City of Blackfoot | minutes | meeting 2025-10-07 | City Council Agenda 10/7/2025 source: https://www.cityofblackfoot.org/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Minutes/_10072025-708 CITY OF BLACKFOOT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FROM OCTOBER 7, 2025 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Carroll called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Those in attendance were: Councilwoman Barlow, Councilman Brown, Councilman Gardner and Councilman Jensen. CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Jensen made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda including minutes from 9/2/2025, alcohol Licenses and payables, Councilman Brown seconded the motion; all were in favor; motion carried. CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CFO GRAHM ANDERSON Treasurers Report City Administrator, Grahm Anderson, presented the monthly treasurers report to the council. Mr. Anderson provided a breakdown of the budget through August 31, 2025, which is 92% of the 2025 fiscal year. He briefly summarized the monthly expense-to-budget and the percentages expended year-to- date for the general fund and each of the departments in the city. He provided the current up-to-date bank and investment account balances, and calendar items to be completed within the next three months. October begins FY 2026 and begin prep for FY 25 audit. For November unclaimed property will be sent over and submitted to the State for the Transparent Idaho report. December the Road and Street Report will be sent to the State and then continue to prep for Audit. Mr. Anderson gave an update on the Meridian /Hwy 91 project working on Right of Way acquisition. West Bridge St Bridge project is in the process of working on final design. Well #14 pump test went well and this project can move forward to the next step. Twin Bridges Landing project is waiting for the river level to drop to move forward with the work to the boat ramp. Public Hearing on Proposed Fee Increases Mr. Anderson went over briefly what the proposed fee increases would consist of and the reason for reposting due to a clerical error in the previous posting. Councilman Jensen made a motion to move into Public Hearing on proposed fee increases at 7:26 PM. Councilman Gardner seconded the motion; on a roll call vote, all were in favor and the meeting moved into Public Hearing. Mayor Carroll reviewed the sign-up sheet there were two citizens signed up to speak. Mayor Carroll reminded them that this Public Hearing is only for the items specified on the agenda. Mr. Ken Seaver residing at 822 S Pendlebury Ln, signed up to speak in favor of the fee increase, stating he wanted to timidly offer his support because he does support the fee increases for the development fees, and the sanitation fees. He agrees that this must mean the City is looking and finding there is a problem in the current fees. He views this as the tip of the iceberg in changes that are necessary to help with the rapid growth of the City. Mayor Carroll again reiterated what the purpose of the Public Hearing is. Jim Thomas, 229 Monroe, was the next to speak. He states he does not support the fee increases believes this is going to drive away those who want to do business in Blackfoot. The Mayor stated he would have the City Clerk Julie Conan post the study from SNH including 57 cities in Idaho, believes that many residents would be interested in seeing the comparison of rates of Water and Sewer services. Councilman Jensen made a motion to move out of Public Hearing at 7:26PM, Councilwoman Barlow seconded on a roll call vote, all were in favor and the Public Hearing moved back into the regular meeting Agenda. Proposed Resolution on Fee Increases City Attorney Sandow read into record Resolution No. 427, Councilman Jensen moved to approve Resolution No. 427 as presented and waive further readings, Councilman Brown seconded the motion; on a roll call vote, all were in favor, motion carried. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BLACKFOOT NUMBER 427 (This is an updated version of Resolution 424 due to an error in the previously published notice.) A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING INCREASED CITY FEES AND ESTABLISHING A REVISED OVERALL FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE CITY: The undersigned, Marc Carroll, does hereby certify that the following is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted at the City Council Meeting of the City of Blackfoot on the date indicated below: 1. WHEREAS, based upon the presentations given to Council certain fees should be increased, amended, and/or added to place the City of Blackfoot’s fees more commensurate with fees charged in surrounding communities, be reasonably related to the service provided, and to cover the costs of providing the applicable service; and 2. WHEREAS, there also needs to be an increase in certain fees due to the increased costs charged to the City for providing such service; and 3. WHEREAS, in order to adequately provide for certain capital expenditures necessary for the operations of the City it is in the best interest of the City to raise certain fees to provide additional revenue for such capital expenditures; and BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED THAT: 1. City Fees shall be increased, amended and/or added to the rates as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto. 2. That Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be considered as an amendment and addition to the overall fee schedule of the City as of October 7, 2025 and will remain in effect until modified by further council action. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL AND APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 7th day of October, 2025. ___________________________________________ Mayor Marc Carroll ATTEST: _________________________________________ City Clerk EXHIBIT “A” CITY OF BLACKFOOT PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE CHANGES OCTOBER 7, 2025 ADMINISTRATION FEES Fireworks Permit Fee Permit $25.00 Inspection Cost $25.00 Alarm Systems - False Alarms $5.00 Residential Commercial 1st and 2nd per year No Fee No Fee 3rd per year $25.00 $100.00 4th per year $50.00 $300.00 5th per year $75.00 $300.00 Each Successive False Alarm $100.00 $400.00 PROPOSED: Any extra manufacturer surcharges, tariffs or other fees may be included on any materials invoiced out by the City of Blackfoot. UTILITY BILLING FEES PROPOSED: Home Inspection – Water Turn On $35.00 Work Hours only PROPOSED: PROPERTY MAINTENANCE FEES Vehicle Repair Permit No Fee Vehicle Restoration Permit $45.00 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FEES: Black pack ED Packet $5.00 BUILDING DEPARTMENT FEES I. PLAN REVIEW – FEE CALCULATION – See Chart Below 2011 PLAN REVIEW FEE Total Valuation Plan Review Fee $1 to $2000 Included in Minimum Building Permit Fee Over $2,000 to $25,000 $27.70 for the first $2,000 plus $5.60 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof Over $25,000 to $50,000 $156.70 for the first $25,000 plus $4.04 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof Over $50,000 to $100,000 $257.50 for the first $50,000 plus $2.80 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof Over $100,000 to $500,000 $397.50 for the first $100,000 plus $2.24 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof Over $500,000 to $1,000,000 $1,293.50 for first $500,000 plus $1.90 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof Over $1,000,000 to $5,000,000 $2,243.50 for first $1,000,000 plus $1.46 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof Over $5,000,000 to $10,000,000 $8,083.50 for first $5,000,000 plus $1.10 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof Over $10,000,000 $13,583.50 for first $10,000,000 plus $.80 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof PROPOSED: BUILDING PERMITS 1. RESIDENTIAL See Building Permit Fee Table Building Plan Review for Residential 15% of Building Permit Fee Category includes single family; duplex; townhomes; and mobile/manufactured homes. 2. COMMERCIAL See Building Permit Fee Table Building Plan Review for Commercial 65% of Building Permit Fee Category includes buildings with three or more dwelling units; businesses; schools; churches; restaurants; etc. When more than one (1) identical commercial building is on the same parcel and is submitted for plan review for a commercial development, only one (1) plan review fee shall be required for the group of identical buildings. To qualify for the single plan review fee, the site plan must include all buildings, utility placement, and site improvements and submitted at the same time in the application for the first building in that commercial development. 3. GENERAL PERMITS A. Demolition Permit B. Retaining Wall Permit C. Mobile Home Standard Block Set Installation Permit D. Roof Repair Only (truss and/or sheathing) E. Fence Permit (when non-exempt from building code; additional fees under Zoning Department) $60.00 $70.00 $70.00 $140.00 $70.00 $70.00 4. OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES B. Work without permit Double the cost of the permit fee C. Re-inspection Fees $47.00 per inspection Re-inspection that requires more than two (2) visits per item or when work to be inspected is not ready at the time requested. Fee must be paid before re-inspection can be scheduled. D. Inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated $47.00 per inspection E. Additional plan review $47.00 per additional review When changes, additions, or revisions are made to an approved plan F. Appeals (Board of Appeals) $150.00 per code item MECHANICAL PERMITS 1. GAS LINES Individual gas line $47.00 per inspection 2. HVAC UNITS Replacement of a previously installed HVAC unit $47.00 per inspection 3. RESIDENTIAL $80.00/dwelling unit + $15.00 for each HVAC unit Category includes single family; duplex; townhomes; mobile/manufactured homes. Additional HVAC Units Added Fee Fireplace (gas or solid fuel) $15.00/ unit Air Conditioning Unit $15.00/ unit Kitchen Hood $15.00/ unit Shop Heater $15.00/ unit ERV/HRV $15.00/ unit Other HVAC units not listed $15.00/ unit 4. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL $80.00 + Percent of Installation Cost Category includes buildings with three or more dwelling units; businesses; schools; churches; restaurants; etc. Total HVAC Cost Added Percentage Up to $20,000.00 2% of installation costs up to $400.00 $20,000.00 and over $400.00 plus 1.5% of costs over $20,000.00 5. OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES A. Work without permit Double the cost of the permit fee B. Re-inspection Fees $47.00 per inspection Re-inspection that requires more than two (2) visits per item or when work to be inspected is not ready at the time requested. Fee must be paid before re-inspection can be scheduled. C. Inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated $47.00 per inspection D. Additional plan review $47.00 per additional review When changes, additions, or revisions are made to an approved plan ELECTRICAL PERMITS 1. TEMPORARY SERVICE $40.00 Temporary power at service entrance for construction purposes only; removal required once permanent service is installed. 2. RESIDENTIAL SERVICES $80.00/dwelling unit + $5.00 per room with any wiring Category includes single family; duplex; mobile/manufactured home service connections. Room charges are required for installations in both finished and unfinished rooms. including basements, residential garages, carports, etc. A separate room charge is required for each use indicated in combination rooms such as kitchen/dining room or kitchen/living/dining room. 3. COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL SERVICES $80.00 + Percent of Installation Cost Category includes buildings with three or more dwelling units; businesses; schools; churches; restaurants; etc. Distribution wiring for developments such as pedestals in mobile home park spaces. Motors, appliances, utilization equipment (except light fixtures) not included. Total Electrical Cost Added Percentage Up to $20,000.00 2% of wiring costs up to $400.00 $20,000.00 and over $400.00 plus 0.5% of costs over $20,000.00 4. CIRCUITS FOR MOTORS, GENERATORS, WELDERS $40.00 + Per Circuit Fee in Table Horsepower Per Circuit Fee 0-4.9 HP $12.50 5-10 HP $17.50 11-25 HP $19.00 26-50 HP $20.00 51-75 HP $21.00 76-100 HP $22.00 101-125 HP $23.00 126-150 HP $24.00 151-175 HP $25.00 176-200 HP $26.00 201-300 HP $31.00 301 HP and up $31.00 plus $5.00 per 100 HP or fraction thereof over 300 HP 5. ELECTRIC SIGNS AND OUTLINE SIGNING $40.00 + 3.00 per sign 6. CARNIVALS OR CIRCUSES $80.00 per event Carnivals, circuses, or similar entertainment operations using self-contained generators or commercial power for lighting or power, which charge for admission to their grounds or enclosures. This fee shall cover any of their wiring with which the public may come into contact with. 7. OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES A. Work without permit Double the cost of the permit fee B. Re-inspection Fees $47.00 per inspection Re-inspection that requires more than two (2) visits per item or when work to be inspected is not ready at the time requested. Fee must be paid before re-inspection can be scheduled. C. Inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated $47.00 per inspection D. Additional plan review $47.00 per additional review When changes, additions, or revisions are made to an approved plan PLUMBING PERMITS 1. WATER AND SEWER LINES Individual water or sewer line Both water and sewer line if at same inspection $47.00 per inspection $47.00 per inspection 2. WATER HEATERS Replacement of previously installed gas or electric water heater $47.00 per inspection 3. RESIDENTIAL $80.00/dwelling unit + $5.00 each fixture Category includes single family; duplex; mobile/manufactured homes. 4. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL $40.00 + Percent of Installation Cost Category includes buildings with three or more dwelling units; businesses; schools; churches; restaurants; etc. Total Plumbing Cost Added Percentage Up to $20,000.00 2% of installation costs up to $400.00 $20,000.00 and over $400.00 plus 1.5% of costs over $20,000.00 5. OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES A. Work without permit Double the cost of the permit fee B. Re-inspection Fees $47.00 per inspection Re-inspection that requires more than two (2) visits per item or when work to be inspected is not ready at the time requested. Fee must be paid before re-inspection can be scheduled. C. Inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated $47.00 per inspection D. Additional plan review $47.00 per additional review When changes, additions, or revisions are made to an approved plan FIRE FIRE PREVENTION PROPOSED: 1. OPERATIONAL PERMITS Burning Permits No Charge Fireworks Stand Retail $50.00 Fireworks Public Display $100.00 Other operations not listed $50.00 Operational permits are for conducting an operation or a business regulated under the International Fire Code. Permits are for a prescribed period or until revoked. 2. CONSTRUCTION PERMITS A. Construction Plan Review and Inspection B. Site Plan Review Residential Commercial $100.00 $10.00 $30.00 Minor Subdivision Subdivision C. Life Safety Systems Plan Review and Inspection Sprinkler System Fire Alarm System Kitchen Hood Suppression System Other $30.00 $50.00 $150.00 + $2.00 per head $100.00 + $3.00 per device $50.00 $50.00 Construction permits are for new installations, buildings, and structures regulated under the International Fire Code. FIRE MITIGATION FEES PROPOSED: Incidents Involving Requiring Response: Open Burning Burning without a permit $50.00 Burning under hazardous conditions $50.00 Burning banned materials Material between 0 – ½ cubic yards $50.00 Material between ½ – 2 cubic yards $100.00 Material greater than 2 cubic yards $150.00 Unattended Fire $100.00 Burning after hours $50.00 Negligent burning Damage less than $500.00 $100.00 Damage greater than $500.00 $300.00 False Alarms (within one year) 1st and 2nd false alarm No Charge 3rd false alarm Warning Letter 4th false alarm $100 5th and subsequent false alarms $300 Base Rate for Acceptance Testing - $50.00/inspection Fire Alarm Plan Review - $ 1.50 per initiating devices $ 1.00 per notification devices Review Fee - $30.00 alternate fire extinguishing systems $50.00 inspection fee of fire extinguishing systems PROPOSED: OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES A. Work without permit Double the cost of permit fee B. Re-inspection Fees $47.00 per inspection Re-inspection that requires more than two (2) visits per item or when work to be inspected is not ready at the time requested. Fee must be paid before re-inspection can be scheduled. C. Inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated $47.00 per inspection D. Additional plan review $47.00 per additional review When changes, additions, or revisions are made to an approved plan E. Appeals (Board of Appeals) $150.00 per code item PARKS AND RECREATION PROPOSED: Driving Range Fees Bucket of Range Golf Balls $4.00 Per Token UTIILITY FEES SANITATION PROPOSED: GARBAGE CHARGES GALLON MONTHLY RATE EXTRA PICK UP CHARGE 100 2ND CAN $17.36 $17.36 (No change) $5.00 $10.00 Fuel chg and $4.34 $5.00 tipping fee = $9.34 $15.00 ADDITIONAL $4.34 $5.00 tipping fee = $13.68 $20.00 $20.00 Delivery fee for all Temporary Container Rentals 300 $10.00 Fuel chg and $10.58 $ 12.43 tipping fee = $20.58 $22.43 1200 $47.12 $49.71 WEEKLY RENTAL RATE $11.78 $12.43 MONTHLY RENTAL RATE $47.12 $49.71 DAILY CHG $1.68 $1.78 2400 $94.24 $99.42 3600 $141.36 $149.13 4800 $188.48 $198.85 6000 $235.60 $248.56 400 $10.00 Fuel chg and $14.11 $16.57 tipping fee = $24.11 $26.57 1600 $62.83 $66.29 WEEKLY RENTAL RATE $15.71 $16.57 MONTHLY RENTAL RATE $62.83 $66.29 3200 $125.66 $132.57 4800 $188.49 $198.86 6400 $251.32 $265.14 DAILY CHG $2.24 $ 2.37 8000 $314.15 $331.43 600 $10.00 Fuel chg and $21.17 $24.86 tipping fee = $31.17 $34.86 2400 $94.24 $99.42 WEEKLY RENTAL RATE $23.56 $24.86 MONTHLY RENTAL RATE $94.24 $99.42 DAILY CHG $3.37 $3.55 Public Comment on HWY 91/Meridian Realignment CFO Grahm Anderson went over what the update for the HWY 91/ Meridian Realignment project is. It has been a process since Mayor Loomis has been working with ITD to get this project done. He stated that part of this process with the grant is to include Public Comment on the project. City Hall has had a poster board with the changes and cards for suggestions from the residents of Blackfoot. Councilman Brown made a motion to move into Public Hearing for comment at 7:31 PM. Councilman Jensen seconded the motion; on a roll call vote, all were in favor and the meeting moved into Public Hearing. Mayor Carroll reviewed the sign-up sheet and Jeff Deru of 1392 S Meridian is testifying in a neutral position. He stated he was not properly notified and feels these changes will affect his business as he does not see any access into his property for his business with the current changes. Mayor Carroll addressed Mr. Deru apologizing for not receiving the proper notification. Mayor Carroll asked Superintendent Scott Murphy to clarify on the adjustments to is business entrance. Mayor Carroll suggested they sit down and have a meeting to get all the details ironed out. Mr. Jim Thomas, 229 Monroe, stepped up to request what the cost to the City would be for this project outside of the grant. Mayor Carroll conferred with Mr. Anderson what the match was, which was 7.4%, but does not have an exact dollar amount as it is still in the design phase. Mr. Thomas doesn’t believe this is fair not to let the citizens know where the tax dollars are going and believes there are numerous other issues to address. He believes the citizens have the right to know where and how much. No more comments to the realignment project were made. Councilman Jensen made a motion to move out of Public Comment at 7:39PM, Councilman Gardner seconded on a roll call vote, all were in favor and the Public Hearing moved back into the regular meeting Agenda. CFO Grahm Anderson made a final comment that the feedback and comments will be gathered and reported back to LTAC. Public Hearing on Accruing Forgone Property Tax for FY2026 CFO/City Administrator Grahm Anderson briefly went over Accruing the Forgone Property Tax for FY2026. Total amount by State Statute at the 3% that the City could levy is $6,216,354.00. However only requesting $6,118,377 overall increase is 3%. Stating we do not need to max out the allotment of Forgone. Therefore, the Forgone amount that we would be reserving would be $97,977.00. Changes in House Bill 389 limits the percentage for what projects they can be used for. Councilwoman Barlow clarified that once reserved in Forgone to use those funds a Public Hearing and resolution would be required. Mayor Carroll informed the council that it has been in talks to cease with Forgone after taking the increase then the remainder just “falls off”. The Mayor gave his opinion that he doesn’t not believe the City needs the forgone at this time as we are in a good standing with the City and unless we have a large Capital project where we could benefit from the 3%, then there is not a need. Councilman Jensen made a motion to move into Public Hearing on Accruing Forgon Property Tax at 7:51 PM. Councilman Brown seconded the motion; on a roll call vote, all were in favor and the meeting moved into Public Hearing. Mr. Ken Seaver residing at 822 S Pendlebury Ln, spoke and is very encouraged on the Mayor’s thought that we do not need to utilize this amount. He believes that any unexplained charges can be done with Impact fees and that forgone is not a bank for free use. He also believes this is a punishment to the City residents when there are other options available. Mr. Seaver touched on the well house projected to be built off Pendlebury inquiring if we have water rights for it. Mayor Carroll confirmed that we do. Mr. Seaver strongly encourages the Council to not accept the forgone. Mr. Jim Thomas residing 229 Monroe, spoke and stated that the legislature returns the citizens money on property taxes and favors that the Mayor is opposed to it. He stated there should be a limit and if not, to do away with it. He also stated we should make a budget and stick to it. Councilman Jensen made a motion to move out of Public Hearing at 7:57PM, Councilman Brown seconded on a roll call vote, all were in favor and the Public Hearing moved back into the regular meeting Agenda. Forgone Resolution CFO Grahm Anderson explained what the process would be whether it is approved or not. Council members discussed their opinions, and it was decided to not reserve the Forgone on Property Tax for FY2026. Councilman Jensen made a motion to not reserve the Forgone for FY2026, Councilman Brown seconded the motion; on a roll call vote, all were in favor; motion carried. Mayor Carroll appreciates the turn out in the Council Meeting tonight states it would be beneficial for those to return month after month and be a part of this and the process. He spoke on the project for the city curbs and storm drains and that is something that is already in the process. He went over potholes, and snow removal and the new equipment to benefit the city and the snow removal. He also spoke about the two biggest City Council meetings in recent years, which were during the process of possibly removing the City Water towers, and the second being the possibility of allowing Side by Sides on City streets. He stated Budget hearing attendance are usually scarce. He said it is unfair to the Mayor, Council, City Administrator and Superintendents with the negativity that is out right now for the work that they do. He encourages residents to take an interest in the City Government. A resident asked if during Council meetings if questions can be asked, and the Mayor informed that by law only the topics on the agenda are allowed to be discussed in order to allow everyone to have notice to attend where these topics will be discussed. MAYOR MARC CARROLL Discussion on Sale of Old Animal Shelter Building Mayor Carroll reminded Council about the fair market analysis that Jed Taylor with Jed Tayor Real Estate did, this was not an appraisal. It was decided to put it out for bid at $175,00.00. He informed Council that a sealed bid was missed and was not discovered until after Council meeting. The City received two bids that were below the bid price that were rejected. The Mayor stated that we recently received from Gil Judkins, representing Doug and Julie Sayer, an offer of $150,000.00. He stated that since then, the Blackfoot Police Department has reached out to inquire about the building to use the lot for an impound lot and evidence building. The Mayor is working with the BPD on getting bids for the upgrades that will be needed for safety. BPD is currently using a location near the transfer station for this purpose. Councilwoman Barlow was first concerned about how far from the Police Station it is but realizes this is a much closer location. Councilman Brown mention that in the process of building the new animal shelter it was agreed that the sale of the old one would help to offset the costs and stated he is still leaning in that direction. Chief Croft was asked and verified that this building and yard is big enough to make a difference for the BPD. Discussion is had in council on whether to continue to market for sale and if the City can negotiate the offer with a counteroffer. Councilman Jensen motioned to deny the current offer from the Sayers and allow the City to keep the building while still researching the costs for the conversion of the building; Councilwoman Barlow seconded; MOTION WITHDRAWN after discussion. Councilman made a motion to authorize the Mayor to negotiate the deal with a counteroffer. Councilman Gardner seconded the motion all were in favor, motioned carried. Discussion on Tennis Courts at Blackfoot High School Mayor Carroll turned the time over to Councilman Jensen to discuss the Tennis Courts located at the Blackfoot High School. Councilman Jensen spoke about the Tennis Courts stating that he noticed they are locked and, in the evening, have no light for use. He talked about a time he went to Rexburg and was able to play pickleball on a tennis court that had painted lines and was a bring-your-own net court. He showed photos of the painted lines for the pickleball court on top of the tennis courts. He believes this is a good way maximize the use of these facilities at a minimal cost. Councilman Jensen would like for Council to consider inquiring with Parks and Rec what the cost would be to upgrade the Tennis Courts to include Pickle Ball. Mayor Carroll informed Council that we currently have one pickleball court on the basketball court to the side of Veteran’s Park, and reminded Council about the shared agreement between the City and the School District, including splitting the maintenance cost of the courts. Currently the courts are locked due to an electrical problem, which is estimated at $7,000.00, to be repaired. He believes this cost would be more on the City side as the School does not use the courts during the evening. Since the addition of the Technical building by the High School, the plan is to move the tennis courts further south and away from the soccer field. Otherwise, it would be a matter of resurfacing the current courts with a timeframe of 12 months or so. Mayor Carroll spoke about the cost of placing three courts by the Community Garden, which at the time the City was researching it was $180,000.00. The Mayor believes the tennis community may not agree with this change and the painting of pickleball courts. This was an informational discussion only, not motion or action needed. Records Retention Policy Approval Mayor Carroll informed Council of the Retention Records Policy that has been updated to include all the amendments and updates from state statute. City Attorney Garrett Sandow read into record Resolution No. 428, Councilman Brown moved to approve Resolution No. 428 as presented and waive further readings, Councilman Jensen seconded the motion; all were in favor, motion carried. (the complete retention policy is available at , City Hall, 157 North Broadway, Blackfoot, Idaho 83221.) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BLACKFOOT NUMBER 428 A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION OF AN AMENDED RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE, LISTING THE VARIOUS TYPES OF CITY RECORDS AND THE RETENTION PERIOD FOR EACH TYPE OF RECORD. The undersigned, Mayor Marc Carroll, does hereby certify that the following is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted at the City Council Meeting of the City of Blackfoot on the date indicated below: WHEREAS the City desires to implement an amended records retention schedule in compliance with Idaho Code Sec. 50-907 in order to help foster an organized and well maintained City Government by ensuring records are kept as long as legally and/or historically required, but also allowing for destruction of unnecessary records to free up valuable storage space; and BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED THAT: 1. That the records retention policy, attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” is hereby adopted as the City of Blackfoot’s records retention policy. 2. That all City personnel shall be informed of the Records Retention Policy through the department heads and shall take all reasonable measures to ensure the policy is fully implemented and complied with in full. 3. This policy may only be amended by approval of City Council. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL AND APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 7th day of October, 2025. ___________________________________________ Mayor Marc Carroll ATTEST: ________________________________________ City Clerk Well #14 Test Results Mayor Carroll went over the test results of the Well House #14 test drilling. He discussed these results stating that the tests show this will be a good producing well. This was informational discussion only, not motion or action needed. Public Hearing on Possible Filing of Judicial Confirmation on the Project for WWTP Improvements Mayor Carroll presented Stephanie Bonney and Alan Giesbrecht with JUB. Councilman Jensen made a motion to move into Public Hearing on possible filing of Judicial Confirmation on the Project for WWTP Improvements at 8:43 PM. Councilwoman Barlow seconded the motion; on a roll call vote, all were in favor and the meeting moved into Public Hearing. Councilwoman Barlow made a motion to move out of Public Hearing at 8:44 PM, Councilman Gardner seconded on a roll call vote, all were in favor and the Public Hearing moved back into the regular meeting Agenda to allow Stephanie to explain the agenda item. Stephanie explained that under Idaho Law the City is not required to obtain City approval for necessary improvements of this sense. However, the City is requesting a loan to update the Wastewater Treatment Plant in the amount of 48 million dollars to bring the WWTP up to compliance through Sewer revenue. This is solely for public input. Alan went over some of the process in this request and previous grants being denied, and based on need, this being the route to go for the time being. Councilman Brown motioned to move back into public Hearing at 8:51PM, Councilwoman Barlow seconded the motion; on a roll call vote, all were in favor and the meeting moved into Public Hearing. Mr. Jim Thomas residing at 229 Monroe, asked for confirmation on what the impact would be to the citizens and stated that using an outhouse would be more cost efficient at this point. He asked what has happened with the previous loans and stated there should be other avenues. Brent Arave residing at 225 Arave Lane, asked for clarification how long will this improvement benefit us when will upgrades need to be done again. Ken Seaver residing at 822 S Pendlebury Ln, asked if the City has done an analysis on what the impact would be on the city residents on cost. Mr. Seaver asked that information that can be disclosed be disclosed prior to the changes made in fees in order for residents to plan. Councilman Jensen made a motion to move out of Public Hearing at 8:58PM, Councilman Brown seconded on a roll call vote, all were in favor and the Public Hearing moved back into the regular meeting Agenda. PLANNING & ZONING TRAVIS ALLEN Address Change at 796 Eagle Way Planning and Zoning Administrator Travis Allen presented the property 796 Eagle Way and the recommendation from the addressing committee was supported by EMS as well. The recommendation to change to 1080 Eagle Way was to make it more sequential and this would require Council approval. Councilman Brown motioned to approve the address change on 796 Eagle way to 1080 Eagle Way, Councilman Jensen seconded the motion; all were in favor; motion carried. Recommendation to Update Formerly Named Residential Zoning Designations to Current Adopted Zoning Designations in City Ordinances (fka R1, R2 and R3) Mr. Allen presented the Recommendation to Update the Formerly Named Residential Zoning Designations to Current Adopted zoning Designations formally known as R1, R2, R3. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD OF THE CITY OF BLACKFOOT September 23, 2025 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS At the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of Blackfoot on August 26, 2025, the Board held a public hearing on the request of the City of Blackfoot to amend and update the formerly named residential designations (fka R1, R2, and R3) to the current adopted zoning designations. Recommendations and the basis for those recommendations from the City of Blackfoot Planning and Zoning Administrator were presented and considered by the Board. No members of the public testified in favor, neutral or opposed. Upon reviewing the matter, the Board found and concluded as follows: FINDINGS: 1. That the City zoning designations should be updated as presented. RESOLUTION AND CONCLUSIONS UPON MOTIONS DULY MADE, SECONDED AND CARRIED, IT WAS RESOLVED THAT: By vote, it is unanimously recommended to the City Council that the residential zoning designations be updated as presented. These findings of fact, conclusions, and resolutions were formally adopted by a unanimous vote of the planning and zoning board on September 23, 2025. _______________________________ Secretary of Planning & Zoning Board City of Blackfoot, Idaho City Attorney Sandow read into record Ordinance No. 2280*, Councilman Brown motioned to adopt the Planning and Zoning Findings of Fact and approve Ordinance No. 2280* as presented and waive further readings, Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion; on a roll call vote, all were in favor, motion carried. (*The Ordinance Number 2276 was a clerical error – corrected to 2280) SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2280 Ordinance number 2280 amends various sections of the Blackfoot City Code, updating the zoning designations. The update in zoning designations replaces the old nomenclature of R1, R2, and R3 to the new nomenclature of LDR1, LDR2, MDR1, MDR2, HDR1 and HDR2. It does not change the zoning regulations in each of those sections. The effective date shall be after October 7, 2025, and after publication as required by law. The full text of Ordinance No. 2280 is available at City Hall, 157 North Broadway, Blackfoot, Idaho 83221. STATEMENT OF LEGAL ADVISOR I, Garrett H. Sandow, City Attorney for the City of Blackfoot, Idaho, have reviewed the summary of Ordinance No. 2276 and find the summary to be true and correct and that it provides adequate notice to the public. ________/s/______________________ Garrett H. Sandow Honeybrook 3 Planned Unit Development Approval (previously tabled 8/5/25) Mr. Allen presented the Planned Unit Development for Honeybrook 3 for approval as it was pending the results of the Wellhouse #14 test. The Councilmembers discussed increased traffic, including if a traffic analysis has been done as well as water rights and the time of completion for the Pendlebury Ln project. Councilman Brown motioned to approve Honeybrook 3 Planned Unit Development, Councilman Jensen seconded the motion; Councilwoman Barlow, Councilman Brown, and Councilman Jensen were in favor; Councilman Gardner was in opposition; on a 3-1 majority vote, motion carried. Councilman Jensen motioned to approve the Findings of Facts and waive further readings for Honeybrook 3, Councilman Brown seconded the motion: Councilwoman Barlow, Councilman Brown, and Councilman Jensen were in favor; Councilman Gardner was in opposition; on a 3-1 majority vote, motion carried. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD OF THE CITY OF BLACKFOOT July 22, 2025 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS At the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of Blackfoot on June 24, 2025, the Board held a public hearing on the request of the Collin Hunter, Honeybrook #4, for a proposed Planned Unit Development located on the south side of Honeybrook #2, at 1924 Lawrence Lane, Blackfoot, Idaho. This request was for 52 units (13 units of 4 townhomes each). Site plans were provided. The parcel is currently zoned as MDR-1. See the Application attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” and made a part hereof by this reference. A staff report was provided which indicated consent from all department heads of the City. At the public hearing testimony in favor was provided by the Applicant, current owners of units from a similar development of applicant, and the applicant’s engineer. No one appeared neutral to the proposal. Approximately five patrons appeared against the proposal primarily concerned with density, traffic, the open canal, affordability and impact fees. Based on the testimony, documents, relevant ordinances, and evidence presented, the Board finds as follows: Findings and Conclusions: 1. The Applicant has applied for a Planned Unit Development and has provided all necessary information to the City of Blackfoot as required. 2. From the information provided it appears that the development will be below the allowed residential units per acre. The MDR-1 zoning allows more residential units than has been requested and so the proposal fits within the required zoning. 3. From the information presented, it appears from the plat dimensions that there is sufficient private open space as required by our city code. 4. Most of the patrons were concerned about issues with the infrastructure, such as roads, water and sewer systems, and traffic. However, it appears that all department supervisors, including utilities and streets, have recommended approval of the development. No studies, data, or analyses were provided by patrons that would show traffic, streets, water or sewer will be adversely affected. Further, the Board determines if certain conditions are met, as set forth below, these issues will be appropriately addressed. No evidence was provided regarding the effect on housing values. 5. Other testimony to the proposal focused on the open canal. The Board determines if certain conditions are met, as set forth below, these issues will be appropriately addressed. 6. It appears all other aspects required in City Code have been met. RESOLUTION AND CONCLUSIONS UPON MOTIONS DULY MADE, SECONDED AND CARRIED, IT WAS RESOLVED THAT: Based upon the above findings, the Board voted to recommend to City Council to approve the request for the Planned Unit Development proposed with the following requirements to be met: All infrastructure, design and planning aspects shall be reviewed by, and approved by the appropriate City staff members as set forth in the proposed site plan. Based upon the county’s recommendation, the development should be renamed to Honeybrook #3. These findings of fact, conclusions, and resolution formally were adopted by a majority vote of the Planning and Zoning Board on the 22nd day of July, 2025. _______________________________ Secretary of Planning & Zoning Board City of Blackfoot, Idaho ADJOURNMENT The City Council meeting was adjourned at 9:17 P.M. City of Blackfoot _________________________________ Mayor Marc Carroll Attest: ___________________________________ City Clerk Julie Conan Prepared by: Adriana Pelayo