Sentinel Media records · public agendas and minutes, text only, refreshed nightly from each body's own site · not a newspaper

City Council Meeting

minutes meeting date 2026-06-25 · fetched 2026-09-17 · 58869 characters · official file · plain text

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Thursday, June 25, 2026
6:30 PM
City Council Chambers

1. Mayor Burtenshaw Called the meeting to Order at 6:30 PM
Call to Order and Roll Call
There were present:
Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw (via Teams)

Council President/Mayor Pro Tem Jim Francis
Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman

Councilor Jim Freeman (via Teams)
Councilor Kirk Larsen

Councilor Brandon Lee
Councilor John Radford

Also present:
Chris Fredericksen, IF Power GM

Wade Sanner, CDS Director
Mark Hagedorn, Finance Manager/Treasurer
Bryce Johnson, Police Chief
Chis Canfield, Public Works Director

Zack Jones, City Attorney
Blake Jolley, Connect Engineering

Collin Hunter, Developer - Tetonia
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk

2. Pledge of Allegiance
Director Fredericksen led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Public Comment

Terri Ireland – Idaho Falls resident, small business owner, and representative of the
Downtown Merchants Association
•
Thanked the Street Department for recent downtown improvements, including new parking
striping, tree trimming on Shoup Avenue, and the new crosswalk at Park and E Street.
•
Noted that trees at Capital Avenue intersections are still blocking stop signs and requested
additional trimming.
•
Raised concerns about graffiti downtown and requested stronger code enforcement efforts
to encourage property owners to remove it.
•
Reported traffic and parking problems around Eastern Boulevard and Elm Street during
school pickup times, including blocked crosswalks, driveways, business entrances, and
parking spaces. Requested City action, potentially involving law enforcement or
coordination with schools.
•
Commented on the proposed alcohol ordinance, specifically catering permits. Suggested
adding language that clearly explains businesses would need an A-2 assembly designation
to continue using catering permits and references the applicable City code requirements.

Ronald O’Connor – Public Works Wastewater Division employee and President of the
Idaho Falls Municipal Employees Association (MEA)

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
Reviewed the MEA's history with the City, noting Council actions in 1974 that recognized
the association as the exclusive bargaining representative for City employees.
•
Stated that under the previous administration, the MEA lost its voice and ability to
participate in discussions affecting employees.
•
Praised City employees for maintaining parks, utilities, roads, and public safety services.
•
Expressed concern that many employees are struggling financially due to inflation and
inadequate cost-of-living increases.
•
Requested renewed recognition of the MEA as a partner in discussions affecting employees
and asked for regular dialogue with the Mayor and Council.

Kayden Walton – Idaho Falls resident
•
Opposed the City's use of Flock Safety cameras.
•
Argued the cameras are unnecessary and expressed concerns about who may have access
to the collected data.

Shane Dial – Downtown Merchants Association President and local business owner
•
Criticized portions of the proposed alcohol ordinance as unconstitutional.
•
Argued that provisions allowing City officials to immediately shut down events without
appeal violate due process protections.
•
Claimed language prohibiting events within 300 feet of places where children are "likely to
be present" is unconstitutionally vague and could be enforced arbitrarily.
•
Expressed concerns that the ordinance could allow individuals to block events by reserving
nearby park spaces and objecting to alcohol permits.
•
Suggested differing alcohol service rules at various City venues may create equal
protection concerns.
•
Warned the ordinance could expose the City to costly litigation and urged revisions before
adoption.

Finn Garrin – Idaho Falls resident
•
Continued opposition to the City's Flock Safety camera program.
•
Claimed Flock had recently exposed police search data through search engine indexing and
cited additional cybersecurity concerns.
•
Alleged Flock employees have had inappropriate access to camera feeds elsewhere in the
country.
•
Noted that cameras near schools and daycare facilities collect information on individuals
traveling to those locations.
•
Argued the system lacks sufficient transparency and should not continue to be used by the
City.

Brian McKeller – Ammon resident, former Idaho Falls resident
•
Opposed the City's contract with Flock Safety.
•
Described the cameras as AI-powered surveillance systems that collect and store data on
vehicles and occupants.
•
Raised concerns about data sharing, security breaches, and access by federal agencies.
•
Claimed the system enables mass surveillance of residents' daily activities.
•
Requested the City:

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
o
Audit all Flock-related searches involving Idaho Falls residents.
o
Disclose data-sharing agreements and security practices.
o
Terminate the Flock contract and remove the cameras within 30 days.
•
Stated that citizens may pursue a tort claim against the City if concerns are not addressed.

Mosy Moran – Operator of The Heart in Idaho Falls
•
Opposed proposed restrictions on alcohol catering permits.
•
Argued limiting catering permits to 12 per year per location would significantly harm
independent event venues such as The Heart and similar community spaces.
•
Said the proposal would effectively force venues to obtain scarce and expensive liquor
licenses or upgrade facilities beyond what is financially feasible.
•
Contended the ordinance favors larger, established venues while disadvantaging smaller
community event spaces.
•
Expressed concern about provisions allowing the City to subpoena surveillance footage
and records.
•
Argued that spreading events across multiple venues is safer than concentrating them in
fewer locations.
•
Requested that the Council reject the proposed catering permit limits.

Matt Jacobson – Downtown business owner
•
Thanked the Council and staff for incorporating feedback and making revisions to the
alcohol ordinance.
•
Supported the move to a tiered penalty system but raised concerns about mandatory
seven-day suspensions for first-time violations.
•
Noted that minor administrative errors could result in suspension of all alcohol licenses at
a location.
•
Requested:
o
Warnings, cure periods, or fines for minor first-time violations.
o
Limiting automatic suspension of all alcohol licenses to related violations.
•
Also expressed concern about subpoena powers related to security video and financial
records.
•
Requested notice requirements and protections for confidential business information.
•
Supported the training provisions and flexibility that had been added to the ordinance.

Janice McGeachin (Museum Inn / The Celt operating partner)
•
Thanked the Council for making substantial improvements to the alcohol ordinance.
•
Questioned the requirement that bartenders carry identification on their person while
working, suggesting it should be sufficient for the ID to be available on-site.
•
Expressed concern about subpoena provisions covering payroll records, financial records,
and surveillance footage.
•
Worried that businesses could be penalized if surveillance systems malfunctioned.
•
Praised the City's efforts to improve downtown safety, particularly the addition of
community policing officers downtown.
•
Encouraged continued collaboration to keep downtown safe and welcoming.

City Council Meeting
Minutes
4
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
4. Consent Agenda
A. Municipal Services
1.
26-214 Purchase One VipIR Handheld Chemical Analyzer for Fire Department for
$99,421
B. Idaho Falls Power
1.
26-222 (IFP 26-14) South Tourist Park Bathroom Replacement - Rivers West
Construction for $136,180.
2.
26-228 (IFP 26-18) IFP 2026 Conductor Purchase - American Wire Group, Irby
Utility, Western Electrical Alliance, Tups, LLC, and Border States for a total of
$1,603,713.64.
C. Airport
1.
26-224 Off-Airport Rental Car Operating Agreement with Avis Budget Car Rental,
LLC
D. Office of the City Clerk
1.
26-208 and 26-223 City Council Meeting Minutes (05.18.2026, 5.21.2026,
6.1.2026, 6.4.2026)
2.
26-209 May 2026 Licensing through the Office of the City Clerk
a.
88 New Business Licenses
b.
35 Renewed Business Licenses
c.
25 Contractor Licenses
Motion: Approve, accept, or receive all items on the Consent Agenda according to the
recommendations presented.
o
Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o
Second: Councilor Radford
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
5. Regular Agenda
A. Municipal Services
1. 26-206
Sole Source Purchase - Wastewater Treatment SCADA Upgrade for Public
Works
Presentation/Discussion (Treasurer Hagedorn): Municipal Services requested Council
approval to declare Automation Works, LLC a sole-source vendor for work on the City's
automation system. Staff explained that Automation Works is the only vendor capable of
performing the required work because it previously developed and worked on the system
and holds the necessary licenses. As required for a sole-source procurement, the City
published a public notice for 14 days.
Along with the sole-source designation, staff requested authorization to issue a
purchase order in the amount of $114,967.50 to Automation Works, LLC.

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Motion: Declare Automation Werx, LLC. as the only vendor able to complete the
Wastewater Treatment Plant SCADA upgrade for the Wastewater Treatment Facility
automation and control system pursuant to Idaho Code § 67 2808(2)(a)(ii) and authorize the
City to issue a purchase order to Automation Werx, LLC. for a total of $114,967.50 and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the necessary documents.
o
Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o
Second: Councilor Radford
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.

B. Police
1. 26-210
Amendments to Police Personnel Manual

Presentation/Discussion (Chief Johnson): Police Chief Bryce Johnson presented the
proposed amendments to the Police Personnel Manual, noting that the changes had
previously been reviewed during a City Council work session in early May. Following that
discussion, the revisions were published to all Police Department employees as required
by policy.
Chief Johnson explained that employees had already provided extensive input
before the manual was finalized and presented to the Council, and their feedback had been
incorporated into the proposed revisions. During the required 30-day review period, no
additional employee comments were received.
With the review period complete, Chief Johnson requested Council approval of the
updated Police Personnel Manual. Council members indicated they had already discussed
the revisions during the earlier work session and did not have additional questions before
taking action.

Motion: Approve the amendments to the Police Personnel Manual
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Radford
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

C. Idaho Falls Power
1. 26-227
IFP 26-19 South Tourist Park Path Lighting - Bid Rejection

Presentation/Discussion (Director Fredericksen): Staff presented the results of the bid
process for the South Tourist Park lighting project, which would install new park lighting.
Four bids were received, but two were determined to be non-responsive. Of the remaining
bids, one contained a mathematical error that, once corrected, totaled 163% of the
engineer's estimate, while the other was 214% of the estimate.
After reviewing the bids with the City's legal department, staff recommended
rejecting all bids and seeking authorization to negotiate directly on the open market to
obtain the work at a reasonable cost while meeting the City's standards.

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
During Council discussion, it was noted that rejecting bids and negotiating on the
open market is a standard practice when bids are non-responsive or significantly exceed
project estimates.

Motion: Reject all bids received for the South Tourist Park Path Lighting System project,
pass a resolution declaring that the goods can be procured more economically by
purchasing goods and services on the open market, and grant staff authority to negotiate
for completion of the work on open market
o Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

D. Public Works
1. 26-226
Sewer Service Cooperative Agreement Extension with Iona Bonneville Sewer
District (IBSD)

Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield): Public Works requested Council approval
of a three-month extension to the City's existing five-year agreement with the Bonneville
Sewer District, which was scheduled to expire at the end of June.
Staff explained that the extension would provide additional time to finalize a new
long-term agreement. Most of the anticipated revisions involve updating service rates to
align with the City's forthcoming wastewater facility plan. The Bonneville Sewer District also
requested additional time for its engineering staff to evaluate agreement provisions related
to its ongoing projects.
During Council discussion, staff noted that the City has maintained this cooperative
agreement with the Bonneville Sewer District for many years and has periodically extended
it while negotiating updated terms. In response to a question, staff confirmed that
extending the agreement poses no risk to the capacity of the City's wastewater treatment
plant.

Motion: Approval of the Service Agreement Extension Authorization and authorization for
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the necessary documents
o Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

2. 26-195
2026 Revised Storage Water Lease Agreement with the City of Pocatello

Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield): Public Works presented an annual water
right lease agreement with the City of Pocatello, which supports the City’s water rights

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
mitigation requirements and helps maintain compliance for the municipal water system.
The agreement covers 2,069.9 acre-feet of water at a cost of $121,296.14.
Staff explained that the City regularly evaluates and adjusts the lease based on
annual water needs and a rolling multi-year assessment of usage and mitigation
requirements. The City aims to maintain a conservative approach to ensure it remains in a
positive mitigation position.
Council discussion highlighted that the City’s mitigation needs have decreased in
part because some park and golf course irrigation has been converted to surface water use,
reducing reliance on groundwater. As a result, less groundwater mitigation is required. Staff
confirmed this reduction is consistent with long-term water management agreements and
planning.
It was also noted that the City continues to pay for and offset water use through
mitigation practices tied to its acquired water rights, including historical sources such as
Palisades water rights, ensuring groundwater impacts are properly balanced.

Motion: Approve the Water Rights Lease Agreement with the City of Pocatello to lease
2,069.9 acre-feet of water for a total amount of $121,296.14 and give authorization for the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Dingman
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

E. City Attorney
1. 26-211
Resolution to Waive Certain 2026 Fourth of July Fees

Presentation/Discussion (Attorney Jones): The City Attorney presented a resolution
supporting the annual practice of waiving certain City fees to assist with the 4th of July
celebration. The waiver covers services provided by Parks and Recreation, Idaho Falls
Power, and Public Works.
The total estimated value of the waived services is $40,595.17. These waivers are a
longstanding practice intended to support community holiday events. Council had no
questions and proceeded toward approval.

Motion: Approve the Resolution to waive certain 2026 Fourth of July fees for services
performed by the City of Idaho Falls to assist in the free, public Fourth of July activities and
give authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o Second: Councilor Dingman
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
2. 26-212
2026 Indemnification Agreement for the 2026 Independence Day Fireworks
Show

Presentation/Discussion (Attorney Jones): The City Attorney presented an annual
agreement with Melaleuca, the sponsor of the City’s fireworks display. As part of
the arrangement, the City agrees to temporarily shut off certain public lighting
during the fireworks show to enhance visibility of the display.
In return, Melaleuca provides an indemnification agreement, accepting
liability for incidents that could occur due to reduced lighting, such as accidents or
slip-and-fall claims. The agreement has been used in previous years, and Melaleuca
has agreed to continue the arrangement for the current year.

Motion: Approve the 2026 Indemnification Agreement and direct the Mayor and City Staff to
execute the necessary documents
o Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o Second: Councilor Dingman
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

3. 26-213
2026 Records Destruction Resolution.

Presentation/Discussion (Attorney Jones): The City Attorney presented a resolution
requesting Council approval to authorize the destruction of certain temporary and semi-
permanent City records, as required by code. This update includes additional records,
including construction-related documents, because the process was not completed the
previous year.
Staff coordinated with multiple City departments to review and incorporate
feedback into the updated records retention list, which is notably extensive due to the two-
year accumulation. The resolution was brought forward for Council approval, with no major
concerns raised aside from general questions about document destruction.

Motion: Approve the 2026 Records Destruction Resolution to destroy certain temporary
and semi-permanent records pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-907.
o Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o Second: Councilor Dingman
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

F. Community Development Services
1. 26-179
Legislative Public Hearing for the Annexation and Initial Zoning of I&M,
Industrial and Manufacturing - Annexation and Initial Zoning Ordinances and Reasoned

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Statements of Relevant Criteria and Standards for approximately 10.7 acres in the NE ¼
of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 38 East.

Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner, Mr. Jolley): This public hearing concerned the
annexation and initial zoning of approximately 10.7 acres of land commonly referred to as
the “Boone property,” located just north of Yellowstone Highway near 15th East and the
Anderson Business Park area.
The applicant, represented by Blake Engineering, requested that the property be
annexed into the City and assigned an Industrial Manufacturing (IM) zoning designation.
They noted the request was straightforward and consistent with surrounding industrial
uses.
City staff explained that the property is within the City’s area of impact, is
contiguous to City limits via 15th East right-of-way, and is adjacent to existing industrially
zoned land. The property is also already showing some construction activity in the county.
The Planning Commission had previously reviewed the proposal on March 3, 2026, and
issued a unanimous positive recommendation. The item had been brought to City Council
earlier, tabled twice, and returned for final consideration. No public comments were
received during the Planning Commission process or the hearing.
After closing the public hearing, Council members briefly discussed the item and
expressed general agreement that the annexation and zoning “made sense” and aligned
with both City growth patterns and industrial development goals. The overall tone was
supportive, with no opposition raised during the meeting.

Motion 1: Approve the Ordinance annexing approximately 10.7 acres in the NE ¼ of Section
8, Township 2 North, Range 38 East; assign a Comprehensive Plan Designation of
“Industrial;” and under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate
readings, request that it be read by title and published by summary.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

ORDINANCE 3658: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF
APPROXIMATELY 10.7 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE, AMENDING
THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY WITH THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY AND STATE
AUTHORITIES; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND
ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Motion 2: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the
annexation of approximately 10.7 acres in the NE ¼ of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range
38 East and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

Motion 3: Approve the Ordinance establishing the initial zoning for I&M, Industrial and
Manufacturing as shown in the Ordinance exhibits under a suspension of the rules requiring
three complete and separate readings; and request that it be read by title and published by
summary; that the City limits documents be amended to include the area annexed
herewith; and that the City Planner be instructed to reflect said annexation, amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan, and initial zoning on the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps
located in the Planning office.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

ORDINANCE 3659: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE INITIAL ZONING OF
APPROXIMATELY 10.7 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE AS I&M,
INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING ZONE; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION
BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.

Motion 4: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the
initial zoning of I&M, Industrial and Manufacturing and give authorization for the Mayor to
execute the necessary documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

2. 25-215
Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Reasoned Statement of Relevant
Criteria and Standards, Petersen Place Division No. 1.

Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner): This item was a final plat approval for the
Peterson Place Subdivision (Division One), a 5.7-acre single-lot subdivision located west of
Broadway near the City boundary and close to the airport.

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
The Community Development Services director explained that the plat formalizes
public utility easements and right-of-way dedications, particularly along Broadway. It also
reflects changes related to Ernest Drive, which is being relocated west and will eventually
extend north to connect with a future roadway segment. The property is zoned R-2 and lies
within the Limited Development Airport Overlay Zone, consistent with its proximity to the
airport.
The subdivision was originally reviewed by the Planning Commission in February
2025. An extension requested by the applicant in February 2026 was granted, allowing the
item to return for final approval at this time. There was no public comment, and the
Planning Commission issued a unanimous positive recommendation. The presentation
was largely informational, and Council discussion was minimal, with no concerns raised.

Motion 1: Approve the Development Agreement for the Final Plat for Petersen Place
Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

Motion 2: Approve the Final Plat for Petersen Place Division No. 1 and give authorization for
the Mayor, City Engineer, and City Clerk to sign said Final Plat.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

Motion 3: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Final
Plat for Petersen Place Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the
necessary documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

3. 25-216
Final Plat and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, MK
Simpson Division No. 4.

Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner): This item was a final plat for the MK Simpson
Division No. 4 subdivision, a two-lot development located on 33rd North in the INL area and
zoned Research and Development (R&D).

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
The main focus of the discussion was clarifying lot numbering confusion. The
director explained that Idaho surveying conventions assign lot numbers based on
subdivision division sequencing rather than simple “Lot 1, Lot 2” labeling. As a result, what
was initially labeled as Lots 6 and 7 during Planning Commission review were corrected in
the final plat to Lots 4 and 5, and staff confirmed the official documents reflect the
corrected numbering to avoid legal or recording issues.
The subdivision divides a long rectangular parcel into two lots and includes right-of-
way dedication along 33rd North for future development tied to the INL campus. A key
feature is the creation of a flag lot access corridor on the west side, designed to provide
legal and physical access to the rear property. This access includes a 27-foot-wide
corridor, exceeding the minimum 26-foot fire access requirement, and also contains utility
easements to ensure service access.
The Planning Commission reviewed the item on March 3, 2026, and unanimously
recommended approval, with no public comments. Council questions focused mainly on
ensuring the lot numbering and access details were correct for future recording and
development, and staff confirmed the corrections and intent.

Motion 1: Approve the Final Plat for MK Simpson Division No. 4 and give authorization for
the Mayor, City Engineer, and City Clerk to sign said Final Plat.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

Motion 2: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Final
Plat for MK Simpson Division No. 4 and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the
necessary documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

4. 26-217
Legislative Public Hearing for the Annexation and Initial Zoning of I&M,
Industrial and Manufacturing - Annexation and Initial Zoning Ordinances and Reasoned
Statements of Relevant Criteria and Standards for approximately 1.35 acres in Lot 4,
Block 1 Kingston-Bauchman Industrial Park Division No. 1.

Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner, Mr. Hughes): This public hearing concerned a
legislative annexation and initial zoning request for a 1.35–1.4 acre parcel (Lot 4, Block 1,

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Kingston Bachman Industrial Park Division 1) located near Highway 20 and North
Boulevard/Stanley Street.
The property manager/applicant, Jason Hughes, explained that the main reason for
the annexation was an ongoing sewer failure issue. The existing system is regularly
overflowing and requires pumping about once a week or every two weeks. The odor has
become severe enough that it is affecting customers when they arrive, prompting the
request to connect to City services through annexation.
City staff explained the parcel is currently zoned industrial (IM-1) in the county, lies
within the City’s area of impact, and is contiguous on multiple sides to the City, making it
eligible for annexation. The requested zoning is Industrial (IM), consistent with the City’s
comprehensive plan (“Imagine IF”) and the area’s industrial designation. The site is also
within a controlled development zone, which will apply additional zoning standards.
The Planning Commission reviewed the request on June 2, 2026, and unanimously
recommended approval. There were some public comments at that level, but no concerns
were raised during the City Council hearing. Council discussion was brief and supportive,
noting the annexation would help resolve the urgent infrastructure problem and allow the
business to function properly.

Motion 1: Approve the Ordinance annexing approximately 1.35 acres in Lot 4, Block 1,
Kingston-Bauchman Industrial Park No. 1; assign a Comprehensive Plan Designation of
“Industrial;” and under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate
readings, request that it be read by title and published by summary.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

ORDINANCE 3660: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF
APPROXIMATELY 1.366 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE, AMENDING
THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY WITH THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY AND STATE
AUTHORITIES; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND
ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.

Motion 2: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the
annexation of approximately 1.35 acres in Lot 4, Block 1, Kingston-Bauchman Industrial
Park Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary
documents
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
o Motion carries.

Motion 3: Approve the Ordinance establishing the initial zoning for I&M, Industrial and
Manufacturing with the Controlled Development Airport Overlay Zone as shown in the
Ordinance exhibits under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate
readings; and request that it be read by title and published by summary; that the City limits
documents be amended to include the area annexed herewith; and that the City Planner be
instructed to reflect said annexation, amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, and initial
zoning on the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps located in the Planning office
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

ORDINANCE 3661: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE INITIAL ZONING OF
APPROXIMATELY 1.366 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE AS I&M,
INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING, WITH CONTROLLED DEVELOPMENT AIRPORT
OVERLAY ZONE; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND
ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.

Motion 4: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the
initial zoning of I&M, Industrial and Manufacturing with the Controlled Development Airport
Overlay Zone and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

5. 26-218
Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing - Planned Unit Development (PUD) and
Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, Willows Place Townhomes.

Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner, Mr. Hunter, Attorney Jones): The Council
opened a quasi-judicial hearing for the Willows Place Townhomes Planned Unit
Development (PUD).

Procedural / Legal Framework
•
The chair explained that this is a revised PUD resulting from a formal mediation
process; and

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
Explained that because two Council members participated in mediation, they
acknowledged potential ex parte communication concerns under Idaho due process
rules (LUPA).
•
The City attorney clarified:
o
Ex parte communications must be fully disclosed on the record.
o
Disclosure allows the public and other parties to respond, preserving fairness.
o
After hearing testimony, the participating Council members will recuse
themselves from deliberation and voting.
•
The mediation process itself was described as lawful under Idaho code and conducted
through a mediator, with no direct developer–council negotiations.

Mediation Background (as summarized on record)
•
The mediation followed a prior Council denial of the original PUD in January 2026.
•
Key issues previously raised included:
o
Density
o
Privacy and buffering
o
Street layout and driveway length
o
Public amenities and playground access
•
The developer originally proposed reducing density from 14 units to 12 units, shifting
from triplexes to twin homes (duplex-style units).
•
The mediation resulted in additional refinements such as:
o
Relocating the playground for better accessibility
o
Adjusting lot layout and road alignment
o
Modifying buffers and driveway lengths
o
Addressing park/amenity standards and HOA maintenance responsibilities
•
Staff confirmed the revised design met safety and PUD standards, including common
area requirements.

Staff Presentation of Revised Proposal
•
The Planning/Development staff explained the updated site plan:
o
Zoning: R-1 within a PUD framework
o
Units reduced to 12 duplex-style homes
o
Internal road (Zoe Lane) shifted east, improving setbacks and eliminating the
need for a variance
o
Driveways extended to allow two parking spaces per unit
o
Guest parking reduced but partially retained
o
Playground relocated to the northwest portion of the site
o
The development still meets density and PUD requirements, including common
open space targets
•
Timeline noted:

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
o
Planning Commission recommended approval (5–1 vote in Oct. 2025)
o
City Council previously denied (Jan. 2026, 5–0)
o
Mediation occurred May 2026, with agreement later approved by Council

Developer Presentation
Colin Hunter (developer, resident of Tetonia, Idaho; previously lived in Idaho Falls) stated:
•
The project responds to a need for entry-level housing in Idaho Falls.
•
Emphasized providing affordable housing options while maintaining quality.
•
Supported the shift to twin homes instead of triplexes, which:
o
Improves private yard space for residents
o
Helps maintain affordability
•
Expressed appreciation for the City’s mediation process and collaboration.
•
No questions were raised by Council at that time.

Public Comment
Dave Rocknak (IF resident):
•
Expressed concern about lack of a privacy fence along their property.
•
Requested:
o
Installation of a privacy fence to separate properties
o
Safety fencing or barriers around the playground
o
Additional safety measures near the adjacent canal due to steep slopes and
drowning risk concerns
•
Emphasized concerns about liability and neighbor impacts, particularly for children and
pets.

Kade John (IF and Blackfoot resident):
•
Spoke in support of the project based on prior positive experience with the developer’s
housing in Blackfoot.
•
Highlighted:
o
The homes there were below market price and well-built
o
The project provides a needed middle-ground housing option for families
o
Housing affordability challenges and high home prices in the area
•
Stated she is interested in the development as a family housing opportunity and
expressed general support.
Matt Smith (IF resident)
•
Claimed many core concerns remain unchanged despite design revisions.
•
Focused heavily on design transparency and infrastructure impacts, arguing:
o
The development relies on modifying the adjacent church parking lot, which he
believes was not clearly disclosed earlier.

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
o
Suggested the road alignment could be moved instead to avoid church
modifications and increase separation from existing homes.
o
Raised concerns about stormwater drainage, stating the project could worsen
runoff patterns and flooding risks.
o
Questioned whether drainage and watershed capacity are adequate for the
revised plan.
o
Criticized what he saw as incomplete disclosure about infrastructure
dependencies.

Teri Smith (IF resident):
•
Raised a series of technical and legal concerns:
o
Questioned historical conditional use permit (CUP) status for the neighboring
church property.
o
Asked whether zoning compliance and CUP conditions remain valid under the
new PUD.
o
Raised concerns about:
▪
Fence requirements along the canal and property edges
▪
Fire safety and emergency access design
▪
Parking discrepancies (noting inconsistencies in stated vs. observed
stall counts)
▪
Setback clarification (20 ft vs. 25 ft)
o
Expressed concern that some documentation was unclear or inconsistent
across meeting materials.
o
Argued the church parking redesign and access changes may have broader
implications for safety and traffic.

Tristan Phillips (IF resident):
•
Shared personal experience living in one of the developer’s prior townhome projects.
•
Said the housing was affordable and made homeownership possible much earlier than
expected.
•
Noted he and his wife recently had a second child and benefited from the affordability.
•
Argued the project is important for young families and workforce housing and should be
approved.

Brad Camphouse (Developer partner):
•
Explained the project is a family-driven development named after his children.
•
Emphasized local roots and long-term investment in Idaho Falls.
•
Said profits remain local and the goal is to provide attainable housing for first-time
buyers.

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
Stated the project reflects a good-faith effort to respond to City concerns and
requested approval.

Matt Smith (returned to podium):
He focused on a procedural objection to prior public comments and the scope of
acceptable testimony in the hearing.
•
Much of the earlier testimony, in his view, did not properly relate to zoning ordinances,
the comprehensive plan, or land-use criteria.
•
He referenced guidance in a letter or procedural note indicating that:
o
Testimony should be focused on relevant land-use policies and zoning issues,
o
Repetitive or opinion-based statements are discouraged,
o
Traffic and engineering concerns should be addressed by the City engineer
rather than general public comment.
•
He argued that some prior testimony instead focused on the “goodness of the
developer”, which he believed was not relevant to zoning or legal criteria.
•
Overall, he asserted that public input should remain focused on legally relevant zoning
considerations rather than personal opinions about the developer or project character.

Alex Zocker (IF resident):
•
Acknowledged mixed feelings but emphasized need for housing options.
•
Supported increased housing supply while also advocating for existing residents’
concerns to be respected.
•
Emphasized transparency and public involvement in planning and mediation.

Kerry McKay (IF resident):
•
Opposed the project primarily due to neighborhood impacts, including:
o
Fire truck access and turnaround concerns
o
Canal safety and lack of fencing
o
Parking overflow and street parking impacts
•
Warned that residents may rely on nearby properties (such as church parking) for
overflow parking.

Developer Rebuttal
Collin Hunter (developer)
•
Responded to concerns point-by-point:
o
Said fencing near canals or neighbors could be added where appropriate and
discussed with affected owners.
o
Stated willingness to address safety fencing if needed.
o
Argued the church parking improvements are independent and cooperative,
including prior donations and easement work.

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
o
Emphasized that parking and design changes were made in response to City
feedback, not to disadvantage neighbors.
o
Defended reliance on zoning approval process, stating:
▪
Developers rely on what is permitted under code.
▪
Property owners should be able to develop land consistent with zoning
expectations.
o
Argued the project provides needed entry-level housing during regional growth
and affordability challenges.
o
Stated reduced parking was intentional to improve aesthetics and reduce
excess impervious surface.

Procedural Close of Public Hearing
•
Mayor Pro Tem/Council President Francis clarified that prior speakers could be allowed
additional comment if needed.
•
No further public comments were offered after reopening.
•
The chair formally closed the public hearing and stepped aside.
•
Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman took over as the Chair.

Council Deliberation Begins
•
Council members acknowledged extensive prior review (planning commission + earlier
Council hearings).
•
Councilor Freeman (attending remotely):
o
Supported approval.
o
Noted developer responsiveness and design improvements.
o
Believed concerns (including fencing and layout) were adequately addressed.
o
Stated he would vote in favor again.
•
General tone of discussion recognized:
o
Extensive revision process
o
Multiple rounds of public input
o
Prior council familiarity with the case

Discussion transitioned from public testimony into formal Council deliberation showing:
•
Strong support arguments focused on housing affordability and workforce needs
•
Strong opposition concerns focused on transparency, drainage, parking, safety, and
infrastructure impacts
•
A detailed developer rebuttal defending design choices and emphasizing
responsiveness
•
Council beginning to signal support based on repeated revisions and prior review
history, with at least one member explicitly voting in favor again.

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
In the final portion of the hearing, the Council transitioned into closing deliberation and
final decision-making, with members reflecting on housing, land use responsibility, and the
legal framework guiding their vote.

Council Deliberation
Councilor Larsen
•
Emphasized that Council must consider all residents, including those not present in the
room.
•
Reflected on broader housing growth concerns and a prior discussion about who would
occupy new housing.
•
Shared the perspective that future residents will often be “our children” or younger
generations, highlighting generational housing needs.
•
Noted that while affordable housing is a frequent public concern, cities have limited
tools to directly mandate affordability, but can support projects that meet demand.
•
Expressed support for the project and stated he would vote in favor.

Councilor Radford
•
Focused on the legal and procedural role of the City Council, emphasizing:
o
Decisions must be based on compliance with adopted ordinances and zoning
regulations, not personal preference.
o
Idaho’s strong tradition of private property rights limits discretionary rejection if
standards are met.
•
Acknowledged the emotional and practical impacts of development on existing
neighborhoods, but emphasized that:
o
Development impacts are real for both existing residents and new residents.
o
Council members must balance competing interests within legal constraints.
•
Referenced personal experience living near a much larger development, indicating
familiarity with these types of land-use conflicts.
•
Commended the transparency of Council members who participated in mediation and
noted that their disclosure helped inform the decision-making process.
•
Concluded by expressing readiness to proceed to a motion for approval or denial.

The Council’s final discussion centered on:
•
The tension between neighborhood impacts vs. housing demand
•
The role of government as an enabler of compliant development rather than a
subjective gatekeeper
•
Recognition of private property rights and zoning compliance as the governing standard
•
Acknowledgment that housing growth is necessary, especially for younger and first-
time buyers
•
Appreciation for transparency following mediation participation

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
Motion 1: Approve the Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Willows Place Townhomes as
presented.
o Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o Second: Councilor Radford
o Vote: Aye: Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none. Recused: Francis, Lee
o Motion carries.

Motion 2: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the
Planned Unit Development for Willows Place Townhomes and give authorization for the
Mayor to execute the necessary documents.
o Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o Second: Councilor Radford
o Vote: Aye: Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none. Recused: Francis, Lee
o Motion carries.
Council President Francis and Councilor Lee returned to the dais.

6. 26-219
Amendment to Title 11, Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Table 11-3-7,
Dimension Standards for Special Zones, Section 11-4-2, Design and Development
Regulations, and 11-7-1, Definitions related to Park and Recreation Facilities and the
standards that apply at the time of development.

Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner): City staff explained that this amendment
grew out of a work session on April 6, 2026, and addresses a gap in the zoning code: parks
and recreation facilities were not well-defined within existing land use categories and were
somewhat inconsistently regulated under “public zoning.”

The proposed changes would:
•
Formally define “parks and recreation facilities” in the zoning ordinance.
•
Remove (exempt) parks from standard zoning regulations, recognizing that parks
function differently from typical land uses like commercial or residential zones.
•
Require each park to instead be guided by its own park-specific comprehensive/master
plan, allowing design and standards to be tailored to the unique character and function
of each park.

Council discussion focused on governance and approval:
•
New or updated park master plans would be developed by the Parks and Recreation
Department.
•
Plans would go through the Parks and Recreation Commission (an appointed citizen
advisory body), similar in role to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
•
Final approval would still come to the City Council, ensuring elected oversight.

Council members broadly supported the amendment, emphasizing that:
•
The City has different financial constraints than private developers, including limited
ability to borrow long-term or finance projects the same way.

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
Parks must be developed in phased, fiscally responsible ways, often using donated or
long-held land.
•
This structure allows more efficient use of limited tax dollars and may improve the pace
and quality of park development over time.
•
It better leverages the expertise of the Parks and Recreation Commission in shaping
park design and planning.

Motion: Approve the Ordinance amending Title 11, Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,
Table 11-3-7, Dimension Standards for Special Zones, Section 11-4-2, Design and
Development Regulations, and 11-7-1, Definitions related to Park and Recreation Facilities
and the standards that apply at the time of development under a suspension of the rules
requiring three complete and separate readings, request that it be read by title and
published by summary.
o Moved by: Councilor Lee
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

ORDINANCE 3662: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; AMENDING TITLE 11 COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
CODE, TABLE 11-3-7 DIMENSION STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL ZONES, SECTION 11-4-2
DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND 11-7-1 DEFINITIONS DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS FOR PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY,
PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.

7. 26-220
Amendment to Title 11, Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Section 11-2-
6(N) Dwelling, Accessory Unit and Table 11-4-2; Off Street Parking Requirements to
comply with state legislation adopted in Legislative Session

Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner, Attorney Jones): Staff explained that:
•
The proposal was already reviewed by the Planning Commission on June 6, 2026, and
incorporates their feedback.
•
The City is required to revise its ADU regulations to match new state law, which
significantly limits local control.

Key changes required by the state law; the ordinance update would:
•
Require cities to allow at least one internal ADU and one detached ADU per single-
family lot
•
Prohibit off-street parking requirements for ADUs
•
Set a minimum ADU size of 1,000 sq. ft. (previously 750 sq. ft.)
•
Limit setbacks to no more than 4 feet from side and rear property lines
•
Prohibit owner-occupancy requirements (meaning both units could potentially be
rented out)
•
Prevent cities from imposing impact fees on ADUs

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
•
Restrict cities from adding additional limits on height or similar standards beyond those
applied to single-family homes
•
Ensure ADUs comply with building code requirements
Staff noted that most of the City’s prior ADU rules had to be struck or rewritten because
they conflicted with state preemption.

Policy impact discussion. Council discussion focused on concerns that:
•
The law reduces local ability to manage density and neighborhood impacts
•
ADUs could increase housing density significantly (e.g., multiple units on single lots)
•
Previous City rules were designed to balance housing flexibility with neighborhood
character and code enforcement

A legal explanation was provided that:
•
If the City does not comply, it could be out of compliance with state law
•
Developers could potentially bring legal or takings claims if denied permits that meet
state standards
Timing and strategy discussion. There was debate over how to proceed:
•
The law’s implementation deadline was clarified as February 1, 2027 (with earlier
confusion about dates).
•
Council discussed whether to:
o
Vote “no” as a political statement of opposition, or
o
Approve the ordinance but set a delayed effective date (e.g., early 2027)

Some members suggested:
•
Approving the ordinance while delaying its effective date to preserve current City
standards as long as possible
•
Using the delay to advocate for legislative changes in future sessions

Motion: Approve the Ordinance amending Title 11, Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,
Section 11-2-6(N) Dwelling, Accessory Unit and Table 11-4-2; Off Street Parking
Requirements to comply with state legislation adopted in Legislative Session under a
suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings, request that it be
read by title and published by summary and to take effect at midnight on January 31, 2027.
o Moved by: Councilor Radford
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: Lee.
o Motion carries.

ORDINANCE 3663: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; AMENDING TITLE 11 COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
CODE, SECTION 11-2-6(N) DWELLING ACCESSORY UNIT AND TABLE 11-4-2: OFF STREET
PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR CHANGES TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS; AND

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE
DATE.

8. 26-221
Amendment to Title 11, Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Sections 11-2-
6(AA) Short Term Rental and 11-7-1 Definitions to comply with State Legislation.

Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner):
Key changes to City code. Staff explained that the ordinance:
•
Updates the City’s definition of short-term rental (still generally tied to stays of 30 days
or less, consistent with state law).
•
Removes the City’s ability to regulate length of stay, meaning the previous 30-day limit
cannot be enforced.
•
Strikes prior restrictions on:
o
Number of occupants
o
Minimum rental duration
•
Maintains that short-term rentals must still comply with fire and building codes.

State preemption and legal context
•
The state law prohibits cities from enacting rules that effectively restrict short-term
rentals.
•
The statute defines short-term rentals broadly as residential units offered for stays of 30
days or less, but also prevents local governments from adding additional limits like
occupancy caps or time restrictions.
•
Legal counsel clarified that cities must comply or risk being preempted and vulnerable
to legal challenges from property owners.

Policy discussion and concerns:
•
Removing occupancy limits could lead to overcrowding or “party house” behavior,
which is a common neighborhood complaint.
•
The changes may reduce local control over neighborhood impacts such as noise and
density.
•
The situation is seen as another example of state preemption limiting local zoning
authority.

There was discussion about whether:
•
The ordinance could be delayed or used as a political statement, but legal counsel
confirmed the City must ultimately comply.
•
The definition still aligns with state law, but the City can no longer enforce the previous
regulatory limits.

Broader implications discussed
•
Concerns were raised that the law could blur distinctions between short-term rentals
and boarding house-style uses, depending on how properties are operated.
•
Officials noted the challenge of interpreting and enforcing rules when legislative intent
is unclear.

City Council Meeting
Minutes

680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID

Motion: Approve the Ordinance amending Title 11, Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,
Sections 11-2-6(AA) Short Term Rental and 11-7-1 Definitions to comply with State
Legislation under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate
readings, request that it be read by title and published by summary.
o Moved by: Councilor Radford
o Second: Councilor Larsen
o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none.
o Motion carries.

ORDINANCE 3664: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; AMENDING TITLE 11 COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
CODE, SECTION 11-2-6(AA) SHORT TERM RENTAL; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY,
PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.

6. Announcements
•
Council highlighted the many community events planned for Idaho Falls' Fourth of July
celebration and encouraged residents to participate.
•
The Independence Day Parade, hosted by the Greater Idaho Falls Chamber of Commerce,
begins at 9:00 a.m. The route starts near the Fourth Street Post Office, travels west on
Fourth Street, and continues down Boulevard. Officials noted it is the largest parade in
Idaho.
•
Riverfest at Snake River Landing will run throughout the day, culminating with the fireworks
display at dusk. Attendees were encouraged to arrive early to secure viewing spots.
•
Officials announced that RV parking will not be available at Snake River Landing this year.
•
Council expressed appreciation to Melaleuca for sponsoring the fireworks display, noting
this is expected to be the final year of the current sponsorship, and anticipated it could be
the largest fireworks show in Idaho Falls history.
•
Residents were informed that a complete schedule of Fourth of July events would be
available on the City of Idaho Falls website the following day.
•
Council also reassured the public that fireworks are expected to continue in future years,
with Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw already beginning plans for a community fireworks celebration
in 2027.

There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:41 PM.

/s/ Linda Lundquist_________________

/s/ Lisa Burtenshaw
_____________
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk

Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor

Text is extracted by machine from the official file linked on each page; the official file is the record. Sentinel Media, LLC.