
A. RECORDS AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 114(r), Sensitive Security Information and Nondisclosure of Security Activities, Sensitive
Security Information (SSI) is a category of sensitive but unclassified (SBU) information that must be protected
because it is information that, if publicly released, would be detrimental to the security of transportation. Under
49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 1520.5(a), the SSI Regulation also provides additional reasons for protecting
information as SSI beyond the condition that the release of the information would be detrimental to the security
of transportation. SSI may not be disclosed except in accordance with the provisions of that rule.
Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1520 defines the scope, categorization, handling requirements
and disposition of information deemed SSI. All members assigned to work under this Agreement are subject to
the provisions of 49 CFR Part 1520, Protection of Sensitive Security Information, and shall safeguard and handle
any SSI in accordance with the policies and procedures outlined in 49 C.F.R. Part 1520, as well as the DHS and
TSA policies and procedures for handling and safeguarding SSI. All members assigned to work under this
Agreement must complete the TSA-mandated SSI Awareness Training course prior to accessing SSI, and on an
annual basis for the duration of the OTA or for the duration of the requester’s need for access to SSI, whichever is
later. The Agreement Holder shall place this requirement in all contracts, sub-contracts, joint venture agreements,
and teaming agreements related to the performance of this Agreement. For purposes of this OTA, the OTA
Agreement holder (Participant) would fall under the provision of 49 CFR § 1520.7(k): Each person employed by,
contracted to, or acting for a covered person, including a grantee of DHS or DOT, and including a person
formerly in such position.
Pursuant to 49 C.F.R. Part 1520.9(a)(3), the Agreement Holder must contact SSI@tsa.dhs.gov for guidance on
handling requests to access to SSI (before using SSI materials) for any other purpose besides activities falling
within the scope of the Agreement by other persons, including requests from experts, consultants, and legal
counsel (“requesters”) hired by the Agreement Holder. The Agreement Holder shall include the Contracting
Officer (CO) and Contracting Officer Representative (COR) as a carbon copy “cc” recipient of its contact to
SSI@tsa.dhs.gov. The TSA SSI office must first make a determination as to whether the requesters are a
“covered person” with a “need to know” under 49 C.F.R. Parts 1520.7 and 1520.11. Further recipients of SSI
shall be provided NDAs, in accordance with these contract provisions, and with a copy of the SSI Quick
Reference Guide for DHS Employees and Contractors.
(Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs). The Contracting Officer will provide the non-disclosure form (DHS
Form 11000-6), as necessary, to the Agreement holder when circumstances warrant. NDAs are required to be
signed by all OTA personnel when access to SSI is necessary for performance of the Agreement. By signing the
NDA, the recipient certifies in writing that they will take the necessary steps to prevent the unauthorized
disclosure and use of information.
10
Breach. In accordance with 49 C.F.R. Part 1520.9(c), the Agreement holder agrees that in the event of any actual
or suspected breach of SSI (i.e., loss of control, compromise, unauthorized disclosure, access for an unauthorized
purpose, or other unauthorized access, whether physical or electronic), the Agreement holder shall immediately,
and in no event later than one hour of discovery, report the breach to the Contracting Officer and the COR. The
Agreement holder is responsible for positively verifying that notification is received and acknowledged by at least
one of the foregoing Government officials.
B. Publicity and Dissemination of Agreement Information
The Agreement holder shall not publish, permit to be published, or distribute for public consumption, any
information, oral or written, concerning the results or conclusions made pursuant to the performance of this
Agreement without the prior written consent of the Contracting Officer. The Agreement holder shall submit any
request for public release at least ten (10) business days in advance of the planned release.
Under no circumstances shall the Agreement holder release any requested submittal prior to TSA approval.
Any material proposed to be published or distributed shall be submitted via email to the Contracting Officer. The
Contracting Officer will follow the procedures in Management Directives 1700.3 and 1700.4. The Office of the
Administrator retains the authority to deny publication authorization. Any conditions on the approval for release
will be clearly described. Notice of disapproval will be accompanied by an explanation of the basis or bases for
disapproval.
Any contact with or by a Media firm or personnel related to this Agreement and in accordance with the terms of
this Agreement shall be referred to the Contracting Officer.
ARTICLE XVIII – MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS OF LEO PERSONNEL FOR WHICH
PARTICIPANT MAY BE REIMBURSED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT
A. Have authority to arrest, with or without a warrant, while on duty at the airport for the following
violations of the criminal laws of the State and local jurisdictions in which the airport is located:
•
A crime committed in the presence of the individual, or
•
A felony, when the individual has reason to believe that the suspect has committed it;
B. Be identifiable by appropriate indicia of authority;
C. Be armed with a firearm and authorized to use it; and
D. Have completed a training program meeting the requirements of 49 C.F.R. § 1542.217(c) and (d), to include
training in:
•
The use of firearms;
•
The courteous and efficient treatment of persons subject to inspection, detention, search, arrest,
and other aviation security activities;
•
The responsibilities of law enforcement personnel under the security program; and
•
Any other subject TSA determines is necessary.
Category III and Category IV airports may apply to TSA for a waiver in order to be reimbursed for their
provision of Armed Security Guards who do not fully meet all of the above qualifications. TSA will review
the qualifications of any such guards proposed to provide LE support on a case-by-case basis, to include these
individuals’ arrest authority and any law enforcement training they undergo, to determine-- in the agency’s sole
discretion-- whether they are sufficient for Program purposes.
ARTICLE XIX – PERFORMANCE REVIEWS
A. The Program Manager shall review the monthly Certification sheets submitted by the FSD.
B. An annual performance review may consist of a comparison of the following:
•
LEO evaluation/certification results
•
Aviation Security Inspector (ASI) Compliance Reports
11
•
Consolidated invoiced and actual cost reports
•
Performance and Results Information System (PARIS) Reports
•
Performance Measurement Information System (PMIS) Reports
•
Airport Information Management System (AIM)
Memorandum
File #: 26-333
City Council
DATE: Tuesday, September 1, 2026
AGENDA: Regular
FROM: Chris Fredericksen, General Manager
DEPARTMENT: Idaho Falls Power
Title
Kleinschmidt Continuing Relicensing Professional Service Contract - FY2027
☐ Ordinance
☐ Resolution
☐ Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐ Legislative Public Hearing
☐ Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☒ Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve the contract for fiscal year 2027 Relicensing Services for the Gem State and Idaho Falls Projects
through the Post-Final License Application (FLA) Filing Process for a total of $579,100 and give authorization to
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
City Council approved Kleinschmidt Associates’ original contract on Oct. 28, 2021, following a search of
qualifications (SOQ) in 2019 to provide professional services on a year-over-year basis as is allowed by Idaho
Code § 67-2320 for relicensing the City’s hydroelectric projects with the Federal Electric Regulatory
Commission (FERC). The fiscal 2027 spending authority is for ongoing project management, completing final
technical reports (FTRs), reviewing comments on the Draft License Application (DLA), resolving comments in
the Final License Application (FLA) development, developing Management Plans in consultation with IFP
management and operations staff, and managing the post filing process as explained on the scope of work.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Municipal Services Departments.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 9/8/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
We provide practical solutions for complex renewable energy, water, and environmental projects.
Project Control No: 1970004.07
KleinschmidtGroup.com
September 4, 2026
VIA EMAIL
Richard Malloy
Idaho Falls Power
140 S. Capital Ave.
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Re:
Proposal for Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Relicensing Services for the Gem State and
Idaho Falls Projects through the Post-Final License Application (FLA) Filing
Process (1970004.07)
Dear Mr. Malloy:
Kleinschmidt Associates (Kleinschmidt) is pleased to submit this proposal to Idaho Falls
Power (IFP) for the continuation of relicensing support for the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) relicensing process in fiscal year (FY) 2027. Kleinschmidt prepared this
proposal at IFP’s request to continue to assist in the next phase of pre- and post-filing
activities for concurrent relicensing processes for the Gem State Hydroelectric Project
(FERC No. 2952) and Idaho Falls Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2842) (collectively,
Projects). Our existing Purchase Order (PO# 98481) is expiring, and IFP has requested that
Kleinschmidt provide an updated budget for FY 2027. This proposal for FY 2027
Relicensing Services for the Gem State and Idaho Falls Projects through the Post-Final
License Application (FLA) Filing Process covers the next phase of required relicensing work,
including the following tasks:
1. Continue project management.
2. Complete Final Technical Reports (FTRs).
3. Review comments on the Draft License Application (DLA) and resolve comments
in the Final License Application (FLA) development.
4. Develop Management Plans in consultation with IFP management and operations
staff.
5. Manage the post-filing process, including parallel processes.
Richard Malloy
September 4, 2026
2
Project Control No: 1970004.07
KleinschmidtGroup.com
SCOPE OF WORK
PHASE 1 – Project Management (Ongoing)
Under the ongoing Project Management phase, Kleinschmidt will continue to manage
project budget, coordinate and direct subconsultants, communicate with IFP
management on project status through biweekly management calls, and manage internal
Kleinschmidt processes including invoicing and project controls. Kleinschmidt may utilize
subconsultants with IFP approval for certain tasks, and this phase includes budget for
subconsultant management.
Tasks under Phase 1 Project Management are detailed in Table 1.
Table 1
Project Management Assumptions and Tasks
Task
Task Description /
Deliverables
Assumptions
Costs
1.1 Administrative /
Contracting
• Manage and administer
subcontracts, including
invoice review
• Track budget and budget
variance
• Invoice IFP monthly
• Communicate with IFP on
budget status and
potential changes
• Monthly invoices and
budget check-ins
• Administer
subcontracts and
manage subcontractor
invoices
$13,400
1.2 Internal Team
Coordination
• Weekly check-in with PM
Team, including
subconsultants, as
necessary
• Biweekly check-in with
Drafting Team
• PM Team consists of
Project Manager (PM),
Deputy PM (DPM), and
one Subject Matter
Expert (SME)
• Drafting Team includes
DPM, Document Lead
$31,400
1.3 IFM Management
Communication
• Biweekly management
team discussion, and
biweekly communication
with IFP PM (Malloy)
• Participation by PM,
DPM, and rotating SME
$27,000
Richard Malloy
September 4, 2026
3
Project Control No: 1970004.07
KleinschmidtGroup.com
Task
Task Description /
Deliverables
Assumptions
Costs
1.4 Website
Maintenance
• Upload and organize
project information on the
existing SharePoint site
and continue updating the
external public website
• Payment of annual public
website subscription fee
($140)
• N/A
$1,000
Phase Total
$72,800
PHASE 2 – Final Technical Reports
The Kleinschmidt Team is responsible for reporting on the following studies:
• Water Quality (WQ-1)
• Fish Assemblage (AQ-1)
• Desktop Fish Entrainment (AQ-2)
• Aquatic Habitat and Sediment Characterization (AQ-3)
• Botanical Resources (TERR-1)
• Project Lands and Roads (LAND-1)
• Cultural Resources (CR-1)
• Tribal Resources (TR-1)
• Wildlife and Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species (TERR-2)
• Recreation Use and Facility Inventory (REC-1)
• Environmental Justice (EJ-1)
For each study, Kleinschmidt will finalize the draft technical reports that were submitted
with the Updated Study Report (USR) on June 12, 2026, based on comments received
from FERC, agencies, and interested parties. The FTRs will (1) state the goals and objectives
of the study; (2) describe the study area; (3) describe the methods used to meet the study
objectives; (4) present the data collected; (5) frame the data in terms of addressing the
goals and objectives of the study; and (6) summarize consultation conducted during study
implementation. Kleinschmidt’s management will include Subject Matter Expert (SME)
Richard Malloy
September 4, 2026
4
Project Control No: 1970004.07
KleinschmidtGroup.com
review of the FTRs for technical content and consistency. Tasks under Phase 2 Final
Technical Reports are detailed in Table 2.
Table 2
Final Technical Report Assumptions and Costs
Task
Task Description /
Deliverables
Assumptions
Costs
2.1 Finalize Technical
Reports
• FTR for IFP Review
• FTR for Stakeholder
Review
• Assumes FTRs will be
revised from Draft
Technical Reports
(DTRs) submitted
with the USR
• IFP will provide one
round of
consolidated
comments per study
$26,100
2.2 Coordination with
SWCA
Environmental
Consultants
(SWCA) on
Technical Reports
• Review reports for
studies SWCA
conducted for accuracy
and consistency with
strategic narrative
• Kleinschmidt will
provide one round of
comments to SWCA
per study
• IFP will provide one
round of comments
per study
$4,200
Phase Total
$30,300
PHASE 3 – Development of Final License Application
Kleinschmidt will revise already drafted exhibits into final form based on comments from
FERC, agencies, and other stakeholders. This task will include revising draft exhibits,
reviewing (including IFP review/edits), and finalizing. Kleinschmidt will then file the final
FLA with FERC and distribute to stakeholders on IFP’s behalf. Tasks under Phase 3
Development of Final License Application are detailed in Table 3.
Richard Malloy
September 4, 2026
5
Project Control No: 1970004.07
KleinschmidtGroup.com
Table 3
Development of Final License Application Assumptions and Costs
Task
Task Description /
Deliverables
Assumptions
Costs
3.1 Exhibit A
(Project Description)
• Finalize an Exhibit A that
meets content
requirements of 18 CFR §
4.51(b)
• Coordinate with IFP
personnel on information
needs and review
• Two rounds of IFP
Exhibit A review and
subsequent revision(s)
$20,200
3.2 Exhibit B
(Operations)
• Finalize an Exhibit B that
meets content
requirements of 18 CFR §
4.51(c)
• Coordinate with IFP
personnel; refine
description of Projects
operations and proposed
operations (as needed)
• Team will take existing
descriptions, update
with known
information, and revise
per IFP review
• Two rounds of IFP
Exhibit B review and
subsequent revision(s)
$21,100
3.3 Exhibit C
(Construction and
History)
• Finalize an Exhibit C that
meets content
requirements of 18 CFR §
4.51(d)
• No proposed
construction to
describe
• Two rounds of IFP
Exhibit C review and
subsequent revision(s)
$18,700
3.4 Exhibit D
(Cost and Financing)
• Finalize an Exhibit D that
meets content
requirements of 18 CFR §
4.51(e)
• Coordinate with IFP
personnel to develop
statement of cost and
finances that account for
proposed protection,
mitigation, and
enhancement (PME)
measures
• Certain document
sections to be initially
drafted with help from
IFP
• Two rounds of IFP
Exhibit D review and
subsequent revision(s)
$18,700
3.5 Exhibit E
(Environment)
• Finalize an Exhibit E that
meets content
requirements of 18 CFR §
4.51(f); § 5.18(b);1 § 4.38(f)2
• Two rounds of IFP
Exhibit E review and
subsequent revision(s)
• Comprehensive half-
day Kleinschmidt/IFP
$49,300
Richard Malloy
September 4, 2026
6
Project Control No: 1970004.07
KleinschmidtGroup.com
Task
Task Description /
Deliverables
Assumptions
Costs
• Include field study results
in application sections
internal page turn
review of Exhibit E
document
3.6 Exhibit F
(Facilities)
• Finalize an Exhibit F that
meets content
requirements of 18 CFR §
4.51(g); § 4.41(g)3
• Compile CAD drawings in
IFP template
• Stability analyses: high-
level scope of work and
level of effort (see
Attachment A)
• Development of
Exhibit F drawings and
supporting design
report (SDR) utilizing
existing information
provided by IFP;
Information for Gate
Stress Analysis will be
scoped under a
separate job
• Two rounds of IFP
Exhibit F review and
subsequent revision(s)
$55,700
3.7 Exhibit G
(Project Lands and
Boundary)
• Finalize an Exhibit G that
meets content
requirements of 18 CFR §
4.51(h); § 4.41(h)
• Potential minor changes
to the Project Boundary
(to widen/lessen Project
Boundary around the
roadside)
• Development of Exhibit
G shapefiles
• Meeting with IFP to
discuss proposed
changes to existing
Exhibit G; development
of three alternative
Exhibit G layouts
• Two rounds of IFP
Exhibit G review and
subsequent revision(s)
$24,100
3.8 Exhibit H
(Plans and Ability to
Operate the Project)
• Finalize an Exhibit H that
meets content
requirements of 18 CFR §
16.104
• Coordinate with IFP
personnel to gain
pertinent Exhibit H
information needs
• IFP will be responsible
for Exhibit H text
• Two rounds of
Exhibit H review and
subsequent revision(s)
$18,700
Richard Malloy
September 4, 2026
7
Project Control No: 1970004.07
KleinschmidtGroup.com
Task
Task Description /
Deliverables
Assumptions
Costs
3.9 Exhibit Work Plan,
Facilitation, and
Coordination
• Develop a work plan
detailing data and
coordination needs and
schedule for each exhibit
including contacts within
IFP and delegating
Kleinschmidt/IFP
responsibilities for
drafting sections or
providing data
• Work plan and work
process
• Notes from
coordination meetings
$28,400
Phase Total
$254,900
1
Application content
2
Consultation requirements
3
Contents of Application
4
Information to be provided by an applicant for new license: filing requirements
PHASE 4 – Draft Management Plans
Kleinschmidt and its subconsultant team will develop the draft management plans listed
in Table 4 with the approval of and in consultation with IFP. Draft management plans will
be appended to the FLA. Resource agency and stakeholder consultation on these plans
will occur in tandem with the agency/stakeholder FLA review period. Tasks under Phase 4
Draft Management Plans are detailed in Table 4. Draft management plans filed with the
FLA are the minimum that FERC may expect to issue an Order Issuing New License. As
agencies file their mandatory conditions under applicable status, including Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act and Section 4e of the Federal Power Act (FPA), or make
recommendations under Section 10(j) of the FPA, additional plans and requirements may
be identified. Kleinschmidt anticipates that potential needs for such plans will be identified
in time to forecast an FY 2028 budget.
Table 4
Draft Management Plan Assumptions and Costs
Draft Management
Plan
Task Description / Deliverables
Costs
4.1 Historic Properties
Management Plan
• Draft plan including PME Measures
• Revise draft following IFP Review
• Submit Draft Plan (appended to FLA)
$25,100
Richard Malloy
September 4, 2026
8
Project Control No: 1970004.07
KleinschmidtGroup.com
Draft Management
Plan
Task Description / Deliverables
Costs
4.2 Vegetation
Management Plan
• Invasive Species
• Special Status
Plants
• Draft plan including PME Measures
• Revise draft following IFP Review
• Submit Draft Plan (appended to FLA)
$20,200
4.3 Recreation
Management Plan
• Draft plan including PME Measures
• Revise draft following IFP Review
• Submit Draft Plan (appended to FLA)
$20,800
4.4 Additional
Management Plan
Needs
• Coordinate with IFP on additional management plan
needs that may arise throughout the drafting process
• Respond to agency or stakeholder requests
$25,600
Phase Total
$91,700
PHASE 5 – Post-Filing Process
Kleinschmidt will coordinate a Section 401 water quality certification with the Idaho
Department of Environmental Quality, track and respond to agency filings (conditions and
recommendations), support additional information requests, and coordinate a Special Use
Permit as needed. Post-filing activities will depend on agency and FERC requests following
filing of the FLA. Tasks under Phase 5 Post-Filing Process are detailed in Table 5.
Table 5
Post-Filing Process Assumptions and Costs
Post-Filing Process
Task Description / Deliverables
Costs
5.1 401 Water Quality
Certification
• Draft a 401 water quality certification permit
• Revise draft following IFP Review
• Submit 401 water quality certification permit following
FLA
$20,300
5.2 Track and Respond
to Agency Filings /
Ready for
Environmental
Analysis Process
• Review and summarize agency conditions and
recommendations
• Coordinate with IFP on responses to agency
conditions and recommendations
• Support development of any measures
$32,100
Richard Malloy
September 4, 2026
9
Project Control No: 1970004.07
KleinschmidtGroup.com
Post-Filing Process
Task Description / Deliverables
Costs
5.3 Additional
Information
Requests (AIR)
• Track and coordinate responses to FERC Additional
Information Requests (AIR) with SMEs
• Coordinate with IFP on AIR responses
$37,800
5.4 Special Use Permit
• Draft Special-Use Permit with SMEs
• Coordinate with IFP on Special-Use Permit
$13,800
5.5 Compliance
• Support IFP with ongoing compliance measures
$25,400
Phase Total
$129,400
SCHEDULE
The following proposed schedule has been assembled in accordance with the Integrated
Licensing Process. Tasks are anticipated to be initiated in October 2026 and end in
September 2027 with the filing of the FLA (Table 6). All draft FLA materials will be
completed by July 2027—allowing 2 months for review and revisions.
Table 6
Proposed Schedule
Phase
Date
Phase 1: Project Management
Ongoing
Phase 2: Final Technical Reports – Finalize technical reports
following DLA comment deadline
December 2, 2026
Phase 3: Development of Final License Application –
FLA to IFP
December 15, 2026
Phase 3: Development of Final License Application –
FLA for filing
January 31, 2027
Phase 3: Development of Final License Application –
Issue Public Notice of FLA
February 14, 2027
Phase 4: Draft Management Plans
December 15, 2026
Phase 5: Post-Filing Process
March – October 2027
Subsequent phases for the Projects will be scoped separately for FY 2028 and may include
receipt of agency filings (conditions and recommendations) and any additional
information requests from FERC beyond those issued in FY 2027.
Richard Malloy
September 4, 2026
10
Project Control No: 1970004.07
KleinschmidtGroup.com
COST OF SERVICES
Kleinschmidt will perform the proposed FY 2027 work on an Hourly Rate plus Expenses
basis for the estimated cost of $579,100 (five hundred seventy-nine thousand one
hundred dollars). Costs are summarized in Table 7 and were calculated using
Kleinschmidt’s Standard Rates. This estimate is not a fixed price or an upper limit.
Kleinschmidt will not exceed the estimated amount without first discussing the need with
IFP and receiving your authorization to proceed.
Table 7
Summary of Cost of Services
TASK
COST
Phase 1: Project Management
$72,800
Phase 2: Final Technical Reports
$30,300
Phase 3: Development of Final License Application
$254,900
Phase 4: Draft Management Plans
$91,700
Phase 5: Post-Filing Process
$129,400
Total
$579,100
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The proposed Scope of Work will be performed on a Time Plus Expenses basis utilizing
Kleinschmidt’s Terms and Conditions as modified on September 4, 2026 (Attachment A).
Kleinschmidt’s 2026 rates are attached as Attachment B (a copy of the 2027 rates will be
provided when available). Kleinschmidt’s Method of Payment is included as Attachment
C.
Richard Malloy
September 4, 2026
11
Project Control No: 1970004.07
KleinschmidtGroup.com
Please contact Finlay Anderson by email at finlay.anderson@kleinschmidtgroup.com or
by phone at 971-345-0517 if you have questions regarding this proposal. We look forward
to continuing our work with IFP on this relicensing process.
Sincerely,
KLEINSCHMIDT ASSOCIATES
Kelly L. Larimer, Vice President
Principal-In-Charge
Finlay Anderson
Project Manager
FA:SS
Attachment A:
Kleinschmidt Associates Terms and Conditions (as of September 4,
2026)
Attachment B:
2026 Rate Schedule (2027 rates will be issued at a later date)
Attachment C:
Method of Payment
K:\Jobs\1970\004\Proposal\07 - FY 27\1970004.07 Idaho Falls FY27 SOW_20260904.docx
Accepted By:
IDAHO FALLS POWER
Signature
Printed Name
Title
Date
ATTACHMENT A
KLEINSCHMIDT ASSOCIATES TERMS AND CONDITIONS (AS OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2026)
REVISED 09/26
Page 1 of 2
KLEINSCHMIDT ASSOCIATES
(A MAINE CORPORATION)
STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Purpose: These Standard Terms and Conditions when combined with a Proposal are intended to form a
complete Agreement between Kleinschmidt Associates (Kleinschmidt) and the Client to whom the Proposal is
addressed. When Kleinschmidt's signed Proposal has been accepted by the Client, the resulting Agreement shall
take the place of all other agreements and representations concerning the subject of the Proposal. This
Agreement may be amended only by a writing signed by both parties. Terms and Conditions of any purchase
order issued by Client shall not be part of this Agreement unless separately signed by Kleinschmidt.
2. Payment: In consideration for Kleinschmidt's performance of the proposed work, Client shall pay Kleinschmidt
as stated in the Proposal. Client agrees to pay promptly Kleinschmidt's fees and expenses as submitted on
monthly invoices. If any balance remains unpaid thirty days from the date of the invoice, Client shall pay
interest on the unpaid balance at the rate of one and one-half percent per month from said thirtieth day and shall,
in addition, pay Kleinschmidt's costs of collection including reasonable legal fees.
3. Client's Duties: At no cost to Kleinschmidt, Client shall:
Promptly provide to Kleinschmidt the information required by Kleinschmidt for performance of its services.
Provide Kleinschmidt personnel with access to the work site so that they may perform their work without
interference.
Designate a Client's representative with authority to transmit instructions, receive information, and define
Client's polices concerning this Agreement.
Promptly notify Kleinschmidt of any defect in Kleinschmidt's services as soon as Client becomes aware of it.
Prior to commencement of Kleinschmidt's work, furnish Kleinschmidt with any special design or construction
standards, which Client may require Kleinschmidt to follow.
4. Kleinschmidt's Liability: Kleinschmidt's services will be performed with that degree of reasonable care and
skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing under similar circumstances.
The total liability by Kleinschmidt and its agents for all claims relating to the work outlined in the Proposal
shall not exceed the compensation received by Kleinschmidt or $100,000, whichever is greater.
Kleinschmidt shall not be liable for any losses resulting from deficiencies in its services if those deficiencies
arise from a cause beyond Kleinschmidt's reasonable control.
5. Ownership of Documents: Any drawings, specifications, or reports prepared by Kleinschmidt under this
Agreement shall be the property of Client; however, Kleinschmidt shall have the unlimited right to use such
drawings, specifications, and reports and the intellectual property therein. Client's use of such drawings,
specifications, and reports shall be limited to the project or purpose for which they were prepared. Any use
other than that purpose will be at Client's sole risk and without liability to Kleinschmidt and Client shall
indemnify and hold harmless Kleinschmidt from all claims, damages, losses, and expenses resulting therefrom.
6. Opinions of Probable Cost: Opinions of Probable Cost prepared by Kleinschmidt are merely expressions of
Kleinschmidt's judgment based on its experience as a design professional familiar with the industry.
Kleinschmidt has no control over market prices, construction methods, or competitive conditions and therefore
cannot represent that actual bids or negotiated prices will not vary from Kleinschmidt's Opinions of Probable
Cost.
7. Patents: Kleinschmidt's work under this Agreement shall not include patent or copyright searches; and
Kleinschmidt assumes no responsibility for any patent or copyright searches; and Kleinschmidt assumes no
responsibility for any patent or copyright infringement that may arise from its work. Kleinschmidt makes no
representation that anything made, used, or sold in connection with its services will be free from such
infringement.
REVISED 09/26
Page 2 of 2
8. Termination or Suspension: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon reasonable notice to the other.
Kleinschmidt shall be paid for the services provided and expenses incurred through the date of termination.
If the Agreement is terminated by the Client without breach by Kleinschmidt or if Kleinschmidt terminates for
Client's breach, Kleinschmidt shall also be paid its reasonable and necessary termination costs which may
include layoff and demobilization expenses as well as costs of terminating contracts, leases, and other
obligations incurred by Kleinschmidt in reliance upon this Agreement. If Client suspends the work,
Kleinschmidt shall be reimbursed by Client for such added fees and costs which arise from the suspension and
remobilization.
Kleinschmidt shall not be liable to Client for losses resulting from Kleinschmidt's termination or suspension
caused by Client's non-payment or other material breach of this Agreement.
9. Assignment: Neither party shall assign its rights, interests, or obligations under this Agreement without prior
written consent from the other party; but such consent shall not unreasonably be withheld.
10. No Waiver: The failure of either party to enforce a provision of this Agreement shall not prevent that party
from later enforcing it or from pursuing the remedies that may be available for breach of the provision.
11. Indemnification: Within its limit of liability Kleinschmidt shall indemnify and hold harmless the Client and its
agents from any and all claims and losses caused solely by the negligent acts or omissions of Kleinschmidt or
its agents in the performance of services under this Agreement to the extent allowed by Idaho law and the limits
of the Idaho Tort Claims Act (Title 6, Chapter 9).
Client shall indemnify and hold harmless Kleinschmidt and its agents from any and all claims and losses caused
solely by the negligent acts or omissions of Client or its agents with respect to this Agreement.
12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Idaho provided that nothing
contained in the Agreement shall be interpreted in such a way as to render the Agreement unenforceable under
any law of the United States or the law of the place in which the Client is located.
13. Anti-Boycott Against Israel Act: Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2346, if payments under this Contract
exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and Kleinschmidt employs ten (10) or more persons,
Kleinschmidt certifies that it is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of this Agreement engage
in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under its control. The terms in this Paragraph that are
defined in Idaho Code section 67-2346 shall have the meaning defined therein.
14. Certification of No Chinese Ownership: Pursuant to Idaho Code 67-2359, Kleinschmidt certifies that
Kleinschmidt is not currently owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic of China and will
not, for the duration of this Agreement, be owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic
China.
15. Anti-Boycott of Certain Sectors: Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2347A, if payments under this Contract exceed
one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and Kleinschmidt employs ten (10) or more persons, Kleinschmidt
certifies that it is not currently engaged in and will not for the duration of the Contract engage in a boycott of
any individual or company because the individual or company engages in or supports either (1) the exploration,
production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacture of fossil fuel-based energy, timber, minerals,
hydroelectric power, nuclear energy, or agriculture; or (2) the manufacture, distribution, sale, or use of firearms,
as defined in Idaho Code § 18-3302(2)(d). The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code § 67-
2347A shall have the meaning defined therein.
16. Time for Acceptance: Kleinschmidt's proposal shall remain firm for no longer than 60 days unless another
period is specified in the proposal or the time is specifically extended by Kleinschmidt.
k:\jobs\1970\master contract\standard terms and conditions_20260904clean.docx
ATTACHMENT B
2026 RATE SCHEDULE (2027 RATES WILL BE ISSUED AT A LATER DATE)
Revised 10.2025
Page 1 of 1
KleinschmidtGroup.com
KLEINSCHMIDT ASSOCIATES
2026 RATES (USD)
LABOR CATEGORY
HOURLY BILLING RATE
SENIOR MANAGERS/CONSULTANTS
Principal Consultant F1
$328.00
ENGINEERS
Senior Engineering Advisor E7
$304.00
Senior Engineering Consultant E6
$275.00
Senior Engineer E5
$226.00
Project Engineer E4
$202.00
Engineer E3
$190.00
Staff Engineer E2
$169.00
Engineer Technician E1
$128.00
LICENSING COORDINATORS
Senior Regulatory Advisor L7
$302.00
Senior Licensing Coordinator L6
$242.00
Project Licensing Coordinator L5
$199.00
Licensing Coordinator L4
$174.00
Staff Licensing Coordinator L3
$150.00
Associate Licensing Coordinator L2
$128.00
Licensing Technician L1
$108.00
SCIENTISTS
Senior Science Advisor S7
$290.00
Senior Scientist S6
$230.00
Project Scientist S5
$196.00
Scientist S4
$166.00
Staff Scientist S3
$150.00
Associate Scientist S2
$118.00
Scientist Technician S1
$102.00
PROJECT AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
Project Director
$320.00
Senior Project Manager
$290.00
Project Manager PM1
$244.00
Senior Support Staff A7
$244.00
Project Controller A6
$202.00
Senior Project Coordinator or Administrator /Accountant A5
$162.00
Project Administrator or /Accountant A4
$141.00
Administrative Staff A3
$122.00
Associate Administrative Staff A2
$105.00
Office Assistant A1
$96.00
DESIGNERS/DRAFTERS
Lead Designer D5
$186.00
Senior Designer D4
$170.00
Designer D3
$149.00
Drafter D2
$130.00
CAD Technician D1
$112.00
Effective January 1, 2026
ATTACHMENT C
METHOD OF PAYMENT
REVISED 04-20
Page 1 of 1
KleinschmidtGroup.com
KLEINSCHMIDT ASSOCIATES
METHOD OF PAYMENT
1. Client may pay Kleinschmidt either on a negotiated Lump Sum basis or Hourly Rate
basis, as defined in the Work Authorization and agreed by the Client and Kleinschmidt
in writing.
2. Client agrees to pay Kleinschmidt for Services the amounts quoted in the Proposal or
Work Authorization, in accordance with the compensation terms laid out in the
contract. Kleinschmidt agrees not to exceed the estimated consulting costs as stated
in the proposal without explaining the need to the Client and obtaining the Client's
authorization to proceed.
3. For Lump Sum projects, Kleinschmidt will invoice monthly as a percent complete of
the project or Work Authorization, unless otherwise defined in the Work Authorization.
4. For Time and Materials, or Hourly Rate projects, Kleinschmidt will invoice monthly for
all employee time at the hourly billing rate currently in effect, times a number of hours
worked on the project plus subconsultant fees and expenses as described below.
Client agrees to pay for expert testimony and direct preparation for testimony in any
litigation, arbitration, or other legal or administrative proceeding at 150% of the
standard billing rates with a minimum daily charge based upon an 8-hour day, plus
Reimbursable Expenses.
5. For any projects where expenses are invoiced separately from labor, the following
apply:
a. Client agrees to pay Kleinschmidt a 15 percent markup for subconsultant
services.
b. Client agrees to pay 3 percent of labor costs for telecommunications (e.g.,
phone, data transmission and storage, fax, conference and video conference,
data security).
c. Client agrees to pay for specialized computer programs, field equipment, and
other unit charges (e.g., photocopies, mileage, photos, drawing reproductions,
CD preparation, SharePoint hosting) according to the current rates in effect.
d. Client agrees to pay any other reimbursable expenses actually incurred by
Kleinschmidt at cost.
V:\Admin Group\Contractual Documents\2020 Files\Method of Payment.docx
Memorandum
File #: 26-334
City Council
DATE: Tuesday, September 1, 2026
AGENDA: Regular
FROM: Chris Fredericksen, General Manager
DEPARTMENT: Idaho Falls Power
Title
Construction Agreement for South Tourist Park Path Lighting Project
☐ Ordinance
☐ Resolution
☐ Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐ Legislative Public Hearing
☐ Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☒ Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve the Construction Agreement with Armstrong Electric, Inc, in the amount of $145,680.06; and give
authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed
necessary).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
On May 14, 2026, Idaho Falls Power (IFP) issued an informal bid request for the project. Bids were received
and opened on June 14, 2026. On June 25, 2026, on the recommendation of IFP and the City’s Legal
Department, the Council rejected the initial bids and directed staff to solicit on the open market.
Following that direction, staff's review found the project is subject to Davis-Bacon prevailing wage
requirements due to its grant funding, a requirement not included in the original bid. During preparation of
the revised bid, a rock removal line item was also added to establish a clear unit cost if rock is encountered
during installation. The construction agreement therefore includes both the Davis-Bacon wage requirement
and the rock removal item to accurately reflect project costs.
In summary, the construction agreement is not simply a higher-priced rebid of the original project. It reflects
two requirements identified after Council's rejection: Davis-Bacon prevailing wages tied to the project's grant
funding, and a rock removal for transparent cost accounting if rock is encountered during construction.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Municipal Services Departments.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 9/8/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this ___day of ________, by and between CITY OF IDAHO
FALLS, IDAHO, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho (hereinafter referred as "CITY"),
and Armstrong Electric, Inc, 1175 Hollipark Dr, Idaho Falls, ID 83401 (hereinafter
"Agreement"):
WITNESS ETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the invitation of CITY to construct and install a park path lighting
system at South Tourist Park (the "Project"), CONTRACTOR did, in accordance therewith file
with CITY a proposal containing an offer which was invited by said notice; and
WHEREAS, CITY has determined that that CONTRACTOR was the negotiated and awarded
open market bidder.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties to this Agreement, in consideration of the mutual covenants and
stipulations set out, agree as follows:
SECTION 1
PROJECT DOCUMENTS
The Project Documents which comprise the entire Agreement between CITY and
CONTRACTOR concerning the work to be performed include this Agreement and the Project
Plans attached to this Agreement as Exhibit "A" and incorporated in this Agreement by this
reference.
SECTION 2
SCOPE OF WORK
CONTRACTOR shall perform all services necessary to complete the entire work described in
the Project Documents, in accordance with the plans and specifications established for this
Project, except where specifically indicated in the Project Documents to be the responsibility of
others.
SECTION 3
PROJECT TIME / SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION
The work to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be substantially complete on or
before October 30, 2026, unless adjustment of the Project completion time is made in
accordance with the provisions of the Project Documents or in written agreement between the
parties. Project completion time shall be measured from the date of commencement. The date of
commencement shall be the later of:
1.
the effective date of the contract; or
2.
the date CONTRACTOR is given access to the Project site.
AGREEMENT - ARMSTRONG ELECTRIC, INC.
PAGE I OF 12
1. Liquidated Damages: Contractor and Owner recognize that time is of the essence and that
Owner will suffer financial and other losses if the Work is not completed and Milestones not
achieved within the Contract Times, as duly modified. The parties also recognize the delays,
expense, and difficulties involved in proving, in a legal or arbitration proceeding, the actual
loss suffered by Owner if the Work is not completed on time. Accordingly, instead of
requiring any such proof, Owner and Contractor agree that as liquidated damages for delay
(but not as a penalty):
a. Substantial Completion: Contractor shall pay Owner $500 for each day that expires
after the time (as duly adjusted pursuant to the Contract) specified above for
Substantial Completion, until the Work is substantially complete.
b. Completion of Remaining Work: After Substantial Completion, if Contractor shall
neglect, refuse, or fail to complete the remaining Work within the Contract Times (as
duly adjusted pursuant to the Contract) for completion and readiness for final
payment, Contractor shall pay Owner $500 for each day that expires after such time
until the Work is completed and ready for final payment.
If Owner recovers liquidated damages for a delay in completion by Contractor, then such
liquidated damages are Owner’s sole and exclusive remedy for such delay, and Owner is
precluded from recovering any other damages, whether actual, direct, excess, or consequential,
for such delay.
SECTION 4
NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT
CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR for completion of work in accordance with the Project
Documents in current funds, the not-to-exceed amount of one hundred forty five thousand six
hundred eighty dollars and six cents ($145,680.06).
This not-to-exceed amount is based upon the estimate from CONTRACTOR dated 07/24//2026
and attached to this Agreement as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 5
FINAL PAYMENT
Final payment, constituting the entire unpaid balance of the not-to-exceed amount, shall be made
by CITY to CONTRACTOR when CONTRACTOR has fully performed the Agreement except
for CONTRACTOR's responsibility to correct Work, and to satisfy other requirements, if any,
which extend beyond final payment.
SECTION 6
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
The parties warrant by their signature that no employer-employee relationship is established
between CONTRACTOR and CITY by the terms of this Agreement. It is understood by the
parties hereto that CONTRACTOR is an independent contractor and as such neither it nor its
employees, agents, representatives or subcontractors, if any, are employees of CITY for purposes
of tax, retirement system, or social security (FICA) withholding.
AGREEMENT — ARMSTRONG ELECTRIC, INC. PAGE 2 OF 12
SECTION 7
CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES
1. Permits: Contractor shall obtain and comply with the provisions of all applicable permits
and licenses relative to the services to be performed hereunder as may be required by the
local jurisdiction.
2. Work in the Right-of-Way. During any period of relocation, construction, or maintenance
in the public easement or Right-of-Way, Contractor shall comply with all applicable
public health and safety rules and regulations, as required by and law, statute, regulation,
ordinance, or resolution of any jurisdiction, regulator, agency, or authority of the City,
State, or Federal government.
SECTION 8
HOLD HARMLESS INDEMNIFICATION
In addition to other rights granted CITY by the Project Documents, CONTRACTOR shall
indemnify and save harmless CITY, its officers and employees, from all suits, actions, or claims
of any character brought because of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person,
persons, or property on account of the negligent operations of CONTRACTOR or its
subcontractors; or on account of or in consequence of any neglect in safeguarding the Work.
Within the limits of the Idaho Tort Claims Act and the Idaho Constitution, CITY agrees to
indemnify, defend, and hold harmless CONTRACTOR and its officers, agents, and employees
against all liability, loss, and costs arising from actions, suits, claims, or demands for the acts or
omission of CITY and its officers, agents, and employees, in performance of this Agreement.
SECTION 9
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
CONTRACTOR covenants that it presently has no interest and will not acquire any interest,
direct, or indirect, in the Project which would conflict in any manner or degree with the
performance of its services hereunder. CONTRACTOR further covenants that, in performing
this Agreement, it will employ no person who has any such interest. Should any conflict of
interest arise during the performance of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall immediately
disclose such conflict to CITY.
SECTION 10
ENTIRE AGREEMENT, MODIFICATION AND ASSIGNABILITY
This Agreement and Project Documents hereto contain the entire agreement between the parties
for this subject matter, and no other statements, promises, or inducements made by either party,
or agents of either party are valid or binding. This Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or
altered except upon written agreement signed by the parties hereto. CONTRACTOR may not
subcontract or assign its rights (including the right to compensation) or duties arising hereunder
other than as contemplated by the Project Documents, without the prior written consent and
express authorization of CITY.
AGREEMENT — ARMSTRONG ELECTRIC, INC. PAGE 3 OF 12
SECTION 11
ADHERENCE TO LAW REQUIRED
All applicable local, state and federal statutes and regulations are hereby made a part of this
Agreement and shall be adhered to at all times. Violation of any of these statutes or regulations
by CONTRACTOR shall be deemed material and shall subject CONTRACTOR to termination
of this Agreement for cause. CONTRACTOR and CONTRACTOR’ surety shall indemnify and
save harmless CITY and its employees, agents and representatives against any claim or liability
arising from or based on the violation of any such laws, codes, ordinances, or regulations by
CONTRACTOR.
CITY shall not terminate this Agreement for a minor or immaterial violation of the law.
SECTION 12
LEGAL FEES / JURISDICTION AND VENUE
In the event either party incurs legal expenses to enforce the terms and conditions or this
Agreement, the prevailing party is entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and other costs
and expenses, whether the same are incurred with or without suit.
It is agreed that this Agreement shall be construed under and governed by the laws of the State of
Idaho. In the event of litigation concerning this Agreement, it is agreed that proper venue shall be
the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District of the State of Idaho, in and for the County of
Bonneville.
SECTION 13
NON-DISCRIMINATION
CONTRACTOR shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the
basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideals, sex, age, marital status, physical, or mental
handicap, gender identity/expression, sexual orientation, or national origin.
Nothing in this section shall require CONTRACTOR to go beyond the reasonable accommodation
requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act in regards to accommodating any employee
or applicant for employment.
SECTION 14
ANTI-BOYCOTT AGAINST ISRAEL ACT.
Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2346, if payments under this Agreement exceed one
hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and CONTRACTOR employs ten (10) or more persons,
CONTRACTOR certifies that it is not currently engaged in, and shall not for the duration of this
Agreement engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under its control.
The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code section 67-2346 shall have the meaning
defined therein.
AGREEMENT — ARMSTRONG ELECTRIC, INC. PAGE 4 OF 12
SECTION 15
ANTI-BOYCOTT OF CERTAIN SECTORS
Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2347A, if payments under this Agreement exceed one hundred
thousand dollars ($100,000) and CONTRACTOR employs ten (10) or more persons,
CONTRACTOR certifies that it is not currently engaged in and will not for the duration of the
Agreement engage in a boycott of any individual or company because the individual or company
engages in or supports either (1) the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or
manufacture of fossil fuel-based energy, timber, minerals, hydroelectric power, nuclear energy, or
agriculture; or (2) the manufacture, distribution, sale, or use of firearms, as defined in Idaho Code
section 18-3302(2)(d). The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code section 67-
2347A shall have the meaning defined therein.
SECTIONI16
CERTIFICATION OF NO CHINESE OWNERSHIP
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2359, CONTRACTOR certifies that CONTRACTOR is not
currently owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic of China and will not,
for the duration of this Agreement, be owned or operated by the government of the People’s
Republic of China.
SECTION 17
SPECIAL WARRANTY
CONTRACTOR warrants that nothing of monetary value has been given, promised or implied as
remuneration or inducement to enter into this Agreement. CONTRACTOR further declares that
no improper personal, political or social activities have been used or attempted in an effort to
influence the outcome of the competition, discussion, or negotiation leading to the award of this
Agreement. Any such activity by CONTRACTOR shall make this Agreement null and void.
SECTION 18
COMMUNICATIONS
Written notice as are required by this Agreement shall be satisfied by mailing, emailing, or by
personal delivery to the parties at the following mailing addresses:
CONTRACTOR:
Armstrong Electric Inc.
1175 Hollipark Dr.
Idaho Falls, ID 83401
Office: 208-524-7192
Email: dallas@armstrongelec.com
CITY:
Idaho Falls Power
Attn: Bill McKellip
140 S. Capital Ave.
AGREEMENT — ARMSTRONG ELECTRIC, INC. PAGE 5 OF 12
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Office: (208) 612-8442
Cell: (208) 881-4095
Email: bmckellip@ifpower.org
Neither CITY's nor CONTRACTOR's representative shall be changed without ten (10) days
prior written notice to the other party.
SECTION 19
INSURANCE AND BOND REQUIREMENTS
CONTRACTOR shall purchase and maintain insurance and provide performance and payment
bonds as specified in Project Documents.
SECTION 20
CITY’S RIGHT FOR TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION
1. Termination of the Construction Agreement for Default. Without limitation to any of CITY’s
other rights or remedies at law or in equity, and reserving to itself all rights to losses related
thereto, CITY shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, upon the
failure of CONTRACTOR to promptly cure any default within fourteen (14) days of CITY’s
written notice to CONTRACTOR. CITY’s election to terminate the Agreement for default
shall be communicated by giving CONTRACTOR a written notice of termination. Any
notice of termination given to CONTRACTOR by CITY shall be effective immediately,
unless otherwise provided.
2. Suspension by City for Convenience. CITY may, at any time and from time to time, without
cause, order CONTRACTOR, in writing, to suspend, delay, or interrupt the Project in whole
or in part for such period of time, as CITY may determine, up to an a period of five (5) days.
The period of suspension shall be computed from the date of the written order.
Upon receipt of a Suspension Order, CONTRACTOR shall, at CITY’s expense, comply with
its terms and take all reasonable steps to minimize costs allocable to the Project covered by
the Suspension Order during the period of the Suspension Order.
Within the period of the above noted aggregate time, or such extension to that period as is
agreed upon by CONTRACTOR and CITY, CITY shall either
a. cancel the Suspension Order; or
b. delete the portion of the Project covered by the Suspension Order by issuing a change
order.
If a Suspension Order is canceled or expires, CONTRACTOR shall resume and continue
with the Project. A change order shall be issued to cover any adjustments of the not-to-
exceed amount or the Project Time necessarily caused by such suspension. The provisions of
this section shall not apply if an order to stop or suspend work 1s not issued by CITY.
AGREEMENT — ARMSTRONG ELECTRIC, INC. PAGE 6 OF 12
A Suspension Order shall not be required to stop the Work as permitted or required under
any other provision of the Project Documents.
3. Termination Without Cause. CITY shall have the option, at its sole discretion and without
cause, of terminating this Agreement in part or in whole by giving thirty (30) days written
notice to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR agrees to accept such sums as allowed under
this section as its sole and exclusive compensation and waives any claim for other
compensation or losses, including, but not limited to, loss of anticipated profits, loss of
revenue, lost opportunity, or other consequential, direct, indirect or incidental damages of
any kind.
Following such termination and within forty-five (45) days after receipt of a billing from
CONTRACTOR seeking payment of sums authorized by this section, CITY shall pay to
CONTRACTOR as its sole compensation for performance of the Project the following:
a. For Work Performed. The amount of the not-to-exceed amount allocable to the
portion of the Project properly performed by CONTRACTOR as of the date of
termination, less sums previously paid to CONTRACTOR.
b. For Close-out Costs. Reasonable costs of CONTRACTOR and its Subcontractors and
Sub-subcontractors for:
i. Demobilizing, and
ii. Administering the close-out of its participation in the Project (including,
without limitation, all billing and accounting functions, not including attorney
or expert fees) for a period of no longer than thirty (30) days.
c. For Fabricated Items. Previously unpaid cost of any items delivered to the Project site
which were fabricated for subsequent incorporation in the Project.
d. Asa liquidated damage, CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR six percent (6%) of the
remaining sums less the amount paid and owed for work performed and for Close-out
Costs.
4. Subcontractors. CONTRACTOR shall include provisions in all of its subcontracts, purchase
orders, and other contracts permitting termination for convenience by CONTRACTOR on
terms that are consistent with this Agreement and that afford no greater rights of recovery
against CONTRACTOR than are afforded to CONTRACTOR under this section.
5. CONTRACTOR’s Duties Upon Termination. Upon receipt of a notice of termination for
default or for convenience, CONTRACTOR shall, unless the notice directs otherwise, do the
following:
a. Immediately discontinue the Project to the extent specified in the notice;
AGREEMENT — ARMSTRONG ELECTRIC, INC. PAGE 7 OF 12
b. Place no further orders or subcontracts for materials, equipment, services or facilities,
except as may be necessary for completion of such portion of the Project as is not
discontinued;
c.
Provide to CITY a description, in writing no later than fifteen (15) days after receipt
of the notice of termination, of all subcontracts, purchase orders and agreements that
are outstanding, including, without limitation, the terms of the original price, any
changes, payments, balance owing, the status of the portion of the Project covered
and a copy of the subcontract, purchase order or agreement and any written changes,
amendments or modifications thereto, together with such other information as CITY
may determine necessary in order to decide whether to accept assignment of or
request CONTRACTOR to terminate the subcontract, purchase order or Agreement;
d. Promptly assign to CITY those subcontracts, purchase orders or agreements, or
portions thereof, that CITY elects to accept by assignment and cancel, on the most
favorable terms reasonably possible, all subcontracts, purchase orders or agreements,
or portions thereof, that CITY does not elect to accept by assignment; and
e.
Thereafter do only such work as may be necessary to preserve and protect the Project
already in progress and to protect materials, plants, and equipment on the Project site
or in transit thereto.
SECTION 21
CONTRACTOR'S RIGHT FOR TERMINATION
1.
Termination for Cause. CONTRACTOR may terminate this Agreement for cause only
upon the occurrence of one of the following:
a. For Work Stoppage. The Work is stopped for sixty (60) consecutive days,
through no act or fault of CONTRACTOR, any Subcontractor, or any
employee or agent of CONTRACTOR or any Subcontractor, due to issuance
of an order of a court or other public authority, other than CITY, having
jurisdiction or due to an act of government, such as a declaration of a national
emergency making material unavailable.
b. For City's Non-Payment. If CITY does not make payment of sums that are not
in good faith disputed by CITY and does not cure such default within fourteen
(14) days after receipt of notice from CONTRACTOR, then upon an
additional fourteen (14) days' notice to CITY, CONTRACTOR may terminate
the Agreement.
2.
Damages to CONTRACTOR. In the event of termination for cause by CONTRACTOR,
CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR the sums provided for in Section 16.3 above.
CONTRACTOR agrees to accept such sums as its sole and exclusive compensation and
agrees to waive any claim for other compensation or losses, including, but not limited to,
loss of anticipated profits, loss of revenue, lost opportunity, or other consequential, direct,
indirect and incidental damages, of any kind.
AGREEMENT - ARMSTRONG ELECTRIC, INC.
PAGE 8 OF 12
SECTION 22
EXTENT OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes all prior
representations, negotiations or agreements, whether written or oral. This Agreement may be
amended only by written instrument, signed by the Parties hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said CONTRACTOR and CITY have caused this Agreement to be
executed on the day and year first above written.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the
date indicated above.
AGREEMENT — ARMSTRONG ELECTRIC, INC. PAGE 9 OF 12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said CONTRACTOR and CITY have caused this Agreement to be executed on
the day and year first above written.
"CONTRACTOR"
STATE OF
)
By ()iJ
·--;c Ovl ·rt o
) ss.
County of 6 onv1C-'I/, tlt')
On this
'Z (p
day of AlA&--t,\,'.)·t
, 2026, before me, the undersigned, a notary
public for said State, personally appeared
Q&u t tt .5 A 11-vvi 5fv1 o,'1(r
, known to me to be the
(?W/'\Qvt...
of (jv1...Wl5-tvtont-- e1.,11t6l'Z--il -áe,.
, and whose name is
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she is authorized to execute the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first
above written.
SUSAN RENE SIMPSON
Notary Public - State of Idaho
Commfssion Number 20251141
My Commission Expires Mar 21, 2031
STATE OF IDAHO
)
) ss.
County of Bonneville
)
s s
Notary Public ofldaho
Residing at: ¢zy.JNtJ..,V.l I le.. .:r.oA ho
My Commission Expires: O'\A.Rc..h d I ,;)031
"CITY"
City ofldaho Falls, Idaho
By ____________ _
Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor
On this ________ day of ________ , 2026, before me, the undersigned, a notary
public for Idaho, personally appeared Lisa Burtenshaw, known to me to be the Mayor of the City ofldaho
Falls, Idaho, a municipal corporation that executed the foregoing document, and acknowledged to me that
she is authorized to execute the same for and on behalf of said City.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year
first above written.
AGREEMENT - ARMSTRONG ELECTRIC, INC.
Notary Public of Idaho
Residing at:
My Commission Expires: _____ _
PAGE 10 OF 12
Exhibit “A”
AGREEMENT — ARMSTRONG ELECTRIC, INC. PAGE 11 OF 12
09 =.
WNOISIATY | ||
"NOISTARY —————
SP) OERIFETS B02 “eVOUCEyeL ea oe
tet ans ozz0-Sorce OF ‘sts CEPI
02205 xog Od
“ony jeydea Ynos Orb
uamod =
sv onva i
CanOuadt
NON SAMISHOD HOS GHSS)
cae,
OMO'ONUHON Wed LSWINOL § 44D
Eeid ST NOLLITS WA “BLE MON ZL
OHVal ‘sTIvs OHVal 40 ALID
ONILHOIT HLVd MNVd LSMHNOL HLNOS
dVW NOILINYULSNOD GNV LNOAV1 1VHaNAD
dVW S.YOLIVYLNOD
os ere
“RVHONINNTD NYT NO AFTON THe AdMNOd JDIANaS ( S6or-i8e (902) dII3KOW TG
FO INNO OSTEO VIGO 4MaMOd STIV4 OHVG! "'Y3MOd STIV4 OHVAILOVINOD
avn SM. NO NOMS C313 "SVISSOIE veeaeranrt “VildNOVE O41 YORId SIHONTUL T
{STWd HON 'STd 'SIHONTAL so ‘Z fe]
“‘tingnod) S3unibys wWaRuIT "
30 NOUYDOT 3H IndBY SNOUS3NO
ANY 3AVH DOA J) "SNOISNINND
¥Od AINIUSENS ¥ S¥ SIONVISIO
ATIVIS 357 1ON 00 “AINO S3S0dHNe
‘1 34¥ d¥A SIMI _NO SSN TV LON
—=
AOU MOULIN THvLSNExOUROUDNN ONLI é
terwova
wh ee exNOHN SYR Oba! 40 ALE THEME 00
ADM 1s CANERWEESTIVJ OHNO! 3D AND DMSO
AM UM DO NINONTHLSNE TRNMON TW Gey gn'y
OCH EA sd aed MSIL OM aM HS
(aaADud) 13D SUNS SUM, THLSN!
(Gann) x08 NOUINY Litvno THIS
(axanod) (Ne02Y) wasDVEsaH STINT OFT THASH
(aaOAOd) Td SSVI BNE 1930 THISN
(OntHOn) 3m AuNrONCOSS 1/0UF THISM # MPa
WBS AMVONDOTS f TIVISN HEPA
{aS AMVONDOSE WE TIN HSH
“ENGNG OF TNGNOS OA .£ THIS WHERE
rect 4
SiHOLD¥BINOD YO WIPIOISMD FHL 90 THYHS 1 OE
1uo.2noNO2 ONO VOUTONN AHDHO0 THIS
OLHaNOD Ov HID ANCHO IE OM
yeLonoNoe ova nyInO AwYONODIE TMs
]so1spa16> eAnousasate kimmmia Dome 17H DMLSEE
SOL NCD aN BeATAC AURA IEMHS AIEHL BNSC
unan09 2nd or Hs
wolsnowo2 anroweuren Lavras Sas THOM
on
01200003 OFMAIAD AANA TEM TMNT —— HO,
snows
ha OF MNRHE 2 NIT MLD MBNA PMSLHNG!TIVABND memos yd semen
ar09 2A8 9 3 MONDE 21 € MI UOLONANOS
meow esON RNAS) THLE TOS TMI
woronoNoa BVA AND ANd 9 96m TOMES OMIA
wo1snano: ovHtFIAO Awad 9 Ind THOME THISN!
a0 2kdor ANCHOR LE MIMO I9NONOD
Onna REWER JWG STONE TSN
WOLenaBO2 OFRIAL AAP BEYOAL STONES NURI 9
voLinan OvBrAINO ANvrus¥ 2504 TIONG THIN
ri
HONBHL WIMO4
‘VaAVH TKS, CWNINIAG HL
BOOKED BAU OF NNGBHOR. A TWEEN me men pe |
Anowo0 stu 6 03108. ONS
Aioano 944 ov TABOR. THASNI
uyonoo atu er neaHo8 MUSE
nano aad oy TNE oe THM
i nce oss vec m0
teen as4orsEROs-ATMe— 2-9 —— 2-9 —|
semen onion roses oMi8H
(af tinanoD ond oF MNCRHOR THLE — "Wo TWHs SANTIDeF WOOF ASN OTT
(NOIMONYISNOD MSN) GNSS NOILOMMISNOS WHENSD |
is -— ~ (aaiaiaow)
AINGNOD ..b -.Z YOd TIV.LaG Nasty V.L3d HONSUL ¥ NOLLOAS TWOIdAL WvuovIG GNV ONLLHON IWI9daWWoo NOLLVONNO4 @ TaNVd TOULNOD ONLLHOIT TyIDuaWWOd
Exhibit “B”
AGREEMENT — ARMSTRONG ELECTRIC, INC. PAGE 12 OF 12
QUOTATION NUMBER: IFP 26-19
Page 1 of 7
Idaho Falls Power
IDAHO FALLS POWER
140 SOUTH CAPITAL AVE.
IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO 83402
PHONE: (208) 612-8354
QUOTATION NUMBER: _IFP 26-19 Date: August 13, 2026
Idaho Falls Power is requesting a quote on the following project:_South Tourist Park Path
Lighting. These quotations will be received at the office of Idaho Falls Power, until 1:00 p.m.
Thursday, June 4, 2026. This request for quotes is per Idaho Code 67-2805(1).
June 17, 2026: Upon presentation before City Council (City of Idaho Falls), a resolution to
reject all bids did pass declaring an open market negotiation would produce more economically
purchased goods and services. (Memorandum File #26-277) After negotiation, Armstrong
Electric, Inc has been awarded.
Quotes are to be submitted:
Attention:_ Bill McKellip
Quotation Number:_ IFP 26-19
140 South Capital
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
or via email:_bmckellip@ifpower.org,
Please designate firm name and address on the following lines:
GENERAL:
The intention of the attached specifications is to describe the project in sufficient detail to secure
comparable quotes. Proposal to be submitted on forms furnished. Idaho Falls Power The project
must be completed by Friday, October 30, 2026. The contractor to provide all labor, materials
and equipment to complete the project.
BASIS OF BID; COMPARISON OF BIDS:
Lump Sum
e Bidders shall submit a Bid on a lump sum basis for the base Bid and include a separate
price for each alternate, if any, described in the Bidding Documents as provided for in the
Bid Form. The price for each alternate will be the amount added to or deleted from the
base Bid if Owner selects the alternate.
Unit Price
e Bidders shall submit a Bid on a unit price basis for each item of Work listed in the Bid
schedule.
e The total of all estimated prices will be the sum of the products of the estimated quantity
of each item and the corresponding unit price.
QUOTATION NUMBER: IFP 26-19
Page 2 of 7
e Discrepancies between the multiplication of units of Work and unit prices will be
resolved in favor of the unit prices. Discrepancies between the indicated sum of any
column of figures and the correct sum thereof will be resolved in favor of the correct
sum.
Item No. 1
e Trench and Backfill With Conduit Install: By the linear foot (LF) measured on a
horizontal basis along the centerline of the trench per typical section in plans, 24” to 30”
deep.
Item No. 2
e Directional Bore With Continuous Duct Placement: By the linear foot (LF) measured on
a horizontal basis along the centerline of the bore path, 24” to 30” deep.
Item No. 3
e Furnish and install 2”, PVC Schedule 40 Conduit: By the linear foot (LF) measured on a
horizontal basis along the center of the pipe from the centerline of mainline to the
termination of public service line.
Item No. 4
e Furnish and install 3’”” PVC Schedule 40 Conduit: By the linear foot (LF) measured on a
horizontal basis along the center of the pipe from the centerline of mainline to the
termination of public service line.
Item No. 5
e Furnish and install #10-4 Secondary Wire (Lighting): By the linear foot (LF) measured
on a horizontal basis along the centerline of conduit from run starting termination point to
run ending termination point. Wire pulling lubrication is required and incidental.
Item No. 6
e Install Direct Bury Fiberglass Pole: By each (EA) measured and payment per each pole
installed (poles furnished by IFP) as designated in the contract documents.
Item No. 7
e Install LED Luminaire & Refractor (Acorn): By each (EA) measured and payment per
each LED luminaire and refractor installed (luminaire and refractor furnished by IFP) as
designated in the contract documents.
Item No. 8
e Install Quazite Junction Box: By each (EA) measured and payment on a per each basis
for installing junction box (quazite junction boxes furnished by IFP) as designated in the
contract documents.
Item No. 9
e Install “Myers” Service Cabinet — Dual Meter: By each (EA) measured and payment on a
per each basis for installing a “Myers” Service Cabinet — Dual Meter (“Myers” Service
Cabinet — Dual Meter furnished by IFP) as designated in the contract documents.
QUOTATION NUMBER: IFP 26-19
Page 3 of 7
Item No. 10
e Furnish and install 2” Bell-Ends: By each (EA) measured and payment on a per each
basis for installing 2” Bell-Ends on conduit as designated in the contract documents.
Item No. 11
e Furnish and install 3” Bell-Ends: By each (EA) measured and payment on a per each
basis for installing 3” Bell-Ends on conduit as designated in the contract documents.
Item No. 12
e Furnish And Install Flood Seal Connectors: By each (EA) measured and payment on a
per each basis for installing Flood Seal Connectors on all terminations in each light pole
and each junction box as designated in the contract documents.
Item No. 13
e Mobilization: By the lump sum (LS).
Item No. 14
e Sales and Use Tax: Paid by contractor on all City of Idaho Falls provided materials at 6%
of the items purchase amount.
SPECIFICATIONS:
City of Idaho Falls to furnish all fiberglass direct bury poles, LED luminaire and “Acorn” style
refractor, quazite junction boxes, a “Myers” Service Cabinet and provide construction staking.
Contractor to furnish all equipment, labor, tools, supplies, materials (less IFP furnished materials
listed above), and services necessary to install new lighting system as designated in the plans, in
compliance with Idaho Falls Power 2026 Service Policy, as specified in these specifications,
contract documents and as directed by the Engineer.
Contractor to use caution when excavating in this area. Contractor shall locate all utilities prior to
construction. Call 811 for locates. Contractor shall retain and protect all utilities where possible
unless shown otherwise. If any utilities need to be adjusted based on the field locate, coordinate
with the utility owner. Contractor shall verify all utility elevations. Maintain a minimum of 18”
vertical and 10’ horizontal clearance between potable and non-potable lines. Maintain a minimum
of 1’ vertical and 6’ horizontal separation between power and wet utility.
Contractor to monitor pole backfill soil conditions at each pole site in order to collaborate with
IFP to determine the type of backfill that will be required.
A. Good soil conditions: The site is well drained and water does not stand during wet periods.
Good soil for mounting is made up of sand and gravel, hard clay, compacted loam or
compacted coarse sand. If the soil type of the mounting site is good, use the soil removed
from the hole for backfilling and tamp thoroughly.
B. Poor conditions: Water stands during wet periods; the soil is soft clay, poorly compacted,
or contains large amounts of silt. If the soil is poor, use concrete or a premixed cement
mixture to fill the top third (minimum) of the embedded depth. The lower portion should
be filled with well tamped good soil (See A, above). Several inches of a sand and gravel
mixture may be added at the base of the shaft to provide additional stability and resistance
to rotation
QUOTATION NUMBER: IFP 26-19
Page 4 of 7
Contractor to install the fiberglass direct bury pole as described:
(These suggestions are guidelines only. Contractor assumes all liability for pole installation.)
1. Avoid cutting or scratching the pole surface.
2. While the pole is easily accessible, install fixture(s) and any accessories, and thread the
wiring between the luminaire and the hand hole.
3. Dig or auger a hole of correct size and depth. The hole should be several inches larger in
diameter than the pole shaft. In poor soil, the diameter of the hole should be a minimum of
double the diameter of the pole. Burial depth for the 12’ mounting height pole is 3’ in
depth.
4. Check the hole depth carefully and tamp in backfill if necessary to assure the correct pole
setting depth.
5. Lift and set the pole in the center of the hole, either by hand or with a nylon sling attached
to a lifting device. Nylon is recommended, so as not to scratch the pole's surface. The sling
should be attached at a point approximately one third down from the top. As the pole is
being lowered into the hole, feed the underground cable through the conductor entrance
hole and up toward the hand hole.
6. Add 6" to 9" of backfill and plumb the pole. Sight the plumb bob from two locations
approximately 90° to each other to the pole from a convenient distance. Straighten the pole
as needed, and tamp backfill around the base. Continue to backfill and thoroughly tamp at
no more than 9" intervals to the bottom of the cable entrance. Frequent, firm tamping of
the backfill during installation is very important to insure a successful installation. To
ensure plumbness, the pole should be checked with a plumb bob while tamping.
7. Ifnot performed previously, install underground cables and pull the wiring out through the
hand hole. Connect the feed cable to the luminaries’ wires; fuse if required. Push the wiring
into the pole and install the hand hole cover. Finish backfilling and tamping to a point 2"
above the final ground line.
Contractor to open and backfill all trenches, install conduit, install junction boxes and install #10-
4 conductor THWN (Red, Black, White and Green) and #1/0 AL Triplex conductor as designated
in the Plans, in compliance with Idaho Falls Power 2026 Service Policy Figure 17, as specified in
these Special Provisions, and as directed by the Engineer.
Contractor is responsible for ensuring all trench, conduit, junction boxes and fiberglass poles have
been successfully inspected and approved by Idaho Falls Power prior to back-filling and installing
conductor.
Contractor to make all “dead” terminations (i.e. in light poles, j-boxes and line side of “Myers”
Service Cabinet). An electrical inspection with the City of Idaho Falls, Building Division will be
required.
Contractor is responsible for coordinating and scheduling all inspections with Idaho Falls Power
and City of Idaho Falls. After all inspections are successful and approved, Idaho Falls Power will
make final terminations (1.e. between power source and “Myers” Service Cabinet as well as power
source and meter base at bathroom) and energize through Contractor scheduled “connect order”.
Contractor to repair and or replace all concrete, asphalt, sprinkler system components and
landscaping that is disturbed and or removed during construction.
QUOTATION NUMBER: IFP 26-19
Page 5 of 7
Contractor to retain and protect all existing curb and gutter, power poles, electrical and fiber
facilities during construction.
Contractor to ensure all construction shall be in compliance with all bid documents and all
references therein, as well as comply with the 2026 Idaho Falls Power Service Policy.
MISCELLANEOUS CONTRACTUAL PROVISIONS:
A. To the extent Idaho Falls Power accepts Contractor’s quote (be it full or in part), agreements
between parties shall be subject to Idaho laws, with jurisdiction and venue to take place within
the Seventh Judicial District within the State of Idaho, within Bonneville County.
B. Ifawarded the project, Contractor will agree that it shall not discriminate against any employee
or applicant for employment on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideals, sex,
age, marital status, physical or mental handicap, gender identity/expression, sexual orientation,
veteran’s status, or national origin.
C. If awarded the project, Contractor will agree, pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2346, that if
payments under the agreement between parties exceed one hundred thousand dollars
($100,000) and Contractor employs ten (10) or more persons, Contractor will certify that it is
not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of the agreement engage in, a boycott of
goods or services from Israel or territories under its control. The terms in this Paragraph that
are defined in Idaho Code § 67-2346 shall have the meaning defined therein.
D. If awarded the project, Contractor will agree, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2347A, that if
payments under this an agreement between parties exceed one hundred thousand dollars
($100,000) and Contractor employs ten (10) or more persons, Contractor will certify that it is
not currently engaged in and will not for the duration of the agreement engage in a boycott of
any individual or company because the individual or company engages in or supports either
(1) the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacture of fossil fuel-
based energy, timber, minerals, hydroelectric power, nuclear energy, or agriculture; or (2) the
manufacture, distribution, sale, or use of firearms, as defined in Idaho Code § 18-3302(2)(d).
The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code § 67-2347A shall have the meaning
defined therein
E. If awarded the project, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2359, Contractor will certify that
Contractor is not currently owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic of
China and will not, for the duration of the agreement between parties, be owned or operated
by the government of the People’s Republic of China.
BASIS OF AWARD:
Bids will be evaluated and the award will be made on the basis of price
*** 4n Idaho Public Works license is required prior to award of contract, but is not mandatory
for bid submission.***
Bids received without the signature of a company representative will be considered invalid.
The City of Idaho Falls reserves the right to accept or reject any or all bids, to waive any or all
bids and to waive any informalities and irregularities in said bids.
QUOTATION NUMBER: IFP 26-19
Page 6 of 7
ITEMIZED QUOTE:
South Tourist Park Path Lighting
(All items must have "Unit Price” and "Total Amount" filled in)
No.
|
|_Doltars | cis
i! i
i |
ay
BASE BID og
Trench & Backfill W/Conduit Placement
Trench & Backfill (In Rock) W/Conduit
Placement
Directional Bore W/Continuous Duct
Placement |
Directional Bore (In Rock) W/Continuous Duct
Placement
Furnish & Install 2" PVC Schedule 40 Conduit
Ls)
Ww
Le | Furnish & Install 3" PVC Schedule 40 Conduit L.F. | $ Z
Furnish & Install 2” Secondary Riser 3 EA | $ G46 raXe)
8 Furnish & Install 3” Secondary Riser
'_ [4 [8] 154/00
Furnish & Install #10-4 Secondary Wire ; ; :
2 | (Lighting 288 LFS Gh [oH |
Install 12 FT Direct Bury Fiberglass Pole ;
10 (Provided 19 EA. | $ 432 Oo;$ 0%
aa
isa)
Install Led Luminaire & Refractor (Acorn)
1 | fpealtes r Bou
42 Install Quazite Junction Box | 24 .
Provided é
13 Install "Myers" Service Cabinet — Dual Meter 1
| (Provided)
14 | Furnish & Install 2" Bell-Ends 84
=
15 | Furnish & Install 3" Bell-Ends 2
16 | Furnish & Install Flood Seal Connectors 40 SO|8G joo |??
+ oe,
17 | Mobilization 1 Gg?
18 | Sales & Use Tax $ 2250 00
BASE TOTAL (fotal al/16 lines) Shy 5.L96 |OG
Note: OO rs =
Fill-in and complete the "Unit Price" and "Total Amount" columns for each quantity item as L.F.= Linear Foot
well as summarized totals. Return to Idaho Falls Power according to the instructions within EA. = Each
the accompanying informal bid invitation letter. Contact Bill McKellip (208) 612-8442 at L.S. = Lump Sum
Idaho Falls Power with any questions.
QUOTATION NUMBER: IFP 26-19
Page 7 of 7
SIGNATURE PAGE:
Exceptions: Ifthe terms and conditions provided on the preceding pages cannot be met, vendors
are instructed to note those terms and conditions with which they take exception, giving a full
explanation and sign below. If no exceptions are taken, write "NONE" and sign below.
i
LM dS5trone Electnic TnAc
Company
ZOB S24-F1/92 [tS HowvAavwic pyc
Telephone Address
AULA Tdato fails
Fax Telephone City
F124 | 202 DOG ko $340 |
Date State Zip Code
Pwe-Cc ~ jy?
Public Works License # (if required)
Bid Tabulation
Unit
Dollars
Cts
Dollars
Cts
Dollars
Cts
Dollars
Cts
Dollars
Cts
Dollars
Cts
1
2,229
L.F.
3
155
L.F.
5
2,344
L.F.
6
150
L.F.
7
3
EA.
8
1
EA.
9
2,288
L.F.
10
19
EA.
11
19
EA.
12
24
EA.
13
1
EA.
14
84
EA.
15
2
EA.
16
40
EA.
17
1
L.S.
18
2
200
L.F.
4
50
L.F.
*DOES NOT INCLUDE
PREVAILING WAGE
Winning Bid
TOTAL
$92,980.00
$236,042.26
$145,680.06
ROCK ADDER - TOTAL
$4,150.00
$24,750.00
$35,000.00
TRENCH & BACKFILL (IN ROCK) W/CONDUIT PLACEMENT
DIRECTIONAL BORE (IN ROCK) W/CONTINOUS DUCT PLACEMENT
$19,250.00
$5,500.00
$2,400.00
$1,750.00
$12.00
$35.00
$96.25
$110.00
ROCK ADDER
Quotation #: IFP 26-19
Item
No.
Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit Price
Total Amount
Unit Price
South Tourist Park Path Lighting
Engineer's Estimate
Wheeler Electric
Open Market Est
8/11/26
BASE BID
Total Amount
DIRECTIONAL BORE W/CONTINOUS DUCT PLACEMENT
$35.00
$5,425.00
$83.87
$12,999.85
TRENCH & BACKFILL W/CONDUIT PLACEMENT
$12.00
$26,748.00
$52.74
$117,557.46
$7,750.00
$50.00
FURNISH & INSTALL 3" PVC SCHEDULE 40 CONDUIT
$12.00
$1,800.00
$2.67
$400.50
FURNISH & INSTALL 2" PVC SCHEDULE 40 CONDUIT
$7.00
$16,408.00
$1.31
$3,070.64
FURNISH & INSTALL 3" SECONDARY RISER
$600.00
$600.00
$1,450.00
$1,450.00
FURNISH & INSTALL 2" SECONDARY RISER
$500.00
$1,500.00
$910.00
$2,730.00
$1,159.00
$1,159.00
INSTALL 12 FT DIRECT BURY FIBERGLASS POLE (PROVIDED)
$274.00
$5,206.00
$992.11
$18,850.09
FURNISH & INSTALL #10/4 SECONDARY WIRE (LIGHTING)
$6.00
$13,728.00
$4.56
$10,433.28
INSTALL QUAZITE JUNCTION BOX (PROVIDED)
$55.00
$1,320.00
$447.92
$10,750.08
INSTALL LED LUMINAIRE & REFRACTOR (ACORN) (PROVIDED)
$275.00
$5,225.00
$276.32
$5,250.08
$200.00
$4,800.00
FURNISH & INSTALL 2" BELL-ENDS
$13.00
$1,092.00
$21.67
$1,820.28
INSTALL "MYERS" SERVICE CABINET - DUAL METER (PROVIDED)
$3,000.00
$3,000.00
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
FURNISH & INSTALL FLOOD SEAL CONNECTORS
$50.00
$2,000.00
$188.25
$7,530.00
FURNISH & INSTALL 3" BELL-ENDS
$14.00
$28.00
$50.00
$100.00
$152.50
$6,100.00
SALES & USE TAX (6%)
$2,250.00
$2,250.00
MOBILIZATION
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
$14,100.00
$14,100.00
BASE TOTAL
$88,830.00
$211,292.26
$15.86
$35,351.94
$2,250.00
$110,680.06
$2,200.00
$2,200.00
$42.70
$3,586.80
$61.00
$122.00
$150.00
$100.00
$30,000.00
$5,000.00
$1,830.00
$1,830.00
$6.04
$13,819.52
$732.00
$13,908.00
$366.00
$6,954.00
$3.20
$7,500.80
$2.80
$420.00
$976.00
$2,928.00
Armstrong Electric
Open Market Est
7/24/26
Unit Price
Total Amount
IFP 26-19
Bid Tabulation
WUE Dres I fe JDL ICR
tj J Ir at
m Sik
_. ee Cer cago
ul
cz HLS cyl jt 3 hes, <Sf / Gomes ot
—Ts LP) SS hain SA Pa aa ee
y. C tt
r
JILIL_IL
g
.
|
a
Ba
SOUTH TOURIST PARK
PATH LIGHTING
Filter By =
epword fark
foe micee indormmation or how to wee cur hirpeeard Geaeih, viet ct
(hesterral Ceparecation:,
Erte Gogh ot Piberer Fhe
Sed ~
() xteer
oO inactive
Peewee (Ch
| MilGemsins | Contracting Federetdasiieere «= eiity infermeten
Shperiegg | 2? ree
ARMSTRONG ELECTRIC, INC.
Contract 1 (FID: acTanzPioaas.
Medificabon Kumber:& Beason Ir Modrheateory flank)
Am cee Coptands
(nea Letiny derailed Type: Fone Coil Dedagueect
aaa tay Te PURT REDE GaDER | fb ms.oo
Date bigred: Tahal Correct Vieker:
Our ad, baad fb ews oe
ARMSTRONG ELECTRIC, INC.
Contract © (FID): acTanzPioaa
Medificabon Kumber:® Beason for Modifies flak)
Am cee Cortands
Lae Lt it Fe aul atl tig
M2eLMPCREITE PURCKALE ORDER =| MO
Kate figeed: Rotel Commnacn akar:
Sep ah, ne eee
Peder! Hierectiry = Minpe Dirteresirationns,
Sort Oy
Cte keto ewe
Contracting Sub-tier
Daparimert wed Agaeery
LE MOP ULE UAE, Te
etter:
AAD AGED UAT URL Ef GAR ee
ior
TMZ - USDA AAS PA TE
Contracting Sub-tier
Depa Will ig
LA - AGRECULTURE, OPT
iat
12M2 AG RSTULT URAL LARC ice
ce
TELE = Uoak ah Pk FE
Memorandum
File #: 26-344
City Council
DATE: Thursday, September 3, 2026
AGENDA: Regular
FROM: Chris Fredericksen, General Manager
DEPARTMENT: Idaho Falls Power
Title
Bid Award - IFP 26-25 Fiber Drop Cable Installation
☐ Ordinance
☐ Resolution
☐ Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐ Legislative Public Hearing
☐ Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☒ Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve the bid award for the Fiber Drop Cable Installation project(s); award to the lowest responsive,
responsible bidder, B Jackson Construction, for $531,463.00 (or take other action deemed appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
On September 1, 2026, bids were received and opened for the Fiber Drop Cable Installation project(s). A
tabulation of bid results is attached. The purpose of the project(s) is to enter into contract to provide
installation of provided fiber, optical network terminal device and required splicing inside homes and at the
access point. Each individual installation is considered a separate project and will be paid per project.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Municipal Services Departments.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 9/8/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
Idaho Falls Power
Bid Tabulation
Project: Fiber Drop Cable Install Number: IFP 26-25
Submitted: Keri West - Workflow Accountant Date: 9/1/2026
Estimated
Quantity
Description per Year Unit Unit Cost Total Amount Unit Cost Total Amount Unit Cost Total Amount
ication | azo rarteianen|s esn00|s sascoon0|s ooraa|s —anasson| 5 aanse|s_ suss00
installation 300 Per Residence] $ 450.00} $ 135,000.00 997.83 | $ 299,349.00 | $ 390.55} $ 117,165.00
| limatasonutrateyaces” | 200, artesiens|s_aso00|s 150mo0|s_azsa76|s asasaeco|sanazi|s_smizv200
2|installation with alley access Per Residence| $ 450.00} $ 135,000.00 1,213.76 | $ 364,128.00 | $ 404.24|$ 121,272.00
$ } ;
$ ; ! 3
Bid for single overhead residence
installation without alley access 300 per Residence] $ 450.00} $ 135,000.00|$ 1,396.88 419,064.00 | $ 458.92] $ 137,676.00
ris Prep and Install aerial inline splice case $ 450.00|$ 22,500.00 | $ 867.18 | $ 43,359.00 | $ 226.16|$ 11,308.00
- § :
$ : :
$ ;
Installation of Ethernet or Coax cable from Per cable
IFF demark at MDU complexes installation |$ 450.00|$ 180,000.00 | $ 116.51|$ 46,604.00
$ ,
$
Installation of Splice Cases, Build Type A Per Splice
Splice Cases 100 Case $ 450.00|}$ 45,000.00 435.94] $ 43,594.00 | $ 203.38 |$ 20,338.00
| site Survey Field Manager | 300 | persite visit | $ 450.00 | $ 135,000.00 | $ 201.56 | $ 60,468.00 | $ 132.53] $ 39,759.00
$ ,
$ ,
ONT Upgrade, Remove Existing ONT from
Home and Install and Splice new ONT 300 Per Upgrade | $ 450.00 |$ 135,000.00 236.50 70,950.00 | $ 124.47|$ 37,341.00
| —«dYstotat = $ 922,500.00] + $ 1,300,912.00] = ~—s« $_ 531,463.00
*Cooke Cabling did not
Attending: Keri West complete Bid Form. Submitted
Nikki Bradford Estimate with one line item.
Kelly Aldinger
Krista Thornton
Memorandum
File #: 26-345
City Council
DATE: Thursday, September 3, 2026
AGENDA: Regular
FROM: Chris Fredericksen, General Manager
DEPARTMENT: Idaho Falls Power
Title
Bid Award - IFP 26-26 Micro Duct Drop Installation Services
☐ Ordinance
☐ Resolution
☐ Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
☐ Legislative Public Hearing
☐ Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance
☒ Approval/Authorization/Ratification
Action(s) Requested:
Approve the bid award for the Micro Duct Drop Installation project(s) and award to the lowest responsive,
responsible bidder, B Jackson Construction, for a price of $208,845.30 (or take other action deemed
appropriate).
Description, Background Information, Purpose:
On September 1, 2026, bids were received and opened for the Micro Duct Drop Installation project(s). A
tabulation of bid results is attached. The purpose of the proposed project(s) is to provide installation of a
micro duct for broadband fiber service to individual structures at a depth greater than 18 inches. Each
installation will be considered a separate project and will be paid per project.
This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Municipal Services Departments.
City of Idaho Falls
Printed on 9/8/2026
Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
Idaho Falls Power
Bid Tabulation
Project: Micro Duct Drop Installation Services Deep Number: \FP 26-26
Submitted: Keri West - Workflow Accountant _ Date: 9/1/2026
Estimated
Quantity per|
Description Year Unit Cost Total Amount [Unit Cost Total Amount
Micro Duct install per residence at depth
of 18" or greater Per Residence] $ 426.04|$ 127,812.00] $ 965.00 | $ 289,500.00
11/4" Fiber duct install at a depth of 18"
or greater 1,500 PerFoot |5$ 17.69|$ 26,535.00] $ 12.50]$ 18,750.00
|g $
|
install HH | 150 | each soso |$ 46.34850|$ _35000|$ 52,500.00
Install HH-2/EPED | cach | Did Not Include P| $ 510.00 | $ 7,650.00
noma | Pa $ 543.32|$ 8,149.80] $ 420.00|$ _6,300.00
pO | ;
TOTAL $ 208,845.30] ~—*«(| $374,700.00
is
15
Attending: Keri West
Nikki Bradford
Kelly Aldinger .
Krista Thornton
Text is extracted by machine from the official file linked on each page; the official file is the record. Sentinel Media, LLC.