Sentinel Media records · public agendas and minutes, text only, refreshed nightly from each body's own site · not a newspaper
minutes meeting date 2025-10-07 · fetched 2026-09-17 · 41902 characters · official file · plain text
CITY OF BLACKFOOT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FROM OCTOBER 7, 2025
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Carroll called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Those in attendance were: Councilwoman Barlow, Councilman Brown, Councilman Gardner and
Councilman Jensen.
CONSENT AGENDA
Councilman Jensen made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda including minutes from 9/2/2025,
alcohol Licenses and payables, Councilman Brown seconded the motion; all were in favor; motion
carried.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CFO GRAHM ANDERSON
Treasurers Report
City Administrator, Grahm Anderson, presented the monthly treasurers report to the council. Mr.
Anderson provided a breakdown of the budget through August 31, 2025, which is 92% of the 2025 fiscal
year. He briefly summarized the monthly expense-to-budget and the percentages expended year-to-
date for the general fund and each of the departments in the city. He provided the current up-to-date
bank and investment account balances, and calendar items to be completed within the next three
months. October begins FY 2026 and begin prep for FY 25 audit. For November unclaimed property will
be sent over and submitted to the State for the Transparent Idaho report. December the Road and
Street Report will be sent to the State and then continue to prep for Audit. Mr. Anderson gave an
update on the Meridian /Hwy 91 project working on Right of Way acquisition. West Bridge St Bridge
project is in the process of working on final design. Well #14 pump test went well and this project can
move forward to the next step. Twin Bridges Landing project is waiting for the river level to drop to
move forward with the work to the boat ramp.
Public Hearing on Proposed Fee Increases
Mr. Anderson went over briefly what the proposed fee increases would consist of and the reason for
reposting due to a clerical error in the previous posting. Councilman Jensen made a motion to move into
Public Hearing on proposed fee increases at 7:26 PM. Councilman Gardner seconded the motion; on a
roll call vote, all were in favor and the meeting moved into Public Hearing. Mayor Carroll reviewed the
sign-up sheet there were two citizens signed up to speak. Mayor Carroll reminded them that this Public
Hearing is only for the items specified on the agenda. Mr. Ken Seaver residing at 822 S Pendlebury Ln,
signed up to speak in favor of the fee increase, stating he wanted to timidly offer his support because he
does support the fee increases for the development fees, and the sanitation fees. He agrees that this
must mean the City is looking and finding there is a problem in the current fees. He views this as the tip
of the iceberg in changes that are necessary to help with the rapid growth of the City. Mayor Carroll
again reiterated what the purpose of the Public Hearing is. Jim Thomas, 229 Monroe, was the next to
speak. He states he does not support the fee increases believes this is going to drive away those who
want to do business in Blackfoot. The Mayor stated he would have the City Clerk Julie Conan post the
study from SNH including 57 cities in Idaho, believes that many residents would be interested in seeing
the comparison of rates of Water and Sewer services. Councilman Jensen made a motion to move out of
Public Hearing at 7:26PM, Councilwoman Barlow seconded on a roll call vote, all were in favor and the
Public Hearing moved back into the regular meeting Agenda.
Proposed Resolution on Fee Increases
City Attorney Sandow read into record Resolution No. 427, Councilman Jensen moved to approve
Resolution No. 427 as presented and waive further readings, Councilman Brown seconded the motion;
on a roll call vote, all were in favor, motion carried.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BLACKFOOT
NUMBER 427
(This is an updated version of Resolution 424 due to an error in the previously published notice.)
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING INCREASED CITY FEES AND ESTABLISHING A REVISED OVERALL FEE
SCHEDULE FOR THE CITY:
The undersigned, Marc Carroll, does hereby certify that the following is a true and correct copy of a
resolution adopted at the City Council Meeting of the City of Blackfoot on the date indicated below:
1.
WHEREAS, based upon the presentations given to Council certain fees should be increased,
amended, and/or added to place the City of Blackfoot’s fees more commensurate with fees
charged in surrounding communities, be reasonably related to the service provided, and to cover
the costs of providing the applicable service; and
2.
WHEREAS, there also needs to be an increase in certain fees due to the increased costs charged
to the City for providing such service; and
3.
WHEREAS, in order to adequately provide for certain capital expenditures necessary for the
operations of the City it is in the best interest of the City to raise certain fees to provide additional
revenue for such capital expenditures; and
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED THAT:
1.
City Fees shall be increased, amended and/or added to the rates as set forth in Exhibit “A”
attached hereto.
2.
That Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be considered as an amendment and addition to the
overall fee schedule of the City as of October 7, 2025 and will remain in effect until modified
by further council action.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL AND APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 7th day of October, 2025.
___________________________________________
Mayor Marc Carroll
ATTEST:
_________________________________________
City Clerk
EXHIBIT “A”
CITY OF BLACKFOOT
PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE CHANGES
OCTOBER 7, 2025
ADMINISTRATION FEES
Fireworks Permit Fee Permit $25.00
Inspection Cost $25.00
Alarm Systems - False Alarms $5.00
Residential Commercial
1st and 2nd per year No Fee No Fee
3rd per year $25.00 $100.00
4th per year $50.00 $300.00
5th per year $75.00 $300.00
Each Successive False Alarm $100.00 $400.00
PROPOSED:
Any extra manufacturer surcharges, tariffs or other fees may be included on any materials invoiced out
by the City of Blackfoot.
UTILITY BILLING FEES
PROPOSED:
Home Inspection – Water Turn On
$35.00 Work Hours only
PROPOSED:
PROPERTY MAINTENANCE FEES
Vehicle Repair Permit
No Fee
Vehicle Restoration Permit
$45.00
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FEES:
Black pack ED Packet $5.00
BUILDING DEPARTMENT FEES
I.
PLAN REVIEW – FEE CALCULATION – See Chart Below
2011 PLAN REVIEW FEE
Total Valuation
Plan Review Fee
$1 to $2000
Included in Minimum Building Permit Fee
Over $2,000 to $25,000
$27.70 for the first $2,000 plus $5.60 for each additional $1,000, or
fraction thereof
Over $25,000 to $50,000
$156.70 for the first $25,000 plus $4.04 for each additional $1,000, or
fraction thereof
Over $50,000 to $100,000
$257.50 for the first $50,000 plus $2.80 for each additional $1,000, or
fraction thereof
Over $100,000 to $500,000
$397.50 for the first $100,000 plus $2.24 for each additional
$1,000, or fraction thereof
Over $500,000 to $1,000,000
$1,293.50 for first $500,000 plus $1.90 for each additional $1,000, or
fraction thereof
Over $1,000,000 to
$5,000,000
$2,243.50 for first $1,000,000 plus $1.46 for each additional
$1,000, or fraction thereof
Over $5,000,000 to
$10,000,000
$8,083.50 for first $5,000,000 plus $1.10 for each additional
$1,000, or fraction thereof
Over $10,000,000
$13,583.50 for first $10,000,000 plus $.80 for each additional
$1,000, or fraction thereof
PROPOSED:
BUILDING PERMITS
1. RESIDENTIAL
See Building Permit Fee Table
Building Plan Review for Residential
15% of Building Permit Fee
Category includes single family; duplex; townhomes; and mobile/manufactured homes.
2. COMMERCIAL
See Building Permit Fee Table
Building Plan Review for Commercial
65% of Building Permit Fee
Category includes buildings with three or more dwelling units; businesses; schools; churches;
restaurants; etc.
When more than one (1) identical commercial building is on the same parcel and is submitted for plan
review for a commercial development, only one (1) plan review fee shall be required for the group of
identical buildings. To qualify for the single plan review fee, the site plan must include all buildings,
utility placement, and site improvements and submitted at the same time in the application for the first
building in that commercial development.
3.
GENERAL PERMITS
A.
Demolition Permit
B.
Retaining Wall Permit
C.
Mobile Home Standard Block Set Installation Permit
D. Roof Repair Only (truss and/or sheathing)
E.
Fence Permit (when non-exempt from building code;
additional fees under Zoning Department)
$60.00 $70.00
$70.00
$140.00
$70.00
$70.00
4.
OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES
B. Work without permit
Double the cost of the permit
fee
C. Re-inspection Fees
$47.00 per inspection
Re-inspection that requires more than two (2) visits per item or when work to be inspected is not
ready at the time requested. Fee must be paid before re-inspection can be scheduled.
D. Inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated
$47.00 per inspection
E.
Additional plan review
$47.00 per additional review
When changes, additions, or revisions are made to an approved plan
F.
Appeals (Board of Appeals)
$150.00 per code item
MECHANICAL PERMITS
1.
GAS LINES
Individual gas line
$47.00 per inspection
2.
HVAC UNITS
Replacement of a previously installed HVAC unit
$47.00 per inspection
3.
RESIDENTIAL
$80.00/dwelling unit + $15.00
for each HVAC unit
Category includes single family; duplex; townhomes; mobile/manufactured homes.
Additional HVAC Units
Added Fee
Fireplace (gas or solid fuel)
$15.00/ unit
Air Conditioning Unit
$15.00/ unit
Kitchen Hood
$15.00/ unit
Shop Heater
$15.00/ unit
ERV/HRV
$15.00/ unit
Other HVAC units not listed
$15.00/ unit
4.
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
$80.00 + Percent of Installation
Cost
Category includes buildings with three or more dwelling units; businesses; schools; churches;
restaurants; etc.
Total HVAC Cost
Added Percentage
Up to $20,000.00
2% of installation costs up to $400.00
$20,000.00 and over
$400.00 plus 1.5% of costs over $20,000.00
5.
OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES
A.
Work without permit
Double the cost of the permit
fee
B.
Re-inspection Fees
$47.00 per inspection
Re-inspection that requires more than two (2) visits per item or when work to be inspected is not
ready at the time requested. Fee must be paid before re-inspection can be scheduled.
C.
Inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated
$47.00 per inspection
D. Additional plan review
$47.00 per additional review
When changes, additions, or revisions are made to an approved plan
ELECTRICAL PERMITS
1.
TEMPORARY SERVICE
$40.00
Temporary power at service entrance for construction purposes only; removal required once
permanent service is installed.
2.
RESIDENTIAL SERVICES
$80.00/dwelling unit + $5.00 per
room with any wiring
Category includes single family; duplex; mobile/manufactured home service connections. Room
charges are required for installations in both finished and unfinished rooms. including basements,
residential garages, carports, etc. A separate room charge is required for each use indicated in
combination rooms such as kitchen/dining room or kitchen/living/dining room.
3.
COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
$80.00 + Percent of Installation
Cost
Category includes buildings with three or more dwelling units; businesses; schools; churches;
restaurants; etc. Distribution wiring for developments such as pedestals in mobile home park spaces.
Motors, appliances, utilization equipment (except light fixtures) not included.
Total Electrical Cost
Added Percentage
Up to $20,000.00
2% of wiring costs up to $400.00
$20,000.00 and over
$400.00 plus 0.5% of costs over $20,000.00
4.
CIRCUITS FOR MOTORS, GENERATORS, WELDERS
$40.00 + Per Circuit Fee in Table
Horsepower
Per Circuit Fee
0-4.9 HP
$12.50
5-10 HP
$17.50
11-25 HP
$19.00
26-50 HP
$20.00
51-75 HP
$21.00
76-100 HP
$22.00
101-125 HP
$23.00
126-150 HP
$24.00
151-175 HP
$25.00
176-200 HP
$26.00
201-300 HP
$31.00
301 HP and up
$31.00 plus $5.00 per 100 HP or fraction thereof over 300 HP
5.
ELECTRIC SIGNS AND OUTLINE SIGNING
$40.00 + 3.00 per sign
6.
CARNIVALS OR CIRCUSES
$80.00 per event
Carnivals, circuses, or similar entertainment operations using self-contained generators or commercial
power for lighting or power, which charge for admission to their grounds or enclosures. This fee shall
cover any of their wiring with which the public may come into contact with.
7.
OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES
A.
Work without permit
Double the cost of the permit
fee
B.
Re-inspection Fees
$47.00 per inspection
Re-inspection that requires more than two (2) visits per item or when work to be inspected is not
ready at the time requested. Fee must be paid before re-inspection can be scheduled.
C.
Inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated
$47.00 per inspection
D. Additional plan review
$47.00 per additional review
When changes, additions, or revisions are made to an approved plan
PLUMBING PERMITS
1.
WATER AND SEWER LINES
Individual water or sewer line
Both water and sewer line if at same inspection
$47.00 per inspection
$47.00 per inspection
2.
WATER HEATERS
Replacement of previously installed gas or electric water
heater
$47.00 per inspection
3.
RESIDENTIAL
$80.00/dwelling unit + $5.00
each fixture
Category includes single family; duplex; mobile/manufactured homes.
4.
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
$40.00 + Percent of Installation
Cost
Category includes buildings with three or more dwelling units; businesses; schools; churches;
restaurants; etc.
Total Plumbing Cost
Added Percentage
Up to $20,000.00
2% of installation costs up to $400.00
$20,000.00 and over
$400.00 plus 1.5% of costs over $20,000.00
5.
OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES
A.
Work without permit
Double the cost of the permit
fee
B.
Re-inspection Fees
$47.00 per inspection
Re-inspection that requires more than two (2) visits per item or when work to be inspected is not
ready at the time requested. Fee must be paid before re-inspection can be scheduled.
C.
Inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated
$47.00 per inspection
D. Additional plan review
$47.00 per additional review
When changes, additions, or revisions are made to an approved plan
FIRE
FIRE PREVENTION
PROPOSED:
1. OPERATIONAL PERMITS
Burning Permits
No Charge
Fireworks Stand Retail
$50.00
Fireworks Public Display
$100.00
Other operations not listed
$50.00
Operational permits are for conducting an operation or a business regulated under the International
Fire Code. Permits are for a prescribed period or until revoked.
2. CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
A.
Construction Plan Review and Inspection
B.
Site Plan Review
Residential
Commercial
$100.00
$10.00
$30.00
Minor Subdivision
Subdivision
C.
Life Safety Systems Plan Review and Inspection
Sprinkler System
Fire Alarm System
Kitchen Hood Suppression System
Other
$30.00
$50.00
$150.00 + $2.00 per head
$100.00 + $3.00 per device
$50.00
$50.00
Construction permits are for new installations, buildings, and structures regulated under the
International Fire Code.
FIRE MITIGATION FEES
PROPOSED:
Incidents Involving Requiring Response:
Open Burning
Burning without a permit $50.00
Burning under hazardous conditions $50.00
Burning banned materials
Material between 0 – ½ cubic yards $50.00
Material between ½ – 2 cubic yards $100.00
Material greater than 2 cubic yards $150.00
Unattended Fire $100.00
Burning after hours $50.00
Negligent burning
Damage less than $500.00 $100.00
Damage greater than $500.00 $300.00
False Alarms (within one year)
1st and 2nd false alarm No Charge
3rd false alarm Warning Letter
4th false alarm $100
5th and subsequent false alarms $300
Base Rate for Acceptance Testing - $50.00/inspection
Fire Alarm Plan Review - $ 1.50 per initiating devices
$ 1.00 per notification devices
Review Fee - $30.00 alternate fire extinguishing systems
$50.00 inspection fee of fire extinguishing
systems
PROPOSED:
OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES
A. Work without permit
Double the cost of permit fee
B. Re-inspection Fees
$47.00 per inspection
Re-inspection that requires more than two (2) visits per item or when work to be inspected is not
ready at the time requested. Fee must be paid before re-inspection can be scheduled.
C. Inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated
$47.00 per inspection
D. Additional plan review
$47.00 per additional review
When changes, additions, or revisions are made to an approved plan
E. Appeals (Board of Appeals)
$150.00 per code item
PARKS AND RECREATION
PROPOSED:
Driving Range Fees
Bucket of Range Golf Balls
$4.00 Per Token
UTIILITY FEES
SANITATION
PROPOSED:
GARBAGE CHARGES
GALLON
MONTHLY RATE
EXTRA PICK UP CHARGE
100
2ND CAN
$17.36
$17.36
(No change)
$5.00 $10.00 Fuel chg and $4.34 $5.00 tipping fee =
$9.34 $15.00
ADDITIONAL $4.34 $5.00 tipping fee = $13.68 $20.00
$20.00 Delivery fee for all Temporary Container Rentals
300
$10.00 Fuel chg and $10.58 $ 12.43 tipping fee =
$20.58 $22.43
1200
$47.12 $49.71
WEEKLY RENTAL RATE $11.78 $12.43
MONTHLY RENTAL RATE $47.12 $49.71
DAILY CHG $1.68 $1.78
2400
$94.24 $99.42
3600
$141.36 $149.13
4800
$188.48 $198.85
6000
$235.60 $248.56
400
$10.00 Fuel chg and $14.11 $16.57 tipping fee =
$24.11 $26.57
1600
$62.83 $66.29
WEEKLY RENTAL RATE $15.71 $16.57
MONTHLY RENTAL RATE $62.83 $66.29
3200
$125.66 $132.57
4800
$188.49 $198.86
6400
$251.32 $265.14
DAILY CHG $2.24 $ 2.37
8000
$314.15 $331.43
600
$10.00 Fuel chg and $21.17 $24.86 tipping fee =
$31.17 $34.86
2400
$94.24 $99.42
WEEKLY RENTAL RATE $23.56 $24.86
MONTHLY RENTAL RATE $94.24 $99.42
DAILY CHG $3.37 $3.55
Public Comment on HWY 91/Meridian Realignment
CFO Grahm Anderson went over what the update for the HWY 91/ Meridian Realignment project is. It
has been a process since Mayor Loomis has been working with ITD to get this project done. He stated
that part of this process with the grant is to include Public Comment on the project. City Hall has had a
poster board with the changes and cards for suggestions from the residents of Blackfoot. Councilman
Brown made a motion to move into Public Hearing for comment at 7:31 PM. Councilman Jensen
seconded the motion; on a roll call vote, all were in favor and the meeting moved into Public Hearing.
Mayor Carroll reviewed the sign-up sheet and Jeff Deru of 1392 S Meridian is testifying in a neutral
position. He stated he was not properly notified and feels these changes will affect his business as he
does not see any access into his property for his business with the current changes. Mayor Carroll
addressed Mr. Deru apologizing for not receiving the proper notification. Mayor Carroll asked
Superintendent Scott Murphy to clarify on the adjustments to is business entrance. Mayor Carroll
suggested they sit down and have a meeting to get all the details ironed out. Mr. Jim Thomas, 229
Monroe, stepped up to request what the cost to the City would be for this project outside of the grant.
Mayor Carroll conferred with Mr. Anderson what the match was, which was 7.4%, but does not have an
exact dollar amount as it is still in the design phase. Mr. Thomas doesn’t believe this is fair not to let the
citizens know where the tax dollars are going and believes there are numerous other issues to address.
He believes the citizens have the right to know where and how much. No more comments to the
realignment project were made. Councilman Jensen made a motion to move out of Public Comment at
7:39PM, Councilman Gardner seconded on a roll call vote, all were in favor and the Public Hearing
moved back into the regular meeting Agenda. CFO Grahm Anderson made a final comment that the
feedback and comments will be gathered and reported back to LTAC.
Public Hearing on Accruing Forgone Property Tax for FY2026
CFO/City Administrator Grahm Anderson briefly went over Accruing the Forgone Property Tax for
FY2026. Total amount by State Statute at the 3% that the City could levy is $6,216,354.00. However only
requesting $6,118,377 overall increase is 3%. Stating we do not need to max out the allotment of
Forgone. Therefore, the Forgone amount that we would be reserving would be $97,977.00. Changes in
House Bill 389 limits the percentage for what projects they can be used for. Councilwoman Barlow
clarified that once reserved in Forgone to use those funds a Public Hearing and resolution would be
required. Mayor Carroll informed the council that it has been in talks to cease with Forgone after taking
the increase then the remainder just “falls off”. The Mayor gave his opinion that he doesn’t not believe
the City needs the forgone at this time as we are in a good standing with the City and unless we have a
large Capital project where we could benefit from the 3%, then there is not a need. Councilman Jensen
made a motion to move into Public Hearing on Accruing Forgon Property Tax at 7:51 PM. Councilman
Brown seconded the motion; on a roll call vote, all were in favor and the meeting moved into Public
Hearing. Mr. Ken Seaver residing at 822 S Pendlebury Ln, spoke and is very encouraged on the Mayor’s
thought that we do not need to utilize this amount. He believes that any unexplained charges can be
done with Impact fees and that forgone is not a bank for free use. He also believes this is a punishment
to the City residents when there are other options available. Mr. Seaver touched on the well house
projected to be built off Pendlebury inquiring if we have water rights for it. Mayor Carroll confirmed that
we do. Mr. Seaver strongly encourages the Council to not accept the forgone. Mr. Jim Thomas residing
229 Monroe, spoke and stated that the legislature returns the citizens money on property taxes and
favors that the Mayor is opposed to it. He stated there should be a limit and if not, to do away with it.
He also stated we should make a budget and stick to it. Councilman Jensen made a motion to move out
of Public Hearing at 7:57PM, Councilman Brown seconded on a roll call vote, all were in favor and the
Public Hearing moved back into the regular meeting Agenda.
Forgone Resolution
CFO Grahm Anderson explained what the process would be whether it is approved or not. Council
members discussed their opinions, and it was decided to not reserve the Forgone on Property Tax for
FY2026. Councilman Jensen made a motion to not reserve the Forgone for FY2026, Councilman Brown
seconded the motion; on a roll call vote, all were in favor; motion carried. Mayor Carroll appreciates the
turn out in the Council Meeting tonight states it would be beneficial for those to return month after
month and be a part of this and the process. He spoke on the project for the city curbs and storm drains
and that is something that is already in the process. He went over potholes, and snow removal and the
new equipment to benefit the city and the snow removal. He also spoke about the two biggest City
Council meetings in recent years, which were during the process of possibly removing the City Water
towers, and the second being the possibility of allowing Side by Sides on City streets. He stated Budget
hearing attendance are usually scarce. He said it is unfair to the Mayor, Council, City Administrator and
Superintendents with the negativity that is out right now for the work that they do. He encourages
residents to take an interest in the City Government. A resident asked if during Council meetings if
questions can be asked, and the Mayor informed that by law only the topics on the agenda are allowed
to be discussed in order to allow everyone to have notice to attend where these topics will be discussed.
MAYOR MARC CARROLL
Discussion on Sale of Old Animal Shelter Building
Mayor Carroll reminded Council about the fair market analysis that Jed Taylor with Jed Tayor Real Estate
did, this was not an appraisal. It was decided to put it out for bid at $175,00.00. He informed Council
that a sealed bid was missed and was not discovered until after Council meeting. The City received two
bids that were below the bid price that were rejected. The Mayor stated that we recently received from
Gil Judkins, representing Doug and Julie Sayer, an offer of $150,000.00. He stated that since then, the
Blackfoot Police Department has reached out to inquire about the building to use the lot for an impound
lot and evidence building. The Mayor is working with the BPD on getting bids for the upgrades that will
be needed for safety. BPD is currently using a location near the transfer station for this purpose.
Councilwoman Barlow was first concerned about how far from the Police Station it is but realizes this is
a much closer location. Councilman Brown mention that in the process of building the new animal
shelter it was agreed that the sale of the old one would help to offset the costs and stated he is still
leaning in that direction. Chief Croft was asked and verified that this building and yard is big enough to
make a difference for the BPD. Discussion is had in council on whether to continue to market for sale
and if the City can negotiate the offer with a counteroffer. Councilman Jensen motioned to deny the
current offer from the Sayers and allow the City to keep the building while still researching the costs for
the conversion of the building; Councilwoman Barlow seconded; MOTION WITHDRAWN after discussion.
Councilman made a motion to authorize the Mayor to negotiate the deal with a counteroffer.
Councilman Gardner seconded the motion all were in favor, motioned carried.
Discussion on Tennis Courts at Blackfoot High School
Mayor Carroll turned the time over to Councilman Jensen to discuss the Tennis Courts located at the
Blackfoot High School. Councilman Jensen spoke about the Tennis Courts stating that he noticed they
are locked and, in the evening, have no light for use. He talked about a time he went to Rexburg and
was able to play pickleball on a tennis court that had painted lines and was a bring-your-own net court.
He showed photos of the painted lines for the pickleball court on top of the tennis courts. He believes
this is a good way maximize the use of these facilities at a minimal cost. Councilman Jensen would like
for Council to consider inquiring with Parks and Rec what the cost would be to upgrade the Tennis
Courts to include Pickle Ball. Mayor Carroll informed Council that we currently have one pickleball court
on the basketball court to the side of Veteran’s Park, and reminded Council about the shared agreement
between the City and the School District, including splitting the maintenance cost of the courts.
Currently the courts are locked due to an electrical problem, which is estimated at $7,000.00, to be
repaired. He believes this cost would be more on the City side as the School does not use the courts
during the evening. Since the addition of the Technical building by the High School, the plan is to move
the tennis courts further south and away from the soccer field. Otherwise, it would be a matter of
resurfacing the current courts with a timeframe of 12 months or so. Mayor Carroll spoke about the cost
of placing three courts by the Community Garden, which at the time the City was researching it was
$180,000.00. The Mayor believes the tennis community may not agree with this change and the painting
of pickleball courts. This was an informational discussion only, not motion or action needed.
Records Retention Policy Approval
Mayor Carroll informed Council of the Retention Records Policy that has been updated to include all the
amendments and updates from state statute. City Attorney Garrett Sandow read into record Resolution
No. 428, Councilman Brown moved to approve Resolution No. 428 as presented and waive further
readings, Councilman Jensen seconded the motion; all were in favor, motion carried. (the complete
retention policy is available at , City Hall, 157 North Broadway, Blackfoot, Idaho 83221.)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BLACKFOOT
NUMBER 428
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION OF AN AMENDED RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE,
LISTING THE VARIOUS TYPES OF CITY RECORDS AND THE RETENTION PERIOD FOR EACH TYPE OF RECORD.
The undersigned, Mayor Marc Carroll, does hereby certify that the following is a true and correct
copy of a resolution adopted at the City Council Meeting of the City of Blackfoot on the date indicated
below:
WHEREAS the City desires to implement an amended records retention schedule in compliance
with Idaho Code Sec. 50-907 in order to help foster an organized and well maintained City Government
by ensuring records are kept as long as legally and/or historically required, but also allowing for
destruction of unnecessary records to free up valuable storage space; and
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED THAT:
1.
That the records retention policy, attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” is hereby adopted as the
City of Blackfoot’s records retention policy.
2.
That all City personnel shall be informed of the Records Retention Policy through the
department heads and shall take all reasonable measures to ensure the policy is fully
implemented and complied with in full.
3.
This policy may only be amended by approval of City Council.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL AND APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 7th day of October, 2025.
___________________________________________
Mayor Marc Carroll
ATTEST:
________________________________________
City Clerk
Well #14 Test Results
Mayor Carroll went over the test results of the Well House #14 test drilling. He discussed these results
stating that the tests show this will be a good producing well. This was informational discussion only, not
motion or action needed.
Public Hearing on Possible Filing of Judicial Confirmation on the Project for WWTP Improvements
Mayor Carroll presented Stephanie Bonney and Alan Giesbrecht with JUB. Councilman Jensen made a
motion to move into Public Hearing on possible filing of Judicial Confirmation on the Project for WWTP
Improvements at 8:43 PM. Councilwoman Barlow seconded the motion; on a roll call vote, all were in favor
and the meeting moved into Public Hearing. Councilwoman Barlow made a motion to move out of Public
Hearing at 8:44 PM, Councilman Gardner seconded on a roll call vote, all were in favor and the Public
Hearing moved back into the regular meeting Agenda to allow Stephanie to explain the agenda item.
Stephanie explained that under Idaho Law the City is not required to obtain City approval for necessary
improvements of this sense. However, the City is requesting a loan to update the Wastewater Treatment
Plant in the amount of 48 million dollars to bring the WWTP up to compliance through Sewer revenue. This
is solely for public input. Alan went over some of the process in this request and previous grants being
denied, and based on need, this being the route to go for the time being. Councilman Brown motioned to
move back into public Hearing at 8:51PM, Councilwoman Barlow seconded the motion; on a roll call vote,
all were in favor and the meeting moved into Public Hearing. Mr. Jim Thomas residing at 229 Monroe,
asked for confirmation on what the impact would be to the citizens and stated that using an outhouse
would be more cost efficient at this point. He asked what has happened with the previous loans and stated
there should be other avenues. Brent Arave residing at 225 Arave Lane, asked for clarification how long will
this improvement benefit us when will upgrades need to be done again. Ken Seaver residing at 822 S
Pendlebury Ln, asked if the City has done an analysis on what the impact would be on the city residents on
cost. Mr. Seaver asked that information that can be disclosed be disclosed prior to the changes made in
fees in order for residents to plan. Councilman Jensen made a motion to move out of Public Hearing at
8:58PM, Councilman Brown seconded on a roll call vote, all were in favor and the Public Hearing moved
back into the regular meeting Agenda.
PLANNING & ZONING TRAVIS ALLEN
Address Change at 796 Eagle Way
Planning and Zoning Administrator Travis Allen presented the property 796 Eagle Way and the
recommendation from the addressing committee was supported by EMS as well. The recommendation to
change to 1080 Eagle Way was to make it more sequential and this would require Council approval.
Councilman Brown motioned to approve the address change on 796 Eagle way to 1080 Eagle Way,
Councilman Jensen seconded the motion; all were in favor; motion carried.
Recommendation to Update Formerly Named Residential Zoning Designations to Current Adopted Zoning
Designations in City Ordinances (fka R1, R2 and R3)
Mr. Allen presented the Recommendation to Update the Formerly Named Residential Zoning Designations
to Current Adopted zoning Designations formally known as R1, R2, R3.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS
AND RESOLUTION ADOPTED
BY THE
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
OF THE
CITY OF BLACKFOOT
September 23, 2025
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
At the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of Blackfoot on August 26,
2025, the Board held a public hearing on the request of the City of Blackfoot to amend and update the
formerly named residential designations (fka R1, R2, and R3) to the current adopted zoning designations.
Recommendations and the basis for those recommendations from the City of Blackfoot Planning and
Zoning Administrator were presented and considered by the Board. No members of the public testified in
favor, neutral or opposed. Upon reviewing the matter, the Board found and concluded as follows:
FINDINGS:
1.
That the City zoning designations should be updated as presented.
RESOLUTION AND CONCLUSIONS
UPON MOTIONS DULY MADE, SECONDED AND CARRIED,
IT WAS RESOLVED THAT:
By vote, it is unanimously recommended to the City Council that the residential zoning designations be
updated as presented.
These findings of fact, conclusions, and resolutions were formally adopted by a unanimous vote of the
planning and zoning board on September 23, 2025.
_______________________________
Secretary of Planning & Zoning Board
City of Blackfoot, Idaho
City Attorney Sandow read into record Ordinance No. 2280*, Councilman Brown motioned to adopt the
Planning and Zoning Findings of Fact and approve Ordinance No. 2280* as presented and waive further
readings, Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion; on a roll call vote, all were in favor, motion carried.
(*The Ordinance Number 2276 was a clerical error – corrected to 2280)
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2280
Ordinance number 2280 amends various sections of the Blackfoot City Code, updating the zoning designations.
The update in zoning designations replaces the old nomenclature of R1, R2, and R3 to the new nomenclature of
LDR1, LDR2, MDR1, MDR2, HDR1 and HDR2. It does not change the zoning regulations in each of those sections.
The effective date shall be after October 7, 2025, and after publication as required by law.
The full text of Ordinance No. 2280 is available at City Hall, 157 North Broadway, Blackfoot, Idaho 83221.
STATEMENT OF LEGAL ADVISOR
I, Garrett H. Sandow, City Attorney for the City of Blackfoot, Idaho, have reviewed the summary of Ordinance
No. 2276 and find the summary to be true and correct and that it provides adequate notice to the public.
________/s/______________________
Garrett H. Sandow
Honeybrook 3 Planned Unit Development Approval (previously tabled 8/5/25)
Mr. Allen presented the Planned Unit Development for Honeybrook 3 for approval as it was pending the
results of the Wellhouse #14 test. The Councilmembers discussed increased traffic, including if a traffic
analysis has been done as well as water rights and the time of completion for the Pendlebury Ln project.
Councilman Brown motioned to approve Honeybrook 3 Planned Unit Development, Councilman Jensen
seconded the motion; Councilwoman Barlow, Councilman Brown, and Councilman Jensen were in favor;
Councilman Gardner was in opposition; on a 3-1 majority vote, motion carried. Councilman Jensen
motioned to approve the Findings of Facts and waive further readings for Honeybrook 3, Councilman
Brown seconded the motion: Councilwoman Barlow, Councilman Brown, and Councilman Jensen were in
favor; Councilman Gardner was in opposition; on a 3-1 majority vote, motion carried.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS
AND RESOLUTION ADOPTED
BY THE
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
OF THE
CITY OF BLACKFOOT
July 22, 2025
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
At the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of Blackfoot on June 24,
2025, the Board held a public hearing on the request of the Collin Hunter, Honeybrook #4, for a proposed
Planned Unit Development located on the south side of Honeybrook #2, at 1924 Lawrence Lane, Blackfoot,
Idaho. This request was for 52 units (13 units of 4 townhomes each). Site plans were provided. The parcel
is currently zoned as MDR-1. See the Application attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” and made a part hereof by
this reference. A staff report was provided which indicated consent from all department heads of the City.
At the public hearing testimony in favor was provided by the Applicant, current owners of units from a
similar development of applicant, and the applicant’s engineer. No one appeared neutral to the proposal.
Approximately five patrons appeared against the proposal primarily concerned with density, traffic, the
open canal, affordability and impact fees.
Based on the testimony, documents, relevant ordinances, and evidence presented, the Board finds as
follows:
Findings and Conclusions:
1.
The Applicant has applied for a Planned Unit Development and has provided all necessary
information to the City of Blackfoot as required.
2.
From the information provided it appears that the development will be below the allowed
residential units per acre. The MDR-1 zoning allows more residential units than has been requested
and so the proposal fits within the required zoning.
3.
From the information presented, it appears from the plat dimensions that there is sufficient private
open space as required by our city code.
4.
Most of the patrons were concerned about issues with the infrastructure, such as roads, water and
sewer systems, and traffic. However, it appears that all department supervisors, including utilities
and streets, have recommended approval of the development. No studies, data, or analyses were
provided by patrons that would show traffic, streets, water or sewer will be adversely affected.
Further, the Board determines if certain conditions are met, as set forth below, these issues will be
appropriately addressed. No evidence was provided regarding the effect on housing values.
5.
Other testimony to the proposal focused on the open canal. The Board determines if certain
conditions are met, as set forth below, these issues will be appropriately addressed.
6.
It appears all other aspects required in City Code have been met.
RESOLUTION AND CONCLUSIONS
UPON MOTIONS DULY MADE, SECONDED AND CARRIED,
IT WAS RESOLVED THAT:
Based upon the above findings, the Board voted to recommend to City Council to approve the
request for the Planned Unit Development proposed with the following requirements to be met:
All infrastructure, design and planning aspects shall be reviewed by, and approved by the
appropriate City staff members as set forth in the proposed site plan.
Based upon the county’s recommendation, the development should be renamed to Honeybrook #3.
These findings of fact, conclusions, and resolution formally were adopted by a majority vote of the Planning
and Zoning Board on the 22nd day of July, 2025.
_______________________________
Secretary of Planning & Zoning Board
City of Blackfoot, Idaho
ADJOURNMENT
The City Council meeting was adjourned at 9:17 P.M.
City of Blackfoot
_________________________________
Mayor Marc Carroll
Attest:
___________________________________
City Clerk Julie Conan
Prepared by: Adriana Pelayo
Text is extracted by machine from the official file linked on each page; the official file is the record. Sentinel Media, LLC.