City of Idaho Falls | agenda | meeting 2026-10-08 | City Council Meeting source: https://www.idahofallsidaho.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_10082026-2190 Page 1 of 10 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Idaho Falls City Council Meeting 680 Park Avenue Thursday October 8, 2026 6:30 P.M. Mayor City Council Jim Francis Council President, Seat 4 John Radford Council Seat 5 Kirk Larsen Council Seat 3 Brandon Lee Council Seat 2 Jim Freeman Council Seat 6 Michelle Ziel-Dingman Council Seat 1 Lisa Burtenshaw Livestream at www.idahofallsidaho.gov/429/Live-Stream Page 2 of 10 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Welcome to the Idaho Falls City Council Meeting. Regularly scheduled City Council meetings are open to the general public. City Council meetings are also live- streamed and archived on the City website. Please be aware that the meeting agenda will differ from the published version if amendments to the agenda are made by the Council during the meeting. The Council encourages public input. While a general public comment option is not required by Idaho law, the Idaho Falls City Council welcomes general public input as part of regular City Council meetings. General public comment will be allowed for up to 20 minutes. However, citizens are always welcome to contact their Council representatives via e-mail or telephone, as listed on the City website. The Council is committed to an atmosphere that promotes equal opportunity, civility, mutual respect, proper decorum and freedom from discrimination or harassment. Those who wish to address City Council during the council meetings are encouraged to adhere to the guidelines below. Public Comment Guidelines Speakers are encouraged to: • State their name and city of residence. • Focus comments on matters within the purview of the City Council. Limit comments to three (3) minutes or less. • Refrain from repeating information already presented to preserve time for others to speak. Large groups are encouraged to select one or two speakers to represent the voice of the entire group. • Practice civility and courtesy. City leaders have the right and the responsibility to maintain order and decorum during the meeting. Time may be curtailed for those speakers whose comments are profane or disruptive in nature. • Refrain from comments on issues involving matters currently pending before the City’s Planning and Zoning Commission or other matters that require legal due process, including public hearings, City enforcement actions, and pending City personnel disciplinary matters. • Comments that pertain to activities or performance of individual City employees should be shared directly with the City’s Human Resources Department (208-612-8248), the City’s Legal Department (208-612- 8178) or with the Office of the Mayor (208-612-8235). Public Hearing Guidelines • In-Person Testimony. Because public hearings must follow various procedures required by law, please wait to offer your testimony until invited/indicated. Please address Council directly and try to limit your time to three (3) minutes. • Written Testimony. The public may provide written testimony via postal mail sent to City Hall or via email sent to the City Clerk at IFClerk@idahofalls.gov. Testimony will be distributed to the members of the Council and become a part of the official public hearing record. Written testimony must be received no later than forty-eight (48) hours prior to the date of the hearing to ensure inclusion in the permanent City record. If you need communication aids or other physical accommodations to attend or access this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (208) 612-8414 or the ADA Coordinator at (208) 612-8323 prior to the meeting. They will help accommodate special needs wherever possible. 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 City Council Agenda City Council Chambers 6:30 PM Thursday, October 8, 2026 1. Call to Order & Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Staff responses to prior public comment and other updates 4. Public Comment Please see guidelines on page 2. 5. Consent Agenda Questions on Consent Agenda Items may be addressed and/or moved to the Regular Agenda for separate consideration if requested by a Council Member. Items typical of consent can include routine items for purchase, supply or inventory replenishment, vehicle or equipment replacement, etc., that are already budgeted. Other changes to this agenda may require the approval of a majority of Council. A) Office of the Mayor 1) City Council Meeting Minutes 26-386 2026-07-21 2026-07-27 2026-08-24 2026-08-27 2026-09-10 Attachments: Action Item: Approve, accept, or receive all items on the Consent Agenda according to the recommendations presented (or take other action deemed appropriate). 6. Regular Agenda A) Human Resources 1) City of Idaho Falls 457 Plan - Capital Group/American Funds 26-384 The City of Idaho Falls 457 Plan with The Capital Group/American Funds is a deferred compensation plan that predates current staff involvement. The exact origination date and full history of the plan are not known - no plan documents have been located either by the City or by Capital Group/American Funds. What is known is that the City stopped allowing new employee enrollments in this plan an estimated one to two decades ago, and no new contributions have been made to the plan since that time. Page 3 of 10 City Council Agenda October 8, 2026 Staff became aware of the plan's existence a little over a year ago. At that time, a review found only a small number of employees with any remaining balance in the plan. Currently, only one individual - a current employee - still has funds invested in this plan, and that individual is in the process of withdrawing their funds. That withdrawal is expected to be completed no later than January 2027. Because the plan retains no active participants (aside from the one individual currently withdrawing) and accepts no new enrollments or contributions, it no longer serves any ongoing purpose for the City or its employees. The purpose of this agenda item is to obtain City Council authorization to formally terminate the City of Idaho Falls 457 Plan with The Capital Group/American Funds. Upon Council approval, staff will send a formal letter to Capital Group/American Funds requesting termination of the plan, to take effect once the remaining participant has completed the withdrawal of their funds. Authorization to formally terminate the City of Idaho Falls 457 Plan held with The Capital Group/American Funds, and to direct staff to notify Capital Group/American Funds in writing to close out the plan once the final participant has withdrawn their funds (or take other action deemed appropriate). Action Item(s): 2) Memorandum of Agreement (MOU) Between IBEW Local 57 and The City of Idaho Falls 26-401 Elimination of one position in the collective bargaining Agreement and the addition of two new positions in the collective bargaining agreement. Position eliminated: Traffic Technician. Positions added: Journeyman Operation and Traffic Signal Electrician and Apprentice Operation and Traffic Signal Electrician. These two classifications shall replace the classification of Traffic Technician currently listed in Exhibit “A.” Upon execution of this MOU, the classification of Traffic Technician shall be removed from Exhibit “A.” Any employee who holds the classification of Traffic Technician as of the date of this Agreement shall be placed into either the Journeyman Operation and Traffic Signal Electrician classification or the Apprentice Operation and Traffic Signal Electrician classification, as mutually determined by the City and IBEW Local 57 based upon the factors set forth in the Promotion & Change of Employment provisions of the Agreement, including the incumbent’s length of continuous service, knowledge, training, ability, skill, and adaptability. This MOU is subject to approval by the Idaho Falls City Council and ratification by the membership of IBEW Local 57. Approve the MOU with Power Union CBA and give authorization to the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Action Item(s): Page 4 of 10 City Council Agenda October 8, 2026 MOU Attachments: B) Parks & Recreation 1) Meppen Park Irrigation System Installation Bid 26-389 Idaho Falls Parks and Recreation solicited bids from qualified vendors for the installation of the Meppen Park Irrigation System Phase. A Summer Rain Inc. was the lowest of the 3 bids received with a total bid of $98,900.00. Accept and approve the proposal for the irrigation system installation at Meppen Park and award the bid to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, A Summer Rain Inc. in the amount of $98,900.00 (or take other action deemed appropriate). Action Item(s): Bid Attachments: C) Idaho Falls Power 1) Professional Services Agreement with HDR Engineering in Support of the Rack Substation Rebuild Project 26-387 On June 21, 2024, the city established a Master Agreement with HDR. This Task Order, if approved, authorizes the consultant to carry out the necessary design work for rebuilding the Rack Distribution Substation, located adjacent to the Lower Power Plant off Sunnyside Road. The total negotiated, not to exceed amount for this work, is $386,000.00. Approve the Amendment to Agreement for Professional Engineering Services and Professional Services Task Order with HDR Engineering Incorporated for a total of $386,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute both documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Action Item(s): Task Order Amendment Agrmt HDR Agreement Attachments: 2) Sole Source Procurement for Materials and Services with Western States Equipment Company for Peaking Plant Equipment 26-353 These agreements retain the Western States Equipment Company who hold warranties on the 7 generators located at the Idaho Falls Peaking Plant. The 3-Year Oil Change Parts Only Kits Agreement supplies oil filters, oil and sample kits needed for performing 2000-hour engine services and the 5-Year Preventative Maintenance Agreement provides required various Page 5 of 10 City Council Agenda October 8, 2026 hourly maintenance required to meet warranty requirements. The totals for these agreements per year are as follows: Make a Determination of Sole Source Procurement of Materials and Services, Approving the Western States Equipment Company (also known as CAT) Customer Value Agreements for 1.) Oil Change Parts Only Kit Totaling $94,689.00; and 2.) Preventative Maintenance Services Totaling $565,390.00 and give authorization to the Mayor to sign the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Action Item(s): Parts Maintenance Attachments: D) Community Development Services 1) Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, Willows Place Townhomes Division No. 1. 26-377 Attached is the application for the Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for Willows Place Townhomes Division No. 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its November 5, 2025, meeting and unanimously voted to recommend approval of the final plat to the Mayor and City Council as presented. This Final Plat was reviewed by CDS Planning staff as well as staff from Fire, Idaho Falls Power, and the Public Works Water, Wastewater, and Engineering/Survey Divisions. 1. Approve the Development Agreement for the Final Plat for Willows Place Townhomes Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement (or take other action deemed appropriate). 2. Approve the Final Plat for Willows Place Townhomes Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor, City Engineer, and City Clerk to sign said Final Plat (or take other action deemed appropriate). 3. Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Final Plat for Willows Place Townhomes Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Action Item(s): Page 6 of 10 City Council Agenda October 8, 2026 Zoning Map Aerial Map Final Plat Staff Report PC Minutes Reasoned Statement Development Agreement Attachments: 2) Legislative Public Hearing for the Annexation and Initial Zoning of I&M, Industrial and Manufacturing - Annexation and Initial Zoning Ordinances and Reasoned Statements of Relevant Criteria and Standards for approximately 4.482 acres. 26-378 Attached is the application for Annexation and Initial Zoning of I&M, Industrial and Manufacturing, which includes the Annexation and Initial Zoning Ordinances and Reasoned Statements of Relevant Criteria and Standards for approximately 4.482 acres in the E ½ of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 38 East. On August 4, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the annexation with initial zoning of I&M to the Mayor and City Council as presented. This annexation was reviewed by CDS Planning staff as well as staff from Fire, Idaho Falls Power, and the Public Works Water, Wastewater, and Engineering/Survey Divisions. 1. Approve the Ordinance annexing approximately 4.482 acres in the E ½ of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 38 East; assign a Comprehensive Plan Designation of “Industrial;” and under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings, request that it be read by title and published by summary (or consider the Ordinance on the first reading and that it be read by title, reject the Ordinance, or take other action deemed appropriate). 2. Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the annexation of approximately 4.482 acres in the E ½ of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 38 East and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). 3. Approve the Ordinance establishing the initial zoning for I&M, Industrial and Manufacturing as shown in the Ordinance exhibits under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings; and request that it be read by title and published by summary; that the City limits documents be amended to include the area annexed herewith; and that the City Planner be instructed to reflect said annexation, amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, and initial zoning on the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps located in the Planning office (or consider the Ordinance on the first reading and that it be read by title, reject the Ordinance, or take other action deemed appropriate). 4. Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the initial zoning of I&M, Industrial and Manufacturing and give authorization for the mayor to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Action Item(s): Page 7 of 10 City Council Agenda October 8, 2026 Zoning Map Aerial Map Comp Plan Map Exhibit Map Exhibit A Staff Report PC Minutes Ordinance (Annexation) Reasoned Statement (Annexation) Ordinance (Initial Zoning) Reasoned Statement (Initial Zoning) Attachments: 3) Legislative Public Hearing for the Annexation and Initial Zoning of HC, Highway Commercial - Annexation and Initial Zoning Ordinances and Reasoned Statements of Relevant Criteria and Standards for approximately 2.23 acres. 26-379 Attached is the application for Annexation and Initial Zoning of HC, Highway Commercial, which includes the Annexation and Initial Zoning Ordinances and Reasoned Statements of Relevant Criteria and Standards for approximately 2.23 acres in Lots 2 and 3, Carlyle-Erma Subdivision Division No. 1. On September 1, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the annexation with initial zoning of HC to the Mayor and City Council as presented. This annexation was reviewed by CDS Planning staff as well as staff from Fire, Idaho Falls Power, and the Public Works Water, Wastewater, and Engineering/Survey Divisions. 1. Approve the Ordinance annexing approximately 2.23 acres for Lots 2 and 3, Carlyle-Erma Subdivision Division No. 1; assign a Comprehensive Plan Designation of “Mixed-Use Centers & Corridors;” and under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings, request that it be read by title and published by summary (or consider the Ordinance on the first reading and that it be read by title, reject the Ordinance, or take other action deemed appropriate). 2. Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the annexation of approximately 2.23 acres in Lots 2 and 3, Carlyle-Erma Subdivision Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). 3. Approve the Ordinance establishing the initial zoning for HC, Highway Commercial as shown in the Ordinance exhibits under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings; and request that it be read by title and published by summary; that the City limits documents be amended to include the area annexed herewith; and that the City Planner be instructed to reflect said annexation, amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, and initial zoning on the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps located in the Planning office (or consider the Ordinance on the first reading and that it be read by title, reject the Ordinance, or take other action deemed appropriate). Action Item(s): Page 8 of 10 City Council Agenda October 8, 2026 4. Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the initial zoning of HC, Highway Commercial and give authorization for the mayor to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Zoning Map Aerial Map Comp Plan Map Exhibit Map Exhibit A Staff Report PC Minutes Ordinance (Annexation) Reasoned Statement (Annexation) Ordinance (Initial Zoning) Reasoned Statement (Initial Zoning) Attachments: 4) Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing - Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, Higham Riverfront Townhomes. 26-380 Attached is the application for the PUD and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for Higham Riverfront Townhomes. On August 4, 2026, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the PUD to the Mayor and City Council with the condition of additional enhanced vegetation, up to 16 trees as to be negotiated with the Parks Department along the northern buffer and/or to the southwest portion of the property. This PUD was reviewed by CDS Planning staff as well as staff from Fire, Idaho Falls Power, Parks and Recreation, the Public Works Water, Wastewater, Sanitation, and Engineering/Survey Divisions. 1. Approve the Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Higham Riverfront Townhomes as presented (or take other action deemed appropriate). 2. Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Planned Unit Development for Higham Riverfront Townhomes and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Action Item(s): Page 9 of 10 City Council Agenda October 8, 2026 Zoning Map Aerial Comp Plan Map Airport Land Use Structure Elevations 4 plex - ELEVATIONS PUD Plans Staff Report PC Minutes Neighborhood Meeting Public Comments Higham PUD Letter Reasoned Statement Attachments: 7. Announcements 8. Adjournment Page 10 of 10 Memorandum File #: 26-386 City Council DATE: Tuesday, September 29, 2026 AGENDA: Consent FROM: Linda Lundquist, City Clerk DEPARTMENT: Mayor's Office Title City Council Meeting Minutes ☐Ordinance ☐Resolution ☐Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☐Legislative Public Hearing ☒Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☐Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: Approve the City Council Meeting minutes from the July 21, 27, August 24, 27, and September 10, 2026 meetings (or take other action deemed appropriate). Description, Background Information, Purpose: Attached are the following minutes · July 21, 2026 - Special Budget Meeting · July 27, 2026 - Work Session · August 24, 2026 - Work Session · August 27, 2026 - City Council · September 10, 2026 - City Council This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/6/2026 Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City Council Budget Session Meeting Minutes 1 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Tuesday, July 21, 2026 12:00 PM City Council Chambers Call to Order and Roll Call There were present: Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw Council President Jim Francis (via Teams) Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman Councilor Jim Freeman Councilor Kirk Larsen Councilor Brandon Lee Councilor John Radford Also present: Ian Turner, Airport Director Chris Fredericksen, IF Power GM Darin Jones, Human Resources Director Pam Alexander, Municipal Services Director PJ Holm, Parks and Recreation Director Wade Sanner, CDS Director Josh Roos, IF Power Chief Financial Officer Johan Olsen, Fire Chief Brooks Slyter, Assistant Finance Manager Bryce Johnson, Police Chief Chis Canfield, Public Works Director Robert Wright, Library Director Roger Chunn, Library Board Margaret Wimborne, Chief of Staff Cody Roberts, Public Information Officer Zack Jones, City Attorney Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Mayor Burtenshaw called the meeting to order at 12:06 p.m. with the following items: Mayor – Opening Remarks and Announcements • Mayor Burtenshaw emphasized that the budget is a forecast, not cash on hand, and represents educated estimates of revenues and expenditures over the coming fiscal year. • Council and staff were reminded that actual revenues (property taxes, state funding, franchise fees, user fees, etc.) must be monitored throughout the year and spending adjusted accordingly. • The upcoming ERP software is expected to improve financial tracking and help department directors better monitor budgets and revenues in real time. • Mayor Burtenshaw stressed the importance of departmental accountability for staying within budget, while recognizing that unexpected emergencies can occur and should be managed appropriately. • Departments were encouraged to use each budget cycle to plan for known expenses and improve future budgeting based on prior experience. • Printed budget binders were provided to staff and attendees who were not Council Members to ensure everyone had access to the budget materials for the workshop. Mayor & Council – Discussion: Review of Council Priorities for 2026-2027 Budget Year: Budget Workshop Discussion – Council Priorities & Budget Direction • Mayor Burtenshaw explained that the City's strategic aspirations (healthy community, economic vibrancy, good governance, financial stability, safety, etc.) guide the daily work of every department, while the 2026–2027 Council priorities identify specific initiatives for the upcoming budget. City Council Budget Session Meeting Minutes 2 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 • To better track progress, staff added status updates to each Council priority so accomplishments can be measured throughout the year rather than carrying the same priorities forward annually without clear completion. • Several priority areas were highlighted for Council discussion to ensure they are clearly reflected in the budget and understood by departments. Major Priority Discussions • Parks & Greenbelt Improvements o The Parks Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes significant investments, particularly along the Greenbelt, following changes in funding responsibilities with Idaho Falls Power. o Council was reminded that these projects are fully funded through the CIP and are intended to produce visible improvements for residents. • Code Enforcement o Mayor Burtenshaw suggested that Council clarify expectations for code enforcement after concerns raised during the Jefferson Street sidewalk project. o Discussion centered on distinguishing between educating property owners and enforcing existing code and whether improvements are needed before enforcement actions begin. • ERP Implementation & Financial Management o Staff reported the ERP implementation has been a major undertaking but has gone relatively smoothly compared to other cities. o As the system stabilizes, financial planning expects to become more proactive by working with departments year-round on budgeting and capital planning instead of focusing primarily on annual budget preparation. • City Hall Space Planning o Funding is included to evaluate and reorganize office space within City Hall after departmental moves. o A committee will review security needs, public-facing functions, and long-term workspace planning. Personnel & Budget Requests • Council discussed whether departmental requests are primarily for new personnel rather than capital projects. • Department responses included: o Public Works and Municipal Services have limited staffing requests tied to growth and utility operations. o Parks & Recreation intentionally submitted no new staffing requests due to the tight budget year. o Police and Fire continue to have personnel needs because their services are labor- intensive. • Council compared Idaho Falls' staffing levels with Caldwell and noted that direct comparisons are difficult because Idaho Falls operates additional services such as electric utilities, fiber, ambulance, sanitation, and other municipal functions. Utility Billing Software & Customer Service • Council discussed plans for a new utility billing system separate from the ERP. • Goals include: o Modernizing billing and customer service. o Supporting new features such as time-of-day rates, prepay options, texting, AI-assisted customer service, and faster access to customer information. City Council Budget Session Meeting Minutes 3 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 o Providing a single source of billing information across utilities while allowing different departments to access the same customer records. • Council also discussed using the billing system as a communication tool to highlight the value residents receive from city-owned utilities and other municipal services. Resident Communication & Community Engagement • Staff described a proposed Welcome Box for new utility customers containing community information, Parks & Recreation guides, Zoo/recreation coupons, and information on City services, emergency alerts, and local amenities. • Council supported improving communication with both new and long-time residents, noting many people still do not fully understand how City services and programs operate. Jefferson Street Sidewalk Replacement Discussion • Council spent considerable time discussing public concerns over the Jefferson Street sidewalk replacement project. • Key concerns included: o Residents misunderstood who would be responsible for replacing sidewalks after City work. o Communication letters created confusion and frustration. o Homeowners struggled to find contractors willing to perform small sidewalk projects. • Ideas discussed included: o Developing a standardized citywide sidewalk replacement program. o Improving communication before projects begin. o Allowing the City to finance sidewalk replacements and recover costs through utility bill payments. o Exploring partnerships with workforce development organizations or nonprofits to complete smaller projects. o Providing residents both City financing and private contractor options. • Council generally agreed a different approach is needed to make sidewalk replacement more affordable and easier for residents. Long-Term Infrastructure Planning • Council discussed whether future developments could contribute funding toward long-term sidewalk replacement, similar to planning for aging infrastructure decades in advance. • While recognizing legal questions remain, members expressed interest in exploring long-term funding mechanisms. River Corridor Planning • Staff reported that planning for the Snake River corridor remains a high priority, with current work focused on: o Data collection. o Public outreach planning. o Environmental and floodplain analysis. o Coordination between Parks, Community Development, and Idaho Falls Power. • Capital projects are expected in future years after planning is complete. • Council emphasized balancing recreation, environmental protection, public safety, and carefully planned economic development while protecting the river corridor. Overall Budget Philosophy • The Mayor encouraged Council to approach budget discussions with the perspective that Idaho Falls offers exceptional amenities and services, including the Zoo, Aquatic Center, Frontier Center, city-owned utilities, parks, and airport. City Council Budget Session Meeting Minutes 4 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 • While acknowledging that difficult budget decisions remain, the Mayor encouraged maintaining a positive tone focused on the value these community assets provide to residents. Finance 1. Presentation — Property Tax Impact to Property Owners • Finance reviewed the proposed property tax assumptions, including the statutory 3% increase, estimated growth and annexation, and optional use of 1% and 3% forgone taxes. • Staff explained that most of the new property tax revenue would support the General Fund, primarily to help offset rising personnel costs, while other tax-supported funds would receive a 3% increase. • Using estimated property values, Finance showed the annual tax impact on homeowners under three scenarios: o 3% statutory increase only o 3% increase plus 1% forgone o 3% increase plus both 1% and 3% forgone • Similar examples were provided for commercial properties, showing how tax impacts increase with higher property values. • Council noted that the recent shift of property tax burden toward residential properties appears to have stabilized, though final assessment data is still pending. • Council also discussed the lack of local data on short-term rentals (Airbnb’s) and rental properties, expressing interest in working with the County Assessor to better understand the number of residential properties that do not receive the homeowner's exemption. 2. Presentation — General Fund Support of Aquatic Center, Frontier Center, Activity Center, Zoo, Skating Rink, Cemetery, Animal Shelter, Rec. Dept. The City Council held a policy discussion on the level of General Fund support provided to City services and facilities that also generate user fee revenue. The Mayor emphasized that the purpose was not to make immediate budget cuts, but to better understand how much taxpayer support each operation receives and to begin a long-term conversation about whether those subsidy levels remain appropriate. Council was encouraged to consider whether some assets should receive more, less, or no General Fund support in the future. Finance presented six years of historical data for nine fee-supported operations. The charts illustrated both the dollar amount and percentage of General Fund support. Increasing General Fund support indicates taxpayers are covering a larger share of operating costs, while decreasing support shows operations becoming more self-sustaining through user fees. Negative General Fund support indicates operations that fully fund themselves and generate additional revenue for future capital needs. Community Development Services • Permit fees fully covered operating costs during years of unusually high commercial and multifamily construction, but General Fund support has increased as development shifted back toward single-family homes, townhomes, and duplexes. • The proposed 5% permit fee increase will generate approximately $70,000 in additional revenue but will only modestly reduce the subsidy. • Staff is conducting a broader review of permit fees separate from development impact fees. City Council Budget Session Meeting Minutes 5 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Frontier Center • Temporary increases in General Fund support were largely due to reduced revenue during the lobby expansion project. • Recent fee restructuring standardized rental rates, improving fairness and increasing annual revenue by more than $200,000. • The expanded lobby now provides additional rental opportunities for weddings and events. • A benchmarking study comparing Frontier Center fees to similar regional venues will be completed before considering additional fee changes. • The facility maintains a Major Unusual Repair and Replacement Fund (MURF) funded through ticket surcharges for future capital replacements. • Council discussed future improvements to backstage areas while noting the facility remains heavily utilized, with bookings exceeding 180 days annually. Animal Shelter • Reduced General Fund support in the proposed budget reflects the transfer of code enforcement officers to the Police Department rather than operational changes. • Overall subsidy levels have gradually increased over time. Parks and Recreation Programs • Recreation programs, including youth and adult sports, are projected to become fully self- supporting. • Increased field-use fees, higher nonresident rates, and operational efficiencies have improved cost recovery. • Staff emphasized a new philosophy of viewing resident discounts as a community benefit rather than charging nonresidents a penalty. • Any operating surplus would help fund future equipment and facility replacements. Aquatic Center • The Aquatic Center continues to require substantial General Fund support because pools are expensive to operate. • Proposed increases to nonresident admission fees are intended to reduce, but not eliminate, the subsidy. • Staff explained that public pools are typically subsidized by approximately 50%, making Idaho Falls consistent with industry norms. • Approximately 60% of users are City residents and 40% are nonresidents. • Higher nonresident swim team fees have increased revenue without significantly affecting facility usage. Skating Rink • The skating rink has historically been nearly self-supporting. • Indoor pickleball participation has fallen short of expectations despite low fees. • Staff is exploring indoor soccer (futsal) and other programming opportunities to improve year- round utilization. Activity Center • Staffing returned to normal levels after turnover, increasing operating costs. • Programming has been shifted primarily to business hours to reduce overtime expenses. City Council Budget Session Meeting Minutes 6 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 • The Mayor questioned whether the City should continue operating the facility because it receives more than 80% General Fund support. • Staff explained that much of the reported cost represents Parks & Recreation employees who perform maintenance and support work throughout the community, suggesting the building functions more as a Parks & Recreation operations center than a fee-supported recreation facility. • Approximately $173,000 of the $223,000 General Fund support is payroll. • Council discussed whether the federally acquired building could someday be repurposed for another community use, such as a Family Justice Center, while recognizing federal restrictions require Parks & Recreation-related uses unless permission is granted. Zoo and Funland • General Fund support for the Zoo has remained relatively consistent. • Funland revenues have improved, currently generating about $12,000 per week, but remain well below the approximately $35,000 per week assumed in the adopted budget, resulting in an estimated $309,000 revenue shortfall. • Staff recommended allowing another full operating season before making major changes because previous seasons were affected by delayed openings and incomplete facilities. • Future revenue opportunities discussed included banquet rentals, an outdoor amphitheater, miniature golf, and an electric train attraction. • Council reviewed the Zoo's approximately $1.3 million General Fund subsidy and proposed admission increases from $8 to $10 for residents and $12 to $14 for nonresidents. • Attendance remains strong at roughly 140,000 annual visits. • Council requested additional analysis of annual pass usage and asked staff to develop long-term options for reducing the Zoo's General Fund subsidy. Long-Term Financial Strategy • Council discussed establishing multi-year financial targets rather than requiring immediate reductions in General Fund support. • Staff indicated that clearly defined goals would allow departments to develop plans involving sponsorships, operational efficiencies, and revenue growth. • Finance estimated that reducing Zoo support by approximately $1 million would require either: o roughly a 67% increase in fee revenue, o approximately $1.3 million in operating reductions, or o a combination of both. • Council emphasized that financial goals should be phased in over several years and compared against similar communities. AZA Accreditation • Staff explained that maintaining Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) accreditation is a policy choice that increases staffing and operating costs. • While some discretionary conservation spending could potentially be reduced, significant reductions could affect employee recruitment, professional standards, accreditation, and the Zoo's reputation. • Council indicated it should establish policy and financial goals while allowing Zoo management to determine how best to achieve them. City Council Budget Session Meeting Minutes 7 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 ERP and Revenue Opportunities • Council highlighted the City's new ERP system as an opportunity for Finance to provide departments with improved financial analysis and strategic budgeting support. • Staff also discussed creating broader membership or subscription programs that could combine Zoo, Funland, and recreation benefits to provide more predictable year-round revenue. Cemetery • The Cemetery continues to receive substantial General Fund support because revenues remain relatively flat while personnel and maintenance costs continue to rise. • Recent investments include road repairs, infrastructure improvements, and niche walls. • Council discussed the challenge of funding perpetual maintenance through a one-time maintenance fee and considered increasing that fee from $200 to $300. • Broader policy questions included whether perpetual maintenance funding should be restructured, whether burial plot resales should be more regulated, and how to address the City's maintenance obligations when individual families own burial plots. • Staff explained that plot owners are responsible for individual grave sites while the City maintains overall grounds and infrastructure. • Council also recognized that cemeteries serve broader public purposes as community green spaces and walking areas. Governmental Fund Overview Finance concluded the discussion by reviewing how City operations are funded through different governmental fund types: • General Fund – flexible funding supported primarily by property taxes and state revenues. • Special Revenue Funds – restricted funding for services such as streets, recreation, library, and EMS. • Capital Project Funds – dedicated to infrastructure, grants, and major capital improvements. • Enterprise Funds – self-supporting operations funded entirely through user fees, including power, water, sewer, sanitation, and the airport. Public Works was highlighted as an example of a department that operates across all four fund types because it manages services funded through multiple revenue sources. 3. Presentation — Governmental Funds, Capital Projects and Personnel Costs for 2026-2027 Staff reviewed the operational enhancements and capital projects already included in the proposed $380 million FY 2026-27 budget, emphasizing that most funding is dedicated to maintaining existing services. The discussion focused on new initiatives before Council considers any remaining discretionary funding requests. • Operational additions include: o A new Police Response Detective funded through opioid settlement and seizure funds. o A part-time Police Evidence Clerk to support evidence management. o New Parks & Recreation winter and spring activity guides, expected to be self-funded through advertising and enterprise revenues. o Additional part-time Transit staff, supported through grants and local match funding. • Major administrative and technology projects: o A $2 million Utility Customer Information System replacement will modernize utility billing over an estimated 18-month implementation, funded by utility enterprise funds. City Council Budget Session Meeting Minutes 8 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 o $300,000 is included to relocate Human Resources into Annex B, eliminating leased office space (saving approximately $40,000 annually) and creating dedicated training and private meeting areas. The project will be funded using repayments associated with the Frontier Center project. • Transit and Parks investments: o Funding is included for new transit bus stops, primarily supported by grants, with locations to be finalized as street improvements occur. o Greenbelt-funded park projects include: ▪ Converting the railroad bridge into a pedestrian pathway. ▪ Building stairs into the Japanese Friendship Garden. ▪ Heritage Park pathway, lighting, and parking lot improvements. ▪ Additional park improvements supported through a combination of grants and delayed playground replacement funding. • Golf Fund improvements: o Strong golf course revenues, driven largely by the success of automated driving range ball machines, will fund new maintenance equipment and patio improvements without General Fund support. • Fire Department investments: o Wildland deployment revenues will fund outfitting new City fire engines and potentially purchase additional wildland apparatus if grant funding is unavailable, allowing wildland revenues to support broader fire department operations. • Impact Fee projects: o Police impact fees will continue funding approximately $630,000 of annual police station debt service and purchase two police vehicles using previously collected impact fees. o Staff cautioned that declining impact fee revenue may require the General Fund to eventually absorb more of the police station debt payments. o Parks impact fees will fund grading and utility work at Sandy Downs. o Street impact fees will support several roadway improvement projects throughout the City. • Public Works infrastructure: o Multiple street, bridge, traffic signal, and landscaping projects are planned, many leveraging state and federal grants. Staff noted that while the City's direct contribution is smaller, the total infrastructure investment exceeds $17 million. • Zoo capital improvements: o Zoo projects will be funded through prior-year surcharge revenues and donations rather than the General Fund. o Planned improvements include exhibit upgrades and facility improvements, while the larger entrance project remains unfunded. o Staff noted these projects are largely replacements or renovations and are not expected to require additional staffing or ongoing General Fund operating costs. Break 2:32 pm – 2:46 pm 4. Presentation — Fees for City Services and Changes/Increases for 2026-2027 Staff presented proposed updates to the City’s Master Fee Schedule, highlighting major fee changes by department. Staff noted that there are a significant number of changes this year, with more than City Council Budget Session Meeting Minutes 9 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 half of the fee schedule being revised when filtering only for updates. A detailed list of all changes will be provided to Council for further review before adoption. Public Works / Utility Fee Changes Water and Wastewater • Water fees: o Proposed 3% increase for service connection fees. o Proposed 5% increase for monthly utility charges. • Wastewater fees: o Proposed 5% increase for monthly sewer charges. o Proposed 5–7% increases for industrial customers depending on classification. o Proposed 5% increase for sewer main connections. o Proposed 30% increase for sewer service connection fees. Sewer Connection Fee Study • The sewer connection fee increase is based on a recently completed capacity study following major wastewater treatment improvements, including the dewatering project. • Staff explained that Idaho Falls’ connection fees are significantly lower than surrounding communities: o Idaho Falls proposed fee: approximately $1,680 per connection after the increase. o Comparable regional fees are much higher (for example, approximately $7,000 in some neighboring systems). • The increase will help: o Better reflect the actual cost of capacity in the treatment system. o Strengthen future agreements with regional partners such as the Eastern Idaho Regional Sewer District and UCON. • Staff noted that while the percentage increase is large, the actual dollar amount remains competitive. Sanitation / Landfill Fee • A new Bonneville County Landfill Fee (tipping fee) is proposed as a separate line item on utility bills. • The fee will be charged by the County based on waste tonnage delivered to the transfer station. • Estimated residential impact: o Current sanitation fee: approximately $9.90/month per can. o New landfill fee: approximately $6.90/month per can. (or $16.80/month per can) • The fee will also affect commercial customers and private waste haulers. • Staff emphasized the fee is driven by County landfill costs and future facility needs, not a City- generated increase. • The County is expected to provide public communication explaining how revenues will be used. • City staff will coordinate messaging and provide notice before implementation. Future Recycling Discussion - Council discussed long-term waste management strategies, including: • Regional recycling approaches. • Potential composting opportunities. • Expanded cardboard collection. • Possible partnerships with Bonneville County to achieve economies of scale. City Council Budget Session Meeting Minutes 10 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 • Staff noted landfill capacity challenges are increasing and future solutions may need regional cooperation. Idaho Falls Power and Fiber Fees Power Rate Adjustments • Proposed: o 2% increase to residential monthly base charges. o 3% increase to residential consumption rates. o Additional adjustments to various demand/service fees. • Fiber backbone service fees proposed to increase by 6%. Street Light Utility Fee • Staff proposed establishing a dedicated street light utility fee. • Proposed charge: approximately $1.50/month per customer. • Purpose: o Create a dedicated funding source for street light operation and maintenance. o Improve accounting transparency. • Staff noted Idaho Falls is approximately 70% complete with LED streetlight conversions. • LED upgrades are expected to reduce electricity usage by more than 50%. Airport Fees • Proposed airport fee changes primarily clarify and restructure existing charges: o New landing fees. o New terminal fees. o Key replacement fees for tenant losses or damages. • The revised approach provides clearer billing for: o Allegiant’s less-than-daily service. o Charter flights. o Other intermittent airline operations. Staff explained the change improves consistency rather than representing a high new cost. Parks, Recreation, Zoo, and Golf Fees Parks Proposed changes include: • Removing and consolidating fees to simplify the schedule. • Increases to: o Facility rentals. o Field use fees. o Cemetery fees. • Perpetual cemetery maintenance fee increase: o From $200 to $300 (50% increase). • Zoo and Funland: o Admission and program fee increases. • War Bonnet Round Up: o Admission and VIP seating increases (approximately 6–20%). City Council Budget Session Meeting Minutes 11 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Recreation Programs • Increased nonresident rates for most programs. • Adjustments to skating rink fees and passes. • Staff noted user participation is approximately 60% residents / 40% nonresidents, supporting continued differentiation between resident and nonresident pricing. Golf • Proposed: o 5% increase for residents. o 20% increase for nonresidents. o 15% increase for driving range fees. o 5–8% increases for rentals and passes. Increases reflect strong demand and improved financial performance at the golf course. Other Governmental Fee Updates Additional proposed changes include: • Police and Animal Control fees: o Licensing. o Cremation. o Euthanasia services. • Community Development Services: o 5% increase to permitting-related fees. • Volunteer Center: o New lobby rental fees for events. • General cleanup: o Removal of outdated fees. o Corrections and administrative updates. Finance, Directors - Presentation — Enterprise Funds (Airport, Water, Sanitation, Wastewater, Power and Fiber), New personnel requests, Large Capital Projects Staff reviewed proposed enterprise fund capital projects and personnel additions, noting that fee discussions had already been covered and the focus would be on new staffing requests and major capital investments. Many projects are continuations of previously discussed initiatives or replacement needs. Airport Enterprise Fund • Staff noted there are no significant new updates from the prior June 22 presentation. • Upcoming Council presentations will cover: o Terminal expansion project. o Air Traffic Control Tower and VOR (VHF Omnidirectional Range) project. • Other airport capital projects include: o Carryover projects from the current year. o The Peterson property project, which is being maintained in the budget to remain eligible for future FAA funding. • Staff also noted routine enterprise equipment replacements are included. City Council Budget Session Meeting Minutes 12 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Water Enterprise Fund New Personnel Request • Two new Water Service Technicians are proposed. • Purpose: o Replace contracted utility locating services. o Improve coordination between Water, Sewer, Power, and Fiber locating operations. • Staff explained this is budget-neutral, not a cost increase: o Current budgets already fund contracted locating work. o Bringing the work in-house provides: ▪ Better accountability. ▪ More consistent service. ▪ One coordinated locator instead of multiple employees/contractors responding separately. Water Usage Data Discussion • Council asked whether expanded metering efforts could eventually allow residents to see their water usage. • Staff noted: o Customers with meters already have access to usage information through an app. o Water usage data can support conservation efforts. o Idaho Falls has information available regarding per-capita water consumption, though current usage levels indicate conservation opportunities remain. Water Capital Projects Major planned investments include: • New Water Administration Building near Poplar. • Well upgrades and new well development north and south of the city. • Annual water main extensions and replacements coordinated with street projects. • Continued meter box installations to support future expanded metering. • 65th South Pump Station upgrades. • Fleet equipment additions. • Developer participation funding for system expansion and service improvements. Sanitation Enterprise Fund Capital projects include: • Annual replacement of dumpsters, which is a significant ongoing system expense. • Equipment replacements. • Additional projects identified after further budget refinement. Staff noted the sanitation capital list has been expanded since the initial budget discussion and now includes more detailed project planning. Wastewater Enterprise Fund Capital projects are based largely on the 2024 Wastewater Facility Plan Update. Major projects include: • Treatment plant expansion and upgrades. • Improvements related to solids and sludge treatment capacity. • Evaluation of the Clean B system, with potential consideration of a dryer system. City Council Budget Session Meeting Minutes 13 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 • Annual sewer line replacement projects. • Lift station and infrastructure improvements, including generator upgrades. • Treatment plant improvements, including chlorine contact system upgrades to improve employee safety and operational reliability. Stormwater Enterprise Fund Planned projects include: • Removal of storm taps where feasible. • Developer participation projects. • Equipment purchases and replacements. Idaho Falls Power and Fiber: New Personnel Requests Four new positions are proposed: 1. Wireman/Electrician o One position replaces the previously proposed traffic technician. o Intended to support electrical work across Power and potentially other City departments. o Staff noted this could improve citywide efficiency by allowing Power staff to assist with electrical projects currently difficult to staff externally. 2. Apprentice Generation Mechanic: Supports power generation operations. 3. Communications Position: Supports Fiber operations. 4. Additional Power/Fiber-related staffing support o Included to address operational needs and service demands. Staff emphasized the electrician position could benefit multiple City departments by creating a shared resource that can be charged to applicable projects. Power and Fiber Capital Projects • Staff stated that most Power and Fiber capital projects were already reviewed during prior Idaho Falls Power Board meetings. • No major changes were identified from previous discussions. Mayor & Council – Discussion: Discussion — 2026-2027 Department Budget Requests Unfunded Capital Requests and Foregone Tax Discussion • Staff reviewed the remaining unfunded capital requests, totaling approximately $1.7 million, compared to about $1.5 million currently available through: o Remaining projected growth revenue (~$300,000) o 1% foregone property tax authority (~$535,000) o One-time general fund savings from Police Complex debt proceeds (~$680,000) • Council discussed whether to use the additional 3% foregone tax authority designated for capital projects, which would provide approximately $1.6 million more but would reduce future foregone capacity. Council Discussion on Using 3% Foregone for Capital • Several Council members expressed reluctance to use the full 3% foregone amount because: o It is a one-time capital funding source and cannot be used for ongoing operational expenses. o Using it now reduces future flexibility if the Legislature changes foregone tax rules again. City Council Budget Session Meeting Minutes 14 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 • Others noted the risk that future legislative action could further restrict or eliminate foregone authority, making it potentially valuable to use now. • Council agreed they did not want to immediately remove the 3% option from consideration until they understood: o Which requests legally qualify as capital projects. o How using the funding could reduce pressure on ongoing personnel needs. Eligible Capital Projects Staff clarified that the 3% capital foregone authority may be used for: • Construction, expansion, renovation, or replacement of public facilities. • Public works improvements. • Equipment with a useful life of more than 10 years. It does not appear to cover design-only work, unless design is part of a broader construction contract. Potential qualifying requests included: • Fire Station 4 restroom improvements. • Fire infrastructure-related capital items. • Parks and Recreation capital requests. • Ice rink bleacher improvements. • Other one-time capital purchases. Staff estimated that approximately $336,000–$350,000 of current requests could qualify for 3% capital foregone. Prioritization Discussion Council emphasized that: • Department requests were not excessive; many represented legitimate needs that had been deferred. • The City continues to face pressure because state limitations on property tax growth have constrained revenue flexibility. • Council members wanted to balance taxpayer impacts with maintaining adequate service levels. • Council reviewed the impact of using approximately $336,000 in 3% foregone funding: • Estimated residential impact was roughly $10 per year on a $375,000 home. • The impact would be higher for commercial properties. • The funding would be a one-time use. Remaining Budget Gap After applying: • 3% foregone for eligible capital needs (~$336,000–$350,000). • 1% foregone. • Growth revenue. • Police Complex one-time funds. Staff determined that the remaining gap was primarily related to ongoing personnel and operational requests. Approximately $220,000 remained to be addressed from ongoing requests, including items such as: • Police training officer positions. • Police records management system needs. • Dispatcher pay adjustments. • Assistant City Attorney position. City Council Budget Session Meeting Minutes 15 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 • Other personnel-related requests. Department Follow-Up Council agreed staff should return with additional recommendations rather than having Council directly eliminate individual requests. Departments, including Police, Fire, City Attorney, and Library, among others, would review priorities and identify possible reductions, alternatives, or phased approaches. Discussion points included: • Fire’s request for two training officers was highlighted as a major priority due to staffing shortages and overtime pressures. • Council recognized that reducing training capacity could worsen overtime issues. • Staff cautioned that relying on vacancy savings or excess revenues is not sustainable for ongoing personnel costs because personnel expenses continue to grow faster than revenues. Final Budget Direction Council reached consensus on the following approach: Funding Plan • Use approximately $350,000 of 3% foregone authority for capital projects (final amount to be refined). • Use Police Complex one-time funds for other eligible one-time needs, including the records management system. • Use growth revenue and 1% foregone authority for ongoing personnel-related costs. • Continue refining approximately $220,000 in ongoing requests through department discussions. Foregone Tax Resolutions and Next Steps Staff will prepare: • A resolution identifying use of the 1% foregone authority. • A resolution identifying use of the 3% capital foregone authority. • Required public notices and hearings. Upcoming timeline: • Staff will provide an updated summary spreadsheet by the end of the week. • A possible budget follow-up discussion may occur during the next Council work session. • July 30: Present proposed “not-to-exceed” budget amount. • August 13: Public hearing on budget, fees, and foregone tax resolutions. • August 27: Final budget adoption. Council thanked Finance staff, particularly Brooks, for the extensive work organizing departmental requests, financial impacts, and funding options to bring clarity to the budget process. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 4:00 PM. /s/ Linda Lundquist_________________ /s/ Lisa Burtenshaw _____________ Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 1 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Monday, July 27, 2026 3:00 PM City Council Chambers Call to Order and Roll Call There were present: Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw Council President Jim Francis Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman Councilor Jim Freeman Councilor Kirk Larsen Councilor Brandon Lee Councilor John Radford Also present: Wade Sanner, CDS Director Cody Gordon, CDS Building Official Scott Grimmett, Fire Marshal Bryce Johnson, Police Chief Pam Alexander, Municipal Services Director Brooks Slyter, Assistant Finance Manager Zack Jones, City Attorney Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Mayor Burtenshaw called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. with the following items: CDS, Library - Presentation & Discussion: Proposal regarding the old Ferrell’s Building and the Idaho Falls Public Library: Motion: Moved to remove the first item on the agenda and table indefinitely the item regarding the Old Ferrell's Building and the Idaho Falls Public Library. o Moved by: Councilor Francis o Second: Councilor Dingman o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries. Reasoning: The presentation provided to the Council differed from the one previously presented to the Library Board. The Library Board would meet again with staff and the legal department to clarify the proposal, including unresolved questions regarding land, lease, and responsibilities. Mayor, City Council – Discussion: Citywide updates, concerns, questions, reports: • Mayor Burtenshaw o Reminded the Council of a special City Council meeting on August 6 at 7:00 p.m., which will be devoted solely to the Willow Place reconsideration of the appeal. o Explained that meeting materials would be distributed midweek to allow Council members time to review them. o Clarified that the matter is quasi-judicial and that the special meeting is necessary to meet required timelines, rather than combining it with the August 13 budget hearing or other scheduled public hearings later in the month. o Announced a new agenda item that will appear before Public Comment on future Council agendas, allowing department directors to: City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 2 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 ▪ Provide updates on solutions or actions taken in response to issues raised during previous public comments. ▪ Inform the Council and the public about upcoming issues or initiatives. ▪ Emphasized that the new agenda section is not intended for debating public comments, but rather to keep the public informed about how concerns are being addressed and to provide proactive updates from staff. • Council President Francis • Explained his intent to separate the server training requirement from the broader alcohol ordinance so it can be adopted more quickly while other elements in the ordinance are still being considered and explained that this would allow the Police Department to provide the free server training to businesses before the holiday season. • Proposed discussing the amendment at the August 10 work session with a vote on August 27, giving the Council and Legal Department time to review and refine the language. • Mayor Burtenshaw clarified that the change would apply only to server training requirements (employees of the alcohol license holders) and not to the alcohol license holder’s businesses. • Reported that he and Council Member Michelle Ziel-Dingman are continuing to work with the Legal Department on reorganizing and improving the comprehensive alcohol ordinance, noting that the effort will take additional time. • Asked whether the Council would consider allowing beer and wine establishments in the LC (Limited Commercial) zoning district, referencing a previous business proposal that had been denied because of zoning restrictions. Several Council members expressed openness to reviewing the idea. • Reminded everyone of: o The July 28 Friendship Garden sign dedication, celebrating the Friendship Garden and Sister Cities program, with Mrs. Yamada, the wife of the Mayor of Tokai-mura, attending. o National Night Out on August 4, noting discussions about having Mayor Burtenshaw issue a proclamation supporting community policing. • Councilor Radford • Reported that the City's outreach booth at the Farmers Market was successful and better positioned next to the market information booth and said residents frequently stopped to ask questions and appreciated the City's presence. • Noted that river activity maps and paddling guides were especially popular and were quickly depleted, while construction information cards remained available. • Suggested providing the paddling guide electronically, such as through a QR code, so more people can access it online. • Councilors Lee, Larsen, and Dingman – No updates. • Councilor Freeman • Shared an update from Parks and Recreation Director PJ Holm that participation in this year's rodeo is expected to be exceptionally strong, with roughly double the number of cowboys and cowgirls attending compared to previous years. • Explained that Idaho Falls Power’s (IFP) drone program had begun operations to check power lines that day and pointed out that they are not spying on people, and IFP anticipated questions from the public. • Mayor Burtenshaw • Distributed a state alcohol law flowchart prepared by the City's Deputy City Clerk in collaboration with Idaho State Police Alcohol Beverage Control Inspector Jeff Rodean. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 3 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 • Explained that the guide illustrates, in an easy-to-follow format, what activities are permitted or prohibited under Idaho state alcohol laws. • Said the flowchart would help answer ongoing questions and misconceptions from residents and business owners about the City's alcohol ordinance, particularly concerns about private gatherings. • Expressed interest in making the flowchart publicly available because it clearly distinguishes what is regulated by state law versus city ordinance, providing a useful reference as the Council continues revising the alcohol ordinance. Legal - Discussion: Draft Ordinance for Certificate of Occupancy, Stop Work Notices and Do Not Occupy Orders: The Legal Department presented a revised draft ordinance updating the City's authority to enforce Certificates of Occupancy (COs) and address unpermitted construction. The revisions reflected Council direction from the May 4th work session, as well as additional feedback from the Mayor. Staff explained that the ordinance would prohibit occupancy of new buildings without a required CO but adds a notice and grace period before penalties apply. Key changes include: • Rather than immediately issuing an infraction, the Building Official must first provide written notice that a CO is required. • Property owners or occupants would then have seven days to either obtain the CO or discontinue occupancy before an infraction could be issued. • Staff noted this notice requirement replaces the previous "knowledge" standard and provides a clear opportunity for voluntary compliance. The ordinance also strengthens enforcement when construction occurs without required permits. • The Building Official may issue a Stop Work Order when construction is occurring without a permit and violates the building code. • If the person continues construction after receiving the order, the violation is generally treated as an infraction. However, if either the Building Official or Fire Marshal determines the violation creates an immediate fire or life-safety hazard, continued work would instead be treated as a misdemeanor. • Council members asked whether property owners would be informed when a violation rises to the misdemeanor level, and staff agreed that clearly documenting the hazard and communicating it would be standard practice. Legal staff emphasized that Do Not Occupy Orders would not be automatic. Instead, they could only be issued when the Building Official determines that occupancy presents an immediate fire or life-safety risk. This change was intended to avoid forcing residents from their homes over relatively minor code violations while still allowing the City to address dangerous situations. Staff recommended aligning City penalties with similar provisions in Idaho law. • Misdemeanor penalties would be limited to up to a $300 fine and/or 90 days in jail, matching comparable state code provisions rather than relying on the City's higher default misdemeanor penalties. • For CO violations: o A first offense includes a seven-day compliance period before becoming an infraction. o A second offense would not escalate to a misdemeanor until 14 days after notice, providing additional time for compliance. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 4 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 To address concerns raised by Mayor Burtenshaw, the ordinance clarifies that property owners are only liable if they knowingly permit occupancy without a CO. Staff cited an example where tenants might move into a building without the owner's permission. In those cases: • The owner would not automatically be in violation. • Once notified by the Building Official, the owner would be expected to end the unauthorized occupancy or obtain the required CO. The draft also revises enforcement authority by: • Allowing the City, rather than the Building Official individually, to seek injunctive relief through the courts. • Limiting that action to situations where unlawful occupancy has continued for 14 days or more, preventing immediate legal action after initial notice. Council members sought clarification on whether the ordinance would affect buildings occupied years ago without Certificates of Occupancy during earlier periods of rapid growth. Staff confirmed that the ordinance is intended to apply prospectively to new construction, not to pursue older cases where CO’s were never obtained. Police - Discussion: Flock Safety Contract Amendments: The Police Department and Legal staff presented a proposed amendment to the City's contract with Flock Safety in response to concerns raised by residents about how data collection by license plate recognition (LPR) cameras could be used. Staff explained that the current contract allows Flock Safety to use images collected by the City's cameras to help train and improve its artificial intelligence models. After receiving public concerns that this constituted a commercial use of City data, the City negotiated an amendment to eliminate that practice. Under the proposed amendment: • Flock Safety may not use Idaho Falls' camera data to train or improve machine learning or AI models. • The restriction specifically applies to photos captured by the City's cameras. • The amendment overrides any conflicting language in the original contract. Flock requested a limited exception allowing it to review customer data only to improve the performance of its hardware and related services, such as diagnosing camera issues. Legal staff said they believed this was a reasonable compromise because it does not permit AI training or commercial model development. Council asked whether the amendment addressed the concerns raised by residents. Staff said the primary concern was that using City data to improve Flock's AI increased the company's commercial value. While not taking a position on that argument, the City negotiated the amendment to remove that capability and respond to those concerns. Council also asked about competing license plate recognition providers. Police staff noted that the three largest vendors are Flock Safety, Axon, and Motorola, and indicated that similar systems generally operate in comparable ways. Legal staff emphasized that: • The City's use of Flock data remains limited to purposes authorized under Idaho Code, primarily law enforcement investigations. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 5 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 • Any agency that enters into a reciprocal data-sharing agreement with Idaho Falls must also agree to comply with Idaho law when accessing City data. • The new amendment likewise requires Flock to comply with those legal limitations. Council discussed persistent public misconceptions about the system. Council members emphasized the need to correct misinformation suggesting the cameras perform facial recognition or continuously track drivers. Police staff explained that: • The cameras capture a single image of the rear of a passing vehicle to read its license plate—they do not continuously record video. • Officers cannot search the database arbitrarily; every search must be connected to a lawful investigative purpose authorized by state law. • The system cannot be used to issue speeding tickets, red-light citations, or other routine traffic enforcement actions. The Police Department acknowledged that some audit records describing searches lacked sufficient detail because officers had not received standardized instructions for documenting their investigative purpose. Going forward: • Officers will be required to clearly identify the applicable misdemeanor, felony, or other authorized investigative reason allowed under state law. • Staff believes this will make audit records more transparent and easier for the public to understand. Council asked how the City could verify that Flock actually complies with the new AI restrictions. Legal staff said Flock has indicated it has an internal mechanism to exclude Idaho Falls' data from AI training. Staff agreed to request written verification that the restriction has been implemented, similar to previous verification requests for security features. Council members requested educational materials explaining exactly how the Flock system works to help address public misconceptions. Police staff reported they are already preparing informational materials for an upcoming Council meeting, including examples of what officers actually see when using the system. Staff noted that many residents incorrectly believe the cameras use facial recognition or continuously monitor individuals, when in reality the system is limited to license plate images used for authorized investigations. Finance - Wrap Up: Budget: Finance presented an updated overview of the proposed Fiscal Year 2026–2027 budget, incorporating Council's funding decisions from the previous budget workshop. Staff also reviewed the proposed property tax levy, new personnel requests, funded capital projects, and the timeline leading to budget adoption. Staff reported the proposed budget includes: • $325 million in projected revenues. • $393.5 million in budgeted expenditures, including all carryover projects from the current fiscal year. • A planned use of approximately $68 million in existing fund balance to fund capital projects and other one-time expenditures. Finance emphasized that much of the beginning fund balance is already committed to reserves for future capital projects, enterprise fund infrastructure, debt service requirements, power rate stabilization, and self-insurance reserves. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 6 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Finance reviewed revenue changes compared to prior years, highlighting: • Taxes and franchise fees increased to approximately $55 million following Council's funding decisions. • Charges for services increased primarily because of utility growth, customer growth, and the new Bonneville County landfill tipping fee. • Licenses and permit revenue declined due to fewer large commercial and multifamily developments generating impact fees. • Contributions and donations decreased because the budget only includes committed donations, unlike prior years that anticipated Zoo entrance contributions. • Investment income was budgeted conservatively despite expectations that actual earnings may exceed estimates. • Debt proceeds decreased substantially because major borrowing associated with previous airport projects has largely concluded. The proposed expenditures include: • Salary and wage increases reflecting: o 10 new full-time employees o Seven employee grade adjustments o A 2% cost-of-living adjustment for non-union employees o An assumed 5% increase in health insurance costs • Increased operating expenses, largely driven by utilities and infrastructure. • Approximately $117 million in capital projects. • $12.6 million in debt service. • Continued contributions toward future equipment replacement reserves (MERF). Council asked whether reserve contributions were keeping pace with equipment replacement needs. Finance responded that each fund is evaluated individually, and some enterprise funds are intentionally drawing down previously accumulated reserves rather than increasing rates further. Finance presented the proposed property tax levy totaling approximately $54.1 million, including: • The statutory 3% increase. • Growth and annexation revenues estimated at just over $1.1 million. • Approximately $538,000 in foregone tax authority for operations. • $350,000 in foregone authority dedicated to capital improvements. Staff confirmed the proposal remains below Idaho's statutory 8% limitation. Finance updated estimated impacts on taxpayers. For a home valued at $450,000: • Estimated City property tax increase: approximately $150 annually (about $13 per month). For commercial properties: • A $500,000 property would increase about $196 annually. • A $2 million property would increase about $784 annually. Council also discussed that future increases in tax bills should be moderated because residential property values have largely stabilized after several years of rapid appreciation. Finance outlined how new property tax revenues would be used. Growth and annexation revenue would fund: • Library levy support. • Police sworn officer pay scale adjustments. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 7 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 • A portion of a new police dispatcher position. • Additional General Fund priorities. 1% foregone operating authority would fund recurring public safety positions, including: • One Assistant City Attorney. • Two Fire/EMS Training Captains. • A portion of the new Police Dispatcher. Capital foregone funding would support: • Fire station restroom upgrades. • Recreation improvements, including aquatic center starting blocks, entrance doors, and ice rink bleachers. • Initial infrastructure work for the future Fire Training Facility. Finance presented a multi-year funding strategy for implementing the new Police Records Management System. Rather than shifting the entire ongoing software cost into the General Fund immediately, the City would: • Use excess Certificate of Participation (COP) funds to cover most costs during the first several years. • Gradually transition annual operating costs into the General Fund over approximately five years. • Fully absorb the recurring software expense into the General Fund by FY 2030–2031. Council supported using the phased approach to avoid a sudden increase in future operating costs. The proposed budget includes 10 new governmental full-time positions: (Finance noted that many of these positions are supported by dedicated revenue sources rather than solely by General Fund property taxes.) • Assistant City Attorney. • Two Fire/EMS Training Captains. • Police Detective (funded through opioid and narcotics revenues). • Police Dispatcher (funded through a combination of County contributions, growth revenues, and foregone authority). Enterprise funds would add six additional positions, including: • Two Water Service Technicians. • Two Power Wiremen. • One Generation Mechanic. • One Fiber Communications and Splicing Technician. These positions would be funded through utility rates and enterprise revenues. Finance summarized revisions incorporated into the updated budget document, including: • Department accomplishments and goals. • Updated revenue projections. • Refined beginning fund balances and reserve estimates. • Multi-year contract schedules. • Previously approved capital and one-time projects. • Adjustments to reflect the City's new ERP accounting structure. Staff also noted they are correcting formatting issues before publishing the final budget documents. Budget Timeline: Finance reviewed the remaining budget schedule: • Next Council meeting: Adoption of the "not-to-exceed" budget amount and publication of budget, fee, and foregone tax notices. • August 13: Public hearings on the budget, proposed fees, and foregone property tax authority. • August 27: Final adoption of the FY 2026–2027 budget. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 8 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Council indicated the proposed budget reflected the funding priorities established during previous budget workshops and was ready to move forward through the public hearing process. Mayor - Announcements, Events, Calendaring, Proclamations, Notes and/or Minutes from Boards and Commissions: War Bonnet Parade Logistics The Mayor confirmed which Council members planned to participate in the upcoming War Bonnet Parade, noting that attendance helps staff coordinate transportation and staging. She indicated that participants would receive a detailed schedule, with Council members expected to meet around 6:15–6:20 p.m. before being transported to the parade lineup. Weekly Department Updates Mayor Burtenshaw asked Council for feedback on the new weekly communication process in which: • Department directors submit updates on Wednesdays. • Staff distribute the compiled updates to Council on Fridays. • Each department highlights a recent project or accomplishment in addition to providing calendar information. Council members indicated the new format was working well and appreciated the additional communication. Library Board Discussion Mayor Burtenshaw briefly revisited the earlier discussion regarding the Library Board meeting, confirming that: • The presentation ultimately provided to City Council was different from the one originally presented to the Library Board. • A letter had been prepared based on the original presentation, which no longer reflected the revised proposal. • To improve consistency going forward, the City Attorney will attend the next Library Board meeting to help ensure that information presented to the Board and the City Council is consistent and legally accurate. Police Promotion Ceremony Mayor Burtenshaw reminded Council members about the upcoming Police Department swearing-in and promotion ceremony, scheduled for August 5 at 3:30 p.m., and confirmed attendance with several Council members. With no additional announcements from Council, Mayor Burtenshaw concluded the meeting. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 4:46 PM /s/ Linda Lundquist_________________ /s/ Lisa Burtenshaw _____________ Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 1 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Monday, August 24, 2026 3:00 PM City Council Chambers Call to Order and Roll Call There were present: Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw Council President Jim Francis Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman Councilor Jim Freeman Councilor Kirk Larsen Councilor Brandon Lee Absent: Councilor John Radford Also present: Ian Turner, Airport Director Nathan Cuvala, Project Manager, Ardurra Group Johan Olson, Fire Chief Dale Burnham, Program Manager, Pond Company Cody Roberts, PIO Janet Romanic, Architecture Manager, Pond Company Margaret Wimborne, Chief of Staff Zack Jones, City Attorney Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Mayor Burtenshaw called the meeting to order at 3:02 p.m. with the following items: Mayor, City Council – Discussion: Citywide updates, concerns, questions, reports: Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) Council President Francis initiated a discussion about the City’s PUD ordinance, expressing concern that recent PUD applications have repeatedly created procedural and substantive difficulties. Council considered two options: placing a temporary moratorium on PUD applications or rescinding the existing PUD provisions entirely and later developing a new approach. The general direction of the discussion favored rescinding the existing PUD provisions rather than imposing a moratorium, because a moratorium would require a defined end date and could create uncertainty or encourage applicants to simply wait until it expired. Council discussed allowing projects already sufficiently underway to continue through the process and establishing a clear effective date so applicants would be treated fairly. Staff noted that approximately two or three PUD applications were already in various stages of the process. Council ultimately directed that the proposed code change move through the required Planning and Zoning Commission and public hearing process, with Legal and Community Development Services providing recommendations regarding implementation and timing. Fire Department Deployment Councilor Freeman reported that Idaho Falls Fire Department personnel were deployed or pre-positioned in several locations, including California, Utah, Boise, and Reno, to assist with wildfire-related needs. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 2 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Parks Grant Councilor Freeman also reported that the City had submitted a grant application for the park project, noting that it was the City’s first such grant submission in approximately 30 years. Community Event Invitation Council discussed an invitation to attend a community barbecue hosted by the Bonneville County Republican Central Committee, where several state and federal elected officials were expected to attend. Councilors interested in participating were invited to coordinate so they could attend together. Water Tower Lighting Policy Council discussed whether the City should revise or formalize its policy governing the decorative lighting of the water tower. The discussion was prompted by requests to light the tower in recognition of an individual community member facing a terminal illness. Councilor Lee expressed interest in developing parameters that would allow the City to use the tower as a way to recognize significant community causes or events. Other participants expressed concern about the difficulty of determining which individuals or causes should qualify and whether recognizing some requests while denying others could create division or legal concerns. Mayor Burtenshaw explained that the City had previously conducted an informal survey of Councilors and had been operating under an unwritten internal policy. The discussion also addressed First Amendment and government-speech issues. Legal counsel explained that if the City opened the lighting program broadly as a public forum, restrictions would generally need to be viewpoint-neutral, potentially limiting the City’s ability to deny controversial requests. Councilors discussed the existing preferences for: • A standard base lighting scheme; • Federal holidays; • The Christmas/New Year holiday season; • Certain additional holidays such as Valentine’s Day, St. Patrick’s Day, and Halloween; and • Limited department-related requests. There was no consensus to broadly open the tower lighting to individual public requests. The Mayor indicated that the existing informal approach would be formalized as a written internal policy, while leaving open the possibility of revisiting the issue in the future. Airport - Discussion: Air Traffic Control Tower Conceptual Design Review Project Background and Site Selection Airport staff and consultants provided an update on the proposed replacement Air Traffic Control Tower. The existing tower was constructed in 1960, is more than 60 years old, and has become both outdated and an obstacle to future terminal expansion. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 3 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Beginning in 2023, the Airport evaluated three potential tower locations using a detailed virtual siting process that modeled aircraft movements, existing airport facilities, and anticipated future development. The preferred location, known as Site 3, is on the west side of the airfield. The FAA initially objected to all three potential sites because of interference concerns involving the existing VOR navigational aid. The VOR remains part of the FAA's navigation backup system and serves a broader regional function. After exploring mitigation options, the Airport determined that relocating the VOR off-site was the most practical solution. A feasibility study for relocating the VOR to the Johnson property was completed and accepted by the FAA. Environmental Review and Tower Location The project has entered the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review process. The environmental review includes both construction of the new tower and relocation of the VOR. Consultants explained that Site 3 offers strong visibility of the airfield and may improve controller operations by reducing the amount of turning required to observe different areas of the airport. The proposed location was also evaluated for potential impacts on nearby residents' views of the Tetons. The analysis indicated that the tower would be visible but would not substantially obstruct mountain views. Tower Design Concepts Architects presented four conceptual design options intended to reflect elements of Idaho Falls and the Airport: 1. Natural/Landscape Concept – Inspired by the surrounding landscape, incorporating stone and materials similar to those proposed for the terminal expansion. 2. Idaho Trace – Featuring an outline or visual reference to the shape of Idaho. 3. Rocky Waterfall – Inspired by Idaho Falls and the movement of water, using flowing vertical design elements. 4. Red Baron/Historic Hangar Concept – Drawing inspiration from the Airport's historic wooden hangar through wood-like materials and structural “X” elements. Council generally responded positively to the concepts, with particular appreciation expressed for the historic hangar-inspired option. They also discussed practical design features, including exterior balconies, window- cleaning access, structural bracing, maintenance, and potential cost differences. The design team emphasized that these were preliminary concepts and that colors, materials, and other architectural details could continue to evolve. Funding and Existing Tower Council discussed the importance of considering the tower design in conjunction with the project's significant funding needs. The existing tower will eventually need to be removed to allow for future terminal work, although the new tower can be constructed before the old tower is removed. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 4 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Airport - Discussion: Airport Capital Funding Airport staff then led a broader discussion about the Airport's ability to fund major capital projects. The purpose was to help Council understand the growing gap between the Airport's capital needs and its available revenue and to receive general direction for long-term planning. Staff noted that the Airport has made significant financial progress. Approximately a decade ago, the Airport relied on General Fund support, while today it operates independently and has shown positive growth in its cash position. However, the Airport's rapid growth has also created capital demands that exceed available revenue. The discussion focused primarily on three major projects: Terminal Expansion The terminal expansion is now expected to cost approximately $56 million, down from estimates exceeding $70 million following value engineering. The project includes baggage screening and makeup areas, airline offices, and ticket counters. The project is expected to require approximately $5–7 million in borrowing. Council discussed whether the Airport should proceed with portions of the originally planned project that are not currently considered essential and whether available borrowing capacity should instead be preserved for other critical needs, including the new Air Traffic Control Tower. Air Traffic Control Tower and VOR The proposed tower and VOR relocation represent a significant local funding challenge. Staff explained that federal grants may cover only a portion of the project rather than the full cost. If the City receives only partial funding, the Airport will need to determine whether to accept the grant and identify how to fund the remaining balance. Runway Rehabilitation The primary runway, Runway 3/21, is anticipated to require approximately $20 million in rehabilitation. The project is currently planned for 2030–2031 and is expected to be largely eligible for FAA funding, with the local share expected to come from Airport funds and Passenger Facility Charges. Other Unfunded Capital Needs Staff also identified numerous additional needs that could be difficult to address if the Airport exhausts its borrowing capacity, including parking lot rehabilitation, roadway improvements, terminal apron repairs, taxiway and taxi lane expansion, and additional general aviation hangar capacity. The Airport already has approximately 30 prospective tenants on its hangar waiting list and is approaching demand levels projected much further into the future. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 5 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Executive Session: The Council will not reconvene after the executive session. Motion: Called pursuant to Idaho Code § 74-206(1)(f) to communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation, or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated. o Moved by: Councilor Francis o Second: Councilor Lee o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee. Nay: none. o Motion carries 5-0. There were present: Mayor Burtenshaw, Council President Francis, Councilor Dingman, Councilor Freeman, Councilor Larsen, Councilor Lee, Attorney Jones, Director Turner. Start: 5:13 pm End: 5:27 pm There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:05 PM. /s/ Linda Lundquist_________________ /s/ Lisa Burtenshaw _____________ Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor Water Tower Lighting Questionnaire Francis Radford Dingman Larsen Yes No Yes 1.) Preference for Implementing a Base Lighting Scheme (Every night)? =| aaa 2.) Preference for Implementing a Federal Holiday Lighting Plan? a (New Year's, Martin Luther King, President's, Memorial, Juneteenth, Independence, Labor, Columbus, Veterans, Thanksgiving, & Christmas) 3.) Include Holiday Season Lighting: Christmas Eve thru New Year's? ae 4.) Preference for Implementing non-Federal Holiday Lighting Plan? ie ia (Valentine's Day, St Patrick's, Halloween, & Christmas Eve) Yes No im) ao a i | 6 | a | 7 | 0 | fear aia | 5 | 2 | i as ST Mia ae 5.) Preference for Allowing Citizen/Business/School Requested Individual Lighting Schemes? ies he! a Old Tower: 1.) Flashing Red Strobes on Top Controlled by Daylight Sensor. 2.) Quadrants of the Bowl along the Walkway Had 4 Solid Red Lights New Tower: Strobe on Top CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION AUGUST 24, 2026 NEW AIRPORT TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER (ATCT) IDAHO FALLS REGIONAL AIRPORT 2140 N SKYLINE DR, IDAHO FALLS, ID 83402 Project Overview 2 ▪Background ▪Existing ATCT ▪New ATCT Siting ▪VOR Relocation ▪FAA National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Process ▪Preliminary Design Existing Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) ee _ gripe ag At a -, So Bas ee @ e- = em >: - ws Air Traffic Control Tower Siting ATCT SITE #3 ++. + ‘eum au cor b= la =n oy ‘f “aa / ATCT SITE #2 al VOR Relocation Ground-based Radio Navigation System FAA NEPA Process 6 ▪Requires an Environmental Assessment ▪ATCT Relocation ▪VOR Relocation ▪Includes Preliminary Design of ATCT Idaho Falls Airport – Contextual Imagery IDAHO FALLS REGIONAL AIRPORT From the Air… Main Entrance Drive… t — Contextual Imagery irpor pice i) | | LT le eee ij | || tH a | HEMET Wy View from 4 ‘. nae OYA : Idaho Falls Airport Next Steps: Terminal Expansion… ** DESIGN & RENDERING BY ALLIIANCE ARCHITECTS Idaho Falls Airport – Current Airport Plan & New Air Traffic Control Tower Location Idaho Falls Airport - Site Context Study Site Context LEGEND Idaho Falls Site @ : Proposed Air Traffic Control Tower location. wy m ' . = : City guidelines and city of Idaho Falls residential neighborhood. : City limits. : Photo perspective. fT : Direction of the Teton Mountains. : Outlines of the Teton mountain range visible from the residential area. Perspective View: View of the proposed ATCT and the mountains from the adjacent residential neighborhood. Idaho Falls ATCT Site - Sightline Study View of the Tetons from the Neighborhood... Perspective Proposed ATCT Teton Mountains Idaho Falls – The Inspiration around us… Grand Teton Mountain Mesa Falls (Winter) Japanese Friendship Garden Craters of the Moon Mesa Falls Idaho Falls River Walk – Greenbelt Trail Façade Option 1: The Mountain Desert Inspired by the surrounding mountains in the region, specifically the Teton Mountains and the Big Southern Butte this concept emphasizes strength, permanence, and connection in place. Textured materials and patterns, with stone-inspired finishes gives the tower the appearance of emerging from the desert landscape. ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT MATERIAL PALETTE BALCONY CURTAINWALL INSTERSECTING TOWER SHAFT EXPOSED X-BRACING BEHIND GLAZING SQUARE BODY TOWER CATWALK ACCESIBLE FROM CAB OCTAGONAL CAB TEXTURED FIBER CEMENT NATURAL STONE HIGH DENSITY FIBER CEMENT Façade Option 2: Idaho Trace A more figurative design approach creates a distinctive and memorable ATCT. The façade incorporates a subtle abstraction of the Idaho state outline through a change in material pattern. The gesture is integrated into the architecture rather than applied as decoration. The contrasting materials enhance visibility and create a recognizable identity from a distance. The tower establishes a strong connection to place while maintaining a clean, contemporary aesthetic. ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT MATERIAL PALETTE SQUARE BODY TOWER CATWALK ACCESIBLE FROM CAB OCTAGONAL CAB IDAHO STATE BORDER ABSTRACTION MATERIAL BREAK LINE INSTERSECTED WITH TOWER GLAZING COMPLETE DESIGN INTENT HIGH DENSITY FIBER CEMENT HIGH DENSITY FIBER CEMENT CURTAINWALL GLAZING SYSTEM ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT MATERIAL PALETTE SQUARE BODY TOWER CATWALK ACCESIBLE FROM CAB OCTAGONAL CAB IDAHO FALLS ABSTRACTION MATERIAL RESEMBLES THE CURVES AND SUBTLE REFLECTION OF THE FALLS COMPLETE DESIGN INTENT Façade Option 3: The Rocky Waterfall Inspired by the iconic Idaho Falls riverwalk and its rocky bedrock, the tower aims to express a flowing guiding movement while connecting the Earth to the sky. CURVES INTRODUCED BETWEEN TOWER AND CATWALK CURTAINWALL GLAZING SYSTEM METAL PANEL FLUTED FIBER CEMENT PANEL ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT MATERIAL PALETTE SQUARE TOWER OCTAGONAL CAB RED BARON ACCENTS COMPLETE DESIGN INTENT Façade Option 4: The Red Baron Inspired by the historic Red Baron Hangar, the new control tower features warm, wood-toned accents as a nod to local aviation heritage. Rather than copying the historic structure, the design pairs a sleek operational cab with contemporary, timber-inspired exterior elements. The result is a clean, modern landmark that subtly honors IDA's past through a refined visual palette. SIMULATED WOOD FIBER CEMENT FIBER CEMENT PANEL SPLIT FACE CMU CHAMFERED CORNERS Comments / Questions OPTION #1: MOUNTAIN DESERT OPTION #2: IDAHO TRACE OPTION #3: ROCKY WATERFALL OPTION #4: RED BARON City Council Meeting Minutes 1 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID Thursday, August 27, 2026 6:30 PM City Council Chambers 1. Mayor Burtenshaw Called the meeting to Order at 6:33 PM Present: Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw Council President Jim Francis Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman Councilor Jim Freeman Councilor Kirk Larsen Councilor Brandon Lee Councilor John Radford Also present: Brian Cunningman, Assistant PW Director Chris Fredericksen, GM - IF Power Pam Alexander, Municipal Services Director PJ Holm, Parks and Recreation Director Wade Sanner, CDS Director Cody Gordon, CDS Building Official Chris Canfield, PW Director Collin Reid, Developer – Elara Homes Johnathan Reid, Developer – Elara Homes Michael Hoffman, McNeil Eng. (via Teams) Yousuf Hafuda, GGP (via Teams) Bryce Johnson, Police Chief Zack Jones, City Attorney Linda Lundquist, City Clerk 2. Pledge of Allegiance Director Holm led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance. Council President Francis encouraged the Council and community to periodically reflect on the meaning of the Pledge of Allegiance, particularly the principles of “liberty and justice for all.” He emphasized that government must balance individual liberties with justice for the entire community and stated that the pledge represents a personal commitment to reject hate and discrimination. He encouraged respectful language and treatment of others, noting that each individual has a responsibility through their daily words and actions to uphold the values of liberty, justice, and community. 3. Staff Responses to Prior Public Comment and Other Updates Police Chief Johnson provided follow-up on several issues raised during prior public comment: • Found firearms and the Second Amendment: Chief Johnson clarified that while the City supports Second Amendment rights, Idaho law treats firearms, explosives, and certain dangerous materials differently from other found property. Based on both a previous and current review by the City Attorney, individuals who find and turn in firearms cannot later claim ownership of them under the found-property process. • Traffic enforcement: Chief Johnson acknowledged residents’ concerns about speeding and unsafe driving, stating that these concerns are valid and are among the Police Department’s most common complaints. He reported that officers made approximately 10,000 traffic stops in 2025 City Council Meeting Minutes 2 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID and are on pace for a similar number in 2026. However, officers cannot respond to every observed traffic violation, as they may be responding to other calls or responsibilities. • License Plate Readers: Chief Johnson provided an update on the Department’s license plate reader audit process. Random searches are reviewed every two weeks, and the vendor also flags potentially questionable activity for review. The Department has also investigated searches questioned by the media or members of the public. He reported that, in every case reviewed so far, the searches were conducted in accordance with Department policy and applicable law. Mayor Burtenshaw thanked Chief Johnson for the follow-up and noted that staff had also contacted the individual who raised concerns during public comment. 4. Public Comment • Stuart Eddins (Idaho Falls resident): Eddins, President of the Desert Eagles Model Airplane Flying Club, introduced the club and thanked the City for its support as the organization relocates from its longtime site in a Bonneville County gravel pit to Noise Park. He described the new location and runway as an ideal facility for model aircraft operations, allowing the club to meet FAA and safety requirements while remaining separate from other activities. He thanked City staff, the City Attorney’s Office, and the Noise Park community for their assistance and invited the public and Council to the club’s upcoming grand opening. • Shane Dial (Idaho Falls resident): Dial thanked the Council, Mayor, Police Chief, and others involved in developing the liquor ordinance and server training requirements. He expressed strong support for the final ordinance and appreciation for the City’s willingness to listen to concerns and work toward a solution that he felt worked for everyone. • Tye Tomchak (Idaho Falls resident): A longtime Idaho Falls resident and member of the Desert Eagles thanked the City for providing the club with its new field at Noise Park. He described it as an exceptional and unique facility, noting that it is one of the few remaining model aircraft fields in the region. He emphasized the club’s community involvement, including charitable fundraising events and educational activities with local students, and expressed hope for a long-term relationship with the City. • Colby Hatton (Idaho Falls resident): Hatton, speaking on behalf of Stronger Idaho Falls, advocated for changes to the City’s transportation and street design. He contrasted downtown’s pedestrian-friendly environment with commercial corridors such as 17th Street, which he described as a “stroad”—a combination of a street and road that he argued is inefficient, unattractive, financially unsustainable, and unsafe. He encouraged the City to avoid constructing additional “stroads” and instead design corridors either as vibrant, pedestrian-oriented streets or efficient transportation routes. He stated that safer and more thoughtful street design could support local businesses, improve safety and air quality, encourage independent mobility for children and teens, and create a healthier and more livable community. City Council Meeting Minutes 3 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 5. Consent Agenda A. Municipal Services 1. 26-294 Treasurer's Report for May 2026 2. 26-295 Treasurer's Report for June 2026 3. 26-319 Sale of Police Department Vehicles to Bannock County Sheriff's Office B. Office of the City Clerk 1. 26-296 July 2025 Licensing through the Office of the City Clerk a. 77 New Business Licenses b. 13 Renewed Business Licenses c. 20 Contractor Licenses Motion: Approve, accept, or receive all items on the Consent Agenda according to the recommendations presented. o Moved by: Councilor Dingman o Second: Councilor Larsen o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. 6. Regular Agenda A. City Attorney 1. 26-312 Ordinance Adding Title 4, Chapter 2.1, Alcohol Server Training Presentation/Discussion (Attorney Jones): Staff presented the proposed ordinance requiring alcohol servers, certain security personnel, and their immediate managers to complete an approved alcohol server training program. The ordinance was developed following several Council discussions and public comments, with amendments made to reduce penalties and create an escalating enforcement process rather than imposing an immediate misdemeanor. Although the ordinance would take effect immediately, the training requirement would not become effective until November 15, allowing businesses time to comply. The Idaho Falls Police Department will provide free in-person training opportunities, including three trainings before the effective date and four free trainings annually, and online training options are also anticipated. Motion: Adopt the Ordinance amending Title 4 by adding a new Chapter 2.1 under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete readings, and request that it be read by title and published by summary. o Moved by: Councilor Franics o Second: Councilor Dingman o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. City Council Meeting Minutes 4 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID ORDINANCE 3673: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 2.1 TO TITLE 4 TO ESTABLISH AN APPROVED SERVER TRAINING PROGRAM; REQUIRE SERVERS OF ALCOHOL, SECURITY PERSONS, AND THEIR IMMEDIATE MANAGERS TO HOLD AND MAINTAIN A CERTIFICATE SHOWING COMPLETION OF AN APPROVED SERVER TRAINING PROGRAM; REQUIRE ALCOHOL LICENSE HOLDERS TO ENSURE THAT SERVERS OF ALCOHOL, SECURITY PERSONS, AND THEIR IMMEDIATE MANAGERS HOLD AND MAINTAIN SUCH CERTIFICATES; PROVIDE APPLICABLE DEFINITIONS; AND PROVIDE PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS; CODIFICATION; PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY; AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE. B. Public Works 1. 26-320 Speed Limit Resolution - N Utah Ave from Broadway to Lindsay Blvd Presentation/Discussion (Assistant Director Cunningham): Public Works recommended increasing the speed limit on North Utah Avenue between Broadway and Lindsay Boulevard from 25 mph to 35 mph following a speed study. Staff explained that the change would create consistency with the adjacent sections of the corridor, which are already posted at 35 mph. Council discussed pedestrian safety and the increased risk associated with higher vehicle speeds but noted that the affected section has relatively limited pedestrian activity. Council members also expressed interest in continuing to prioritize safety when evaluating future speed studies and suggested that speeds in the more heavily developed area near Broadway be reviewed in the future. Motion: Approve the Resolution (2026-21) to establish a speed limit of 35 miles per hour (MPH) on N Utah Ave from Broadway to Lindsay Blvd and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute necessary documents. o Moved by: Councilor Dingman o Second: Councilor Larsen o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. C. Idaho Falls Power 1. 26-298 Bid Rejection - IFP 26-22 12.5 Substation Transformer Equipment Bid Presentation/Discussion (Director Fredericksen) for 26-298 and 206-299: Idaho Falls Power requested rejection of all bids for the 12.5 substation transformers and bulb turbine transformer equipment. Staff explained that the bids contained significant price variations and that the City could not verify that all proposed equipment met the specifications. Concerns included ambiguity regarding transformer configurations and the presence of unfamiliar vendors in the marketplace. Staff recommended clarifying the specifications and rebidding the equipment to ensure the City receives reliable equipment appropriate for its anticipated long- term use. Council supported the rebidding approach and emphasized the importance of maintaining a competitive procurement process while ensuring equipment quality and specifications are clearly defined. City Council Meeting Minutes 5 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID Motion: Reject all bids received for the 12.5 Substation Transformer equipment bid. o Moved by: Councilor Freeman o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. 2. 26-299 Bid Rejection - IFP 26-23 Bulb Turbine Transformer Equipment Bid Motion: Reject all bids received for the Bulb Turbine Transformer equipment bid. o Moved by: Councilor Freeman o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. D. Municipal Services Presentation/Discussion (Director Alexander) for 26-300 – 26-303: Director Alexander reviewed the City’s budget development process, including budget work sessions, required public notices, publication requirements, and the August 13 public hearing. The proposed actions included adoption of the 2026–2027 fee resolution, use of 1% foregone revenue, use of foregone funds for one-time capital projects, and adoption of the annual budget. Updated property valuation information resulted in adjustments to the proposed foregone amounts, including $540,078 for ongoing 1% foregone revenue and $250,116 for one-time capital projects, without changing the overall levy rate or published budget amount. The proposed fiscal year budget totaled approximately $393.5 million, with total property taxes remaining approximately $54.1 million. Council members discussed the City’s approximately $9 billion taxable valuation and the growth in community property values. They also emphasized that the City's total budget includes enterprise operations and other services, such as Idaho Falls Power, the airport, water and sewer utilities, fiber, recreation facilities, and golf courses, and therefore should not be viewed solely as taxpayer-funded spending. Council members expressed appreciation for the City's efforts to maintain services and infrastructure while utilizing fees, grants, enterprise revenues, and other funding sources in addition to property taxes. 1. 26-300 2026/27 Fee Resolution (2026-22) Including New Fees and Fee Increases Motion: Adopt the 2026/27 fee resolution and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the necessary documents. o Moved by: Councilor Dingman o Second: Councilor Larsen o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0 City Council Meeting Minutes 6 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 2. 26-301 Resolution to Adopt 1% Levy of Forgone Revenue for Fiscal Year 2026/27 Motion: Approve this resolution (2026-23) to adopt the 1% levy of the 2026/27 forgone amount of $540,078.00 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the necessary documents. o Moved by: Councilor Dingman o Second: Councilor Larsen o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. 3. 26-302 Resolution to Adopt Forgone for One-Time Capital Projects for Fiscal Year 2026/27 Motion: Approve the 2026/27 resolution (2026-24) adopting $250,116.00 of the City’s forgone balance for the specific purpose of funding one-time capital projects for Fire and Parks and Recreation and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the necessary documents. o Moved by: Councilor Dingman o Second: Councilor Larsen o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. 4. 26-303 Ordinance to Adopt 2026/27 Fiscal Year Budget Motion: Adopt the 2026/27 fiscal year budget for $393,483,954 and approve the attached appropriations ordinance appropriating monies to and among various funds, under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings and request that it be read by title and published by summary. o Moved by: Councilor Dingman o Second: Councilor Larsen o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. ORDINANCE 3674: AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2026, APPROPRIATING THE SUM OF $393,483,954 TO DEFRAY THE EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS FOR SAID FISCAL YEAR, SPECIFYING THE OBJECTS AND PURPOSES FOR WHICH SAID APPROPRIATION IS MADE, AUTHORIZING A LEVY OF A SUFFICIENT TAX UPON THE TAXABLE PROPERTY, PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES, DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO FILE CERTIFIED COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE WITH THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND IDAHO SECRETARY OF STATE, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. City Council Meeting Minutes 7 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID E. Community Development Services 1. 26-317 Mediation request from surrounding property owners for the Willows Place Townhomes Planned Unit Development Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner, Attorney Jones): Staff presented a mediation request submitted by Mack and Teri Smith concerning the Willows Place Townhomes PUD. The request alleged procedural errors, lack of representation of affected persons during the previous mediation, and inaccuracies in information provided to the public. Legal counsel explained that mediation is discretionary and may be ordered if Council believes it could resolve the dispute. Due to the continuing quasi-judicial nature of the matter, Councilor Francis and Councilor Lee recused themselves from the discussion and vote. The remaining Council members discussed the prior mediation process, public hearings, and due process considerations. Legal counsel explained that the prior mediation was not binding on the Council and that the public had opportunities to present concerns during the public hearing process. Council members expressed their belief that the concerns raised by neighboring property owners had been considered through the previous hearings and mediation process and concluded that additional mediation was unlikely to resolve the dispute. Motion: Deny the mediation request submitted by Mack and Teri Smith regarding Willows Place Townhomes Planned Unit Development. o Moved by: Councilor Freeman o Second: Councilor Dingman o Vote: Aye: Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none. Recused: Francis, Lee. o Motion carries 4-0. 2. 26-313 Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing - Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, Elara Homes at Willow Creek Cove Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner, Assistant Director Cunningham, Developers Collin and Jonathan Reid): Mr. C. Reid presented the proposed Willow Creek Cove PUD, a nearly 36-acre residential development at Fifth West and 33rd North containing 359 dwelling units at approximately 10 units per acre. The project would include a mix of single-family homes, condominium-style duplex units, and flexible housing products designed to provide a range of housing sizes and price points. The development would exceed the required open space, landscaping, parking, and amenity standards, with proposed amenities including trails, playgrounds, pickleball courts, a clubhouse, fitness areas, community gardens, dog parks, and open space. The development would include both public and private streets, with the PUD request primarily seeking approval for private streets and modified setbacks. Staff reviewed the PUD request and explained that the proposed density was substantially below the maximum allowed under the R-3 zoning designation. Staff discussed the proposed City Council Meeting Minutes 8 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID housing types, private street network, setbacks, parking, amenities, connectivity, and preservation of Willow Creek. Staff also addressed prior neighborhood concerns regarding irrigation access, utility easements, adjacent property access, fencing, trees, traffic, and the Willow Creek corridor. Planning Commission had previously considered the application and unanimously recommended approval. Council discussed the timing and reimbursement of transportation improvements and impact fees, the phased installation of amenities, pedestrian connectivity, traffic impacts, setbacks, parking, and public access to Willow Creek. Staff explained that a traffic impact study would determine necessary transportation improvements and that qualifying roadway improvements could be addressed through the development agreement and impact fee reimbursement process. Council also discussed making the trail along Willow Creek accessible to the public as a community resource. Following discussion, the PUD was amended to provide public access to the Willow Creek trail, with the exact location subject to Public Works approval, and the project remained subject to the proposed traffic condition. Motion 1: Approve the Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Elara Homes at Willow Creek Cove as amended to reflect that the portion of the trail along Willow Creek is open to the public, with the exact location subject to the approval of the Idaho Falls Public Works Department, and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents. o Moved by: Councilor Francis o Second: Councilor Lee o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. Motion 2: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards as amended for the Planned Unit Development for Elara Homes at Willow Creek Cove and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents o Moved by: Councilor Francis o Second: Councilor Lee o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. 3. 26-314 Amendment to City Code Title 7 to add a new Chapter 13 regarding Certificate of Occupancy Requirements and Construction without a Required Permit Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner, Building Official Gordon): Staff presented an amendment to City Code Title 7 adding Chapter 13 regarding building code enforcement, certificates of occupancy, and construction without required permits. The proposed ordinance would establish enforcement procedures, penalties, and compliance pathways for individuals who occupy a building without a certificate of occupancy or perform construction without City Council Meeting Minutes 9 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID required permits. Staff explained that the intent was to create a more graduated and compliance-focused process, rather than relying immediately on misdemeanor enforcement under state law. The ordinance would also provide authority for stop-work notices, do-not- occupy orders, injunctive relief, and other enforcement measures. Motion: Approve the Ordinance amending City Code Title 7 to add a Chapter 13 regarding building code enforcement under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings and request that it be read by title. o Moved by: Councilor Lee o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. ORDINANCE 3675: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, AMENDING TITLE 7 TO ADD A CHAPTER 13 TO REQUIRE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY BEFORE A STRUCTURE IS OCCUPIED, PROHIBIT VIOLATING VARIOUS BUILDING CODES IN CONSTRUCTING OR ALTERING STRUCTURES WITHOUT A REQUIRED PERMIT, PROVIDE AUTHORITY FOR THE BUILDING OFFICIAL TO ISSUE STOP WORK NOTICES AND “DO NOT OCCUPY” ORDERS, PROVIDE AUTHORITY TO SEEK INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND PROVIDE PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS; CODIFICATION; PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY; AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE. 4. 26-322 Provide staff direction regarding whether the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning designation and associated provisions should be rescinded from the Comprehensive Zoning Code Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner): Staff requested Council direction regarding whether to begin the process of rescinding the Planned Unit Development provisions from the Comprehensive Zoning Code. Staff explained that state law allows, but does not require, municipalities to maintain a PUD ordinance. Depending on Council direction, staff could begin drafting rescission language and proceed through the required Planning Commission and public hearing process. Staff noted that two PUD applications already submitted would continue through the existing process because development rights vest upon application. Council discussed concerns with the current PUD process, including uncertainty regarding Council discretion, inconsistent interpretations of the ordinance, private streets, and the difficulty of balancing developer expectations with public concerns. Several Council members supported rescinding the current ordinance while allowing time to evaluate whether a revised PUD process, development agreements, or other zoning tools could better address unique development situations. Council also discussed the potential effects of new state housing legislation and the need to consider future housing density and affordability. Council ultimately City Council Meeting Minutes 10 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID directed staff to begin the formal process of rescinding the current PUD ordinance through the Planning Commission and public hearing process Motion: To direct staff to begin the process of rescinding Planned Unit Development Ordinance 11-2-6W from the Comprehensive Zoning Code, including preparation of the necessary ordinance language and referral through the Planning Commission process. o Moved by: Councilor Dingman o Second: Councilor Radford o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. 5. 26-315 Final Plat and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, Rose Nielson Addition Division No. 101, Sixth Amended Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner): No substantive staff presentation or Council discussion was recorded. Motion 1: Approve the Final Plat for Rose Nielson Addition Division No. 101, Sixth Amended and give authorization for the Mayor, City Engineer, and City Clerk to sign said Final Plat. o Moved by: Councilor Lee o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. Motion 2: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Final Plat for Rose Nielson Addition Division No. 101, Sixth Amended and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents o Moved by: Councilor Lee o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. 6. 26-316 Final Plat and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, Stanger Farms Commercial Addition, Second Amended Presentation/Discussion (Director Sanner): No substantive staff presentation or Council discussion was recorded. Motion 1: Approve the Final Plat for Stanger Farms Commercial Addition, Second Amended and give authorization for the Mayor, City Engineer, and City Clerk to sign said Final Plat. o Moved by: Councilor Lee City Council Meeting Minutes 11 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. Motion 2: Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Final Plat for Stanger Farms Commercial Addition, Second Amended and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents o Moved by: Councilor Lee o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. 7. Announcements • Council President Francis announced a POW/MIA remembrance event at the War Memorial on the Greenbelt, scheduled for September 18 at 5:15 p.m. The event, organized by a veterans group, will honor prisoners of war, service members missing in action, and those who remain unaccounted for. • Willows Place Townhomes: Council discussed whether the matter could be publicly discussed and was advised that it remains a quasi-judicial matter because the 28-day period for filing a petition for judicial review has not yet expired. Therefore, the ex parte communication rules continue to apply. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:42 PM. /s/ Linda Lundquist_________________ /s/ Lisa Burtenshaw _____________ Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor Desert Eagles Model Airplane Flying Field Grand Opening Saturday, Sept. 19 @ 9:00 a.m.- 1:00 p.m. We have built a brand new flying field at 8433 West Arco Highway at Noise Park Fly RC Airplanes with an instructor Static display of RC airplanes Free food and drinks For more information, call Stu Eddins @ 208-589-4650 or Tye Tomchak @ 208-201-1812 http://deserteaglesrcclub.com/ Aegean Son COMMUNITY SUPPORT Sitter veiet Sate Way LAYING THE TURF EXCAVATION ie Rime FINISHED PRODUCT 8/27/2026 City of Idaho Falls Fiscal Year 2026/27 Budget Adoption Staff Presentation Thursday, August 27, 2026 Overview of Key Dates for the 2026/27 Budget Process ¢ Friday, April 10 - City of Idaho Falls Budget Hearing Notice to County ¢ Thursday, July 30 —- Tentative, Not to Exceed Budget ¢ August 1 and August 2 (Saturday) — Public Notices of Hearings Published in Post Register ¢ Thursday, August 13 - Conducted Public Hearings and testimony for fees, forgone, and budget 8/27/2026 Updates to the 2026/27 Budget After Public Hearing * Updates to 1% and one-time capital forgone (post certification of valuation from County, August 11) * 1% forgone from $538,354 to $540,078.00 * One-time capital forgone from $350,000 to $250,116.00 * Total not-to-exceed budget remains the same at $393,483,954 ($393.5M) * Total property taxes remains the same at $54,098,846 ($54.1 M) Idaho Falls Property Valuation and Property Levy Rate Year Base Valuation % Change Levy Rate % Change 2013-14 2,965,273,734 0.0090267460 2014-15 2,977,260,980 0% 0.0092620910 2015-16 3,008,461,828 1% 0.0095618580 2016-17 3,124,421,943 4% 0.0096250280 2017-18 3,309,246,661 6% 0.0095131860 2018-19 3,540,971,736 7% 0.0095836470 2019-20 4,203,242,707 19% 0.0087957340 2020-21 4,766,436,340 13% 0.0066565220 2021-22 5,317,114,014 12% 0.0076497700 2022-23 7,052,741,278 33% 0.0060540040 2023-24 8,296,484,599 18% 0.0054044800 2024-25 8,103,605,399 -2% 0.0058839760 2025-26 8,660,283,169 6.87% 0.0058381958 2026-27 9,086,702,190 4.92% 0.0059536282 2.6% 3.2% 0.7% -1.2% 0.7% -8.2% -24.3% 14.9% -20.9% -10.7% 8.9% -0.78% 1.98% 7363999399393 35595 €€ 7x €€6€37€ € 3 €6€39393 8/27/2026 Next Steps * Adoption of the resolutions * Fees — effective October 1 * Forgone - 1% and one-time capital * Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Budget Conclusion of the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Budget Adoption Staff Presentation City Council Meeting Minutes 1 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID Thursday, September 10, 2026 6:30 PM City Council Chambers 1. Mayor Burtenshaw Called the meeting to Order at 6:30 PM Present: Mayor Lisa Burtenshaw Council President Jim Francis Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman Councilor Jim Freeman Councilor Kirk Larsen Councilor John Radford Councilor Brandon Lee (Via Teams, left at 7:15 pm) Also present: Chris Canfield, PW Director Pam Alexander, Municipal Services Director Ian Turner, Airport Director Chris Fredericksen, GM - IF Power Mark Hagedorn, Finance Director / Treasurer Colby Hatton, Stronger IF Zack Jones, City Attorney Linda Lundquist, City Clerk 2. Pledge of Allegiance Mr. Hatton led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Staff Responses to Prior Public Comment and Other Updates (None) 4. Public Comment • Colby Hatton (Idaho Falls resident and representative of Stronger Idaho Falls): Expressed appreciation for neighborhood street reconstruction, including new asphalt and improved water and sewer infrastructure, but encouraged the City to incorporate safety improvements while streets are being rebuilt. He recommended bulb-outs and daylighting at intersections to prevent parking near crosswalks, shorten pedestrian crossing distances, improve visibility, and encourage drivers to slow down. He shared a recent near-miss while cycling to work caused by a driver who could not see him around parked cars. Hatton urged the City to consider all modes of transportation in every roadway project and prioritize safer, more intentional street design for pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers. 5. Consent Agenda A. Fire Department 1. 26-326 Bonneville County Fire Protection District #1 Service Agreement B. Public Works 1. 26-341 Bid Award – Tautphaus Park Surface Water Conversion – to B Squared Legacy GC, LLC for $692,600. 2. 26-340 Bid Award – Yellowstone Ave Sidewalk – Federal Aid 24705 – Galicia’s Concrete, LLC, for $322,570.80 C. Office of the City Clerk City Council Meeting Minutes 2 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 1. 26-338 City Council Meeting Minutes (7.30.2026, 8.6.2026, 8.10.2026, 8.12.2026, 8.13.2026) Motion: Approve, accept, or receive all items on the Consent Agenda according to the recommendations presented. o Moved by: Councilor Dingman o Second: Councilor Larsen o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. 6. Regular Agenda A. Public Works 1. 26-336 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5307 Small Urban Funding Agreement Presentation/Discussion (Director Canfield): • Director Canfield presented the Section 5307 Small Urban Funding Agreement. • The agreement is an annual funding arrangement for transit operations. • The funding provides approximately $1.7 million in support. • The agreement includes varying local match requirements: o 20% match for one portion of the funding. o 50% match for another portion. o Overall, the match averages approximately 35%. • Director Canfield noted that a separate agreement approved the previous month focused on ADA and disability accommodations, while this agreement supports operational expenses. Motion: Approve the FTA 5310 Small Urban Funding Agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign the necessary document. o Moved by: Councilor Larsen o Second: Councilor Dingman o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries. B. Municipal Services 1. 26-321 Approve the Write-off of Unpaid Ambulance Service Accounts Presentation/Discussion (Director Alexander): o Director Alexander explained that the write-off request is part of the City's fiscal year-end closeout process. o The request covers $3,395,031.25 in unpaid ambulance accounts, including Medicare and Medicaid contractual adjustments and accounts determined uncollectible. o Approximately 87% of the write-off represents the difference between published ambulance rates and Medicare/Medicaid allowable reimbursement rates. The remaining City Council Meeting Minutes 3 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 13% includes accounts from 2020 and 2021 involving deceased individuals with no known estate, bankruptcies, and approved hardships. o Council discussed the role of the ground transportation fund in helping offset Medicaid- related costs. o Director Alexander explained that the City's collection agency is authorized to collect in all 50 states and that the City conducts due diligence before submitting accounts for write-off. o Councilor Freeman commented on the City's efforts to control ambulance costs and its role as a public, rather than private, ambulance service. Motion: Approve the write-off of unpaid ambulance service accounts for the calendar dates of service 2020, 2021, and 2025 determined as past statute or uncollectible for a total of $3,395,031.25. o Moved by: Councilor Dingman o Second: Councilor Freeman o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. C. Office of the Mayor 1. 26-346 Ordinance amending Title 1, Chapters 7, 9 and 13, Creation of a City Finance Department Presentation/Discussion (Mayor Burtenshaw): • The Mayor introduced an updated ordinance establishing the City Finance Department and transferring financial responsibilities from Municipal Services. • An amendment clarified the division of responsibilities for City grants. The Finance Department will provide centralized fiscal oversight, compliance monitoring, and financial reporting, while individual operating departments will remain responsible for their grants. • The Mayor explained that the ordinance primarily formalizes duties that the Finance Division was already performing. • The ordinance also designates the Treasurer as the Finance Department Director and establishes consistent terminology across the City Code. Motion: Adopt the Ordinance amending Title 1, Chapters 7, 9 and 13 and other updated titles, chapters and sections of City ordinance to create a Finance Department, move the financial duties from the Department of Municipal Services to the Finance Department, and designate the City Treasurer as the Director of the Finance Department, under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete readings, and request that it be read by title and published by summary. o Moved by: Councilor Dingman o Second: Councilor Freeman o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. City Council Meeting Minutes 4 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID ORDINANCE 3676: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, AMENDING TITLE 1, CHAPTERS 7, 9, AND 13; TITLE 2, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 12; TITLE 3, CHAPTER 3, SECTION 3; TITLE 4, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 2; TITLE 7, CHAPTERS 9 AND 10; TITLE 8, CHAPTERS 5 ,12, AND 13; TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, SECTION 25; AND TITLE 10, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 12; AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 11 TO TITLE 3 TO CREATE A NEW FINANCE DEPARTMENT, DELINEATE THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT, DESIGNATE THE CITY FINANCE DIRECTOR/TREASURER AS THE DIRECTOR OF THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT, CREATE CONSISTENT TERMINOLOGY FOR THE FINANCE DIRECTOR/TREASURER AND FINANCE DEPARTMENT, AND REMOVE RESPONSIBILITIES FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES; CODIFICATION; PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY; AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE. 2. 26-347 Appointment of Finance Director/Treasurer Presentation/Discussion (Mayor Burtenshaw): • Mayor Burtenshaw recommended Mark Hagedorn for appointment as the City's Finance Director and Treasurer. • She noted his previous experience as Treasurer and head of the Finance Division and expressed confidence in his financial knowledge and leadership. • Councilors commended Hagedorn for his expertise, accessibility in answering budget and finance questions, and work on the City's Workday ERP software implementation. • Hagedorn thanked the Council and City staff for their support and expressed his commitment to serving City employees and the public. He introduced his wife and daughter. Motion: Confirm the appointment of Mark Hagedorn as the City’s new Finance Director/Treasurer o Moved by: Councilor Dingman o Second: Councilor Freeman o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. 3. 26-343 Ordinance Repealing Title 2, Chapter 8, Dissolving the Sister Cities Advisory Committee and Releasing its Members Presentation/Discussion (Council President Francis): • Council President Francis provided background on the Sister Cities Advisory Committee, which was established in 2021 to address financial oversight, expand the program's community presence, and develop economic relationships with Tokai-mura, Japan. • He credited the committee with formalizing the financial relationship between the City and the Sister Cities programs, strengthening community outreach, and laying the groundwork for future economic partnerships. City Council Meeting Minutes 5 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID • Council President Francis highlighted upcoming exchange activities involving new departmental and educational relationships. • He expressed appreciation for the committee members' work and contributions to the program. Motion: Adopt the Ordinance repealing Title 2, Chapter 8, of the Idaho Falls City Code, under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete readings, and request that it be read by title and published by summary o Moved by: Councilor Francis o Second: Councilor Radford o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. ORDINANCE 3677: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, REPEALING TITLE 2, CHAPTER 8, SISTER CITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND RELEASING SISTER CITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY; CODIFICATION; PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY; AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE. D. Airport 1. 26-328 Approve Additional Services Request with T.O. Engineers (Ardurra) for Terminal Renovation and Expansion Phase 3 (Priority 1A-Phase 1) Presentation/Discussion (Director Turner): • Airport Director Turner presented an amendment to the terminal expansion design contract. • The amendment will cover design services for Phase 1 of the terminal renovation & expansion. • The total amendment cost is $1,630,000, with a net contract increase of $1,242,969.28 after accounting for $388,000 in unused contract funds. • In response to a Council question, Director Turner explained that the design work is expected to be completed by early 2027. Construction administration services will be addressed separately, with construction anticipated to take approximately 24–30 months. Motion: Approve Additional Services Request 2 to Work Order 24-01 with T.O. Engineers, now Ardurra, related to the Terminal Renovation and Expansion Phase 3 (Priority 1A - Phase 1). o Moved by: Councilor Larsen o Second: Councilor Radford o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. 2. 26-330 Approve the Other Transaction Agreement for the Law Enforcement Officer Reimbursement Program with the Transportation Security Administration City Council Meeting Minutes 6 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID Presentation/Discussion (Director Turner): • Airport Director Turner explained that the Transportation Security Administration awarded the City up to $146,000 to reimburse the cost of a law enforcement officer stationed at the airport security checkpoint. • The funding was made available through the reinstated Law Enforcement Officer Reimbursement Program. • The agreement provides reimbursement for a portion of the assigned police officer's wages, up to $25 per hour. • The Director clarified that “Other Transaction Agreement” is the official name of the agreement. Motion: Approve the Other Transaction Agreement for the Law Enforcement Officer Reimbursement Program o Moved by: Councilor Larsen o Second: Councilor Radford o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. E. Idaho Falls Power 1. 26-333 Kleinschmidt Continuing Relicensing Professional Service Contract - FY2027 Presentation/Discussion (Director Fredericksen): • General Manager Fredericksen presented the continuing professional services contract with Kleinschmidt to support the relicensing process for the Gem State and Idaho Falls projects. • The contract has a not-to-exceed amount of $579,100 and will cover services through the post- final license application filing process. • Mayor Burtenshaw identified that the contract was missing the City's required nondiscrimination ordinance clause. • Council agreed to authorize the contract, with execution by the Mayor and City Clerk conditioned on adding the nondiscrimination clause. Motion: Approve the contract for fiscal year 2027 Relicensing Services for the Gem State and Idaho Falls Projects through the Post-Final License Application (FLA) Filing Process for a total of $579,100 and give authorization to the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents once the City’s nondiscrimination clause has been added to the contract. o Moved by: Councilor Francis o Second: Councilor Freeman o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. City Council Meeting Minutes 7 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 2. 26-334 Construction Agreement for South Tourist Park Path Lighting Project Presentation/Discussion (Director Fredericksen): • General Manager Fredericksen explained that the project was rebid after the City rejected earlier bids in June. • Idaho Falls Power staff negotiated a construction agreement with Armstrong Electric, Inc., for $145,680.06. • The project will install lighting along the pathway through South Tourist Park, adjacent to the river, to improve nighttime visibility and safety. • Council discussed the importance of improving Riverwalk amenities, enhancing pathway safety, and expanding usability during Idaho Falls' darker winter months. • The contract includes a contingency for potential rock encountered during construction, which could affect the project schedule. Motion: Approve the Construction Agreement with Armstrong Electric, Inc, in the amount of $145,680.06; and give authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents. o Moved by: Councilor Freeman o Second: Councilor Radford o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. 3. 26-344 Bid Award - IFP 26-25 Fiber Drop Cable Installation Presentation/Discussion (Director Fredericksen): • General Manager Fredericksen explained that the project supports the continued growth of Idaho Falls Power's fiber network and the installation of connections for customers enrolled in the fiber program. • Three bids were received, with B. Jackson Construction identified as the lowest responsible, responsive bidder. • The contract award amount is $531,463. • Councilors commented positively on the quality of the fiber program and B. Jackson Construction's previous work and interactions with residents. Motion: Approve the bid award for the Fiber Drop Cable Installation project(s); award to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, B Jackson Construction, for $531,463.00. o Moved by: Councilor Freeman o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. City Council Meeting Minutes 8 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 4. 26-345 Bid Award - IFP 26-26 Micro Duct Drop Installation Services Presentation/Discussion (Director Fredericksen): • General Manager Fredericksen presented the second fiber-related installation project, which supports the expansion of the City's fiber network. • B. Jackson Construction was identified as the lowest responsible, responsive bidder. • The bid award amount is $208,845.30. • The discussion emphasized continued fiber network growth and the benefits of expanding connectivity for City residents. Motion: Approve the bid award for the Micro Duct Drop Installation project(s) and award to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, B Jackson Construction, for a price of $208,845.30. o Moved by: Councilor Freeman o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Francis, Dingman, Freeman, Larsen, Lee, Radford. Nay: none. o Motion carries 6-0. 7. Announcements • Councilor Radford: Announced the America 250 event taking place the following day at the Bonneville County Fairgrounds. The event will include a presentation, a trivia contest, and the traveling Liberty Bell. • Mayor Burtenshaw: Shared her experience participating in the 9/11 Memorial Stair Climb, completing 110 flights representing the 110 floors of the World Trade Center. She thanked the Idaho Falls Police Department for organizing the event and for assisting her during the climb when she experienced fear of heights. She specifically recognized the support of Chief Johnson, Chief Olson, and the officers who helped her reach the top. • Councilor Francis: Announced a Constitution Day ceremony at the Museum of Idaho on September 17 at 2:00 p.m. The event will commemorate the signing of the U.S. Constitution on September 17, 1787, and include the ringing of the bell once for each of the 13 original colonies. He also noted that the Mayor would have a proclamation for the occasion. • Councilor Freeman: Reflected on the 25th anniversary of September 11, 2001, drawing on his experience as a retired firefighter. He honored the 343 firefighters who died at the World Trade Center, referring to them as his brothers in arms, and emphasized the lasting impact of the tragedy and the importance of remembering those who perished. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:19 PM. /s/ Linda Lundquist_________________ /s/ Lisa Burtenshaw _____________ Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor CL flea Example of a Bulb out in Rexburg. Google} Maps Memorandum File #: 26-384 City Council DATE: Friday, September 25, 2026 AGENDA: Regular FROM: Darin Jones, Director DEPARTMENT: Human Resources Title City of Idaho Falls 457 Plan - Capital Group/American Funds ☐ Ordinance ☐ Resolution ☐ Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☐ Legislative Public Hearing ☐ Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☒ Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: Authorization to formally terminate the City of Idaho Falls 457 Plan held with The Capital Group/American Funds, and to direct staff to notify Capital Group/American Funds in writing to close out the plan once the final participant has withdrawn their funds (or take other action deemed appropriate). Description, Background Information, Purpose: The City of Idaho Falls 457 Plan with The Capital Group/American Funds is a deferred compensation plan that predates current staff involvement. The exact origination date and full history of the plan are not known - no plan documents have been located either by the City or by Capital Group/American Funds. What is known is that the City stopped allowing new employee enrollments in this plan an estimated one to two decades ago, and no new contributions have been made to the plan since that time. Staff became aware of the plan's existence a little over a year ago. At that time, a review found only a small number of employees with any remaining balance in the plan. Currently, only one individual - a current employee - still has funds invested in this plan, and that individual is in the process of withdrawing their funds. That withdrawal is expected to be completed no later than January 2027. Because the plan retains no active participants (aside from the one individual currently withdrawing) and accepts no new enrollments or contributions, it no longer serves any ongoing purpose for the City or its employees. The purpose of this agenda item is to obtain City Council authorization to formally terminate the City of Idaho Falls 457 Plan with The Capital Group/American Funds. Upon Council approval, staff will send a formal letter to Capital Group/American Funds requesting termination of the plan, to take effect once the remaining participant has completed the withdrawal of their funds. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/6/2026 Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #: 26-384 City Council This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/6/2026 Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Memorandum File #: 26-401 City Council DATE: Thursday, October 8, 2026 AGENDA: Regular FROM: HR Director, Darin Jones DEPARTMENT: Human Resources Title Memorandum of Agreement (MOU) Between IBEW Local 57 and The City of Idaho Falls ☐ Ordinance ☐ Resolution ☐ Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☐ Legislative Public Hearing ☐ Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☒ Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: Approve the MOU with Power Union CBA and give authorization to the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Description, Background Information, Purpose: Elimination of one position in the collective bargaining Agreement and the addition of two new positions in the collective bargaining agreement. Position eliminated: Traffic Technician. Positions added: Journeyman Operation and Traffic Signal Electrician and Apprentice Operation and Traffic Signal Electrician. These two classifications shall replace the classification of Traffic Technician currently listed in Exhibit “A.” Upon execution of this MOU, the classification of Traffic Technician shall be removed from Exhibit “A.” Any employee who holds the classification of Traffic Technician as of the date of this Agreement shall be placed into either the Journeyman Operation and Traffic Signal Electrician classification or the Apprentice Operation and Traffic Signal Electrician classification, as mutually determined by the City and IBEW Local 57 based upon the factors set forth in the Promotion & Change of Employment provisions of the Agreement, including the incumbent’s length of continuous service, knowledge, training, ability, skill, and adaptability. This MOU is subject to approval by the Idaho Falls City Council and ratification by the membership of IBEW Local 57. This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/6/2026 Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Memorandum of Agreement Between IBEW Local 57 And The City of Idaho Falls The City of Idaho Falls and IBEW Local 57 agree to the addition of the following provisions to the Agreement when the parties commence bargaining in March, 2027 AGREEMENT The Parties agree to the addition of the classifications of a Journeyman Operations and Traffic Signal Electrician and Apprentice Operations and Traffic Signal Electrician to Exhibit “A” in the Agreement, along with the corresponding wage rates shown below: Journeyman Operation and Traffic Signal Electrician $43.20 $46.22 $49.50 $53.00 Apprentice Operation and Traffic Signal Electrician $35.56 $38.05 $40.74 $43.62 These two classifications shall replace the classification of Traffic Technician currently listed in Exhibit “A.” Upon execution of this Memorandum of Agreement, the classification of Traffic Technician shall be removed from Exhibit “A.” Any employee who holds the classification of Traffic Technician as of the date of this Agreement shall be placed into either the Journeyman Operation and Traffic Signal Electrician classification or the Apprentice Operation and Traffic Signal Electrician classification, as mutually determined by the City and IBEW Local 57 based upon the factors set forth in the Promotion & Change of Employment provisions of the Agreement, including the incumbent’s length of continuous service, knowledge, training, ability, skill, and adaptability. This Memorandum of Agreement is subject to approval by the Idaho Falls City Council and ratification by the membership of IBEW Local 57. CITY OF IDAHO FALLS IBEW LOCAL 57 ___________________ Date: _______ Mayor ___________________ Date: _______ Unit Chairman ___________________ Date: _______ Power General Manager ___________________ Date: _______ Business Manager ___________________ Date: _______ Human Resources Memorandum File #: 26-389 City Council DATE: Thursday, October 1, 2026 AGENDA: Regular FROM: PJ Holm, Director DEPARTMENT: Parks & Recreation Title Meppen Park Irrigation System Installation Bid ☐ Ordinance ☐ Resolution ☐ Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☐ Legislative Public Hearing ☐ Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☒ Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: Accept and approve the proposal for the irrigation system installation at Meppen Park and award the bid to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, A Summer Rain Inc. in the amount of $98,900.00 (or take other action deemed appropriate). Description, Background Information, Purpose: Idaho Falls Parks and Recreation solicited bids from qualified vendors for the installation of the Meppen Park Irrigation System Phase. A Summer Rain Inc. was the lowest of the 3 bids received with a total bid of $98,900.00. This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/6/2026 Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ A SUMMER RAIN INC 675 E 440 N Firth , ID 83236 208-681-4401 a.summerrain@yahoo.com BID FOR : IF Meppen Park sprinkler system 2000 mainline and wire 4'' hdpe sdr 11 455 – I 25 24- 2'' hunter valves 4 -4 '' isolation valves sprinkler install and 3 year warranty …............................Total $ 98,900.00 will take 16 good day with not muddy soil . Signature Date IPW # 021746-B-4 IC # RCE 39171 Supplier indicated this was a typo and it should read I20. Memorandum File #: 26-387 City Council DATE: Wednesday, September 30, 2026 AGENDA: Regular FROM: Chris Fredericksen, General Manager DEPARTMENT: Idaho Falls Power Title Professional Services Agreement with HDR Engineering in Support of the Rack Substation Rebuild Project ☐ Ordinance ☐ Resolution ☐ Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☐ Legislative Public Hearing ☐ Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☒ Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: Approve the Amendment to Agreement for Professional Engineering Services and Professional Services Task Order with HDR Engineering Incorporated for a total of $386,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute both documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Description, Background Information, Purpose: On June 21, 2024, the city established a Master Agreement with HDR. This Task Order, if approved, authorizes the consultant to carry out the necessary design work for rebuilding the Rack Distribution Substation, located adjacent to the Lower Power Plant off Sunnyside Road. The total negotiated, not to exceed amount for this work, is $386,000.00. This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/6/2026 Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ HDR ENGINEERING, INC. TASK ORDER NUMBER 2026-002 This Task Order pertains to an agreement by and between the City of Idaho Falls, (“IFP”), and HDR Engineering, Inc. (“HDR”), dated June 21, 2024, (“the Agreement”). HDR shall perform services on the project described below as provided herein and in the Agreement. This Task Order shall not be binding until it has been properly signed by both parties. Upon execution, this Task Order shall supplement the Agreement as it pertains to the project described below. PART 1.1 1.2 1.3 1. GENERAL Project Name City of Idaho Falls Power Rack Substation Rebuild Engineering and Design. Definition For the purposes of this Technical Scope, the following definitions have been used: PROJECT shall be the Rack 69/46-12.47kV Substation. Site is located in the City of Idaho Falls. OWNER shall be Idaho Falls Power (IFP). ENGINEER shall be HDR Engineering, Inc. (HDR). MANUFACTURER shall be any company that is fabricating, manufacturing, or supplying specific equipment for the PROJECT. CONTRACTOR shall be the firm performing the construction of the PROJECT. Project Description The PROJECT is the rebuild of the existing 46-12.47kV Rack Distribution Substation. The current Rack substation is a five bay transfer bus with (2) 46kV lines, (1) 43.8- 4.16kV, 8.75kVA step-up transformer, (1) 46.0-2.40kV, 4.00kVA step-up transformer, and (1) 43.8-12.47kV, 15kVA transformer with a five feeder 12.47kV underground distribution. The majority of the existing equipment, structures and foundations have been in operation for over 40 years and are considered end-of-life equipment. This project is to replace all equipment and supporting structures/foundations with the exception of the 46 & 12.47kV breakers and the 46.0-2.40kV, 4.00kVA step-up transformer. The new substation high side will be built with 69kV clearances for a future upgrade to a 69kV system. The transformers will be dual 46/69KV high sides. The conceptual design will explore substation layouts that will physically fit on the existing IFP property. Proposed layouts will include a transfer bus, main and transfer bus and a ring bus configuration. A new equipment enclosure will contain new protection relay panels. New cable trench and control cables will be included in this PROJECT. Page 1 of 10 PART 2.1 2.2 2.3 Based on the final selected layout, a simple switching diagram for the substation will be provided. The ENGINEER will create AC and DC schematics required for control design. This includes one-lines, three-lines, control schematics, relay details, equipment enclosure layout, relay panel layouts, communication diagrams, connection diagrams for equipment, wiring diagrams for relaying panels and cable schedule. The ENGINEER will develop the final schematics and connection diagrams from the manufacturer’s approval drawings that have been approved by the OWNER. The ENGINEER will assist with control building bid solicitation and bid processing services and coordinate with successful building and relay panel manufacturer to determine the equipment enclosure layout and panel wiring. The ENGINEER will provide on call field support during construction by phone or email. Transmission and distribution line design and/or items that are not listed below are outside the scope of work for the PROJECT. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY OWNER ON THE PROJECT Substation Design Information - OWNER The OWNER will provide the following MANUFACTURER equipment outline and wiring drawings to complete the substation design: 46/69-12.47kV, 15/20/25MVA Transformer (New) 46/69-4.16kV, 1|OMVA Step-up Transformer (New) 46-2.40kV, 4.00kVA Step-up Transformer (Existing) 72kV Circuit Breakers (Existing) 12.47kV Circuit Breakers (Existing) 69 & 12.47kV Disconnect Switches (New) Substation Permitting - OWNER The OWNER will acquire any applicable permits needed for construction, access, building permits, special use permits, design permits, or other permits to facilitate the PROJECT. Permit costs will be paid by the OWNER. Permit acquisition, agency coordination, permit compliance, SWPPP inspections, SPCC implementation, and regulatory reporting are the responsibility of OWNER or CONTRACTOR. HDR's scope is limited to preparation of design documents. Substation Material Procurement Support - OWNER The OWNER or CONTRACTOR will be responsible for bidding and procuring material and equipment required for the PROJECT. The ENGINEER will provide technical specifications for the following major equipment items, and support shop drawing reviews during the approval process for general conformance to the design. OWNER has already bid the 46/69-12.47kV, 15/20/25MVA transformer. e 46/69-12.47kV power transformer — (Out for bid) 69kV & 12.47kV power circuit breakers — (Existing) e 69kV & 12.47kV group operated disconnect switches (manually operated) — (OFCI) Page 2 of 10 69kV & 12.47kV instrument transformers (CFCI) 69kV & 12.47kV surge arresters (CFCI) 12.47kV single-pole disconnect switches (CFCI) 12.47kV fuse disconnect switches (CFCI) 12.47kV/120V/240V station service transformers (Existing) Structural steel (OFCI) Equipment enclosure and relay panels (OFCI) 2.4 Other - OWNER The OWNER will provide data to the ENGINEER as requested and respond to inquiries and milestone reviews as needed. This data includes the Manufacturer’s final drawings for new equipment procured by the OWNER along with existing equipment that will remain in service. PART 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY ENGINEER ON THE 3.1 3.2 PROJECT: Design drawings for the PROJECT will be developed using Autodesk AutoCAD software in two-dimensional format, unless otherwise noted. The ENGINEER will submit (4) design review packages at the 10%, 30%, 60% and 90% milestones and schedule a design review meeting with the OWNER after each submittal. Design review meetings will be conducted remotely via MS Teams. A design review is not required after submitting the IFC design package. Changes to the design, design criteria, standards, or preferences by the OWNER or others, which causes or involves rework by the ENGINEER, may require an amendment or change order. Changes to the PROJECT schedule outlined in Part 5 due to OWNER, equipment vendors, or construction contractors may require an amendment or change order. Survey — ENGINEER ENGINEER will subcontract a survey company to conduct a survey of the substation area. Survey will include topography of the area, marked underground utilities, existing site foundations, and site control points. Survey services are based on a $10,000 allowance. Additional costs may require a change order. Geotechnical Investigation - ENGINEER ENGINEER will subcontract a geotechnical company to conduct a geotechnical analysis of the substation area. Geotech will include a geotechnical report. It is assumed that there will be three test areas. As the area is next to the river, test pits will be dependent on the depth of the competent basalt in the area. The ENGINEER will provide testing parameters, specifications, (3) test locations, review the report, and request additional information as needed. Geotechnical services are based on a $10,000 allowance. Additional costs may require a change order. Page 3 of 10 3.3 Switching Diagram - ENGINEER Based on the final selected substation layout, a simple switching diagram for the substation will be provided. The ENGINEER will use these documents as a basis for a substation one-line that shows major equipment, electrical ratings, and protection relaying requirements. 3.4 Grading/SWPPP/SPCC Design - ENGINEER The ENGINEER will develop the overall site grading design for the PROJECT, including grading elevations surrounding the substation area. The ENGINEER will develop final substation grading and rock surfacing design based on the geotech report, grading model and PROJECT requirements. The ENGINEER will provide an AutoCAD Civil 3D model with active surfaces in .DWG format. Survey control points and surface data may be provided in .CSV or other mutually acceptable formats as required. The ENGINEER will be responsible for the design of stormwater drainage, including any retention and detention ponds if required. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) development, erosion and sediment control measures. 3.5 Soil Resistivity Report - ENGINEER The ENGINEER will perform soil resistivity testing. The ENGINEER will provide testing parameters and testing locations. 3.6 Security Fence Design - ENGINEER The ENGINEER will provide substation security fence design services, including establishing fence alignment, determining required setbacks from energized equipment and property boundaries, and locating personnel and vehicle access gates to support substation operation and maintenance activities. The design will include grounding and bonding of metallic fence components, as required, to mitigate touch and step potential hazards associated with the substation grounding system. Additional design considerations will include coordination with grading, drainage, access roads, signage, and provisions for future security system installations. The security fence design will be developed in accordance with applicable NESC requirements, project-specific criteria, and OWNER standards and preferences. 3.7 Equipment Layout Design - ENGINEER The ENGINEER will explore substation layouts that will physically fit on the existing OWNER property. Proposed layouts will include a transfer bus, main and transfer bus and a ring bus configuration. Considerations for bus clearances, equipment placement, working clearances and ease of operations will be checked in this design. A preliminary equipment layout based on typical (approximate) equipment sizes will be developed to determine the overall size and arrangement of the substation. After the ENGINEER has received all Manufacturer equipment approval drawings, the final equipment layout will be developed. Page 4 of 10 3.8 3.9 Equipment Elevations Design - ENGINEER Elevations for the new equipment and the bus system will be prepared after the final equipment layout design has been completed and approved. The elevations will be used to show the Bill of Material items as well as the controlling heights of equipment and buses. Bus System Design - ENGINEER Rigid bus systems will be utilized for main overhead distribution buses in the substation based on the final equipment layout. Bus systems will be designed based on industry codes and standards. Detailed drawings will be prepared showing the equipment, bus system, bus connection fittings and a Bill of Material listing for each item. 3.10 Lightning Shielding Protection - ENGINEER 3.11 The ENGINEER will design the lightning shielding protection of the substation based on IEEE Std. 998 using a combination of static shield wires and static masts for protection. Bus voltages at or below 69kV will rely on the fixed-angle method. Yard Lighting - ENGINEER The ENGINEER will design a yard lighting plan and layout for the substation based on input and preferences from the OWNER. A detailed yard lighting analysis, illumination calculations, and study are not included. 3.12 Conduit System / Cable Trench / Control Cable Design - ENGINEER The conduit system, including wire sizing and cable trench, will be designed and detailed on the drawings. Details of specific conduit installations (i.e., conduit sizes, lengths) will be included. The conduit installation will be direct-bury PVC below grade and rigid 90 degree and elbows up into the equipment. The cable trench will be designed with drive- over sections where vehicles and large trailers (i.e. transformer, NGR, breakers) will need to cross. The control cable lengths, sizes, and count will be called out on a cable schedule as well as on a drawing. 3.13 Grounding System Design - ENGINEER The ENGINEER will design the substation grounding system per IEEE Std. 80 based on soil resistivity and fault current information. Calculations and details for the grounding equipment and structures will be prepared. Fence, gate, and station grounds will be connected. Equipment and buses will include provisions for attaching personal protective grounding cables. Ground grid material will consist of bare soft drawn copper conductor, size verified during design. Copperweld ground rods will be %” x 10’, sectional type ground rods, based on design. Below grade, the connections will be weld-type Cadweld or Burndy Hy-ground. Above grade connections will be bolted type to equipment or structures. Page 5 of 10 3.14 3.15 3.16 3.17 3.18 3.19 Structural Steel Design - ENGINEER The ENGINEER will design structural steel for bus supports, switch supports, termination structures, and other structures and brackets required based on ASCE 113- 23 and ASCE 7-16 or 7-22. Design calculations can be provided to the OWNER upon request. Design of tapered tubular structures shall be provided by the steel vendor. Steel Fabrication Drawings - ENGINEER After structural steel has been analyzed and designed, the ENGINEER will create fabrication drawings of each standard shape steel member showing welds, holes, sizes, and erection hardware. The completion of the final structural steel fabrication drawings is dependent on receiving the Manufacturer equipment shop drawings. Fabrication drawings will be developed in Autodesk Inventor. Fabrication drawings for tapered tubular structures shall be provided by the steel vendor. ENGINEER will provide performance level or load tree drawings for tapered tubular structures. Foundation Design - ENGINEER Using the equipment and steel support structure loading information, foundations will be designed based on a geotechnical investigation report. The foundation types will be spread footing, mats, or drilled piers, depending on structural loads, geotechnical report, and economies of construction. Transformer oil containment pits will also be designed for the SPCC oil containment. Design calculations can be provided to the OWNER upon request. Bill of Materials - ENGINEER ENGINEER will provide a bill of materials for bus, grounding and conduit material for the PROJECT. A preliminary bill of material will be developed with the preliminary equipment layout drawing and will prioritize long lead items. A final bill of material will be developed after the final equipment layout and elevation drawings have been completed. Equipment Enclosure - ENGINEER The ENGINEER will develop the layout, interior elevations, and bill of material for a prefabricated equipment enclosure. The enclosure vendor shall provide architectural, structural, HVAC, and electrical design. The ENGINEER will assist with equipment enclosure bid solicitation and bid processing services and coordinate with successful building and relay panel manufacturers to determine the equipment enclosure layout and panel wiring. ENGINEER will also provide foundation design for the enclosure based on loading data from the vendor. Substation Construction Specifications - ENGINEER The ENGINEER will provide substation construction specifications for the parts of the substation per the latest industry standards. OWNER will be responsible for providing bid letting, bid evaluation and award, contract management, change order management, Page 6 of 10 3.20 3.21 3.22 3.23 payment processing, and closeout. The following construction specifications for the PROJECT will include: Concrete Testing Foundation Excavation Caisson Drilling Reinforced Concrete Conduit Grounding Structural Steel Erection Substation Equipment Installation Bus System - Welded/Bolted/Compression/Swage Control Wiring Testing Security Fence Construction Bid Document - ENGINEER N/A — Construction has already been awarded to Rising Edge Group. Equipment Specifications, Drawing Review and Approval - ENGINEER The ENGINEER will provide technical specifications for minor substation equipment. Items may include: equipment enclosure, disconnect switches, structural steel, and instrument transformers. The ENGINEER will work with the OWNER to provide manufacturer drawing review and approval services for the minor substation equipment. Control Drawings - ENGINEER Based on the proposed switching diagram for the substation, the ENGINEER will develop protection and control drawings. Design drawings may include one-line diagrams, three-line diagrams, equipment control schematics, relay schematics, relay panel layouts, relay panel bill of material, communication diagrams, connection diagrams for equipment, wiring diagrams for relaying panels and a cable schedule. The ENGINEER will develop the final schematics and connection diagrams from the manufacturer’s approval drawings that have been approved by the OWNER. ENGINEER will create Protection and Control drawings. This includes drafting and point-to-point, panel-to-panel drawings. The ENGINEER will submit (4) design review packages at the 10%, 30%, 60% and 90% milestones and schedule a design review meeting with the OWNER after each submittal Communication Design - ENGINEER ENGINEER will follow standards or examples provided by the OWNER to create communication schematics and wiring diagrams. OWNER shall be responsible for communication design upstream of the data concentrator. Communication device settings, point lists, and programming will be provided by OWNER. The communication panel may contain the following devices. Page 7 of 10 Data concentrator: SEL-3350 RTAC Ethernet gateway: SEL-3620 Satellite clock: SEL-2407 Network ethernet switches 3.24 AC & DC Auxiliary Power Design - ENGINEER ENGINEER will calculate and design the AC and DC auxiliary power system for the substation based on the anticipated loads for the substation equipment. This design will include the station service transformer, backup power source, transfer switches, fused disconnect switches, station battery, battery charger, distribution panels, and conduit and cable as required. 3.25 Protection Relay Settings - ENGINEER ENGINEER will develop protective relay settings and associated relay calculation worksheets for zones of protection established in the substation design. OWNER will provide relay setting criteria/philosophy and short-circuit data and source impedance (Thevenin). The following relay types are expected to be used in the design. 69/46kV line protection: SEL-311C 69/12.47kV breaker control: SEL-351S 69/46-12.47kV transformer differential protection: SEL-387E 69/46-12.47kV transformer lockout: SEL-2414 69/46-12.47kV transformer metering: SEL-735 69kV or 12.47kV bus protection: SEL-787Z 12.47kV feeder protection: SEL-351S High voltage load flow, dynamics, EMT studies, critical clearing time, TRV, TOV, SOV, Insulation Coordination, Reactive Power studies will be performed by Others. Logic diagrams associated with the relay settings are not required or included in this scope. Relay settings for the remote terminal(s) of the 46kV lines are not included in this task order. Compliance with NERC Protection and Control (PRC) Reliability Standards is not required and is excluded from this scope. PART 4. OTHER - ENGINEER 4.1 Record Drawings - ENGINEER The drawings generated by ENGINEER during the PROJECT will be updated once, at the end of the PROJECT to reflect changes and revisions based on the field construction set of ‘redline’ drawings provided by OWNER. ENGINEER will provide a final “Record” set of prints for the PROJECT. ENGINEER will not PE stamp Manufacturer drawings or Record drawings. Page 8 of 10 4.2 Project Management, Conference Call Meetings - ENGINEER The ENGINEER will provide project management and information processing services related to the design and engineering of the PROJECT and set up a bi-weekly conference call meetings during the design phase (8 months) of the PROJECT. 4.3 Construction Support - ENGINEER The ENGINEER will assist the OWNER with remote technical support during construction and commissioning by answering questions and interpreting technical provisions of plans and specifications when clarification is needed. This task does not include support for reviewing and evaluating contractor means and methods td carry out the required construction. On-site construction support has not been included. A total of 100 hours has been included for construction support. 4.4 Other - ENGINEER Additional engineering services, deliverables, or construction tasks requested by the OWNER that are not listed in this proposal will require an executed amendment or change order prior to startup. PART 5. PERIODS OF SERVICE 5.1 Estimated Schedule ENGINEER’s schedule for completion of the services set forth in this Scope of Services is as follows: Design: October 2026 — May 2027 Construction Support: June 2027 — December 2027 Schedule is based on receipt of manufacture drawings early in the design phase and equipment delivery during the construction phase. The ENGINEER will develop and maintain a project design schedule. In the event the established project design schedule is impacted, the ENGINEER will coordinate with the OWNER to identify schedule impacts, assess causes, develop and implement appropriate mitigation or recovery actions. Schedule variances will be reviewed and reconciled as needed to support reestablishment of the agreed upon schedule. PART 6. DELIVERABLES Design review drawings (10%, 30%, 60%, and 90%) will be submitted electronically in pdf format. Issued for Construction (IFC) hard copies will be mailed to the Owner’s office for construction purposes ((2) 11x17 and (2) 22x34 ANSI D). One set of the ANSI D drawings shall be used for the field construction set of ‘redline’ drawings and sent back to the ENGINEER at the close of the project to complete the record drawings. Record drawings (pdf/CADD) will be sent back to IFP for their records. PART 7. FEE ESTIMATE Page 9 of 10 The cost estimate for this task order is $386,000.00, including actual out-of-pocket expenses. The total payment to HDR ENGINEERING, INC. shall not exceed this amount without prior authorization from the IFP. PART 8. PAYMENTS TO ENGINEER Billed hourly based on the attached Power Delivery 2026 Hourly Rate Schedule. The billing rates are subject to change in January of each calendar year. This Task Order is executed this day of , 2026. IN WITNESS WHEREOPF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year written below: HDR ENGINEERING, INC. ("HDR") CITY OF IDAHO FALLS (“CITY”) py EB By: Title:_Vice President ‘Title: Date: 09.30.2026 Date: Page 10 of 10 eat) 7 CONCEPTUAL DRAWING NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IDAHO FALLS POWER GENERAL ARRANGEMENT IDAHO FALLS, [D PLAN VIEW i —__f ene = sca | reso GA-01 RACK SUBSTATION 69-24.94 AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES WHEREAS: HDR ENGINEERING, INC. (‘HDR’ or ‘CONTRACTOR’) entered into an Agreement on June 21st, 2024 to perform engineering services for City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, dba Idaho Falls Power ("CITY"); CITY desires to amend this Agreement in order for HDR to perform services beyond those previously contemplated; HDR is willing to amend the agreement and perform the additional engineering services. NOW, THEREFORE, HDR and CITY do hereby agree: The Agreement and the terms and conditions therein shall remain unchanged other than those sections and exhibits listed below; Sections P, Q, and R are deleted and replaced in their entirety with the following provisions. All other sections of the Agreement, including Section S, remain unchanged and in full force and effect.: 1. Non-Discrimination. CONTRACTOR shall not discriminate against any user of its services, employee, or applicant for employment on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideals, sex, age, marital status, physical, or mental handicap, gender identity/expression, sexual orientation, or national origin. 2. Anti-Boycott Against Israel Act. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2346, if payments under this AGREEMENT exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and CONTRACTOR employs ten (10) or more persons, CONTRACTOR certifies that it is not currently engaged in, and shall not for the duration of this AGREEMENT engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under its control. The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code section 67-2346 shall have the meaning defined therein. 3. Anti-Boycott of Certain Sectors. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2347A, if payments under this AGREEMENT exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and CONTRACTOR employs ten (10) or more persons, CONTRACTOR certifies that it is not currently engaged in and will not for the duration of the AGREEMENT engage in a boycott of any individual or company because the individual or company engages in or supports either (1) the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacture of fossil fuel-based energy, timber, minerals, hydroelectric power, nuclear energy, or agriculture; or (2) the manufacture, distribution, sale, or use of firearms, as defined in Idaho Code § 18-3302(2)(d). The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code § 67-2347A shall have the meaning defined therein. 4. Certification of No Chinese Ownership. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2359, CONTRACTOR certifies that CONTRACTOR is not currently owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic of China and will not, for the duration of this AGREEMENT, be owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic China. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year written below: HDR ENGINEERING, INC. ("HDR") CITY OF IDAHO FALLS (“CITY”) By:____________________________ By:_______________________________ Title:___________________________ Title:______________________________ Date:_________________________ Date:_____________________________ Vice President 09.30.2026 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (hereinafter “Agreement”), is made and entered intothis Z/ _dayof_ “Savy , 2024, by and between the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, dba IDAHO FALLS POWER, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, P.O. Box 50220, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83405 (hereinafter “CITY”), and HDR Engineering, Inc., a Nebraska corporation (hereinafter “CONTRACTOR”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, CITY, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2320(2)(i), published and advertised a Request for Qualification to develop a preapproved list of firms to perform engineering services on as-needed basis; and WHEREAS, CITY selected firms, including CONTRACTOR, as the most qualified firms to preform engineering services on as-needed basis; and WHEREAS, CONTRACTOR has the skills, education, training, and experience to provide engineering services. NOW, THEREFORE, be it agreed, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises between the parties hereto, as follows: SECTION I: SCOPE OF WORK CONTRACTOR agrees that the scope of all services under this Agreement shall be issued, from time to time, in a written task order that has been negotiated and mutually agreed upon by CITY and CONTRACTOR. All task orders shall reference this Agreement. In the event of conflict between the terms of a subsequent task order and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control. SECTION II: A. Independent Contractor. The contracting parties warrant by their signature that no employer/employee relationship is established between CONTRACTOR and CITY by the terms of this Agreement. It is understood by the parties hereto that CONTRACTOR is an independent contractor and as such neither it nor its employees, if any, are employees of CITY for purposes of tax, retirement system, social security (FICA) withholding, or workman’s compensation claims. B. Fees and Conditions for Professional Services. 2; All task orders issued under this Agreement shall be billed on a time and materials basis, with a total, not-to-exceed budget amount for each task order. 3; Payment is due upon receipt of CONTRACTOR’s statement(s). 4. CITY and CONTRACTOR may mutually agree to re-allocate tasks, providing the fixed “not-to-exceed” price described in each task order is unchanged. PRE-APPROVED ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT PAGE 1 OF 6 SECTION I: A. Termination of Agreement. This Agreement may be terminated by CONTRACTOR upon thirty (30) days written notice, should CITY fail to substantially perform in accordance with its terms through no fault of CONTRACTOR. CITY may terminate this Agreement with thirty (30) days’ notice without cause and without further liability to CONTRACTOR except as designated by this section. In the event of termination, CONTRACTOR shall be paid for services performed to termination date, based upon the work completed. All work including reports, shall become the property of, and shall be surrendered to, CITY. CONTRACTOR shall not be terminated for cause without CONTRACTOR first being given at least ten (10) days written notice of and a reasonable opportunity to cure the event or failure giving rise to such termination. B. Extent of Agreement. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument, signed by both parties hereto. C. No Exclusive Relationship Created Nothing in this Agreement shall entitle CONTRACTOR to any project, work, or task. Neither does this Agreement create an exclusive relationship between CITY and CONTRACTOR. CITY shall be under no obligation to provide or award work to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR acknowledges that they are merely a preapproved qualified design professional and that they have been placed on a preapproved list, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2320(2)(i). CITY has the exclusive right to award projects or work to any preapproved design professional or to seek other design professionals through the Request for Qualifications process outlined in Idaho Code § 67-2320. This Agreement merely formalizes the general conditions and terms for preapproved design professionals, D. Project Timeline. The term of this Agreement shall be from date of signature, unless adjusted by mutual agreement between the parties. CITY shall make available to CONTRACTOR all technical data of record in CITY’s possession, including financial, operations, and other information necessary for services prior to the initial date of the term of this Agreement. E. Termination of Project. If any portion of the services covered by this Agreement shall be suspended, abated, abandoned, or terminated, CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR for the services rendered to the date of such suspended, abated, abandoned, or terminated work; the payment to be based, insofar as possible, on the amounts established in this Agreement or, where the Agreement cannot be applied, the payment shall be based upon a reasonable estimate as mutually agreed upon between the two (2) parties as to the percentage of the work completed. F. CONTRACTOR’s Duty of Care. In performance of professional services, CONTRACTOR will use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by members of its profession; and no other PRE-APPROVED ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT PAGE 2 OF 6 warranty, either expressed or implied, is made in connection with rendering CONTRACTOR’s services. G. Indemnification. CONTRACTOR agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless CITY against damages, liabilities and costs arising from the negligent acts of CONTRACTOR in the performance of professional services under this Agreement, to the extent that CONTRACTOR is responsible for such damages, liabilities and costs on a comparative basis of fault and responsibility between CONTRACTOR and CITY. CONTRACTOR shall not be obligated to indemnify CITY for CITY’s negligence. H. Jurisdiction and Venue. It is agreed that this Agreement shall be construed under and governed by the laws of the State of Idaho. In the event of litigation concerning it, it is agreed that proper venue shall be the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District of the State of Idaho, in and for the County of Bonneville. I. Binding of Successors. CITY and CONTRACTOR each bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns, and legal . Tepresentatives to the other parties to this Agreement and to the partner, successors, assigns, and legal representatives of such other parties with respect to all covenants of this Agreement. J. Modification and Assignability of Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties concerning the professional services, and no statements, promises, or inducements made by either party, or agents of either party, are valid or binding unless contained herein. This Agreement may not be enlarged, modified, or altered except upon written agreement signed by the parties hereto. CONTRACTOR may not subcontract or assign its rights (including the right to compensation) or duties arising hereunder without the prior written consent and express authorization of CITY. Any such subcontractor or assignee shall be bound by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement as if named specifically herein. K. CITY’s Representatives. CITY shall designate a representative authorized to act in behalf of CITY. The authorized representative shall examine the documents of the work as necessary, and shall render decisions related thereto in a timely manner so as to avoid unreasonable delays. L. Ownership and Publication of Materials and CITY’s Right to Use Delivered Materials. CITY and CONTRACTOR agree that CITY, with this Agreement, acquires the right to use all written materials, including but not limited to reports, information, data, images, diagrams, plans, and any other written documents prepared and delivered to CITY by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Agreement, and CITY shall have the authority to release, publish, or otherwise use any written materials delivered to CITY, in whole or in part. The use of written materials (s) may include, but is not limited to, electronic and print promotion of CITY sponsored programs or functions. With CONTRACTOR’ s written consent, written materials(s) may be provided to other PRE-APPROVED ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT PAGE 3 OF 6 entities, such as newspapers or other publishers, for inclusion in print advertisements, without cost to CITY or payment to CONTRACTOR for use of such written materials. Any re-use of written materials shall be at CITY’s sole risk and without liability to CONTRACTOR. Nothing in this section shall constrain CONTRACTOR from using materials for other trainings or projects with other entities or from using the written materials for CONTRACTOR’s general reference or enrichment. Nothing in this section shall be constructed to entitle CITY to any materials owned by CONTRACTOR which were not delivered or received by CITY, even if those materials were used by CONTRACTOR to produce the written materials delivered to CITY or if the written materials delivered to CITY were used to develop, improve, or add value to anything CONTRACTOR does not deliver or release to CITY. The parties acknowledge that any written materials received by CITY are subject to public disclosure under the Idaho Public Records Law, Chapter 2 of Title 74 of the Idaho Code. M. Mediation Any and all disputes, controversies or claims between the parties to this Agreement, not settled within twenty (20) days following written notice of such dispute, shall be referred to senior management of the parties for resolution. In the event that the parties are unable to settle the dispute through senior management negotiations as set forth above, all remaining controversies or claims shall be mediated prior to any formal proceedings in any court of law or equity. The parties shall share equally the costs and fees of the mediator and each party shall pay its own costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in mediation. Unless the parties agree otherwise, mediation shall be held in Idaho Falls, Idaho. This agreement to mediate shall be specifically enforceable under the prevailing law of any court having jurisdiction. In the event that the dispute is not resolved through mediation within thirty (30) days after mediation begins, either party may initiate formal proceedings against the other party. N. Costs and Attorney Fees. In the event either party incurs legal expenses to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement, apart from any costs incurred during any mediation required by this Agreement, the prevailing party is entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and other costs and expenses. PRE-APPROVED ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT PAGE 4 OF 6 O. COMMUNICATIONS Written notice as are required by this Agreement shall be satisfied by mailing, emailing, or by personal delivery to the parties at the following mailing addresses: Contractor: City: Resources Business Group Manager Assistant General Manager Tyler Allen Stephen Boorman, PE 412 East Parkcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 140 S. Capital Ave. Boise, ID 83706 Idaho Falls, ID 83402 208-387-7018 (208) 612-8573 Tyler.Allen@hdrinc.com , sboorman@ifpower.org P. Non-discrimination. CONTRACTOR shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideals, sex, age, marital status, physical, or mental handicap, gender identity/expression, sexual orientation, or national origin. Q. Anti-Boycott Against Israel Act. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2346, if payments under this AGREEMENT exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100, 000) and CONTRACTOR employs ten (10) or more persons, CONTRACTOR certifies that it is not currently engaged i in, and will! not for the duration of this AGREEMENT engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under its control. The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code section 67-2346 shall have the meaning defined therein. R. Certification of No Chinese Ownership. Pursuant to Idaho Code 67-2359, CONTRACTOR certifies that CONTRACTOR is not currently owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic of China and will not, for the duration of this AGREEMENT, be owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic China. S. No Consequential Damages Neither Party to this Agreement shall be liable to the other Party for any special, incidental, indirect, or consequential damages (including but not limited to loss of profits or revenue; loss of use or opportunity; loss of good will; cost of substitute facilities, goods, or services; and/or cost of capital) arising out of, resulting from, or in any way related to the Project, the work or this Agreement from any cause or causes, including but not limited to any such damages caused by negligence, errors or omissions, strict liability or breach of contract. PRE-APPROVED ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT PAGE 5 OF 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date indicated above. PRE-APPROVED ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT “CILy” CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO By Dae hace Bear Prairie-Gereral Manager “CONTRACTOR” HDR ENGINEERING, INC. Nfs oer Re ea Jon Osier, Idaho Operations Manager PAGE 6 OF 6 Memorandum File #: 26-353 City Council DATE: Tuesday, September 29, 2026 AGENDA: Regular FROM: Chris Fredericksen, General Manager DEPARTMENT: Idaho Falls Power Title Sole Source Procurement for Materials and Services with Western States Equipment Company for Peaking Plant Equipment ☐ Ordinance ☐ Resolution ☐ Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☐ Legislative Public Hearing ☐ Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☒ Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: ..recommendation Make a Determination of Sole Source Procurement of Materials and Services, Approving the Western States Equipment Company (also known as CAT) Customer Value Agreements for 1.) Oil Change Parts Only Kit Totaling $94,689.00; and 2.) Preventative Maintenance Services Totaling $565,390.00 and give authorization to the Mayor to sign the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Description, Background Information, Purpose: These agreements retain the Western States Equipment Company who hold warranties on the 7 generators located at the Idaho Falls Peaking Plant. The 3-Year Oil Change Parts Only Kits Agreement supplies oil filters, oil and sample kits needed for performing 2000-hour engine services and the 5-Year Preventative Maintenance Agreement provides required various hourly maintenance required to meet warranty requirements. The totals for these agreements per year are as follows: City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/6/2026 Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #: 26-353 City Council This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Finance Departments. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/6/2026 Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ STANDBY PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE WESTERN ; © STATES CSA Program Enrollment Form As a valued Customer of the Western States Equipment Company, the CUSTOMER SUPPORT AGREEMENT, herein referred to as " The Agreement" for new and used equipment is an important part of our continuing effort to provide electric power equipment owners with superior value and product support. This Agreement provides the owner reasonable assurance that the reliability and productivity of your equipment is maintained and unexpected repair cost is minimized. This Agreement allows you to do what you do best and focus on your core business while Western States provides expert product support services on your equipment. Additional customer benefits: ADDITIONAL BENEFITS: *PREDETERMINED COST: No surprises - maintenance cost are guaranteed up front. *FACTORY-TRAINED TECHNICIANS: Experienced technicians that keep pace with advances in equipment technology. *MAINTENANCE HISTORY & SCHEDULING: Maintenance support staff utilize computerized scheduling & monitoring system. *GUARANTEED QUALITY: Cat diagnostic tools, fluids & filters assure consistent product quality and results. *EPA COMPLIANCE: Properly dispose of used fluids and filters in compliance with local & federal laws. *SAVING: Avoid overhead on maintenance vehicles, insurance or unemployment compensation; minimize costly downtime; repair before failure; increase your productivity; extend your equipment life and get maximum performance and resale benefits. D ‘ _AnnualAgreement ae LG Nea New Agreement [_] Renewal Agreement |_] Revised Agreement Company Name (Owner): City of Idaho Falls Account Number: 4206800 Billing Address: 140 S Capitol City: Idaho Falls State: ID Zip Code: 83402 Customer Contact: Jason Cooper Customer Phone Number: 801-450-4709 ; Customer Email: jcooper@ifpower.org Customer Fax #: Purchase Order #: Payment Method [|Prepay [_] Scheduled Payment Pay As You Go IWSECO Sales Contact: Doug Erickson Phone: 208-241-9701 Email: Douglas.Erickson@wseco.com } lAgreement Start Date: | Agreement End Date: Term Years: | WSECO Store Name: WSECO Store # P5206 a a i Hl This proposal covers a PARTS ONLY KIT: This includes Oil Filters, Oil, and Sample Kits needed for performing the 2000 hr engine service only. Special Instructions This agreement may be cancelled in writing 20 days prior to services being rendered. Prices listed for services do not include taxes or environmental fees. Prices do not include permits or electrician cost required by Washington State L&I. Prices reflect normal business hours Monday through Friday unless otherwise stated. Prices for coolant systems, load bank, battery replacement, etc. are to be performed during other scheduled PM Services NFPA 110 recommends replacing the battery every 30 to 36 months. OMM recommends servicing your cooling system: every three years for standard cooiant and every six years for ELC. Prices are per unit and per visit on all parts, labor, and travel. quote will be provided for any non CSA related repairs found during the maintenance visit. Exceptions and Recommendations i! Terms and Conditions: Upon the (a) execution of this document, (b) your oral or physical acceptance of equipment, goods, or services to be performed as detailed in this document, or (c) receipt of i # equipment or goods, or commencement of services, as described herein, you consent and agree that the purchase of services, parts, or goods from Western States Equipment Company will be governed i ! solely by the Western States Equipment Company's Customer Value Agreement Terms and Conditions ("Terms and Conditions”), which are available at : i https://www.westernstatescat.com/termsandconditions/. A hard copy of the Terms and Conditions is available upon written request to legal@wseco.com. Western States Equipment Company's Terms i and Conditions are hereby incorporated by reference into this document and all other documents related to your purchase of services, parts, or goods from Western States Equipment Company. By i purchasing services, parts, or goods from Western States Equipment Company, you agree tobe bound by the Terms and Conditions as exactly written. Customer Signature: Date: Western States Equipment Company Signature: G ) = ez S se Date: 8/13/2026 .Internal Data Customer Equipment #: Equipment Make: Serial Number: Norher amas SS a A CT 1 mm: ia = La me on a me $5,566.00 i These prices are based on current market oil prices. Due to fluctuations in the oil market, pricing may increase or fNotes: at } i cecrease. i i i} i i I a a 2 2 Bo SE ae ee eee These prices are based on current market oil prices. Due to fluctuations in the oil market, pricing may increase or 1 : i H decrease. f a a a ET i SERRA 7 AE RERNS NEN eto mnRPRR BORO RST eRe j i These prices are based on current market oil prices. Due to fluctuations in the oil market, pricing may increase or decrease. i —— a a a EL ETE a EAE RAY SLE TM $5,154.00 $5,566.00 | H These prices are based on current market oil prices. Due to fluctuations in the oil market, pricing may increase or | ots: i decrease. t savers Ma ceummenet [Setamumes [| bo rns idaho Falls ae a Every 2000 Hrs Every 2000 Hrs Every 2000 Hrs iPoK (PARTS ONLY KIT) $2,807.00 i $5,154.00 ; —— $5,566.00 HNotes: | : - H ! decrease. i ; These prices are based on current market oil prices. Due to fluctuations in the oil market, pricing may increase or | internal Data GustomerEauiomenta | Eaulpment Maker | faulpment Moder | SetalNumben Sd? SCS a a a a a ROE RMN TA gE OR PoKtpamtsontvem | ____szsor00 sf Sse $5,566.00 These prices are based on current market oil prices. Due to fluctuations in the oil market, pricing may increase or decrease. customerEouipments: | Eaulsment Make: | Equipment Model: | SevalNumbers a a ETE = OS a BT Ee TO [EPRORRRET = REERRRENN [MEPGIN ee eg TN ayes SER ee = Jroxteamrsonorxm [| _____szso700 «iY —SSsSasen |S SSEOO These prices are based on current market oil prices. Due to fluctuations in the oil market, pricing may increase or decrease. internal Data EXHIBIT A: AMENDMENTS TO THE CUSTOMER VALUE AGREEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Customer Vaiue Agreement Terms and Conditions (“Terms and Conditions”) shall be amended as follows: 1. Additional Terms and Conditions: The following terms and conditions shall be added to the Terms and Conditions. a. Non-Discrimination. WSECO shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employmenton the basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideals, sex, age, marital status, physical or mental handicap, gender identity/expression, sexual orientation, veteran’s status, or national origin. Independent Contractor. The contracting Parties warrant by their signature that no employer/employee relationship is established between WSECO and Customer by the terms of this Agreement. It is understood by the Parties hereto that WSECO is an independent contractor and as such neither it nor its employees, if any, are employees of Customer for purposes of tax, retirement system, workmen’s compensation claims, or social security (FICA) withholding. Anti-Boycott Against Israel Act. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2346, if payments under this Agreement exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) and WSECO employs ten (10) or more persons, WSECO certifies that it is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of this Agreement engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under its control. The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code § 67-2346 shall have the meaning defined therein. Anti-Boycott of Certain Sectors. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2347A, if payments under this Agreement exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) and WSECO employs ten (10) or more persons, WSECO certifies that it is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of the Agreement engage in, a boycott of any individual or company because the individual or company engages in or supports either (1) the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacture of fossil fuel-based energy, timber, minerals, hydroelectric power, nuclear energy, or agriculture; or (2) the manufacture, distribution, sale, or use of firearms, as defined in Idaho Code § 18- 3302(2)(d). The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code § 67-2347A shall have the meaning defined therein. Certification of No Chinese Ownership. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2359, WSECO certifies that WSECO is not currently owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic of China and will not, for the duration of this Agreement, be owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic China. Non-Appropriation. This Agreement is contingent upon Customer, as a municipality of the State of Idaho, receiving the necessary funding to cover the obligations of Customer. in the event that such funding is not received or appropriated, then, and in that event, Customer's obligations under this Agreement shall cease and each Party shall be released from further performance under this Agreement without any liability to the other Party, and WESCO shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed hereunder. Internal Data 2. Limitation of Liability. The second to last full sentence of Section 19 of the Terms and Conditions is amended as follows: INNO EVENT SHALL WSECO’s AGGREGATE LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS CVA, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO BREACH OF AGREEMENT, WARRANTY, STRICT LIABILITY TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE, EXCEED THE GREATER OF (a) TOTAL OF THE AMOUNTS PAID TO WSECO UNDER THE CVA FOR THE PREVIOUS TWELVE (12) MONTHS (AND, IF THE CVA INCLUDES MULTIPLE PIECES OF EQUIPMENT, THE AMOUNT RELATED TO THE EQUIPMENT IN QUESTION, PAID TO WSECO FOR THE PREVISOUS TWELVE (12) MONTHS) IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT CLAIM; OR (b) $25,000. 3. Indemnification. Section 21.a of the Terms and Conditions is deleted in its entirety. 4. Jurisdiction and Venue. Section 32 of the Terms and Conditions is amended in its entirety as follows: This CVA and the relationship between WSECO and Customer shall be governed and construed according to the laws of the State of Idaho. Ai the sole and exclusive election of WSECO, jurisdiction and venue for any action or dispute arising under this CVA shall be in the Seventh Judicial District of the State of Idaho, in and for the County of Bonneville. In addition, Customer waives any and all rights to jurisdiction and/or venue in any other forum, including waiver of any and all rights to remove the action from any court originally acquiring jurisdiction. Internal Data ADDITIONAL BENEFITS: Company Name (Owner): Billing Address: City: State: ID ZIP: Customer Contact: Customer Email: Purchase Order #: WSECO Sales Contact: WSECO Service Contact: Agreement Start Date: Aug-26 Date: Date: 5 Idaho Falls 15 Western States Equipment Company Signature: 8/13/2026 Terms and Conditions: Upon the (a) execution of this document, (b) your oral or physical acceptance of equipment, goods, or services to be performed as detailed in this document, or (c) receipt of equipment or goods, or commencement of services, as described herein, you consent and agree that the purchase of services, parts, or goods from Western States Equipment Company will be governed solely by the Western States Equipment Company’s Customer Value Agreement Terms and Conditions (“Terms and Conditions”), which are available at https://www.westernstatescat.com/termsandconditions/. A hard copy of the Terms and Conditions is available upon written request to legal@wseco.com. Western States Equipment Company’s Terms and Conditions are hereby incorporated by reference into this document and all other documents related to your purchase of services, parts, or goods from Western States Equipment Company. By purchasing services, parts, or goods from Western States Equipment Company, you agree to be bound by the Terms and Conditions as exactly written. Jason Cooper Customer Phone Number: (208) 612-8573 STANDBY PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE CVA Program Enrollment Form Hourly Agreement Special Instructions The Parties, by signing this Standby Preventative Maintenance Agreement, mutually agree to amend the CVA Terms and Conditions, as specifically set forth in Exhibit A (attached hereto) and incorporate Exhibit A herein. Exceptions and Recommendations Agreement End Date: Term Years: WSECO Store Name: As a valued Customer of the Western States Equipment Company, the CUSTOMER VALUE AGREEMENT, herein referred to as " The Agreement" for new and used equipment is an important part of our continuing effort to provide electric power equipment owners with superior value and product support. This Agreement provides the owner reasonable assurance that the reliability and productivity of your equipment is maintained and unexpected repair cost is minimized. This Agreement allows you to do what you do best and focus on your core business while Western States provides expert product support services on your equipment. Additional customer benefits: *PREDETERMINED COST: No surprises - maintenance cost are guaranteed up front. *FACTORY-TRAINED TECHNICIANS: Experienced technicians that keep pace with advances in equipment technology. WSECO Store # Dec-30 Douglas Erickson Phone: 208-241-9701 Email: Douglas.Erickson@wseco.com Erick Garnica Phone: 208-519-9113 Email:Erick.Garnica@wseco.com 83401 Idaho Falls Payment Method *MAINTENANCE HISTORY & SCHEDULING: Maintenance support staff utilize computerized scheduling & monitoring system. *GUARANTEED QUALITY: Cat diagnostic tools, fluids & filters assure consistent product quality and results. *EPA COMPLIANCE: Properly dispose of used fluids and filters in compliance with local & federal laws. *SAVING: Avoid overhead on maintenance vehicles, insurance or unemployment compensation; minimize costly downtime; repair before failure; Increase your productivity; extend your equipment life and get maximum performance and resale benefits. jcooper@ifpower.org Customer Fax #: Customer Signature: This agreement may be cancelled in writing 20 days prior to services being rendered. Prices listed for services do not include taxes or environmental fees. Prices do not include permits or electrician cost required by Washington State L&I. Prices reflect normal business hours Monday through Friday unless otherwise stated. Prices for coolant systems, load bank, battery replacement, etc. are to be performed during other scheduled PM Services NFPA 110 recommends replacing the battery every 30 to 36 months. OMM recommends servicing your cooling system: every three years for standard coolant and every six years for ELC. Prices are per unit and per visit on all parts, labor, and travel. A quote will be provided for any non CSA related repairs found during the maintenance visit. 4206800 City of Idaho Falls Account Number: 2017 E Iona Rd Prepay Pay As You Go New Agreement Renewal Agreement Revised Agreement Scheduled Payment Customer Equipment #: Generator 1 State: ID 2000 HR PM 4000 Hr PM 8000 Hr PM 10000 HR PM Total Per Visit Notes: Customer Equipment #: Generator 2 State: ID 2000 HR PM 4000 Hr PM 8000 Hr PM 10000 HR PM Total Per Visit Notes: Customer Equipment #: Generator 3 State: ID 2000 HR PM 4000 Hr PM 8000 Hr PM 10000 HR PM Total Per Visit Notes: 2476 KW Serial Number: Highlighted cells indicate the anticipated service events based on 2,500 operating hours per year. Additional pricing shown in each year column reflects the added maintenance costs that would apply if annual operating hours are less than or exceed 2,500 hours. 83401 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Cat G3520H GFR01324 2017 E Iona Idaho Falls 15 WSECO Store # $5,156 $5,311 $5,470 $5,634 $5,803 $23,598 $24,306 $25,035 $25,786 $26,560 15 Equipment Make: Quarterly Agreement Scheduled Services Equipment Model: Serial Number: KW Cat GFR01323 2476 2017 E Iona Idaho Falls 83401 G3520H Zip Code: WSECO Store # Site Address: City: $11,625 $5,311 $24,306 $31,582 Equipment Make: Equipment Model: $32,529 $23,598 $30,662 $10,957 $33,505 $34,510 Site Address: City: Service $33,505 $12,333 Cat G3520H GFR01325 $11,974 $5,156 $24,306 $5,470 Zip Code: $30,662 $31,582 $10,957 $11,286 $11,625 $12,333 2476 Site Address: City: Zip Code: WSECO Store # Highlighted cells indicate the anticipated service events based on 2,500 operating hours per year. Additional pricing shown in each year column reflects the added maintenance costs that would apply if annual operating hours are less than or exceed 2,500 hours. Equipment Make: Equipment Model: Serial Number: KW 15 Service Highlighted cells indicate the anticipated service events based on 2,500 operating hours per year. Additional pricing shown in each year column reflects the added maintenance costs that would apply if annual operating hours are less than or exceed 2,500 hours. $5,156 $24,306 $5,470 $33,505 $12,333 $23,598 $24,306 $25,035 $25,786 2017 E Iona Idaho Falls 83401 $30,662 Service $5,156 $24,306 $5,470 $33,505 $12,333 $11,286 2028 2029 $5,634 $25,786 $33,505 $11,974 2030 $5,803 $26,560 $34,510 $12,333 2026 2027 $5,156 $5,470 $25,035 $32,529 $31,582 $32,529 $33,505 $34,510 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 $5,156 $5,311 $5,470 $5,634 $5,803 $26,560 $10,957 $11,286 $11,625 $11,974 $12,333 Customer Equipment #: Generator 4 Applicant: Tyler Pridemore, Hunt - Day Engineering Owner : River Front Townhomes LLC Project Manager: David Peterson Location: Generally located north of Higham St, east of the Snake River, south of Presto St, and west of Latah Ave. Size: Approx. 2.7 Acres Units: 41 Existing Zoning Site: R2 North: R2 South: LC East : R2 West: R2, P Existing Land Uses: Site: Vacant North: Residential South: Commercial East: Residential West: Res idential Future Land Use Map: General Urban Attachments : 1. PUD Standards 2. Zoning Ordinance 3. Comprehensive Plan Policies 4. Maps and aerial photos 5. PUD Exhibit $32,529 Requested Action: To approv e the Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Higham Riverfront Townhomes by the Mayor and City Council . Staff Recommendation: Staff has reviewed the PUD and finds that it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the requirements of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance . Staff recommends approval of the PUD . Staff Comments: The proposed PUD includes 41 units on approximately 2.7 acres. Buildings consist of three to five attached single - unit dwellings per s tructure, each with rear - loaded garages accessed from private streets . All units are two stories and feature front - facing balconies and covered porches. This property has been vacant and undeveloped in the city for 120 years. The first attempt at development occurred in 1981 as a second phase of the condominiums to the north. That development never materialized. Additionally, zone change requests that would have allowed for commercial use or additional residential density, were also denied. Water a nd wastewater utility mains have been provided on the site and set idle since 1981 as well. Customer Equipment #: Generator 7 State: ID 2000 HR PM 4000 Hr PM 8000 Hr PM 10000 HR PM Total Per Visit Notes: AGREEMENT TOTALS PER YEAR AGREEMENT TOTAL 2000 Hr Service 4000 Hr Service 8000 Hr Service 10000 Hr Service Perform Valve Recession Inspection Grease Bearings Peform Valve and Bridge Lash Adjustment Perform Valve Recession Inspection Grease Bearings Perform Valve and Bridge Lash Adjustment Inspect Engine Mounts Perform Cylinder Pressure Test and Cylinder Wall Inspection Inspect Spark Plug Components and Replace as Necessary Check and Adjust Ignition System Timing Perform Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Sensor Calibration Perform Valve Recession Inspection Grease Bearings Perform Valve and Bridge Lash Adjustment Inspect Engine Mounts Perform Cylinder Pressure Test and Cylinder Wall Inspection Inspect Spark Plug Components and Replace as Necessary Check and Adjust Ignition System Timing Perform Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Sensor Calibration Replace Thermostats Clean and Inspect Engine Timing Sensor Replace Ignition Transformer Extender Perform Generator End Insulation Test Perform Bearing Inspection Perform Valve Recession Inspection Grease Bearings Peform Valve and Bridge Lash Adjustment Replace Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Sensor Verify Proper Sensor Operation Following Replacement The services outlined below represent the recommended hourly maintenance activities that Western States Equipment Company will perform as part of the Customer Value Agreement (CVA). All other services to be performed by Idaho Falls Power $30,662 $31,582 $32,529 $33,505 $34,510 $10,957 $11,286 $11,625 $11,974 $12,333 $565,390.00 $36,092.00 $170,142.00 $38,290.00 $234,535.00 $86,331.00 Highlighted cells indicate the anticipated service events based on 2,500 operating hours per year. Additional pricing shown in each year column reflects the added maintenance costs that would apply if annual operating hours are less than or exceed 2,500 hours. AGREEMENT TOTALS $23,598 $24,306 $25,035 $25,786 $26,560 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Service $5,156 $5,311 $5,470 $5,634 $5,803 2476 WSECO Store # 2017 E Iona Idaho Falls Site Address: 15 City: Zip Code: 83401 Cat G3520H GFR01330 Equipment Make: Equipment Model: Serial Number: KW $5,156 $24,306 $5,470 $33,505 $12,333 EXHIBIT A: AMENDMENTS TO THE CUSTOMER VALUE AGREEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Customer Value Agreement Terms and Conditions (“Terms and Conditions”) shall be amended as follows: 1. Additional Terms and Conditions: The following terms and conditions shall be added to the Terms and Conditions. a. Non-Discrimination. WSECO shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant foremploymenton the basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideals, sex, age, marital status, physical or mental handicap, gender identity/expression, sexual orientation, veteran’s status, or national origin. Independent Contractor. The contracting Parties warrant by their signature that no employer/employee relationship is established between WSECO and Customer by the terms of this Agreement. It is understood by the Parties hereto that WSECO is an independent contractor and as such neither it nor its employees, if any, are employees of Customer for purposes of tax, retirement system, workmen’s compensation claims, or social security (FICA) withholding. Anti-Boycott Against Israel Act. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2346, if payments under this Agreement exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) and WSECO employs ten (10) or more persons, WSECO certifies that it is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of this Agreement engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under its control. The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code § 67-2346 shall have the meaning defined therein. Anti-Boycott of Certain Sectors. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2347A, if payments under this Agreement exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) and WSECO employs ten (10) or more persons, WSECO certifies that it is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of the Agreement engage in, a boycott of any individual or company because the individual or company engages in or supports either (1) the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacture of fossil fuel-based energy, timber, minerals, hydroelectric power, nuclear energy, or agriculture; or (2) the manufacture, distribution, sale, or use of firearms, as defined in Idaho Code § 18- 3302(2)(d). The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code § 67-2347A shall have the meaning defined therein. . Certification of No Chinese Ownership. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2359, WSECO certifies that WSECO is not currently owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic of China and will not, for the duration of this Agreement, be owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic China. Non-Appropriation. This Agreement is contingent upon Customer, as a municipality of the State of Idaho, receiving the necessary funding to cover the obligations of Customer. In the event that such funding is not received or appropriated, then, and in that event, Customer’s obligations under this Agreement shall cease and each Party shall be released from further performance under this Agreement without any liability to the other Party, and WESCO shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed hereunder. Internal Data 2. Limitation of Liability. The second to last full sentence of Section 19 of the Terms and Conditions is amended as follows: INNO EVENT SHALL WSECO’s AGGREGATE LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS CVA, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO BREACH OF AGREEMENT, WARRANTY, STRICT LIABILITY TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE, EXCEED THE GREATER OF (a) TOTAL OF THE AMOUNTS PAID TO WSECO UNDER THE CVA FOR THE PREVIOUS TWELVE (12) MONTHS (AND, IF THE CVA INCLUDES MULTIPLE PIECES OF EQUIPMENT, THE AMOUNT RELATED TO THE EQUIPMENT IN QUESTION, PAID TO WSECO FOR THE PREVISOUS TWELVE (12) MONTHS) IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT CLAIM; OR (b) $25,000. 3. Indemnification. Section 21.a of the Terms and Conditions is deleted in its entirety. 4, Jurisdiction and Venue. Section 32 of the Terms and Conditions is amended in its entirety as follows: This CVA and the relationship between WSECO and Customer shall be governed and construed according to the laws of the State of Idaho. At the sole and exclusive election of WSECO, jurisdiction and venue for any action or dispute arising under this CVA shall be in the Seventh Judicial District of the State of Idaho, in and for the County of Bonneville. In addition, Customer waives any and all rights to jurisdiction and/or venue in any other forum, including waiver of any and all rights to remove the action from any court originally acquiring jurisdiction. Internal Data Memorandum File #: 26-377 City Council DATE: Thursday, September 24, 2026 AGENDA: Regular FROM: Wade Sanner, Director DEPARTMENT: Community Development Services Title Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, Willows Place Townhomes Division No. 1. ☐ Ordinance ☐ Resolution ☐ Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☐ Legislative Public Hearing ☐ Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☒ Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: 1. Approve the Development Agreement for the Final Plat for Willows Place Townhomes Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement (or take other action deemed appropriate). 2. Approve the Final Plat for Willows Place Townhomes Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor, City Engineer, and City Clerk to sign said Final Plat (or take other action deemed appropriate). 3. Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Final Plat for Willows Place Townhomes Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Description, Background Information, Purpose: Attached is the application for the Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for Willows Place Townhomes Division No. 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its November 5, 2025, meeting and unanimously voted to recommend approval of the final plat to the Mayor and City Council as presented. This Final Plat was reviewed by CDS Planning staff as well as staff from Fire, Idaho Falls Power, and the Public Works Water, Wastewater, and Engineering/Survey Divisions. This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal and Municipal Services Departments. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/6/2026 Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ CLIENT SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, SPENCER MCCUTCHEON , A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF IDAHO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THIS SUBDIVISION DESIGNATED AS WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES DIVISION NO. 1, WAS MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION, AND THAT SAID SUBDIVISION PLAT, IS TRULY AND CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND STAKED AS PROVIDED BY LAW AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT AS DESCRIBED HEREON. SPENCER MCCUTCHEON PLS NO. 20907 DATE OF PLAT: 9-17-2026 20907 OWNER'S DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT THE UNDERSIGNED BEAR HUNTER HOLDINGS, LLC A IDAHO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, IS THE LAWFUL OWNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON AND HAS CAUSED THE SAME TO BE PLATTED AND DIVIDED INTO BLOCKS, AND LOTS WHICH PLAT SHALL HEREAFTER BE KNOWN AS WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES DIVISION NO. 1, A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO. BE IT FURTHER KNOWN THAT OWNER DOES HEREBY GRANT AND CONVEY TO THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS ALL PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOREVER AS IRREVOCABLE PERMANENT NON-EXCLUSIVE PUBLIC EASEMENTS AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON. OWNER DOES HEREBY GRANT AND CONVEY TO LOTS 1 -12, OF BLOCK 1, A PRIVATE CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENT AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON AND LABELED AS C.A.E., THE SAID PRIVATE CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENTS IS GRANTED BY THE MUTUAL CONSENT AND AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THE ADEQUACY AND RECEIPT OF WHICH IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED, THAT THE OWNER ALSO DOES HEREBY GRANT, BARGAIN, AND CONVEY TO THE OWNER OF SAID LOTS HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS, BENEFITED C.A.E. HOLDERS, THEIR LICENSEES, INVITEES, AGENTS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS, THE FULL AND FREE RIGHT FOR SAID BENEFITED C.A.E. HOLDERS AND SAID BENEFITED C.A.E. HOLDERS' TENANTS, INVITEES, LICENSEES, AND VISITORS TO THE PRIVATE CROSS-ACCESS AGREEMENTS DESCRIBED HEREIN IN COMMON WITH ALL PERSONS DESIGNATED TO HAVE A LIKE RIGHT AT ALL TIMES HEREAFTER, FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND VEHICULAR ACCESS, AND A PERPETUAL EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES, ON AND ACROSS THE PROPERTY, EXCEPT FOR PARKING, THAT OWNER ALSO DOES HEREBY GRANT AND CONVEY TO THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS FOREVER A NON-EXCLUSIVE IRREVOCABLE EASEMENT FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES AND EMERGENCY RESPONDERS, ACROSS THE CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENTS C.A.E. 1. OWNER DOES HEREBY GRANT TO THE OWNERS OF LOTS 1-12, OF BLOCK 1, A PRIVATE STORM WATER EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON THE ACCOMPANYING DRAWING, AND LABELED P.S.W.E., THE SAID PRIVATE STORM WATER EASEMENT IS GRANTED BY THE MUTUAL CONSENT AND AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THE ADEQUACY AND RECEIPT OF WHICH IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED. OWNER DOES HEREBY GRANT, BARGAIN, AND CONVEY TO THE BENEFITED LOT OWNERS, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS: BENEFITED P.S.W.E. HOLDERS, THEIR LICENSEES, INVITEES, AGENTS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS, THE FULL AND FREE RIGHT FOR SAID BENEFITED P.S.W.E. HOLDERS AND SAID BENEFITED P.S.W.E. HOLDERS' TENANTS, SERVANTS, INVITEES, LICENSEES, TO USE THE PRIVATE STORM WATER EASEMENT DESCRIBED HEREIN IN COMMON WITH ALL PERSONS DESIGNATED TO HAVE A LIKE RIGHT AT ALL TIMES HEREAFTER, FOR PRIVATE STORM WATER RETENTION. OWNER OR ITS HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, AGREE THEY WILL CONSTRUCT NO PERMANENT STRUCTURE WITHIN OR UPON ANY EASEMENT SHOWN HEREON, AND THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS AND ITS SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS, PERMITEES OR LICENSEES SHALL ALSO HAVE THE RIGHT, TO REMOVE, CUT OR TRIM ANY TREES, BRUSH, ORNAMENTAL SHRUBBERY OR PLANT WHICH MAY INJURE OR INTERFERE WITH THE USE THEREOF FOR ITS INTENDED PURPOSES, SUCH RIGHT MAY BE EXERCISED WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE TO OWNER OR OWNER'S HEIRS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS. OWNER, OR ITS HEIRS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS FURTHER AGREE THAT THEY SHALL NOT PLANT ANY TREES, BRUSH, ORNAMENTAL SHRUBBERY OR PLANTS WHICH MAY HINDER THE SAFE AND EFFICIENT UTILIZATION OF SAID EASEMENTS. OWNER, OR ITS HEIRS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, FURTHER AGREE THAT THEY SHALL CONSTRUCT NO STRUCTURES OR MAINTAIN ANY OBSTRUCTIONS ON SAID CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO GATES, BARRIERS, OR VEHICLES OF ANY TYPE. OWNER, OR ITS HEIRS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, FURTHER AGREE TO MAINTAIN THE SAID CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENTS AND TO REMOVE SNOW PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE §503 AS IT IS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, AND AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO. OWNER, OR ITS HEIRS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS HEREBY RELEASES THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS AND ITS SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS, PERMITEES OR LICENSEES FROM ANY CLAIM FOR DAMAGES, BASED UPON CONCEALED OR UNDISCLOSED PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED OR PERMITTED TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY OWNER OR ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS WITHIN ANY PUBLIC EASEMENTS, SUBSEQUENT TO RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION, THAT MAY BE INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS AND ITS SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS, PERMITEES OR LICENSEES ORDINARY USE OF THE PUBLIC EASEMENTS WITH DUE CARE. OWNER, OR ITS HEIRS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS DO HEREBY WARRANT AND SHALL DEFEND SUCH DEDICATION AND CONVEYANCES IN THE QUIET AND PEACEFUL POSSESSION OF THE PUBLIC OR THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, OR EACH LOT OWNER AS THE CASE MAY BE, AGAINST SAID OWNER AND ITS HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, AND AGAINST EVERY PERSON WHOMSOEVER WHO LAWFULLY HOLDS OR WHO LATER CLAIMS TO HAVE LAWFULLY HELD ANY RIGHTS IN SAID ESTATE AS OF THE DATE HEREOF. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER HAS HEREUNTO SUBSCRIBED ITS SEAL AND SIGNATURE THIS ________DAY OF ____________, 202____. BEAR HUNTER HOLDINGS LLC, AN IDAHO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ____________________________________________________________ COLLIN HUNTER, MANAGER RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING PLAT WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES DIVISION NO. 1, WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO ________________________________________________DATE:_____________________________________ BONNEVILLE COUNTY RECORDER HEALTH DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL SANITARY RESTRICTIONS AS REQUIRED BY I.C. §50-1326 HAVE BEEN SATISFIED BASED ON THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (DEQ) APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE CONDITIONS IMPOSED ON THE DEVELOPER FOR CONTINUED SATISFACTION OF THE SANITARY RESTRICTIONS. BUYER IS CAUTIONED THAT AT THE TIME OF THIS APPROVAL, NO DRINKING WATER OR SEWER/SEPTIC FACILITIES WERE CONSTRUCTED. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CAN BE ALLOWED WITH APPROPRIATE BUILDING PERMITS IF DRINKING WATER OR SEWER FACILITIES HAVE SINCE BEEN CONSTRUCTED OR IF THE DEVELOPER IS SIMULTANEOUSLY CONSTRUCTING THOSE FACILITIES. IF THE DEVELOPER FAILS TO CONSTRUCT FACILITIES OR MEET THE OTHER CONDITIONS OF DEQ, THEN SANITARY RESTRICTIONS MAY BE REIMPOSED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH I.C. §50-1326, BY THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF DISAPPROVAL, AND NO CONSTRUCTION OF ANY BUILDING OR SHELTER REQUIRING DRINKING WATER OR SEWER/SEPTIC FACILITIES SHALL BE ALLOWED. EASTERN IDAHO PUBLIC HEALTH DISTRICT _________________________________________ _______________________ ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST, REHS DATE: EXAMINING SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE I CERTIFY THAT I AM A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF IDAHO AND THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS PLAT AND FIND THAT IT COMPLIES WITH I.C. §50-1305. DATE:_________ _______________________________________________________________ BONNEVILLE COUNTY SURVEYOR, DAVID D. ROMRELL PLS 12223 ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF _________________ ) :SS. COUNTY OF _______________ ) ON THIS _______DAY OF ____________, 20___, BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE, PERSONALLY APPEARED COLLIN HUNTER, KNOWN OR IDENTIFIED TO ME, TO BE A MANAGER OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY OF BEAR HUNTER HOLDINGS, LLC, AND THE PERSON WHO SUBSCRIBED SAID LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY'S NAME TO THE FOREGOING OWNER’S DEDICATION, PREVIOUSLY PLATTED EASEMENTS VACATION CERTIFICATE, AND THE DRINKING WATER SYSTEM CERTIFICATE AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME IN SAID LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY'S NAME AS A PERSON AUTHORIZED TO BIND SUCH LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AND AFFIXED MY OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND THE YEAR IN THIS CERTIFICATE FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. __________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF _________________ RESIDING AT: ______________________________ COMMISSION EXPIRATION DATE: ________________ DRINKING WATER SYSTEM CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO I.C. §50-1334, THE OWNER DOES HEREBY, CERTIFY THAT ALL LOTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE WATER FROM THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM, AND SAID CITY HAS AGREED IN WRITING TO PROVIDE CULINARY WATER SERVICE TO SAID LOTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 8, CHAPTER 4 OF THE IDAHO FALLS CITY CODE, AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER HAS HEREUNTO SET ITS SIGNATURE THIS ________DAY OF ____________, 202____. BEAR HUNTER HOLDINGS, LLC ________________________________________________________ COLLIN HUNTER, MANAGER IRRIGATION WATER RIGHTS STATEMENT WATER RIGHTS AND ASSESSMENT OBLIGATIONS ARE NOT APPURTENANT TO THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THIS PLAT. LOTS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION WILL NOT RECEIVE A WATER RIGHT. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND THAT LIES FULLY WITHIN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH RANGE 37 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN. BEING 1.815 ACRES OF LAND IN LOTS 4, 6, AND 7 BLOCK 5 OF THE NEW SWEDEN ESTATES DIVISION NUMBER 3 AS FOUND IN THE BONNEVILLE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER 573735. BASIS OF BEARING FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SOUTH 00° 06' 45” WEST 2583.28 FEET BETWEEN THE FOUND EAST QUARTER CORNER AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT THAT LIES ON THE SOUTHERLY 60 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF PLOMMON STREET, SAID POINT LIES 510.58 FEET SOUTH 00° 06' 45” WEST ALONG THE SECTION LINE AND 297.55 FEET NORTH 89° 53' 15” WEST FROM THE FOUND EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22, BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 45° 07' 30” WEST 28.29 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 08' 15” WEST 206.05 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 50' 57” EAST 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 08' 15” WEST 14.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 51' 43” EAST 90.48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 08' 17” WEST 147.88 FEET TO THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID ABOVE MENTIONED SUBDIVISION PLAT; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINES OF SAID SUBDIVISION PLAT THE FOLLOWING (2) TWO COURSES: (1) SOUTH 61° 46' 58” WEST 264.74 FEET TO THE EXTENSION LINE OF 2 FOUND MONUMENTS MONUMENTING THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, WHICH IS COINCIDENT WITH THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE NEW SWEDEN ESTATES DIVISION NUMBER 4 AS FOUND IN SAID RECORDER'S OFFICE AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER 700791; (2) NORTH 00° 08' 15” EAST 514.26 FEET TO SAID SOUTHERLY 60 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TO A FOUND ½” IRON ROD AND NO CAP; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 89° 53' 15” EAST 142.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 79,075 SQUARE FEET OR 1.815 ACRES OF LAND TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE I, THE UNDERSIGNED COUNTY TREASURER IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BONNEVILLE, STATE OF IDAHO, PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF I.C. §50-1308, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL COUNTY PROPERTY TAXES DUE FOR THE PROPERTY INCLUDED IN THE BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON ARE CURRENT. DATE:_________ ______________________________________________________ BONNEVILLE COUNTY TREASURER WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES DIVISION NO. 1 A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO BEING A REPLAT OF PORTIONS OF LOTS 4, 6, AND ALL OF LOT 7 OF BLOCK 5 OF THE NEW SWEDEN ESTATES DIVISION NO. 3 LOCATED FULLY IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH RANGE 37 EAST BOISE MERIDIAN CITY ACCEPTANCE THE ACCOMPANY PLAT WAS DULY ACCEPTED AND APPROVED AND THE GRANTS AND DEDICATIONS ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO FALLS ADOPTED THIS ______________ DAY OF ________________, 202______. ______________________ _______________________________________ MAYOR CITY CLERK ______________________________________ _______________________________________ CITY ENGINEER CITY SURVEYOR JONATHAN W, KNOWLES, PE 14787 KENNETH BALDWIN ROBERTS, PLS 9755 PREVIOUSLY PLATTED EASEMENTS VACATION CERTIFICATE THE OWNER DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF I.C. §50-1306A(5) HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH IN ORDER TO VACATE PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING EASEMENTS OF RECORD WITHIN THE PLAT BOUNDARY: 1.) A PORTION OF THE FRONT 10 FT UTILITY EASEMENT LYING WITHIN THE BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON, GRANTED BY NEW SWEDEN ESTATES DIVISION NO. 3 , A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, FILED WITH THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER FOR BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER 573735, DATED: 10-9-1979. 2.) ALL 8 FT UTILITY EASEMENTS LYING WITHIN THE BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON, GRANTED BY NEW SWEDEN ESTATES DIVISION NO. 3 , A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, FILED WITH THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER FOR BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER 573735, DATED: 10-9-1979 . THE VACATED EASEMENTS LISTED HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS DRAWING. ALL OTHER EXISTING EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE STILL ACTIVE AND VALID. UPON APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, EXECUTION AND RECORDING OF THIS DOCUMENT, THE PORTIONS OF SAID EASEMENTS SHALL BE VACATED WITHOUT FURTHER FUNCTION OF LAW. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER HAS HEREUNTO SUBSCRIBED ITS SEAL AND SIGNATURE THIS____________ DAY OF________________________ 202__ BEAR HUNTER HOLDINGS, LLC ______________________________________________________ COLLIN HUNTER, MANAGER 3534 APOLENA AVE IDAHO FALLS, ID 435-633-3012 BEAR HUNTER HOLDINGS, LLC LOCATION COPYRIGHT ALL REPORTS, DESIGN, FIELD DATE, FIELD NOTES, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, CALCULATIONS, ESTIMATES OR ANY REPRESENTATION CONTAINED HEREON ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF ELEVATED LAND SURVEYING UNLESS PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED BY PRECEDENCE OR AGREEMENT. NO. REVISIONS BY DATE DRAWN: SURVEYED: FIELD WORK: DATE: SJM SJM SJM 9-17-26 LOCATED FULLY IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH RANGE 37 EAST BOISE MERIDIAN FINAL PLAT SHEET 1 OF 2 36.50' C.A.E. NEW SWEDEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO. 1 INST. 537699 BLOCK 5 LOT 3 BLOCK 5 LOT 2 BLOCK 5 LOT 1 BLOCK 5 LOT 6 BLOCK 5 LOT 5 NEW SWEDEN ESTATES SUB DIVISION NO. 4 INST. 700791 BLOCK 5 LOT 25 BLOCK 5 LOT 24 BLOCK 5 LOT 23 BLOCK 5 LOT 22 BLOCK 5 LOT 9 NEW SWEDEN ESTATES SUB DIVISION NO. 3 INST. 573735 HIGHLAND LATERAL CANAL NEW SWEDEN ESTATES SUB DIVISION NO. 1 INST. 537699 PLOMMON STREET (60 FT RIGHT-OF-WAY) N00° 08' 15"E 514.26 FT (S2, S3 - S00° 06' 41"W 514.03 FT) S89° 53' 15"E 142.50 FT (S1, S2, - S89° 53' 18"W) L1 S00° 08' 15"W 206.05 FT L2 L3 L4 S00° 08' 17"W 147.88 FT S61° 46' 58"W 264.74 FT (S1, S2 - S61° 46' 55"W) S89° 53' 15"E 237.55 FT S61° 46' 58"W 190.00 FT LINE TABLE LINE # L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 LENGTH 28.29 FT 20.00 FT 14.65 FT 90.48 FT 80.50 FT 28.29 FT 33.92 FT DIRECTION S45° 07' 30"W S89° 50' 57"E S00° 08' 15"W S89° 51' 43"E N89° 53' 15"W S45° 07' 30"W N44° 53' 19"W 3,182 SQ 0.073 AC 2 3,182 SQ 0.073 AC 1 3,182 SQ 0.073 AC 3 37.00 FT 37.00 FT 37.00 FT 37.00 FT 37.00 FT 37.00 FT 37.00 FT 37.00 FT 37.00 FT 37.00 FT 37.00 FT 37.00 FT 37.00 FT 37.00 FT 37.00 FT 37.00 FT 37.00 FT 37.00 FT 55.26 FT 130.08 FT BLOCK 5 LOT 4 15' P.U.E. 51.5' P.U.E. ZOEY LANE (32.5 FT PRIVATE STREET) NEW SWEDEN ESTATES SUB DIVISION NO. 3 INST. 573735 BLOCK 1 15' P.U.E. 3,182 SQ 0.073 AC 6 3,182 SQ 0.073 AC 10 3,182 SQ 0.073 AC 12 N89° 51' 45"W 86.00 FT 37.00 FT N89° 51' 45"W 86.00 FT N89° 51' 45"W 86.00 FT N89° 51' 45"W 86.00 FT N89° 51' 45"W 86.00 FT N89° 51' 45"W 86.00 FT N89° 51' 45"W 86.00 FT N89° 51' 45"W 86.00 FT N89° 51' 45"W 86.00 FT N89° 51' 45"W 86.00 FT 15' P.U.E. AND PUBLIC SIDEWALK EASEMENT LOT1 BLOCK4 37.48' C.A.E. L5 62.00 FT S00° 08' 15"W 40.30 FT (C.A.E.) 36.93 FT N00° 08' 15"E L6 (C.A.E.) S00° 08' 15"W 133.00 FT (C.A.E.) 0.98 FT (C.A.E.) 97.73 FT L7 (C.A.E.) S00° 08' 15"W 206.05 FT (C.A.E.) S89° 50' 49"E 47.52 FT (C.A.E.) 3,182 SQ 0.073 AC 9 3,182 SQ 0.073 AC 8 3,182 SQ 0.073 AC 5 3,182 SQ 0.073 AC 4 3,182 SQ 0.073 AC 11 40,891 SQ 0.939 AC 13 89.00 FT S51° 25' 22"W 30.11 FT S22° 58' 33"E 59.85 FT S89° 51' 45"E 86.00 FT 37.00 FT N89° 51' 45"W 86.00 FT 37.00 FT 37.00 FT S89° 51' 45"E 86.00 FT 37.00 FT N89° 51' 45"W 86.00 FT S00° 08' 15"W 3,182 SQ 0.073 AC 7 37.00 FT 12' P.S.W.E. N89° 51' 45"W 86.00 FT 6' P.S.W.E. 15' S00° 08' 15"W 74.00 FT N00° 08' 15"E 443.90 FT (C.A.E.) 6' P.S.W.E. N89° 51' 45"W 52.50 FT (C.A.E.) S00° 08' 15"W 51.00 FT (C.A.E.) 52.5' 67.5' P.U.E. CLIENT BEAR HUNTER HOLDINGS, LLC 3534 APOLENA AVE IDAHO FALLS, ID 435-633-3012 LOCATION COPYRIGHT ALL REPORTS, DESIGN, FIELD DATE, FIELD NOTES, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, CALCULATIONS, ESTIMATES OR ANY REPRESENTATION CONTAINED HEREON ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF ELEVATED LAND SURVEYING UNLESS PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED BY PRECEDENCE OR AGREEMENT. NO. REVISIONS BY DATE DRAWN: SURVEYED: FIELD WORK: DATE: 40 80 0 SCALE: 1" = 40' N LEGEND SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY LINE SJM SJM SJM 9-17-26 ADJOINING TITLE LINE FOUND 1 2" IRON ROD AND NO CAP 20907 WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES DIVISION NO. 1 A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO BEING A REPLAT OF PORTIONS OF LOTS 4, 6, AND ALL OF LOT 7 OF BLOCK 5 OF THE NEW SWEDEN ESTATES DIVISION NO. 3 LOCATED FULLY IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH RANGE 37 EAST BOISE MERIDIAN LOCATED FULLY IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH RANGE 37 EAST BOISE MERIDIAN FINAL PLAT POSTPONED INTERIOR 1 2" X 24" IRON ROD & PLASTIC CAP MARKED "PLS 20907" (SEE INTERIOR MONUMENT COMPLETION CERTIFICATE) MEASURED DISTANCE (M) RECORD SUBDIVISION INFORMATION (S*) SQUARE FEET (SQ FT) ACRES (AC) INSTRUMENT INST. NUMBER NO. POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.B. P.O.B. TIE (TIE) SHEET 2 OF 2 FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD AND CAP MARKED PLS 20907 FOUND 1 2" IRON ROD AND CAP MARKED PLS 10944 STREET CENTERLINE LOT LINES 15 FT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.) CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT (C.A.E.) WIDTH SHOWN HEREON SECTION LINE FOUND GOVERNMENT P.L.S.S. MONUMENT (SECTION CORNER) FOUND GOVERNMENT P.L.S.S. MONUMENT (QUARTER CORNER) RECORD OF SURVEY INFORMATION (RS*) FEET (FT) PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.) CORNER PERPETUATION AND FILING RECORD (CP&F) BASIS OF BEARING ALL MEASURED BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON RELATE DIRECTLY TO THE "CITY OF IDAHO FALLS COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 2004" WHICH IS DERIVED FROM THE IDAHO STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (EAST ZONE 1101) US SURVEY FEET AND USING A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.000277265 FOR A GRID TO GROUND CONVERSION, [REFERENCE FRAME NAD_83 (2011), EPOCH 2010.0000]. THE SYSTEM ORIENTATION IS BASED ON GRID NORTH ALONG THE EAST ZONE CENTRAL MERIDIAN. NO CONVERGENCE ANGLE HAS BEEN APPLIED. S1 - NEW SWEDEN ESTATES DIVISION NO. 1 - GARTH CUNNINGHAM - PLS 827 - INST. NO. 537699 S2 - NEW SWEDEN ESTATES DIVISION NO. 3 - GARTH CUNNINGHAM - PLS 827 - INST. NO. 573735 S3 - NEW SWEDEN ESTATES DIVISION NO. 4 - GARTH CUNNINGHAM - PLS 827 - INST. NO. 700791 S4 - BLUE RIDGE ESTATES DIVISION NO. 7 - ROBERT JON MEIKLE - PLS 8795 - INST. NO. 1134549 RS1 - IGLESIA BAUTISTA EL CALVARIO CORP - ELEVATED LAND SURVEYING - PLS 20907 - INST. NO. 1784183 REFERENCES BONNEVILLE COUNTY IDAHO S61° 46' 58"W 61.08 FT (S3 - S61° 46' 55"W 61.21 FT) S45° 07' 11"W 95.79 FT (S3 - S45° 07' 16"W 95.80 FT) INTERIOR MONUMENT COMPLETION CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF I.C. §50-1331, I.C. §50-1332, AND I.C. §50-1333, I SPENCER MCCUTCHEON CERTIFY THAT THE INTERIOR MONUMENTS SHALL BE SET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF I.C. §50-1303 WITHIN ONE CALENDAR YEAR OF THE RECORDING OF THIS PLAT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.) WIDTH SHOWN HEREON FOUND IDAHO FALLS BRASS MONUMENT MARKING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 37 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN CP&F 1697789 FOUND ALUMINUM CAP MARKED PLS 9755 MONUMENT MARKING THE EAST QUARTER CORNER SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 37 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN CP&F 1517646 BASIS OF BEARING S00° 06' 45"W 2583.28 FT (M) (S1, S2, S3, S4, - N00° 06' 41"E 2583.26 FT) P.O.B. N89° 53' 15"W 297.55 FT (TIE) CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT (C.A.E.) SET EXTERIOR 1 2" X 24" IRON ROD & PLASTIC CAP MARKED "PLS 20907" 510.58 FT (TIE) ATTACHED HOMES NOTIFICATION LOTS 1 - 12, BLOCK 1 ARE PLATTED FOR USE BY ATTACHED SINGLE UNIT DWELLINGS AS PERMITTED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE. OTHER RESIDENTIAL USE TYPES SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET THE STANDARDS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, AS IT IS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME. SURVEYORS NARRATIVE IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED TO CORRECTLY REPRESENT THE BOUNDARY LINES AND PROPERTY CORNERS OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL AND TO SUBDIVIDE SUBJECT PARCEL AS REQUESTED BY MOUNTAIN WEST ENGINEERING. THE BASIS OF BEARING IS SOUTH 00° 06' 45" WEST 2583.28 FEET BETWEEN THE EAST QUARTER CORNER AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 37 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN. FOUND EVIDENCES AND MONUMENTS ARE REPRESENTED HEREON. I PERFORMED A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THIS YEAR AND FILED AND SET THE EXTERIOR CORNERS AS SHOWN IN RECORD OF SURVEY INSTRUMENT NO. 1784183. I HAVE HELD MY RECORD OF SURVEY BOUNDARY AND MY SET CORNERS WERE HELD FOR THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARIES OF THIS PLAT. FOR EXPLANATION AND SURVEYORS NARRATIVE OF THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARY DETERMINATION, PLEASE SEE SAID RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 1784183. MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION IS RENDERED UPON THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT. THERE MAY EXIST OTHER EVIDENCE, MONUMENTS, OR DOCUMENTS THAT COULD AFFECT THIS SURVEY. ANY NEW EVIDENCE, MONUMENTS, OR DOCUMENTS CONTRADICTORY TO THIS SURVEY SHOULD BE PRESENTED TO ME FOR MY REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION. SUBDIVISION OF RECORD LOT LINES REPLACED WITH 5 8" IRON ROD AND CAP MARKED PLS 20907 NOTE: 1) SUBDIVISION IS SUBJECT TO A TELEPHONE EASEMENT PURSUANT TO BOOK 6 PAGE 385 OF LEASES AND CONTRACT. NO LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS FOUND IN SAID DOCUMENT. 2) THE WEST LINE OF THE C.A.E. IS DIRECTLY COINCIDENT WITH THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 1-10 BLOCK 1. 3) THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF THE C.A.E. IS DIRECTLY COINCIDENT WITH THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 11 AND 12 BLOCK 1 4) LOT 13 BLOCK 1 IS A PRIVATE STORM WATER EASEMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY FOR THE USE OF LOTS 1-12 BLOCK 1 . 15 FT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.) AND PUBLIC SIDEWALK EASEMENT P.S.W.E. SEE NOTE 3 PRIVATE STORM WATER EASEMENT (P.S.W.E.) 12 FT PRIVATE STORM WATER EASEMENT (P.S.W.E.) VINCULUM (PARCEL HOOK) Page 1 of 4 Applicant: Steve Heath, Mountain West Engineering Project Manager: Caitlin Long Property Owner: Collin Hunter, Bear Hunter Holdings, LLC. Location: Generally, north of the Highland Canal, east of Bluebird Ln, south of Plommon St, and west of S Bellin Rd. Size: Approx. 1.815 acres Lots: 13 Buildable: 12 Existing Zoning: Site: R1 North: R1 South: R1 East: R1 West: R1 Existing Land Uses: Site: Vacant North: Church South: Elementary School East: Church West: Residential Future Land Use Map: General Urban Attachments: 1. Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance Requirements 2. Comprehensive Plan Policies 3. Maps and aerial photos 4. Final Plat Requested Action: To approve of the final plat for Willows Place Townhomes to the Mayor and City Council. History: The property is currently zoned R1, Single-Dwelling Residential. It was annexed in July of 1979 with an initial zoning of R-1, Residential and platted as part of the New Sweden Estates in October of 1979. A Conditional Use Permit was approved in 1981 for a Church. No conditions were applied as part of the Conditional Use Permit approval. On October 7th, 2025, the PUD, Planned Unit Development was brought before the Planning & Zoning Commission where it was recommended for approval to the Mayor and City Council. The Planned Unit Development for Willows Place was approved on June 25, 2026. Staff Comments: The proposed final plat consists of approximately 1.815 acres and includes 13 lots, 12 buildable lots and one common lot, per the approved Planned Unit Development. Access to the lots will be provided from Plommon Street, a local street. The common lot includes a private street, Zoey Lane, which will provide access to each of the lots. Staff Recommendation: Staff has reviewed the final plat and finds it consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The plat also meets the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance when developed as a PUD. Staff recommends approval of the final plat. STAFF REPORT FINAL PLAT WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES, DIVISION 1 October 8, 2026 Community Development Services Page 2 of 4 Subdivision Ordinance: Boxes with an “X” indicated compliance with the ordinance REQUIREMENTS Staff Review Requirements listed in Section 10-1: Building envelopes sufficient to construct a building. X Lot dimensions conform to the minimum standards of Zoning Ordinance. X Lots have full frontage on, and access to, a dedicated street. N/A Residential lots do not have direct access to arterial streets. N/A Direct access to arterial streets from commercial or industrial lots shall be permitted only where it can be demonstrated that: 1) The direct access will not impede the flow of traffic on the arterial or otherwise create an unsafe condition; 2) There is no reasonable alternative for access to the arterial via a collector street; 3) There is sufficient sight distance along the arterial from the proposed point of access; 4) The proposed access is located so as not to interfere with the safe and efficient functioning of any intersection; and 5) The developer or owner agrees to provide all improvements, such as turning lanes or signals, necessitated for the safe and efficient uses of the proposes access. N/A Adequate provisions shall be made for soil preservation, drainage patterns, and debris and waste disposal and collection. X Sidelines of lots shall be at, or near, right angles or radial to the street lines. All corner lots shall have a minimum radius of twenty feet on the property line. X All property within the subdivision shall be included within a lot or area dedicated for public use. X All major streets in subdivision must conform to the major street plan of the City, as set forth in Comprehensive Plan. N/A The alignment and width of previously platted streets shall be preserved unless topographical conditions or existing buildings or structures require otherwise. X Residential lots adjoining arterial streets shall comply with: 1) Such lots shall have reverse frontage on the arterial streets, 2) such lots shall be buffered from the arterial street by any effective combination of the following: lot depth, earth berms, vegetation, walls or fences, and structural soundproofing, 3) Minimum lot depth shall be 150 ft except where the use of berms, vegetation, and structures can be demonstrated to constitute an effective buffer, 4) Whenever practical, existing roadside trees shall be saved and used in the arterial buffer, 5) Parking areas shall be used as part of the arterial buffer for high density residential uses, 6) Annexation and development agreement shall include provisions for installation and continued maintenance of arterial buffers. N/A Planning Director to classify street on basis of zoning, traffic volume, function, growth, vehicular & pedestrian safety, and population density. No new streets Page 3 of 4 Subdivision Ordinance: 10-1-5: GENERAL SUBDIVISION STANDARDS Meets all standards. 10-1-9: FINAL PLAT APPROVAL PROCESS (A)(9) If the final plat conforms to the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance and all other applicable State or Federal laws, or local ordinances, the Council shall approve the final plat. Zoning Ordinance: 11-3-3: PURPOSE OF RESIDENTIAL ZONES (C)R1 Single Dwelling Residential Zone. This zone provides a residential zone which is representative of a less automobile-oriented, more walkable development pattern, characterized by somewhat smaller lot widths; and a somewhat denser residential environment than is characteristic of the RP Residential Park Zone. The principal uses in the R1 Residential Zone shall be single detached and attached dwelling units. This zone is also generally located near limited commercial services that provide daily household needs. ImaginelF Transects o-_ 06 © = =_ 1 Park & Future Uroan Industrial Suburban General Urban | Nwixed-Use Ctrs) Urban Core Special Use Open Space ; Development & Conidors: 2. eee structure wares structure varies Lower INTENSITY Higher H ' Uniform LAND USES. Mixed = 1 tg nnSUS TAX REVENUE Per ACRE Higher!) >t | Less BUILT INFRASTRUCTURE More | 1 Lower SERVICE LEVEL Higher | & 5. General Urban General Urban Snapshot: The General Urban Transect denotes residential areas with a mix of commercial and service uses convenient to residents. These areas contain a wide variety of housing types, generally including small single-units, duplexes, trislexes, fourplexes, courtyard apartments, bungalow courts, townhouses, multiplexes and live-work units. Lot sizes are smaller and more compact than suburban areas. These areas could also include, parks, schools, churches and commercial services. These areas have highly connective street patterns, similar to the traditional grid-pattern that encourages bicycle and pedestrian usage. These areas should be near an existing or part of a new walkable center. Local examples: Bonnavista Addition, Johns Height Subdivision, Jennie Lee Addition, Bell-Aire, Linden Park, Linden Trails, Falls Valley Page 4 of 4 November 5, 2025 7:00 p.m. Planning Department City Annex Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Glen Ogden, Arnold Cantu, Dale Storer, Bill Scott, Tia Panter, Matthew Meehan, Forrest Ihler. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. ALSO PRESENT: Assistant Planning Director Kerry Beutler, Caitlin Long Planner, David Peterson Planner; Zack Jones, Esq, City Attorney, and interested citizens. CALL TO ORDER: Ogden called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and welcomed the new Commissioner Tia Panter. MINUTES: Meehan moved to accept the minutes of October 7, 2025 with a correction to show that Mr. Beck was present, Ihler seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Business: 4. PLT 25-027: FINAL PLAT FOR WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES DIVISION NO. 1. Applicant: Brad Cramer, Perspective Planning, 1742 Avalon, Idaho Falls, Idaho. Cramer stated that this is related to the PUD that the commission recommended approval in the last month’s meeting. Slide 1 – Zoning – R1. Slide 2 – Aerial - showing surrounding land uses and current land use of undeveloped. Slide 3- Aerial – Broader view showing single family attached in the area, apartments, green space, educational uses. Slide 4 – Final Plat – Final plat does comply with zoning then the City’s Code states that the final plat should be approved. In this case, in an R1 Zone the plat does comply with the subdivision ordinance and zoning ordinance. The minimum lot size is 7000 and these are smaller (2,000 – 3,000) but when they are attached there is a portion of the zoning ordinance that states that when attached homes are being developed, the lot size minimums and widths do not apply. One area where the lots do not comply is that they face a private street not public street and that was the reason for the PUD, and any approval of the plat is contingent on the approval of PUD. The private street is on a common lot (Lot 15). There are 15 total lots. 14 buildable, 1 common lot. Within the private drive there are public utilities within a public utility easement. Slide 5- Current photo of site. Beutler presented the staff report, a part of the record. Ihler moved to recommend to the Mayor and City Council approval of the Final Plat for Willows Place Townhomes Division No. 1. Meehan seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. REASONED STATEMENT OF RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT OF WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES. GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF THE HIGHLAND CANAL, EAST OF BLUEBIRD LANE, SOUTH OF PLOMMON STREET, AND WEST OF S BELLIN ROAD. WHEREAS, the applicant filed an application for a final plat on September 24, 2025; and WHEREAS, this matter came before the Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission during a duly noticed public meeting on November 5, 2025; and WHEREAS, this matter came before the Idaho Falls City Council during a duly noticed public meeting on October 8, 2026, and WHEREAS, having reviewed the application, including all exhibits entered and having considered the issues presented: I. RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the request pursuant to the City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan, the City of Idaho Falls Zoning Ordinance, the City of Idaho Falls Subdivision Ordinance, the Local Land Use Planning Act, and other applicable development regulations. 2. The property comprises approximately 1.815 acres of land, generally located north of the Highland Canal, east of Bluebird Ln, south of Plommon St, and west of S Bellin Rd. 3. The final plat includes a total of 13 lots, 12 are buildable lots. 4. The final plat will be developed as a PUD, Planned Unit Development. 5. Access to the subdivision will come from Plommon Street, a local street. 6. The plat complies with all requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance in the R1, Single Dwelling Residential Zone when developed as a PUD. 7. The proposed development is consistent with the principles of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. II. DECISION Based on the above Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria, the City Council of the City of Idaho Falls approved the Final Plat. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS THIS _______ DAY OF ______________________, 2026 _____________________________________ Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor NOTICE The Applicant or any affected person seeking judicial review of the compliance of this Reasoned Statement with the provisions of Idaho Code § 67-6535 must first seek reconsideration of this Reasoned Statement within fourteen (14) days by filing a request to reconsider pursuant in compliance with Idaho Code 67-6535. In addition, the above Applicant has the right to request a regulatory taking analysis pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES This DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES (“AGREEMENT”), made this day of , 2026, by and between CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, (“CITY”), whose mailing address is P.O. Box 50220, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83405, and BEAR HUNTER HOLDINGS, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, whose mailing address 4429 Tails Down Road, Tetonia, Idaho 83452 (“DEVELOPER”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, DEVELOPER is the sole owner, in law or equity, of a certain tract of land in the County of Bonneville, State of Idaho, which land (hereafter referred to as “Subdivision’”), is more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER desires to develop the Subdivision within CITY and has submitted a plat bearing the Subdivision name described in the caption of this AGREEMENT; and WHEREAS, City Engineer, and the Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission, have recommended such development be allowed, subject to certain requirements and obligations on the part of DEVELOPER; and WHEREAS, CITY is willing to allow the development of the Subdivision within City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, subject to the terms and. conditions of this AGREEMENT and the Special Conditions attached hereto; and. WHEREAS, CITY has authority to approve Subdivision plats and the construction of streets, utility lines and other public improvements within CITY; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER specifically waives DEVELOPER’: right to protest development requirements described in this AGREEMENT, including DEVELOPER’s right of judicial review contained in Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code, and pursuant to the standards set forth in § 67-5279, Idaho Code; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER understands that the public improvements required herein are standards required pursuant to Idaho Falls City Code, Title 10, Chapter 1, and are authorized by Idaho Code §§ 67-6513 and 67-6518; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER and CITY believe that without the public improvements required DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES 8.3.26 Page 1 of 15 herein, CITY would not be able to otherwise provide for mitigation of the effects of the Subdivision development on the ability of CITY to deliver services without compromising quality of such service delivery to current CITY residents, or without imposing substantial additional costs upon current CITY residents to accommodate the proposed Subdivision; and WHEREAS, CITY desires to ensure that public improvements consisting of those described in this AGREEMENT, including Special Conditions for the Subdivision, are constructed; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER understands that a waiver of public improvements is available pursuant to Idaho Falls City Code, but DEVELOPER specifically does not wish to request such a waiver and wishes to enter into this AGREEMENT; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER enters into this AGREEMENT of DEVELOPER's own free will and accord, without coercion and without inducement and at DEVELOPER's request; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER has read this AGREEMENT, has understood it, and has had the opportunity to avail itself of legal and other counsel prior to entering into this AGREEMENT and prior to signing it; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER has submitted a preliminary plat bearing the Subdivision name described in the caption of this AGREEMENT; and WHEREAS, City Engineer and City Planning and Zoning Commission have recommended such Subdivision be approved subject to certain requirements and obligations on the part of DEVELOPER; and WHEREAS, CITY is willing to approve the Subdivision to CITY, subject to the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT and the Special Conditions attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Approval of Subdivision. CITY hereby approves the Subdivision plat as described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part to this AGREEMENT by reference and agrees that upon DEVELOPER’s full and complete performance of the terms and conditions hereto, it will accept and maintain the property dedicated to CITY on the Subdivision plat and all public facilities and improvements shown in the Improvement Plans for the Subdivision. 2. Improvement, Preliminary, and Final Improvement Plans. “Improvement Plans,” used in this AGREEMENT, are engineer-designed plans showing all streets, sewer lines, water lines, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES 8.3.26 Page 2 of 15 storm drains, street signs, traffic control devices, barricades, other public utilities (telephone, gas, electricity, fiber optic and irrigation facilities) and other public improvements contemplated within the Subdivision. “Preliminary Improvement Plans” as used in this AGREEMENT, are those Improvement Plans submitted and considered for the Subdivision development prior to the approval of City Engineer, and not yet approved for construction. “Final Improvement Plans” as used in this AGREEMENT, are those Improvement Plans submitted, considered and approved by City Engineer for the Subdivision development. DEVELOPER anticipates that development of the entire Subdivision will occur in phases or divisions. DEVELOPER has filed, and City Engineer has approved, Improvement Plans for the public improvements to be constructed within public rights-of-way exterior to the Subdivision, (hereafter referred to as the “Exterior Improvement Plans”) showing the width, location and alignment of all streets, sewer lines and water lines within the Subdivision and the size and materials specifications for such water and sewer lines. Prior to the commencement of any construction or development within any phase or division of the Subdivision, DEVELOPER shall also file with, and obtain the approval of, City Engineer Improvement Plans (hereafter the “Interior Improvement Plans”) for all streets, sewer lines, water lines, storm drainage facilities, street signs, traffic control devices, barricades and other public improvements contemplated within such phase or division of the Subdivision. The filed Improvement Plans shall also show the proposed location of other public utilities (telephone, gas and electricity), and irrigation facilities affected by the development of such phase or division of the Subdivision. Preliminary Improvement Plans are incorporated herein by reference as though set out in full, and the Final Improvement Plans shall also, upon approval by City Engineer, be deemed to be incorporated herein by reference. 3. Construction of Public Improvements. Unless otherwise agreed in the Special Conditions, DEVELOPER shall, at its expense, design and construct all public improvements shown in the Exterior Improvement Plans and Interior Improvement Plans. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by City Engineer, DEVELOPER shall construct all required public improvements within such Improvement Plans in strict accordance with the approved Preliminary and Final Improvement Plans and CITY Standard Engineering Drawings and Specifications (hereafter referred to as the “Standard Specifications”) in effect at the time the construction is accomplished. The Standard Specifications are incorporated herein by reference as though set out in. full and compliance to the Standard Specifications is a condition of this AGREEMENT. 4. Permits. DEVELOPER shall obtain all right-of-way, excavation and/or other permits required by local ordinance and comply with all requirements therein with respect to the timely performance of the work governed by such permits. 5. Inspection. DEVELOPER shall retain a professional engineer (hereafter referred to as the “Project Engineer”) licensed within the State of Idaho to supervise, inspect and test the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES 8.3.26 Page 3 of 15 construction of all public improvements within the Subdivision in order to ensure such improvements are constructed in accordance with this AGREEMENT, the Improvement Plans and the Standard Specifications. DEVELOPER shall not materially deviate from the Improvement Plans or Standard Specifications without the express written approval of the City Engineer. 6. Corrected Improvement Plans. Prior to acceptance of any phase or division of the Subdivision, DEVELOPER will file “As Constructed”/ “As Built” Improvement Plans (hereafter referred to as the “Corrected Improvement Plans”) with City Engineer. Such Corrected Improvement Plans shall be prepared by the Project Engineer and shall show the actual constructed location of all public improvements within the Subdivision including the horizontal and vertical location of all water, sewer and storm drain lines, individual building service lines curb and gutter alignment and street grades. Such Corrected Improvement Plans shall also specifically show all changes between the Final Improvement Plans and the public improvements as actually constructed. The Project Engineer shall also certify upon the Corrected Improvement Plans that such Corrected Improvement Plans correctly show all public improvements as actually constructed and that such public improvements have been constructed in accordance with the Standard Specifications in effect at the time such construction was accomplished. The Project Engineer shall also deliver to City Engineer all compaction reports, daily construction logs, reports, written tests, analysis and other data as may be necessary to verify or support the certification of the Project Engineer. 7. Acceptance of Subdivision. Upon satisfactory completion of such public improvements and facilities, DEVELOPER's delivery of Corrected Improvement Plans and the filing and approval by CITY of a final plat, CITY will accept that portion of the Subdivision for which a final plat has been approved. Such acceptance shall not be valid unless expressly acknowledged in writing by City Engineer. Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Special Conditions, upon acceptance of any phase or division within the Subdivision, CITY shall assume ownership and control of all public facilities within any dedicated street or public utility right-of-way within the Subdivision and shall execute and record an instrument documenting such acceptance and that also references the recording information for this AGREEMENT and thereby releasing the Subdivision, or the accepted portion thereof, from the encumbrances of this AGREEMENT. Acceptance of the Subdivision Improvements and recording the acceptance instrament shall not be deemed as a waiver of DEVELOPER's agreement herein to fully and completely perform the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT, or as a waiver or release of the warranty set forth below in this AGREEMENT. 8. Warranty. DEVELOPER warrants that the materials and workmanship employed in the construction of all public improvements within the Subdivision shall be good and sound, and shall conform to generally accepted standards within the construction industry. Such warranty shall extend for a period of one (1) year after acceptance of any phase or division of the Subdivision DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES 8,3.26 Page 4 of 15 within which such improvements are located, by CITY, provided nothing herein shall limit the time within which CITY may bring an action against DEVELOPER on account of DEVELOPER's failure to construct such improvements in accordance with this AGREEMENT, the Improvement Plans or the Standard Specifications. DEVELOPER, and DEVELOPER’s heirs, successors and assigns, shall and do hereby respectively warrant and agree, to defend the quiet and peaceful possession of CITY in all easements, rights-of-way, street dedications or other estates conveyed pursuant to the terms of this AGREEMENT or pursuant to the subdivision plat which is the subject hereof, from and against all claims against DEVELOPER and DEVELOPER's successors or assigns, respectively, and against every person whomsoever who lawfully holds, or who later lawfully claims to have held, rights in the premises by or through DEVELOPER and DEVELOPER’s successors or assigns, respectively, as of the date of this AGREEMENT, 9. Water and Sewer Main Connection Charges. DEVELOPER agrees to pay to CITY at the time any separate sanitary sewer service or culinary water service connection to CITY sanitary sewer system or culinary water system is requested, all connection fees, main connection charges, and main charges as set forth in the City Code in effect at the time such request for service is made. 10. Failure to Pay Fees. In the event DEVELOPER fails or refuses to pay any of the fees, charges or costs set forth herein, CITY may disannex any property owned by DEVELOPER within the Subdivision or declare the entire unpaid balance immediately due and payable and collect such sums in the manner provided by law, or may pursue any other remedy set forth herein or as may be available at law or in equity. All such remedies shall be cumulative and CITY may pursue the same separately or simultaneously as it deems necessary or appropriate. In the event of such acceleration, all sums due shall bear interest at the rate established by law for judgments entered in the State of Idaho, commencing on the date the unpaid amount is declared immediately due and written demand therefor is delivered to DEVELOPER. All fees owed by DEVELOPER are due and payable upon execution of this AGREEMENT unless otherwise specified. 11. Participation by CITY. The parties agree that those portions of the water main, the sanitary sewer line, storm drains and street section work (hereafter collectively referred to as the “Shared Work”), the cost (if any) of which CITY may have expressly agreed to pay pursuant to the Special Conditions (if any conditions for reimbursement are contained therein), which may include any water or sewer line or storm line extensions, increased line size or capacity and road construction, are required because of future service needs originating from properties not owned by DEVELOPER and located within the vicinity of the Subdivision, and that sound planning requires construction thereof at the present time in order to accommodate future expansion and development. In recognition of the cost savings which can be accomplished by construction of such increased capacity and improvements concurrently with the facilities to be constructed for DEVELOPER's purposes, and the impracticality of constructing such increased capacity and improvements separately or at a later time, DEVELOPER agrees to design and construct such DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES 8.3.26 Page 5 of 15 facilities subject to CITY's agreement to reimburse DEVELOPER for a portion of such costs, to the extent such is set forth in the Special Conditions. If such reimbursement for the Shared Work is set forth in the Special Conditions, prior to the commencement of the Shared Work, DEVELOPER shall obtain and deliver to CITY three (3) independent bona fide bids for the performance of such work from qualified and responsible contractors. Such bids shall be solicited and itemized in a manner which allows clear and specific identification of that portion of the construction work for which CITY is responsible. CITY shall have no obligation to pay for any portion of the costs of such Shared work unless prior to the commencement of the work, the parties have expressly agreed in writing to a specific amount for which CITY will reimburse the DEVELOPER. Payment of such costs by CITY shall be due within thirty (30) days from when all of the following have been completed or received: (1) acceptance of the Subdivision by CITY; (2) delivery of a complete itemized statement to CITY, in a format acceptable to the CITY, setting forth in detail the total amount of the costs for which CITY is responsible; and, if any part of the Subdivision is within the boundaries of an urban renewal district, (3) a sworn statement signed by DEVELOPER, including its successors and assigns, and acknowledged by the Urban Renewal Agency for the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, also known as Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency (the “Agency”), that DEVELOPER paid for the costs of the Shared Work and that DEVELOPER and its successors and assigns has not contracted with and will not contract with the Agency for reimbursement of any portion of the costs of the Shared Work and has not received and will not receive reimbursement from the Agency for any portion of the costs of the Shared Work. To the extent DEVELOPER, or its successors and assigns, have contracted or contract in the future with the Agency for reimbursement for any portion of the costs of the Shared Work, the CITY’s obligation to reimburse DEVELOPER under this AGREEMENT shall be reduced on a dollar-for- dollar basis. Under no circumstances will the CITY and Agency each reimburse DEVELOPER or any third party for the same costs of the Shared Work. In the event DEVELOPER is reimbursed by CITY for any portion of the costs of the Shared Work that was also reimbursed by the Agency to DEVELOPER or another third-party, the CITY may, in addition to any other legal remedies available under the law, immediately pursue DEVELOPER and require DEVELOPER to repay to CITY any amount that CITY paid DEVELOPER for the costs of the Shared Work that were also reimbursed by Agency and, if CITY prevails, CITY shall be entitled to an award of attorneys fees and costs. DEVELOPER shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY and Agency from claims of any nature that any third party may assert against CITY or Agency for any costs of the Shared Work CITY pays DEVELOPER pursuant to this AGREEMENT and which same costs the third party claims are due from CITY or Agency to the third party. 12. Special Conditions. In recognition of the unique circumstances relative to this Subdivision the parties agree to the Special Conditions attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and by this reference made a part hereof. 13. Irrigation Facilities. DEVELOPER shall relocate or reconstruct, at DEVELOPER’s DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — WILLOWS PLACE: TOWNHOMES 8.3.26 Page 6 of 15 expense, all ditches, headgate structures, culverts, siphons, drywells or other similar appurtenant structures that will be impaired or otherwise disturbed by the construction of this Subdivision, DEVELOPER shall also obtain the consent of all persons or entities who have any water right or control over such structures. DEVELOPER shall also indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any action, claim, demand or cost of any kind, including attorney's fees and court costs, arising from the relocation or reconstruction of such facilities or DEVELOPER's failure to properly relocate or reconstruct such facilities. 14, Relocation of Power Lines. DEVELOPER shall relocate at its expense, all existing electric utility poles or other utility lines or fixtures necessary to construct the public improvements within this Subdivision as shown on the Improvement Drawings. 15. Construction Schedule Change. Any modification to the public improvements shown in the Improvement Drawings or to the construction phase limits shall be approved by City Engineer. Prior to said approval, revised Improvement Drawings shall be resubmitted to City Engineering Department showing the proposed changes. 16. Taxes and Assessments. DEVELOPER shall pay all real property taxes and assessments levied or assessed against any interest in real property which DEVELOPER has agreed to convey to CITY pursuant to this AGREEMENT up to the date the final Subdivision plat for this Subdivision is recorded. Such taxes and assessments shall be paid prior to the acceptance by CITY of the public improvements within any phase or division of the Subdivision. 17. Occupancy. No building or structure within the Subdivision shall be used or occupied for any purpose other than for the construction of such building or structure, unless a final plat has been filed and approved and all public improvements within the plat have been completed and accepted by City Engineer. CITY may withhold Certificates of Occupancy until all such work has been completed. Nothing herein shall prevent the use of a model building for the purpose of DEVELOPER's sales promotional efforts provided the building is not occupied for any other commercial or industrial purposes, 18. Default. In the event DEVELOPER fails to comply with the terms and conditions hereof in any material respect, CITY may, without further notice to DEVELOPER, exercise any or all of the following remedies: A. Withhold the issuance of any building permit or certificate of occupancy for any structure located within any phase or division of the Subdivision affected by such default; B. Withhold the connection of water, sewer or electric service to any property located within any phase or division of the Subdivision affected by such default; DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES 8.3.26 Page 7 of 15 C. Refuse to accept public ownership and maintenance of public improvements within any phase or division of the Subdivision affected by such default and record a notice of such action with the Bonneville County Recorder's office; D, Issue a stop work order for any building under construction within any phase or division of the Subdivision affected by such default; E. Withhold reimbursement of Subdivision inspection fees collected pursuant to the Idaho Falis City Code; and F, Bring an action for damages, injunctive relief, specific performance or any other remedy available at law or in equity. 19, Notices. Any notice required by this AGREEMENT shall be mailed to the receiving party at the address set forth above or such other address as may be delivered to the sending party in writing. Such notice shall be mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid and addressed as set forth above and shall be deemed received upon its deposit in the United States mail in such manner. 20. Recording and Recording Fees. CITY may record this AGREEMENT with the Bonneville County Recorder’s office and prior to the execution and approval of this AGREEMENT, DEVELOPER shall pay to CITY all recording fees necessary to record this AGREEMENT with the Bonneville County Recorder's office. Prior to the approval of any final plat within the Subdivision, DEVELOPER shall pay to CITY all recording fees necessary to record such final plat with the Bonneville County Recorder's office. 21. Compliance With Applicable Law and Regulation. DEVELOPER agrees to comply with all applicable rules, regulations, Ordinances, Resolutions, statutes or administrative laws having applicability to development to this Subdivision and or phase of this Subdivision including, of those of CITY, Bonneville County, the State of Idaho, the United States of America, or any agency or political subdivisions thereof having jurisdiction over the Subdivision and to obtain any permits, licenses, permissions, authorizations, etc., that are required for such development. 22. Conflict With Standard Specifications. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this AGREEMENT or the Improvement Plans and the Standard Specifications, the terms of this AGREEMENT or the Improvement Plans shall prevail over any contrary provision of the Standard Specifications. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this AGREEMENT and the Improvement Plans, the terms of this AGREEMENT shall prevail. 23. Covenants Appurtenant to the Land. All covenants and conditions set forth herein shall be appurtenant to and run with the Subdivision and shall be binding upon DEVELOPER's heirs, successors or assigns. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES 8.3.26 Page 8 of 15 24, Governing Law. This AGREEMENT shall be governed by the laws of the State of Idaho. The venue for any action arising out of this Agreement shall be exclusively in the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District of the State of Idaho, Bonneville County or in the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. 25. Anti-Boycott Against Israel Act. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2346, if payments under this AGREEMENT exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and DEVELOPER employs ten (10) or more persons, DEVELOPER certifies that it is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of this AGREEMENT engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under its control. The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code section 67-2346 shall have the meaning defined therein. 26. Anti-Boycott of Certain Sectors. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2347A, if payments under this AGREEMENT exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and DEVELOPER employs ten (10) or more persons, DEVELOPER certifies that it is not currently engaged in and will not for the duration of the Agreement engage in a boycott of any individual or company because the individual or company engages in or supports either (1) the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacture of fossil fuel-based energy, timber, minerals, hydroelectric power, nuclear energy, or agriculture; or (2) the manufacture, distribution, sale, or use of firearms, as defined in Idaho Code section 18-3302(2)(d). The terms in this Paragraph that are defined in Idaho Code section 67-2347A shall have the meaning defined therein. 27. Certification of No Chinese Ownership. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2359, DEVELOPER certifies that DEVELOPER is not currently owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic of China and will not, for the duration of this AGREEMENT, be owned or operated by the government of the People’s Republic China. 28. Non-Discrimination. DEVELOPER shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideals, sex, age, marital status, physical, or mental handicap, gender identity/expression, sexual orientation, or national origin. 29. Entire Agreement. This writing evidences the final and complete agreement between the parties and no other prior statement, representation or understanding shall be binding upon the parties unless expressly set forth herein. 30. Effective Date. This AGREEMENT shall become valid and binding only upon its approval by CITY Council of CITY and upon its execution by the Mayor. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES 8.3.26 Page 9 of 15 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals this day and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO By Linda Lundquist, City Clerk Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor BEAR HUNTER HOLDINGS, LLC Collin Hunter, Managing Member [Notary Page to Follow] DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ~ WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES 8.3.26 Page 10 of 15 STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss. County of Bonneville ) On this day of , 2026, before me, the undersigned, a notary public for Idaho, personally appeared Lisa Burtenshaw, known to me to be the Mayor of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, the municipal corporation that executed the foregoing document, and acknowledged to me that they are authorized to execute the same for and on behalf of said City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public of Idaho (Seal) Residing at: My Commission Expires: STATE OF _}D ) ) ss: County of \ JP: ) On this | ¢ day of Avwu 4] , 2026, before Vy the undersigned, a notary public, in and for said State, personally appeared or identified to me to be an authorized signator and whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they are authorized to execute the same for and on behalf of said developer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. Residing at: A¢ Rfer-$e NTE OF IDAHO y Commission Expires:_; E M , MY CONESION EXPIRES 09/12/2038 . DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES 8.3.26 Page 11 of 15 EXHIBIT “A” PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES A PARCEL OF LAND THAT LIES FULLY WITHIN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH RANGE 37 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN. BEING 1.815 ACRES OF LAND IN LOTS 4, 6, AND 7 BLOCK 5 OF THE NEW SWEDEN ESTATES DIVISION NUMBER 3 AS FOUND IN THE BONNEVILLE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER 573735. BASIS OF BEARING FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SOUTH 00° 06' 45” WEST 2583.28 FEET BETWEEN THE FOUND EAST QUARTER CORNER AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A-POINT THAT LIES ON THE SOUTHERLY 60 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF PLOMMON STREET, SAID POINT LIES 510.58 FEET SOUTH 00° 06' 45” WEST ALONG THE SECTION LINE AND 297.55 FEET NORTH 89° 53' 15” WEST FROM THE FOUND EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22, BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 45° 07' 30” WEST 28.29 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 08' 15” WEST 206.05 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 50'57” EAST 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 08' 15” WEST 14.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 51' 43” EAST 90.48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 08' 17” WEST 147.88 FEET TO THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID ABOVE MENTIONED SUBDIVISION PLAT; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINES OF SAID SUBDIVISION PLAT THE FOLLOWING (2) TWO COURSES: (1) SOUTH 61° 46' 58” WEST 264.74 FEET TO THE EXTENSION LINE OF 2 FOUND MONUMENTS MONUMENTING THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, WHICH IS COINCIDENT WITH THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF — THE NEW SWEDEN ESTATES DIVISION NUMBER 4 AS FOUND IN SAID RECORDER'S OFFICE AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER 700791; DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES 8.3.26 Page 12 of 15 (2) NORTH 00° 08' 15” EAST 514.26 FEET TO SAID SOUTHERLY 60 FOOT RIGHT-OF- WAY AND TO A FOUND %” TRON ROD AND NO CAP; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 89° 53! 15” EAST 142.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 79,075 SQUARE FEET OR 1.815 ACRES OF LAND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES 8.3.26 Page 13 of 15 EXHIBIT “B” SPECIAL CONDITIONS WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES S.C. 1.00 Access to Plommon Street. Access to Plommon Street shall be in accordance with the Bonneville Metropolitan Planning Organization (“BMPO”) Access Management Plan. S.C, __2.00__ Existing Infrastructure. When it is necessary to move or remove existing infrastructure not belonging to CITY and not within CITY right-of-way, DEVELOPER shall coordinate such activities with the applicable owner, (e.g., poles owned by Pacificorp, dba Rocky Mountain Power). Any existing electrical infrastructure owned by Pacificorp, dba Rocky Mountain Power, will require a buy-out from DEVELOPER prior to receipt of electrical service from CITY. Request for the buy-out, if any, is to be initiated by DEVELOPER after annexation. S.C. __3.00__ Construction of Idaho Falls Power and Idaho Falls Fiber Infrastructure. DEVELOPER shall, at DEVELOPER’s sole expense, install all power infrastructure as described and illustrated on the Idaho Falls Power approved and signed contractor’s map provided and reviewed by Idaho Falls Power. All power infrastructure installation shall conform with Idaho Falls Power’s service policy. Typical power trench installation shall have a warranty of workmanship of one (1) year beginning at the time of City's final acceptance. However, if power infrastructure is installed during winter conditions (where frost is evident in the ground and backfill has the potential to be frozen earth) the warranty of workmanship shall be extended to two (2) full years beginning at the time of City’s final acceptance. DEVELOPER will incur all costs associated with Idaho Falls Power/Idaho Falls Fiber crews removing infrastructure in order to remedy settling. This includes, but is not limited to, all settlement of trenching, transformer bases, fiber boxes, and/or conduit separation. $.C.__4.00__Storm Drainage. Storm Drainage shall be designed and constructed to accommodate drainage of the lots within the Subdivision by DEVELOPER. The storm drainage system shall meet CITY’s Storm Drainage Policy. The storm system shall be constructed as shown on the CITY-approved Site Plan. Maintenance of the storm system shall be the responsibility of DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER’s heirs, successors, or assigns. S.C. 5.00 Water Line Connection in Plommon Street. CITY agrees to allow DEVELOPER to connect to the water main located in Plommon Street, subject to DEVELOPER's payment of the water main connection fees in the amount of Seven Thousand Two Hundred Sixty- Four Dollars and Forty Cents ($7,264.40; 143 feet currently at $50.80 per foot), pursuant to section 8- 4-14 (C) of the City Code. Mainline connection fee costs are subject to adjustment when CITY’s fee resolution is adjusted from time to time by City Council. This fee amount is subject to fee adjustments at time of building permit application. Pursuant to section 8-4-14 (B) of the City Code, DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER’s heirs or assigns shall also pay individual water system connection fees each time an individual water service line is connected to CITY’s water systems. Such fees shall be paid in the amounts and manner set forth in such Code Sections DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES 8.3.26 Page 14 of 15 S.C, 6.00 Sewer Main Connection Fee in Plommon Street. CITY agrees to allow DEVELOPER to connect to the sewer main previously constructed in Plommon Street, subject to DEVELOPER's payment of the sewer main connection charge pursuant to section 8-1-23(C) of the City Code in the amount of Four Thousand Two Hundred Fifty-Seven Dollars and Eleven Cents ($4,257.11; 143 feet; currently at $29.77 per foot). Mainline connection fee costs are subject to adjustment when CITY’s fee resolution is adjusted from time to time by City Council. This fee amount is subject to fee adjustments at time of building permit application. Pursuant to section 8-1-23(B) of the City Code, DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER’s heirs or assigns shall also pay individual sewer connection fees each time an individual sewer service line is connected to CITY’s sewer system. Such fees shall be paid in the amounts and manner set forth in such Code Section. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — WILLOWS PLACE TOWNHOMES 8.3.26 Page 15 of 15 Memorandum File #: 26-378 City Council DATE: Thursday, September 24, 2026 AGENDA: Regular FROM: Wade Sanner, Director DEPARTMENT: Community Development Services Title Legislative Public Hearing for the Annexation and Initial Zoning of I&M, Industrial and Manufacturing - Annexation and Initial Zoning Ordinances and Reasoned Statements of Relevant Criteria and Standards for approximately 4.482 acres. ☒ Ordinance ☐ Resolution ☐ Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☒ Legislative Public Hearing ☐ Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☒ Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: 1. Approve the Ordinance annexing approximately 4.482 acres in the E ½ of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 38 East; assign a Comprehensive Plan Designation of “Industrial;” and under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings, request that it be read by title and published by summary (or consider the Ordinance on the first reading and that it be read by title, reject the Ordinance, or take other action deemed appropriate). 2. Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the annexation of approximately 4.482 acres in the E ½ of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 38 East and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). 3. Approve the Ordinance establishing the initial zoning for I&M, Industrial and Manufacturing as shown in the Ordinance exhibits under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings; and request that it be read by title and published by summary; that the City limits documents be amended to include the area annexed herewith; and that the City Planner be instructed to reflect said annexation, amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, and initial zoning on the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps located in the Planning office (or consider the Ordinance on the first reading and that it be read by title, reject the Ordinance, or take other action deemed appropriate). 4. Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the initial zoning of I&M, Industrial and Manufacturing and give authorization for the mayor to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Description, Background Information, Purpose: Attached is the application for Annexation and Initial Zoning of I&M, Industrial and Manufacturing, which includes the Annexation and Initial Zoning Ordinances and Reasoned Statements of Relevant Criteria and Standards for approximately City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/6/2026 Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #: 26-378 City Council 4.482 acres in the E ½ of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 38 East. On August 4, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the annexation with initial zoning of I&M to the Mayor and City Council as presented. This annexation was reviewed by CDS Planning staff as well as staff from Fire, Idaho Falls Power, and the Public Works Water, Wastewater, and Engineering/Survey Divisions. This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal Department and Municipal Services. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/6/2026 Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ i cone ian en crt a Cor I Sect ee [EE tn cre (instal EE eto cpenSce (= Sen ANNEXATION ORDINANCE # AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO pw we BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN. COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST BOISE MERIDIAN; THENCE S00°09'03”W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 8 A DISTANCE OF 1413.68 FEET; THENCE $89°S4'22”E 75.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING SAID POINT OF BEGINNING ALSO BEING ALONG THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF asi EAST ESTABLISHED IN ANDERSEN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DIVISION NO. 1 PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 1597972. RUNNING THENCE FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF 15H EAST $00°09'03”W 212.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF CITY OF IDAHO FALLS ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 3579; THE NEXT TWO (2) CALLS BEING ALONG SAID CITY OF IDAHO FALLS ANNEXATION ORDINANCE; (1) THENCE N89°51'07”W 100.02 FEET; (2) THENCE S00°08'S9”W 27.80 FEET TO THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF WARRANTY DEED INSTRUMENT NUMBER 1790184 AND A NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF CITY OF IDAHO FALLS ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 3658; THE NEXT THREE (3) CALLS BEING ALONG SAID WARRANTY DEED; (1) THENCE N89°54'22”W 724.98 FEET ALONG SAID ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 3658; (2) THENCE NO0°09'03”E 240.00 FEET ALONG SAID ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 3658 TO A NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID ORDINANCE; (3) THENCE $89°54'22”E 725.00; THENCE $89°54'22"E 100.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 4.482 ACRES wo N89°S4'22 $89°54'22"E 725.00' ANNEXATION AREA = 4.482 ACRES "W 724,98' S00 °08'S9"W 27.80' — ? a ie] my ca st ct | FOUND BRASS CAP MONUMENT IN VAULT NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 8 TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST BOISE MERIDIAN, CPF NO. 1624768 .$89°54'22"E.. 212.23' N89°51'07"W 100.02' ZX 1101.45' NO0°09'03"E 2727,36' . RECORDED WITH THE BONNEVILLE COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE AS INSTRUMENT NO. 15TH EAST BASIS OF BEARING Ni (SECTION LINE) FOUND ALUMINUM CAP EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 8 TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST BOISE MERIDIAN, CPF NO. 1036113 2 m x < N Oo W = Fa) 2 D o ° a 49 29 oe pS | | 100' ~=— 50 100' el SCALE: 1" = 100' AGLE ROCK NGINEERING CIVIL. © PLANNING © SURVEYING IDARO FALLS 20855422665 — REXBURS, 208) 359-2665 Cc. MACAKY C. MACKAY K. ROLAND SURVEYED BY: DRAWN BY: APPROVED BY: PROJECT NO. OFFICES AT: 1331 Fremont Ave. tdaho Falls, Idaho 83402 343 E 4th N, Suite 119 Rexburg, Idaho 83440 SEPTEMBER 2026 CAD NAME: 25017 ROS_ANNEXATION.OWG AGLE ROCK NGINEERING CIVIL © PLANNING © SURVEYING IDAHO FALLS (208) 542-2665 REXBURG (208) 359-2665 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR GATEWAY IF LLC ANNEXATION A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION $ AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN. COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST BOISE MERIDIAN; THENCE $00*09’03”W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 8 A DISTANCE OF 1413.68 FEET; THENCE $89°54'22"E 75.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING SAID POINT OF BEGINNING ALSO BEING ALONG THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF 15™ EAST ESTABLISHED IN ANDERSEN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DIVISION NO. 1 PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT NO. 1597972. RUNNING THENCE FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF 15™ EAST $00°0903"W 212.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF CITY OF IDAHO FALLS ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 3579; THE NEXT TWO (2) CALLS BEING ALONG SAID CITY OF IDAHO FALLS ANNEXATION ORDINANCE; (1) THENCE N89°51’07”W 100.02 FEET; {2) THENCE SO0°08'59"W 27.80 FEET TO THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF WARRANTY DEED INSTRUMENT NUMBER 1790184 AND A NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF CITY OF IDAHO FALLS ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 3658; THE NEXT THREE (3) CALLS BEING ALONG SAID WARRANTY DEED; (1) THENCE N89°54‘22"W 724.93 FEET ALONG SAID ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 3658; (2) THENCE N00°09'03”E 240.00 FEET ALONG SAID ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 3658 TO A NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID ORDINANCE; (3} THENCE $89°54’22”E 725.00; THENCE $89°54’22”E 100.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 4.482 ACRES CSM 25017 Submitted by: Eng/Survey Firm Name: EAGLE ROCK ENGINEERING Contact Name: DEVAN KNIGHT Phone Number; 801-328-2051 Email: DEVANKNIGHT@METROGROUP.COM Page_1__ of _1 Application for Annexation Page 1 of 5 Applicant: Devan Knight Owner: Gateway IF LLC Project Manager: Mike Thrower Location: Generally located north of N Yellowstone Hwy, east of the Idaho Canal, south of E Iona Rd, and west of N 15th East. Size: Approximately 4.482 Acres Zoning: Existing: County IM-3 North: County IM-3 South: I&M East: County C-2 West: I&M Proposed Zoning: I&M Existing Land Uses: Site: Vacant North: Industrial South: Industrial East: Industrial West: Industrial Future Land Use Map: Industrial Attachments: 1. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2. Zoning Information 3. Allowed Uses 4. Annexation Exhibit 5. Maps & Aerial Photos Requested Action: To Approve the annexation and initial zoning of I&M, Industrial and Manufacturing. Annexation: This annexation was requested by the property owner. The property is in the Area of Impact and contiguous to city limits along the southern and western property line. Annexation of the property is consistent with the policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Initial Zoning: The proposed zoning is I&M. The property is adjacent to I&M zoning to the south and west. Surrounding properties within Bonneville County are Zoned IM-3, an industrial zone. Surrounding land uses include a salvage yard, Fire Station 6, and other vacant industrial lots. Staff Recommendation: Staff has reviewed the annexation and initial zoning application and finds that it is consistent with the Comprehensive Zoning Code and the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends approval of the annexation and initial zoning I&M. STAFF REPORT ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING OF I&M, INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING EAST HALF OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST October 8, 2026 Community Development Services Comprehensive Plan Land Use Transects: pg. 60-70 ImaginelF Transects eo 2 @ b Park & Future Urban Industrial Suburban © Special Use structure varies Lower INTENSITY Higher | uniform LAND USES Mixed | lower TAX REVENUE Per ACRE } Higher 1 Less BUILT INFRASTRUCTURE More} Lower | | SERVICE LEVEL | Higher || &) 3. Industrial * Snapshot: The Industrial Transect denotes areas set aside for all Industrial a. . ; . vgs varieties of industrial operations, from manufacturing facilities and related warehousing and distribution to machine shops or j greenhouses. These areas are generally near major roadways, with — frontage on arterial roadways, and they may have railroad access. uid — — Local examples: Industrial Parks south of Sunnyside Road along the Joa Yellowstone Highway Corridor, Anheuser Bush facilities, industrial park | | located north of Science Center Drive/Anderson Street and US 20 | Page 2 of 5 Page 3 of 5 Zoning Ordinance: 11-3-3: PURPOSE OF INDUSTRIAL ZONES 11-3-8: STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL ZONES 11-2-5: ALLOWED USES IN INDUSTRIAL AND SPECIAL PURPOSE ZONES. Table 11-2-3: Allowed Uses in Industrial Zones P= permitted use. (Cl © administrative conditional use. C2 = Board of Adjustment conditional use. C3 © City Council conditional use. A blank denotes a use that is not allowed in that zone. "Indicates uses that are subject to specific land use provisions set forth in the Standards for Allowed Land Uses Section of this Chapter. Industrial Special Purpose [Proposed Land Use Classification] LM | aM] RSDP a a FAgricutweTowsm «dtd TTCd FAamusementCenter «dt CdS Amusement Center, Indoor Shooting ae [Aduit Business® 0 ee ee a LN a a Building Material, Garden and Equipmetit Cemetery* Club* ~ Communication Facility Correctional Facility ar Jail oy Drive-through Establishment* Dwelling, Accessory Lnit* Eating Establishment, Limited Equipment Sales, Rental and Service Financial Institution Food Processing, Small Scale Processing With or Without Sales Food Products, Processing, With or Without Retail Sales Page 4o0f 5 Proposed Land Use Classification Health Care and Social Services Higher Education Facilities —_— Ce a industry, Weavy Ee Finauwy.tan OO information Temaogy LY [Lodging Facility | [Medical SupportFacitiies | PT [Parking Facility | [Park and Recreation Facility® [| | FPawastop OO PPesomel Seamed [Professional Service | PT [Public Service Facitity® | Pe Public Service Facility, immed | PPP [Public Service Use | Pe FRaitoad Feigh Tema nase [| Recreational Vehicle Pat? | Sid Sd Od OT [Research and Development Business| P| P| a Ee [SixapeFaiiy,Oudoor iP PY fSomevauh dO a a a Vehicle Sales, Rentals and Service I ee Gs es Se Warehouse, Wholesale With Flammable Materials Fuel Station, Super | oP Page 5 of 5 August 4, 2026 6:30 p.m. Planning Department City Annex Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Forrest Ihler, Matthew Meehan, Marry Scales, Tia Panter, Dale Storer. MEMBERS ABSENT: Glen Ogden, Bill Scott, Deanna Harger ALSO PRESENT: Assistant Planning Director Kerry Beutler, Caitlin Long Planner, Mike Thrower Planner; David Peterson Planner; Terry Rodino, Esq, City Attorney, and interested citizens. CALL TO ORDER: Ihler called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. MINUTES: Meehan moved to accept the minutes of July 7, 2026, Scales seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Public Hearing: 2. ANNX 26-006: ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING OF I&M FOR 4.482 ACRES Applicant: Jaylynn – Eagle Rock Engineering. Requesting annexation into the City for 4.482 acres with the initial zoning of I&M. It is currently zoned I&M in the County and everything around it is zoned I&M. Thrower presented the staff report, a part of the record. Storer asked about the right of way and the jog on the southern part. Thrower showed that one portion was annexed with the previous annexation to the south with the Fire Station and so it created a small parcel overlap that wasn’t annexed to the north. Ihler opened the public hearing. SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: No one appeared. Ihler closed the public hearing. Meehan moved to recommend to the Mayor and City Council approval of the Annexation and Initial zoning of I&M for 4.482 acres in the east half of section 8 Township 2 North, Range 38 East. Panter seconded the motion. Ihler called for roll call vote: Meehan, yes; Panter, yes; Ihler, yes; Scales, yes; Storer, yes. The motion passed unanimously. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE – ZONING I&M 4.482 ACRES EAST HALF OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST PAGE 1 OF 4 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 4.482 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY WITH THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY AND STATE AUTHORITIES; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the lands described in Exhibit A of this Ordinance are contiguous and adjacent to the City limits of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho; and WHEREAS, such lands described herein are subject to annexation to the City pursuant to the provisions of Idaho Code Section 50-222, and other laws, as amended; and WHEREAS, the annexation of the lands described in Exhibit A is reasonably necessary to assure the orderly development of the City in order to allow efficient and economically viable provision of tax-supported and fee-supported municipal services; to enable the orderly development of private lands which benefit from a cost-effective availability of City services in urbanizing areas; and to equitably allocate the costs of City/public services in management of development on the City’s urban fringe; and WHEREAS, the City has authority to annex lands into the City pursuant to procedures of Idaho Code Section 50-222, as amended; and WHEREAS, any portion of a highway lying wholly or partially within the lands to be annexed are included in the lands annexed by this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the lands annexed by this Ordinance are not connected to the City only by a “shoestring” or a strip of land which comprises a railroad or right-of-way; and WHEREAS, all private landowners have consented to annexation of such lands, where necessary; and WHEREAS, City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan includes the area of annexation; and WHEREAS, after considering the written and oral comments of property owners whose lands would be annexed and other affected persons, City Council specifically makes the following findings: ANNEXATION ORDINANCE – ZONING I&M 4.482 ACRES EAST HALF OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST PAGE 2 OF 4 1) That the lands annexed meet the applicable requirements of Idaho Code Section 50-222 and do not fall within exceptions or conditional exceptions contained in Idaho Code Section 50-222; 2) The annexation is consistent with public purposes addressed in annexation and related plans prepared by the City; and 3) Annexation of the lands described in Section 1 are reasonably necessary for the orderly development of the City; and WHEREAS, it appears to the Council that the lands described herein below in Exhibit A of this Ordinance should be annexed to and become a part of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to exercise jurisdiction over the annexed lands in a way that promotes the orderly development of such lands; and WHEREAS, the City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan sets out policies and strategies designed to promote and sustain future growth within the City; and WHEREAS, such designation is consistent with policies and principles contained within the City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City desires the City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan Map to be amended to reflect the designation contained in this Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, as follows: SECTION 1. Annexation of Property. The lands described in Exhibit A are hereby annexed to the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho. SECTION 2. Amended Map and Legal Description. The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Bonneville County Auditor, Treasurer, and Assessor, within ten (10) days after the effective date hereof. The City Engineer shall, within ten (10) days after such effective date, file an amended legal description and map of the City, with the Bonneville County Recorder and Assessor and the Idaho State Tax Commission, all in accordance with Idaho Code Section 63-2215. SECTION 3. Findings. The findings contained in the recitals of this Ordinance be, and the same are hereby adopted as the official City Council findings for this Ordinance, and any further findings relative to this Ordinance shall be contained in the officially adopted Council minutes of the meeting in which this Ordinance was passed. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE – ZONING I&M 4.482 ACRES EAST HALF OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST PAGE 3 OF 4 SECTION 4. Savings and Severability Clause. The provisions and parts of this Ordinance are intended to be severable. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. SECTION 5. Publication. This Ordinance, or a summary thereof in compliance with Idaho Code, shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect immediately upon its passage, approval, and publication. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL AND APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2026. Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Lundquist, City Clerk (SEAL) STATE OF IDAHO ) : ss. County of Bonneville ) ANNEXATION ORDINANCE – ZONING I&M 4.482 ACRES EAST HALF OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST PAGE 4 OF 4 I, LINDA LUNDQUIST, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY: That the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Ordinance entitled: “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 4.482 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY WITH THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY AND STATE AUTHORITIES; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.” “A copy of the full text of the ordinance is available at City Hall” Linda Lundquist, City Clerk (SEAL) REASONED STATEMENT OF RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 4.482 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF N YELLOWSTONE HWY, EAST OF THE IDAHO CANAL, SOUTH OF E IONA RD, AND WEST OF N 15TH EAST. WHEREAS, the applicant filed an application for annexation on May 29, 2026; and WHEREAS, this matter came before the Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission during a duly noticed public hearing on August 4, 2026; and WHEREAS, this matter came before the Idaho Falls City Council during a duly noticed public hearing on October 8, 2026; and WHEREAS, having reviewed the application, including all exhibits entered and having considered the issues presented: I. RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS 1. The City Council considered the request pursuant to City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan, City of Idaho Falls Zoning Ordinance, City of Idaho Falls Subdivision Ordinance, the Local Land Use Planning Act, and other applicable development regulations. 2. The property is approximately 4.482 acres generally located north of N Yellowstone Hwy, east of the Idaho Canal, south of E Iona Rd, and west of N 15th East. 3. This property is in the Area of Impact and included in the Comprehensive Plan Map. 4. The property is contiguous to City limits along the south and west property lines. 5. The annexation was initiated by the property owner. 6. City utilities are in the vicinity of this property. 7. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Industrial. 8. Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of annexation. 9. The proposed annexation is consistent with the principles of the Comprehensive Plan. II. DECISION Based on the above Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria, the City Council of the City of Idaho Falls approved the annexation as presented. PASSED BY CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS THIS ______ DAY OF ____________, 2026 _____________________________________ Lisa Burtenshaw – Mayor NOTICE The Applicant or any affected person seeking judicial review of the compliance of this Reasoned Statement with the provisions of Idaho Code § 67-6535 must first seek reconsideration of this Reasoned Statement within fourteen (14) days by filing a request to reconsider pursuant in compliance with Idaho Code 67-6535. In addition, the above Applicant has the right to request a regulatory taking analysis pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003. ORDINANCE – ZONING I&M, EAST HALF OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST PAGE 1 OF 3 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE INITIAL ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 4.482 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE AS I&M, INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the proposed initial zoning district of lands described in Exhibit A is I&M, Industrial and Manufacturing for such annexed lands is consistent with the current City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan Land use designation “Industrial”; and WHEREAS, the proposed zoning district is consistent and compatible with the existing and surrounding zoning districts and is consistent with principles of the City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, the Council desires to designate the lands within the area of annexation as “Industrial”; and WHEREAS, Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on August 4, 2026, and recommended approval of zoning the subject property to I&M; and WHEREAS, the Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing and passed a motion to approve this zoning on October 8, 2026. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Comprehensive Plan Designation. The area described in Exhibit A are hereby given a Comprehensive Plan designation of Industrial. SECTION 2: Legal Description. The lands described in Exhibit A are hereby zoned as I&M, Industrial and Manufacturing. SECTION 3. Zoning. The property described in Section 1 of this Ordinance be and the same hereby is zoned “I&M, Industrial and Manufacturing” and the City Planner is hereby ordered to make the necessary amendments to the official maps of the City of Idaho Falls which are on file at the City Planning Department Offices, 680 Park Avenue. SECTION 4. Savings and Severability Clause. The provisions and parts of this Ordinance are intended to be severable. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, ORDINANCE – ZONING I&M, EAST HALF OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST PAGE 2 OF 3 clause or phrase of this Ordinance. SECTION 5. Publication. This Ordinance, or a summary thereof in compliance with Idaho Code, shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect immediately upon its passage, approval, and publication. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication. PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, this day of , 2026. CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO ATTEST: Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor Linda Lundquist, City Clerk (SEAL) STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss: County of Bonneville ) ORDINANCE – ZONING I&M, EAST HALF OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST PAGE 3 OF 3 I, LINDA LUNDQUIST, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY: That the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Ordinance entitled, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE INITIAL ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 4.482 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE AS I&M, INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.” “A copy of the full text of the ordinance is available at City Hall” Linda Lundquist, City Clerk (SEAL) REASONED STATEMENT OF RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS INITIAL ZONING OF I&M, INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING, APPROXIMATELY 4.482 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF N YELLOWSTONE HWY, EAST OF THE IDAHO CANAL, SOUTH OF E IONA RD, AND WEST OF N 15TH EAST. WHEREAS, the applicant filed an application for annexation on May 29, 2026; and WHEREAS, this matter came before the Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission during a duly noticed public hearing on August 4, 2026; and WHEREAS, this matter came before the Idaho Falls City Council during a duly noticed public hearing on October 8, 2026; and WHEREAS, having reviewed the application, including all exhibits entered and having considered the issues presented: I. RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS 1. The City Council considered the request pursuant to City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan, City of Idaho Falls Zoning Ordinance, City of Idaho Falls Subdivision Ordinance, the Local Land Use Planning Act, and other applicable development regulations. 2. The property is approximately 4.482 acres generally located north of N Yellowstone Hwy, east of the Idaho Canal, south of E Iona Rd, and west of N 15th East. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Industrial. 3. The proposed zoning consists of 4.482 acres of I&M, Industrial and Manufacturing. The proposed zone is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and existing zoning and land uses in the area. 4. Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the I&M, Industrial and Manufacturing. II. DECISION Based on the above Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria, the City Council of the City of Idaho Falls approved the initial zoning as presented. PASSED BY CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS THIS ______ DAY OF ____________, 2026 _____________________________________ Lisa Burtenshaw – Mayor NOTICE The Applicant or any affected person seeking judicial review of the compliance of this Reasoned Statement with the provisions of Idaho Code § 67-6535 must first seek reconsideration of this Reasoned Statement within fourteen (14) days by filing a request to reconsider pursuant in compliance with Idaho Code 67-6535. In addition, the above Applicant has the right to request a regulatory taking analysis pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003. Memorandum File #: 26-379 City Council DATE: Thursday, September 24, 2026 AGENDA: Regular FROM: Wade Sanner, Director DEPARTMENT: Community Development Services Title Legislative Public Hearing for the Annexation and Initial Zoning of HC, Highway Commercial - Annexation and Initial Zoning Ordinances and Reasoned Statements of Relevant Criteria and Standards for approximately 2.23 acres. ☒ Ordinance ☐ Resolution ☐ Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing ☒ Legislative Public Hearing ☐ Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance ☒ Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: 1. Approve the Ordinance annexing approximately 2.23 acres for Lots 2 and 3, Carlyle-Erma Subdivision Division No. 1; assign a Comprehensive Plan Designation of “Mixed-Use Centers & Corridors;” and under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings, request that it be read by title and published by summary (or consider the Ordinance on the first reading and that it be read by title, reject the Ordinance, or take other action deemed appropriate). 2. Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the annexation of approximately 2.23 acres in Lots 2 and 3, Carlyle-Erma Subdivision Division No. 1 and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). 3. Approve the Ordinance establishing the initial zoning for HC, Highway Commercial as shown in the Ordinance exhibits under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings; and request that it be read by title and published by summary; that the City limits documents be amended to include the area annexed herewith; and that the City Planner be instructed to reflect said annexation, amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, and initial zoning on the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps located in the Planning office (or consider the Ordinance on the first reading and that it be read by title, reject the Ordinance, or take other action deemed appropriate). 4. Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the initial zoning of HC, Highway Commercial and give authorization for the mayor to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Description, Background Information, Purpose: Attached is the application for Annexation and Initial Zoning of HC, Highway Commercial, which includes the Annexation and Initial Zoning Ordinances and Reasoned Statements of Relevant Criteria and Standards for approximately 2.23 acres City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/6/2026 Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #: 26-379 City Council in Lots 2 and 3, Carlyle-Erma Subdivision Division No. 1. On September 1, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the annexation with initial zoning of HC to the Mayor and City Council as presented. This annexation was reviewed by CDS Planning staff as well as staff from Fire, Idaho Falls Power, and the Public Works Water, Wastewater, and Engineering/Survey Divisions. This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal Department and Municipal Services. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/6/2026 Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ DIVISION NO. 1 BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO hare or cao PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SECTION 16, T. 2 N., R. 38 E.B.M. County ef fornevilbe ) t hereby 40, the withla we (7 sos roa A" 0 9d Dm —_—— ‘ ‘<— )eanron aNqIn@Ering j | idaho Falls, idaho T 2N, R 38 EBM SCALE: 1° = 100’ | | | FRONT AND REAR ———— | | LOT LINES ARE PARALLEL, 200 ~~ |.0 50. 100 200 | ’ S | rs FEET BETWEEN 2 | R= 2511.33 5S oa bn 323.55) F cl592.41' © a | | i Tx162,00' — T=146.50" 5 4 s- \ 3 «1.418 ACRES Es 8 = 3 | CHAFFIN LANE CHAFFIN ADDITION ReSSeIW/ pro DIVISION NO. 5 \ NORTH 1/4 COR. SEC. 16, a NOT OW 1796.02" \ — ‘STATE OF IDAHO wiih Rl ipo pe Pp per ced pake Rdbujea ay BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION ‘Beginning at a point that is S.89°39'08"E. 840.87 feet along the ‘City Monumented Section line and S.0°20’52"W. 264.99 feet from ‘the Northwest corner of Section 16, Township 2 North, Range 38 East of the Boise Meridian, said point of beginning being the southwest corner of the property conveyed by Instrument No. 403751 and running thence S.89°39'08"E. 205.07 feet along the south line of said property to a point on a curve with a radius of 2511.33 and a ‘chord that bears S.12°36’00"E. 908.68 feet; thence to the left along said curve 914.63 feet through a central angle of 22°40'22”"; thence S.23°56'11"E. 50.00 feet; thence S.66°03'49”"W. 205.00 feet to the existing east line of Woodruff Avenue (80.00 foot right of way); thence N,23°56'11"W. 50.00 feet along said east line to a point of curve with a radius of 2516.33 feet and a chord that bears N.12°32'03"W. 994.92 feet; thence to the right along said curve 1001.52 feet through a central angle of 22°48'15", to the point of beginning, containing 4.744 acres more or less. DEED OF DEDICATION BE IT KNOWN THAT: We the undersigned, do hereby certify that we are the legal owners of the above tract of land and have caused the same to be subdivided into lots, blocks and streets to be known as CARLYLE—ERMA SUBDIVISION, Division No. 1, Bonneville County, Idaho, and we do hereby give, grant and dedicate to the public for perpetual public use all streets, alleys and easements shown hereon and we do further certify that the individual lots shown on this plat will not be served by any woter system, but will be served by an individual well and well agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF: We have hereto set our signatures this “f _ fo” _aay ot _Seplenm Ser __. 1992. ied Marvin L. Olsen | Patricia C. Olson ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ) COUNTY OF BONNEVILLE y 5-5: Personally appeared before me the undersigned Notary Public, Marv Olson and Patricia C. Olson, known to me to be the signers of the above Deed of Dedication and duly acknowledged to me that they executed the same for the purpose therein mentioned. Notary Public for State of Idaho va Residing ot. Lolahe fall's Ta My commission expires: //-OF 7 OF 16 | SURVEYOR’S CERTIFICATE l, Dennis L. Jones, a Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that at the request of the owners | have surveyed the tract of land shown on this plat and described it hereon to be known as CARLYLE-ERMA SUBDIVISION, Division No. 1, Bonneville County, Idaho. 2 Dennis L. Jores, P.L.S. Idaho License No. 760. : tt ome eee cd [oe ABS Pee | fi ‘| mah dl pal ils Silettyy Boas CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL Presented to the Idaho Falls, City Council this__Z4 TE day of SEP TEMPER 1992, at which time this subdivision was approved and accepted. Mayor City Clerk City Engineer SURVEYORS APPROVAL I, certify that | have examined this plat and find it to be correct and acceptable as required by Section ' STATE OF IDAHO $s COUNTY OF BONNEVILLE )~*~" Recorded and filed at the request of : —— SO Date: G- 30-4 Book: C-77 Time: [-23om Fee: [/ = ____ County Recdrder 7 Oe omeey TREASURERS CERTIFICATE l, Lila Jordan, County Treasurer In and for the County of Bonneville, per the requirements of Section 50-1308, Idaho Code, do hereby certify that all County property taxes for the property included in this proposed subdivision are current. DotesLape M1092. Mile 9. Vinelan! Coufity Yreasurer COUNTY APPROVAL Presented fo the Bonneville County Board of Commissioners this 30 day of _Septemser ALD, 1992, at which time this subdivision was approved and accepted. t Aching = Ch one = NOTES — indicates a 1/2” x 24” iron rod placed with a yellow County Engineer plastic cap marked L.S. 760. -— a ee utility easements are 8’ through each lot unless otherwise shown. . a 10’ wide utility edsernent is reserved along the street side of all lots. accesses on Woodruff Avenue shall be limited to four accesses. HEALTH CERTIFICATE Sanitary restrictions are removed under Title 50, Chapter 13, Idaho Code. Date: 29 -0-72 * Exhibit “A” Pages: 1 of 1 _ Total Pages: of _ L:\Bluebeam Sessions\Mike\Z others\ANX26-007 Exhibit A.docx EXHIBIT "A" A parcel of land being Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, and all of the public right-of-way that was dedicated by Carlyle-Erma Subdivision, Division No. 1, as recorded with the Office of the Recorder for Bonneville County as instrument number 836868, excepting therefrom any portion of said dedicated right-of-way that has been previously annexed, lying within a portion of the Northwest (NW)¼ of Section 16, Township 2 North, Range 38 East of the Boise Meridian, Bonneville County, Idaho. Page 1 of 5 Applicant: Zahe Elabed Owner: On Time Financial LLC Project Manager: Mike Thrower Location: Generally located north of Bentley Way, east of N Woodruff Ave, south of Lincoln Rd, and west of Quail Dr. Size: Approximately 2.2 Acres Zoning: Existing: County C-2 North: HC South: County C-2 East: County R1 West: HC Proposed Zoning: HC, Highway Commercial. Existing Land Uses: Site: Commercial North: Commercial South: Vacant East: Vacant West: Commercial Future Land Use Map: Mixed Use Centers and Corridors Attachments: 1. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2. Zoning Information 3. Allowed Uses 4. Annexation Exhibit 5. Maps & Aerial Photos Requested Action: To Approve the annexation and initial zoning of HC, Highway Commercial. Annexation: This annexation was requested by the property owner. The property is in the Area of Impact and contiguous to city limits along the northern and western property lines. Annexation of the property is consistent with the policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The property includes two previously platted lots and a strip of right-of-way, along Woodruff Ave. that was dedicated as part of the plat. Initial Zoning: The proposed zoning is HC. The property is adjacent to HC zoning to the north and west. Surrounding properties within Bonneville County are Zoned C-1 and R1. Surrounding land use includes similar commercial uses and vacant land. Staff Recommendation: Staff has reviewed the annexation and initial zoning application and finds that it is consistent with the Comprehensive Zoning Code and the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends approval of the annexation and initial zoning HC. STAFF REPORT ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING OF HC, HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL Lots 2 and 3 Carlyle-Erma Subdivision Division No. 1 October 8, 2026 Community Development Services Comprehensive Plan Land Use Transects: pg. 60-70 ImaginelF Transects Park Open Space Ona Den 8) H General Urban: Mix ed-Use Crs Wonton structure varies INTENSITY LAND USES ‘isi | TAX REVENUE Per ACRE Higher | : | BUILT INFRASTRUCTURE pn | SERVICE LEVEL | Higher | 6. Mixed-Use Centers & Corridors Snapshot: The Mixed-Use Centers and Corridors Transect denotes areas where people tend to shop, eat and gather. These areas include all housing types but generally at a more intense scale than other areas. These areas also include mixed-use buildings, recreation centers and commercial uses. Mixed-Use Centers and corridors may vary in scale from large, regional commercial centers with supportive housing to smaller commercial pockets called walkable centers that support a well-connected, walkable neighborhood. Local examples: Northgate Mile and 1* Street corridors, Intersection of 65" South and 5” West, Intersection of Skyline and Broadway, Snake River Landing Page 2 of 5 Page 3 of 5 Zoning Ordinance: 11-3-5: PURPOSE OF COMMERCIAL ZONES (D) HC Highway and General Commercial Zone. This zone provides a commercial zone for retail and service uses serving the traveling public. Characteristics of the Zone are buildings set back from the right- of-way line to promote safety on the highway and maintain maximum use of highway right-of-way for travel purposes, and a wide variety of architectural forms and shapes. This Zone should be located at specific locations along highways leading into the City. Uses: 1]-2-4: ALLOWED USES IN COMMERCTAL ZONES. Table 11-27-27: Allowed Uses in Commercial Zones P= permutted use. C] = admmistrative condihonal use. C2 = Board of Adjustment conditional use. C3 = City Couned conditional use. A blank denotes a use that is not allowed im that zone. "Indicates uses that are subject to specific land use provisions set forth in the Standards for Allowed Land Uses Section of this Chapter. Commercial Proposed Land Vie Clnnifeaon PB [66 a asceory Use, Srage Yao [| — Center, Indoor Amusement Center, Indoor Shooting Range* Aumsement Center, Outdoor* Anil Care Clinic a ‘Animal CaeFectig®§ ||P a a | Boarding RoomingHoue = /Rooming House Building Matenal, Garden and Farm Supplies \Cometery*# \Cometery*# a a [Commaiatoaealiy dpi [Day Canal pet SSSC*dS [Drinking Eibisimer ~———~SC~SSC*C“‘“‘CRSUSCOCSSCS [DrivedroughEsabimai* | PP ee CC [Dueling Acceap tai? +P SSC*iSO Dreline Maite SCE] TTCdS Eee eee ES [Drelins Frotae ———SCSC*iSCSC“‘CNS*SOUOCSC“‘#NCSWRSSS [Fstng Evatt ———~—SC*dSSC“‘“‘“RUSSCS Pd [Esing Esublsiment Lined [P| +P i [Finncil Intinins ————~SC*~dSCSCiSS*d [Entertsinment and CulwalFuciiies [P| P [P| P |? _| [Eaipment Sal ReatalandSenizes | ——~«| Si [Food rocesing.SeallSle | ——~+d| Si Ee CO [Hels Cue aniSochlSaxxes + Pd [Higher Education Centr———~—=sSSSC*iS [Home Occwati* ——~+|~—P«d| SP | SPST dT Pd = Page 4 of 5 F T Professional Service Planned Unit Development* Cc Pubbe Service Facility* Gc Publee Service Facility, Limited Proposed Land Use Classification Public Service Use Velucle Repair and Service (Ord. 3210, 8-23-18) (Ord. 3218, 9-13-18) (Ord. 3233, 12-20-18) (Ord 3277, 10-10-19) (Ord. 3358, 12-10-20) (Ord. 3451, 3-31-22) (Ord. 3574, 6-13-24) [re [cc | 1c | «ce | . SS a Recreation Vehicle Pa? Se Residential Cae Fait Oe SO Page 5 of 5 September 1, 2026 6:30 p.m. Planning Department City Annex Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Glen Ogden, Tia Panter, Forrest Ihler, Matthew Meehan, Marry Scales, Deanna Harger, Bill Scott. MEMBERS ABSENT: Dale Storer ALSO PRESENT: Assistant Planning Director Kerry Beutler, Caitlin Long Planner, Mike Thrower Planner; David Peterson Planner; Terry Rodino, Esq, City Attorney, and interested citizens. CALL TO ORDER: Ihler called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. MINUTES: Meehan moved to accept the minutes of August 4, 2026 with the correction to page 4, Scales seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Public Hearing: 1. ANX 26-007: ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING OF HC 2.23 ACRES in LOTS 2 AND 3 CARLYLE-ERMA SUBDIVISION DIVISION NO. 1. Applicant: No one appeared. Thrower presented the staff report, a part of the record. Ihler opened the public hearing. SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: No one appeared in support or opposition. Ihler closed the public hearing. No discussion. Scott moved to recommend to the Mayor and City Council approval of the Annexation and Initial Zoning of HC for 2.23 acres of Lots 2 and 3 Carlyle-Erma Subdivision Division No. 1. Meehan seconded the motion. Ihler called for roll call vote: Harger, yes; Meehan, yes; Ihler, yes; Scales, yes; Scott, yes; Ogden, yes. The motion passed unanimously ANNEXATION ORDINANCE – ZONING HC 2.2 ACRES LOTS 2 AND 3 CARLYLE-ERMA SUBDIVISION DIVISION NO. 1 PAGE 1 OF 4 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 2.2 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY WITH THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY AND STATE AUTHORITIES; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the lands described in Exhibit A of this Ordinance are contiguous and adjacent to the City limits of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho; and WHEREAS, such lands described herein are subject to annexation to the City pursuant to the provisions of Idaho Code Section 50-222, and other laws, as amended; and WHEREAS, the annexation of the lands described in Exhibit A is reasonably necessary to assure the orderly development of the City in order to allow efficient and economically viable provision of tax-supported and fee-supported municipal services; to enable the orderly development of private lands which benefit from a cost-effective availability of City services in urbanizing areas; and to equitably allocate the costs of City/public services in management of development on the City’s urban fringe; and WHEREAS, the City has authority to annex lands into the City pursuant to procedures of Idaho Code Section 50-222, as amended; and WHEREAS, any portion of a highway lying wholly or partially within the lands to be annexed are included in the lands annexed by this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the lands annexed by this Ordinance are not connected to the City only by a “shoestring” or a strip of land which comprises a railroad or right-of-way; and WHEREAS, all private landowners have consented to annexation of such lands, where necessary; and WHEREAS, City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan includes the area of annexation; and WHEREAS, after considering the written and oral comments of property owners whose lands would be annexed and other affected persons, City Council specifically makes the following findings: ANNEXATION ORDINANCE – ZONING HC 2.2 ACRES LOTS 2 AND 3 CARLYLE-ERMA SUBDIVISION DIVISION NO. 1 PAGE 2 OF 4 1) That the lands annexed meet the applicable requirements of Idaho Code Section 50-222 and do not fall within exceptions or conditional exceptions contained in Idaho Code Section 50-222; 2) The annexation is consistent with public purposes addressed in annexation and related plans prepared by the City; and 3) Annexation of the lands described in Section 1 are reasonably necessary for the orderly development of the City; and WHEREAS, it appears to the Council that the lands described herein below in Exhibit A of this Ordinance should be annexed to and become a part of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to exercise jurisdiction over the annexed lands in a way that promotes the orderly development of such lands; and WHEREAS, the City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan sets out policies and strategies designed to promote and sustain future growth within the City; and WHEREAS, such designation is consistent with policies and principles contained within the City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City desires the City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan Map to be amended to reflect the designation contained in this Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, as follows: SECTION 1. Annexation of Property. The lands described in Exhibit A are hereby annexed to the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho. SECTION 2. Amended Map and Legal Description. The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Bonneville County Auditor, Treasurer, and Assessor, within ten (10) days after the effective date hereof. The City Engineer shall, within ten (10) days after such effective date, file an amended legal description and map of the City, with the Bonneville County Recorder and Assessor and the Idaho State Tax Commission, all in accordance with Idaho Code Section 63-2215. SECTION 3. Findings. The findings contained in the recitals of this Ordinance be, and the same are hereby adopted as the official City Council findings for this Ordinance, and any further findings relative to this Ordinance shall be contained in the officially adopted Council minutes of the meeting in which this Ordinance was passed. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE – ZONING HC 2.2 ACRES LOTS 2 AND 3 CARLYLE-ERMA SUBDIVISION DIVISION NO. 1 PAGE 3 OF 4 SECTION 4. Savings and Severability Clause. The provisions and parts of this Ordinance are intended to be severable. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. SECTION 5. Publication. This Ordinance, or a summary thereof in compliance with Idaho Code, shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect immediately upon its passage, approval, and publication. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL AND APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2026. Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Lundquist, City Clerk (SEAL) STATE OF IDAHO ) : ss. County of Bonneville ) ANNEXATION ORDINANCE – ZONING HC 2.2 ACRES LOTS 2 AND 3 CARLYLE-ERMA SUBDIVISION DIVISION NO. 1 PAGE 4 OF 4 I, LINDA LUNDQUIST, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY: That the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Ordinance entitled: “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 2.2 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY WITH THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY AND STATE AUTHORITIES; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.” “A copy of the full text of the ordinance is available at City Hall” Linda Lundquist, City Clerk (SEAL) REASONED STATEMENT OF RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 2.2 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF BENTLEY WAY, EAST OF N WOODRUFF AVE, SOUTH OF LINCOLN RD, AND WEST OF QUAIL DR. WHEREAS, the applicant filed an application for annexation on July 16, 2026; and WHEREAS, this matter came before the Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission during a duly noticed public hearing on September 1, 2026; and WHEREAS, this matter came before the Idaho Falls City Council during a duly noticed public hearing on October 8, 2026; and WHEREAS, having reviewed the application, including all exhibits entered and having considered the issues presented: I. RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS 1. The City Council considered the request pursuant to City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan, City of Idaho Falls Zoning Ordinance, City of Idaho Falls Subdivision Ordinance, the Local Land Use Planning Act, and other applicable development regulations. 2. The property is approximately 2.2 acres generally located north of Bentley Way, east of N Woodruff Ave, south of Lincoln Rd, and west of Quail Dr. 3. This property is in the Area of Impact and included in the Comprehensive Plan Map. 4. The property is contiguous to City limits along the north and west property lines. 5. The annexation was initiated by the property owner. 6. City utilities are in the vicinity of this property. 7. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Industrial. 8. Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of annexation. 9. The proposed annexation is consistent with the principles of the Comprehensive Plan. II. DECISION Based on the above Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria, the City Council of the City of Idaho Falls approved the annexation as presented. PASSED BY CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS THIS ______ DAY OF ____________, 2026 _____________________________________ Lisa Burtenshaw – Mayor NOTICE The Applicant or any affected person seeking judicial review of the compliance of this Reasoned Statement with the provisions of Idaho Code § 67-6535 must first seek reconsideration of this Reasoned Statement within fourteen (14) days by filing a request to reconsider pursuant in compliance with Idaho Code 67-6535. In addition, the above Applicant has the right to request a regulatory taking analysis pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003. ORDINANCE – ZONING HC, LOTS 2 AND 3 CARLYLE-ERMA SUBDIVISION DIVISION NO. 1 PAGE 1 OF 3 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE INITIAL ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 2.2 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE AS HC, HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the proposed initial zoning district of lands described in Exhibit A is HC, Highway Commercial for such annexed lands is consistent with the current City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan Land use designation “Mixed Use Centers and Corridors”; and WHEREAS, the proposed zoning district is consistent and compatible with the existing and surrounding zoning districts and is consistent with principles of the City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, the Council desires to designate the lands within the area of annexation as “Mixed Use Centers and Corridors”; and WHEREAS, Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on September 1, 2026, and recommended approval of zoning the subject property to HC; and WHEREAS, the Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing and passed a motion to approve this zoning on October 8, 2026. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Comprehensive Plan Designation. The area described in Exhibit A are hereby given a Comprehensive Plan designation of Mixed Use Centers and Corridors. SECTION 2: Legal Description. The lands described in Exhibit A are hereby zoned as HC, Highway Commercial. SECTION 3. Zoning. The property described in Section 1 of this Ordinance be and the same hereby is zoned “HC, Highway Commercial ” and the City Planner is hereby ordered to make the necessary amendments to the official maps of the City of Idaho Falls which are on file at the City Planning Department Offices, 680 Park Avenue. SECTION 4. Savings and Severability Clause. The provisions and parts of this Ordinance are intended to be severable. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, ORDINANCE – ZONING HC, LOTS 2 AND 3 CARLYLE-ERMA SUBDIVISION DIVISION NO. 1 PAGE 2 OF 3 clause or phrase of this Ordinance. SECTION 5. Publication. This Ordinance, or a summary thereof in compliance with Idaho Code, shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect immediately upon its passage, approval, and publication. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication. PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, this day of , 2026. CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO ATTEST: Lisa Burtenshaw, Mayor Linda Lundquist, City Clerk (SEAL) STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss: County of Bonneville ) ORDINANCE – ZONING HC, LOTS 2 AND 3 CARLYLE-ERMA SUBDIVISION DIVISION NO. 1 PAGE 3 OF 3 I, LINDA LUNDQUIST, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY: That the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Ordinance entitled, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE INITIAL ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 2.2 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE AS HC, HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.” “A copy of the full text of the ordinance is available at City Hall” Linda Lundquist, City Clerk (SEAL) REASONED STATEMENT OF RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS INITIAL ZONING OF HC, HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL, APPROXIMATELY 2.2 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF BENTLEY WAY, EAST OF N WOODRUFF AVE, SOUTH OF LINCOLN RD, AND WEST OF QUAIL DR. WHEREAS, the applicant filed an application for annexation on July 16, 2026; and WHEREAS, this matter came before the Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission during a duly noticed public hearing on September 1, 2026; and WHEREAS, this matter came before the Idaho Falls City Council during a duly noticed public hearing on October 8, 2026; and WHEREAS, having reviewed the application, including all exhibits entered and having considered the issues presented: I. RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS 1. The City Council considered the request pursuant to City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan, City of Idaho Falls Zoning Ordinance, City of Idaho Falls Subdivision Ordinance, the Local Land Use Planning Act, and other applicable development regulations. 2. The property is approximately 2.2 acres Generally located north of Bentley Way, east of N Woodruff Ave, south of Lincoln Rd, and west of Quail Dr. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Mixed Use Centers and Corridors. 3. The proposed zoning consists of 2.2 acres of HC, Highway Commercial. The proposed zone is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and existing zoning and land uses in the area. 4. Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the HC, Highway Commercial. II. DECISION Based on the above Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria, the City Council of the City of Idaho Falls approved the initial zoning as presented. PASSED BY CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS THIS ______ DAY OF ____________, 2026 _____________________________________ Lisa Burtenshaw – Mayor NOTICE The Applicant or any affected person seeking judicial review of the compliance of this Reasoned Statement with the provisions of Idaho Code § 67-6535 must first seek reconsideration of this Reasoned Statement within fourteen (14) days by filing a request to reconsider pursuant in compliance with Idaho Code 67-6535. In addition, the above Applicant has the right to request a regulatory taking analysis pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003. Memorandum File #: 26-380 City Council DATE: Thursday, September 24, 2026 AGENDA: Regular FROM: Wade Sanner, Director DEPARTMENT: Community Development Services Title Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing - Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, Higham Riverfront Townhomes. N/A Ordinance N/A Resolution YES Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing N/A Legislative Public Hearing N/A Confirmation/Consent/Acceptance YES Approval/Authorization/Ratification Action(s) Requested: 1. Approve the Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Higham Riverfront Townhomes as presented (or take other action deemed appropriate). 2. Approve the Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Planned Unit Development for Higham Riverfront Townhomes and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate). Description, Background Information, Purpose: Attached is the application for the PUD and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for Higham Riverfront Townhomes. On August 4, 2026, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the PUD to the Mayor and City Council with the condition of additional enhanced vegetation, up to 16 trees as to be negotiated with the Parks Department along the northern buffer and/or to the southwest portion of the property. This PUD was reviewed by CDS Planning staff as well as staff from Fire, Idaho Falls Power, Parks and Recreation, the Public Works Water, Wastewater, Sanitation, and Engineering/Survey Divisions. This item has been reviewed by the City’s Legal & Municipal Services Departments. City of Idaho Falls Printed on 10/6/2026 Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Se Oe a ae PUD26-003 Higham Riverfront To ‘SI Sv peideooe sue suey |BUIJ JeUMC PU = slo;pequcoqns ‘oes ayy Yat feos Suewses ood SU 10 AMET IV S “Teouu 10 o9qyry Ue 10} Panioses S9OAOS Aue WO\ed OU ju S909 Sunyeia ua “p5}0U And ssejUn yalosd si 40) SuuBeubvg feoUII6/3 40 EB ico} [ROUEYIAYY TEINJINAS AID AU Ui ]UAWEAOAUI OU PEY SPY SeaIAlES BuNseIQ — < x q payed Va @ Jo uojoeup ay) Japun paredesd useq eney sue aseu, Woueisoss0 ava rer frm 8 2g Ss ‘o fo} [o) ZS € xy Q's ol|= «£ o|F 2 Elec s o 3 £ $ ce £ £ ns RE sels Bs a ae Be Pais Oo Sia oO. Bl x I @ Fale Qa Sie ice sis] /2 gor al’ Z @| 8) 0/8 a ks af- zi 4 o/s el3 a | 7 ae Z| SB} ac] & & a g | S| t g J a TS iisle|s o | g 1 4 fl} }¢ | s| |= WSReE Ses t 6 t 6 T | BBS 9 Fretted pate z8ee Spelfa sae pals 2p) TTT TT TTT gees Se py Ty SENE a a — a ei 8 g S % 8 = Mm, 3 Y% \ | 0%, o, > oy <4 I | | \ | | Tt T i. TTT i - J my wal th 7 tet py? Mt [pp Hoop R Hy PS, bef my c 2 o > a im < 2 irs my Cc 2 o > o ih lu : | ra eae i pannees Ph int c ei tine - tH porate EES, pH Fat re SP i J etree laa a Peas, 7 fle rdbectia artis hs | irl eens 7) (a COOcoe 1 CoO id a. a a el 7 , The plans are the joint property of B'n'R Drafting and the Client. They are not to be reproduced or to be used for any construction except by express written consent by one of the owning parties. B'n'R Drafting assumes no labilly beyond the production of these plans. AI information contained has been exclusively provided by the client and are accepted as is. 5"/ 12" UPPER DBL TOP PLATE ——J ~ 20° 10 3/4" UPPER FLOOR A 11°- 93/4" © DBL TOP PLATE a OO 10"/ 12" _ 10" / 12" 10"/ 12" _ 10" / 12" = 10"/ 12" Jo —MAINFLQOR 6 ¢ ) ROOF CONTOUR di T.O. CONCRETE. oo 10"/ 12" 4410" / 12" —_ GARAGE FTG oD Right Elevation ——— g § 8 = UPPER DBL TOP Ss _ _ PLATE 2 20'- 10 3/4" ‘Al Lablty fortis project remains soley withthe contacter, subcontractors ‘and Owner. Final Plans are accepted AS IS. These plans have been prepared UPPER FLOOR 11°- 9 3/4" _ _ DBL TOP PLATE z 70'-3" 2 E ‘ 3 . it a 5 _ 7 _ MAIN FLOOR 1-2" Fe 1.0. CONGRETE_@ 7 ie — _ GARAGE FTG. a Gi ccna lec era neecdani torn epenacenseaataeannceraeaca mean Shae) ” 4 Plex Townhomes & ELEVATION! Ss a 1993 arene |W 12 Mar 2024_|| FoR Riverfront Condo , st D DRAVIN BY: RRS J!) +O" Idaho Falls, ID 83401 - ( 2 ) Left Elevation oO 208-589-8383 A6.1 1h OP services@bnrdrafting.com || PROT 2309123 Idaho Falls, Idaho : The plans are the joint property of B'n'R Drafting and the Client. They are not to be reproduced or to be used for any construction except by express written consent by one of the owning parties. B'n'R Drafting assumes no labilly beyond the production of these plans. AI information contained has been exclusively provided by the client and are accepted as is. ( ) FRONT LEFT | 7 | 7, ol | ATLA | at ; MLPORANWEY 10 LT mi These plans have been prepared under the direction of a ADA Certified Dialer to approved cratting practices. All information contained in these plans have been provided by the customer and has been accepted as is, Bn’ Dratting Services has had no involvement inthe Civ, Structural, Mechanical or Electrical Engineering for this project unless exolicily noted. B'n'R Dralting ‘Services will nat perform any services reserved for an Architect or Engineer. ‘All Liability for this project remains solely withthe contractor, subcontractors ‘and Owner. Final Plans are accepted AS IS. fis HAE FRONT CENTER aes ©) 11 3 ce g Pi if iro > I i 0 0 ira | I — 7 °, 4 Plex Townhomes fo _ seca n arene | t2 Mar 2024 _|| FO? Riverfront Condo PERSPECTIVE Idaho Falls, ID 83401 DRAWN BY: RRS 7 ——) o — ONG earicesoreinen | PER 200129 Idaho Falls, Idaho AZ The plans are the joint property of B'n'R Drafting and the Client. They are not to be reproduced or to be used for any construction except by express written consent by one of the owning parties. B'n'R Drafting assumes no labilly beyond the production of these plans. AI information contained has been exclusively provided by the client and are accepted as is. ‘SI Sv peideooe sue suey |BUIJ JeUMC PU = slo;pequcoqns ‘oes ayy Yat feos Suewses ood SU 10 AMET IV S “Teouu 10 o9qyry Ue 10} Panioses S9OAOS Aue WO\ed OU ju S909 Sunyeia ua “p5}0U And ssejUn yalosd si 40) SuuBeubvg feoUII6/3 40 EB ico} [ROUEYIAYY TEINJINAS AID AU Ui ]UAWEAOAUI OU PEY SPY SeaIAlES BuNseIQ — < x q payed Va @ Jo uojoeup ay) Japun paredesd useq eney sue aseu, Woueisoss0 ava rer frm 8 2g Ss ‘o fo} [o) ZS € xy Q's ol|= «£ o|F 2 Elec s o 3 £ $ ce £ £ ns RE sels Bs a ae Be Pais Oo Sia oO. Bl x I @ Fale Qa Sie ice sis] /2 gor al’ Z @| 8) 0/8 a ks af- zi 4 o/s el3 a | 7 ae Z| SB} ac] & & a g | S| t g J a TS iisle|s o | g 1 4 fl} }¢ | s| |= WSReE Ses t 6 t 6 T | BBS 9 Fretted pate z8ee Spelfa sae pals 2p) TTT TT TTT gees Se py Ty SENE a a — a ei 8 g S % 8 = Mm, 3 Y% \ | 0%, o, > oy <4 I | | \ | | Tt T i. TTT i - J my wal th 7 tet py? Mt [pp Hoop R Hy PS, bef my c 2 o > a im < 2 irs my Cc 2 o > o ih lu : | ra eae i pannees Ph int c ei tine - tH porate EES, pH Fat re SP i J etree laa a Peas, 7 fle rdbectia artis hs | irl eens 7) (a COOcoe 1 CoO id a. a a el 7 , The plans are the joint property of B'n'R Drafting and the Client. They are not to be reproduced or to be used for any construction except by express written consent by one of the owning parties. B'n'R Drafting assumes no labilly beyond the production of these plans. AI information contained has been exclusively provided by the client and are accepted as is. 5"/ 12" UPPER DBL TOP PLATE ——J ~ 20° 10 3/4" UPPER FLOOR A 11°- 93/4" © DBL TOP PLATE a OO 10"/ 12" _ 10" / 12" 10"/ 12" _ 10" / 12" = 10"/ 12" Jo —MAINFLQOR 6 ¢ ) ROOF CONTOUR di T.O. CONCRETE. oo 10"/ 12" 4410" / 12" —_ GARAGE FTG oD Right Elevation ——— g § 8 = UPPER DBL TOP Ss _ _ PLATE 2 20'- 10 3/4" ‘Al Lablty fortis project remains soley withthe contacter, subcontractors ‘and Owner. Final Plans are accepted AS IS. These plans have been prepared UPPER FLOOR 11°- 9 3/4" _ _ DBL TOP PLATE z 70'-3" 2 E ‘ 3 . it a 5 _ 7 _ MAIN FLOOR 1-2" Fe 1.0. CONGRETE_@ 7 ie — _ GARAGE FTG. a Gi ccna lec era neecdani torn epenacenseaataeannceraeaca mean Shae) ” 4 Plex Townhomes & ELEVATION! Ss a 1993 arene |W 12 Mar 2024_|| FoR Riverfront Condo , st D DRAVIN BY: RRS J!) +O" Idaho Falls, ID 83401 - ( 2 ) Left Elevation oO 208-589-8383 A6.1 1h OP services@bnrdrafting.com || PROT 2309123 Idaho Falls, Idaho : The plans are the joint property of B'n'R Drafting and the Client. They are not to be reproduced or to be used for any construction except by express written consent by one of the owning parties. B'n'R Drafting assumes no labilly beyond the production of these plans. AI information contained has been exclusively provided by the client and are accepted as is. ( ) FRONT LEFT | 7 | 7, ol | ATLA | at ; MLPORANWEY 10 LT mi These plans have been prepared under the direction of a ADA Certified Dialer to approved cratting practices. All information contained in these plans have been provided by the customer and has been accepted as is, Bn’ Dratting Services has had no involvement inthe Civ, Structural, Mechanical or Electrical Engineering for this project unless exolicily noted. B'n'R Dralting ‘Services will nat perform any services reserved for an Architect or Engineer. ‘All Liability for this project remains solely withthe contractor, subcontractors ‘and Owner. Final Plans are accepted AS IS. fis HAE FRONT CENTER aes ©) 11 3 ce g Pi if iro > I i 0 0 ira | I — 7 °, 4 Plex Townhomes fo _ seca n arene | t2 Mar 2024 _|| FO? Riverfront Condo PERSPECTIVE Idaho Falls, ID 83401 DRAWN BY: RRS 7 ——) o — ONG earicesoreinen | PER 200129 Idaho Falls, Idaho AZ The plans are the joint property of B'n'R Drafting and the Client. They are not to be reproduced or to be used for any construction except by express written consent by one of the owning parties. B'n'R Drafting assumes no labilly beyond the production of these plans. AI information contained has been exclusively provided by the client and are accepted as is. 12' 12' 12' 20' 26' 26' 10' 3' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 13 12 11 10 9 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 26 25 24 23 26' 15' 15' 15' 34.9' 20.2' EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX 8" W EX 8" W EX 8" W EX 6" W EX 6" W EX 6" W EX 6" W EX 6" W EX 6" W EX 6" W EX 6" W EX 6" W EX 6" W EX 6" W EX 6" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS 21.2' 15' 26.4' W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS W W W W W W W W SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD 12' 36.8' HIGHAM STREET PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY W N E S Scale: 1" = 30' 30 0 30 60 90 SHEET NO. PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1. The address shall be posted and maintained on every job site prior to and during construction. NO ADDRESS = NO INSPECTION. 2. A Site Plan including a completed City review block shall be on the job site at all times during construction. 3. Any changes to this site plan shall be submitted to the City of Idaho Falls Community Development Services Department for approval prior to construction. 4. Failure to comply with the requirements of this plan may result in the City withholding building permits, certificates of occupancy, water or electrical service. 5. Approval of the City Engineer is required for any proposed construction within a public right-of-way or easement and shall be in accordance with the current City of Idaho Falls Standard Drawings and Specifications . 6. A City of Idaho Falls Public Works License is required for any contractor working in a public right-of-way or easement. 7. A Public Right-of-Way Use Permit is required for any work in any public right-of-way or easement. The City Engineering Division must be notified at least two (2) days prior to any excavation under this permit (208-612-8250). 8. Placing Concrete within the public right-of-way requires inspection and approval by the City Engineering Division. The Division shall be notified at least four (4) hours prior to placing (208-612-8250). 9. All Driveway Approaches shall be concrete and meet the requirements of the current City of Idaho Falls Standard Specifications and Drawings. All driveways and parking areas shall be hard surface. 10. Replace all broken or poor quality curb, gutter, and sidewalk. 11. Remove all unused driveway approaches and replace with standard full height curb, gutter and sidewalk. 12. A Licensed Idaho Professional Engineer shall inspect, certify to City Standards, and prepare "As-built" drawings for all Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Main Lines. 13. All Water Service Lines less than four (4) inches and Sanitary Service Lines less than eight (8) inches shall be inspected by the City Wastewater Division prior to backfilling (208-612-8108). All 4" and larger taps to existing City water mains shall be inspected by the City Water Division (208-612-8471) prior to backfilling. Verification of a passing bacteria test for the installation of all new water mains 4" and larger in diameter must be submitted to the City Engineering Division prior to placing mains into service. 14. Pursuant to IDAPA 58.01.08, all new construction shall install provisions for a water meter to capture domestic and landscape irrigation uses. Provisions shall be installed per City of Idaho Falls Standard Drawings and Specifications - Drawings IF-401A through IF-401F. Water meters are required on all non-residential construction as well as common landscaped areas. Residential construction must install an idler in place of water meter. Meters or idlers must be on approved material list and may be purchased from the Water Division warehouse (208-612-8474). 15. Fire flow and access road requirements for commercial buildings are based on building construction type, height, and total square footage of all floors. This information must be provided on the site plan. 16. Private fire service water mains shall be installed by a city licensed fire sprinkler contractor. Fire service mains must be tested and approved by the Fire Marshal prior to backfilling. 17. All Electrical Facilities, including new services or the relocating of existing, shall be in accordance with the current Idaho Falls Power Service Policy. Service Policy available at I.F.P. office or I.F.P. website. The developer must submit two (2) copies of these plans directly to Idaho Falls Power for the design and/or approval of electric service. Contact Idaho Falls Power prior to construction of electrical facilities (612-8430). 18. All single-family attached dwellings shall have separate electrical, water, and sewer service lines without any common facilities. 19. Appropriate erosion and sediment control requirements associated with construction shall be shown on the Site Plan or a separate attached plan. 20. In compliance with Idaho Code § 55-1613 a field search and location survey has been conducted under the direction of a professional land surveyor prior to this project's construction. 21. Construction within the Public Right-of-Way shall be in compliance with City of Idaho Falls Traffic Control Policy. PHONE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS SITE PLAN APPROVAL Date FILE NO. SCALE: of SITE PLAN CONTACT PERSON NAME ADDRESS DATE PLOTTED: SITE PLAN NAME AND ADDRESS (See Note #1) Revision 8/2025 REVIEW NO.: NOTES SEWER FRONT FOOTAGE _____________ FT. WATER FRONT FOOTAGE _____________ FT. ENGINEERING DEPT. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: Stamp 1 Approved City of Idaho Falls SEWER CONNECTIONS__________________ EACH WATER CONNECTIONS _________________ SIZE/EACH IRRIGATION CONNECTIONS _____________ SIZE/EACH WATER CONNECTIONS _________________ SIZE/EACH ENGINEERING DEPT. PROJECT LOCATION VICINITY MAP A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SITUATED WITHIN THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO, BEING COMPRISED OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, PARK VILLAGE #1, PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 37 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO. TYLER PRIDEMORE 3445 ANTELOPE DRIVE, SUITE 200, SYRACUSE, UT 84075 (539) 777 - 4152 HIGHAM RIVERFRONT TOWNHOMES 1" = 30' G. DAY T. PRIDEMORE 9/4/2026 3 4 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - CONCEPT PLAN HIGHAM RIVERFRONT TOWNHOMES LOCATED IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 37 EAST, BOISE PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO 3445 ANTELOPE DRIVE, ST 200 SYRACUSE, UT 84075 PH: 801.664.4724 EM: THOMAS@HUNTDAY.CO HUNT DAY E N G I N E E R I N G 401 401 41 / 1-IN 41 / 4-IN EX OHP x" SS EX x" SS x" W EX x" W SD PROPERTY LINE CENTERLINE ADJACENT LOT LINE EXIST. CONTOUR MAJOR EXIST. CONTOUR MINOR 4355 4355 EX OVERHEAD POWER EX CULINARY WATER CULINARY WATER EX SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER STORM DRAIN SHEET LEGEND SHEET KEYNOTES # 1. PEDESTRIAN RAMP 2. TIRE STOPS WHERE PARKING ABUT A PEDESTRIAN WAY 3. REMOVE EXISTING UTILITY PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION CONCRETE PAVEMENT ASPHALT PAVEMENT x" PI DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION STREET LANDSCAPE BUFFER SITE LANDSCAPING SITE INFORMATION ADDRESS - 1315 HIGHAM ST, IDAHO FALLS ,83402 ZONING - MIXED RESIDENTIAL (R2) SIZE OF FOOTPRINT - 50' x 21'-3" (INSIDE UNIT) 50' x 22'-3" (CORNER UNIT) BUILDING HEIGHT - 31' 1" (TWO STORIES) BUILDING CODE - 2020 IDAHO RESIDENTIAL CODE (NON-SPRINKLED) BUILDING HEIGHT - 31' 1" (TWO STORIES) UNIT COUNT - 10 TOTAL BUILDINGS (41 UNITS) AMENITIES · COMMUNITY GARDEN · DOG PLAY AREA WITH STEP-IN DOG WASH ENTRANCE REQUIREMENTS A SECOND ACCESS TO PRIVATE DRIVE AS SHOWN HEREON IS REQUIRED FOR DEVELOPMENT OVER 30 UNITS. SURVEY NOTE THIS SITE PLAN CONFORMS WITH AN ACTUAL SURVEY THAT WAS PERFORMED ON THE GROUND BY A LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED BY THE STATE OF IDAHO. THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE SURVEY ARE SHOWN HEREON WITH BEARINGS AND DISTANCES. IT IS THE OWNER'S/DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONSTRUCT ALL STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THIS SITE PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID SURVEY. IRRIGATION NOTE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDES NO WATER RIGHTS; IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL UTILIZE EXISTING CULINARY WATER INFRASTRUCTURE FOR DISTRIBUTION. SETBACK REQUIREMENT MINIMUM SETBACKS PER IDAHO FALLS ZONING REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 3, TABLE 11-3-3, R2 ZONE : · FRONT : 20' · BACK : 25' · SIDE : 6' THESE SETBACKS APPLY TO RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES MINIMUM STREET LANDSCAPE BUFFERS PER SECTION (8) (C) (I) AND (II) : · PUBLIC STREETS: 20' (EXCEPT AS NOTED) · PRIVATE DRIVES: 10' (EXCEPT AS NOTED) PARKING COUNTS GARAGE PARKING - 82 GARAGE STALLS PROVIDED (2 STALLS PER UNIT) OFF-STREET PARKING - 10 STALLS PROVIDED TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED - 92 PUD REQUIREMENTS SUBSECTION (10) PROVIDE AT LEAST 1 AMENITY GIVEN 73 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS. AMENITIES OPTIONS INCLUDE PRIVATE OR PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, PLAZAS, PEDESTRIAN PATHS, OR DRAINAGE FACILITY WITH ADDITIONAL AMENITIES. SEE SAID SUBSECTION FOR MORE DETAILS. SEE SECTION 11-6-3 FOR APPLICATION PROCEDURES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NOTES ALL STREETS AND PARKING AREA INSIDE P.U.D. WILL BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED AND OPERATED. ALL EASEMENTS INSIDE P.U.D. ARE CONSIDERED PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS, SEE SHEET 2 FOR PROVIDED WIDTHS. POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER WILL BE INSTALLED IN A 30' WIDE P.U.E FOR CITY MAINTENANCE. STRUCTURES, INCLUDING ALL PROJECTIONS AND FOOTINGS, SHALL NOT ENCROACH INTO THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.). OR OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARY OF THE INDIVIDUALLY PLATTED LOTS. IDAHO FALLS POWER NOTES ADDITIONAL UTILITY EASEMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED. FINAL EASEMENT LOCATIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON RECEIPT OF THE IDAHO FALLS POWER CONTRACTOR MAP, TO BE PROVIDED AT A LATER DATE. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE SUBJECT TO ADJUSTMENT BASED ON THE FINAL POWER DISTRIBUTION DESIGN AS APPROVED BY IDAHO FALLS POWER. SANITATION NOTE REFUSE CONTAINERS SHALL BE PLACED AT CURBSIDE PER CITY OF IDAHO FALLS COLLECTION STANDARDS. SIDE-LOAD COLLECTION VEHICLES ARE UTILIZED; ADEQUATE CONTAINER CLEARANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. CULINARY WATER 6' MINIMUM COVER REQUIRED FOR ALL CULINARY WATER MAINS & LATERALS CULINARY WATER MAIN - DUCTILE IRON PIPE CULINARY WATER LATERALS - 1" CTS POLY PIPE AND METER REQUIRED PER UNIT RIVERFRONT LUXURY TOWNHOMES ACCESS NOTE LOTS 25, 26 & 27 OF THE RIVERFRONT LUXURY TOWNHOMES, DIVISION NO. 1 WILL BE AFFECTED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE DIRECT ACCESS TO THE PRIVATE DRIVE AS SHOWN HEREON. DISCUSSIONS HAVE BEEN INITIATED WITH THE DEVELOPER, WITH FINAL ACCESS BEING ADDRESSED IN A FUTURE SUBMITTAL. BASIS OF BEARING ALL MEASURED BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON RELATE DIRECTLY TO THE "CITY OF IDAHO FALLS COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 2004", WHICH IS DERIVED FROM THE IDAHO STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (EAST ZONE 1101) US SURVEY FEET AND USING A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.000277265 FOR A GRID TO GROUND CONVERSION, [REFERENCE FRAME NAD_83(2011), EPOCH 2010.0000]. THE SYSTEM ORIENTATION IS BASED ON GRID NORTH ALONG THE EAST ZONE CENTRAL MERIDIAN. NO CONVERGENCE ANGLE HAS BEEN APPLIED SHEET INDEX 1 OF 4 - CONCEPT PLAN 2 OF 4 - EASEMENT LAYOUT 3 OF 4 - LANDSCAPE PLAN 4 OF 4 - PHASING PLAN 1141 SQ FT / 0.026 AC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE VACATED CREEK WILLOW FORK NORTH EX ASPHALT PAVEMENT PRIVATE STREET PRIVATE STREET PRIVATE STREET DOG PLAY AREA COMMUNITY GARDEN EX SS LAT EX SS LAT EX SS LAT EX SS LAT EX SS LAT EX SS LAT 1 NOT TO SCALE PRIVATE STREET SECTION 13' 13' ℄ 30' ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT 4' APRON LANDSCAPE 15' 15' 3" - ASPHALT PLANTMIX PAVEMENT 6" - 3/4" AGGREGATE BASE 12" - UNCRUSHED AGGREGATE SUBBASE 2' ROLLED CURB AND GUTTER PER ISPWC STANDARD DRAWING NO. SD-702 EX BLDG EX BLDG EX BLDG 1 1 2 PUD MAINTENANCE NOTE PROPERTY OWNER OR HOA SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE FOLLOWING: GREEN SPACES, COMMUNITY GARDEN, DOG PLAY AREA, SIDEWALK, LANDSCAPE STRIP, CURB, AND GUTTER ALONG ROW. REQUESTED VARIANCES 1. INDIVIDUALLY PLATTED LOTS THAT FRONT A PRIVATE STREET. 2. REDUCE 20' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG PUBLIC STREETS TO 15'. WHERE A PORTION OF THE BUILDING EXTENDS BEYOND THE 15' BUFFER, THAT AREA IS EXCLUDED FROM COMMON SPACE CALCULATIONS UNTIL REACHING 20'. THIS REDUCTION IS OFFSET BY PRIVATE BALCONIES INTEGRATED INTO THE STRUCTURE, PROXIMITY AND CONNECTIVITY TO FREEMAN PARK AND THE RIVER WALK, ENHANCED LANDSCAPING TO BUFFER DOG PLAY AREA FROM NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, 11 TREES PLACED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, AND ADDITIONAL PROVIDED AMENITY 3. ESTABLISH A 12' PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST SIDES OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH INCLUDES A REDUCTION FROM THE REQUIRED 25' REAR SETBACK. THIS REDUCTION IS OFFSET BY PRIVATE BALCONIES INTEGRATED INTO THE STRUCTURE, PROXIMITY AND CONNECTIVITY TO FREEMAN PARK AND THE RIVER WALK, ENHANCED LANDSCAPING TO BUFFER DOG PLAY AREA FROM NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, 11 TREES PLACED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, AND ADDITIONAL PROVIDED AMENITY 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 STORMWATER NOTES TOTAL PARCEL AREA - 199,032 SQ. FT. (HIGHAM RIVERFRONT TOWNHOMES + PREV. DEVELOPMENT) HEIGHT OF WATER DURING STORM - 1.33 INCHES / 0.1108 FT PER PEAK HOUR STORMWATER CALCULATIONS · QP=I*A QP=(PEAK FLOW (CUFT/HR), I=RAIN INTENSITY (FT/HR), A=AREA OF MATERIAL (SQFT) · TOTAL VOLUME IS CALCULATED ASSUMING NO LOCATIONS ON SITE ARE PERMEABLE WITH NO REDUCTIONS. · (117,679 + 81353) * 0.1108 = 22,052 REQUIRED VOLUME : 22,052 CU. FT PROVIDED VOLUME : 22,052 CU. FT STORMWATER WILL BE RETAINED ON-SITE IN AN EXISTING INFILTRATION TRENCH, CONSTRUCTED WITH THE PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT, THAT HAS BEEN SIZED TO ACCOMMODATE BOTH DEVELOPMENTS. EXISTING EASEMENT NOTE IT IS THE INTENTION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT TO REPLACE THE EXISTING EASEMENTS GRANTED BY THE PARK VILLAGE ADDITION DIVISION NO 1 SUBDIVISION, (NOT SHOWN), WITH NEW EASEMENTS USING THE PROCESS OUTLINED IN I.C. §50-1306A(5) TO VACATE THE EXISTING PLATTED EASEMENTS. EASEMENT FOR HYDRANT FLUSH HYDRANT FLUSH HYDRANT STUB FOR POTENTIAL TRAIL CONNECTION TO THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. FUTURE CONTINUATION ON ADJACENT LAND IS AT THE DISCRETION OF THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNER. COMMON SPACE REQUIREMENT TOTAL SITE AREA 117,130 SQ FT MINUS THE FOLLOWING: 23,305 SQ FT 6,995 SQ FT 45,454 SQ FT N / A 11,549 SQ FT N / A TOTAL AREA DEDUCTED 87,303 SQ FT COMMON SPACE AREA PROVIDED (MINIUMUM OF 25% OF GROSS AREA) 29,827 SQ FT INTERNAL LANDSCAPED AREA, EXCLUDING REQUIRED BUFFERS 29,827 SQ FT TREES REQUIRED / PROVIDED (1 PER 5,000 SQ FT OF INTERNAL LANDSCAPED AREA) 6 / 6 SHRUBS REQUIRED / PROVIDED (2 REQUIRED PER TREE) 12 / 12 PUBLIC STREET TREES REQUIRED / PROVIDED (1 TREE PER 30 LINEAR FEET) 300 TOTAL LF 10 / 14 PRIVATE STREET TREES REQUIRED / PROVIDED (1 TREE PER 40 LINEAR FEET - EXCLUDING DRIVEWAYS) 728 TOTAL LF 19 / 19 TOTAL TREES REQUIRED / PROVIDED (INCLUDING REQUIRED DOG PARK BUFFERING) 47 / 58 AREA FOR THE STREETS AREA FOR THE DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING AREA FOR SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET REQUIRED BUFFER AREAS {REQUIRED BUFFERS ALONG PERIMETER PUBLIC STREETS (20') AND INTERNAL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETS (10'), REQUIRED PERIMETER BUFFER AREAS ADJACENT TO SINGLE UNIT DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR DRAINAGE FACILITY NOT INCLUDING AN AMENITY AREA FOR THE RESIDENCES LOTS 25, 26, AND 27 OF RIVERFRONT LUXURY TOWNHOMES, DIVISION NO. 1, ARE AFFECTED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT. A CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENT ACROSS THESE LOTS IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE DIRECT ACCESS TO THE PRIVATE DRIVE. PROPOSED STORM WATER EASEMENT TO BE GRANTED TO RIVERFRONT LUXURY TOWNHOMES EX SS LAT 09-04-2026 S89°51'21"E 98.09' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 13 12 11 10 9 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 12' 15' 15' 26 25 24 23 EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX 8" W EX 8" W EX 8" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS SS SS SS 30' 30' 30' 10' 12.2' CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS W W W W W W W W SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD 30' 12' 30' N89°56'29"W 450.85' S10°07'23"E 279.31' S89°57'15"E 197.41' R=20.00' L=15.42' Δ=44°10'58" CH=N69°03'41"E 15.04' R=50.00' L=77.48' Δ=88°46'58" CH=N89°46'26"E 69.96' R=20.00' L=15.86' Δ=45°25'51" CH=S67°32'53"E 15.45' S89°59'27"E 105.57' N0°06'20"E 274.92' W N E S Scale: 1" = 30' 30 0 30 60 90 SHEET NO. PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1. The address shall be posted and maintained on every job site prior to and during construction. NO ADDRESS = NO INSPECTION. 2. A Site Plan including a completed City review block shall be on the job site at all times during construction. 3. Any changes to this site plan shall be submitted to the City of Idaho Falls Community Development Services Department for approval prior to construction. 4. Failure to comply with the requirements of this plan may result in the City withholding building permits, certificates of occupancy, water or electrical service. 5. Approval of the City Engineer is required for any proposed construction within a public right-of-way or easement and shall be in accordance with the current City of Idaho Falls Standard Drawings and Specifications . 6. A City of Idaho Falls Public Works License is required for any contractor working in a public right-of-way or easement. 7. A Public Right-of-Way Use Permit is required for any work in any public right-of-way or easement. The City Engineering Division must be notified at least two (2) days prior to any excavation under this permit (208-612-8250). 8. Placing Concrete within the public right-of-way requires inspection and approval by the City Engineering Division. The Division shall be notified at least four (4) hours prior to placing (208-612-8250). 9. All Driveway Approaches shall be concrete and meet the requirements of the current City of Idaho Falls Standard Specifications and Drawings. All driveways and parking areas shall be hard surface. 10. Replace all broken or poor quality curb, gutter, and sidewalk. 11. Remove all unused driveway approaches and replace with standard full height curb, gutter and sidewalk. 12. A Licensed Idaho Professional Engineer shall inspect, certify to City Standards, and prepare "As-built" drawings for all Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Main Lines. 13. All Water Service Lines less than four (4) inches and Sanitary Service Lines less than eight (8) inches shall be inspected by the City Wastewater Division prior to backfilling (208-612-8108). All 4" and larger taps to existing City water mains shall be inspected by the City Water Division (208-612-8471) prior to backfilling. Verification of a passing bacteria test for the installation of all new water mains 4" and larger in diameter must be submitted to the City Engineering Division prior to placing mains into service. 14. Pursuant to IDAPA 58.01.08, all new construction shall install provisions for a water meter to capture domestic and landscape irrigation uses. Provisions shall be installed per City of Idaho Falls Standard Drawings and Specifications - Drawings IF-401A through IF-401F. Water meters are required on all non-residential construction as well as common landscaped areas. Residential construction must install an idler in place of water meter. Meters or idlers must be on approved material list and may be purchased from the Water Division warehouse (208-612-8474). 15. Fire flow and access road requirements for commercial buildings are based on building construction type, height, and total square footage of all floors. This information must be provided on the site plan. 16. Private fire service water mains shall be installed by a city licensed fire sprinkler contractor. Fire service mains must be tested and approved by the Fire Marshal prior to backfilling. 17. All Electrical Facilities, including new services or the relocating of existing, shall be in accordance with the current Idaho Falls Power Service Policy. Service Policy available at I.F.P. office or I.F.P. website. The developer must submit two (2) copies of these plans directly to Idaho Falls Power for the design and/or approval of electric service. Contact Idaho Falls Power prior to construction of electrical facilities (612-8430). 18. All single-family attached dwellings shall have separate electrical, water, and sewer service lines without any common facilities. 19. Appropriate erosion and sediment control requirements associated with construction shall be shown on the Site Plan or a separate attached plan. 20. In compliance with Idaho Code § 55-1613 a field search and location survey has been conducted under the direction of a professional land surveyor prior to this project's construction. 21. Construction within the Public Right-of-Way shall be in compliance with City of Idaho Falls Traffic Control Policy. PHONE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS SITE PLAN APPROVAL Date FILE NO. SCALE: of SITE PLAN CONTACT PERSON NAME ADDRESS DATE PLOTTED: SITE PLAN NAME AND ADDRESS (See Note #1) Revision 8/2025 REVIEW NO.: NOTES SEWER FRONT FOOTAGE _____________ FT. WATER FRONT FOOTAGE _____________ FT. ENGINEERING DEPT. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: Stamp 2 Approved City of Idaho Falls SEWER CONNECTIONS__________________ EACH WATER CONNECTIONS _________________ SIZE/EACH IRRIGATION CONNECTIONS _____________ SIZE/EACH WATER CONNECTIONS _________________ SIZE/EACH ENGINEERING DEPT. PROJECT LOCATION VICINITY MAP A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SITUATED WITHIN THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO, BEING COMPRISED OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, PARK VILLAGE #1, PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 37 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO. TYLER PRIDEMORE 3445 ANTELOPE DRIVE, SUITE 200, SYRACUSE, UT 84075 (539) 777 - 4152 HIGHAM RIVERFRONT TOWNHOMES 1" = 30' G. DAY T. PRIDEMORE 9/4/2026 3 4 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - EASEMENT LAYOUT HIGHAM RIVERFRONT TOWNHOMES LOCATED IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 37 EAST, BOISE PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO 3445 ANTELOPE DRIVE, ST 200 SYRACUSE, UT 84075 PH: 801.664.4724 EM: THOMAS@HUNTDAY.CO HUNT DAY E N G I N E E R I N G HIGHAM STREET PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY EX OHP x" SS EX x" SS x" W EX x" W SD PROPERTY LINE CENTERLINE ADJACENT LOT LINE CROSS-ACCESS / PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT CAE CAE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ONLY PUE PUE EX OVERHEAD POWER EX CULINARY WATER CULINARY WATER EX SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER STORM DRAIN SHEET LEGEND IRRG PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SURVEY NOTE THIS SITE PLAN CONFORMS WITH AN ACTUAL SURVEY THAT WAS PERFORMED ON THE GROUND BY A LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED BY THE STATE OF IDAHO. THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE SURVEY ARE SHOWN HEREON WITH BEARINGS AND DISTANCES. IT IS THE OWNER'S/DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONSTRUCT ALL STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THIS SITE PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID SURVEY. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NOTES ALL STREETS AND PARKING AREA INSIDE P.U.D. WILL BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED AND OPERATED. ALL EASEMENTS INSIDE P.U.D. ARE CONSIDERED PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS. POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER WILL BE INSTALLED IN A 30' WIDE P.U.E FOR CITY MAINTENANCE. STRUCTURES, INCLUDING ALL PROJECTIONS AND FOOTINGS, SHALL NOT ENCROACH INTO THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.). IDAHO FALLS POWER NOTES ADDITIONAL UTILITY EASEMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED. FINAL EASEMENT LOCATIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON RECEIPT OF THE IDAHO FALLS POWER CONTRACTOR MAP, TO BE PROVIDED AT A LATER DATE. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE SUBJECT TO ADJUSTMENT BASED ON THE FINAL POWER DISTRIBUTION DESIGN AS APPROVED BY IDAHO FALLS POWER. BASIS OF BEARING ALL MEASURED BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON RELATE DIRECTLY TO THE "CITY OF IDAHO FALLS COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 2004", WHICH IS DERIVED FROM THE IDAHO STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (EAST ZONE 1101) US SURVEY FEET AND USING A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.000277265 FOR A GRID TO GROUND CONVERSION, [REFERENCE FRAME NAD_83(2011), EPOCH 2010.0000]. THE SYSTEM ORIENTATION IS BASED ON GRID NORTH ALONG THE EAST ZONE CENTRAL MERIDIAN. NO CONVERGENCE ANGLE HAS BEEN APPLIED RELOCATED INFILTRATION TRENCH LOTS 25, 26, AND 27 OF RIVERFRONT LUXURY TOWNHOMES, DIVISION NO. 1, ARE AFFECTED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT. A CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENT ACROSS THESE LOTS IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE DIRECT ACCESS TO THE PRIVATE DRIVE. 1141 SQ FT / 0.026 AC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE VACATED EASEMENT FOR HYDRANT PROPOSED STORM WATER EASEMENT TO BE GRANTED TO RIVERFRONT LUXURY TOWNHOMES CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE CAE PROPOSED CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENT 09-04-2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 13 12 11 10 9 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 26 25 24 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 13 12 11 10 9 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 26 25 24 23 HIGHAM STREET PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY W N E S Scale: 1" = 30' 30 0 30 60 90 SHEET NO. PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1. The address shall be posted and maintained on every job site prior to and during construction. NO ADDRESS = NO INSPECTION. 2. A Site Plan including a completed City review block shall be on the job site at all times during construction. 3. Any changes to this site plan shall be submitted to the City of Idaho Falls Community Development Services Department for approval prior to construction. 4. Failure to comply with the requirements of this plan may result in the City withholding building permits, certificates of occupancy, water or electrical service. 5. Approval of the City Engineer is required for any proposed construction within a public right-of-way or easement and shall be in accordance with the current City of Idaho Falls Standard Drawings and Specifications . 6. A City of Idaho Falls Public Works License is required for any contractor working in a public right-of-way or easement. 7. A Public Right-of-Way Use Permit is required for any work in any public right-of-way or easement. The City Engineering Division must be notified at least two (2) days prior to any excavation under this permit (208-612-8250). 8. Placing Concrete within the public right-of-way requires inspection and approval by the City Engineering Division. The Division shall be notified at least four (4) hours prior to placing (208-612-8250). 9. All Driveway Approaches shall be concrete and meet the requirements of the current City of Idaho Falls Standard Specifications and Drawings. All driveways and parking areas shall be hard surface. 10. Replace all broken or poor quality curb, gutter, and sidewalk. 11. Remove all unused driveway approaches and replace with standard full height curb, gutter and sidewalk. 12. A Licensed Idaho Professional Engineer shall inspect, certify to City Standards, and prepare "As-built" drawings for all Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Main Lines. 13. All Water Service Lines less than four (4) inches and Sanitary Service Lines less than eight (8) inches shall be inspected by the City Wastewater Division prior to backfilling (208-612-8108). All 4" and larger taps to existing City water mains shall be inspected by the City Water Division (208-612-8471) prior to backfilling. Verification of a passing bacteria test for the installation of all new water mains 4" and larger in diameter must be submitted to the City Engineering Division prior to placing mains into service. 14. Pursuant to IDAPA 58.01.08, all new construction shall install provisions for a water meter to capture domestic and landscape irrigation uses. Provisions shall be installed per City of Idaho Falls Standard Drawings and Specifications - Drawings IF-401A through IF-401F. Water meters are required on all non-residential construction as well as common landscaped areas. Residential construction must install an idler in place of water meter. Meters or idlers must be on approved material list and may be purchased from the Water Division warehouse (208-612-8474). 15. Fire flow and access road requirements for commercial buildings are based on building construction type, height, and total square footage of all floors. This information must be provided on the site plan. 16. Private fire service water mains shall be installed by a city licensed fire sprinkler contractor. Fire service mains must be tested and approved by the Fire Marshal prior to backfilling. 17. All Electrical Facilities, including new services or the relocating of existing, shall be in accordance with the current Idaho Falls Power Service Policy. Service Policy available at I.F.P. office or I.F.P. website. The developer must submit two (2) copies of these plans directly to Idaho Falls Power for the design and/or approval of electric service. Contact Idaho Falls Power prior to construction of electrical facilities (612-8430). 18. All single-family attached dwellings shall have separate electrical, water, and sewer service lines without any common facilities. 19. Appropriate erosion and sediment control requirements associated with construction shall be shown on the Site Plan or a separate attached plan. 20. In compliance with Idaho Code § 55-1613 a field search and location survey has been conducted under the direction of a professional land surveyor prior to this project's construction. 21. Construction within the Public Right-of-Way shall be in compliance with City of Idaho Falls Traffic Control Policy. PHONE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS SITE PLAN APPROVAL Date FILE NO. SCALE: of SITE PLAN CONTACT PERSON NAME ADDRESS DATE PLOTTED: SITE PLAN NAME AND ADDRESS (See Note #1) Revision 8/2025 REVIEW NO.: NOTES SEWER FRONT FOOTAGE _____________ FT. WATER FRONT FOOTAGE _____________ FT. ENGINEERING DEPT. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: Stamp 3 Approved City of Idaho Falls SEWER CONNECTIONS__________________ EACH WATER CONNECTIONS _________________ SIZE/EACH IRRIGATION CONNECTIONS _____________ SIZE/EACH WATER CONNECTIONS _________________ SIZE/EACH ENGINEERING DEPT. PROJECT LOCATION VICINITY MAP A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SITUATED WITHIN THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO, BEING COMPRISED OF PARCELS RPA00038306941, RPA00038308621 & RPA00038308586, PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO. TYLER PRIDEMORE 3445 ANTELOPE DRIVE, SUITE 200, SYRACUSE, UT 84075 (539) 777 - 4152 HIGHAM RIVERFRONT TOWNHOMES 1" = 30' G. DAY T. PRIDEMORE 9/4/2026 3 4 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - LANDSCAPE PLAN HIGHAM RIVERFRONT TOWNHOMES 3445 ANTELOPE DRIVE, ST 200 SYRACUSE, UT 84075 PH: 801.664.4724 EM: THOMAS@HUNTDAY.CO HUNT DAY E N G I N E E R I N G CREEK WILLOW FORK NORTH SHEET LEGEND CLASS II TREE PER I.F. TREE LIST STREET LANDSCAPE BUFFER SITE LANDSCAPING CONCRETE PAVEMENT ASPHALT PAVEMENT PROPERTY LINE CENTERLINE ADJACENT LOT LINE STEP-IN DOG WASH STATION DOG PLAY AREA PET WASTE STATION (TYP) BENCH W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE (TYP) COMMUNITY GARDEN BENCH OUTDOOR WATERPROOF STORAGE BOXES AGGREGATE BASE COURSE PATH W/ RAISED BEDS PET TURF IRRIGATION NOTE THIS PROJECT SHALL UTILIZE A PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH WATER SOURCED FROM THE IDAHO CANAL. THE SYSTEM WILL CONNECT TO AND UTILIZE THE PROPOSED IRRIGATION INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE ADJACENT RIVER HOLLOW AT SAGE LAKES DEVELOPMENT FOR DISTRIBUTION THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT SITE. LANDSCAPE BUFFERS MINIMUM STREET LANDSCAPE BUFFERS PER SECTION (8) (C) (I) AND (II) : · PUBLIC STREETS: 20' (EXCEPT AS NOTED) · PRIVATE DRIVES: 10' (EXCEPT AS NOTED) CLASS I TREE PER I.F. TREE LIST CLASS III TREE PER I.F. TREE LIST COLUMNAR EVERGREEN EVERGREEN SHRUBBERY EVERGREEN (11 PROV'D) / SPACED 10' O.C. PARKS DEPARTMENT NOTE PER DISCUSSIONS THE PARKS AND REC DEPARTMENT, NO TREES OR LANDSCAPING ARE TO BE INCLUDED OR INSTALLED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WEST OF THE CUL-DE-SAC OR ADJECENT TO THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE. COMMON SPACE REQUIREMENT TOTAL SITE AREA 117,130 SQ FT MINUS THE FOLLOWING: 23,305 SQ FT 6,995 SQ FT 45,454 SQ FT N / A 11,549 SQ FT N / A TOTAL AREA DEDUCTED 87,303 SQ FT COMMON SPACE AREA PROVIDED (MINIUMUM OF 25% OF GROSS AREA) 29,827 SQ FT INTERNAL LANDSCAPED AREA, EXCLUDING REQUIRED BUFFERS 29,827 SQ FT TREES REQUIRED / PROVIDED (1 PER 5,000 SQ FT OF INTERNAL LANDSCAPED AREA) 6 / 6 SHRUBS REQUIRED / PROVIDED (2 REQUIRED PER TREE) 12 / 12 PUBLIC STREET TREES REQUIRED / PROVIDED (1 TREE PER 30 LINEAR FEET) 300 TOTAL LF 10 / 14 PRIVATE STREET TREES REQUIRED / PROVIDED (1 TREE PER 40 LINEAR FEET - EXCLUDING DRIVEWAYS) 728 TOTAL LF 19 / 19 TOTAL TREES REQUIRED / PROVIDED (INCLUDING REQUIRED DOG PARK BUFFERING) 47 / 58 AREA FOR THE STREETS AREA FOR THE DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING AREA FOR SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET REQUIRED BUFFER AREAS {REQUIRED BUFFERS ALONG PERIMETER PUBLIC STREETS (20') AND INTERNAL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETS (10'), REQUIRED PERIMETER BUFFER AREAS ADJACENT TO SINGLE UNIT DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR DRAINAGE FACILITY NOT INCLUDING AN AMENITY AREA FOR THE RESIDENCES 09-04-2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 13 12 11 10 9 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 26 25 24 23 EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX OHP EX 8" W EX 8" W EX 8" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX 12" W EX EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS SS SS SS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 13 12 11 10 9 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 26 25 24 23 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS W W W W W W W W SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD W N E S Scale: 1" = 30' 30 0 30 60 90 SHEET NO. PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1. The address shall be posted and maintained on every job site prior to and during construction. NO ADDRESS = NO INSPECTION. 2. A Site Plan including a completed City review block shall be on the job site at all times during construction. 3. Any changes to this site plan shall be submitted to the City of Idaho Falls Community Development Services Department for approval prior to construction. 4. Failure to comply with the requirements of this plan may result in the City withholding building permits, certificates of occupancy, water or electrical service. 5. Approval of the City Engineer is required for any proposed construction within a public right-of-way or easement and shall be in accordance with the current City of Idaho Falls Standard Drawings and Specifications . 6. A City of Idaho Falls Public Works License is required for any contractor working in a public right-of-way or easement. 7. A Public Right-of-Way Use Permit is required for any work in any public right-of-way or easement. The City Engineering Division must be notified at least two (2) days prior to any excavation under this permit (208-612-8250). 8. Placing Concrete within the public right-of-way requires inspection and approval by the City Engineering Division. The Division shall be notified at least four (4) hours prior to placing (208-612-8250). 9. All Driveway Approaches shall be concrete and meet the requirements of the current City of Idaho Falls Standard Specifications and Drawings. All driveways and parking areas shall be hard surface. 10. Replace all broken or poor quality curb, gutter, and sidewalk. 11. Remove all unused driveway approaches and replace with standard full height curb, gutter and sidewalk. 12. A Licensed Idaho Professional Engineer shall inspect, certify to City Standards, and prepare "As-built" drawings for all Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Main Lines. 13. All Water Service Lines less than four (4) inches and Sanitary Service Lines less than eight (8) inches shall be inspected by the City Wastewater Division prior to backfilling (208-612-8108). All 4" and larger taps to existing City water mains shall be inspected by the City Water Division (208-612-8471) prior to backfilling. Verification of a passing bacteria test for the installation of all new water mains 4" and larger in diameter must be submitted to the City Engineering Division prior to placing mains into service. 14. Pursuant to IDAPA 58.01.08, all new construction shall install provisions for a water meter to capture domestic and landscape irrigation uses. Provisions shall be installed per City of Idaho Falls Standard Drawings and Specifications - Drawings IF-401A through IF-401F. Water meters are required on all non-residential construction as well as common landscaped areas. Residential construction must install an idler in place of water meter. Meters or idlers must be on approved material list and may be purchased from the Water Division warehouse (208-612-8474). 15. Fire flow and access road requirements for commercial buildings are based on building construction type, height, and total square footage of all floors. This information must be provided on the site plan. 16. Private fire service water mains shall be installed by a city licensed fire sprinkler contractor. Fire service mains must be tested and approved by the Fire Marshal prior to backfilling. 17. All Electrical Facilities, including new services or the relocating of existing, shall be in accordance with the current Idaho Falls Power Service Policy. Service Policy available at I.F.P. office or I.F.P. website. The developer must submit two (2) copies of these plans directly to Idaho Falls Power for the design and/or approval of electric service. Contact Idaho Falls Power prior to construction of electrical facilities (612-8430). 18. All single-family attached dwellings shall have separate electrical, water, and sewer service lines without any common facilities. 19. Appropriate erosion and sediment control requirements associated with construction shall be shown on the Site Plan or a separate attached plan. 20. In compliance with Idaho Code § 55-1613 a field search and location survey has been conducted under the direction of a professional land surveyor prior to this project's construction. 21. Construction within the Public Right-of-Way shall be in compliance with City of Idaho Falls Traffic Control Policy. PHONE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS SITE PLAN APPROVAL Date FILE NO. SCALE: of SITE PLAN CONTACT PERSON NAME ADDRESS DATE PLOTTED: SITE PLAN NAME AND ADDRESS (See Note #1) Revision 8/2025 REVIEW NO.: NOTES SEWER FRONT FOOTAGE _____________ FT. WATER FRONT FOOTAGE _____________ FT. ENGINEERING DEPT. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: Stamp 4 Approved City of Idaho Falls SEWER CONNECTIONS__________________ EACH WATER CONNECTIONS _________________ SIZE/EACH IRRIGATION CONNECTIONS _____________ SIZE/EACH WATER CONNECTIONS _________________ SIZE/EACH ENGINEERING DEPT. PROJECT LOCATION VICINITY MAP A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SITUATED WITHIN THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO, BEING COMPRISED OF PARCELS RPA00038306941, RPA00038308621 & RPA00038308586, PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO. TYLER PRIDEMORE 3445 ANTELOPE DRIVE, SUITE 200, SYRACUSE, UT 84075 (539) 777 - 4152 HIGHAM RIVERFRONT TOWNHOMES 1" = 30' G. DAY T. PRIDEMORE 9/4/2026 3 4 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - PHASING PLAN HIGHAM RIVERFRONT TOWNHOMES 3445 ANTELOPE DRIVE, ST 200 SYRACUSE, UT 84075 PH: 801.664.4724 EM: THOMAS@HUNTDAY.CO HUNT DAY E N G I N E E R I N G DOG PLAY AREA COMMUNITY GARDEN EX OHP x" SS EX x" SS x" W EX x" W SD PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT LOT LINE EX OVERHEAD POWER EX CULINARY WATER CULINARY WATER EX SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER STORM DRAIN SHEET LEGEND IRRG PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION SUBJECT TO PHASING PHASING NOTE THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF A SINGLE DIVISION, WITH ALL AMENITIES AND HORIZONTAL INFRASTRUCTURE COMPLETED WITHIN THAT DIVISION. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WILL BE COMPLETED OVER MULTIPLE PHASES. PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5 PHASE 6 PHASE 8 PHASE 10 PHASE9 PHASE 7 HIGHAM STREET PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 09-04-2026 Page 1 of 8 Applicant: Tyler Pridemore, Hunt-Day Engineering Owner: River Front Townhomes LLC Project Manager: David Peterson Location: Generally located north of Higham St, east of the Snake River, south of Presto St, and west of Latah Ave. Size: Approx. 2.7 Acres Units: 41 Existing Zoning Site: R2 North: R2 South: LC East: R2 West: R2, P Existing Land Uses: Site: Vacant North: Residential South: Commercial East: Residential West: Residential Future Land Use Map: General Urban Attachments: 1. PUD Standards 2. Zoning Ordinance 3. Comprehensive Plan Policies 4. Maps and aerial photos 5. PUD Exhibit Requested Action: To approve the Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Higham Riverfront Townhomes by the Mayor and City Council. Staff Recommendation: Staff has reviewed the PUD and finds that it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the requirements of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Staff recommends approval of the PUD. Staff Comments: The proposed PUD includes 41 units on approximately 2.7 acres. Buildings consist of three to five attached single-unit dwellings per structure, each with rear-loaded garages accessed from private streets. All units are two stories and feature front-facing balconies and covered porches. This property has been vacant and undeveloped in the city for 120 years. The first attempt at development occurred in 1981 as a second phase of the condominiums to the north. That development never materialized. Additionally, zone change requests that would have allowed for commercial use or additional residential density, were also denied. Water and wastewater utility mains have been provided on the site and set idle since 1981 as well. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Urban Core, which denotes areas within proximity to Downtown. The Urban Core also includes legacy residential subdivisions platted in a traditional grid pattern. This legacy residential is most prevalent in the neighborhood to the west across Fremont Ave. Even as late as 2020 there were large tracts of undeveloped lots along Fremont and Latah Avenues. Townhome development has filled these previously undeveloped tracts since. The neighborhood immediately surrounding the property includes townhomes at a density of 13 units per acre and condominiums at a density of 25 units per acre with the proposed PUD including 15 units per acre. The development complies with the Urban Core transect by bringing moderate-density development with an efficient use of land near the Snake River, Riverwalk, Fremont Park, and convenient access to employment and service areas like Downtown, University Place, and INL. The PUD is laid out intentionally to utilize the existing alley parallel with Latah Avenue, have townhome units facing Higham Street and the open space along the river and provide open/common space between the development and condominium project to the north, a concern from previous failed attempts at developing the property. With Freeman Park so close the applicant has chosen amenities that are not provided at the park. --- Continued Page 2 --- STAFF REPORT HIGHAM RIVERFRONT TOWNHOMES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) October 8, 2026 Community Development Services Page 2 of 8 The cul-de-sac at Higham Street includes a paved pathway section that connects to the Riverwalk and the pathway out to Fremont Ave and into Downtown. The development will provide a new section of pathway around the cul-de-sac that will complete the connection providing access for the residents and the public. The R2 Zone permits a maximum density of 17 dwelling units per acre; the proposed development has a density of 15 units per acre. Required parking will be provided within each unit’s two car garage. Ten additional visitor parking spaces have been provided within the development. Higham Street will also provide additional on-street parking that can be used. Common areas include two amenities, a dog play yard and a community garden, and the project meets the requirement for at least 25% landscaped common space. Stormwater retention has been designed to be underground, providing an approximately level surface for the dog park and common area on the north side of the property. Second floor balconies provide private space for each unit. No portion of the structures may encroach into an easement, and the entirety of the structure must be contained within the individual platted lots. All areas of the PUD not covered by a building or drive area will be landscaped. If the property is constructed in multiple phases, each phase will need to meet all requirements for landscaping, utilities, and emergency access. At least one amenity will be required within the first phase. The application for the PUD was submitted on June 23, 2026. A neighborhood meeting, required under Section 11-6-8 of the Zoning Ordinance, was held on June 5, 2026, with eight members of the public in attendance. Key concerns raised included sewer capacity, underground retention ponds, and residential density. Variances: The PUD consists of 41 individually platted lots that front private streets. Each lot will be platted to the extent of the building envelope for its attached dwelling unit. The applicant is requesting a reduction of the required 20-foot landscape buffer along Higham Street to 15 feet. To offset the reduced buffer width, the applicant has proposed a second amenity in addition to the one required. The 5-foot reduction represents approximately 775 square feet; the proposed community garden amenity provides 1,300 square feet. The reduced setback allows the development to shift further south, away from the condominium community to the north, and increases usable open space. Higham Street is a dead-end roadway with low traffic volumes, and the reduction will not interfere with utility easements. A 10-foot landscape buffer is required along internal private streets; however, the rear-loaded garages eliminate space for this buffer along much of the internal street frontage. Guest parking further limits available area for this landscape buffer. The applicant has relocated the required trees to areas near pedestrian pathways where feasible. In this PUD, the pedestrian-focused portion of the streetscape is located at the front of the townhome units, leaving the private streets to function primarily as alleys. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that enhanced vegetation (up to 16 trees) be discussed with the Parks Department, specifically focusing on the northern buffer adjacent to the dog park and the southwest area near the pathway connection to the Riverwalk. In response, the applicant has added eleven additional evergreen trees along the northern boundary adjacent to the dog park, although these trees are not required by the PUD ordinance. After discussions with the applicant, the Parks Department indicated they were not interested in working with the developer to provide any trees or other improvements on the city-owned property to the south and west of the PUD. History: The property was originally annexed into the City in 1891. As part of an attempt to clean up City boundaries in this area. The property was included in a deannexation in 1901 and was reannexed in Page 3 of 8 1906. Another attempt to clean up City boundaries occurred in 1950, confirming this area to be within the city limits of Idaho Falls. The property was replatted and rezoned from R-1 to R-2 with a PUD overlay in 1981 as part of the Park Village Condominium Development. In 2001 it was rezoned from R-2 to PB, Professional Business, and then in 2005 it was rezoned back to R-2 with the PUD overlay. In 2020, the property owner at the time applied to rezone to LC, Limited Commercial. The City Council remanded the application back to the Planning Commission with concerns regarding residential density and height allowances in the R3A Zone and the rezone was not pursued any further. The property is currently zoned R2, Mixed Residential with the Limited Development Airport Overlay Zone. The final plat will be required to include a note regarding the property’s proximity to the airport. Zoning Ordinance: 11-2-6(W) Planned Unit Development (PUD). Section Subsection Code Requirement Staff Comment 1. Purpose A Allow flexibility from traditional zoning standards to improve living environment. Common space, amenities, landscaping, and compatibility increased over standard requirements. B Promote flexibility and innovation of design; diversify development types. Private roads and townhomes allowed for desired density. C Achieve compatible land use relationship with surrounding area. Compatible land use relationship achieved. D Promote redevelopment and reuse of previously developed property. Property platted and rezoned multiple times but never built on. E Encourage development of vacant properties within developed areas. Surrounding residential uses consist of condos and townhomes. F Provide usable/suitably located common space or facilities. 25% common space provided; two amenities included. G Facilitate functional/efficient systems of streets, pathways, utilities. Pedestrian connectivity to Freeman Park and Riverwalk. H Promote efficient land use with flexible building/land arrangements. Private streets allow individually platted lots facing open space. I Provide master-planned development with interconnected design elements. Pathways connect all townhomes to amenities. Page 4 of 8 Section Subsection Code Requirement Staff Comment J Ensure appropriate phasing of development and amenities. All critical infrastructure and amenities completed in first phase. K Provide attractive streetscapes not dominated by vehicles/garages. Trees line pedestrian pathways on the front of townhome units where feasible. 2. Allowed Uses A All uses allowed in underlying zone. R2 – Townhomes allowed. B(I) Limited commercial uses must match neighborhood character and mitigate impacts. N/A. No mixed uses; 100% residential. B(II) Uses must not create traffic/pedestrian hazards or exceed street capacity. Proposed use will not generate traffic beyond Higham Street’s capacity. Connected pedestrian paths have been planned throughout the development. B(III) Commercial uses may not exceed 20% of PUD land area. N/A. 3. General Requirements A Unified ownership/control; whole-site planning. PUD managed by HOA. B Additional design standards may be imposed. Relocate internal street trees, provide landscape screening from dog park to north property line. C Must conform to all other applicable regulations unless otherwise approved. Meets minimum standards. D Must follow PUD approval process in Chapter 6. Meets minimum standards. 4. Dimensional Requirements A Minimum PUD size: 2 acres. PUD is greater than 2 acres. B No minimum lot size. Meets minimum standards. C(I) Max density per Table 11-2-4. Pass – Density is 15.2 units per acre. 17 units per acre allowed. C(II) Other zones: max 35 DU/acre. N/A. C(III) Density cannot transfer between zones. Meets minimum standards. D(I) Setbacks shall reflect the general standards of the area. Meets minimum standards. Page 5 of 8 Section Subsection Code Requirement Staff Comment D(II) Internal setbacks may be set through PUD process. Shown as building envelope. E Height per base zone unless increased setback ratio met. Height restrictions maintained. 5. Arrangement & Design A Must be compatible with surrounding neighborhood bulk/scale/mass. Meets minimum standards. B Lowest height/intensity uses arranged around boundaries. N/A – all buildings 2 stories. C Taller structures toward interior. N/A – all buildings 2 stories. D Structures oriented toward common areas; provide private space. All face common space. E High-quality architecture with cohesive style/materials. Cohesive architectural style. 6. Landscaping & Buffering A All non-built areas landscaped/maintained. Meets minimum standards. B Landscape plan required. Meets minimum standards. C 1 tree per 5,000 sq ft + 2 shrubs per tree. Meets minimum standards. D Alternate tree spacing allowed if total count maintained. Private street trees displaced by garages relocated to pedestrian pathways E Buffers required when commercial uses present. N/A – no commercial. 7. Parking Lot Design A Lots >24 spaces require 10% landscaping. N/A – parking area less than 24 spaces. B Lots >24 spaces contiguous to streets require 4’ berm. N/A. C Interior landscaping must include pedestrian ways. N/A. 8. Streetscapes A Must front public or approved private street. PUD fronts Higham St. B Streetscapes must be safe, inviting, attractive. Meets minimum standards. C(I) Perimeter landscape strip: 20’ wide, trees at 30’ centers. Requesting variance – 15’ perimeter landscape buffer along Higham St Page 6 of 8 Section Subsection Code Requirement Staff Comment C(II) Internal landscape strip: 10’ wide, trees at 40’ centers. Pass – trees relocated where driveways exist along private streets. D Trash enclosures are not allowed in setbacks or near streets. N/A – residential cans only. 9. Common Space A ≥25% of gross area must be common space. Meets minimum standards. B Common space may include recreation facilities and usable outdoor areas. Meets minimum standards. C Common space excludes roads, parking, sidewalks, required strips, etc. Meets minimum standards. 10. Amenities A 1 amenity per 50 units; additional per 50 thereafter. 2 amenities. B Amenities must be logically placed for convenient access. Meets minimum standards. C Amenities must be from approved list. Pass – Dog park and community garden. 11. Pedestrian System A Provide pedestrian connections to schools, parks, public lands. Pedestrian connection to Freeman Park and Riverwalk. B System must be logical, safe, and convenient. Meets minimum standards. 12. Phasing A Phasing allowed with approved schedule; amenities must be built early. All amenities and critical infrastructure for the whole development will be completed in Phase 1. Page 7 of 8 11-3-3: PURPOSES OF RESIDENTIAL ZONES. R2 Mixed Residential Zone. This zone provides a residential zone characterized by smaller lots and dwellings, more compact and denser residential development; and higher volumes of vehicular and pedestrian traffic than are characteristic of the RE, RP and R1 Zones. The principal uses permitted in the R2 Zone shall be one (1), two (2), three (3), and four (4) dwelling units. This zone is also generally located near limited commercial services that provide daily household needs. 11-3-4: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONES. (F) Building Orientation. Every dwelling site shall face or front upon a public street, except in a Planned Unit Developments (PUD), or where dwelling units face a common space fronting on a street. ImaginelF Transects et 3 Ta —cmeaman® | Future Urban | Industrial Suburban} General Urban; gee Ctrs} Urban Core | Special Use Opens Space | Development ; H i Corridors H structure varies Lower INTENSITY Higher | Uniform LAND USES Mixed re TAX REVENUE Per ACRE Higher | Less BUILT INFRASTRUCTURE ssonenib| Lower SERVICE LEVEL Higher 3 7. Urban Core Wissaueee Snapshot: The Uroan Core Transect denotes the central area which functions as fhe City core and areas within or in close proximity ta Downtown and South Downtown. The Urban Core also includes ty — legacy residential subdivisions platted in a traditional grid pattern. Tr | [| These subdivisions tend to be characterized by taller structures, mixed- fi |e @! use buildings, pedestrian-oriented movement of people, commercial —- and entertainment enterprises. All housing types, civic buildings, Town squares and transit stations are typical, but vary between neighborhoods. Local examples: Downtown, Original Townsite, Highland Park Addition, Crows Addition, Brodbecks Addition, Riverside Addition EVV VV VY OOOH Page 8 of 8 August 4, 2026 6:30 p.m. Planning Department City Annex Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Forrest Ihler, Matthew Meehan, Marry Scales, Tia Panter, Dale Storer. MEMBERS ABSENT: Glen Ogden, Bill Scott, Deanna Harger ALSO PRESENT: Assistant Planning Director Kerry Beutler, Caitlin Long Planner, Mike Thrower Planner; David Peterson Planner; Terry Rodino, Esq, City Attorney, and interested citizens. CALL TO ORDER: Ihler called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. MINUTES: Meehan moved to accept the minutes of July 7, 2026, Scales seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Public Hearing: 1. PUD 26-003: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR HIGHAM RIVERFRONT TOWNHOMES. Meehan has been involved in the planning process and Panter was involved in an outside conversation and as such both recused themselves from this item. Applicant: Tyler Pridemore 2688 North Freeman Drive, Syracuse, Utah. Pridemore is proposing an infill development next to Freman Park, zoned R2. They are proposing 41 alley load townhomes. The density is 15 units per acre. Zoned R2 permits 17 units per acre, so they are under the allowable density. The building has a semi-enclosed balcony on 2nd floor as one of the good factors on the site plan. One of the issues with the alley load product is placing all the townhomes on a private street, in between the units is a narrow corridor with no privacy, and they have changed their layout to ensure that there are no narrow corridors, all of the townhomes with the exception of the right side face out and the ones on the southeast corner do not face another unit to provide privacy. The proximity to Freman Park they maximized the units on the west side to have balcony and residents benefit from existing open space. The north of this project is an established neighborhood that is nice and they want to minimize the impact to that neighborhood. On the site plan they shifted the units south toward Higham Street and that allowed them to provide an open space to the north of the units and the landscape buffer match what is on the other side of the fence. They want to minimize impact to the neighborhood. The storm water is underground, and they maximized the common space. There are 2 amenities, including a dog park and a community garden, and both are maintained by HOA. They only were required to provide one, but they wanted to give the residents a dedicated space. They intend to work with the Parks Department to implement any changes they recommend along the west side right of way and west of the cul-de-sac where there is not planned to be any more roadway improvements. They are excited to hear feedback. Scales asked about the bottom showing a vacated easement, and will that be consumed into the development parcel. Pridemore agreed and indicated that his surveyor is working on that it will be submitted shortly. Peterson presented the staff report, a part of the record. Storer asked about the approval with enhanced landscaping/additional landscaping and is that a recommendation for a variance and is asking for more clarity of what enhanced landscaping is. Storer stated that some of these things don’t develop for several years, and if they don’t document with specificity what the variance is and what is expected of the developer. Storer asked what the enhanced landscaping would be. Peterson stated that it is a 5’ reduction of the buffer and staff would like to see some sort of equivalent brought forward and the second amenity that is being proposed might be sufficient, but the Commission can decide what to give as a recommendation to Council. Peterson is requesting the Commission discussing the second amenity and give Council recommendation of what would be sufficient. Storer wants more direction. Peterson stated that they want more trees, and want enhanced landscaping, and they are working with Parks on the west to fill in the vacant area of the property up to Willowcreek. Peterson stated that they are working on things, but the Commission needs to decide if those things are sufficient. Ihler stated that the Commission gets to decide what they think is sufficient and that can be documented. Storer says sufficient and enhanced are vague words and he wants more specificity on the second amenity and what is enhanced. Peterson stated that minimum required landscaping is tree every 30’ on the public street, a tree and 2 shrubs every 40’ along private street and 1 tree per 5000 square feet of required landscaping, and there should be some ground cover and lawn, and anything beyond that would contribute to making up for the reduction in the buffer. The two amenities are a dog park and a community garden. Peterson added that they have a pedestrian connection connecting to riverwalk at Freman Park. Peterson stated that the Planning Commission gets to decide if that is sufficient. Scales stated that one of the comments received was the concern about the location of the dog park, and enhancing the landscaping to provide an auditory buffer on the north side of the dog park would help alleviate the public concern and get down the road with the enhancements as well as the access to the path way. Ihler asked about the landscape buffer on the south side between building and road. Peterson agreed that on Higham Street – public street, PUD’s are required a 20’ landscape buffer and they are asking for 15’ as a variance. Ihler opened the public hearing. SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: Dr. Paul Brook, 1405 #4 Presto Street, Idaho Falls, Idaho. Has been here 35 years and has seen many changes and a planned development is an oxymoron. Brook has retained legal counsel and has been advised that the best thing to do is hold the developer to what they say in this document and if they start to vary then he has recourse. Paul White, 1435 Presto #4, Idaho Falls, Idaho. White has been a resident for 6 years and had involvement in the previous questions about rezoning. He is pleased with the plan and they had a community meeting and he was impressed with the clarity of the presentation and it looks like it will fit within the area, and they are doing well. The cooperation and communication makes him happy. Mathew Meehan, 1415 Presto #6, Idaho Falls, Idaho. Meehan is in favor of the project as presented and it fits with the adjacent neighborhood. It is similar number of units, similar property. The slide shows the spur off the greenbelt that comes to the south of the property and terminates, and he walks that spur and it is overgrown and undeveloped. Meehan would welcome pedestrian connectivity, and it will be great for residents to walk the neighborhood. Meehan thinks the developer has been mindful of the community, and it takes into account the existing neighborhood. Meehan shares the concerns on the dog park location as it could bring additional noise, and there is an idea to have additional landscape buffering to mitigate that concern. He is excited to see it going forward. Ihler closed the public hearing. Ihler stated that he does love the connectivity to the park and the trails and the fact that they are adding a sidewalk to connect neighborhood to trail spur. The alley load units are nice. He does not have a problem with the units being closer to Higham as they are facing a business, and if that helps create a northern buffer that is fine. Ihler wants to clarify more landscaping and as a Commission they can recommend to the Council something clear. Storer stated that he is in favor of the PUD and feels there are delightful connectivity issues. He is not bothered by the reduction in the buffer along the street but does want the specificity in what landscape buffer will be and the location of the additional landscaping. Scales stated that as a means to alleviate the comments that received from public regarding anticipated sound, Scales feels additional vegetation on north portion adjacent to the fence would be good, and consideration to the southwest side as well. Scales asked if the sidewalk would connect to the neighborhood to the north. There is an informal pathway and will it connect. Pridemore stated that they have not had that discussion with the other neighborhood, and Pridemore is not opposed to connecting and stated he would reach out and see if the property owners are ok with connecting. Scales asked about 10 detached parking stalls and asked about street-based parking on Latah, and asked if there is any consideration on the property. Pridemore stated that they are private streets with no street parking. Ihler stated that he is assuming the residents are already cutting through to go to the pathway, and so the only people going through the existing development live there. It is not an extension and personally he thinks there should be a sidewalk connection to plug into the other sidewalks. Ihler stated that they cannot force the neighbor to do that, but they want a stub on this property to show they are willing to make a connection. Scales stated it is 20’ of sidewalk that could be added. Ihler stated that there needs to be trees along the northern buffer. Ihler is concerned that dogs urinating on the trees will kill the trees. Scales stated that they should be on the outside of the fence between the existing fence and then the chain link design for the dog park. Ihler asked the applicant if they were going to do another fence for the dog park. Is there a space between existing fence and new fence. Pridemore stated that the dog park would have chain link fence or another new fence type and the remainder they weren’t proposing a another fence as visually one fence is better than 2. Ihler asked it to be 8’ back so they can plant trees. Pridemore stated they can adjust the trees to keep them alive. Ihler asked if they should specify trees or let Parks work on it. Scales thinks let Parks Department work through what type of tree. Ihler asked between Higham and the spur route, will be vacated and who will be responsible for the vegetation outside of the property line. Pridemore is working with the Parks Department as that is right of way. Pridemore stated that the easiest way is to not put trees there. Pridemore stated they will figure it out with the Parks Department. Pridemore is unsure who is responsible and they want to provide the trees that are required. Ihler asked about the darkness in this area and asked if there are plans to put a streetlight at the end of the cul- de-sac. More light is safer. Pridemore stated that they do not currently have plans for lighting, but he will make a note. Beutler stated that there are already streetlights along Higham and one streetlight at the pole near the cul-de-sac. Pridemore stated that onsite lighting could be where the trail connects to the spur and provide a light at that point. Ihler asked Beutler how to create the motion. Beutler stated that conditions should be included as part of the motions – approval with conditions. Beutler suggested that the distance along Higham and the square footage of the variance request of 5’ equates 775 square feet that will be varied and the addition of the community garden space is 1300 square feet is more than what is requested to be varied. There are 16 trees that would be varied and so the Commission could have a condition that 16 trees are included with a discussion with Parks Department. Beutler stated that it is up to the Commission how to manage it or rely on the Parks Department to come up with a solution that fits the space. Ihler likes the idea of including it with the motion and the condition is part of the approval. Scales suggested up to 16 trees as negotiated with the Parks Department. Pridemore asked how the 16 trees were calculated. Beutler stated that it is the distance along the internal street network where normally you would see trees along the private streets. Scales wants it slightly lose to account for the southern portion and the fence line. Scales moved to recommend to the Mayor and City Council approval of the Planned Unit Development for Higham Riverfront Townhomes with the following conditions: The additional enhanced vegetation up to 16 trees as to be negotiated with Parks Department along the northern buffer and/or to the southwest portion of the property. Storer seconded the motion. Meehan seconded the motion. Ihler called for roll call vote: Ihler, yes; Scales, yes; Storer, yes. The motion passed unanimously Neighborhood Meeting on 06/05/2026 Dear Property Owner or Resident, This letter is to inform you about a proposed development in your area and to invite you to a neighborhood informational meeting where the developer will present the project and answer questions. River Front Townhomes is a proposed townhome development located adjacent to Freeman Park in Idaho Falls, Idaho. The property is approximately 2.67 acres, currently undeveloped, and is zoned R-2. The parcel number is RPA1850001001C The proposal includes the development of townhomes on the site. We welcome and encourage your participation in the discussion of this project. Community input is an important part of the City’s development review process. You are invited to attend a Neighborhood Meeting where the development concept will be presented and residents will have the opportunity to ask questions and provide feedback. Meeting Details Date: June 5th, 2026 Time: 6:00 PM Location: 3522 Briar Creek Lane, Ammon, ID 83401 Please note: The meeting will be held at this office location in Ammon and not at the project site in Idaho Falls. If you are unable to attend but would still like to provide input or ask questions, please feel free to contact me directly. Phone: 801-787-0532 Email: joe@77devco.com We look forward to meeting with you and discussing the proposal. Sincerely, Joe Brown Partner 77 Development RIVER FRONT TOWNHOMES LLC Neighborhood Meeting Sign-In Sheet Project: River Front Townhomes Date: June 5, 2026 Time: 6:00 PM Location: 3522 Briar Creek Lane, Ammon, ID 83401 "Address Email Address» yy 44355 Presfo St Ast Ft 83402 Signature SYEASIS| IIS “Resto St 3 | wh on shel. G3\ 2028 Raul Ghite 864-321-041 Fahy Fal) PR. biz gana com _ [hay doe VE-SZEZEE Sree S3doD—| ee a wriuSs Comeil. conn -_ Sem ZENNA_| 208 -757- lol 2 Paul Prockens> z of F2U14S7 45d | Sct Vert, 208 Feo g (VC este Sew aie Ge o$-10\-5414_ NSIS Krome sae wei > on adive OI Joun Miller 319-899-757 140s -7(-200S - _ —--5- penanireeensemenasetesin samme i ans _ ro AWe (e504, — Thank you for attending and participating in the River Front Townhomes Neighborhood Meeting. ous stivesicheanensisqremnienmanppicies. nenpynsatshanesenatetadettns{ntnnssasetetbsatnacnentehiasitinnsmunmeaseieansfiban [ Mink ot word We Cort iF you guys feed; = RIVER FRONT TOWNHOMES LLC Neighborhood Meeting Notes & Comments Project: River Front Townhomes Date: June 5, 2026 Time: 6:00 PM Location: 3522 Briar Creek Lane, Ammon, ID 83401 Meeting Notes & Comments be Lonct Ts ot fle bY 77s 2a + Cncuns Gef Fie Led gel Lt fea fur Re 4 TA M Lnebtn bot SLWOLE WAY Wes 23 Lomein, phovt-__ When Ly All fork _silee wil ve shh Rs of ks lel _ barf ~ rn tds Certification | certify that the above notes accurately reflect the discussion, comments, questions, and concerns raised during the River Front Townhomes Neighborhood Meeting held on June 5, 2026. Joe Byown, Manager River Front Townhomes LLC Date: b-S-206 Caution: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Outlook Project PUD26-003 Applicant Tyler Pridemore From faye whitmore Date Fri 7/31/2026 4:59 PM To David Peterson Hello This is Cindy C that owns property on Presto next to this planned development project call Higham Riverfront Townhomes #PUD26-003. I would like to give my testimony of this project. I am against this as this should be commercial building on this piece of land instead of homes! It would make more sense to keep Higham road all commercial like what it is now.  I have been going through some of the old city council meetings regarding this area being developed. On November 8th 2018 there was a executive session regarding the zoning for the Fremont Ave Subdivision. The ordinance 3229 was established. Fast forward to March 12th 2020 during that city council another meeting regarding the zoning was discussed as they wanted to develop the land that had been vacant for several decades. I know that the HOA of North Park Village retained counsel for this meeting regarding this zone change, please refer back for your reference. I have concerns of this new development as it will be a different style of townhomes from the ones that were built in 2021 and the ones that RPI Construction is working on now on Latah Street plus NPV. I believe it would be a eyesore by many having 4 different styles of homes in the same place. I am also concerned about the traffic that may use the backyard/alley of the Latah Townhomes to access Freeman Park mistaking the backyard/alley from the street main street Latah.  This is my written comment regarding this application, and I hope to attend the public meeting to hear others testimony. Thank You Cindy C 9/15/26, 8:47 AM Project PUD26-003 Applicant Tyler Pridemore - David Peterson - Outlook about:blank?windowId=SecondaryReadingPane4 1/1 FULLER & BECK LAW OFFICES, PLLC. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mark R. Fuller 410 Memorial Drive, Suite 201 Telephone: (208) 524-5400 Daniel R. Beck — Of Counsel P.O. Box 50935 Email: fullerandbeck@gmail.com Paul L. Fuller Idaho Falls, Idaho 83405-0935 Email: paulfuller.law@gmail.com Idaho Falls City Planning Division September 29, 2026 380 Constitution Way Idaho Falls, ID 83402 dmpeterson@idahofalls.gov RE: To: Project Description: Higham Riverfront Townhomes PUD Project File No: PUD26-003 Applicant: Tyler Pridemore My Client: Paul Brooke Idaho Falls City Council Members Our office has the pleasure of representing Paul Brooke who resides in a planned unit development adjacent to the Higham Riverfront Townhomes PUD. This letter is written in opposition to the proposed amendment to the PUD to include a dog play area with a dog wash station. For the reasons set forth below, the dog play area with dog wash as identified in the Notice of Hearing is in violation of multiple provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Plan. . No dog park or other outdoor activities area in Idaho Falls may be maintained within the minimum 50-foot minimum boundary setback designed to protect nearby residential properties. Idaho Falls Land Use Regulations, Section 11-2-6(F)(1) states “All outdoor activity areas must maintain a minimum set back of fifty feet (50’) from all contiguous residential zones and uses.” As currently proposed in the landscape plan, the dog play area and dog wash are located immediately adjacent to the exterior north boundary of the property, directly adjacent to my client’s property, and within the 50 foot setback. . As currently proposed the dog play area and dog wash are in violation of the Planned Unit Development Provisions of Idaho Falls Municipal Code. Title 1 1-2-6(W)(1)(c) states that the purpose of planned unit developments are to “achieve a compatible land use relationship with the surrounding area.” Title 11-2-6(W)(4)(d) states the following regarding setbacks: Setbacks shall reflect the general standards of the area and character of the neighborhood in which the PUD is located. (i) In residential PUDs, the established setbacks of residential September 29, 2026 Page 2 properties contiguous to or across the street from the PUD, shall constitute the minimum setback for the perimeter area of the PUD which it is contiguous to. Locating this dog park and dog wash directly adjacent to a contiguous residential premises without such an amenity would not meet the general standards of the area and character of the neighborhood in which the PUD is located. Title 11-2-6(W)(5)(a) provides that ““A PUD shall be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood bulk, scale, structural mass, and character demonstrated by similar building types, construction, separations and heights.” This same section, subpart (d) states that all “structures shall be oriented toward common areas.” As planned, locating the dog park and dog wash area on the far north boundary setback of the PUD does not allow the structures to be oriented toward common areas. The community garden also being proposed is located centrally and the structures are oriented toward that common area. The dog park area and dog wash, if allowed, should be located directly adjacent to the community garden, and centrally located to the other structures in the PUD. Title 11-2-6(W)(6)(b) requires that the “landscape plan shall be submitted as part of the PUD application.” This landscaping plan for the dog park and dog wash was not submitted with the PUD application, preventing opposition when the initial application was set for public hearing. Specifically with regard to amenities, Title 1 1-2-6(W)(10)(b) requires as follows: Amenities. All PUDs shall provide amenities in addition to the common space required by this section as follows: 22K (b) Amenities shall be placed in logical areas that allow convenient access to most of the occupants of the development. The dog park and dog wash proposed for the far north boundary setback of the PUD does not place the amenities in the logical area to allow convenient access to most of the occupants of the development. The dog play area and dog wash are located at the far North boundary of the premises and far from many of the occupants located within the PUD. It September 29, 2026 Page 3 is not logical to place the dog park area in the far north setback area unless the intention is to allow the smell, noise, and waste from the dog wash and dog play area to be absorbed by the adjacent properties rather than the majority of the occupants located in the Higham Riverfront Townhouses PUD. It is apparent that the developer wishes to shift the odor, noise, and waste run off to the adjacent premises rather than to absorb them into the current PUD. The dog play area and dog wash should be located directly adjacent to the community garden, which is the logical area to allow convenient access for most of the occupants of the development, isolating contiguous properties from the smell, noise and waste. 6. PUD developments must comply with all other requirements in the R-2 Residence Zone, pursuant to Title 10-3-11(H)(4) which requires the following perimeter landscaping: Required Perimeter Landscaping. The required front setback and side yard which face on a public street shall not be used for parking but shall be landscaped except for permitted driveways. Required landscaping shall include lawn or other ground cover and trees spaced at no less than forty (40) foot centers. The proposed design for the dog play area and dog wash includes the placement of “pet turf’ which indicates some form of artificial turf will be placed in this area rather than lawn or other ground cover as mandated. Such pet turf will retain the odor and waste deposited by the dogs in the dog play area, and run off will most likely flow to the north, into my client’s property. This dog play area and dog wash should include lawn and be placed in a central location convenient to all occupants of the Higham Riverfront Townhomes PUD, and to assure that any runoff, odors, noise, and waste generated by the dog play area and the dog wash will be at the inconvenience of occupants of the planned PUD. There is no logical basis for placing the dog play area, constructed using artificial turf, in the perimeter setback directly adjacent to other parcels, who will likely absorb both the odor and the runoff from the dog play area. For all of the reasons set forth above, the proposed plan to place the dog play area and dog wash directly adjacent to contiguous property is in direct violation of multiple provisions of Title 11-2-6 of the Idaho Falls City Code. This proposed amenity should have been submitted with the initial PUD plans, the City Council should not reduce any of the regulatory requirements simply September 29, 2026 Page 4 because the developer failed to obtain approval for this amenity in his initial application. The City Council should simply consider whether they would like this dog play area and dog wash located directly adjacent to their own residential property and I am certain that the answer would be an adamant “NO”. The dog play area may be a valuable amenity to the PUD, but is should be centrally placed, adjacent to the Community Gardens so that it is available for the convenient use of all PUD residents, and so that it will not subject adjacent owners to the smell, noise or runoff which absolutely will result from this amenity. We request your consideration of these violations of applicable Idaho Code, and look forward to a denial of the proposed plan and amenity location within the 50 foot setback and adjacent to my client’s property. Very truly yours, hed K Gol Mark R Fuller Attorney at Law Cc: Client REASONED STATEMENT OF RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR HIGHAM RIVERFRONT TOWNHOMES, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHAM ST, EAST OF THE SNAKE RIVER, SOUTH OF PRESTO ST, AND WEST OF LATAH AVE. WHEREAS, the applicant filed a complete application for the PUD on June 22, 2026; and WHEREAS, this matter came before the Idaho Falls Planning and Zoning Commission during a duly noticed public hearing on August 4, 2026; and WHEREAS, this matter came before the Idaho Falls City Council during a duly noticed public hearing on October 8, 2026; and WHEREAS, having reviewed the application, including all exhibits entered and having considered the issues presented: I. FINDINGS OF FACT The City Council (“Council”) makes the following factual findings: 1. On June 5, 2026, a neighborhood meeting took place as required by section 11-6-8 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed PUD consists of 41 units that are intended to be platted on individual lots. 3. The property is approximately 2.68 total acres generally located north of Higham St, east of the Snake River, south of Presto St, and west of Latah Ave. 4. The property is currently zoned R2 with the Limited Development Airport Overlay Zone and will be developed under the PUD Standards. 5. The PUD will be under unified control with all common areas and open space under shared ownership among individual property owners. 6. The PUD has a proposed residential density of approximately 15 units per acre. 7. The buildings are shown to have two stories with a wall height of 24 feet or less. 8. Balconies on the individual units will provide private space. 9. All non-hard surfaced areas are proposed to be covered by landscaping. 10. At least twenty-five percent of the PUD will be designated and maintained as common space for the recreational and/or common use of the occupants of the development. 11. The PUD is required to have one amenity. Two amenities are proposed, a dog park and a community garden. 12. The PUD fronts Higham St and all proposed internal lots front named private streets. 13. Each unit has two parking stalls, both provided by rear loaded garage parking. 14. Pedestrian connectivity is provided throughout the development, connecting the individual dwelling units to amenities and the public sidewalk. All dwelling units will front common open space with pedestrian walkways. 15. 10 guest parking stalls are provided and on street parking is available on Higham St. 16. The applicant is requesting the front setback and required landscape buffer along Higham St be reduced from 20 feet to 15 feet. This provides greater separation from the condominium to the north of the property. 17. Perimeter setbacks are set at 12 feet on the west and north sides, and 3 feet adjacent to the private alley on the east side. 18. On August 4, 2026, the Planning Commission recommended to The Mayor and City Council approval of the PUD by a unanimous vote with the condition that the applicant work with Parks and Recreation to plant up to 16 additional trees along City property to the south and west and to provide a landscape buffer and screening from the dog park. The additional trees are required trees that have been displaced by the garages facing the private streets. This condition was to help make up for the loss of landscaping along Higham St and the loss of some internal street trees. The buffer and landscape screening is intended to help mitigate potential negative impacts of the dog park on the neighboring property owners. 19. Parks and Recreation declined to work with the applicant for the placement of additional trees and improvement of adjacent City property. The applicant has proposed a hedge along the north border of the dog park and has distributed some additional trees along the pedestrian walkways where feasible. 20. On September 19, 2026, notice was published in the Post Register regarding the public hearing on October 8, 2026, to consider the PUD. II. RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS 1. The City Council considered the applicant’s request pursuant to City of Idaho Falls Comprehensive Plan, City of Idaho Falls Zoning Ordinance, City of Idaho Falls Subdivision Ordinance, the Local Land Use Planning Act, and other applicable development regulations. 2. The notices referenced in Finding of Fact 20 that were published on September 19, 2026, satisfied the notice requirements of Title 67, Chapter 65 of Idaho Code. 3. A PUD is a conditional use allowed within the R2 Zone and all regulations and uses shall be the same as the underlying zoning district unless modified as part of the PUD. See City Code 11-2-6(W)(1), (2)(a) 4. Pursuant to City Code 11-2-6(W)(3)(a), the development site of a PUD is required to be under unified ownership or control and shall be planned as a whole. This requirement is satisfied by the PUD including unified control. Finding of Fact 5. 5. Pursuant to City Code 11-2-6(W)(4)(c)(i), “the maximum density allowed in residential zones is set forth in Table 11-2-4 Maximum Residential Density:” The developer proposes approximately 15 units per acre, Finding of Fact 6, which satisfies this requirement. 6. Pursuant to City Code 11-2-6(W)(4)(e), “[t]he maximum structure height for a residential PUD shall be determined by the underlying base zone, except where a structure is set back from required setback lines by at least two foot (2’) for each additional one foot (1’) of building height.” According to Finding of Fact 7, the buildings are shown as 2 stories. The base zone R2 allows for a maximum building height of 24 feet. 7. Pursuant to City Code 11-2-6(W)(5)(d), “[s]tructures should be oriented towards common areas. Residential uses should be separated and arranged to provide private space, in addition to providing for common areas. As stated in Finding of Fact 8, townhomes will provide private space for each unit with second floor balconies as well as incorporate the common areas into the overall development layout as required by Section 11-2-6(W)(5)(d). 8. Pursuant to City Code 11-2-6(W)(6)(a), “[a]ll areas within the PUD not covered by buildings, parking spaces, sidewalks or driveways shall be landscaped and maintained.” Here, all non- hard surfaced areas are proposed to be covered by landscaping. Finding of Fact 9. As such, this requirement has been satisfied. 9. Pursuant to City Code 11-2-6(W)(9)(a), “[n]ot less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the gross area of a PUD shall be designated and maintained as common space for the recreational and/or common use of the occupants of the development.” According to Finding of Fact 10, at least twenty-five percent of the PUD will be designated and maintained as common space for the recreational and/or common use of the occupants of the development. As such, the proposed PUD meets the twenty-five percent requirement. 10. Pursuant to City Code 11-2-6(W)(10), “[a]ll PUDs shall provide amenities in addition to the common space required by this Section as follows: (a) The number and size of amenities should increase as overall acreage and scale of the development increases. At least one (1) amenity shall be provided for the first fifty (50) residential units proposed, and one (1) additional amenity shall be provided for each fifty (50) residential units proposed thereafter. (b) Amenities should be placed in logical areas that allow convenient access to most of the occupants of the development. (c) PUDs shall provide at least one (1) of the following amenities: (i) Private or public indoor or outdoor recreational facility, such as a swimming pool, hot tub, theater room, gym, ball courts, or commercial playground equipment featuring a minimum of three (3) different functions, such as slide, swing set and climbing wall. (ii) Private or public plaza, pedestrian mall, community garden area which includes irrigation and planting beds, outdoor kitchen facilities, shade structures such as pavilions, or other similar space for social gatherings. (iii) Public access to or additions to the greenbelt, bike lanes, neighborhood park systems or other public open space or enhanced pedestrian connections to City pathway system, adjacent employment and shopping centers. (iv) Trail system or pedestrian paths in addition to necessary circulation paths that would be required if the development was not a PUD. (v) A drainage facility developed with additional permanently affixed physical amenities beyond open space. (vi) Dog Park. Dog Parks must be completely fenced and shall include pet waste stations, trash cans, benches or picnic tables and a minimum of one of the following: wash station, grooming tables, or agility training equipment. (vii) Similar amenities which reflect the purposes of this Section, as approved by the Council.” The PUD proposes 41 units. Finding of Fact 2. As such, at least one amenity is required under City Code 11-2-6(W)(10)—one for the first 50 units. Because the PUD includes the two amenities listed in Finding of Fact 11, the requirement for one amenity has been satisfied. 11. Pursuant to City Code 11-2-6(W)(8)(a), “[a]ll PUDs shall have frontage on a public or an approved private street.” The PUD will have public and private internal streets, providing the required frontage. Findings of Fact 12. 12. Pursuant to City Code 11-2-6(W)(7)(c), “[i]nterior parking lot landscaping shall be designed to incorporate pedestrian ways through the parking area and to break large parking areas into smaller bays.” Based on Findings of Fact 14 and 15 the PUD provides pedestrian ways in and throughout the development and proposes 10 guest parking spaces. 13. Pursuant to City Code 11-2-6(W)(1)(a), another purpose of the PUD regulations is to “[a]llow for flexibility from traditional zoning standards that results in development providing an improved living environment, including usable common space, amenities or services, increased landscaping, additional architectural features or standards, and compatibility with the contiguous neighborhood.” The developer has requested to vary the front setback and landscape buffer along Higham St from 20ft to 15ft. The applicant has made good-faith effort to meet the conditions of the Planning Commission by providing landscape screening on the north side of the dog park and placing additional trees throughout the development where feasible. The Parks and Recreation Department declined to work with the applicant for improvement of City property to the west and south. See Findings of Fact 16, 18, and 19. The Council approves of this varied development standard for this PUD. 14. Based on the foregoing, the PUD is consistent with requirements of the Zoning Ordinance as well as the principles and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. III. DECISION Based on the above Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria, the City Council of the City of Idaho Falls approves the PUD as presented. PASSED BY CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS THIS ______ DAY OF ____________, 2026 _____________________________________ Lisa Burtenshaw – Mayor NOTICE The Applicant or any affected person seeking judicial review of the compliance of this Reasoned Statement with the provisions of Idaho Code § 67-6535 must first seek reconsideration of this Reasoned Statement within fourteen (14) days by filing a request to reconsider pursuant in compliance with Idaho Code 67-6535. In addition, the above Applicant has the right to request a regulatory taking analysis pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003