Sentinel Media records · public agendas and minutes, text only, refreshed nightly from each body's own site · not a newspaper

City of Idaho Falls

City Council Meeting *Part 1 of 2*

minutes meeting date 2025-12-18 · fetched 2026-09-17 · 82525 characters · read by OCR, check numbers against the source · official file · plain text

City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
! DAHO
FALLS
Thursday, December 18,2025
7:32 PM
City Council Chambers
1.
CalltoOrder
Present:
Mayor Rebecca L. Noah Casper
Council President Lisa Burtenshaw {via Teams)
Councilor Jim Francis
Councilor John Radford
Councilor Jim Freeman {via Teams)
Councilor Kirk Larsen
Absent:
Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Also present:
Stephen Boorman, Acting General Mgr IF Power
Wade Sanner, CDS Director
Brad Cramer, Prospective Planning
Brian Cunnngham, Public Works
Emily Geisler, City Clerk
Chris Fredericksen, Public Works Director
Pam Alexander, Municipal Services Director
Meghan Conrad, Elam and Burke {via Teams)
Zack Jones, City Attorney
2.
Pledge of Allegiance
Rick Dale led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.
3.
Public Comment
No one appeared.
4.
Mayor’s Choice Awards
Purpose of the Awards
●
Established about sixyears ago
●
Selected by the Mayor’s staff with input from City Council members and department
directors.
●
Intended to recognize outstanding residents, businesses, organizations, or local efforts
that made unique contributions to Idaho Falls.
●
Typically presented at the first Council meeting of the year but awarded early this year to
accommodatea busy Januaryagendaand to align with the holiday season.
●
Recipient:Idaho Falls Spud Kings (juniorhockeyteam)
●
Founded in 2022 and quickly became a major source of community pride.
●
Won the 2025 Dineen Cup (NCDC championship), defeating the South Shore Kings 2-1.
1

City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
Goalie Charlie Durkin earned Championship Series MVP honors.
Idaho Falls became the first non-East Coast City selected to host the Cup championships,
happening in April 2026.
The team regularly sells out the Mountain America Center and has built strong community
engagement, including service activities by players.
A Citywide celebration followed the recent championship, and May 1®^ was declared Idaho
Falls Spud Kings Day.
Award accepted by Kevin Greene, team president and co-owner.
Mayor’s Choice Award forOutstanding.Community.Education
●
Recipient: Mayor’s Scholarship Fund
●
Founded in 2006 to support Idaho Falls students pursuing education beyond high school.
●
Focuses on “strivers” — students often overlooked by traditional scholarships due to GPA
orfinancial criteria.
●
Has awarded nearly $1 million in locally raised funds to approximately800 students in
Districts 91 and 93.
●
Includes Promise Scholarships for grades 8-11 and awards for graduating seniors.
●
Scholarships support colleges, universities, community colleges, and workforce training
programs.
●
Emphasizes encouragement, belief in students’ potential, and life-changing support, not
just financial aid.
●
Designed to help students see new possibilities for their future and feel supported by their
community.
●
Recognized for fostering a community-wide belief in students who may not fit traditional
scholarship molds.
●
Entirely funded by local donations and focused on helping students bridge financial gaps
while motivating them to pursue education.
●
Award accepted by Leslie Pincock, Executive Director, who emphasized continued
community support and fundraisingfor local students.
Mayor’s Choice Award for Outstanding CommunityContribution
●
Recipient: Idaho Environmental Coalition (lEC), contractorfor the Idaho Cleanup Project at
Idaho National Laboratory.
●
Honored for critical national-level environmental cleanup work conducted safely and
responsibly in Idaho.
«
Achievements include:
o
Treating one-third of INL’s legacy liquid radioactive waste,
o
Leading the DOE complex in shipments of transuranic waste (over 1,100 shipments
since 2022).
o
Completing major cleanup projects ahead of schedule, including subsurface
disposal areas and historic facility demolitions.
●
lEC employs and trains hundreds of Idahoans and contributes significant volunteer hours
and community investment.
●
Award accepted by Dana Kirkham, lEC principal and former Ammon Mayor.
2

City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
Mayor’s Choice Award for "Under the Radar”
●
Recipient: Steve Taggart, Idaho Falls attorney and communityleader.
●
Recognized for behind-the-scenesleadership and strategic contributions to major local
initiatives.
●
Key roles have included:
o
Messaging and strategy behind the creation of the College of Eastern Idaho,
o
Assistance in reorganizing local transit into Greater Idaho Falls Transit (GIFT),
o
Mentoring leaders, candidates, and community organizations.
●
Known for humility, volunteerism, and prioritizingteamwork over personal recognition.
●
Celebrated for long-term civic impact, community responsibility, and quiet service.
●
Award accepted by Steve Taggart himself.
Mayor’s Choice Award for OutstandingCommunity Enrichment
●
Recipient: Idaho Falls Farmers Market
●
The Idaho Falls Farmers Market is a key communitygathering place that strengthens local
connections, culture, and the economy.
●
The market has grown significantly in recent years, expanding to Memorial Drive and
hosting up to 173 vendors in 2025.
●
During the May-October season, it attracts 8,000-9,000 visitors on a typical Saturday, with
peak attendancereaching12,000.
●
Overthe past four years, the markethas generatedmore than $6 million in Local sales,
supportingfarmers,artisans,and small businesses.
●
To adapt to Idaho’swinters,the marketlaunched a monthly indoor winter market
(November-April)featuring about 75 vendors.
●
The winter market provides year-round income opportunitiesfor local producers and a
warm, welcoming space for families.
●
The Farmers Market plays a major role in community events, including the Water Tower
Tribute Block Party and the City tree lighting, helping transform them into vibrant
celebrations.
●
The market is recognized for its innovation, leadership, creativity, and service.
●
Award accepted by Clark Poston, Market Manager
Mayor’s Choice Award for Outstanding Humanitarian Service
●
Defined by consistently stepping in to help wherever there is need.
●
For more than 30 years, Dr. Fritz Schmutz has demonstrated this commitment to the Idaho
Falls community.
●
He is known for his quiet, hands-on compassion, always putting people first and never
seeking recognition.
●
Dr. Schmutz has played a key role in launching and supporting programs for individuals with
special needs and veterans, contributing in anyway necessary to help those programs
succeed.
●
His early efforts helped create lasting opportunities that continue to change lives today.
●
Long before the term “food insecurity” was common, he worked to address hunger in the
community.
●
He organized food drives, personally rented storage space when none existed, and
partnered with local organizations to ensure food reached families in need.
3

City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
His work influenced community traditions, including parade-based food donation efforts
supported by City leaders.
Professionally, he has served as a physician in Idaho Falls for over three decades, known
for exceptional care, attentiveness, and going the extra mile for patients.
Dr. Schmutz exemplifies humility, compassion, and service above self.
Award accepted by Dr. Schmutz himself.
Mayor’s Choice Award for Outstanding Global Citizenship:
●
Recognizes extraordinary dedication to international friendship and cultural understanding
in Idaho Falls.
●
Clarke Kido is honored for his long-standing service with the Idaho Falls Sister Cities
organization, strengthening ties with Tokai, Japan.
●
His work has built lasting cross-culturalconnectionsthat enrich the entire community.
●
Clarke conceived and helped design the Idaho Falls Friendship Garden, inspired by gardens
he saw in Japan.
●
He collaborated with community partners and the Idaho Falls Parks and Recreation
Department to bring the garden to life.
●
The Friendship Garden is a valued community space used for reflection, gatherings, and
milestone photos such as proms and weddings.
●
Clarke continues to devote significant time to maintaining the garden and preserving its
authenticityand cultural integrity.
●
He is a longtime member of the Japanese American Citizens League (JACL) and has served
as treasurer of the Idaho Falls Sister Cities Association.
●
He has helped preserve and celebrate Japanese culture locally and created opportunities
for meaningful cultural exchange.
●
Clarke organized and led visits to important historical sites, including the Minidoka
internment site, to foster understanding and remembrance.
●
Community leaders describe him as thoughtful, kind, humble, and focused on improving
life for others ratherthan seeking recognition.
●
Clarke Kido is recognized as a quiet leader whose vision and service exemplify global
citizenship and community impact.
●
As he prepares to move to Boise to be closer to family, the community expresses gratitude
for his lasting legacy and contributions.
Mayor’s Choice Award for Outstanding Philanthropic Commitment
●
Recipient: Heroes Defense Fund
●
Hosts annual 9/11 Tribute Banquet and public events that bring first responders and 9/11
heroes to Idaho Falls to share their stories.
●
Uses events as fundraisers to support first responders, veterans, and their families while
deepening community appreciation for their service.
●
Recognized for sustained, hands-on philanthropy despite operating as a for-profit business.
●
Emphasized strong partnerships with local first responders and the strength of the Idaho
Falls community.
●
Award accepted by Travis Snowder, board of directors co-chair
4

City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
Mayor_:s ChoiceAwardJQr_Qjjtstanding Community Partnership
●
Recipient: Shoshone-BannockTribes
●
Honored for generations of stewardship of the land and meaningful collaboration with
Idaho Falls.
●
Contributions include cultural preservation, education, and community engagement.
●
Longstanding partnership with the War Bonnet Round-Up Rodeo, including opening
ceremonies with tribal drummers and dancers and cultural messages.
●
Key partners with the Museum of Idaho’s Way Out West exhibit, providing expertise,
artifacts, ceremonies, and cultural guidance.
●
Collaborate annually with INLon Earth Day celebrations, including cultural blessings.
●
Recognized for enriching the communitythrough respectful, professional, and enduring
partnerships.
Mayor’s Choice Award for_^Out of_the_Ashes”
●
Recipient: Alan Reed, Reed’s Dairy
●
Family-owned Idaho Falls institution dating back to 1955, rooted in early home milk delivery
and farm-to-table practices.
●
Alan Reed pioneered Reed’s Dairy ice cream, now a regional staple.
●
Business has grown to serve Eastern and Western Idaho, operating multiple retail stores
and processing milk from their own dairy.
●
Known for innovation, communitytraditions, and family leadership across generations.
●
After a devastating fire in January 2024 destroyed the original production facility, the family
persevered with community support.
●
Opened a new 25,000-square-foot production facility in November 2025, symbolizing
resilience, renewal, and enduring community ties.
●
Award accepted by Alan Reed, who expressed gratitude and humility, emphasizing that
while tragedy brought sadness, it did not bring defeat.
●
Mr. Reed credited the successful rebuilding of a new dairy processing facility in just 22
months to:
o
Dedicated employees and leadership,
o
Strong community support,
o
Assistance and partnership from the City.
●
Mr. Reed thanked the Idaho Falls community for standing behind the business and making
recovery possible.
●
The Mayorclosed by Lightheartedly acknowledging the length of the ceremony, notingthat
many more people deserve recognition and emphasized that Idaho Falls is a great place
because of its people.
The meeting paused briefly to allow recipients to gather for a group photo before the meeting was
called back to order.
5.
Remarks - Mayor Casper {Presented during the Mayor’s Choice Awards)
6.
Consent Agenda
A.
Office of the Mayor
5

City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
1.
25-496 Appointment of Jim Freeman to the Golf Advisory Board, reappointment of
Bill Combo & Robert Nitschke to the Parks & Recreation Commission, and
Reappointment of Tanner Fonnesbeck, Robert Skinner and Brent Robertson to the
War Bonnet Advisory
B.
Municipal Services
1.
25-498 Bulk purchase of ammunition from Salt Lake Wholesale Sports for
$107,190.
2.
25-501 Purchase of a Compact Wheel Loader from Intermountain Bobcat of Idaho
Falls for $89,595.71.
3.
25-502 Software & Professional services from VLCM with Arctic Wolf for
$104,802.50.
4.
25-505 Treasurer's Reportfor October2025
C.
Airport
1.
25-504 Non-Exclusive Rental Car Concession Agreement with Overland West for
$219,596.58 in revenue plus a 10% privilege fee.
2.
25-506 Peer-to-PeerCar SharingAgreementwith Turo Inc for 10% of its gross
revenue.
D.
Office of the City Clerk
1.
25-465 City Council Meeting Minutes (04.26.2024)
2.
25-463 November 2025 permits and licenses
a.
21 New
b.
18 Renewed
c.
15 Contractors
3.
25-474 Results of the Regular and Runoff Elections held on November 4'^ and
December 2"'^ 2025
Motion 1: Approve, accept, or receive all items on the Consent Agenda according to the
recommendationspresented,
o
Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o
Second: Councilor Radford
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
7.
Regular Agenda
A.
Idaho Falls Power
1.
25-486
Resolution Establishing Standards for Greenbelt Maintenance
Presentation/Discussion (Acting General Manager Boorman): Idaho Falls Power uses
the Snake River, a public resource, for hydroelectric generation, which creates physical
impacts on the river. Under its Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license,
Idaho Falls Power is legally required to:
o
Provide recreational opportunities related to its hydro projects,
o
Mitigate environmental and public-use impacts on the river.
The proposed resolution clarifies responsibility for Greenbelt maintenance, specifically:
6

City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
Which maintenance obligations belong to the utility versus the City.
How funding and resources are allocated.
o
o
Proposed Approach:
●
Rather than Idaho Falls Power directly managing park-like spaces, resources will be
transferred so Parks & Recreation—the department with appropriate expertise—handles
Greenbelt maintenance.
●
This arrangement was described as a practical and efficient partnership that leverages
existing City expertise.
Council members acknowledged significant staff effort in developing the resolution.
The resolution clarifies long-standing confusion over definitions, including the difference
between the “Greenbelt” and the “pathway.”
The agreement aligns well with the ongoing relicensing of the City’s hydroelectric
generation project, expected to conclude around 2028.
Motion: Approve the Resolution authorizing Idaho Falls Power (IFP) to contributeten
percent of its annual gross hydro generation value to Idaho Falls Parks and Recreation
(P&R) forgreenbelt maintenance and improvements within the FERC project boundary and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all necessary documents.
Moved by: Councilor Francis
Second: Councilor Larsen
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen. Nay: Radford.
Motion carries.
o
o
o
o
Public Works
1.
25-499
B
Local Professional Services Agreement with Horrocks Engineers in support
of the Holmes Avenue, Sunnyside Road to TaylorviewImprovement Project
Presentation/Discussion(Director Fredericksen):
Project Overview:
●
The project involves the expansion and urbanization of Holmes Avenue, from south of
Sunnysideto TaylorviewMiddle School.
●
Improvements include widening the arterial roadway and adding sidewalks, curb and
gutter, and lighting where right-of-way allows.
●
Some limitations exist due to remaining county-owned properties, but the goal is to
completethe arterial corridorwithin those constraints.
Funding and Timeline:
●
Design contract cost: $443,874
●
City match: 7.34% ($32,580}
●
Design timeline: Approximately 12 months
●
Estimated construction cost: Just under $3.4 million
●
Construction funding is currently scheduled across 2030-2031, with hopes to
consolidate into a single year closer to construction.
Federal Funding Context:
7

City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
The project is part of the Federal Aid Program through the Bonneville Metropolitan
PlanningOrganization(BMPO).
Idaho is a net recipientstate, receivingmore federaltransportation funding than it
contributes in gas taxes—unlike states such as Texas or California.
Because of federal matching, the City effectively pays about $0.07 on the dollar, making
the project a strong value for taxpayers.
While federal funding adds complexity and longer timelines, it enables projects that
would otherwise be unaffordable locally.
Council Discussion:
Council members emphasized the importance of long-range planning to take
advantage of federal funds.
Staff explained that although the timeline is lengthy, the project was not feasible earlier
due to funding constraints and federal requirements.
The consensuswas that waiting for federal assistance provides substantial benefit and
makes major infrastructure investments possible.
Motion: Approve the ProfessionalServices Agreementwith Horrocks Engineers, Inc., and
authorize the Mayorto execute the document,
o
Moved by: Councilor Radford
o
Second: Councilor Francis
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
Resolution for Grant Application to Rehabilitate the Lincoln Road Bridge
2.
25-500
over the Idaho Canal
Presentation/Discussion (Director Fredericksen):
Key Details:
●
The resolution is required to formally acknowledge the City’s intent to seek federal
funds and committo the required local match.
●
Federal funding requested: $2.6 million
●
Local match: $190,840 (7.34%)
●
if approved,the earliestconstructionfundingwould be available in 2033, reflectinglong
federal project timelines.
Additional Context:
●
Federal aid projects take significant time to develop, often placing construction in the
outeryears of funding programs.
●
The City may use advance construction, paying upfront with local funds and later
seekingfederal reimbursement, if community priorities and funding allow.
●
Having design work completed early positions the City to take advantage of advance
construction opportunities.
Council Discussion:
●
A Council member asked about the impact of newly collected road impact fees,
specifically how much they are reducing the City’s infrastructure backlog.
●
Staff explained that the impact fee study:
8

City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
o
Based projections on arterial road mileage as of 2022.
o
Aims to maintain the same level of service as growth continues.
●
Public Works staff offered to provide more detailed information in a future discussion.
Motion: Approve the Resolution required as part of the grant application submission for
federal funds to rehabilitate the Lincoln Road bridge over the Idaho Canal and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign the document,
o
Moved by: Councilor Radford
o
Second: Councilor Francis
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
C.
Community Development Services
Final Plat and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards,
Idaho Traffic Safety, Division No. 1.
1.
25-503
Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner):
●
Councilors Larson and Radford noted the item was straightforward, had gone through
the Planning Commission, and raised no concerns.
●
The plat met all requirements and aligned with prior approvals.
●
Discussion clarified that the property name comes from the company name - Idaho
Traffic Safety, which supplies and stores traffic control equipment such as cones and
related materials.
●
The company is relocating from its current Sunnyside location after outgrowing the
existing facility.
Motion 1: Accept or Approve the Final Plat for Idaho Traffic Safety, Division No. 1 and give
authorization for the Mayor, City Engineer, and City Clerk to sign said Final Plat,
o
Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o
Second: Councilor Radford
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
Motion 2: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Final
Platfor Idaho TrafficSafety, Division No. 1 and give authorizationforthe Mayortoexecute
the necessarydocuments.
Moved by: CouncilorLarsen
Second: Councilor Radford
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
Motion carries.
o
o
o
o
9

City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
Legislative Hearing for Consideration of an Ordinance approving the Urban
Renewal Plan for the Riverwalk Urban Renewal District
2.
25-495
Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner, Mr. Cramer, Ms. Conrad - via Teams):
●
The public hearing was opened, with all materials and testimony ordered into the
official record.
●
The proposed ordinance establishes a 20-year urban renewal district, running through
December 31,2045.
●
Key milestones:
Eligibility Report Adopted by City Council: July 2025.
Agency approval: Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency, October 16,2025.
Planning Commission review: November 5, 2025, for Comprehensive Plan
compliance.
Public notice: All affected taxing districts notified; notices published in
November.
District Overview:
●
Covers approximately 10 acres west of the Snake River near Pancheri Drive, Broadway
Avenue, and adjacent to the existing River Commons area.
●
Portions previously included in the Snake River Urban Renewal District (1988-2018) but
remained undeveloped.
●
Includes portions of Bridgeport Drive and Utah Avenue rights-of-way.
Statutory CQmp,liancg^gd Jaxi DgJnip^cts:
●
Plan meets Idaho Code requirements, including revenue allocation, financing
provisions, and economic feasibility.
●
District is well under the 10% taxable value cap, with total combined urban renewal
districts at ~$108 million versus an $810 million limit.
●
Bonneville County Ambulance District excluded due to lack of consent; school district
levies not contributing at plan preparation.
●
Fiscal impact primarily involves temporary deferral of new tax revenue, not a reduction
in existing budgets.
Economic Feasibility Highlights:
●
Private investment: ~$40 million, including:
TownePlace Suites hotel (112 rooms, ~$27 million)
Multi-story office building
Mixed-use development near Culver’s
●
Eligible urban renewal costs: ~$4.1 million, mainly for rock blasting, infill, and limited
public infrastructure.
●
Multiplegrowthscenariosmodeled(conservativeto moderate),all showingsufficient
tax increment revenue to cover costs.
●
Developers receive 75% of tax increment revenues via Owner Participation Agreements
(OPAs); the agency retains 25% for administration and potential public projects (~$1.1-
$1.8 million).
●
Full repaymentunder a conservativemodel is projectedby 2046, after district closure in
2045.
Infrastructure and Timing:
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
10

City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
●
Key improvements, like the canal pathway, planned early with initial development (Site
One).
●
Sidewalk gaps on Utah Avenue scheduled for later Site Three development but could be
built earlier if funds allow.
●
Prompt project initiation (e.g., hotel in 2026) is crucial for financial feasibility.
Public_Comment and Legal Clarifications:
●
Public inquiry by John Cummingham on possible parcel interest. He believes he has put
money down on a portion of the property. He was directed to staff for follow-up outside
the hearing.
●
Minor slide corrections noted: “Bannock County” should not be shown
●
Land use and zoning maps support mixed-use commercial development.
Financing Clarification:
●
Upfront costs (infrastructure, basalt removal) are developer-paid and reimbursed via
tax increment revenue.
Tax increment financing (TIF) does not directly burden taxpayers; long-term
development increases the City’s tax base.
Example: property values projected to grow from under $1 million to ~$40 million,
enhancingfuture tax revenue.
Hearing concluded and closed; Council moved to deliberation and consideration of the
ordinanceto formallyapprovethe RiverwalkUrban RenewalDistrict.
o
o
Motion: Approve the Ordinance approving the Riverwalk Urban Renewal District under a
suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings and request that it
be read by title and publishedby summary,
o
Moved by: CouncilorLarsen
o
Second: Councilor Radford
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
Ordinance Title Read: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO
FALLS. IDAHO, APPROVING THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE RIVERWALK URBAN
RENEWAL PROJECT, WHICH PUN INCLUDES REVENUE ALLOCATION FINANCING
PROVISIONS: AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT A COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE
AND OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION TO COUNTY AND STATE OFFICIALS AND THE
AFFECTEDTAXING ENTITIES; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY.CODIFICATION,AND
PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY; PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
D.
Municipal Services
1.
25-473
Police Department Vehicle Lease and Upfit Program for FY 2025/26
Presentation/Discussion(DirectorAlexander):
●
14 police vehicles and associated equipment.
11

City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
●
Lease Authorization: Based on Resolution 2024-04, which allowed a lease-purchase
agreement up to $1.5 million for law enforcement equipment.
●
CurrentProposal:
o
Total lease amount: $904,135 over 5 years
o
Annual lease payments: $180,827
●
Procurement:
o
Vehicles purchased from United Fleet Services via RFP 24-01
o
Vehicle upfits sourced via a separate RFP with Day Wireless
●
Budget & Compliance:
o
Total authorized with this approval: $1,368,660, still under the $1.5 million cap
o
Lease and budget forecasts confirm the department remains within allocated
funds
●
Police Chief Johnson was present to answer operational questions; no further concerns
raised.
Motion: Accept and approve the Police Department vehicle lease and upfit program for
fiscal year 2025/26 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the necessary
documents,
o
Moved by: Councilor Larsen
o
Second: Councilor Francis
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen. Nay: Radford,
o
Motion carries.
Appeal Hearing-Impact Fee Assessment for Barnwood Estates Townhomes
and Terrace Gate Condominiums
2.
25-497
Presentation/Discussion (Director Alexander, Director Fredericksen, Mr. Cunningham
Attorney Jones), Appellant(s): Erin Bingham, Eric Reed:
●
The hearing was opened with all material & testimony ordered to be includedin the
record.
R e im b u rsement_Rga.u_e.st
●
Developers (the Appellant) sought credits for impact fees already paid, arguing the City
required them to widen Skyline Drive beyond what their projects needed.
●
Widening included land dedication (0.17 and 0.423 acres) and construction costs
totaling $328,212.50.
●
Developers claimed the City previously indicated, through staff discussions, that such
credits could be granted if costs were verified.
●
They requested a credit toward future fees, not a reimbursement for fees already paid,
to avoid “double-dipping.”
12

City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
Development Agreement & Legal Context
●
The Development Agreement allowed reimbursement for roadway improvements
subject to City approval and impact fee collection.
●
No formal written agreement existed prior to construction specifying the credit amount.
●
City code (§10-8-9) requires a written agreement and three independentbids submitted
priorto constructionto qualify for reimbursement.
●
Developers submitted bids after construction, making their request procedurally
untimely.
●
A single-unit exemption for a demolished home was granted ($5,273.50), but other
requested creditswere denied.
City Reviewand Determinations
●
Impact Fee Administrator (Director Alexander):
o
Denied system improvementcredits due to timeliness and lack of pre
construction agreement,
o
Offered informal resolution: submission of three bids for potential
consideration of road widening costs.
●
Public Works Engineer (Mr. Cunningham):
o
Confirmed three bids prior to construction are required to ensure legal and
competitive compliance,
o
Reimbursementpost-construction is difficult under state law.
●
Procedural Notes:
o
Reimbursement applies only to construction costs, not right-of-way dedication.
Skyline Drive’s arterial designation required lOOftwidth; this was consistent
with City code and annexation requirements,
o
Paying impact fees without protest typically bars appeals, but Council
determined it didn’t impact reimbursement eligibility here.
o
Developer/Appellant Position
●
Developers obtained four bids prior to construction (Pepco, Edstrom, Knife River, MD
Nursery& Landscape).
●
Construction began in spring/summer 2024; delays in planning and zoning caused
repeated resubmissions.
●
Developers argued they were effectively being charged twice: through impact fees and
roadway construction costs.
●
They sought recognition of actual costs incurred and a negotiated credit for roadway
construction (~$328,212) plus land dedication (~$370,000), totaling -$700,000.
●
Developers expressed willingness to work with staff under the informal resolution
offered.
●
Appellant provided five handouts to Council and City Clerk (attached)
13

City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
C_o.uncil DLs_cuss[o_n
●
Credit vs. Reimbursement: Council clarified reimbursement is separate from routine
impact fees.
●
Policy Limitations: Council focused on the appeal only; broader policy changes (e.g.,
right-of-way reimbursement) were off-limits.
●
Procedural Errors: Council noted developers’ failure to pay under protest or obtain pre
construction agreement but determined this did not prevent reimbursement eligibility
for construction costs.
●
Motions & Outcomes:
1.
Affirmed Impact Fee Administrator’s Novembers, 2025, letter denying system
improvement credits.
2.
Affirmed single-unit housing exemption for the demolished home.
3.
Directed staff to negotiate informal reimbursement for Skyline Drive
construction based on pre-constructionbids.
4.
Directed Legal staff to draft a reasoned statementexplaining Council
deliberation and rationale.
Council Direction on Reason Statement
●
Paying Under Protest: Council decided not to include this as a denial basis to prevent it
from becoming standard practice.
●
Drafting & Review: Legal staff to prepare a written reasoned statement reflecting
Council discussion, to be reviewed at a work session on January 5 and finalized January
8, before the end of the current Council term.
●
The process was deliberately slow and deliberate to ensure transparency and public
understanding of complex issues.
Motion 1: Uphold the terms of the letter from the Impact Fee Administratorissued on
November 6,2025, in terms of its offer of an informal resolution to resolve the official denial
of eligibility for reimbursement of impact fees for the construction of Skyline Drive,
o
Moved by: Councilor Francis
o
Second: Councilor Larsen
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
o
Motion carries.
Motion 2; Request that a Reasoned Statement be drafted by the Legal Department based
on tonight’s deliberation and be returned to City Council no later than January 8,2026.
o
Moved by: Councilor Francis
o
Second: Councilor Burtenshaw
o
Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none
14

City Council Meeting
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
Idaho Falls, ID
I DAHO
FALLS
o
Motion carries.
8.
Announcements
●
UTV Holiday Light Parade:
o
Tomorrow night,
o
The parade is already full—no additional vehicles can participate,
o
Donations are encouraged for the food bank during the holiday season; details on
whether donations should be cash only will be clarified via a social media post.
●
Fire Station Ribbon Cutting:
o
Monday at 10:00 a.m. at Fire Station #6, 2767 Spitfire Drive,
o
Open to the public, with tours available.
●
Police Department Swearing-In:
o
Monday at 4:00 p.m., swearing in of new police officers.
●
City Closures:
o
City offices closed December 25 for Christmas Day.
o
City offices closed January 1 for New Year’s Day.
●
Upcoming Meetings:
o
Work session: Monday, January 5, at 3:00 p.m.
o
Council meeting: January 8, to conclude old business, swear in newly elected
officials, and formally seat the new Council.
There being no'further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:44 PM
Rebecca L. Noah Casper, Mayor
15

CITY OF IDAHO FALLS

November 4, 9095

Bonneville County
Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025
November 04, 2025
Detailed Results by Contest
Idaho Falls Mayor
Vote For
1
9
5»>
s
«●
6
r
.●c
.<●
Tl
C
T
Si
O'
Sj
i?
's
f9
i?
c
#3
e>
.■5r
Si
Si
Si
‘S
o
4-
●*
o
o
.C'
●6
J?
■fP
Si
A.
a
'S
A?
Si
V/
C-
o
O
C5
a:
NON
NON
NON
267
01
XI
203
0
1
1.482
520
02
203
36
133
0
0
1193
374
03
104
7
88
0
0
7fi«
199
224
04
IS
23S
0
4
1.351
474
05
162
37
99
1
1
1.037
298
06
244
26
172
0
0
1.156
442
157
07
26
139
0
1
1.096
324
06
279
21
165
0
1
1.203
465
09
159
32
134
0
3
1.389
325
10
220
26
170
0
1
1.161
416
176
11
36
242
0
1
1.223
454
12
162
41
186
0
2
1.123
409
158
13
36
186
0
1
1.293
382
14
172
20
215
0
2
954
407
251
15
17
320
0
0
1.206
568
282
16
9
309
0
0
V180
600
17
256
30
212
0
1
1.316
498
16
196
79
167
0
1
1.340
442
19
172
20
292
0
0
1.045
484
20
130
21
135
0
0
1.153
266
21
275
28
260
0
0
1.870
563
Consolidated Election
- November 4, 2025
4
Last Updated: 11 /07/2025 14:37:51

Bonneville County
Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025
November 04. 2025
Detailed Results by Contest
Idaho Falls Mayor
Vote For
1
s
■'b
b
.cG
T
.<●
.<●
f3
.c
T
O
'3
S'
«●
»
«>
#!>
■9
Si
o
Ji'
e>
●s’
o
Sr
S
Js
.If
ft
■f?
»s
e>
,e>
O
'J
6
,o
A
S)
s
S'
O
NON
NON
NON
21
28
8
0
22
0
1,017
57
161
19
217
0
2
1.616
23
397
23
363
364
0
24
0
1,826
750
25
261
0
2
254
25
1,179
540
28
226
199
0
26
U
1,120
453
140
20
201
0
27
0
1,659
361
0
0
0
0
37
0
787
0
1
0
0
6
0
38
966
7
0
0
0
0
39
0
1,563
0
53
4
47
0
0
1,825
46
104
117
57
105
8
0
0
1,686
230
Contest Total
5,599
733
5.537
1
24
40.783
11.869
5
Consolidated Election
- November 4, 2025
Last Updated; 11 /07/2025 14:37:51

Bonneville County
Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025
November 04, 2025
Detailed Results by Contest
Idaho Falls City Council Seat 2
Vote For
1
a
O
<9
*■
o
-V
5>
a
}«
*
S'
e>
,C>-
.c
S'
<●
3i
Qj
s
K
'6
O
a
a
U
c-
i.
■4P
Q
o
o
6»
o
Jtf
fi-
«9
f9
<9
o
a
.e<
s
o
K
<Jr
,b^
«5
-●C
a
b
z-
S'
s.
a
o
K
o
'tf
‘9
0;
O
<●
c
a:
s.
●5
<1?
a:
A?
e>
A'
A?
o
NON
NON
NON
NON
NON
NON
NON
7
01
s
101
137
48
114
71
4
34
1.482
4B3
02
8
8
91
71
34
99
53
0
10
1.193
364
03
2
4
44
38
40
29
29
1
12
766
186
10
04
13
61
156
S6
76
64
1
21
1.351
456
05
9
19
51
.5?
36
65
54
2
12
1.037
286
06
8
17
106
108
43
68
57
0
35
1.156
407
07
9
12
S3
52
67
66
47
2
15
1.098
308
08
12
9
139
112
31
83
57
1
22
1.203
443
09
19
14
70
63
33
69
38
2
20
1.389
306
10
6
28
SI
103
36
77
61
1
24
1.161
392
11
6
12
89
107
86
79
39
2
33
1.223
420
12
18
13
102
111
45
66
41
1
16
1,123
394
13
5
9
55
104
58
67
62
0
23
1.293
360
14
4
11
77
146
45
57
37
0
32
954
377
IS
9
7
94
235
60
94
56
1
32
1.206
555
16
11
8
115
193
36
III
64
0
62
1.180
538
17
9
IS
111
116
58
92
68
2
28
1.316
469
16
6
15
70
149
36
78
S3
3
33
1.340
407
19
12
to
63
217
19
54
62
0
47
1.045
437
20
3
17
61
79
24
51
34
1
16
1.153
269
21
6
12
118
175
55
111
72
1
33
1,870
549
Consolidated Election
- November 4, 2025
6
Last Updated: 11 /07/2025 14:37:51

Bonneville County
Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025
November 04, 2025
Detailed Results by Contest
Idaho Fails City Council Seat 2
Vote For
1
A
is'
9/
fj
*
O
A
.c.
A
vg-
e>
<z>
.c<
.c
(9
s-
●■S'
9j
0/
S
<6
a
s-
O
A
9
S-
●V
o
Q
«9
o
o
fo
jC-
«●
,«9
ft
.ft
-ft
o
9
A
o
4"
ft
A
o
o
A
c-
e<
ft
A'
o
.c
S>
9
y>
o
As^
is'
.o
is'
<6
'S
s
e>
-S
-C
o
O
A.'
NON
NON
NON
NON
NON
NON
NON
2
1
7
t2
17
22
11
6
0
1
1,017
S6
17
ee
135
4G
S
62
32
23
1
32
1,616
366
3
11
171
293
40
124
24
48
3
57
1,826
690
6
10
84
262
46
60
25
46
0
26
1.179
516
6
13
71
188
29
69
26
41
1
95
1.120
417
5
12
51
25
27
126
63
53
0
24
1.659
337
0
0
0
0
0
37
0
0
0
0
787
0
0
3
0
2
0
0
38
2
0
0
966
7
0
0
0
39
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.563
0
0
2
21
20
2
46
25
28
0
6
1,825
98
57
3
30
107
3
39
4
19
0
25
1,666
205
Contest Totei
213
327
2.276
3.671
1,148
2.067
1.396
30
766
40.783
11,098
Consolidated Election
- November 4, 2025
7
Last Updated: n/07/2025 14:37:52

Bonneville County
Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025
November 04, 2025
Detailed Results by Contest
Idaho Palls City Council Seat 4
Vote Por1
*
*:
●S'
<p
O'
a
o
s>
<●
P)
C
o
>6
e>
Qi
Qj
V
o
b
<?r
o
e>
ft
ft
j.
e>
●s
ft
ft
A
o
O
-ik'
NON
NON
01
207
285
0
29
1,482
492
02
184
177
0
13
1.193
3fi1
03
93
97
0
9
766
190
04
164
287
0
27
1,351
451
05
121
162
0
17
1.037
283
06
186
229
0
27
1.156
415
07
138
175
0
12
1,098
313
08
230
217
0
19
1.203
447
09
149
163
0
16
1,389
312
10
182
215
0
20
1,161
397
151
11
282
1
21
1,223
433
168
12
229
0
14
1.123
397
124
13
237
0
22
1,293
361
14
127
265
0
17
954
392
IS
175
397
0
16
1,206
572
198
16
365
0
37
1,180
563
17
201
280
0
18
1.316
481
18
144
265
0
34
1,340
409
19
119
330
0
35
1.045
449
20
123
149
0
14
1.153
272
21
206
345
0
32
1,870
551
Consolidated Election
- November 4,2025
Last Updated: 11/07/2025 14:37:52

Bonneville County
Consolidated Election - November 4. 2025
November 04, 2025
Detailed Results by Contest
Idaho Falls City Council Seat 4
Vote For
1
j)
*
●V
e>
●c
#0
●9
<j
o
c-
ft
<9
<3
Cl
e>
&
o
S'
o
o
A'
,«3
i.
>s’
.V
/o
ij.
Cl
■5
S
A?
ro
e>
A?
o
NON
NON
33
0
3
22
21
1,017
54
229
0
129
41
1,616
23
358
420
0
54
24
276
1,826
696
188
329
0
25
25
1,179
517
151
262
0
20
26
1,120
433
223
27
108
0
30
1,659
331
0
0
0
37
0
787
0
6
1
0
0
36
966
7
0
39
0
0
0
1,563
0
48
51
0
5
1,825
46
99
74
132
0
24
57
1,686
206
6,848
651
Contest Total
4,394
1
40.783
11,242
9
Consolidated Election - November 4. 2025
Last Updated: 11/07/2025 14:37:52

Bonneville County
Consolidated Election - November 4. 2025
November 04, 2025
Detailed Results by Contest
Idaho Falls City Council Seat 6
Vote For 1
5.
fi-
e>
.c
fC
«/
<6
/f
o
45
49
A..-
Si
9)
Cl
9)
S>
0/
Si
9>
o
4
Si
o
o
A'
a
y>
,o ^
i.
/ft
b*
f.
'J
b‘
St
A
.C
A?
o
NON
NON
01
306
170
0
45
1.4B2
476
02
219
134
0
21
1.193
353
03
117
67
0
IS
766
1S4
04
319
128
1
30
1.351
447
05
177
104
0
19
1.037
261
06
262
121
0
39
1.156
403
or
191
117
0
17
1.098
308
08
278
159
0
29
1,203
437
09
188
115
1
24
1.389
303
10
258
134
0
25
1,161
392
11
300
124
0
31
1,223
424
12
265
127
0
19
1.123
392
13
259
77
0
47
1,293
336
14
253
114
1
41
954
367
IS
433
127
0
28
1,206
560
16
398
153
0
49
1,180
551
17
311
154
0
24
1.316
475
18
302
94
0
47
1.340
396
19
330
102
0
52
1.045
432
20
180
90
0
16
1.153
270
21
391
150
0
42
1,870
541
Consolidated Election
●November 4,2025
10
Last Updated: 11/07/2025 14:37:52

Bonneville County
Consolidated Election - November 4, 2025
November 04, 2025
Detailed Results by Contest
Idaho Falls City Council Seat 6
Vote For
1
f.
«i
b
■S'
o
.c
Si?
3)
<?
o
-●&
«9
■<-
<z>
,<3
ti
ft>
e>
e>
*>
<c
iZ>
o
o
^
A
e>
j.
V,
s
.V
e>
c-
A?
O
NON
NON
28
26
0
22
3
1,017
54
258
99
0
42
23
1.616
357
24
460
208
0
82
1.826
668
133
0
25
358
61
1,179
491
125
26
299
0
29
1,120
424
71
27
249
0
41
1.659
320
37
0
0
0
0
787
0
3
0
38
4
0
966
7
0
0
0
0
39
1.563
0
23
46
74
0
7
1,825
97
57
155
40
0
35
1.686
195
Contest Tolsl
7,642
3,299
3
950
40,783
10.941
Consolidated Election
●November 4,2025
11
Last Updated: 11 /07/2025 14:37:52

STATE OF IDAHO
COUNTY OF
BONNEVILLE
We, the commissioners of the county and state aforesaid, acting as a Board of Canvassers of Election, do hereby
state that the attached is a true and complete abstract of all votes cast within this county at the Consolidated
Election held November4, 2025, as shown by the records now on file in the County Clerk's office.
s'-
lP
■-
\ 6
Q:
<.
■■
-fc '...'“OL/NTV
/■
^ O
■
;
rn
cC
.
●
I
V/
.Y
T
\Y
County Board of Canvassers
Attest:
  
Clerk
c.'"
S
s
N
m
'iLi
ICO^N-PPW^
.
%GWHEVILLE /'k ^
/oaho
^
s''
I, Christopher Poulter, County Clerk of said county and state, do hereby certify that the attached is a full, true and
complete copy of the abstract of votes for the candidate/issue therein named as appeared on the election ballot
held November4, 2025, as shown by the record of the Board of Canvassers filed in my office this 12th day of
November, 2025.
s'
County Clerk

CITY OF IDAHO FALLS
RUNOFF ELECTION

December 2, 2025

CITY OF IDAHO FALLS RUNOFF ELECTION
DECEMBER 2, 2025
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS
VOTING STATISTICS
MAYOR
COUNCIL SEAT 2
!C
in
a> 2
■o
<u
o>
0>
O)
a:
76
0)
-.c:
O
_
o
o >
OJ
"S
E 5
§
,52
2
P
2
cc
O
o>
9
2
o
,2
●o
cn
n:
■o
c
x:
0)
</:
<u
O
OT
S; O
in
TO
E
0)
<
° £
0)
"o
E >
E
T3
2— 2
c
a>
o
(U
o>
S'
(ft
Precinct
Q
o
■c
(ft
X3
®
05
^
(U
^
ct
I «
-5 Q
0>
■o
E
o
5
OT
CO
c
CO
0>
(ft
O)
52
CO
05
CD
CO
05
CO
05
(ft
05
^
O
O >
CD
(ft
05
O
oi
O)
I—
<u
LU
a:
292
233
220
273
01
1,387
10
1,397
526
37.7%
30.5%
24.1%
37.1%
27.2%
39.2%
28.3%
41.3%
22.3%
35.1%
37.0%
34.2%
27.4%
42.1%
47.1%
51.9%
37.4%
31.3%
47.6%
24.6%
42.7%
25.1%
37.1%
48.2%
50.7%
44.7%
31.6%
215
149
192
166
02
1,188
5
1,193
364
96
85
70
100
03
749
2
751
181
223
266
190
275
04
1,314
5
1,319
489
158
126
123
150
05
1.039
7
1.046
284
218
223
200
06
222
1,121
7
1,128
442
157
160
136
07
165
1,104
16
1,120
317
283
204
243
08
232
1,173
7
1,180
487
165
144
142
09
159
1,373
15
1,388
310
200
208
179
202
10
1,158
4
1,162
408
173
281
148
276
11
1,214
13
1,227
454
180
199
150
12
221
1.112
1
1,113
381
153
199
132
212
13
1,282
1
1,283
352
156
253
144
250
14
959
13
972
409
225
347
181
378
15
1,208
6
1,214
572
274
340
228
351
16
1,173
9
1,182
614
244
249
205
270
17
1,312
6
1,318
493
209
213
152
262
18
1,344
5
1,349
422
174
326
19
145
327
1,039
12
1,051
500
135
20
147
110
165
1,146
5
1,151
283
311
332
250
360
21
1,499
1,507
643
24
27
25
24
22
198
5
203
51
181
252
23
155
255
1,157
10
1,167
433
403
24
425
345
451
1,712
1,720
829
25
270
317
198
378
1,150
9
1,159
588
217
254
165
26
288
1,044
9
1,053
471
138
244
124
240
27
1,192
16
1,208
382
0
0
0
0
37
0
0
0
0
0.0%
12
38
1
6
5
16
0
16
13
81.3%
0
39
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0%
51
56
46
41
61
294
295
1
108
36.6%
53.2%
57
126
562
175
96
181
4
566
301
CO. TOTAL
5,663
6,435
4,695
6,899
32,219
219
32,438
12,107
37.3%
Total number of absentee ballots cast
Total number of early voting ballots cast
1,086
3,063

STATE OF IDAHO
COUNTY OF
BONNEVILLE
We, the commissioners of the county and state aforesaid, acting as a Board of Canvassers of Election, do hereby
state that the attached is a true and complete abstract of all votes cast within this county at the City of Idaho
Falls Runoff Election held December 2, 2025, as shown by the records now on file in the County Clerk's office.
N
cr
●
●
r <
;
' O
'
●
rn
■a?
cJJ
z
Co
6l
^
.. CounT>
●●
%
/OahO
■o
County Board of Canvassers
vW'
’'n/'NJilil"'
Attest:
Clerk
STATE OF IDAHO
COUNTY OF
BONNEVILLE
I, Christopher Poulter, County Clerk of said county and state, do hereby certify that the attached is a full, true and
complete copy of the abstract of votes for the candidate/issue therein named as appeared on the ballot for the
election held December 2, 2025, as shown by the record of the Board of Canvassers filed in my office this 8th
day of December, 2025.
- ^ND F}^
'o
O
V O
✓>
N
Q
O
§/ BONNEVILLE
\
COUNTY
iT»
33
County Clerk
's*
/OahO

IDAHO FALES

City Council
December 18, 2025

IDAHO FALES

Final Plat
PLT25-019
Idaho Traffic Safety Division No. 1

PLT25-019 Idaho Traffic Safety Div. 1

A Aerial PLT25-019 Idaho Traffic Safety Div. 1

PLT25-019 Idaho Traffic Safety Div.

a a wa fom 1 7] 1am
R2 Goo rmeh} C__)] 22 BR ce CC paeeg

< ities i ied

| frseany pom emen

~~ -Hemmert’Ave — f

0

_ Pop Kroll\Way

Et
NR 1 cpa ec

ye Wy

| Se)

Tilt tees
TTLitlibe
PLULELERE
PLiTEVER

IDAHO TRAFFICSAFETYDIVISIONNO.l
A
NOHrN(A&TCO0l(*
UOMt;
TWnM>2 PlOMTh lUMi UU5TSM
C^NQ 13«*a9»
t
A SUBDIVISION IN THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY IDAHO
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER AND THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7,
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN
SHEFTIOF?
I
b
I
mirn ●
ubfuncs
KMOvai
HpbMd
(ASTiy«CQIIHt«
UCHOM7
TOW««Hr2HCIIIN
CTfNo
●U&SCA^
.y*'0\
UUt
lAM
●»r«rt
in
M04«
iM|
kWi/
-o-
Hi IT
410 20
lUJii
I
urs&oci
1
CrHTTII VACOtMl
rOMNV***
2 WMm «AM4I UIAST4M
i
I
POuNO U2I
HvVISt CCftN|AOT*«
’1.'4
1/4
* l/UTHUCTKM
7]
S*
MHTIH'
u
,«i.s
v«»c4nin
i
ii'
2
loritiodi
f
R
I
a
Si
Ml
irw»
JB
inMisor'
ia*iKocxi
t
'i
HkOUl
‘?ll
5 * 2 s
3i 2
i!
«v
/
i&.oo*
<
a
iii
a
2
i
'i
t
s
b
las
a
SrS|g
Z
M
r
6
uToT
€=::
UTl C* E2M0
R
vuno UWII MIMWI
>>«mMhTllO
151M1
ttv®
T
voSTT
.rrt«
iMPiAnro
bUflAITID
BOUNDARY DESCRtPTlON
iiaUhiUQ AT A POiNT THAT 1$ $ M‘J7 2$'W AJ?N<» ThL U&T.WbSl OMEASiCTON UfiL 2M.90
F6kl ^KUM iHbEA^T l/4CUMSLMOSbCIION
7, >{7WNSHIA
KANCSfc
^AS7 (}^
MHOIAK,
:WU1>
POtNf
etMCj
iHfc NOKtHWl&(
CCMNER
Of
LUf
1. tiUXK
PIOKIH nCLMES
OIVlWCM NUMBfR
1
AN AtJUrllON
TO
r»l(
ntT Of
l0A2<0 ^A4lS. BONNEVUU
COUNTY. IDAHO. R JNNING 7HCNCE ACONO ThC BOUNOAAV l\Ut OF SAIO HORTh HOUSES BUSNCSE
KOUTC, DIVISION NUMBER
*. TNf FO.LOW1N6 FOUR
|4| COURSES. U) THENCE $.00'a2*C5*W. 3QS.4T
^Ecr.
(2)
iHfcNCb
lib.1/ 7UI:
iMLNCb S
SS^.
^tET 10 A PONT Qt
CURVE WiTN
A RADIUS Of
20.00 FET AND A CHORD N 45*29 26*E. 2B.3S FEH. |4| tHENCE TO THE
LE^TAlONQ SAID CURVE 31.S0 FEET THROUOH A CENTRAL ANOlE OF 90*IS Or TO A PONT ON THE
WEST
Ri(dHr^-WAY
UNE
OF
NONIH
HOMES
AVENUe
SAID
PONT
SEIMS
A PONT
ON
A
NON-TANGENT CURVE Wmi A RADIUS OF
114141,^6 FEH ANO A CMOAO BEARING S acr»'S6*^
40.01
FEET- THENCE
TO
ThI
AlGHT AlONO MuQ NON-TANGENT CURVE
4001
FEET ThAOIAjH
A
CENTRAL ANCia OF 02*29^* 1HEMLE N49*34 Ol'W
209 07 FEET; THENCE N49*37*44'W
1C74 74
FEET TO Tkl WEST UNE Of NORTHWEST
1/4 0^ THE SOCTHEAST J/4 OF SAiD SECTION 7, THENCE
NOraSaS'E
ALONG
SAID WEST
UNE
264.47 FEET, THENCE
5,49*3 7 SrE.
4IQ.00
FEET, THCNCE
N 00*2505*1. 207 S FfFT To SAID FAST WEST CENTER
SECT ON UNE
OF SAID SECTION
7,
TV4ENCE
NM*37 29*E
AlONu
kAST WtSI
UNIER SACTTOK
UNE
b44 U
Fi£T
10
THE
f^Nl
OF
SE^ S NINO, C ON TAIN
>
N 0 >.9S7 ^C5.
If
J
KMIM) 1/r IRON KIWANII
RIPLACtbWIlHVS' IRON
ROD WITH PlASnCCAP
MAKKMJP.I.&.RttR
cui-l ,AU
JtUM_
CttA
MC
■APVt
IURW6
pftTAiia
I
«0*ui
Mrann
‘ntfw*y
4j*r
4441'
[ iiisiriy
2AM*
>401
I
FOUUOimtlUM
wirTHe^orcowift
SCCTICN7
IOWHSfW
2 IClATM AMI
CH
LEGEND
p.o.a.
POINT OFftlGINNiNG
SECTION LINE
AQIACENI LOT LME
PIAT AOLINDAIIV
ERTSIINOUniirY EASEMENT AS NOTED
lOUNO 1/2' X24* IRON ROD WfTH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP
MARiaDP.tS. 9469 OR AS NOTED
lOilNO S/B* X 24* IRON ROD WnTN YELLOW PLASTIC CAP
MARKED P.i.S. 9469 OR AS NOTCO
VET S/8* X 30* MON ROD WITH YEl lOW PlASTIC CAP
PIS
9469 OR AS MARKED
Pl.S.S. CORNER AS NOTED
SuRjECfTO
EKP>'IN<>(ASFMfNTVCH-RICORO
E
AGLE ROCK
/ NGINEERING
NARRATIVE
EAOU ROCK
Iftij.HLEX NU
WAS LOMM HOHIO
B* lUAHO
SAfCTV INC.
TO SURVCT LAKC
FUNSUAMT TO DFED INSTRUMENT NUMBER *.747969
A RECORD Of SURVfV WAS COMmETTO ANC
A tCOADf U
H M AT UP <024 tN BONNE Vi(. i COUN T T RECORDS PU»UAN 110 INSmUMEN T NUMBER
:747354. MONUMENTS WERE FOUND AS SHOWN ON 'HE FAST R£COAS€D SURVrr AS kAlF tNC»
WON HODS WUHPJ^SMC CAPS L>
MONUMtNIi Vtl WU 46 E.W UUHliS<*«CH MUM RUO>
W TH PLASnC CAPS SIAMFCO LS
9369 SCC'lON CORNUl uSED FOR CONTROL Of
SoRVET ARE
iHf
FAST
1/4
(ORNfR PURSUANT
TO
H5'Rl>MFN1
Nl>veE*(
1S9BUS7. SOUTHEAST
CCftNEk
PURSUANT
TO
INSTRUMENT NUMBER
1594DSB
AND
THE CINT^R
1/4
COANST
PtRSUAN*^
TO
INSTRUMENT NUMUR 1447319
ALl B&UBPA3 SK7WN
h£R£0N RelATE QIRK^;T TO THE Ci*V OF
IDAHO
COORDINATE S«STEM OF
2004. WMCn
Q DEAivEO FROM The IDAHO STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM {EAST 2CWC
llOlJ J S
SUNVtT HH AND LAIN3 A COM8NES SCALE FFCTOA
Of 1.000277244 FOR A i»RlD TO GROUND CCWVERS>ON. {REHRCNCE FRAME NAD U I2D01J. EPOO
2010 QOOQ
THF SYSTEM OZENTAT^ON
rS
BASED
ON
OAiD NORTH ALONG
THE
CAST aNTRA
MER DIAN. hi) LONVERuENCE AM E HAS BEEN AFPllEU.
I
n
GMIP PLWMNGD
5.\Fh'niNC
o
VlUkUi^.-
A4 Ui**A
>»I K4J6M
MAM
SURvrYEDST:
Off ICES A1
0
4
1>KAWWB»:
M/IR
1331 Rrmont Ave.
Idaho F«lb. kUhoS3402
ytUAKl pm
MKiS
HAND
APPRO/rneY:
«0'
MT
A(
PMUEO NO.
24075
343 E4lhN, Sun* 119
Rcaburg. Kliho 63440
SYAI-t: r-8ff
DATE:
■202S
CAD NAME.
I.DW6

PLT25-019 Idaho Traffic Safety Div 1
Site Photo
Site Photo
Looking west from N Holmes Ave
■j
Ws,:.?,
m
<●
5

Site Photo
PLT25-019 Idaho Traffic Safety Div 1
Site Photo
Looking west from N Holmes Ave (interior)
V
■
-fs*
6

Urban Renewal Plan for the
Riverwalk Urban Renewal Project
daho Falls City Counci
December 18, 2025

7^
ff*
.
Apt 13U
.106
‘AfX IM
This Project Area includes
an estimated 10 acres
(including public rights-of-
way).
/
t
Project Area

Plan Approval Process
●
June 18, 2025-Agency Board adopted Resolution No. 2025-07 accepting the Riverwalk Eligibility Report,
prepared by Brad Cramer, Perspective Planning & Consulting LLC, and, thereafter, submitted the Report to the
City Council for its consideration
●
July 10, 2025- City Council adopts Resolution No. 2025-11, adopting the River\walk Eligibility Report and directs
Agency to commence preparation of a plan
●
October 16, 2025-Agency Board adopts Resolution No. 2025-15 approving the Urban Renewal Plan for the
Riverwalk Urban Renewal Project and directing transmittal of the Riverwalk Plan to the Mayor and City Clerk to
take the necessary action to process the Riverwalk Plan
♦
November 5, 2025-
City Planning Commission meeting to find the Riverwalk Plan conforms to the City's
Comprehensive Plan
●
November 14, 2025- Notice of public hearing published in the newspaper of record and the Riverwalk Plan
received by the affected taxing districts.
●
November 28, 2025- Second notice of public hearing published in the newspaper
●
December 18, 2025- City Council public hearing, consider public comment, and City Council Ordinance
approving the Riverwalk

P an E ements
M'
Idaho Code § 50-2905 identifies what information the Plan must include with specificity as follows;
(1)
A statement describing the total assessed valuation of the base assessment roll of the revenue allocation area and the total assessed
valuation of all taxable property within the municipality;
●
Section 502.3
A statement listing the kind, number, and location of all proposed public works or improvements within the revenue allocation area;
●
Section 301 and Attachment 5
An economic feasibility study;
●
Attachment 5
A detailed list of estimated project costs;
●
Attachment 5
A fiscal impact statement showing the impact of the revenue allocation area, both until and after the bonds are repaid, upon all taxing
districts levying taxes upon property on the revenue allocation area;
●
Section 502.8 and Attachment 5
A description of the methods of financing all estimated project costs and the time when related costs or monetary obligations are to be
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
incurred;
●
Sections 303, 304, 309, 501, 502, 503, 504 and Attachment 5
A termination date for the plan and the revenue allocation area as provided for in section 50-2903(20), Idaho Code. In determining the
termination date, the plan shall recognize that the agency shall receive allocation of revenues in the calendar year following the last year of the
revenue allocation provision described in the urban renewal plan; and
●
Section 800
A description of the disposition or retention of any assets of the agency upon the termination date. Provided, however, nothing herein shall
prevent the agency from retaining assets or revenues generated from such assets as long as the agency shall have resources other than revenue
allocation funds to operate and manage such assets.
●
Section 800
(7)
(8)

Additional Plan Requirements
The adjusted base assessed value of the existing
revenue allocation areas, plus the new Project Area is
estimated as follows (2025):
Total Taxable Value of the City: $8,103,605,399
$
810,360,540
10% Value Limitation:
$107,473,839
993,015
$108,466,854
Existing Plans:*
New Area:
Total:
$
The existing base value, plus the current value of the
proposed Area is well within the 10% value limitation.
*lncludes estimated values for Snake River West
District, Yellowstone Square District, and proposed
Riverside District

River Commons Distiict^
Eaele Ridse District
Jackson Hole Junction District
Paiiclieri East Bank District
Anderson Bush District
Stanley Boge District
Snake Ri\'er West District (Estunated)
Yellowstone Square District (Estimated)
Ri\'erside District Proposed (Estunated)^
Ri\"erwalk District Proposed (Estimated)
$
154,412
$
7,549,640
■
$
864,666
$
5,965,637
,
$
6,536,2691
$ 4230S;702
i
$
"547III5
'
$
9,533^697'
$ 34,013,401
:
$
’ 9931015
:
Total of Existing and Proposed Districts
,S54.00
i
® Adjusted to show removal of values from deannexed parcels.
® Includes current value of deannexed parcels.

Taxing Districts
●Bonneville County
●Bonneville County Ambulance
●Bannock County Road & Bridge
●City of Idaho Falls
●College of Eastern Idaho
●Flood Control No. 1
●Idaho Falls School District # 91

RIVERWALK

Po
(a)
=)
—
”
=
Sa
=
faa)
7,
<
Li
im
2
>
O
Zz
O
U
Lu

STUDY APPROACH
●Reviewed potential private development
projects, timelines, and valuations
●Reviewed known and potential public
infrastructure projects, timelines and costs
●Considered two revenue scenarios based
on trends in city valuations and levies
●Considered one potential Owner
Participation Agreement

STUDY AREA
BOUNDARIES
.
..
-'●'■●V
●Vv
.
.
*
,V
, f-
*J
)
\Y.'A
●,U
«
»
.●
V
:k;>
1
1

ANTICIPATED PRIVATE INVESTMENT
AND PUBLIC PROJECT COSTS
Estimated 2025 Value
Project Name
$27,000,000
Site
I Hote
$3,000,000
Site 2 Office
$ 10,000,000
Site 3 Mixed Use
$40,000,000
Total

ANTICIPATED ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS
Project
Estimated Cost
Site
I Blasting and Fill
Site 2 Blasting and Fill
Site 3 Blasting and Fill
Sidewalk on Utah
Power Pole Relocation
Canal Pathway
Total
$808,889
$622,222
$2,485,124
$ 10,000
$75,000
$ 150,000
$4,151,235

LEVY AND VALUATION TRENDS
Levy
Rate
City Valuation
$9,000,000,000
$8,000,000,000
$7,000,000,000
$6,000,000,000
$5,000,000,000
$4,000,000,000
$3,000,000,000
$2,000,000,000
$1,000,000,000
0.016
0.014
0.012
0.01
0.008
0.006
0.004
$-
0.002
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
0
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
City Valuation

CONSERVATIVE REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS
Conservative Revenue.Total valuation increases 2% per year
Applicable tax levy decreases
I % per year
Moderate Revenue:Total valuation increases 5% per year
Applicable tax levy decreases 2% per year
Base value remains unchanged
Revenues collected year after valuation year
●Project area will be approved by the end of 2025

Total Project Area Annual Revenue Comparisons
$600,000
$500,000
$400,000
$300,000
$200,000
$100,000
$-
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
ro
ro
to
ro
cn
O
'O
00
nO
O
s>
to
to
to
lO
to
o
o
o
o
o
o
^
4^
4^
4x
4^
4^
to
OJ
4^
Cn
OJ
CO
CO
CO
to
co
4:>.
cn
o^
'O
OO
sO
O
CO
CO
Conservative Revenue
Moderate Revenue

Total Project Area Cumulative Revenue
Comparisons
$7,000,000
$6,000,000
$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
Conservative Revenue
Moderate Revenue

TOTAL PROJECT AREA CASH FLOW ASSUMPTIONS
●Accounts for respective revenue assumptions
●Estimated revenues reflects actual year revenues received, based on
prior year’s valuations
●Accounts for one Owner Participation Agreement
75% ofTIF revenues go towards ORA payments
●IFRA will collect 10% ofTIF revenues for district administration
●All funds will be expended on projects by the end of the district

TOTAL PROJECT AREA
CASH FLOW WITH

CONSERVATIVE REVENUE

TOTAL PROJECT
AREA CASH FLOW

WITH MODERATE
REVENUE

FINDINGS
The Riverwalk project is economically feasible with a 75% ORA
With a conservative revenue model, there may need to be a small
payment in the final year of revenue receipts

QUESTIONS?

aD

PERSPECTIVE

PLANNING &€ CONSULTING

FLUM and ZONING
a
Houston
S
p4«
WPt
’I
.
Albany
h'
*:
Ssison St*
‘
t
/A/
●
●P
r
▼
■
●-<
●
.c*
■.'
'‘i.-

Post-July 1,
2016, Plan anc
●
Limitations on Amendments to the
Plan-I.C. 50-2903A
●
Base reset
●Exceptions
RAA

●December 18, 2025 - City Couna
public hearing, consider public
comment, and City Council
ordinance readings
●
Thereafter: publication of the
ordinance summary; recordation of
ordinance and separately recorded
map/legal; transmittal of documents
to County officials, STC and affected
taxing districts
●
Deadline to complete tasks
12/31/2025
Next Steps

n
"X-.
‘●'■V
r-?
'●I ^●
i
.‘■'V V
●
7’..1
iitr.
-^1^;
●l
^
jy?
p*»v
●■^
,
-
.»
<
i-.
f
T
??
i
w.’--
i
'rji^
1
7
●;
V'.
/
Questions/Com merits?
ri>.JLa&U/

Suggested Motion: Move to waive readings and
approve Ordinance approving the Urban Renewal
Plan for the RiverwalkUrban Renewal Project and give
authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
the necessary documents (or take other action
deemed appropriate).
Action

"Chris Canfield" <CCanfield@idahofalls.gov>
1/10/2023 8:38:03 PM
"matt.smith@summitbuildinggroup.com" <matt.smith@summitbuildingg roup.com>
"Naysha Foster" <nfoster@idahofai!s.gov>, ’"Kurt Roland"' <kroland@erengr.com>, "Brian Cunningham'
<BCunningham@idahofalis.gov>, "Kent Fugal" <KFugal@idahofalls.gov>, "Kerry Beutler"
<kbeutler@idahofa[ls.gov>
FW: Terrace Gate/Barnwood Estates Impact Fees
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Matt
Your request to present your concerns regarding impact fees to Council was forwarded to us.
I
have the following notes from
the discussions in our meettngs:
●
Wastewater Connection: Concordia requested that the construcdon of the Sewer for a gravity line to the South to be
installed to serve the developmentbe offset with the applicable Impact fees.
It was clarified that as impact Fees are
to offset costs associated with Transportation, police, fire, and parks, that the sewer improvements required by the
development cannot be interchanged or offset the applicable impact fees.
In our meeting on December 23, 2022 with
yourself and the Engineering department. Wastewater Mainline Connection fees were questioned regarding the
development. The question was if the Mainline connection fees could be waived in the event that the line in front of
the development was not used. We reviewed this further and would recommend if the gravity line to the south is
constructed by this development that the mainline connection fees would not be applicable and handled in the
DevelopmentAgreement accordingly. The other item we can offer is the reimbursement clause for future
connections made to the wastewater main that is constructed by the developer outside of His development.
●
There was also discussion about the ability to reimburse the Developer from the Transportation Impact fees for
capacity improvements completed along the frontage of Skyline.
This could be reimbursed and handled in the
development agreement as well, however please note that the reimbursement is subject to construcdon bids and
costs that can be verified prior to reimbursement of public funds. We would be happy to work with you on this further
as the development progresses.
●
The subject of a potential Redevelopment district that could be set up through Community Development Services in
an effort to mitigate some of the development costs to support mutual goals accordingly.
IT was recommended to
review this with the Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency and see what can be done.
Regarding your question on the appeal of the Impact Fees pertaining to your project, a fee payer is entitled to an appeal for
Impact fees when the fee payer applies for a Building Permit. Impact fees are calculated by the City, using the City’s fee
schedule at the time of application for a building permit. Idaho Falls City Code § 10-8-5(A). Alternatively, you can submit a
written appticatton for an individual assessment for the project. Idaho Falls City Code § 10-8-5(D). it is after the City has
determined the specific impact fee applied to the proposed construcdon (either at the time of building permit application or
review and acceptance/denial of a developer's written application for individual assessment) that you can present an appeal
to the Impact fee administrator for consideration.
Thanks.
IDAHO FALLS
WORKS
[im
Chris Canfield, P.E.
t
Assistant Public Works Director
380 Constitution Way
Box 50220
Idaho Falls. Idaho 83405-0220
Work
(208)612-8259
Cell
(208)201-5695

From: matt.smith@summitbuildineeroupj:Qm <matt.smith@summitb,uild_lnggroyp.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 3,2023 11:40 AM
To: Naysha Foster <nfoster@idahofalls.gov>
Cc: 'Kurt Roland' <kmLaQ.d@_eie.Dgr._CQm>
Subject: Terrace Gate/Barnwood Estates Impact Fees
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Naysha,
Good morning. Hope you had a good New Year and Christmas break. Would it be possible for us to schedule some time at a
future City Council meeting to address the impact fees for Terrace Gate/Barnwood Estates? Kurt Roland and
I discussed the
possibility of with the Engineering Dept, to revisit the issue with the City Council a week or so ago and while Kent was
pessimistic about the outcome, he thought we could still bring up the impact fees for their reconsideration. Kurt is away for
a couple of weeks but as soon as he gets back, we can come in to discuss the specifics of what we would like to present.
Thanks,
Matt Smith
Land Development
Summit Building Group/Concordia Development Group
(928) 241-2298M
% CONCORDIA
[f
DEVELOPMENT
INGROUP

APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT
INSTRUCTIONS:
Please
fill
all applicable blanks in completely and accurately.
This
application should accompany your Special Conditions exhibit that will be attached to the
standard-form agreement which contains the standard terms and conditions for
all
annexation or development agreements. A form Annexation or Development Agreement
and sample special conditions have been provided to you separately. No deviations will
be allowed from the standard terms and conditions in the form Annexation/Development
Agreement.
Your special Conditions exhibit should be uniquely drafted to
fit the
particular circumstances of your subdivision, however you should follow the sample
special conditions as closely as possible.
You should also prepare an “Exhibit A” which
sets forth the legal description of your subdivision.
Name of Subdivision: Terrace Gate Apartments & Barnwood Estates
Name of Developer: Summit Development Group, LLC
Address:
901 Pier View Dr, Suite 204
Idaho Falls, ID
83402
Form of Business Entity:
Limited Liability
Company
Corporation
Trust
Other
Individual
Partnership
Government
(Check One)
State of Incorporation/Principal Place of Business: Idaho
Name, Brandt Monette
Office:
Managing Member
Authorized Signator:
Location Where Agreement
Will Be Signed:
'
j
Anticipated Date of Development: January 2024
Consulting Engineer: Firm Name:, Eagle Rock Engineering
Contact Person:
Kurt Roland
Address:
1331 Fremont Ave
City/Zip:
Idaho Falls
, ID 83402
Telephone: 208 757 7625
Names of Corporate Guarantors (if applicable): Brandt M, Monette
State:
Idaho
County:
Bonneville

-EXHIBIT A-
TERRACE GATE APARTMENTS AND BARNWOOD ESTATES
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BEGINNING AT A POINT THAT IS S.00"1Z’14”E. ALONG THE SECTION LINE 300.01 FEET
AND S 89'57’52”W. 40.00 FEET FROM THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP
2 NORTH
RANGE 37 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WEST
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SKYLINE DRIVE; RUNNING THENCE S.00‘12’14”E. ALONG SAID
WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 460.12 FEET; THENCE N.89“47’46’’E. 40.00 FEET TO THE EAST
LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S.00“12’14”E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE 276.51 FEET;
THENCE N 89°59’57”W. 270.02 FEET; THENCE S.00"12’14”E. 281.70 FEET TO THE
SOUTHLINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1 /4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1 /4 OF SAID SECTION 23;
THENCE N 89°59’25”W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 312.92 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY
LINE OF SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 91; THENCE FOLLOWING ALONG SAID BOUNDARY
LINE OF SAID SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 91 THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES; (1)
THENCE N.00°10’03”E. 350.90 FEET; (2) THENCE N.89‘50’43”E. 108.38 FEET; (3)
THENCE N.01'16’54’’E. 6.90 FEET; (4) THENCE N.01 ”13’41”E. 208.76 FEET; (5) THENCE
N.89"59’57”W. 112.37 FEET; (6) THENCE N.OO°10’O3”E. 451.00 FEET TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WESTGATE PROFESSIONAL PARK, A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT,
PURSUANT TO IDAHO CODE, TITLE 55, CHAPTER 15, A PART OF THE CITY OF IDAHO
FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO; THENCE N.89"57’52”E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID WESTGATE PROFESSIONAL PARK AND THE SOUTH LINE OF SAFARI 66, DIVISION
NUMBER 1ST AMENDED, TO THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY IDAHO A
DISTANCE OF 536.34 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 10.831 ACRES

-EXHIBIT B-
SPECiAL CONDITIONS FOR
TERRACE GATE APARTMENTS AND BARNWOOD ESTATES
s; r.
i.nn.TrnffirSi|jns. Developer agrees to install all street signs designating the names
of all streets within the Subdivision. Street signs designating the name of public streets shall be
constructed with white letters over green background. Street signs designating the name of
private streets shall be constructed with white lettering over blue background. Such signs shall be
installed in the manner and locations as directed by the City Engineer.
s r. 2.nn.
to Skyline Drive. Shall be in accordance with the Bonneville
Metropolitan Planning Organization Access Management Plan.
St r ;;.on
infrastrnchire. When it is necessary to move or remove existing
infrastructure not belonging to the CITY and not within the CITY Right-of-Way, the
DEVELOPER will coordinate such activities with the applicable owner, (e.g. poles owned by
Pacificorp dba Rocky Mountain Power). Any existing electrical infrastructure owned by
Pacificorp dba Rocky Mountain Power will require a buy-out from the DEVELOPER prior to
receipt of electrical service from the CITY. Request for the buy-out is to be initiated by the
DEVELOPER after annexation.
s; r. 4.01). Artprial Street Section Improvements. DEVELOPER shall design and
construct the Roadway improvements in Skyline Drive in accordance with the City Approved
Improvement Drawings/Siie Plan. DEVELOPER shall be reimbursed for this work and be subject
the requirements of this Agreement. The reimbursement schedule is subject to the City’s ability to
collect impact fees and final acceptance of the Roadway. DEVELOPER shall also provide for the
landscaping in the park strip between the curb and the sidewalk. Maintenance of the landscape
buffer shall be the responsibility of the DEVELOPER or the DEVELOPER’S heirs, successors, or
assigns.
to
s r.
fS.nn water rinp rnnnection. The City agrees to allow the Developer to connect
to the water main located in Skyline Drive, subject to the Developer's payment of the water main
connection fees in the amount of One Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty-One Dollars and Eighty
Cents ($ 1.751 -80; 38 feet currently al $46.10 per foot), upon execution of this agreement,
pursuant to section 8-4-14 (C) of the City Code.
Pursuant to section 8-4-14 (B) of the City Code,
the Developer or his heirs or assigns shall also pay individual water system connection fees each
time an individual water service line is connected to the City water systems. Such fees shall be
paid in the amounts and manner set forth in such Code Sections.
S.r.
6.nn spwer Main Connection Fee. The City agrees to allow the Developer to
connect to the sewer previously constructed within the development, subject to the Developer's
payment of the sewer main connection charge pursuant to section 8-l-23(C) of the City Code in

the amount of l\vcm\ Thousand One Hundred Sixty-Nine Dollars and Ninety Cents ($20,169.00;
747 feet; currently at $27.00 per foot). Mainline connection fee costs will be adjusted
accordingly if the connections are not made at a time when the City fee resolution reflects the rate
referenced herein. Pursuant to section 8-1-23(3) of the City Code, the Developer or his heirs or
assigns shall also pay individual sewer connection fees each time an individual sewer service line
is connected to the City sewer system. Such fees shall be paid in the amounts and manner set
forth in such Code Section.
The sewer main in Sk\ line Drive, where this development will connect, is shallow with
respect to other developments in this area. The Developer will address this issue with the building
design and provide additional measures necessary to mitigate the potential freezing of sewer
service lines. The Developer acknowledges that sewer service lines will be maintained by the
Developer or the Developer's heirs, successors, or assigns.
S.C. 7.00 Storm Drainage. Storm Drainage will be designed and constructed to
accommodate drainage of the lots within the development by the Developer. The storm drainage
system shall meet the volume rcqiiircmcnis of the City Storm Drainage Policy. The storm pond
will be constructed as shown on the improvement drawings and Site Plan. Maintenance of the
storm pond shall be the responsibility of the Developer or the Developer's heirs, successors, or
assigns.

Requested Amount
Land Credit - 0.17 Acre Strip for Road
106,931
Road Construction
328.213
Land Credit - 0.423 Acres Right of Way
266,070
Exemption for Prior Home (Granted)
5,273
706,487
Total
3.02 Acres appraised for $1,900,000 = $14.44 per SQFT
7,405.2 SQFT X $14.44= $106,931
0.17 Acres =7,405.2 SQFT
18,425.88 SQFT x 14.44 = $266,070
0.423 Acres = 18,425.88 SQFT
(43,560 SQFT per Acre)

APPRAISAL REPORT
OF
PROPOSED
Terrace Gate Condominiums Buildings 1 and 2
And Foundation of Building 3
To be located at
Approximately 1020 South Skyline Drive
Idaho Fails, Idaho 83401
Appraisal No. 25-118
FOR
CITIZENS COMMUNITY BANK,
A DIVISION OF GLACIER BANK
BY
CHAD RIGBY, MAI

RIGBY & COMPANY
APPRAISERS AND CONSULTANTS
LARS
RIGBY MAI
CHAI
L. RIGBY MAI
JEFF H. RIGBY
Ma> 9,2025
Laima Ditto
Citi2 ens Community Bank a Division of Glacier Bank
Re:
Appraisal of two condominium buildings consisting of a total of 48 units, and one
proposed building to be completed up to the foundation, located at approximately
1020 South Skyline Drive, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402
Dear Ms. Ditto:
Pursiant your request, I have perfonned an appraisal on the above referenced property
This
appraisal considers the market value of the subject underlying land as well as the two proposed
cond 3ramum buildmgs to contain a total of 48 units with each building having 24 units with a unit
3f one-bedroom, two-bedroom and three-bedroom condominium units. Building 3 is also
dered up to the point of completion of the foundation. The value calculations m“ade in this
apprusal
are considered m an as
is
condition
as
well as
at
completion
of the proposed
unprovements.
Please refer to the Description of Improvements section of the appraisal for
intor nation regarding the proposed improvements.
mix
consi
ollowing narrative appraisal report is in full conformance with USPAP regulations.
This
app^isal also conforms to the reporting requirements set forth by FIRREA.
The appraisal also
confc rms to the Code of Ethics of the Appraisal Institute.
The
The iharketing time estimated in this report is less than one year with exposure time also estimated
to be ess than one year with no additional discounting necessary.
The L itended user of this appraisal is Citizens Community Bank a Division of Glacier Bank.
iTothetical conditions are considered as part of this appraisal.
It is the extraordinary
assun ption of this appraisal that the subject proposed improvements will be built according to the
plans and cost mformation provided to the appraiser. The use of these extraordinary assumptions
may i npact assigned results.
^
No h
14^6 North Highway 89, Suite 220, Farmington, Utah 84025, (801) 298-3205 Fax (801)451-0443
E-mail: t:hadr]ebvmai a:Bmail i-om

Ms. Ditto
Pag 12
Maj 9,2025
It IS my opinion that the market values per the respective dates of appraisal in fee simple estate are:
Mai ket value—as is—April 23.202j>
ONE MILLION NINE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS
($1,900,000)
pective market value at completion of vertical improvements—^Buildings 1 and 2. with
Bniiping 3 fonndatioii—bulk valae—April 1.2026
TWELVE MILLION NINE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS
($12,900,000)
bined retail value at completion—^Buildings I and 2 only—^Aoril 1. 2026
Con
Unit types
No. units
Value/unit
Retail value
1-bed
12
@
$230,000
$255,000
$275,000
$300,000
$2,760,000
$3,060,000
$3,300,000
$3.600.000
$12,720,000
2-bed
2-bed
3-bed
12
@
12
@
12
@
Total
Shou d you have any questions concerning this analysis, please do not hesitate to contact my office.
Resp ictflilly submitted,
Chad L. Rigby, MAI
Idaho
Certi^cate CGA-4690 &qDires 5-3-26
State-Certified General Appraiser

CERTIFICATION
The nyJersigned does hereby certify that*
The statements of efet contained in this erport are true and correct
The erported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the erported assumptions and limiting
conditions, and are my personal, impartial, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions.
I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal
interest with respect to the parties involved.
I have no bias wife erspect to the property efat is the subject of this report or to efe parties involved with this
assignment
My mgagement in this assignment was not contmgent upon developing or rqwrting predetermined results.
My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon efe development or reporting of a
predetermined value or direction in value that efvors fee cause of efe client, the amount of the value opinion,
fee ^tainment of a stipulated result, or the occunence of a subsequent event directly erlated to efe intended use
of efis ^praisal.
The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in
confotmily wife the requirements of efe Code of Professional Ethics & Standards of Professional AoDraisal
Practice ofthe Appraisal histitute.
"
The reported^ analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and efis erport has been prepared, in
conformity wife efe Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practi
The use of this report is subject to efe requirements of efe Appraisal Institute relating to erview by its duly
authorized representatives.
^
I have made a personal inspection ofthe subject property.
I have primed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, on efe property that is efe subject of this
appraisal in efe pnor three years.
No person has provided professional assistance to the person signing efe certification.
As ofthe date ofthis report, I have completed efe continuing education program of efe Appraisal Institute.
ce.
May 9.2025
Date
Chad L. Rigby, MAI  
Idaho State-Ceitified General Appraiser
Certificate CGA-4690 Expires 5-3-26

SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Idei tificatioD of the properly:
The subject of this appraisal is Buildings
1 and 2, with
Building 3 foundation value also included as part of the
proposed Terrace
Gate Condominiums
to be
located
approximately 1020 South Skyline Drive, Idaho Falls, Idaho
83402.
at
Proj erty right appraised:
Fee simple estate
Effe :tive date of appraisal:
April 23,2025
April 1,2026—prospective date of completion
May 9.2025
■as IS
Dah of report:
Land size:
8.055 acres
3.02 acres allocated to subject Buildings 1,2, and 3
Proposed development
Proposed
HigI est and best use:
Yeai built:
Unit
1-bed
sizes:
691 SF
964 SF
1,045 SF
1,317 SF
2-bed
2-bed
3-bed
Desc ription of improvements:
The
subject
is
proposed
to
be
built
out
with
two
condominium buildings—Buildings 1 and 2. The buildings
will have a combined area of 48,204 square feet with a gross
area including the breeze ways and patios at 54,618 square
feet
The unit mix is six one-bedroom, six three-bedroom,
and
12 two-bedroom
units. The subject
also
considers
Building 3 at completion of die foundiion before vertical
improvements take place. Please erfer to the Description of
Improvements
section
of
the
appraisal
for
detailed
information regarding the proposed improvements.

Value Indicators
As is
At completion
As is
Cost approach
Sales comparison approach
Income approach
$1,900,000
$14,100,000
$12,900,000
$12,400,000
Values
$1,900,000
$12,900,000
The ^alue calculations above for the subject in an as is condition considers the pad value associated
with Buildings 1,2, and 3.

Amounts paid by Terrace Gate Properly Fund for Knife River to widen Skyline Drive
Item
Scheduled
Nutek
Unit Cost
Quemrtv
Units
Speiificelxin
SesIwnNo
Uescriplion
$2 00
SS.J8UOJ
1740
1 SjuvCurtme
30
S7.h97 SO
$9 75
HIO
cr
t fteim»4lul PevenienlSeciiwi
Sliylloe
50
$3,395 00
53,>95 00
1
L5
1 ConnccHotsisimKWileilinc
90
571,775 00
$99 00
725
u
1
Insult
12' Ajieiline
100
$1,275.00
5:,550 00
2
£A
1 InsUU 12'WjlnlH1mi!S|regtPU)gl
no
5io,nooQ
$5.070.00
£A
l-lnsuil 12'Vatu'
120
$9,665 00
515,330 00
Tneie weteShyOiafils
in phase
1, 2yirateonst|l'n<-
£A
160
1
Install iecHyaijni
525,000 00
AicasanO 7 weteioitttiineg AiBaSisonsHylen: ana wasa0oui25n
$25,000 00
l lnsLill UndeigiounO Heltiilion S/slem [Area S&7;
15
290
$37.00
528,490 00
7/0
If
1
Insl.ill 30‘Cui6jihJ Cullei
330
550 31000
$?G 00
lftisvi4S<)iii;injllYcaiW'ti ixjl ll^■^llc^ i„iniL' scct«m,islli<;teslQHneaevi:lui>nw;nl. jllei Onl
1935
V lull IOihIiI itieiniiiiJicocity scctiiin
SY
l-PavenicmSi;Clionlui Ssylmi-(7~/4‘/9*l
360
$20 00
54,lbO.CO
IbO
SY
2 Patemt-nlSeaionlut SSvliiH'(2V4*/9*|
780
(SS4.47U.C0l
l$2fa U0|
2095
PEtCUPanemenlScrlionSKYlINf (ITtM360&76Q|
SY
4
$53 00
5111,035 00
2095
ADD Ntf* P4>«iiu:iil Scclioii SKYLINb
SY
4.1
$15.00
510,920 00
729
CY
ftOD AdUilH)iMl
I X lot SKYIIWI
4 2
534,,●'00 00
lt)l.il<ni.iiilily
I'l
1 IGCOSf Ixil tins
is ttur (|ii.nitily iiloini styling
$'3 00
3300
Sf
;tio
i-aminvjHi
$328,313.50
Total Cost:

1/31/2024 6:2l:17PM
.f
V-.
●'r
Knife River Corporation - Mountain West
4055 Professional Way
Idaho Fails, ID 83402
Contact:
Phone:
Fax:
Concordia Development
Matt Smith
'idMi.'
/●
James Hammer
208.220.0659
(208) 562-5045
/:
'1
:
.
'i, 1 V
Quote To:
Terrace Gate/Bamwood Estates
12/5/2023
Job Name:
Date of Plans:
Addendums:
Phone:
Fax;
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
QUANTITY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
ITEM
1,675.00
LF
1.50
2,512.50
Removal of Fence
10
1.00
LS
22,770.00
22,770.00
Removal of Existing Foimdation/Garbage
20
1,740.00
LF
2.00
3,480.00
Saw Cutting
30
16,810.00
SY
0.80
13,448.00
Clear and Grub
40
810.00
CY
9.75
7,897.50
Removal of Pavement Section - Skyline
50
2,370.00
CY
24,885.00
10.50
Cut/Fill to Subgrade
60
18,270.00
630.00
CY
29.00
Import Pit Run for Subgrade
70
1.00
LS
8,565.00
8,565.00
Tosoil Respread
80
1.00
LS
3,395.00
3,395.00
Connect to Existing Waterline
Install 12" Waterline
90
725.00
LF
99.00
71,775.00
100
2,550.00
2.00
EA
1,275,00
Install 12" Water Fittings (Tee & Plug)
no
5,070.00
10,140.00
2.00
EA
Install 12" Valve
120
1,480.00
LF
103,600.00
70.00
Install 8" Waterline
130
9.00
EA
3,065,00
27,585.00
Install 8" Water Valve
140
6.00
EA
950.00
5,700.00
Install 8" Water Fitting (Tee, 90*)
150
9,665.00
48,325.00
5.00
EA
Install Fire Hydrant
160
1.00
EA
16,000.00
16,000.00
2" Water/Fire Service to Clubhouse
170
35,400.00
2.00
EA
17,700.00
4" W'ater & Fire Service to Condo
180
28.00
EA
2,600.00
72,800.00
1" Water Service to Townhouse Unit
190
78.00
93,600.00
1,200.00
LF
Install 12" Sewer Line
200
4,760.00
70.00
LF
68.00
Install 8" Sewer Line
210
9.00
EA
41,850.00
4,650,00
Install Sewer Manhole
220
28.00
EA
1,840.00
51,520.00
Install 4" Sewer Service to Townhouse Units
230
3,800.00
22,800.00
6.00
EA
Install Stonn Catch Basin
240
43,225.00
910.00
LF
47.50
Install 12" Storm
245
44,400.00
12.00
EA
3,700.00
install Strom Manhole
250
9,695.00
1.00
EA
9.695.00
260
Install Infiltration Manhole
15.00
LF
80.00
1,200.00
270
Install 24" Storm
1.00
LS
3,050.00
3,050.00
280
Install Infiit. Beds w/6' Drain Rock (Pond 4)
1.00
LS
65,750.00
65,750.00
Install Underground Retention System (Area 5&7)
290
Page 1 of 5

ITEM
DHSCRJPTION
QUANTITY
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
810
Mobilizarion'Genera} Conditions
1,00
L.S
69,250.00
69,250.00
820
Traffif
1.00
LS
750.00
750.00
830
Signs
1.00
LS
12,650.00
12,650.00
840 PavemtuM Markings
1.00
LS
5,185.00
5,185.00
Phase U
1,452,164.50
890
Fence Removal
1.135.00
LF
1.50
1,702.50
900
Clear and Grub
12,850.00
SY
0.80
10,280.00
910
CuPPill to Subgrade
830.00
CY
10.50
8.715.00
920 Import Fit Run for .Subgrade
160.00
CY
29.00
4.640.00
930
Topsoil Respread
1.00
LS
8,190.00
8,190.00
940
Insrall 8" Watcrlme
255.00
LF
70.00
17,850.00
950
Install 8“ Fitting
1.00
EA
950.00
950.00
Install 8" Valve
960
2.00
EA
3,065.00
6,130.00
970
Install 4" FireAVaicr Service to Condo
2.00
EA
17,100.00
34,200.00
980
Install Fire Hydrani
1.00
EA
9,665.00
9,665.00
990
Install 8" Sewer
210.00
LF
64.00
13,440.00
1000
Install 6” Sewer .Service
3.00
EA
2.765.00
8,295.00
1010
Install Sewer Manhole
2.00
EA
4,650.00
9,300.00
1020
Install 12" Sionn
215.00
LF
47.50
10,212.50
1030
Install Storm Maiiliolc
4.00
EA
3,700.00
14,800.00
Sidewalk
1040
7,890.00
SF
9.00
71,010.00
1050
Trash Pad
LOO
EA
19,000.00
19,000.00
1,130.00
1060
Install 18" Curb and Gutter
LF
46.00
51,980.00
Pavement Section (2"/4".'9")
3,035.00
SY
1070
26.00
78,910.00
1.00
LS
1080
SWTPF
4,000.00
4,000.00
Mobtlizaiion/Gcnct'al Conditions
1.00
LS
49,000.00
1090
49,000.00
LS
IlOO
Traffic Control
1.00
750-00
750.00
Signs
1.00
LS
1110
265.00
265.00
PavemctU Markings
l.OO
LS
1120
L470.00
1,470.00
Pliase m
434,755.00
(JRAND TOTAL
$3,464,993.00
NOTES:
Bid Notes:
1. Price includes (1) mobilization to job. Each additional mobilization will be invoiced at quoted price.
2. Work will be completed upon a inuiually agreed scheclaic.
3.All utilities are stubbed to within 5' of tJie building.
4. Concrete flat work is included for sidewalks and AD.A's, Building Breesewas-s and townhomc driveways are excluded.
5. Knife River shall provide matcnals in conformance with the mix design provided to it or required in the plans and
specifications applicable to this Proposal.
EXCLUSIONS
I. Permits, fees,
2. Perfomiance or payment bonds.
3. Fees for inspection.^ or testing.
4, Sun'cying or slaking.
5. Removal'backfill of soft or satuiaied soils below subgradc.
6. SWPPP or N(,)l filing.
7. EPA.' DEO permit, paperwork or inspection requireinem.s.
Page 3 of 5

Text is extracted by machine from the official file linked on each page; the official file is the record. Sentinel Media, LLC.