City of Pocatello | minutes | meeting 2026-08-13 | City Council Work Session Agenda (9:00 AM)
source: https://pocatello.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Minutes/_08132026-1941

CITY OF CITY OF POCATELLO, IDAHO
CITY COUNCIL

CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
AUGUST 13, 2026

AGENDA ITEM NO. 1; ROLL CALL

Council President Corey Mangum called the City Council Work Session to order at 9:00
a.m. Other council members present were Dakota Bates, Brent Nichols, Hayden Paulsen,
Stacy Satterfield, and Ann Swanson. Mayor Mark Dahlquist was excused.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: HUMAN RELATIONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

UPDATE

Representatives from the Human Relations Advisory Committee (HRAC) were in
attendance to update the Council on the Committee’s goals and projects. JD Wardell,
Committee Chair, reported that the Committee is in the process of selecting the Human
and Civil Rights Award recipient. He requested that the City Council consider changing
the committee’s name from the Human Relations Advisory Committee to the Human
Rights Advisory Committee, citing the committee’s desire for greater opportunity to
advise the Council on human rights issues and take action. Mr. Wardell stated that the
Committee has had difficulty finding ways to serve within the legal parameters of its role
as an advisory board.

In response to questions from Council for examples of tangible things the committee
wanted but had not been able to do, Mr. Wardell referenced frustrations surrounding the
requirement to comply with State open meetings law in relation to planning, attending,
and hosting events as a committee, as well as limitations on discussing pending legal
action. He added that the committee would like to host a town hall meeting for the public
to bring forward human rights matters, even though they recognize it may be difficult to
keep comments on topic.

Mr. Mangum emphasized that human rights and human relations are two completely
different ideas, and HRAC is tasked primarily with improving human relations within the
community through education and partnerships. He clarified that human rights matters
are related to legal issues. —

Ms. Swanson acknowledged that legal restrictions may result in Committee members
who are passionate about human rights feeling they are ineffectual in their roles on the
committee. She put forth the option of dissolving the Committee and allowing members
to pursue human rights matters in a less restrictive environment.

Mr. Wardell admitted that their committee has had difficulty establishing a quorum for
many meetings and is concerned that individuals would be less likely to attend meetings
unless it was part of an official committee.

Mr. Bates drew the distinction between advising and advocacy, emphasizing that
advocacy is not the purpose of an advisory committee, and reiterated the description of

CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 2
AUGUST 13, 2026

the Committee’s purpose to create an informal forum to present concerns and proposals,
as well as to promote positive relations among members of the community. He cautioned
against advocating for a particular view or agenda that may create division in the
community and alienate certain segments of the population. He cited awarding Reading
Time with the Queens with the 2023 Human and Civil Rights Award as an example of
creating discord amongst local taxpayers. Mr. Bates suggested that the Committee
members consider whether they would be more effective in their current role or in an
organization outside the City.

Holli Harnsberger, HRAC Staff Liaison, stated that HRAC originally had a dedicated

phone line and form for members of the public to submit concerns. She explained that
when HRAC brought the non-discrimination ordinance forward and it was passed by the
City Council, responsibility for handling complaints shifted from HRAC to the Police
Department, as complaints were then considered violations of a City ordinance. Ms.
Harnsberger noted that HRAC’s ability to take action was significantly reduced by the
ordinance.

Council discussed HRAC’s role in advising the Council, noting that HRAC may request to
be placed on a City Council agenda whenever they wish to advise the Council about a
matter within their purview. Council also emphasized that HRAC’s role includes
communicating to citizens that they are welcome in the community and encouraged to
submit concerns to the Committee, including various methods of submitting concerns that
do not require attending an HRAC meeting. Council emphasized that the Committee’s
role does not include advocacy and the Committee’s role is outlined on the website.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: POCATELLO ARTS COUNCIL UPDATE

Representatives from the Pocatello Arts Council (PAC) were in attendance to update the
Council on the Committee’s goals and projects.

Dale Spencer, Committee Chair, stated that PAC’s mission is to support the arts and
foster community participation through advocacy, grants, networking, promotion, and
event sponsorship. He explained that PAC was established in 1991 with a $100,000 fund
from the Chief Theater settlement and receives an annual allocation of $10,000.
Approximately $40,000 remains available in the fund.

Jake Knievel, PAC member, and Mr. Spencer reviewed PAC’s recent activities, including
the Empty Bowls event, which raised approximately $6,000 for the Idaho Foodbank;
sponsorship of Montana Shakespeare in the Park, which attracted more than 1,000
attendees; participation in the Festival of Trees; the Golden Pumpkin Award, recognizing
local Halloween decorations; and grants to local artists and arts organizations.

Council expressed appreciation for PAC’s activities and the value of arts programming in
bringing the community together. Council asked whether additional grant funding could
be pursued and discussed the importance of continuing to support the arts.

CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 3
AUGUST 13, 2026

Mr. Spencer stated that the remaining PAC funds are expected to last approximately
three to four years and that the Committee is beginning to explore future funding options,
including corporate sponsorships. He noted that fundraising varies and that PAC has
received co-sponsorships for Montana Shakespeare in the Park, reducing the amount
PAC must contribute toward the approximately $5,000 cost of the event. He added that
PAC is committed to ensuring the event is funded each year.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: STREET RENAMING AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORT

The Street Renaming Ad Hoc Committee Chair Person was present to give the

Committee’s recommendation for renaming the honorary stretch of South 8th Avenue
between Martin Luther King Jr. Way and East Humbolt Street.

Adam Velasquez, Chair, presented the Committee’s unanimous recommendation to
rename the honorary stretch of South 8th Avenue between Martin Luther King Jr. Way
and East Humbolt Street in honor of Judge Sergio Roberto Gutierrez. Mr. Velasquez
highlighted Judge Gutierrez’s distinction as Idaho's first Latino district judge and first
Latino judge on the Idaho Court of Appeals, his appointments by governors of both
political parties, his advocacy for migrant workers, and his work promoting fairness and
equal access within the judicial system. He noted Judge Gutierrez’s efforts to establish
standards for court interpreters and his work mentoring and encouraging educational
achievement among Idaho youth. Mr. Velasquez stated that the Committee believed
Judge Gutierrez’s accomplishments and nonpartisan legacy made him a positive
representation of Idaho and Pocatello, particularly given the street’s location near Idaho
State University.

In response to a question from Council regarding the other finalist, Mr. Velasquez
identified Art Paz as a local business owner who supported employees pursuing higher
education. He explained that the Committee selected Judge Gutierrez because of his
documented record of public service, advocacy for equal rights, Hispanic representation,
and the strength of his professional accomplishments. He stated that the
recommendation was not intended to advance a political agenda, but rather to recognize
an individual who could serve as a positive example to the community. Mr. Velasquez also
noted that Judge Gutierrez had been informed of the recommendation and expressed
that he would be honored to participate if the renaming is approved.

Council indicated support for moving forward with the recommendation. The item is
expected to be placed on a future City Council agenda for formal consideration.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: PROPOSED CHANGES TO CITY CODE TITLE 5.04
GENERAL LICENSE REGULATIONS AND 5.56 TAXICABS - POLICE DEPARTMENT

A member of Pocatello Police Department staff was in attendance to discuss proposed
updates to Pocatello City Code Title 5.04 General License Regulations and 5.56 Taxicabs
to modernize and streamline codes for consistency as follows:

CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 4
AUGUST 13, 2026

a) City Code 5.04 “General License Regulations” revisions; and
b) City Code 5.56 “Taxicabs” revisions; and

c) City Code 5.04 “School Crossing Guards” addition; and

d) City Code 5.04 “Traveling Carnival or Circus” addition; and
e) City Code 5.04 “Christmas Tree Sales” addition.

Mallarie Bascom, Licensing Officer, presented proposed revisions to City Code Title 5.04,
General License Regulations, and Title 5.56, Taxicabs, intended to modernize and
streamline licensing requirements. She explained that the General License Regulations
had not been updated since 2013 and the Taxicab regulations since 1990. The revisions

consolidate redundant provisions, clarify definitions and licensing procedures, update
fees to reference the annual fee resolution, and establish more consistent requirements
for issuance, denial, suspension, revocation, appeals, and penalties.

Ms. Bascom explained that the proposed taxicab revisions distinguish traditional taxi
services from transportation network companies and non-emergency medical
transportation. The revisions would also move taxi licenses to a rolling one-year renewal
period, clarify disqualifying convictions and consideration periods, require licenses to be
associated with a licensed taxi business, and require insurance to remain in effect. She
noted that the changes would provide more reasonable consideration for older
convictions while retaining an appeal process.

Ms. Bascom reviewed proposed provisions for school crossing guards, traveling carnivals
and circuses, and Christmas tree sales. Crossing guard requirements would be
streamlined while retaining the requirement for background checks and identification
badges. Carnival and circus permits would clarify applicable uses and provide additional
lead time for applications. Christmas tree sales requirements would address temporary
electrical installations and other structures while exempting retail establishments selling
trees as part of their regular merchandise.

In response to questions from Council, Ms. Bascom explained the distinction between
licenses, which generally remain valid for a year, and permits, which are issued for a
specified period. She also stated that the proposed changes would not create a
significant administrative burden and that taxi businesses are required to maintain a
business license. She noted that the City’s licensing requirements for school crossing
guards were established to ensure background checks are completed for individuals
working with children.

Council discussed whether the proposed Christmas tree and carnival/circus requirements
should instead be consolidated into a general temporary-use licensing or permitting
process. Council members expressed concern about creating separate licensing
requirements for individual temporary businesses and emphasized the importance of
consistency, equity, and limiting licensing requirements where possible. Staff noted that
few Christmas tree and carnival/circus permits are issued annually and that other Idaho

CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 5
AUGUST 13, 2026

cities generally address similar activities through temporary-use requirements based on
factors such as electrical installations, structures, tents, and other safety considerations.

Council reached consensus to move forward with the proposed revisions to General
License Regulations, Taxicabs, and School Crossing Guards as presented. Council
requested that the provisions for Traveling Carnivals or Circuses and Christmas Tree
- Sales be revised to consider consolidation into a more general temporary licensing or
permitting process, with the revised provisions to return to Council for consideration.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: CITY INITIATED TEXT AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 17:

ZONING REGULATIONS—PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

Planning and Development Services staff were in attendance to discuss proposed
updates to Pocatello City Code Title 17, Zoning Regulations, in response to State
preemption legislation.

Jim Anglesey, Long Range Planner, explained that the proposed amendments continue
the prior month's discussion and primarily clarify existing language, with the addition of
provisions required by Senate Bill 1352 for starter home subdivisions. The legislation
requires cities to allow starter home subdivisions in residential zones on developments of
at least four acres, with lots of 1,500 square feet or smaller. Based on legal counsel's
clarification, 1,500 square feet is a maximum lot size. Qualifying developments must still
complete the subdivision application process and would not qualify for existing infill
provisions or the 10% adjustment due to the additional density allowed under State law.

Mr. Anglesey explained that the State requirements would significantly reduce lot sizes
and setbacks. Approximately 264 city parcels contain four acres or more, primarily in
foothill areas, and adjacent parcels owned by a developer could potentially be combined
to meet the four-acre requirement. Conceptual layouts showed that a four-acre
development could accommodate approximately 116 units under maximum
configurations, or about 76 units after accounting for roadway right-of-way. A 1,500-
square-foot lot could support a footprint of approximately 400 square feet and, with a
basement and two additional stories, potentially a 1,200-square-foot home. Mr.
Anglesey noted that such development could create significant challenges for parking,
utilities, landscaping, sanitation, and open space. He noted that the current code
provides limited authority to regulate architectural style outside the Historic District, but
the upcoming comprehensive zoning rewrite could consider form-based or other
architectural standards. Mr. Anglesey raised concerns about "backwards density," where
high-density development could occur on the City's urban fringe rather than in the urban
core. To encourage development more consistent with the City's growth objectives, staff
proposed alternative infill standards for areas bordered on at least two sides by existing
development, below 4,600 feet in elevation, platted in their current configuration for at
least five years, and containing less than four acres. These areas would have no minimum
lot size or 1,500-square-foot maximum, while proposed setbacks and existing height

CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 6
AUGUST 13, 2026

standards would apply. Townhomes and multifamily housing could also be developed in
zones where those uses are permitted.

Mr. Anglesey presented an overview of cottage courts, which would allow smaller
setbacks and shared front-yard/open-space areas with consolidated parking. He
highlighted their potential to provide greater housing diversity and community-oriented
development while addressing some concerns associated with maximum-density starter
home subdivisions.

Utility and sanitation concerns were discussed, particularly on very small lots. Tom

Kirkman, Public Works Director, noted that 30-foot-wide lots would not provide
sufficient frontage for individual garbage, recycling, and compost carts, potentially
requiring centralized dumpsters. He explained that centralized waste service could
create billing and responsibility issues based on problems experienced with similar
arrangements.

Council also discussed whether incentives such as reduced fees or garbage services could
encourage cottage courts or other preferred development types, but Mr. Kirkman
cautioned against creating inequitable treatment between development types and
problematic billing procedures.

Council discussed whether to reduce minimum lot sizes in the City's two lowest-density
residential zones to increase housing opportunities. They noted the need for additional
housing and more diverse housing types but also expressed concerns about excessive
density in foothill and fringe areas and the importance of maintaining quality of life, open
space, and orderly growth. Council discussed potentially allowing more moderate
densities in appropriate areas rather than encouraging maximum-density development.

Mr. Anglesey explained that the amendments will require an addendum to
Comprehensive Plan 2040 incorporating the State requirements. The earliest
anticipated Planning and Zoning Commission hearing is September 9, 2026, followed by
a City Council hearing on October 1, 2026. The State requirements must be implemented
by February 1, 2027.

Council requested that staff proceed with the proposed subdivision-related amendments
and bring potential changes to minimum lot sizes back for separate discussion at the next
work session. Council reached consensus to move forward with the current Title 17
amendments to meet State requirements while considering minimum lot size changes
separately.

Council President Mangum called a recess at 10:52 a.m.

Council President Mangum resumed the meeting at 11:01. a.m.

CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 7.
AUGUST 13, 2026

AGENDA ITEM NO. 7: PAY SCALE CHANGES FOR POLICE MANAGEMENT
AND FIRE MANAGEMENT—HUMAN RESOURCES

Jay Seedall, Human Resources Director, presented a proposal to expand the Police and
Fire management compensation pay scales from 10 to 12 steps. He explained that the City
had previously updated the pay scales for general employees, temporary/seasonal
employees, and non-management Police and Fire positions, but management scales had
not yet been addressed. The proposal is intended to align management scales with the
City's existing 12-step structures, provide additional compensation growth, and address
salary compression between frontline and management positions. Mr. Seedall explained

that the current Police management scale has 10 steps, with 2.5% increases between the
initial steps and 1.5% increases thereafter. The proposal would add two steps and
modestly adjust the progression. He emphasized that the change is not a comprehensive
compensation study, but an effort to improve internal consistency and encourage
employees to pursue management positions. He explained that salary compression
occurs when overtime, holiday pay, and other compensation allow frontline employees to
earn compensation comparable to or greater than salaried managers.

Police Chief Roger Schei noted that a detective sergeant who has reached step 10 on the
scale and a lieutenant currently earn within approximately 40 cents of one another
despite the lieutenant's greater responsibilities. He also noted that only two sergeants
applied for two recent lieutenant openings, highlighting the challenge of attracting
employees to management roles.

For Fire management, approximately four positions would be affected. Mr. Seedall
explained that the Fire scale has a different historical progression, so directly applying
the same structure as Police could negatively affect Fire compensation. The proposal
therefore retains the Fire scale's existing compensation philosophy while making modest
adjustments to provide for additional growth and greater consistency between Police
and Fire management scales. Mr. Seedall clarified that management positions are
outside the Police and Fire Collective Bargaining Agreements, so the proposal would not
affect those contracts.

Chief Schei stated that the union president supports the proposal because it would
strengthen succession planning by encouraging employees to pursue management
positions and develop future department leaders.

The estimated annual cost is approximately $22,492 for Police management and $8,047
for Fire management, which departments indicated could be absorbed within existing
budgets. Human Resources is also continuing to collect compensation data from other
cities for a future comprehensive compensation review.

Council expressed support for addressing salary compression, management
recruitment, and succession planning. Council discussed making the Fire scale fully
consistent with the Police scale, but Mr. Seedall explained that this would be better

CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 8
AUGUST 13, 2026

addressed through the future comprehensive review. Council reached consensus to
expand the Police and Fire management pay scales from 10 to 12 steps, with
implementation targeted for the beginning of the fiscal year.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 8: JOHNNY CREEK SEWER CONNECTION FEES
DISCUSSION—WATER POLLUTION CONTROL

Water Pollution Control staff was in attendance to discuss the Johnny Creek mainline
project and receive Council feedback regarding possible reduction or elimination of
capacity fees for residents who connect to the new sewer line.

Levi Adams, Water Pollution Control Superintendent, explained that the City charges
capacity fees, rather than connection fees, to new sewer users. The one-time fees
represent a user’s share of existing treatment and collection system infrastructure and
may be used for limited purposes, primarily repayment of existing debt. The current
residential capacity fee is approximately $5,000. The proposed Johnny Creek project is
the first phase of a larger effort to extend sanitary sewer service through an area with
approximately 180 homes currently served by septic systems. The first phase includes
nearly one mile of sewer mainline and was funded through approximately $1 million in
federal funds.

Mr. Adams explained that the City cannot generally require residents to connect to the
sewer system. However, if a septic system fails within 300 feet of an available sewer line,
the Health Department will not permit the septic system to be repaired and the property
must connect to the sewer. Staff was seeking Council direction on whether reducing or
eliminating capacity fees could encourage residents to connect voluntarily as the sewer
becomes available. Mr. Adams noted that eliminating the capacity fee would not affect
sewer operations or maintenance, but would reduce funds available for repayment of
existing infrastructure debt and potentially free other funds for future system
expansions.

Council discussed the financial burden on homeowners, noting that eliminating the
capacity fee would not eliminate the significant cost of connecting to the sewer system.

Mr. Adams estimated that a private contractor could charge approximately $15,000 to
$20,000 for the connection, in addition to applicable permits and other costs. He also
explained that homeowners must currently pay the full capacity fee when connecting
after annexation, as well as the cost of the private connection.

Council discussed the potential environmental benefits of moving residents from septic
systems to sanitary sewer, particularly because of the density of development in the
Johnny Creek area.

Justin Armstrong, Water Superintendent, stated that the City frequently monitors nitrate
levels in the area as an indicator of potential impacts from failing septic systems. He

CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 9
AUGUST 13, 2026

reported that no particular impact to City wells had been identified to date, but
acknowledged that failing septic systems could present a concern for groundwater
quality in the future.

Council expressed concern about establishing a precedent by providing a financial
incentive to Johnny Creek residents when similar incentives had not been provided to
residents in other areas. Council members noted that any reduction or waiver would need
to be considered fairly for future annexations, sewer extensions, and new development.
Council also noted that the Johnny Creek mainline was constructed with federal funding
rather than ratepayer funds, but concluded that this did not justify waiving capacity fees.

Council reached consensus that the capacity fees should not be waived or reduced for
Johnny Creek residents and that residents should connect to the sewer system as their
septic systems fail or when they otherwise determine connection is necessary.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 9: FLOCK CAMERA POLICIES AND USAGE—POLICE
DEPARTMENT

Representatives from the Pocatello Police Department (PPD), including Chief Roger
Schei, Captain Zac Bartschi, and Assistant Chief Eric Anderson, were in attendance to
discuss and receive Council feedback about the Pocatello Police Department's Flock
camera policies, procedures, and usage.

Captain Bartschi stated that PPD began researching automated license plate reader
(ALPR) technology in 2024 and evaluated several vendors based on cost, whether the
system would be purchased or leased, technology updates, installation and relocation, IT
requirements, and overall value. He explained that PPD selected Flock because its lease-
based model included camera installation and technology updates and was determined
to best meet the Department’s needs.

Mr. Mangum stated that this presentation was intended to be informational regarding
Flock camera policies, procedures, and usage, and that no decisions would be made at
this time.

Captain Bartschi explained that the Flock system does not use facial recognition, identify
vehicle drivers, track cell phones, issue traffic citations, record conversations, or replace
police officers or their discretion. He described the system as an investigative tool and
force multiplier that provides information and investigative leads to officers.

Chief Schei stated that the technology allows the Department to improve efficiency and
maintain staffing levels as the City grows by allowing officers to identify vehicle locations
without physically searching multiple locations.

Captain Bartschi stated that the system can assist investigations by identifying vehicle
characteristics, including make, model, color, roof racks, rear tags, and certain stickers
or other distinguishing features. He explained that officers can search using vehicle

CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 10
AUGUST 13, 2026

characteristics when a license plate is unavailable, although a plate, date, and time
provide more precise search results. He cited a 2024 hit-and-run investigation in which a
Flock camera captured both the vehicle and the incident itself; he noted that existing City
traffic cameras did not capture the incident. Captain Bartschi explained that
investigative alerts can be generated when law enforcement enters a vehicle of interest
into appropriate law enforcement databases, such as a stolen vehicle or an endangered
or missing person associated with an alert. The system can notify trained personnel when
the vehicle passes a reader, allowing officers to respond and confirm the circumstances.
Captain Bartschi stated that Pocatello owns the data generated by its cameras and that
the system is limited to images captured on public streets. He explained that Flock data is

automatically deleted after 30 days and cannot be searched after that period. If a read
is relevant to an investigation, officers can download it and attach it to the Department's
records as evidence, where it is retained as part of the case. In response to a question by
Council, Captain Bartschi explained that officers may run a license plate when it is visible
in public, similar to an officer observing and checking a plate while driving, and that a
specific suspicious activity is not required for the plate to be checked.

In response to questions from Council, Chief Schei explained that PPD had disabled
nationwide access to its camera data and limited access to regional law enforcement
partners, which included the western states. He stated that the Department had recently
changed its access procedures in response to technology developments and community
feedback. Regional partners may access Pocatello’s cameras without calling for
permission, but PPD is implementing requirements that a search must include a qualifying
criminal purpose, a reason, and a report number consistent with PPD policies. Agencies
outside the regional network must contact PPD and provide a specific law enforcement
reason before information is shared. Chief Schei cited a recent ATM burglary in which
PPD officers used Idaho Falls cameras to locate a suspect vehicle and then notified Idaho
Falls officers of the vehicle’s location and direction of travel. He stated that regional
access was established because of Pocatello’s location along major transportation
corridors, including Interstate 15, Interstate 86, and Highway 30, and the area’s exposure
to drug and human trafficking. He noted that the system has been used in human
trafficking investigations with regional law enforcement agencies. In response to
questions from Council regarding earlier audit materials indicating that Pocatello
cameras were being queried by agencies nationwide, Chief Schei explained that
nationwide access had been disabled within approximately the previous two months as
PPD continued to evaluate and modify its policies and procedures. He stated that the
Department had consulted with other Idaho law enforcement agencies and was
continuing to narrow access based on law enforcement purpose and community
concerns. In response to questions from Council regarding whether Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) could access or request information from PPD’s Flock system
for immigration purposes, Chief Schei stated that PPD has conducted zero searches
solely for immigration purposes. He explained that when ICE contacts PPD, the request
generally involves a criminal matter, such as a person with a warrant for arrest for
aggravated battery or domestic battery. In those circumstances, PPD may conduct a
search related to the criminal matter. Chief Schei stated that ICE’s access to PPD’s

CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION NN
AUGUST 13, 2026

system has been completely disabled and that ICE would have to contact PPD and submit
an agency-assist request identifying the reason for the request. PPD would then
document the agency assist and the criminal matter supporting the search.

In response to questions from Council regarding whether Flock employees could access
Pocatello’s data because the live data is hosted through Flock’s cloud infrastructure,
Sheerica Wilkins, Flock Safety Public Affairs Manager for Idaho and the greater Pacific
Northwest, stated that Flock uses Amazon Web Services GovCloud and that access by
Flock personnel is limited to employees meeting Criminal Justice Information Services
(CJIS) requirements. She explained that such access is intended for technical_and

software updates and that an audit trail is maintained. She offered to provide written
information identifying the applicable personnel and access controls. Ms. Wilkins stated
that Flock personnel do not generally access individual license plate information as part
of technical support and that access is limited by contractual obligations.

Council expressed concern that the contract appeared to permit Flock to use customer-
generated data and potentially disclose footage to third parties under certain
circumstances.

In response to questions from Council regarding Section 4.2 of the Flock contract
concerning customer-generated data, Ms. Wilkins stated that Flock uses aggregate, de-
identified data to improve its technology and that individual vehicle or City-specific
information is not used for that purpose. She acknowledged that the contract language
could be clearer and stated that Flock was working toward more plain-language terms.
Ms. Wilkins offered to provide written clarification and stated that Flock was willing to
amend its contracts if a City desired different language. In response to questions from
Council regarding Section 5.3 concerning disclosure of footage, Ms. Wilkins explained
that Flock reviews legal requests to determine whether they are valid, properly served,
appropriately scoped, and legally enforceable, and that the City is notified when legally
permitted. She stated that a court order or other legally enforceable process would
control and that Flock has an emergency procedure for situations involving an immediate
threat of death or serious physical injury. In response to questions from Council regarding
how Flock determines that an emergency justifies disclosure without prior City approval,
Ms. Wilkins described Flock’s emergency process and stated that it is based on a credible
risk of serious physical injury or death and whether the requested information could help
prevent that harm. She agreed to provide the process in writing.

Council expressed a preference for amending the contract so that Flock could not
disclose Pocatello footage to a third party without the City’s express permission, except
when disclosure was legally. required.

Ms. Wilkins stated that Flock was willing to discuss such an amendment with its legal team.

CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 12
AUGUST 13, 2026

Chief Schei stated that law enforcement requests involving Pocatello data should be
routed through PPD rather than directly through Flock, particularly in situations where
another agency may need information concerning a suspect traveling through the area.

In response to questions from Council regarding whether any Flock employee, including
corporate personnel, could view Pocatello’s cameras, Ms. Wilkins stated that access is
restricted to CJIS-compliant personnel and that she personally does not have access.

Chief Schei explained that CJIS requirements restrict access to sensitive law enforcement
systems and provide auditability of system activity.

Captain Bartschi stated that PPD employees who access the Flock system must be
trained and that access is limited to sworn officers, dispatch personnel, and crime
analysts. Access is immediately terminated when an employee separates from the
Department. Each search is required to include a reason and report number, and
employees must follow PPD policy and applicable state law. Captain Bartschi stated that
PPD conducts audits of system use and plans to conduct them quarterly rather than only
at the minimum frequency required by state law. He explained that the Department
reviews system activity, including searches, reasons for searches, and report numbers,
and that regional partner activity is included in the audit process. PPD uses a crime
analyst and administrators to provide additional checks and balances. Misuse is subject
to the Department's disciplinary policies. Captain Bartschi stated that an audit had
identified an instance in which an officer failed to enter the reason for a search, and the
Department corrected the issue.

Ms. Wilkins stated that Flock had recently made entering a search reason mandatory for
all agencies using the system. The importance of auditing all activity rather than relying
solely on asample and ensuring that misuse is identified and addressed was discussed.

In response to questions from Council regarding Flock’s Nova system and whether
Pocatello’s data was being used to create detailed profiles of individuals, Chief Schei
stated that Pocatello does not have Flock Nova and has no intention of moving in that
direction.

Captain Bartschi demonstrated the type of information generated by a Flock camera,
explaining that a read generally provides an image of the rear of a vehicle, its license
plate, location, date, and time. He explained that multiple reads may be available when a
vehicle passes several cameras and that relevant images can be preserved as part of an
investigation. Captain Bartschi described PPD’s ALPR transparency portal, which
provides information regarding the program, applicable state law and Department
policy, and examples of successful uses of the system. He stated that PPD intends to
continue updating the portal as additional information and successes become available.

Chief Schei and Captain Bartschi reviewed several examples in which Flock had assisted
PPD investigations, including locating a 71-year-old man arrested for sexual abuse of a

CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 13°
AUGUST 13, 2026

child under 16, locating a kidnapped 13-year-old who was returned to her family, and
locating a dementia patient who had traveled to Nevada. They also discussed the use of
ALPR technology in the investigation of Skylar Meade after he traveled through the
region. Chief Schei discussed the University of Idaho student murders in Moscow and
stated that license plate readers could have assisted investigators in identifying the
suspect vehicle more quickly. He also referenced the McKinley stabbing case and stated
that ALPR technology could have helped establish the vehicle’s route and movements.

Chief Schei stated that Flock is a tool that can assist officers but does not independently
solve crimes. He acknowledged public concerns regarding surveillance technology and

stated that PPD can control its local use through policies, procedures, and access

restrictions. He emphasized that the Department intends to continue adapting its policies

as technology and community expectations change. In response to questions from

Council regarding the annual cost of the Flock system, Chief Schei stated that the

ewoooe currently has two contracts with a combined annual cost of approximately
120,000.

Council discussed the effectiveness of the system in relation to its cost and the
community’s concerns about surveillance. Council members asked whether Flock
technology has resulted in measurable reductions in crime, increased warrants, arrests,
or prosecutions, and which categories of crime have benefited most. They noted that
available independent academic research appears limited and that the clearest
documented benefits identified to date involve vehicle-related crimes, including stolen
vehicles and hit-and-run investigations. Council expressed interest in independent, non-
law-enforcement and non-Flock academic research to evaluate the effectiveness and
trade-offs of ALPR technology.

Chief Schei stated that he would research available information from organizations such
as the National Academy and the International Association of Chiefs of Police.

Council members emphasized that independent academic studies, rather than studies
conducted by Flock or law enforcement organizations, would be particularly useful in
evaluating the technology. They discussed the difficulty of measuring the monetary value
of the system against the benefits of solving serious crimes, particularly crimes involving
children. Council members also noted the difficulty of measuring the deterrent effect of
the cameras because it is impossible to know how many crimes may not have occurred
because offenders were aware of the technology.

In response to questions from Council regarding how PPD measures the effectiveness of
Flock, Chief Schei stated that the transparency portal could provide more specific
statistics regarding the number of criminal investigations materially assisted, stolen
vehicles recovered, wanted persons arrested, missing or endangered persons located,
hit-and-run cases solved, and other cases materially advanced through the use of Flock.
Chief Schei stated that officers have been instructed to report successful uses of the
system to their supervisors and acknowledged that the existing list of successes is not

CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 14
AUGUST 13, 2026

exhaustive. He indicated that it would work toward creating a more consistent method of
documenting such outcomes. Chief Schei discussed the deterrent effect of the
technology and noted that the locations of the cameras are publicly known. He stated
that PPD has become aware of information being shared on social media showing the
locations of Flock cameras, which may allow individuals involved in criminal activity to
avoid monitored routes. He noted that this demonstrates both the visibility of the system
and the difficulty of measuring deterrence. In response to questions from Council
regarding whether copies of system audits could be provided to Council, Chief Schei
agreed to provide future quarterly audits and stated that audit information could also be
included on the transparency portal.

Council members requested additional information regarding Flock access logs, including
when and where Flock employees may access data; the contract provisions concerning
customer-generated data; the extent of Flock employee access to cameras; independent
academic studies regarding ALPR effectiveness; and additional statistics regarding the
system's effectiveness. They also requested additional information regarding custom hot
lists, including who has authority to place a vehicle on a hot list and the standards
governing that process. Council members requested that the subject be placed on the
agenda of another Work Session to further discuss the Flock system and potential
contract amendments, specifically section 4.2 and 5.3. Council members also requested
that independent academic studies be compiled and presented as they become available.

Captain Bartschi agreed to work with Flock on the requested changes and return to
Council with an update regarding the steps taken.

Ms. Wilkins stated that Flock was willing to work with the City on contract amendments
and provide written clarification regarding its data-use and emergency disclosure
provisions.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 10: FISCAL YEAR 2027 BUDGET DISCUSSION—FINANCE
DEPARTMENT

Council reviewed public comments and Council discussion from the August 6, 2026 Public
Hearing.

Rich Morgan, Chief Financial Officer, stated that only one comment had been received
regarding the budget during the public hearing which was addressed at that time. In
response to a question from Council, Mr. Morgan confirmed that the Fiscal Year 2027
budget appropriation ordinance, Fiscal Year 2027 forgone levy resolution, and Fiscal
Year 2027 departmental fee schedule resolution would be brought before Council at the
August 20, 2026 Regular City Council meeting and reviewed the remaining steps for
finalizing the budget process.

CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION ibs)
AUGUST 13, 2026

Council members referenced topics from previous budget discussions, including salary
savings, which they would like to discuss further at a future Work Session, the possibility
of holding regular budget discussions on a monthly or quarterly basis, and introducing
formal financial policies for procurement and bid processing.

Mr. Morgan stated that there has been discussion about a formal procurement policy and
a quote had been secured from Central Square for adding a module to the Naviline
system. Inresponse to a question from Council, he stated that the total amount published
for the Fiscal Year 2027 budget is $186, 698, 370.

AGENDA ITEM NO. Tl: COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARD UPDATES

Council President Mangum announced that this item had been pulled from the agenda.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 12: ADJOURN

There being no further business, Council President Mangum adjourned the meeting at
1:00 p.m.

APPROVED:

“Wye Oath

MARK DAHLQUIST, MAYOR

PREPARED BY: