Sentinel Media records · public agendas and minutes, text only, refreshed nightly from each body's own site · not a newspaper
minutes meeting date 2026-07-06 · fetched 2026-09-17 · 122690 characters · read by OCR, check numbers against the source · official file · plain text
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
1
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Monday, July 6, 2026
3:00 PM
City Council Chambers
Call to Order and Roll Call
There were present:
Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw
Council President Jim Francis
Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Councilor Jim Freeman
Councilor Kirk Larsen
Councilor John Radford
Councilor Brandon Lee (Arrived at 3:11 pm, Left at 6:00)
Also present:
Lisa Farris, CDS Grants Administrator
Wade Sanner, CDS Director
Chis Canfield, Public Works Director
Brian Cunningham, PW Engineer
Brooks Slyter, Assistant Finance Manager
Bryce Johnson, Police Chief
PJ Holm, Parks and Recreation Director
Zack Jones, City Attorney
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Mayor Burtenshaw called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. with the following items:
Community Development Services – Review: CAPERS for CDBF (5-Year Plan), (Administrator Farris, Director
Sanner):
Community Development Services presented the proposed 2026–2030 Consolidated Plan, including the
2026 Annual Action Plan and the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, following the public hearing
held on May 22. The Council's action is to approve the recommended projects and funding allocations for the
2026 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program.
Staff explained that project recommendations were based on extensive public outreach conducted during
development of the Consolidated Plan, identified community needs, and HUD funding priorities. While applicants
requested more than $627,000, the City's 2026 CDBG allocation is $414,143, requiring more than $200,000 in
reductions.
The funding recommendations include:
•
Public Services ($62,000):
o
Idaho Legal Aid – $12,000
o
Behavioral Health Crisis Center – $20,000
o
United Way childcare assistance – $6,000
o
Salvation Army rental and utility assistance – $10,000
o
Family Emergency Shelter case management/intake – $9,000
o
Hope Soup Kitchen volunteer training – $5,000
•
Economic Development:
o
Façade Improvement Program – $32,000
•
Low- and Moderate-Income (LMI) Direct Benefit Projects:
o
Highland Park curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements – $195,000
o
Eastern Idaho Community Action Partnership parking lot and warehouse LED lighting – $6,000
o
Idaho Falls Rescue Mission security camera upgrades – $12,500
o
Senior Center Meals on Wheels delivery trays – $23,815
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
2
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
•
Program Administration:
o
Community Development Services administration (one full-time employee) – $82,828
Councilor Radford recused himself from the discussion. The remaining Council members praised staff for the
difficult work of prioritizing limited funds and had no questions. Staff noted that the Consolidated Plan will return
for formal approval as a resolution at the next Council meeting rather than on the consent agenda.
Public Works, Idaho Falls Power – Discussion: Strategic Extension of Utilities (Director Canfield, Engineer
Cunningham):
Public Works Director Canfield provided an update on the City's proposed Strategic Utility Extensions
policy, which would allow utility service extensions outside City limits on a case-by-case basis, subject to City
Council approval. The policy is intended to support development within the City's impact area while ensuring
future annexation and protecting the City's infrastructure and financial interests.
The first proposed project is located at the corner of Iona Road and 15th East, within the City's impact
area but outside current City limits. The development requires City sewer service, while potable water will be
provided by Falls Water under an existing service area agreement. The project also aligns with planned
transportation improvements, including the future widening of Woodruff Avenue.
Staff explained that a new development agreement has been drafted by combining elements from
previous Idaho Falls agreements and a similar agreement used by the City of Nampa. The agreement was
reviewed internally, discussed with Bonneville County, and shared with the developer. Bonneville County would
be a signatory to the agreement to coordinate permitting and future annexation.
Key provisions of the proposed agreement include:
•
Utility extensions are approved individually and only where they support the City's long-term service area
plans.
•
The County would coordinate building permits and collect substitute development fees comparable to
City impact fees where applicable.
•
The developer must dedicate necessary public rights-of-way.
•
The developer agrees to annex into the City within one year after the property becomes contiguous with
City limits.
•
Properties receiving City sewer service must comply with all applicable City of Idaho Falls water and
wastewater ordinances, even before annexation.
•
The agreement addresses reimbursement for developer-installed utility infrastructure and coordination
with Idaho Falls Power, Falls Water, and local irrigation districts.
Councilors focused much of their discussion on ensuring the annexation requirement would be legally
enforceable. Staff explained that the agreement is intended to constitute express consent for annexation once the
property becomes contiguous, rather than requiring a new request from the property owner. One council
member asked staff to confirm with the City attorney that the language provides a sufficiently strong legal basis
for automatic annexation.
Councilors also discussed the importance of notifying future property owners that the agreement runs
with the land. Staff explained that while the agreement is legally binding on successors, the developer is also
required to disclose the annexation obligation to future purchasers for transparency. Council Members expressed
support for the approach, noting that they have historically been reluctant to extend City utilities outside City
limits because doing so can discourage annexation. They agreed that requiring annexation upon contiguity,
making the County a party to the agreement, and requiring compliance with City ordinances addressed those
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
3
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
concerns. Staff indicated they would continue refining the agreement with Bonneville County before bringing it
back to the Council for formal consideration.
Legal, Police, City Clerk, CDS, Fire – Review: Additional Updates to Draft Alcohol Ordinance – Discuss and revise
as needed the City ordinances regulating alcohol (Attorney Jones): The City Attorney reviewed revisions to the
draft alcohol ordinance since the June 22 work session, explaining that some changes reflected prior Council
direction while others resulted from public comments, staff review, and technical clarifications.
Council-Directed Changes
•
Commercial establishments may serve alcohol to 20 or fewer employees without violating the City
ordinance, provided state law is not violated.
•
Limits on alcohol catering permits per and based on location will not begin until October 2028, allowing
two years of unlimited permits before gradually reducing the annual maximum from 52 to 26 and
ultimately 12 permits
•
Nonprofit-owned or leased facilities are exempt from the annual limit on alcohol catering permits,
although they must still obtain permits.
•
Occupancy limits will be determined by the building code and Fire Department policies.
•
The six-day waiting period between charitable events was eliminated.
•
Approval of server training programs was changed from the Chief of Police to the Police Department.
Additional Revisions Based on Public Feedback
•
Removed ownership disclosure requirements that duplicate state law, eliminating unnecessary paperwork
and avoiding stricter local requirements for beer and wine applicants.
•
Clarified that annual catering permits are counted by the number of permits issued for a particular
location, rather than the number of events held, as the issuance is what is tracked.
•
Defined a permit as "issued" once approved by the City Clerk.
•
Permits canceled at least 24 hours before an event will not count toward the annual limit.
•
Clarified that individuals serving only beer or wine at charitable events are not considered "bartenders"
for purposes of bartender-specific requirements.
•
Specified that the 300-foot separation requirement applies only to alcohol licenses—not catering or
charitable event permits.
•
Added a legal definition of "possession" allowing bartenders to keep identification nearby rather than
physically on their person.
Subpoena Authority and Due Process
•
Limited subpoena authority to investigations involving enforcement of the City's alcohol ordinance, state
alcohol laws, or criminal investigations.
•
The City Attorney explained that while attorneys may issue subpoenas, only a court can compel
compliance.
•
Individuals may challenge subpoenas by filing a motion to quash within 14 days, after which a judge
determines whether the subpoena should be enforced.
•
Added a provision making it a misdemeanor to intentionally destroy requested records while a subpoena
is pending.
Enforcement Changes
•
Revised the graduated penalty schedule:
o
First violation: $1,000 fine (replacing the proposed seven-day suspension).
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
4
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
o
Second violation: Seven-day suspension (replacing the proposed ten-day suspension).
o
Third and fourth violation penalties remain unchanged.
•
The City Clerk would have discretion to issue warnings for minor violations rather than immediately
imposing penalties.
•
Violations are tracked on a rolling five-year basis for purposes of escalating penalties.
Discussion on Landlord Liability
•
Councilor Radford expressed concern that the ordinance could place an unreasonable burden on owners
of event centers and commercial properties.
•
He argued that:
o
Property owners should not be expected to monitor social media or investigate renters' activities.
o
Criminal penalties could discourage businesses from hosting events.
o
Idaho Falls could become less competitive than neighboring communities if its regulations are
significantly stricter.
•
Radford suggested that landlords who include rental contract provisions prohibiting unauthorized alcohol
service should receive explicit protection in the ordinance.
City Attorney's Response
•
The City Attorney emphasized that:
o
Property owners have no duty to police or investigate events.
o
Liability only exists if an owner knowingly permits unauthorized alcohol service.
o
Prosecutors must prove actual knowledge beyond a reasonable doubt.
•
He stated that rental agreements prohibiting unauthorized alcohol would already serve as strong
evidence that a landlord did not knowingly permit a violation.
•
He cautioned that creating an automatic contractual exemption in the ordinance could allow bad actors to
avoid liability despite knowingly allowing violations.
State Law Context
•
The City Attorney noted that Idaho law already makes unauthorized possession, sale, or distribution of
alcohol a misdemeanor.
•
The proposed ordinance extends liability by making it a misdemeanor for a property owner who
knowingly allows illegal alcohol service on their premises.
•
Radford acknowledged the distinction but maintained that the proposal goes beyond existing state law by
potentially holding landlords criminally responsible instead of only those dispensing alcohol.
Future Discussion and Public Education
•
The City Attorney advised that additional amendments could still be made before adoption if directed by
the Council.
•
Radford requested additional time to inform business owners who may not understand the ordinance's
implications for property owners.
•
Staff announced plans to prepare a comprehensive Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document,
modeled after Boise's guidance, to explain the ordinance and common compliance scenarios.
Closing Remarks
•
Other Council members expressed less concern, stating that the "knowingly" standard and prosecutorial
discretion provide adequate protection for responsible property owners.
•
Council members emphasized that the City's goal is compliance rather than punishment.
•
The Mayor thanked staff, particularly the Legal Department, for the extensive work invested in the
ordinance and indicated the Council would continue discussion and likely consider final action at the
upcoming Thursday meeting.
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
5
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Finance Team, Mayor’s Office, Council, General Fund, Departments – Review and Discussion: Budget (Assistant
Finance Manager Slyter, Attorney Jones, Chief Johnson, Director Holm): The City Council held an extensive budget
workshop reviewing department priorities, available funding, major budget pressures, and proposed new
requests for the upcoming fiscal year. Staff emphasized that departments had already worked through reductions
and prioritization, and the requests presented represented the items departments felt were most important after
reviewing their needs.
Overall Budget Position
Department Requests and Prioritization - Staff provided Council with two lists:
•
Comprehensive request list
o
Included all department requests.
o
Included funded items, unfunded requests, carry-forward items, capital requests, personnel
requests, and items supported by grants or other funding sources.
•
Prioritized unfunded request list
o
Removed items already funded.
o
Removed items departments determined were not their highest priority this year.
o
Represented the requests departments most wanted Council to consider.
Staff emphasized that items not prioritized are not necessarily unnecessary; many will likely return in future
budget cycles.
Available Funding vs. Requests - Staff identified available funding sources:
•
Growth and annexation revenue: approximately $300,000
•
Remaining 1% property tax foregone authority: approximately $535,000
•
One-time COP debt excess funding: approximately $680,000
Total available funding: approximately $1.515 million
The prioritized unfunded requests totaled approximately $1.725 million, leaving a gap of approximately $210,000.
Property Tax Foregone Discussion
Council discussed whether to utilize the remaining 1% foregone property tax authority.
Staff explained that the budget assumptions already included maintaining approximately 2% personnel growth,
because reducing personnel funding creates long-term challenges:
•
The City falls behind market wages.
•
Employee retention becomes more difficult.
•
Future councils must make larger corrections to catch up.
Staff noted that wages have increased substantially in recent years, and maintaining competitive compensation is
necessary to avoid future staffing challenges.
Council Consensus:
•
Proceed with using the remaining 1% foregone.
Council also discussed the possibility of using some of the additional 3% foregone authority for capital needs,
particularly public safety facilities. Staff explained that Council could use only a portion of that authority if desired.
Transit / GIFT Funding Request:
Additional contribution to GIFT transit operations.
•
Current contribution: approximately $410,000 annually
•
Request: approximately 5% increase (about $20,000)
Staff explained that transit funding also benefits the City because local dollars help leverage grant funding.
Council expressed support for maintaining this contribution.
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
6
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Legal Department Additional Assistant City Attorney Position Requested:
The state’s public defender system has expanded significantly following litigation regarding inadequate
public defense services.
Changes include:
•
Public defender staffing increased from approximately 3 attorneys handling misdemeanors to 5
attorneys.
•
More defense resources have resulted in:
o
More trials.
o
More motions.
o
More complex case preparation.
Meanwhile:
•
The City Attorney’s Office remains at approximately four attorneys.
•
Staff workload is divided between:
o
Criminal prosecution.
o
Civil work.
o
Council priorities.
o
Ordinance updates.
Need: Without additional support:
•
Prosecutors may have less capacity to take cases to trial.
•
Police officers may become discouraged if cases do not move forward.
•
Civil projects and policy work may slow.
Proposed Use: The new attorney would split time:
•
Approximately 50% prosecution.
•
Approximately 50% civil work.
Expected benefits:
•
Strengthen misdemeanor prosecution.
•
Improve workload balance.
•
Increase capacity for Council priorities.
Police Department Priorities
1. Records Management System Upgrade
Request: Move to Bonneville County’s upgraded enterprise records management system.
Background: Idaho Falls currently shares systems with Bonneville County. The County is moving forward
with a new enterprise platform, requiring Idaho Falls to transition.
Benefits:
•
Improved case management.
•
Better dispatch integration.
•
Improved efficiency.
•
Stronger data sharing.
Costs:
•
One-time implementation: approximately $83,000
•
Ongoing annual cost: approximately $237,000
•
Existing system cost: approximately $45,000
•
Net increase: approximately $192,000 annually
Staff noted that building an independent system would likely cost the City more than $1 million, making
the partnership with the county the most cost-effective option.
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
7
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
2. Police Officer Pay Scale Adjustment
Move sworn officers from a 21-step pay scale toward alignment with the City’s 19-step structure.
First phase:
•
Reduce from 21 steps to 20 steps.
•
Cost: approximately $85,000 annually.
Reason: A comparison with similar agencies showed Idaho Falls officers are approximately 9.6% below
market average around the five-year experience level.
The City has lost experienced officers to Nampa, Idaho State Police, and Bonneville County.
Goals:
•
Improve retention.
•
Reduce costly turnover.
•
Avoid becoming a training ground for other agencies.
Staff noted this was a conservative first step focused on the area where the City is most vulnerable.
3. Additional Dispatcher Position
Dispatch staffing has remained around 30 employees for years.
The long-term goal is to increase staffing to approximately 35 positions.
Benefits:
•
Reduce overtime backfill.
•
Improve coverage during vacations, sick leave and staffing shortages.
Funding is shared among:
•
Idaho Falls Police.
•
Bonneville County Sheriff’s Office.
•
Idaho Falls Fire Department.
4. Opioid/Narcotics Detective
Create a detective position focused on opioid investigations.
Funding (No general fund impact expected) sources:
•
50% asset seizure funds.
•
50% opioid settlement funds.
Responsibilities:
•
Investigate overdose deaths.
•
Identify drug suppliers.
•
Support prosecutions.
•
Provide prevention outreach.
Discussion:
Council expressed caution about relying on unpredictable seizure revenue for long-term staffing.
Staff explained:
•
Current funds could sustain the position for several years.
•
Opioid settlement funds are expected to continue.
•
Reporting requirements would ensure eligible use.
Fire Department Priorities
1. Add Two Training Officer Positions
Current Situation:
•
Fire Department has one training chief.
•
No dedicated training officers.
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
8
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
•
Similar-sized departments typically have 3–4.
Benefits:
•
Improve fire and EMS training.
•
Reduce reliance on on-duty firefighters for academy duties.
•
Reduce overtime backfill.
•
Support future accreditation requirements.
2. Fire Station Facility (bathrooms and related facilities) Improvements at an older fire station
Reason: Fire stations are firefighters’ second homes during 48-hour shifts.
Improvements support:
•
Decontamination after fires.
•
Health and safety.
•
Quality of life.
Council noted this was more than a typical bathroom renovation because of firefighter exposure and
health concerns.
3. Fire Training Facility Development (begin development toward a regional training facility).
Current Situation: Firefighters have created a makeshift training area using existing resources.
Long-Term Goal: A full regional training facility could cost more than $4 million.
The current request would:
•
Begin planning.
•
Develop infrastructure.
•
Identify sustainable funding.
•
Create assets that can move to a future permanent facility.
Parks and Recreation Priorities
1. Aquatic Center Starting Blocks
Request: Replace eight starting blocks.
Cost: Approximately $74,000
Reason:
•
Existing blocks are nearly 40 years old.
•
Current equipment has stability concerns.
•
Replacement would improve safety and allow easier removal/storage.
2. Ice Rink Bleachers
Request: Replace existing bleachers.
Issues: Current seating:
•
Is not ADA-friendly.
•
Creates accessibility challenges.
•
Creates safety concerns.
New bleachers would:
•
Improve accessibility.
•
Provide safer spectator seating.
3. Aquatic Center Entrance Door
Request: Replace original entrance doors.
Cost: Approximately $18,000
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
9
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
Includes: New doors, updated hardware, and ADA automatic openers.
4. Recreation Fees Discussion
Council questioned whether outside users should pay more, particularly school swim teams.
Staff explained:
•
A significant portion of aquatic users are nonresidents.
•
Fee structures have already been adjusted.
•
District 91 receives resident treatment.
•
Other outside users pay higher rates.
Goals:
•
Increase nonresident fees where appropriate.
•
Keep resident costs stable.
•
Maintain community access.
Library Funding Request
Request: Additional $201,661 from the General Fund.
Background: The Library lost County Library District funding after the County ended its participation.
Staff explained:
•
The library has already received its regular property tax allocation increase.
•
This request is above that amount.
Library proposal:
•
Use fund balance for half.
•
Request City funding for the remaining half.
Capital Projects Already Moving Forward
Staff highlighted that many major projects are already funded and progressing.
Examples include:
•
Sunnyside to 21st Street improvements.
•
Citywide landscape improvements.
•
Pioneer Bridge improvements.
•
Sage Lakes restroom improvements.
•
Railroad bridge pathway conversion.
•
Zoo improvements.
•
Greenbelt projects.
•
Projects supported by impact fees.
•
Projects supported by new FERC licensing revenues.
Staff emphasized that while there are many unfunded requests, the City continues to make significant
investments.
Municipal Services / Facility Planning
Space Utilization and Hart Building: The City is evaluating how to consolidate staff and reduce leased
space.
Goal: Eliminate the Hart Building lease.
Proposed Phase One: Approximately $300,000 for Annex B renovations.
Purpose:
•
Move Human Resources out of leased space.
•
Bring staff back into City-owned facilities.
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
10
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
•
Improve workspace utilization after ERP changes.
Future phases may include:
•
Additional workspace improvements.
•
Training space.
•
Better public access and wayfinding.
Budget Process Next Steps
•
Council was asked to:
o Review prioritized requests.
o Discuss needs with department directors.
o Understand why each item became a department priority.
•
Before Budget Tuesday, staff will provide department explanations of how they are fulfilling Council
priorities, fee comparisons and budget strategy documents.
•
Staff emphasized that many Council priorities are already being addressed within existing department
budgets and do not necessarily require additional funding requests.
All Participants – Wrap-up Discussion: Information and Data Requests, Next Steps in Budget Development:
•
Staff opened the wrap-up portion of the budget discussion and asked Council members if there were any
additional information requests, data points, or specific analysis they would like included beyond the
materials already planned and previously discussed priorities.
•
Council was encouraged to submit any additional requests as soon as possible so staff could prepare the
information before the next budget steps.
o
Examples included requests for additional data related to staffing levels, police personnel, or
other departmental information.
•
Staff indicated they would provide Council with:
o
The draft budget book.
o
The proposed fee schedule.
o
Additional requested supporting data as available.
•
Council discussed whether additional assistance or training could be provided on the budget software
tools currently available.
o
Staff clarified that the current budgeting system is still the existing software.
o
The new ERP system has not yet been implemented for this budget cycle and will be rolled out in
future operations.
Mayor and Council: Calendars, Announcements, Events, Reports, Updates, Concerns, Questions, Proclamations,
Notes or Minutes from Boards and Commissions:
Motion: Receive the recommendations from the June 2, 2026 meeting of the Planning and Zoning
Commission pursuant to the Local Land Use Planning Act.
o
Moved by: Councilor Francis
o
Second: Councilor Dingman
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes
11
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:05 PM.
Executive Session: The Council will not reconvene after the executive session.
Motion: Called pursuant to Idaho Code § 74-206(1)(f) to communicate with legal counsel for the public
agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation, or controversies not
yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated.
o
Moved by: Councilor Francis
o
Second: Councilor Dingman
o
Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none.
o
Motion carries.
Executive Session began at 6:12 PM and ended at 6:51 PM.
There were present: Mayor Burtenshaw, Council President Francis, Councilor Dingman, Councilor Freeman,
Councilor Larsen, Councilor Radford, Deputy Chief Galbreaith, Chief Johnson and Attorney Jones.
/s/ Linda Lundquist_________________
/s/ Lisa Burtenshaw
_____________
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk
Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor
PY2026 CDBG List of Recommended Projects/Activities
Program Year (PY) Activity/Project Description Recommended | Reason for
2026 CDBG Applicant | Allocation $414,143 Amount Recommendation
Public Service 15% max of allocation
Activities
Idaho Legal Aid Legal Aid/victims of domestic violence $12,000 DVSAC
(Idaho Falls office). PS High priority.
Behavioral Health Case management treatment for mental health | $20,000 Case management
Crisis Center E ID & substance abuse clients (18/older). services - High need.
United Way Assistance with affordable daycare expenses | $6,000.00 Household expense
ALICE Child Care for working families that don’t meet the adds to cost burden.
Scholarship Prgm. threshold for state financial assistance. Anti-poverty.
Salvation Army Rental ($7,500). Utility Assistance $10,000 Rent/Utility - Adds to
($3,700.00) for LMI individuals/families. cost burden. High need.
Promise Ridge Family | (1) PTE for intake/case management services | $9,000.00 ER family housing/case
Emergency Shelter of LMI clients. (17) pay periods (June -Dec). mgmt. High priority.
IF Soup Kitchen Support for training of volunteers to prepare | $5,000.00 Food expense adds to
and serve food at the Soup Kitchen. cost burden. Anti-
poverty.
Slum/Blight by Area | 30% max allowed for Economic
(SBA) Development (Downtown)
IFDDC/Downtown Facade Improvement Program in CT 9712 $32,000.00 Economic Dev.
Idaho Falls (signs, awnings, facades). Priority
LMI Direct Benefit Must allocate 70% or more as direct benefit
for LMI persons
City of Idaho Falls, Highland Park Sidewalk Improvement Project | $195,000 Infrastructure in LMI
Public Works Assist LMI with Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk in neighborhood.
Subdivision within CT 9712. High priority.
EICAP Parking Lot/Warehouse LED Lighting $6,000.00 Facility rehab
Upgrade Project. Retrofit light fixtures. High priority.
Idaho Falls Rescue Replace existing security cameras with new $12,500 Emergency and
Mission (IFRM) internal/external security camera system. Supportive housing.
High priorities.
Reusable/disposable trays to serve/deliver
meals to seniors/disabled LMI individuals.
IF Sr. Center
Meals on Wheels
$23,815 Equipment to support
meals for seniors.
High priority.
Administration 20% max of allocation ($414,143.00) eres
CDS/Administration | Administer CDBG Program with (1) FT $82,828
employee within CDS.
ro Total Amount of Applications $414,143.00
Administer CDBG
Program
Pa
Public Comments/Questions during the Draft 2026-2030 CDBG Consolidated Plan
Public Comment received from 5/22/26 to 6/22/26
Friday, June 12, 2026, the Grant Administrator met with Christan Ashcraft, an engaged and
concerned citizen, to answer/address questions related to the Draft 2026-2030 CDBG
Consolidated Plan. Christian wanted to get a better understanding so he could shape public
comments that are constructive and aligned with the City’s process.
Specific questions and discussion centered around practical limitations and factors that shaped
the plan’s priorities, and how the City balanced economic development approaches with
housing-focused approaches. The Grant Administrator shared how the process of gathering
public input took several months and the various approaches used to gather input through
community development and housing surveys, focus group meetings, interviews, ACS data, and
input from the Region 6 Housing Coalition. The input was analyzed by an outside consulting
firm to identify the needs presented by the community and connect them to the HUD priorities of
Community, Housing, Economic, and Public Service priorities (as defined by HUD). From there,
the data, input, and process will help define the goals and objectives for utilizing annual
CDBG/HUD funds over the next five years to address the needs identified.
Public Comments/Questions during the Draft 2026 CDBG Annual Action Plan
Public Comment received from 5/22/26 to 6/22/26
Wednesday, June 3, 2026, the Grant Administrator was referred to the Christine Hagedorn Reilly
State Director, Adult Education & GED regarding GED opportunities and resources available in
the community. Resources were shared and discussed by email related to the 2026 CDBG
application received for GED assistance through the DVSAC GED program administered in their
department.
PY2026 CDBG List of Recommended Projects/Activities
2026 CDBG Plan Year (PY) runs from 4/1/26 to 3/31/27
2026 CDBG allocation $414,143.00 expected Sept 2026
CDBG Program Formulas for Allocating PY2026 Funds
627,854.04 Total Dollar Amount of Applications received by Categories
$82,828.60 Administration of Program
$157,385.6 Public Service activities
$50,000 Slum/Blight projects
$337,639.84 LMI direct projects
Allowable % of Allocation ($414,143.00) by Categories
Max allowed for Administration 20% or $82,828.60
Max allowed for Public Service 15% or $62,121.45
Max allowed for Slum/Blight *30% or $124,242.9
Minimum for LMI Direct 70% or $231,920.80 (or more) to directly benefit Low
Moderate Income (LMI) persons
Formula:
$414,143.00 - $82,828.60 (Admin) = $331,314.4
$331,314.4 X 70% = $231,920.08. This is the minimum to satisfy the 70% LMI direct
benefit.
$331,314.4 - $231,920.08 = $99,394.32 left for Public Service and Slum/Blight
projects/activities.
$99,394.32 for PS/SBA
- $62,000 (PS activities) = $37,394.32 for (SBA/Downtown/Facade)
Options for meeting 70% LMI:
e Public Service may count towards LMI direct benefit due to the clients they serve if the
agency can provide quantifiable data of their clients served within the grant year.
e Examples of Public Service activities that provide direct assistance to LMI clients include
case management for homelessness, and rental assistance to LMI in the (3) census tracts.
e The public service activity benefits special needs populations (LMI, disabled, elderly).
e *SBA/Facade does not have a direct LMI benefit.
Summary of Public Participation Results:
e Affordable housing top concern
e Homelessness and mental health are rapidly growing needs
e Shortage of shelter beds
e Infrastructure investment supported
e Public transportation is critical
e Housing discrimination is uncommon, yet when it occurs it is rarely reported
PY2026 CDBG List of Recommended Projects/Activities
2026-2030 CDBG Consolidated Plan - Recommendations/Goals:
Housing Goal
Priority Need- Affordable Housing
Actions - add new and rehab homeowner units.
Public Service Goal
Priority Need - Homeless and Non-Homeless Special Needs Public Service
Actions - Assist with rental application fees for affordable housing, Assist with overnight shelter,
Add overnight emergency, or transitional housing beds, Assist with homelessness prevention.
Community Development Goal
Priority Need - Non-Homeless Special Needs, Non-Housing Community Development
Actions - Non-Housing public facilities/infrastructure, Housing public facilities/infrastructure
Economic Development
Priority Need - Non-Housing Community development
Actions - Study at least one area for Slum/Blight designation, Assist with facade treatments and
building rehab.
Additional Recommended action
Conduct a feasibility study for designation of a neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area
(NRSA)
Analysis of Impediments Recommendations
* Find partners to leverage funds and programs to increase affordable housing stock
* Continue to implement ADA Transition Plan, EICAP home modification partnership, and
support for Legal Aid to address fair housing issues
* Continue to co-sponsor Fair Housing Training
* Conduct a feasibility study to consider incentives for affordable housing including:
re-establishing the impact fee waiver for affordable housing, density bonus programs,
establishing income-restricted units, and other affordable housing tools
Needs Assessment for Idaho Falls over the 2026-2030 CDBG Consolidated Plan period
Housing needs identified through the 2026 stakeholder interviews, Region 6 Housing Coalition
meeting, the 2026 community survey, ACS demographic data, CHAS data, the 2018 to 2022
ADA Transition Plan, and District 7 Health Department reporting.
Supportive housing, Senior housing, Disability accommodation, Mental health, Substance
use disorder treatment, Domestic violence and sexual assault survivor, and Veterans.
PY2026 CDBG List of Recommended Projects/Activities
Issues Identified
Housing - Cost Burden and Substandard housing problems:
1. Cost burden/paying >30% of monthly income for housing costs
2. Renters most at risk paying >30% of monthly for housing costs
3. Female headed households without a spouse at an even higher risk
4, Elderly non-family renter (single adults age 62 or older living alone in rented units)
among highest rates of any household type
Deferred maintenance, inadequate insulation, and outdated heating systems in older units
Housing problems concentrate steeply at the bottom of the income distribution
Hispanic households exhibit disproportionately greater need with severe housing
problems at the 30 to 50% AMI and 80 to 100% AMI income levels
8. Disability accommodation refusals, particularly affecting tenants with mental health and
developmental disabilities
9. Source of income discrimination against Section 8 voucher holders, which Idaho law
does not currently prohibit
10. Blanket denials of applicants with any criminal record or any eviction within a set
lookback period
11. Older numbered street area in Census Tracts 9711 and 9712 contains a higher
concentration of lower income renter households
Homelessness - Capacity issues in Idaho Falls:
e Family-shelter capacity is concentrated at City of Refuge and is meaningfully
undersupplied relative to need
e Structural capacity gap exceeds what CDBG can resolve
Special population - additional supportive services/facilities needed for:
e Youth aging out of foster care
e Persons with mental illness
e HIV/AIDS and people experiencing homelessness
e Seniors under supported in Idaho Falls
MINN
Strategic Plan in SP-25 - Strategies to address housing problems:
e Preserve existing affordable housing
e Support affordable housing production
° Partner with EICAP, Habitat for Humanity Idaho Falls on owner occupied housing rehab
in LMI census tracts
2026-27 Requests By Fund & Department
Anticipated Unfunded Costs
Ongoing | __OneTime |
Prioritized Capital,
Quan Anticipated Requests not | Prioritized Unfunded Equipment, Total Anticipated
Fund/Department/Request Description Type tity Estimated Cost Funding Source(s)} Fully Funded Request Requests Personnel Consulting Unfunded Costs
General Fund
Mayor and Council -
a N E
Non - Departmental
GIFT Contribution to Cover Increased Costs Other Ongoing 1$ 430,000 $ 410,000 20,000 Y 20,000 $ - $ 20,000 | $ - $ 20,000
Municipal Services :
FTE - IT System Administrator I/II - Security and Access Personnel 1 128,290 80,566 47,724 N - - - . :
Control
FTE - Frontier Center Facility Technical Lead Personnel 1 112,402 - 112,402 N - - - - -
ERP-Workday/SpryPoint Post Go-Live Consulting (PY 1 150,000 150,000 - ¥ - - - - -
Carryforward)
Finance-Workday Tax Compliance Services (Payroll Taxes, Other Ongoing 1 25,000 - 25,000 N - - - - -
Quarterly 941, W-2's, 1095's, etc.)
Utility Billing System Replacement One-time 1 2,000,000 2,000,000 - Y - - - > =
Treasury-Space Improvements (PY Carryforward) One-time 1 140,000 140,000 - sf - - - = -
Utility Billing-Space Improvements (PY Carryforward) One-time 1 75,000 75,000 - Y - - - - -
Finance-Personnel Pay changes related to post-ERP impact Personnel 1 10,000 - 10,000 N - - - -
Equipment Maintenance-Fuel Tank Expansion (PY One-time 1 100,000 100,000 - Y - - - - :
Carryforward)
Equipment Maintenance-Fuel ConVault Tanks (Annual One-time 3 60,000 60,000 - Y - - - - :
budget)
Equipment Maintenance-Replace Unit 1008 (MERF Funded) One-time a: 39,118 39,118 - Y - - - = °
Building Maintenance-Replace Building Roofs (1includedin Other Ongoing 2 120,000 60,000 60,000 N - - * 2 *
Annual Budget)
Building Maintenance-Replace Unit 1304-2014 Chevy (MERF One-time 1 52,696 52,696 - Y - : - = -
Funded)
Human Resources -
Annex B on D Street Renovation for HR Offices Phase 1 & One-time a: 300,000 300,000 - Y - - - - :
ERP Team Return to Teams (~$200K HR/$100K ERP Team)
Annex B on D Street Renovation for HR Offices Phase 1 One-time 1 123,076 - 123,076 N - - - - -
Additional Costs ($291,076 Renovation and $32,000
Furniture)
Annex B on D Street Renovation for HR Offices Phase 2 One-time 1 574,735 - 574,735 N - - . * =
($504,735 Renovation and $70,000 Furniture)
Community Development Services -
GIS Intern (ISU Funded) One-time 1 15,000 15,000 - Y - - - - -
Replace Unit 6604 (MERF Funded) One-time 4: 28,255 28,255 - Y - - - > -
Legal
FTE - Assistant City Attorney Personnel 176,311 - 176,311 Y 176,311 176,311 - - 176,311
PTE - Public Records Assistant Personnel 26,642 - 26,642 N - - - 5: °
Police
Pay Scale Change for Sworn Officers Personnel 1 84,308 - 84,308 Y 84,308 84,308 - - 84,308
FTE - Dispatcher Personnel 1 93,514 37,406 56,108 Y 56,108 56,108 - - 56,108
FTE - Wellness Coordinator (Grant Funded if Awarded) Personnel 1 104,530 88,466 16,064 N - - - - -
FTE - Opioid Response Detective (Opioid/Seizure Funded) Personnel 1 104,530 104,530 - Y - - = .
FTE - Patrol Officers Personnel 1 104,530 - 104,530 N - - - - :
FTE - Patrol Officers-Hispanic Liaison Personnel 1 104,530 - 104,530 N - - - - -
PTE - Evidence Clerk (Included in Operational Budget) Personnel 17,586 17,586 - - - “ - =
F:\Budget\2026-2027 Budget\Council Requests\All Fund Requests 2026-27 - Ongoing & Onetime - Personnel, O&M, & Capital-BAS Review 7-6-26 10f8
2026-27 Requests By Fund & Department
Anticipated Unfunded Costs
| Ongoing | One Time
Prioritized Capital,
Quan Anticipated Requests not | Prioritized Unfunded Equipment, Total Anticipated
Fund/Department/Request Description Type tity Estimated Cost Funding Source(s)} Fully Funded Request Requests Personnel Consulting Unfunded Costs
Records Managment System Upgrade (Bonneville County) | One-time 83,481 83,481 83,481 - - 83,481 83,481
Implementation 1 Y
Records Managment System Upgrade (Bonneville County) Other Ongoing 237,014 45,000 192,014 192,014 - 192,014 - 192,014
Annual SaaS Year 1 1 v
Shooting Range (PY Carryforward) One-time 1 950,000 950,000 - ¥ - - - - -
Bearcat (PY Carryforward) One-time 1 428,645 428,645 - bf - - - - °
Lease Payments-Bancorp FY22 19 Units PO117617 (MERF One-time 299,548 299,548 - - - - - -
Funded) b 4
Lease Payments-Financial Pacific Leasing FY23 17 Units 013- One-time 229,763 229,763 - - - - = -
256851-001 (MERF Funded) Y
Lease Payments-Financial Pacific Leasing FY24 2 Units013- One-time 21,348 21,348 - - - - - :
256851-002 (MERF Funded) ¥
Lease Payments-Financial Pacific Leasing FY24 1 Units013- One-time 11,252 11,252 - - - : - :
256851-003 (MERF Funded) bf
Lease Payments-KS Statebank FY25 8 Units PO 118213 One-time 99,943 99,943 - - - - = od
(MERF Funded) Y
Lease Payments-KS Statebank FY25 6 Units PO 118091 One-time 72,161 72,161 - - - : = :
(MERF Funded) Y
Lease Payments-KS Statebank FY26 4 Units PO 121246 One-time 53,671 53,671 - - - : - :
(MERF Funded) Y
Lease Payments-KS Statebank FY26 9 Units PO 120570 One-time 110,940 110,940 - - - - - -
(MERF Funded) ¥
New Lease for 16 Replacement Vehicles (MERF Funded) One-time 214,754 214,754 - ¥ - - < . .
Upfit 16 Replacement Vehicles (MERF Funded) One-time 480,000 480,000 - Y - : 5 = .
Fire
FTE - Training Officers (Captains Rank) Personnel 1 162,548 - 162,548 Y 162,548 162,548 - - 162,548
FTE - Training Officers (Captains Rank) Personnel 1 162,548 - 162,548 Y 162,548 162,548 - - 162,548
FTE - Firefighters (Overhire/Growth Plan) Personnel 3 263,955 - 263,955 N - : ° * (:
FTE - Deputy Chief Personnel 2 175,834 - 175,834 N - - - - -
FTE - Admin Assistants Personnel 2 161,760 - 161,760 N - - - = 2
FTE - PIO / Community Outreach Specialist Personnel 1 115,584 - 115,584 N - - - - =
FTE - Data Analyst / Accreditation Manager Personnel 1 115,584 - 115,584 N =] : : = or
FTE - IT Specialist Personnel 1 100,000 - 100,000 - - = - =
FTE - Fire Prevention Captain Personnel 1 162,548 - 162,548 N - - : > >
FTE - Account Analyst (Accountant/Finance) Personnel 1 104,858 - 104,858 N : - - - :
Upgrade/Remodel the 35 year old Station 4 Bathrooms One-time 1 75,000 - 75,000 Y 75,000 - - 75,000 75,000
Public Relations Trailer One-time Budget C 4,000 - 4,000 N - - - . :
Gas Monitor One-time Budget C 6,000 - 6,000 N - - - - .
Training Mannequins One-time Budget C 5,050 - 5,050 N - - - - -
Hydrant Adaptors One-time Budget C 22,850 - 22,850 N - - - - -
Battery Powered Rams One-time Budget C 30,000 - 30,000 N - - - - -
Battery Chainsaw One-time Budget C 1,700 - 1,700 N - - - - -
Hose Washers One-time Budget C 5,650 - 5,650 N - - - - -
Dump Trailer (Training) One-time 1 16,000 - 16,000 N - ce : - bd
Lease Payments-3 New Engines (MERF Funded) One-time 3 601,969 601,969 - b 4 - = . : -
Hazmat Equipment (Grant Funded) (PY Carryforward) One-time 1 2,168,286 2,168,286 - Y - - - - -
Parks -
Winter Activity Guides Other Ongoing 1 21,000 21,000 - Y - - - = :
Spring Activity Guides Other Ongoing 1 23,000 23,000 - ¥ - - : - :
F:\Budget\2026-2027 Budget\Council Requests\All Fund Requests 2026-27 - Ongoing & Onetime - Personnel, O&M, & Capital-BAS Review 7-6-26 20f8
2026-27 Requests By Fund & Department
Anticipated Unfunded Costs
| Ongoing | One Time
Prioritized Capital,
Quan Anticipated Requests not | Prioritized Unfunded Equipment, Total Anticipated
Fund/Department/Request Description Type tity Estimated Cost Funding Source(s)} Fully Funded Request Requests Personnel Other Consulting Unfunded Costs
Convert Railroad Bridge to Pathway-Add Fencing and Rails One-time 1 150,000 150,000 - Y - : - = -
(Greenbelt Capital Funded)
Build Stairs Down into Japanese Garden (Greenbelt Capital One-time 1 40,000 40,000 - Y - - - - .
Funded)
Heritage Park Pathway Lighting (Greenbelt Capital ($210K) & One-time Zz 295,000 295,000 - Y - : - : :
Rotary ($80K) Funded)
Heritage Park (Annual Budget ($125K), MERF ($150K) & One-time 550,000 550,000 - ¥ - - - - :
Grant ($275K) Funded
Heritage Park Parking Lot #2 (Greenbelt Capital Funded) One-time 1 200,000 200,000 - Y - : = :
Replace Unit 0243 (MERF Funded) One-time 208,000 208,000 - ¥ - - : :
Replace Unit 2039 (MERF Funded) One-time 21,000 21,000 - Y - - ° *
Replace Unit 2044 (MERF Funded) One-time 57,000 57,000 - Y - - : - -
Replace Unit 2047 (MERF Funded) One-time 40,000 40,000 - v - - - . :
Replace Unit 2070 (MERF Funded) One-time 16,952 16,952 - Y - - - - -
Replace Unit 2059 (MERF Funded) One-time 52,450 52,450 - Y s 7 : =
Replace Unit 2031 (MERF Funded) One-time 55,753 55,753 - Y - : : :
Replace Unit 2057 (MERF Funded) One-time 19,202 19,202 - Y - - : = :
Zoo-Replace Unit 2213 (MERF Funded) One-time 10,000 10,000 - , - - : . :
Cemetery-Replace Unit 6821 (MERF Funded) One-time 21,000 21,000 - Y - - : : -
Cemetery-Replace Unit 6813 (MERF Funded) One-time 45,000 45,000 - Y - - = -
Cemetery-Replace Unit 6815 (MERF Funded) One-time 17,952 17,952 - Y - ° © :
Cemetery-Replace Unit 6816 (MERF Funded) One-time 18,331 18,331 - i - ° = :
Softball Drive (PY Carryforward) One-time 200,000 200,000 - ¥ - - - = :
Public Works -
PTE - Transit-Casual/Part-time Personnel Other Ongoing 85,000 85,000 - ¥ - 2 : = *
City Hall Annex Remodel - Engineering (S$208K or S300K) & One-time 1 392,000 - 392,000 N - - - - -
PW Admin & GIS ($92K)?
Transit-GIFT Bus Stops (Grant & TRPTA Funded) One-time 1 170,000 170,000 - Y - = = - - Ss - -
General Fund Total ity. $ 15,762,935 $ 11,862,541] $ 3,900,394 $ 1,012,318 ~|$ 641,823 $ 212,014] $ 158,481}$ 1,012,318
Special Revenue Funds
Streets -
Single Axle Patch Truck w/ Brine Applicator and Underbody One-time 1$ 450,000 450,000 - Y - $ - $ : $ - $ :
Plow Unit 1537 (MERF Funded)
Asphalt Paver Unit 1550 (MERF Funded) One-time 1 300,000 300,000 - y - - : - :
Oump Truck w/ Slide in Spreader and Plow Units 1534and One-time 2 700,000 700,000 - Y - - - = °
1541 (MERF Funded)
New Street and Sanitation Admin Building ($2.75M & One-time 7 2,900,000 2,900,000 - ¥ - - = = :
Furnishings $150K) (PY Carryforward)
Recreation
Starting Blocks for 8 Lap Lanes One-time 1 74,240 - 74,240 Y 74,240 - - 74,240 74,240
New Custom Bleachers for Ice Rink One-time 1 140,000 - 140,000 Y 140,000 - - 140,000 140,000
Replace Aquatic Center Main Entrance Door One-time a 18,700 - 18,700 y. 18,700 - - 18,700 18,700
Recreation-Replace Equipment Unit 2061 (MERF Funded) One-time ok 52,000 52,000 - ie - - - > :
Zamboni Ice Resurfacer (MERF Funded PY Carryforward) One-time 1 150,000 150,000 - ¥ - - : - :
Golf 2
Pine Crest Equipment Replacements (MERF Funded) One-time TBD 220,000 220,000 - 7 - - - : :
Irrigation Repairs (MERF Funded) One-time 1 12,000 12,000 - 7 - - = = ¢
Sand Creek Equipment Replacements (MERF Funded) One-time TBD 220,000 220,000 - 7 - - = :
Sage Lake Equipment Replacements (MERF Funded) One-time TBD 150,000 150,000 - : - - = -
F:\Budget\2026-2027 Budget\Council Requests\All Fund Requests 2026-27 - Ongoing & Onetime - Personnel, O&M, & Capital-BAS Review 7-6-26 3o0f8
2026-27 Requests By Fund & Department
Anticipated Unfunded Costs
[Ongoing ‘| __OneTime
Prioritized Capital,
Quan Anticipated Requests not | Prioritized Unfunded Equipment, Total Anticipated
Fund/Department/Request Description Type tity Estimated Cost Funding Source(s)} Fully Funded Request Requests Personnel Consulting Unfunded Costs
Library
Roof Replacement (PY Carryforward) One-time 400,000 400,000 - Y - - - - -
Operational Tax Levy Increase Other Ongoing 201,661 - 201,661 Y 201,661 - 201,661 - 201,661
EMS - -
Lease Payments-Stryker 360 (MERF Funded) One-time 303,719 303,719 - b - - - : :
2 Ambulances (MERF Funded) One-time 2 622,800 622,800 - b 4 - - - - :
Ambulance Remounts (PY Carryforward) One-time Zz 370,000 370,000 - Y - - - = -
Wildland 5
Upfitting for New Fire Engines (Arriving Fall 2026) One-time 3 675,000 675,000 - Y - - - - -
Equipment (Grant Funded if Awarded-Assistance to One-time 560,000 560,000 - Y - - - - :
Firefighters)
Police Impact Fee -
Debt Service One-time 630,000 630,000 - Y - - - - -
Police Vehicles (Add to Fleet) One-time 2 200,000 200,000 - bi - : : 2 2
Parks Impact Fee -
Earthwork and Grading of Sandy Downs One-time 1 800,000 800,000 - Y - - - - -
Utilities at Sandy Downs One-time 1 700,000 700,000 - Y - - = = -
Fire Impact Fee -
One-time : - - N - = > = :
Streets Impact Fee -
Skyline Drive Freeway Commercial Center One-time 1 275,000 275,000 - i - - - - -
15th E from 49th S Along Faraday Subdivision One-time 1 1,600,000 1,600,000 - i - : - - :
33rd N Recycle Road West and E of N Sth W Intersection One-time 1 650,000 650,000 - Y - - - - -
15th E and 49th S Intersection One-time 1 900,000 900,000 - Y - - : = -
5th W Expansion from City Limits North Through W 33rdN One-time 1 2,600,000 2,600,000 - Y - - - 2 :
Special Revenue Funds Total $ 16,875,120 $ 16,440,519 | $ 434,601 | $ 434,601 | $ - $201,661] $ 232,940 | $ 434,601
Capital Construction Funds
Public Works Capital -
Rollandet Improvements Sunnyside Road to 21st Street (PY One-time 15 2,300,000 $ 2,300,000 - Y - $ - $ = $ = $ :
Carryforward
Landscape Improvements Citywide One-time 1 250,000 250,000 - ¥ - > : = =
Pioneer Bridges One-time 1 500,000 500,000 - Y : - : 2 -
Storm Tap Removal (PY Carryforward) One-time TBD 350,000 350,000 : Y - - = - °
Streets Capital -
Woodroof Expansion Lincoln to Yellowstone-FA-Keller One-time 150,000 150,000 - ¥ - - - > :
Design Work (23302 Grant Funded)
Holmes Widening Sunnyside to Taylorview-FA-Horrocks One-time 200,000 200,000 - hf : - > S :
Design Work (24241 Grant Funded)
Yellowstone Avenue Sidewalk (TAP Grant Funded) One-time 740,000 740,000 - Y - - : - :
Traffic Capital -
Fiber Connection (PY Fund Balance) One-time 1 25,000 25,000 - Y > : : :
Controller Upgrade (PY Fund Balance) One-time 1 10,000 10,000 - Y - - - S
2 RRFB (PY Fund Balance) One-time 1 60,000 60,000 - Y - - : - >
Battery Backup (PY Fund Balance) One-time 1 40,000 40,000 - Y - - - .
Detection Upgrade (PY Fund Balance) One-time 50,000 50,000 - ¥ - - : - -
Video (PY Fund Balance) One-time 5,000 5,000 - Y - : : : °
Consultant Assistance (PY Fund Balance) One-time 20,000 20,000 - Y - 2 - = =
3 Audio Upgrades (PY Fund Balance) One-time 15,000 15,000 - f - : : : :
F:\Budget\2026-2027 Budget\Council Requests\All Fund Requests 2026-27 - Ongoing & Onetime - Personnel, O&M, & Capital-BAS Review 7-6-26 40t8
2026-27 Requests By Fund & Department
Anticipated Unfunded Costs
Prioritized Capital,
Quan Anticipated Requests not | Prioritized Unfunded Equipment, Total Anticipated
Fund/Department/Request Description Type tity Estimated Cost Funding Source(s)} Fully Funded Request Requests Personnel Consulting Unfunded Costs
Cellular Coordination (PY Fund Balance) One-time 20,000 20,000 - Y - - - - -
ITD Signal Shared Improvements (PY Fund Balance) One-time 30,000 30,000 - Y - - - - -
49th/15th E Signal Upgrades (PY Fund Balance) One-time 200,000 200,000 - Y - - . =
Checkpoint Fiber Switches (PY Fund Balance) One-time 40,000 40,000 - Y - - - - -
Detection Replacement (PY Fund Balance) One-time 30,000 30,000 - Y - - - - :
5th E and 49th S Intersection (ITD 23389 Grant Funded) One-time 50,000 50,000 - 4 - - - :
15th E and 49th S Intersection Improvements (ITD 24285 One-time 246,800 246,800 - Y - - . :
Grant Funded)
Fire Capital
Conex Containers for Training Facility One-time 1 28,500 - 28,500 Y 28,500 - - 28,500 28,500
Training Facility Infrastructure Phase 1 Basic Infrastructure One-time 1 250,000 250,000 Y 250,000 - - 250,000 250,000
Training Facility Tower One-time 1 1,700,000 - 1,700,000 N - - - . .
Training Facility Infrastructure (Water Main, Hydrant, One-time 1 1,300,000 - 1,300,000 N - - - - =
Buildings)
Training Facility Driving Course One-time 1 1,000,000 1,000,000 N - - a < -
Storage Facility One-time 1 2,100,000 - 2,100,000 N - - - : -
Zoo Capital -
Part 1 Fencing on Rollandet (1400 ft) (PY Fund Balance) One-time al 57,000 57,000 - Y - - - - -
Part 2 Fencing on Rollandet (1520 ft) (PY Fund Balance) One-time 1 61,885 61,885 - Y - - - - .
New Penguin Roof (PY Fund Balance) One-time 1 40,000 40,000 - Y - - - - :
New Camel Barn and Enclosure (PY Fund Balance) One-time 1 100,000 100,000 - Y - - - - -
New Fence and Windows for Zebras (PY Fund Balance) One-time 1 35,000 35,000 - Y - - - = <
New Kookaburra Kafe (PY Fund Balance) One-time 1 55,000 55,000 - Y - - - = ~
Pavilion to Maint Shop (PY Fund Balance) One-time 1 5,000 5,000 - Y - - - - =
Islands Unfinished South End (PY Fund Balance) One-time 1 150,000 150,000 - Y - - = .
Frontier Center Capital -
Golf Capital -
Reel Grinder Mower (Add to Fleet for All Courses) One-time 1 50,000 50,000 - Y - - - - -
CR-20 Large Area Topdresser (Add to Fleet) One-time 1 53,000 $3,000 - Y - - - - :
Patio Cover for Sage Lakes Café One-time 1 70,000 70,000 - Y - - - = -
Bathroom on Hole #5 at Sage Lakes (PY Carryforward) One-time 1 150,000 __ 150,000 - | Y - - - ae |i Pe F -
Capital Construction Total $ 12,537,185 $ 6,158,685 | $ 6,378,500 $ 278,500 $ = $ =a 278,500 | $ 278,500
Enterprise Funds -
Airport -
Ops Truck (MERF Funded) One-time 1$ 70,000 $ 70,000 - F : $ = § - $ - $ -
Economy Lot Expansion One-time 1 51,637 51,637 - Y - - - - -
ARFF Truck (Grant or MERF Funded) One-time 1 725,000 725,000 - ¥ - - - - -
Shuttle Bus (Grant or MERF Funded) One-time 1 240,000 240,000 - Y - - - = =
Parking (CFC Funded) One-time 1,600,000 1,600,000 - Y - - - - -
Terminal Deice and Cargo Apron (Grant & PFC Funded) One-time 12,216,859 12,216,859 - Y - - - - :
Peterson Property Acquisition (Grant & PFC Funded) One-time 3,297,960 3,297,960 - Y - - - - -
Terminal Concept Budget Report (Grant Funded) One-time 2,657 2,657 - Y - - - = -
Expand Terminal (Grant, PFC, & Debt Funded) One-time 28,438,432 28,438,432 - ¥ - - - = -
Air Traffic Control Tower Siting (Grant Funded) One-time 592,919 592,919 - Y - - - * -
Taxiway Pavement Maintenance (Grant & PFC Funded) One-time 14,596 14,596 - ¥ - - - - -
VOR and Tower Design (Grant & PFC Funded) One-time 700,000 700,000 - Y - - - = .
Water -
F:\Budget\2026-2027 Budget\Council Requests\All Fund Requests 2026-27 - Ongoing & Onetime - Personnel, O&M, & Capital-BAS Review 7-6-26 5of8
2026-27 Requests By Fund & Department
Anticipated Unfunded Costs
Ongoing | __OneTime |
Prioritized Capital,
Quan Anticipated Requests not | Prioritized Unfunded Equipment, Total Anticipated
Fund/Department/Request Description Type tity Estimated Cost Funding Source(s)} Fully Funded Request Requests Personnel Other Consulting Unfunded Costs
SUV (Add to Fleet) One-time 1 35,000 35,000 - Y - - - - -
Well 17 Upgrades One-time a. 500,000 500,000 - ¥ - - - - :
Well 3 Electrical One-time 1 200,000 200,000 - Y - - - - :
65th South Pump Station One-time af 500,000 500,000 - ¥ - - - - -
Well 7 Abandonment One-time 1 250,000 250,000 - Y - - - : :
Well S Upgrades - Prepurchase One-time 1,500,000 1,500,000 - ¥ - - - - -
Well 3 Upgrades - Prepurchase One-time 1,250,000 1,250,000 - Y - - - - -
7th St & Linden Park Water Main Replacement One-time 1 2,450,000 2,450,000 - Y - - - - -
Edgemont Gardens Addition Water Main Replacement One-time 1 850,000 850,000 - Y - - - - -
D St Memorial Dr to Yellowstone One-time 1 750,000 750,000 - Y - - - - :
2027 Contracted Meter Box Installs One-time 1 1,960,000 1,960,000 - Y - - - 2 :
Valve Exercising Truck (MERF Funded) One-time 1 285,000 285,000 - Y - - - - :
Pipe Trailer (Add to Fleet) One-time 1 30,000 30,000 - ¥. - - - - ‘
Backhoe (Add to Fleet) One-time xf 190,000 190,000 - ¥ - - - - *
Well 20 Property Purchase One-time 1 200,000 200,000 - ¥ - : - - -
New Water Division Office (PY Carryforward) One-time 1 6,000,000 6,000,000 - ¥ - - < s .
N 15th E Water Main Extension-N Yellowstone Hwy to E lona One-time 1 1,000,000 1,000,000 - Y - - - . °
Rd
N Woodruff Ave Water Main Extension - E Lincoln Rd to N One-time 1 1,000,000 1,000,000 - ¥. - - - - -
Yellowstone Hwy
Well 20 & 21 Drilling One-time 1 1,200,000 1,200,000 - Y - - - - -
Participation with Developers One-time 1 200,000 200,000 - Y - - - - -
Sanitation -
Replace 3/4 Ton Pickup Truck Full Size Bed w/Tommygate One-time 1 70,000 70,000 - Y - - - - -
Unit 7030
1/2 Ton Crew Cab Pickup Truck (Add to Fleet) One-time 1 60,000 60,000 - ¥ - - - - -
Replace Sweeper Unit 1548 One-time 1 480,000 480,000 - ¥ - - - - :
95 gallon Residential Carts (Yearly Container Purchase) One-time 1667 100,000 100,000 - Y - - - = -
Small Metal Dumpsters (Yearly Container Purchase) One-time 25 50,000 50,000 - Y - - - - -
New Street and Sanitation Admin Building ($2.75M & One-time 1 2,900,000 2,900,000 - Y - - - - :
Furnishings $150K) (PY Carryforward)
Power E
FTE - Wireman Personnel 1 110,946 110,946 - Y - - - - -
FTE - Apprentice Generation Mechanic Personnel 1 82,108 82,108 - Y - - - - -
FTE - Traffic Tech Personnel 1 110,946 110,946 - ¥ = - 4
Digger Derrick to replace #3010 (MERF Funded) One-time 1 445,729 445,729 - Y - - - - -
Land Acquisition One-time $50,000 550,000 < Y - - - -
Construction Work Orders - For PWs One-time 180,000 180,000 - Lf - - - = .
FERC Relicense One-time $79,000 579,000 - Y - - - - -
Bulb AVR Replacement One-time 400,000 400,000 - Y - - - - -
City Plant ReBuild - Mechanical, Controls, Communication One-time 625,000 625,000 - Y - - - - :
and Rotor Rewind
Gem State Rip Rap One-time 100,000 100,000 - Y - - - - :
Governor Pilot Valve Upgrades - Upper/Lower One-time 20,000 20,000 - Y - = - - -
HMI Upgrades at Upper Plant/Air Compressor One-time 20,000 20,000 - ¥ - - - - -
HVAC System Pump Replacement/Plumbing Upgrade Bulbs One-time 30,000 30,000 - ¥ - - - - -
HVAC system coil replacement - City and Lower Plants One-time 20,000 20,000 - Y - - - - :
Thermal Camera One-time 30,000 30,000 - ¥ - - - - :
Upper Dam Coffer Dam, Hydraulics Coatings & Seals One-time 750,000 750,000 - Y - - - - -
F:\Budget\2026-2027 Budget\Council Requests\All Fund Requests 2026-27 - Ongoing & Onetime - Personnel, O&M, & Capital-BAS Review 7-6-26 6of8
2026-27 Requests By Fund & Department
Anticipated Unfunded Costs
| Ongoing | One Time
Prioritized Capital,
Quan Anticipated Requests not | Prioritized Unfunded Equipment,
Total Anticipated
Fund/Department/Request Description Type tity Estimated Cost Funding Source(s)} Fully Funded Request Requests Personnel Other Consulting Unfunded Costs
Concrete Cracking and Spalling Repair - Old Plant One-time 8,000 8,000 - ¥ - - = 7 -
Gem State Rear Stop Logs Rehab (Seals & Coatings) One-time 35,000 35,000 - ¥ - - - : -
Gem State Concrete Cracking and Spalling Repair Work One-time 8,000 8,000 - ¥ - ° - - .
South Tourist Park - Lighting (Grant Funded) One-time 170,000 170,000 - Y - - - - :
Sugarmill-Hatch Tie Upgrade-NW Bonneville Tie- One-time 400,000 400,000 - Y - - - - -
Transmission & Distribution
Automate LTCs for Conservation Voltage Reduction (CVR) One-time 60,000 60,000 - Y - - - -
Harrison Sub Upgrade (Design) One-time 900,000 900,000 - Y - - - -
City Sub Upgrade 46kv Breaker (Construction) One-time 650,000 650,000 - " - - - - -
Rack Sub Upgrade w/ New Control Building (Design & One-time 250,000 250,000 - Y - - - - -
Material Purchase)
Hatch, Harrison LTC Maintenance & Updates One-time 100,000 100,000 - Y - - - : -
East River Reconductor-33rd North) (Design and Easement One-time 500,000 500,000 - Y - - - ° .
Acquisition)
Direct Connect Fiber between Harrison-York-Sugarmill One-time 100,000 100,000 - Y - - - - -
161 Gem State Breaker (Material Acquisition) 2 Year Lead One-time 200,000 200,000 - ¥ - - - - -
Time
161 Gem State Breaker (Design) One-time 100,000 100,000 - Y - - - - -
Customer Line Extensions One-time 1,700,000 1,700,000 - Y - - - -
Backyard Rebuild One-time 750,000 750,000 - Y - - - -
Distribution Automation (3 sites) One-time 75,000 75,000 - Y - - - : -
Public Works Projects (Miscellaneous) One-time 100,000 100,000 - ¥ - - - «
City Sub Upgrade 46kv Breaker (Construction) One-time 650,000 650,000 - Y - - - - -
Harrison Sub Upgrade (Design) One-time 900,000 300,000 - Y - 7 -
Streetlight Retrofit Project One-time 225,000 225,000 - Y - e - - «
Rack Sub Upgrade w/ New Control Building (Design & One-time 250,000 250,000 - Y - = - - -
Material Purchase)
Sugarmill-Hatch Tie Upgrade-NW Bonneville Tie- One-time 400,000 400,000 - Y - - - -
Transmission & Distribution
East River Rd, MK Simpson and 33rd N One-time 75,000 75,000 - Y - - - - -
Pioneer and I-15 OH to UG Crossing One-time 550,000 550,000 - Y - - - - -
Snake River Landing 1100 u/g JHJ to Event Center One-time 900,000 900,000 - Y = e - - “
New Milligan Feeder to City Sub Tie One-time 75,000 75,000 - Y - - - - -
49th South and 15 East 795 Feeder One-time 200,000 200,000 - Y - = - - .
49th South (Brookside to St Clair) One-time 80,000 80,000 - Y - - - - -
795 Relocation Rollandet One-time 120,000 120,000 - Y - - - - -
FAA Property Release Funding One-time 528,000 528,000 - Y - - - - -
Fault Indicator Analysis One-time 25,000 25,000 - Y - - - = *
Downtown H Structure to Underground (Grant Funded) One-time 500,000 500,000 - Y - - - - -
New Generation Gate Keepers One-time 50,300 50,300 - ¥ . - - - *
New Services (Meters and CTs) One-time 487,700 487,700 - Y - - - - -
Field Circuit Tester One-time 60,000 60,000 - Y - - - - -
Security Camera/Physical Security Upgrade One-time 50,000 50,000 - Y - - - -
Upgrade UPS System One-time 75,000 75,000 - Y - - - =
Generator or Battery Bank at City Plant for Dispatch/SCADA One-time 500,000 500,000 - i - - - - -
Westside Cover Storage One-time 500,000 500,000 - ¥ - - - - -
Truck Barn Lean-to One-time 250,000 250,000 - Y - - - - -
CFI Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (Grant Funded) One-time 450,000 450,000 - Y - - - : =
Fiber -
F:\Budget\2026-2027 Budget\Council Requests\All Fund Requests 2026-27 - Ongoing & Onetime - Personnel, O&M, & Capital-BAS Review 7-6-26 7ofs
2026-27 Requests By Fund & Department
Anticipated Unfunded Costs
Ongoing | OneTime |
Prioritized Capital,
Quan Anticipated Requests not | Prioritized Unfunded Equipment, Total Anticipated
Fund/Department/Request Description Estimated Cost Funding Source(s)} Fully Funded Request Requests Personnel Other Consulting Unfunded Costs
FTE - Communications and Splicing Technician Personnel 77,442 77,442
Fiber Network Capital (New Customers, Capital Upgrades) One-time 1,700,000 1,700,000
Upgrade Fiber Ring Network One-time 200,000 200,000
Wastewater
Scada Update to Lift Stations (Maintenance Review) One-time 3 60,000 60,000
Trailer for hauling Mr-Manhole Equipment One-time 12,000 12,000
Imps Other Than Build One-time 300,000 300,000
Replace Auto Equipment (MERF Funded) One-time TBD 207,100 207,100
Lift Station Upgrades (3) One-time 1,000,000 1,000,000
Participation With Devel One-time 200,000 200,000
Sewer Line Replacement One-time TBD 1,300,000 1,300,000
Imps Other Than Build One-time 500,000 500,000
Storm Drain Projects One-time 500,000 500,000
Replace Digester Feed Valves and Control System One-time TBD 60,000 60,000
VFD and SCADA Upgrades to the Headworks Process One-time TBD 105,000 105,000
Slurry Pump for Digester Transfer One-time TBD 150,000 150,000
Stairs on Digester One-time 1 80,000 80,000
Additional Facility improvements One-time TBD 30,000 30,000
Sample Shed One-time 1 25,000 25,000
Parking Lot Paving One-time | 250,000 250,000
Storm Lift Station Pump at Treatment Plant One-time 1 35,000 35,000
Borger Pump for Primary (Spare Pump) One-time 1 70,000 70,000
ooaaas Tenement Elen Exaposion Upgrade Clean. 2 rocess Onesie DSO) 0000
Enterprise FundsTotal = eritt sa ortoe -$ 101,882,331 $ 101,882,331 |
F:\Budget\2026-2027 Budget\Council Requests\All Fund Requests 2026-27 - Ongoing & Onetime - Personnel, O&M, & Capital-BAS Review 7-6-26 8o0f8
7/6/2026
BUDGET
EXPECTATIONS &
ASSUMPTIONS
Monday July 6, 2026
Discussion Roadmap
= FY2025-26 Performance
o Areas of Note
o Grants & Projects
=" FY2026-27 Assumptions
o Property Tax & State Shared Revenue
o Personnel
o Obligations
o Areas of Note
# General Fund Balancing Process
® FY2026-27 Additional Department Requests
o Estimated Additional Funding Available
o Ongoing Personnel & Other Operations
o One-time
7/6/2026
Background
FY2025-26 Areas of Note
Governmental Services Charged Directly to Enterprise Funds
o Parks Maintenance to Power
o Traffic Engineering and Signals returning from Power
o Street Sweeping to Sanitation
o Power Repayment-Past Maintenance to Parks (None)
o Why This Matters
° If budgeted amounts not met, funding may need to come
from the General Fund
7/6/2026
FY2025-26 Areas of Note
= Permit & Impact Fee Revenues Down
oO Why This Matters
e Less funding available for Projects
¢ Police Complex Debt increased impact on General Fund
FY2025-26 Areas of Note
# Zoo/Funland Revenues
o Outperforming Prior Year
o Not at Budgeted Revenue Levels
oO Why This Matters
¢ If budgeted amounts not met, costs have to be reduced, or
funding comes from the General Fund
7/6/2026
FY2025-26 Areas of Note
= Public Safety
© Monitor Police & Fire/EMS Personnel & Overtime against
budget
« |f budgeted amounts exceeded, costs have to be reduced,
or funding comes from the General Fund
o NEW - EMS GEMT Revenue Arrived in June $1.4M
= Rebuild up Fund Balance (Negative Cash)
FY2025-26 Grants
ARPA
oO Fire Station Generator
o Bearcat swapped for Personnel Cost
o All other Projects Complete
Police Victim’s Assistance Coordinator Ending (FY26-27 General
Funded)
Roadways, Trails, & Sidewalks (Carryforward to FY26-27)
Airport Terminal Expansion (Carryforward to FY26-27)
Water Commercial Meter Conversion
Power Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (Carryforward to FY26-
7/6/2026
FY2025-26 Additional Large Projects
ERP Implementation (Carryforward to FY26-27)
Police Shooting Range (Carryforward to FY26-27)
Fire/EMS Storage Facility (Prioritized Other Needs)
Peaking Plant (Completed)
Water Tower (Completed)
Water Administration Facility (Carryforward to FY26-27)
Wastewater Treatment Expansion (Carryforward to FY26-27)
Sanitation/Street Administration Facility (Carryforward to FY26-
27)
FY2026-27
Assumptions
7/6/2026
FY2026-27 Revenue Assumptions
= Property Taxes
o 3% allowable ~$1.5 million — for Personnel & Benefits
o Growth & Annexation ~S1M
© $750K Included in Proposed Budget
© $300K Available for Department requests
o Forgone Options
* 1% for Operations ~$535K
* 3% One-time for Capital Projects ~$1.6 million
FY2026-27 Revenue Assumptions
= State Shared
o General Fund ~$338K
o Streets ~$528K
= COP Police Complex Excess Funding ~S680K
7/6/2026
FY2026-27 Baseline Personnel Assumptions
Step & Grade Wage Increases
Power 6% Market Adjustment
All other employees 2% Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA)
Insurance increase
o Health 5.0% (negotiated 4.7%)
o Dental 10% (TBD)
PERSI 3.5% (TBD)
FY2026-27 Personnel Projections
FTE + Seasonals/Casual & Overtime — All Funds
ii _ Percentage Amount —
| Current FY2026-27 _ Increase over Increase over.
| FY2024-25 | py2025-26 | Proposed = FY2025-26 - FY2025-26
City Personnel Estimate __ Actual Budget __ Budget | Budget _| _ Budget
Property Tax Supported Funds 60,035,114 | | 64,600,549 | 67,618,309 | 4.7%| 3,017,760 -
Other Governmental Funds 10,223,293 . | 10,047,558 | | 10,880,154, j= 83% 832,596.
Enterprise Funds _ 26,639,780 | 29,635,053] _ 31,972,579 | 7.9% __ 2,337,526 .
Total City Personnel Estimate __96,898,187_ 104,283,160 | | 110,471,042 | 5.9%,
to
6,187,882
7/6/2026
FY2026-27 Proposed Property Tax Allocation-
Traffic in
FY26-27
: Proposed
Property Tax Levy Allocation FY25-26 Budget. Budget *
‘General Fund
‘Streets
‘Recreation
‘Ubrary
‘Public Works Capital
Total
3,041,981
1,223,080
3,134,046
813,700
2,953,380 |
1,187,466 |
3,042,763
790,000 |;
* Includes $750K of Levy related to Growth
|
|
$42,586,820 $ 44,633,192 | $
_ $50,560,429 $52,846,009 | $ 2,285,580 _
GF
: (| Fv26-27
- % Proposed | ; Proposed
Proposed Levy Levy ' Personnel
Increase/ Increase/ : Increase/
(Decrease) | (Decrease) | (Decrease) .
2,046,372 | 4.8% $ 3,100,120:
88,601 | 3.0% 41,967 |
35,624 3.0% (64,464)
91,283 3.0% (59,863)
23,700 3.0% |
4.5% _$ 3,017,760
\
4
j
t
FY2026-27 Estimated State Shared Revenues
‘State Shared Revenues __
|F¥25-26 Budget |
‘GeneralFund = |
FY26-27
| Proposed
Budget
Estimated | %Estimate |
Increase/ | Increase/ |
| (Decrease) (Decrease) |
i |
Uquor* -
Sales Tax Shared Distribution =—
7,200,000
8,350,000 $
_ 7
‘Streets
,$ 1,150,000 $
_ 988,500 $ (161,500),
7,700,000 | 500,000 |
8,688,500! $ 338,500 |
“14.0%
6.9%:
4.1%
Highway User Apportionment _
$
| HB312_
356,000 _
HB362
HB354 _
654,800
1,600,600
_$ 5,175,800 |. $
zeaaon'§ 2653.06 §
3.5%
123.0%
89,526 |
_ 793,812 | 437,812 |
656,667 |
1,599,953 ;
5,704,358 | $
1,867 |
(647).
528,558 |
0.3%
0.0%
10.2%
* State's Projection is less than Current FY and end of year true-up is historically less than State's projection
1
7/6/2026
Ongoing Debt Obligations
= Debt Annual Payments
© Police Complex COP Bond $2.0 million
o Power Revenue Bonds
° 2021 Transmission $1.5 million
* 2024 Power Supply $3.8 million
© Wastewater DEQ Loan $1.1 million
Ongoing Lease Obligations
= Lease Annual Payments (MERF Funded)
o Police vehicles $1.5 million
o Fire equipment $0.6 million
o EMS equipment $0.3 million
Ongoing & New Internal Obligations
= Golf Irrigation MERF Replenishment $300K+ annual payment
(4.5yrs left)
Fiber to Power $19.2 million + interest
New — ERP Implementation Repayment Allocation to
Wastewater & Power
FY2026-27 Areas of Note
Services or Costs Relocated
Downtown Parking moved from Community Development
Services to Non-Departmental
GIFT Contribution moved from City Council to Non-
Departmental
Animal Control Officers moved to Patrol to Isolate Costs to
run Shelter
Traffic Personnel moved from Power to General Fund
7/6/2026
10
FY2026-27 Areas of Note
=» NEW - ‘Street Lighting Utility Fund
= NEW — EMS Funding Source — Ground Emergency Medical
Transport (GEMT)
= CIS Utility Billing System Replacement Project
FY2026-27 Areas of Note
=" Lower Impact Fees
o Less Funding available for Future Projects
© Police Complex Debt will have Increased Impact on General
Fund
7/6/2026
11
7/6/2026
FY2026-27 Areas of Note
= Fee Supported Operations
o Why it Matters —
¢ What % should be Fee vs General Fund Supported
> Community Development
> Frontier Center
> Zoo/Funland
> Cemetery
> Recreation Programs
> Aquatic Center
> Skating Rink
FY2026-27 Budget Balancing Process
for General Fund
Proposed Department Budgets Reviewed
Salary Projections Higher than Original Estimates
o Benefit Choices of new Personnel
o Position Changes (Turnover, Promotions, Restructures, etc.)
© Seasonal, Casual, Overtime Changes
Additional Cuts Requested for Divisions with Operational
Increases over 2.5%
Included $750,000 Growth related Levy
12
7/6/2026
Expenditure History by Department
(Property Tax Supported Funds Only - General Fund, Streets, Recreation, Library)
All Expenditures with no Interfund Offsets
Total Expeditures by Department
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
$15,000,000
$10,000,000
$5,000,000 | |,
sill ea WEE ce a Wl
s id ra & € . & s e & s
Sa ris)
& NN ee co NS S
£ & 1) g <
x s
x of 4 ¥
$35,000,000
$30,000,000
@ 2021-2022 Actual @ 2022-2023 Actual m 2023-2024 Actual @ 2024-2025 Actual @ 2025-2026 Budget # 2026-2027 Proposed
FY2026-27 Department Requests
Growth & Annexation (Remaining) $300,000 Ongoing
1% Forgone $535,000 Ongoing (Adds to Base)
COP Police Complex Excess Funding $680,000 One-time
3% Capital Forgone $1,600,000 One-time (Not recommended, gone
once used)
13
7/6/2026
FY2026-27 Department Requests
# All Request Listing
# Prioritized Unfunded Request Listing
Questions?
2026-27 Requests By Fund & Department-PRIORITIZED
Anticipated Unfunded Costs
| OneTime |
Prioritized Capital,
Quan Anticipated Requests not | Prioritized Unfunded Equipment, Total Anticipated
Fund/Department/Request Description Type tit Estimated Cost Funding Source(s' Fully Funded Request Requests Personnel Consulting Unfunded Costs
General Fund
Non - Departmental
GIFT Contribution to Cover Increased Costs Other Ongoing 1$ 430,000 $ 410,000 20,000 Y 20,000 20,000
Legal
FTE - Assistant City Attorney Personnel 176,311 - 176,311 Y 176,311 176,311 176,311
Police
Pay Scale Change for Sworn Officers Personnel 1 84,308 - 84,308 Y 84,308 84,308 84,308
FTE - Dispatcher Personnel 1 93,514 37,406 56,108 $6,108 56,108 56,108
Records Managment System Upgrade (Bonneville County) One-time 83,481 83,481 83,481 - 83,481
Implementation 1 Y
Records Managment System Upgrade (Bonneville County) Other Ongoing 237,014 45,000 192,014 192,014 192,014
Annual SaaS Year 1 F | ¥
Fire
FTE - Training Officers (Captains Rank) Personnel 1 162,548 - ¥ 162,548 162,548 162,548
FTE - Training Officers (Captains Rank) 1 162,548 - ¥ 162,548 162,548 162,548
Upgrade/Remodel the 35 year old Station 4 Bathrooms 75,000 - ud 75,000 75,000 |
"General unc To SP et ARE OR | To ee RS A at =F i = a Ty Cy Se eS a 1,012,318
Special Revenue Funds
Recreation
Starting Blocks for 8 Lap Lanes One-time 1 74,240 - ¥ 74,240
New Custom Bleachers for Ice Rink One-time 1 140,000 - 140,000
Replace Aquatic Center Main Entrance Door One-time 1 18,700 - Y 18,700
Library
Operational Tax Levy Increase 201,661 - ¥ 201,661 201,661 =
‘SpecialRevenueFundsTotal eS TAGES OA PE ER 201661 | $
Capital Construction Funds
Fire Capital
Conex Containers for Training Facility One-time - Y 28,500
Training Facility Infrastructure Phase 1 Basic Infrastructure One-time Y 250,000
‘Capital Construction Total = the SOc ek eg at - $ 278,500 —
F:\Budget\2026-2027 Budget\Council Requests\All Fund Requests 2026-27 - Ongoing & Onetime - Personnel, O&M, & Capital-BAS Review 7-6-26
lofi
an
TOTAL EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT 1)
37
Property Tax, State Share Revenue, Franchise Fees
+ Permits, Grants, Contracts, Work Orders
2026-2027
2021-2022 Actual |2022-2023 Actual 2023-2024 Actual] 2024-2025 Actual | 2025-2026 Budget \, Proposed
| | 1636,173| 4,973,220 | _ 2,176,006
it ease] rns nara] sisano| aoa) sosna0|
fieasns | seararae| svemon| seorsen| _sraoacea| ssaranea| — zos200
Iubicwons | s47sa702) sas7eez| asesn| _seraane| zoamore| 565550
NonDepartmental Pt 976,940 53,138 901,294 8,469,663 2,674,000
3,355,827 2,786,326 3,303,968 3,399,684 4,649,913 3,768,928
$ 82,274,360|$ 92,142,961] $ 97,612,619] $ 101,114,784] $ 125,177,159 | $ 120,326,734
Total Expeditures by Department
$35,000,000
$30,000,000
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
$15,000,000
$10,000,000
$5,000,000 | *
$0 eGHEh?2 eoomes TT anomie
e Oy eS
RAMA AAA
CRASSA
RAM AAAS
RGVhMiMSSWSs
RNAV SRA
]
0
PALL
= GZ BDREEZ
BS eS 5 & 2 Se we & Ss
Nd s & ro & & x & SS
e - & & oe os s
NS ‘ yy R
we & ee 8 &
Ww Zs ri <S
m 2021-2022 Actual w@ 2022-2023 Actual @ 2023-2024 Actual w 2024-2025 Actual w@ 2025-2026 Budget @ 2026-2027 Proposed
EXPENDITURES SUPPORTED BY
PROPERTY TAXES, STATE SHARE REVENUE, FRANCHISE FEES
26-2027
2021-2022 Actual |2022-2023 Actual] 2023-2024 Actual] 2024-2025 Actual | 2025-2026 Budget se “
Department Proposed
in| ——saseana| ——sesios2|—snasea | aisoio | asnaze| 588.672
rouce «| ~—=teasa.oas | r9.ses73| 2acraces | axoraass| 2x.e70.276| 22,058,601 |
freaens «| ~—azaraqsa | sa.aesaoe| raer9e0 | aizeaa| 13.s65240| 13,972,362 |
NonDepartmental 1,722,906 (239,387)
2,988,776
Grand Total $ 54,787,385 $ 57,333,204 $ 59,985,647 $ 64,402,052 $ 60,587,177 $ 63,280,970
General Fund Support (3)
25,000,000
gG
20,000,000 40
OZ
Wy
GG
g
15,000,000 WY
We om)
Y
10,000,000 YW Wy ba
Vm \|\ WA
Wa \\\ ae
5,000,000 4 Wy) Wy WW gf
ae) Go GY Ge GG
ay Gy G4 We Ny Ye
| i Wy Han \\| ae | AY g whl?
7 ee | eee 1) 4G a 4 meme Ge GY 3B GY | nt GE
2 ~ er] o s > cy
& & PP s & RS Ss RS ee & ee
om ¥ ss & Phd & — x v
tB,000}600) 5 ee (oy eS — of ee
oe e NG ° a
SS > SS
N
m 2021-2022 Actual w@ 2022-2023 Actual w 2023-2024 Actual w 2024-2025 Actuat 4 2025-2026 Budget % 2026-2027 Proposed
PERCENTAGE OF DEPARTMENT SUPPORTED BY
PROPERTY TAXES, STATE SHARE REVENUE, FRANCHISE FEES
. : 1
HR
pouce | a] casas] aan] az.csmol as. 7ame] i
firewems | z2.son| ara] aa.seno] zo.zume| ——zaz.06m| 22.08%
pubicwons «| ———atzaase] zens] sa.gmm] soa aso].
0.88%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
40.00% m 2021-2022 Actual w 2022-2023 Actual m 2023-2024 Actual
35.00% General Fund Su Gy (%)
2a
4g
9 4g
30.00% We
Wy
ag
25.00% ,
j ‘
20.00% Wy Z
va \\\V
15.00% W Z 4
. " ag g yA
2 Wa
10.00% ag y ag
~ “g Z y ¥
y Wy y 4 Wd
Uy Gs y % ag
Ug % Z “4G Z Z g
ag y y g 2g i Y Wy
0.00% en ee wan et woe os “y a. v0 mmm se Z 4G WY 4Y a_ wh 4G
~~ > o & S S > S\
Ss £§ £§ $ FSF FS S$ SF SF $F
5.00% © co $ & oe RS RS ~
o e ~ ye Ye oe
3 & x» se
Q =
Development Impact Fees
Capital projects funded by development impact fees
O Police
e Debt service
e Police vehicles (2 vehicles)
€ Parks
e Earthwork and grading of Sandy Downs
e Utilities at Sandy Downs
C) Fire
e Funded projects to be added
Skyline Drive Freeway Commercial Center
15th E from 49th S along Faraday Subdivision
33rd N Recycle Road, W and E of N 5th W intersection
15th E and 49th S intersection
Sth W expansion from city limits N through W 33rd N
TOTAL PROGRAMMED* $8,
‘Total excludes Fire impact fee projects, which are still to be determined.
$830,000
$630,000
$200,000
$1,500,000
$800,000
$700,000
$275,000
$1,600,000
$650,000
$900,000
$2,600,000
355,000
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS
apital Projects & Community $8,578,885
Investments
Parks Projects
Parks & Recreation
Convert Railroad Bridge to Pathway — Add
Fencing & Rails
Greenbelt Capital funded
Build Stairs Down into Japanese Garden
Rreenhelt Canital funde
Greenbelt Capital funded
Heritage Park Pathway Lighting
Greenbelt Capital ($210K) & Rotary (80K) funded
Heritage Park
invested across the community
Annual Budget ($125K), MERF ($150K) & Grant ($275K) funded
Heritage Park Parking Lot #2
Greenbelt Capital funded
Softball Drive
Prior-year carryforward
Public Works Capital
Public Works — Levy
Rollandet Improvements — Sunnyside Rd to
21st St
Landscape Improvements Citywide
Pioneer Bridges
Storm Tap Removal
©
oO
Ce]
°
|
<
°
»
Golf Capital
Idaho Falls Golf
Bathroom on Hole #5 at Sage Lakes
Prior-year carryforward
Streets Capital
Public Works — Levy
$150,000 FA-23302 Keller Design Work $150,000
Grant funded
FA-24241 Horrocks Design Work $200,000
$40,000 Grant funded
TAP Grant — Yellowstone (moved from Parks) $740,000
$295,000 Grant funded
ITD 24285 — 15th E & 49th S Intersection $2,000,000
$550,000 Improvements
$200,000 Category total $3,090,000
$200,000
Zoo Capital
$4,435 000 Idaho Falls Zoo
, ’
Part 1 Fencing on Rollandet (1,400 ft) $57,000
Part 2 Fencing on Rollandet (1,520 ft) $61,885
New Penguin Roof $40,000
New Camel Barn & Enclosure $100,000
$2,300,000 New Fence & Windows for Zebras $35,000
New Kookaburra Kafe $55,000
$250,000 Pavilion to Maintenance Shop $5,000
$500,000 Islands — Unfinished South End $150,000
$350,000
Category total $503,885
$3,400,000
$150,000
$150,000
Also advancing — Development Impact Fee projects
Police Impact Fee
* Debt Service
+ Police Vehicles
]
i
&
a
2
®
o
a
D
Gg
C
Oo
gS)
i
3
Parks Impact Fee
+ Earthwork & Grading of Sandy Downs
+ Utilities at Sandy Downs
Streets Impact Fee
* Skyline Drive Freeway Commercial Center
* 45th E from 49th S along Faraday Subdivision
+ 33rd N— Recycle Rd West & E of N 5th W
Intersection
+ 15th E & 49th S Intersection
+ 5th W Expansion from City Limits N through W
33rd N
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO,
This DEVELOPMENT [AGREEMENT (hereinafter called “AGREEMENT”), made_ this
day of , 2026, by and between the CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, a
municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, (hereinafter called “CITY”), whose mailing address
is P.O, Box 50220, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83405, Bonneville County, a municipal corporation of the
State of Idaho, (hereinafter called “COUNTY”), whose mailing address is 605 N. Capital Ave,
Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402,and Franklin Building Supply., (hereinafter called “DEVELOPER”),
whose mailing address 1951 Flandro Dr., Pocatello, ID. 83202
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER is the sole owner, in law or equity, of a certain tract of land in
the County of Bonneville, State of Idaho, which land (hereafter referred to as “Development”), is
more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and by this reference made a part
hereof; and,
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER desires to develop its Development within the CITY area of
impact, and planned future city service area,and ,
WHEREAS, CITY is willing to allow DEVELOPER to extend CITY utility services
beyond the corporate limits of CITY to serve the Development, subject to the terms and conditions
of this AGREEMENT and, especially, the Special Conditions attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER and their subsequent purchasers, heirs or assigns agree that
this agreement constitutes irrevocable consent to annexation within the City of Idaho Falls at the
option of the City at such time as the City limits are contiguous to the subject property;
WHEREAS, CITY works with Bonneville County who has authority to approve access to
the street right-of-way, the construction of streets, utility lines and other public improvements
within the Street Right-of-way, to contract with DEVELOPER and to cooperate with CITY and
Bonneville County, regarding development of this Development; and
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER specifically waives DEVELOPER’s right to protest
development requirements described in this AGREEMENT, including DEVELOPER’s right of
judicial review contained in Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code, and pursuant to the standards set
forth in § 67-5279, Idaho Code; and,
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER understands that the public improvements required herein are
AREA OF IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE | OF 17
Commented [KB1]: Bonneville County needs to be party to the
agreement as well.
standards required pursuant to Idaho Falls City Code, Title 10, Chapter 1, and are authorized by
Idaho Code §§ 67-6513 and 67-6518; and,
WHEREAS, it would be advantageous to DEVELOPER to develop Real Property and
connect to City of Idaho Falls Wastewater and/or Water service.
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER and CITY believe that, without the public improvements
required herein, CITY would not be able to otherwise provide for mitigation of the effects of the
Development’s development on the ability of CITY to deliver services without compromising
quality of such service delivery to current CITY residents, or without imposing substantial
additional costs upon current CITY residents to accommodate the proposed Development; and,
WHEREAS, CITY desires to ensure that public improvements consisting of those
described in this AGREEMENT, especially Special Conditions for the Development, are
constructed; and,
|WHEREAS, DEVELOPER understands that a waiver of public improvements is available
pursuant to Idaho Falls City Code, but DEVELOPER specifically does not wish to request such a
waiver and wishes to enter freely into this AGREEMENT; and,
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER enters into this AGREEMENT of DEVELOPER's own free
will and accord, without coercion and without inducement and at DEVELOPER's request; and,
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER has read this AGREEMENT, has understood it, and has had
the opportunity to avail itself of legal and other counsel prior to entering into this AGREEMENT
and prior to signing it; and,
WHEREAS, CITY is willing to approve the Development improvements addressed in this
AGREEMENT, subject to the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT and the Special
Conditions attached hereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the
parties agree as follows:
1. Approval of Development Improvements. |CITY/ hereby approves the Special
Conditions in this AGREEMENT that are related to DEVELOPER’s Development as described
in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part to this AGREEMENT by reference, and agrees
that, upon DEVELOPER’s full and complete performance of the terms and conditions hereto, it
will accept and maintain all public facilities and improvements within CITY shown in the
Improvement Plans and as described in the Special Conditions to this AGREEMENT]
2. Improvement, Preliminary, and Final Improvement Plans. “Improvement Plans,”
used in this AGREEMENT, are engineer-designed plans showing all streets, wastewater lines,
water lines, storm drains, street signs, traffic control devices, barricades, other public utilities
AREA OF IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 2 OF 17
- [Commented [CC2]: Legal - is this necessary to Include? _
“"-+{ Commented [3B2R2]: Chris, t would recommend leaving It in.
.--7] Commented [CC3]: Lega! - Should we inctude the County here?
.--7] Commented [CC4]: Clarify County Jurisdiction
acceptance./maintenance.
(telephone, gas, electricity, fiber optic and irrigation facilities) and other public improvements
within the CITY Area of Impact... “Preliminary Improvement Plans” as used in this
AGREEMENT, are those Improvement Plans submitted and considered for the Development
access and Utility Connection prior to the approval of City Engineer, and not yet approved for
construction. “Final Improvement Plans” as used in this AGREEMENT, are those Improvement
Plans submitted, considered and approved by City Engineer related to Development access and
Utility Connection from the roadways in the area of the Development.
DEVELOPER will file, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, Improvement Plans
for the public improvements to be constructed within public rights-of-way exterior to the
Development, (hereafter referred to as the “Exterior Improvement Plans”) showing the width,
location and alignment of all streets, wastewater lines and water lines related to the Development
and the size and materials specifications for such water and wastewater lines. Prior to the
commencement of any construction or development within any phase or division of the
Development, DEVELOPER shall also file with, and obtain the approval of, City Engineer
Improvement Plans (hereafter the “Interior Improvement Plans”) for all streets, wastewater lines,
water lines, storm drainage facilities, street signs, traffic control devices, barricades and other
public improvements contemplated within such phase or division of the Development. The filed
Improvement Plans shall also show the proposed location of other public utilities (telephone, gas
and electricity), and irrigation facilities affected by the development of such phase or division of
the Development. Preliminary Improvement Plans are incorporated herein by reference as though
set out in full, and the Final Improvement Plans shall also, upon approval by City Engineer, be
deemed to be incorporated herein by reference.
3 Right-Of-Way Dedication and Construction of Public
Improvements. Unless otherwise agreed in the Special Conditions, DEVELOPER shall, at its
expense, dedicate the necessary right-of-way per the BMPO Access Management Plan and CITY
required easements, design and construct all public improvements shown in the Improvement
Plans within dedicated street right-of-way. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by City & County
Engineer, DEVELOPER shall construct all required public improvements within such
Improvement Plans in strict accordance with the approved Preliminary and Final Improvement
Plans and CITY Standard Engineering Drawings and Specifications (hereafter referred to as the
“Standard Specifications”) in effect at the time the construction is accomplished. The Standard
Specifications are incorporated herein by reference as though set out in full and compliance to the
Standard Specifications is a condition of this AGREEMENT.
4. Permits. DEVELOPER shall obtain all right-of-way, excavation and/or other
permits required by CITY, Bonneville County and local ordinance and comply with all
requirements therein with respect to the timely performance of the work governed by such permits.
Bit Inspection. DEVELOPER shall retain a professional engineer (hereafter referred
to as the “Project Engineer”) licensed within the State of Idaho to supervise, inspect and test the
AREA OF IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 3 OF 17
[weoveseds [KB5]: Should there be some reference to the
BI
MPO Access Management Plan?
J
{Commented [BC5R2]: We will check with Legal
)
construction of all public improvements within the Development required by this AGREEMENT
in order to ensure such improvements are constructed in accordance with this AGREEMENT, the
Improvement Plans and the Standard Specifications. DEVELOPER shall not materially deviate
from the Improvement Plans or Standard Specifications without the express written approval of
the City Engineer.
6. Corrected Improvement Plans. DEVELOPER will file “As Constructed’/ “As
Built” Improvement Plans (hereafter referred to as the “Corrected Improvement Plans”) with City
Engineer. Such Corrected Improvement Plans shall be prepared by the Project Engineer and shall
show the actual constructed location of all public improvements within the street right-of-way and
required by this AGREEMENT including the horizontal and vertical location of all water,
wastewater and storm drain lines, individual building service lines curb and gutter alignment and
street grades. Such Corrected Improvement Plans shall also specifically show all changes between
the Final Improvement Plans and the public improvements as actually constructed. The Project
Engineer shall also certify upon the Corrected Improvement Plans that such Corrected
Improvement Plans correctly show all public improvements as actually constructed and that such
public improvements have been constructed in accordance with the Standard Specifications in
effect at the time such construction was accomplished. The Project Engineer shall also deliver to
City Engineer all compaction reports, daily construction logs, reports, written tests, analysis and
other data as may be necessary to verify or support the certification of the Project Engineer.
7. Acceptance of Development. Upon satisfactory completion of such public
improvements and facilities, DEVELOPER's delivery of Corrected Improvement Plans, CITY
will review for acceptance of the utility improvements and associated appurtenances and the
Bonneville County will review for acceptance of the roadway improvements , as constructed.
Acceptance shall not be valid unless expressly acknowledged in writing by appropriate
jurisdiction. Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Special Conditions, upon acceptance
of the roadway construction, CITY shall assume ownership and control of all public utility
facilities within the street or public utility right-of-way. Bonneville County shall assume
maintenance responsibility of the roadway improvements constructed within the adjacent rights of
way until annexation of the roadways into the CITY. Acceptance of the Development
Improvements shall not be deemed as a waiver of DEVELOPER's agreement herein to fully and
completely perform the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT, or as a waiver or release of
the warranty set forth below in this AGREEMENT.
8. Warranty. DEVELOPER warrants that the materials and workmanship employed
in the construction of all public improvements related to the utility improvements and street right-
of-way pursuant to this AGREEMENT shall be good and sound, and shall conform to generally
accepted standards within the construction industry. Such warranty shall extend for a period of one
(1) year after acceptance, provided nothing herein shall limit the time within which CITY or
Bonneville County may bring an action against DEVELOPER on account of DEVELOPER's
failure to construct such improvements in accordance with this AGREEMENT, the Improvement
AREA OF IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 4 OF |7
Plans or the Standard Specifications. DEVELOPER, and DEVELOPER’s heirs, successors and
assigns, shall and do hereby warrant and agree, to defend the quiet and peaceful possession of
CITY and Bonneville County in all easements, rights-of-way, street dedications or other estates
conveyed pursuant to the terms of this AGREEMENT, from and against all claims against
DEVELOPER and DEVELOPER's successors or assigns and against every person whomsoever
who lawfully holds, or who later lawfully claims to have held, rights in the premises as of the date
of this AGREEMENT.
9. Water and Wastewater Main Connection Charges. DEVELOPER agrees to pay to CITY
at the time any separate sanitary wastewater service or culinary water service connection to CITY
sanitary wastewater system or culinary water system is requested, all connection fees, main
connection charges, and main charges as set forth in the City Code in effect at the time such request
for service is made.
10. Failure to Pay Fees. In the event DEVELOPER fails or refuses to pay any of the
fees, charges or costs set forth herein, CITY may disconnect utility service of any property owned
by DEVELOPER within the Development or declare the entire unpaid balance immediately due
and payable and collect such sums in the manner provided by law, or may pursue any other remedy
set forth herein or as may be available at law or in equity. All such remedies shall be cumulative
and CITY may pursue the same separately or simultaneously as it deems necessary or appropriate.
In the event of such acceleration, all sums due shall bear interest at the rate established by law for
judgments entered in the State of Idaho.
11. Participation by CITY. The parties agree that those portions of the water main, the
sanitary wastewater line, storm drains and street section work (hereafter collectively referred to as
the “Shared Work”), the cost of which CITY has expressly agreed to pay pursuant to the Special
Conditions, including any water or wastewater line or storm line extensions, increased line size or
capacity and road width or thickness, are required because of future service needs originating from
properties not owned by DEVELOPER and located within the vicinity of the Development, and
that sound planning requires construction thereof at the present time in order to accommodate
future expansion and development. In recognition of the cost savings which can be accomplished
by construction of such increased capacity and improvements concurrently with the facilities to be
constructed for DEVELOPER's purposes, and the impracticality of constructing such excess
capacity and improvements separately or at a later time, DEVELOPER agrees to design and
construct such facilities subject to CITY's agreement to reimburse DEVELOPER for a portion of
such costs, all as set forth in the Special Conditions. Prior to the commencement of the Shared
Work, DEVELOPER shall obtain and deliver to CITY three (3) independent bona fide bids for the
performance of such work from qualified and responsible contractors. Such bids shall be solicited
and itemized in a manner which allows clear and specific identification of that portion of the
construction work for which CITY is responsible. CITY shall have no obligation to pay for any
portion of the costs of the Shared Work unless prior to the commencement of the Shared Work,
the parties have expressly agreed in writing to a specific amount for which CITY will reimburse
AREA OF IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 5 OF 17
DEVELOPER. Payment of such costs by CITY shall be due within thirty (30) days from when
all of the following have been completed or received: (1) acceptance of the Development by CITY;
(2) delivery of a complete itemized statement to CITY, in a format acceptable to the CITY, setting
forth in detail the total amount of the costs for which CITY is responsible; and, if any part of the
Development is within the boundaries of an urban renewal district, (3) a sworn statement signed
by DEVELOPER, including its successors and assigns, and acknowledged by the Urban Renewal
Agency for the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, also known as Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency (the
“Agency”), that DEVELOPER paid for the costs of the Shared Work and that DEVELOPER and
its successors and assigns has not contracted with and will not contract with the Agency for
reimbursement of any portion of the costs of the Shared Work and has not received and will not
receive reimbursement from the Agency for any portion of the costs of the Shared Work. To the
extent DEVELOPER, or its successors and assigns, have contracted or contract in the future with
the Agency for reimbursement for any portion of the costs of the Shared Work, the CITY’s
obligation to reimburse DEVELOPER under this AGREEMENT shall be reduced on a dollar-for-
dollar basis. Under no circumstances will the CITY and Agency each reimburse DEVELOPER
or any third party for the same costs of the Shared Work. In the event DEVELOPER is reimbursed
by CITY for any portion of the costs of the Shared Work that was also reimbursed by the Agency
to DEVELOPER or another third-party, the CITY may, in addition to any other legal remedies
available under the law, immediately pursue DEVELOPER and require DEVELOPER to repay to
CITY any amount that CITY paid DEVELOPER for the costs of the Shared Work that were also
reimbursed by Agency and, if CITY prevails, CITY shall be entitled to an award of attorneys fees
and costs. DEVELOPER shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY and Agency from
claims of any nature that any third party may assert against CITY or Agency for any costs of the
Shared Work CITY pays DEVELOPER pursuant to this AGREEMENT and which same costs the
third party claims are due from CITY or Agency to the third party.
12. Special Conditions. In recognition of the unique circumstances relative to this
Development, the parties agree to the Special Conditions attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and by
this reference made a part hereof.
13. Irrigation Facilities. DEVELOPER sshall relocate or reconstruct, at
DEVELOPER’s expense, all ditches, headgate structures, culverts, siphons, drywells or other
similar appurtenant structures that will be impaired or otherwise disturbed by the construction of
street improvements adjacent to this Development. DEVELOPER shall also obtain the consent
of all persons or entities who have any water right or control over such structures. DEVELOPER
shall also indemnify and hold CITY and Bonneville County harmless from any action, claim,
demand or cost of any kind, including attorney's fees and court costs, arising from the relocation
or reconstruction of such facilities or DEVELOPER's failure to properly relocate or reconstruct
such facilities.
14. Relocation of Power Lines. DEVELOPER shall relocate, at its expense, all existing
electric utility poles or other utility lines or fixtures necessary to construct the public improvements
AREA OF IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 6 OF |7
related to this Development, as shown on the Improvement Drawings.
15. Construction Change. Any modification to the public improvements shown in the
Improvement Drawings or to the construction phase limits shall be approved by City Engineer for
Utility Improvements and Bonneville County Public Works Director for roadway improvements.
Prior to said approval, revised Improvement Drawings shall be resubmitted to City Engineering
Department and Bonneville County Public Works Department showing the proposed changes.
16. | Occupancy. No building or structure within the Development shall be used or
occupied for any purpose other than for the construction of such building or structure, unless all
public improvements within the plat have been completed and accepted by the City Engineer and
Bonneville County pursuant to this AGREEMENT. CITY may recommend to the Bonneville
County that it withhold Certificates of Occupancy until all such work has been completed.
17. Default. In the event DEVELOPER fails to comply with the terms and conditions
hereof in any material respect, CITY or Bonneville County shall, without further notice to
DEVELOPER, exercise any or all of the following remedies:
A. Bonneville County will withhold issuance of any building permit or
certificate of occupancy for any structure located within any phase or division of the
Development affected by such default;
B. Refuse to accept public ownership and maintenance of public
improvements affected by such default and record a notice of such action with
the Bonneville County Recorder's office;
C. Bonneville County will issue a stop work order for any building under
construction within any phase or division of the Development affected by such
default; |
D. Withhold reimbursement of CITY Participation of utility or roadway
reimbursements identified in the Special Conditions;
E. Bring an action for damages, injunctive relief, specific performance or any
other remedy available at law or in equity; and
F. Remove Utility Connections to the City system or recommend that the County
remove access to or from Development.
18. Notices. Any notice required by this AGREEMENT shall be mailed to the
receiving party at the address set forth above or such other address as may be delivered to the
sending party in writing. Such notice shall be mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested,
postage prepaid and addressed as set forth above and shall be deemed received upon its deposit in
the United States mail in such manner.
AREA OF IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 7 OF 17
mmented [CC6]: Get legal to provide language to have City ]
Col
input on stop work orders for City Utilities.
f Commented [KB7]: Same as above, recommend is not stron
| enough word. The County should be agreeing to do this.
|
19. Recording. Prior to the execution and approval of this AGREEMENT,
DEVELOPER shall be recorded with the Bonneville County Recorder's office.
20. Storm Water Discharge Certification. Prior to the acceptance and approval of Final
Improvement Plans for any division or phase of the Development, DEVELOPER shall obtain the
certification of any Irrigation District, canal company or other entity into which any storm water
from such phase or division will be discharged. The certification shall state that such water
delivery entity has reviewed and approved the Final Improvement Plans for such phase or division
and that the discharge of storm waters from such area into their canal or ditch in the manner shown
in the Final Improvement Plans is approved and accepted by such entity.
21. Conflict With Standard Specifications. In the event of any conflict between the
terms of this AGREEMENT or the Improvement Plans and the Standard Specifications, the terms
of this AGREEMENT or the Improvement Plans shall prevail over any contrary provision of such
Standard Specifications. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this AGREEMENT and
the Improvement Plans, the terms of this AGREEMENT shall prevail.
22. | Covenants Appurtenant to the Land. All covenants and conditions set forth herein
shall be appurtenant to and run with the Development and shall be binding upon DEVELOPER's
heirs, successors, or assigns.
23. Governing Law. This AGREEMENT shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Idaho. The venue for any action arising out of this Agreement shall be exclusively in the District
Court of the Seventh Judicial District of the State of Idaho, Bonneville County or in the United
States District Court for the District of Idaho.
24. Entire Agreement. This writing evidences the final and complete agreement
between the parties and no other prior statement, representation or understanding shall be binding
upon the parties unless expressly set forth herein.
25. Effective Date. This AGREEMENT shall become valid and binding only upon its
approval by Council of CITY and upon its execution by the Mayor kand execution by the County
Commisioners|
26. Compliance With Applicable Law and Regulation. DEVELOPER agrees to
comply with all applicable rules, regulations, Ordinances, Resolutions, statutes or administrative
laws having applicability to development to this Subdivision and or phase of this Subdivision
including, of those of CITY, Bonneville County, the State of Idaho, the United States of America,
or any agency or political subdivisions thereof having jurisdiction over the Subdivision and to
obtain any permits, licenses, permissions, authorizations, etc., that are required for such
development.
27. Anti-Boycott Against Israel Act. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2346, if
AREA OF IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 8 OF 17
_.--77 | Commented [CC8];: Include?
payments under this AGREEMENT exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and
DEVELOPER employs ten (10) or more persons, DEVELOPER certifies that it is not currently
engaged in, and will not for the duration of this AGREEMENT engage in, a boycott of goods or
services from Israel or territories under its control. The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in
Idaho Code section 67-2346 shall have the meaning defined therein.
28, Anti-Boycott of Certain Sectors. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2347A, if
payments under this AGREEMENT exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and
DEVELOPER employs ten (10) or more persons, DEVELOPER certifies that it is not currently
engaged in and will not for the duration of the Agreement engage in a boycott of any individual or
company because the individual or company engages in or supports either (1) the exploration,
production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacture of fossil fuel-based energy, timber,
minerals, hydroelectric power, nuclear energy, or agriculture; or (2) the manufacture, distribution,
sale, or use of firearms, as defined in Idaho Code section 18-3302(2)(d). The terms in this
Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code section 67-2347A shall have the meaning defined therein.
29, Certification of No Chinese Ownership. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2359,
DEVELOPER certifies that DEVELOPER is not currently owned or operated by the government
of the People’s Republic of China and will not, for the duration of this AGREEMENT, be owned
or operated by the government of the People’s Republic China.
30. SUBSTITUTE DEVELOPMENT FEES. DEVELOPER, its successors and
assigns, further agree to pay a Substitute Development Fee for each structure constructed in the ‘
Development, in an amount set forth in the special conditions and equal to the fees set forth in
Idaho Falls City Code Title 10 Chapter 8. In addition to the wastewater and water connection fees
payable to the CITY, each applicant for a water and wastewater connection shall also pay a fee to
the City of Idaho Falls equal to the development impact fees then being charged to like
development/buildings in the City of Idaho Falls. Failure to pay such substitute development
impact fee will constitute a breach of this agreement and no wastewater or water connection will
be permitted unless such substitute development impact fee is paid.
Include document review and permit/inspection fees to be paid here.
31. |Annexation into the City. DEVELOPER agrees that this Development shall be
annexed once the Development is contiguous with the City corporate limits. The DEVELOPER
agrees that DEVELOPER shall communicate this requirement on the property to any future
purchaser. |
32. OBEDIENCE TO CITY’S ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS. Asa specific
and material condition of this Agreement, DEVELOPER agrees to adhere to CITY’s Wastewater
Ordinance, presently in force or hereafter enacted, including those establishing standards for
quality of sewage entering the wastewater system and otherwise governing all aspects of the
AREA OF IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 9 OF 17
| Commented [KB9}: In my opinion referring to the impact fee
| ordinance complicates this. They won't be applying for building
permits with the City and the County won’t have a mechanism for
taking payment at the time of building permit. It would be more
straight forward if we structured it like the previous road and
bridge fees were within the agreement itself. The agreement would
lay out the impact fee costs and connection fees. This would be
\. | calculated individually each time so we could always make
. | adjustments as fees change.
>
{ Commented [BC9R2]: These fees will be defined in the special )
conditions
J
Commented [CC10]: Does Implied Consent language belong
L here (Legal)?
construction, maintenance, and operation of the connections to CITY’s wastewater system.
DEVELOPER further agrees to take the necessary steps properly to police and enforce those
provisions of CITY Wastewater Ordinance, which relates to the discharge of waters and waste
into the wastewater system. Failure to adhere to CITY’s Wastewater Ordinance shall be deemed
a material breach of this Agreement.
33. INSPECTIONS. Subject to the Wastewater Ordinance, DEVELOPER shall also
allow authorized personnel from CITY at all reasonable hours to enter and inspect
DEVELOPER’s facilities and property, and all records pertaining to the operation thereof, for
the purpose of conducting sampling, testing, measuring, or other monitoring procedures to
determine DEVELOPER’s compliance with all federal, state, and local laws, as well as
applicable ordinances, rules, and regulations. Whenever practical, CITY shall give
DEVELOPER reasonable advance notice of and an opportunity to attend such inspections,
unless the circumstances constitute an emergency.
34. NOTICE OF CHANGES IN PROPERTY USE. No change in the facilities and
property to be connected shall be made without first given written notice CITY that such
change is to be made and CITY approving the continued or adjusted wastewater connection.
35. DISCONNECTION. If this Agreement is terminated, for any reason, CITY shall
disconnect DEVELOPER from CITY’s water and/or wastewater system. In the event that
DEVELOPER requests reconnection to CITY’s wastewater and/or water system, DEVELOPER
shall pay all late fees, established by CITY’s ordinances and regulations, in addition to all costs
associated with disconnection and reconnection.
INWITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals this day and
year first above written.
ATTEST: CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO
By: By:
Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor
AREA OF IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 10 OF 17
Franklin Building Supply
By
Levi Smith (President)
BONNEVILLE COUNTY
By
Karl T. Casperson, Chairman
STATE OF IDAHO )
) ss.
County of Bonneville )
On this day of , 2026, before me, the undersigned, a
notary public for Idaho, personally appeared Lisa Burtenshaw, known to me to be the Mayor of
the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, the municipal corporation that executed the foregoing document,
and acknowledged to me that she is authorized to execute the same for and on behalf of said
City.
IN WITNESS WHEREOPF, | have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the
day and year first above written,
Notary Public of Idaho
(Seal) Residing at:
My Commission Expires:
AREA OF IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE I! OF 17
STATE OF IDAHO )
) ss:
County of Bonnevile )
On this day of , 2026, before me, the undersigned, a
notary public, in and for said State, personally appeared Levi Smith, known or identified to me
to be the authorized signator for Franklin Building Supply, and whose name is subscribed to
the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he is authorized to execute the same for
and on behalf of said company.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the
day and year in this certificate first above written.
Notary Public of Idaho
(Seal) Residing at:
My Commission Expires:
STATE OF IDAHO )
) ss.
County of Bonneville )
On this day of , 2026, before me, the undersigned, a
notary public for Idaho, personally appeared Karl T. Casperson, known to me to be the Chairman
of the Board of Bonneville County, Idaho Commissioners, the COUNTY that executed the
foregoing document, and acknowledged to me that he is authorized to execute the same for and
on behalf of said Bonneville County.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the
day and year first above written.
Notary Public of Idaho
(Seal) Residing at:
AREA OF IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 12 OF 17
My Commission Expires:
AREA OF IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 13 OF 17
EXHIBIT “A”
PROPERTY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Franklin Building Supply
Beginning at the Southwest Comer of Section 4, Township 2 North, Range 38 East of the Boise
Meridian, Bonneville County, Idaho; running thence N00°06'16"W along the Section line 1291.76
feet to the Southwesterly Right-of-Way line of an existing railroad; thence S62°54'57"E along said
Southwesterly Right-of-Way line 2863.56 feet to the South line of said Section 4; thence
N89°43'46"W along said South line 2547.21 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
AREA OF (IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 14 OF 17
EXHIBIT “B”
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
S.C. _[].00 Access and Street Right-of-Way Dedication. Access to [Street Name] shall be
in accordance with the Bonneville Metropolitan Planning Organization (“BMPO”) Access Management
Plan. DEVELOPER shall dedicate the right-of-way and utility easements necessary per the Access
Management Plan and required by the CITY
S.C. Substitute Impact Fees. DEVELOPER will pay CITY Substitute Impact Fees, as
calculated and set forth within Idaho Falls City Code Title 10 Chapter 8, as if the structure(s) within
the Development were constructed within CITY limits. DEVELOPER shall provide building plan for
review and calculation of the appropriate Substitute Impact Fees to be invoiced and paid to the CITY.
S.C. 00 Arterial (Developer _responsible/development_ required) Street Section
Improvements for [Street name]. DEVELOPER shall be responsible for the design and construction
of Arterial Roadway ({number] ft) improvements in [Street name] through the limits of the
Development in accordance with CITY approved Improvement Drawings. DEVELOPER shall be
responsible for the design and construction costs. DEVELOPER shall also provide for the landscape
strip between the curb and the sidewalk/pathway. Maintenance of the landscape strip shall be the
responsibility of DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER’s heirs, successors, or assigns.
S.C.__[ ].00_ [Street name] Turn Lane Improvements. DEVELOPER is completing a
Traffic Impact Study to further evaluate turn lane improvements required to the approaches to the
Development from [Street name]. Improvement Drawings will be updated to match the forthcoming
Traffic Impact Study requirements prior to completion of the construction and acceptance of
improvements. Improvement Drawings shall be resubmitted and reviewed and approved by CITY as
part of the as-built drawings submittal for this Project.
S.C.__[].00 Existing Infrastructure. When it is necessary to move or remove existing
infrastructure not belonging to CITY or COUNTY and not within right-of-way, DEVELOPER shall
coordinate such activities with the applicable owner, (e.g., poles owned by Pacificorp, dba Rocky
Mountain Power). Any existing electrical infrastructure owned by Pacificorp, dba Rocky Mountain
Power, that is annexed into the CITY will require a buy-out from DEVELOPER prior to receipt of
electrical service from CITY. Request for the buy-out, if any, is to be initiated by DEVELOPER after
annexation, )wner/developer will take the necessary steps to provide a Rocky Mountain Power/Idaho
Falls Power buyout and ensure City annexed property is being serviced by Idaho Falls Power.
S.C; [].00 Construction of Idaho Falls Power and Idaho Falls Fiber Infrastructure.
When Idaho Falls Power and Idaho Falls Fiber is needed as part of the development, DEVELOPER
shall, at DEVELOPER’s sole expense, install all power infrastructure as described and illustrated on
the Idaho Falls Power approved and signed contractor’s map provided and reviewed by Idaho Falls
Power. All power infrastructure installation shall conform with Idaho Falls Power’s service policy.
DEVELOPER will incur all costs associated with Idaho Falls Power/Idaho Falls Fiber crews
removing infrastructure in order to remedy settling. This includes, but is not limited to, all
AREA OF IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 15 OF 17
{ Commented [CC11]: Adjust fee title?
{ Commented [KB12]: will this include the pathway section
| from the Access Management Plan?
Commented [BC13]: Check with power for additional language
at Annexation
settlement of trenching, transformer bases, fiber boxes, and/or conduit separation.
S.C.__[].00_ Storm Drainage. Storm Drainage shall be designed and constructed to
accommodate drainage of the lots within the Development by DEVELOPER. The storm drainage
system shall meet CITY’s Storm Drainage Policy. The storm system shall be constructed as shown
on the CITY-approved Improvement Drawings. Maintenance of the storm system shall be the
responsibility of DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER’s heirs, successors, or assigns.
S.C. _[].00 [Construction of Water Lines. DEVELOPER shall, at DEVELOPER’s sole
expense, design and construct [written number] feet ([number)’] of [written number] inch ([number]”)
water main line starting approximately [number] feet east from the intersection of [street] and [street]
and continuing to and across the entire frontage of this Development, as shown on the improvement
plans approved by and on file with CITY Engineer. DEVELOPER shall design and construct, at
DEVELOPER’s sole expense, all water mains and appurtenances within the Development in
accordance with CITY Standard Drawings and Engineering Specifications and as shown on the
Improvement Drawings filed with and approved by CITY Engineer, and upon completion thereof,
DEVELOPER shall furnish CITY with a certificate signed by a licensed professional engineer,
certifying that the water mains and appurtenances have been constructed in accordance with such
Specifications.. CITY agrees to reimburse DEVELOPER that portion of the costs of materials for the
{written number] inch ([number]”) main line which exceeds the costs of materials for a [written
number] inch ((number]”) water main line, subject to the limitations and bid procurement
requirements of this AGREEMENT. |
S.C. __[].00 Construction of Sanitary Wastewater Lines. DEVELOPER shall, at
DEVELOPER’s sole expense, design and construct [written number] feet ([number)’] of [written
number] inch ([{number]”) sanitary wastewater main line starting approximately [number] feet east
from the intersection of [street] and [street] and continuing to and across the entire frontage of this
Development, as shown on the improvement plans approved by and on file with CITY Engineer.
DEVELOPER shall design and construct, at DEVELOPER’s sole expense, all wastewater mains and
appurtenances within the Development in accordance with CITY Standard Drawings and
Engineering Specifications and as shown on the Improvement Drawings filed with and approved by
CITY Engineer, and upon completion thereof, DEVELOPER shall furnish CITY with a certificate
signed by a licensed professional engineer, certifying that the wastewater mains and appurtenances
have been constructed in accordance with such Specifications. CITY agrees to reimburse
DEVELOPER that portion of the costs of materials for the [written number] inch ({number]”) main
line which exceeds the costs of materials for a [written number] inch ({number]”) wastewater main
line, subject to the limitations and bid procurement requirements of this AGREEMENT.
S.C.___[].00_ Reimbursement of Sanitary Wastewater Lines. Upon connection of sanitary
wastewater service to any property owned by any person other than DEVELOPER and fronting upon
that portion of sanitary wastewater which DEVELOPER has constructed outside of this Development,
CITY shall, to the extent permitted by law, and upon written request of DEVELOPER, pay to
DEVELOPER all wastewater main connection charges collected by CITY from the owners of such
property, pursuant to Section 8-1-23(C), City Code, as the same currently exists or may be amended
hereafter. Such right to reimbursement shall terminate with respect to any wastewater main charge
collected by CITY after the expiration of ten (10) years from the date of this AGREEMENT
AREA OF IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 16 OF 17
_.---7 | Commented [CC14]: Construct our waterline at our cost.
S.C. Wastewater Connection Fee. DEVELOPER will be responsible for Connection Fees
per Idaho Falls Section 8-1-23, City Code. DEVELOPER shall provide building plan for review and
calculation of the appropriate Connection fees to be invoiced and paid to the CITY.
Irrigation Water Special Condition.
S.C. [].00 Bonneville County Ordinance. (KB1.1]Bonneville County agrees to
exempt water and sewer utilities extended as part of this agreement from it franchise ordinance.
S.C. {].00. Annexation. Developer will provide property legal description and
exhibit map consistent with the City of Idaho Falls annexation application process.
AREA OF IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 17 OF 17
Commented [KB15]: Not sure of the correct wording and if this
would be possible. if the County won’t rescind it’s ordinance out
right then we should at least see if they'll agree to not have it apply
in these instances. Otherwise we're just creating the potential for
development in the county with no need to ever annex.
Text is extracted by machine from the official file linked on each page; the official file is the record. Sentinel Media, LLC.